Method and apparatus for controlling a contact center

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 6766011
  • Patent Number
    6,766,011
  • Date Filed
    Friday, June 16, 2000
    24 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, July 20, 2004
    20 years ago
Abstract
A switching apparatus for a contact center is integrated into a legacy contact center including a PBX. The switching capacity of both of the PBX and the switch are utilized efficiently by handing off controller specific desktop agents between the central processor and the PBX.
Description




TECHNICAL FIELD




This invention relates to telecommunications contact centers, and more specifically, to an improved technique of controlling and monitoring a plurality of agent stations in the contact center.




BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION




Many large customer oriented companies maintain a call center in order to permit agents to interact with customers. A typical example of such a call center would be that maintained by an airline or credit card company, where customers may call in with questions, make reservations, etc. Often the call centers include the ability to do automated outbound calling to selected customers as well.




Recently, these call centers have evolved into full “contact centers.” A contact center is substantially the same as a call center other than the fact that communications may be in a variety of media, instead of just by telephone. For example, a contact center may have the ability to support agent customer interaction via e-mail, web chat, video, etc. The particular types of interactions are the subject of the client's own choice, and the contact center may support some or all such interactions.




Contact centers will often co-exist and complement PBX systems. PBX systems provide telephony functions to a set of users in a business environment. In one type of architecture, contact center software will direct the operation of the PBX via a computer telephony interface (CTI) link.




Recently, full contact center systems have become available that comprise both contact center software and contact center switches in a single system. One such contact center system is sold by the Assignee of the present patent application under the trademark CCPRO. These contact center systems typically comprise a plurality of call center software applications as well as switching capability for routing incoming and outgoing contacts between customers and agents. In many modem contact centers, the call center system is added to an existing PBX system.




When adding a call center system, an issue arises regarding how to integrate such new hardware, and associated software, with the existing PBX and agent stations. Specifically, both the PBX and the contact center switch contain switching capacity, and both may be addressing the same set or subset of users. Thus, there is the potential for conflict in controlling the operation of the call center. It is important to note that either the PBX or the contact center switch can use either traditional analog or digital telephony to connect the desktop devices together, and to connect desktop devices to the public networks; or either or both the PBX or the contact center switch can use packet or cell based data networks—for example, an Internet protocol network—to provide such connectivity.





FIG. 1

shows a typical technique utilized to integrate the call center applications hardware/software (hereinafter “call center application's switch”, “call center switch” or “switch”) with the PBX. In the arrangement of

FIG. 1

, a semi-permanent connection is “nailed up” between call center applications


102


and telephones


104


-


106


. The PBX is used to nail up this connection, operating as a semi-permanent patch panel rather than an actual switching device. Specifically, the PBX is utilized to establish semi-permanent connections from telephones


104


-


106


to call center applications switch


102


. The semi-permanent connections are established when an agent logs on to the contact center system, and persist during the period of time in which the agent is logged in. Different semi-permanent connections are established through PBX


103


for each of the telephones


104


-


106


. The nailed up connection is initiated by switch


102


after the agent at one of terminals


107


-


109


logs onto switch


102


. Switch


102


knows which telephone extension is associated with each of terminals


107


-


109


, and can thus nail up the appropriate connection. The data and voice terminal are associated with each other to form the agent positions


120


-


122


as shown.




In the arrangement of

FIG. 1

, call center switch


102


includes switching hardware analogous to that included in the PBX. Thus, all of the applications and the switching are executed on the hardware denoted call center switch


102


. The PBX is simply left to patch connections together.




One problem with the arrangement of

FIG. 1

is the increased cost resulting from all of the connections. Specifically, switch


102


requires a port to connect to each of data terminals


107


-


109


, another port for each voice terminal


104


-


106


connected to the switch through the PBX


103


, and still further ports for connecting to the public network


101


. This increases hardware and software requirements, as well as cost, and also decreases reliability by having too many failure points.




A second configuration for utilizing a call center application switch to implement a call or contact center is shown in FIG.


2


. The arrangement of

FIG. 2

includes a local area network (LAN)


210


for interconnecting the call center application switch


206


with a plurality of agent stations. The functionality required for all of the call center applications, as well as the ability to switch contacts into and out of the call center, is contained within call center application switch


206


. It is noted that while the LAN


210


is shown as interconnecting the agents with the call center application switch, separate connections between the call center switch


206


and agents


201


-


204


may also be implemented. The approach shown in

FIG. 2

also has several flaws. One problem is that the PBX is eliminated from the entire architecture. The functionality of the PBX is instead implemented in call center application switch


206


. However, since such a switch is not designed to be a full PBX, some of the functionality of a typical PBX is not included in such a call center switch. For example, general purpose conferencing, unified messages and other functions normally included in the PBX are typically not included in a call center applications switch.




Still another architecture for integrating a call center application switch with the PBX is shown in FIG.


3


. The architecture of

FIG. 3

includes a separate PBX


302


and a call center applications switch


301


. Each of the PBX


302


and call center application switch


301


may independently talk to a wide area network (WAN)


350


. Agents that require a call center applications to service customers are connected to a LAN


320


for communication with call center applications switch


301


. General personnel within the company, whose telephone sets are indicated by


303


-


306


, are connected only to PBX


302


for general inbound and outward calling. Finally, supervisory personnel


311


-


315


, who require access to both the PBX


302


for general calling purposes, and to call center applications switch


301


to monitor and/or participate in call center applications, are connected to both PBX


302


and call center applications switch


301


.




The arrangement of

FIG. 3

permits those personnel utilizing mostly PBX functionality to configure their systems with only one port for access to the PBX. Personnel stationed at stations


307


-


310


are typically configured for access to call center applications switch


301


. The disadvantages of the arrangement shown in

FIG. 3

is that any of the personnel at stations


311


-


315


may be on the telephone or servicing a contact from either PBX


302


or call center applications switch


301


, when the other of the two requests contact with the particular person. Moreover, the stations


311


-


315


which require access to both, also require duplicative hardware and software.




In view of the above, there exists a need in the art for an improved and economical manner in which a contact center system can be integrated into a system, which also includes a PBX. Ideally, the functionality of both the PBX and contact center applications switch


301


should be utilized in conjunction with one another to maximize the effectiveness of the system.




SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION




The above and other problems with the prior art are overcome in accordance with the present invention, which relates to an integrated contact center capable of inward/outbound calling which utilizes both a call center application switch and a conventional PBX. Both are in communication with all agents over a local area network, and software resident preferably in the applications switch control—directly or indirectly—which of either the applications switch or the PBX accesses and/or controls the various agent stations.




Control of agents stations may be passed between the PBX and contact center switch either on a temporary bases or a semi-permanent basis, or even on a permanent basis. Tables may be maintained in the call center applications switch indicating all of the agents available online, and which of the PBX or call center applications switch has control over such agents.











BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS





FIG. 1

shows prior art contact center configuration;





FIG. 2

shows a second prior art contact center configuration;





FIG. 3

shows still another prior art contact center configuration in which a contact center utilizes both a PBX and a contact center switch;





FIG. 4

shows the architecture an exemplary embodiment of the present invention; and





FIG. 5

shows a flow chart of software which preferably runs in the contact center switch in accordance with the teachings of the present invention.











DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENT





FIG. 4

depicts a high level functional diagram of the basic architecture of the present invention. The arrangement of

FIG. 4

represents only an exemplary embodiment, and other network configurations are possible.




Public network


480


may be the public switched telephone network (PSTN) or, in the case of more modern contact centers, may be the Internet. Moreover, it is possible that either PBX


401


or switch


402


may communicate with one or both of the Internet and the PSTN. The arrangement of

FIG. 4

also includes a local area network (LAN)


410


, exemplary agent terminals


404


-


408


, each connected to communicate with the PBX


401


via LAN


410


. Each agent is also connected to contact center switch


402


, and may access the contact center applications as needed. Each agent station


404


-


408


may include an audio terminal and a data terminal.




In operation, the PBX switch fabric within PBX


401


can respond to and initiate communications between any desktop device


404


-


408


and any other desktop device


404


-


408


and/or public network


480


. The default condition is that the PBX is connected to the desktop agents


404


-


408


and has complete control over such agents. When a particular agent desires to log directly into the switch


402


, that agent logs on and the switch


402


then takes control over the desktop from the PBX


401


.




Optionally, the switch


402


may advise the PBX


401


over LAN


410


of the hand-off in control for a particular agent. Alternatively, the desktop agent itself may send either an in-band or out of band message to PBX


401


indicating that control has been passed off to the switch


402


. Another method is for the contact center switch to initiate a connection to the appropriate agent at the beginning of the agent's shift via the PBX. This is accomplished by sending a signal to the PBX to create a virtual connection from the contact center switch to the agent; in this instance, the contact center switch looks to the PBX like a set of desktop devices or a set of multi-channel packet trunks—no special protocol or API is required to coordinate interaction between the PBX and the contact center switch.




In all cases, since only control information is sent to the PBX from the contact center switch, and such control information goes over the existing local area network, no extra hardware is required to establish and maintain the connection between the contact center switch and the agent desktop, yielding a cost-effective solution for coordinating interaction between the contact center switch and the PBX.




Once an agent is logged into the switch


402


, the switch


402


may interact with such agent to facilitate the implementation of numerous applications. Such applications may involve the interconnection of agent stations with parties over public network


480


, the interaction of agent stations with other computers, and/or any of a variety of functions typical of contact centers.




The switch


402


may also interface with other peripherals (not shown) such as database servers, integrated voice response systems, etc. The switch


402


may have more or less switching capacity than PBX


401


.




In an additional embodiment, the switch


402


and PBX


401


may arbitrate control of specific agent stations over LAN


410


. The switch


402


may itself control which of PBX


401


or switch


402


controls any particular agent station.




During contact center operation, the switch


402


switching fabric may occasionally need to connect with a desktop agent station being controlled by PBX


401


. Such a scenario could arise when a contact taking place via switch


402


requires a supervisor or other desktop agent to patched in, and wherein such supervisor or other desktop agent is controlled by the PBX


401


rather than switch


402


. Such temporary patch-ins can be accomplished via a temporary hand-off for a particular contact. After the contact is completed, control will automatically revert back to the PBX for the additional agent patched into the switch


402


.




One exemplary technique for accomplishing the foregoing is to define a message exchange protocol between the PBX


401


and the call center switch


402


. A default condition includes control of a specified agent, (e.g.,


406


) being vested in the PBX


401


. When it is desired to redirect control of the agent to the call center application switch, a message is sent from the call center switch


402


, to the PBX, which causes the PBX to relinquish control of the agent. Thus, the PBX


401


will no longer send messages to the agent and/or read responses. At a time when control was turned over to the call center application switch


402


, the optional table within said switch


402


is updated to reflect the fact that call center switch


402


is now in control of the particular agent


406


. Messages may now be transmitted from call center switch


402


to agent


406


, and the PBX will send no further messages to agent


406


until advised to do so by call center switch


402


.




Note that the handoff of control may optionally be accomplished without the agent


406


even knowing. Instead, the address of the PBX on the network is known to the call center switch


402


. Thus, during such time as switch


402


has control, it will receive messages destined for the PBX network address and originated by agent


406


will process such messages. At the end of the time that switch


402


is controlling agent


406


, it will send a message to PBX


401


to relinquish control and then cease itself to receive or process messages from agent


406


.




By communicating with the switch


402


and PBX


401


, all of the switching capacity of both of the modern switch


402


and the PBX


401


may be utilized. There is no master slave relationship, nor is the PBX utilized as a patch panel, thereby effectively wasting its switching capacity. Rather, the switching capacity of the contact center is comprised of the switching capacity of both of the PBX


401


and switch


402


, thereby maximizing the use of all components in a hybrid configuration.




A table may be maintained within the switch


402


. If control is to be transferred to the PBX


401


, the table so indicates and the switch


402


then knows not to attempt control of such an agent. Alternatively, any of the agents


404


-


408


may designate whether they ought to be controlled by the switch


402


or the PBX


401


. By sending an appropriate message to both PBX


401


and switch


402


, control conflicts are avoided and the specified device maintains control of the desktop agent until a new message is sent by such agent. In such a system that allows each agent station to specify whether the call center


402


or the PBX


401


, the call center switch


402


may still have the ability to at least temporarily override such preference. This ability would be utilized in the event that one of agents


404


-


408


is requested on a call that is not controlled by whichever of PBX


401


or switch


402


is controlling the subject agent. Thus, control is normally as specified by the agent, except for temporary overrides.




In other embodiments, the switch


402


itself may assign the PBX to handle certain agent stations, while maintaining control of other agent stations for itself based on any desired factors. This decision made by the switch may account for a variety of factors. For example, applications which involve agents simply receiving a call from a calling customer, and little more, may be handled by the PBX, since such applications require only basic switching capabilities. Other applications, which require conferencing, supervisors, or interface with other processors and computers and thus, require the vast functionality of switch


402


, may be handled through such central processor.




Still another criteria for dividing control of desktop agents


404


-


408


may be the role in which any agent is placed at any particular duration of time. For example, an agent designated to a particular simplistic task which can be handled by the PBX


401


may be controlled solely by the PBX


401


, whereas the same agent, when redesignated for other tasks, may be controlled by the central processor. The control may be divided among switch


402


and PBX


401


based upon simply the number of agents each is capable of controlling, as well as the switching capacity available in each of the switch


402


and PBX


401


. Any subdivision of agents between one of more PBX's and one or more call center switches may be implemented, thereby allowing the switching capacity of both the switch


402


running the applications, as well as the PBX


401


, to be used.





FIG. 5

shows a high level flow chart of the steps executed by the switch


402


when one of agents


404


-


408


logs on. At start


501


, the log on message is received at block


502


and control is transferred to block


503


. The log on message includes information from the agent logging on indicative of whether such agent should be controlled by switch


402


or PBX


401


. Such information may be derived by the roll in which the agent is acting, or privileges granted by the security software operable within each one of agent terminals


404


-


408


.




The switch


402


determines whether it or PBX


401


will be controlling the particular agent and advises PBX


401


of the same at block


504


. Control is then given to switch


402


at block


505


, and tables indicative of each of the agents


404


-


408


, as well as whether the PBX


401


or switch


402


is controlling each such agent, are updated.




It is noted that the functional diagram shown in

FIG. 5

is for implementing the configuration in which the determination as to which of PBX


401


or switch


402


controls each of agents


404


-


408


. It is notable however, that the determination may be made in advance in the programming of switch


402


. Specifically, as previously noted, switch


402


may itself include a preprogrammed table indicative of which of the agents should be controlled by itself, as well as which agent should be controlled by PBX


401


. In such a case, when an agent logs on the switch immediately looks up the appropriate information and either transfers control the PBX


401


if required or maintains control of the agent on its own. Alternatively, the switch can be programmed to a default, with the agent having an option to override that default.




While the above describes the preferred embodiment in the invention, various modifications or additions will be apparent to those of skill in the art. Such modifications and additions are intended to be covered by the following claims.



Claims
  • 1. Apparatus for controlling a plurality of agent stations in a contact center, said apparatus comprising:a switch, for running contact center applications software and for controlling agent stations and facilitating switching between agent stations and customers or other agent stations; a Private Branch Exchange (PBX) for controlling agent stations and for facilitation switching between said agent stations and said customers or other agent stations; wherein the switch and the PBX are mutually exclusive with respect to controlling agent stations such that each of the agent stations is controlled by either the switch or the PBX at any given time; and control means for determining whether a particular agent station should be controlled by said PBX or said switch, and for allocating said control.
  • 2. The apparatus of claim 1 wherein said control means is contained within said switch.
  • 3. The apparatus of claim 1 wherein said control means relies at least in part on a message sent from a particular agent in order to determine whether said particular agent should be controlled by either the PBX or the switch.
  • 4. The apparatus of claim 3 wherein said control means maintains a table indicative of which of said agent stations are presently being controlled by said switch, and which are being controlled by said PBX.
  • 5. The apparatus of claim 1 wherein said control means allocates control to said PBX for some duration and then allocates control to said switch for some duration.
  • 6. The apparatus of claim 1 wherein said allocation is dynamic, said control being changed repeatedly from said PBX to said switch during operation.
  • 7. The switch of claim 1 wherein said control means dynamically varies, during system operation, which agents are controlled by said PBX.
  • 8. Apparatus for implementing a contact center comprising:a PBX, for switching contacts within said contact center, and for controlling agent stations; a switch, for switching contacts within said contact center, and for controlling agent stations; wherein the switch and the PBX are mutually exclusive with respect to controlling agent stations such that each of the agent stations is controlled by either the switch or the PBX at any given time; and a central processor, said central processor comprising means for controlling whether said switch or said PBX is responsible for controlling and switching said contacts within said contact center to and from any particular agent.
  • 9. The apparatus of claim 8 wherein said switch further comprises means for running software contact center applications, said applications being implemented in contacts controlled by said PBX as well as in contacts controlled by said switch.
  • 10. The apparatus of claim 8 wherein said means for controlling comprises apparatus for temporarily changing a particular agent contacts from being controlled by said PBX to being controlled by said switch for the purpose of a single contact or portion thereof.
  • 11. Apparatus of claim 9 wherein said means for controlling comprises apparatus for temporarily changing a particular agent contacts from being controlled by said switch to being controlled by said PBX for the purpose of a single call.
  • 12. A method of switching contacts through a contact center to an agent comprising:determining, for a particular agent, which of either a PBX or other switch should control the particular agent, wherein the PBX and the switch are mutually exclusive with respect to controlling the particular agent such that each of the agent is controlled by either the switch or the PBX at any given time; and after said determination, switching said contact through to said agent via either the PBX or the switch, as said determining step requires.
US Referenced Citations (105)
Number Name Date Kind
3333271 Robinson et al. Jul 1967 A
4066847 Giordano Jan 1978 A
4286118 Mehaffey et al. Aug 1981 A
4356348 Smith Oct 1982 A
4392129 Mehaffey et al. Jul 1983 A
4408100 Pritz et al. Oct 1983 A
4477698 Szlam et al. Oct 1984 A
4494229 Jolissaint Jan 1985 A
4510351 Costello et al. Apr 1985 A
4540855 Szlam et al. Sep 1985 A
4593273 Narcisse Jun 1986 A
4599493 Cave Jul 1986 A
4600814 Cunniff et al. Jul 1986 A
4677663 Szlam Jun 1987 A
4692858 Redford et al. Sep 1987 A
4694483 Cheung Sep 1987 A
4720853 Szlam Jan 1988 A
4742537 Jesurum May 1988 A
4742538 Szlam May 1988 A
4742539 Szlam May 1988 A
4757267 Riskin Jul 1988 A
4782463 Sanders Nov 1988 A
4782510 Szlam Nov 1988 A
4792968 Katz Dec 1988 A
4797911 Szlam et al. Jan 1989 A
4811240 Ballou et al. Mar 1989 A
4829563 Crockett et al. May 1989 A
4858120 Samuelson Aug 1989 A
4866638 Cosentino et al. Sep 1989 A
4881261 Oliphant et al. Nov 1989 A
4894857 Szlam et al. Jan 1990 A
4896345 Thorne Jan 1990 A
4933964 Girgis Jun 1990 A
4939771 Brown et al. Jul 1990 A
4939773 Katz Jul 1990 A
4988209 Davidson et al. Jan 1991 A
5021976 Wexelblat et al. Jun 1991 A
5041992 Cunningham et al. Aug 1991 A
5062103 Davidson et al. Oct 1991 A
5070525 Szlam et al. Dec 1991 A
5115501 Kerr May 1992 A
5119072 Hemingway Jun 1992 A
5119475 Smith et al. Jun 1992 A
5121477 Koopmans et al. Jun 1992 A
5175761 Ramsey et al. Dec 1992 A
5179657 Dykstal et al. Jan 1993 A
5179700 Aihara et al. Jan 1993 A
5206903 Kohler et al. Apr 1993 A
5214688 Szlam et al. May 1993 A
5276731 Arbel et al. Jan 1994 A
5309505 Szlam et al. May 1994 A
5345589 King et al. Sep 1994 A
5357254 Kah Oct 1994 A
5386412 Park et al. Jan 1995 A
5428827 Kasser Jun 1995 A
5430792 Jesurum et al. Jul 1995 A
5440616 Harrington et al. Aug 1995 A
5479487 Hammond Dec 1995 A
5490211 Adams Feb 1996 A
5500891 Harrington et al. Mar 1996 A
5511112 Szlam Apr 1996 A
5511117 Zazzera Apr 1996 A
5519773 Dumas et al. May 1996 A
5533109 Baker Jul 1996 A
5546456 Vilsoet et al. Aug 1996 A
5553133 Perkins Sep 1996 A
5568544 Keeler et al. Oct 1996 A
5581602 Szlam Dec 1996 A
5588045 Locke Dec 1996 A
5594781 Kozdon et al. Jan 1997 A
5594791 Szlam et al. Jan 1997 A
5619557 Berkum Apr 1997 A
5623540 Morrison et al. Apr 1997 A
5675637 Szlam et al. Oct 1997 A
5689240 Traxler Nov 1997 A
5696818 Doremus et al. Dec 1997 A
5714932 Castellon et al. Feb 1998 A
5722059 Campana Feb 1998 A
5722064 Campana Feb 1998 A
5742233 Hoffman et al. Apr 1998 A
5815565 Doremus et al. Sep 1998 A
5825283 Camhl Oct 1998 A
5825869 Brooks et al. Oct 1998 A
5828731 Szlam Oct 1998 A
5832059 Aldred et al. Nov 1998 A
5832070 Bloom et al. Nov 1998 A
5940494 Rafacz Aug 1999 A
5963635 Szlam et al. Oct 1999 A
RE36416 Szlam et al. Nov 1999 E
6044146 Gisby et al. Mar 2000 A
6044355 Crockett et al. Mar 2000 A
6118763 Trumbull Sep 2000 A
6134530 Bunting et al. Oct 2000 A
6157655 Shtivelman Dec 2000 A
6269153 Carpenter Jul 2001 B1
6272347 Griffith et al. Aug 2001 B1
6314089 Szlam et al. Nov 2001 B1
6359892 Szlam Mar 2002 B1
6359982 Foster et al. Mar 2002 B1
6362838 Szlam et al. Mar 2002 B1
20020047859 Szlam et al. Apr 2002 A1
20020067822 Cohen et al. Jun 2002 A1
20020143878 Birnbaum et al. Oct 2002 A1
20020145624 Szlam et al. Oct 2002 A1
20020161896 Wen et al. Oct 2002 A1
Foreign Referenced Citations (1)
Number Date Country
0855826 Jul 1998 EP
Non-Patent Literature Citations (3)
Entry
M2 Presswire, 3COM: Cell IT launches breakthrough multimedia call center solution based on high speed 3Com systems; Mar. 4, 1998; 1-3 webpages; Coventry.
AT & T Technology; In The Forefront With Integrated Call Centers; Winter 1992; 1-7 webpages; New York.
Telemarketing & Call Center Solutions; How a Travel-Industry Call Center Excels; Sep. 1997; 1-2 webpages; Norwalk.