The present invention relates generally to electronic chips and devices, and more particularly, to a method and device suitable for use in performing DC parametric tests.
Recent years have seen a rapidly increasing demand for highly integrated mixed-signal integrated circuits (IC's). This demand is mostly driven by the ever-expanding communications industry. However, as the level of integration increases, more and more mixed-signal components are becoming buried deep inside large amounts of digital circuitry without any external I/O access. This creates a difficult problem for initial device and circuit characterisation and diagnosis, as well as during a production test. For example, to measure the bias current for a high precision ADC circuit requires some form of external access. However, the access mechanism, such as a test bus, can introduce additional noise from off-chip sources.
Typically circuit characterisation includes the determination of the electrical characteristics of a circuit such as for example measuring the input/output impedance of an amplifier circuit, or finding the voltage transfer characteristics of an amplifier circuit or transistor device amongst others.
One particular area of IC testing that is being affected is the DC parametric tests. These tests are typically conducted to characterise a wide variety of mixed-signal circuits such as Analog-to-Digital Converters (ADCs), PLLs and bias networks. Also, these tests are used in digital test applications such as pad current leakage and IDDQ tests. For example, the pad current leakage test and the IDDQ test are common test techniques for detecting faults in digital ICs.
DC parametric tests are generally classified as one of two types. The first type of DC parametric test involves forcing a voltage at a circuit node while measuring the current that flows into the node. Commonly used method for on-chip current measurements include using device having either a transimpedance amplifier, as shown in
A deficiency of devices of the type described above is that they involves the use of elaborate Analog-to-Digital Converters (ADCs) with trimmed components, which makes these devices expensive and relatively non-scalable for on-chip implementation. Another deficiency of devices of the type described above is that they make use of op-amps (operational amplifiers) which also makes them relatively non-scalable for on-chip implementation. Generally, the size of the op-amp circuit does not shrink to the same extent as the size of logic circuits do as IC technology advances.
The second type of DC parametric test involves forcing a known current into a circuit node while measuring the voltage at the node.
A deficiency of commonly used on-chip current sources is that they generally suffer from low output resistance and shifts in current levels due to process variation. Such current sources are described in W. Sansen et al., “A CMOS Temperature-Compensated Current Reference”, IEEE Journal of Solid-State Circuits, Vol. 23, pp. 821-824, June 1988 and in H. J. Oguey et al., “CMOS Current Reference Without Resistance”, IEEE Journal of Solid-State Circuits, Vol. 32, pp. 1132-1135, July 1997 whose contents are herein incorporated by reference. Other on-chip current source implementations, of the type described in Burr-Brown Corporation, “Dual Current Source/Current Sink”, REF200 (Datasheet), October 1993 and in U.S. Pat. No. 4,792,748 issued to David M. Thomas et al. in Dec. 20, 1998, can generally achieve good current accuracy but require laser-trimmed on-chip resistors, which is costly when multiple measurement units are required on a single chip. The contents of the above documents are hereby incorporated by reference.
In the context of the above, there is a need in the industry to provide a method and device for use in performing DC parametric tests that alleviates at least in part problems associated with the existing devices and methods.
In one embodiment, the present invention is directed to a method of performing a DC parametric test on a first load. The method comprises electrically coupling an output of a second load to the first load and applying a first electrical signal to the second load so as to cause a second electrical signal at the output. The second signal is fed back to a search entity. A forcing parameter signal is input into the search entity, and the first electrical signal is determined as a function of the second electrical signal and the forcing parameter signal.
In another embodiment, the present invention is directed to a method of performing a DC parametric test on a first load. The method comprises the step of applying a first electrical signal and receiving a forcing parameter signal. The first electrical signal is caused to approximate the forcing parameter signal as a function of a feedback signal of the first electrical signal and the forcing parameter signal. A DC parametric signal of the first load is measured. The DC parametric signal is a response of the first load to the first electrical signal.
In the accompanying drawings:
a, 1b and 1c show examples of prior art circuit devices for on-chip current measurements;
a and 2b show circuit devices suitable for use in performing a DC parametric test on an external load in accordance with non-limiting examples of implementation of the invention;
a and 4b show specific example of implementation of the internal load of the circuit device shown in
a), b), c) and d) show four alternate specific examples of implementation of the circuit device of
Other aspects and features of the present invention will become apparent to those ordinarily skilled in the art upon review of the following description of specific embodiments of the invention in conjunction with the accompanying figures.
With reference to
The system 200 includes an input 202 for receiving a forcing parameter signal, an output 204 suitable for releasing to an external load 206 a signal approximating the forcing parameter signal. The system also includes a first circuit segment between the input 202 and the output 204 and a second circuit segment connected in a feedback arrangement with the first circuit segment.
As shown in
It will be appreciated to the person skilled in the art that the search entity 199 may be adapted for processing and generating signals in either digital format or analog format or a combination of both without detracting from the spirit of the invention. For example, the forcing parameter signal applied at input 202 and the second voltage signal released by the search entity 199 may also be in either digital or analog format.
In a specific configuration shown in
In yet another configuration (not shown in the figures), the first path includes a search unit and a circuit module having digital-to-analog conversion functionality and load functionality. The circuit module is connected between the output of the search unit and the circuit output. A non-limiting example of a circuit module having digital-to-analog conversion functionality and load functionality is shown in
With reference to
The input 202 allows receiving either a forcing voltage value or a forcing current value. In embodiments where the input 202 is for receiving a forcing voltage, the set of functional elements allows forcing the voltage VADC at output 204 to a required voltage value at the external load R2 206 using a search algorithm implemented by search unit 208. The search unit 208 controls the voltage at intermediate voltage point 214, which is input to the Digital-to-Analog-Converter (DAC) 210, such that the desired voltage VADC at output 204 is set as desired. In embodiments where the input 202 is for receiving a forcing current, the set of functional elements allows forcing the current Iout at output 204 to a required current value at the external load R2 206.
Depending on the forcing parameter (the voltage VADC or Iout at output 204), different searching algorithms are implemented by the search unit 208. The algorithms implemented by search unit 208 are described in greater detail herein below.
The resistance of the internal load R1 216 depends on both terminal voltage VDAC at point 214 and voltage VADC at output 204. The Analog-to-Digital-Converter (ADC) 212 has an input coupled to output 204 and an output coupled to the search unit 208. The ADC 212 has essentially an infinite resistance in the operating range of the system 200. As such the ADC 212 does not draw current and consequently, the current at output 204 flowing in external load 206 also flows into internal load R1 216.
Internal Load R1 216
In a specific implementation, the internal load R1 216 is a non-linear resistor device whose resistance depends on both terminal voltages VDAC and VADC. As a result, Iout is dependent on both VDAC and VADC. A non-limiting example of the DC characteristics of internal load R1 216 is shown in
Positive Resistance Property
From
An internal load R1 216 is said to have a “positive resistance” if the condition in equation 1 is satisfied. Two non-limiting examples of implementations of such a load element are shown in FIGS. 4(a) and 4(b). FIG. 4(a) shows a linear resistor and FIG. 4(b) shows a CMOS inverter. For either one of these elements, the current Iout at 204 increases with voltage VADC if voltage VDAC is fixed at any voltage. Hence the examples of load elements shown in FIGS. 4(a) and 4(b) follow the relationship in equation 1.
For the purpose of simplicity, only elements with a positive resistance will be used for internal load R1 216. Therefore, in all the analysis that follows, R1 will be assumed to have a positive resistance. It will be readily apparent to the person skilled in the art in light of this description that an implementation where R1 has a non-positive resistance can be implemented without detracting from the spirit of the invention.
Non-Inverting Property
If the voltages at the intermediate voltage point 214 correspond to VDAC voltages in
A load element R1 216 is said to be “non-inverting” if the condition in equation 2 is satisfied. An example of a non-inverting load R1 216 is shown in FIG. 4(a). It will be readily apparent to the person skilled in the art that if current Iout at output 204 is fixed at any value, there will be a constant potential difference between VADC and VDAC. Therefore, VADC increases with VDAC. The condition in equation 2 is satisfied.
Alternatively, load element R1 216 may be “inverting” if it satisfies the following condition. If the voltages shown in
A load element R1 216 is said to be “inverting” if the condition in equation 3 is satisfied. An example of an inverting R1 is shown in FIG. 4(b). For a constant Iout, the VADC increases while VDAC decreases, and vice versa.
Depending on whether an inverting or a non-inverting internal load R1 216 is implemented in the system 200 (shown in
External Load R2 206
With reference to
An example DC characteristic of external load R2 206 that follows equation 4 is shown in FIG. 5. For the purpose of simplicity, R2 is assumed to follow the property defined by equation 4. It will be readily apparent to the person skilled in the art in light of this description that an implementation where R2 does not follow the property defined by equation 4 can be implemented without detracting from the spirit of the invention.
Series-connected Loads
When the system 200 is in operation, the internal load R1 216 is connected in series with external load R2 206 as shown in
It can be seen from
VADC=f1(VDAC) Equation 5
Iout=f2(VDAC) Equation 6
The relationships in equations 5 and 6 imply that it is possible to force either a voltage (VADC) or a current (Iout) at output 204 by establishing a corresponding voltage VDAC at the intermediate voltage point 214.
Force-Voltage-Measure-Current Algorithm
In a first example of implementation of the invention, the input 202 (shown in
The Search Algorithm
An objective of the force-voltage algorithm is to vary the voltage VDAC at the intermediate voltage point 214 such that the voltage at the output (VADC) 204 will be set to approximate the desired forcing voltage Vforce. We will refer to this desired VDAC voltage as V*DAC.
As shown in
Mathematically, kforce 84 can be expressed as follows:
where Q[x] is the quantizer function of the ADC 80, VLSB-ADC is the LSB voltage of the ADC 80 and {circumflex over (V)}force is the quantized Vforce aplied at 202. Also, the digitized value of VDAC at intermediate point 214 is denoted by kDAC at point 87 in FIG. 8.
It will be readily apparent that for any voltage x and its quantized value Q[x], the difference is no bigger than half the LSB voltage of the ADC 80 (VLSB-ADC). This voltage difference is negligible when ADC 80 has a sufficiently small quantization step. Therefore, for the purpose of simplicity of the description, the following assumption have been made:
x=Q[x]=k×VLSB-ADC Equation 8
where k is the digital representation of voltage x at the output of the ADC. From equation 8, it can be seen that:
Vforce={circumflex over (V)}force Equation 9
Therefore, equation 7 becomes:
Similarly, for the ADC 212 at the feedback path of
where VADC is the voltage at output 204 and ktrack is the digital approximation of the voltage signal VADC at node 85 in FIG. 8.
Upon equilibrium in the system, VADC=Vforce and VDAC=V*DAC.
Current Measurement
Once the voltage Vforce has been applied, the current Iout at output 204 needs to be obtained in order to obtain the DC characteristics of external load R2 206.
With reference to
Iout=G(VDAC, VADC) Equation 12
If the voltage VADC at output 204 is kept constant at a voltage which approximates Vforce, current Iout at output 204 becomes a one variable function of the voltage VDAC at the intermediate voltage point 214 as follows:
Iout=G(VDAC, Vforce) Equation 13
This is illustrated in
With reference to
Iout=G(V*DAC, Vforce) Equation 14
Using the relationship in equation 14, a current measurement mechanism can be derived as follows. First, it can be seen in
VDAC=kDAC×VLSB-DAC Equation 15
When the circuit in
By substituting equations 7 and 16 into equation 14, the value of the current Iout at output 204 can be deduced as follows:
Iout=G(V*DAC, Vforce)=G(k*DAC×VLSB-DAC,kforce×VLSB-ADC) Equation 17
As VLSB-DAC and VLSB-ADC in equation 17 are constant scale factors, equation 17 can be simplified as follows:
Iout=G(k*DAC×VLSB-DAC,kforce×VLSB-ADC)=Ĝ(k*DAC,kforce) Equation 18
The relationship described in equation 18 can be implemented by the circuit shown in FIG. 11.
The system depicted in
In accordance with a specific implementation, the search logic of the current measurement circuit includes a data structure in the form of a lookup table 90 containing Ĝ. The data structure may be stored on any suitable memory unit such as a RAM, ROM, PROM, EPROM and EEPROM. In a specific non-limiting implementation, the data structure is stored on a RAM device. The values k*DAC 87 and kforce 84 are fed into lookup table 90 to derive Iout. When the system is in equilibrium, the value of Iout can be computed using equation 18.
Calibration Techniques
In a specific implementation, to perform a force-voltage current measurement, a lookup table containing Ĝ 90 is used. In this section, two different examples of methods of the calibration procedure for generating the required lookup-table entries for Ĝ are described. It will be readily apparent that methods other than those described herein below may be used for generating the lookup table containing Ĝ 90 without detracting from the spirit of the invention.
Method 1
In a first specific example, if kADC is forced to a constant value approximating kforce, equation 18 can be written as follows:
Iout=Ĝ(k*DAC,kADC)|k
Equation 19 indicate that Iout would become a one-variable function of k*ADC. Alternatively, we can write the inverse relationship of equation 19 as follows:
k*DAC={circumflex over (=)}Ĝ−1(Iout,kADC)|k
where k*DAC is a function of Iout, and Ĝ−1 is the inverse function of G. The relationship in equation 20 can be obtained by the circuit shown in FIG. 12. In the circuit, voltage VADC at output 204 is held constant at the desired forcing voltage dictated by kforce 84. The inverse function Ĝ−1 is found by sweeping an external current reference Isweep 94 over a range of current values, followed by recording k*DAC 87 at each current step. The values of k*DAC may be recorded in any suitable readable memory device. In a non-limiting implementation, the values of k*DAC 87 are recorded on a RAM. In other words, for a given combination of kforce 84 and Isweep 94, a corresponding value of k*DAC is recorded.
Once the inverse mapping Ĝ−1 is known, the input and output variables can be interchanged to obtain the function in equation 19. The resultant mapping Ĝ can then be used in the current measurement circuit in FIG. 11. Note that the lookup table Ĝ 90 needs to be re-calibrated using this procedure should a different forcing voltage Vforce/kforce be needed.
Method 2
A drawback of a force-voltage current measurement with calibration method 1 described above is that a large number of calibration points is required before an actual measurement can be done. For example, an n-bit current measurement will require a calibration of 2n points for the function Ĝ. If the number of actual current measurements is small, a significant amount of test time will be wasted to generate the unused entries of the lookup table Ĝ 90.
This section describes a second specific example of a calibration scheme that can avoid unnecessary calibrations. To achieve this, the current measurement system is calibrated after an actual measurement is made. The details of this algorithm are described below.
A plot of Ĝ−1 defined in equation 20 is shown in FIG. 13. It can be seen that for the same forcing voltage given by a constant kADC=kforce 84, voltage k*DAC 87 is a function of Iout at the output 204. Suppose Iout=Ix when the voltage at the external load R2 206 in
k*DACx=Ĝ−1(Ix,kADC)|k
Now, suppose the output node 204 is connected to a current source at a value Itest 96 as shown in FIG. 14. It can be seen from
It can be seen from
k*DAC>k*DACx when Itest<Ix Equation 22
Similarly, by observing the intersection point at Iout=Itest2>Ix, it can be said that
k*DAC<k*DACx when Itest>Ix Equation 23
The relationships in equations 22 and 23 provide the basis for the calibration search algorithm. In each iteration, Itest is set to a value and the corresponding k*DAC will be compared with k*DACx, the comparison result can then be used to increment/decrement Itest in the next iteration. The detail of this algorithm is summarised in Table 1.
The calibration algorithm described in Table 1 can be implemented by the calibration circuit 102 shown in FIG. 15. The calibration circuit 102 includes a current DAC (IDAC) 104, a digital comparator module 108 and a digital integrator 106. In the figure, IDAC 104 is a current DAC whose output current Itest can be controlled digitally. Upon equilibrium, k*DAC (87)=k*DACx (110), the digital value of Itest 112 would be equal to the digitised value of the unknown current Ix.
The advantage of this calibration algorithm is that for an n-bit current measurement, a calibration of the 2n points for function Ĝ is not required. For example, when the search algorithm in Table 1 is implemented using the step search circuit in
Force-Current-Measure-Voltage Algorithms
In a second example of implementation of the invention, the input 202 (shown in
The Search Algorithms
The objective of the force-current algorithms is to control the voltage VDAC at intermediate voltage point 214 or voltage VADC at output 204 using the system in
Search Variables
From equation 6, it can be seen that by varying voltage VDAC intermediate voltage point 214, the value of Iout can be set to approximate a desired value, Iforce. A search of the voltage VDAC can be implemented using the system shown in FIG. 16. The desired VDAC voltage is defined as V*DAC. Mathematically, this can be expressed as follows:
Iforce=f2(V*DAC) Equation 24
VADC may also be viewed as a search variable. According to equations 5 and 6, we can write:
Iout=f2(f1−1(VADC))=f3(VADC) Equation 25
Equation 25 indicates that if voltage VADC an output 204 can be controlled, Iout at output 204 can be set to a desired value by searching for the corresponding VADC. A search of voltage VADC at output 204 can be implemented using the system shown in FIG. 18.
Iforce=f3(V*ADC) Equation 26
Convergence Conditions
From equations 24 and 26, it can be seen that when Iout=Iforce, the following two conditions will be satisfied:
VDAC=V*DAC Equation 27
VADC=V*ADC Equation 28
Therefore, a search algorithm can determine if Iout=Iforce by observing either VDAC or VADC. This means that either equation 27 or 28 can be used as a convergence condition of the search.
The Four Search Algorithms
From the above discussions, it has been shown that a force-current search algorithm can be implemented by using either VDAC or VADC as the search variable. Also, the convergence condition can be determined by observing either VDAC or VADC. Therefore, there are at least four possible variations for the force-current algorithm, as shown in Table 2.
The descriptions for four force-current algorithms will be presented in the following sections.
Voltage Measurement
For the force-current-measure-voltage operation, the voltage VADC at output 204 must be measured after the force-current algorithm is applied. From the general architecture of the System in
Convergence Criteria
In the search control logic implemented by search unit 208 of a force-current system, the convergence conditions are observed by evaluating a function (or its inverse) that relates the quantities kDAC, kADC and Iout. That function will be described in this section.
Consider the load lines of internal load R1 216 in FIG. 20. It can be seen from this figure that voltage VADC at output 204 is dependent on both the voltage VDAC at the intermediate voltage point 214 and current Iout at output 202. Mathematically, this can be expressed as follows:
VADC=H(VDAC, Iout) Equation 29
If current Iout at output 204 is kept constant at a value that approximates Iforce, voltage VADC at output 204 becomes a one variable function of VDAC as follows:
VADC=H(VDAC, Iforce) Equation 30
This is illustrated in
If we denote the LSB voltage of the DAC 210 used in the system 200 by VLSB-DAC, then VDAC can be represented by a digital number kDAC defined in equation 15. Similarly, if the LSB voltage of the ADC 212 is defined as VLSB-ADC, VADC can be represented by a digital value kADC as follows:
VADC=kADC×VLSB-DAC Equation 31
Substituting equation 15 and 31 into equation 30, the following relationship is obtained:
kADC×VLSB-ADC=H(kDAC×VLSB-DAC, Iforce) Equation 32
As VLSB-DAC and VLSB-ADC in equation 32 are constant scale factors, equation 32 can be simplified as follows:
On the other hand, it can be seen from equation 30 that if current Iout is kept constant at Iforce, voltage VADC is a one variable function of VDAC. From this, the reverse relationship can be expressed as:
VDAC=H−1(VADC, Iout)|I
The relationship in equation 34 is illustrated in
VDAC=H−1(VADC1, Iout)|I
If kDAC and kADC in
kDAC×VLSB-DAC=H−1(kADC×VLSB-ADC, Iout)|I
As VLSB-DAC and VLSB-ADC in equation 36 are constant scale factors, equation 36 can be simplified as follows:
The functions Ĥ and Ĥ−1 defined in equations 33 and 37 are used in the four force-current search algorithms. A summary of the algorithms is presented in Table 3.
Table 4 is an index to the figures corresponding to the Force-Current Search Algorithms described in the specification. It will be appreciated that binary searches can also be performed by replacing the integrators 352362372376 in FIG. 23(a) to (d) with Successive Approximation Registers (SARs) without detracting from the spirit of the invention.
The Four Search Implementations
In this section, details of the four search algorithms will be described. Note that because of the similarities in the four algorithms, the reader should get the basic idea from any one of the four algorithm descriptions and may not need to read the other descriptions. In addition, the algorithms are described for signals represented in digital format. It will be appreciated that corresponding algorithms for signals represented in the analog domain may be used without detracting from the spirit of the invention. Such corresponding algorithms and will become apparent to a person skilled in the art in light of the present specification and as such will not be described further here.
Vary−VDAC−Compare−VADC (Algorithm 1)
The plot in
VADC2=H(VDAC2, Iforce) Equation 38
Therefore, it follows that:
VADC=H(VDAC, Iforce) when VDAC=V*DAC Equation 39
Moreover, it can be seen that for VDAC1<VDAC2, the corresponding VADC1 is given by:
VADC1>H(VDAC1, Iforce) Equation 40
Therefore,
VADC>H(VDAC, Iforce) when VDAC<V*DAC Equation 41
Similarly, by observing VDAC3, it can be shown that:
VADC<H(VDAC, Iforce) when VDAC>V*DAC Equation 42
The relationships in equations 39, 41 and 42 provides the search algorithm required to force Iout=Iforce. In each iteration, voltage VDAC is set to a value and the corresponding VADC will be compared with H(VDAC, Iforce). The comparison result can then be used to increment/decrement VDAC in the next iteration. Using the definitions of kDAC, kADC and Ĥ in equations 15, 31 and 33, the conditions in equations 41 and 42 can be summarised into the force current algorithm in Table 3. The corresponding circuit implementation is shown in
Vary−VADC−Compare−VADC (Algorithm 2)
An alternative force-current approach can be derived by interpreting the load line plot in
VADC2=H(VDAC2, Iforce) Equation 43
Therefore, it follows that:
VADC=H(VDAC, Iforce) when VADC=V*ADC Equation 44
Moreover, by observing the intersection points at VADC=VADC1 and VADC=VADC3, it can be shown that:
VADC>H(VDAC, Iforce) when VADC<V*ADC Equation 45
VADC<H(VDAC, Iforce) when VADC>V*ADC Equation 46
Using the definitions of kDAC, kADC and Ĥ in equations 15, 31 and 33, the conditions in equations 45 and 46 can be summarised into the force current algorithm in Table 3. The corresponding circuit implementation is shown in FIG. 23(b). As shown, the search unit 208 implemented in accordance with this second algorithm includes a lookup table 354 containing the function Ĥ, a first digital comparator 356, a first digital integrator 358, a second digital comparator 360 and a second digital integrator 362.
Vary−VADC−Compare−VDAC (Algorithm 3)
The graph in
VDAC2=H−1(VADC2, Iforce)|I
Therefore, it follows that:
VDAC=H−1(VADC, Iforce)|I
Moreover, it can be seen that for VADC1<VADC2, the corresponding VDAC1 is given by:
VDAC1<H−1(VADC1, Iforce)|I
Therefore,
VDAC<H−1(VADC, Iforce)|I
Similarly, by observing VADC3, it can be shown that:
VDAC>H−1(VADC, Iforce)|I
The relationships in equations 48, 50 and 51 provides the search algorithm required to force Iout=Iforce. In each iteration, VADC is set to a value and the corresponding VDAC will be compared with H−1(VADC, Iforce)|I
Vary−VDAC−Compare−VDAC(Algorithm 4)
An alternative force-current approach can be derived by interpreting the load line plot in
VDAC2=H−1(VADC2, Iforce)|I
Therefore, it follows that:
VDAC=H−1(VADC, Iforce)|I
Moreover, by observing the intersection points at VDAC=VDAC1 and VDAC=VDAC3, it can be shown that:
VDAC<H−1(VADC, Iforce)|I
VDAC>H−1(VADC, Iforce)|I
Using the definitions of kDAC, kADC and Ĥ−1 in equations 15, 31 and 37, the conditions in equations 54 and 55 can be summarized into the force current algorithm in Table 3. The algorithm described in Table 3 can be implemented by the circuit shown in FIG. 23(d). As shown, the search unit 208 implemented in accordance with this fourth algorithm includes lookup table 364 containing the function Ĥ−1, a digital comparator 374 and a digital integrator 376. It can be observed that the circuit in FIG. 23(d) including 374, 376 and the feedback line from 376 to 374 is a unity gain buffer. As such, the circuit can be simplified to the implementation shown in FIG. 26.
In the circuit in
Calibration Techniques
In the first and second force-current algorithms described above, a lookup table 354 containing the function Ĥ is used in the circuit implementation as shown in
The function Ĥ defined in equation 34 can be found using the circuit shown in FIG. 27. In the circuit, Iout at output 204 is held constant at the desired forcing current Iforce by current source 380. The function Ĥ is found by sweeping kDAC over the full-scale range of the DAC 210, followed by recording kADC 85 at each step.
On the other hand, the function Ĥ−1, defined in equation 37, can be found using the circuit shown in FIG. 28. In this circuit, Iout at output 204 is held constant at the desired forcing current Iforce by current source 380. The function Ĥ−1 is found by sweeping kADC over the full-scale range of the ADC 212, followed by recording kDAC 87 at each step.
Note that, alternatively, the function Ĥ can be obtained by first finding the functional relationship. Ĥ−1 followed by a switch of input and output variables. Similarly, the function Ĥ−1 can be obtained by switching the input and output variable after finding Ĥ.
The lookup table Ĥ (or Ĥ−1, whichever is employed in the force-current search algorithm) needs to be re-calibrated should a different forcing current Iforce be needed.
Algorithm Modifications for an Inverting Load
The section below describes the circuit modifications when the internal load R1 216 used in the system 200 is an inverting load.
Force-Voltage-Measure-Current Algorithms
If the internal load R1 216 of the system 200 follows the inverting property defined in equation 3, the feedback loop in
The current measurement and the first calibration method described above for a non-inverting internal load R1 216 do not need to be modified for an inverting R1 because V*DAC (as well as k*DAC) is still a one-to-one corresponding function of Iout for any particular VADC=Vforce. However, the second calibration method described needs to be modified for an inverting R1. A modified calibration search algorithm is shown in Table 5. The modified calibration search circuit in
Force-Current-Measure-Voltage Algorithms
When the internal load R1 216 of the system 200 follows the inverting property as defined in equation 3, the feedback loop in the general force-VADC architecture in
The modifications for each force-current algorithm is described herein below.
Vary−VDAC−Compare−VADC (Algorithm 1)
When an inverting internal load R1 216 is used, this search algorithm is modified in order to maintain convergence of the target current value Iforce. The modified search algorithm and its implementation are shown in Table 6 and FIG. 32. As shown, the search unit 208 implemented in accordance with this first algorithm when an inverting internal load R1 216 is used includes a lookup table 364 containing the function Ĥ−1, a digital comparator 600 and a digital integrator 602.
Vary−VADC−Compare−VADC (Algorithm 2)
There is no change in this search algorithm when an inverting internal load R1 216 is used. However, because this algorithm has a force-VADC circuit implementation, the modification in
Vary−VADC−Compare−VDAC (Algorithm 3)
When an inverting internal load R1 216 is used, this search algorithm has to change in order to maintain convergence of the target current value. The modified search algorithm is shown in Table 7. Also, because this algorithm has a force-VADC circuit implementation, the modification in
Vary−VDAC−Compare−VDAC (Algorithm 4)
There is no change in this algorithm or its implementation if an inverting R1 is used.
Special Case: Using an Internal Linear Resistive Load R1 216
This section deals with the special case where the internal load R1 216 used in the system 200 is a linear resistor. The general architectures of the system that forces VDAC and VADC are shown in FIG. 35 and FIG. 36. In both figures, the internal load R1 216 is a linear resistor and is denoted by R1L. In
where Ioffset is a current offset term resulted from the offset voltages of the DAC 210 and the ADC 212. A calibration process is required to determine the values of the constants R1L and Ioffset. After these values are found, the lookup tables can be readily constructed for the force-voltage-measure-current or the force-current-measure-current algorithms.
From equation 56, it can be seen that the quantities Iout, KADC and kDAC are linearly related. As we will see in the following sections, this linearity property will dramatically deduce the amount calibration time required.
Current Measurement
Consider the force-voltage-measure-current circuit in FIG. 37. It is the same as the circuit in
where the values of R1L and Ioffset can be found using the calibration method described further on in the specification.
The relationship in equation 57 indicates that the lookup table Ĝ 706 in the current measurement system (shown in
Current Generation
With the relationship in equation 56, we can write Ĥ defined in equation 33 as follows:
Similarly, we can write Ĥ−1 defined in equation 37 as follows:
The relationships in equations 58 and 59 mean that the lookup table Ĥ and Ĥ−1 in the force-current system described previously for the case of a general internal load R1 216 can be generated by two calibration points when internal load R1 216 is a linear resistor. Moreover, from equations 58 and 59, it can also be seen that the lookup tables need not be re-calibrated if a different forcing current is required. This is different from the lookup tables for the generalised current forcing system in Section 2.4, where the functions Ĥ and Ĥ−1 need to be re-calibrated whenever a different forcing current (Iforce) is needed.
Calibration Circuits
The force-voltage circuit in
Another force-voltage circuit is shown in FIG. 39. This circuit is similar to the force-VADC architecture shown in FIG. 36. The voltage VADC at output 204 is set by the digital value kADC-cal 713. When the circuit is shown in
A purpose of the calibration process is to determine the values of the constants R1L and Ioffset. To find these two constants, two calibration points are used. Note that either one of the circuits in FIG. 38 and
For the circuit in
The values of kADC-cal for the two calibration points will be designated as kADC-cal1 and kADC-cal2. Similarly, the calibration values for kDAC-cal and Iref can be written as kDAC
Equations 61 and 62 can be solved to yield the values of R1L and Ioffset as follows:
Special Case: Simplified Calibration and Measurement
Equations 57, 58 and 59 can be used to generate a lookup table with the generic calibration procedure described previously in the specification. The section below shows how to simplify equations 63 and 64 to reduce the computational complexity of generating a lookup table for a linear resistive load.
Equations 57, 58 and 59 can be simplified if constraints are imposed on the design of the system and on the calibration procedures. This section describes an example of such a set of constraints that enables effective implementation of the system with a linear element. It will be readily appreciated that other methods for simplifying the computations may also be used without detracting from the spirit of the invention.
To avoid unnecessary arithmetic due to LSB conversions, the system 200 can be designed such that:
VLSB-ADC=VLSB-DAC Equation 65
In other words, the LSB voltage of ADC 212 and DAC 210 are the same. In the calibration procedure, the force-VADC circuit in
The zero reference current Iref2 can be easily set by merely disconnecting the output 204. Hence, only one calibration point Iforce-ref requires an external reference. The calibration process is summarised in Table 9 with reference to FIG. 39.
With the system requirement in equation 65 and the calibration points in Table 8, equations 57, 58 and 59 can be simplified as follows:
kADC=Ĥ(kDAC, Iforce)=kDAC+L(Iforce) Equation 67
kDAC=Ĥ−1(kADC, Iforce)|I
where:
These formulas can be reasonably easily implemented by a digital circuit. The force-voltage-measure-current process using the calibrated values is summarised in Table 10 with reference to FIG. 37.
The calibrated system can also be used to force any arbitrary current Iout at output 204 to the external load R2 206 and measure the voltage VADC at output 204. Any force-current algorithm in
Circuit Implementations
The following part of this specification describes specific examples of implementations of the general system 200 shown in
General Architectures of the Force-Voltage/Force-Current Algorithms
In a non-limiting implementation, the system 200 shown in
Force-Voltage-Measure-Current Algorithm
The general structure of the system for implemented a force-voltage-measure-current circuit is shown in FIG. 40. As depicted, the system includes a lookup table 706 containing Ĝ and a front-end circuit, referred to as “VADC-Forcing circuit” 721 in FIG. 40. In this non-limiting implementation, lookup table 706 is implemented by a RAM. Lookup table 706 releases a current measurement at output 715. It will be appreciated that other suitable memory devices may be used without detracting from the spirit of the invention. The VADC-Forcing circuit 721 is shown in isolation in FIG. 41. Details of the VADC-Forcing circuit 721 will be described further on in the specification.
Force-Current-Measure-Voltage Algorithm
With reference to
For the force-current architecture that uses voltage VADC at output 204 as a search variable, shown in
VDAC-Forcing Circuit 725
In a non-limiting implementation, the architecture of the VDAC-Forcing Circuit 725 in
DAC 210 and the Internal Load Element R1 216
The partial front-end circuit with the low-impedance DAC 210 and internal load R1 216 is shown in FIG. 45. The combination of the DAC 210 and internal load R1 216 as separate components is one example of implementation of a circuit module having digital-to-analog conversion functionality and load functionality. The voltage VADC at output 204 is given by a function of voltage VDAC at intermediate voltage point 214 and current Iout at output 204 as follows:
VADC=HR1(VDAC, Iout) Equation 70
where the function HR1 is dependent on the internal load R1 216. The voltage VDAC at intermediate voltage point 214 is described by:
VDAC=kDAC×VLSB-DAC Equation 71
In this description, five alternative specific implementations of the circuit module having digital-to-analog conversion functionality and load functionality in
Two of these implementations are shown in
where VDD is the voltage representing the high value of the PDM generator 801. Also, the equivalent internal load R1 216 is linear and is given by the values in Table 12 below.
Alternatively, the circuit in
Each of the MOS circuits 807 in FIGS. 47(a) to (c) correspond to the internal load R1 216 in FIG. 45. It can be seen that the equivalent internal load R1 216 for any one of the MOS circuits shown is inverting because the equivalent voltage VDAC at intermediate voltage point 214 (not shown) increases while voltage VADC at output 204 decreases for a particular current Iout at output 204. Note that in practice, the current sources in FIGS. 47(b) and (c) of the MOS circuits 807 will generally have a positive differential output resistance. Hence, Ibias is dependent on voltage VADC at output 204. Moreover, load configurations D and E (shown in FIGS. 47(b) and (c)) can also be implemented with the bias current sources removed (i.e., Ibias=0). In this case, configuration D (in FIGS. 47(b)) can be used to measure/generate negative output currents (where Iout<0) only while configuration E (in FIGS. 47(c)) can be used to measure/generate positive output currents (where Iout>0) only.
The value of voltage VADC at output 204 for the five configurations described above can be easily deduced and is shown in Table 13. In Table 13, voltage VDAC at intermediate node 214 is the equivalent DAC voltage given by equation 71. The functions HNOT, HPMOS and HNMOS are DC transfer functions of the CMOS inverter, PMOS and NMOS circuits shown in FIGS. 48(a), (b) and (c), respectively, which can be written as:
Vout1=HNOT(Vin1, Iout1) Equation 75
Vout2=HPMOS(Vin2, Iout2) Equation 76
Vout3=HNMOS(Vin3, Iout3) Equation 77
It will be appreciated that although the examples shown in FIGS. 46(a), 46(b) and 47(a) to (c) include the PDM generator 801, the latter may be replaced by a suitable general-purpose pulse generator that provides a digital pulse.
ADC 212 (Digital Integration/Successive Approximation)
In a non-limiting implementation, the ADC 212 shown in
As shown, the analog-to-digital converter module 212 includes an analog comparator 504, a digital integrator 502 and a feedback circuit. The analog comparator 504 receives a signal indicative of the voltage at the output 204 and a tracking voltage Vtrack and generates a difference signal on the basis of the signals received. The digital integrator 502 receives the difference signal and generates successive digital approximations of the voltage signal at the output of the circuit device. The feedback circuit processes the successive digital approximations of the voltage signal to generate the tracking voltage Vtrack and provide the latter to the analog comparator 504. In a non-limiting implementation, the feedback circuit includes a digital-to-analog converter module 500.
In a non-limiting implementation, the DAC 500 in
The output of the digital integrator 502, kADC, increases or decreases by a constant amount depending on the result from the comparator 504. Upon equilibrium, the tracking voltage Vtrack released by the DAC 500 will equal voltage VADC. The value kADC will become a digital representation of VADC.
In accordance with an alternative specific example of implementation, the ADC 212 shown in
where VLSB-ADC is the LSB voltage of the ADC circuit 212. If we denote the LSB voltage of the DAC 500 that is used in the ADC circuit in
VLSB-ADC=VLSB-DAC(ADC) Equation 84
ADC 212 (Delta Modulator)
In yet another alternative implementation, the ADC 212 is implemented by a delta-modulator of the type described in D. J. G. Janssen, “Delta Modulation in DVM Design”, IEEE Journal of Solid-State Circuits, Vol. SC-7, pp. 503-507, Dec. 1972. The content of this document is hereby incorporated by reference. A non-limiting implementation of the circuit is shown in FIG. 52. As shown, the ADC 212 includes an analog comparator 504, a D-Flip-Flop (D-FF) 508, an RC filter 512 and a frame counter 510. It will be appreciated that although the example shown in
At equilibrium, the tracking voltage Vtrack will equal voltage VADC at output 204. The DC value of Vtrack (and thus VADC) can be deduced by observing the density of 1's (hereinafter referred to as “pulse density”) from the D-FF 508. The frame counter 510 captures a frame of bits from the output of the D-FF 508 and counts the number of 1's in a frame. The resultant count kADC will become a digital representation of voltage VADC. For example, if the length of the frame captured is 2n bits, the output value kADC will be a quantized representation of VADC given by equation 83, where:
Functional Relationship Between kADC, kDAC and Iout
When the VDAC-Forcing circuit 725 (
where VLSB-ADC is the LSB voltage of the ADC 212 in the VDAC-Forcing circuit 725. Using equation 86, the relationships in Table 13 can be rewritten as functions Ĥ listed in Table 14.
VADC-Forcing Circuits 721
VADC-Forcing Circuits 721, of the type shown in
When a VADC-Forcing Circuit 721 is in equilibrium, the quantities kDAC, kADC and Iout will be related by a function which is dependent on the internal load R1 216. That function will be described in the following. Let us define a DC transfer characteristic WR1 for internal load R1 216 such that voltage VDAC at intermediate voltage point 214 is a function of the voltage VADC and the current Iout at the output 204. Mathematically, this can be expressed as follows:
VDAC=WR1(VADC, Iout) Equation 92
When the circuit in
where VLSB-ADC and VLSB-DAC are the LSB voltages of the equivalent ADC 212 and the DAC 210 employed in the VADC-forcing circuit 721, respectively. Function ŴR1 can be defined as:
For each variation of the VADC-Forcing Circuit 721 described in the following sub-sections, the function ŴR1 will be derived and listed. At the end of the section, we will show that the function ŴR1 for the VADC-Forcing circuits described is related to the functions Ĝ and Ĥ used the force-voltage/force-current algorithms.
VADC-Forcing Circuit 721 (Digital Integration/Successive Approximation)
The VADC-Forcing Circuit 721 in
In a non-limiting implementation where the combination of DAC 210 and internal load R1 216 is of the type shown in
If an alternative non-limiting implementation where the combination of DAC 210 and the internal load R1 216 is of the type shown in
Similarly to the ADC circuit 212 described above with reference to
Upon equilibrium, the function ŴR1 for each load configuration is given by Table 15. In Table 15, VLSB-ADC and VLSB-DAC(PDM) are the LSB voltages of the equivalent ADC 212 and the DAC 210. The functions WNOT, WPMOS and WNMOS represent the DC transfer characteristics of the CMOS inverter, PMOS and NMOS circuits shown in FIGS. 48(a), (b) and (c), which can be written as:
Vin1=WNOT(Vout1, Iout1) Equation 95
Vin2=WPMOS(Vout2, Iout2) Equation 96
Vin3=WNMOS(Vout3, Iout3) Equation 97
VADC-Forcing Circuit 721 (Delta Modulation)
The VADC-Forcing Circuits 721 in
Upon equilibrium, the voltage VADC at output 204 will be equal to the DC value set by kADC and the DAC 904. As previously described, the value of kDAC can be deduced by observing the pulse density from the D-Flip Flop 906 using a frame counter 900.
The function ŴR1 for the different load configurations are given by equations 105 to 109 shown in Table 16. In the table, VLSB-ADC is given by:
VLSB-ADC=VLSB-DAC(Force-VADC) Equation 103
where VLSB-DAC(Force-VADC) is the LSB voltage of the DAC used in the Force-VADC circuits in FIGS. 55(a) to (d).
The value of VLSB-DAC in Table 16 depends on the length of a captured frame in the frame counter 900. For a captured frame with 2n bits in length, VLSB-DAC is given by:
Comparing the equations in Table 16 to that in Table 15, it can be seen that the structures in FIG. 55(a) to (d) can also be mapped into the generalised architecture of the VADC-forcing circuit in FIG. 41. For the load configuration of type shown in FIGS. 46(a) and (b) (type A or B), the equivalent internal load R1 216 is linear and the corresponding values are shown in Table 17. For load configurations shown in FIGS. 47(a) to (c) (type C, D or E) the equivalent internal load R1 216 will be an inverting load.
Functional Relationship Between kADC, KDAC and Iout
When the VADC-Forcing circuit 721 (
Comparing equation 94 to equations 20 and 37, it can be seen that ŴR1 represents Ĝ−1 in the force-voltage-measure-current algorithm and Ĥ−1 in the force-current measurement voltage algorithm, i.e.:
Ĝ−1(kADC, Iout)|k
Ĥ−1(kADC, Iout)|I
Therefore, for all the VADC-Forcing circuit 721 with ŴR1 defined in equations 105 to 109, the corresponding Ĝ and Ĥ for the force-voltage-measure-current algorithm and the third and fourth force-current-measure-voltage algorithm are given by equations 112 and 113.
In a first alternative specific example, depicted in
Current Measurement
Using the VADC-Forcing circuit in
To calibrate this ammeter for a 5-bit current resolution, 32 currents, each with an increment of {fraction (1/32)} of the full-scale current, is applied to the output 204 in the manner shown in FIG. 58. For each current increment, the corresponding k*DAC from the frame counter is recorded. The result is tabulated as that listed in Table 18. In this example, the full-scale current range is from −1 mA to 0.9375 mA. Note that Table 18 is a mapping of the function Ĝ−1 defined in equation 18. To find Ĝ, we simply invert the second and third column of the table.
After the calibration, the system in
Current Generation
Using the VADC-Forcing circuit in
The lookup table 933 containing Ĥ−1 needs to be calibrated whenever a new value of Iforce applied at input 202 is required. That can be done using the set-up shown in FIG. 60. During calibration, the Iout is set to Iforce by an external current reference 926 while kADC is swept. For each KADC increment, the corresponding value kDAC from the frame counter 900 is recorded. The resultant lookup table lists the value of kDAC as a function of kADC, i.e., the function Ĥ−1 defined in equation 37. An example lookup-table is shown in Table 19.
After calibration, an external load 206 can be applied to the output 204 of the system as shown in
In a second alternative specific example, depicted in
The architectures/operations of the Force-voltage and Force-current systems derived from the VADC-Forcing circuit in
As both the equivalent ADC and DAC 904 in the VADC-Forcing circuit shown in
In a non-limiting implementation, the resistance R2 in the RC circuit 932 in
Calibration
The method summarised in Table 9 can be used to calibrate the system depicted in FIG. 61. In this example, we first set kADC to an arbitrary reference level (kforce-ref) at 612. For the calibration process, in a first step a current reference (Iforce-ref) 936 of +200 uA is applied to the system as shown in FIG. 62 and the value of kDAC as kDAC-cal1 is recorded. In a second step, the output 204 is disconnect from any external sources/loads to make current Iout zero and the corresponding kDAC as kDAC-cal2 is recorded. The resultant calibration points are summarised in Table 20. These calibration values will be used in generating the lookup tables required in the force-voltage/force-current algorithms described herein below.
Current Measurement
In a non-limiting implementation, the force-voltage-measure-current system described in connection with FIG. 37 and with reference to equation 57 can be constructed using the VADC-Forcing circuit shown in FIG. 61. The resultant system is shown in FIG. 63. For this current-measurement system, the lookup table Ĝ 936 is a simple expression generated by calibration data. If the calibration points in Table 20 are substituted into equation 66 and the equation is simplified, the following can be obtained:
Iout=Ĝ(k*DAC,kforce)=[kforce−k*DAC−7]×1 μA Equation 117
Knowing equation 117, the calibrated system in
The resultant bit code k*DAC can then be substituted in equation 117 to find the current value for Iout at output 204. For example, if an unknown current is applied and a k*DAC of 866 is produced, the value of the unknown current Iout will be given by:
Iout=Ĝ(866,512)=[512−866−7]×1 μA=−361 μA
Iout={acute over (G)}(866,512)=[512−866−71]×1 μA=−361 μA Equation 119
Current Generation
In accordance with a specific non-limiting implementation, an embodiment of the force-current-measure-voltage system shown in FIG. 23(c) can be constructed using the VADC-Forcing circuit in FIG. 61. The resultant system is shown in FIG. 64. For this force-current system, the lookup table {acute over (H)}−1 is a simple expression generated by calibration data. If we substitute the calibration points in Table 20 into equation 69 and 68, the following is obtained:
Knowing the result of equation 121, the system can then be used to set an arbitrary current at output 204 node. In this example, let us assume that a current Iforce of 50 uA must be forced at the output 204. The corresponding relationship in equation 121 can be simplified as:
kDAC=Ĥ−1(kADC, Iout)|I
After defining the lookup table Ĥ−1 from the calibration data, an external load R2 206 can be applied to the output 204 as shown in FIG. 64. With Ĥ−1 defined in equation 122, a current of value Iforce=50 uA will be forced into the load R2 206 when the system is in equilibrium.
The general structure of the circuits shown in
As shown in
In a first non-limiting implementation, the analog accumulation device 1000 includes an analog integrator module. In a second non-limiting implementation, the analog accumulation device 1000 includes a low-pass filter unit. It will be appreciated that other suitable equivalent devices instead of a low-pass filter unit may be used without detracting from the spirit of the invention.
The system shown in
Other specific examples of implementation of this invention are presented in C. K. L. Tam, G. W. Roberts, “A Robust DC Current Generation and Measurement Technique for Deep Submicron Circuits”, Proc. IEEE International Symposium on Circuits and Systems, Vol. 1, pp. 719-722, May 6, 2001. The contents of this document are hereby incorporated by reference.
Specific Physical Implementation
Those skilled in the art should appreciate that in some embodiments of the invention, all or part of the functionality previously described herein with respect to the circuit device and system may be implemented as pre-programmed hardware or firmware elements (e.g., application specific integrated circuits (ASICs), FPGA chips, ROM, PROM, EPROM, etc.), or other related components.
For example, the above described circuits may be incorporated in IC generally, diagnostic tools, IC testing equipment, on-chip testing and IC including on-chip testing functionality amongst others.
Specific non-limiting examples of use of the above-described system include:
Although the present invention has been described in considerable detail with reference to certain preferred embodiments thereof, variations and refinements are possible without departing from the spirit of the invention. Therefore, the scope of the invention should be limited only by the appended claims and their equivalents.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2384627 | May 2002 | CA | national |
This application is a continuation of U.S. application Ser. No. 10/427,819, filed May 1, 2003, now U.S. Pat. No. 6,727,834 issued Apr. 27, 2004, which is hereby incorporated herein by reference which claims benefit of Ser. No. 60/377,272 filed May 3, 2002.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2605361 | Cutler | Jul 1952 | A |
4593270 | White | Jun 1986 | A |
4641246 | Halbert et al. | Feb 1987 | A |
4646299 | Schinabeck et al. | Feb 1987 | A |
4792748 | Thomas et al. | Dec 1988 | A |
4792932 | Bowhers et al. | Dec 1988 | A |
4816750 | Van der Kloot et al. | Mar 1989 | A |
4875210 | Russo et al. | Oct 1989 | A |
5025205 | Mydill et al. | Jun 1991 | A |
5103230 | Kalthoff et al. | Apr 1992 | A |
5270582 | Brown et al. | Dec 1993 | A |
5274375 | Thompson | Dec 1993 | A |
5321700 | Brown et al. | Jun 1994 | A |
5321702 | Brown et al. | Jun 1994 | A |
5369604 | Ravindranath et al. | Nov 1994 | A |
5512895 | Madden et al. | Apr 1996 | A |
5568493 | Morris | Oct 1996 | A |
5610826 | Whetsel | Mar 1997 | A |
5744949 | Whetsel | Apr 1998 | A |
5812469 | Nadeau-Dostie et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5867054 | Kotowski | Feb 1999 | A |
5905967 | Botham | May 1999 | A |
5923676 | Sunter et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
5938780 | Panis | Aug 1999 | A |
6000051 | Nadeau-Dostie et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6107818 | Czamara | Aug 2000 | A |
6128759 | Hansen | Oct 2000 | A |
6184810 | Burns | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6191715 | Fowers | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6288588 | Frisch | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6313657 | Hashimoto | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6356129 | O'Brien et al. | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6363507 | Truebenbach et al. | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6449744 | Hansen | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6727834 | Roberts et al. | Apr 2004 | B2 |
20040051551 | Sunter | Mar 2004 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20040246002 A1 | Dec 2004 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
60377272 | May 2002 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 10427819 | May 2003 | US |
Child | 10832208 | US |