Mechanical teleoperated device comprising an interchangeable distal instrument

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 10265129
  • Patent Number
    10,265,129
  • Date Filed
    Monday, January 26, 2015
    9 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, April 23, 2019
    5 years ago
  • Inventors
  • Original Assignees
  • Examiners
    • Boes; Terence
    Agents
    • Foley & Lardner LLP
    • Bolten; Christopher C.
    • Pisano; Nicola A.
Abstract
Disclosed is a mechanical teleoperated device comprising i) a handle (30) placed in a proximal part of the device, having a plurality of handle links interconnected by respective handle joints, ii) an end effector (31) placed in a distal part of the device, having a plurality of end-effector links interconnected by respective end-effector joints, iii) a transmission system arranged to kinematically connect the end effector to the handle such that movements of the end effector correspond to movements of the handle, comprising at least one arrangement of a plurality of rotatable elements (41a-d) coaxially mounted together about an axis and arranged to rotate independently from each other, b) first transmission means comprising driving elements (62a-c) which are arranged to actuate in rotation of the plurality of rotatable elements (41a-d) based upon movements of the handle, c) second transmission means comprising driven elements (63a-c) which are arranged to be driven by rotation of the plurality of rotatable elements resulting in movement of the end effector links, wherein the transmission system is configured for removably coupling together the first and second transmission means wherein each driven element is removably coupled to one corresponding rotatable element.
Description
CROSS-REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS

This application is a national phase of International PCT Patent Application No. PCT/EP2015/051473, filed Jan. 26, 2015, which claims priority to Switzerland Patent Application No. CH00408/14, filed Mar. 18, 2014, EPO Patent Application No. 14159025.7, filed Mar. 12, 2014, and Switzerland Patent Application No. CH00138/14, filed Feb. 3, 2014, the entire contents of each of which are incorporated herein by reference.


FIELD OF THE INVENTION

The present invention relates to the field of remotely actuated mechanical systems. In particular embodiments, the invention relates to a mechanical teleoperated device for use primarily in surgical procedures and comprising an interchangeable distal instrument. Certain embodiments have particular applicability in minimally invasive surgical procedures. The present invention is also suitable for any remotely actuated application requiring dexterous manipulation with high stiffness and precision along with force feedback. Examples of such applications include assembly manipulation, manipulation in narrow places, manipulation in dangerous or difficult environments, and manipulation in contaminated or clean-room environments.


BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

Numerous environments and applications call for remote actuation with mechanically teleoperated devices. These applications include fine manipulation in assembly tasks, manipulation in narrow places, manipulation in dangerous or contaminated environments, manipulation in clean-room or sterile environments and manipulation in surgical environments, whether open field or minimally invasive. While these applications vary along parameters such as precise tolerances and typical end user, each demands many of the same features from a mechanically teleoperated system, such as the ability to carry out dexterous manipulation with high stiffness and precision along with force feedback.


Surgical applications are now discussed in more detail as a representative example of an application for a mechanically teleoperated device system where known devices exist but significant shortcomings are evident in the current state of the art.


Open surgery is still the standard technique for most surgical procedures. It has been used by the medical community for several decades and consists of performing the surgical tasks by making a long incision in the abdomen or other area of the body, through which traditional surgical tools are inserted. However, due to the long incision, this approach is extremely invasive for patients, resulting in substantial blood loss during surgery and, typically, long and painful recovery periods in a hospital setting.


In order to reduce the invasiveness of open surgery, laparoscopy, a minimally invasive technique, was developed. Instead of a single long incision, several small incisions are made in the patient through which long and thin surgical instruments and endoscopic cameras are inserted. Because of the minimally invasive nature of the procedure, this technique reduces blood loss and pain and shortens hospital stays. When performed by experienced surgeons, this technique can attain clinical outcomes similar to open surgery. However, despite the above-mentioned advantages, laparoscopy requires extremely advanced surgical skill to manipulate the rigid and long instrumentation. The entry incision acts as a point of rotation, decreasing the freedom for positioning and orientating the instruments inside the patient. The movements of the surgeon's hand about this incision are inverted and scaled-up relative to the instrument tip (“fulcrum effect”), which reduces dexterity and sensitivity and magnifies the tremors of the surgeon hands. In addition, the long and straight instruments force the surgeon to work in an uncomfortable posture for hands, arms and body, which can be tremendously tiring during several hours of an operation. Therefore, due to these drawbacks of laparoscopic instrumentation, these minimally invasive techniques are mainly limited to use in simple surgeries, while only a small minority of surgeons is able to use them in complex procedures.


To overcome these limitations, surgical robotic systems were developed to provide an easier-to-use approach to complex minimally invasive surgeries. By means of a computerized robotic interface, these systems enable the performance of remote laparoscopy where the surgeon sits at a console manipulating two master manipulators to perform the operation through several small incisions. Like laparoscopy, the robotic approach is also minimally invasive, bringing the above-mentioned advantages over open surgery in terms of pain, blood loss, and recovery time. In addition, it also offers better ergonomy for the surgeon compared to open and laparoscopic techniques. However, although being technically easier, robotic surgery brings several negative aspects. A major disadvantage of these systems relates to the extremely high complexity of the existing robotic devices, which comprise complex mechatronic systems, leading to huge costs of acquisition and maintenance, which are not affordable for the majority of surgical departments worldwide. Another drawback of these systems comes from the fact that current surgical robots are large, competing for precious space within the operating room environment and significantly increasing preparation time. Access to the patient is thus impaired, which, together with a general lack of force-feedback, raises safety concerns.


WO9743942, WO9825666 and U.S.2010011900 disclose a robotic tele-operated surgical instrument, designed to replicate surgeons' hand movements inside the patient's body. By means of a computerized, robotic interface, it enables the performance of remote laparoscopy, wherein the surgeon sits at a console manipulating two joysticks to perform the operation through several small incisions. However, this system does not have autonomy or artificial intelligence, being essentially a sophisticated tool fully controlled by the surgeon. The control commands are transmitted between the robotic master and robotic slave by a complex computer-controlled mechatronic system, which is extremely costly to produce and maintain and difficult to use for the hospital staff.


WO2012049623 describes a mechanical manipulator for surgical instruments with a master-slave configuration and including remote actuation of a distal end effector. However, the system described therein does not provide for an interchangeable instrument.


WO2013014621 describes a mechanical teleoperated device for remote manipulation which comprises master-slave configuration including a slave unit driven by a kinematically equivalent master unit such that each part of the slave unit mimics the movement of each corresponding part of the master unit. Although the mechanical transmission system is well adapted to the device, cables passing through an axial joint are twisted when the device is operating, which can force the cables to rub against each other. This increases wear on the cables over time and increases friction in the overall mechanical transmission.


Accordingly, an aim of the present invention is to provide a mechanical teleoperated device comprising an interchangeable distal instrument. This device could be designed for use in a surgical environment such that the interchangeable distal instruments would be surgical instruments. However, one of skill in the art will realize that the device could also be deployed in other applications where complex, remote manipulation is required and wherein interchangeable instruments would be useful for different manipulation tasks.


Another aim of the present invention is to provide a mechanical teleoperated system with an improved transmission system. In such a system, the transmission system, and particularly the joints, would be designed such that cables do not rub against each other, thus reducing wear and tear.


SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

These aims and other advantages are achieved through a mechanical teleoperated device for remote manipulation designed to naturally replicate the operator's hand movements in the distal area where the manipulation must occur. The mechanical teleoperated device may comprise a slave unit, configured to be driven by a master unit, which is preferably kinematically equivalent to the slave unit. The slave unit has a plurality of slave links interconnected by respective slave joints and comprises a proximal part and a distal part (also referred to as a distal instrument) connected distally to one of the slave joints, referred to as the interface slave joint. More particularly, this interface slave joint of the slave unit may have a coaxial configuration, connecting a proximal and a distal link of the slave unit in such a manner that these two adjoining links are axially rotatable with respect to each other about the axis of the coaxial joint. The master unit comprises a plurality of master links interconnected by respective master joints, and a corresponding interface master joint.


An articulated handle is connected to the master unit for operating the mechanical teleoperated device and an articulated end-effector is connected to the distal extremity of the distal instrument. The mechanical teleoperated device further comprises a transmission system arranged to kinematically connect the equivalent degrees-of-freedom of the master and slave units, including the degrees-of-freedom of the end-effector to the degrees-of-freedom of the handle such that said end-effector replicates the movements of the handle when the mechanical teleoperated device is operated.


The transmission system comprises (i) at least one arrangement of a plurality of rotatable elements coaxially mounted together and coaxial to the axis of the interface slave joint of the slave unit and arranged to rotate independently from each other; (ii) first transmission means integrated into the proximal part of the slave unit and comprising driving cables or the like which are arranged to actuate in rotation each one of the rotatable elements of the said at least one arrangement; and (iii) second transmission means integrated into the distal instrument and comprising driven cables or the like which are arranged to be driven by the rotation of each one of the corresponding rotatable elements of the at least one arrangement of a plurality of rotatable elements.


The transmission system according to the invention is advantageously configured for removably coupling together the first and second transmission means of the respective proximal and distal parts of the slave unit. In this arrangement, each driven cable of said second transmission means is removably connected, by means of additional elements, to one corresponding rotatable element of said at least one arrangement of a plurality of rotatable elements in order to provide a user-friendly interchangeable and modular tooling/instrument system for use with the mechanical teleoperated device.


According to one embodiment of the invention, a segment of each driven cable of the second transmission means is removably connected to one corresponding rotatable element of the at least one arrangement of a plurality of rotatable elements. Each of these segments is guided along a path within a plane which is substantially perpendicular to the axis about which the rotatable elements of the at least one arrangement of a plurality of rotatable elements are able to rotate. This path preferably extends along a circular trajectory, whose center point is coincident with the rotatable elements' axis.


According to another embodiment of the invention, each driven cable of said second transmission means is anchored to a mating receptacle pivotally mounted about the axis of the interface slave joint of the slave unit. Each corresponding rotatable element of the at least one arrangement of a plurality of rotatable elements comprises a complementary mating part removably mounted inside the corresponding mating receptacle.


According to a further embodiment of the invention, each complementary mating part is mounted on a pointer which is connected to one corresponding rotatable element. These pointers are able to rotate around the axis of the interface slave joint and may be angularly offset from each other so that their angular amplitude of movement allows the full-range actuation of the end-effector articulations.


According to a further embodiment of the invention, the mating receptacles and corresponding mating parts are housed inside a slave housing. The slave housing comprises two complementary housing parts removably mounted against each other. Said mating receptacles are mounted inside one complementary housing part which is connected to the distal part of the slave unit whereas said complementary mating parts are mounted inside the other complementary housing part which is connected to the proximal part of the slave unit.


According to another embodiment of the invention, the transmission system comprises two arrangements of a plurality of rotatable elements, wherein rotatable elements of the first arrangement are coaxially mounted together so that each one is able to rotate about the axis of an interface slave joint of the slave unit, and wherein rotatable elements of the second arrangement are coaxially mounted together to rotate about each other, being collinear with the axis of an interface master joint of the master unit. In this configuration, each driving cable of the first transmission means is connected to one rotatable element of the first arrangement of the slave unit and to one corresponding rotatable element of the second arrangement of the master unit such that rotation of each rotatable element of said second arrangement rotates the corresponding rotatable element of said first arrangement.


According to yet another embodiment of the invention, two or more teleoperated devices, as defined above, can be set to work together, enabling the user to perform bi-manual manipulation. In addition, two or more telemanipulators can be mounted on a movable and articulated station, so that they can be easily moved on the ground from one place to the other and their working position and orientation can be tuned in the 3D space.





BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE FIGURES

The invention will be better understood according to the following detailed description of several embodiments of the invention with reference to the attached figures, in which:



FIG. 1 shows a perspective view of a mechanical teleoperated device according to the invention;



FIG. 2 shows a schematic view of the transmission system of the mechanical teleoperated device of FIG. 1;



FIG. 3 shows a schematic view of the transmission system of FIG. 1 comprising first, second and third transmission means;



FIGS. 4, 5 and 6 show a schematic view of the transmission system for the transmission of each degree-of-freedom of the handle to the end-effector;



FIG. 7 shows a perspective view of a detachable distal instrument;



FIG. 8 shows a perspective view of a lower part of the slave housing of the first arrangement of the transmission system containing mating receptacles;



FIG. 9 shows a perspective view of the guiding means of the slave housing of FIG. 8;



FIG. 10 shows an upper part of the slave housing containing complementary mating parts arranged to be removably mounted inside the corresponding mating receptacle of FIG. 8;



FIGS. 11a, 11b and 11c show three different views of the distal part coupling with the proximal part of the slave unit of the mechanical teleoperated device of FIG. 1, and



FIG. 12 shows an exemplary embodiment comprising two identical mechanical teleoperated devices of FIG. 1 mounted on an articulated and movable station, namely a mechanical telemanipulator for surgical procedures.





DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION

A mechanical telemanipulator, which may be used in minimally invasive surgical procedures or in other applications, constructed in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention, is described herein, and is seen generally in FIG. 12. This manipulator comprises preferably two identical mechanical teleoperated devices, as shown for example in FIG. 1, mounted on an articulated and movable station 110 (FIG. 12) and configured to be operated independently from the other. Each mechanical teleoperated device of FIG. 1, as conceptually described in WO2013/014621, comprises, on the one hand, a master-slave configuration, having a slave unit 10 driven by a kinematically equivalent master unit 20 and, on the other hand, mechanical constraint means 90 such that each part of the slave unit 10 mimics the movement of each corresponding part of the master unit 20 without deviating, during operation of the device, from a remote-center-of-motion (RCM) as shown in FIG. 3. However, in other embodiments of the current invention, the mechanical teleoperated device may not have a remote-center-of-motion (RCM). Given that the two mechanical teleoperated devices are structurally and functionally identical, the description hereafter will refer to one mechanical teleoperated device only as shown particularly in FIGS. 1 to 6.


Referring more particularly to FIG. 3, the slave unit 10 comprises a plurality of slave links 11, 12, 13, 14 interconnected by respective slave joints 16, 17, 18, 19. An articulated end-effector 31 is mounted at the distal end of the slave link 14 which is rotatably connected to the adjoining link 13 through an coaxial joint 19 such that the two adjoining links 13, 14 are coaxially rotatable with respect to each other about the axis of the axial joint 19. The remaining slave joints 16, 17, 18 of the slave unit 10 are of the type of so-called pivot-joint which connects two adjoining links (e.g. pivot joint 17 connecting link 12 with link 13) in order to be angularly actuable with respect to each other within a plane perpendicular to the axis of rotation of said pivot-joint. The master unit 20 comprises a structural and kinematic configuration identical to the slave unit 10. More particularly, the master unit 20 comprises a corresponding plurality of master links 21, 22, 23, 24 interconnected by respective master joints 26, 27, 28, 29. One of these joints is a coaxial joint 29 while the other joints are pivot-joints 26, 27, 28. An articulated handle 30 is connected at the distal end of a master link 24 of the master unit 20 for operating the mechanical teleoperated device.


Upward and downward movements applied to the handle 30 by the operator when the mechanical teleoperated device is in the neutral position of FIG. 3 translate the master link 24 along its longitudinal axis through the mechanical constraint means 90 whereas frontward and backward movements applied on the handle rotate the master link 24 about an axis parallel to the axis of each pivot-joint. Each one of these movements or a combination thereof generates angular displacement of the master joints 26, 27, 28, 29 of the master unit 20 wherein said angular displacement of each master joint causes, through mechanical transmission, an identical angular displacement of the corresponding slave joint 16, 17, 18, 19 of the slave unit 10. The kinematic connection between each pivot-joint 26, 27, 28 of the master unit 20 with the corresponding pivot joint 16, 17, 18 of the slave unit 10, is achieved by pulley-routed cables which are each arranged to be anchored to two corresponding pulleys rotatably mounted around a shaft whose axis is coincident with the axis the corresponding pivot-joint. Kinematic connections between each pivot-joint 16, 17, 18 of the slave unit 10 with the corresponding pivot-joint 26, 27, 28 of the master unit 20 are described in more details in the aforementioned PCT application (WO2013/014621). In this configuration, the kinematic model of the chain formed by the plurality of slave links 11, 12, 13, 14 and respective slave joints 16, 17, 18, 19 of the slave unit 10 is identical to the kinematic model of the chain formed by the plurality of master links 21, 22, 23, 24 and respective master joints 26, 27, 28, 29 of the mater unit 20.


As schematically shown in FIG. 2, the handle 30 is configured to actuate three degrees-of-freedom of the end effector 31 by a transmission system adapted to kinematically connect three pulleys 30a, 30b, 30c of the handle 30 with three corresponding pulley 31a, 31b, 31c of the end-effector 31. In this way, angular displacement of each pulley of the handle 30, when the teleoperated surgical device is operating, is replicated by the corresponding pulley of the end-effector 31. The latter is configured such that counter-rotation of both pulleys 31b, 31c in one direction rotates jaws 32a, 32b in opposite direction away from each other to open the grip of the jaws while counter-rotation of both pulleys 31b, 31c in the other direction rotates the jaws 32a, 32b in opposite directions toward each other to close the grip and maintain a gripping force of the jaws. The working tips of the jaws 32a, 32b have a surface for gripping and may be used, for example, in forceps or cautery applications. Alternately, “gripping” which closes the jaws may be a cutting action when the tips of the jaws 32a, 32b are blades that cooperatively cut as a scissors. Gripping can thus perform different functions depending the nature of the end-effector 31. This end-effector is further configured to pivot about the axis of its pulley 31a when the latter is actuated by the cable-driven system according to the invention.


Still referring to FIG. 2, the transmission system according to this preferred embodiment comprises a first arrangement 40 of three rotatable elements 41a, 41b, 41c coaxially mounted together about the axis 19a of the interface slave joint of the slave unit and a second arrangement 50 of three rotatable elements 51a, 51b, 51c coaxially mounted together about the axis 29a of the interface master joint of the master unit. The rotatable element 41d comprises the driven pulley that actuates the interface slave joint 19 of the slave unit 10, being rigidly attached to the slave link 14. The rotatable element 51d comprises the driving pulley that actuates the interface master joint 29 of the master unit 20, being rigidly attached to the master link 24. Rotatable elements 41a, 41b, 41c of the first arrangement 40 are partly housed inside a slave housing 40′ while rotatable elements 51a, 51b, 51c of the second arrangement 50 are partly housed inside a master housing 50′. As shown in FIG. 1, the slave and master housings 40′, 50′ are connected respectively to a distal link 14 of the slave unit 10 and to a corresponding master link 24 of the master unit 20. The slave housing 40′ is further connected to the rotatable element 41d whereas the master housing 50′ is further connected to the corresponding rotatable element 51d.


The transmission system as shown in FIG. 2 further comprises first transmission means which have three cables 62a, 62b, 62c or similar structure which are each arranged to connect one rotatable element 51a, 51b, 51c of the second arrangement with one corresponding rotatable element 41a, 41b, 41c of first arrangement 40 such that rotation of each rotatable element 51a, 51b, 51c of second arrangement 50 actuates the corresponding cable which rotates in turn the equivalent rotatable element 41a, 41b, 41c of first arrangement 40.


Referring now to FIGS. 4 to 6, the transmission system comprises second transmission means which have three driven cables 63a, 63b, 63c or similar structures which are each arranged to be anchored on a corresponding pulley 31a, 31b, 31c of the end-effector 31 to enable angular displacement of these pulleys about their respective pivotal connection. These driven cables extends axially through the slave link 14 to be removably anchored to a corresponding rotatable element 41a, 41b, 41c of the first arrangement 40 of the slave unit 10. The removable connection of each driven cable to the corresponding rotatable element will be described in details subsequently.


The transmission system further comprises third transmission means which have three cables 61a, 61b, 61c or similar structures which are each arranged to be anchored on a corresponding pulley 30a, 30b, 30c of the handle 30 in order to be driven by angular displacement of these pulleys about their respective pivotal connection generated by the actuation of handle 30. Each of these cables 61a, 61b, 61c extends axially along the master link 24 to be anchored to a corresponding rotatable element 51a, 51b, 51c of the second arrangement 50 of the master unit 20. FIG. 2 partly shows in more details how this type of connection is achieved. Each cable 61a, 61b, 61c (only cables 61a and 61c are visible) are partially guided within a plane which is preferably perpendicular to the axis of the axial joint 29 of the master unit 20 and along a substantially circular path through an angle of less than 120 degrees (on the current embodiment). A segment 75a, 75c (75b is not visible in FIG. 2) of each cables is attached to a corresponding pointer 76a, 76b, 76c, wherein these pointers are coaxially mounted jointly with respective rotatable element 51a, 51b, 51c, and are superposed and angularly offset from each other.


According to the configuration of the transmission system, angular displacement of each pulley 30a, 30b, 30c of the handle 30 about their respective pivotal connection, during operation of the mechanical teleoperated device, drives the corresponding cable 61a, 61b, 61c of the third transmission means which causes the angular displacement of the corresponding rotatable element 51a, 51b, 51c of the second arrangement 50 about the axis of the interface slave joint 29 of the master unit 20. Rotation of each one of these rotatable elements 51a, 51b, 51c drives the corresponding cable 62a, 62b, 62c of the first transmission means which causes the angular displacement of the equivalent rotatable element 41a, 41b, 41c of the first arrangement 40 about the axis of the interface slave joint 19 of the slave unit 10. Rotation of each one of these rotatable elements 41a, 41b, 41c causes in turn the angular displacement of the corresponding pulley 31a, 31b, 31c of the end-effector 31 by means of the corresponding driven cable 63a, 63b, 63c of the second transmission means. The remaining two rotatable elements 41d, 51d of respective slave and master units 10, 20 are connected together by means of cable 62d such that axial rotation of the master link 24 rotates the corresponding slave link 14 about its longitudinal axis.


Due to this particular configuration, the transmission system is advantageously arranged to avoid twisting of the cables, when the master link 24 and the corresponding slave link 14 are coaxially rotating. Wear and tear of the cables resulting from prolonged use of the mechanical teleoperated device are therefore significantly reduced.


Referring now to FIGS. 8, 9 and 10, the transmission system according to the invention comprises a coupling/decoupling mechanism for removably connecting each driven cable 63a, 63b, 63c of the second transmission means with the corresponding cable 62a, 62b, 62c of the first transmission means in order to provide a user-friendly interchangeable and modular tooling system to the mechanical teleoperated device. To this end, lower and upper parts 40a, 40b of the slave housing 40′ are removably secured against each other preferably by means of screws to allow the user to structurally disconnect the distal part 10a (FIG. 7) from the proximal part 10b of the slave unit 10 as particularly shown in FIG. 1.


With reference to FIG. 9, the coupling/decoupling device of the transmission system comprises guiding means 73a, 73b, 73c within the lower part 40a of the slave housing. Each of these guiding means 73a, 73b, 73c are preferably in the form of a series of rollers arranged to guide a segment 74a, 74b, 74c of each cable 63a, 63b, 63c of the second transmission means within a plane which is substantially perpendicular to the axis of the interface slave joint 19 of the slave unit 10 and along a substantially circular path through a certain angular range. In other embodiments of the same invention, instead of being composed by a series of rollers, the guiding means may comprise non-moving elements or surfaces in order to guide the segment 74a, 74b, 74c of each cable 63a, 63b, 63c of the second transmission means within their path. Each segment 74a, 74b, 74c of each one of these cables is anchored to a mating receptacle 81a, 81b, 81c pivotally mounted about the axis 19a of said interface slave joint 19 of the slave unit 10 as shown in FIG. 8. As can be seen in FIG. 10, a complementary mating part 82a, 82b, 82c, preferably in the form of a connecting pin, is mounted on respective supports 83a, 83b, 83c which are coaxially arranged jointly with respective rotatable element of the first arrangement. These supports 83a, 83b, 83c which are preferably in the form of pointers are superposed and angularly offset from each other. Each connecting pin 82a, 82b, 82c is adapted to be removably mounted inside the corresponding mating receptacle 81a, 81b, 81c as particularly shown in FIG. 11c.


According to the transmission system, the ratio of Rs/Rm (FIG. 2) equates to the ratio of Ds/Dm wherein:

    • i) Rs is the radial distance between the axis of the interface slave joint 19 of the slave unit 10 and one anchored segment 73a, 73b, 73c of one driven cable 63a, 63b, 63c of the second transmission means;
    • ii) Rm is the radial distance between the axis of the interface slave joint 29 of the master unit 20 and one anchored segment of one cable 61a, 61b, 61c of the third transmission means;
    • iii) Ds is the diameter of one corresponding pulley 31, 31b, 31c of the end-effector 31; and
    • iv) Dm is the diameter of one corresponding pulley 30a, 30b, 30c of the handle 30.


The configuration of the mechanical teleoperated device according to the invention allows the operator to easily remove the distal part 10a, comprising at its distal end the end-effector 31, and to replace it with another distal part comprising any type of end-effector such as scissors, scalpels, cutters, needle holders or any other surgical accessories.


Although the transmission system as disclosed in this preferred embodiment comprises cables, its particular configuration is not limited to this embodiment. For example, the present invention may also encompasses other flexible and non-flexible drive elements such as rods, linkages or the like which could be arranged to achieve the same functionality set forth herein.


Moreover, although the transmission system of the mechanical teleoperated device according to the preferred embodiment comprises first, second and third transmission means comprising each three cables to actuate three degrees of freedom of the end-effector when the handle is operated, the scope of the invention also covers configurations with first and second transmission means only such that their respective cables circumvents only joint 19 of the slave unit to allow detachment of the distal part 10a from the proximal part 10b of the slave unit 10. Transmission means in excess of three comprising each a distinct set of cables can also be envisaged to cover embodiments in which the master and slave units comprise each several coaxial joints.


While this invention has been particularly shown and described with references to particular embodiments thereof, it will be understood by those skilled in the art that various changes in form and details may be made therein without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention as defined by the appended claims. For example the scope of the invention includes configurations where at least the first and the third transmission means comprise N cables for the transmission of N degrees-of-freedom of the handle to the end-effector, where N can be for example 2, 4 or 5. In addition, the transmission system disclosed according to the embodiments described herein can be adapted to any teleoperated device which does not necessarily comprise a kinematically equivalent master-slave configuration.

Claims
  • 1. A mechanical teleoperated device comprising: a handle having a plurality of handle links interconnected by respective handle joints;an end effector spaced apart from the handle and having a plurality of end-effector links interconnected by respective end-effector joints;a transmission system that kinematically couples the end effector to the handle such that movements of the end effector correspond to movements of the handle, the transmission system comprising: a plurality of independently rotatable elements coaxially mounted about a single axis;a plurality of driving elements arranged to cause rotation of the plurality of independently rotatable elements responsive to movements of the handle; anda plurality of driven elements arranged to cause movement of the end effector links responsive to rotation of the plurality of independently rotatable elements,wherein the transmission system is configured for removably coupling the plurality of driving elements to the plurality of driven elements such that each one of the plurality of driven elements is removably coupled to a corresponding one of the plurality of independently rotatable elements.
  • 2. The mechanical teleoperated device of claim 1, wherein a segment of each driven element is removably connected to a corresponding independently rotatable element such that each segment is guided along a path within a plane which is substantially perpendicular to the axis about which the corresponding independently rotatable element is arranged to rotate.
  • 3. The mechanical teleoperated device of claim 2, wherein the path extends along a circular trajectory having a center point coincident with the single axis.
  • 4. The mechanical teleoperated device of claim 1, wherein the single axis coincides with the axis of a joint of the mechanical teleoperated device.
  • 5. The mechanical teleoperated device of claim 1, wherein each driven element is anchored to a mating receptacle pivotally mounted about the single axis, wherein each corresponding independently rotatable element comprises a complementary mating part configured to be removably mounted inside the mating receptacle.
  • 6. The mechanical teleoperated device of claim 5, wherein each mating part is mounted on a support connected to a corresponding independently rotatable element.
  • 7. The mechanical teleoperated device of claim 6, wherein the mating receptacles and corresponding mating parts are housed inside a first housing, the first housing comprising first and second complementary housing parts removably mounted together.
  • 8. The mechanical teleoperated device of claim 7, wherein the mating receptacles are mounted inside the first complementary housing part and wherein the complementary mating parts are mounted inside the second complementary housing part.
  • 9. The mechanical teleoperated device of claim 1, wherein the plurality of independently rotatable elements are arranged into two groups, wherein a first group of independently rotatable elements are coaxially mounted to rotate about a first axis of rotation and a second group of independently rotatable elements are coaxially mounted to rotate about a second axis of rotation.
  • 10. The mechanical teleoperated device of claim 9, wherein each driving element is connected to an independently rotatable element of the first group and to a corresponding independently rotatable element of the second group.
  • 11. The mechanical teleoperated device of claim 10, wherein the second axis is coincident with the axis of a joint of the mechanical teleoperated device.
  • 12. The mechanical teleoperated device of claim 11, wherein the transmission system further comprises links kinematically connected to an actuable element of the handle.
  • 13. The mechanical teleoperated device of claim 12, wherein a segment of each link is anchored to a corresponding rotatable element of the second group.
  • 14. The mechanical teleoperated device of claim 1, wherein the mechanical teleoperated device has a master-slave configuration, comprising a slave unit, having a plurality of slave links interconnected by respective slave joints, and a master unit having a plurality of master links interconnected by respective master joints.
  • 15. The mechanical teleoperated device of claim 14, wherein the kinematic model of plurality of slave links and respective slave joints of the slave unit is identical to the kinematic model of the plurality of master links and respective master joints of the mater unit.
Priority Claims (3)
Number Date Country Kind
138/14 Feb 2014 CH national
14159025 Mar 2014 EP regional
408/14 Mar 2014 CH national
PCT Information
Filing Document Filing Date Country Kind
PCT/EP2015/051473 1/26/2015 WO 00
Publishing Document Publishing Date Country Kind
WO2015/113933 8/6/2015 WO A
US Referenced Citations (226)
Number Name Date Kind
2774488 Goertz Dec 1956 A
2846084 Goertz et al. Aug 1958 A
4756655 Jameson Jul 1988 A
5147357 Rose et al. Sep 1992 A
5207114 Salisbury et al. May 1993 A
5209747 Knoepfler May 1993 A
5304203 El-Mallawany et al. Apr 1994 A
5308358 Bond et al. May 1994 A
5330502 Hassler et al. Jul 1994 A
5368606 Marlow et al. Nov 1994 A
5383888 Zvenyatsky et al. Jan 1995 A
5484435 Fleenor et al. Jan 1996 A
5599151 Daum et al. Feb 1997 A
5603723 Aranyi et al. Feb 1997 A
5631973 Green May 1997 A
5649956 Jensen et al. Jul 1997 A
5710870 Ohm et al. Jan 1998 A
5716352 Viola et al. Feb 1998 A
5735874 Measamer et al. Apr 1998 A
5784542 Ohm et al. Jul 1998 A
5797900 Madhani et al. Aug 1998 A
5810716 Mukherjee et al. Sep 1998 A
5810805 Sutcu et al. Sep 1998 A
5828813 Ohm Oct 1998 A
5908436 Cuschieri et al. Jun 1999 A
5951587 Qureshi et al. Sep 1999 A
6026701 Reboulet Feb 2000 A
6197017 Brock et al. Mar 2001 B1
6206903 Ramans Mar 2001 B1
6233504 Das et al. May 2001 B1
6281651 Haanpaa et al. Aug 2001 B1
6358249 Chen et al. Mar 2002 B1
6361534 Chen et al. Mar 2002 B1
6364879 Chen et al. Apr 2002 B1
6371952 Madhani et al. Apr 2002 B1
6394998 Wallace et al. May 2002 B1
6435794 Springer Aug 2002 B1
6554844 Lee et al. Apr 2003 B2
6786896 Madhani et al. Sep 2004 B1
6788999 Green Sep 2004 B2
6850817 Green Feb 2005 B1
6852107 Wang et al. Feb 2005 B2
6902560 Morley et al. Jun 2005 B1
6951535 Ghodoussi et al. Oct 2005 B2
6991627 Madhani et al. Jan 2006 B2
6994708 Manzo Feb 2006 B2
7090637 Danitz et al. Aug 2006 B2
7101363 Nishizawa et al. Sep 2006 B2
7204836 Wagner et al. Apr 2007 B2
7232440 Dumbauld et al. Jun 2007 B2
7306597 Manzo Dec 2007 B2
7316681 Madhani et al. Jan 2008 B2
7338513 Lee et al. Mar 2008 B2
7364582 Lee Apr 2008 B2
7398707 Morley et al. Jul 2008 B2
7481824 Boudreaux et al. Jan 2009 B2
7608039 Todd Oct 2009 B1
7615002 Rothweiler et al. Nov 2009 B2
7615067 Lee et al. Nov 2009 B2
7674255 Braun Mar 2010 B2
7699855 Anderson et al. Apr 2010 B2
7819894 Mitsuishi et al. Oct 2010 B2
7824401 Manzo et al. Nov 2010 B2
7828798 Buysse et al. Nov 2010 B2
7976458 Stefanchik et al. Jul 2011 B2
8048084 Schneid Nov 2011 B2
8105320 Manzo Jan 2012 B2
8114017 Bacher Feb 2012 B2
8137263 Marescaux et al. Mar 2012 B2
8224485 Unsworth Jul 2012 B2
8287469 Stefanchik et al. Oct 2012 B2
8292889 Cunningham et al. Oct 2012 B2
8306656 Schaible et al. Nov 2012 B1
8308738 Nobis et al. Nov 2012 B2
8332072 Schaible et al. Dec 2012 B1
8336751 Scirica Dec 2012 B2
8347754 Veltri et al. Jan 2013 B1
8353898 Lutze et al. Jan 2013 B2
8357161 Mueller Jan 2013 B2
8382742 Hermann et al. Feb 2013 B2
8403832 Cunningham et al. Mar 2013 B2
8418904 Wenchell et al. Apr 2013 B2
8496152 Viola Jul 2013 B2
8523900 Jinno et al. Sep 2013 B2
8540748 Murphy et al. Sep 2013 B2
8562592 Conlon et al. Oct 2013 B2
8568444 Cunningham Oct 2013 B2
8579176 Smith et al. Nov 2013 B2
8591397 Berkelman et al. Nov 2013 B2
8603077 Cooper et al. Dec 2013 B2
8617203 Stefanchik et al. Dec 2013 B2
8663270 Donnigan et al. Mar 2014 B2
8668689 Dumbauld et al. Mar 2014 B2
8668702 Awtar et al. Mar 2014 B2
8696666 Sanai et al. Apr 2014 B2
8709000 Madhani et al. Apr 2014 B2
8768509 Unsworth Jul 2014 B2
8792688 Unsworth Jul 2014 B2
8801752 Fortier et al. Aug 2014 B2
8818560 Kishi Aug 2014 B2
8821480 Burbank Sep 2014 B2
8828046 Stefanchik et al. Sep 2014 B2
8845517 Russo Sep 2014 B2
8845622 Paik et al. Sep 2014 B2
8870867 Walberg et al. Oct 2014 B2
8887979 Mastri et al. Nov 2014 B2
8894674 Balanev et al. Nov 2014 B2
8930027 Schaible et al. Jan 2015 B2
8945098 Seibold et al. Feb 2015 B2
8961499 Paik et al. Feb 2015 B2
8961514 Garrison Feb 2015 B2
8968187 Kleyman et al. Mar 2015 B2
8989844 Cinquin et al. Mar 2015 B2
8992564 Jaspers Mar 2015 B2
9023015 Penna May 2015 B2
9033998 Schaible et al. May 2015 B1
9044238 Orszulak Jun 2015 B2
9084606 Greep Jul 2015 B2
9113861 Martin et al. Aug 2015 B2
9149339 Unsworth Oct 2015 B2
9307894 Von Grunberg et al. Apr 2016 B2
9480531 Von Grunberg Nov 2016 B2
9696700 Beira et al. Jul 2017 B2
20020040217 Jinno Apr 2002 A1
20020049367 Irion et al. Apr 2002 A1
20020072736 Tierney et al. Jun 2002 A1
20030155747 Bridges Aug 2003 A1
20030208186 Moreyra Nov 2003 A1
20040049205 Lee et al. Mar 2004 A1
20040236316 Danitz et al. Nov 2004 A1
20040253079 Sanchez Dec 2004 A1
20050096502 Khalili May 2005 A1
20050204851 Morley et al. Sep 2005 A1
20050240078 Kwon et al. Oct 2005 A1
20060043698 Bridges Mar 2006 A1
20060178559 Kumar et al. Aug 2006 A1
20060183975 Saadat et al. Aug 2006 A1
20060219065 Jinno et al. Oct 2006 A1
20060235436 Anderson et al. Oct 2006 A1
20060253109 Chu Nov 2006 A1
20070088340 Brock et al. Apr 2007 A1
20070137371 Devengenzo et al. Jun 2007 A1
20070156123 Moll et al. Jul 2007 A1
20070208375 Nishizawa et al. Sep 2007 A1
20070299387 Williams et al. Dec 2007 A1
20080046122 Manzo et al. Feb 2008 A1
20080058776 Jo et al. Mar 2008 A1
20080071208 Voegele et al. Mar 2008 A1
20080103492 Morley et al. May 2008 A1
20080177285 Brock et al. Jul 2008 A1
20080243106 Coe Oct 2008 A1
20080314181 Schena Dec 2008 A1
20090036902 Dimaio et al. Feb 2009 A1
20090198253 Omori Aug 2009 A1
20090216249 Jinno et al. Aug 2009 A1
20090247821 Rogers Oct 2009 A1
20090248039 Cooper et al. Oct 2009 A1
20090299141 Downey et al. Dec 2009 A1
20100004508 Naito et al. Jan 2010 A1
20100023025 Zeiner et al. Jan 2010 A1
20100121347 Jaspers May 2010 A1
20100160929 Rogers et al. Jun 2010 A1
20100160940 Lutze et al. Jun 2010 A1
20100170519 Romo et al. Jul 2010 A1
20100305595 Hermann Dec 2010 A1
20100318099 Itkowitz et al. Dec 2010 A1
20100318101 Choi Dec 2010 A1
20110087236 Stokes et al. Apr 2011 A1
20110213346 Morley et al. Sep 2011 A1
20110230867 Hirschfeld et al. Sep 2011 A1
20110275901 Shelton, IV Nov 2011 A1
20110276084 Shelton, IV Nov 2011 A1
20110290854 Timm et al. Dec 2011 A1
20110301419 Craft et al. Dec 2011 A1
20120027762 Schofield Feb 2012 A1
20120031114 Mueller et al. Feb 2012 A1
20120095298 Stefanchik et al. Apr 2012 A1
20120116163 Lutze et al. May 2012 A1
20120132018 Tang et al. May 2012 A1
20120143173 Steege et al. Jun 2012 A1
20120158014 Stefanchik et al. Jun 2012 A1
20120209292 Devengenzo et al. Aug 2012 A1
20120253326 Kleyman Oct 2012 A1
20120277762 Lathrop et al. Nov 2012 A1
20120289973 Prisco Nov 2012 A1
20120289974 Rogers et al. Nov 2012 A1
20120296341 Seibold et al. Nov 2012 A1
20130123805 Park et al. May 2013 A1
20130144274 Stefanchik et al. Jun 2013 A1
20130245643 Woodard et al. Sep 2013 A1
20130245647 Martin et al. Sep 2013 A1
20130282027 Woodard et al. Oct 2013 A1
20130304083 Kaercher et al. Nov 2013 A1
20140005681 Gee et al. Jan 2014 A1
20140018447 McGovern et al. Jan 2014 A1
20140018780 Hirscheld Jan 2014 A1
20140076088 Berkelman et al. Mar 2014 A1
20140114481 Ogawa et al. Apr 2014 A1
20140142595 Awtar et al. May 2014 A1
20140166023 Kishi Jun 2014 A1
20140180308 Von Grünberg Jun 2014 A1
20140188091 Vidal et al. Jul 2014 A1
20140188159 Steege Jul 2014 A1
20140200561 Ingmanson et al. Jul 2014 A1
20140207150 Rosa et al. Jul 2014 A1
20140230595 Butt et al. Aug 2014 A1
20140249546 Shvartsberg et al. Sep 2014 A1
20140263541 Leimbach et al. Sep 2014 A1
20140263553 Leimbach et al. Sep 2014 A1
20140276956 Crainich et al. Sep 2014 A1
20140350570 Lee Nov 2014 A1
20150057499 Erden et al. Feb 2015 A1
20150057702 Edmondson et al. Feb 2015 A1
20150060517 Williams Mar 2015 A1
20150066018 Doll et al. Mar 2015 A1
20150105821 Ward et al. Apr 2015 A1
20150142018 Sniffin et al. May 2015 A1
20150150575 Hartoumbekis et al. Jun 2015 A1
20150250547 Fukushima et al. Sep 2015 A1
20150265355 Prestel et al. Sep 2015 A1
20160022365 Jensen et al. Jan 2016 A1
20160051274 Howell et al. Feb 2016 A1
20160151115 Karguth et al. Jun 2016 A1
20160374766 Schuh Dec 2016 A1
20170273749 Grover Sep 2017 A1
20180055583 Schuh Mar 2018 A1
Foreign Referenced Citations (88)
Number Date Country
101584594 Nov 2009 CN
101637402 Feb 2010 CN
101732093 Jun 2010 CN
103717355 Apr 2014 CN
43 03 311 Aug 1994 DE
19652792 May 1999 DE
10314827 Apr 2004 DE
10314828 Jul 2004 DE
10 2012 222 755 Jun 2014 DE
10 2014 205 036 Sep 2015 DE
10 2014 205 159 Sep 2015 DE
0 595 291 May 1994 EP
0 621 009 Oct 1994 EP
0 677 275 Oct 1995 EP
1 254 642 Nov 2002 EP
1 279 371 Dec 2004 EP
1 886 630 Feb 2008 EP
1 889 579 Feb 2008 EP
2 058 090 May 2009 EP
1 977 677 Aug 2009 EP
2 095 778 Sep 2009 EP
1 889 583 Apr 2011 EP
2 377 477 May 2012 EP
2 473 119 Jul 2012 EP
2 305 144 Oct 2012 EP
2 044 893 Jul 2013 EP
2 653 110 Oct 2013 EP
2 679 192 Jan 2014 EP
2 736 680 Jun 2014 EP
2 777 561 Sep 2014 EP
2 837 340 Feb 2015 EP
2 837 354 Feb 2015 EP
2 554 131 Aug 2015 EP
2 979 657 Feb 2016 EP
0 969 899 Sep 1964 GB
2004-041580 Feb 2004 JP
2007-290096 Nov 2007 JP
2008-104620 May 2008 JP
2009-018027 Jan 2009 JP
20110032444 Mar 2011 KR
20130031403 Mar 2013 KR
WO-8200611 Mar 1982 WO
WO-03067341 Aug 2003 WO
WO-03086219 Oct 2003 WO
WO-2004052171 Jun 2004 WO
WO-2005009482 Feb 2005 WO
WO-2005046500 May 2005 WO
WO-2006086663 Apr 2006 WO
WO-2007133065 Nov 2007 WO
WO-2008130235 Oct 2008 WO
WO-2009091497 Jul 2009 WO
WO-2009095893 Aug 2009 WO
WO-2009145572 Dec 2009 WO
WO-2009157719 Dec 2009 WO
WO-2010019001 Feb 2010 WO
WO-2010030114 Mar 2010 WO
WO-2010050771 May 2010 WO
WO-2010083480 Jul 2010 WO
WO-2010096580 Aug 2010 WO
WO-2010130817 Nov 2010 WO
WO-2012020386 Feb 2012 WO
WO-2012049623 Apr 2012 WO
WO-2014012780 Jan 2014 WO
WO-2014018447 Jan 2014 WO
WO-2014067804 May 2014 WO
WO-2014094716 Jun 2014 WO
WO-2014094717 Jun 2014 WO
WO-2014094718 Jun 2014 WO
WO-2014094719 Jun 2014 WO
WO-2014145148 Sep 2014 WO
WO-2014156221 Oct 2014 WO
WO-2014201010 Dec 2014 WO
WO-2014201538 Dec 2014 WO
WO-2015081946 Jun 2015 WO
WO-2015081947 Jun 2015 WO
WO-2015088647 Jun 2015 WO
WO-2015088655 Jun 2015 WO
WO-2015111475 Jul 2015 WO
WO-2015113933 Aug 2015 WO
WO-2015129383 Aug 2015 WO
WO-2015139674 Sep 2015 WO
WO-2016083189 Jun 2016 WO
WO-016189284 Dec 2016 WO
WO-2016189284 Dec 2016 WO
WO-2017064301 Apr 2017 WO
WO-2017064303 Apr 2017 WO
WO-2017064305 Apr 2017 WO
WO-2017064306 Apr 2017 WO
Non-Patent Literature Citations (38)
Entry
Abbott, et al., “Design of an Endoluminal Notes Robotic System,” IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems, San Diego, CA, pp. 410-416 (2007).
Aesculap Surgical Technologies, Aesculap® Caiman®, Advanced Bipolar Seal and Cut Technology Brochure, 6 pages (retrieved Aug. 31, 2015).
Arata, et al., “Development of a dexterous minimally-invasive surgical system with augmented force feedback capability,” IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems, pp. 3207-3212 (2005).
çavuo{hacek over (g)}lu, et al., “Laparoscopic Telesurgical Workstation,” IEEE Transactions on Robotics and Automation,(15)4:728-739 (1999).
Dachs, et al., “Novel Surgical Robot Design: Minimizing the Operating Envelope Within the Sterile Field,” 28th International Conference, IEEE Engineering in Medicine Biology Society, New York, pp. 1505-1508 (2006).
Dario, et al., “Novel Mechatronic Tool for Computer-Assisted Arthroscopy,” IEEE Transactions on Information Technology in Biomedicine, 4(1):15-29 (Mar. 2000).
Focacci, et al., “Lightweight Hand-held Robot for Laparoscopic Surgery,” IEEE International Conference on Robotics & Automation, Rome, Italy, pp. 599-604 (2007).
Guthart, et al., “The Intuitive™ Telesurgery System: Overview and Application,” IEEE International Conference on Robotics & Automation, San Francisco, CA, pp. 618-621 (2000).
Ikuta, et al., “Development of Remote Microsurgery Robot and New Surgical Procedure for Deep and Narrow Space,” IEEE International Conference on Robotics & Automation, Taipei, Taiwan, pp. 1103-1108 (2003).
Ikuta, et al., “Hyper Redundant Miniature Manipulator ‘Hyper Finger’ for Remote Minimally Invasive Surgery in Deep Area,” IEEE International Conference on Robotics & Automation, Taipei, Taiwan, pp. 1098-1102 (2003).
International Search Report & Written Opinion dated Feb. 2, 2017 in Int'l PCT Patent Appl. Serial No. PCT/IB2016/001286.
International Search Report & Written Opinion dated Jan. 18, 2013 in Int'l PCT Patent Appl Serial No. PCT/IB2012/053786.
International Search Report dated Jan. 18, 2013 in Int'l PCT Patent Appl Serial No. PCT/IB2012/053786.
International Search Report dated Mar. 23, 2012 in Int'l PCT Patent Appl Serial No. PCT/IB2011/054476.
Ishii, et al., “Development of a New Bending Mechanism and Its Application to Robotic Forceps Manipulator,” IEEE International Conference on Robotics & Automation, Rome, Italy, pp. 238-243 (2007).
International Search Report & Written Opinion dated May 23, 2016 in Int'l PCT Patent Appl Serial No. PCT/IB2015/002524.
International Search Report & Written Opinion dated Mar. 30, 2015 in Int'l PCT Patent Appl Serial No. PCT/EP2015/051473.
International Search Report & Written Opinion dated Apr. 26, 2016 in Int'l PCT Patent Appl Serial No. PCT/IB2015/002512.
International Search Report & Written Opinion dated May 24, 2016 in Int'l PCT Patent Appl Serial No. PCT/IB2015/002487.
International Search Report & Written Opinion dated Jun. 10, 2016 in Int'l PCT Patent Appl Serial No. PCT/IB2015/002533.
International Search Report & Written Opinion dated Jun. 13, 2016 in Int'l PCT Patent Appl Serial No. PCT/IB2015/002493.
International Search Report & Written Opinion dated Aug. 25, 2016 in Int'l PCT Patent Appl Serial No. PCT/IB2016/000542.
International Search Report & Written Opinion dated Sep. 2, 2016 in Int'l PCT Patent Appl Serial No. PCT/IB2016/000543.
Kobayashi, et al., “Small Occupancy Robotic Mechanisms for Endoscopic Surgery,” International Conference on Medical Image Computing and Computer assisted Interventions, pp. 75-82 (2002).
Mayer, et al., “The Endo[PA]R System for Minimally Invasive Robotic Surgery,” IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems, Sendai, Japan, pp. 3637-3642 (2004).
Mitsuishi, et al., “Development of a Remote Minimally Invasive Surgical System with Operational Environment Transmission Capability,” IEEE International Conference on Robotics & Automation, Taipei, Taiwan, pp. 2663-2670 (2003).
Nakamura, et al., “Multi-DOF Forceps Manipulator System for Laparoscopic Surgery-Mechanism miniaturized & Evaluation of New Interface,” 4th International Conference on Medical Image Computing and Computer assisted Interventions (MICCAI2001), pp. 606-613 (2001).
Peirs, et al., “Design of an advanced tool guiding system for robotic surgery,” IEEE International Conference on Robotics & Automation, Taipei, Taiwan, pp. 2651-2656 (2003).
Sallé, et al., “Optimal Design of High Dexterity Modular MIS Instrument for Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting,” IEEE International Conference on Robotics & Automation, New Orleans, LA, pp. 1276-1281 (2004).
Seibold, et al., “Prototype of Instrument for Minimally Invasive Surgery with 6-Axis Force Sensing Capability,” IEEE International Conference on Robotics & Automation, Barcelona, Spain, pp. 496-501 (2005).
Simaan et al., “Dexterous System for Laryngeal Surgery: Multi-Backbone Bending Snake-like Slaves for Teleoperated Dexterous Surgical Tool Manipulation,” IEEE International Conference on Robotics & Automation, New Orleans, LA, pp. 351-357 (2004).
Stryker®, Endoscopy, Take a Look Around, Ideal Eyes™ FFD122 HD, Articulating Laparoscope Brochure, 2 pages (2009).
Swiss Search Report dated Jun. 4, 2012 in Swiss Patent Application No. CH 00702/12.
Tavakoli, et al., “Force Reflective Master-Slave System for Minimally Invasive Surgery,” IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems, Las Vegas, NV, pp. 3077-3082 (2003).
Taylor, et al., “Steady-Hand Robotic System for Microsurgical Augmentation,” The International Journal of Robotics Research, 18(12):1201-1210 (1999).
www.cttc.co/technologies/maestro-non-robotic-dexterous-laproscopic-instrument-writs-providing-seven-degrees, “Maestro: Non-Robotic Dexterous Laproscopic Instrument With a Wrist Providing Seven Degrees of Freedom”, accessed Nov. 12, 2015, 4 pages.
Yamashita, et al., “Development of Endoscopic Forceps Manipulator Using Multi-Slider Linkage Mechanisms,” The 1st Asian Symposium on Computer Aided Surgery-Robotic and Image-Guided Surgery, Ibaraki, Japan, 4 pages (2005).
Zeus, “Robotic Surgical System” available at http://allaboutroboticsurgery.com/zeusrobot.html.
Related Publications (1)
Number Date Country
20160346053 A1 Dec 2016 US