A number of non-invasive imaging approaches are known and are presently in use. One such type of system is based upon the detection of X-rays or other radiation that has passed through a volume of interest. The radiation traverses the volume, and whatever materials occupy the volume, and impact a film or a digital detector. In medical diagnostic contexts, for example, such systems may be used to visualize internal tissues and diagnose patient ailments. In other contexts, parts, baggage, parcels, and other materials may be imaged to assess their contents or for other purposes, such as for quality review in a manufacturing context.
Increasingly, such non-invasive imaging or inspection systems use digital circuitry, such as solid-state detectors, for detecting the radiation of interest. Such solid-state detectors may generate electrical signals indicative of the incident radiation on the detector, which in turn is indicative of the attenuation or scatter of the radiation along different ray paths through the imaged volume. The generated signals may in turn be processed to reconstruct images of the subject or object of interest within the volume, including internal features of an object or patient within the imaged volume.
Such solid-state or digital detectors may be portable and may be used in place of older detection systems (including film based detection systems) as a means of upgrading an existing system. In addition, in newer systems, a variety of portable detectors may be provided and used interchangeably with different systems, such that no one detector is fixed to or dedicated for use with a particular imaging system.
One drawback to a detector being portable and transportable is that the detector becomes subject to being dropped or damaged while being moved about a facility or between inspection or imaging locations. Further, to the extent that a portable digital detector is designed as a replacement for an existing detector implementation, the portable digital detector may be designed to conform to a form-factor or industry standard size associated with the existing detection scheme. In such a context, the space available within the detector to provide shock absorption or other physical protection of internal components may be limited due to adherence to the standardized size or shape of detector system being replaced.
In accordance with one embodiment, a portable radiation detector is provided. The portable radiation detector comprises an enclosure, a support layer comprising a plurality of mounting holes, and a respective elastomeric structure positioned within each mounting hole. In addition, the portable radiation detector comprises a respective fastener positioned within each elastomeric structure and secured to the enclosure such that the support layer is fastened to the enclosure. A detector array is mounted on the support layer and readout electronics communicatively coupled to the detector array.
In accordance with a further embodiment, a portable radiation detector is provided. The portable radiation detector comprises an enclosure and an elastomeric strip disposed around at least a portion of an outer perimeter of the enclosure. In addition, the portable radiation detector comprises a support layer fastened to the enclosure, a detector array mounted on the support layer, and readout electronics communicatively coupled to the detector array.
In accordance with an additional embodiment, a cover for a portable radiation detector is provided. The cover comprises an elastomeric cover configured to be removably applied to an enclosure of a portable radiation detector. The elastomeric cover, when applied, covers at least a portion of an outer perimeter of the enclosure.
These and other features, aspects, and advantages of the present disclosure will become better understood when the following detailed description is read with reference to the accompanying drawings in which like characters represent like parts throughout the drawings, wherein:
When introducing elements of various embodiments of the present disclosed subject matter, the articles “a,” “an,” “the,” and “said” are intended to mean that there are one or more of the elements. The terms “comprising,” “including,” and “having” are intended to be inclusive and mean that there may be additional elements other than the listed elements. Moreover, while the term “exemplary” may be used herein in connection to certain examples of aspects or embodiments of the presently disclosed technique, it will be appreciated that these examples are illustrative in nature and that the term “exemplary” is not used herein to denote any preference or requirement with respect to a disclosed aspect or embodiment. Further, any use of the terms “top,” “bottom,” “above,” “below,” other positional terms, and variations of these terms is made for convenience, but does not require any particular orientation of the described components.
As discussed herein, portable digital radiation detectors (such as detectors suitable for detecting X-rays, gamma rays, radioactive isotopes, and so forth) may be provided with different forms and degrees of mechanical shock protection. In particular, a portable detector as discussed herein may be subject to various size constraints, such as when the portable detector is constructed to replace an existing size class or category of detection systems, such as film-based detector cassettes in one example. However, even when not envisioned as a replacement for existing detector systems, it may be desirable to construct the portable detector to be as thin as possible and/or to minimize the distance between the edge and active area of the portable detector (i.e., to maximize the surface area available for radiation detection).
However, there may be a tradeoff between these desirable size constraints and the ruggedness of the portable detector. Indeed, due to the portable nature of the detector, it may be desirable to construct the portable detector such that it is sufficiently rugged to survive the mechanical shock of being dropped from a height typically associated with use or transport, e.g., 3-5 feet. However, since motion is typically associated with mechanical shock absorption (i.e., the components being protected should move relative to the external enclosure or housing in some way), the limited space envelope associated with a portable detector may constrain the ability to provide mechanical shock absorption. The various implementations of portable detectors discussed herein address one or more of these challenges.
In particular, one or more specific embodiments of a mechanically rugged portable detector will be described below. In an effort to provide a concise description of these embodiments, all features of an actual implementation may not be described in the specification. It should be appreciated that in the development of any such actual implementation, as in any engineering or design project, numerous implementation-specific decisions must be made to achieve the developers' specific goals, such as compliance with system-related and business-related constraints, which may vary from one implementation to another. Moreover, it should be appreciated that such a development effort might be complex and time consuming, but would nevertheless be a routine undertaking of design, fabrication, and manufacture for those of ordinary skill having the benefit of this disclosure.
With the foregoing comments in mind and turning to
In the embodiment illustrated in
A portion of the radiation 20 passes through or around the subject and impacts a portable digital radiation detector, represented generally at reference numeral 22. In the context of an X-ray based imaging or inspection system, the portable detector 22 may convert the X-ray photons incident on its surface to lower energy photons, and subsequently to electric signals, which are acquired and processed to reconstruct an image of the features within the subject. In other radiation detection contexts, the incident radiation may be converted to lower energy photons that may then be detected or, in a direct conversion implementation, the incident radiation itself may be measured without an intermediary conversion process.
In one example of an imaging or inspection system 10, the source 12 of radiation is a controlled source, which may be powered and/or controlled by a power supply/control circuit 24 which supplies both power and control signals for examination sequences. An example of one such controlled implementation is depicted in
In one example, the portable detector 22 is communicatively coupled to a detector controller 26 which commands acquisition of the signals generated in the portable detector 22. In the depicted example, the portable detector 22 communicates wirelessly with the detector controller 26 via a suitable wireless communication standard. In other embodiments, the portable detector 22 can communicate with the detector controller 26 over a wire or cable. In one implementation, the detector controller 26 may be implemented on a laptop computer or other suitable processor-based system suitable for communicating with the portable detector 22. For example, in certain implementations the detector controller 26 and/or other components of the system 10 may be implemented on or as part of a processor-based system, such as a desktop, laptop, or tablet computer platform.
In one embodiment, the detector controller 26 may be a handheld device or controller that allows a user to control operation of the portable detector 22, such as to place the detector 22 in a receptive state where incident radiation on the detector 22 may be measured or in a standby or idle state when an image operation is not currently being performed or is not imminent. In such implementations, the detector controller 26 may be controlled by a user, without further communication with the other components of the system 10. In other embodiments, the detector controller 26 may communicate with a system controller 28 and/or other components of the system 10, discussed below, to coordinate operation and readout of the portable detector 22 with the operation of the other components of the system 10.
In implementations in which a controlled source 12 is present, the respective power supply/control circuit 24 is responsive to signals from a system controller 28. In some implementations, the detector controller 26 may also be responsive to signals from the system controller 28. In general, the system controller 28 commands operation of the system 10 to execute examination protocols and, in some instances, to process acquired image data. For example, in some embodiments the system controller 28 may include signal processing circuitry, typically based upon a programmed general purpose or application-specific digital computer; and associated manufactures, such as optical memory devices, magnetic memory devices, or solid-state memory devices, for storing programs and routines executed by a processor of the computer to carry out various functionalities, as well as for storing configuration parameters and image data; interface protocols; and so forth. In one embodiment, a general or special purpose computer system may be provided with hardware, circuitry, firmware, and/or software for performing the functions attributed to one or more of the power supply/control circuit 24, the detector controller 26, and/or the system controller 28 as discussed herein.
In the embodiment illustrated in
With the foregoing discussion of imaging systems in mind, it should be appreciated that such systems may be used in conjunction with a portable detector 22, as discussed herein. One example of an embodiment of a portable detector 22 is generally illustrated in
In one embodiment, operating power may be provided to the portable detector 22 via a removable or non-removable battery (see
Turning to
For example, turning to
In a further implementation, the portable detector 22 may be provided with an elastomeric strip 120 (i.e., a strip having a Shore A durometer between 40-70 inclusive) around the edge of the enclosure 90. In one such embodiment, an elastomeric strip 120 that is approximately 3 mm to 5 mm (e.g. 4 mm) thick is positioned on the outside edge of the enclosure 90 and either fully surrounds the portable detector 22 on all four edges or partially surrounds the portable detector 22, such as at the corners only. In certain implementations, the elastomeric strip 120 may extend to cover one or both faces of the portable detector 22 at the edges.
Turning to
In practice, the elastomeric cover 130 may be applied to the portable detector 22 for transport or storage of the detector 22 and may be removed from the portable detector 22 when the portable detector 22 is to be used. In this manner, a suitable (i.e., short) distance between the edge and active area of the portable detector 22 may be maintained. In one embodiment, the elastomeric cover 130 may be stretched over the portable detector 22 on application. In other embodiments, the elastomeric cover may be applied in other manners, such as a clip-on or latch on case, a strapped-on enclosure, a clamshell enclosure and so forth. For example, in certain implementations the elastomeric cover 13 may be assembled over the enclosure 90 from two or more pieces by engaging complementary latches, slotted connectors or clips, fitted connections, or friction fits of the separate constituent pieces of the cover 130. Conversely, the elastomeric cover 130 may be removed, in such implementations, by disengaging the respective connection structures and separating the constituent pieces of the cover 130.
With the foregoing discussion in mind,
Turning to
This written description uses examples to disclose the present subject matter, including the best mode, and also to enable any person skilled in the art to practice the disclosed subject matter, including making and using any devices or systems and performing any incorporated methods. The patentable scope is defined by the claims, and may include other examples that occur to those skilled in the art. Such other examples are intended to be within the scope of the claims if they have structural elements that do not differ from the literal language of the claims, or if they include equivalent structural elements with insubstantial differences from the literal languages of the claims.