The present invention relates generally to communication methods and systems, and more particularly, to methods and systems that notify one or more users of information.
Several technologies are available to notify users of events or new information. Typically, these technologies are based on email lists, bulletin boards, publish-subscribe systems, database triggers and filtering systems. A core issue in all of these systems is how the message to be sent is matched with interested subscribers. Email distribution lists and bulletin boards, for example, provide a fixed taxonomy of topics of interest. People subscribe to receive notifications for one or more topics by joining the email list or the bulletin board on that topic.
Publish-subscribe systems are also often organized with fixed taxonomies of topics. These systems are sometimes called topic-based (or type-based) publish-subscribe systems in the literature. Another category of publish-subscribe system is called the content-based publish-subscribe system. In these systems, attribute-value pairs in the message published are matched against user-specified constraints that are conjunctions of relational expressions over some of the attribute-value pairs (for example, item=car and price <$10,000) or, more generally selection queries in a normal form such as conjunctive normal form (for example, ((item=car) or (item=motorcycle)) and (price <$10,000)).
While such publish-subscribe systems provide an effective mechanism for notifying users of events or new information, they suffer from a number of limitations which, if overcome could make such publish-subscribe systems better suited for enterprise applications. For example, currently available publish-subscribe systems only allow users to enter subscriptions based on static attributes. A need therefore exists for improved publish-subscribe systems that allow users to enter subscriptions based on one or more dynamic attributes.
Generally, methods and apparatus are provided for subscribing to dynamic attributes. One or more users are notified of information having a plurality of attributes, including at least one dynamic attribute. According to one aspect of the invention, a user can enter a subscription request to be notified when the at least one dynamic attribute changes a value. For example, the subscription request can notify the user when the dynamic attribute (i) changes a value to one or more predefined values; (ii) changes to satisfy a user specified condition; or (iii) changes to a value within a specified range of values. The subscription request can optionally include one or more temporal conditions. For example, the temporal conditions can evaluate whether the dynamic attribute satisfied a value constraint during a given time interval.
A more complete understanding of the present invention, as well as further features and advantages of the present invention, will be obtained by reference to the following detailed description and drawings.
As discussed further below in a section entitled “Subscribing to Dynamic Attributes,” the present invention allows a user to enter a subscription based on one or more dynamic attributes. Static attributes are attributes that will not change during the life span of a request. Dynamic attributes are thus attributes that will change during the life span of a request. The present invention allows a subscriber to subscribe to any combination of static attributes and ask to be notified when one or more dynamic attributes change to match a subscriber specified condition, such as changing to a particular value or changing to be within a range of values.
In one exemplary implementation, the users provide their subscriptions to the subscription server 300 using a self subscription portal 170. The self subscription portal 170 enables users to create, modify, and delete subscriptions. Given the notification requests from the applications 110 and the subscriptions recorded in the subscription database 150, the subscription server 300 can perform a matching process to identify those users that should be notified of given information.
The subscription server 300 employs subscribable objects that are specific things of potential interest to users. For example, using subscribable objects, applications 110 can specify information of interest based on, e.g., customers or customer locations. A user can subscribe to a subscribable object. For example, a user can subscribe to the subscribable object for a customer to be notified about service requests from that customer.
In addition, subscribable objects can have access controls applied to them, so, for example, the set of users who can subscribe to a specific customer can be restricted. Privileges specify what a user or role can do. Privileges can apply with respect to a specific person or object, or they can apply more generally. For example, an application may have the privilege to notify a specific user, or it may be able to notify any user. Privileges can include the ability of a person or role to subscribe to a subscribable object or to an application.
In this manner, the portal 170 can perform an initial access control when a user attempts to register a subscription to ensure that the user has the appropriate privileges required for the subscription. In addition, according to another aspect of the invention, the portal 170 ensures that a user only sees objects during the registration process that the user is authorized to view. In addition, the subscription server 300 can perform a secondary check at run time to ensure that the users associated with matching subscriptions are authorized to receive the notifications.
The subscription server 300 identifies the users having subscriptions that match the notification requests and provides a list of the matching users to a third party application, such as a notification and response system 200, discussed below in conjunction with
Subscriptions provide a mechanism for specifying in advance the application-specific events about which a user will be notified. Subscriptions enable applications 110 to create notification requests without having to generate a communication flow or explicitly identify the users to notify. Instead, the subscription server 300 uses subscription information to preprocess the request, identifying the users to notify and generating a communication flow. After this preprocessing, the notification and response system 200 executes the communication flow. Furthermore, subscriptions provide an easy way for users to define the conditions under which they want to be notified (self subscription). Users can also define the conditions under which other users are to be notified (automatic subscription).
As discussed more fully below, a subscription may be created based on (i) subscribable objects that represent characteristics of a request to which a user can subscribe, e.g., a customer or customer location; (ii) zero or more attribute values that specify the values of request attributes that match a user's subscription; and (iii) optional rules that specify further conditions to be met for a request to match a user's subscription. A subscription could include any combination of mechanisms, e.g., a subscribable object and a rule. A rule could contain a condition, or it could refer to a general rule. A general rule contains a condition that can be reused in multiple subscriptions, and can be a subscribable object. Each subscription has an owner and a subscriber, and may also have a delegate. The owner is typically the creator of the subscription, while the subscriber is the primary user to be notified. The delegate is a second or alternate user to be notified, when specified. For a notification to match a subscription, it must match at least one subscribable object of the subscription. It also must match at least one value of each attribute specified on the subscription, and it must satisfy all of the subscription's rules.
Generally, the applications 110 provide notification requests to the subscription server 300 when they have information to publish (that may be of interest to one or more subscribers). Thereafter, the subscription server 300 processes the notification requests and returns a status indication and notification and response system request identifier to the associated application 110. The application 110 can use this request identifier, for example, to process, update, delete or evaluate the status of the request. In addition, if responses are received by the application 110, the request identifier can be used to associate the received responses to the request.
Generally, as shown in
The applications 110 create notification requests and submit them to the notification and response system 200. The notification requests must contain a communication flow to execute. Once the notification and response system 200 receives a notification request, the notification and response system 200 executes the communication flow logic to notify the recipients 220 and collect their responses. Generally, subscriptions specify criteria for deciding whether a user should be included in the communication flow for a request. A subscription belongs to a user and is specific to an application.
As discussed further below, the separation of the notification functionality provided by the notification and response system 200 from the subscription processing functionality provided by the subscription server 300 allows the subscription server 300 to handle issues like scalability, security and access controls, and availability.
The memory 330 may comprise, for example, a subscription processing routine, one or more matching processes and a communication flow generation process. Generally, the subscription processing routine processes notification requests received from applications 110 and determines if they match any subscriptions, using one or more matching processes. In addition, the communication flow generation process processes the matching subscriptions to generate communication flows that can be provided to a third party for delivery of the subscriptions. The communication flow generation process also ensures that the recipient of a notification has proper privileges.
In one exemplary implementation, the subscription server 300 provides an API that enables applications 110 to create notification requests that notify users according to their subscriptions. To create a notification request, an application (subject to access controls) (i) creates a notification request; (ii) identifies subscribable objects, if any, associated with the requests, e.g., a customer, and (iii) identifies attributes of the notification.
Once a notification request has been created by an application 110 for subscription processing, the subscription server 300 processes the notification request to identify users and generate a communication flow. Generally, the subscription server 300 (i) identifies those subscriptions that are associated with the application 110 and that also match at least one subscribable object of the request or else have no subscribable objects (i.e., if a subscription has any subscribable objects, at least one of them must match a subscribable object of the request; in addition, the owner of the subscription must have privileges to subscribe to at least one matching subscribable object); (ii) of the subscriptions that match based on subscribable objects or have no subscribable objects, the subscription server matches the attributes of the request to the attributes of the subscriptions (one value of each attribute of a subscription must match the value of the same attribute on the request); and (iii) evaluates the rules of the subscriptions, if any, based on the attributes of the request. All of the rules of a subscription must evaluate to true for a match. The subscriptions that match a request based on subscribable objects (or have no subscribable objects), and which also match based on attributes and rules, match the request and are selected for notification.
Once the subscriptions that match a request have been identified, the subscription server 300 employs a communication flow generation process to identify the subscriber and optionally the delegate for the subscription, and includes those users in the communication flow for that request (subject to the privileges of the subscription owner). Specifically, the owner of the subscription must have the privilege to subscribe to a matching subscribable object, and also to notify the subscriber and delegate (if any). Subscriptions that do not have sufficient privileges are not added to the communication flow. Instead, appropriate errors are logged. For example, the subscriber is often the subscription owner, in which case the subscriber can be notified in the communication flow. If, however, the subscriber or delegate is not the owner, then the owner must have sufficient privileges to notify those users, or else an error occurs. The privileges of the subscription are also checked by the self subscription portal when the subscription is created or modified.
It should be noted that for each attribute (e.g., ZIP Code), the notification request can have at most one value (e.g., 07920). However, for a single attribute, a subscription may have any number of values. Both notification requests and subscriptions can have any number of subscribable objects.
For a high volume of requests and a large number of subscriptions, computational efficiency will become an issue in matching notification requests to subscriptions. There are several ways that the matching could be done in practice:
1. First of all, the subscription server could maintain a conventional tree type index on the subscribable object associations of the subscriptions. The subscription server could use this index to match the request to those subscriptions with the same subscribable objects as the request. The subscription server could then further filter the subscriptions based on their attribute values and rules.
2. It may be that some subscriptions have no associated subscribable objects. In this case, the request need only match the attribute values and rules of the subscription, and the approach above will not work. Instead the subscription server could maintain a bitmap index on the attribute values of the subscriptions. The subscription server could use this index to match the request to those subscriptions with the same attribute values as the request. The subscription server could then further filter the subscriptions based on rules.
As previously indicated, attributes that will not change during the life span of a request are called static attributes. The others, that can change, are referred to as dynamic attributes. According to the present invention, the subscriber can subscribe to any combination of static attributes and ask to be notified when the dynamic attributes change to some desired values. For example, for a repair alert application, company name, severity, and product are static attributes, and status is a dynamic attribute. Subscribers can subscribe to Company One's repair alert for product A, of severity 4. If they are more interested in cases when status is refTSO (referred to Technical Support Organization), they can choose to be notified when the status changes to refTSO, since status is a dynamic attribute.
The list of valid values for dynamic attributes can vary for different value sets of static attributes. For example, only for messages of type case opened, the subscriber can ask to be notified when status is changed to assign, refTSO and so on (those options are not available for case completion messages). So when the users subscribe to the cases that have sub-events, the subscription portal should present a list of events and let them specify how they want to be notified, if at all, for the events.
Typically, static attributes define the characteristics of the events, e.g., severity of the ticket, origin of the problem and/or problematic product unit, while dynamic attributes monitor the processing of the events, or sub-events, i.e., current workgroup on one case, status of a ticket and so on. The ability to subscribe to dynamic attributes increases the granularity of the subscriptions. Subscribers can apply profiles of different urgency for each dynamic attribute value.
For those subscribers who care only about very specific problems related to major events, the ability to subscribe to dynamic attributes provides the functionality of filtering out unrelated information, which is indispensable in this information-overwhelming era. For example, the head of a FSO (Field Service Organization) team may only want to be notified when the status of a repair is changed to FSO.
During the life span of the notifications, subscribers can access either a web portal or a voice portal to obtain up-to-date information. For more critical problems, subscribers will set timed reminders to monitor the dangling problems and keep abreast of the changes. However, reminders only reflect the lapse of time, which is not specific. Subscribing to dynamic attributes is a mechanism that proactively provides specific up-to-date information.
In some cases, subscribers just want to be notified when a certain amount of time has passed. This may be achieved using reminders or using time as a dynamic attribute. The latter implementation has some advantages. The timers for reminders always start when the notification and response system initiates a request. When using time as a dynamic attribute, the notification and response system has access to the data of the requests, so temporal expressions and watch points can be set relative to a time specified in the request. This way, notifications can be initiated at a time relative to some time data in the requests. For example, some maintenance contracts state that all the repair tickets must be resolved within 4 hours of when a customer reports the problem. The notification and response system cannot necessarily send out a request the moment customers report a problem, but the time stamp of the customer report is included in the request data. By using time as a dynamic attribute and setting the timer based on the time of the customer report in the requests, application-based time constraints can be satisfied with better accuracy.
Some subscribers only subscribe to values of dynamic attributes that happen during a big event. When these subscribers get their notifications, they are presented with the context of the whole event such as data updates or responses that happened since the main event triggered the notifications. This feature provides real time reporting.
The last row of the attribute template table 500 specifies whether each attribute is dynamic (D) or static (S). In the example of
For example, row 510 indicates that the company name is a required attribute. When this required attribute is supplied, values for the optional static attributes, i.e. severity, SEid, source, city, Province/state, Pn/Zip, country, product and region, can also be supplied. In addition, values for the optional dynamic attributes, i.e. status and workgroup, can be supplied. Another example, row 520 indicates that the combination of city and province/state is required in this case.
For the classification attributes, a list of valid values can be provided by the application. For example, severity codes can be from 1 to 4. But for some attributes, users need to input possible values when they subscribe. Applications must provide some mechanism to validate these values.
Again, after a user logs in to the subscription portal 170, the portal 170 presents a list of applications that the user has access to. Next to the application name is a list of the required attributes, which are links to different tables that are generated dynamically according to data in an attribute_map table, discussed hereinafter, in the subscription server 300.
As discussed further below, dynamic attributes have three important properties. First, dynamic attributes are time sensitive. Dynamic attributes monitor the processing of events, so their relative time (relative to some time in the data), or absolute time can be an indicator for some kinds of problems. Using the repair alert application as an example, it is normal for a ticket to have a “waiting for parts” status; but it indicates inventory problems if that ticket stays in “waiting for parts” status longer than a certain period of time.
Second, dynamic attributes exhibit data dependency. Thus, not all of the dynamic attributes are applicable to all the value sets of certain static attributes. For example, static attribute “message type” has possible values of case opened and case completed. Workgroup is a dynamic attribute. Only open messages have workgroup information, not completion messages. So this dependency of attributes needs to be addressed in the subscription server.
Third, dynamic attributes are part of the notification and response system request or/and response data. Dynamic attribute values are retrieved when updates are made to the existing ticket. In one exemplary implementation, they are in an XML data file, so XPath syntax is used to describe the source of the values of the dynamic attributes.
As discussed further below in conjunction with
As indicated in the cardinality table 1300 (
As shown in
The Association 1030 for a dynamic attribute can either refer to the whole template or one value of a static attribute. For example, an association of “Template” indicates that the dynamic attribute applies to the template of ticket application. An association of “Message Type:Case Opened” indicates that the dynamic attribute only applies to the case when Message Type is Case Opened.
The Type 1040 of a dynamic attribute can be a number, string, or time. The Dynamic Source 1050 of the attribute value may be a single XML data element that changes, e.g., status of the ticket, or it may be an expression based on one or more data elements or system variables that change, e.g., time relative to the start of the notification, or relative to start of the case. The dynamic source and dynamic time are specified using communication flow test expression syntax and time expression syntax respectively.
The Comparison List 1060 lists all the possible test for the attribute. Some tests, such as =, !=, <, >, >=, <=, and ==where “=” is case insensitive and “==” is case sensitive, are text expression operators. Some tests are more complex operations such as “has never been” or “has been” which test the entire history of values for an attribute to see that certain values have not occurred or have occurred respectively. The Dynamic Time 1070 specifies either relative or absolute time when the dynamic attribute is being tested. Time comparison 1080 uses communication flow operators to specify how the dynamic attribute should be combined with time. For example, the operator AFTER is used for watching events that happen after a period of time. Sometimes, subscribers would like to be notified when some actions are taken before a fixed period of time, then the operator UNTIL can be used, as discussed below.
It is noted that subscriptions are submitted to the subscription server 300 for processing, but dynamic attribute values are kept in the recipient preference and role database, 210, to maintain the benefit of communication rules and communication flows.
Consider a user, userA, that has entered subscription 26929602. Subscription 26929602 includes a clause for dynamic attributes. The application communication flow can be expressed as follows:
Continuing the example of
1. Notify me via Profile1 when status changes to “Assign.”
The corresponding communication flow can be expressed as follows:
2. After 2 days from when the customer reported the problem, if ticket status is still pending, notify me via Profile1.
The corresponding communication flow can be expressed as follows:
3. After 2 days from when the customer reported the problem, if ticket status has never changed to Assign or ConFSO, notify me via Profile1.
The corresponding communication flow can be expressed as follows:
4. Notify me every time ticket status is changed to EscTier4 (escalates to Tier4) in the first hour after the customer reports the problem.
The corresponding communication flow can be expressed as follows:
System and Article of Manufacture Details
As is known in the art, the methods and apparatus discussed herein may be distributed as an article of manufacture that itself comprises a computer readable medium having computer readable code means embodied thereon. The computer readable program code means is operable, in conjunction with a computer system, to carry out all or some of the steps to perform the methods or create the apparatuses discussed herein. The computer readable medium may be a recordable medium (e.g., floppy disks, hard drives, compact disks, or memory cards) or may be a transmission medium (e.g., a network comprising fiber-optics, the world-wide web, cables, or a wireless channel using time-division multiple access, code-division multiple access, or other radio-frequency channel). Any medium known or developed that can store information suitable for use with a computer system may be used. The computer-readable code means is any mechanism for allowing a computer to read instructions and data, such as magnetic variations on a magnetic media or height variations on the surface of a compact disk.
The computer systems and servers described herein each contain a memory that will configure associated processors to implement the methods, steps, and functions disclosed herein. The memories could be distributed or local and the processors could be distributed or singular. The memories could be implemented as an electrical, magnetic or optical memory, or any combination of these or other types of storage devices. Moreover, the term “memory” should be construed broadly enough to encompass any information able to be read from or written to an address in the addressable space accessed by an associated processor. With this definition, information on a network is still within a memory because the associated processor can retrieve the information from the network.
It is to be understood that the embodiments and variations shown and described herein are merely illustrative of the principles of this invention and that various modifications may be implemented by those skilled in the art without departing from the scope and spirit of the invention.
This application claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Application No. 60/554,232, filed Mar. 18, 2004, and is related to U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/184,236, filed Jun. 26, 2002, entitled “Method and Apparatus for Automatic Notification and Response;” U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/184,325, filed Jun. 26, 2002, entitled “Method and Apparatus for Automatic Notification and Response Based on Communication Flow Expressions,” and U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/999,909, filed Nov. 30, 2004, entitled “Method and Apparatus for a Publish-Subscribe System with Templates for Role-Based View of Subscriptions,” each incorporated by reference herein.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
5742668 | Pepe et al. | Apr 1998 | A |
5812865 | Theimer et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5873084 | Bracho et al. | Feb 1999 | A |
5999978 | Angal et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6021443 | Bracho et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6037934 | Himmel et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
6041360 | Himmel et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
6098099 | Ellesson et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6112246 | Horbal et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6158007 | Moreh et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
6173310 | Yost et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6208995 | Himmel et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6211871 | Himmel et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6381594 | Eichstaedt et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6404880 | Stevens et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6442565 | Tyra et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6446114 | Bulfer et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6457046 | Munakata | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6463462 | Smith et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6502093 | Bhatt et al. | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6604093 | Etzion et al. | Aug 2003 | B1 |
6643661 | Polizzi et al. | Nov 2003 | B2 |
6643682 | Todd et al. | Nov 2003 | B1 |
6643684 | Malkin et al. | Nov 2003 | B1 |
6643705 | Wallace et al. | Nov 2003 | B1 |
6654770 | Kaufman | Nov 2003 | B2 |
6671715 | Langseth et al. | Dec 2003 | B1 |
6689742 | Cerundolo et al. | Feb 2004 | B1 |
6725333 | Degenaro et al. | Apr 2004 | B1 |
6728715 | Astley et al. | Apr 2004 | B1 |
6754832 | Godwin et al. | Jun 2004 | B1 |
6895406 | Fables et al. | May 2005 | B2 |
6910070 | Mishra et al. | Jun 2005 | B1 |
6965917 | Aloni et al. | Nov 2005 | B1 |
6971065 | Austin | Nov 2005 | B2 |
6990633 | Miyasaka et al. | Jan 2006 | B1 |
7016477 | Contractor | Mar 2006 | B2 |
7032030 | Codignotto | Apr 2006 | B1 |
7103592 | Huret | Sep 2006 | B2 |
7219153 | Day | May 2007 | B1 |
7249197 | Roestenburg et al. | Jul 2007 | B1 |
7278065 | Conkel | Oct 2007 | B2 |
7287230 | Austin et al. | Oct 2007 | B2 |
7372833 | Kyronaho et al. | May 2008 | B2 |
7409430 | Leukert-Knapp et al. | Aug 2008 | B2 |
7436947 | Ordille et al. | Oct 2008 | B2 |
7452268 | Annunziata | Nov 2008 | B2 |
7558951 | Munshi | Jul 2009 | B2 |
7577581 | Schuyler | Aug 2009 | B1 |
7626952 | Slemmer et al. | Dec 2009 | B2 |
7937655 | Teng et al. | May 2011 | B2 |
20010018718 | Ludtke et al. | Aug 2001 | A1 |
20020072348 | Wheeler et al. | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020072966 | Eldering et al. | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020091789 | Katariya et al. | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20020111855 | Hammerstad | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020112073 | Melampy et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020116336 | Diacakis et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020169839 | Goldberg | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20020184521 | Lucovsky et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20030009497 | Yu | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030014297 | Kaufman et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030018771 | Vinberg | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030036960 | Suzaki et al. | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030055829 | Kambo et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030093417 | Kagimasa et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
20030193558 | Doss et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030195698 | Jones | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030215067 | Ordille et al. | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20030217109 | Ordille et al. | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20030229722 | Beyda | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20040003058 | Trossen | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040006606 | Marotta et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040015371 | Thomas et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040015778 | Britton et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040029625 | Annunziata | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040029626 | Annunziata | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040039517 | Biesinger et al. | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040059705 | Wittke et al. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040064387 | Clarke et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040095939 | Yang | May 2004 | A1 |
20040153413 | Gross | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20040162943 | Degenaro et al. | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20040225733 | Tesink et al. | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20040254937 | Gernold | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050021383 | Fliess et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050021622 | Cullen | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050033657 | Herrington et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050086469 | Dunagan et al. | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050114401 | Conkel | May 2005 | A1 |
20050165743 | Bharat et al. | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050171958 | Cheng et al. | Aug 2005 | A9 |
20050262016 | Hill et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20060067309 | Zhakov et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060253585 | Fein et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20070168550 | Wang et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070203741 | Ordille et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070299685 | Marsh | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20080005278 | Betz et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080046510 | Beauchamp et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080249843 | Gross | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20090037548 | Ordille et al. | Feb 2009 | A1 |
20090082076 | Annunziata | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090110159 | Kalbag | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090110174 | Gallant et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090201919 | Swartz | Aug 2009 | A1 |
20090204977 | Tavares et al. | Aug 2009 | A1 |
20090235084 | Ferraro et al. | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20100064020 | Weyer et al. | Mar 2010 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
WO 02093886 | Nov 2002 | WO |
Entry |
---|
“EP Application No. 05251632.5 Office Action Oct. 2, 2006”, , Publisher: EPO, Published in: EP. |
“EP Application No. 05251632.5 Office Action Apr. 11, 2006”, , Publisher: EPO, Published in: EP. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20050234993 A1 | Oct 2005 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
60554232 | Mar 2004 | US |