Millimeter wave (mmW), which refers to electromagnetic radiation with a frequency of 30-300 GHz, has found numerous applications in modern society. For example, mmW spectroscopy has been used for chemical analysis because many chemicals exhibit signature resonance modes within the mmW band. Moreover, the small wavelength of mmW makes it suitable for use in high-resolution imaging. Due to the rich spectrum availability, mmW wireless communication supports wider bandwidth for data transmission and hence high data rates. Thus far, it has been demonstrated that mmWs with frequencies of 28 and 38 GHz can be used in the 5th cellular network technology (5G), with the data rate reaching the order of gigabytes per second (Gb/s). (Rappaport, T. S. et al. IEEE access 1, 335-349 (2013).) Moreover, mmW radar sensors utilizing a frequency range of 76-81 GHz have been used for autonomous driving, allowing the transmission of a significantly larger amount of data than lower-frequency operation. (Hasch, J. et al. IEEE Trans. Microw. Theory Tech. 60, 845-860 (2012).) Although the use of higher frequency mmWs would enable even higher lateral resolution in imaging and a higher data rate in communication, the inverse power-frequency relationship of existing solid-state mmW emitters has led to limited output power at higher frequencies. For instance, the output power of the Impact ionization Avalanche Transit Time (IMPATT) diode, which produces the highest output power among existing mmW emitters, is proportional to 1/f2 when the frequency f exceeds 100 GHz. (Aghasi, H. et al. Appl. Phys. Rev. 7, 21302 (2020).) This is mainly because the optimum junction area of the diode is proportional to 1/f2 due to the device-circuit impedance matching. Although this issue can be mitigated by fabricating multi-element emitter arrays to combine the signals of individual emitter spatially, a fundamental solution to improving the output power of an individual emitter would be more appealing.
Acoustically mediated pulsed radiation sources, phased arrays incorporating the radiation sources, and methods of using the radiation sources and phased arrays are provided.
One example of a heterostructure includes: a metal layer; and a superlattice acoustically coupled to the metal layer, the superlattice comprising a series of adjacent bilayers disposed along a length axis, each bilayer comprising a magnetic insulator layer and a dielectric layer, wherein the magnetic insulator layers in the superlattice have equal thicknesses and the dielectric layers in the superlattice have equal thicknesses.
One example of a radiation source for emitting electromagnetic radiation includes: a light-to-acoustic transducer layer; and a superlattice acoustically coupled to the light-to-acoustic transducer layer, the superlattice comprising a series of adjacent bilayers disposed along a length axis, each bilayer comprising a magnetic insulator layer and a dielectric layer, wherein the magnetic insulator layers in the superlattice have equal thicknesses and the dielectric layers in the superlattice have equal thicknesses; and a femtosecond pulsed laser optically coupled to the light-to-acoustic transducer layer, opposite the thermal insulation layer.
One example of a method of generating electromagnetic radiation from a superlattice comprising a series of adjacent bilayers disposed along a length axis, each bilayer comprising a magnetic insulator layer and a dielectric layer, wherein the magnetic insulator layers in the superlattice have equal thicknesses and the dielectric layers in the superlattice have equal thicknesses, includes the steps of: passing an acoustic pulse through the superlattice, along the length axis, the duration of the acoustic pulse being selected such that the acoustic pulse selectively excites an n=1 mode standing spin wave in each magnetic insulator layer of the superlattice, and the n=1 mode standing spin waves of the magnetic insulator layers are in-phase, wherein the in-phase standing spin waves generate electromagnetic radiation via magnetic dipole emission.
One example of a phased array includes: a plurality of radiation sources for emitting electromagnetic radiation, the radiation sources including: a light-to-acoustic transducer layer; and at least one magnetic layer optically coupled to the light-to-acoustic transducer layer; and a laser system comprising: at least one femtosecond pulsed laser for generating a plurality of femtosecond pulsed laser beams that are optically coupled to the light-to-acoustic transducer layers of the radiation sources; and a time delay control system for introducing an adjustable time delay in the femtosecond pulsed laser beams arriving at the light-to-acoustic transducer layers of the radiation sources.
Other principal features and advantages of the invention will become apparent to those skilled in the art upon review of the following drawings, the detailed description, and the appended claims.
Illustrative embodiments of the invention will hereafter be described with reference to the accompanying drawings, wherein like numerals denote like elements.
Acoustically mediated pulsed radiation sources, phased arrays incorporating the radiation sources, and methods of using the radiation sources and phased arrays are provided. The radiation sources are based on a superlattice heterostructure that supports in-phase magnetic dipole emission from a series of magnetic insulator layers disposed along the length of the heterostructure.
The radiation sources can be designed to emit radiation with a high output power at a wide range of frequencies, including mmW radiation having frequencies in the range from 30 GHz to 300 GHz. As a result, the radiation sources are well suited for use in wireless communication applications that require high data rates. For example, radiation sources emitting in the mmW range can operate with frequencies of 28 GHz and 38 GHz, which are useful for 5G applications. The radiation sources are also well suited for high spatial resolution imaging and radar sensors for use in such applications as autonomous driving.
A schematic diagram of one embodiment of an acoustically mediated pulsed radiation source 100 is shown in
An alternative embodiment of an acoustically mediated pulsed radiation source 100 is shown in
Yet another embodiment of an acoustically mediated pulsed radiation source 100 is shown in
Thermal insulation layer 108 and/or dielectric substrate 114 may be composed of the same material as dielectric layers 106, although it will generally be thicker than those layers. If it acts as an epitaxial growth substrate for magnetic insulator layer 105, dielectric layer 114 will be a single-crystalline substrate, for example, a MAO single crystal can be used as a growth substrate for a MAFO magnetic insulator layer.
Without intending to be bound to any particular theory of the invention, the principles of operation of the radiation sources can be explained as follows. During operation, a pulsed light source, such as a femtosecond (fs) laser, directs fs-time scale pulses of light 110 onto a light receiving surface 112 of transducer layer 107. Transducer layer 107 acts as a light-to-acoustic transducer to convert the femtosecond timescale laser pulses into fast (e.g., picosecond timescale) acoustic pulses (εzz) that are injected into the first magnetic insulator layer of superlattice 102. (Acoustic pulses are also referred to herein as strain pulses.) As the acoustic wave traverses superlattice 102 along its length, it excites spin waves in magnetic insulator layers 105 through magnetoelastic coupling. (For this reason, magnetic insulator layers are also referred to herein as magnetoelastic layers.) The spin waves propagate together with the injected acoustic pulse along the magnetic insulator layers 105 and are completely reflected at the surfaces of the magnetic insulator layers 105. A standing spin wave forms due to the interference between the incident and the reflected spin waves. The standing spin waves give rise to the emission of electromagnetic wave through magnetic dipole radiation.
Magnetic insulator layers 105 are composed of a magnetic material having a sufficiently strong magnetoelastic coupling between the spins and the strains to generate spin waves in the magnetic insulator. However, layers 105 should also be electrical insulators in order to avoid the absorption of the emitted radiation. The magnetic insulator layers also desirably have sufficiently low magnetic damping to allow the radiation sources to operate at the energy efficiency and duration requirements for their intended application, and to achieve excited standing spin waves with long lifetimes, including lifetimes of approximately 1 ns. MgAl0.5Fe1.5 O4 (MAFO) is one example of a low-damping magnetic insulator with high magnetoelastic coupling properties. However, other magnetic insulators, such as yttrium-iron-garnet (Y3Fe5O12; “YIG”) and gadolinium-iron garnet (Gd3Fe5O12; “GdIG”) can also be used for at least some applications.
The thickness of magnetic insulator layers 105 can be selected to support an n=1 mode of a standing spin wave having a desired frequency, corresponding to the desired emission frequency of the radiation source. The n=1 mode is then selectively excited by an acoustic pulse that has an appreciable spectral amplitude at that frequency. While the standing spin waves of other odd modes (n=3,5, . . . ) can also produce non-zero net electromagnetic waves via magnetic dipole radiation, the n=1 mode standing spin wave has higher radiation efficiency than higher-order modes. For this reason, the radiation sources are designed such that the injected acoustic pulse has a pulse duration that selectively excites the n=1 mode standing spin wave.
The ability to tailor the emission frequency by engineering the magnetic insulator layer thickness and the acoustic pulse duration makes it possible to design radiation sources that emit radiation across a broad range of frequencies. This approach to engineering the emission frequency based on layer thickness and pulse duration is illustrated in Example 2. Generally, thicker magnetic insulator layers produce emission at lower frequencies, but with a higher peak amplitude of the electric field component (Ex(t)). Typical layer thicknesses for the magnetic insulator layers in the superlattice are in the range from 5 nm to 20 nm, and typical pulse durations include those in the range from 5 ps to 60 ps; however, layer thicknesses and pulse durations outside of these ranges can be used.
The superlattice-based radiation sources are engineered such that the electromagnetic radiation waves emitted from the magnetic insulator layers are in-phase and interfere constructively in order to enhance the Ex(t) and the peak output power density. In-phase emission results when the time it takes for the acoustic pulse to travel across bilayer 104 is equal to the period of the selectively excited n=1 mode standing spin waves of magnetic insulator layers 105. Thus, the thickness of dielectric layers 106 is chosen accordingly. This approach to engineering the bilayer thickness to achieve in-phase emission at a selected emission frequency is illustrated in Example 1. The optimal thickness for dielectric layers 106 will depend on the thickness of magnetic insulator layers 105 and on the magnetic insulator and dielectric materials being used. Generally, dielectric layer thicknesses in the range from 15 to 300 nm are suitable. However, layer thicknesses outside of these ranges can be used, depending on the particular materials selected.
Dielectric layers 106 are composed of a non-magnetic, electrically insulating material that does not appreciably absorb the emitted radiation. Moreover, it is desirable for the electrically insulating material to have a good acoustic match with the magnetic insulator, so that the magnitude of the acoustic wave is not substantially reduced as it passes from dielectric layers 106 into magnetic insulator layers 105. Further, the electrically insulating material of dielectric layers 106 should have a sufficiently close lattice match with the magnetic insulator material to allow for epitaxial growth of the magnetic insulator on the dielectric. This enables the epitaxial growth of a superlattice comprising high-quality crystalline layers. Thus, the particular dielectric material used for dielectric layers 106 will depend on the magnetic insulator material. By way of illustration, the non-magnetic electrical insulator MgAl2O4 (MAO) can be used as the dielectric material for radiation sources that use MAFO as the magnetic insulator. Other suitable dielectric materials include Gd3Ga5O12 (GGG). The epitaxial growth of the superlattice can be carried out using, for example, molecular beam epitaxy (MBE), pulsed laser deposition (PLD), or magnetron sputtering. Other known methods can be used to form superlattices, including superlattices in which the magnetic insulator and/or dielectric layers are polycrystalline or amorphous, rather than single-crystalline. However, single-crystalline superlattice layers will typically produce the best device performance and, so, are preferred.
The peak amplitude of the emission from the radiation source increases as the number of magnetic insulator layers 105 in the superlattice increases, due to the constructive interference of the output radiation from each such layer. However, in practice, a maximum peak amplitude may be imposed due to an imperfect acoustic match between magnetic insulator layers 105 and dielectric layers 106. The number of magnetic insulator layers in the superlattice is desirably equal to or greater than the number of magnetic insulator layers needed to achieve the maximum achievable peak amplitude for the superlattice, but a lower number of layers can be used. Generally, a superlattice having from 5 to 20 magnetic insulator layers is sufficient to achieve the maximum peak amplitude.
Transducer layer 107 will typically be a metal layer. However, non-metals that can convert incident femtosecond timescale laser pulses into picosecond timescale acoustic pulses can also be used. For the purposes of this disclosure, femtosecond timescale pulses include pulses of tens or hundreds of femtoseconds (i.e., pulses in the range from 10−15 to 10−13 seconds), and picosecond timescale pulses include pulses of tens or hundreds of picoseconds (i.e., pulses in the range from 10−12 to 10−10 seconds). Metals from which transducer layer 107 can be made include aluminum (Al), Iron (Fe), platinum (Pt), gold (Au), cobalt (Co), and nickel (Ni). Thermal expansion coefficients, electron-phonon coupling coefficients, and electronic specific heat coefficients are properties to consider when choosing materials for use as a transducer layer. Specifically, to generate larger strains, it is better to simultaneously have a large thermal expansion coefficient, a large electron-phonon coupling coefficient, and a small electronic specific heat coefficient. Transducer layer 107 should have a thickness that is at least as large as the absorption depth of the laser pulses in the transducer layer in order to prevent the laser radiation from reaching thermally insulating layer 108 and/or the superlattice 102. However, excess thickness is generally not desirable because a thinner transducer layer provides a larger temperature gradient across the interface between the transducer layer and the thermal insulation layer. This is advantageous because it leads to the injection of larger elastic strains into the magnetic insulator layer, which results in electromagnetic radiation emission with a higher amplitude. The optimal thickness of the transducer layer will depend on the particular transducer material being used and the required magnitude of the output signal. However, by way of illustration, layer thicknesses in the range from about 10 nm to about 100 nm, including thicknesses in the range from about 20 nm to 50 nm, are suitable. The transducer layer may be single-crystalline, polycrystalline, or amorphous, and can be formed on the surface of the substrate using known deposition methods, such as magnetron sputtering or electron beam (e-beam) evaporation followed by an anneal.
Thermal insulation layer 108 is an optional layer that provides thermal insulation between transducer layer 107 and the first layer of the superlattice (for example, the first magnetic insulator layer 105 of superlattice 102 in the illustrative embodiments of
A femtosecond laser is optically coupled to light-receiving surface 112 of transducer layer 107. As used herein, the term optically coupled is used to mean that the femtosecond laser is positioned to direct a beam of femtosecond laser pulses 110 onto light-receiving surface 112, either directly or indirectly using, for example, reflective surfaces or other optical components to steer the beam from the laser to the light-receiving surface. Pulsed femtosecond (fs) lasers are known and commercially available. Such lasers generate a pulsed laser output at a frequency in the range from 10−15 to 10−13 seconds. As discussed above, the optimal acoustic pulse duration and, therefore, the optimal laser pulse duration, will depend on the particular materials and layer thicknesses of the superlattice. By way of illustration, fs pulses having a duration in the range from 10 fs to 30 fs may be used. However, fs pulses with durations outside of this range can also be used.
A plurality of acoustically mediated radiation sources can be incorporated into a phased array in which the collective emission from the radiation sources generates an output beam of electromagnetic radiation, the direction of which is electrically steerable.
It should be noted that, while the radiation sources used in the phased array can be the acoustically mediated, superlattice based radiation sources, acoustically mediated radiation sources that include only a single magnetic layer for emission, rather than a superlattice structure, can also be used. Examples of single magnetic layer, acoustically mediated radiation sources are described in Example 2 and in Zhuang, Shihao, et al. ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces 13, 48997-49006 (2024 As illustrated schematically in
Like the superlattice-based radiation emitters, the single magnetic layer radiation emitters generate electromagnetic waves through magnetic dipole radiation. Although the inventors do not intend to be bound to any particular theory, the principles of operation of the single magnetic layer-based radiation sources are similar in some respects to those of the superlattice-based radiation sources. However, the single magnetic layer sources do not rely on the constructive interference of the emitted electromagnetic waves from multiple magnetic layers. The mechanism can be summarized as follows: layer 207 acts as a light-to-acoustic transducer to convert fs timescale laser pulses incident upon its outermost surface, which is referred to herein as a light-receiving surface, into fast (e.g., ps timescale) acoustic pulses that are injected into magnetic layer 205, giving rise to a strain wave (also referred to as an acoustic wave) in magnetic layer 205. This strain wave excites spin waves in magnetic layer 205 through magnetoelastic coupling and short-range exchange coupling. Strong interactions between the spin waves and the strain wave produce high frequency exchange spin waves propagating in magnetic layer 205. High frequency exchange spin waves incident upon the far surface of magnetic layer 205 are reflected, and the incident and reflected exchange spin waves produce a high-frequency standing spin wave, which leads to the emission of electromagnetic waves through magnetic dipole radiation.
The materials and layer thicknesses for the light-to-acoustic transducer layer, the thermal insulator layer, and the dielectric substrate in the non-superlattice radiation sources may be the same as those for the corresponding layers in the superlattice-based radiation sources. However, the magnetic layer in the non-superlattice-based radiation sources need not be composed of an electrical insulator and, therefore, magnetic metals and metal alloys having strong magnetoeleastic coupling can be used, as well as magnetic insulators. Suitable materials for magnetic layer 205 include an Fe metal, an FeGa alloy, a CoFeB alloy, a CoFe alloy, MgO, and GGG. Magnetic insulators, such as MAFO, YIG, and GdIG, can also be used. If magnetic layer 205 is grown epitaxially on thermal insulating layer 208 or dielectric substrate 214, those layers can be selected to promote epitaxial growth.
Typical thickness of magnetic layer 205 is in the range from 5 nm to 20 nm for emitting electromagnetic radiation with a frequency of 30-300 GHz. However, the optimal thickness will depend on the particular magnetic material being used because the frequency of the emitted radiation depends on the magnetic parameters and the thickness of the magnetic layer 205.
A schematic illustration of a phased array that includes a plurality of (in this case, nine) radiation sources is shown in
The phased arrays use a plurality of individual radiation sources 200 that are separately triggered by femtosecond pulsed laser beams 210 to cumulatively produce an output electromagnetic wave that is highly directional. Time delays (Δt) are introduced in the different pulsed laser beams (
This example computationally demonstrates a mmW pulsed emitter based on acoustically mediated optically induced excitation of spin waves in a magnetoelastic superlattice heterostructure. The peak output power of such a magnonic mmW emitter can maintain the same order of magnitude over the entire frequency span of 30-300 GHz, not subjected to the 1/f2 scaling. The emitter is based on a magnetoelastic superlattice, which integrates repetitive stacks of the low-damping magnetic insulator MgAl0.5Fe1.5O4 (MAFO) and a non-magnetic insulator MgAl2O4 (MAO). The computations demonstrate that the emitter can deliver a peak output power of about 106 times higher than that of the IMPATT diodes over the entire mmW band. This magnonic mmW pulsed emitter therefore represents a fundamentally new solution to the generation of the much-needed high-power mmW pulses especially at a high-frequency (100-300 GHz) regime.
The structure of the superlattice heterostructure based on MAFO is shown in
When the strain pulse traveled across the MAO/(MAFO)7/(MAO)6 structure (subscripts m and n refer to the number of layers), standing spin waves (SSWs) in each MAFO layer were excited in order. When the time for the strain pulse to travel across one repetitive unit (MAFO/MAO bilayer) was exactly the period of the SSW of mode n=1, the excited SSWs of mode n=1 in each MAFO layer, and hence their emitted electromagnetic waves, were in phase. The frequency of the n=1 mode SSW, and hence the emitted radiation, was determined by the thickness and materials parameters of the magnetic insulator layer MAFO. Therefore, the thickness of the MAFO needed to be selected based on the desired frequency of the emitted radiation. For example, in
However, the partial reflection of the injected strain pulse at the MAO/MAFO interfaces, as shown in
The temporal profile of Ex(t) from the MAO/(MAFO)7/(MAO)6 structure is shown in
This example illustrates the selection of an appropriate magnetic insulator layer thickness and acoustic pulse duration for an acoustically mediated, superlattice-based radiation source. Radiation sources that include only a single magnetic conductor layer (e.g., a metal; FeGa) or only a single magnetic insulator layer (e.g., MAFO) were used as proof of principle.
Methods
An in-house fully coupled Multiphysics model that considers the coupled dynamics of elastic waves, spin waves, and electromagnetic wave emission was used to simulate the spatiotemporal profiles of the local mechanical displacement, local magnetization, and EM wave. In this model, the evolution of local mechanical displacement u is described by elastodynamic equation incorporating the magnetostrictive stress, given by,
where ρ is the mass density; c11, c12 and c44 are the elastic stiffness coefficients. ρ and c are different in different layers of the metal/dielectric/magnetoelastic heterostructure. B1=−1.5λ100(c11M−c12M) and B2=−3λ111c44M are the magnetoelastic coupling coefficients of the magnetoelastic film (λ100 and λ111 are its magnetostrictive coefficients); m=M/Ms is the normalized local magnetization vector. The evolution of local magnetization m(z,t) is governed by the Landau-Lifshitz-Gilbert (LLG) equation,
The total effective magnetic field Heff is contributed by the magnetocrystalline anisotropy field Hanis magnetic exchange coupling field
magnetoelastic anisotropy field Hmel, magnetic dipolar coupling field Hdip, the external magnetic field Hext, and the magnetic field component of the emitted electromagnetic wave Hemw. For magnetic materials with a cubic high-temperature parent phase, one has (i=x, y, z, and j≠i, k≠i, j),
where μ0 is vacuum permeability; K1 and K2 are magnetocrystalline anisotropy coefficients; strain
A bias magnetic field was applied along the z axis (Hext=Hzext) to lift magnetizations off the xy plane by 45° before acoustic excitation, so that the torque exerted by the effective magnetoelastic field on the magnetizations was maximized. The dipolar coupling field is calculated as Hdip=(0, 0, −Msmz). In electrically insulating heterostructures, the Hz
where the upper sign is for z′>z0 and the lower sign is for z′<z0. The total Hemw(z=z′, t) is contributed by the magnetic dipoles at different location z0 and calculated as an integral of Hz
The electric field component Ex(t) of the magnetic dipole radiation is obtained by an inverse Fourier transformation of its frequency domain component Ex(ω), which is obtained via solving the plane wave equation,
where ε0 and μ0 are vacuum permittivity and permeability, εr(ω) is frequency-dependent relative permittivity containing both the real and imaginary parts, with εr(ω)=εr′(ω)+iεr″(ω). The Eq. (10) is numerically solved using a transfer-matrix algorithm. (Michalski, Krzysztof A. Journal of Quantitative Spectroscopy, and Radiative Transfer 226 (2019)).
The word “illustrative” is used herein to mean serving as an example, instance, or illustration. Any aspect or design described herein as “illustrative” is not necessarily to be construed as preferred or advantageous over other aspects or designs. Further, for the purposes of this disclosure and unless otherwise specified, “a” or “an” can be construed to mean only one or can be construed to mean “one or more”. Embodiments of the inventions consistent with either construction are covered.
The foregoing description of illustrative embodiments of the invention has been presented for purposes of illustration and of description. It is not intended to be exhaustive or to limit the invention to the precise form disclosed, and modifications and variations are possible in light of the above teachings or may be acquired from practice of the invention. The embodiments were chosen and described in order to explain the principles of the invention and as practical applications of the invention to enable one skilled in the art to utilize the invention in various embodiments and with various modifications as suited to the particular use contemplated. It is intended that the scope of the invention be defined by the claims appended hereto and their equivalents.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4614923 | Roveda | Sep 1986 | A |
5501913 | Shimokawa | Mar 1996 | A |
5589261 | Tamari | Dec 1996 | A |
6759137 | Furuya | Jul 2004 | B1 |
7652769 | Zhao et al. | Jan 2010 | B2 |
10161790 | Ding et al. | Dec 2018 | B2 |
10475564 | Thomas | Nov 2019 | B2 |
11112355 | Hu et al. | Sep 2021 | B2 |
11169402 | Jin | Nov 2021 | B2 |
11199447 | Hu | Dec 2021 | B1 |
20020067480 | Takahashi | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20030235717 | van de Veerdonk | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20080151615 | Rodmacq | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20090219602 | Alameh | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20120113417 | Linfield et al. | May 2012 | A1 |
20130312802 | Kirihara | Nov 2013 | A1 |
20170104150 | Shi | Apr 2017 | A1 |
20170199402 | Sun | Jul 2017 | A1 |
20190227404 | Wu et al. | Jul 2019 | A1 |
20190385655 | Lin | Dec 2019 | A1 |
20200067198 | Hunziker | Feb 2020 | A1 |
20210055162 | Rice | Feb 2021 | A1 |
20210199571 | Hu | Jul 2021 | A1 |
20220328757 | Pereira de Sousa | Oct 2022 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
108023263 | May 2018 | CN |
110535003 | Dec 2019 | CN |
Entry |
---|
Chiang et al. (J. Mag. Mag. Mat., 239, 2002, 332-334. (Year: 2002). |
J.-M. Hu, et al., “Purely Electric-Field-Driven Perpendicular Magnetization Reversal,” Nano Letters, 15, 616 (2015). |
J.-M. Hu, et al., “Fast Magnetic Domain-Wall Motion in a Ring-Shaped Nanowire Driven by a Voltage,” Nano Letters, 16, 2341 (2016). |
J.-M. Hu, et al., “High-density magnetoresistive random access memory operating at ultralow voltage at room temperature,” Nature Communications, 2, 1(2011). |
G. P. Carman et al., “Strain-mediated magnetoelectrics: Turning science fiction into reality,”, MRS Bulletin, 43, 822 (2018). |
J.-M. Hu, et al., “Strain-mediated voltage controlled switching of magnetic skyrmions in nanostructures,” npj Computational Materials, 4, 1(2017). |
J.-M. Hu, et al., “Stability and dynamics of skyrmions in ultrathin magnetic nanodisks under strain,” Acta Materialia, 183, pp. 145-154 (2020). |
S. Zhuang et al., “An Ultra-narrowband, Acoustically Mediated Spintronic Terahertz Emitter,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2005.00629 (2020). |
Feng et al., “Photonic Structure Enhanced Spintronic Terahertz Emitter,” published in 2019 44th International Conference on Infrared, Millimeter, and Terahertz Wave, 2 pages, Sep. 2019. |
Gao et al, “Coherent control of femtosecond spin current investigated by polarization dependent terahertz emission spectroscopy in ferromagnetic heterostructures,” 2018 IEEE 43rd International Conference on Infrared, Millimeter and Terahertz Waves, 2018. |
Uchida et al., “Acoustic spin pumping: Direct generation of spin currents from sound waves in Pt/Y3Fe5O12 hybrid structures,” Journal of Applied Physics 111, 053903 (2012), 8 pages. |
Weiler et al., “Spin pumping with coherent elastic waves,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 108, 176601—Apr. 23, 2020, 8 pages. |
Masayoshi Tonouchi, “Cutting-edge terahertz technology,” Nature Photonics, vol. 1, Feb. 2007, pp. 97-105. |
Henighan et al., “Generation mechanism of terahertz coherent acoustic phonons in Fe,” Physical review B 93, 2016, pp. 220301-1 to 220301-5. |
Gobaut et al., “FeGaMgO/Fe/GaAs(001) magnetic tunnel junction: Growth and magnetic properties,” Journal of Magnetism and Magnetic Materials 383 (2015) pp. 56-59. |
Ferguson, B et al.,Materials for terahertz science and technology. Nature Mater 1, 26-33 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1038/nmat708. |
Ho, L., et al., Nature Photon 2, 541-543 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1038/nphoton.2008.174. |
Garik Torosyan et al., “Optimized Spintronic Terahertz Emitters Based on Epitaxial Grown Fe/Pt Layer Structures,” Scipentific Reports, pp. 1-9, Jan. 22, 2018. |
A.V. Scherbakov et al., “Optical Excitation of Single- and Multimode Magnetization Precession in Fe—Ga Nanolayers,” Physical Review Applied, pp. 1-7, May 2, 2019. |
Valynn Katrine Mag-Usara et al, “Spintronic Thz Generation Using a Silicon-based Fe/Pt Bilayer as the Radiation Scorce,” 2019 44th International Conference on Infrared, Millimeter, and Terahertz Waves (IIRMMW-THz), pp. 1-2, Oct. 21, 2019. |
U. Nandi et al., “Antenna-coupled spintronic terahertz emitters driven by a 1550 nm femtosecond laser oscillator,” Applied Physics Letters, pp. 1-5, Jul. 9, 2019. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT/US2022/042490 dated Dec. 22, 2022; pp. 1-10. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20230154662 A1 | May 2023 | US |