T. BIFANO et al. “Continuous-Membrane Surface-Micromachined Silicon Deformable Mirror”, Optical Engineering, Vol. 36, No. 5, p. 1354-60, May, 1997.
G. VDOVIN et al., “Flexible mirror micromachined in silicon”, Applied Optics, 34(16), pp. 2968-2972, 1995.
R. GROSSO et al., “The membrane mirror as an adaptive optical element”, J. Opt. Soc. Am., 67(3), pp. 399-406, 1977.
S. ERRICO et al., “Stretched Membrane with Electrostatic Curvature (SMEC) Mirrors: A new technology for large lightweight space telescopes”, SPIE Proc. 4849, pp. 356-64 (2002).
F. ZAMKOTSIAN et al., “Polymer-based microdeformable mirror for adaptive optics”, SPIE Proc. 5719, (2005).
G. S. BURLEY et al., “Membrane mirror and bias electronics”, Applied Optics, 37 (21), pp. 4649-55, 1998.
H. TAKAMI et al., “Membrane deformable mirror for SUBARU adaptive optics”, SPIE Proc. 2201-78, 762-7 (1994).
G. PERCIN et al. “Controlled ink-jet printing and deposition of organic polymers and solid-particles,” Applied Physics Letters, vol. 73, no. 16, pp. 2375-2377, 19 Oct. 1998.
J. D. MANSELL et al. “Progress Toward Compact Low-Cost Adaptive Optics Systems”, DEPS Fourth Directed Energy Modeling & Simulation Conference (Mar. 19, 2006). (presentation available at www.mza.com)
S. BONORA et al. “Push-pull membrane mirrors for adaptive optics”, Optics Express v. 14 n. 25, 11935-44 (Dec. 11, 2006)
1. Field of the Invention
This invention relates generally to the field of adaptive optics, and in particular to a polymer deformable mirror suitable for use in a wide range of adaptive optics applications.
2. Background of the Invention
Adaptive optics is a technique for controlling the spatial phase of light that has been under development for several decades. In a general adaptive optics system, light is reflected from a deformable mirror and a small fraction is split off to illuminate a sensor. The sensor provides feedback to a control computer that adjusts the deformable mirror to change some property of the beam of light. Astronomers have used adaptive optics systems to remove the distortions induced by the atmosphere and achieve higher quality images from large telescopes. Adaptive optics systems have been used on lasers to improve the beam quality and to shape the intensity profile.
There are many commercial applications of the technology, but the widespread implementation of adaptive optics has been hampered by their high cost. To date, the cost of the deformable mirror has been the largest component cost in a typical adaptive optics system.
The most widely used deformable mirrors to date are comprised of a set of actuators attached to a reflective plate on one side and to a stiff backplane on the other. The actuators are typically piezoelectric (typically lead zirconium titanate) or electrostrictive (typically lead magnesium niobate). This conventional deformable mirror design has been used for many years, but the mirrors are very costly because of all the hand assembly required in their fabrication.
Microelectromechanical system (MEMS) technology has produced a variety of different deformable mirror architectures. The first generation of these devices was formed by combining a metal-coated silicon nitride membrane with a set of electrostatic pads. The mirror surface is deformed by applying a potential difference between the membrane and the electrostatic pads. These deformable mirrors were described in “Flexible mirror micromachined in silicon” by Vdovin, G. et al., in Applied Optics, 34(16), pp. 2968-2972, 1995. Similar membranes-type deformable mirrors were fabricated with metal membranes by R. Grosso et al., in “The membrane mirror as an adaptive optical element”, J. Opt. Soc. Am., 67(3), pp. 399-406, 1977.
Another MEMS deformable mirror design was disclosed by Bifano et al. in “Continuous-Membrane Surface-Micromachined Silicon Deformable Mirror”, Optical Engineering, Vol. 36, No. 5, p. 1354-60, May, 1997. Bifano discloses a deformable mirror produced by surface micromachining three layers of polycrystalline silicon and two sacrificial layers of silicon dioxide which separate the layers of polysilicon. The top layer of polysilicon forms the mirror surface. The bottom layer of polysilicon is used to create an array of electrode pads. The middle layer of polysilicon is patterned into an array of fixed-end double cantilevers which act as second electrodes for deforming the mirror. After the polysilicon layers are patterned, the sacrificial oxide layers are removed by drilling holes in the mirror surface and etching the mirror with hydrofluoric acid.
To address some of the deficiencies in Bifano's deformable mirror design, Mansell introduced several new types of deformable mirror (U.S. Pat. No. 6,108,121). This mirror used a similar architecture, but, since it was created with bulk micromachining, it could be fabricated with a truly continuous front surface and high optical quality.
All of the MEMS deformable mirrors are conducive to mass fabrication, but they suffer from the fact that mass fabrication of the devices typically requires a large expensive fabrication facility. Thus, in low volume, the amortization of the cost of the facility increases the cost of the devices to make them comparable to the conventional bulk actuator deformable mirrors.
In recent years, small optical pellicles have been developed for a variety of applications including beam splitters and as protective coatings for microlithography. These pellicles, which are typically made from nitrocellulose have demonstrated high optical quality and the ability to be coated with high reflectivity coatings.
Large membrane mirrors have become of recent interest for large lightweight telescopes. Recently, Errico et al. demonstrated a large membrane mirror made from CP-1, a membrane material developed by SRS Technologies, that was deformed spatially with electrostatic forces in “Stretched Membrane with Electrostatic Curvature (SMEC) Mirrors: A new technology for large lightweight space telescopes”, SPIE Proc. 4849, pp. 356-64 (2002). This membrane demonstrated reasonable optical quality and was able to be shaped using electrostatic forces. The electrostatic deformation was implemented by placing discontinuous sections of electrostatic actuators behind the membrane near the edges. This implantation was adequate for large apertures, but was not compatible with mass fabrication and did not offer any control of the mirror surface near the center of the membrane.
Recently Zamkotsian et al. published a paper on a deformable mirror using polymer actuators in “Polymer-based microdeformable mirror for adaptive optics”, SPIE Proc. 5719, (2005). The advantages of this design are a reduced voltage, but they do so at the cost of high speed performance.
Takami et al. demonstrated a nitrocellulose membrane deformable mirror in “Membrane deformable mirror for SUBARU adaptive optics”, SPIE Proc. 2201-78, 762-7 (1994). Their deformable mirror operated at reduced atmospheric pressure, but this made the device complicated. Furthermore, their device used a very thick backplane made of Macor with a glass insulating layer. A disadvantage of with using a glass insulating layer is that over time the glass tends to accumulate charge and induce a permanent deformation of the mirror surface that cannot be controlled. A very similar device was published by G. S. Burley et al. in “Membrane mirror and bias electronics”, Applied Optics v. 37 (21), pp. 4649-55 (1998).
In recent years plastic has been used to create low-cost optics in many commercial products including low-cost cameras, barcode scanners, and the optical computer mouse. In light of the advances in polymer optics, an object of the present invention is to provide a high optical quality active mirror that is at least partially polymer to leverage the advances in polymer optics to create a mirror that is both low-cost and mass fabrication compatible. These active mirrors can be deformable mirrors, steering mirrors, focus mirrors, and/or piston mirrors.
It is a further object of the present invention to introduce a hybrid active mirror architecture comprising a polymer front surface and a wide variety of different types of actuators, including but not limited to MEMS actuators, electrostatic actuators, piezoelectric actuators, electrostrictive actuators, fluidic actuators, and thermal actuators. These and other objects and advantages of the invention will be apparent after considering the ensuing descriptions and accompanying drawings.
The above objectives are obtained by combining a high quality polymer membrane with a second substrate of actuators. In the preferred embodiment, the polymer membrane is a polymer pellicle attached to a stiff frame. One method of fabricating the described framed membrane is to spin-cast a liquid polymer material to a polished substrate, allow it to cure into a solid thin film, remove it from the substrate and attach it loosely to a large frame, and then epoxy the membrane to a smaller frame with a controlled weight such that it is in tension on the smaller frame. After attaching it to the frame, the membrane can be coated on one surface with a high reflectivity coating and on the opposite surface with a conductive coating. Some types of polymer membranes bonded to frames are commercially available as optical pellicles. This membrane and frame are then bonded to an actuator array.
In the preferred embodiment, the mirror is actuated electrostatically by an electrostatic pad array fabricated using a printed circuit board below the membrane. The Japanese group used an expensive Macor substrate, but one object of this invention is to show that it can be accomplished much less expensively with lower-cost materials like printed circuit board. The membrane could also be actuated via an array of any type of actuator including but not limited to piezoelectric actuators, thermal actuators like bimetallic strips, fluidic pressure actuators, or magnetic actuators. Some of these actuators would have to be bonded to the mirror.
In another embodiment described here, the actuator array is micromachined actuator array comprising a pillar connecting the mirror membrane to a flexible interstitial layer and an electrostatic pad. The interstitial layer provides mechanical restoring force as the electrostatic pad beneath this interstitial layer attracts it. This is different from the prior Mansell work or the Zamkotsian work in that the mirror surface is formed separately and the mirror surface is a polymer.
In this invention, it is possible to include a section of the membrane that is stiffer than the surrounding area. This is desirable for applications that only want to induce tilt or piston phase shifts to a beam of light. The stiff section of the membrane can be created by a variety of processes including by bonding a stiff piece of material to the membrane, by introducing a second stiffer material into the membrane during the fabrication of the membrane, or by adjusting the membrane thickness by etching the membrane after it has been created with something like an oxygen plasma or casting the membrane into a shape during its curing process.
This invention also describes an alternative embodiment in which the frame is integrated with the actuators such that the polymer membrane can be bonded directly to the actuators without the need of a frame. One method of accomplishing this is to etch a recess into the actuator substrate for the actuators such that the original surface of the actuator substrate becomes the frame. Another fabrication method is to build up material on the surface of an actuator array through methods like electroplating or spin-casting and photolithography. Another fabrication method is to screen-print a material like epoxy onto an actuator array and curing it to create the frame.
In the preferred embodiment the polymer membrane 102 is either conductive itself or coated with a thin layer of conductive material to enable electrostatic attraction between the underlying pad arrays and the membrane. The polymer membrane 102 can be made conductive by incorporation of an additive during formation, like graphite or silver. If the polymer membrane is non-conductive, a thin layer of a conductor can be applied. Example conductors include, but are not limited to, metals like aluminum, silver, or gold, and conductive oxides like indium tin oxide.
The spacer 103 can be fabricated in a variety of ways. One way is to etch a recess into the second substrate before creating the electrostatic actuator pads. Other ways of creating the spacer 103 are to build-up material on the edges by patterned deposition through a mask like screen printing, controlled spatial deposition like is done with ink-jets (see G. Percin et al. “Controlled ink-jet printing and deposition of organic polymers and solid-particles,” Applied Physics Letters, vol. 73, no. 16, pp. 2375-2377, 19 Oct. 1998.), bulk deposition and photolithography, bulk deposition of a UV-cure material and patterned UV exposure, and application of a pre-patterned solid material spacer like a metal perform, a patterned thin film, piece of adhesive tape, or a precise glass bead. These methods are just examples and, as such, are not exhaustive. The preferred embodiment would use a paste of precision glass beads in an epoxy binder to achieve the spacer and the bonding process simultaneously.
In the embodiment in
The second substrate 105 can be any material that can be machined to reasonable flatness. The preferred embodiment uses a silicon wafer, but cost of this substrate is forcing consideration of other materials, like FR4 printed circuit board material, ceramics, and injection molded polymer.
Patent NumberDate IssuedInventorU.S. Class6,108,121August, 2000Mansell et al.359/291Provisional -Mar. 16, 2006Mansell et al.112975, 60/78346