This invention relates to the field of mass storage for computers. More particularly, this invention relates to an architecture for replacing a hard disk with a semiconductor nonvolatile memory and in particular flash memory.
Computers conventionally use rotating magnetic media for mass storage of documents, data, programs and information. Though widely used and commonly accepted, such hard disk drives suffer from a variety of deficiencies. Because of the rotation of the disk, there is an inherent latency in extracting information from a hard disk drive.
Other problems are especially dramatic in portable computers. In particular, hard disks are unable to withstand many of the kinds of physical shock that a portable computer will likely sustain. Further, the motor for rotating the disk consumes significant amounts of power decreasing the battery life for portable computers.
Solid state memory is an ideal choice for replacing a hard disk drive for mass storage because it can resolve the problems cited above. Potential solutions have been proposed for replacing a hard disk drive with a semiconductor memory. For such a system to be truly useful, the memory must be nonvolatile and alterable. The inventors have determined that FLASH memory is preferred for such a replacement.
FLASH memory is a transistor memory cell which is programmable through hot electron, source injection, or tunneling, and erasable through Fowler-Nordheim tunneling. The programming and erasing of such a memory cell requires current to pass through the dielectric surrounding floating gate electrode. Because of this, such types of memory have a finite number of erase-write cycles. Eventually, the dielectric deteriorates. Manufacturers of FLASH cell devices specify the limit for the number of erase-write cycles between 100,000 and 1,000,000.
One requirement for a semiconductor mass storage device to be successful is that its use in lieu of a rotating media hard disk mass storage device be transparent to the designer and the user of a system using such a device. In other words, the designer or user of a computer incorporating such a semiconductor mass storage device could simply remove the hard disk and replace it with a semiconductor mass storage device. All presently available commercial software should operate on a system employing such a semiconductor mass storage device without the necessity of any modification.
SanDisk proposed an architecture for a semiconductor mass storage using FLASH memory at the Silicon Valley PC Design Conference on Jul. 9, 1991. That mass storage system included read-write block sizes of 512 Bytes to conform with commercial hard disk sector sizes.
Earlier designs incorporated erase-before-write architectures. In this process, in order to update a file on the media, if the physical location on the media was previously programmed, it has to be erased before the new data can be reprogrammed.
This process would have a major deterioration on overall system throughput. When a host writes a new data file to the storage media, it provides a logical block address to the peripheral storage device associated with this data file. The storage device then translates this given logical block address to an actual physical block address on the media and performs the write operation. In magnetic hard disk drives, the new data can be written over the previous old data with no modification to the media. Therefore, once the physical block address is calculated from the given logical block address by the controller, it will simply write the data file into that location. In solid state storage, if the location associated with the calculated physical block address was previously programmed, before this block can be reprogrammed with the new data, it has to be erased. In one previous art, in erase-before-write architecture where the correlation between logical block address given by the host is one to one mapping with physical block address on the media. This method has many deficiencies. First, it introduces a delay in performance due to the erase operation before reprogramming the altered information. In solid state flash, erase is a very slow process.
Secondly, hard disk users typically store two types of information, one is rarely modified and another which is frequently changed. For example, a commercial spread sheet or word processing software program stored on a user's system are rarely, if ever, changed. However, the spread sheet data files or word processing documents are frequently changed. Thus, different sectors of a hard disk typically have dramatically different usage in terms of the number of times the information stored thereon is changed. While this disparity has no impact on a hard disk because of its insensitivity to data changes, in a FLASH memory device, this variance can cause sections of the mass storage to wear out and be unusable significantly sooner than other sections of the mass storage.
In another architecture, the inventors previously proposed a solution to store a table correlating the logical block address to the physical block address. The inventions relating to that solution are disclosed in U.S. patent application Ser. No. 08/038,668 filed on Mar. 26, 1993, now U.S. Pat. No. 5,388,083, and U.S. patent application Ser. No. 08/037,893 also filed on Mar. 26, 1993, now U.S. Pat. No. 5,479,638. Those applications are incorporated herein by reference.
The inventors' previous solution discloses two primary algorithms and an associated hardware architecture for a semiconductor mass storage device. It will be understood that “data file” in this patent document refers to any computer file including commercial software, a user program, word processing software document, spread sheet file and the like. The first algorithm in the previous solution provides means for avoiding an erase operation when writing a modified data file back onto the mass storage device. Instead, no erase is performed and the modified data file is written onto an empty portion of the mass storage.
The semiconductor mass storage architecture has blocks sized to conform with commercial hard disk sector sizes. The blocks are individually erasable. In one embodiment, the semiconductor mass storage can be substituted for a rotating hard disk with no impact to the user, so that such a substitution will be transparent. Means are provided for avoiding the erase-before-write cycle each time information stored in the mass storage is changed.
According to the first algorithm, erase cycles are avoided by programming an altered data file into an empty block. This would ordinarily not be possible when using conventional mass storage because the central processor and commercial software available in conventional computer systems are not configured to track continually changing physical locations of data files. The previous solution includes a programmable map to maintain a correlation between the logical address and the physical address of the updated information files.
All the flags, and the table correlating the logical block address to the physical block address are maintained within an array of CAM cells. The use of the CAM cells provides very rapid determination of the physical address desired within the mass storage, generally within one or two clock cycles. Unfortunately, as is well known, CAM cells require multiple transistors, typically six. Accordingly, an integrated circuit built for a particular size memory using CAM storage for the tables and flags will need to be significantly larger than a circuit using other means for just storing the memory.
The inventors proposed another solution to this problem which is disclosed in U.S. patent application Ser. No. 08/131,495 filed on Oct. 4, 1993, now U.S. Pat. No. 5,485,595. That application is incorporated herein by reference.
This additional previous solution invented by these same inventors is also for a nonvolatile memory storage device. The device is also configured to avoid having to perform an erase-before-write each time a data file is changed by keeping a correlation between logical block address and physical block address in a volatile space management RAM. Further, this invention avoids the overhead associated with CAM cell approaches which require additional circuitry.
Like the solutions disclosed above by these same inventors, the device includes circuitry for performing the two primary algorithms and an associated hardware architecture for a semiconductor mass storage device. In addition, the CAM cell is avoided in this previous solution by using RAM cells.
Reading is performed in this previous solutions by providing the logical block address to the memory storage. The system sequentially compares the stored logical block addresses until it finds a match. That data file is then coupled to the digital system. Accordingly, the performance offered by this solution suffers because potentially all of the memory locations must be searched and compared to the desired logical block address before the physical location of the desired information can be determined.
What is needed is a semiconductor hard disk architecture which provides rapid access to stored data without the excessive overhead of CAM cell storage.
The memory storage 104 is arranged into N blocks of data from zero through N−1. Each of the blocks of data is M Bytes long. In the preferred embodiment, each data block is 512 Bytes long to correspond with a sector length in a commercially available hard disk drive plus the extra numbers of bytes to store the flags and logical block address (LBA) information and the associated ECC. The memory 104 can contain as much memory storage as a user desires. An example of a mass storage device might include 100 M Byte of addressable storage.
There are a plurality of RAM locations 102. Each RAM location 102 is uniquely addressable by controller using an appropriate one of the logical block addresses provided by the host system or the actual physical address of the nonvolatile media. The RAM location 102 contains the physical block address of the data associated with the logical block address and the flags associated with a physical block address on the nonvolatile media.
It is possible that the physical block address (PBA) can be split into two fields as shown in
A collection of information flags is also stored for each nonvolatile memory location 106. These flags include an old/new flag 110, a used/free flag 112, a defect flag 114, and a single/sector flag 116. Additionally, there is also a data store 122.
When writing data to the mass storage device of the present invention, a controller determines the first available physical block for storing the data. The RAM location 102 corresponding to the logical block address selected by the host is written with the physical block address where the data is actually stored within the nonvolatile memory array in 104 (
Assume for example that a user is preparing a word processing document and instructs the computer to save the document. The document will be stored in the mass storage system. The host system will assign it a logical block address. The mass storage system of the present invention will select a physical address of an unused block or blocks in the mass storage for storing the document. The address of the physical block address will be stored into the RAM location 102 corresponding to the logical block address. As the data is programmed, the system of the present invention also sets the used free flag 112 in 104 and 293 to indicate that this block location is used. One used/free flag 112 is provided for each entry of the nonvolatile array 104.
Later, assume the user retrieves the document, makes a change and again instructs the computer to store the document. To avoid an erase-before-write cycle, the system of the present invention provides means for locating a block having its used/free flag 112 in 100 unset (not programmed) which indicates that the associated block is erased. The system then sets the used/free flag for the new block 112 of 106 and 293 of 100 and then stores the modified document in that new physical block location 106 in the nonvolatile array 104. The address of the new physical block location is also stored into the RAM location 102 corresponding the logical block address, thereby writing over the previous physical block location in 102. Next, the system sets the old/new flag 110 of the previous version of the document indicating that this is an old unneeded version of the document in 110 of 104 and 293 of 109. In this way, the system of the present invention avoids the overhead of an erase cycle which is required in the erase-before-write of conventional systems to store a modified version of a previous document.
Because of RAM array 100 will lose its memory upon a power down condition, the logical block address with the active physical block address in the media is also stored as a shadow memory 108 in the nonvolatile array 104. It will be understood the shadow information will be stored into the appropriate RAM locations 102 by the controller. During power up sequence, the RAM locations in 100 are appropriately updated from every physical locations in 104, by reading the information 106 of 104. The logical address 108 of 106 is used to address the RAM location of 100 to update the actual physical block address associated with the given logical block address. Also since 106 is the actual physical block address associated with the new data 122, the flags 110, 112, 114, and 116 are updated in 293 of 102 with the physical block address of 106 in 100. It will be apparent to one of ordinary skill in the art that the flags can be stored in either the appropriate nonvolatile memory location 106 or in both the nonvolatile memory location and also in the RAM location 102 associated with the physical block address.
During power up, in order to assign the most recent physical block address assigned to a logical block address in the volatile memory 100, the controller will first read the Flags 110, 112, 114, and 116 portion of the nonvolatile memory 104 and updates the flags portion 293 in the volatile memory 100. Then it reads the logical block address 108 of every physical block address of the nonvolatile media 104 and by tracking the flags of the given physical block address in the volatile memory 100, and the read logical block address of the physical block address in the nonvolatile memory 104, it can update the most recent physical block address assigned to the read logical block address in the volatile memory 100.
A simplified example, showing the operation of the write operation according to the present invention is shown in
The host directs the mass storage device of the example to write data pursuant to the logical block address ‘3’ and then to ‘4’. The mass storage device will first write the data associated with the logical block address ‘3’. The device determines which is the first unused location in the nonvolatile memory. In this example, the first empty location is location ‘0’.
Accordingly,
The host instructs that something is to be written to logical block address ‘3’ again. The next empty location is determined to be location ‘2’.
Next, the host instructs that something is to be written to logical block address ‘4’ again. The next empty location is determined to, be location ‘3’.
If on the other hand, the system is unable to locate a block having an unset used/free flag, the system erases the flags (used/free and old/new) and data for all blocks having a set old/new flag and unset defect flag (step 204) and then searches for a block having an unset used/free flag (step 202). Such a block has just been formed by step 204. The system then sets the used/flag for that block and programs the data file into that block (step 206).
If the data is a modified version of a previously existing file, the system must prevent the superseded version from being accessed. The system determines whether the data file supersedes a previous data file (step 208). If so, the system sets the old/new flag associated with the superseded block (step 210). If on the other hand, the data file to be stored is a newly created data file, the step of setting the old/new flag (step 210) is skipped because there is no superseded block. Lastly, the map for correlating the logical address 308—to the physical addresses updated (step 212).
By following the procedure outlined above, the overhead associated with an erase cycle is avoided for each write to the memory 104 except for periodically. This vastly improves the performance of the overall computer system employing the architecture of the present invention.
In the preferred embodiment of the present invention, the programming of the flash memory follows the procedure commonly understood by those of ordinary skill in the art. In other words, the program impulses are appropriately applied to the bits to be programmed and then compared to the data being programmed to ensure that proper programming has occurred. In the event that a bit fails to be erased or programmed properly, a defect flag 148 is set which prevent that block from being used again.
The controller circuit 506 may be a semiconductor (otherwise referred to as an “integrated circuit” or “chip”) or optionally a combination of various electronic components. In the preferred embodiment, the controller circuit is depicted as a single chip device. The nonvolatile memory unit 508 is comprised of one or more memory devices, which may each be flash or EEPROM types of memory. In the preferred embodiment of
The host 502 is coupled through host information signals 504 to a controller circuit 506. The host information signals comprise of address and data busses and control signals for communicating command, data and other types of information to the controller circuit 506, which in turn stores such information in memory unit 508 through flash address bus 512, flash data bus 514, flash signals 516 and flash status signals 518 (508 and 513-516 collectively referred to as signals 538). The signals 538 may provide command, data and status information between the controller 506 and the memory unit 508.
The controller 506 is shown to include high-level functional blocks such as a host interface block 520, a buffer RAM block 522, a flash controller block 532, a microprocessor block 524, a microprocessor controller block 528, a microprocessor storage block 530, a microprocessor ROM block 534, an ECC logic block 540 and a space manager block 544. The host interface block 520 receives host information signals 504 for providing data and status information from buffer RAM block 522 and microprocessor block 524 to the host 502 through host information signals 504. The host interface block 520 is coupled to the microprocessor block 524 through the microprocessor information signals 526, which is comprised of an address bus, a data bus and control signals.
The microprocessor block 524 is shown coupled to a microprocessor controller block 528, a microprocessor storage block 530 and a microprocessor ROM block 534, and serves to direct operations of the various functional blocks shown in
Controller 506 further includes a flash controller block 532 coupled to the microprocessor block 524 through the microprocessor information signals 526 for providing and receiving information from and to the memory unit under the direction of the microprocessor. Information such as data may be provided from flash controller block 532 to the buffer RAM block 522 for storage (may be only temporary storage) therein through the microprocessor signals 526. Similarly, through the microprocessor signals 526, data may be retrieved from the buffer RAM block 522 by the flash controller block 532.
ECC logic block 540 is coupled to buffer RAM block 522 through signals 542 and further coupled to the microprocessor block 524 through microprocessor signals 526. ECC logic block 540 includes circuitry for generally performing error coding and correction functions. It should be understood by those skilled in the art that various ECC apparatus and algorithms are commercially available and may be employed to perform the functions required of ECC logic block 540. Briefly, these functions include appending code that is for all intensive purposes uniquely generated from a polynomial to the data being transmitted and when data is received, using the same polynomial to generate another code from the received data for detecting and potentially correcting a predetermined number of errors that may have corrupted the data. ECC logic block 540 performs error detection and/or correction operations on data stored in the memory unit 508 or data received from the host 502.
The space manager block 544 employs a preferred apparatus and algorithm for finding the next unused (or free) storage block within one of the flash memory devices for storing a block of information, as will be further explained herein with reference to other figures. As earlier discussed, the address of a block within one of the flash memory devices is referred to as PBA, which is determined by the space manager by performing a translation on an LBA received from the host. A variety of apparatus and method may be employed for accomplishing this translation. An example of such a scheme is disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 5,485,595, entitled “Flash Memory Mass Storage Architecture Incorporating Wear Leveling Technique Without Using CAM Cells”, the specification of which is herein incorporated by reference. Other LBA to PBA translation methods and apparatus may be likewise employed without departing from the scope and spirit of the present invention.
Space manager block 544 includes SPM RAM block 548 and SPM control block 546, the latter two blocks being coupled together. The SPM RAM block 548 stores the LBA-PBA mapping information (otherwise herein referred to as translation table, mapping table, mapping information, or table) under the control of SPM control block 546. Alternatively, the SPM RAM block 548 may be located outside of the controller, such as shown in
In operation, the host 502 writes and reads information from and to the memory unit 508 during for example, the performance of a read or write operation through the controller 506. In so doing, the host 502 provides an LBA to the controller 506 through the host signals 504. The LBA is received by the host interface block 520. Under the direction of the microprocessor block 524, the LBA is ultimately provided to the space manager block 544 for translation to a PBA and storage thereof, as will be discussed in further detail later.
Under the direction of the microprocessor block 524, data and other information are written into or read from a storage area, identified by the PBA, within one of the flash memory devices 510-512 through the flash controller block 532. The information stored within the flash memory devices may not be overwritten with new information without first being erased, as earlier discussed. On the other hand, erasure of a block of information (every time prior to being written), is a very time and power consuming measure. This is sometimes referred to as erase-before-write operation. The preferred embodiment avoids such an operation by continuously, yet efficiently, moving a sector (or multiple sectors) of information, within a block, that is being rewritten from a PBA location within the flash memory to an unused PBA location within the memory unit 508 thereby avoiding frequent erasure operations. A block of information may be comprised of more than one sector such as 16 or 32 sectors. A block of information is further defined to be an individually-erasable unit of information. In the past, prior art systems have moved a block stored within flash memory devices that has been previously written into a free (or unused) location within the flash memory devices. Such systems however, moved an entire block even when only one sector of information within that block was being re-written. In other words, there is waste of both storage capacity within the flash memory as well as waste of time in moving an entire block's contents when less than the total number of sectors within the block are being re-written. The preferred embodiments of the present invention, as discussed herein, allow for “moves” of less than a block of information thereby decreasing the number of move operations of previously-written sectors, consequently, decreasing the number of erase operations.
Referring back to
It should be noted, that the SPM RAM block 548 may alternatively be nonvolatile memory, such as in the form of flash or EEPROM memory architecture. In this case, the mapping table will be stored within nonvolatile memory thereby avoiding the need for “shadowing” because during power interruptions, the mapping information stored in nonvolatile memory will be clearly maintained.
When one or more sectors are being moved from one area of the flash memory to another area, the preferred embodiment of the present invention first moves the sector(s) from the location where they are stored in the flash memory devices, i.e., 510-512, to the buffer RAM block 522 for temporary storage therein. The moved sector(s) are then moved from the buffer RAM block 522 to a free area within one of the flash memory devices. It is further useful to note that the ECC code generated by the ECC logic block 540, as discussed above, is also stored within the flash memory devices 510-512 along with the data, as is other information, such as the LBA corresponding to the data and flag fields.
The rows of table include PBA/LBA rows 716, 718 through 728 with each row having a row number that may be either an LBA or a PBA depending upon the information that is being addressed within the table 700. For example, row 716 is shown as being assigned row number ‘00’ and if PBA information in association with LBA ‘00’ is being retrieved from table 700, then LBA ‘00’ may be addressed in SPM RAM block 548 at row 716 to obtain the associated PBA located in 730. On the other hand, if status information, such as flag fields, 706-712, regarding a block is being accessed, the row numbers of rows 716-728, such as ‘00’, ‘10’, ‘20’, ‘30’, ‘40’, ‘50’, ‘N−1’ represent PBA, as opposed to LBA, values. Furthermore, each row of table 700 may be thought of as a block entry wherein each entry contains information regarding a block. Furthermore, each row of table 700 may be addressed by an LBA.
In the preferred embodiment, each block is shown to include 16 sectors. This is due to the capability of selectively erasing an entire block of 16 sectors (which is why the block size is sometimes referred to as an “erase block size”. If an erase block size is 16 sectors, such as shown in
It should be noted however, other block sizes may be similarly employed. For example, a block may include 32 sectors and therefore have an erase block size of 32 sectors. In the latter situation, each block entry or row, such as 716, 718, 720 . . . , would include information regarding 32 sectors.
The VPBA block address locations 702 of table 700 stores information generally representing a PBA value corresponding to a particular LBA value. The MVPBA block address locations 704 store information representing a PBA value identifying, within the memory unit 508, the location of where a block (or sector portions thereof) may have been moved. The move flag locations 706 store values indicating whether the block being accessed has any sectors that may have been moved to a location whose PBA is indicated by the value in the MVPBA block address location 704 (the PBA value within 704 being other than the value indicated in VPBA block address 702 wherein the remaining block address information may be located). The used/new flag location 708 stores information to indicate whether the block being accessed is a free block, that is, no data has been stored since the block was last erased. The old/new flag location 710 stores information representing the status of the block being accessed as to whether the block has been used and re-used and therefore, old. The defect flag location 712 stores information regarding whether the block is defective. If a block is declared defective, as indicated by the value in the defect flag location 712 being set, the defective block can no longer be used. Flags 708-712 are similar to the flags 110-114 shown and described with respect to
Sector move status location 714 is comprised of 16 bits (location 714 includes a bit for each sector within a block so for different-sized blocks, different number of bits within location 714 are required) with each bit representing the status of a sector within the block as to whether the sector has been moved to another block within the memory unit 508. The moved block location within the memory unit 508 would be identified by a PBA that is other than the PBA value in VPBA block address location 702. Said differently, the status of whether a sector within a block has been moved, as indicated by each of the bits within 714, suggests which one of either the VPBA block address locations 702 or the MBPBA block address locations 704 maintain the most recent PBA location for that sector.
Referring still to
Assuming that the operation of writing to LBA ‘0’ is occurring after initialization or system power-up when all of the blocks within the flash memory devices 510-512 (in
The value in 734 is at logic state ‘0’ to show that LBA ‘0’ block does not contain any moved sectors. Location 736 within the used flag 708 column of row 716 will be set to logic state ‘1’ indicating that the PBA ‘0’ block is in use. The state of location 738, representing the old flag 710 for row 716, is set to ‘0’ to indicate that PBA ‘0’ block is not “old” yet. Location 740 maintains logic state ‘0’ indicating that the PBA ‘0’ block is not defective and all of the bits in move status location 714 are at logic state ‘0’ to indicate that none of the sectors within the LBA ‘0’ through LBA ‘15’ block have been moved.
In
At this time, a discussion of the contents of one of the flash memory devices within the memory unit 508, wherein the LBA ‘0’ block may be located is presented for the purpose of a better understanding of the mapping information shown in table 700 of
Turning now to
PBA0 row 750 additionally includes storage location for maintaining in LBA address location 758, the LBA number corresponding to PBA ‘0’, which in this example, is ‘0’. While not related to the example at hand, the remaining PBA locations of LBA ‘0’ are stored in the next 15 rows following row 750 in the flash memory device 510.
It will be understood from the discussion of the examples provided herein that the information within a PBA row of flash memory device 510 is enough to identify the data and status information relating thereto within the LBA ‘0’ block including any moves associated therewith, particularly due to the presence of the “move” flag within each PBA row (750, 762, 764, . . . ) of the flash memory. Nevertheless, alternatively, another field may be added to the first PBA row of each LBA location within the flash, replicating the status of the bits in the move status location 714 of the corresponding row in table 700. This field is optionally stored in sector status location 760 shown in
That is, rather than reading every PBA row (altogether 16 rows in the preferred example) to update each LBA entry of the table 700 upon power-up, only the first PBA row of each LBA must be read from flash memory and stored in SPM RAM 548 thereby saving time by avoiding needless read operations. On the other hand, clearly more memory capacity is utilized to maintain 16 bits of sector status information per LBA.
In the above example, wherein location 760 is used, the value in sector status location 760 would be all ‘0’s (or ‘0000’ in hexadecimal notation).
In flash memory device 510, each of the rows 750, 762, 764, 768 . . . , is a PBA location with each row having a PBA row number and for storing data and other information (data and other information are as discussed above with respect to row 750) for a sector within a block addressed by a particular LBA. Furthermore, every sixteen sequential PBA rows represents one block of information. That is, PBA rows 750, 762, 764 through 768, which are intended to show 16 PBA rows correspond to LBA 0 (shown as row 716 in table 700 of
Continuing on with the above example,
The entries in row 716 are modified to show ‘10’ in MVPBA block address location 732, which provides the PBA address of the moved portion for the LBA ‘00’ block. The move flag in location 734 is set to logic state ‘1’ to indicate that at least a portion (one or more sectors) of the LBA ‘00’ block have been moved to a PBA location other than the PBA location indicated in location 730 of table 700. Finally, the bits of the move status location 714 in row 716 are set to ‘1000000000000000’ (in binary notation, or ‘8000’ in hexadecimal notation), reflecting the status of the moved sectors within the block LBA ‘00’. That is, in this example, ‘8000’ indicates that the first sector, or sector ‘0’, within LBA ‘00’ block has been moved to a different PBA location.
Referring now to
While not specifically shown in the figure, the move flag within location 756 of PBA row 750 is set to indicate that at least a portion of the corresponding block has been moved. The value stored in the move status location 714 of row 716 (in
Row 718 is modified to show that the LBA ‘10’ block is now old and can no longer be used before it is erased. This is indicated by the value in location 744 being set to logic state ‘1’. The entries for LBA ‘20’, row 720, remain unchanged except that location 746 is modified to be set to logic state ‘1’ for reflecting the state of the PBA ‘20’ block as being in use. It is understood that as in
Continuing further with the above example,
Row 718 remains the same until it is erased. The flags in locations 742 and 744 are set to logic state ‘0’. Row 720 also remains unchanged except for the value in its old flag 710 column being modified to ‘1’ to show that the block of PBA ‘20’ is also old and can not be used until first erased. Row 722 remains the same except for the value in its used flag 708 column being changed to logic state ‘1’ to show that the block of LBA ‘30’ is now in use.
When writing to LBA ‘5’, it should be understood that the LBA entries of rows 716, 718, 720, etc. are only for LBA ‘00’, LBA ‘10’, LBA ‘20’, so on, and therefore do not reflect an LBA ‘5’ entry. The reader is reminded that each of the LBA row entries is for a block of information with each block being 16 sectors in the preferred embodiment. For this reason, LBA ‘5’ actually addresses the fifth sector in row 716. Since PBA ‘20’ was used to store LBA ‘0’, only the sector within PBA ‘20’, corresponding to LBA ‘5’, is yet not written and “free”. Therefore, the data for LBA ‘5’ is stored in PBA ‘20’ in sector ‘5’. The move status location 714 of row 716 will be modified to logic state ‘8400’ (in Hex. Notation). This reflects that the location of the first and fifth sectors within LBA ‘0’ are both identified at PBA ‘20’ in the flash memory device 510. The remaining values in table 700 of
Continuing on with the example of
The used flag in location 746 of row 720 is set to reflect the use of the PBA ‘20’ location in flash memory and the old flag in location 744 is set to discard use of PBA ‘10’ location until it is erased. Again, in flash memory, the state of these flags as well as the state of the move flag for both the LBA ‘0’ and LBA ‘5’ sectors are replicated.
As may be understood from the discussion presented thus far, at some point in time, the number of sectors being moved within a block makes for an inefficient operation. Thus, the need arises for the user to set a threshold for the number of sectors within a block that may be moved before the block is declared “old” (the old flag is set) and the block is no longer used, until it is erased. This threshold may be set at, for example, half of the number of sectors within a block. This is demonstrated as follows: For a block having 16 sectors, when 8 of the sectors are moved into another block, the “original” block and the “moved” block (the block in which the moved sectors reside) are combined into the same PBA block. The combined PBA block may be stored in a new block altogether or, alternatively, the “original” block may be combined with and moved into the “moved” block. In the latter case, the “original” block is then marked as “old” for erasure thereof. If the combined PBA block is stored in a new block, both of the “original” and the “moved” blocks are marked as “old”.
The steps as outlined in
When the host writes to a block of LBA M, step 800, the space manager block 544, in step 802, checks as to whether LBA M is in use by checking the state of the corresponding used flag in table 700 of the SPM RAM block 548. If not in use, in step 804, a search is performed for the next free PBA block in memory unit 508. If no free blocks are located, an “error” state is detected in 808. But where a free PBA is located, in step 806, its used flag is marked (or set) in table 700 as well as in flash memory. In step 810, the PBA of the free block is written into the VPBA block address 702 location of the corresponding LBA row in table 700.
Going back to step 802, if the LBA M block is in use, search for the next free PBA block is still conducted in step 812 and upon the finding of no such free block, at 814, an “error” condition is declared. Whereas, if a free PBA location is found, that PBA is marked as used in table 700 and flash memory, at step 816. Next, in step 818, the state of the block is indicated as having been moved by setting the move flag as well as the setting the appropriate bit in the move status location 714 of table 700. The new location of where the block is moved is also indicated in table 700 in accordance with the discussion above.
Finally, after steps 818 and 810, data and all corresponding status information, ECC code and LBA are written into the PBA location within the flash memory.
As earlier indicated, when a substantial portion of a block has sectors that have been moved (in the preferred embodiment, this is eight of the sixteen sectors), the block is declared “old” by setting its corresponding “old” flag. Periodically, blocks with their “old” flags set, are erased and may then be re-used (or re-programmed, or re-written).
As can be appreciated, an advantage of the embodiments of
Although the present invention has been described in terms of specific embodiments, it is anticipated that alterations and modifications thereof will no doubt become apparent to those skilled in the art. It is therefore intended that the following claims be interpreted as covering all such alterations and modification as fall within the true spirit and scope of the invention.
This application is a continuation of U.S. application Ser. No. 12/243,538, filed on Oct. 1, 2008, now U.S. Pat. No. 7,908,426, issued Mar. 15, 2011, titled “Moving Sectors Within A Block of Information In A Flash Memory Mass Storage Architecture,” which is a divisional of U.S. application Ser. No. 11/201,612 of the same title, filed on Aug. 10, 2005, now U.S. Pat. No. 7,441,090, which is a continuation of U.S. application Ser. No. 09/620,544 of the same title, filed on Jul. 21, 2000, now U.S. Pat. No. 6,978,342, which is a continuation of U.S. application Ser. No. 09/264,340 of the same title, filed on Mar. 8, 1999, now U.S. Pat. No. 6,145,051, which is a continuation of U.S. application Ser. No. 08/831,266 of the same title, filed on Mar. 31, 1997, now U.S. Pat. No. 5,907,856, which is a continuation-in-part of U.S. application Ser. No. 08/509,706, filed on Jul. 31, 1995, now U.S. Pat. No. 5,845,313, and entitled “Direct Logical Block Addressing Flash Memory Mass Storage Architecture,” all of which are incorporated herein by reference.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4099069 | Cricchi et al. | Jul 1978 | A |
4130900 | Watanabe | Dec 1978 | A |
4210959 | Wozniak | Jul 1980 | A |
4309627 | Tabata | Jan 1982 | A |
4355376 | Gould | Oct 1982 | A |
4398248 | Hsia et al. | Aug 1983 | A |
4405952 | Slakmon | Sep 1983 | A |
4414627 | Nakamura | Nov 1983 | A |
4450559 | Bond et al. | May 1984 | A |
4456971 | Fukuda et al. | Jun 1984 | A |
4468730 | Dodd et al. | Aug 1984 | A |
4473878 | Zolnowsky et al. | Sep 1984 | A |
4476526 | Dodd | Oct 1984 | A |
4498146 | Martinez | Feb 1985 | A |
4525839 | Nozawa et al. | Jun 1985 | A |
4532590 | Wallach et al. | Jul 1985 | A |
4609833 | Guterman | Sep 1986 | A |
4616311 | Sato | Oct 1986 | A |
4654847 | Dutton | Mar 1987 | A |
4710871 | Belknap et al. | Dec 1987 | A |
4746998 | Robinson et al. | May 1988 | A |
4748320 | Yorimoto et al. | May 1988 | A |
4757474 | Fukushi et al. | Jul 1988 | A |
4774700 | Satoh et al. | Sep 1988 | A |
4780855 | Iida et al. | Oct 1988 | A |
4788665 | Fukuda et al. | Nov 1988 | A |
4797543 | Watanabe | Jan 1989 | A |
4800520 | Iijima | Jan 1989 | A |
4829169 | Watanabe | May 1989 | A |
4843224 | Ohta et al. | Jun 1989 | A |
4896262 | Wayama et al. | Jan 1990 | A |
4914529 | Bonke | Apr 1990 | A |
4920518 | Nakamura et al. | Apr 1990 | A |
4924331 | Robinson et al. | May 1990 | A |
4943745 | Watanabe et al. | Jul 1990 | A |
4953122 | Williams | Aug 1990 | A |
4970642 | Yamamura | Nov 1990 | A |
4970727 | Miyawaki et al. | Nov 1990 | A |
5070474 | Tuma et al. | Dec 1991 | A |
5093785 | Iijima | Mar 1992 | A |
5168465 | Harari | Dec 1992 | A |
5198380 | Harari | Mar 1993 | A |
5200959 | Gross et al. | Apr 1993 | A |
5218695 | Noveck et al. | Jun 1993 | A |
5220518 | Haq | Jun 1993 | A |
5226168 | Kobayashi et al. | Jul 1993 | A |
5227714 | Lou | Jul 1993 | A |
5253351 | Yamamoto et al. | Oct 1993 | A |
5267218 | Elbert | Nov 1993 | A |
5268318 | Harari | Dec 1993 | A |
5268870 | Harari | Dec 1993 | A |
5270979 | Harari et al. | Dec 1993 | A |
5293560 | Harari | Mar 1994 | A |
5297148 | Harari et al. | Mar 1994 | A |
5303198 | Adachi et al. | Apr 1994 | A |
5305276 | Uenoyama | Apr 1994 | A |
5305278 | Inoue | Apr 1994 | A |
5315541 | Harari et al. | May 1994 | A |
5315558 | Hag | May 1994 | A |
5329491 | Brown et al. | Jul 1994 | A |
5337275 | Garner | Aug 1994 | A |
5341330 | Wells et al. | Aug 1994 | A |
5341339 | Wells | Aug 1994 | A |
5341341 | Fukuzo | Aug 1994 | A |
5353256 | Fandrich et al. | Oct 1994 | A |
5357475 | Hasbun et al. | Oct 1994 | A |
5359569 | Fujita et al. | Oct 1994 | A |
5365127 | Manley | Nov 1994 | A |
5369615 | Harari et al. | Nov 1994 | A |
5371702 | Nakai et al. | Dec 1994 | A |
5381539 | Yanai et al. | Jan 1995 | A |
5382839 | Shinohara | Jan 1995 | A |
5384743 | Rouy | Jan 1995 | A |
5388083 | Assar et al. | Feb 1995 | A |
5396468 | Harari et al. | Mar 1995 | A |
5404485 | Ban | Apr 1995 | A |
5406527 | Honma | Apr 1995 | A |
5418752 | Harari et al. | May 1995 | A |
5422842 | Cernea et al. | Jun 1995 | A |
5422856 | Sasaki et al. | Jun 1995 | A |
5428621 | Mehrotra et al. | Jun 1995 | A |
5430682 | Ishikawa et al. | Jul 1995 | A |
5430859 | Norman et al. | Jul 1995 | A |
5431330 | Wieres | Jul 1995 | A |
5434825 | Harari | Jul 1995 | A |
5438573 | Mangan et al. | Aug 1995 | A |
5455926 | Keele et al. | Oct 1995 | A |
5465235 | Miyamoto | Nov 1995 | A |
5465338 | Clay | Nov 1995 | A |
5471478 | Mangan et al. | Nov 1995 | A |
5473765 | Gibbons et al. | Dec 1995 | A |
5479638 | Assar et al. | Dec 1995 | A |
5485595 | Assar et al. | Jan 1996 | A |
5490117 | Oda et al. | Feb 1996 | A |
5495442 | Cernea et al. | Feb 1996 | A |
5504760 | Harari et al. | Apr 1996 | A |
5508971 | Cernea et al. | Apr 1996 | A |
5513138 | Manabe et al. | Apr 1996 | A |
5515333 | Fujita et al. | May 1996 | A |
5519847 | Fandrich et al. | May 1996 | A |
5523980 | Sakui et al. | Jun 1996 | A |
5524230 | Sakaue et al. | Jun 1996 | A |
5530673 | Tobita et al. | Jun 1996 | A |
5530828 | Kaki et al. | Jun 1996 | A |
5530938 | Akasaka et al. | Jun 1996 | A |
5532962 | Auclair et al. | Jul 1996 | A |
5532964 | Cernea et al. | Jul 1996 | A |
5534456 | Yuan et al. | Jul 1996 | A |
5535328 | Harari et al. | Jul 1996 | A |
5541551 | Brehner et al. | Jul 1996 | A |
5544118 | Harari | Aug 1996 | A |
5544356 | Robinson et al. | Aug 1996 | A |
5552698 | Tai et al. | Sep 1996 | A |
5554553 | Harari | Sep 1996 | A |
5563825 | Cernea et al. | Oct 1996 | A |
5566314 | DeMarco et al. | Oct 1996 | A |
5568439 | Harari | Oct 1996 | A |
5572466 | Sukegawa | Nov 1996 | A |
5579502 | Konishi et al. | Nov 1996 | A |
5581723 | Hasbun et al. | Dec 1996 | A |
5583812 | Harari | Dec 1996 | A |
5592415 | Kato et al. | Jan 1997 | A |
5592420 | Cernea et al. | Jan 1997 | A |
5596526 | Assar et al. | Jan 1997 | A |
5598370 | Niijima et al. | Jan 1997 | A |
5602987 | Harari et al. | Feb 1997 | A |
5603001 | Sukegawa et al. | Feb 1997 | A |
5606660 | Estakhri et al. | Feb 1997 | A |
5611067 | Okamoto et al. | Mar 1997 | A |
5640528 | Harney et al. | Jun 1997 | A |
5642312 | Harari | Jun 1997 | A |
5648929 | Miyamoto | Jul 1997 | A |
5663901 | Wallace et al. | Sep 1997 | A |
5693570 | Cernea et al. | Dec 1997 | A |
5712819 | Harari | Jan 1998 | A |
5719808 | Harari et al. | Feb 1998 | A |
5723990 | Roohparvar | Mar 1998 | A |
5734567 | Griffiths et al. | Mar 1998 | A |
5734816 | Niijima et al. | Mar 1998 | A |
5740396 | Mason | Apr 1998 | A |
5745418 | Ma et al. | Apr 1998 | A |
5754567 | Norman | May 1998 | A |
5757712 | Nagel et al. | May 1998 | A |
5758100 | Odisho | May 1998 | A |
5761117 | Uchino et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5768190 | Tanaka et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5768195 | Nakamura et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5773901 | Kantner | Jun 1998 | A |
5778418 | Auclair et al. | Jul 1998 | A |
5781478 | Takeuchi et al. | Jul 1998 | A |
5787445 | Daberko | Jul 1998 | A |
5787484 | Norman | Jul 1998 | A |
RE35881 | Barrett et al. | Aug 1998 | E |
5799168 | Ban | Aug 1998 | A |
5802551 | Komatsu et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5809515 | Kaki et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5809558 | Matthews et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5809560 | Schneider | Sep 1998 | A |
5818350 | Estakhri et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
5818781 | Estakhri et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
5822245 | Gupta et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
5822252 | Lee et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
5822781 | Wells et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
5831929 | Manning | Nov 1998 | A |
5835935 | Estakhri et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
5838614 | Estakhri et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
5845313 | Estakhri et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
5847552 | Brown | Dec 1998 | A |
5860083 | Sukegawa | Jan 1999 | A |
5860124 | Matthews et al. | Jan 1999 | A |
5862099 | Gannage et al. | Jan 1999 | A |
5890192 | Lee et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
5901086 | Wang et al. | May 1999 | A |
5907856 | Estakhri et al. | May 1999 | A |
5909586 | Anderson | Jun 1999 | A |
5920884 | Jennings, III et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
5924113 | Estakhri et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
5928370 | Asnaashari | Jul 1999 | A |
5930815 | Estakhri et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
5933368 | Ma et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
5933846 | Endo | Aug 1999 | A |
5936971 | Harari et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
5937425 | Ban | Aug 1999 | A |
5953737 | Estakhri et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
5956473 | Ma et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
5959926 | Jones et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
5966727 | Nishino | Oct 1999 | A |
5986933 | Takeuchi et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
5987563 | Itoh et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
5987573 | Hiraka | Nov 1999 | A |
5991849 | Yamada et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
6011322 | Stumfall et al. | Jan 2000 | A |
6011323 | Camp | Jan 2000 | A |
6018265 | Keshtbod | Jan 2000 | A |
6021408 | Ledain et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6026020 | Matsubara et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6026027 | Terrell, II et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6034897 | Estakhri et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
6035357 | Sakaki | Mar 2000 | A |
6040997 | Estakhri | Mar 2000 | A |
6041001 | Estakhri | Mar 2000 | A |
6047352 | Lakhani et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
6055184 | Acharya et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
6055188 | Takeuchi et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
6069827 | Sinclair | May 2000 | A |
6072796 | Christensen et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
6076137 | Asnaashari | Jun 2000 | A |
6081447 | Lofgren et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
6081878 | Estakhri et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
6084483 | Keshtbod | Jul 2000 | A |
6097666 | Sakui et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6115785 | Estakhri et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
6122195 | Estakhri et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
6125424 | Komatsu et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
6125435 | Estakhri et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
6128695 | Estakhri et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6134145 | Wong | Oct 2000 | A |
6134151 | Estakhri et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6141249 | Estakhri et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6145051 | Estakhri et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
6151247 | Estakhri et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
6172906 | Estakhri et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6173362 | Yoda | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6181118 | Meehan et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6182162 | Estakhri et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6202138 | Estakhri et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6223308 | Estakhri et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6226708 | McGoldrick et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6230234 | Estakhri et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6262918 | Estakhri et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6272610 | Katayama et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6275436 | Tobita et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6279069 | Robinson et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6279114 | Toombs et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6285607 | Sinclair | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6327639 | Asnaashari | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6345367 | Sinclair | Feb 2002 | B1 |
6374337 | Estakhri | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6385667 | Estakhri et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
6393513 | Estakhri et al. | May 2002 | B2 |
6397314 | Estakhri et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
6411546 | Estakhri et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6467021 | Sinclair | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6490649 | Sinclair | Dec 2002 | B2 |
6567307 | Estakhri | May 2003 | B1 |
6578127 | Sinclair | Jun 2003 | B1 |
6587382 | Estakhri et al. | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6711059 | Sinclair et al. | Mar 2004 | B2 |
6721819 | Estakhri et al. | Apr 2004 | B2 |
6721843 | Estakhri | Apr 2004 | B1 |
6725321 | Sinclair et al. | Apr 2004 | B1 |
6728851 | Estakhri et al. | Apr 2004 | B1 |
6751155 | Gorobets | Jun 2004 | B2 |
6757800 | Estakhri et al. | Jun 2004 | B1 |
6772274 | Estakhri | Aug 2004 | B1 |
6813678 | Sinclair et al. | Nov 2004 | B1 |
6898662 | Gorobets | May 2005 | B2 |
6912618 | Estakhri et al. | Jun 2005 | B2 |
6950918 | Estakhri | Sep 2005 | B1 |
6957295 | Estakhri | Oct 2005 | B1 |
6973519 | Estakhri et al. | Dec 2005 | B1 |
6978342 | Estakhri et al. | Dec 2005 | B1 |
7000064 | Payne et al. | Feb 2006 | B2 |
20030033471 | Lin et al. | Feb 2003 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
0 557 723 | Jan 1987 | AU |
0 220 718 | May 1987 | EP |
0 243 503 | Nov 1987 | EP |
0 392 895 | Oct 1990 | EP |
0 424 191 | Apr 1991 | EP |
0 489 204 | Jun 1992 | EP |
0 522 780 | Jan 1993 | EP |
0 522 780 | Jan 1993 | EP |
0 544 252 | Jun 1993 | EP |
0 613 151 | Aug 1994 | EP |
0 617 363 | Sep 1994 | EP |
0 619 541 | Oct 1994 | EP |
0 663 636 | Jul 1995 | EP |
0 686 976 | Dec 1995 | EP |
0 897 579 | Jul 2000 | EP |
0 891 580 | Nov 2000 | EP |
0 896 669 | Nov 2000 | EP |
0 852 766 | May 2001 | EP |
0 852 765 | Sep 2001 | EP |
0 722 585 | May 2002 | EP |
0 910 826 | Jun 2002 | EP |
0 691 008 | Nov 2002 | EP |
0 861 468 | Apr 2003 | EP |
0 978 040 | May 2004 | EP |
1 157 328 | May 2005 | EP |
93 01908 | Aug 1993 | FR |
2 251 323 | Jul 1992 | GB |
2 291 990 | Feb 1996 | GB |
2 297 637 | Jul 1996 | GB |
2 304 428 | Mar 1997 | GB |
2 348 991 | Dec 2002 | GB |
2 351 822 | Jan 2003 | GB |
2 384 337 | Jul 2003 | GB |
2 384 883 | Oct 2005 | GB |
2 384 338 | Nov 2005 | GB |
2 384 072 | Dec 2005 | GB |
2 411 499 | Feb 2006 | GB |
117881 | May 2003 | IS |
59-45695 | Sep 1982 | JP |
58-21594 | Dec 1983 | JP |
58-215795 | Dec 1983 | JP |
59-092483 | May 1984 | JP |
59-162695 | Sep 1984 | JP |
60-212900 | Oct 1985 | JP |
61-96598 | May 1986 | JP |
62-283496 | Dec 1987 | JP |
62-283497 | Dec 1987 | JP |
63-183700 | Jul 1988 | JP |
1-138694 | May 1989 | JP |
3-228377 | Oct 1991 | JP |
4-057295 | Feb 1992 | JP |
4-254994 | Sep 1992 | JP |
4-268284 | Sep 1992 | JP |
4-278297 | Oct 1992 | JP |
4-332999 | Nov 1992 | JP |
5-128877 | May 1993 | JP |
5-282883 | Oct 1993 | JP |
6-004399 | Jan 1994 | JP |
6-036578 | Feb 1994 | JP |
6-124175 | May 1994 | JP |
6-124231 | May 1994 | JP |
6-131889 | May 1994 | JP |
6-132747 | May 1994 | JP |
6-149395 | May 1994 | JP |
6-266596 | Sep 1994 | JP |
7-084871 | Mar 1995 | JP |
7-093499 | Apr 1995 | JP |
7-114499 | May 1995 | JP |
7-141258 | Jun 1995 | JP |
7-235193 | Sep 1995 | JP |
7-311708 | Nov 1995 | JP |
7-334996 | Dec 1995 | JP |
8-018018 | Jan 1996 | JP |
8-069696 | Mar 1996 | JP |
08-137634 | May 1996 | JP |
9-147581 | Jun 1997 | JP |
1388877 | Apr 1988 | SU |
1408439 | Jul 1988 | SU |
1515164 | Oct 1989 | SU |
1541619 | Feb 1990 | SU |
1573458 | Jun 1990 | SU |
1686449 | Oct 1991 | SU |
WO 9420906 | Sep 1994 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Kai Hwang & Faye A. Briggs, Computer Architecture and Parallel Processing, McGraw-Hill Book Co., 1984, p. 64. |
Walter Lahti and Dean McCarron, “State of the Art: Magnetic VS Optical Store Data in a Flash”, Byte Magazine, Nov. 1, 1990. 311, vol. 15, No. 12. |
Ron Wilson, Technology Updates, Integrated Circuits, “I-Mbit flash memories seek their role in system design”, Computer Design 28 Mar. 1, 1989, No. 5, Tulsa OK, US, pp. 30 and 32. |
S. Mehoura et al., SunDisk Corporation, Santa Clara, CA. R.W. Gregor et al., AT&T Bell Laboratories, Allentown, PA. 1992 Symposium of VLSJ Circuits Digest of Technical Papers, “EEPROM for Solid State Disk Applications”, pp. 24 and 25. |
Mendel Rosenblum and John K. Ousterhout, “The Design and Implementation of a Log-Structured File System,” 1991, 15 pgs., Berkeley, USA. |
Brian Dipert and Markus Levy, Designing with Flash Memory, Annabooks, Apr. 1994, 445 pgs. |
Science Forum, Inc. “Flash Memory Symposium '95”, 1995, 13 pgs. Tokyo. |
Ross S. Finlayson and David R. Cheriton, “An Extended File Service Exploiting Write-Once Storage,” ACM Symposium on Operating Systems Principles, 1987, 10 pgs. |
Jason Gait, “The Optical File Cabinet: A Random-Access File System for Write-Once Storage”, Computer, Jun. 1988, 12 pgs. |
Henry G. Baker, Memory Management, 1995, Springer-Verlag Heidelberg, Germany, 19 pgs. |
Sape J. Mullender and Andrew S. Tanenbaum, “A Distributed File Service Based on Optimistic Concurrency Control”, ACM Press, 1985, 12 pgs. New York, New York. |
Hiroshi Nakamura, Junichi Miyamoto, Kenichi Imamiya and Yoshihisa Iwata, “A Novel Sense Amplifier for Flexible Voltage Operation NAND Flash Memories”, VLSI Circuits, 1995, Digest of Technical Papers, 2 pgs. |
Hiroshi Nakamura, Junichi Miyamoto, Kenichi Imamiya, Yoshihisa Iwata and Hideko Oodaira, “A Novel Sensing Scheme with On-Chip Page for Flexible Voltage NAND Flash Memories”, IEICE Transactions on Electronics, vol. E79-C, No. 6, pp. 836-844, Jun. 20, 1996. |
Takaaki Nozaki, Toshiaki Tanaka, Yoshiro Kijiya, Eita Kinoshita, Tatsuo Tsuchiya and Yutaka Hayashi, “A 1-Mb EEPROM with MONOS Memory Cell for Semiconductor Disk Application”, Journal of Solid-State Circuits, vol. 26, No. 4, 5 pgs. Apr. 1991. |
Kai Hwang and Faye A. Briggs, Computer Architecture and Parallel Processing, 1984, McGraw-Hill, Inc. |
Ron Wilson, “Integrated Circuits; 1-Mb flash memories seek their role in system design”, Mar. 1, 1989, 2 pgs. Tulsa, OK. |
S. Mehroura, J.H. Yuan, R.A. Cemea, W.Y. Chien, D.C. Guteman, G. Samachisa, R.D. Norman, M. Mofidi, W. Lee, Y. Fong, A. Mihnea, E. Hann, R.W. Gregor, E.P. Eberhardt, J.R. Radosevich, K.R. Stiles, R.A. Kohler, C.W. Leung, and T.J. Mulrooney, “Serial 9Mb F EEPROM for Solid State Disk Applications”, symposium, 2 pgs., 1992, Mountain View, CA. |
Steven H. Leibson, “Nonvolatile, In-Circuit-Reprogrammable Memories”, EDN Special Report, Jan. 3, 1991, No. 12, 12 pgs. |
Walter Lahti and Dean McCarron, “State of the Art: Magnetic vs. Optical Store Data in a Flash”, Byte Magazine, 1990, vol. 15, No. 12, 7 pgs. |
Ramon Caceres, Fred Douglis, Kai Li and Brian Marsh, “Operating System Implications of Solid-State Mobile Computers”, Workshop on Workstation Operating Systems, Oct. 1993, pp. 21-27. |
Michael Wu and Wily Zwaenepoel, “A Non-Volatile, Main Memory Storage System”, ACM Press, 1994, 12 pgs., San Jose, CA. |
Dave Bursky, “Innovative flash memories match DRAM densities: available with a choice of features, flash memories are finding homes in many systems (including related articles on the origins of flash, and on the differences between NAND and NOR flash memories)”, Electronic Design, May 16, 1994, vol. 42, No. 10, 9 pgs. |
Anthony Cataldo, “New flash enhancements up ante. (Intel's 28F400BV-120 and 28F004BV-120, Atmel's AT29BV010 and AT29BV020, and Samsung Semiconductor's KM29V3200 flash memory devices)” (product announcement), Electronic News, Mar. 13, 1995, vol. 41, No. 2056, 4 pgs. |
Sam Weber, “Flash modules' portability, reusability, small size valued for a host of APPs-Consumer formats flocking to flash”, Electronic Engineering Times, Jul. 22, 1996, No. 911, 9 pgs. |
Stan Baker, “But Integration Calls for Hardware, Software Changes: Flash designers face the dawn of a new memory age”, Electronic Engineering Times, Dec. 3, 1990, vol. 41, No. 619, 5 pgs. |
Toshiba, MOS Memory (Non-Volatile), 1995, Data Book. |
Toshiba, Toshiba MOS Digital Integrated Circuit Silicon Gate CMOS, (TC58NS512DC), Mar. 21, 2001, 43 pgs., Data Book. |
Toshiba, Toshiba Corporation, SMIL (Smartmedia Interface Library) Hardware Edition Version 1.00, Jul. 1, 2000, 136 pgs., Data Book. |
Toshiba, Toshiba MOS Digital Integrated Circuit Silicon Gate, (TC58512FT), Mar. 5, 2001, 43 pgs., Data Book. |
Toshiba, Toshiba MOS Digital Integrated Circuit Silicon Gate, (TC58DVM92A1FT00), Jan. 10, 2003, 44 pgs., Data Book. |
Toshiba, Toshiba MOS Digital Integrated Circuit Silicon Gate, (TC58DVG02A1FT00), Jan. 10, 2003, 44 pgs., Data Book. |
Toshiba, Toshiba MOS Digital Integrated Circuit Silicon Gate, (TC58100FT), Mar. 5, 2001, 43 pgs., Data Book. |
Toshiba, MOS Memory (Non-Volatile), 1996, 279 pgs., Data Book. |
“Fifth Biennial Nonvolatile Memory Technology Review,” 1993 Conference, Jun. 22-24, 1993, Linthicum Heights, MD, USA. |
Dan Auclair, “Optimal Solid State Disk Architecture for Portable Computers”, Silicon Valley PC Design Conference, Jul. 9-10, 1991, pp. 811-815. |
O. Kobayashi, et al. “Flash EEPROM The Use Environment for External Storage Devices is Put Into Place,” Nikkei Electronics, Apr. 11, 1994, pp. 21. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20110167204 A1 | Jul 2011 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 11201612 | Aug 2005 | US |
Child | 12243538 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 12243538 | Oct 2008 | US |
Child | 13045159 | US | |
Parent | 09620544 | Jul 2000 | US |
Child | 11201612 | US | |
Parent | 09264340 | Mar 1999 | US |
Child | 09620544 | US | |
Parent | 08831266 | Mar 1997 | US |
Child | 09264340 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 08509706 | Jul 1995 | US |
Child | 08831266 | US |