Method and system for multimedia messaging service (MMS) rating and billing

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 8542676
  • Patent Number
    8,542,676
  • Date Filed
    Wednesday, August 24, 2011
    13 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, September 24, 2013
    11 years ago
Abstract
The advances disclosed herewith delimit an improved method and system for smoothly rating and billing Multimedia Messaging Service (MMS). Implemented as part of a computer program product, the solution seeking the protection of Letters Patent, represents a comprehensive real-time solution for rating incoming and outgoing MMS messages which, with a view towards simplicity and efficacy of purpose, enables wireless/mobile subscribers to maintain a single account for both voice and messaging (MMS) services.
Description
BACKGROUND ART

Owing to the contemporary nature of Multimedia Messaging Services (MMS), the art directed at its rating and billing remains very much in its infancy, and in particular to real-time solutions developed in this regard. Consider US Patent Application No. 20010053687 by Sivula, entitled Method for addressing billing in a message service, messaging service system, server and terminal discloses art related to a method for addressing billing in a multimedia messaging service applying store-and-automatic forward messaging. However, the application by Sivula concerns a zero charge for the retrieval of a MMS message to a destination number. Sivula's application does not intimate or cover the rating and charging of the origination of a MMS message by a wireless subscriber, which remains a principal crux of our invention of present.


TECHNICAL FIELD

The present invention relates generally to telecommunication network implementations and billing systems; and in particular, to an improved method and system for Multimedia Messaging Service (MMS) rating and billing.


SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

The invention disclosed provides for an improved method and system for smoothly rating and billing Multimedia Messaging Service (MMS). Articulated as part of a computer program product, the art incorporates a real-time, flexible rating engine, which can non-limitingly provide for the rating of such Multimedia Messaging Services based on subscriber and service variables, messaging type, origination/termination type, on/off-Net differentiation, content, size, quantity, duration, time of day/buckets/free transactions, configured promotions. The logic of the art has also been refined and adapted to include the ability to block MMS based on account threshold.


The invention interacts with the relevant Service Control Point (SCP) through an Open Charging (OC) middleware platform and gateway system as detailed in patent application Ser. No. 10/307,335 (or similar intermediating telecommunications network implementations, technologies, platforms, and/or gateways may be employed without diluting the intended result or elucidation of the art).





BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS


FIG. 1 illustrates a typical, non-limiting embodiment of the system level architecture employed in the disclosure of present;





DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS

The improved method and system for Multimedia Messaging Service (MMS) rating and billing disclosed herewith offers members skilled in the art of telecommunication network operation and intermediation an innovative mechanism for real-time rating and charging for MMS messages. (Both Mobile Originated (MO) and Mobile Terminated (MT) messages are encompassed by elements of the application).


With reference now to FIG. 1, the improved method and system for Multimedia Messaging Service (MMS) rating and billing 20 in particular is juxtaposed and remains contingent upon, in the preferred embodiment, an Open Charging (OC) middleware platform and gateway system 10 as detailed in patent application Ser. No. 10/307,335, for mediation with a prepaid or postpaid platform. Noble technicians skilled in the art will recognize that the invention of present need not be limited to the aforementioned Open Charging (OC) middleware platform and gateway system and other similar network implementations may be employed without diluting the intent and scope as such. However, to facilitate ease of instruction and overall efficacy of purpose the recourse to the Open Charging (OC) middleware platform and gateway system 10 is expressly invoked and relied upon.


Furthermore, to facilitate the instruction of the art, the improved method and system for Multimedia Messaging Service (MMS) rating and billing 20 disclosed herewith interfaces with the Multimedia Messaging Service Center's (MMSC) 30 Real Time Payment Protocol (RTPP) interface for real-time Mobile Originated MMS rating and charging. The invention 20, which is articulated as part of computer program product, accepts RTPP triggers from a MMSC 30 and subsequently rates, and charges messaging traffic against the Open Charging (OC) middleware platform and gateway system 10. Technicians skilled in the art will recognize that the invention of present need not be limited to the aforementioned Open Charging (OC) middleware platform and gateway system and other similar network implementations may be employed without diluting the intent and scope as such. Technicians skilled in the art will also recognize that any number of protocols, triggers and interfaces may be employed herewith, and indeed, remain only bound by the state of the art and the reference to any one protocol (or similar rules, methods and means for the transmission of data) remains purely for the purposes of simplicity and ease of instruction, and do not serve to dilute the application and scope of the invention as such.


In alternate embodiments, the invention 20, may also access an external Lightweight Directory Access Protocol (LDAP) subscriber database 50 for subscriber profile queries. Technicians skilled in the art will also recognize that the triggers, protocols and like commands used among the network elements remain only bound by the state of the art and do not serve to dilute the generality of such interaction.


The MMSC 30 initiates connections to the improved method and system for Multimedia Messaging Service (MMS) rating and billing 20; and therewith once the connection has been established, the MMSC 30 performs transactions by submitting requests to the requisite logic of the disclosed invention 30.


In the preferred embodiment, the computer program product which implements the invention 20 disclosed herewith has been articulated with particular ‘fail-safe’ logic. Indeed, wherever the improved method and system for Multimedia Messaging Service (MMS) rating and billing 20 is invoked it attempts to connect to the external LDAP subscriber database 50. In the event the connection is lost, the node implementing the invention 20 will reattempt the connection at periodic intervals for a configurable number of times. Where re-connection remains unrealized, the improved method and system for Multimedia Messaging Service (MMS) rating and billing 20 will instinctively switch to one of the following configurable modes. In “reject” mode, all incoming RTPP triggers will be rejected immediately until connection is re-established. Connection attempts are performed at periodic intervals. In “passthrough” mode, all incoming RTPP triggers will be successfully acknowledged immediately until connection is re-established. Connection attempts are performed at periodic intervals. When a connection is broken, an SNMP trap will be raised. Once the connection is re-established, another SNMP trap is generated to clear the alarm.


At the core of the invention 20 remains the rating engine and the logic, routines and rules used therewith, articulated to provide real-time, high performance rating for MMS messages. The Rating Rule definition allows a member skilled in the art to determine the rate for each MMS. In the preferred embodiment, rules are to be considered in order. The first rule that matches a given MMS Event will be used and remaining rules will be ignored. Where no rules match, the MMS will be assumed to be free of charge. No charging will occur.


The member skilled in the art may insert, change and delete rules as they deem appropriate. For ease of reference, the following table (Table 1) seeks to outline the rating rule architecture in a non-limiting, illustrative manner.









TABLE 1







Rating Rule Architecture








Title
Description





Rule #
The Rule #. Rules are processed in this order,



starting from 1 increasing to DEF.


SPID
The Service Provider this rule belongs to.



Required for MSP compliance


Originating Rate Plan
The Rate Plan of the Originating subscriber.


Originating MSISDN
The source address of the incoming message.



Both exact matching and prefix matching



supported.


Terminating Rate Plan
The Rate Plan of the Terminating subscriber


Terminating MSISDN
The destination address of the incoming message.



Both exact matching and prefix matching



supported.


Min Volume
The minimum volume, based on number of bytes,



that the rule applies.


Max Volume
The maximum volume, based on number of bytes,



that the rule applies. Use ‘*’ to indicate no upper



limit.


Day
The day that this rule applies. This can be one of:



Monday, Tuesday, Wednesday, Thursday, Friday,



Saturday, Sunday, Weekdays (Mon-Fri),



Weekends (Sat, Sun), Holidays (see Holiday



table), Everyday (week)


Start Time
The Start Time, based on SMSC time, that the



rule applies


End Time
The End Time, based on SMSC time, that the



rule applies


Start Date
The date the rule is effective. The rule will be



considered as effective on or following this day.


Orig Rate
The rate charged to the originating MSISDN.


Term Rate
The rate charged to the terminating MSISDN.









The invention 20 interfaces with an Open Charging (OC) middleware platform and gateway system 10 as detailed in patent application Ser. No. 10/307,335, for mediation with the wireless subscriber's prepaid account in performing the requisite balance deduct function. Noble technicians skilled in the art will recognize that the invention of present need not be limited to the aforementioned Open Charging (OC) middleware platform and gateway system and other similar network implementations for balance deductions may be employed without diluting the intent and scope as such.


Additionally, when handling group messages, the invention 20 interfaces with an Open Charging (OC) middleware platform and gateway system 10 as detailed in patent application Ser. No. 10/307,335, to query the balance of the wireless subscriber's prepaid account. Noble technicians skilled in the art will recognize that the invention of present need not be limited to the aforementioned Open Charging (OC) middleware platform and gateway system and other similar network implementations for balance queries may be employed without diluting the intent and scope as such.


Much like the ‘fail-safe’ scenario outlined prior (in regards to the external LDAP subscriber database 50), wherever the invention 20 is invoked the art therewith attempts to connect to the Open Charging (OC) middleware platform and gateway system 10. In the event the connection is lost, the node implementing the invention 20 will reattempt the connection at periodic intervals for a configurable number of times. Where re-connection remains unrealized, the improved method and system for Multimedia Messaging Service (MMS) rating and billing 20 will instinctively switch to one of the following configurable modes. In “reject” mode, all incoming RTPP triggers will be rejected immediately until connection is re-established. Connection attempts are performed at periodic intervals. In “passthrough” mode, all incoming RTPP triggers will be successfully acknowledged immediately until connection is re-established. Connection attempts are performed at periodic intervals. When a connection is broken, an SNMP trap will be raised. Once the connection is re-established, another SNMP trap is generated to clear the alarm. Technicians skilled in the art will recognize that the invention of present need not be limited to the aforementioned Open Charging (OC) middleware platform and gateway system and other similar network implementations for balance queries may be employed without diluting the intent and scope as such.


Another singular aspect of the invention of present, remains the ability to rate and charge for Group Messages. A Group Message is defined as an MMS message addressed to multiple recipients. In the all-or-none scenario, where the originating wireless subscriber does not have sufficient fund to send the MMS message to all the recipients, the whole Group Message Transfer is rejected and no MMS message is delivered to any of the recipients.


In elucidating further how the improved method and system for Multimedia Messaging Service (MMS) rating and billing handles Group Messages, the following steps should prove illustrative. In the first instance, determine if the incoming Debit Request received from the MMSC belongs to a Group Message by examining the MMSC_NUMBER_OF_RECIPIENTS field. Where the MMSC_NUMBER_OF_RECIPIENTS is greater than 1, the Debit Request is for Group Messaging. Next confirm if the Debit Request is for the first recipient by searching corresponding MMSC_A_MSISDN and MMSC_MSG_ID in the Group Message Store. The Group Message Store holds all outstanding Group Message information which includes, but need not be bounded by, MMSC_A_MSISDN, MMSC_MSG_ID, MMSC_NUMBER_OF_RECIPIENTS, number of processed recipients, each recipient's information (B-Party Address and Service Type), balance, total rate, SCP ID.


Where the Debit Request is for the first recipient, an LDAP subscriber query on A-Party will be performed and a new Group Message entry will be created in the Group Message Store. In addition, the logic of the invention can be articulated to perform a balance query to SCP on the first recipient message, a BaIQ will be triggered to the Open Charging (OC) middleware platform and gateway system and the subscriber balance will be returned. Otherwise, a configurable fixed balance will be used instead. Members skilled in the art will recognize that the invention of present need not be limited to the aforementioned Open Charging (OC) middleware platform and gateway system and other similar network implementations for balance queries may be employed without diluting the intent and scope as such.


Next, the art of the invention performs an LDAP subscriber query on B-Party address (if it is a National number), rates the message, and subtracts the amount from the balance. Next, an update is performed to the corresponding Group Message entry with the Total Rate and B-Party information. Where the Total Rate exceeds Balance, the invention clears the corresponding Group Message entry and sends a warning message (where configured by a member skilled in the art) to A-Party. Also, a Debit Response with status code 0×6000 (insufficient funds) will be sent back to MMSC via the original node. Credit Requests may then be triggered by the MMSC to refund a charge for each recipient and should all be positively acknowledged.


If the Debit Request is not for the last recipient and the Total Rate does not exceed Balance, the invention positively acknowledges the Debit Request to MMSC via the original node. Whereas, where the Debit Request is for the last recipient, another balance query is performed by triggering an Open Charging (OC) middleware platform and gateway system as detailed in patent application Ser. No. 10/307,335, as to minimize the fault window. If the Total Rate exceeds the new Balance, a warning message (where configured by a member skilled in the art) is sent to A-Party and a Debit Response with status code 0×6000 (insufficient funds) will be sent back to MMSC via the original node. Otherwise, the logic of the invention positively acknowledges the Debit Request to MMSC via the original node and then performs a sequence of BalDeduct (for each recipient) to the Open Charging (OC) middleware platform and gateway system to debit the wireless subscriber. The corresponding Group Message entry is cleared afterwards.


The computer program product which implements the improved method and system for Multimedia Messaging Service (MMS) rating and billing, has been articulated as to store Group Message entries (then ‘Group Message Store’), and will allow said messages to expire and eliminated after a configurable time period. This functionality and implementation is intended to deal with scenarios as MMSC node failures and related exceptions.


In alternate embodiments, the improved method and system for Multimedia Messaging Service (MMS) rating and billing may send a warning message to a prepaid wireless subscriber where said subscriber has an insufficient balance to send a Mobile Originated message. This applies to Single Recipient MMS messages (when debit fails) and Group Messages (when balance falls below 0 or debit fails). The content of the warning message remains entirely configurable (e.g. “Sorry you have insufficient funds. Please try again and thank you for playing”). The message is limited to a single SM.

Claims
  • 1. A method for real-time multimedia messaging service (MMS) rating and billing comprising: receiving a request from a multimedia server in a multimedia messaging service rating and billing device via an interface protocol to rate an MMS message associated with a user account;determining a rate for the MMS message in dependence on pre-determined rating rules at the multimedia messaging service rating and billing device;communicating the determined rate from the multimedia messaging service rating and billing device to an external billing system in order to charge the user account;receiving a second communication in the multimedia messaging service rating and billing device indicating a success or failure in charging the determined rate to the user account; andcommunicating a response from the multimedia messaging service rating and billing device to the multimedia server via the interface protocol indicating, in dependence on the second communication received in the multimedia messaging service rating and billing device, the success or failure in charging the user account.
  • 2. The method of claim 1, further comprising receiving the response at the multimedia server and, in the event that the response indicates a success in charging the user account, sending the MMS message from the multimedia server to a recipient.
  • 3. The method of claim 1, further comprising receiving the response at the multimedia server and, in the event that the response indicates a failure in charging the user account, sending a failure notification from the multimedia server to the sender of the MMS message.
  • 4. The method of claim 1, wherein the rating rules specify rates based on at least one of the following: size of the MMS message; day of the week on which the MMS message is sent; time of day during which the MMS message is sent; a rate plan of a sender of the MMS message; and a rate plan of a target recipient of the MMS message.
  • 5. The method of claim 1, further comprising, prior to communicating the determined rate to the external billing system, accessing a subscriber database to determine if a determined rate should be communicated to the external billing system, and if not, then forgoing communicating a determined rate to the external billing system.
  • 6. The method of claim 5, wherein the determination of whether a determined rate should be communicated to the external billing system is based on information in the subscriber database about at least one of a sender and a target recipient of the MMS message.
  • 7. The method of claim 5, wherein when a determination is made to not communicate the determined rate to the external billing system, the response communicated to the multimedia server indicates a success in charging the user account.
  • 8. The method of claim 1, wherein determining a rate for the MMS message includes accessing a subscriber database for information about at least one of a sender and a target recipient of the MMS message.
  • 9. The method of claim 1, wherein the request received from the multimedia server is a debit request.
  • 10. A system for real-time multimedia messaging service (MMS) rating and billing device comprising: a multimedia messaging service (MMS) rating and billing device connected to a multimedia server, said multimedia messaging service (MMS) rating and billing device configured to interface with the multimedia server, said multimedia messaging service (MMS) rating and billing device further configured to receive requests from the multimedia server to rate an MMS message associated with a user account; andan external billing system connected to said multimedia messaging service (MMS) rating and billing device;wherein said multimedia messaging service (MMS) rating and billing device is configured to determine a rate for the MMS message in dependence on pre-determined rating rules, the determined rate being received at said external billing system; andwherein said multimedia messaging service (MMS) rating and billing device further is configured to receive a second communication indicating a success or failure in charging the user account the determined rate and to communicate a response to the multimedia server indicating, in dependence on the second communication received from said external billing system, the success or failure in charging the user account.
  • 11. The system of claim 10, wherein the rating rules specify rates based on at least one of the following: size of the MMS message; day of the week on which the MMS message is sent; time of day during which the MMS message is sent; a rate plan of a sender of the MMS message; and a rate plan of the target recipient of the MMS message.
  • 12. The system of claim 10, wherein the multimedia messaging service (MMS) rating and billing device is configured to access a subscriber database retrieve information on either the sender or target recipient of the MMS message.
  • 13. The system of claim 12, wherein the information retrieved from the subscriber database includes rating information about at least one of a sender and a target recipient of the MMS message or whether said external billing system is required to be notified of a debit request.
  • 14. A non-transitory computer readable medium encoded with instructions capable of being executed by a computer for performing the method comprising: receiving a request from a multimedia server in a multimedia messaging service rating and billing device via an interface protocol to rate an MMS message associated with a user account;determining a rate for the MMS message in dependence on pre-determined rating rules at the multimedia messaging service rating and billing device;communicating the determined rate from the multimedia messaging service rating and billing device to an external billing system in order to charge the user account;receiving a second communication in the multimedia messaging service rating and billing device indicating a success or failure in charging the determined rate to the user account; andcommunicating a response from the multimedia messaging service rating and billing device to the multimedia server via the interface protocol indicating, in dependence on the second communication received in the multimedia messaging service rating and billing device, the success or failure in charging the user account.
  • 15. The non-transitory computer readable medium of claim 14, wherein the rating rules specify rates based on at least one of the following: size of the MMS message; day of the week on which the MMS message is sent; time of day during which the MMS message is sent; a rate plan of a sender of the MMS message; and a rate plan of a target recipient of the MMS message.
  • 16. The non-transitory computer readable medium of claim 14, further comprising instructions capable of being executed by the computer for, prior to communicating the determined rate to the external billing system, accessing a subscriber database to determine if a determined rate should be communicated to the external billing system, and if not, then forgoing communicating a determined rate to the external billing system.
  • 17. The non-transitory computer readable medium of claim 16, wherein the determination of whether a determined rate should be communicated to the external billing system is based on information in the subscriber database about at least one of a sender and a target recipient of the MMS message.
  • 18. The method of claim 1, wherein the determined rate is communicated to external billing system through an open charging middleware platform, the open charging middleware platform mediating with the external billing system for charging the user account.
  • 19. The method of claim 1, wherein the external billing system is one of a prepaid system and a postpaid system.
  • 20. The method of claim 5, wherein the subscriber database is accessed by the multimedia messaging service rating and billing device.
  • 21. The system of claim 10, further comprising an open charging middleware platform, wherein the determined rate is communicated from the said multimedia messaging service (MMS) rating and billing device to said external billing system through said open charging middleware platform.
  • 22. The system of claim 10, wherein said external billing system is one of a prepaid system and a postpaid system.
  • 23. The non-transitory computer readable medium of claim 14, wherein the determined rate is communicated to the external billing system through an open charging middleware platform, the open charging middleware platform mediating with the external billing system for charging the user account.
  • 24. The non-transitory computer readable medium of claim 14, wherein the external billing system is one of a prepaid system and a postpaid system.
CROSS-REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS

This application is a continuation from U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/205,422, filed Sep. 5, 2008 now U.S. Pat. No. 8,027,334, which is a continuation from U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/461,485, filed Jun. 16, 2003, now U.S. Pat. No. 7,440,441, and related to U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/307,335, now U.S. Pat. No. 7,801,171.

US Referenced Citations (151)
Number Name Date Kind
5812533 Cox et al. Sep 1998 A
5852812 Reeder Dec 1998 A
5963630 Dabbs et al. Oct 1999 A
5995822 Smith et al. Nov 1999 A
6044264 Huotari et al. Mar 2000 A
6226373 Zhu et al. May 2001 B1
6298383 Gutman et al. Oct 2001 B1
6311275 Jin et al. Oct 2001 B1
6345239 Bowman-Amuah Feb 2002 B1
6427132 Bowman-Amuah Jul 2002 B1
6473402 Moharram Oct 2002 B1
6473622 Meuronen Oct 2002 B1
6473794 Guheen et al. Oct 2002 B1
6536037 Guheen et al. Mar 2003 B1
6606744 Mikurak Aug 2003 B1
6611867 Bowman-Amuah Aug 2003 B1
6611875 Chopra et al. Aug 2003 B1
6615166 Guheen et al. Sep 2003 B1
6615262 Schweitzer et al. Sep 2003 B2
6621793 Widegren et al. Sep 2003 B2
6628951 Grohn et al. Sep 2003 B1
6661780 Li Dec 2003 B2
6667780 Cho Dec 2003 B2
6671818 Mikurak Dec 2003 B1
6683870 Archer Jan 2004 B1
6714515 Marchand Mar 2004 B1
6718380 Guheen et al. Apr 2004 B1
6721713 Mohaban et al. Apr 2004 B1
6741687 Coppage May 2004 B1
6775267 Kung et al. Aug 2004 B1
6785534 Ung Aug 2004 B2
6839684 Rissanen et al. Jan 2005 B1
6847708 Abbasi et al. Jan 2005 B1
6891811 Smith et al. May 2005 B1
6895235 Padgett et al. May 2005 B2
6947531 Lewis et al. Sep 2005 B1
6956935 Brown et al. Oct 2005 B2
6961858 Fransdonk Nov 2005 B2
6981029 Menditto et al. Dec 2005 B1
6993360 Plahte et al. Jan 2006 B2
7002977 Jogalekar Feb 2006 B1
7003307 Kupsh et al. Feb 2006 B1
7039037 Wang et al. May 2006 B2
7062253 Money et al. Jun 2006 B2
7076562 Singhal et al. Jul 2006 B2
7079521 Holur et al. Jul 2006 B2
7092398 Schweitzer Aug 2006 B2
7107068 Benzon et al. Sep 2006 B2
7124101 Mikurak Oct 2006 B1
7130807 Mikurak Oct 2006 B1
7139387 Dahari Nov 2006 B2
7151939 Sheynblat Dec 2006 B2
7171460 Kalavade et al. Jan 2007 B2
7191244 Jennings et al. Mar 2007 B2
7194235 Nykanen et al. Mar 2007 B2
7194554 Short et al. Mar 2007 B1
7215970 Corrigan et al. May 2007 B2
7228427 Franskonk Jun 2007 B2
7233948 Shamoon et al. Jun 2007 B1
7246173 Le et al. Jul 2007 B2
7272133 Valin et al. Sep 2007 B2
7274700 Jin et al. Sep 2007 B2
7302254 Valloppillil Nov 2007 B2
7315826 Guheen et al. Jan 2008 B1
7330721 Bhatia et al. Feb 2008 B2
7339937 Mitra et al. Mar 2008 B2
7340214 Hamberg Mar 2008 B1
7343168 Valloppillil Mar 2008 B2
7440441 Lakhani et al. Oct 2008 B2
7444669 Bahl et al. Oct 2008 B1
7457865 Ramakrishnan et al. Nov 2008 B2
7478161 Bernet et al. Jan 2009 B2
7487262 Cardina et al. Feb 2009 B2
7496111 Itzkovitz et al. Feb 2009 B2
7526547 Rodrigo Apr 2009 B2
7529711 Reith May 2009 B2
7564840 Elliott et al. Jul 2009 B2
7573881 Cain et al. Aug 2009 B2
7590225 Sivula Sep 2009 B2
7620557 Nakamatsu et al. Nov 2009 B2
7643486 Belz et al. Jan 2010 B2
7644158 Ramakrishnan et al. Jan 2010 B2
7707109 Odijk et al. Apr 2010 B2
7716077 Mikurak May 2010 B1
7792086 Popoff et al. Sep 2010 B2
7801171 Skoczkowski et al. Sep 2010 B2
7870196 Requena Jan 2011 B2
7930340 Arunachalam Apr 2011 B2
7974247 Takatori et al. Jul 2011 B2
8027334 Lakhani et al. Sep 2011 B2
8027360 Skoczkowski et al. Sep 2011 B2
8032409 Mikurak Oct 2011 B1
20010026553 Gallant et al. Oct 2001 A1
20010044893 Skemer Nov 2001 A1
20020029197 Kailamaki et al. Mar 2002 A1
20020032616 Suzuki et al. Mar 2002 A1
20020033416 Gerszberg et al. Mar 2002 A1
20020052754 Joyce et al. May 2002 A1
20020058496 Bos et al. May 2002 A1
20020065774 Young et al. May 2002 A1
20020073167 Powell Jun 2002 A1
20020103925 Sheth et al. Aug 2002 A1
20020107754 Stone Aug 2002 A1
20020107755 Steed et al. Aug 2002 A1
20020129088 Zhou et al. Sep 2002 A1
20020152319 Amin et al. Oct 2002 A1
20020155823 Preston et al. Oct 2002 A1
20020156696 Teicher Oct 2002 A1
20020156863 Peng Oct 2002 A1
20020176377 Hamilton Nov 2002 A1
20020176378 Hamilton et al. Nov 2002 A1
20030009580 Chen et al. Jan 2003 A1
20030031134 Chiu Feb 2003 A1
20030083990 Berg et al. May 2003 A1
20030096605 Schlieben et al. May 2003 A1
20030101135 Myatt et al. May 2003 A1
20030105720 Ishibashi Jun 2003 A1
20030105864 Mulligan et al. Jun 2003 A1
20030134614 Dye Jul 2003 A1
20030134615 Takeuchi Jul 2003 A1
20030157925 Sorber et al. Aug 2003 A1
20030158902 Volach Aug 2003 A1
20030169718 Hirata et al. Sep 2003 A1
20030200313 Peterka et al. Oct 2003 A1
20030207686 Ramanna et al. Nov 2003 A1
20030208444 Sauer Nov 2003 A1
20030214958 Madour et al. Nov 2003 A1
20040028055 Madour et al. Feb 2004 A1
20040064351 Mikurak Apr 2004 A1
20040066769 Ahmavaara et al. Apr 2004 A1
20040088244 Bartter et al. May 2004 A1
20040103040 Ronaghi et al. May 2004 A1
20040117312 Lialiamou et al. Jun 2004 A1
20040127215 Shaw Jul 2004 A1
20040148384 Ramakrishnan et al. Jul 2004 A1
20040236686 Bohmer et al. Nov 2004 A1
20040252657 Lakhani et al. Dec 2004 A1
20050002407 Shaheen et al. Jan 2005 A1
20050071179 Peters et al. Mar 2005 A1
20050074014 Rao et al. Apr 2005 A1
20050131984 Hofmann et al. Jun 2005 A1
20050177506 Rissanen Aug 2005 A1
20050195743 Rochberger et al. Sep 2005 A1
20050272465 Ahmavaara et al. Dec 2005 A1
20060023861 Carlson Feb 2006 A1
20060031297 Zuidema Feb 2006 A1
20080013531 Elliott et al. Jan 2008 A1
20080318603 Lakhani et al. Dec 2008 A1
20100303050 Popoff et al. Dec 2010 A1
20110305330 Skoczkowski et al. Dec 2011 A1
20110306317 Lakhani et al. Dec 2011 A1
Foreign Referenced Citations (24)
Number Date Country
101 48 540 Oct 2001 DE
1 026 853 Aug 2000 EP
1 054 529 Nov 2000 EP
1 265 397 Dec 2002 EP
1 278 359 Jan 2003 EP
1 278 383 Jan 2003 EP
1 298 599 Apr 2003 EP
1 309 213 May 2003 EP
1 320 214 Jun 2003 EP
1 278 359 Jun 2004 EP
1 278 359 Mar 2007 EP
WO 0016891 Mar 2000 WO
WO 0024184 Apr 2000 WO
WO 0163883 Aug 2001 WO
WO 0169891 Sep 2001 WO
WO 02067600 Aug 2002 WO
WO 03014972 Feb 2003 WO
WO 03032618 Apr 2003 WO
WO 03037023 May 2003 WO
WO 03047164 Jun 2003 WO
WO 03047164 Jun 2003 WO
WO 2004036825 Apr 2004 WO
WO 2004036890 Apr 2004 WO
WO 2007138407 Dec 2007 WO
Non-Patent Literature Citations (20)
Entry
Dippelhofer: “Flexible Abrechnung”, Wireless LAN, XP-001164781, Un 0202, Po Jan. 17, 2003, p. 34-36 (no English version available).
EPO Office Action for corresponding EP04076726.1-2414 dated Mar. 16, 2006.
European Search Report for EP04076726.1-2414 completed Nov. 4, 2004 by M. Kahl in Munich.
International Search Report for corresponding PCT/CA2007/002372 mailed Sep. 10, 2008 by Cathy Ma of the Canadian Intellectual Property Office.
Yi-Bin Lin et al.; “Mobile Prepaid Phone Services”; XP011092391; IEEE Personal Communications; Jun. 2000; pp. 6-14.
3GPP TS 23.203 V7.4.0—“3rd Generation Partnership Project: Technical Specification Group Services and System Aspects; Plicy and Charging Control Architecture” (release 7) Sep. 26, 2007; retrieved from the internet; http://www.3gpp.org/ftp/Specs/archive/23—series/23.203/23203-740.zip pp. 11-30, 42, 47-48, 58-59.
U.S. Appl. No. 12/856,759, Aug. 2010, Skoczkowski et al.
Amat, Jean-Louis; “Charging Data Collection: The Key to Revenue Generation;” Alcatel Telecommunications Review; 3rd Quarter 2003; 7 pages.
Gylterud, Geir, et al.; “Providing Open Application Interfactes to Support Third-Party Service Providers and Developers;” Telektronikk; Jan. 2001; pp. 92-98.
Haverinen, Henry, et al.; “Cellular Access Control and Charging for Mobile Operator Wireless Local Area Networks;” IEEE Wireless Communications; Dec. 2002; pp. 52-60.
Källström, Olle; “Business Solutions for Mobile E-Commerce;” Erricsson Review No. 2; 2000; pp. 80-92.
Koutsopoulou et al.; “Charging, Accounting, and Billing as a Sophisticated and Reconfigurable Discrete Service for next Generation Mobile Networks;” Dec. 10, 2002; 4 pages.
Koutsopoulou, Maria, et al.; “Subscription Management and Charging for Value Added Services in UMTS Networks;” 1999; 5 pages.
Knospe, Heiko, et al.; “Online Payment for Access to Heterogeneous Mobile Networks;” Feb. 14, 2002; 6 pages.
Lee, ByungGil, et al.; “An AAA Application Protocal Design and Service for Secure Wireless Internet Gateway Roaming;” ICOIN 2002, LNCS 2344; 2002; pp. 123-135.
Lilge, Manfred; “Evolution of Prepaid Service Towards a Real-Time Payment System;” IEEE; 2001; pp. 195-198.
Metz, Christopher; “AAA Protocols: Authentication, Authorization, and Accounting for the Internet;” IEEE Internet Computing; Nov.-Dec. 1999; pp. 75-79.
Rayes, Ammar; “Common Management Architecture for Third Generation Wireless Networks;” IEEE; 2000; pp. 1060-1064.
Weber, Ricarda; “Technological Foundations of E-Commerce—Chapter 5: Digital Payment Systems;” Mar. 2001; pp. 173-194.
Wrona, Konrad, et al.; “Mobile Payments—State of the Art and Open Problems;” WELCOM 2001, LNCS 2232; 2001; pp. 88-100.
Related Publications (1)
Number Date Country
20110306317 A1 Dec 2011 US
Continuations (2)
Number Date Country
Parent 12205422 Sep 2008 US
Child 13216476 US
Parent 10461485 Jun 2003 US
Child 12205422 US