The present invention relates to a non-destructive method for characterizing a material and particularly applies to materials consisting of light chemical elements.
Devices for characterizing materials make use of the absorption of X-radiation transmitted through the objects to be examined, in order to identify the constituent materials thereof. These devices are however unsuitable for bulky or dense objects.
Further devices are based on backscatter. This technology only requires access to a single side of the suspect object to be inspected. In this case, the X-ray photon source and the detector are situated on the same side of the object. The X-ray photons scatter in the object rather than passing therethrough.
This technique becomes a good inspection tool for the detection and identification of materials wherein the constituent atoms have low atomic numbers, for example less than 10. These materials consist of carbon, oxygen, hydrogen, nitrogen, or fluorine. In this case, the Compton scattering phenomenon is predominant in relation to the photoelectric effect absorption phenomenon at the energies conventionally used, between approximately 50 and 200 keV.
The method described in the patent application WO 2011/009833, considered by the applicant to be close prior art, is a first approach for identifying materials using non-destructive measurements, by producing a spectrum of the backscattered radiation. This method enables an estimation of the density of the material, based on estimations of a coefficient μ′(E), called combined attenuation coefficient, at different energies. This method is also suitable for determining the ratio Zeff/A, Zeff being a quantity characterizing the material studied, called effective atomic number and A being described as the normalized molar mass of the material. The present patent application relates to an alternative to the method described in this prior patent application.
The aim of the present invention is that of providing a method for characterizing a constituent material of an object, this material being a pure substance or a mixture of pure substances, and a device for characterizing the material, this method and this device has having the above limitations and problems.
As a general rule, the invention is suitable for the detection and identification of material wherein the atoms have low atomic numbers, for example less than 10. It relates for example to materials consisting of carbon, oxygen, hydrogen, nitrogen or fluorine.
One aim of the invention is that of providing a reliable method for characterizing objects comprising light elements and for example organic materials.
This characterization may be performed regardless of the nature of the object and the position of the materials in the object.
A further aim of the invention is that of providing a method to be able to readily distinguish water in relation to other liquids comprising for example organic materials.
To achieve this aim, the present invention proposes to use the spectral signature scattered by an object, irradiated by an incident ionizing photon beam, this spectral signature being output by a detector.
More specifically, the invention is a method for characterizing a material comprising the following steps:
a) arranging an object made of the material to be characterized, a collimated ionizing photon source having a collimation axis and a collimated detector having a collimation axis, such that the two collimation axes are secant in the material of the object and define a scatter depth in the material of the object and a scatter angle different to zero,
b) irradiating the object with ionizing photons generated by the source and acquiring, by means of the detector, a first energy spectrum corresponding to scatter of a first ionizing photon flux at a first scatter depth according to said scatter angle and a second energy spectrum corresponding to scatter of a second ionizing photon flux at a second scatter depth according to said scatter angle, the ionizing photons passing through the material by paths before and after scattering such that the ratio of the paths before and after scattering, called asymmetry factor, is substantially constant from one acquisition to another,
c) determining a combined linear attenuation function based on the two energy spectra after scattering and the path difference travelled by the ionizing photons before and after scattering from one acquisition to another,
d) selecting in this combined linear attenuation function a plurality of energy ranges,
e) calculating in each energy range a representative quantity of the combined linear attenuation function,
f) estimating on the basis of at least two of these quantities, at least one physical characteristic of the material to be characterized, by means of a comparison with the same quantities obtained using known materials.
This comparison may be carried out using an existing relation between the same quantities of known materials, called standard materials, and the known physical characteristic of said standard materials, this relation being suitable for being established experimentally, by calculation or by simulation.
Advantageously, to be specific, in step e), the representative quantity of the combined linear attenuation function is a statistical indicator such as a mean or an integral.
For the purposes of simplification, the asymmetry factor may be substantially equal to one.
During the selection of the two energy ranges, one so-called lower range comprises at least one energy less than those of the other so-called upper range, the physical characteristic of the material to be characterized estimated in step f) then being the atomic number thereof or the mass effective atomic number thereof according to whether the material to be characterized is a pure substance or a mixture.
It is preferable that in step f), a ratio between said two quantities is produced.
The lower range is advantageously between approximately 20 and 50 keV and the upper range between approximately 50 and 150 keV.
Furthermore, in step d), it is possible to select a third energy range, that comprising at least one energy greater than those of the lower range, in step f) the characteristic of the material to be characterized then being the density thereof.
Advantageously, the third energy range is between approximately 50 and 150 keV.
When, in step f), at least two physical characteristics of the material to be characterized are estimated, the method may further comprise a step for identifying the material to be characterized consisting of:
The comparison is preferably performed according to a geometric proximity criterion or a probabilistic criterion.
The present invention also relates to a device for characterizing a material comprising:
The present invention will be understood more clearly on reading the description of the merely indicative and in no way limiting examples of embodiments given, with reference to the appended figures wherein:
Identical, similar or equivalent parts of the various figures described hereinafter bear the same reference numbers for easier transition from one figure to another.
The various parts represented in the figures are not necessarily represented on a uniform scale, to render the figures easier to read.
Reference will be made to
The device comprises an ionizing photon source 10 and an advantageously spectrometric detector 11. It is assumed that the energies used are those typically output by X or gamma ionizing photons, and that they are typically between a few keV and approximately 300 keV. It is also assumed that, in the example described, at least one object 100 made of material to be characterized is used and that this object 100 consists of a single material, this material being a pure substance or a mixture of pure substances. It has been represented as a substantially rectangular block. Other shapes may obviously be used provided that the shape and the position of the surface of the object in relation to the source and the detector are known.
The ionizing photon source 10 and spectrometric detector 11 are collimated and each have a central collimation axis and the collimation angle is generally small, preferentially less than approximately 10° and more particularly less than 5° C. The collimator of the ionizing photon source 10 is referenced 10.1 and the collimator of the spectrometric detector 11 is referenced 11.1. The central collimation axes are referenced 10.2 and 11.2 in
The ionizing photon source 10 is intended to produce an incident ionizing photon beam 12 wherein the spectrum is a function of the energy E0.
The incident ionizing photon beam 12 penetrates the material of the object 100, at a substantially plane zone, and scatters in an inspection volume δV, situated at a given scatter depth. Attenuation occurs between the emission by the ionizing photon source 10 and the inspection volume δV. A scattered ionizing photon beam 13 is generated and it is detected by the spectrometric detector 11. Attenuation occurs between the inspection volume δV and the spectrometric detector 11. These incident and scattered ionizing photon beams each have a central axis. The central axis of the incident ionizing photon beam 12 corresponds to the central collimation axis 10.2 of the source 10. Similarly, the central axis of the scattered and detected ionizing photon beam 13 corresponds to the central collimation axis 11.2 of the detector 11.
The inspection volume δV corresponds to the intersection between the incident ionizing photon beam 12 and the scattered ionizing photon beam 13 to the spectrometric detector 11. Due to the collimation of the ionizing photon source 10 and the spectrometric detector 11, the incident and scattered ionizing photon beams are defined spatially, and the intersection thereof in the material to be characterized of the object 100 defines an inspection volume δV. This inspection volume δV is relatively small, typically in the region of one cubic centimeter. The collimation angles of the ionizing photon source 10 and the spectrometric detector 11 will be chosen accordingly. The incident ionizing photon beam 12 and the detected scattered ionizing photon beam 13 are separated by a scatter angle θ, as illustrated in
The object 100 will be irradiated with the incident ionizing photon beam 12 so as to obtain an inspection volume δV at a given scatter depth in the material of the object 100 and, using the spectrometric detector 11, the scattered ionizing photon flux will be acquired, the spectrometric detector 11 thus performs acquisitions of the scattered ionizing photon flux. This scattered ionizing photon flux, annotated X(E1), corresponds to the number of ionizing photons reaching the sensitive surface of the spectrometric detector 11. As seen hereinafter, at least two consecutive acquisitions of the scattered ionizing photon flux are made. For this, the ionizing photon source 10, the spectrometric detector 11 and the object 100 are moved in relation to each other, such that scattering occurs at different scatter depths in the material of the object. Means for moving the source and/or the detector and/or the object in relation to each other have been represented with the reference 110. The two positions are illustrated in
The device for characterizing the material further comprises means 200 for processing the two energy spectra output by the spectrometric detector 11. They will be described in more detail hereinafter.
By limiting itself to the first Compton scatter, the incident ionizing photon beam 12 at the energy E0 emitted by the ionizing photon source 10 is subject to three interaction processes before reaching the spectrometric detector 11. The first is an attenuation in the material to be characterized before scatter in the inspection volume, the second is the scatter, the third being an attenuation in the material to be characterized after scatter.
When performing the two acquisitions, it is ensured that the ratio between the lengths of the paths travelled by the ionizing photons in the material to be characterized before scatter and after scatter remain substantially constant from one acquisition to another. The term lbef refers to the length of the path travelled by the ionizing photons in the material to be characterized before scatter. The term laft refers to the length of the path travelled by the ionizing photons in the material to be characterized after scatter. The term asymmetry factor ε denotes the ratio lbef/laft. It could equally well have been possible to study another asymmetry factor ε′ corresponding to the ratio laft/lbef and thus equalling 1/ε. The ionizing photon source 10, the spectrometric detector 11 and the sample 100, are positioned during both acquisitions, such that the asymmetry factor ε remains substantially constant.
The ionizing photon flux X(E1) scattered in the inspection volume δV and having reached the sensitive front face of the spectrometric detector may be expressed with the formula (1), it is then assumed that the material is a mixture of pure substances:
wherein:
Hereinafter in the application, the quantity Zeff-m corresponding to the mass effective atomic number of the material to be characterized, this material being a mixture, will also be used. It is of the same type as the atomic number for a pure substance. It is expressed by
ωi is the mass percentage of the atom i in the material.
If the material to be characterized is a pure substance, formula (1) will comprise instead of Zeff-a and Anorm respectively Z and A, i.e. the atomic number and the molar mass of the pure substance. In this case, Zeff-m is also equal to Z.
During an acquisition with a given inspection volume, at a given scatter depth, the spectrometric detector thus outputs a signal X(E1) which is the energy spectrum of the scattered flux in the inspected volume δV according to the scatter angle θ. The detector 11 comprises means 11.3 for outputting such energy spectra.
By compiling in formula (1) all the independent terms of the material into a single coefficient annotated k(E1), formula (1) is simplified, becoming formula (1′):
Combined linear attenuation function denotes the term μ′(E1, ε) hereinafter expressed as μ′(E1). It is the sum of the linear attenuation function at the incident energy E0 before scatter and the linear attenuation function at the scattered energy E1 after scatter, one of the attenuation functions being weighted by an asymmetry factor. When the weighting affects the linear attenuation function at the incident energy E0, the asymmetry factor ε is used and when the weighting affects the linear attenuation function at the scattered energy E1, the asymmetry factor ε′ is used. In the example described, the combined linear attenuation function is expressed by formula (2):
μ′(E1)=μ(E1,Z)+ε·μ(E0,z) (2)
It is then possible to calculate directly the combined linear attenuation function μ′(E1) which is expressed by formula (3):
laft1 and laft2 are the lengths of the path travelled by the ionizing photons in the material to be characterized, after scatter, for one of the acquisitions, or for the other acquisition. The term Δl is called the path difference. When the asymmetry factor is such that ε=lbef/laft then Δl=laft2−laft1.
In the case whether the asymmetry factor is defined by ε′=laft/lbef, it can be demonstrated that:
where μ′(E1)=ε′·μ(E1,Z)+μ(E0,Z)
The path difference Δl is then such that Δl=lbef2−lbef1, lbef1 and lbef2 are the lengths of the path travelled by the ionizing photons in the material to be characterized before scatter for one of the acquisitions, or for the other acquisition.
Hereinafter in the description, it is considered that ε=lbef/laft.
For these two acquisitions, the movement of the ionizing photon source 10, the spectrometric detector 11 in relation to the object 100 is known and also the path difference Δl, Δl=laft2−laft1.
The inventors observed that the behaviour of the combined linear attenuation function μ′(E1) as a function of the scattered energy E1 was very similar to that of the linear attenuation function μ(E1) as a function of the energy E1. In any case, there is a bijection between μ′(E1) and μ(E1).
Reference may be made to
The variation of the combined linear attenuation function μ′(E1) is such that for high energies, the curve has a horizontal asymptote and, for low energies, a vertical asymptote.
If it is possible to extract at least one physical characterised of the material to be characterized based on the linear attenuation function μ(E1), it is possible to extract the same physical characteristic of the combined linear attenuation function μ′(E1).
It can be expressed in general that:
μ(E)=ρμ(E)/ρ where ρ is the density in g·cm−3 of the material. Therefore, also, μ(E)=ρσ(E) where σ(E) is the mass attenuation function of the material in cm2/g. These two quantities ρ and σ(E) are suitable for characterizing the material.
The composite materials which are mixtures of pure substances, the mass attenuation function is equal to:
where wi is the mass proportion of each pure substance in the mixture and σi(E) is the mass attenuation function of each pure substance in the mixture, these quantities are known and tabulated.
In the same way as a combined linear attenuation function μ′(E) is defined above, it is possible to define a combine mass attenuation function σ′(E) where σ′(E)=μ′(E)/ρ.
The mass attenuation function σ(E) has a high-energy predominant Compton component, this component conveying the ability of the material to scatter the incident ionizing photons with a change of wavelength and a low-energy predominant photoelectric component, this photoelectric component conveying the ability of the material to stop the incident ionizing photons.
In this context, the term low energy denotes an energy less than approximately 50 keV, the term high energy denotes an energy greater than or equal to approximately 50 keV. For routine materials in a mixture, consisting of light pure elements such as hydrogen, carbon, oxygen, nitrogen, they may comprise a greater proportion of oxygen and nitrogen than hydrogen or carbon. However, these predominant pure elements are the heaviest. The atomic number Z is equal to 7 for nitrogen, 8 for oxygen whereas it is merely equal to 6 for carbon and 1 for hydrogen. One consequence of this is that these materials have a high mass effective atomic number, between approximately 6.7 and 8. A further consequence is that the slope of decline of the curve illustrating the variation of the combined linear attenuation function μ′(E) as a function of E is greater than that which the combined linear attenuation function would have had for other materials with a lower mass effective atomic number. The latter observation stems from the fact that, at low energies, the predominant effect is the photoelectric effect for which the mass attenuation function σ(E) is proportional to Zr/Es where the exponent r is between approximately 3.1 and 4 and the exponent s is substantially equal to 3.
With reference to
The same conclusion may be drawn for, on one hand, materials consisting of pure substances and, on the other, the combined mass attenuation function σ′(E).
To obtain access to the slope and subsequently the atomic number or the mass effective atomic number depending on whether the material to be identified is a pure substance or not, the inventors recommend selecting at least two separate energy ranges in the representation of the combined linear function μ′(E1) as a function of the scattered energy E1, one extending in lower energies than the other. These two low energy ranges may overlap, meaning that they are not necessarily separated. The lower energy range is called BE in
By calculating for each energy range BE and HE.1, a representative quantity η of the combined linear attenuation function μ′(E1), at least one physical characteristic of the material to be characterized will be deduced therefrom. The representative quantity η of the combined linear attenuation function μ′(E1) is preferably a statistical indicator. In the example discussed and illustrated using
The higher the atomic number Z, the lower the ratio μ′mean(HE.1)/μ′mean(BE). The range BE is between 35 and 45 keV and the range HE.1 is between 50 and 75 keV. The asterisks correspond to standard pure substances.
The line passing through the largest number of asterisks makes it possible to demonstrate the relationship existing between the ratio μ′mean(HE.1)/μ′mean(BE) and Z over a wide range of Z values.
After calculating the ratio μ′mean(HE.1)/μ′mean(BE) for the material to be characterized that is assumed to be a pure substance, by noting same in the graph on the y-axis, the atomic number thereof is readily estimated, on the x-axis, using the line.
The description given above for pure substances also applies for standard materials which are mixtures of pure substances.
Furthermore, for routine materials consisting of light pure elements such as hydrogen, carbon, oxygen, nitrogen, fluorine, etc., it is observed that the combined mass attenuation function σ′(E) converges to the same value, once high energies are attained, for example greater than several tens of keV, for which Compton scattering is predominant. In this way, the combined linear attenuation function μ′(E) tends, for high energies, towards a value which is only essentially dependent on the density ρ of the material.
According to the invention, a third energy range HE.2 is selected, for which the Compton effect is predominant, a representative quantity η′ of the combined linear attenuation function μ′(E) on this third range is calculated and, by means of this quantity η′, the density ρ of the material to be characterized is estimated. The energy range HE.2 is a range corresponding to high energies, for example, between 50 keV and 150 keV. This is represented schematically in
As explained above, the representative quantity η′ of the combined linear attenuation function μ′(E) may be a statistical indicator such as a mean or an integral of said combined linear attenuation function μ′(E), calculated on the range HE.2. In practical terms, based on the tabulated density data for various routine standard materials and on the quantity η′ in the third energy range HE.2, it is easy to demonstrate a relationship between the quantity η′ and the density p. The quantity η′ for standard materials is obtained under the same conditions for spectrum acquisition, calculating and selecting the energy range as the quantity η′ for the material to be characterized.
The three energy ranges BE, HE.1, HE.2 are to be optimized according to the materials to be characterized and according to the energies that the spectrometric detector is capable of detecting with a satisfactory energy resolution.
Following the previous steps, a set of physical characteristics are thus available for the material to be characterized, i.e. in the example described, the density thereof and the atomic number thereof or the mass effective atomic number thereof. This set is hereinafter referred to at the estimated set of physical characteristics.
With the above, the processing means 200 of the characterizing device according to the invention, illustrated in
They also comprise:
An existing relationship between the same quantities of standard materials and the known physical characteristics of said standard materials is used, these quantities of standard materials being suitable for being obtained using the device by replacing the object made of the material to be characterized by samples of standard materials. These quantities of standard materials may also be estimated by means of calculations or modelling.
The method according to the invention may further comprise a step for identifying the material to be characterized with a comparison, according to a defined criterion, between the estimated set of physical characteristics with sets of the same physical characteristics of known materials of interest, hereinafter referred to as sets of known physical characteristics. These physical characteristics of known materials are also known, they are found in publications, encyclopaedias, literature of manufacturers marketing these materials and on the Internet.
For this, there may be, in a multi-dimensional space, on one hand, a plurality of sets of known physical characteristics, and, on the other, the estimated set of physical characteristics to perform the comparison according to the defined criterion. The material to be characterized is then the known material of interest most suitable for the comparison.
These materials are either materials considered to be hazardous, such as RDX (cyclotrimethylene trinitramine), TNT (trinitrotoluene), nitroglycerin, DNT (dinitrotoluene), tetrazene, octanitrocubane, or more common materials such as polyethylene, polystyrene, Plexiglas, polyurethane, Kynar which is a PVDF (polyvinylidene fluoride) marketed by Arkema, polytetrafluoroethylene known as the trademark Teflon registered by DuPont, a polyamide such as that known under the name of nylon which is a trademark of Burbery's, polyoxymethylene known as the trademark Delrin registered by DuPont.
It is observed that, in this reference frame, the materials considered to be hazardous are all grouped together in a boxed zone, and that the other more common materials are outside this zone.
The defined criterion may be a proximity criterion in respect of distance between the estimated set of physical characteristics and each of the sets of known physical characteristics.
With reference again to the example in
It is possible to use a comparative criterion other than the proximity in respect of distance. For example, it is possible to use a probabilistic comparative criterion, if the known materials make reference to probability distributions. Once the estimated set of physical characteristics is located in the space where each of the sets of known physical characteristics are situated, the material to be characterized is that which is in the vicinity of the set of known physical characteristics having the greatest probability.
The description above is based on the fact that the material to be characterized is identified using two of the physical characteristics thereof. It may be necessary in some cases to include a further physical feature in the research on the material. It will be possible for this to determine this further physical characteristic, based on at least one representative quantity η of the combined linear attenuation function μ′(E) on at least one further energy range. For the determination of a given material, it will be possible to use for one of the characteristics a statistical indicator η, for example the mean, and for a further characteristic a further statistical indicator, for example the integral.
If more than two physical characteristics are required, the identification will no longer be performed in a two-dimensional space, but in a space with more than two dimensions. The number of dimensions is dependent on the number of estimated physical characteristics.
We will now apply the method according to the invention to an actual concrete example. This example is obviously not limiting. The characterizing device used is that illustrated in
A scatter angle θ of 120° is used. During irradiation, two acquisitions of the scattered ionizing photon flux are performed, for one acquisition, the inspection volume δV is at a scatter depth P1=15 mm from the surface whereby the incident ionizing photon beam penetrates the material to be characterized of the object. For the other acquisition, the inspection volume δV is at a scatter depth P2=30 mm from said surface. The two scattered photon flux spectra output by the spectrometric detector are illustrated in
If the curve of the combined linear attenuation function μ′(E) as a function of the scattered energy E is constructed, as described above, the representation in
Based on this curve, the following windows are selected: BE=35-45 keV, HE.1=50-75 keV and HE.2=50-83 keV. It is ensured that the lower range BE does not include very low energies, in this case less than 30 keV, since it is observed that the curve falls sharply. This fall is essentially due to the influence of the response of the spectrometric detector.
Based on the two windows BE and HE.1, a first physical characteristic of the material to be characterized, i.e. the mass effective atomic number Zeff-m thereof, is estimated. As a representative quantity η, the combined linear attenuation function μ′(E), the arithmetic mean μ′mean(E) of said combined linear attenuation function on the range BE and on the range HE.1 are used. The result of the calculation gives Zeff-m=7.7628.
A second physical characteristic of the material to be characterized, the density p, is estimated. As a representative quantity η of the combined linear attenuation function μ′(E), the arithmetic mean μ′mean(E) of said combined linear attenuation function μ′(E) on the third range HE.2 is used. The result of the calculation gives ρ=1.7948 g/m3.
These estimations are made using standard materials as described above.
In a two-dimensional space Zeff-m(ρ) illustrated in
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind | 371c Date |
---|---|---|---|---|
PCT/FR2011/000568 | 10/21/2011 | WO | 00 | 5/23/2014 |
Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
WO2013/057381 | 4/25/2013 | WO | A |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
6459764 | Chalmers et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
7561666 | Annis | Jul 2009 | B2 |
20090052621 | Walter | Feb 2009 | A1 |
20110161062 | Paulus et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20120123697 | Fabiani et al. | May 2012 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2011 009833 | Jan 2011 | WO |
2011 069748 | Jun 2011 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Lalleman, A.S., et al., “A Dual X-Ray Backscatter System for Detecting Explosives: Image and Discrimination of a Suspicious Content”, IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium Conference Record, pp. 299-304, (2011) XP 032117513. |
International Search Report Issued May 23, 2012 in PCT/FR11/000568 Filed Oct. 21, 2011. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20140286478 A1 | Sep 2014 | US |