The present disclosure relates generally to tunable magnetoelectric inductors with large inductance tunability and a method of manufacturing such inductors. The invention also relates to semiconductor devices containing tunable magnetoelectric inductors.
Incorporating tunability in conventional RF front-end components allows for the development of radio architectures capable of operating over multiple bands and standards, resulting in a reduction in cost, size, complexity, and power consumption of the radio transceiver. Front-end components such as tunable filters, phase shifters, voltage controlled oscillators, tunable low-noise amplifiers, and other RF components use on-chip and off-chip passive electronic components. Inductors, as one of the three fundamental components for electronic circuits, are extensively used in these front-end components as well as in other electronic applications. Tunable inductors, especially tunable inductors suitable for use in RF circuits, are key elements in creating intelligent, reconfigurable radios. While electronically tunable capacitors and resistors have been widely used for such tasks, electronically tunable inductors have not been readily available, despite the broad range of uses for such inductors.
Different technologies have been explored for tunable RF inductors, including inductors with magnetic materials where the permeability can be tuned by a magnetic field, inductors with magnetic materials where the permeability can be tuned by changing the coupling of the inductor coil and the magnetic core, inductors where the winding is digitally controlled via MEMS switches, mechanical tuning of mutual inductance between coupled inductors, varactor-based tunable inductors created by connecting a varactor with a fixed inductor so as to vary the bias voltage applied across the varactor and thus tuning the effective inductance, and manually tuned inductors. Each of these tunable inductor technologies has shortcomings that prevent general and widespread acceptance. Magnetic field tuning requires significant power and a constant current. Mechanical tuning requires large, complex actuators which are difficult to fabricate. Switchable inductors are limited by the number of switches used and the number of switches is limited as increasing this number reduces inductor quality. Varactor-tuned inductors have low quality factors and limited tunability. Manually tuned inductors are inconvenient to use. These negative aspects to currently available tunable inductors limit their usage.
An electrostatically tunable inductor with a wide range of tunable inductance that does not require complex mechanical actuators or switches and does not require significant consumption of power or an ongoing constant current draw is described.
In one or more embodiments, the electrostatically tunable inductor comprises a piezoelectric layer disposed above a substrate. Disposed above the piezoelectric layer is a magnetoelectric structure, comprising a first electrically conductive layer, a magnetic film layer adjacent to the first electrically conductive layer, and a second electrically conductive layer electrically connected to the first electrically conductive layer. A method of manufacture is also disclosed.
In one aspect, the electrostatically tunable inductor is manufactured by forming a piezoelectric layer disposed above a substrate. Disposed above the piezoelectric layer is a magnetoelectric structure, formed of a first electrically conductive layer, a magnetic film layer adjacent to the first electrically conductive layer, and a second electrically conductive layer electrically connected to the first electrically conductive layer.
The electrostatically tunable inductor is manufactured using techniques that are adapted from semiconductor manufacturing and allow the incorporation and/or integration of tunable inductor devices into semiconductor devices. In one or more embodiments, the tunable inductor is incorporated into the semiconductor device during the manufacture and assembly of the device.
The above and other objects and advantages of the present invention will be apparent upon consideration of the following detailed description, taken in conjunction with the accompanying drawings, in which like reference characters refer to like parts throughout, and in which:
The present disclosure provides for tunable magnetoelectric inductors with large inductance tunability and improved performance over the prior art. Additionally, the present disclosure provides for a method of manufacturing such an inductor suitable for integration into standard semiconductor manufacturing processes. Unlike other tunable inductors, the electrostatically tunable magnetoelectric inductor of this disclosure displays a tunable inductance range of >5:1 while consuming less than 0.5 mJ of power in the process of tuning, does not require continual current to maintain tuning, and does not require complex mechanical components such as actuators or switches.
A magnetoelectric inductor 200 according to one or more embodiments is described with reference to
After deposition, the magnetic film is magnetically annealed to align magnetic domains and patterned to enhance the permeability of the material. In one or more embodiments, each of the layers in the magnetoelectric inductor are spaced apart from one another by an isolation layer. This structure leads to enhanced tunable inductance range and quality factor over previous tunable inductors integrated into semiconductor devices.
In some embodiments, recesses 107 are formed in the second isolation layer. The recesses 107 are formed so at penetrate the second isolation layer 106 and expose a surface of the first electrically conducting layer 104. While two recesses 107 are shown in device 100, any number of recesses may be used for a particular device (e.g., 1, 3, etc.). A second electrically conducting layer 108 is above at least part of the second isolation layer 106, and is so placed as to fill the at least one recess 107 and contact the first electrically conducting layer 104. In some embodiments, the second electrically conducting layer 108 is patterned. In some embodiments, the patterning of the first electrically conducting layer 104 and the second electrically conducting layer 108 are arranged, in combination with the arrangement of the recesses 107, so as to form at least one coil around the magnetic film layer 109. In some embodiments, a portion of the substrate 101 below the piezoelectric layer is thinner than the portion of the substrate not below the piezoelectric layer 109 in order to maximize the deformation of the piezoelectric layer for a given induced electric field.
Further, the configurations shown in
In some embodiments, the substrate layer 101 is composed of silicon. In other embodiments, it may be composed of gallium arsenide, gallium nitride, sapphire, or another substrate material. In some embodiments, the piezoelectric layer 102 is a layer of lead zirconate titanate (PZT) of about 1 to 20 μm thickness, placed on the substrate. Doping of these lead zirconatc-titanatc ceramics (PZT) with, for example, Ni, Bi, Sb, Nb ions etc., make it possible to adjust individual piezoelectric and dielectric parameters as required. Other exemplary piezoelectric materials include PMN-PT (lead manganese niobate-lead titanate), PZN-PT (lead zinc niobate-lead titanate), BaTiO3, (Ba,Sr)TiO3, ZnO, and AlN. In some embodiments, the layer of lead zirconate titanate is composed of lead zirconate titanate with a ratio of about 52 parts zircon to 48 parts titanium. In other embodiments, the piezoelectric layer 102 is a layer of lead magnesium niobate-lead titanate. In some embodiments, the layer of lead magnesium niobate-lead titanate is composed of lead magnesium niobate-lead titanate with a ratio of about 65 parts lead magnesium niobate to 35 parts lead titanate. In some embodiments, the layer of lead zirconate titanate is of a thickness of about 5 to 10 μm. In some embodiments, the first isolation layer 103 and second isolation layer 106 are composed of silicon dioxide. In some embodiments, the first electrically conducting layer 104 and second electrically conducting layer 108 are composed of copper. Exemplary magnetic materials or magnetic/non-magnetic insulator multilayers include those having high permeability, low loss tangent, and high resistivity. In some embodiments, the magnetic film layer 105 is composed of Metglas 2605CO™. In other embodiments, the magnetic film layer 105 is composed of galfenol, terfenol, CoFeB, CoFeN, CoFe, or ferrites with a thickness based on the inductance required and the magnetoelectric strain change of the material.
A method of manufacturing an electrostatically tunable magnetoelectric inductor with large inductance tunability is also disclosed. As shown in
Then, as shown in
In some embodiments, as shown in
As shown in
where Ha is the intrinsic anisotropy, HME is the induced anisotropy field due to magnetoelectric coupling, λs is the saturation magnetostriction constant, Y is the Young's modulus, d31 is the piezoelectric coefficient of the piezoelectric layer, E is the electric field across the piezoelectric layer, and Ms is the saturation magnetization of the magnetic layer. The converse magnetoelectric coupling coefficient is thus expressed by the following equation:
From the effective magnetic anisotropy, the effective relative permeability of the magnetic film layer can be expressed as:
where N is the number of turns of coil around the magnetic film layer, A is the cross-sectional area of the coil around the magnetic film layer, l is the length of the coil around the magnetic film layer, t is the thickness of the magnetic film layer, and d is the height of the magnetic film layer. Because effective magnetic anisotropy varies with induced electric field across the piezoelectric, effective relative permeability varies with effective magnetic anisotropy, and inductance varies with effective relative permeability, application of an electric field across the piezoelectric layer produces variation in inductance, enabling tunability of the magnetoelectric inductor. A strong electric field dependence of the inductance can be observed, with inductance decreasing rapidly at higher electric fields.
A high converse magnetoelectric coupling coefficient is desirable for achieving large tunability in tunable magnetoelectric inductors. Piezoelectric materials with a high piezoelectric coefficient and magnetic materials with a high saturation magnetostriction constant and low saturation magnetization are desirable to achieve a stronger converse magnetoelectric coupling coefficient and thus a greater tunable inductance range. It is also desirable that the magnetic material have a low loss tangent in order to improve the quality factor Q of the tunable inductor. Quality factor also varies with application of electric field, as the reduced permeability achieved at higher electric fields leads to increased skin depth and reduced core eddy current loss in combination with the increased peak quality factor frequency, also due to reduced permeability. At lower frequencies, inductance tunability is much greater as eddy current loss is not significant.
Tuning of the electrostatically tunable magnetoelectric inductor 100 is thus accomplished by deformation of the piezoelectric layer 102 via an electric field across the piezoelectric layer. Deformation of the piezoelectric layer 102 induces a deformation of the magnetic film layer 105. Deformation of the magnetic film layer 105 then leads to an effective magnetic anisotropy field due to the inverse magnetoelastic effect. This anisotropy field leads to a change in relative permeability of the magnetic film layer 105 and thus to a change in inductance L of the electrostatically tunable magnetoelectric inductor 100 as per equations 1-4 above. The inductance L of the electrostatically tunable magnetoelectric inductor 100 varies as per equation 4 above directly as a function of the relative permeability of the magnetic film layer 105, which can be calculated by equation 3, where Ms is the saturation magnetization of the magnetic film layer 105 and Heff is the total effective anisotropy field in the magnetic film layer 105. Thus inducing deformation of the piezoelectric layer 102 leads to tuning of the inductance of the electrostatically tunable magnetoelectric inductor 100. A tunable inductance range of >5:1 with low power consumption is achieved.
Deformation of the piezoelectric layer 102 within the device is advantageously achieved by taking advantage of the capacitive properties of the piezoelectric layer 102. An applied voltage across the piezoelectric layer 102 can lead to a piezoelectric strain, which leads to a strain in the magnetic material, and therefore a change of the permeability. The electrical energy required to induce an applied voltage can be estimated from the energy associated with charging a piezoelectric capacitor, expressed as E=½ CV2, where C is the capacitance associated with the piezoelectric layer and V is the voltage to be induced across the piezoelectric layer. The stored electrical energy induces a voltage across the thickness of the piezoelectric layer 102 corresponding to an electric field across the piezoelectric layer 102 dependent on the thickness of the piezoelectric layer 102 and the voltage. The induced electric field deforms the piezoelectric layer 102 via the piezoelectric effect. By varying the stored charge, the induced electric field varies, which in turn varies the relative permeability. Variation of relative permeability allows tuning of inductance. As charge leakage from the piezoelectric layer 102 can be made negligibly small, tuning does not require the continual induction of an electric field but rather can be accomplished by one time induction of a charge across the piezoelectric layer.
Upon review of the description and embodiments of the present invention, those skilled in the art will understand that modifications and equivalent substitutions may be performed in carrying out the invention without departing from the essence of the invention. Thus, the invention is not meant to be limiting by the embodiments described explicitly above, and is limited only by the claims which follow.
The present application is a divisional of and claims priority to U.S. patent application Ser. No. 14/241,032, entitled “ELECTROSTATICALLY TUNABLE MAGNETOLECTRIC INDUCTORS WITH LARGE INDUCTANCE TUNABILITY”, filed Feb. 25, 2014, which in turn is a national stage entry of and claims priority to PCT/US2012/51579, entitled “ELECTROSTATICALLY TUNABLE MAGNETOLECTRIC INDUCTORS WITH LARGE INDUCTANCE TUNABILITY” filed Aug. 20, 2012, which in turn claims priority to and benefit of U.S. Provisional Application 61/524,913, entitled “ELECTROSTATICALLY TUNABLE MAGNETOLECTRIC INDUCTORS WITH LARGE INDUCTANCE TUNABILITY AND IMPROVED PERFORMANCE” all of which are incorporated herein by reference in their entirety.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3614554 | Shield et al. | Oct 1971 | A |
3858138 | Gittleman et al. | Dec 1974 | A |
6037649 | Liou | Mar 2000 | A |
6042707 | Moslehi | Mar 2000 | A |
6065353 | Hirabayashi et al. | May 2000 | A |
6759727 | Ju | Jul 2004 | B2 |
7144101 | Ifuku et al. | Dec 2006 | B2 |
7146861 | Cook et al. | Dec 2006 | B1 |
7170384 | Kim et al. | Jan 2007 | B2 |
7250831 | Song et al. | Jul 2007 | B2 |
7262680 | Wang | Aug 2007 | B2 |
7310029 | Robert et al. | Dec 2007 | B2 |
7608975 | Orlando | Oct 2009 | B2 |
7694551 | Jakoby | Apr 2010 | B2 |
7800278 | Ujihara et al. | Sep 2010 | B2 |
8134444 | Horiuchi et al. | Mar 2012 | B2 |
8143987 | Kireev | Mar 2012 | B2 |
8797711 | Matsumoto et al. | Aug 2014 | B2 |
20020104990 | Dereus et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20030000058 | Tsai et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030021004 | Cunningham et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20050028336 | Robert et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20060091608 | Yercha et al. | May 2006 | A1 |
20060256167 | Ifuku et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20070045773 | Mi et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20080068759 | Orlando et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080303624 | Yamada et al. | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20090189486 | Matsuki | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090243780 | Inoue | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090277300 | Matsuki | Nov 2009 | A1 |
20100277037 | Fukano | Nov 2010 | A1 |
20110128602 | Hamano et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110205173 | Arai | Aug 2011 | A1 |
20110234351 | Kawarai et al. | Sep 2011 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
08288143 | Nov 1996 | JP |
11040427 | Feb 1999 | JP |
2000296612 | Oct 2000 | JP |
Entry |
---|
Machine Translation of Japanese Patent Publication, JP 2000-296612, (English), Apr. 2019. |
Chinese Office Action on Appln. Ser. No. 2012800511951 dated Jun. 2, 2016 (6 pages). |
Chinese Office Action on Appln. Ser. No. 2012800511951 dated Nov. 3, 2015 (20 pages). |
International Preliminary Report on Patentability on Appln. Ser. No. PCT/US2012/051579 dated Feb. 18, 2014 (6 pages). |
International Search Report & Written Opinion on Appln. Ser. No. PCT/US2012/051579 dated Nov. 2, 2012 (7 pages). |
Third Chinese Office Action on Appln. Ser. No. 201280051195.1 dated Oct. 25, 2016 (16 pages). |
U.S. Notice of Allowance on U.S. Appl. No. 14/241,032 dated Feb. 24, 2017 (9 pages). |
U.S. Office Action on U.S. Appl. No. 14/241,032 dated Apr. 26, 2016 (11 pages). |
U.S. Office Action on U.S. Appl. No. 14/241,032 dated Jul. 27, 2016 (11 pages). |
U.S. Office Action on U.S. Appl. No. 14/241,032 dated Sep. 22, 2015 (11 pages). |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20180075966 A1 | Mar 2018 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61524913 | Aug 2011 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 14241032 | US | |
Child | 15603816 | US |