Low profile phased array

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 12021306
  • Patent Number
    12,021,306
  • Date Filed
    Tuesday, October 26, 2021
    3 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, June 25, 2024
    5 months ago
Abstract
A low profile array (LPA) includes an antenna element array layer having at least one Faraday wall, and a beamformer circuit layer coupled to the antenna element array layer. The beamformer circuit layer has at least one Faraday wall. The Faraday walls extends between ground planes associated with at least one of the antenna element array layer and the beamformer circuit layer.
Description
GOVERNMENT RIGHTS

Not applicable.


BACKGROUND

As is known in the art, radars can include phased arrays to transmit and receive signals. Conventional Printed Circuit Board (PCB) methods may not yield an effective approach providing low profile arrays. Existing processes have feature sizes and substrate thickness limits that may preclude compliance with desired thicknesses. Current array designs employ a standard PCB process which relies on multiple process steps, expensive materials, and slow cycle turnaround time. Multiple process steps drive high costs and slow turnaround times. As assemblies are moved from one process to the next (e.g., lamination, conductive via backfill) labor cost is added to the overall assembly. The added labor cost adds cycle time which leads to long build times which extend any troubleshooting phase.


SUMMARY

In embodiments, a low profile array (LPA) includes a phased array that utilizes additive manufacturing technology (AMT). LPA embodiments can include phased array functionality well-suited for space-based radars. LPA embodiments may be configured to be foldable for allowing significantly reduced launch and manufacturing costs. AMT techniques can be used to provide small features and thin substrates.


In accordance with one aspect of the concepts described herein, a low profile array (LPA) includes radiators, beamformers, circuit layers, and/or micro-strip layers that may be formed using additive manufacturing techniques in accordance with example embodiments of the invention. In embodiments, a radiator has a thickness in the range of about 0.020 inches (20 mils) provided using additive manufacturing technology (AMT) and thus may be referred to as an AMT radiator. A beamformer can include Faraday walls and be readily integrated with the radiator.


The disclosed LPA embodiments provide a phased array configured for space-based radar and related applications with small feature sizes and thin substrate materials, using Faraday walls, SNAP-RF connections between layers, printed vertical launch connections, and/or milled copper conductors. The overall array height can be confined to 41 mils (1,100 microns), for example, with the use of inventive milling and printing AMT techniques. Printed conductive Faraday walls confine electric fields and can be produced in the same manufacturing step as milling the other features. This saves significant labor costs which drive down the overall cost of the assembly. The design also utilizes the AMT capability to print conductive elements of virtually any shape and size, within machine constraints. These are used as tuning elements to achieve the desired performance for the low profile array. A custom printed connector interface can be used so that a standard BMB connector can be used to test the device.


One aspect of the present disclosure is directed to a low profile array (LPA) comprising an antenna element array layer having at least one Faraday wall, and a beamformer circuit layer coupled to the antenna element array layer. The beamformer circuit layer has at least one Faraday wall. The Faraday walls extends between ground planes associated with at least one of the antenna element array layer and the beamformer circuit layer.


Embodiments of the LPA further may include the LPA having a total thickness of less than about 47 mils. The antenna element array layer further may have a substrate, a conductor applied on the substrate, and a radiator is formed by removing conductive material and printing a conductor to create the radiator. The at least one Faraday wall of the antenna element array layer may be created by forming a trench that is back-filled with a conductive material. The at least one Faraday wall of the beamformer circuit layer may be created by forming a trench that is back-filled with a conductive material. The LPA further may include a vertical launch that extends through the radiator of antenna element array layer and the beamformer circuit layer. The vertical launch may be created by soldering pads on the radiator and the beamformer circuit layer prior to bonding so a solder bump is present on the surface of the beamformer circuit, drilling a center conductor hole, and filling the center conductor hole with copper. The LPA further may include a logic circuit layer disposed below the beamformer circuit layer. The LPA further may include a phase shift layer disposed below the logic circuit layer. The vertical launch may extend through the logic circuit layer and the phase shift layer. The vertical launch may extend extends through the logic circuit layer and the phase shift layer.


An array antenna includes a plurality of LPAs, with each LPA embodying the LPA described herein. The array antenna includes comprising four LPAs arranged such that the first set of tuning elements of an LPA and a first set of tuning elements of a second LPA are respectively adjacent to a second set of tuning elements of a third LPA and a second set of tuning elements of a fourth LPA.


Another aspect of the present disclosure is directed to a method of fabricating a low profile array (LPA). In one embodiment, the method comprises: milling trenches in a portion of an array having antenna elements and filling the trenches with a conductive material using additive manufacturing processing to form Faraday wall; and milling trenches in a beamformer substrate and filling the trenches with a conductive material using additive manufacturing processing to form Faraday walls.


Embodiments of the method further may include providing a vertical launch that extends through the radiator of antenna element array layer and the beamformer circuit layer. The vertical launch may be created by soldering pads on the radiator and the beamformer circuit layer prior to bonding so a solder bump is present on the surface of the beamformer circuit, drilling a center conductor hole, and filling the center conductor hole with copper. The LPA may include a logic circuit layer disposed below the beamformer circuit layer. The method further may include a phase shift layer disposed below the logic circuit layer. The vertical launch may extend through the logic circuit layer and the phase shift layer. The LPA may have a total thickness of less than about 47 mils. An antenna element array layer of the array may have a substrate, a conductor applied on the substrate, and a radiator is formed by removing conductive material and printing a conductor to create the radiator, the Faraday wall being created by forming a trench that is back-filled with a conductive material.





BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

Various aspects of at least one embodiment are discussed below with reference to the accompanying figures, which are not intended to be drawn to scale. The figures are included to provide illustration and a further understanding of the various aspects and embodiments, and are incorporated in and constitute a part of this specification, but are not intended as a definition of the limits of the disclosure. In the figures, each identical or nearly identical component that is illustrated in various figures may be represented by a like numeral. For purposes of clarity, not every component may be labeled in every figure. The foregoing features may be more fully understood from the following description of the drawings in which:



FIG. 1 is a perspective view of a low profile array having radiators, beamformers, circuit layers, and/or micro-strip layers that may be formed using additive manufacturing techniques in accordance with example embodiments of the disclosure;



FIG. 1A is a top view of a bowtie antenna element manufactured using an additive manufacturing technology (AMT) manufacturing process;



FIG. 1B is a top view of a plurality of bowtie radiators disposed form an array antenna;



FIG. 1C is a perspective view of an example subarray portion shown during processing to create Faraday walls;



FIG. 2 is a top view of a beamformer that forms a portion of a low profile array;



FIG. 2A is a schematic view of a subarray having pairs of unit cells that are coupled to a beamformer at ports;



FIG. 2B is a perspective view showing the creation of a Faraday wall on a beamformer;



FIG. 3 is a cross-sectional view of a low profile array stack up;



FIG. 4 is a chart showing example array components and illustrative thicknesses;



FIGS. 5A-5C illustrate a first portion of process steps for fabricating a low profile array in accordance with example embodiments of the disclosure;



FIGS. 6A-6C illustrate a second portion of process steps for fabricating a low profile array;



FIGS. 7A-7C illustrate a first bond cycle;



FIGS. 8A-8C shows Faraday walls milled in the radiator and in the beamformer;



FIG. 9 is a perspective view of an active micro-strip layer;



FIG. 10A is a perspective view of a final bonded assembly;



FIG. 10B is a cross-sectional view of a stack up after a second bonding cycle;



FIG. 11A is a perspective view of center conductors formed in an active microstrip layer;



FIG. 11B is a perspective view of Faraday walls after drilling and filling with conductive ink; and



FIG. 12 is a process flow diagram.





DETAILED DESCRIPTION

The concepts, systems and techniques described herein are directed toward a phased array provided using additive manufacturing technology so as to provide the phased array having a low profile, i.e., a thickness in the range of approximately 1 mm or less (referred to herein as a low profile phased array).


It is to be appreciated that embodiments of the methods and apparatuses discussed herein are not limited in application to the details of construction and the arrangement of components set forth in the following description or illustrated in the accompanying drawings. The methods and apparatuses are capable of implementation in other embodiments and of being practiced or of being carried out in various ways. Examples of specific implementations are provided herein for illustrative purposes only and are not intended to be limiting. Also, the phraseology and terminology used herein is for the purpose of description and should not be regarded as limiting. The use herein of “including,” “comprising,” “having,” “containing,” “involving,” and variations thereof is meant to encompass the items listed thereafter and equivalents thereof as well as additional items. References to “or” may be construed as inclusive so that any terms described using “or” may indicate any of a single, more than one, and all of the described terms. Any references to front and back, left and right, top and bottom, upper and lower, end, side, vertical and horizontal, and the like, are intended for convenience of description, not to limit the present systems and methods or their components to any one positional or spatial orientation.



FIG. 1 shows an example low profile array 5 having radiators, beamformers, circuit layers, and/or micro-strip layers that may be formed using additive manufacturing techniques in accordance with example embodiments of the invention. In the illustrated embodiment, a 2×2 subarray 7 is shown separated from the array 5. In embodiments, the array is built by combining line replaceable units (LRUs) comprising 64 elements that can be further divided into 16 mini-arrays, each having 4 elements. The array 5 includes a bottom ground plane 6, a top ground plane 8, with Faraday walls, each indicated at 9 extending between the ground planes 6, 8. The array 5 may be referred to herein as an antenna element array layer.



FIG. 1A shows a bowtie antenna element 10 (or more simply antenna 10) manufactured using an additive manufacturing technology (AMT) manufacturing process including a radiator 12 (e.g., a slot aperture) having a general “bowtie” shape milled into a surface 14a of a dielectric substrate 14. Substrate surface 14a is provided having an electrically conductive material 16 (e.g., copper or an equivalent conductive material) disposed thereover (a portion of conductor 16 has here been removed to reveal a portion of dielectric substrate surface 14a). The bowtie shape radiator 12 is formed by an AMT milling operation which removes the conductive material 16 and then printing a conductor to form radiator 12. In some embodiments the conductive material 16 is provided as copper having a thickness of 0.007 inch. In this case, the slot aperture conductor would also be about 0.7 mils (18 microns) thick.


It should, of course, be appreciated that in other embodiments, other conductive materials and thicknesses may also be used. It is understood that the conductor thickness is selected to excite the bowtie radiator 12 in a desired manner. In embodiments, a thickness of the conductor is in the order of 0.005 mils.


Bowtie antenna element 10 further includes first and second sets of tuning elements 18, 20. The first set of tuning elements 18 includes a two pairs of conductors 22a, 22b with each conductor in the pair having a rectangular shape. The second set of tuning elements 20 includes a two pairs of conductors 24a, 24b with each conductor in the pair having a square shape. The conductors 22a, 22b, and 24a, 24b may be referred to herein as Faraday walls or singularly as a Faraday wall. The tuning elements 22a, 22b, 24a, 24b are formed by an AMT milling operation which removes the conductive material 16 as well as substrate material 14 so as to form an opening in the substrate having the desired shape of the tuning element (here, pairs of rectangular and square shapes). A conductive ink (or more generally a conductive fluid) is then disposed in the openings to form the tuning elements 22a, 22b, 24a, 24b.


With this technique, an antenna element having a geometry which is relatively simple compared with geometries of prior art antenna elements having similar operational characteristics (e.g., frequencies of operation, bandwidth characteristics, gain characteristics, etc.) is provided.


The printed tuning elements can be of the shape or size needed to produce double tuned performance, e.g., creating resonances at two different frequencies. That is, two sets of tuning elements are used to produce a desired field configuration in a unit cell.


Referring now to FIG. 1B, a plurality of bowtie radiators, are disposed form an array antenna 30. In the illustration of FIG. 1B, four bowtie radiators 10a-10d are disposed to form a 2×2 array. Those of ordinary skill in the art will appreciate, of course, that any size array may be formed. Array antenna 30 may form a building block with which to build relative large array antennas (e.g., array antennas comprising tens, hundreds or thousands of antenna elements depending upon the needs of a particular application). Thus, the antenna element design described above in conjunction with FIG. 1 can be integrated into full antenna arrays that can be printed and prototyped in short amount of time.



FIG. 1C is an example subarray portion shown during processing to create Faraday walls in the form of trenches that can be later back-filled with a conductive material, such as conductive ink, as shown and described above. In one embodiment, the Faraday wall extends between ground planes associated with substrate 14, e.g., a bottom ground plane and a top ground plane.



FIG. 2 shows an example beamformer 200 that forms a portion of a low profile array. The beamformer 200 aggregates unit cell RF signals. In embodiments, the beamformer is configured as an RF division network that fits within a 10 mil subassembly, as described below. The beamformer 200 may also be referred to herein as a beamformer layer, which is applied to the antenna element array layer.


In embodiments, low profile array embodiments are provided as a single beam half-duplex X-Band phased array producing a single linear polarization, although dual polarization, multi-beam array architectures at various microwave frequencies are also practical applications of the described method. In one embodiment, unit cells fall into about a 0.6 in. square lattice, the dimensions of which control the integrated RF front-end components.


Antenna elements may be grouped together into a subarray and fed together in a phase-controlled manner to generate the beam characteristics of an antenna larger than that of any single antenna element. A beamformer can include a beam port and a plurality of element ports. In a transmit mode, the signal to be transmitted is applied to the beam port and is distributed by the beamformer to the various element ports. In the receive mode, the unguided electromagnetic signals received by the antenna elements and coupled in guided form to the element ports are combined to produce a beam signal at the beam port of the beamformer.


In the illustrated embodiment, beamformer 200 is provided as a 2×2:1 beamformer having a first pair of element ports shown as first and second element ports 202a,b and a second pair of element ports shown as third and fourth element ports 204a,b. The signals from the element ports are combined into a beam port 206. The beamformer includes several beamformer circuits, indicated at 208. As will be described more fully below, the beamformer 200 can include Faraday walls 210, 212, 214, 216 to enhance signal isolation. As shown, the Faraday walls 212 provide signal isolation to the beam port 206 and the Faraday walls 214 provide signal isolation to the beamformer circuits 208. As mentioned above, the Faraday wall can be configured to extend between ground planes associated with substrate, e.g., a bottom ground plane and a top ground plane.



FIG. 2A shows an example subarray 220 having pairs of unit cells that are coupled to the beamformer 200 at ports 202a,b and 204a,b. The 2×2:1 beamformer 200 can be coupled to a N×M:1 beamformer 210 of any practical size. FIG. 2B shows Faraday wall creation for a beamformer.



FIG. 3 shows an example low profile array 300 stack up. In embodiments, the total thickness T of the array is less than about 47 mils (1.18 mm). In embodiments, the low profile array 300 includes a slot radiator 302, such as the radiator of FIG. 1A, coupled to a radiator feed circuit 304. A vertical launch 306 is coupled to the slot radiator 302.


A beamformer circuit layer 308, such as the beamformer circuit of FIG. 2, is coupled between the radiator feed circuit 304 and a DC and logic circuit layer 310. A phase shifter layer 312 can be coupled to the DC and logic circuit layer 310.



FIG. 4 is a tabular representation of example array components and illustrative thicknesses. As can be seen the total thickness of the low profile array is less than about 47 mils.



FIGS. 5A-5C show a first portion of process steps for fabricating a low profile array in accordance with example embodiments of the invention. Radiator fabrication includes a 4 element layer in FIG. 5A, a feed layer in FIG. 5B, and ground plane clearance in FIG. 5C.



FIGS. 6A-6C shows a second portion of processing steps for fabricating a low profile array including a beamformer layer in FIG. 6A, resistor (shown as R) dispensing on the beamformer layer in FIG. 6B, and ground plane clearance in FIG. 6C.


A first bond cycle is shown in FIGS. 7A-7C. FIG. 7A shows a top view of a first bonding stack up and FIG. 7B shows a side view of the first bonding stack up with a radiator slot and radiator feed with a bond film. The stack up further includes a radiator ground plane, bond film, beamformer trace layer and bond film and a beamformer ground plane in FIG. 7C.



FIGS. 8A-8C shows Faraday walls milled in the radiator FIG. 8A and in the beamformer FIG. 8B. In embodiments, trenches are formed down to a ground plane. FIG. 8C shows the trenches in the radiator and beamformer filled with a conductive material, such as a conductive ink using AMT techniques.



FIG. 9 shows machining of an active micro-strip layer. IC are shown on the micro-strip layer.



FIG. 10A shows a final bonded assembly and FIG. 10B shows the stack up after the second bonding cycle. The radiator/beamformer corresponds to the stack up of FIG. 7B to which bond film is added, a DC layer, bond film, logic layer, bond film and active microstrip layer.



FIG. 11A shows center conductors formed in the active microstrip layer and FIG. 11B shows Faraday walls after drilling and filling with conductive ink, for example.



FIG. 12 shows an example process flow diagram with steps represented as per unit cell except for the beamformer which is represented as per mini array. In the example build, there were 64 unit cells, equating to about 20.75 hours of machine use time to manufacture 64 elements. One other aspect of the process flow diagram is the time to create Faraday walls. As shown, the process time counts 2 milling and filling operations of the Faraday walls.


Faraday Walls:


Faraday walls replace ground vias and provide even better EMI shielding for adjacent microwave circuits and higher-order mode suppression. Instead of drilling through the entire assembly and electroplating, a trench is created from one ground plane to another then backfilled with conductive ink. For the radiator, as shown and described above, the response is tuned by providing a block of conductive material. These blocks of conductive material serve to double-tune the radiator providing increased bandwidth within the operating frequency range. The beamformer Faraday walls attenuate the higher order modes present in the beamformer layer more effectively than conventional ground vias because they are continuous, and so eliminate the periodic effects and the electrical leakage of a via fence. Faraday walls provide EMI shielding techniques and perform without the need for an electroplating process.


In one embodiment, the Faraday wall is a conductor providing an electromagnetic boundary “vertically” through the substrates. As described herein, the Faraday wall may be formed by machining a trench through the substrates down to a ground plane and filling the trench with a conductive material, such as a conductive ink applied with additive manufacturing techniques. The conductive ink, when set, may form a substantially electrically continuous conductor. The trench in which the Faraday wall is formed does not have to pierce or go through the ground plane. The Faraday wall may therefore be in electrical contact with the ground plane. Additionally, a top of the Faraday wall may be in electrical contact with another ground plane, which may be accomplished by slight over-filling of the machined trench to ensure contact between the conductive ink and the ground plane and/or by application of solder, for example. Positioning of the Faraday wall may be selected for its influence on signal(s) conveyed by the feed circuit. In various embodiments, a Faraday wall may be positioned to provide isolation without regard to influencing a signal in any particular way other than to provide the isolation.


Copper Vertical Launch:


While Faraday walls remove electroplating from the shielding techniques, a new method to remove electroplating from the vias (center conductors) is provided in order to connect layers together with blind vias easily. These provide a Transverse Electro-Magnetic (TEM) coaxial interface between different layers of stripline and microstrip circuits in a multi-layer Printed Circuit Board (PCB). In order to do this, the pads on the beamformer and radiator layers are pre-tinned (soldered) before bonding so a solder bump is present on the surface of the trace. During subsequent milling operations, these center conductor holes are drilled and filled with a copper center conductor using soldering processes. As the soldering iron is used to connect the center conductor to the top trace on the active micro-strip layer, heat is conducted down the length of the center conductor to the layer underneath, reflowing the pre-deposited solder bump. This solder bump does reflow during bonding, but does not migrate throughout the assembly because of a pre-drilled hole in the boards above the solder bump. Post processing after bonding includes milling down to the solder bump, inserting the copper center conductor, and reflowing the center conductor to both traces. This creates an effective solution that is inexpensive, fast, does not require electroplating, and is easily automatable. This method could be extended in the future to insert the center conductor before bonding of the assembly, allowing the center conductor connections to be made during the bonding process.


Small Feature Size Processing:


Many of the trace widths throughout the LPA array are below 5 mil (thousands of an inch). Traditional PCB houses that etch boards generally can safely create PCBs with line widths above 5 mils, or will require additional money or time to get below that limit. For a rapid prototyping architecture that is counterproductive. The team has been able to take the capabilities at the Raytheon UMass Lowell Research Institute (RURI) and use them to create copper traces of 2.7 mil (˜70 microns). An accurate CNC machine has a very accurate gantry system, which allows these very small traces to be milled with acceptable edge properties. Resistive ink can be dispensed very accurately with Nordson Pro4 system, for example, to make resistors inside of these small traces. Finally, the Faraday wall assemblies need not be screen printed, as they are dispensed easily with the use of the Pro4 Machine and Pico-Pulse stand-off dispenser. The combination of small feature size processing with accurate dispensing enables the creation of cutting edge assemblies that push the limits of current technology, all while providing a rapid prototyping solution to decrease time to market.


Traditional PCB Process vs. Embodiments Using AMT Processing:


The traditional PCB process has successfully introduced changes over the last 15 to 20 years resulting in substantial recurring cost reductions. Major design methods have not changed very much as ground vias are still used to create EMI shielding, center conductors are used to connect layers together, and RF PCBs take a significant amount of time to prototype. It can take 3 to 5 months from when a prototype is requested from an outside board house to when it arrives ready for test at one of our sites. Below is a table comparing significant aspects of the traditional vs. AMT prototyping method:














Metric:
Traditional:
AMT:








Electroplated Vias
Faraday Walls





Line Isolation/
Increased engineering time
Decreased engineering time


TEM Mode
because of interaction between
due to inconsequential


Propagation
vias
interaction between microwave


Ground Vias/
Electrical leakage at higher
circuits


Faraday Walls
frequencies
Excellent electrical



Vias are drilled through the
performance at microwave and



entire RF PCB to allow for
millimeter wave frequencies,



effective electroplating
providing about −80 dB of




isolation




Walls are milled from one




ground plane to another, not




through the entire board.






Electroplated Vias
Copper Vertical Launch





PCB Coaxial
Vias are drilled through the
Blind vias are easily created by


Center Conductor
entire board, electroplated, then
pre-tinning the bottom pads



back drilled to remove copper in
Insertion of a copper center



areas where it is not required
conductor is easily automatable



Process is increasingly difficult
Solder reflows on both layers



with blind vias, requiring
with a touch of the soldering



precision milling to ensure the
iron to the top layer



drill stops at each center
Removes electrodepositing of



conductor pad
copper from the center



Before electroplating via holes
conductor process



must be thoroughly cleaned to




ensure no residue impacts the




plating of the copper.



Trace Conductors
Minimum Line Width: 5 mil,
Minimum Line Width: 2.7 mil,



expensive cost to 3 mil
path of development to 2 mil






Conventional RF Connectors
SNAP-RF





Array Building
Bulky, expensive connectors that
Allows board to board


Blocks/
need to be solder reflowed to the
interconnections with a low


Interconnections
board
profile connector that is made



Arrays need to be made in large
from on board features



panels so if one connectors or
Arrays can be built by utilizing



chip is not working the entire
tiny building blocks



panel may need to be scraped
If one building block fails, it



Adds weight, cost, and
can be replaced with another



complexity to an already
working block



difficult assembly
Spreads out risk to make sure




the building block works




before integrated to the array


Prototype Build
3-5 months
3 weeks (Currently)


Cycle

Overnight (Potential)









Inventive AMT methods push the technology boundaries because of the need for smaller feature sizes than traditional etching techniques. In order to meet the requirements for LPA embodiments, reliable creation of 2.7 mil traces is desired. In embodiments, we accomplish this by milling on the accurate CNC machine.


Having described preferred embodiments, which serve to illustrate various concepts, structures and techniques, which are the subject of this patent, it will now become apparent to those of ordinary skill in the art that other embodiments incorporating these concepts, structures and techniques may be used. Additionally, elements of different embodiments described herein may be combined to form other embodiments not specifically set forth above.


Accordingly, it is submitted that that scope of the patent should not be limited to the described embodiments but rather should be limited only by the spirit and scope of the following claims.

Claims
  • 1. A method of fabricating a low profile array (LPA), the method comprising: milling first trenches in a portion of an antenna element array layer having antenna elements and filling the first trenches with a conductive material using additive manufacturing processing to form Faraday wall; andmilling second trenches in a beamformer circuit layer and filling the second trenches with the conductive material using additive manufacturing processing to form Faraday walls,wherein the beamformer circuit layer is coupled to the antenna element array layer, the beamformer circuit layer having at least one Faraday wall extending between ground planes associated with at least one of the antenna element array layer and the beamformer circuit layer, andwherein four LPAs are arranged such that a first set of tuning elements of a first LPA and a first set of tuning elements of a second LPA are respectively adjacent to a second set of tuning elements of a third LPA and a second set of tuning elements of a fourth LPA.
  • 2. The method according to claim 1, wherein the LPA has a total thickness of less than 47 mils.
  • 3. The method according to claim 1, wherein the antenna element array layer has a substrate, a conductor applied on the substrate, and a radiator.
  • 4. The method according to claim 1, further comprising providing a vertical launch that extends through a radiator of the antenna element array layer and the beamformer circuit layer.
  • 5. The method according to claim 4, wherein the vertical launch is created by soldering pads on the radiator and the beamformer circuit layer prior to bonding so a solder bump is present on a surface of the beamformer circuit layer, drilling a center conductor hole, and filling the center conductor hole with copper.
  • 6. The method according to claim 4, wherein the LPA includes a logic circuit layer disposed below the beamformer circuit layer.
  • 7. The method according to claim 6, wherein the LPA further includes a phase shift layer disposed below the logic circuit layer.
  • 8. The method according to claim 7, wherein the vertical launch extends through the logic circuit layer and the phase shift layer.
CROSS-REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS

This application claims priority under 35 U.S.C. § 121 as a division of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 16/183,116 filed Nov. 7, 2018, entitled LOW PROFILE PHASED ARRAY, which claims priority to U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 62/584,300 filed Nov. 10, 2017, entitled LOW PROFILE PHASED ARRAY and to U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 62/584,264 filed Nov. 10, 2017, entitled ADDITIVE MANUFACTURING TECHNOLOGY (AMT) LOW PROFILE RADIATOR. Each of these applications is herein incorporated by reference in its entirety for all purposes.

US Referenced Citations (43)
Number Name Date Kind
4875087 Miyauchi et al. Oct 1989 A
5401175 Guimond et al. Mar 1995 A
5426399 Matsubayashi et al. Jun 1995 A
5828555 Itoh Oct 1998 A
5857858 Gorowitz et al. Jan 1999 A
6000120 Arledge et al. Dec 1999 A
6137453 Wang et al. Oct 2000 A
6353189 Shimada et al. Mar 2002 B1
6400234 Ohhashi et al. Jun 2002 B1
6486755 Aruga Nov 2002 B2
6651322 Currie Nov 2003 B1
6674347 Maruhashi et al. Jan 2004 B1
6747217 Jochym et al. Jun 2004 B1
6937120 Fisher et al. Aug 2005 B2
7038622 Schmidt et al. May 2006 B2
7405477 Tao et al. Jul 2008 B1
7443279 Yagisawa et al. Oct 2008 B2
8749434 Han et al. Jun 2014 B2
8773323 Manry, Jr. et al. Jul 2014 B1
10505255 Baheti et al. Dec 2019 B2
20030067410 Puzella et al. Apr 2003 A1
20030188889 Straub et al. Oct 2003 A1
20030201851 Yoshida et al. Oct 2003 A1
20060044083 Kuzmenka Mar 2006 A1
20060214744 Margomenos Sep 2006 A1
20070164843 Yagisawa et al. Jul 2007 A1
20090000804 Kobayashi et al. Jan 2009 A1
20100182105 Hein et al. Jul 2010 A1
20100206617 Johnson et al. Aug 2010 A1
20100254094 Ohhira Oct 2010 A1
20130009729 Kim Jan 2013 A1
20130028298 Manry, Jr. et al. Jan 2013 A1
20130154773 Siprak Jun 2013 A1
20150189754 Bohra et al. Jul 2015 A1
20150323576 Bulja et al. Nov 2015 A1
20160079646 Ichige Mar 2016 A1
20160172741 Panat et al. Jun 2016 A1
20170117620 Lapushin Apr 2017 A1
20180086628 Vossough et al. Mar 2018 A1
20190148807 Sikina et al. May 2019 A1
20190150271 Azadzoi et al. May 2019 A1
20190269007 Sikina et al. Aug 2019 A1
20200028257 Benedict et al. Jan 2020 A1
Foreign Referenced Citations (15)
Number Date Country
1619879 May 2005 CN
201845850 May 2011 CN
102904019 Jan 2013 CN
106936521 Jul 2017 CN
206742473 Dec 2017 CN
1202377 May 2002 EP
1473979 Nov 2004 EP
2322237 Aug 1998 GB
H08236894 Sep 1996 JP
2010507929 Mar 2010 JP
2013034184 Feb 2013 JP
201387731 May 2013 JP
2015185550 Oct 2015 JP
10-2002-0041771 Jun 2002 KR
10-2005-0074517 Jul 2005 KR
Non-Patent Literature Citations (25)
Entry
Hong et al. “Grid Assembly-Free 60-GHz Antenna Module Embedded in FR-4 Transceiver Carrier Board”, IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation (2013) vol. 61, No. 4, pp. 1573-1580. (Year: 2013).
Shafique et al. “Laser machining of microvias and trenches for substrate integrated waveguides in LTCC technology”, Proceedings of the 39th European Microwave Conference (2009), pp. 272-275. (Year: 2009).
Bailey, M. “General Layout Guidelines for RF and Mixed-Signal PCBs”, Maxim Integrated (2011), pp. 1-10. Retrieved from URL: <<https://pdfserv.maximintegrated.com/en/an/AN5100.pdf>>.
International Search Report and Written Opinion in application No. PCT/US2018/059636 dated Mar. 4, 2019.
Farhan Shafique et al. “Laser machining of microvias and trenches for substrate integrated waveguides in LTCC technology”, Proceedings of the 39th European Microwave Conference (2009), pp. 272-275.
Deslandes et al. “Integrated Microstrip and Rectangular Waveguide in Planar Form”, IEEE Microwave and Wireless Components Letters (2001) vol. 11, No. 2, pp. 68-70.
International Search Report and Written Opinion in application No. PCT/US2018/059625 dated Mar. 4, 2019.
Leib et al. “An ultra-wideband vertical transition from microstrip to stripline in PCB technology”, Proceedings of 2010 IEEE International Conference on Ultra-Wideband (2010), p. 1-4.
International Search Report and Written Opinion in application No. PCT/US2018/059240 dated Mar. 4, 2019.
Mukherjee et al. “Broadband Substrate Integrated Waveguide Cavity-Backed Bow-Tie Slot Antenna”, IEEE Antennas and Wireless Propagation Letters (2014) vol. 13, p. 1152-1155.
Liu et al. “Broadband Circularly Polarized Antenna With High Gain for Ku-band Applications”, IEEE Conference Proceedings (2017), p. 1-2.
Kim et al. “Slot-Coupled Circularly Polarized Array Antenna With Substrate-Integrated Waveguide Cavity for Parallel-Plate-Mode Suppression”, IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation (2017) vol. 65, No. 8, p. 3999-4006.
Luo et al. “Antenna Array Elements for Ka-band Satellite Communication on the Move”, Loughborough Antennas & Propagation Conference (2013), p. 135-139.
Beeresha et al. “Embedded Microstrip Line to Stripline Vertical Transition Using LTCC Technique”, International Journal of Research in Engineering and Technology (2015) vol. 4, Issue 12, pp. 30-34.
Shan et al. “A Compact Broadband Stripline-fed Slot Antenna for Array Application”, IEEE International Workshop on Antenna Technology (2005), pp. 555-558.
International Search Report and Written Opinion in application No. PCT/US2018/059602 dated Apr. 18, 2019.
Hong et al. “Grid Assembly-Free 60-GHz Antenna Module Embedded in FR-4 Transceiver Carrier Board”, IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation (2013) vol. 61, No. 4, pp. 1573-1580.
Invitation to Pay Additional Fees in application No. PCT/US2018/059410 dated Apr. 23, 2019.
International Search Report and Written Opinion in application No. PCT/US2018/059841 dated Mar. 4, 2019.
Sitaraman et al. “Modeling, Design and Demonstration of Integrated Electromagnetic Shielding for Miniaturized RF SOP Glass Packages”, Electronic Components & Technology Conference (2015), p. 1956-1960.
International Search Report in application No. PCT/US2019/019851 dated May 29, 2019.
Jung et al. “Inkjet-printed resistors with a wide resistance range for printed read only memory applications”, Organic Electronics (2013) vol. 14, pp. 699-702.
Kim et al. “Fabrication of Fully Inkjet-Printed Vias and SIW Structures on Thick Polymer Substrates”, IEEE Transactions on Components, Packaging and Manufacturing Technology (2016) vol. 6, No. 3, pp. 486-496.
International Search Report and Written Opinion in application No. PCT/US2019/019847 dated May 29, 2019.
Kangasvieri et al. “An Ultra-Wideband BGA-Via Transition for High-Speed Digital and Millimeter-Wave Packaging Applications”, IEEE (2007), pp. 1637-1640.
Related Publications (1)
Number Date Country
20220052460 A1 Feb 2022 US
Provisional Applications (2)
Number Date Country
62584300 Nov 2017 US
62584264 Nov 2017 US
Divisions (1)
Number Date Country
Parent 16183116 Nov 2018 US
Child 17511153 US