There exists a desire reduce critical dimensions of features in products. As the features decrease in size, the impact of contamination during processing of the features increases, which may produce defects. Exemplary contaminants are particulates that include polysilicon slivers, photoresist particles, metal oxide particles, metal particles, slurry residue, dust, dirt, as well as various elementary molecules such as carbon, hydrogen, and/or oxygen. Particulates frequently adhere to a surface by weak covalent bonds, electrostatic forces, van der Waals forces, hydrogen bonding, coulombic forces, or dipole-dipole interactions, making removal of the particulates difficult.
Historically, particulate contaminants have been removed by a combination of chemical and mechanical processes. These processes employ cleaning tools and agents that have a probability of introducing additionally contaminants during a cleaning process.
Another technique for cleaning substrate surfaces omits the use of chemical agents by exposing the surface to high heat in to vaporize contaminants present thereon. The vapors are removed by evacuating a chamber in which the surface is present. The high temperatures required for this process limits its application to post deposition processes not involving material having a structure that varies at temperatures proximate to the vaporization temperature of the contaminants.
Another cleaning technique is disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 6,881,687 and employs a laser-clean yield-enabling system. The system incorporates a laser cleaning operation working in conjunction with a defect inspection operation cooperating to feed information regarding the root cause of the remaining defects back to earlier process stages, for correction of the root causes, with resultant improvement in yield. In a simplest configuration, the particles remaining after a laser cleaning would be characterized as to their types, sizes, shapes, densities, locations, and chemical compositions in order to deduce the root causes of the presence of those particular particles. This information is used to improve the yield of subsequent product wafers being processed so that their yields are higher than the wafers characterized. It is desired, however, to provide a more robust cleaning process that avoids the presence of particulate contaminants remaining on the surface that has been subjected to a cleaning process.
Therefore, a need exists to provide improved techniques to clean substrate surfaces.
A method and system for cleaning a surface, having particulate matter thereon, of a substrate features impinging upon the surface a jet of a liquid having coupling elements entrained therein. The method includes impinging upon the surface a jet of a liquid having coupling elements entrained therein; and imparting sufficient momentum upon the coupling elements to move within the liquid and impart a quantity of said momentum upon the particulate matter, with said quantity being of sufficient magnitude to cause said particulate matter to move with respect to said substrate. The present invention is based upon the belief that the liquid in which the coupling elements are entrained forms a barrier between the coupling elements and the particulate contaminants that impedes interaction of the coupling elements with the particulate contaminants. This is believed to reduce the effectiveness of the coupling elements to remove the particulate contaminants from the surface of the substrate. The present invention attenuates, if not avoids, the barrier effect of the liquid by forming a jet of the liquid. The momentum of the coupling elements in the jet coupled with the impact of the liquid on the surface is believed to increase a probability that the coupling elements will interact with and remove the particulate contaminants. For lower velocities of the liquid jet, the entrained coupling elements experience a fluid drag. This drag force can be transferred directly to the particulate matter through interaction with the coupling element in which a sufficient force is generated to remove the contamination. Thus, the present invention can also operate in flow regimes where viscous forces dominate. Other aspects and advantages of the invention will become more apparent from the following detailed description, taken in conjunction with the accompanying drawings, illustrating by way of example the present invention.
The present invention will be readily understood by the following detailed description in conjunction with the accompanying drawings, and like reference numerals designate like structural elements.
In the following description numerous specific details are set forth in order to provide a thorough understanding of the present invention. It will be apparent, however, to one skilled in the art that the present invention may be practiced without some or all of these specific details. In other instances, well known process operations have not been described in detail in order not to unnecessarily obscure the present invention.
Referring to
Containers 42, 44 and 46 are provided with the appropriate chemicals via a wall supply 58 in fluid communication with the same over line 59. Wall supply 58 is in fluid communication with storage tanks (not shown) of appropriate chemicals that are outside of the clean room and, therefore, wall 12 to selectively place chemicals in storage tanks (not shown) in fluid communication with containers 42, 44 and 46 through valves 62, 64 and 66. Although only three containers 42, 44 and 46 are shown, as well as three valves 62, 64 and 66, many additional containers and valves may be included to facilitate control of numerous chemicals used in the processes carried-out by system 10. Exemplary chemicals that may be employed to that end include isopropyl alcohol (IPA), carbon dioxide (CO2), nitrogen (N2), ethyl glycol, deionized water (DIW), ammonia (NH3), hydrogen fluoride (HF), argon (Ar), oxygen (O2), hydrogen peroxide (H2O2), hydrogen (H2), hydrochloric acid (HCl), ozone (O3), ammonium Peroxide (NH4OH), and/or combinations thereof, for example, a de-foaming agent referred to herein as SC-1 solution (NH4OH/H2O2/H2O). Although not shown, system 10 may be completely enclosed defining a chamber 67. To control the pressure in system 10, a pump 68 may be placed in fluid communication with chamber 67.
Referring to both
Referring to
Coupling elements 94 consist of a material capable of removing contaminants 96 from surface 98 through transfer of forces from suspension 90, i.e., movement of liquid regions 92, to contaminant 96 via coupling elements 94. Thus, it is desired to provide coupling elements 94 with a cross-sectional area sufficient to remove contaminant 96 from surface 98. Typically, the cross-sectional area of coupling elements 94 is greater than a cross-sectional area of contaminant 96. In this manner, movement of contaminant 96 in response to a drag force {right arrow over (F)}d acting upon coupling element 94 is facilitated, with the understanding that drag force {right arrow over (F)}d includes both a frictional forces {right arrow over (F)}fc and normal forces, with the normal forces including momentum. Drag force {right arrow over (F)}d is a function of the physical properties and relative velocities associated with liquid region 92 and coupling elements 94.
Friction force {right arrow over (F)}fc, the tangential component of drag force {right arrow over (F)}d, on the surface of contaminant 96 is a function of the shear stress at the contaminant surface multiplied by the surface area of the contaminant: {right arrow over (F)}fc={right arrow over (τ)}cAc. The friction force {right arrow over (F)}f acting upon the coupling element is the shear stress at the coupling element surface multiplied by the surface area of the coupling element: {right arrow over (F)}f={right arrow over (τ)}A. A coupling element 94 in contact with contamination 96 directly transfers its friction force. Thus, the contaminant experiences an apparent shear stress that is a ratio of the coupling element 94 to contaminant 96 surface areas. Specifically, the apparent shear force {right arrow over (τ)}c to which contaminant experiences is
{right arrow over (τ)}c{right arrow over (τ)}A/Ac
where A is the cross-section area of coupling element 94 and Ac is the cross-sectional area of contaminant 96. Assume, for example, that an effective diameter, D, of contaminant 96 is less than about 0.1 micron and a width, W, and length, L, of coupling element 94 are each between about 5 microns to about 50 microns. Assuming a thickness, t, of coupling element 94 is between about 1 to about 5 microns, the ratio (or stress multiplier) could range between 2,500 to about 250,000. This number will increase when the normal forces are included in the drag force {right arrow over (F)}d calculation. Coupling element 94, shown in
Referring to
One such coupling mechanism is mechanical contact between coupling elements 94 and contaminant 96. To that end, coupling elements 94 may be more or less malleable than contaminant 96. In an embodiment wherein coupling elements 94 are more malleable than contaminants 96, the force imparted upon contaminant 96 is reduced due to deformation of coupling elements 94 occurring from impact with contaminant 96. As a result, contaminant 96 may become imprinted within coupling element 94 and/or entangled in a network of coupling elements 94. This may produce a mechanical linkage between coupling element 94 and contaminant 96, fixing the relative position therebetween. Mechanical stresses may be transferred of coupling elements 94 to contaminant 96, thereby increasing the probability that contaminant 96 is broken free from surface 98. Additionally, a chemical coupling mechanism, such as adhesion between contaminant 96 and coupling elements 94, may occur.
Where coupling elements 94 and contaminant 96 are sufficiently rigid, a substantially elastic collision would occur resulting in a significant transfer of energy from coupling elements 94 to contaminant 96, thereby increasing the probability that contaminant 96 is broken free from surface 98. However, the chemical coupling mechanism of adhesion between coupling elements 94 and contaminant 96 may be attenuated, which may reduce the probability gained by the collision.
In addition, to mechanical and chemical coupling mechanisms discussed above, electrostatic coupling may occur. For example, were coupling element 94 and contaminant 96 to have opposite surface charges they will be electrically attracted. It is possible that the electrostatic attraction between coupling element 94 and contaminant 96 can be sufficient to overcome force connecting contaminant 96 to surface 98. It should be realize that one or more the aforementioned coupling mechanisms may be occurring at any given time with respect to one or more contaminants 96 on surface. In addition, this may occur randomly or be induced by having coupling element 94 formed from different materials and having different shaped and hardness. Alternatively, the electrostatic repulsive interaction between the approaching coupling element 94 and the contaminant 96 may be strong enough to dislodge the contaminant 96 from the surface 98.
Exemplary embodiments of suspension 90 include liquid region 92 having a viscosity between about 1 Centipoises (cP) to about 10,000 cP. Moreover, liquid regions 92 may be a Newtonian fluid or a non-Newtonian fluid. Exemplary materials that may be employed as liquid region 92 include de-ionized water (DIW), hydrocarbon, a fluorocarbon, a mineral oil, or an alcohol and the like. Furthermore, suspension 90 may include ionic or non-ionic solvents and other chemical additives. For example, the chemical additives to suspension 90 can include any combination of co-solvents, pH modifiers, chelating agents, polar solvents, surfactants, ammonia hydroxide, hydrogen peroxide, hydrofluoric acid, tetramethylammonium hydroxide, and rheology modifiers such as polymers, particulates, and polypeptides.
Coupling elements 94 may possess physical properties representing essentially any sub-state such that in addition to the properties set forth above, do not adhere to surface 98 when positioned in close proximity or contact with surface 98. Additionally, the damage caused to surface 98 by coupling elements 94 should be deminimus, as well as the adhesion between coupling elements 94 and surface 98. In one embodiment, the hardness of coupling elements 94 is less than the hardness of surface 98. Moreover, it is desired that coupling element 94 avoiding adherence to surface 98 when positioned in either close proximity to or in contact with surface 98. Various embodiments coupling elements 94 may be defined as crystalline solids or non-crystalline solids. Examples of non-crystalline solids include aliphatic acids, carboxylic acids, paraffin, wax, polymers, polystyrene, polypeptides, and other visco-elastic materials. To that end, the quantity of coupling elements 94 in suspension 90 should be present at a concentration that exceeds its solubility limit within liquid region 92.
It should be understood that the aliphatic acids represent essentially any acid defined by organic compounds in which carbon atoms form open chains. A fatty acid is an example of an aliphatic acid that can be used as coupling element 94 within suspension 90. Examples of fatty acids that may be used as coupling elements 94 include lauric, palmitic, stearic, oleic, linoleic, linolenic, arachidonic, gadoleic, eurcic, butyric, caproic, caprylic, myristic, margaric, behenic, lignoseric, myristoleic, palmitoleic, nervanic, parinaric, timnodonic, brassic, clupanodonic acid, lignoceric acid, cerotic acid, and mixtures thereof, among others.
In one embodiment, coupling elements 94 may represent a mixture of fatty acids formed from various carbon chain lengths extending from C-1 to about C-26. Carboxylic acids are defined by essentially any organic acid that includes one or more carboxyl groups (COOH). When used as coupling elements 94, the carboxylic acids can include mixtures of various carbon chain lengths extending from C-1 through about C-100. Also, the carboxylic acids can include other functional groups such as but not limited to methyl, vinyl, alkyne, amide, primary amine, secondary amine, tertiary amine, azo, nitrile, nitro, nitroso, pyridyl, carboxyl, peroxy, aldehyde, ketone, primary imine, secondary imine, ether, ester, halogen, isocyanate, isothiocyanate, phenyl, benzyl, phosphodiester, sulfhydryl, but still maintaining insolubility in suspension 90.
One manner by which to form suspension 90 with regions formed from carboxylic acid components includes presenting liquid regions 92 as a gel that is formed from a concentration of carboxylic acid solids, such as between about 3% to about 5% and preferably between about 4% to about 5%, with De-ionized water (DIW). The concentration may be heated to between 75° C. to about 85° C., inclusive to facilitate the solids going into solution, i.e., dissolving. Once the solids are dissolved, the cleaning solution can be cooled down. During the cooling down process, solid compounds in the form of needles or plates would precipitates. An exemplary suspension 90 formed in this manner has a viscosity of about 1000 cP at 0.1 per second shear rate and the viscosity falls to about 10 cP when the shear rate increases to 1000 per second, i.e., it is a non-Newtonian fluid. It should be understood that suspension may be formed by carboxylic acid(s) (or salts) in solvents other than water, polar or non-polar solvents, such as alcohol, may be employed.
Another embodiment of suspension 90 coupling elements 94 are formed from a hydrolyzed chemical agent, or by including a surfactant. For example, a dispersant material may be included in liquid region 92 to facilitate dispersal of coupling element 94 throughout suspension 90. To that end, a base can be added to suspension 90 to enable entrainment of coupling elements 94 from materials such as carboxylic acid or stearic acid that are present in less than stoichiometric quantities. An exemplary base is Ammonium Hydroxide, however, any commercially available base may be used with the embodiments described herein. Additionally, the surface functionality of the materials from which coupling elements 94 are formed may be influenced by the inclusion of moieties that are miscible within suspension 90, such as carboxylate, phosphate, sulfate groups, polyol groups, ethylene oxide, etc. In this manner, it may be possible to disperse coupling elements 94 throughout suspension 90 while avoiding unwanted conglomeration of the same, i.e., form a substantially homogenous suspension 90. In this manner, avoided may be a situation in which a conglomeration of coupling elements 94 becomes insufficient to couple to and/or remove contaminant 96 from surface 98.
Referring to
Referring to
Referring to
Referring to
Referring to 7, 8, 9, 10 and
Referring to
Liquid phase immiscible components 111 may include a low-molecular weight alkane, such as, pentane, hexane, heptane, octane, nonane, decane, or mineral oil. Alternatively, liquid phase immiscible components 111 may include oil soluble surface modifiers.
Referring to both
Immiscible components 111 may be entrained in suspension 190 before being disposed on substrate 11. Alternatively, immiscible components 111 may be entrained in suspension 190 in-situ as suspension is being deposited on surface 98 and/or may be generated by impact of suspension 190 with surface 98 thereby entraining gases, such as air, present in the surrounding ambient, e.g., generating a foam. In one example, immiscible components 111 may be generated from a gas dissolved within liquid region 192 that comes out of solution upon suspension 190 being subjected to a decrease in ambient pressure relative to pressure of suspension 190. One advantage of this process is that the majority of immiscible components 111 will form proximate to coupling elements 194, due to coupling elements 194 have moved settled under force gravity toward surface 98. This increases the probability that coupling elements 194 coupling with contaminant 96.
As with bi-state suspension 90, tri-state suspension 190 may include additional components to modify and improve the coupling mechanism between coupling elements 194 and contaminant. For example, the pH of the liquid medium can be modified to cancel surface charges on one or both of the solid component and contaminant such that electrostatic repulsion is reduced or amplified. Additionally, the temperature cycling of suspension 190 may be employed to control, or change, the properties thereof. For example, coupling elements 94 may be formed from a material, the malleability of which may change proportionally or inversely proportionally with temperature. In this fashion, once coupling elements 94 conform to a shape of contaminant, the temperature of suspension may be changed to reduce the malleability thereof. Additionally, the solubility of suspension 190 and, therefore, the concentration of coupling elements 94 may vary proportionally or inversely proportionally with temperature.
An exemplary suspension 190 is fabricated by combining Stearic acid solids, heated above 70° Celsius, to DIW heated above 70° Celsius. The quantity of Stearic acid solids combined with the DIW is approximately 0.1% to 10%, inclusive by weight. This combination is sufficiently to disperse/emulsify the Stearic acid components within the DIW. The pH level of the combination is adjusted above 9 to neutralize the stearic acid components. This is achieved by adding a base, such as ammonium hydroxide (NH4OH) to provide a concentration of 0.25% and 10%, inclusive by weight. In this manner, an acid-base mixture is formed, which is stirred for 20 minutes to ensure the homogeneity of the mixture. The acid-base mixture is allowed to reach ambient temperature and precipitate to form coupling elements 194. It is desired that coupling elements 194 formed during precipitation reach a size in a range of 10 to 5000 micrometers, inclusive. Immiscible component 111 may be formed from entrainment of air within the acid-base mixture as the same is stirred, if desired.
In another embodiment, suspension 190 is formed by from granular Stearic acid solids milled to a particle size in a range of 0.5 to 5000 micrometers, inclusive. The milled Stearic acid in granular form is added to DIW while agitating the same to form an acid-DIW mixture. Agitation of the DIW may occur by any means known, such as shaking, stirring, rotating and the like. The Stearic acid forms approximately 0.1% to 10%, inclusive, by weight of the acid-DIW mixture. Dissociation of the Stearic acid is achieved by establishing the pH level of the acid-DIW mixture to be approximately 9 by adding a base. An exemplary base includes ammonium hydroxide (NH4OH) in a concentration of 0.5% to 10%, inclusive by weight. This ionizes the Stearic acid component forming solidified Stearic acid particles. Typically the NH4OH is added to the acid-DIW mixture while the same is being agitated to disperse the solidified Stearic acid particles throughout the acid-DIW mixture. The size distribution of these solidified Stearic acid particles is in a range of 0.5 to 5,000 micrometers, inclusive.
In yet another embodiment, suspension 190 is formed from a Stearic-palmitic acid mixture dissolved in isopropyl alcohol (IPA) while the IPA is agitated, as discussed above. This provides a concentration of dissolved fatty acids present in the concentration from a range 2% to 20%, inclusive by weight. Heating of the IPA while avoiding boiling of the same and/or adding an organic solvent, such as acetone, benzene or a combination thereof, may improve solubility of the fatty acid. Any solids remaining in the concentration following dissolution may be removed by filtration or centrifugation techniques, producing a solid-free solution. The solid-free solution may be mixed with a liquid that is a nonsolvent, to the fatty acid, such as water, to precipitate a fatty-acid solid. The precipitated fatty acid becomes suspended in solution with the size distribution in the range between 0.5 and 5,000 microns, inclusive. The Stearic acid component may be ionized, as discussed above.
While this invention has been described in terms of several embodiments, it will be appreciated that those skilled in the art upon reading the preceding specifications and studying the drawings will realize various alterations, additions, permutations and equivalents thereof. Therefore, it is intended that the present invention includes all such alterations, additions, permutations, and equivalents as fall within the true spirit and scope of the invention. In the claims, elements and/or steps do not imply any particular order of operation, unless explicitly stated in the claims.
This application claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Application No. 60/755,377, filed Dec. 30, 2005. The disclosure of this patent application is incorporated by reference herein for all purposes. This application is related to U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/608,871, filed Jun. 27, 2003, and entitled “Method and Apparatus for Removing a Target Layer from a Substrate Using Reactive Gases”; U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/816,337, filed on Mar. 31, 2004, and entitled “Apparatuses and Methods for Cleaning a Substrate”; U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/173,132, filed on Jun. 30, 2005, and entitled “System and Method for Producing Bubble Free Liquids for Nanometer Scale Semiconductor Processing”; U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/153,957, filed on Jun. 15, 2005, and entitled “Method and Apparatus for Cleaning a Substrate Using Non-Newtonian Fluids”; U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/154,129, filed on Jun. 15, 2005, and entitled “Method and Apparatus for Transporting a Substrate Using Non-Newtonian Fluid”; U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/174,080, filed on Jun. 30, 2005, and entitled “Method for Removing Material from Semiconductor Wafer and Apparatus for Performing the Same”; U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/746,114, filed on Dec. 23, 2003, and entitled “Method and Apparatus for Cleaning Semiconductor Wafers using Compressed and/or Pressurized Foams, Bubbles, and/or Liquids”; U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/336,215 filed on Jan. 20, 2006, and entitled “Method and Apparatus for Removing Contamination from Substrate”; U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/346,894, filed on Feb. 3, 2006, and entitled “Method for Removing Contamination From a Substrate and for Making a Cleaning Solution”; and U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/347,154 filed on Feb. 3, 2006, and entitled “Cleaning Compound and Method and System for Using the Cleaning Compound”. The disclosure of each of these related applications is incorporated herein by reference for all purposes.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3617095 | Lissant | Nov 1971 | A |
3978176 | Voegeli | Aug 1976 | A |
4838289 | Kottman et al. | Jun 1989 | A |
5048549 | Hethcoat | Sep 1991 | A |
5062898 | McDermott et al. | Nov 1991 | A |
5209028 | McDermott et al. | May 1993 | A |
5271774 | Leenaars et al. | Dec 1993 | A |
5364474 | Williford, Jr. | Nov 1994 | A |
5447574 | Inoue | Sep 1995 | A |
5464480 | Matthews | Nov 1995 | A |
5660642 | Britten | Aug 1997 | A |
5705223 | Bunkofske | Jan 1998 | A |
5785068 | Sasaki et al. | Jul 1998 | A |
5858283 | Burris | Jan 1999 | A |
5865901 | Yin et al. | Feb 1999 | A |
5900191 | Gray et al. | May 1999 | A |
5944582 | Talieh | Aug 1999 | A |
5945351 | Mathuni | Aug 1999 | A |
5964954 | Matsukawa et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
5997653 | Yamasaka | Dec 1999 | A |
6066032 | Borden et al. | May 2000 | A |
6081650 | Lyons et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
6090217 | Kittle | Jul 2000 | A |
6152805 | Takahashi | Nov 2000 | A |
6167583 | Miyashita et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6228563 | Starov et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6267125 | Bergman et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6272712 | Gockel et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6276459 | Herrick et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6290780 | Ravkin | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6296715 | Kittle | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6386956 | Sato et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
6395693 | Wang | May 2002 | B1 |
6398975 | Mertens et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6401734 | Morita et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6439247 | Kittle | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6457199 | Frost et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6491764 | Mertens et al. | Dec 2002 | B2 |
6493902 | Lin | Dec 2002 | B2 |
6537915 | Moore et al. | Mar 2003 | B2 |
6594847 | Krusell et al. | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6616772 | De Larios et al. | Sep 2003 | B2 |
6797071 | Kittle | Sep 2004 | B2 |
6802911 | Lee et al. | Oct 2004 | B2 |
6846380 | Dickinson et al. | Jan 2005 | B2 |
6851435 | Mertens et al. | Feb 2005 | B2 |
6874516 | Matsuno et al. | Apr 2005 | B2 |
7122126 | Fuentes | Oct 2006 | B1 |
7138362 | Abe et al. | Nov 2006 | B2 |
20020094684 | Hirasaki et al. | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20020121290 | Tang et al. | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20020157686 | Kenny et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020185164 | Tetsuka et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20030171233 | Abe et al. | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20030171239 | Patel et al. | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20030226577 | Orll et al. | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20040053808 | Raehse et al. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040221877 | Bergman | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20040261823 | De Larios | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050067000 | Kosugi | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050132515 | Boyd et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050133060 | De Larios et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050133061 | De Larios et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20060128590 | Freer et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060201267 | Liu | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060283486 | De Larios et al. | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20060285930 | Korolik et al. | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20070000518 | De Larios et al. | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070079848 | Freer et al. | Apr 2007 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
1539161 | Oct 2004 | CN |
40 38 587 | Jun 1992 | DE |
0905746 | Mar 1999 | EP |
5924849 | Feb 1984 | JP |
62119543 | May 1987 | JP |
5-15857 | Jan 1993 | JP |
11 334874 | Dec 1999 | JP |
11350169 | Dec 1999 | JP |
2002-66475 | Mar 2002 | JP |
2002 280330 | Sep 2002 | JP |
2002-309638 | Oct 2002 | JP |
WO 9916109 | Apr 1999 | WO |
WO 0033980 | Jun 2000 | WO |
WO 0059006 | Oct 2000 | WO |
WO 0112384 | Feb 2001 | WO |
WO 02101795 | Dec 2002 | WO |
WO 2005006424 | Jan 2005 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Hunter, “Introduction to Modern Colloid Science,” Oxford University Press, Feb. 1994. |
Weaire et al, “The Physics of Foams,” Department of Physics, Trinity College, Dublin, 1999. |
Lester, M.A., “Is Foam Wafer Cleaning and Drying the Future?” <htttp://www.aquafoam.com/papers/SC10202.pdf>, Semiconductor International, 25, #2 (Feb.), 42 (2002). |
Kittle, P.A., “Particulate Removal Using a Foam Medium,” http://www.aquafoam.Com/papers/particulate.pdf>, Jan. 2002. |
Kittle et al., “Photoresist Removal Using Aqueous Foam,” http://www.aquafoam.com/papers/A2C2photoresist.pdf, 2001. |
Kittle et al., “Foam Wafer Cleaning—Experimental Proof of Concept,” http://www.aquafoam.com/papers/Proof-11MB.pdf.>. |
Kittle, P.A., “Aqueous Foam Drying and Cleaning of Semiconductor Wafers,” http://www.aquafoam.com/papers/SCCPresentation.pdf>, Apr. 2004. |
Kittle, “Removing Particles with a Foam Medium,” <http://www.aquafoam.com/papers/A2C2foammedium.pdf>, A2C2, p. 11-15, Jan. 2002. |
Kittle, P.A., “Semiconductor Wafer Cleaning and Drying Using a Foam Medium,” http://www.aquafoam.com/papers/NWCWG.pdf>, Sematech Novel Wafer Cleans Working Group Meeting Internet Presentation, Nov. 13, 2001. |
Kittle et al., “Photoresist Residue Removal Using Aqueous Foam Proof of Concept Experiments,” <http://www.aquafoam.com/papers/Removalall.pdf>,<papers/A2C2Pphotoresist.pdf>, pp. 13-17, May 2002. |
Kirkpatrick et al., “Advanced Wafer-Cleaning Evolution,” Solid State Technology, May 2003, www.solid-state.com. |
Lide, “Air Composition,” CRC Handbook of Chemistry and Physics, 1997. |
U.S. Appl. No. 11/639,752, filed Dec. 15, 2006, Boyd et al. |
U.S. Appl. No. 11/743,283, filed May 2, 2007, Freer et al. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20070151583 A1 | Jul 2007 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
60755377 | Dec 2005 | US |