The present invention relates generally to synthetic sports fields and more specifically to a modular indoor/outdoor synthetic sports turf.
Synthetic grass sports surfaces are well known. These surfaces are becoming increasingly popular as replacements for natural grass surfaces in stadiums, playgrounds, golf driving ranges, and other facilities where natural grass is typically utilized. The synthetic grass surfaces stand up to wear much better than the natural grass surfaces, do not require as much maintenance, and can be used in partially or fully enclosed stadiums where natural grass cannot typically be grown.
Most synthetic grass surfaces comprise rows of strips or ribbons of synthetic grass-like material, extending vertically from a backing mat with particulate material infill in between the ribbons on the mat. One or more layers of aggregate material are typically introduced between the backing mat and on top of a smoothed and compacted subgrade. The surfaces are preferably crowned to promote water drainage.
The ribbons of synthetic grass-like material usually extend a short distance above the layer of particulate material and represent blades of grass. The length of these fibers is dictated by the end use of the playing surface. For example, football fields utilize fibers that are longer than golf driving range surfaces.
The particulate material usually comprises sand, as shown by way of example in U.S. Pat. No. 3,995,079 and U.S. Pat. No. 4,389,435, both to Haas, Jr. The particulate matter can also comprise a mixture of sand and other materials, including rubber infill, as shown, for example, in U.S. Pat. No. 6,338,885 to Prevost. In these systems, the rubber infill and sand together provide resiliency to the synthetic grass surfaces. In addition, the sand particles add weight to hold down the backing material, thus helping to ensure that the strips of synthetic grass do not move or shift during play.
While the growth of synthetic grass surfaces has grown exponentially over the past quarter century, the technology used in forming the grass surfaces and laying the synthetic fields is still relatively new. For example, there is no current technology available for easily installing and subsequently removing the synthetic grass surfaces for indoor multipurpose stadiums that utilize the arenas for substantially different sporting events and concerts.
To install a typical indoor synthetic grass field, strips of synthetic turf are unrolled and aligned on the floor or onto a level subgrade previously installed over the floor. Each strip of turf is then sewn together to the next adjacent strip(s) to ensure that no gaps exist between the strips. A layer of infill is then introduced over the strips of turf, leveled and groomed. This process is time consuming and labor intensive.
To remove the field, the infill must first be removed. The process of removing the infill is tedious and inefficient, as millions of small particles of sand and/or rubber are difficult to pick up and remove. Next, the strips must be removed one at a time. To accomplish this, the seams must be cut or otherwise un-sewn. The strips must then be re-rolled and removed. Finally, if a level subgrade is added over the flooring, it must also be removed. As such, the indoor venue may not be ready for other events for several days.
Because of the time and expense in removing these indoor synthetic fields, it is more likely that the fields will remain in place while other events within the venue are staged. For example, in late 2003, Ford Field in Detroit, Mich. staged a collegiate basketball game between Michigan State University and the University of Kentucky. In this game, a basketball floor was installed over the synthetic grass surface, rather than removing the grass surface, a process that was potentially damaging to the underlying grass surface.
It is thus highly desirable to produce a synthetic grass surface having desired playability while being easy to install and remove that is especially ideal for use in indoor multipurpose sporting arenas.
The present invention is directed to a modular synthetic grass surface that can be used in all types of end use applications. The present invention is also directed at a method for installing and removing the playing field utilizing this modular concept.
The present invention discloses a modular synthetic grass playing surface system formed from a plurality of modular synthetic grass units. Each modular synthetic grass unit has a synthetic grass layer placed upon predetermined sized pallets having a pre-installed elastomeric layer. A layer of resilient particles, preferably cryogenic or ambiently ground rubber infill particles, may optionally be introduced to the top surface of the modular unit, depending upon the characteristics of the synthetic grass layer. A corrugated plastic sleeve is installed around each formed modular unit having a resilient particle infill while the modular unit is stored and moved.
A plurality of modular units, having the optional corrugated plastic sheet removed, are then installed onto a relatively flat surface to form the playing surface in a desired shape and size. The installation of each modular unit is accomplished by using forklifts or other suitable equipment to move the modular units to the desired location to form the synthetic grass playing surface. The modular units are then preferably fastened together to form, the larger field surface.
To remove the field, the forklift simply removes each of the modular units one at a time. The corrugated plastic sheet is reinstalled to ensure that the rubber infill remains on the top surface of the modular unit when the unit is stored for subsequent use.
The present invention thus allows synthetic turf fields to be easily installed and removed in a fraction of the time and expense typically need in prior art synthetic surfaces as described above. The present invention also forms a field that can be easily stored in efficient and space-limiting manner.
Other objects and advantages of the present invention will become apparent upon considering the following detailed description and appended claims, and upon reference to the accompanying drawings.
The playing surface 20 may have a series of numbers 34, letters 36, logos 38, yard lines 40, sideline markings 42 and/or other markings 44 (collectively features 46), preferably inlaid or stenciled, within or on the surface of one or more modular units 22.
As best shown in
After the pallets 52 are fastened together to form the unit 22, as shown in
A 1-inch by 5-inch wood form is placed around the outer surfaces of the pallet 52 forming the unit 52 for a period of about three days to allow elastomeric material layer 62 to settle onto the surface 54 of the pallets to “relieve” the elastomeric layer. The wood form is then removed.
Next, a synthetic grass surface 64 is adhered on top of the elastomeric material 62 using an adhesive 70. One preferred adhesive is Nordot 346, available from Nordot Industries. In alternative embodiments, the synthetic grass surface may be coupled to the elastomeric material (and also to the underlying pallet) using one of more conventional fasteners with or without the use of an adhesive 70.
The synthetic grass surface 64 has a plurality of fibrillated yarn strands 66 tufted (stitched) through a backing layer 68 in rows separated by a first distance, or gauge.
The strands 66 are preferably fibrillated polyethylene fibers having a blade thickness of about 80–110 microns, a fiber width of about 12 millimeters, and a pile length that varies from 0.5 to 2.5 inches depending upon end use. For football fields, longer pile lengths around 2.5 inches are preferred. For soccer fields, wherein the soccer ball moves generally along the grass surface, shorter pile lengths of about 1.5 inches are generally preferred.
Three preferred strands 66 particularly suited for football fields are Thiolon XPS, Thiolon XP and Thiolon LSR fibrillated polyethylene strands, each available from TC Thiolon USA of Dayton, Tenn. The Thiolon XPS and XP strands do not have as many fibrils as the Thiolon LSR strand, therein producing a thicker, heartier blade when fully fibrillated. One synthetic grass surface 64 utilizing the Thiolon XPE version of the strands is GameDay Grass Xpe, manufactured for General Sports Turf Systems or Rochester, Mich., by TC Thiolon USA of Dayton, Tenn.
In conjunction with pile length, blade thickness, and fiber width, the strands 66 have a certain mass per unit length, or denier, that contributes to the overall plushness and playability of the field. Larger deniers equate to strands 66 having a larger mass per unit length. Thus, where high plushness is desired, such as with sports surface such as football and soccer fields, the strands 66 have a denier of at least 10000, while other non-sports related fields 20 may have deniers of less than 10000. Each of these Thiolon strands described above has a denier of about 10,000 and 100-micron thickness.
The strands 66, when applied to the backing 68 will be configured to lay a particular way on the backing. In other words, the tufting process is performed such that the uppermost ends 66A of the strands 66 lying above the tufted portion 66B will naturally fall substantially in the same direction. The grain of the unit 22 can therefore be classified as “with the grain” or “against the grain”, depending upon an observer's relative position. A “with the grain” positioning is thus defined wherein the uppermost end 66A of the strand 66 has fallen in a direction away from a viewer's eye relative to the tufted portion 66B of the strand, while an “against the grain” positioning is defined wherein the uppermost end 80A of the strand 66 falls towards a viewer's eye. The importance of this grain classification will become evident below.
In addition, the strands 66 are stitched into the backing layer 68 at a stitch rate of between about 7 and 24 stitches per 3-inch period. The strands 66 have a gauge of between ⅛ and ½ inch, depending upon the end use application of the field. The smaller the gauge, the plusher the field. In addition, a smaller gauge adds additional barriers to prevent the movement of the infill 96 during use and weather conditions such as rainfall and wind, as additional rows of strands 80 physically prevent infill 96 movement.
The stitch pattern of strands 66 within the backing layer 68 may vary depending upon the desired look and plushness. For example, the strands 66 are stitched in a substantially linear pattern, in a “lazy s” pattern, or in a single herringbone or double herringbone pattern. In particular, the single herringbone pattern and the double herringbone pattern are preferable for use on fields having a crown from the center to the sides, in that these patterns help to prevent the overlaid infill 96 from washing away from the center towards the sides during heavy rainstorms.
The gauge, as people of ordinary skill in the carpeting understand, refers to the average distance between rows of fiber strands 66. The smaller the gauge, the more fibers per unit distance, and hence the plusher the field.
The GameDay Grass Xpe, one of the preferred grass surfaces 64 described above, is a 10000 denier grass surface having a 2 and ¾ inch pile height, ⅜ inch gauge, 100 micron fiber thickness, and 12 mm fiber width.
In addition, the grass surface 64 may be tufted with yarn strands 66 having varying colors tufted to form the desired feature 46, such as a logo 38 or number 34. Alternatively, after the individual modular units 22 are formed, the features 46 may be inlaid or stenciled onto the surface.
In the inlaying process, a template is introduced onto the surface 64 of the modular unit 22 at a position determined by laser plotting or some other kind of alignment technique. A cutting utensil is used to cut through the backing layers 68 corresponding to the edges of the stencil within an opening. The cut out portion of the field 64 is removed, therein leaving an opening. An adhesive 100 is then applied within the opening, and a new section of the synthetic grass material 64, colored as desired, corresponding in size to the cut out portion, is then laid onto the adhesive within the opening. A border of a third color may be installed around the new section in substantially the same manner.
In the stenciling process, a template is introduced onto the surface 64 at a position determined by laser plotting or some other kind of alignment technique. A can of spray paint is then sprayed within the opening of the template onto the surface 64. The template is removed and the paint is allowed to dry, therein forming the feature 64. The process may be repeated to introduce a border or to introduce other colors within the painted regions.
The backing material 68 preferably provides dimensional stability to the grass surface 64. One preferred backing material 68 is formed from one or more layers of a double woven polypropylene/polyethylene warp and weft layer. Another preferred backing material 68 is a woven polypropylene/polyethylene layer having a construction polypropylene warp fiber of 94 threads per 10 cm and a construction polyester weft fiber of 63 threads per 10 cm.
A secondary coating is applied to the woven layers of the backing material 68 to seal the strands 66 to the backing layer 68 and to add a layer of dimensional stability to the backing 68. The secondary coating is applied at about 24 to 30 ounces per square foot onto the woven component of the backing material 68.
One preferred backing material 68 is Thiobac™, available from TC Thiolon USA of Dayton, Tenn.
Alternatively, a backing material 68 may be formed from two or more layers of woven backing materials coupled together. A secondary coating is applied to the woven layers to seal the strands 66 to the backing layer 68 and to add a layer of dimensional stability to the backing 68. The secondary coating is applied at about 24 to 30 ounces per square foot onto the backing material 68.
Next, a resilient particle infill 96 is preferably introduced on top of the synthetic grass surface 64 at a thickness commensurate with the pile length of the strands 66 that allows the uppermost end 66A to extend above the thickness of the infill 96. For the football field, the thickness is between approximately 0.5 and 3 inches and has a density of between about 3 and 3.5 pounds per square foot. The resilient particle infill 96 preferably is composed of cryogenically ground vulcanized scrap rubber having a sieve of between approximately 8 and 30, and more preferably between 10 and 15. This rubber is preferably 100 percent recycled post-consumer automobile tires, and therein provides an environmentally friendly use for these products. However, other cryogenically ground vulcanized rubber products that meet the desired specifications may be utilized as the infill 96, alone or in combination with automobile tire rubber. For example, ground rubber recycled rubber may come from certain types of shoes. In addition, other resilient particles, including crumb rubber, cork, or polymer beads, for example, may compose a portion of the resilient particle infill 96.
In addition, and specifically for indoor facilities, a portion or all of cryogenically ground rubber may be replaced by ambiently ground rubber. As those of ordinary skill in the art recognize, however, ambiently ground rubber produces irregular jagged shaped particles that may not be beneficial for sports surfaces. In addition, the process for forming the rubber particles may degrade the rubber due to excess heat buildup. Also, and most relevant in the case of outdoor sports fields, excess heat generated by environmental conditions (the sun and outdoor air temperature) may act to degrade the rubber infill. As such, ambiently ground rubber is not desirable for outdoor sports playing surfaces.
After the infill 96 is introduced, a corrugated plastic sleeve 74 is introduced around the modular unit 22. The sleeve 74 functions to prevent the infill 96 from falling off the modular unit 22 during storage and transportation. To accomplish this, the sleeve 74 extends slightly higher than the top surface of the synthetic grass surface 64.
The sleeve 74 may also be affixed to the modular unit by any number of mechanisms well known in the art. For example, the sleeve 74 could be nailed or screwed to the side of the modular unit 22. Preferably, however, the sleeve 74 substantially conforms to the side surfaces of the modular unit without any affixation.
In alternative embodiments, plusher grass surface may be formed utilizing the so-called knit-to-knit process, in which the shorter strands of polyethylene fibers are tufted in tighter configurations (i.e. smaller gauge). The plushness of grass surfaces utilizing the knit-to-knit process has sufficient resilience that does not require the introduction of a resilient particle infill 96 and corrugated plastic sleeves 74. In this embodiment, an additional layer of resilient padding (not shown) is introduced between the backing material and the elastomeric layer for added bounce.
Next, in Step 110, a corresponding number of stacked modular units 22 are unloaded one at a time by placing the forks of a standard forklift within the respective openings 60 in the side of one of the pallets 52.
In Step 120, the units 22 are placed next to each other in the desired configuration (for example, as shown in
In Step 130, the plastic sleeves 74 of each respective placed unit 22, in units having an infill layer 96, are removed and the units 22 moved together with respective side regions of adjacent units 22 substantially abutting one another. In this configuration, the synthetic grass surface 64 of each modular unit 22 is substantially level with respect to the synthetic grass layer 64 of the next adjacent modular unit 22 to form a substantially level playing surface.
In Step 140, the units 22 are optionally fastened together with ⅜-inch all-thread rods with coarse-thread hex nuts and with 5/16-inch washers on top and bottom. This step is optional but preferable, as the units 22 have sufficient weight to prevent shifting during play. A 3.5-inch by 1-inch c-channel may also be introduced through the center of the units 22 to aid in stabilizing the units.
In Step 150, a groomer device is introduced to the playing surface 64 to ensure that the infill 96 is substantially level and evenly distributed across the top surface. A brush may also be applied to the grass strands 66 to ensure complete fibrillation.
In Step 160, the field 20 is inspected to ensure that the playing surface is in a desired playing condition.
To disassemble the field, as shown in Step 170, simply repeat steps 100–140 in reverse order.
The modular concept of the present invention thus allows synthetic turf fields 20 to be easily installed and removed in a fraction of the time and expense typically need in prior art synthetic surfaces as described above. This allows stadiums and venues utilizing such units 20 to be able to potentially schedule more events in any calendar year, therein increasing profitability of the respective venue. The modular units 22 are easily transportable and stackable, therein allowing for efficient and space-limiting storage.
While the invention has been described in terms of preferred embodiments, it will be understood, of course, that the invention is not limited thereto since modifications may be made by those skilled in the art, particularly in light of the foregoing teachings.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3513062 | Vinicki | May 1970 | A |
3661687 | Spinney et al. | May 1972 | A |
3735988 | Palmer et al. | May 1973 | A |
3935352 | Toland | Jan 1976 | A |
3995079 | Haas, Jr. | Nov 1976 | A |
4061804 | McCulloch | Dec 1977 | A |
4389435 | Haas, Jr. | Jun 1983 | A |
4571353 | Gable, Jr. | Feb 1986 | A |
4637942 | Tomarin | Jan 1987 | A |
4755401 | Friedrich et al. | Jul 1988 | A |
5082712 | Starp | Jan 1992 | A |
5292130 | Hooper | Mar 1994 | A |
5309846 | Peterson | May 1994 | A |
5595021 | Ripley et al. | Jan 1997 | A |
5673513 | Casimaty | Oct 1997 | A |
5958527 | Prevost | Sep 1999 | A |
6263616 | Hummer | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6338885 | Prevost | Jan 2002 | B1 |
6723413 | Walters | Apr 2004 | B1 |
6740387 | Lemieux | May 2004 | B1 |
6767595 | Prevost et al. | Jul 2004 | B1 |
20020136846 | Prevost | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20030118755 | Motz et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20040058096 | Prevost | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040081771 | Waterford | Apr 2004 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20050158482 A1 | Jul 2005 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
60537754 | Jan 2004 | US |