Owing to the contemporary nature of Multimedia Messaging Services (MMS), the art directed at its rating and billing remains very much in its infancy, and in particular to real-time solutions developed in this regard. Consider US Patent Application No. 20010053687 by Sivula, entitled Method for addressing billing in a message service, messaging service system, server and terminal discloses art related to a method for addressing billing in a multimedia messaging service applying store-and-automatic forward messaging. However, the application by Sivula concerns a zero charge for the retrieval of a MMS message to a destination number. Sivula's application does not intimate or cover the rating and charging of the origination of a MMS message by a wireless subscriber, which remains a principal crux of our invention of present.
The present invention relates generally to telecommunication network implementations and billing systems; and in particular, to an improved method and system for Multimedia Messaging Service (MMS) rating and billing.
The invention disclosed provides for an improved method and system for smoothly rating and billing Multimedia Messaging Service (MMS). Articulated as part of a computer program product, the art incorporates a real-time, flexible rating engine, which can non-limitingly provide for the rating of such Multimedia Messaging Services based on subscriber and service variables, messaging type, origination/termination type, on/off-Net differentiation, content, size, quantity, duration, time of day/buckets/free transactions, configured promotions. The logic of the art has also been refined and adapted to include the ability to block MMS based on account threshold.
The invention interacts with the relevant Service Control Point (SCP) through an Open Charging (OC) middleware platform and gateway system as detailed in patent application Ser. No. 10/307,335 (or similar intermediating telecommunications network implementations, technologies, platforms, and/or gateways may be employed without diluting the intended result or elucidation of the art).
The improved method and system for Multimedia Messaging Service (MMS) rating and billing disclosed herewith offers members skilled in the art of telecommunication network operation and intermediation an innovative mechanism for real-time rating and charging for MMS messages. (Both Mobile Originated (MO) and Mobile Terminated (MT) messages are encompassed by elements of the application).
With reference now to
Furthermore, to facilitate the instruction of the art, the improved method and system for Multimedia Messaging Service (MMS) rating and billing 20 disclosed herewith interfaces with the Multimedia Messaging Service Center's (MMSC) 30 Real Time Payment Protocol (RTPP) interface for real-time Mobile Originated MMS rating and charging. The invention 20, which is articulated as part of computer program product, accepts RTPP triggers from a MMSC 30 and subsequently rates, and charges messaging traffic against the Open Charging (OC) middleware platform and gateway system 10. Technicians skilled in the art will recognize that the invention of present need not be limited to the aforementioned Open Charging (OC) middleware platform and gateway system and other similar network implementations may be employed without diluting the intent and scope as such. Technicians skilled in the art will also recognize that any number of protocols, triggers and interfaces may be employed herewith, and indeed, remain only bound by the state of the art and the reference to any one protocol (or similar rules, methods and means for the transmission of data) remains purely for the purposes of simplicity and ease of instruction, and do not serve to dilute the application and scope of the invention as such.
In alternate embodiments, the invention 20, may also access an external Lightweight Directory Access Protocol (LDAP) subscriber database 50 for subscriber profile queries. Technicians skilled in the art will also recognize that the triggers, protocols and like commands used among the network elements remain only bound by the state of the art and do not serve to dilute the generality of such interaction.
The MMSC 30 initiates connections to the improved method and system for Multimedia Messaging Service (MMS) rating and billing 20; and therewith once the connection has been established, the MMSC 30 performs transactions by submitting requests to the requisite logic of the disclosed invention 30.
In the preferred embodiment, the computer program product which implements the invention 20 disclosed herewith has been articulated with particular ‘fail-safe’ logic. Indeed, wherever the improved method and system for Multimedia Messaging Service (MMS) rating and billing 20 is invoked it attempts to connect to the external LDAP subscriber database 50. In the event the connection is lost, the node implementing the invention 20 will reattempt the connection at periodic intervals for a configurable number of times. Where re-connection remains unrealized, the improved method and system for Multimedia Messaging Service (MMS) rating and billing 20 will instinctively switch to one of the following configurable modes. In “reject” mode, all incoming RTPP triggers will be rejected immediately until connection is re-established. Connection attempts are performed at periodic intervals. In “passthrough” mode, all incoming RTPP triggers will be successfully acknowledged immediately until connection is re-established. Connection attempts are performed at periodic intervals. When a connection is broken, an SNMP trap will be raised. Once the connection is re-established, another SNMP trap is generated to clear the alarm.
At the core of the invention 20 remains the rating engine and the logic, routines and rules used therewith, articulated to provide real-time, high performance rating for MMS messages. The Rating Rule definition allows a member skilled in the art to determine the rate for each MMS. In the preferred embodiment, rules are to be considered in order. The first rule that matches a given MMS Event will be used and remaining rules will be ignored. Where no rules match, the MMS will be assumed to be free of charge. No charging will occur.
The member skilled in the art may insert, change and delete rules as they deem appropriate. For ease of reference, the following table (Table 1) seeks to outline the rating rule architecture in a non-limiting, illustrative manner.
The invention 20 interfaces with an Open Charging (OC) middleware platform and gateway system 10 as detailed in patent application Ser. No. 10/307,335, for mediation with the wireless subscriber's prepaid account in performing the requisite balance deduct function. Noble technicians skilled in the art will recognize that the invention of present need not be limited to the aforementioned Open Charging (OC) middleware platform and gateway system and other similar network implementations for balance deductions may be employed without diluting the intent and scope as such.
Additionally, when handling group messages, the invention 20 interfaces with an Open Charging (OC) middleware platform and gateway system 10 as detailed in patent application Ser. No. 10/307,335, to query the balance of the wireless subscriber's prepaid account. Noble technicians skilled in the art will recognize that the invention of present need not be limited to the aforementioned Open Charging (OC) middleware platform and gateway system and other similar network implementations for balance queries may be employed without diluting the intent and scope as such.
Much like the ‘fail-safe’ scenario outlined prior (in regards to the external LDAP subscriber database 50), wherever the invention 20 is invoked the art therewith attempts to connect to the Open Charging (OC) middleware platform and gateway system 10. In the event the connection is lost, the node implementing the invention 20 will reattempt the connection at periodic intervals for a configurable number of times. Where re-connection remains unrealized, the improved method and system for Multimedia Messaging Service (MMS) rating and billing 20 will instinctively switch to one of the following configurable modes. In “reject” mode, all incoming RTPP triggers will be rejected immediately until connection is re-established. Connection attempts are performed at periodic intervals. In “passthrough” mode, all incoming RTPP triggers will be successfully acknowledged immediately until connection is re-established. Connection attempts are performed at periodic intervals. When a connection is broken, an SNMP trap will be raised. Once the connection is re-established, another SNMP trap is generated to clear the alarm. Technicians skilled in the art will recognize that the invention of present need not be limited to the aforementioned Open Charging (OC) middleware platform and gateway system and other similar network implementations for balance queries may be employed without diluting the intent and scope as such.
Another singular aspect of the invention of present, remains the ability to rate and charge for Group Messages. A Group Message is defined as an MMS message addressed to multiple recipients. In the all-or-none scenario, where the originating wireless subscriber does not have sufficient fund to send the MMS message to all the recipients, the whole Group Message Transfer is rejected and no MMS message is delivered to any of the recipients.
In elucidating further how the improved method and system for Multimedia Messaging Service (MMS) rating and billing handles Group Messages, the following steps should prove illustrative. In the first instance, determine if the incoming Debit Request received from the MMSC belongs to a Group Message by examining the MMSC_NUMBER_OF_RECIPIENTS field. Where the MMSC_NUMBER_OF_RECIPIENTS is greater than 1, the Debit Request is for Group Messaging. Next confirm if the Debit Request is for the first recipient by searching corresponding MMSC_A_MSISDN and MMSC_MSG_ID in the Group Message Store. The Group Message Store holds all outstanding Group Message information which includes, but need not be bounded by, MMSC_A_MSISDN, MMSC_MSG_ID, MMSC_NUMBER_OF_RECIPIENTS, number of processed recipients, each recipient's information (B-Party Address and Service Type), balance, total rate, SCP ID.
Where the Debit Request is for the first recipient, an LDAP subscriber query on A-Party will be performed and a new Group Message entry will be created in the Group Message Store. In addition, the logic of the invention can be articulated to perform a balance query to SCP on the first recipient message, a BaIQ will be triggered to the Open Charging (OC) middleware platform and gateway system and the subscriber balance will be returned. Otherwise, a configurable fixed balance will be used instead. Members skilled in the art will recognize that the invention of present need not be limited to the aforementioned Open Charging (OC) middleware platform and gateway system and other similar network implementations for balance queries may be employed without diluting the intent and scope as such.
Next, the art of the invention performs an LDAP subscriber query on B-Party address (if it is a National number), rates the message, and subtracts the amount from the balance. Next, an update is performed to the corresponding Group Message entry with the Total Rate and B-Party information. Where the Total Rate exceeds Balance, the invention clears the corresponding Group Message entry and sends a warning message (where configured by a member skilled in the art) to A-Party. Also, a Debit Response with status code 0×6000 (insufficient funds) will be sent back to MMSC via the original node. Credit Requests may then be triggered by the MMSC to refund a charge for each recipient and should all be positively acknowledged.
If the Debit Request is not for the last recipient and the Total Rate does not exceed Balance, the invention positively acknowledges the Debit Request to MMSC via the original node. Whereas, where the Debit Request is for the last recipient, another balance query is performed by triggering an Open Charging (OC) middleware platform and gateway system as detailed in patent application Ser. No. 10/307,335, as to minimize the fault window. If the Total Rate exceeds the new Balance, a warning message (where configured by a member skilled in the art) is sent to A-Party and a Debit Response with status code 0×6000 (insufficient funds) will be sent back to MMSC via the original node. Otherwise, the logic of the invention positively acknowledges the Debit Request to MMSC via the original node and then performs a sequence of BalDeduct (for each recipient) to the Open Charging (OC) middleware platform and gateway system to debit the wireless subscriber. The corresponding Group Message entry is cleared afterwards.
The computer program product which implements the improved method and system for Multimedia Messaging Service (MMS) rating and billing, has been articulated as to store Group Message entries (then ‘Group Message Store’), and will allow said messages to expire and eliminated after a configurable time period. This functionality and implementation is intended to deal with scenarios as MMSC node failures and related exceptions.
In alternate embodiments, the improved method and system for Multimedia Messaging Service (MMS) rating and billing may send a warning message to a prepaid wireless subscriber where said subscriber has an insufficient balance to send a Mobile Originated message. This applies to Single Recipient MMS messages (when debit fails) and Group Messages (when balance falls below 0 or debit fails). The content of the warning message remains entirely configurable (e.g. “Sorry you have insufficient funds. Please try again and thank you for playing”). The message is limited to a single SM.
This application is a continuation from U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/205,422, filed Sep. 5, 2008 now U.S. Pat. No. 8,027,334, which is a continuation from U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/461,485, filed Jun. 16, 2003, now U.S. Pat. No. 7,440,441, and related to U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/307,335, now U.S. Pat. No. 7,801,171.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
5812533 | Cox et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5852812 | Reeder | Dec 1998 | A |
5963630 | Dabbs et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
5995822 | Smith et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
6044264 | Huotari et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
6226373 | Zhu et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6298383 | Gutman et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6311275 | Jin et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6345239 | Bowman-Amuah | Feb 2002 | B1 |
6427132 | Bowman-Amuah | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6473402 | Moharram | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6473622 | Meuronen | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6473794 | Guheen et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6536037 | Guheen et al. | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6606744 | Mikurak | Aug 2003 | B1 |
6611867 | Bowman-Amuah | Aug 2003 | B1 |
6611875 | Chopra et al. | Aug 2003 | B1 |
6615166 | Guheen et al. | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6615262 | Schweitzer et al. | Sep 2003 | B2 |
6621793 | Widegren et al. | Sep 2003 | B2 |
6628951 | Grohn et al. | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6661780 | Li | Dec 2003 | B2 |
6667780 | Cho | Dec 2003 | B2 |
6671818 | Mikurak | Dec 2003 | B1 |
6683870 | Archer | Jan 2004 | B1 |
6714515 | Marchand | Mar 2004 | B1 |
6718380 | Guheen et al. | Apr 2004 | B1 |
6721713 | Mohaban et al. | Apr 2004 | B1 |
6741687 | Coppage | May 2004 | B1 |
6775267 | Kung et al. | Aug 2004 | B1 |
6785534 | Ung | Aug 2004 | B2 |
6839684 | Rissanen et al. | Jan 2005 | B1 |
6847708 | Abbasi et al. | Jan 2005 | B1 |
6891811 | Smith et al. | May 2005 | B1 |
6895235 | Padgett et al. | May 2005 | B2 |
6947531 | Lewis et al. | Sep 2005 | B1 |
6956935 | Brown et al. | Oct 2005 | B2 |
6961858 | Fransdonk | Nov 2005 | B2 |
6981029 | Menditto et al. | Dec 2005 | B1 |
6993360 | Plahte et al. | Jan 2006 | B2 |
7002977 | Jogalekar | Feb 2006 | B1 |
7003307 | Kupsh et al. | Feb 2006 | B1 |
7039037 | Wang et al. | May 2006 | B2 |
7062253 | Money et al. | Jun 2006 | B2 |
7076562 | Singhal et al. | Jul 2006 | B2 |
7079521 | Holur et al. | Jul 2006 | B2 |
7092398 | Schweitzer | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7107068 | Benzon et al. | Sep 2006 | B2 |
7124101 | Mikurak | Oct 2006 | B1 |
7130807 | Mikurak | Oct 2006 | B1 |
7139387 | Dahari | Nov 2006 | B2 |
7151939 | Sheynblat | Dec 2006 | B2 |
7171460 | Kalavade et al. | Jan 2007 | B2 |
7191244 | Jennings et al. | Mar 2007 | B2 |
7194235 | Nykanen et al. | Mar 2007 | B2 |
7194554 | Short et al. | Mar 2007 | B1 |
7215970 | Corrigan et al. | May 2007 | B2 |
7228427 | Franskonk | Jun 2007 | B2 |
7233948 | Shamoon et al. | Jun 2007 | B1 |
7246173 | Le et al. | Jul 2007 | B2 |
7272133 | Valin et al. | Sep 2007 | B2 |
7274700 | Jin et al. | Sep 2007 | B2 |
7302254 | Valloppillil | Nov 2007 | B2 |
7315826 | Guheen et al. | Jan 2008 | B1 |
7330721 | Bhatia et al. | Feb 2008 | B2 |
7339937 | Mitra et al. | Mar 2008 | B2 |
7340214 | Hamberg | Mar 2008 | B1 |
7343168 | Valloppillil | Mar 2008 | B2 |
7440441 | Lakhani et al. | Oct 2008 | B2 |
7444669 | Bahl et al. | Oct 2008 | B1 |
7457865 | Ramakrishnan et al. | Nov 2008 | B2 |
7478161 | Bernet et al. | Jan 2009 | B2 |
7487262 | Cardina et al. | Feb 2009 | B2 |
7496111 | Itzkovitz et al. | Feb 2009 | B2 |
7526547 | Rodrigo | Apr 2009 | B2 |
7529711 | Reith | May 2009 | B2 |
7564840 | Elliott et al. | Jul 2009 | B2 |
7573881 | Cain et al. | Aug 2009 | B2 |
7590225 | Sivula | Sep 2009 | B2 |
7620557 | Nakamatsu et al. | Nov 2009 | B2 |
7643486 | Belz et al. | Jan 2010 | B2 |
7644158 | Ramakrishnan et al. | Jan 2010 | B2 |
7707109 | Odijk et al. | Apr 2010 | B2 |
7716077 | Mikurak | May 2010 | B1 |
7792086 | Popoff et al. | Sep 2010 | B2 |
7801171 | Skoczkowski et al. | Sep 2010 | B2 |
7870196 | Requena | Jan 2011 | B2 |
7930340 | Arunachalam | Apr 2011 | B2 |
7974247 | Takatori et al. | Jul 2011 | B2 |
8027334 | Lakhani et al. | Sep 2011 | B2 |
8027360 | Skoczkowski et al. | Sep 2011 | B2 |
8032409 | Mikurak | Oct 2011 | B1 |
20010026553 | Gallant et al. | Oct 2001 | A1 |
20010044893 | Skemer | Nov 2001 | A1 |
20020029197 | Kailamaki et al. | Mar 2002 | A1 |
20020032616 | Suzuki et al. | Mar 2002 | A1 |
20020033416 | Gerszberg et al. | Mar 2002 | A1 |
20020052754 | Joyce et al. | May 2002 | A1 |
20020058496 | Bos et al. | May 2002 | A1 |
20020065774 | Young et al. | May 2002 | A1 |
20020073167 | Powell | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020103925 | Sheth et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020107754 | Stone | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020107755 | Steed et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020129088 | Zhou et al. | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20020152319 | Amin et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020155823 | Preston et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020156696 | Teicher | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020156863 | Peng | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020176377 | Hamilton | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20020176378 | Hamilton et al. | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20030009580 | Chen et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030031134 | Chiu | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030083990 | Berg et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
20030096605 | Schlieben et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
20030101135 | Myatt et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
20030105720 | Ishibashi | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030105864 | Mulligan et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030134614 | Dye | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030134615 | Takeuchi | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030157925 | Sorber et al. | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20030158902 | Volach | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20030169718 | Hirata et al. | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20030200313 | Peterka et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030207686 | Ramanna et al. | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20030208444 | Sauer | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20030214958 | Madour et al. | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20040028055 | Madour et al. | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040064351 | Mikurak | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040066769 | Ahmavaara et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040088244 | Bartter et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
20040103040 | Ronaghi et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
20040117312 | Lialiamou et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040127215 | Shaw | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040148384 | Ramakrishnan et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040236686 | Bohmer et al. | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20040252657 | Lakhani et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050002407 | Shaheen et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050071179 | Peters et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050074014 | Rao et al. | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050131984 | Hofmann et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050177506 | Rissanen | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050195743 | Rochberger et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050272465 | Ahmavaara et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20060023861 | Carlson | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060031297 | Zuidema | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20080013531 | Elliott et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080318603 | Lakhani et al. | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20100303050 | Popoff et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20110305330 | Skoczkowski et al. | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20110306317 | Lakhani et al. | Dec 2011 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
101 48 540 | Oct 2001 | DE |
1 026 853 | Aug 2000 | EP |
1 054 529 | Nov 2000 | EP |
1 265 397 | Dec 2002 | EP |
1 278 359 | Jan 2003 | EP |
1 278 383 | Jan 2003 | EP |
1 298 599 | Apr 2003 | EP |
1 309 213 | May 2003 | EP |
1 320 214 | Jun 2003 | EP |
1 278 359 | Jun 2004 | EP |
1 278 359 | Mar 2007 | EP |
WO 0016891 | Mar 2000 | WO |
WO 0024184 | Apr 2000 | WO |
WO 0163883 | Aug 2001 | WO |
WO 0169891 | Sep 2001 | WO |
WO 02067600 | Aug 2002 | WO |
WO 03014972 | Feb 2003 | WO |
WO 03032618 | Apr 2003 | WO |
WO 03037023 | May 2003 | WO |
WO 03047164 | Jun 2003 | WO |
WO 03047164 | Jun 2003 | WO |
WO 2004036825 | Apr 2004 | WO |
WO 2004036890 | Apr 2004 | WO |
WO 2007138407 | Dec 2007 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Dippelhofer: “Flexible Abrechnung”, Wireless LAN, XP-001164781, Un 0202, Po Jan. 17, 2003, p. 34-36 (no English version available). |
EPO Office Action for corresponding EP04076726.1-2414 dated Mar. 16, 2006. |
European Search Report for EP04076726.1-2414 completed Nov. 4, 2004 by M. Kahl in Munich. |
International Search Report for corresponding PCT/CA2007/002372 mailed Sep. 10, 2008 by Cathy Ma of the Canadian Intellectual Property Office. |
Yi-Bin Lin et al.; “Mobile Prepaid Phone Services”; XP011092391; IEEE Personal Communications; Jun. 2000; pp. 6-14. |
3GPP TS 23.203 V7.4.0—“3rd Generation Partnership Project: Technical Specification Group Services and System Aspects; Plicy and Charging Control Architecture” (release 7) Sep. 26, 2007; retrieved from the internet; http://www.3gpp.org/ftp/Specs/archive/23—series/23.203/23203-740.zip pp. 11-30, 42, 47-48, 58-59. |
U.S. Appl. No. 12/856,759, Aug. 2010, Skoczkowski et al. |
Amat, Jean-Louis; “Charging Data Collection: The Key to Revenue Generation;” Alcatel Telecommunications Review; 3rd Quarter 2003; 7 pages. |
Gylterud, Geir, et al.; “Providing Open Application Interfactes to Support Third-Party Service Providers and Developers;” Telektronikk; Jan. 2001; pp. 92-98. |
Haverinen, Henry, et al.; “Cellular Access Control and Charging for Mobile Operator Wireless Local Area Networks;” IEEE Wireless Communications; Dec. 2002; pp. 52-60. |
Källström, Olle; “Business Solutions for Mobile E-Commerce;” Erricsson Review No. 2; 2000; pp. 80-92. |
Koutsopoulou et al.; “Charging, Accounting, and Billing as a Sophisticated and Reconfigurable Discrete Service for next Generation Mobile Networks;” Dec. 10, 2002; 4 pages. |
Koutsopoulou, Maria, et al.; “Subscription Management and Charging for Value Added Services in UMTS Networks;” 1999; 5 pages. |
Knospe, Heiko, et al.; “Online Payment for Access to Heterogeneous Mobile Networks;” Feb. 14, 2002; 6 pages. |
Lee, ByungGil, et al.; “An AAA Application Protocal Design and Service for Secure Wireless Internet Gateway Roaming;” ICOIN 2002, LNCS 2344; 2002; pp. 123-135. |
Lilge, Manfred; “Evolution of Prepaid Service Towards a Real-Time Payment System;” IEEE; 2001; pp. 195-198. |
Metz, Christopher; “AAA Protocols: Authentication, Authorization, and Accounting for the Internet;” IEEE Internet Computing; Nov.-Dec. 1999; pp. 75-79. |
Rayes, Ammar; “Common Management Architecture for Third Generation Wireless Networks;” IEEE; 2000; pp. 1060-1064. |
Weber, Ricarda; “Technological Foundations of E-Commerce—Chapter 5: Digital Payment Systems;” Mar. 2001; pp. 173-194. |
Wrona, Konrad, et al.; “Mobile Payments—State of the Art and Open Problems;” WELCOM 2001, LNCS 2232; 2001; pp. 88-100. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20110306317 A1 | Dec 2011 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 12205422 | Sep 2008 | US |
Child | 13216476 | US | |
Parent | 10461485 | Jun 2003 | US |
Child | 12205422 | US |