The present disclosure relates to a memory device and erasing and verification method thereof, and more particularly, to a memory device and erasing and verification method thereof capable of increasing channel discharging time to avoid false error verification.
Semiconductor memories are widely used in various electronic devices such as cellular phones, digital cameras, personal digital assistants, medical electronic devices, mobile computing devices and non-mobile computing devices. A nonvolatile memory allows information to be stored and retained. Examples of the nonvolatile memory comprises a flash memory (e.g., NAND type and NOR type flash memory) and electrically erasable programmable read only memory (Electrically Erasable Programmable Read-Only Memory, EEPROM).
Recently, ultra high density storage devices have been proposed using a three-dimensional (3D) stacked memory structure sometimes referred to as a Bit Cost Scalable (BiCS) architecture. For example, a 3D NAND stacked flash memory device can be formed from an array of alternating conductive and dielectric layers. A memory hole is drilled in the layers to define many memory layers simultaneously. A NAND string is then formed by filling the memory hole with appropriate materials. Control gates of the memory cells are provided by the conductive layers.
Each planar NAND memory consists of an array of memory cells connected by multiple word lines and bit lines. Data is programmed into or read from the planar NAND memory on a page-by-page basis, and erased from the planar NAND memory on a block-by-block basis, i.e., a block is the unit of a conventional erasing operation and a page is the unit of a conventional programming operation.
For the existing three-dimensional (3D) NAND Flash structure, after an erasing stage, a verification stage is required to verify whether the erasing is successful or not. However, in the 3D NAND Flash, a false error may occur in the verification stage.
It is therefore an objective of the present disclosure to provide a memory device and erasing and verification method thereof capable of increasing channel discharging time to avoid false error verification.
The present disclosure discloses a memory device. The memory device includes a plurality of memory blocks, and a control circuit. A selected memory block of the plurality of memory blocks comprises a top select gate, a bottom select gate, a plurality of word lines, a common-source line, and a P-well. The control circuit performs an erasing and verification method, wherein the erasing and verification method includes erasing the selected memory block during an erasing stage; and maintaining the bottom select gate to be turned on during a maintaining period before the top select gate are turned on during a verification stage.
The present disclosure discloses an erasing and verification method for a memory device, wherein a selected memory block of the plurality of memory blocks of the memory device comprises a top select gate, a bottom select gate, a plurality of word lines, a common-source line, and a P-well. The erasing and verification method includes erasing the selected memory block during an erasing stage; and maintaining the bottom select gate to be turned on during a maintaining period before the top select gate is turned on during a verification stage.
These and other objectives of the present disclosure will no doubt become obvious to those of ordinary skill in the art after reading the following detailed description of the embodiments that are illustrated in the various figures and drawings.
In the following detailed description, reference is made to the accompanying drawings that show, by way of illustration, specific embodiments in which the present disclosure may be practiced. These embodiments are described in sufficient detail to enable those skilled in the art to practice the present disclosure. It is to be understood that the various embodiments of the present disclosure, although different, are not necessarily mutually exclusive. For example, a particular feature, structure, or characteristic described herein in connection with one embodiment may be implemented within other embodiments without departing from the spirit and scope of the present disclosure. In addition, it is to be understood that the location or arrangement of individual elements within each disclosed embodiment may be modified without departing from the spirit and scope of the present disclosure. The following detailed description is, therefore, not to be taken in a limiting sense, and the scope of the present disclosure is defined only by the appended claims, appropriately interpreted, along with the full range of equivalents to which the claims are entitled. In the drawings, like numerals refer to the same or similar functionality throughout the several views.
In the following description and in the claims, the terms “include” and “comprise” are used in an open-ended fashion, and thus should be interpreted to mean “include, but not limited to.” Also, the term “couple” is intended to mean either an indirect or direct electrical connection. Accordingly, if one device is electrically connected to another device, that connection may be through a direct electrical connection, or through an indirect electrical connection via other devices and connections. “Roughly” means that within the acceptable error budgets, those skilled in the art can solve the technical problem within a certain error budgets, and basically achieve the technical effect.
For illustrative purpose,
A typical architecture for a flash memory system using a NAND structure includes several NAND strings. Each NAND string is connected to the common source line CSL by its bottom select gate SG_B controlled by the select line SGBL and connected to its associated bit line by its top select gate SG_T controlled by the select line SGTL. Each bit line and the respective NAND string(s) that are connected to that bit line via a bit line contact comprise the columns of the array of memory cells. Bit lines are shared with multiple NAND strings. Typically, the bit line runs on top of the NAND strings in a direction perpendicular to the word lines and is connected to one or more sense amplifiers.
When the control circuit 304 performs erasing operation in a unit of a block, a corresponding verification operation must be taken to guarantee that corresponding memory cells are erased to prevent data remanence or meta-stability, which would cause short life to the 3D NAND flash memory.
More specifically, in the verification stage, the corresponding memory cells are conducted, to examine whether the corresponding memory cells are “strong” logic 1 or “weak” logic 1 by measuring threshold voltages of the corresponding memory cells. If the corresponding memory cells are not “strong” enough, or the threshold voltages of the corresponding memory cells does not meet a predefined threshold, the bit-cell may turn to logic 0 from logic 1 during aging, and the reliability of 3D NAND flash is degraded. Therefore, after the erasing stage, it needs to check the bit-cell to determine whether the threshold voltages of the corresponding memory cells meet the predefined threshold or not. However, a false error may occur in the verification stage.
In detail, please refer to
Then, in the verification stage, word lines are provided with a verification voltage Vv (e.g., 2.2 V), then the top select gate SG_T, the bottom select gate SG_B are provided with a turn-on voltage Von, and the word lines are provided with the verification voltage Vv again in the end, to check whether the threshold voltages of the corresponding memory cells meet the predefined threshold or not. If the threshold voltages of the corresponding memory cells do not meet the predefined threshold, i.e., a verification during the verification stage is failed, another erasing stage and another verification stage are performed until the threshold voltages of the corresponding memory cells meet the predefined threshold, or an error message is generated if a predefined number of verification stages with failed verification are performed.
However, since the top select gate SG5_T and the bottom select gate SG_B are floated in the erasing stage, when the voltage of the P-well decreases to zero, voltages of the top select gate SG_T and the bottom select gate SG_B drop accordingly and then belong the turn-on voltage Von, such that the bottom select gate SG_B is turned off and thus a channel stops discharging and is floated (as shown in the dotted line of
For example, if the corresponding memory cells are erased to strong logic 1, but determined to be weak logic 1, then another erasing stage is needed to guarantee that erasing is successful. However, it is a redundant step to erase the corresponding memory cells with strong logic 1 since the corresponding memory cells are logically strong enough. As a result, the more of the false error results in the longer period of the erasing stage and verification stage, which degrades the reliability and programming performance of the memory device 30.
In comparison, in the erasing and verification process of the present disclosure, when a selected memory block of the memory blocks BLOCK1˜BLOCKI is selected to be erased, the control circuit 304 maintains the bottom select gate SG_B to be turned on during a maintaining period before the top select gate SG_T is turned on during a verification stage. As a result, by maintaining the bottom select gate SG_B to be turned on during the maintaining period before the top select gate SG_T is turned on during a verification stage, the present disclosure increases channel discharging time to avoid voltage drop of the word lines and false error verification thereafter.
More specifically, please refer to
Under such a situation, the common-source line CSL and the channel can be connected during the maintaining period Pm. Therefore, in comparison with the conventional erasing and verification process with issues of higher channel potential due to word line coupling and voltage drop of the word lines due to channel discharging coupling in the above description, the channel keeps discharged to zero potential in the early verification stage (after T1) as shown in the solid line in
Noticeably, the spirit of the present disclosure is to maintain the bottom select gate SG_B to be turned on during a maintaining period before the top select gate SG_T is turned on during the verification stage, to increases channel discharging time to avoid voltage drop of the word lines due to channel discharging coupling. Those skilled in the art could make modifications or alterations, which still belong to the scope of the present disclosure. For example, a maintaining period during which the bottom select gate SG_B is turned on is not limited to the maintaining period Pm shown in
For example, please refer to
On the other hand, as shown in
Notably, the default value of the 3D NAND flash is logic 1 in the above embodiments. However, in other embodiments, the default value of the 3D NAND flash may be logic 0, and the moving of erasing is to make the memory cell from 1 to 0. In an embodiment, the high voltage (say 1.1 Volt) represents the logic 1, and in an embodiment, the logic 1 may be represented by low voltage (say 0 Volt), which is not limited thereto. Moreover, the predefined threshold between strong logic 1 and logic 0 may differ between the techniques of process; for example, the thresholds may be 0.7 volt in 22 nm ultra-low power (22ULP) technology. Those skilled in the art may make modifications and alterations accordingly, which is not limited herein.
Besides, although the present disclosure avoids false error verification, however, if the threshold voltages of the corresponding memory cells does not meet the predefined threshold, i.e. a verification during the verification stage is failed, another erasing stage and another verification stage are performed until the threshold voltages of the corresponding memory cells meet the predefined threshold, or an error message is generated if a predefined number of verification stages with failed verification are performed. The criteria to determine the failure of the erasing and verification process is not limited, and may be based on a threshold time, a threshold number of performing erasing and verification process for the 3D NAND flash, or any combination thereof. In addition, the threshold time or the threshold number may be fixed by pre-determining or calibration, be a number mapped by a table, or adjusted accordingly to fit the practical scenario. Those skilled in the art may make modifications of the decision rule and alterations accordingly, and not limited herein.
In addition, the erasing and verification process may be modified to have a verification stage to follow a plurality of erasing stages in sequence. For example, the 3D NAND flash erasing and verification process may comprise a first erasing stage, a second erasing stage, and a verification stage. In an embodiment, each of the erasing and verification process should include a maintaining period during which the bottom select gate SG_B is turned on, to increase channel discharging time and thus avoid voltage drop of the word lines due to channel discharging coupling.
Notably, the embodiments stated in the above are utilized for illustrating the concept of the present disclosure. Those skilled in the art may make modifications and alterations accordingly, and not limited herein. Hence, as long as the bottom select gate SG_B is turned on before the top select gate SG_T is turned on during the verification stage, the requirement of the present application is satisfied, which is within the scope of the present application.
Step 700: Start.
Step 702: Erase the selected memory block during an erasing stage;
Step 704: Maintain the bottom select gate SG_B to be turned on during a maintaining period before the top select gate SG_T is turned on during a verification stage.
Step 706: End.
Detailed operations of the erasing and verification process 70 can be derived by referring to the above description, and are not narrated hereinafter for brevity.
In summary, by maintaining the bottom select gate SG_B to be turned on during a maintaining period before the top select gate SG_T is turned on during the verification stage, the present disclosure increases channel discharging time to avoid voltage drop of the word lines due to channel discharging coupling and false error verification.
Those skilled in the art will readily observe that numerous modifications and alterations of the device and method may be made while retaining the teachings of the present disclosure. Accordingly, the above disclosure should be construed as limited only by the metes and bounds of the appended claims.
This application is a continuation of U.S. application Ser. No. 16/905,880, filed on Jun. 18, 2020, which is a continuation of International Application No. PCT/CN2020/087356, filed on Apr. 28, 2020, both of which are incorporated herein by reference in their entireties.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
5515324 | Tanaka | May 1996 | A |
6055188 | Takeuchi et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
6108238 | Nakamura et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6108263 | Bauser et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
7995392 | Shibata | Aug 2011 | B2 |
9449698 | Paudel | Sep 2016 | B1 |
9460799 | Costa | Oct 2016 | B1 |
10020046 | Uemura | Jul 2018 | B1 |
10147734 | Varkony | Dec 2018 | B1 |
10685723 | Chen et al. | Jun 2020 | B1 |
10832778 | Yang et al. | Nov 2020 | B1 |
20040208061 | Toda | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20060233012 | Sekiguchi et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20080013360 | Hemink | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080019164 | Hemink | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080158983 | Mokhlesi et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20090154252 | Shibata | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090207657 | Tamada | Aug 2009 | A1 |
20090231919 | Won | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20090273978 | Fukuda | Nov 2009 | A1 |
20090303799 | Nakamura | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20090323432 | Futatsuyama et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20100002514 | Lutze | Jan 2010 | A1 |
20100067299 | Futatsuyama | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100214842 | Honda | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20120127803 | Hazama | May 2012 | A1 |
20120195123 | Lee | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20120224427 | Takekida | Sep 2012 | A1 |
20120327720 | Eguchi | Dec 2012 | A1 |
20130088920 | Huang et al. | Apr 2013 | A1 |
20130272067 | Lee et al. | Oct 2013 | A1 |
20140226414 | Costa et al. | Aug 2014 | A1 |
20140347928 | Lee | Nov 2014 | A1 |
20150003157 | Aritome | Jan 2015 | A1 |
20160027504 | Lee | Jan 2016 | A1 |
20160217860 | Lai | Jul 2016 | A1 |
20160240264 | Hosono | Aug 2016 | A1 |
20170018555 | Kwan et al. | Jan 2017 | A1 |
20170076801 | Shirakawa et al. | Mar 2017 | A1 |
20180137005 | Wu et al. | May 2018 | A1 |
20180151237 | Lee | May 2018 | A1 |
20190279720 | Nam et al. | Sep 2019 | A1 |
20190371416 | Kuddannavar et al. | Dec 2019 | A1 |
20200013468 | Yoshida et al. | Jan 2020 | A1 |
20200075102 | Liu et al. | Mar 2020 | A1 |
20200075110 | Suzuki et al. | Mar 2020 | A1 |
20200194077 | Sanad et al. | Jun 2020 | A1 |
20200211663 | Baraskar et al. | Jul 2020 | A1 |
20200381067 | Maeda | Dec 2020 | A1 |
20200388342 | Yang et al. | Dec 2020 | A1 |
20210175240 | Tran et al. | Jun 2021 | A1 |
20210175243 | Shin et al. | Jun 2021 | A1 |
20210183447 | Chai | Jun 2021 | A1 |
20210183851 | Davis et al. | Jun 2021 | A1 |
20210193194 | Suzuki et al. | Jun 2021 | A1 |
20210193227 | Kim | Jun 2021 | A1 |
20210264981 | Liu et al. | Aug 2021 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
102881329 | Jan 2013 | CN |
105513639 | Apr 2016 | CN |
109273039 | Jan 2019 | CN |
111373478 | Jul 2020 | CN |
2009266356 | Nov 2009 | JP |
2010067327 | Mar 2010 | JP |
2022524578 | May 2022 | JP |
2018132186 | Jul 2018 | WO |
2021168674 | Sep 2021 | WO |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20220013177 A1 | Jan 2022 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 16905880 | Jun 2020 | US |
Child | 17485241 | US | |
Parent | PCT/CN2020/087356 | Apr 2020 | US |
Child | 16905880 | US |