The described embodiments relate generally to shielding electrical components and more particularly to low-profile, space efficient electrical shields.
Electromagnetic interference (EMI) signals can adversely affect the performance and function of electrical devices. Some electrical devices can be sensitive to radiated EMI signals from other devices. For example, a low noise amplifier may provide substantial gain to an input signal; however, the performance of the amplifier may be negatively affected by the presence of interfering EMI signals on the amplifier inputs. The EMI signals can distort or otherwise cause errors in the sensitive input section and as a result the output of the amplifier can become distorted. To protect electrical devices from receiving unintentional EMI radiation, the strength of emitted electromagnetic interference is typically regulated by governmental agencies.
A common device used to control both emission and reception of EMI signals is a metallic shield employed to cover electrical components. The shield protects sensitive electrical parts from receiving stray EMI signals and can also limit the radiation of EMI signals. Shields function by providing a low impedance pathway for EMI signals. Shields are typically constructed of metal, such as steel or, in some instances, can be constructed with conductive paint over an insulator such as plastic.
As described, traditional shield implementations cover one or more electrical components. Unfortunately traditional shield implementations can increase area used on supporting substrates such as a printed circuit board (PCB). Increased area can be due, at least in part, to air gaps commonly used between protected components and the shield. The air gap may ease assembly and installation of the shield on the supporting substrate. As product designs are driven smaller, the areas of related modules such as printed circuit boards are driven to be smaller as well. Thus, there is a desire to decrease the area need to support shield implementations, particularly on supporting substrates such as PCBs.
Therefore, what is desired is space efficient shield assembly to attenuate interfering electrical signals for use on supporting substrates.
The described embodiments and the advantages thereof may best be understood by reference to the following description taken in conjunction with the accompanying drawings. These drawings in no way limit any changes in form and detail that may be made to the described embodiments by one skilled in the art without departing from the spirit and scope of the described embodiments.
Representative applications of methods and apparatus according to the present application are described in this section. These examples are being provided solely to add context and aid in the understanding of the described embodiments. It will thus be apparent to one skilled in the art that the described embodiments may be practiced without some or all of these specific details. In other instances, well known process steps have not been described in detail in order to avoid unnecessarily obscuring the described embodiments. Other applications are possible, such that the following examples should not be taken as limiting.
In the following detailed description, references are made to the accompanying drawings, which form a part of the description and in which are shown, by way of illustration, specific embodiments in accordance with the described embodiments. Although these embodiments are described in sufficient detail to enable one skilled in the art to practice the described embodiments, it is understood that these examples are not limiting; such that other embodiments may be used, and changes may be made without departing from the spirit and scope of the described embodiments.
Shielding techniques are widely practiced to control the effects of unwanted electromagnetic interference (EMI). Shielding can be used to not only protect sensitive components from absorbing unwanted EMI, but can also be used to prevent unintended emission of EMI signals. Traditional shielding techniques, however, can be bulky and can impose design constraints by requiring excessive area on mounting substrates such as a printed circuit boards.
A low-profile, space efficient integrated shield solution is disclosed. In one embodiment, an integrated circuit is surrounded by top and bottom metal layers and edge plating forming a shield around the integrated circuit. In one embodiment, the shield can be coupled to a signal shared with the integrated circuit. In another embodiment, the shield can be isolated from the integrated circuit. For example the shield can be coupled to a signal separate from the signal coupled to the integrated circuit. In certain embodiments the separate signal is ground signal. In yet another embodiment, the edge plating can be replaced with through vias that both couple the top and bottom metal layers and also act as an edge shield. In still another embodiment, passive components can be included within the shield with the integrated circuit.
Integrated circuit 102 or the combination of integrated circuit 102 and matrix 104 can be effectively wrapped with a shield. In one embodiment, shield 101 can include shield top 120, shield bottom 122 and shield edge plating 124. Shield 101 can be formed out of thin metal foil such as copper, aluminum, steel or other suitable material. By attaching shield 101 directly to integrated circuit 102 (or integrated circuit 102 and matrix 104 combination), substantial area can be saved on substrate 110 because the combination of shield 101 and integrated circuit 102 need not require much more surface area than integrated circuit 102 alone. In some embodiments shield 101 can be formed from metal foil, only a few microns thick. For example, the foil can range from 10 microns to 100 microns thick. Differing foil thicknesses can attenuate differing EMI frequencies. In one embodiment, the foil thickness can be selected to reduce a particular target frequency. In another embodiment, the foil thickness can be selected to increase or decrease an amount of EMI attenuation.
Integrated circuit 102 signals can be coupled through terminals 130, laser vias 132 and bumps 134. In one embodiment, laser vias 132 are formed before shield 101 is formed. That is, shield 101 is formed to have openings therein corresponding to the locations of laser vias 132. In one embodiment bumps 134 can be balls, solder balls or other suitable feature allowing the coupling of signals to pads 106. In one embodiment, shield 101 can be coupled to one or more bumps 134 shared in common with integrated circuit 102. In this way, when bump 134 is coupled to ground, then shield 101 is also coupled to ground. This arrangement can reduce or eliminate the need for dedicated pads needed to support shield signal coupling. In one embodiment, shield 101 can be used as a contact point or support point for other components such as a flex circuit. For example, when shield 101 is coupled to ground, then a separate flex circuit can couple a flex circuit ground signal to shield 101.
In one embodiment shield top 120 can receive a solder mask. The solder mask can resist solder especially as shield system 914 may be attached to a circuit board though a flow or re-flow soldering technique. In another embodiment, at least a portion of shield top 120 can be free from a solder mask to allow the attaching of a heat sink, heat pipe or other thermal conductive solution. In one embodiment, matrix 104 can be minimized over integrated circuit 102 in area 950 to help increase thermal transfer from integrated circuit 102.
Pads 934 are on the far side of shield system 1014 (as in
The foregoing description, for purposes of explanation, used specific nomenclature to provide a thorough understanding of the described embodiments. However, it will be apparent to one skilled in the art that the specific details are not required in order to practice the described embodiments. Thus, the foregoing descriptions of specific embodiments are presented for purposes of illustration and description. They are not intended to be exhaustive or to limit the described embodiments to the precise forms disclosed. It will be apparent to one of ordinary skill in the art that many modifications and variations are possible in view of the above teachings.
This application claims priority to U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 61/602,529, filed Feb. 23, 2012, entitled “LOW PROFILE, SPACE EFFICIENT CIRCUIT SHIELDS,” and to U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 61/613,427, filed Mar. 20, 2012, entitled “LOW PROFILE, SPACE EFFICIENT CIRCUIT SHIELDS,” which are incorporated herein by reference in their entireties and for all purposes.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
5153379 | Guzuk et al. | Oct 1992 | A |
5355016 | Swirbel et al. | Oct 1994 | A |
5557142 | Gilmore et al. | Sep 1996 | A |
5668406 | Egawa | Sep 1997 | A |
5864062 | Nagahara et al. | Jan 1999 | A |
6000968 | Hagiwara | Dec 1999 | A |
6150193 | Glenn | Nov 2000 | A |
6743975 | Kolb | Jun 2004 | B2 |
6823747 | Hasegawa et al. | Nov 2004 | B2 |
7109410 | Arnold et al. | Sep 2006 | B2 |
7478474 | Koga | Jan 2009 | B2 |
7548430 | Huemoeller et al. | Jun 2009 | B1 |
7618846 | Pagaila et al. | Nov 2009 | B1 |
7633765 | Scanlan et al. | Dec 2009 | B1 |
8018068 | Scanlan et al. | Sep 2011 | B1 |
8072769 | Ieki et al. | Dec 2011 | B2 |
8084300 | San Antonio et al. | Dec 2011 | B1 |
8097494 | Tang et al. | Jan 2012 | B2 |
8227338 | Scanlan et al. | Jul 2012 | B1 |
8341835 | Huemoeller et al. | Jan 2013 | B1 |
8592958 | Ko et al. | Nov 2013 | B2 |
20010015869 | Kamezawa et al. | Aug 2001 | A1 |
20020168798 | Glenn et al. | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20030138991 | Kung | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030169056 | Hasegawa et al. | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20030169057 | Ishiguro et al. | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20030218257 | Ishio et al. | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20040021156 | Asano et al. | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040156172 | Lin et al. | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20040178500 | Usui | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040238857 | Beroz et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20040252475 | Tsuneoka et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050104164 | Awujoola et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20050104165 | Ishio et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20050130495 | Schultz et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20060148317 | Akaike et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060267159 | Yamamoto et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20070023203 | Goudarzi et al. | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070096160 | Beroz et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20070170582 | Nomura et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070200748 | Hoegerl et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070210392 | Sakakibara et al. | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20070267725 | Lee et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20080210462 | Kawagishi et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080296053 | Ishimaru et al. | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20090029506 | Fujii et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090032933 | Tracht et al. | Feb 2009 | A1 |
20090072357 | Tang et al. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090075428 | Tang et al. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090096041 | Sakakibara et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090115026 | Gerber et al. | May 2009 | A1 |
20090146269 | Chow et al. | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090152688 | Do et al. | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090236700 | Moriya | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20090243012 | Vanam et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090243051 | Vanam et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090302435 | Pagaila et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20090315156 | Harper | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20100013065 | Mistry et al. | Jan 2010 | A1 |
20100019359 | Pagaila et al. | Jan 2010 | A1 |
20100027225 | Yuda et al. | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20100105171 | Lee et al. | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100109132 | Ko et al. | May 2010 | A1 |
20100127396 | Tang | May 2010 | A1 |
20100157566 | Bogursky et al. | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100207258 | Eun et al. | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20100267207 | Tang | Oct 2010 | A1 |
20110003435 | Tang et al. | Jan 2011 | A1 |
20110175210 | Yao et al. | Jul 2011 | A1 |
20110176279 | Zhao et al. | Jul 2011 | A1 |
20110233736 | Park et al. | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20110294261 | Moriya | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20110298102 | Yoo et al. | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20110304015 | Kim et al. | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20120062439 | Liao et al. | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20120086109 | Kim et al. | Apr 2012 | A1 |
20120098109 | Ko et al. | Apr 2012 | A1 |
20120104570 | Kim | May 2012 | A1 |
20120104573 | Pagaila et al. | May 2012 | A1 |
20120133032 | Tsai et al. | May 2012 | A1 |
20120228751 | Song | Sep 2012 | A1 |
20120241922 | Pagaila | Sep 2012 | A1 |
20120250267 | Lee et al. | Oct 2012 | A1 |
20130082364 | Wang et al. | Apr 2013 | A1 |
20130087895 | Upadhyayula et al. | Apr 2013 | A1 |
20140028518 | Arnold et al. | Jan 2014 | A1 |
Entry |
---|
International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT application PCT/US2013/027179, dated Jun. 21, 2013. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20130223041 A1 | Aug 2013 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61602529 | Feb 2012 | US | |
61613427 | Mar 2012 | US |