The present invention relates to an apparatus and a method for automatic staining of tissue samples. It may further relate to systems for sample processing and data acquisition, data maintenance, and data retrieval for sample processing. Applications to which the present invention may especially relate include immunohistochemistry, in-situ hybridization, fluorescent in-situ hybridization, special staining, and cytology, as well as potentially other chemical and biological applications.
Tissue sample processing in immunohistochemical (IHC) applications and in other chemical and biological analyses, such as in-situ hybridization, special staining and cytology, may require one or more processing sequences or protocols as part of an analysis of one or more samples. The sample processing sequences or protocols may be defined by the individual or organization requesting an analysis, such as a pathologist or histologist of hospital, or may be defined by dictates of a particular analysis to be performed, e.g. standardized protocols defined by an organization.
In preparation for sample analysis, a biological sample may be acquired by known sample acquisition techniques and may comprise tissues which in some applications may even be one or more isolated cells. The tissue sample may be accommodated on a sample carrier such as a slide or perhaps a microscope slide.
For example, immunologic applications may require processing sequences protocols that comprise steps such as deparaffinisation, target retrieval, and staining. Previously, in some applications, these steps may have been performed manually, potentially resulting in a time consuming protocol and necessitating personnel to be actively involved in sample processing. In particular relating to the staining process, various devices for automated staining of tissue slides are known, as attempts have been made to automate sample processing to address the need for expedient sample processing and less manually burdensome operation.
Aspects of the present invention may be especially applicable to sample processing having one or a plurality of processing steps to be performed on one, a portion, or an entirety of samples, such protocols identified in some instances by the individual carriers presenting the samples. Aspects of the present invention may be especially applicable to immunohistochemistry (IHC) techniques, as well as in-situ hybridization (ISH) and fluorescent in-situ hybridization (FISH), especially techniques incorporating the staining of samples.
Embodiments of the invention may further relate to automated control systems for sample processing. Embodiments may also be directed to data acquisition, data maintenance, data retrieval for sample processing, especially information sharing of processing protocol and processing status, such as for individual samples or multiple batch processing, sample diagnostic features, and real-time or adaptive capabilities for multiple batch processing.
U.S. Pat. No. 5,839,091 discloses an apparatus for automatic tissue staining where microscope slides are arranged in a number of rows and reagent vials are stored in a section next to this slide section. A robotic head pick up a predetermined amount of reagent from a bottle and deposits this amount of reagent on a predetermined slide and blows the liquid off the slides according to a control program. This program is run on a computer that is coupled to the staining apparatus. The apparatus is loaded with a number of slides, and each slide and its position is registered in the computer and a staining sequence is selected. The program also receives data relating to the reagents and their position in the reagent section. On the basis of these slide and reagent position data, the program calculates a staining run and controls the robotic motion in the apparatus.
U.S. Pat. No. 6,352,861 discloses a carousel-type automatic staining apparatus in which the slides are arranged on a rotatable carousel slide support and the reagents are similarly arranged on a rotatably carousel reagent support above the slide support. A particular slide is then rotated to a delivery zone and a particular reagent vial is also rotated to this position and reagent is dispensed onto the slide. The slides and the reagent bottles are provided with bar codes and associated bar code readers are provided to identify the slides and the reagents respectively. A blowing zone and an identifying zone are also provided at the periphery of the slide carousel. The slide bar codes identify the slide samples and their particular immunohistochemical processes required for the particular samples. A reagent bar code reader is positioned to an the reagent bar codes on the reagent bottles. The scanned information from the slide bar code reader and the reagent bar code reader is fed into a computer and correlated with the indexed position of the slide and the reagent carousel, respectively. This information is used to rotate the slide carousel and the reagent carousel to place the correct reagent bottle in the dispense zone for each slide treatment step for each slide.
A drawback of the automated staining apparatus described in '091 is that the position of each of the tissue slides and each of the reagent vials in the slide section and in the reagent section, respectively, must be entered manually into the computer, since the control program cannot check the location of the particular slides and reagent vials. This involves the risk that a misplaced slide is treated with the wrong staining protocol and makes the apparatus very inflexible in use.
Although the '861 patent use a bar code identification of the slides and reagents, this carousel-type apparatus is time consuming ii running the staining protocols, since this involves rotating the carousels with the entire reagent inventory and the slide carousel with all the slides for each step in a protocol. These rotations are time consuming and make this type of apparatus unsuitable for running of larger numbers of slides. Moreover, the bar codes can only carry a small amount of data, typically simply an identification code, which means that the control computer must be provided with corresponding data associated with the identification codes.
It is an object for the present invention to provide an automatic tissue sample processing apparatus of the initially mentioned kind, with automatic identification of the inventory of reagents and slides present in the machine. Another object is to provide identification of relevant properties of the apparatus to allow for automatic preparatory checks before a staining process of newly loaded slides is initiated.
In one embodiment these objects are achieved by an apparatus of the initially mentioned kind wherein a robotic element, perhaps with a robotic head, is provided with an optical sensor, or perhaps a 2-D optical sensor means for detecting two-dimensional image data of a relevant property and with the capability of feeding the captured image data to the control means.
The invention also provides a method of identifying at least one property in an automatic staining apparatus perhaps including at least one slide may and a reagent array and a robotic element or perhaps robotic means for performing staining of the slides also using reagents;
Furthermore, the invention concerns a method of staining tissue samples in an automatic staining apparatus perhaps including at least one slide any and a reagent array, a robotic element or perhaps and robotic means for performing staining of the slides also using reagents according to tissue sample specific staining protocols; said method including in one embodiment the steps of:
In embodiments, the automatic staining apparatus 1, that is any apparatus that stains with at least some automated operation, may include a reagent container 3. One or more reagent containers 3 may be positioned in a reagent section 2 of the automatic staining apparatus 1. The automatic staining apparatus may also include a tissue sample 74 which may therein be placed on a slide. A plurality of slides with tissue samples thereon may also be positioned in a slide section 5 of the automatic staining apparatus 1. The invention, in embodiments, may also include a robotic element 20, some type of control element, and even an optical sensor (86), perhaps an image-capture 2-D optical sensor. As can be easily understood, the control element 85, may be a computer, software routine, or merely a particular programmable processor functionality.
As mentioned, the present invention may provide for the capability of optically sensing a two dimensional image. This can occur through an image-capture 2-D sensor which may provide a two-dimensional image of an element in the auto staining apparatus 1. Through providing the robotic element or perhaps a robotic head with a 2-D optical sensor or means, as but one embodiment, a common image processing means is able to have multiple functions. By using a 2-D optical image processing system, the control system of the apparatus may easily be adapted to read various types of data presentations, just as actual images of elements or for sections of the apparatus may be identified in order to assess the condition of the apparatus. The optical sensor or optical armor means may be used to automatically identify the slides and the reagent containers present in the apparatus, just as the optical sensor or optical sensor means may be used for checking if a slide is misplaced at or absent from a certain slide position, etc.
An optical sensor provides a staining apparatus according to the invention with a hitherto unseen flexibility and possibility of automating the identification functions in a staining apparatus. By utilizing a CCD-camera or the like, perhaps on the robotic head or even the robotic element, individual identification means for each of the identification tasks may no longer be required. This means that controlling as well as maintenance of the apparatus is facilitated. The software controlling the apparatus may be adapted to include automated identifications of various properties and conditions of the apparatus, including slide and reagent information. By a method of identifying relevant properties in the staining apparatus and a method of performing the staining process according to the invention, the alternated staining process may be less time-consuming and more qualitative checks may be included without loosing any significant speed in the slide staining operations.
In one embodiment of the invention, the reagent section accommodates a plurality of reagent containers stationary arranged in a plurality of rows. Similarly, the tissue samples are accommodated on slides that are stationary arranged in a plurality of rows in the at least one staining section or slide section during the staining process. The layout of these sections is such that it presents a substantially planar platform work area for the robotic head, which is moveable in the X and Y-axis. In a particularly preferred embodiment, a row of slides and/or reagents can be removed and be replaced without interfering with the staining process.
In another preferred embodiment, the apparatus comprises at least two staining sections separated by a reagent section, that is they may be arranged so that at least some of the tissue samples are closer to at least some of the reagent containers. Hereby, the movements required by the robotic head in order to reach all the slides may be significantly limited and the capacity of the staining apparatus can hereby be increased, just as a reduction in the time for running the staining protocols or other advantages may be achieved. It is further realized that the shorter processing times or other advantages may also be achieved by this layout of the slide and reagent sections without a vision system, e.g. an optical sensor.
In other preferred embodiments of the invention, the optical sensor may be as camera or perhaps include a CCD element. By the term “camera” it should be understood that any image capture apparatus is intended whether or not is uses film, plates, memory, or any type of electronic media and whether or not it images light, visible electromagnetic radiation, or even non-visible electromagnetic radiation such as now well known. By recording the relevant image, relevant image data, or even recording digital image data, a computer processing of this data in the control system may be carried out in a quick manner by known image processing capabilities already available. Moreover, by using this digital technology relative complex images can be recorded with high resolution, just as a that recording of several identifications, e.g. labels on an entire row of slides, may be achieved as the robotic head may be moved across the slide labels in a continuous movement, so stop and start time for each slide identification may be avoided. However, by the invention it is realized that other image sensors, e.g. solid state sensors, or perhaps CMOS sensors could also be used depending on the requirements for image resolution.
As indicated above, the optical sensor may be adapted to record the individual reagent containers or bottles and slides present in the apparatus. While of course it may image larger areas, or perhaps even the entire device, it may be configured for individual imaging either electronically, optically, or positionally. Regardless, as a result of the imaging capability, predetermined positions of the slides or reagent containers or bottles that are loaded into the automatic staining apparatus may not be required, since the apparatus may be adapted to automatically identify new slides and reagent bottles once they are loaded into the apparatus.
In an embodiment, the reagent containers and the slides may be provided with an optical identification element. For example, a reagent container may be provided with a reagent optical identification element and a slide may be provided with a slide optical identification element. These optical identification elements may contain machine readable data concerning the reagent type as well as other relevant data relating to the reagent in the bottle, and the slide identifiers may contain data concerning the tissue sample, such as identification of the patient, the staining protocol, etc. An optical identification element may include reiterated information or perhaps even redundant information. This may include information that is repeated or even partially repeated and may even include information that may or may not be in different versions which may relate to similar information.
The optical identification element or alternatively optical identification means may be on or even mounted on the reagent container or on the slides in such a manner that the optical identification element is readable by the optical sensor. By being positioned “on” it is intended that any manner of association be encompassed; thus it should be understood that separate attachment or surface mounting is not required. Similarly, by being “above” it should be understood that this may exist not only in a sense such as with respect to gravity, but also in a figurative sense such as roughly perpendicularly above a surface or the like. In an embodiment, the optical identification element may be readable from above by the optical sensor or alternatively means. Furthermore, the optical identification element may be provided on a label, which is perhaps adhesively attachable to a specific slide or reagent bottle. Hereby, the labels or perhaps adhesive labels may be presented to the optical sensor means on the robotic head above the slides and the reagent bottles facilitating the reading of the optical identification means. By providing the optical identification means on a printed label which is attached to the slide, respectively the reagent bottle, individual labels may be prepared on site and the relevant data may be entered into a computer and a corresponding label carrying said relevant data may be printed on an associated label printer.
In an embodiment of the invention, one type of optical identification element may be a two-dimensional high-resolution symbology code, e.g. of the so-called “Infoglyph™” type. The optical identification may also be more generically a two-dimensional symbology. Two-dimensional symbology may be representative of data including, but not limited to: tissue sample related data, patient identification data, staining protocol data, reagent related data, reagent type data, reagent volume related data, reagent durability related data, and the like data. By encoding the relevant information into numerous tiny, individual graphic elements, typically small lines in 45° diagonal lines as short as 0.02 mm ( 1/100 inch), a high resolution with high contrast encoded information label may be achieved which is printable in a printer and readable by a high resolution camera. The type of encoded 2-D symbology label may be provided in different colors and in a variety of materials.
Alternatively, the optical identification means or alternatively the optical identification element may be a data matrix code or even a one-dimensional bar code, namely the identification code with a pattern of vertical bars whose width and spacing identifies an item marked. An advantage of using an optical sensor capable of reading 2-D symbology is that the apparatus may be capable of reading any kind of optical identifier, as this is only requires an adaptation in the software processing the captured perhaps digital image.
In an embodiment, an optical identification element label may include a two-dimensional (2-D) symbology zone and even at least one human readable text zone, each as conceptually depicted in
In a more advanced usage of the 2-D image capturing capability, the image processing capability or image processor element may be adapted to identify the texture or outline of the tissue sample itself captured by the optical sensor and may use said image-captured tissue property as an individual identification of the tissue sample. The optical sensor may be configured to identify desired features of the tissue samples such as but not limited to the texture, outline, a visual property, or even an individual feature of a tissue sample. Of course, various different features or properties may be identified as desirable to detect or perhaps identify, a property which may include any attribute, characteristic, or the like. This embodiment could make the use of slide labels obsolete, as the tissue texture itself or at least a predefined section thereof (with or without magnification) could be used as an identifier for a list of data in the control software.
In one preferred embodiment of the invention, the optical sensor may be a moveable optical sensor which may be moveable along the areas above the staining and the reagent sections, and said optical sensor may be adapted to determine the presence of and the positions of slides in the at least one staining section. This may be facilitated by having the optical sensor movable in response to or perhaps on a robotic element. Once a new set of slides are being loaded into the apparatus, this feature would allow the staining apparatus according to this embodiment of the invention to automatically determine where the slides are positioned so that the optimal scheduling of treatment steps can be calculated. The optical sensor may even determine the approximate location and the approximate area of a tissue sample. Furthermore, this capability may also provide the apparatus control software with warning if a slide is not correctly positioned or other irregularities have occurred during the loading of the slides.
In another embodiment of the invention, the optical sensor may be adapted to locate pre-selected reference locations for self-calibration of the robotic control system or robotic element controlling the movements of the robotic head. The earners can be used to teach the robotic arm critical locations necessary to calibrate the system, allowing the apparatus to properly position the robotic head to all required positions and locations within the platform work area. If the apparatus has been moved or otherwise been tampered with, e.g. due to maintenance, etc., this feature may provide the staining apparatus according to the invention with the capability of self-calibrating the robotic motion control system, e.g. if the slides are arranged in racks (intended to broadly encompass any locationally tied collection) by checking if the slide rack fit correctly into a receiving element in the apparatus, and/or by determining the position of predefined reference components of the apparatus.
In another embodiment of the invention, the optical sensor may be a camera adapted to record an image of the finalized tissue sample after said tissue sample has been subjected to a staining protocol for recording an image of the manipulated tissue sample. Hereby, a picture or digital image of the stained tissue sample may be recorded, preferably in a high resolution, for later examination or for sending this digitalize picture to a remote location for examination. Accordingly, in embodiments the present invention may provide for storing an image relevant to the process of staining tissue samples. This may include images both before and after staining or some, other operation, of course. Also, this feature of the invention may provide for archiving images of the about to be stained or the stained tissue samples for later verification of the tissue sample analysis or the identification if this should it be required. Thus the invention may automatically facilitate a user activity such as those mentioned. To understand the various possibilities, the automatic facilitation may be of activities including, but not limited to, later accessing a historical image of a stained tissue sample, remotely accessing an image of a stained tissue sample, archiving an image of a stained tissue sample, later accessing a historical image of an unstained tissue sample, remotely accessing an image of an unstained tissue sample, archiving an image of an unstained tissue sample, and the like activities.
A sensor may be provided in some embodiments that may automatically identify information from one or more slides or reagent containers. In some embodiments, protocol information may be provided by the adaptive sample processing control system. The sample processing system may process one or more slides, or one or more batches of slides, concurrently, sequentially, or in any other temporal fashion, potentially in accordance with protocol information provided by a slide having a sample or provided by the adaptive sample processing control system. Sample batches or individual slides may be inserted or removed during processing protocol steps by the control and monitoring accomplished by the adaptive sample processing control system.
Another embodiment of the present invention that may achieve the foregoing and other objects of invention may comprise a method of sample processing, comprising the steps of accessing at least one of a plurality of drawers, providing at least one sample carrier retainment assembly configured with at least one sample carrier, configuring at least one of the drawers with the at least one sample carrier retainment assemblies, and adaptively processing the sample carriers. The step of adaptive processing may automate the processing of samples and may allow for either or both continuous or batch processing of slides, and may afford multiple independent slide processing and in some embodiments redundant slide processing to process each slide independently.
Embodiments of the invention may further comprise a method of automated sample processing, comprising the steps of: acquiring protocol information transmitting the protocol information to at least one sample processing system, adaptively processing samples and acquiring sample processing information from the step of adaptively processing. Furthermore, embodiments may provide: maintaining the protocol information, maintaining the sample processing information, information sharing of protocol information, and sample processing information. These and other method steps may be provided for individual samples or multiple batch processing, sample diagnostic features, and real-time or adaptive capabilities for multiple batch processing.
Many aspects of invention am applicable to immunohistochemistry (IHC) techniques, as well as in-situ hybridization (ISH) and fluorescent in-situ hybridization (FISH) special staining of samples, and microarrays, especially techniques incorporating target retrieval or the staining of samples.
Support should be understood to exist for the following aspects and embodiments of the invention:
A method of identifying at least one property hr an automatic staining apparatus comprising the steps of:
A method of staining samples in an automatic staining apparatus comprising the steps of
An automatic staining apparatus comprising:
In the following the invention is described with reference to the accompanying drawings, in which:
An automatic staining apparatus 1 according the invention is shown in
As mentioned, the present invention may include a robotic element, which may somehow affect the reagent container and tissue sample. Thus any sort of action to, action resulting from, or merely information from the reagent container or tissue sample may be facilitated through the robotic element. The robotic element, in embodiments, may be adapted to perform staining of the slides with (including as a result of or in conjunction with) the reagent application or the like. The robot arm or robotic element 20 may also remove reagent from a reagent container to a predetermined tissue sample. For example, a robotic element 20 for moving a probe 10 in X and Y (as well as Z) direction as indicated by the arrows X and Y is arranged above the frame 4 of the staining apparatus. A robot arm, may position the probe 10 above all reagent vials 3 as well as above all the slides 7, and may further operate the probe 10 to aspirate portions of reagent contained in any of the vials 3, to transfer the portion of reagent and apply it to any of the slides 7 in order to provide a selected staining or treatment of the sample on each slide 7. A control element may manage a staining process by controlling the entire processor even any portion of it. By use of a suitable control element or alternatively a control means e.g. capability within a computer (not shown) having the appropriate software and input data for the purpose, this staining apparatus 1 may be able to automatically stain or treat samples requiring different staining or treatment reagents and processes.
As shown in
In some embodiments a robotic element 20 or even a robotic head 22 may include a variety of components, including but not limited to a push tool 38 that may be connected to an air cylinder 39, a probe 10 that may be responsive to a probe movement element 36 which may even be connected to a syringe pump 37, and an optical sewer 86 as shown in
In embodiments, the optical sensor may detect two-dimensional image data of a relevant property. It may also be adapted to sense a two-dimensional image of an element in general. The camera may be utilized to determine status information of the slides and the reagent bottles and other features of the apparatus in the work area, for example reading a code provided on a reagent container to determine the reagent type and the reagent location within the system. The camera may also determine status of the tissue sample carriers, for example the location of a particular slide, informational indicia, such as a code, that indicate information about the tissue sample presented on the slide or the processing protocol to be performed. A camera may be used for diagnostic purposes. In some embodiments, the sample may be scanned for further analysis, potentially by a computer. The present invention may include, in embodiments, a computer image biological analysis element or perhaps even biologically analysing image data of a sample with a computer.
As previously discussed, the invention may include recording a variety of relevant image data. Of course, a variety of relevant image data may be recorded. Importantly, this may include recording element calibration reference points, or perhaps even robotic element calibration reference positions on or in the apparatus. As mentioned, the invention may also provide for recording slide identification image data and reagent identification image data. A significant aspect of an embodiment is the possibility of recording an optical identification element of a particular slide or perhaps merely recording information relevant to an element. Such information may include information concerning the tissue sample, of course. Similarly, optical identification may be recorded on a reagent container that may include information concerning the reagent contained therein. It may provide for recording a two dimensional symbology on a slide or even on a reagent container. Two-dimensional symbology recorded an a slide may represent data including, but not limited to: tissue sample related date, patient identification data, staining protocol data, or the like. Two-dimensional symbology recorded on a reagent container may represent data including, but not limited to: reagent related data, reagent type data, reagent volume related data, reagent durability related data, or the like. It may also provide a connection element through which captured image data may be transferred to the control element. It may include feeding the image data to a control element so that the robotic element may respond. After the relevant image data has been recorded, and perhaps as a result of feeding that data to the control element, the invention may manipulate a staining or other process according to that relevant image data. Thus the invention may perform staining of slides according to tissue specific protocols.
The staining apparatus 1 of the present embodiment further comprise a probe washing station 8 and a reagent mixer 9, and the robotic element 20 is furthermore arranged to transfer the probe to the washing station 8 as well as to the reagent mixer 9.
As shown in
In
In
In an embodiment, the optical identifiers on the slides and on the reagent bottles are the same type. This may facilitate the image processing of the identification process in the staining apparatus.
A different approach to identifying the individual slides or as a way of facilitating the new capabilities of confirming identification or storing confirmatory information may be to record the contour and/or the texture of the tissue ample 74 itself, such as shown in
Besides identifying the microscope slides and the reagent bottles in the staining apparatus, the 2-D optical sensor can also be used for self-calibration of the apparatus, e.g. after maintenance, if the apparatus has been disassembled or moved to another location. By identifying critical locations within the apparatus by capturing an image by the camera, the image processing software can compare the captured image with a reference image to determine if certain critical components in the apparatus are offset from their predetermined positions, e.g. if a slide rack or a slide is slightly off-set, and if so, a set of correction data for the robotic motion control system may be calculated and this set of data may be used for calibrating the apparatus. If the correction needed exceeds a certain size, a warning could be automatically issued to an operator, so that it is ensured that the apparatus does not malfunction during the processing of the slides. Furthermore, this image analysis system could also be used for determining if a slide is present or dislocated in the rack in order to produce a warning signal.
By the invention, it is realised that a variety of changes of the above description of some preferred embodiments of the invention may be made without departing from the scope of the invention as set forth in the claims. As can be easily understood, the basic concepts of the present invention may be embodied in a variety of ways. It involves both staining techniques as well as various systems, assemblies, and devices to accomplish staining and other functions. In this application, the staining techniques are also disclosed as part of the results shown to be achieved by the various systems, assemblies, and devices described and as steps that are inherent to utilization. They should be understood to be the natural result of utilizing the devices as intended and described. In addition, while some devices are disclosed, it should be understood that these not only accomplish certain methods but also can be varied in a number of ways. Importantly, as to all of the foregoing, all of these facets should be understood to be encompassed by this disclosure.
The reader should be aware that the specific discussion may not explicitly describe all embodiments possible; many alternatives are implicit. It also may not fully explain the generic nature of the invention and may not explicitly show how each feature or element can actually be representative of a broader function or of a great variety of alternative or equivalent elements. Again, these are implicitly included in this disclosure. Where the invention is described in device-oriented terminology, each element of the device implicitly performs a function. Apparatus claims may not only be included for the device described, but also method or process claims may be included to address the functions the invention and each element performs. Neither the description nor the terminology is intended to limit the scope of the disclosure.
It should also be understood that a variety of changes may be made without departing from the essence of the invention. Such changes are also implicitly included in the description. They still fall within the scope of this invention. A broad disclosure encompassing both the explicit embodiment(s) shown, the great variety of implicit alternative embodiments, and the broad methods or processes and the like are encompassed by this disclosure and may be relied upon to support additional claims for presentation in this or subsequent patent application.
Further, each of the various elements of the invention and claims may also be achieved in a variety of manners. This disclosure should be understood to encompass each such variation, be it a variation of an embodiment of any apparatus embodiment, a method or process embodiment, or even merely a variation of any element of these. Particularly, it should be understood that as the disclosure relates to elements of the invention, the words for each element may be expressed by equivalent apparatus terms or method terms—even if only the function or result is the same. Such equivalent, broader, or even more generic terms should be considered to be encompassed in the description of each element or action. Such terms can be substituted where desired to make explicit the implicitly broad coverage to which this invention is entitled. As but one example, it should be understood that all actions may be expressed as a means for taking that action or as an element which causes that action. Similarly, each physical element disclosed should be understood to encompass a disclosure of the action which that physical element facilitates. Regarding this last aspect, as but one example, the disclosure of a “sensor” should be understood to encompass disclosure of the act of “sensing”—whether explicitly discussed or not—and, conversely, were there effectively disclosure of the act of “sensing”, such a disclosure should be understood to encompass disclosure of a “sensor” and even a “means for sensing”. It should also be understood that in jurisdictions where specific language may be construed as limiting, as but one example in the United States where some interpretations of “means for” elements can be construed narrowly, broader equivalent language (such as “element” or the like) may be used to avoid the narrow interpretation and should be understood as encompassed by this specification. Such changes and alternative terms are to be understood to be explicitly included in the description.
Any patents, patent applications, publications, or other references mentioned in this application for patent are hereby incorporated by reference. In addition, as to each terra used it should be understood that unless its utilization in this application is inconsistent with such interpretation, common dictionary definitions should be understood as incorporated for each term and all definitions, alternative terms, and synonyms such as contained in the Random House Webster's Unabridged Dictionary, second edition are hereby incorporated by reference. Finally, any priority case for this application is hereby appended and hereby incorporated by reference.
Thus, the applicant(s) should be understood to have support to claim at least: i) each of the sample processing systems and subsystems as herein disclosed and described, ii) the related methods disclosed and described, iii) similar, equivalent and even implicit variations of each of these systems, assemblies, devices and methods, iv) those alternative designs which accomplish each of the functions shown as are disclosed and described, v) those alternative designs and methods which accomplish each of the functions shown as are implicit to accomplish that which is disclosed and described, vi) each feature, component, and step shown as separate and independent inventions, vii) the applications enhanced by the various systems or components disclosed, viii) the resulting products produced by such systems or components, and ix) methods and systems, assemblies, devices, and apparatuses substantially as described hereinbefore and with reference to any of the accompanying examples, x) the various combinations and permutations of each of the elements disclosed, xi) each potentially dependent claim or concept as a dependency on each and every one of the independent claims or concepts presented, xii) processes performed with the aid of or on a computer as described throughout the above discussion, xiii) programmable system as described throughout the above discussion, xiv) a computer readable memory encoded with data to direct a computer comprising means or elements which function as described throughout the above discussion, xv) a computer configured as herein disclosed and described, xvi) individual or combined subroutines and programs as herein disclosed and described, xvii) the related methods disclosed and described, xviii) similar, equivalent, and even implicit variations of each of these systems and methods, xix) those alternative designs which accomplish each of the functions shown as are disclosed and described, xx) those alternative designs and methods which accomplish each of the functions shown as are implicit to accomplish that which is disclosed and described, xxi) each feature, component, and step shown as separate and independent inventions, and xxii) the various combinations and permutations of each of the above.
Further, if or when used, the use of the transitional phrase “comprising” or the like is used to maintain the “open-end” claims herein, according to traditional claim interpretation. Thus, unless the context requires otherwise, it should be understood that the term “comprise” or variations such as “comprises” or “comprising” or the like, are intended to imply the inclusion of a stated element or step or group of elements or steps but not the exclusion of any other element or step or group of elements or steps. Such terms should be interpreted in their most expansive form so as to afford the applicant the broadest coverage legally permissible.
Any claims set forth at any time are hereby incorporated by reference as part of this description of the invention, and the applicant expressly reserves the right to use all of or a portion of such incorporated content of such claims as additional description to support any of or all of the claims or any element or component thereof, and the applicant further expressly reserves the right to move any portion of or all of the incorporated content of such claims or any element or component thereof from the description into the claims or vice-versa as necessary to define the matter for which protection is sought by this application or by any subsequent continuation, division, or continuation-in-part application thereof, or to obtain any benefit of reduction in fees pursuant to, or to comply with the patent laws, rules, or regulations of any country or treaty, and such content incorporated by reference shall survive during the entire pendency of this application including any subsequent continuation, division, or continuation-in-part application thereof or any reissue or extension thereon.
This application is a continuation of application Ser. No. 13/567,308, filed Aug. 6, 2012, which is a continuation of application Ser. No. 10/538,964, filed Jun. 14, 2005, which is the United States National Stage of International Application No. PCT/US2003/040518, filed Dec. 19, 2003 which claims the benefit under 35 U.S.C. §119(e) of U.S. Provisional Application No. 60/435,601, filed Dec. 20, 2002, each hereby incorporated by reference herein.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3219416 | Natelson | Nov 1965 | A |
3398935 | Livesey et al. | Aug 1968 | A |
3482082 | Isreeli | Dec 1969 | A |
3513320 | Weldon | May 1970 | A |
3547064 | Glass | Dec 1970 | A |
3553438 | Blitz et al. | Jan 1971 | A |
3600900 | Buddecke | Aug 1971 | A |
3644715 | Holderith | Feb 1972 | A |
3660638 | Oberli | May 1972 | A |
3680967 | Engelhardt | Aug 1972 | A |
3772154 | Isenberg et al. | Nov 1973 | A |
3801775 | Acker | Apr 1974 | A |
3807851 | Knox et al. | Apr 1974 | A |
3831006 | Chaffin, III et al. | Aug 1974 | A |
3851972 | Smith et al. | Dec 1974 | A |
3853092 | Amos et al. | Dec 1974 | A |
3854703 | Gibbs et al. | Dec 1974 | A |
3873079 | Kuus | Mar 1975 | A |
3876297 | Appeldorn et al. | Apr 1975 | A |
3909203 | Young et al. | Sep 1975 | A |
RE28585 | Amos et al. | Oct 1975 | E |
3916157 | Roulette et al. | Oct 1975 | A |
3916160 | Russo et al. | Oct 1975 | A |
3971917 | Maddox et al. | Jul 1976 | A |
3976028 | Howells et al. | Aug 1976 | A |
3994594 | Sandrock et al. | Nov 1976 | A |
4013038 | Rogers et al. | Mar 1977 | A |
4018565 | Fletcher, III et al. | Apr 1977 | A |
4039288 | Moran | Aug 1977 | A |
4066412 | Johnson et al. | Jan 1978 | A |
4083638 | Sandrock et al. | Apr 1978 | A |
4084541 | Ito | Apr 1978 | A |
4092952 | Wilkie et al. | Jun 1978 | A |
4100309 | Micklus et al. | Jul 1978 | A |
4113437 | Duff et al. | Sep 1978 | A |
4115861 | Allington | Sep 1978 | A |
4135883 | McNeil et al. | Jan 1979 | A |
4159875 | Hauser | Jul 1979 | A |
4163643 | Hunter et al. | Aug 1979 | A |
4200056 | Johnson | Apr 1980 | A |
4200607 | Suzuki | Apr 1980 | A |
4227810 | Sandrock et al. | Oct 1980 | A |
4245967 | Busselet | Jan 1981 | A |
4263504 | Thomas | Apr 1981 | A |
4281387 | Kraft et al. | Jul 1981 | A |
4286146 | Uno et al. | Aug 1981 | A |
RE30730 | Duff | Sep 1981 | E |
4298571 | DiFulvio et al. | Nov 1981 | A |
4311667 | Gocho | Jan 1982 | A |
4323537 | Mody | Apr 1982 | A |
4338279 | Orimo et al. | Jul 1982 | A |
4346056 | Sakurada | Aug 1982 | A |
4371498 | Scordato et al. | Feb 1983 | A |
4404641 | Bazarnik | Sep 1983 | A |
4406547 | Aihara | Sep 1983 | A |
4447395 | Englar et al. | May 1984 | A |
4451433 | Yamashita et al. | May 1984 | A |
4455280 | Shinohara et al. | Jun 1984 | A |
4467073 | Creasy | Aug 1984 | A |
4467603 | Wilson | Aug 1984 | A |
4488679 | Bockholt et al. | Dec 1984 | A |
4510169 | Linner | Apr 1985 | A |
4517160 | Galle et al. | May 1985 | A |
4528159 | Liston | Jul 1985 | A |
4531455 | Palmer | Jul 1985 | A |
4539632 | Hansen et al. | Sep 1985 | A |
4558946 | Galle et al. | Dec 1985 | A |
4567748 | Klass et al. | Feb 1986 | A |
4571699 | Herzog et al. | Feb 1986 | A |
4585622 | Bowe et al. | Apr 1986 | A |
4609017 | Coulter et al. | Sep 1986 | A |
4624588 | Bivin | Nov 1986 | A |
4634576 | Galle et al. | Jan 1987 | A |
4634850 | Pierce et al. | Jan 1987 | A |
4643879 | Hanaway | Feb 1987 | A |
4647432 | Wakatake | Mar 1987 | A |
4647543 | Stöcker | Mar 1987 | A |
4664526 | Scheffler et al. | May 1987 | A |
4675299 | Witty et al. | Jun 1987 | A |
4678752 | Thorne et al. | Jul 1987 | A |
4678894 | Shafer | Jul 1987 | A |
4681741 | Hanaway | Jul 1987 | A |
4683120 | Meserol et al. | Jul 1987 | A |
4692308 | Riley et al. | Sep 1987 | A |
4692603 | Brass et al. | Sep 1987 | A |
4695430 | Coville et al. | Sep 1987 | A |
4708886 | Nelson | Nov 1987 | A |
4719087 | Hanaway | Jan 1988 | A |
4727033 | Hijikata et al. | Feb 1988 | A |
4728783 | Brass et al. | Mar 1988 | A |
4728959 | Maloney et al. | Mar 1988 | A |
4729661 | Bell | Mar 1988 | A |
4738824 | Takeuchi | Apr 1988 | A |
4751186 | Baisch et al. | Jun 1988 | A |
4754414 | Gocho | Jun 1988 | A |
4761075 | Matsushita | Aug 1988 | A |
4764342 | Kelln et al. | Aug 1988 | A |
4774055 | Wakatake et al. | Sep 1988 | A |
4781891 | Galle et al. | Nov 1988 | A |
4782221 | Brass et al. | Nov 1988 | A |
4794239 | Allais | Dec 1988 | A |
4795613 | Azuma et al. | Jan 1989 | A |
4795710 | Muszak et al. | Jan 1989 | A |
4797938 | Will | Jan 1989 | A |
4800762 | Sugaya | Jan 1989 | A |
4808380 | Minekane | Feb 1989 | A |
4815978 | Mazza | Mar 1989 | A |
4817916 | Rawstron | Apr 1989 | A |
4824641 | Williams | Apr 1989 | A |
4844887 | Galle et al. | Jul 1989 | A |
4847208 | Bogen | Jul 1989 | A |
4849177 | Jordan | Jul 1989 | A |
4855109 | Muraishi et al. | Aug 1989 | A |
4855110 | Marker et al. | Aug 1989 | A |
4865811 | Newton et al. | Sep 1989 | A |
4868129 | Gibbons et al. | Sep 1989 | A |
4869114 | Kido et al. | Sep 1989 | A |
4871682 | Mazza | Oct 1989 | A |
4873877 | Harris | Oct 1989 | A |
4874936 | Chandler et al. | Oct 1989 | A |
4886590 | Tittle | Dec 1989 | A |
4896029 | Chandler et al. | Jan 1990 | A |
4900513 | Barker et al. | Feb 1990 | A |
4919887 | Wakatake | Apr 1990 | A |
4924078 | Sant'anselmo et al. | May 1990 | A |
4933147 | Hollar et al. | Jun 1990 | A |
4935875 | Shah et al. | Jun 1990 | A |
4939354 | Priddy et al. | Jul 1990 | A |
4939674 | Price et al. | Jul 1990 | A |
4943415 | Przybylowicz et al. | Jul 1990 | A |
4961906 | Andersen et al. | Oct 1990 | A |
4965049 | Lillig et al. | Oct 1990 | A |
4967606 | Wells et al. | Nov 1990 | A |
4985206 | Bowman et al. | Jan 1991 | A |
4986891 | Sarrine et al. | Jan 1991 | A |
4988482 | Weston | Jan 1991 | A |
4998010 | Chandler et al. | Mar 1991 | A |
5031797 | Boris et al. | Jul 1991 | A |
5051238 | Umetsu et al. | Sep 1991 | A |
5053609 | Priddy et al. | Oct 1991 | A |
5059393 | Quenin et al. | Oct 1991 | A |
5068091 | Toya | Nov 1991 | A |
5073504 | Bogen | Dec 1991 | A |
5075079 | Kerr et al. | Dec 1991 | A |
5081038 | Sugaya et al. | Jan 1992 | A |
5102624 | Muraishi | Apr 1992 | A |
5104527 | Clinkenbeard | Apr 1992 | A |
5106583 | Raysberg et al. | Apr 1992 | A |
5118369 | Shamir | Jun 1992 | A |
5122342 | Mcculloch | Jun 1992 | A |
5124536 | Priddy et al. | Jun 1992 | A |
5180606 | Stokes et al. | Jan 1993 | A |
5202552 | Little et al. | Apr 1993 | A |
5225325 | Miller et al. | Jul 1993 | A |
5229074 | Heath et al. | Jul 1993 | A |
5232664 | Krawzak et al. | Aug 1993 | A |
5250262 | Heidt et al. | Oct 1993 | A |
5281395 | Markart et al. | Jan 1994 | A |
5282149 | Grandone et al. | Jan 1994 | A |
5289385 | Grandone | Feb 1994 | A |
5311426 | Donohue et al. | May 1994 | A |
5316319 | Suggs | May 1994 | A |
5316452 | Bogen et al. | May 1994 | A |
5316726 | Babson et al. | May 1994 | A |
5316728 | Hayashi et al. | May 1994 | A |
5322771 | Rybski et al. | Jun 1994 | A |
5331176 | Sant'anselmo et al. | Jul 1994 | A |
5338358 | Mizusawa et al. | Aug 1994 | A |
5346672 | Stapleton et al. | Sep 1994 | A |
5350697 | Swope et al. | Sep 1994 | A |
5355304 | Demoranville et al. | Oct 1994 | A |
5355439 | Bernstein et al. | Oct 1994 | A |
5355695 | Kawaguchi et al. | Oct 1994 | A |
5365595 | Li | Nov 1994 | A |
5365614 | Perkins | Nov 1994 | A |
5366896 | Margrey et al. | Nov 1994 | A |
5369261 | Shamir | Nov 1994 | A |
5380486 | Anami | Jan 1995 | A |
5382511 | Stapleton | Jan 1995 | A |
5395588 | North, Jr. et al. | Mar 1995 | A |
5399316 | Yamada | Mar 1995 | A |
5417213 | Prince | May 1995 | A |
5418138 | Miller et al. | May 1995 | A |
5424036 | Ushikubo | Jun 1995 | A |
5425918 | Healey et al. | Jun 1995 | A |
5428740 | Wood et al. | Jun 1995 | A |
5431455 | Seely | Jul 1995 | A |
5432056 | Hartman et al. | Jul 1995 | A |
5439645 | Saralegui et al. | Aug 1995 | A |
5439649 | Tseung et al. | Aug 1995 | A |
5439826 | Kontorovich | Aug 1995 | A |
5446652 | Peterson et al. | Aug 1995 | A |
5449622 | Yabe et al. | Sep 1995 | A |
5473551 | Sato et al. | Dec 1995 | A |
5487975 | Miller et al. | Jan 1996 | A |
5544650 | Boon et al. | Aug 1996 | A |
5549848 | Zeheb et al. | Aug 1996 | A |
5552087 | Zeheb et al. | Sep 1996 | A |
5573727 | Keefe | Nov 1996 | A |
5578452 | Shi et al. | Nov 1996 | A |
5580524 | Forrest et al. | Dec 1996 | A |
5595707 | Copeland et al. | Jan 1997 | A |
5602674 | Weissman et al. | Feb 1997 | A |
5612524 | Sant'anselmo et al. | Mar 1997 | A |
5645114 | Bogen et al. | Jul 1997 | A |
5646046 | Fischer et al. | Jul 1997 | A |
5646049 | Tayi | Jul 1997 | A |
5649537 | Anelli et al. | Jul 1997 | A |
5650136 | Platzek et al. | Jul 1997 | A |
5650327 | Copeland et al. | Jul 1997 | A |
5654199 | Copeland et al. | Aug 1997 | A |
5654200 | Copeland et al. | Aug 1997 | A |
5656493 | Mullis et al. | Aug 1997 | A |
5675715 | Bernstein et al. | Oct 1997 | A |
5677966 | Doerrer et al. | Oct 1997 | A |
5681543 | Schmitt-willich et al. | Oct 1997 | A |
5695739 | Schmitt-willich et al. | Dec 1997 | A |
5696887 | Bernstein et al. | Dec 1997 | A |
5723092 | Babson | Mar 1998 | A |
5733528 | Felder et al. | Mar 1998 | A |
5737449 | Lee | Apr 1998 | A |
5737499 | Bernstein et al. | Apr 1998 | A |
5758033 | Bernstein et al. | May 1998 | A |
5776414 | Itani et al. | Jul 1998 | A |
5798092 | Schmitt-willich et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
5814277 | Bell et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5820849 | Schmitt-willich et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
5839091 | Rhett et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
5854075 | Levine et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
5875286 | Bernstein et al. | Feb 1999 | A |
5876698 | Schmitt-willich et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
5885529 | Babson et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
5888576 | Nagano | Mar 1999 | A |
5888733 | Hyldig-nielsen et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
5888876 | Shiozawa et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
5896488 | Jeong | Apr 1999 | A |
5930461 | Bernstein et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
5945341 | Howard, III | Aug 1999 | A |
5947167 | Bogen et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
5948359 | Kalra | Sep 1999 | A |
5958341 | Chu | Sep 1999 | A |
5963368 | Domanik et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
5965454 | Farmilo et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
5985563 | Hyldig-nielsen et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
5994071 | Ross et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
6017495 | Ljungmann | Jan 2000 | A |
6019945 | Ohishi et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6045759 | Ford et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
6080363 | Takahashi et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
6083490 | Ellis et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
6092695 | Loeffler | Jul 2000 | A |
6093574 | Druyor-sanchez et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
6096271 | Bogen et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6097995 | Tipton et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6104483 | Sebok et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6110425 | Gao et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6110676 | Coull et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6142292 | Patterson | Nov 2000 | A |
6169169 | Hyldig-nielsen et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6180061 | Bogen et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6183693 | Bogen et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6192945 | Ford et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6193933 | Sasaki et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6208771 | Jared et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6235476 | Bergmann et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6244474 | Loeffler | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6245207 | Yasuda et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6248590 | Malachowski | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6281004 | Bogen et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6287772 | Stefano et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6296809 | Richards et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6310179 | Batz et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6327395 | Hecht et al. | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6335208 | Lowry | Jan 2002 | B1 |
6349264 | Rhett et al. | Feb 2002 | B1 |
6352861 | Copeland et al. | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6358682 | Jaffee et al. | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6387326 | Edwards et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
6388061 | Bergmann et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
6395562 | Hammock et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
6403036 | Rodgers et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6403931 | Showalter et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6405609 | Richards et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6408931 | Tilak | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6414133 | Dietz-band et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6416713 | Ford et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6420916 | Freeman | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6426794 | Trainoff | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6444170 | Heid et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6451551 | Zhan et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6472217 | Richards et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6495106 | Kalra et al. | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6498037 | Carey | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6509193 | Tajima | Jan 2003 | B1 |
6534008 | Angros | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6537818 | Reinhardt et al. | Mar 2003 | B2 |
6541261 | Bogen et al. | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6544798 | Christensen et al. | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6548822 | Morris et al. | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6582962 | Richards et al. | Jun 2003 | B1 |
6594537 | Bernstein et al. | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6632598 | Zhang et al. | Oct 2003 | B1 |
6635225 | Thiem et al. | Oct 2003 | B1 |
6699710 | Kononen et al. | Mar 2004 | B1 |
6735531 | Rhett et al. | May 2004 | B2 |
6746851 | Tseung | Jun 2004 | B1 |
6800249 | De La Torre-Bueno | Oct 2004 | B2 |
6821072 | Thiem et al. | Nov 2004 | B2 |
6855559 | Christensen et al. | Feb 2005 | B1 |
6872901 | Su | Mar 2005 | B2 |
6943029 | Copeland et al. | Sep 2005 | B2 |
7135992 | Karlsson et al. | Nov 2006 | B2 |
7142852 | Tell et al. | Nov 2006 | B2 |
7226788 | De La Torre-Bueno | Jun 2007 | B2 |
7303725 | Reinhardt et al. | Dec 2007 | B2 |
7378055 | Lemme et al. | May 2008 | B2 |
7396508 | Richards et al. | Jul 2008 | B1 |
7400983 | Feingold et al. | Jul 2008 | B2 |
7404927 | Lemme et al. | Jul 2008 | B2 |
20010006417 | Modlin et al. | Jul 2001 | A1 |
20010010936 | Richards et al. | Aug 2001 | A1 |
20010037072 | Virtanen | Nov 2001 | A1 |
20010044124 | Bacus | Nov 2001 | A1 |
20010049114 | Bacus | Dec 2001 | A1 |
20010055799 | Baunoch et al. | Dec 2001 | A1 |
20020001849 | Copeland et al. | Jan 2002 | A1 |
20020009391 | Marquiss et al. | Jan 2002 | A1 |
20020019001 | Light | Feb 2002 | A1 |
20020034456 | Ford et al. | Mar 2002 | A1 |
20020072122 | Copeland et al. | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020091593 | Fowler | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20020098117 | Ammann et al. | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20020098595 | Lubman et al. | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20020110494 | Lemme et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020114733 | Copeland et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020116132 | Rhett et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020127727 | Bach et al. | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20020176801 | Giebeler et al. | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20020177137 | Hodge | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20020178547 | Shofner et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20020182628 | Dietz-Band et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20030003537 | Fischer et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030022391 | Richards et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030043963 | Yamagami et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030059790 | Jaffee et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030087443 | Pressman et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
20030099573 | Tseung et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
20030100043 | Kalra et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
20030119200 | Taft et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030120633 | Torre-Bueno | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030124729 | Christensen et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030162221 | Bader et al. | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20030215357 | Malterer et al. | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20040002163 | Reinhardt et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040033163 | Tseung et al. | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040265185 | Kitagawa | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20040266015 | Favuzzi et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050038676 | Showalter et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050064535 | Favuzzi et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050124028 | Windeyer et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050159982 | Showalter et al. | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20060045806 | Winther et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060046298 | Key et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060062365 | Yeh | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060063265 | Welcher et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060085140 | Feingold et al. | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060088928 | Sweet et al. | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060088940 | Feingold et al. | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060105359 | Favuzzi et al. | May 2006 | A1 |
20060148063 | Fauzzi et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060172426 | Buchanan et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060265133 | Cocks et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20070010912 | Feingold et al. | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070196909 | Showalter et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
7754191 | Feb 1992 | AU |
0644876 | Dec 1993 | AU |
2172363 | Mar 1995 | CA |
4312093 | Oct 1993 | DE |
4313807 | Nov 1993 | DE |
69417908 | Nov 1999 | DE |
0285851 | Oct 1988 | EP |
0290018 | Nov 1988 | EP |
0310303 | Apr 1989 | EP |
0325101 | Jul 1989 | EP |
0502638 | Sep 1992 | EP |
0881481 | Dec 1998 | EP |
0722363 | Apr 1999 | EP |
0600939 | Oct 1999 | EP |
2160486 | Mar 2010 | ES |
2239167 | Jul 1973 | FR |
2216259 | Mar 1988 | GB |
2218514 | Nov 1989 | GB |
54014287 | Feb 1979 | JP |
55107957 | Aug 1980 | JP |
63240688 | Oct 1988 | JP |
03209163 | Dec 1991 | JP |
6504115 | May 1994 | JP |
8500922 | Jan 1996 | JP |
8506888 | Jul 1996 | JP |
9503304 | Mar 1997 | JP |
WO 8503571 | Aug 1985 | WO |
WO 8700086 | Jan 1987 | WO |
WO 8802865 | Apr 1988 | WO |
WO 8802866 | Apr 1988 | WO |
WO 8901616 | Feb 1989 | WO |
WO 9113335 | Sep 1991 | WO |
WO 9201919 | Feb 1992 | WO |
WO 9303451 | Feb 1993 | WO |
WO 9320440 | Oct 1993 | WO |
WO 9406080 | Mar 1994 | WO |
WO 9510035 | Apr 1995 | WO |
WO 9533240 | Dec 1995 | WO |
WO 9723732 | Jul 1997 | WO |
WO 9726541 | Jul 1997 | WO |
WO 9826295 | Jun 1998 | WO |
WO 9934190 | Jul 1999 | WO |
WO 9943434 | Sep 1999 | WO |
WO 9949295 | Sep 1999 | WO |
WO 9955916 | Nov 1999 | WO |
WO 9957309 | Nov 1999 | WO |
WO 9958972 | Nov 1999 | WO |
WO 0002030 | Jan 2000 | WO |
WO 0002660 | Jan 2000 | WO |
WO 0036393 | Jun 2000 | WO |
WO 0077592 | Dec 2000 | WO |
WO 0102859 | Jan 2001 | WO |
WO 0102861 | Jan 2001 | WO |
WO 0104828 | Jan 2001 | WO |
WO 0106255 | Jan 2001 | WO |
WO 0107890 | Feb 2001 | WO |
WO 0151909 | Jul 2001 | WO |
WO 0155346 | Aug 2001 | WO |
WO 0168259 | Sep 2001 | WO |
WO 0168269 | Sep 2001 | WO |
WO 0175540 | Oct 2001 | WO |
WO 0187487 | Nov 2001 | WO |
WO 0188500 | Nov 2001 | WO |
WO 02056121 | Jul 2002 | WO |
WO 02064812 | Aug 2002 | WO |
WO 03045560 | Jun 2003 | WO |
WO 03052386 | Jun 2003 | WO |
WO 2004057307 | Jul 2004 | WO |
WO 2004057308 | Jul 2004 | WO |
WO 2004058404 | Jul 2004 | WO |
WO 2004058950 | Jul 2004 | WO |
WO 2004059284 | Jul 2004 | WO |
WO 2004059287 | Jul 2004 | WO |
WO 2004059288 | Jul 2004 | WO |
WO 2004059297 | Jul 2004 | WO |
WO 2004059441 | Jul 2004 | WO |
WO 2004074845 | Sep 2004 | WO |
WO 2004074847 | Sep 2004 | WO |
WO 2005031312 | Apr 2005 | WO |
Entry |
---|
U.S. Appl. No. 60/435,601, “Sample Processing System and Methods of Sample Processing,” filed Dec. 20, 2002, 81 pages. |
European Patent Application No. 91 90 8695 Supplementary European Search Report, Search completed Mar. 26, 1993, 6 pages. |
12 Most Frequently Asked Questions About Thermoelectric Cooling. In: Tellurex Corporation, accessed Oct. 27, 2004, http://www.tellurex.com/12most.html. |
Chow et al, “Application of Existing Technology to Meet Increasing Demands for Automated Sample Handling,” Clinical Chemistry, 36(9):1 579-1582. 1990. |
Dricsoll et al., “Discreet Automated Chemistry System with Tableted Reagents,” Clinical Chemistry, 29(9): 1609-1615, 1983. |
Garza et al., “Bar Codes in the Clinical Laboratory,” Clinical Laboratory Science, 4(1 ):23-24, Jan./Feb. 1991. |
Innis et al., “DNA Sequencing with Themus Aquaticus DNA Polymerase and Direct Sequencing of Polymerase Chain Reaction-Amplified DNA,” Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci, 85:9436-9440, Dec. 1988. |
International Application No. PCT/US03/040880 Written Opinion dated Sep. 28, 2005. |
Lindeman et al., “Evaluation of the Automation of the ImmunoenzymatIc Procedures in a Routine Histo/Cytopathalogical Laboratory,” Histopathology, 6:739-746, 1982. |
Rappaport, “If Bar Code Works in Supermarkets, It Should Be Great for Medicine.”PathologIst, 39(2): 39-40, 185. |
Saiki et al., “Enzymatic Amplification of β-Globin Genomic Sequences and Restriction Site Analysis for Diagnosis of Sickle Cell Anemial,” Science 230:1350-1353, Dec. 20, 1985. |
Stark et al., An automated Devide of Immunocytochemistry, Journal of Immunological Methods, 1986, Elsevier, 107, pp. 89-92. |
Tilzer et al., “Use of Bar Code Labels on Collection Tubes for Specimen Management in the Clinical Laboratory.” Arch Pathol Lab Mcd, 112:1201-1202, Dec. 1988. |
U.S. Appl. No. 071488,601, “Automated Biological Reaction Apparatus” filed Mar. 2, 1990. |
U.S. Appl. No. 071924.052. “Automated Biological Reaction Apparatus” filed Aug. 31, 1992. |
United States District Court, District of Arizona, Ventana v. Cytologix, CIV 02117 TUC (WDB) Defendant's Surreply in Opposition to Plaintiff's Motion for Preliminary Injunctive Relief filed Jul. 2002. |
United States District Court, District of Arizona, Ventana v. Cytologix, CIV 02117 TUG (RCC) Plaintiff's Motion for Temporary Restraining Order filed Mar. 2002. |
United States District Court, District of Arizona, Ventana v. Cytologix, CIV 02117 TUG (RCC) Plaintiff's Memorandum in Support of Petition for Temporary Restraining Order and Permanent Injunction filed Mar. 2002. |
United States District Court, District of Arizona, Ventana v. Cytologix, CIV 02117 TUC (WDB) Ventana's Reply in Support of its Motion for Preliminary Relief filed Jun. 2002. |
United States District Court, District of Arizona, CV03-92 TUC-RCC, Ventana Medical vs Biogenix Laboratories, Order and Opinion on Motion, Aug. 23, 2005. |
United States District Court, District of Arizona, CV03-92 TUC-RCC, Ventana Medical vs Biogenix Laboratories Reporter's Transcript of Proceedings (Markman Hearing) before Honorable Raner C. Collins, Aug. 11, 2005. |
United States District Court, District of Arizona, CV03-92 TUC-RCC. Ventana Medical vs Biogenix Laboratories, Order filed Oct. 4, 2005. |
United States District Court, District of Arizona, CV03-92 TUC-RCC, Ventana Medical vs Biogenix Laboratories, Judgment in a CMI Case, Oct. 19, 2005. |
United States District Court, District of Delaware, Ventana v. Dakocytomation California, CIV041522 (GMS) Order Construing the Terms of U.S. Pat. No. 6,827,901 dated Dec. 13, 2005. |
United States District Court, Eastern District of Massachusetts, Vision Biosystems (USA) Trading v. Ventana Medical Systems, CIV 03CV10391GAO, Defendant's Statement of Undisputed Material Facts, in Support of its Cross-Motion for Summary Judgment of Infringement of the 861 Patent filed Jan. 2004. |
United States District Court, Eastern District of Massachusetts, Vision Biosystems (USA) Trading v. Ventana Medical Systems, CIV 03CV103910A0, Defendant's Memorandum in Opposition to Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment of No Infringement, and in Support of Defendant's Cross-Motion for Summary Judgment of Infringement of the 861 Patent, filed Jan. 15, 2004. |
United States District Court, District of Massachusetts, Vision Biosystems (USA) Trading v. Ventana Medical Systems, CIV 03CVIO391GAO, Defendant's Statement of Material Facts in Dispute, in Opposition to Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment of No Infringement of the 861 Patent, filed Jan. 15, 2004. |
United States District Court, District of Massachusetts, Vision Biosystems (USA) Trading v. Ventana Medical Systems, CIV 03CV10391GAO, Memorandum and Order filed Sep. 30, 2004. |
United States District Court, District of Massachusetts, Vision Biosystems (USA) Trading v. Ventana Medical Systems, CIV 03CV10391GAO, Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment of Non-Infringement Based on Collateral Estoppel filed Oct. 7, 2005. |
United States District Court, District of Massachusetts, Vision Biosystems (USA) Trading v. Ventana Medical Systems, CIV 03CV10391GAO, Plaintiff's Statement of Undisputed Facts in Support of its Motion for Summary Judgment of Non-Infringement Based on Collateral Estoppel, filed Oct. 7, 2005. |
United States District Court, District of Massachusetts, Vision Biosystems (USA) Trading v. Ventana Medical Systems, CIV 03CV10391GAO, Plaintiff's Memorandum in Support of its Motion for Summary Judgment of Non-Infringement Based on Collateral Estoppel, filed Oct. 7, 2005. |
United States District Court. District of Massachusetts, Vision Biosystems (USA) Trading v. Ventana Medical Systems, CIV 03CV10391GAO, Declaration of Richard Wydeven in Support of Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment of Non-Infringement Based on Collateral Estoppel, filed Oct. 7, 2005. |
United States District Court. District of Massachusetts, Vision Biosystems (USA) Trading v. Ventana Medical Systems, CIV 03CV10391 GAO, Defendant Ventana Medical Systems, Inc.'s Memorandum in Opposition to Vision's Motion for Summary Judgment of Non-Infringement Based on Collateral Estoppel. filed Oct. 21, 2005. |
United States District Court, District of Massachusetts, Vision Biosystems (USA) Trading v. Ventana Medical Systems, CIV 03CV10391 GAO, Defendant Ventena Medical Systems, Inc.'s Statement of Material Facts in Dispute, in Opposition to Vision's Motion for Summar Judgment of Non-Infringement Based on Collateral Estoppel, filed Oct. 21, 2005. |
International Preliminary Examination Report, P142WO01, International Application No. PCT/US03-40519 filed Dec. 19, 2003. |
International Preliminary Examination Report, P143WO01, International Application No. PCT/US03-40591 filed Dec. 19, 2003. |
International Preliminary Examination Report, P131 WO01, International Application No. PCT/US03-40518 filed Dec. 19, 2003. |
International Preliminary Examination Report, P139WO01, International Application No. PCT/US03-40880 filed Dec. 22, 2003. |
International Preliminary Examination Report, P140WO01, International Application No. PCT/US03-00877 filed Dec. 15, 2003. |
International Preliminary Examination Report, P144WO01, International Application No. PCT/US03-41022 filed Dec. 22, 2003. |
International Preliminary Examination Report, P1 45W001, International Application No. PCT/US03-40520 filed Dec. 19, 2003, mailing date Mar. 27, 2006. |
Written Opinion, P145WO01 • International Application No. PCT/US03-40520 filed Dec. 19, 2003. |
International Preliminary Examination Report, P145WO01, International Application No. PCT/US03-40520 filed Dec. 19, 2003, mailing date May 31, 2005. |
Written Opinion, P149WO01, International Application No. PCT/US03-40974 filed Dec. 19, 2003. |
International Preliminary Examination Report. P1 49W001 • International Application No. PCT/US03-40974 filed Dec. 19, 2003. |
U.S. Appl. No. 11/119,417, filed Apr. 30, 2005, Method and Apparatus for Pretreatment of Biological Samples. |
U.S. Appl. No. 10/054,535, filed Apr. 30, 2005, Automated Biological Reaction Apparatus, now U.S. Pat. No. 6,943,029, the entire wrapper, filed Jan. 22, 2002. |
Taylor, C., Creating a bar code chemistry system, Medical Laboratory Observer, Feb. 1993;25(2):34-6. |
Singer, R. et al, Selection and evaluation of laboratory instrumentation in clinical chemistry: II Guidelines for selection and evaluation, Med Lab Sci. Jan. 1987;44(1):6-14. |
Rocks, B. F. et at., Automatic analysers in clinical biochemistry, B F Rocks et al 1986 Clin. Phys. Physiol. Meas. 7 1-29. |
Pearson, L. S., The use of bar coding technology, Medical Device Technology, Mar. 1994. |
Lifshitz, M. 8, et al., Talking about Technology, Clinical Laboratory Management Review, Jan.-Feb. 1989;3(1):53-4. |
U.S. Appl. No. 60/487,998, An Interface Point Server, filed Jul. 17, 2003. 52 pages. |
Juroshek et al., A High-Power Automatic Network Analyzer for Measuring the RF Power Absorbed by Biological Samples in a TEM Cell, 1984, IEEE, gpo 818-824. |
Meldrum et al., ACAPELLA, a capillary-based submicroliter automated sample preparation system for genome analysis, 1999, IEEE, p. 39-48. |
Shepard, DNA purification robotics system, 1994, IEEE, gpo 424-425. |
Suckau et al., Automation of MALDI-TOF Analysis for Proteomics, 1999, IEEE, p. 1-5. |
Histologic, Technical Bulletin for Histotechnology, 2001, Internet, p. 21-44. |
Garrett et al., Successful techniques for supporting multidisciplinary science programs with 'ROPOS: 1999, IEEE, p. 753-756. |
Office Action dated Apr. 15, 2010, issued in U.S. Appl. No. 10/539,561, filed Jun. 16, 2005, Key et al. |
European Patent Office, Supplemental European Search Report issued in Application EP03814333, mailed Nov. 29, 2011, 3 pages. |
European Patent Office, Supplemental European Search Report issued in Application EP03800071, mailed Sep. 14, 2011, 5 pages. |
European Patent Office, Supplemental European Search Report issued in Application EP 0539379, entitled “Automatic Tissue Staining for Imminohistochemistry,” 4 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 11/156,760, filed Jun. 20, 2005, “Method and Apparatus for Automated Pretreatment and Processing of Biological Samples,” 126 pages. |
PCT/US2005-006383 filed Feb. 28, 2005, entitled “Reagent Delivery System, Dispensing Device and Container for a Biological Staining Apparatus,” 56 pages. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20140186218 A1 | Jul 2014 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
60435601 | Dec 2002 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 13567308 | Aug 2012 | US |
Child | 14151130 | US | |
Parent | 10538964 | US | |
Child | 13567308 | US |