Patent Grant
9860868
The present application relates generally to a wireless mobile communication system, and more particularly to methods and systems that provide enhanced location information for wireless mobile devices.
Wireless communication technologies and mobile electronic devices (e.g., cellular phones, tablets, laptops, etc.) have grown in popularity and use over the past several years. To keep pace with increased consumer demands, mobile electronic devices have become more powerful and feature rich, and now commonly include global positioning system (GPS) receivers, sensors, and many other components for connecting users to friends, work, leisure activities and entertainment. However, despite these advancements, mobile devices remain lacking in their ability to provide effective location based services, information, or communications. As mobile devices and technologies continue to grow in popularity and use, generating enhanced location information for mobile devices is expected to become an important and challenging design criterion for mobile device manufactures and network engineers.
The various aspects include methods of providing an enhanced location based service via a mobile device, including receiving, in a processor of the mobile device via an antenna of the mobile device, a first set of externally determined location information and a second set externally determined location information from one or more external location tracking systems, generating by the processor a best stride length estimate based on the first set of externally determined location information, the second set of externally determined location information and an output of an accelerometer of the mobile device, generating, by the processor, a best altitude estimate based on output of a barometer of the mobile device, and at least one of the first set of externally determined location information and the second set of externally determined location information, generating, by the processor, a best compass heading estimate based on output of a magnetometer of the mobile device, output of an accelerometer of the mobile device, and at least one of the first set of externally determined location information and the second set of externally determined location information, generating, by the processor, dead reckoning location information based on the best stride length estimate, the best altitude estimate, and the best compass heading estimate, calculating, by the processor, a best location estimate based on the dead reckoning location estimate and a set of externally determined location information, and using the best location estimate to provide a location based service in the mobile device. In an aspect, receiving the first set of externally determined location information includes receiving location information that includes a longitude value, a latitude value, a declination value, and an altitude value. In a further aspect, the operation of receiving the first set of externally determined location information and the second set externally determined location information from one or more external location tracking systems is performed repeatedly until the location based service terminates.
In a further aspect, generating the best stride length estimate further may include calculating a distance between the first set of externally determined location information and the second set of externally determined location information, adding the calculated distance to a distance sum, determining whether a number of distances calculated exceeds a pre-determined threshold and continuing calculating distances until the number of distances calculated exceeds the pre-determined threshold, calculating an average stride length, determining whether an error associated with the average stride length is within a pre-determined stride error threshold, and updating a stored best stride length estimate to the average stride length in response to determining that the error associated with the average stride length falls within a pre-determined stride length error threshold.
In a further aspect, calculating the distance between the first set of externally determined location information and the second set of externally determined location information and adding the calculated distance to a distance sum may further include executing a haversine function on the first set of externally determined location information and the second set of externally determined location information. In a further aspect, generating the best altitude estimate may include calculating an altitude estimate from the output of the barometer, calculating a moving average altitude, determining whether an error associated with the moving average altitude is within a pre-determined altitude error threshold, and updating a stored best altitude estimate to the moving average altitude in response to determining that the error associated with the moving average altitude falls within a pre-determined altitude error threshold.
In a further aspect, the method may include performing kalman filter operations on the output of the barometer to remove observation noise and produce a filtered sensor output. In a further aspect, the method may include determining a difference between the altitude estimate and an altitude component of at least one of the first set of externally determined location information or the second set of externally determined location information to produce a bias value, and updating an altitude sum to include the difference between the altitude estimate and an altitude component of the first or second location information normalized by the bias value.
In a further aspect, the method may include increasing the frequency of barometer readings in response to determining that the error associated with the moving average altitude does not fall within a pre-determined altitude error threshold. In a further aspect, generating a best heading estimate may include generating rotation information based on the output of the accelerometer and the output of the magnetometer, and adjusting the rotation information to an offset of true north to produce the best compass heading estimate. In a further aspect, generating rotation information includes performing kalman filter operations on the output of the accelerometer and output of the magnetometer to produce rotation information. In a further aspect, updating the rotation information to the offset of true north further includes comparing the rotation information to declination information associated with at least one of the first set of externally determined location information or the second set of externally determined location information.
In a further aspect, determining the best location estimate includes determining whether the distance between a set of externally determined location information and the dead reckoning location information is below a pre-determined comparison threshold, calculating a midpoint between the set of externally determined location information and the dead reckoning location information in response to determining that the distance between the externally determined location information and the dead reckoning location information is less than the pre-determined comparison threshold, and updating the best location estimate to the midpoint. In a further aspect, the one or more external tracking systems include a global positioning (GPS) or service provider.
Further aspects may include a mobile computing device that includes an antenna, a processor coupled to the antenna, in which the processor may be configured with processor executable instructions to perform operations including receiving a first set of externally determined location information and a second set externally determined location information from one or more external location tracking systems, generating a best stride length estimate based on the first set of externally determined location information, the second set of externally determined location information and an output of an accelerometer of the mobile device, generating a best altitude estimate based on output of a barometer of the mobile device, and at least one of the first set of externally determined location information and the second set of externally determined location information, generating a best compass heading estimate based on output of a magnetometer of the mobile device, output of an accelerometer of the mobile device, and at least one of the first set of externally determined location information and the second set of externally determined location information, generating dead reckoning location information based on the best stride length estimate, the best altitude estimate, and the best compass heading estimate, calculating a best location estimate based on the dead reckoning location estimate and a set of externally determined location information, and using the best location estimate to provide a location based service.
In an aspect, the processor may be configured with processor executable instructions to perform operations such that generating the best stride length estimate includes calculating a distance between the first set of externally determined location information and the second set of externally determined location information, and adding the result to a distance sum, determining whether a number of distances calculated exceeds a pre-determined threshold and continuing calculating distances until the number of distances calculated exceeds the pre-determined threshold, calculating an average stride length, determining whether an error associated with the average stride length is within a pre-determined stride error threshold, and updating a stored best stride length estimate to the average stride length in response to determining that the error associated with the average stride length falls within a pre-determined stride length error threshold. In a further aspect, the processor may be configured with processor executable instructions to perform operations such that generating the best altitude estimate includes calculating an altitude estimate from the output of the barometer, calculating a moving average altitude, determining whether an error associated with the moving average altitude is within a pre-determined altitude error threshold, and updating a stored best altitude estimate to the moving average altitude in response to determining that the error associated with the moving average altitude falls within a pre-determined altitude error threshold.
Further aspects may include non-transitory computer readable storage medium having stored thereon processor-executable software instructions configured to cause a mobile device processor to perform operations including receiving a first set of externally determined location information and a second set externally determined location information from one or more external location tracking systems, generating a best stride length estimate based on the first set of externally determined location information, the second set of externally determined location information and an output of an accelerometer of the mobile device, generating a best altitude estimate based on output of a barometer of the mobile device, and at least one of the first set of externally determined location information and the second set of externally determined location information, generating a best compass heading estimate based on output of a magnetometer of the mobile device, output of an accelerometer of the mobile device, and at least one of the first set of externally determined location information and the second set of externally determined location information, generating dead reckoning location information based on the best stride length estimate, the best altitude estimate, and the best compass heading estimate, calculating a best location estimate based on the dead reckoning location estimate and a set of externally determined location information, and using the best location estimate to provide a location based service.
In an aspect, the stored processor-executable software instructions may be configured to cause a processor to perform operations such that generating the best stride length estimate includes calculating a distance between the first set of externally determined location information and the second set of externally determined location information, and adding the result to a distance sum, determining whether a number of distances calculated exceeds a pre-determined threshold and continuing calculating distances until the number of distances calculated exceeds the pre-determined threshold, calculating, by the processor, an average stride length, determining whether an error associated with the average stride length is within a pre-determined stride error threshold, and updating a stored best stride length estimate to the average stride length in response to determining that the error associated with the average stride length falls within a pre-determined stride length error threshold.
In a further aspect, the stored processor-executable software instructions may be configured to cause a processor to perform operations such that generating the best altitude estimate includes calculating an altitude estimate from the output of the barometer, calculating a moving average altitude, determining whether an error associated with the moving average altitude is within a pre-determined altitude error threshold, and updating a stored best altitude estimate to the moving average altitude in response to determining that the error associated with the moving average altitude falls within a pre-determined altitude error threshold.
The accompanying drawings, which are incorporated herein and constitute part of this specification, illustrate exemplary embodiments of the invention, and, together with the general description given above and the detailed description given below, serve to explain features of the invention.
The various embodiments will be described in detail with reference to the accompanying drawings. Wherever possible, the same reference numbers will be used throughout the drawings to refer to the same or like parts. References made to particular examples and implementations are for illustrative purposes, and are not intended to limit the scope of the invention or the claims.
The word “exemplary” is used herein to mean “serving as an example, instance, or illustration.” Any implementation described herein as “exemplary” is not necessarily to be construed as preferred or advantageous over other implementations.
The terms “mobile device,” “cellular telephone,” and “cell phone” are used interchangeably herein to refer to any one or all of cellular telephones, smartphones, personal data assistants (PDA's), laptop computers, tablet computers, ultrabooks, palm-top computers, wireless electronic mail receivers, multimedia Internet enabled cellular telephones, wireless gaming controllers, and similar personal electronic devices which include a programmable processor, a memory and circuitry for sending and/or receiving wireless communication signals. While the various embodiments are particularly useful in mobile devices, such as cellular telephones, which have limited battery life, the embodiments are generally useful in any computing device that may be used to wirelessly communicate information.
The terms “wireless network”, “network”, “cellular System”, “cell tower” and “radio access point” may used generically and interchangeably to refer to any one of various wireless mobile systems. In an embodiment, wireless network may be a radio access point (e.g., a cell tower), which provides the radio link to the mobile device so that the mobile device can communicate with the core network.
A number of different cellular and mobile communication services and standards are available or contemplated in the future, all of which may implement and benefit from the various embodiments. Such services and standards include, e.g., third generation partnership project (3GPP), long term evolution (LTE) systems, third generation wireless mobile communication technology (3G), fourth generation wireless mobile communication technology (4G), global system for mobile communications (GSM), universal mobile telecommunications system (UMTS), 3GSM, general packet radio service (GPRS), code division multiple access (CDMA) systems (e.g., cdmaOne, CDMA2000™), enhanced data rates for GSM evolution (EDGE), advanced mobile phone system (AMPS), digital AMPS (IS-136/TDMA), evolution-data optimized (EV-DO), digital enhanced cordless telecommunications (DECT), Worldwide Interoperability for Microwave Access (WiMAX), wireless local area network (WLAN), public switched telephone network (PSTN), Wi-Fi Protected Access I & II (WPA, WPA2), Bluetooth®, integrated digital enhanced network (iden), and land mobile radio (LMR). Each of these technologies involves, for example, the transmission and reception of voice, data, signaling and/or content messages. It should be understood that any references to terminology and/or technical details related to an individual telecommunication standard or technology are for illustrative purposes only, and are not intended to limit the scope of the claims to a particular communication system or technology unless specifically recited in the claim language.
A number of different methods, technologies, solutions, and/or techniques (herein collectively “solutions”) are currently available for determining the location of mobile device, any or all of which may be implemented by, included in, and/or used by the various embodiments. Such solutions include, e.g., global positioning system (GPS) based solutions, assisted GPS (A-GPS) solutions, and cell-based positioning solutions such as cell of origin (COO), time of arrival (TOA), observed time difference of arrival (OTDOA), advanced forward link trilateration (AFLT), and angle of arrival (AOA). In various embodiments, such solutions may implemented in conjunction with one or more wireless communication technologies and/or networks, including wireless wide area networks (WWANs), wireless local area networks (WLANs), wireless personal area networks (WPANs), and other similar networks or technologies. By way of example, a WWAN may be a Code Division Multiple Access (CDMA) network, a Frequency Division Multiple Access (FDMA) network, an OFDMA network, a 3GPP LTE network, a WiMAX (IEEE 802.16) network, and so on. The WPAN may be a Bluetooth network, an IEEE 802.15x network, and so on. A WLAN may be an IEEE 802.11x network, and so on. A CDMA network may implement one or more radio access technologies (RATs) such as CDMA2000, Wideband-CDMA (W-CDMA), and so on.
Various embodiments discussed herein may generate, compute, and/or make use of location information pertaining to one or more mobile devices. Such location information may be useful for providing and/or implementing a variety of location-based services, including emergency location services, commercial location services, internal location services, and lawful intercept location services. By way of example: emergency location services may include services relating to the provision of location and/or identification information to emergency service personnel and/or emergency systems (e.g., to 911 system); commercial location services may include any general or value-added service (e.g., asset tracking services, navigation services, location-based advertising services, etc); internal location services may include services pertaining to the management of the wireless service provider network (e.g., radio resource management services, message delivery services, paging services, call delivery services, services for providing position/location network enhancements, etc.); and lawful intercept location services may include any service that provides public safety and/or law enforcement agencies with identification and/or location information pertaining to a mobile device or a mobile device user. While the various embodiments are particularly useful in applications that fall within one or more of the categories/types of location based services discussed above, the embodiments are generally useful in any application or service that benefits from location information.
Modern mobile electronic devices (e.g., mobile phones) typically include one or more geospatial positioning systems/components for determining the geographic location of the mobile device. Location information obtained by these geospatial systems may be used by location-aware mobile software applications (e.g., Google® Maps, Yelp®, Twitter® Places, “Find my Friends” on Apple®, etc.) to provide users with information regarding the mobile device's physical location at a given point in time. In recent years, such location-based services and software applications have increased in popularity, and now enable mobile device users to navigate cities, read reviews of nearby restaurants and services, track assets or friends, obtain location-based safety advice, and/or take advantage of many other location-based services on their mobile devices.
Consumers of modern mobile devices now demand more advanced, robust, and feature-rich location-based services than that which is currently available on their mobile devices. However, despite many recent advances in mobile and wireless technologies, mobile devices remain lacking in their ability to provide their users/consumers with location based services that are accurate or powerful enough to meet the demands of these consumers. For example, while existing location-aware mobile software applications (e.g., “Find my Friends” on Apple®, Google® Latitude, etc.) enable a mobile device user to view the approximate geographical position of other mobile devices on a two-dimensional map, they lack the capability to accurately, efficiently and consistently pin point the precise location and/or position of the other mobile devices in all three dimensions and/or within a wireless communication network. The various embodiments overcome these and other limitations of existing solutions by collecting information from multiple mobile devices, generated more precise location information on or about one or more mobile devices, generating advanced three-dimensional location and position information on or about one or more mobile devices, and using the generated location/position information to provide mobile device users with more accurate, more powerful, and more reliable location based services.
One of the challenges associated with using geo-spatial positioning technology on a mobile device is that the mobile device's ability to acquire satellite signals and navigation data to calculate its geospatial location (called “performing a fix”) may be hindered when the mobile device is indoors, below grade, and/or when the satellites are obstructed (e.g., by tall buildings, etc.). The presence of physical obstacles, such as metal beams or walls, may cause multipath interference and signal degradation of the wireless communication signals when the mobile device is indoors or in urban environments that include tall buildings or skyscrapers. In rural environments, the mobile device may not have sufficient access to satellite communications (e.g., to a global positioning system satellite) to effectively ascertain the mobile device's current location. These and other factors often cause existing geo-spatial technologies to function inaccurately and/or inconsistently on mobile devices, and hinder the mobile device user's ability to fully utilize location-aware mobile software applications and/or other location based services and applications on his/her mobile device.
Another problem with using existing geo-spatial positioning technologies is that position accuracy afforded by existing technologies is not sufficient for use in emergency services due to the relatively high level of position accuracy required by these services.
The various embodiments include improved location determination solutions that determine the location of a mobile device at the level of position accuracy which is suitable for use in emergency location services, commercial location services, internal location services, and lawful intercept location services.
Generally, there are three basic approaches for determining the location of mobile devices in a communication network: a mobile-device centric approach, a network centric approach and a hybrid approach that may include aspects of both the mobile device centric approach and the network centric approach.
In an embodiment, the communication network may be a cellular telephone network. A typical cellular telephone network includes a plurality of cellular base stations 104 coupled to a network operations center 108, which operates to connect voice and data calls between mobile devices 102 (e.g., mobile phones) and other network destinations, such as via telephone land lines (e.g., a POTS network, not shown) and the Internet 114. Communications between the mobile devices 102 and the cellular telephone network 11 may be accomplished via two-way wireless communication links, such as 4G, 3G, CDMA, TDMA, and other cellular telephone communication technologies. The network 106 may also include one or more servers 112 coupled to or within the network operations center 108 that provide connections to the Internet 114.
In various embodiments, the mobile device 102 may be configured to communicate with a radio access node, which can include any wireless base station or radio access point such as LTE, CDMA2000/EVDO, WCDMA/HSPA, IS-136, GSM, WiMax, WiFi, AMPS, DECT, TD-SCDMA, or TD-CDMA and switch, Land Mobile Radio (LMR) interoperability equipment, a satellite Fixed Service Satellite (FSS) for remote interconnection to the Internet and PSTN.
In an embodiment, the radio access points 204 may be configured to determine the location of the mobile device relative to a known location of a network component, such as the illustrated radio access point 206. In this manner, the additional radio equipment 208 installed on the radio access points 204, 206 provides the communication system 200 with similar functionality as is provided by a GPS receiver for signals received from the mobile device. For example, the radio equipment on one or more of the radio access points 204 may measure how long it takes for the radio signal to travel from the mobile device 102 to another radio access point 206, and using trilateration techniques (e.g., time of arrival, angle of arrival, or a combination thereof), the mobile device 102 or a network server 210 may estimate the location of the mobile device 102 to within an accuracy of 100 to 300 meters. Once the network has estimated the latitude and longitude coordinates of the mobile device 102, this information can be used to determine the geo-spatial location of the mobile device 102, which may be communicated to other systems, servers or components via the Internet 114.
Various embodiments may implement and/or make use of a hybrid approach for determining the location of mobile devices in a communication network, which may include aspects of both the device-centric and the network-centric approaches discussed above with reference to
The mobile device/phone 102 may also include one or more sensors 310 for monitoring physical conditions (e.g., location, motion, acceleration, orientation, altitude, etc.). The sensors may include any or all of a gyroscope, a barometer, an accelerometer, a magnetometer, a magnetic compass, an altimeter, an odometer, and a pressure sensor. The sensors may also include various bio-sensors (e.g., heart rate monitor, body temperature sensor, carbon sensor, oxygen sensor, etc.) for collecting information pertaining to environment and/or user conditions. The sensors may also be external to the mobile device and paired or grouped to the mobile device via a wired or wireless connection (e.g., Bluetooth®, etc.). In embodiment, the mobile device 102 may include two or more of the same type of sensor (e.g., two accelerometers, etc.).
The mobile device/phone 102 may also include a GPS receiver 318 configured to receive GPS signals from GPS satellites to determine the geographic location of the mobile device/phone 102. The mobile device/phone 102 may also include circuitry 320 for transmitting wireless signals to radio access points and/or other network components. The mobile device/phone 102 may further include other components/sensors 322 for determining the geographic position/location of the mobile device/phone 102, such as components for determining the radio signal delays (e.g., with respect to cell-phone towers and/or cell sites), performing trilateration and/or multilateration operations, identifying proximity to known networks (e.g., Bluetooth® networks, WLAN networks, WiFi, etc.), and/or for implementing other known geographic location technologies.
The mobile device/phone 102 may also include a system acquisition function configured to access and use information contained in a subscriber identity module (SIM), universal subscriber identity module (USIM), and/or preferred roaming list (PRL) to, for example, determine the order in which listed frequencies or channels will be attempted when the mobile device/phone 102 is to acquire/connect to a wireless network or system. In various embodiments, the mobile device/phone 102 may be configured to attempt to acquire network access (i.e., attempt to locate a channel or frequency with which it can access the wireless/communication network) at initial power-on and/or when a current channel or frequency is lost (which may occur for a variety of reasons).
The mobile device 102 may include pre-built in USIM, SIM, PRL or access point information. In an embodiment, the mobile device may be configured for first responders and/or public safety network by, for example, setting the incident radio system as the default and/or preferred communication system.
As mentioned above, despite recent advances in mobile and wireless communication technologies, determining the specific location of a mobile device in a wireless network remains a challenging task for a variety of reasons, including the variability of environmental conditions in which mobile devices are often used by consumers, deficiencies in existing technologies for computing and/or measuring location information on mobile devices, and the lack of uniform standards. For example, there is currently no universally accepted standard for implementing or providing location-based services. As a result, mobile device designers and wireless network operators, in conjunction with local public safety and third party providers, are using a variety of inefficient, incoherent, and sometimes incompatible methods, technologies, solutions, and/or techniques to determine the location of a mobile device and/or to provide location based services.
While there are no universally accepted standards for implementing or providing location-based services, there are certain requirements or standards associated with determining the location of a mobile device that may be of use in various embodiments. The U.S. Congress has mandated that cellular service providers configure their networks, communication systems and/or mobile devices so that the locations of mobile devices can be determined when a 911 call is placed. To implement Congress's mandate, the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) requested cellular service providers upgrade their systems in two phases (herein “Phase I” and “Phase II” respectively). While the level of precision/accuracy provided by these Phase I and II upgrades are generally inadequate for providing effective location based services that meet the demands of modern users of mobile devices, these upgrades provide a foundation from which more effective location based solutions may be built.
As mentioned above, the FCC requested cellular service providers upgrade their systems in two phases. In the first phase (Phase I), cellular service providers were to upgrade their systems so that emergency calls (e.g., 911 calls) are routed to the public service answering point (PSAP) closest to the cell-tower antenna with which the mobile device is connected, and so that PSAP call-takers can view the phone number of the mobile device and the location of the connecting cell-tower. The location of the connecting cell-tower may be used to identify the general location of the mobile device within a 3-6 mile radius.
In the second phase (Phase II), cellular service providers were to upgrade their systems so that PSAP call-takers could identify the location of the mobile device to within 300 meters. To meet these Phase II requirements, wireless service providers have implemented a variety of technologies, and depending on the technology used, can generally identify the location of the mobile device to within 50-300 meters. For example, on systems that have implemented a network-based solution (e.g., triangulation of nearby cell towers, etc.), the location of a mobile device can be determined within an accuracy of 100 meters 67% of the time, and to within an accuracy of 300 meters 95% of the time. On systems that have adopted a mobile device-based solution (e.g., embedded global positioning system receivers, etc.), the location of the mobile device may be determined to within 50 meters 67% of the time, and to within 150 meters 95% of the time.
Existing phase I and II solutions, alone, are not adequate for generating location information having sufficient accuracy or detail for use in providing accurate, powerful, and reliable location based services. Various embodiments may use some or all of the capabilities built into existing systems (e.g., as part of phase I and II upgrades, device-centric systems, network-centric systems, etc.), in conjunction with more advanced location determination techniques, to compute location information suitable for the advanced location based services demanded by today's consumers.
In addition to the three basic approaches discussed above, a number of different solutions are currently available for determining the location of mobile device, any or all of which may be implemented by and/or included in the various embodiments.
Most conventional location determination solutions use distance estimation techniques that are based on single-carrier signals, and one of the fundamental operations in ground-based (or network-centric) location determination solutions is timing estimation of a first-arrival path of a signal. That is, a single-carrier signal transmitted between a transceiver and a mobile device can be received via multiple paths (i.e., multipath), and the multiple paths of the signal can have different received powers and arrival times. The received signal may be cross-correlated to distinguish the multiple paths of the received signal. In this method it is generally assumed that the first-arrival path (e.g., first detected signal, strongest signal, etc.) is associated with the path traveling the shortest distance, and hence is the right value to use in estimating distance between the mobile device and the transceiver. Often, this first-arrival path is the strongest path due to zero or fewer reflections, relative to the other paths, between the transceiver and the mobile device.
In various embodiments, the first-arrival time of the identified first-arrival path may be used in addition to other parameters (e.g., an estimated signal transmission time and/or a time offset between clocks of the transceiver and the mobile device, etc.) to estimate distance between a mobile device and a network component (e.g., another mobile device, a transceiver, an access point, a base station, etc.). The first-arrival time may be estimated by the mobile device (e.g., based on the downlink received signal) or by the network component (e.g., based on an uplink received signal).
The location of the mobile device may also be determined by estimating the distance between the mobile device and a network component or other signal sources (e.g., a transceiver, ground or satellite-based signal sources, etc.). For example, the location of the mobile device may be determined by performing trilateration using estimated distances between multiple (e.g., three or more) transceivers and the mobile device.
Another location determination solution may include computing an observed time difference of arrival (OTDOA) value by measuring the timing of signals received from three network components (e.g., mobile devices, transceivers, access points, etc.). For example, a mobile device may be configured to compute two hyperbolas based on a time difference of arrival between a reference transceiver signal and signals of two neighbor transceivers. The intersection of the computed hyperbolas may define a position on the surface of the earth that may be used by various embodiments to determine the location of the mobile device.
The accuracy of such OTDOA solutions may be a function of the resolution of the time difference measurements and the geometry of the neighboring transceivers. As such, implementing an OTDOA solution may require determining the precise timing relationship between the neighboring transceivers. However, in existing asynchronous networks, this precise timing relationship may be difficult to ascertain.
In various embodiments, location measurement units (LMUs) may be added throughout a deployment region of an asynchronous network to measure/compute timing information for one or more network components (e.g., transceivers) relative to a high quality timing reference signal. For example, a mobile device or an LMU may determine the observed time difference between frame timing of transceiver signals, and the observed time difference may be sent to the transceiver or a radio network controller of the communication network to determine the location of the mobile device. The location of the mobile device may also be determined based on the observed time difference and assistance data (e.g., position of the reference and neighbor transceivers) received from the communication network.
Another location determination solution may include computing an uplink-time difference of arrival (U-TDOA) based on network measurements of the time of arrival of a known signal sent from the mobile device and received at multiple (e.g., four or more) LMUs. For example, LMUs may be positioned in the geographic vicinity of the mobile device to accurately measure the time of arrival of known signal bursts, and the location of the mobile device may be determined using hyperbolic trilateration based on the known geographical coordinates of the LMUs and the measured time-of-arrival values.
As discussed above, conventional location determination solutions are typically based on single-carrier signals. The various embodiments include a ground-based location determination solution based on multi-carrier signals. A location determination solution based on multi-carrier signals may improve the accuracy of the computed location information by, for example, improving the accuracy of the timing estimation (e.g., by expanding the bandwidth of cellular signals). Location determination solutions based on multiple carriers may be used in both the device-centric (e.g., mobile device-based) and network-centric (e.g., base station-based) approaches, and may be applied to both 3GPP and 3GPP2 wireless communication technologies.
In various embodiments, a mobile device may be configured to determine its geospatial location based on information collected from mobile device sensors (e.g. gyroscope, accelerometer, magnetometer, pressure sensor, etc.), information received from other mobile devices, and information received from network components in a communication system.
The MME 410 may request user and subscription information from a home subscriber server (HSS) 412, perform various administrative tasks (e.g., user authentication, enforcement of roaming restrictions, etc.), and send various user and control information to the S-GW 408. The S-GW 408 may receive and store the information sent by the MME 410 (e.g., parameters of the IP bearer service, network internal routing information, etc.), generate data packets, and forward the data packets to a packet data network gateway (P-GW) 416. The P-GW 416 may process and forward the packets to a policy and control enforcement function (PCEF) 414 which receives the packets and requests charging/control policies for the connection from a policy and charging rules function (PCRF) 415. The PCRF 415 provides the PCEF 414 with policy rules that it enforces to control the bandwidth, the quality of service (QoS), and the characteristics of the data and services being communicated between the network (e.g., Internet, service network, etc.) and the mobile device 102. In an embodiment, the PCEF 414 may be a part of, or perform operations typically associated with, the P-GW 416. Detailed information about policy and charging enforcement function operations may be found in “3rd Generation Partnership Project Technical Specification Group Services and System Aspects, Policy and Charging Control Architecture,” TS 23.203, the entire contents of which are incorporated herein by reference.
In an embodiment, the network 406 may also include an Evolved Serving Mobile Location Center (E-SMLC) 418. Generally, the E-SMLC 418 collects and maintains tracking information about the mobile device 102. The E-SMLC 418 may be configured to provide location services via a lightweight presentation protocol (LLP), which supports the provision of application services on top of TCP/IP networks. The E-SMLC 418 may send or receive (e.g., via LPP) almanac and/or assistance data to and from the MME 410 and/or eNB 404. The E-SMLC 418 may also forward external or network initiated location service requests to the MME 410.
In addition, the mobile device 102 may receive information from the serving eNodeB 404 via System Information Blocks that includes the neighbor cells to scan that are on the same system using the same frequencies or different frequencies, Home eNB (HeNB), in addition to CDMA, GERAN and UTRA cells.
In various embodiments, the mobile device 102 may be configured to determine its geospatial location based on information collected from mobile device sensors (e.g. gyroscope, accelerometer, magnetometer, pressure sensor, etc.), information received from other mobile devices, and information received from network components in a communication system. In an embodiment, the collection and reporting of sensor information may be controlled/performed by the sensor data module 464. For example, the application module 458 may retrieve/receive sensor information from the sensor data module 464 and send the sensor information to the position calculation module 460 to compute the location of the mobile device locally for position updates and/or position augmentation. The application module 458 may also send the computed location information to the network location based system 452 and or other mobile devices.
As mentioned above, in various embodiments, the mobile device 102 may be configured to determine its geospatial location based on information collected from other mobile devices. In these embodiments, two or more mobile devices may be organized into groups. Each mobile device may also share its location information with the other mobile devices with which the mobile device is grouped. For example, mobile devices may be configured to share their current location and/or position information (e.g., latitude, longitude, altitude, velocity, etc.) and an estimate of a distance between themselves and a target mobile device with other mobile devices in their group.
In an embodiment, the grouping of mobile devices may be controlled by the wireless grouping module 462. For example, the application module 458 may retrieve wireless group information (e.g., information pertaining to the locations of other mobile devices) from the wireless grouping module 462, and send the group information to the position calculation module 460 to perform local calculations for position updates and/or position augmentation. In an embodiment, the position calculation module 460 may perform the local calculations based on both sensor information received from the sensor data module 464 and group information received from the wireless grouping module 462.
In an embodiment, the mobile device 102 may be configured to automatically share its location information with other mobile devices upon discovery of the other mobile devices. Mobile devices may augment their location information (e.g., position coordinates) with information received from other mobile devices within same geographic location, and in a controlled pseudo ad-hoc environment. Since the shared location information (e.g., latitude, longitude, altitude, velocity, etc.) involves a relatively small amount of data, in an embodiment the mobile devices may receive such information from a network server by in-band and or out-of-band signaling.
When implemented in a 3GPP-LTE network, the various embodiments may include an E-SMLC 418 component configured to send and receive location information (e.g., latitude, longitude, altitude, velocity, etc.) to and from the mobile devices, which may be achieved both on-net and off-net. The location information may be delivered in standard formats, such as those for cell-based or geographical co-ordinates, together with the estimated errors (uncertainty) of the location, position, altitude, and velocity of a mobile device and, if available, the positioning method (or the list of the methods) used to obtain the position estimate
To aid in the determination of the locations of mobile devices, 3GPP-LTE networks have standardized several reference signals. Various embodiments may use these reference signals for timing based location and positioning solutions. Such reference signals may include the primary and secondary synchronization signals and the cell specific reference signals.
As mentioned above, two or more mobile devices may be organized into groups. Mobile devices within the same group may be part of the same network, or may be associated with different networks and/or network technologies. The mobile devices within the same group may also operate on different network operating systems (NOSs) and/or radio access networks (RANs).
The mobile device 102 may also begin acquiring GPS signals while scanning the airwaves for radio frequency carriers and/or systems. If the mobile device 102 cannot acquire GPS signals, a network component (not illustrated) may help determine the relative position of the mobile device 102 based on one or more of the location determination solutions discussed herein (e.g., based on the antenna used for the radio access point, the time delay, angle of arrival, etc.).
The mobile device 102 may acquire (i.e., connect to) an appropriate radio access system, radio frequency carrier and/or system via the mobile device's system acquisition system. In the examples illustrated in
After the mobile device 102 acquires the radio access system, the network 510 (i.e., a component in the network such as a server) will know the approximate location of the mobile device 102 (e.g., via one or more of the location determination solutions discussed above, such as proximity to base towers). In addition, the mobile device 102 may compute its current location (e.g., via GPS and/or the location determination solutions discussed above), store the computations in a memory of the mobile device, and report its current location to the network 510.
In addition to knowing the approximate location of the mobile device 102, the network 510 may also be informed of the locations of other mobile devices 502 and the proximity of the other mobile devices 502 to the recently acquired mobile device 102.
The mobile devices 102, 502 may be configured report sensor information to each other and/or the network 510. The sensor information may include x, y, z coordinate information and velocity information. The sensor information may be polled on a continuous basis, may be requested periodically, and/or made available on demand in response to network/system requests.
In an embodiment, a mobile device 102, 502 may be configured to report sensor information in response to determining that there is a high likelihood that there has been change in a location of the mobile device 102, 502 (e.g., in response to detecting motion). The mobile devices 102, 502 may also be configured collect and report sensor information to the network 510 in response to receiving an instruction/command from the network 510 (i.e., a component in the network such as a server or E-SLMC 418 illustrated in
In an embodiment, the reporting of sensor information may be based on local parameter settings. For example, the mobile devices 102, 502 may be configured to transmit sensor information when any of the measured parameters (e.g., x, y, z and velocity information) meet or exceed a threshold value (e.g., exceed a rate-of-change, meet a timeout limit), which may be identified by local parameter settings stored in a memory of the mobile devices 102, 502. In an embodiment, the mobile devices 102, 502 may be configured to re-compute and/or update their location information in response to determining that the measured parameters (e.g., x, y, and z coordinates and velocity information) meet or exceed a threshold value.
In an embodiment, a mobile device 102 and/or the network 510 (i.e., a component in the network) may be configured to compare collected sensor information to computed latitude and longitude coordinates, relative altitude information, and other available information to determine if there is a discrepancy between the collected/measured values and the expected values. When it is determined that there exists a discrepancy between the expected and measured values, the mobile device 102 and/or network 510 may perform additional measurements to improve the location accuracy of the measurements/location information.
In block 558, the mobile device may compute its current location (e.g., via GPS and/or the location determination solutions discussed above), store the computations in a memory, and report its current location to the network. In block 560, the mobile device may group with other mobile devices in response to receiving instructions/commands from a network component and/or in response to detecting that the other mobile devices are within a predefined proximity to the mobile device (i.e., within a threshold distance). In block 562, the mobile device may share its current location information, as well as information collected from sensors, with the grouped mobile devices. In block 564, the mobile device may receive location and/or sensor information from the grouped mobile devices. The sensor information may include x, y, z coordinate information and velocity information.
In block 566, the mobile device may identify the relative positions of the other mobile devices, which may be achieve by evaluating the location and sensor information received from the other mobile devices and/or via any or all of the location determination solutions discussed herein. In block 568, the mobile device may send the relative location information, its current location information, and/or sensor information to a network component and/or the other mobile devices, which may receive the sensor and location information and compute updated location information (e.g., based on distance in time delay and angle of arrival, relative altitude information, etc.). In block 570, the mobile device may receive updated location information from the network component and/or the other grouped mobile devices. In block 572, the mobile device may update its current location calculation and/or information based on the information received from the network component and/or the other grouped mobile devices. The operations of blocks 562-572 may be repeated until the desired level of precision is achieved for the location information.
The operations discussed above with respect to
In block 658, the first and/or second mobile devices may re-compute, refine, and/or update their current location calculations and/or location information based on information received from the other mobile devices and/or the network. In block 660, the first and/or second mobile devices may send their updated current location calculations and/or location information to the network component, which may receive the calculations/information and compute updated location information (e.g., based on distance in time delay and angle of arrival, relative altitude information, etc.). In block 662, the first and/or second mobile devices may receive updated location information from the network. The operations in blocks 658-662 may be repeated until the desired level of precision is achieved for the location information.
It should be understood that the methods and operations discussed above with reference to
In an embodiment, a mobile device 102 and/or a network component may store relative location information for all the mobile devices within each group, based on the type of grouping. For example, a network component may store relative location information for all the mobile devices grouped/paired by an incident command system (ICS) commander. Likewise, the network component may store relative location information for all the mobile devices grouped/paired based on their proximity to each another.
In an embodiment, the mobile device 102 may be configured to detect a low battery condition, and initiate operations to conserve battery. For example, a mobile device 102 may be configured to turn off its radio and/or terminate or reduce its participation in the group/pairing information exchange. As another example, a mobile device 102 may be flagged or identified as having a low battery condition, and the other grouped/paired mobiles devices may be informed of the low battery situation so that update intervals may be adjusted to reduce battery consumption.
As discussed above, grouped mobile devices may share various types of information to improve the accuracy of the location determination calculations. For the information shared between grouped/paired mobile devices, a comparison may be made for the path, range, between the mobile devices using any or all of the information available to the mobile devices (e.g., location coordinates, sensor information, proximity information, etc.). If the two mobile devices report relative positional information that is within a user or network defined range tolerance as being acceptable this is information may be forwarded to the network. If the relative positional information is not within the user or network defined range tolerance, additional polling operations may be performed to improve the accuracy of the measurements or location information. The above-mentioned operations may be repeated until the desired level of accuracy is achieved. In an embodiment, the number of times the above-mentioned operations are repeated may determined based on a user-definable values which can be set by the network, user or algorithm used.
As mentioned above, a mobile device 102 may include two or more of the same type of sensor. In the embodiments in which the mobile device 102 includes more than one of the same type of sensor (e.g., includes two accelerometers), one of the sensors (e.g., one the two accelerometers) may be identified as a master sensor. The values measures by each sensor may be compared, and if the difference between the values falls within a tolerance range, the values measured by the master sensor may be used to compute the sensor parameters (e.g., x, y, z and velocity parameters). If the difference between the values falls outside a tolerance range, the mobile device may use information collected from other sensors (of the same or different types) to determine if the values measured by the master sensor are consistent with expected values. For example, the mobile device may use information collected from various other types of sensors to compute sensor parameters (e.g., x, y, z and velocity parameters), and compare the computed sensor parameters to similar sensor parameters computed based on the values measured on the master sensor to determine if the master sensor is functioning correctly. Values measured on the master sensor may also be compared to information stored in the network or other mobile devices to determine if the master sensor is functioning correctly. If it is determined that the master sensor is not functioning correctly, a secondary sensor may be designated as the master sensor. The previous master sensor may be demoted to standby status (i.e., for use if the primary sensor has a failure) and not used for immediate positional calculations.
As mobile devices move into an area, the mobile devices may be asked to group/pair with more devices. The number devices that a mobile device can group/pair with may be restricted by user configuration, through the system, and/or user intervention so as to conserve battery and computational efforts (e.g., when the mobile device detects a low battery condition).
In an embodiment, proximity grouping may be used in the x, y and z coordinates/fields and/or for velocity and acceleration information.
In the event that a mobile device is unable to group with another mobile device with which it is instructed to group/pair with (e.g., due to a RF path problems), the mobile device may group with yet another mobile device in an ad-hoc fashion. If no mobile device is pairable with the mobile device, it may rely on its own geographic and/or and sensor information to report to the network.
When a mobile device 102 is undetected as being within a given proximity of a grouping radius, other mobile devices in the same group as the mobile device 102 may be informed of the decision to degroup/depair them from the mobile device 102. In an embodiment, the system may be configured so that an approval from the incident commander or user is required before the mobile is degrouped/depaired. In an embodiment, this may be achieved may transmitting a signal to a mobile device of the incident commander or user requesting approval, to which the incident commander or user may send a reply approving or disapproving of the request to degroup/depair. In an embodiment, the degrouping/depairing process may be transparent to the mobile device users.
In the event that a mobile device is unable to communicate with the network, the mobile device may send telemetry information pertaining to location services (and other telemetry information) to a grouped mobile device for relaying to the network.
In an embodiment, polling for information may be performed once the network has lost communication with the mobile device. Mobile devices that and known to be grouped to the mobile device may be instructed to communicate with the disconnected mobile even when it is trying to reacquire the network. A logical sequence based on proximity, signal quality to the network, and/or battery strength may be used to determine which mobile device will be used as a relay for communicating with the network.
The relayed telemetry information may include more than just positional information. For example, the telemetry information may also include bio sensor and user bio information reporting on the environment and user conditions, including heart rate and temperature, CO, O2 and other sensor information.
In an embodiment, the network may continuously measure/monitor the connected mobile devices. Knowing their location and relative location to each of the other mobile devices enables the network to continuously measure the uplink and downlink communication paths. If a communication path degradation occurs and begins to fall within a defined system quality range (which may be user defined), a mobile device may be instructed to either handover to another radio access node for the same network and/or network technology, or be instructed to initiate to perform relay operations to relay communications though a defined mobile device as a secondary signal path.
In the event that a communication link is lost with the network the mobile device may attempt to acquire itself on another network. While the acquisition process is underway, a mobile device may act as a mesh device. Other mobile devices in the proximity group may also connect as a mesh network.
In an embodiment, the mobile devices may utilize dead reckoning techniques to compute location information. Mobile devices may store the information for use in calculating more accurate location information, and may eventually relay to another mobile device which has network access or until one of the mobile devices or both devices have access to the initial network or another network and granted access to whether it is public or a private network.
Once synched with the access point the mobile device may determine the timing difference and other requisite information to help determine its relative location and distance from the access point. This information may be related to the location system used by the mobile device to help refine its current location calculations.
Additionally the mobile device may be configured to compare each cell read to its own coordinate and using bearing and time difference for all the cells it reads. The mobile device may then triangulate on its own position.
During a 911 call a software application on the distressed mobile device may be executed. The software application may access an active neighbor list, read the overhead of each cell, and use that information to triangulates on the mobile device's own positions. The mobile device may also read the time offset for each of the cells.
In this case the system begins to try and locate the distressed mobiles position with more precision an accuracy to assist First Responders with triangulating on the distressed mobiles position and sending the information to the incident commander and/or public service answering point (PSAP) with a relative distance to target indication that is updated on pre-defined intervals. If the mobile device has lost contact with the 911 center, PSAP then the last location is continuously display and any velocity information is also relayed to assist the first responders.
In an emergency, the mobile device 102 may be configured to send its location information to the network. The mobile device 102 may be configured to automatically send its location information in response to detecting the emergency, or may provide the user with an option to send the location information. In an embodiment, the mobile device 102 may be configured to send its location information in response to a network initiated command.
Each mobile device may become an access point (AP). The decision to be the access point may be periodically updated while still in communication with the network, or when no network is found. Upon powering up, each mobile device may act as a client, and on a pseudo random time interval, the mobile devices may become an access point and then a client.
The location based methodology may be the same for a frequency-division duplexing (FDD) and a time-division duplexing (TDD) system. However in the event that the communication link between the mobile device and the network is lost, the mobile device may be configured to relay its telemetry information through another mobile device having network access.
In an embodiment, all information sent via wireless communication links may be digital. In an embodiment, the information may be encrypted to a requisite advanced encryption standard (AES) standards level or the appropriate encryption level needed for the requisite communication system and access method used.
Generally, the location based systems (LBS) may utilize reactive or proactive based methods. In a reactive location based system, the mobile devices may synchronously interact with each other on a time basis or some other predetermined update method. In a proactive location based system, the mobile devices may update their location information based on a set of predetermined event conditions using an algorithm. The various embodiments may include both reactive and proactive aspects, taking the best of both approaches to enhance location accuracy and precision.
Various embodiments may include location determination solutions that utilize horizontal data (i.e., a set of reference points on the Earth's surface against which position measurements are made) and/or vertical data. Horizontal data define the origin and orientation of the coordinate system and are prerequisites for referring a position relative to the Earth's surface. Vertical data are based on geoids, which primarily serves as a basis to determine the height of a position relative to means sea level for which the geoids act as a benchmark for origin and orientation. Various embodiments may utilize horizontal and vertical data to provide/generate enhanced three dimensional location information. The horizontal and vertical data can be global, national, local or custom depending on the locality and positioning reference system utilized.
Traditionally global data are used for position location as compared to a local datum. Global data are used for initial position fixing if possible and are based on GPS coordinates. Local data are based on a particular position on the surface of the earth, which allows for a non GPS based location based services to take place. The various embodiments may use global data, local data, or both. In an embodiment, GPS may be used to help identify the initial positional fix, and may be augmented by dead reckoning and a hybrid trilateration solution that utilizes both network and terminal based positioning. In this embodiment, both local and global data may be used. If GPS determined position information is unavailable then the initial position may be set to zero or a distance that is estimated using received signal strength indication (“RSSI”) such that 0.5 of the estimated distance is applied to the horizontal component and vertical component of the reporting mobile device and the altitude, may be reported by the additional mobile devices.
Generally, a hybrid lateration and trilateration solution includes a mobile device performing a measurement and sending it to the network, and a network component performing the location determination calculations. The various embodiments include a hybrid lateration and trilateration solution in which the mobile device performs the location determination calculations, with and without the support of the network components.
Various embodiments may include sensor fusion operations in which a collaborative approach is used so that the sensors do not act as individual sensors, but as a collective team. As discussed above, the mobile device may include various sensors (e.g., accelerometer, gyros, magnetic compass, altimeters, odometers, etc.) capable of generating heading, orientation, distance traveled, and velocity as part of the sensor information collected on the mobile device. In various embodiments, information collected from any or all the internal sensors may be used for improving location or positioning accuracy and/or confidence improvements. Various embodiments may compute location information based on information from multiple sensors, with or without the aid of radio frequency propagation information.
The sensor fusion operations may include the sharing of telemetry including sensor data indicating relative movement of the individual mobile device, which enables temporal readings to assist in the location estimate, either with external assistance or dead reckoning.
Dead reckoning may provide the needed positional corrections as a local datum method for positioning when GPS or other network related positioning solutions are not available. Additionally dead reckoning may enhance the location position accuracy and precision calculations by providing and additional horizontal and vertical datum comparisons.
With dead reckoning, the current position may be deduced (or extrapolated) from the last known position. The dead reckoning accuracy requires a known starting point which either can be provided by the network, GPS, near field communication link, RF beacon, a predetermined zero position, or via another mobile device. For example, If GPS initial position information is available then the initial position may be set to zero or a distance that is estimated using RSSI such that 0.5 of the estimated distance is applied to the horizontal component and vertical component of the reporting mobile device and the altitude, may be reported by the additional mobile device
A dead reckoning system may be dependent upon the accuracy of measured distance and heading, and the accuracy of the known origin. However the problem with relying on dead reckoning alone to assist in positional improvement is error accumulation caused by sensor drift (i.e., differences or errors in values computed/collected from one or more sensors). In particular, magnetic, accelerometers and gyroscopes are susceptible to sensor drift. The error accumulation for any of the sensors may increase over undulating terrain, as compared to flat terrain. Bias error and step size error are leading contributors to dead reckoning errors.
Various embodiments may tightly couple the mobile device sensors and continuously recalibrate the sensors to reduce any drift problems caused by unaided dead reckoning. Additionally, as part of the tightly coupling the sensors, any bias drift associated with the sensors (e.g., a gyroscope) may be address by utilizing a Kalman filter to reduce the errors from the primary and/or secondary sensors (e.g., gyroscopes).
In various embodiments, the mobile device may be configured to include velocity computations as part of the location determination computations to account for position changes that occur. When a GPS signal is available, the step size (via velocity computation) and compass bias errors may be estimated by an Enhanced Kalman Filter (EKF). Additionally if GPS is available, the compass may also be able to identify slow motion changes due to changes in magnetic inclination. The compass may be relied upon for motion computations in addition to that of accelerometers and gyroscopes, with and without the availability of GPS.
Dead reckoning accuracy degrades with time, requiring regular position updates or positional corrections. Therefore, the mobile device may be configured to not only use its own internal sensors to compute the location/positional information, but may also communicate with other mobile devices to leverage their location/positional information to enhance its own location/positional information. In essence, the mobile devices may act as RF base stations, proving the lateration capability to improve the positional accuracy of other mobile devices.
In an embodiment, a mobile device may be configured to poll one or more other mobile devices to gain a better positional fix on its location.
Mobile devices may be grouped together, either through assignment by the network or through the mobile device acquiring/detecting/connecting to other mobile devices (which may or may not be in the same network) as part of a discovery method for sharing location information.
Location information may be shared via the use of a near field communications system (e.g., Bluetooth®, ultrawideband, peanut radios, etc.), infrared, ultrasonic, and other similar technologies, such as via the use of WiFi. The wireless communications may also be ad hoc or infrastructure based, or based on a TDD system, such as LTE, SD-CDMA, TD-CDMA, or any other TDD methods.
In an embodiment, the mobile device may be configured to initiate the sharing of location/position information in response to receiving a network-driven grouping request from a network component.
In an embodiment, when the mobile device has lost contact with the network, it may attempt to find a suitable mobile device to help in its location determination computations, and for possible connection to the network (e.g., via a relay).
In an embodiment, the mobile device may be configured to send a request for location information to another mobile device. The request may be sent after the authentication process between mobile devices, and may include a time stamp which may be sub-seconds in size (milliseconds). Another mobile device may respond with a message that also has its time stamp and when it received the time stamp from the initiating mobile device.
Several messages (e.g., three messages) may be exchanged quickly between the mobile devices to establish time synchronization and share location/positional information that includes horizontal, vertical, and altitude coordinates (e.g. x, y, and z coordinates), a velocity, and acceleration component in each message. The time differences along with the x, y, and z coordinates may be compared with possible pulses or pings to establish an estimated distance vector between the devices.
When the distance vector and the x, y, z coordinates of two mobile devices are known, a point-to-point fix may be established. This process may be repeated for all the mobile devices in a group that has been assigned or created by the mobile device itself. Having multiple distance vectors from other points to the mobile will enhance the positioning accuracy.
A mobile device may be configured to report back to the network location server the distance vectors it has found between different mobiles. The other mobile devices also involved with the positioning enhancement may also report their distance vectors to the network to have their overall position accuracy improved as well.
The positional accuracy is meant to be done in incremental steps and the process will continue until no more positional improvements will be achievable. The positional accuracy improvement threshold may be operator defined, and may be stored in a mobile device memory.
When collecting the distance vectors and other positional information, if the error in position is greater than x % for a lower positional confidence level then no update may be required. As the mobile device receives other sensor data and more than a pre-described distance in any direction or a combined distance vector than the positional update process begins again. However if the x % of positional confidence level is less than desired additional positional, updates may be made with the mobile devices grouped together in an interactive process to improve the confidence level of the positional information.
It is important to note that typical positional location methods that are used currently by the network are not necessarily replaced with above-described positional lateration. Instead, the hybrid lateration method may be used in various embodiments to augment the positioning accuracy and confidence for network based position request due to boundary changes or paging requests or other position location triggered events.
As illustrated in
The three circles or ellipses 909, 915 and 916 illustrated in
For each axis (x, y, or z), a similar process occurs where the error area 930 is a combination of determining the range between the other mobile devices and mobile device 901. The hyperbolic lateration is a typical calculation method used in location based systems and is based on the principal that the range between two locations is the same. However the range determined for the points may not be constant since both can be moving toward, away or together at a similar velocity and trajectory.
With the hybrid lateration method proposed a corrective distance vector Δx, Δy, Δz is used that can be used to apply to the estimated position.
The three circles or ellipses 909, 915 and 916 illustrated in
The pseudo range pi deviated from the actual range in any axis due to the inaccuracy in synchronization or propagation in a multipath environment or due to sensor induced errors. Where the distance vector accounting for change in direction is: ri=√(Xi−x)2+(Yi−y)2+(Zi−z)2
Three range calculations are then averaged to determine the distance vector that is used. If the previous range calculation rj as compared to that of the current calculation has an error in excess of a user defined % or variant then the new measurement is disregarded. Included with the distance vector validation may be the fusion sensor information where expected position verse calculated may be included for the confidence interval. Range difference=dij=ri−rj
An iterative process may be used for position improvement, which may include the use of a least squares calculation fit to approximate the position solution in a step wise basis. The process may continue until the range difference measured does not produce any noticeable accuracy improvement, which may be user-defined, either at the mobile device or network or both.
The multi-lateration calculations may include estimating a location of a mobile device based upon estimated distances to three or more measurement locations (i.e., locations of three other mobile devices or wireless transceivers). In these calculations, the estimated distance from a measurement location (location of another mobile device) to the mobile device may be derived from the measured signal strength. Since signal strength roughly decreases as the inverse square of the separation distance, and the transmission power of the mobile device can be presumed, the distance di can be simply calculated as: di=√(S0/Sii) where: di is the estimated separation distance between a measurement location and the mobile device; Si is the measured signal strength; and S0 is the strength of the signal transmitted by the other mobile device.
Alternatively, the signal strength readings may be translated into distances using a path loss model, such as the following: RSSIi=a−cb log10(di) where: a is the signal strength at di=1 meter; b is the path loss exponent; and c is the pathloss slope with 20 being used for free space.
The lateration operations may include performing a least squares computation, which may accomplished by a processor calculating the following formula: min(x,y)Σ(di−∥MSi−(x,y)∥)2 where: di is the distance calculated based on a measured signal strength value; MSi corresponds to the known location/position of the mobile device; and the minimization value of (x, y) is the estimated position of other mobile devices.
In various embodiments, the velocity and acceleration of the mobile device with respective to the three or more reference locations (i.e., locations of three other mobile devices or wireless transceivers) may be determined along with the estimated distance from each reference location to the mobile device. The estimated distances to three or more measurement locations (i.e., locations of three other mobile devices or wireless transceivers), velocities, and acceleration calculations may have their components separated into a horizontal component set, a vertical component set, and an altitude component set respectively. As will be discussed in greater detail below, each of the component sets main contain the distance component, velocity component, and acceleration component for each of the reference locations. For example, an “x” component set may contain the distance x components, velocity x components, and acceleration x components associated with all reference locations. Some embodiments may include executing a kalman filtering procedure on the component sets individually to produce an estimated position of the mobile device.
Mobile device 901 may send a request for position information to mobile device 902. The information may be sent after the authentication process between mobile devices, and may include a time stamp. The time stamp may be sub seconds in size (e.g., milliseconds). The mobile device 902 may respond with a message that also has a time stamp, and timing information pertaining to when the mobile device 902 received the time stamp from mobile device 901. Three messages may be transferred quickly to establish time synchronization. The time differences may then be compared, along with possible pulses or pings, to establish an estimated distance vector between the mobile devices. Knowing the distance vector and the x, y, and z coordinates of both 901 and 902, a point-to-point fix may be established. In various embodiments, the position fix may be extrapolated to synchronize the trilateration time stamp with a time stamp of a dead reckoning calculation. Similarly, the time interval adopted for dead reckoning calculation updates may be adopted as the time interval between trilateration recalculations.
The mobile device 901 may then initiate communication with mobile devices 903, 904 and repeat the operations discussed above with respect to mobile device 902 for each of mobile device 903, 904. After obtaining two or more distance vectors along with positional information, the mobile device 901 may compare the new coordinates to its previously computed current location, and adjust the location computations accordingly.
The positional information distance vectors may be sent to the network for positional processing with other network positional information. Based on the position calculated for the mobile device, the network (i.e., a component in the network, such as a network server or E-SMLC) may instruct the mobile device to adjust its positional information.
Additionally the mobile device 901 may also make a positional correction if the network either does not respond in time, which may result in a message update time out. Alternatively, when the network cannot make the necessary correction, and the positional information may used by another component and/or other mobile devices to perform the necessary corrections.
If the error is greater than x % for a lower positional confidence level then no update is required. As the mobile receives other sensor data and more than a pre-described distance in any direction or a combined distance vector than the positional update process begins again. If the x % of positional confidence level is less than desired, additional positional updates may be made with the grouped mobile devices (e.g., iteratively) to improve the confidence level of the positional information. Additionally if the positional information from one of the mobile devices that is being attempted to obtain a distance vector appears to be in error, then that mobile devices data may be selected to not be used for this iterative step of performing positional updates with other grouped mobile devices. However it will continue to be queried as part of the process since its position location could be corrected in one of the steps it is taking to improve its position location as well.
Additionally in the event that one or more mobile devices lose communication with the core network it will still be possible to maintain position accuracy through one of the other grouped mobile devices. In some embodiments, the last position of the mobile device may be re-used an the amount of error increased. It will also be possible to continue to maintain a communication link by establishing a network relay connection with another of the mobile devices in the same group which still has communication with the network itself.
In the example illustrated in
The mobile device 901 may also communicate its positional information and establish near field communication link with a mobile device that is not part of the home network associated with mobile device 901.
The mobile devices may have the USIM, SIM, PRL or access point information pre-built in. The mobile device for first responders may have the incident radio system set as their preferred system, or in the case that the radio access system being used as a public safety network.
For first responders to utilize a wireless mobile network (e.g., LTE) the position location information accuracy needs to improved for in building environments in addition to providing more accurate location information about where the mobile devices are actually located. Whether the mobile device is used by a first responder, commercial cellular user or a combination of both.
The positional location improvement for first responders may be helpful to improve situation awareness, improved telemetry and overall communication with the incident commander. Since all incidents for first responders tend to be fluid the ability to account for a dynamic environment of mobile devices will come into and out of the incident area. In addition the mobile devices proximity location to other mobile devices can and will change as the incident situation changes where resources are added and or reassigned as the need arises for operational requirements.
The use of network and terminal driven position enhancement techniques previously discussed may be exploited. The grouping of mobile devices may be done either as part of pre-plan, with intervention by the incident commander or driven from the commercial wireless network, public safety wireless network or local incident communication system (ICS) 1204 based on reported proximity of the mobile devices.
For first responders when a situation arises that requires finding a man down or responding to an emergency call (911) the location based process can be used to help in the search and rescue of the person.
Once the mobile device has been grouped, or is still connected to the network, the relative location of the mobile device will be sent to all the mobile devices that are in active search for that mobile device. The selection of which mobile devices will be searched may be determined by operator intervention and selection.
As discussed above, the various embodiments may include performing dead reckoning on one or more outputs of mobile device sensors. The mobile device may utilize the sensor outputs to calculate a dead reckoning location estimate for the mobile device at a given point in time. Various embodiments may include comparison of externally determined location information with the dead reckoning location estimate to produce a precise location estimate. This estimate may be provided to the mobile device's local location based software services, as well as service provides such as emergency and law enforcement services.
Externally determined location information may be received by the mobile device and used to determine an initial position. In some embodiments, the mobile device may wait until updated location information is received from an external positioning system, or alternatively may use location information previously received from the external positioning system. Once two sets of location information are obtained from one or more external positioning systems, determination of precise location information may begin. The mobile device may continue to check for, and receive updated externally determined location information throughout execution of the various routines and subroutines of embodiment methods, in order to ensure that the most current location information is employed during all calculations and comparisons. During a dead reckoning procedure, the mobile device may check for updated externally determined location information after a pre-determined distance is travelled (e.g., 10 meters).
In some embodiments, precise location information may be determined at regular time intervals, regardless of whether the mobile device has experienced a change in position at any given point in time. The two instances of externally determined location information may be compared to determine whether the mobile device has moved during the interval between receipt of the first and second instances of externally determined location information. In some embodiments, precise location information may only be recalculated when a difference between the two externally determined location information exceeds a threshold value.
Various embodiments may include execution of dead reckoning on outputs from sensors such as a gyroscope, a barometer, an accelerometer, a magnetometer, a magnetic compass, an altimeter, an odometer, and a pressure sensor. A best estimated output may be calculated for each participating sensor for a given time interval, and the best estimated outputs passed as inputs to a dead reckoning process. The dead reckoning process may utilize the best estimated outputs to produce a dead reckoning location estimate.
Various embodiments may rely on both the dead reckoning location estimate and externally determined location information to determine precise location information for the mobile device. The external location information may be compared to the dead reckoning location estimate and a physical distance between the two locations may be calculated. If the calculated distance between location estimates is smaller than a pre-defined threshold (e.g. three meters), then a midpoint between the two location estimates may be calculated and stored as the current best location estimate. The current best location estimate may be provided to location based services as the current position of the mobile device. If the calculated distance does not fall beneath a pre-determined threshold, the dead reckoning location estimate may be discarded and the procedure may begin again.
The various embodiments may include methods, systems, and devices for producing precise location information for enhanced location based services, using both externally determined location information and locally generated dead reckoning location estimates.
Generating locally determined dead reckoning location information may require best estimates from one or more sensors in communication with the mobile device. In an embodiment, the mobile device may calculate stride length estimates, altitude estimates, and compass heading estimates using participating sensors, and may pass these estimates to the dead reckoning procedure as inputs. In some embodiments, a stride length estimation may be a calculation of the average length of the mobile device user's stride (i.e., the average distance the mobile device moves with each iteration of motion). Average stride length may be construed by the device as the average stride length of the mobile device user under optimal conditions and in the clear line of communication of multiple satellites. In some embodiments, an altitude estimate may be calculated using an altitude received from a service provider (i.e., externally determined altitude) and an altitude measurement obtained from one or more of the sensors in communication with the mobile device, such as a barometer. In some embodiments, a compass heading estimate may include calculation of a compass heading using a declination received from a service provider (i.e., externally determined declination) and the outputs of sensors in communication with the mobile device, such as an accelerometer and a magnetometer.
In the various embodiments, a mobile device may generate a best stride length estimate at the beginning of a dead reckoning procedure. Stride length estimation may begin with the comparison of two instances of externally determined location information. If the mobile device is in motion, then the difference between two location estimates may be associated with at least one “stride” of a user or support mechanism. Averaging the difference over a number of iterations may produce a best stride length estimate. An initial stride length may be calculated by extrapolating a distance between the two instances of externally determined location information. For example, one or more processors of the mobile device may execute a haversine function on longitude and latitude components of the externally determined location information to produce an interim distance. The haversine function may be represented by the expression: ds=2r*arcsin [ sin2((φ2−φ1)/2)+cos (φ1)+cos(φ1)cos(φ2)sin2(λ2−λ1)/2))]1/2 where ds=distance between two locations associated with the beginning and ending of a stride; φ=latitude; λ=longitude; and r=radius of earth.
Numerous stride lengths (i.e., ds) may be calculated and averaged in a moving average of stride length. The aggregated stride lengths and average stride length may be utilized to determine a confidence interval of 95%. The variance of the aggregated stride length population may also be calculated. If the variance is less than that of a stored current best stride length estimate, then the best stride length estimate may be updated to the average stride length. If the variance is greater than that of the current best location estimate, then the average stride length may be discarded. In both instances, the process may reiterate with updated location information. Some embodiments may include the continued recalculation of a best stride length estimate so long as the mobile device is powered on, in motion, or in communication with one or more service providers. At each iteration, the best stride length estimate may be passed as an input to a dead reckoning procedure.
In the various embodiments, a mobile device may generate a best altitude estimate at the beginning of a dead reckoning procedure. Like the stride length estimation procedure, altitude estimation may utilize externally determined location information. An altitude component of the location information may be compared to a local altitude estimate to reduce measurement bias during the altitude estimation procedure. The local altitude estimate may be the result of executing various filter functions on the output of a barometric pressure sensor in communication with the mobile device. For example, the barometric pressure sensor (i.e., barometer) output may be subjected to a single layer kalman filter to remove environmental noise from the measurement. A hypsometric function may be executed on the filtered barometric pressure sensor output to produce the local altitude estimate. The hypsometric function may be expressed in terms of a measured pressure, pressure at sea level, and a measured temperature, which may optionally be set to a static 35 degrees C., by the function: h=([P0/P)(1/5.257)−1]*[T+273.15])/0.0065 where: h=altitude; P0=pressure at sea level (hPa); P=measured pressure (hPa); and T=measured temperature (C).
The result of the hypsometric function (i.e., the local altitude estimate) may be compared to the externally determined altitude information. The value of the difference between the locally and externally determined altitudes may be a bias value. This bias value may be combined with future altitude estimates to reduce error. A predetermined number (e.g., 100) sets of local altitude estimates and externally determined altitude estimates may be obtained or calculated, and subsequently normalized using the bias value. A moving average may be calculated as sets of altitude estimates are obtained, and a confidence interval having a 95% confidence may be calculated. Variance of the altitude estimate population may also be calculated. If the variance is less than that of the current best altitude estimate, then the average altitude estimate may be stored as the new current best altitude estimate, and the process may reiterate. If the variance is greater than that of the current best altitude estimate, it may be determined whether the variance falls within a 90% confidence interval. When it is determined that the variance of the current best altitude estimate lies within the 90% confidence interval, one or more processors of the mobile device may increase the frequency of barometric pressure sensor readings (i.e., reduce time interval between subsequent readings). In this manner, rapid changes in altitude may be detected by the mobile device with greater precision. Once the altitude variance normalizes within the 95% confidence interval, the frequency of barometric pressure sensor readings may be scaled back to a default frequency. The best altitude estimate may be passed as input to a dead reckoning procedure for calculating precise location information.
In the various embodiments, a mobile device may generate a best compass heading estimate at the beginning of a dead reckoning procedure. Externally determined location information received by the mobile device may include declination of the mobile device as calculated by a service provider. Declination information obtained from a service provider may enable the device to adjust locally calculated compass headings to a true north position. A local compass heading estimate may be calculated using the outputs of an accelerometer and magnetometer in communication with the mobile device. Each of the accelerometer and magnetometer outputs may be subjected to a kalman filter function to reduce environmental noise. In this manner, a local compass heading estimate, in the form of the rotation matrix of the mobile device with respect to a real world coordinate system, may be determined. The declination value received from the service provider may then be compared to the local compass heading estimate to adjust the local compass heading estimate toward true north. The adjusted compass heading estimated may be stored as a best compass heading estimate and the process may reiterate. The best compass heading estimate may be passed as input to a dead reckoning procedure for calculating precise location information.
Various embodiments include generating a predicative estimate of the mobile device's position at the beginning of the time period immediately subsequent to the current time interval. The best stride length estimate, best altitude estimate, and best compass heading estimate may be combined with the external determined location information (i.e., latitude, longitude, altitude, declination) and any of a number of dead reckoning techniques applied to the combined values to predict the mobile device's subsequent position. This combination may occur with each “stride” or instance of motion experienced by the mobile device. The best stride length estimate may be utilized to predict the distance the mobile device is likely to travel away from its current position during the next stride or iteration of motion. Similarly, the best altitude estimate may be utilized to predict a likely change in altitude that the mobile device will experience during the next stride or iteration of motion. The best compass heading estimate may be utilized to predict the direction in which the mobile device is likely to travel during the subsequent stride or iteration of motion. Performing the dead reckoning procedure on the best altitude estimate, the best stride length estimate, and the best compass heading may be a dead reckoning location estimate. The dead reckoning location estimate may be passed as input to a comparison procedure, which may calculate a best location estimate based on the dead reckoning location estimate and a current best location estimate.
In various embodiments, a comparison function may generate the best location estimate, a set of precise location information, which may be passed to location based services and external service providers as the current location of the mobile device. During the comparison, the dead reckoning location estimate may be compared to a current best location estimate. If no former location estimate is available, the most recently received externally determined location information may be utilized in place of the best location estimate. Such substitutions may be necessary upon initialization of the present methods, systems, and devices for providing precise location information.
In some embodiments, the difference between the dead reckoning location estimate and the best location estimate may be calculated using a haversine function such as that described above with respect to the stride length estimation procedure. If the distance between the two location estimates is less than a predetermined threshold (e.g. 3 meters) than the midpoint of the two locations may be calculated. A geographical midpoint formula may be used to calculate the midpoint and may be expressed by the set of functions: Bx=cos(φ2)cos(Δλ); By=cos(φ2)sin(Δλ); φm=a tan 2(sin(φ1)+sin(φ2)*((cos(φ1)+Bx)2+By2))1/2); and λm=λ1+a tan 2(By cos(φ1)+Bx) where: φ=latitude and λ=longitude.
The calculated midpoint may be stored as the best location estimate, in a local storage of the mobile device. The then precise location estimation procedure may be rest, and dead reckoning reiterated using the new location information. If the distance between the location estimates is not less than the predetermined threshold, then the current best location estimate is not updated and the precise location estimation procedure may reiterate.
In block 1504, the mobile device may perform operations (e.g., via one or more of its mobile device processors) to initiate or begin setup of a dead reckoning procedure, which may produce/generate precise location information in the device. Examples of the dead reckoning procedure setup operations that may be performed in block 1504 include seeding one or more calculations of stride length, altitude, and compass heading with the externally determined location information to produce output information that may be used as inputs to a subsequent dead reckoning procedure (e.g., in block 1516, etc.). In determination block 1506, the mobile device may check for additional externally determined location information and/or determine whether there is new or additional external location information available to the device. As part of these operations, the mobile device may perform operations to ensure that the most recent location information available to the mobile device is used for determining/computing the precise location information.
In response to determining that new or additional location information is available from external systems (i.e., determination block 1506=“Yes”), in determination block 1508 the mobile device may evaluate (e.g., by comparison, calculation, etc.) whether the new or additional location information is more accurate than the previously received location information. In response to determining that the newly acquired location information is not more accurate than the previously received location information (i.e., determination block 1508=“No”) or that new or additional location information is not available (i.e., determination block 1506=“No”), the mobile device may perform the operations illustrated in determination block 1510. In particular, in determination block 1510, one or more processors of the mobile device may determine whether the mobile device has moved or changed position since the last iteration of method 1500. In some embodiments, device movement (e.g., whether the mobile device has changed position) may be determined by calculating the difference between the most recent location information and a previously stored best location estimate. In some embodiments, the mobile device may be configured to compare the calculated difference to a threshold value, and determine that the mobile device has moved or changed position in response to determining that the threshold value is exceeded by the calculated difference. In other embodiments, analogous techniques for determining a change in position may be employed/used by the device processor in determination block 1510 without departing from the scope of the process/method 1500.
In response to determining that the mobile device has not moved since the last iteration of the method (i.e., determination block 1510=“No”), the mobile device may return to block 1502 and wait to receive update location information from one or more external positioning systems. In response to determining that the mobile device has moved or changed position since the last iteration of the procedure (i.e., determination block 1510=“Yes”), the mobile device may begin execution of dead reckoning operations in block 1516. In particular, in block 1516, the one or more processors of the mobile device may perform or execute a dead reckoning calculation procedure/algorithm to produce a precise location estimate, which may be an information structure that includes one or more information fields, component vectors, location information, position information, coordinate information, etc. These operations/process is described in greater detail below with reference to
In response to determining that the newly received location information is more accurate than the previously received location information (i.e., determination block 1508=“Yes”), the one or more processors of the mobile device may skip performance of the dead reckoning operations (e.g., operations of blocks 1510 and 1516, etc.), and compare the newly acquired location information to a dead reckoning estimate determined during the previous iteration of method 1500 to determine whether the current estimate is better than the previous best estimate in determination block 1518.
For example, in determination block 1518, the mobile device process may compare the newest dead reckoning estimate or newly received location information to a currently stored best location estimate (i.e., to a best location estimate value stored in a memory of the device). If the new dead reckoning location estimate or the newly received location information is more accurate than the current best location estimate (e.g., variance is lower or confidence interval smaller), the mobile device may determine that the current estimate is better than the previous best estimate. In response to determining that the new information is not better than then current best location estimate or that the current estimate is not better than the previous best estimate (i.e., determination block=“No”), no further changes are made to the stored current best location estimate and the mobile device may wait to receive update location information from one or more external positioning systems in block 1502. In response to determining that the new information is not better than then current best location estimate or that the current estimate is better than the previous best estimate (i.e., determination block=“Yes”), the new dead reckoning location estimate or newly received location information may be stored in memory as the current best location estimate in block 1522, and the procedure may reiterate and return to block 1502. The mobile device may begin the process again with a new iteration.
In block 1604, the one or more processors of the mobile device may determine whether the received externally determined location information is the first such set. If the mobile device has a previously received set of externally determined location information (i.e., block 1604=“yes”) then the mobile device may proceed to block 1606 and begin the dead reckoning procedure. If no previous externally determined location information is available (i.e., block 1606=“no”) then the mobile device may return to block 1602 and wait for receipt of a second set of externally determined location information.
In block 1804, the one or more processors of the mobile device may determine whether the mobile device has calculated a sufficient number of stride lengths from received location information. A sufficient number of stride lengths may be a predetermined minimum population size necessary for calculation of a moving average. For example, a sample size of 100 may be aggregated. At each iteration of the method, the most recent stride length calculation may be added and the moving average calculated. If a sufficient number of samples has not yet been obtained (i.e., block 1804=“no”) then the mobile device may return to block 1802 and continue calculate new stride lengths until a sample population of sufficient size is obtained. If the sample population is larger than the predetermined minimum population size (i.e., block 1804=“yes”) then an estimate may be calculated according to a specific confidence interval.
In block 1806, the one or more processors of the mobile device may determine a specific confidence interval and variance of the average stride length. In some embodiments, the selected confidence interval may be a 95% interval. The variance may be calculated using the average stride length and the confidence interval (e.g., 0.95).
In block 1810, the one or more processors of the mobile device may compare the calculated variance to the variance of the stored current best stride length estimate. If the variance is less than that of the stored current best stride length estimate (i.e., block 1810=“yes”), then in block 1812 the best stride length estimate may be updated to the newest average stride length. If the variance is greater than that of the stored current best location estimate (i.e., block 1810=“no”), then the average stride length may be discarded. In both instances, the process may return to block 1802 and update the moving average using newly received sets of externally determined location information.
In block 1906, the barometric sensor output may be processed by the one or more processors of the mobile device. Processing may include subjecting the adjusted barometric pressure sensor output to a filter such as a single layer kalman filter to reduce environmental noise. In block 1908, the filtered barometric sensor output may be used to calculate a local altitude estimate. A hypsometric function may be executed on the filtered barometric pressure sensor output to produce the local altitude estimate. The local altitude estimate may be compared to the received externally determined altitude estimate to produce a bias value.
In block 1910, the mobile device may whether a sufficient number of altitude samples have been calculated. If a sufficient number of samples has not been obtained (i.e., block 1910=“no”) then the mobile device may incorporate the local altitude estimate into a moving average, and may return to block 1902 to receive further location information. If the mobile device has calculated a sufficient number (e.g., 100 sets) of local altitude estimates, then it may normalized by applying the bias value, to produce an average altitude estimate.
In block 1912, the one or more processors of the mobile device may calculate a confidence interval and the variance of the local altitude estimate. The confidence interval may be specific and predetermined (e.g., 95%). In block 1914, the variance of the local altitude estimate may be compared with the variance of the stored current best altitude estimate (i.e., the best estimate of a previous iteration of method 1900). If the variance is less than that of the current best altitude estimate (i.e., block 1914=“yes”), then the average altitude estimate may, in block 1918, be stored as the new current best altitude estimate, and the process may reiterate, returning to block 1902. If the variance is greater than that of the current best altitude estimate (i.e., block 1914=“no”), it may be determined in block 1916, whether the variance corresponds to a 90% confidence interval. If the variance of the current best altitude estimate corresponds to a secondary range (e.g., 90%) confidence interval, the mobile device may, in block 1920, increase the frequency of barometric pressure sensor readings (i.e., reduce time interval between subsequent readings). If the variance of the average altitude estimate does not correspond to a confidence interval within the secondary range (i.e., less than 90%), then the estimate may be discarded and the process may reiterate, returning to block 1902.
In block 2006, the mobile device may calculate a current compass heading estimate using the declination information received from a service provider or stored in the mobile device, and the accelerometer and magnetometer output. Both of the sensor outputs may be subjected to filtering functions (e.g., single layer kalman filter) to remove noise, and the results may be combined in a rotational matrix to provide a local compass heading estimate. The received declination information may be compared to the local compass heading estimate, and may be a guide for adjusting the local compass heading estimate relative to true north. In block 2008, the adjusted compass heading estimate may be stored as a best compass heading estimate and the process may reiterate, returning to block 2002.
In block 2104, the one or more processors of the mobile device may determine whether the mobile device has moved since the last execution of the dead reckoning procedure. In some embodiments, movement may be determined by comparing the two sets of externally determined location information (e.g., information in operation 1702 or which is received in block 1602 of embodiment method 1600 as discussed above with respect to
In block 2106, the one or more processors of the mobile device may execute a dead reckoning algorithm. The result of the dead reckoning execution may be a set of location information and may include a latitude component, a longitude component, an altitude component, and optional declination component). In block 2108, the rest of the dead reckoning execution may be stored as the current dead reckoning location estimate.
In block 2206, the one or more processors of the mobile device may determine whether the difference between the dead reckoning location estimate and the most recent externally determined location information is below a predetermined threshold value. This value may be a measure of distance (e.g., 2, 3, or 5 meters) or may be a percentage. If the calculated difference does not lie beneath the threshold value (i.e., block 2206=“no”) then the procedure may terminate and return to block 2202 to await a new dead reckoning location estimate. If the calculated difference is beneath a threshold value (i.e., block 2206=“no”) then the mobile device may continue calculating the precise location estimate.
In block 2208, the one or more processors of the mobile device may calculate a midpoint between the dead reckoning location estimate and the externally determined location information. A result of the midpoint calculation may be set at the best location estimate in block 2210. This best location estimate may be passed to local location based service applications and transmitted to external providers. In block 2212, the precise location determination procedure employing dead reckoning may be reset and may begin a new iteration.
In block 2306, the processor may generate a best stride length estimate based on the first set of externally determined location information, the second set of externally determined location information, and an output of an accelerometer of the mobile device. The best stride length estimate may be an information structure that includes one or more information fields, component vectors, location information, position information, coordinate information, etc. Similarly, the mobile device may include, generate, compute, determine or use a best altitude estimate, best compass heading estimate, a best location estimate, a dead reckoning estimate, and various temporary position and error values, any or all of which may be information structures that each include one or more information fields, component vectors, location/position information such as coordinates, and/or other similar information.
Also in block 2306, the processor also calculate the distance between the first set of externally determined location information (i.e., information received in block 2302) and the second set of externally determined location information (i.e., information received in block 2304), add the calculated distance to a distance sum value, execute/perform a haversine function/operations on the first set of externally determined location information and the second set of externally determined location information, and determine whether a number of distances calculated (or the distance sum value) exceeds a pre-determined threshold value. The processor may continuing calculating distances (and incrementing the distance sum value) until the number of distances calculated exceeds the pre-determined threshold value. In addition, the processor may calculate an average stride length, and determine whether an error associated with the average stride length is within a pre-determined stride error threshold. The processor may update the stored best stride length estimate (e.g., a best stride length value stored in memory, etc.) based on the average stride length value in response to determining that the error associated with the average stride length falls within a pre-determined stride length error threshold. For example, the processor may overwrite the stored best stride length estimate with the average stride length value in response to determining that the error associated with the average stride length falls within a pre-determined stride length error threshold.
In block 2308, the processor may generate a best altitude estimate based on output of a barometer of the mobile device, and at least one of the first set of externally determined location information and the second set of externally determined location information. As part of these operations, the processor may calculate an altitude estimate (i.e., an altitude value, etc.) from the output of the barometer, calculate a moving average altitude value, determine whether an error associated with the moving average altitude is within a pre-determined altitude error threshold, and update a stored best altitude estimate (i.e., a best altitude value stored in memory) to the moving average altitude in response to determining that the error associated with the moving average altitude falls within a pre-determined altitude error threshold. In some embodiments, the processor may also execute kalman filter (e.g., by performing kalman filter operations, etc.) on the output of the barometer to remove observation noise and produce a filtered sensor output.
Also in block 2308, the processor may determine/compute a difference between the altitude estimate value and an altitude component/value of at least one of the first set of externally determined location information or the second set of externally determined location information to produce a bias value. The processor may then update an altitude sum value to include the difference between the altitude estimate and an altitude component of the first or second location information normalized by the bias value. In some embodiments, the processor may also be configured to increase the frequency of barometer readings in response to determining that the error associated with the moving average altitude does not fall within a pre-determined altitude error threshold.
In block 2310, the processor may generate a best compass heading estimate based on output of a magnetometer, accelerometer, and at least one of the first set of externally determined location information and the second set of externally determined location information. As part of these operations, the processor may generate rotation information based on the output of the accelerometer and the output of the magnetometer, and adjust the rotation information to an offset of true north to produce the best compass heading estimate. In some embodiments, generating the rotation information may include performing kalman filter operations on the output of the accelerometer and output of the magnetometer to produce rotation information. In some embodiments, updating the rotation information to the offset of true north may include comparing the rotation information to declination information associated with at least one of the first set of externally determined location information or the second set of externally determined location information.
In block 2312, the processor may generate dead reckoning location information based on the best stride length estimate, the best altitude estimate, and the best compass heading estimate. In block 2314, the processor may generate a best location estimate based on the dead reckoning location estimate and at least one of the first set of externally determined location information and the second set of externally determined location information. In block 2316, the processor may use the best location estimate to provide a location based service via the mobile device, such as an emergency location service, a commercial location service, an internal location service, a lawful intercept location service, etc.
The various embodiments may be implemented on a variety of mobile computing devices, an example of which is illustrated in
A typical cell phone 2400 also includes a sound encoding/decoding (CODEC) circuit which digitizes sound received from a microphone into data packets suitable for wireless transmission and decodes received sound data packets to generate analog signals that are provided to the speaker 2404 to generate sound. Also, one or more of the processor 2401, wireless transceiver 2406 and CODEC may include a digital signal processor (DSP) circuit (not shown separately). The cell phone 2400 may further include a peanut or a ZigBee transceiver (i.e., an IEEE 802.15.4 transceiver) for low-power short-range communications between wireless devices, or other similar communication circuitry (e.g., circuitry implementing the Bluetooth® or WiFi protocols, etc.).
Various embodiments may be implemented on any of a variety of commercially available server devices, such as the server 2500 illustrated in
The processors 2401, 2501, and 2502 may be any programmable microprocessor, microcomputer or multiple processor chip or chips that can be configured by software instructions (applications) to perform a variety of functions, including the functions of the various embodiments described below. In some mobile devices, multicore processors 2502 may be provided, such as one processor core dedicated to wireless communication functions and one processor core dedicated to running other applications. Typically, software applications may be stored in the internal memory 2402, 2503, and 2504 before they are accessed and loaded into the processor 2401, 2501, and 2502. The processor 2401, 2501, and 2502 may include internal memory sufficient to store the application software instructions.
The wireless device location determination techniques described herein may be implemented in conjunction with various wireless communication networks such as a wireless wide area network (WWAN), a wireless local area network (WLAN), a wireless personal area network (WPAN), and so on. The term “network” and “system” are often used interchangeably. A WWAN may be a Code Division Multiple Access (CDMA) network, a Frequency Division Multiple Access (FDMA) network, a Time Division Multiple Access (TDMA) network, an OFDMA network, a 3GPP LTE network, a WiMAX (IEEE 802.16) network, and so on. A CDMA network may implement one or more radio access technologies (RATs) such as CDMA2000, Wideband-CDMA (W-CDMA), and so on. CDMA2000 includes IS-95, IS-2000, and IS-856 standards. W-CDMA is described in documents from a consortium named “3rd Generation Partnership Project” (3GPP). CDMA2000 is described in documents from a consortium named “3rd Generation Partnership Project 2” (3GPP2). 3GPP and 3GPP2 documents are publicly available. A WLAN may be an IEEE 802.11x network, and a WPAN may be a Bluetooth network, an IEEE 802.15x, or some other type of network. The techniques may also be implemented in conjunction with any combination of WWAN, WLAN, and/or WPAN.
The various embodiments may include enhancements to the current location based service methodologies used for wireless mobile communications. Determining the location of the mobile device in a wireless network is becoming more and more important in recent years both for commercial and public safety positioning applications. Services and applications based on accurate knowledge of the location of a mobile device are becoming more prevalent in the current and future wireless communication systems Additionally Public Safety is also embarking on the use of commercial cellular technology, LTE, as a communication protocol of choice. Of specific importance is the need for improved situation awareness at an incident with first responders.
Presently GPS provides a good estimate of the mobile devices current location under optimum conditions. However in many situations and especially in building and urban environments the ability to utilize GPS for position location determination is hampered and many times is not usable. The network based solutions for determining the mobile devices location, while good, has many problems with locating the mobile device within buildings and in urban areas. The introduction of wireless network systems such as the third generation partnership project (3GPP) long-term evolution (LTE) present new capabilities has the ability in the public safety band to provide excellent coverage in urban and indoor environments. Although the wireless mobile networks can provide coverage in urban and in-building environments the location information position accuracy has limitations.
Better positional location accuracy and confidence has many advantages for use in emergency location services, commercial location services, internal location services and lawful intercept location services. The various embodiments provide the ability to improve the positional location information for both new and existing wireless networks.
For commercial applications the ability to have the mobile device improve location specific information within a multiple story building, in an urban environment or within a mall provides both network radio resource improvements and has unique advertising targeting capabilities as well as applications for improved fleet management, asset tracking and various machine to machine communications applications where positional determination is required to be highly accurate. For commercial users the need for improves position location information accuracy is most needed for in-building environments where the location of the mobile device can be more accurately pin pointed for location based services
The advantage of law enforcement with improved positional information will enable the tracking of mobile devices inside a building to enable determination of what floor or part of the building the device is being used is located without the need for replacing radio beacons or location aware access points.
For emergency services the advantage comes to better positional location of the part in need of assistance especially in an urban environment where the positional information is most problematic with existing techniques.
For first responders this enhancement enables mobile devices which are in the same scene to help augment their position coordinates with each other in a controlled ad-hoc environment. The positional information shared not only includes latitude and longitude but also altitude and velocity. Since this information involves a small amount of data the mobile devices can have the E-SMLC in the case of LTE share the information both on net and off-net.
The use of sensors including accelerometers, gyroscopes, magnetometers and pressure sensors along with GPS receivers with mobile devices is becoming more prevalent. Therefore the enhancements for positional location will give the E-SMLC in the case of LTE the ability to not only utilize GPS or Network derived coordinate information but also to have an augmentation with sensors associated the mobile device which can include accelerometers, gyroscopes, magnetometer and pressure sensors for refining and reducing some of the positional uncertainties that are in inherent to wireless positional determination.
Wireless mobile network like LTE the position location information accuracy needs to be improved for in building environments in addition to providing more accurate location information about where the mobile devices are actually located. Whether the mobile device is used by a first responder, commercial cellular user or a combination of both.
Positional location improvement enable improved situation awareness, improved telemetry, and improved overall communication with the incident commander. In addition, the mobile devices proximity location to other mobile devices can and will change dynamically allowing for resources to be added and/or reassigned as the need arises for operational requirements.
The foregoing method descriptions and the process flow diagrams are provided merely as illustrative examples and are not intended to require or imply that the blocks of the various embodiments must be performed in the order presented. As will be appreciated by one of skill in the art the order of blocks in the foregoing embodiments may be performed in any order. Words such as “thereafter,” “then,” “next,” etc. are not intended to limit the order of the blocks; these words are simply used to guide the reader through the description of the methods. Further, any reference to claim elements in the singular, for example, using the articles “a,” “an” or “the” is not to be construed as limiting the element to the singular.
The various illustrative logical blocks, modules, circuits, and algorithm blocks described in connection with the embodiments disclosed herein may be implemented as electronic hardware, computer software, or combinations of both. To clearly illustrate this interchangeability of hardware and software, various illustrative components, blocks, modules, circuits, and blocks have been described above generally in terms of their functionality. Whether such functionality is implemented as hardware or software depends upon the particular application and design constraints imposed on the overall system. Skilled artisans may implement the described functionality in varying ways for each particular application, but such implementation decisions should not be interpreted as causing a departure from the scope of the present invention.
The hardware used to implement the various illustrative logics, logical blocks, modules, and circuits described in connection with the embodiments disclosed herein may be implemented or performed with a general purpose processor, a digital signal processor (DSP), an application specific integrated circuit (ASIC), a field programmable gate array (FPGA) or other programmable logic device, discrete gate or transistor logic, discrete hardware components, or any combination thereof designed to perform the functions described herein. A general-purpose processor may be a microprocessor, but, in the alternative, the processor may be any conventional processor, controller, microcontroller, or state machine. A processor may also be implemented as a combination of computing devices, e.g., a combination of a DSP and a microprocessor, a plurality of microprocessors, one or more microprocessors in conjunction with a DSP core, or any other such configuration. Alternatively, some blocks or methods may be performed by circuitry that is specific to a given function.
In one or more exemplary aspects, the functions described may be implemented in hardware, software, firmware, or any combination thereof. If implemented in software, the functions may be stored as one or more instructions or code on a non-transitory computer-readable medium or non-transitory processor-readable medium. The steps of a method or algorithm disclosed herein may be embodied in a processor-executable software module which may reside on a non-transitory computer-readable or processor-readable storage medium. Non-transitory computer-readable or processor-readable storage media may be any storage media that may be accessed by a computer or a processor. By way of example but not limitation, such non-transitory computer-readable or processor-readable media may include RAM, ROM, EEPROM, FLASH memory, CD-ROM or other optical disk storage, magnetic disk storage or other magnetic storage devices, or any other medium that may be used to store desired program code in the form of instructions or data structures and that may be accessed by a computer. Disk and disc, as used herein, includes compact disc (CD), laser disc, optical disc, digital versatile disc (DVD), floppy disk, and blu-ray disc where disks usually reproduce data magnetically, while discs reproduce data optically with lasers. Combinations of the above are also included within the scope of non-transitory computer-readable and processor-readable media. Additionally, the operations of a method or algorithm may reside as one or any combination or set of codes and/or instructions on a non-transitory processor-readable medium and/or computer-readable medium, which may be incorporated into a computer program product.
The preceding description of the disclosed embodiments is provided to enable any person skilled in the art to make or use the present invention. Various modifications to these embodiments will be readily apparent to those skilled in the art, and the generic principles defined herein may be applied to other embodiments without departing from the spirit or scope of the invention. Thus, the present invention is not intended to be limited to the embodiments shown herein but is to be accorded the widest scope consistent with the following claims and the principles and novel features disclosed herein.
This application is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 14/951,662, entitled “Method and System for Providing Enhanced Location Based Information for Wireless Handsets using Dead Reckoning” filed on Nov. 25, 2015, which is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 14/735,210, entitled “Method and System for Providing Enhanced Location Based Information for Wireless Handsets using Dead Reckoning” filed on Jun. 10, 2015, which is a continuation in part of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 14/293,056 entitled “Method and System for Providing Enhanced Location Based Information for Wireless Handsets” filed on Jun. 2, 2014, which is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/585,125 entitled “Method and System for Providing Enhanced Location Based Information for Wireless Handsets” filed Aug. 14, 2012, and which claims the benefit of priority of U.S. Provisional Application No. 61/575,300, entitled “Method and System for Providing Enhanced Location Based Information for Wireless Handsets” filed Aug. 18, 2011, and U.S. Provisional Application No. 61/573,636, entitled “Method and System for Providing Enhanced Location Based Information for Wireless Handsets” filed Sep. 9, 2011, the entire contents of all of which are hereby incorporated by reference.
| Number | Name | Date | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| 7298327 | Dupray | Nov 2007 | B2 |
| 7764231 | Karr et al. | Jul 2010 | B1 |
| 8032153 | Dupray | Oct 2011 | B2 |
| 8180379 | Forstall | May 2012 | B2 |
| 8260320 | Herz | Sep 2012 | B2 |
| 8290513 | Forstall | Oct 2012 | B2 |
| 8326315 | Phillips | Dec 2012 | B2 |
| 8359643 | Low et al. | Jan 2013 | B2 |
| 8626198 | Das | Jan 2014 | B2 |
| 9173065 | Smith et al. | Oct 2015 | B2 |
| 9258675 | Smith | Feb 2016 | B2 |
| 9538498 | Smith | Jan 2017 | B2 |
| 20050049787 | Cho | Mar 2005 | A1 |
| 20060270421 | Phillips | Nov 2006 | A1 |
| 20070232319 | Bells et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
| 20070275730 | Bienas et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
| 20080242258 | Lim | Oct 2008 | A1 |
| 20090047973 | MacHaughtan et al. | Feb 2009 | A1 |
| 20090079622 | Seshadri et al. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
| 20090149202 | Hill et al. | Jun 2009 | A1 |
| 20090209268 | Ha et al. | Aug 2009 | A1 |
| 20100062792 | Han et al. | Mar 2010 | A1 |
| 20100076677 | Bussmann et al. | Mar 2010 | A1 |
| 20110009130 | Wu | Jan 2011 | A1 |
| 20110025494 | Adcook et al. | Feb 2011 | A1 |
| 20110124347 | Chen et al. | May 2011 | A1 |
| 20110151892 | Vengroff et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
| 20110171973 | Beck et al. | Jul 2011 | A1 |
| 20110207471 | Murray | Aug 2011 | A1 |
| 20110227788 | Lundgren et al. | Sep 2011 | A1 |
| 20110276556 | Meier et al. | Nov 2011 | A1 |
| 20120077522 | Mate | Mar 2012 | A1 |
| 20120286997 | Lin et al. | Nov 2012 | A1 |
| 20130231130 | Cherian et al. | Sep 2013 | A1 |
| 20130281120 | Oka et al. | Oct 2013 | A1 |
| 20130297690 | Lucero | Nov 2013 | A1 |
| 20140248904 | Meredith et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
| 20140368382 | Vartanian et al. | Dec 2014 | A1 |
| 20150133162 | Meredith | May 2015 | A1 |
| 20150281884 | Smith | Oct 2015 | A1 |
| Number | Date | Country |
|---|---|---|
| 2011037214 | Mar 2011 | WO |
| Entry |
|---|
| Notification of Transmittal of International Search Report and the Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority, or the Declaration issued for International Application No. PCT/US2016/064335 dated Feb. 7, 2017. |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 20170079008 A1 | Mar 2017 | US |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 61573636 | Sep 2011 | US | |
| 61575300 | Aug 2011 | US |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Parent | 14951662 | Nov 2015 | US |
| Child | 15361966 | US | |
| Parent | 14935210 | Jun 2015 | US |
| Child | 14951662 | US | |
| Parent | 13585125 | Aug 2012 | US |
| Child | 14293056 | US |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Parent | 14293056 | Jun 2014 | US |
| Child | 14935210 | US |
