Patent Grant
11920151
Provided are: a composition for DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs), comprising (1) a cytosine deaminase and an inactivated target-specific endonuclease, (2) a guide RNA, and (3) a uracil-specific excision reagent (USER); a method of generating DNA double-strand breaks by means of a cytosine deaminase using the composition; a method for analyzing a DNA nucleic acid sequence to which base editing has been introduced by means of a cytosine deaminase; and a method for identifying (or measuring or detecting) base editing site, base editing efficiency at on-target site, an off-target site, and/or target-specificity, by means of a cytosine deaminase.
Cas9-linked deaminases enable single-nucleotide conversions in a targeted manner to correct point mutations causing genetic disorders or introduce single-nucleotide variations of interest in human and other eukaryotic cells. Genome-wide target-specificities of these RNA-programmable deaminases, however, remain largely unknown.
Four different classes of programmable deaminases have been reported to date: 1) base editors (BEs) comprising catalytically-deficient Cas9 (dCas9) derived from S. pyogenes or D10A Cas9 nickase (nCas9) and rAPOBEC1, a cytidine deaminase from rat, 2) target-AID (activation-induced cytidine deaminase) comprising dCas9 or nCas9 and PmCDA1, an AID ortholog from sea lamprey, or human AID, 3) CRISPR-X composed of dCas9 and sgRNAs linked to MS2 RNA hairpins to recruit a hyperactive AID variant fused to MS2-binding protein, and 4) zinc-finger proteins or transcription activator-like effectors (TALEs) fused to a cytidine deaminase.
A programmable deaminase, consisting of a DNA binding module and cytidine deaminase, enables targeted nucleotide substitution or base editing in the genome without generating DNA double strand breaks (DSBs). Unlike programmable nocleas such as CRISPR-Cas9 and ZFNs, which induce small insertions or indels in the target site, programmable deaminases are able to convert C to T(U) (or to a lower frequency, C to G or A) within window of several nucleotides at a target site. Programmable deaminases can correct point mutations that cause genetic disorders in human cells, animals and plants, or can generate single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs).
Despite broad interest in base editing by programmable deaminase, there has not been developed any means for analyzing target-specificity of programmable deaminase to whole genome. Therefore, it is required to develop technologies to analyze target-specificity of programmable diaminnase to whole genome, thereby analyzing base editing efficiency, off-target site, and off-target effect of programmable diaminnase.
In this description, provided are technologies for analyzing target-specificity of a programmable deaminase to whole genome, and for analyzing base editing efficiency, off-target site, off-target effect, and the like of a programmable deaminase.
An embodiment provides a composition for DNA double strand breaks (DSBs) comprising (1) a cytosine deaminase and an inactivated target-specific endonuclease, or a cytosine deaminase coding gene and an inactivated target-specific endonuclease coding gene, or a plasmid comprising a cytosine deaminase coding gene and an inactivated target-specific endonuclease coding gene; (2) a guide RNA; and (3) a uracil-specific excision reagent (USER).
Another embodiment provides a method of generating DNA double strand break, the method comprising:
Another embodiment provides a method of analyzing nucleic acid sequence of DNA in which a base editing is introduced by cytosine deaminase, comprising:
Another embodiment provides a method of identifying (or measuring or detecting) a base editing site, a base editing efficiency at on-target site, an off-target site, and/or a target-specificity, of cytosine deaminase, comprising:
In this description, a modified Digenome-seq is used to assess specificities of a base editor (e.g., Base Editor 3 (BE3), composed of a Cas9 nickase and a deaminase, in the human genome. Genomic DNA is treated with BE3 and a mixture of DNA-modifying enzymes in vitro to produce DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs) at uracil-containing sites. BE3 off-target sites are computationally identified using whole genome sequencing data. BE3 is highly specific, inducing cytosine-to-uracil conversions at just 18±9 sites in the human genome. Digenome-seq is sensitive enough to capture BE3 off-target sites with a substitution frequency of 0.1%. Interestingly, BE3 and Cas9 off-target sites are often different, calling for independent assessments of genome-wide specificities.
First, a technique for generating double strand breaks in DNA using cytosine deaminase that does not induce double strand breakage in DNA, is provided.
An embodiment provides a composition for double strand breaks (DSBs) comprising (1) a cytosine deaminase and an inactivated target-specific endonuclease, or a cytosine deaminase coding gene and an inactivated target-specific endonuclease coding gene, or a plasmid comprising a cytosine deaminase coding gene and an inactivated target-specific endonuclease coding gene; (2) a guide RNA; and (3) a uracil-specific excision reagent (USER). The composition may be used in inducing DNA double-strand breaks using cytosine deaminase.
The cytosine deaminase refers to any enzyme having activity to convert a cytosine, which is found in nucleotide (e.g., cytosine present in double stranded DNA or RNA), to uracil (C-to-U conversion activity or C-to-U editing activity). The cytosine deaminase converts cytosine positioned on a strand where a PAM sequence linked to target sequence is present, to uracil. In an embodiment, the cytosine deaminase may be originated from mammals including primates such as humans and monkeys, rodents such as rats and mice, and the like, but not be limited thereto. For example, the cytosine deaminase may be at least one selected from the group consisting of enzymes belonging to APOBEC (apolipoprotein B mRNA editing enzyme, catalytic polypeptide-like) family, and for example, may be at least one selected from the following group, but not be limited to:
As used herein, a target-specific nuclease is also referred to as a programmable nuclease, and refers to all types of endonuclease that are capable of recognizing and cleaving a specific target position on a genomic DNA.
For example, the target-specific nuclease may be at least one selected from the group consisting of all nuclases capable of recognizing a particular sequence of a target gene and having a nucleotide-cleavage activity thereby inducing insertion and/or deletion (Indel) on the target gene.
For example, the target-specific nuclease may be at least one selected from the group consisting of, but not limited to:
According to an embodiment, the target-specific nuclease may be at least one selected from the group consisting of endonucleases involved in type II and/or type V of the CRISPR (Clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats) system, such as Cas protein (e.g., Cas9 protein (CRISPR associated protein 9)), Cpf1 protein (CRISPR from Prevotella and Francisella 1), etc. In this regard, the target-specific nuclease may further comprise a target DNA-specific guide RNA for guiding to an on-target site in genomic DNA. The guide RNA may be one transcribed in vitro, for example, from an oligonucleotide duplex or a plasmid template, but is not limited thereto. The target-specific nuclease and the guide RNA may form a ribonucleic acid-protein complex, to act in the form of ribonucleic acid protein (RNP).
Cas9 protein is a main protein component of the CRISPR/Cas system, which can function as an activated endonuclease or nickase.
Cas9 protein or gene information thereof may be acquired from a well-known database such as the GenBank of NCBI (National Center for Biotechnology Information). For example, the Cas9 protein may be at least one selected from the group consisting of, but not limited to:
Cpf1 protein, which is an endonuclease of a new CRISPR system distinguished from the CRISPR/Cas system, is small in size compared to Cas9, requires no tracrRNA, and can function with a single guide RNA. In addition, Cpf1 can recognize thymidine-rich PAM (protospacer-adjacent motif) sequences and produces cohesive double-strand breaks (cohesive end).
For example, the Cpf1 protein may be an endonuclease derived from Candidatus spp., Lachnospira spp., Butyrivibrio spp., Peregrinibacteria, Acidominococcus spp., Porphyromonas spp., Prevotella spp., Francisella spp., Candidatus Methanoplasma), or Eubacterium spp. Examples of the microorganism from which the Cpf1 protien may be derived include, but are not limited to, Parcubacteria bacterium (GWC2011_GWC2_44_17), Lachnospiraceae bacterium (MC2017), Butyrivibrio proteoclasiicus, Peregrinibacteria bacterium (GW2011_GWA_33_10), Acidaminococcus sp. (BV3L6), Porphyromonas macacae, Lachnospiraceae bacterium (ND2006), Porphyromonas crevioricanis, Prevotella disiens, Moraxella bovoculi (237), Smiihella sp. (SC_KO8D17), Leptospira inadai, Lachnospiraceae bacterium (MA2020), Francisella novicida (U112), Candidatus Methanoplasma termitum, Candidatus Paceibacter, and Eubacterium eligens.
The target-specific endonuclease may be a microorganism-derived protein or an artificial or non-naturally occurring protein obtained by a recombinant or synthesis method. By way of example, the target-specific endonuclease (e.g., Cas9, Cpf1, and the like) may be a recombinant protein produced with a recombinant DNA. As used herein, the term “recombinant DNA (rDNA)” refers to a DNA molecule artificially made by genetic recombination, such as molecular cloning, to include therein heterogenous or homogenous genetic materials derived from various organisms. For instance, when a target-specific endonuclease is produced in vivo or in vitro by expressing a recombinant DNA in an appropriate organism, the recombinant DNA may have a nucleotide sequence reconstituted with codons selected from among codons encoding the protein of interest in order to be optimal for expression in the organism.
The term “inactivated target-specific endonuclease”, as used herein, refers to a target-specific endonuclease that lacks the endonuclease activity of cleaving a DNA duplex. The inactivated target-specific endonuclease may be at least one selected from among inactivated target-specific endonucleases that lack endonuclease activity, but retain nickase activity, and inactivated target-specific endonuclease that lack both endonuclease activity and nickase activity. In an embodiment, the inactivated target-specific endonuclease may retain nickase activity. In this case, when a cytosine base is converted to a uracil base, a nick is introduced into a strand on which cytosine-to-uracil conversion occurs, or an opposite strand thereto simultaneously or sequentially irrespective of order (for example, a nick is introduced at a position between third and fourth nucleotides in the direction toward the 5′ end of a PAM sequence on a strand opposite to a strand having the PAM sequence). The modification (mutation) of such target-specific endonucleases may include substitution of a catalytic aspartate residue (for Streptococcus pyogenes-derived Cas9 protein, for example, at least one selected from the group consisting of aspartic acid at position 10 (D10)) with a different amino acid, and the different amino acid may be alanine, but is not limited thereto.
As used herein, the expression “different amino acid” may be intended to refer to an amino acid selected from among alanine, isoleucine, leucine, methionine, phenylalanine, proline, tryptophan, valine, asparagine, cysteine, glutamine, glycine, serine, threonine, tyrosine, aspartic acid, glutamic acid, arginine, histidine, lysine, and all known variants thereof, exclusive of the amino acid having a wild-type protein retained at the original substitution position.
In one embodiment, when the inactivated target-specific endonuclease is a modified Cas9 protein, the Cas9 protein may be at least one selected from the group consisting of modified Cas9 that lacks endonuclease activity and retains nickase activity as a result of introducing mutation (for example, substitution with a different amino acid) to D10 of Streptococcus pyogenes-derived Cas9 protein (e.g., SwissProt Accession number Q99ZW2(NP_269215.1)), and modified Cas9 protein that lacks both endonuclease activity and nickase activity as a result of introducing mutations (for example, substitution with different mutations) to both D10 and H840 of Streptococcus pyogenes-derived Cas9 protein. In Cas9 protein, for example, the mutation at D10 may be D10A mutation (the amino acid D at position 10 in Cas9 protein is substituted with A; below, mutations introduced to Cas9 are expressed in the same manner), and the mutation at H840 may be H840A mutation.
The cytidine deaminase and the inactivated target-specific endonuclease may be used in the form of a fusion protein in which they are fused to each other directly or via a peptide linker (for example, existing in the order of cytidine deaminase-inactivated target-specific endonuclease in the N- to C-terminus direction (i.e., inactivated target-specific endonuclease fused to the C-terminus of cytidine deaminase) or in the order of inactivated target-specific endonuclease-cytidine deaminase in the N- to C-terminus direction (i.e., cytidine deaminase fused to the C-terminus of inactivated target-specific endonuclease) (or may be contained in the composition), a mixture of a purified cytidine deaminase or mRNA coding therefor and an inactivated target-specific endonuclease or mRNA coding therefor (or may be contained in the composition), a plasmid carrying both a cytidine deaminase-encoding gene and an inactivated target-specific endonuclease-encoding gene (e.g., the two genes arranged to encode the fusion protein described above) (or may be contained in the composition), or a mixture of a cytidine deaminase expression plasmid and an inactivated target-specific endonuclease expression plasmid which carry a cytidine deaminase-encoding gene and an inactivated target-specific endonuclease-encoding gene, respectively (or may be contained in the composition). In one embodiment, the cytidine deaminase and the inactivated target-specific endonuclease may be in the form of a fusion protein in which they exist in the order of cytidine deaminase-inactivated target-specific endonuclease in the N- to C-terminus direction or in the order of inactivated target-specific endonuclease-cytidine deaminase in the N- to C-terminus direction, or a single plasmid in which a cytidine deaminase-encoding gene and an inactivated target-specific endonuclease-encoding gene are contained to encode the fusion protein.
So long as it carries the cytidine deaminase-encoding gene and/or the inactivated target-specific endonuclease-encoding gene and contains an expression system capable of expressing the gene in a host cell, any plasmid may be used. The plasmid contains elements for expressing a target gene, which include a replication origin, a promoter, an operator, and a terminator, and may further comprise an enzyme site suitable for introduction into the genome of a host cell (e.g., restriction enzyme site), a selection marker for identifying successful introduction into a host cell, a ribosome binding site (RBS) for translation into a protein, and/or a transcriptional regulatory factor. The plasmid may be one used in the art, for example, at least one selected from the group consisting of, but not limited to, pcDNA series, pSC101, pGV1106, pACYC177, ColE1, pKT230, pME290, pBR322, pUC8/9, pUC6, pBD9, pHC79, pIJ61, pLAFR1, pHV14, pGEX series, pET series, and pUC19. The host cell may be selected from among cells to which base editing or a double-strand break is intended to introduced by the cytidine deaminase (for example, eukaryotic cells including mammal cells such as human cells) and all cells that can express the cytidine deaminase-encoding gene and/or the inactivated target-specific endonuclease-encoding gene into cytidine deaminase and inactivated target-specific endonuclease, respectively (for example, E. coli, etc.).
The guide RNA, which acts to guide a mixture or a fusion protein of the cytidine deaminase and the inactivated target-specific endonuclease to an on-target site, may be at least one selected from the group consisting of CRISPR RNA (crRNA), trans-activating crRNA (tracrRNA), and single guide RNA (sgRNA), and may be, in detail, a crRNA:tracrRNA duplex in which crRNA and tracrRNA is coupled to each other, or a single-strand guide RNA (sgRNA) in which crRNA or a part thereof is connected to tracrRNA or a part thereof via an oligonucleotide linker.
Concrete sequences of the guide RNA may be appropriately selected, depending on kinds of the target-specific endonucleases used, or origin microorganisms thereof, and are an optional matter which could easily be understood by a person skilled in the art.
When a Streptococcus pyogenes-derived Cas9 protein is used as a target-specific endonuclease, crRNA may be represented by the following General Formula 1:
In an embodiment, the Xcas9 may include, but is not limited to, UGCUGUUUUG (SEQ ID NO: 231).
In addition, the tracrRNA may be represented by the following General Formula 2:
Further, sgRNA may form a hairpin structure (stem-loop structure) in which a crRNA moiety including the targeting sequence and the essential region thereof and a tracrRNA moiety including the essential region (60 nucleotides) thereof are connected to each other via an oligonucleotide linker (responsible for the loop structure). In greater detail, the sgRNA may have a hairpin structure in which a crRNA moiety including the targeting sequence and essential region thereof is coupled with the tracrRNA moiety including the essential region thereof to form a double-strand RNA molecule with connection between the 3′ end of the crRNA moiety and the 5′ end of the tracrRNA moiety via an oligonucleotide linker.
In one embodiment, sgRNA may be represented by the following General Formula 3:
The oligonucleotide linker included in the sgRNA may be 3-5 nucleotides long, for example 4 nucleotides long in which the nucleotides may be the same or different and are independently selected from the group consisting of A, U, C, and G.
The crRNA or sgRNA may further contain 1 to 3 guanines (G) at the 5′ end thereof (that is, the 5′ end of the targeting sequence of crRNA).
The tracrRNA or sgRNA may further comprise a terminator inclusive of 5 to 7 uracil (U) residues at the 3′ end of the essential region (60 nt long) of tracrRNA.
The target sequence for the guide RNA may be about 17 to about 23 or about 18 to about 22, for example, 20 consecutive nucleotides adjacent to the 5′ end of PAM (Protospacer Adjacent Motif (for S. pyogenes Cas9, 5′-NGG-3′ (N is A, T, G, or C)) on a target DNA.
As used herein, the term “the targeting sequence” of guide RNA hybridizable with the target sequence for the guide RNA refers to a nucleotide sequence having a sequence complementarity of 50% or higher, 60% or higher, 70% or higher, 80% or higher, 90% or higher, 95% or higher, 99% or higher, or 100% to a nucleotide sequence of a complementary strand to a DNA strand on which the target sequence exists (i.e., a DNA strand having a PAM sequence (5′-NGG-3′ (N is A, T, G, or C))) and thus can complimentarily couple with a nucleotide sequence of the complementary strand.
In the present specification, a nucleic acid sequence at an on-target site is represented by that of the strand on which a PAM sequence exists among two DNA strands in a region of a target gene. In this regard, the DNA strand to which the guide RNA couples is complementary to a strand on which a PAM sequence exists. Hence, the targeting sequence included in the guide RNA has the same nucleic acid sequence as a sequence at an on-target site, with the exception that U is employed instead of T due to the RNA property. In other words, a targeting sequence of guide RNA and a sequence at the on-target site (or a sequence of a cleavage site) are represented by the same nucleic acid sequence with the exception that T and U are interchanged, in the present specification.
The guide RNA may be used in the form of RNA (or may be contained in the composition) or in the form of a plasmid carrying a DNA coding for the RNA (or may be contained in the composition).
The uracil-specific excision reagent (USER) may include any agent capable of removing uracil that is converted from cytosine by cytosine deaminase and/or introducing DNA cleavage at the position where uracil is removed.
In an embodiment, the uracil-specific excision reagent (USER) may comprise a uracil DNA glycosylase (UDG), endonuclease VIII, or a combination thereof. In an embodiment, the uracil-specific removal reagent may comprise a combination of endonuclease VIII or uracil DNA glycosylase and endonuclease VIII.
The uracil DNA glycosylase (UDG) may refer to an enzyme that acts to remove uracil (U) present in DNA thereby preventing mutagenesis of DNA. It may be at least one selected from the group consisting of enzymes that cleave N-glycosylic bond of uracil to initiate base-excision repair (BER). For example, the uracil DNA glycosylase may be an Escherichia coli uracil DNA glycosylase (e.g., GenBank Accession Nos. ADX49788.1, ACT28166.1, EFN36865.1, BAA10923.1, ACA76764.1, ACX38762.1, EFU59768 1, EFU53885.1, EFJ57281.1, EFU47398.1, EFK71412.1, EFJ92376.1, EFJ79936.1, EF059084.1, EFK47562.1, KXH01728.1, ESE25979.1, ESD99489.1, ESD73882.1, ESD69341.1, etc.), human uracil DNA glycosylase (for example, GenBank Accession Nos. NP_003353.1, NP_550433.1, etc.), mouse uracil DNA glycosylase (for example, GenBank Accession Nos. NP_001035781.1, NP_035807 0.2, etc.), and the like; but not be limited thereto.
The endonuclease VIII functions to remove the uracil-deleted nucleotides. It may be at least one selected from the group consisting of enzymes having N-glycosylase activity to remove uracil damaged by the uracil DNA glycosylase from double-stranded DNA and AP-lyase activity to cut 3′ and 5′ ends of apurinic site (AP site) which is generated by the removal of damaged uracil. For example, the endonuclease VIII may be human endonuclease VIII (e.g., GenBank Accession Nos. BAC06476.1, NP_001339449.1, NP_001243481.1, NP_078884.2, NP_001339448.1, etc.), mouse endonuclease VIII (e.g., GenBank Accession Nos. BAC06477.1, NP082623.1, etc.), Escherichia coli endonuclease VIII (e.g., GenBank Accession Nos. OBZ49008.1, OBZ43214.1, OBZ42025.1, ANJ41661.1, KYL40995.1, KMV55034.1, KMV53379.1, KMV50038.1, KMV40847.1, AQW72152.1, etc.), but not be limited thereto.
In another embodiment, in case of using an inactivated target-specific endonuclease lacking nickase activity as well as endonuclease activity, such as a modified Cas9 which is generated by introducing both of D10A and H840A into Cas9 protien derived from Streptococcus pyogenes; for generating double strand cleavage, the composition may further comprise an endonuclease capable of specifically degrading a DNA single strand region generated by removing uracil on one strand among two strands of DNA (the endonuclease may cleave phosphodiester bonds of both ends of DNA single strand region). The endonuclease capable of specifically degrading a single strand region of DNA may be at least one selected from the group consisting of S1 nuclease (derived from Aspergillus oryzae; e.g., catalog number M5791 (Promega), etc.), Mung bean nuclease, and the like.
By using a cytosine deaminase, an inactivated target-specific endonuclease, and a uracil-specific excision reagent, a double strand break can be generated at a site where a base conversion (base editing) from cytosine to uracil (C→U) by cytosine deaminase occurs (
Another embodiment provides a method of generating double strand break using a cytosine deaminase, the method comprising:
By generating (or introducing) a double strand break into DNA using cytosine deaminase, a base editing (i.e., conversion from C to U) site, a base editing efficiency by a cytosine deaminase, and the like can be analyzed, thereby identifying (or measuring) a base editing efficiency at on-target site, specificity to on-target sequence, an off-target sequence, etc., of cytosine deaminase.
Another embodiment provides a method of analyzing nucleic acid sequence of DNA in which a base editing is introduced by cytosine deaminase, comprising:
Another embodiment provides a method of identifying (or measuring or detecting) a base editing site, a base editing efficiency at on-target site, an off-target site, and/or a target-specificity, of cytosine deaminase, comprising:
The cytosine deaminase, inactivated target-specific endonuclease, plasmid, guide RNA and uracil-specific excision reagent are as described above.
The method may be carried out in a cell or in vitro, for example, it may be carried out in vitro. More specifically, all steps of the method are carried out in vitro; or step (i) is carried out in a cell, and step (ii) and subsequent steps are carried out in vitro using DNA (e.g., genomic DNA) extracted from the cell used in step (i).
Said step (i) comprises transfecting a cell or contacting (e.g., co-incubating) DNA extracted from the cell with a cytosine deaminase and an inactivated target-specific endonuclease (or coding genes thereof) together with a guide RNA, to induce conversion from cytosine to uracil and generation of DNA nick in a target site targeted by the guide RNA. The cell may be selected from all eukaryotic cells which are desired to be introduced with a base editing by cytosine deaminase, and for example, it may be selected from mammalian cells including human cells. The transfection can be carried out by introducing a plasmid containing a gene encoding a cytosine deaminase and an inactivated target-specific endonuclease into a cell by any conventional means. For example, the plasmid may be introduced into a cell by electroporation, lipofection, and the like, but not be limited thereto.
In one embodiment, step (i) may be performed by culturing DNA extracted from a cell (a cell to which base editing (e.g., a base editing site, base editing efficiency, etc.) by a cytosine deaminase is to be examined) together with a cytosine deaminase and an inactivated target-specific endonuclease (e.g., a fusion protein comprising a cytosine deaminase and an inactivated target-specific endonuclease) and a guide RNA (in vitro). The DNA extracted from the cell may be a genomic DNA or a PCR (polymerase chain reaction) amplification product containing a target gene or a target site.
Said step (ii) may comprise removing a base modified with uracil in the step (i) to generate DNA double strand break. More specifically, step (ii) may comprise treating (contacting) uracil DNA glycosylase (UDG), endonuclease VIII, or a combination thereof to the reaction product obtained in step (i). When both of uracil DNA glycosylase and endonuclease VIII are treated (contacted), they can be treated at the same time or sequentially in any order. The step of contacting (contacting) may be carried out by incubating the reaction product obtained in step (i) with uracil DNA glycosylase and/or endonuclease VIII.
When step (i) is carried out in a cell (i.e., when the cell is transfected), the reaction sample of step (ii) may comprise DNA isolated from the transfected cell. When step (i) is carried out in vitro for DNA extracted (separated) from a cell, the reaction sample of step (ii) may comprise isolated DNA treated with a cytosine deaminase and an inactivated target-specific endonuclease and a guided RNA.
In another embodiment, when an inactivated target-specific endonuclease generated by introducing both of D10A and H840A into Cas9 protien derived from Streptococcus pyogenes is used in step (i), since the inactivated target-specific endonuclease lacks nickase activity as well as endonuclease activity, for generating double strand cleavage, the method may further comprise a step (step (ii-1)) of treating an endonuclease capable of specifically degrading a DNA single strand region generated by removing uracil on one strand among two strands of DNA (the endonuclease may cleave phosphodiester bonds of both ends of DNA single strand region), after step (ii) and before step (iii) (
Optionally, the method may further comprise a step of removing the cytosine deaminase, inactivated target-specific endonuclease, and/or guide RNA used in step (i), after performing (finishing) step (i) and prior to performing step (ii). The cytidine deaminase and inactivated target-specific endonuclease are used together with a guide RNA, thereby having sequence specificity, and thus, they mostly act on an on-target site; however, if similar sequences to a target sequence of on-target site are present on an off-target site, they may also act on the off-target site. As used herein, the term “off-target site” may refer to a site that is not an on-target site, but to which the cytidine deaminase and inactivated target-specific endonuclease have activity. That is, the off-target site may refer to a site where base editing and/or cleavage by cytidine deaminase and inactivated target-specific endonuclease occurs, besides an on-target site. In an embodiment, the term “off-target site” may used to cover not only sites that are not on-target sites of the cytidine deaminase and inactivated target-specific endonuclease, but also sites having possibility to be off-target sites thereof. The off-target sites may refer to, but not be limited to, any sites that are cleaved by the cytidine deaminase and inactivated target-specific endonuclease in vitro, besides on-target sites.
The activity of cytidine deaminase and inactivated target-specific endonuclease on sites besides an on-target site may be caused by various reasons. For example, a sequence (off-target sequence) other than target sequence having low mismatch level to a target sequence designed for a desired target site and high sequence homology with the target sequence, may act as an on-target sequence of cytidine deaminase and inactivated target-specific endonuclease used. The off-target sequence may be a sequence (gene region) having 1 to 6, 1 to 5, 1 to 4, 1 to 3, 1 to 2, or 1 nucleotide mismatch to a target sequence, but not be limited thereto.
The working of the deaminase and the inactivated target-specific endonuclease in an off-target site may incur undesirable mutation in a genome, which may lead to a significant problem. Hence, a process of accurately detecting and analyzing an off-site sequence may be as very important as the activity of the deaminase and the inactivated target-specific endonuclease at an on-target site. The process may be useful for developing a deaminase and an inactivated target-specific endonuclease which both work specifically only at on-target sites without the off-target effect.
Because the cytidine deaminase and the inactivated target-specific endonuclease have activities in vivo and in vitro for the purpose of the present invention, the enzymes can be used in detecting in vitro an off-target site of DNA (e.g., genomic DNA). When applied in vivo, thus, the enzymes are expected to be active in the same sites (gene loci including off-target sequences) as the detected off-target sites.
Step (iii) is a step of analyzing nucleic acid sequence of DNA fragments cleaved in step (ii), and can be performed by any conventional method for analyzing nucleic acid sequence. For example, when the separate DNA used in step (i) is a genomic DNA, the nucleic acid sequence analysis may be conducted by whole genome sequencing. In contrast to the indirect method in which a sequence having a homology with the sequence at an on-target site is searched for and would be predicted to be off-target site, whole genome sequencing allows for detecting an off-target site actually cleaved by the target-specific nuclease at the level of the entire genome, thereby more accurately detecting an off-target site.
As used herein, the term “whole genome sequencing” (WGS) refers to a method of reading the genome by many multiples such as in 10X, 20X, and 40X formats for whole genome sequencing by next generation sequencing. The term “Next generation sequencing” means a technology that fragments the whole genome or targeted regions of genome in a chip-based and PCR-based paired end format and performs sequencing of the fragments by high throughput on the basis of chemical reaction (hybridization).
In the step (iv), a DNA cleavage site is identified (or determined) using the base sequence data (sequence read) obtained in step (ii). By analyzing the sequencing data, an on-target site and an off-target site can simply be detected. The determination of a site at which DNA is cleaved from the base sequence data can be performed by various approaches. In the specification, various reasonable methods are provided for determining the site. However, they are merely illustrative examples that fall within the technical spirit of the present invention, but are not intended to limit the scope of the present invention.
As an example of determining a cleaved site, when the sequence reads obtained by whole genome sequencing are aligned according to sites on a genome, the site at which the 5′ ends are vertically (straightly) aligned may mean the site at which DNA is cleaved. The alignment of the sequence reads according to sites on genomes may be performed using an analysis program (for example, BWA/GATK or ISAAC). As used herein, the term “vertical alignment” refers to an arrangement in which the 5′ ends of two more sequence reads start at the same site (nucleotide position) on the genome for each of the adjacent Watson strand and Crick strand when the whole genome sequencing results are analyzed with a program such as BWA/GATK or ISAA. Through this method, the DNA fragments that are cleaved in step (ii) and thus have the same 5′ end are each sequenced.
That is, when the cleavage in step (ii) occurs at on-target sites and off-target sites, the alignment of the sequence reads allows the vertical alignment of the common cleaved sites because each of their sites start at the 5′ end. However, the 5′ end is not present in the uncleaved sites, so that it can be arranged in a staggered manner in alignment. Accordingly, the vertically aligned site may be regarded as a site cleaved in step (i), which means an on-target site or off-target site cleaved by the inactivated target-specific endonuclease.
The term “alignment” means mapping sequence reads to a reference genome and then aligning the bases having identical sites in genomes to fit for each site. Accordingly, so long as it can align sequence reads in the same manner as above, any computer program may be employed. The program may be one already known in the pertinent art or may be selected from among programs tailored to the purpose. In one embodiment, alignment is performed using ISAAC, but is not limited thereto.
As a result of the alignment, the site at which the DNA is cleaved by the deaminase and the inactivated target-specific endonuclease can be determined by a method such as finding a site where the 5′ end is vertically aligned as described above, and the cleaved site may be determined as an off-target site if not an on-target site. In other words, a sequence is an on-target site if identical to the base sequence designed as an on-target site of the deaminase and inactivated target-specific endonuclease, and is regarded as an off-target site if not identical to the base sequence. This is obvious according to the definition of an off-target site described above. The off-target site may comprise a sequence having homology with the sequence of on-target site; in particular, a sequence having at least one nucleotide mismatch with the on-target site; more particularly, a sequence having 1 to 6, 1 to 5, 1 to 4, 1 to 3, 1 to 2, or 1 nucleotide mismatch with the on-target site; however, the off-target site does not limited thereto, but includes any site capable of being cleaved by the cytidine deaminase and the inactivated target-specific endonuclease used.
In another example, in addition to finding a vertically aligned position at the 5′ end, when the double peak pattern is seen in 5′ end plot, the position can be determined as an off-target site if it is not on-target site. When a graph is drawn by counting the number of nucleotides constituting 5′ end having the same base for each site in a genomic DNA, a double peak pattern appears at a specific position. This is because the double peak is caused by each strand of a double strand cleaved by a cytidine deaminase and inactivated target-specific endonuclease.
Therefore, the method of identifying an off-target site may further comprise, after the step (iv), determining the cleaved site as an off-target site when the site is not an on-target site.
In an embodiment, the steps (i) and (ii) are conducted with regard to the genomic DNA to induce a double-strand break and after the whole genome analysis (step (iii), the DNA reads are aligned with ISAAC to identify alignment patterns for vertical alignment at cleaved sites and staggered alignment at uncleaved sites. A unique pattern of double peaks may appear at the cleavage sites as represented by a 5′ end plot.
Moreover, as a non-limiting examples, a site where two or more sequence reads corresponding to each of Watson strand and Crick strand are aligned vertically may be determined as an off-target site. In addition, a site where 20% or more of sequence reads are vertically aligned and the number of sequence reads having the same 5′ end in each of the Watson and Crick strands is 10 or more is determined as an off-target site, that is, a cleavage site.
The process in steps (iii) and (iv) of the method described above may be Digenome-seq (digested-genome sequencing). For greater details, reference may be made to Korean Patent No. 10-2016-0058703 A (this document is herein incorporated by reference in its entirety).
Base editing sites (i.e., double-strand break site) of cytidine deaminase, base editing efficiency at on-target sites or target-specificity (i.e., [base editing frequency at on-target sites]/[base editing frequency over entire sequence]), and/or off-target sites (identified as base editing sites of deaminase, but not on-target sites) can be identified (or measure or detected) by the method described above.
The identification (detection) of an off-target site is performed in vitro by treating a genomic DNA with the deaminase and the inactivated target-specific endonuclease. Thus, it can be identified whether off-target effects are actually produced also in vivo in the off-target site detected by this method. However, this is merely an additional verification process, and thus is not a step that is essentially entailed by the scope of the present invention, and is merely a step that can be additionally performed according to the needs.
In the present specification, the term “off-target effect” is intended to mean a level at which base editing and/or double-strand break occurs at an off-target site. The term “indel” (insertion and/or deletion) is a generic term for a mutation in which some bases are inserted or deleted in the middle of a base sequence of DNA.
In another embodiment, a method for identifying (or measuring or detecting) a base editing site, a base editing efficiency at on-target site, an off-target site, and/or target-specificity of a cytosine deaminase can be conducted by a method other than the Digenome-seq method as described above.
In a concrete embodiment, the method for identifying (or measuring or detecting) a base editing site, a base editing efficiency at on-target site, an off-target site, and/or target-specificity of a cytosine deaminase may be conducted by circle-seq method (
The cytosine deaminase and inactivated target-specific endonuclease in step (ii) may be used together with a guide RNA.
In another concrete embodiment, the method for identifying (or measuring or detecting) a base editing site, a base editing efficiency at on-target site, an off-target site, and/or target-specificity of a cytosine deaminase may be conducted by Bless method (
The cytosine deaminase and inactivated target-specific endonuclease, or a gene encoding the same, or a plasmid comprising the gene in step (i) may be used together with a guide RNA or DNA encoding the guide RNA or a plasmid comprising the DNA.
In another concrete embodiment, the method for identifying (or measuring or detecting) a base editing site, a base editing efficiency at on-target site, an off-target site, and/or target-specificity of a cytosine deaminase may be conducted by DSBCapture method (
The cytosine deaminase and inactivated target-specific endonuclease, or a gene encoding the same, or a plasmid comprising the gene in step (i) may be used together with a guide RNA or DNA encoding the guide RNA or a plasmid comprising the DNA.
The method of generating DNA double-strand break and technologies for analyzing nucleic acid sequence using the method can achieve more accurate and efficient validation of base editing site, a base editing efficiency at on-target site, an off-target site, and/or target-specificity of a cytosine deaminase.
Hereinafter, the present invention will be described in more detail with reference to the following examples. However, these are only for illustrating the present invention, and the scope of the present invention is not limited by these examples.
1. Cell Culture and Transfection
HEK293T cells (ATCC CRL-11268) were maintained in DMEM (Dulbecco Modified Eagle Medium) supplemented with 10% (w/v) FBS and 1% (w/v) penicillin/streptomycin (Welgene). HEK293T cells (1.5×105) were seeded on 24-well plates and transfected at ˜80% confluency with sgRNA plasmid (500 ng) and Base Editor plasmid (Addgene plasmid #73019 (Expresses BE1 with C-terminal NLS in mammalian cells; rAPOBEC1-XTEN-dCas9-NLS;
2. Protein Purification
The His6-rAPOBEC1-XTEN-dCas9 protein-coding plasmid (pET28b-BE1; Expresses BE1 with N-terminal His6 tag in E. coli;
Rosetta expression cells (Novagen, catalog number: 70954-3CN) were transformed with the prepared pET28b-BE1 or pET28b-BE3 delta UGI and cultured overnight in Luria-Bertani (LB) broth containing 100 μg/ml kanamycin and 50 mg/ml carbenicilin at 37° C. Ten ml of the overnight cultures of Rosetta cells containing pET28b-BE1 or pET28b-BE3 delta UGI was inoculated into 400 ml LB broth containing 100 μg/ml kanamycin and 50 mg/ml carbenicilin and cultured at 30° C. until the OD600 reached 0.5-0.6. The cells were cooled to 16° C. for 1 hour, supplemented with 0.5 mM IPTG (Isopropyl β-D-1-thiogalactopyranoside), and cultured for 14-18 hours.
For protein purification, cells were harvested by centrifugation at 5,000×g for 10 min at 4° C. and lysed by sonication in 5 ml lysis buffer (50 mM NaH2PO4, 300 mM NaCl, 1 mM DTT, and 10 mM imidazole, pH 8.0) supplemented with lysozyme (Sigma) and a protease inhibitor (Roche complete, EDTA-free). The soluble lysate obtained after centrifugation of the cell lysis mixture at 13,000 rpm. for 30 min at 4° C. was incubated with Ni-NTA agarose resin (Qiagen) for 1 hour at 4° C. The cell lysate/Ni-NTA mixture was applied to a column and washed with a buffer (50 mM NaH2PO4, 300 mM NaCl, and 20 mM imidazole, pH 8.0). The BE3 protein was eluted with an elution buffer (50 mM NaH2PO4, 300 mM NaCl, and 250 mM imidazole, pH 8.0). The eluted protein was buffer exchanged with a storage buffer (20 mM HEPES-KOH (pH 7.5), 150 mM KCl, 1 mM DTT, and 20% glycerol) and concentrated with centrifugal filter units (Millipore) to give purified rAPOBEC1-XTEN-dCas9 protein and rAPOBEC1-nCas9 protein.
3. Desamination and USER Treatment of PCR Amplification Products
PCR amplification products (10 μg) containing EMX1 site were incubated with purified rAPOBEC1-nCas9 protein (4 μg) and EMX1-specific sgRNA (3 μg) at 100 μl reaction volume for 1 hour at 37° C. The cultures were then incubated for 30 min at 37° C. in a uracil-specific excitation reagent (6 units) (New England Biolabs; containing a mixture of Uracil DNA glycosylase (UDG) and DNA glycosylase-lyase Endonuclease VIII, 50 mM KCl, 5 mM NaCl, 10 mM Tris-HCl (pH 7.4), 0.1 mM EDTA, 1 mM DTT, BSA 175 mg/ml, and 50% (w/v) glycerol) glycerol) and then subjected to agarose gel electrophoresis.
4. Deamination and USER Treatment of Genomic DNA
Genomic DNA was purified (extracted) from HEK293T cells with a DNeasy Blood & Tissue Kit (Qiagen) according to the manufacturer's instructions. Genomic DNA (10 μg) was incubated with the rAPOBEC1-nCas9 protein (300 nM) purified in Reference Example 2 and an sgRNA (900 nM) in a reaction volume of 500 μL for 8 hours at 37° C. in a buffer (100 mM NaCl, 40 mM Tris-HCl, 10 mM MgCl2, and 100 μg/ml BSA, pH 7.9). After removal of sgRNA using RNase A (50 μg/mL), uracil-containing genomic DNA was purified with a DNeasy Blood & Tissue Kit (Qiagen). The on-target site was amplified by PCR using a SUN-PCR blend and subjected to Sanger sequencing to check BE3-mediated cytosine deamination and USER-mediated DNA cleavage.
5. Sequencing of Whole Genome and Digenome
Genomic DNA (1 μg) was fragmented to the 400- to 500-bp range using the Covaris system (Life Technologies) and blunt-ended using End Repair Mix (Thermo Fischer). Fragmented DNA was ligated with adapters to produce libraries, which were then subjected to WGS (whole genome sequencing) using HiSeq X Ten Sequencer (Illumina) at Macrogen.
6. Targeted Deep Sequencing
On-target and potential off-target sites were amplified with a KAPA HiFi HotStart PCR kit (KAPA Biosystems #KK2501) for deep sequencing library generation. Pooled PCR amplicons were sequenced using MiniSeq (Illumina) or Illumina Miseq (LAS Inc. Korea) with TruSeq HT Dual Index system (Illumina).
Base editing efficiencies, defined by single-nucleotide substitution frequencies, of three different forms of BEs, at seven genomic loci (EMX1, FANCF, HEK2, RNF2, HEK3, HEK4 and HBB) in HEK293T cells were determined, and compared with genome editing efficiencies, defined by indel frequencies at target sites, of Cas9 nucleases (
To assess specificities of BE3 deaminases, it was examined in a cell whether BE3 can tolerate mismatches in small guide RNAs (sgRNAs). To this end, plasmids encoding BE3 or Cas9 (Reference Example 1) eand sgRNAs with one to four mismatches were co-transfected into HEK293T cells, to measure mutation frequencies at three endogenous sites (EMX1, HBB, RNF2).
The used target sites (including the PAM sequence (in bold)) of the sgRNA with 1 to 4 mismatches are summarized in Table 1 below:
GGG
CGG
AGG
GGG
CGG
AGG
GGG
GGG
GGG
GGG
GGG
GGG
GGG
GGG
GGG
GGG
GGG
GGG
GGG
GGG
GGG
GGG
GGG
GGG
GGG
GGG
GGG
GGG
GGG
GGG
GGG
GGG
GGG
GGG
GGG on tar-
(In Table 1, the base position in a lower-case letter refers to the mismatched site)
The results (Indel frequency and cytosine conversion frequency) obtained in the mismatched sequence and the on-target sequence listed in Table 1 are shown in
In addition, the Cas9 nuclease-associated indel frequency and BE3-associated base editing frequency in EMX1 site (
BE3 deaminases and Cas9 nucleases tolerated one-nucleotide (nt) mismatches at almost every position and 2-nt mismatches in the protospacer-adjacent motif (PAM)-distal region but did not tolerate most of the 3-nt or 4-nt mismatches in either the PAM-proximal or distal regions. We noticed, however, that several sgRNAs (indicated by asterisks in
Several different cell-based methods, which include GUIDE-seq (Tsai, S.Q. et al. GUIDE-seq enables genome-wide profiling of off-target cleavage by CRISPR-Cas nucleases. Nature biotechnology 33, 187-197 (2015)), HTGTS (Frock, R. L. et al. Genome-wide detection of DNA double-stranded breaks induced by engineered nucleases. Nature biotechnology (2014)), BLESS (Ran, F. A. et al. In vivo genome editing using Staphylococcus aureus Cas9. Nature 520, 186-191 (2015)), and IDLV capture(Wang, X. et al. Unbiased detection of cleavage by CRISPR-Cas9 and TALENs using integrase-defective lentiviral vectors. Nature biotechnology 33, 175-178 (2015)), have been developed for identifying genome-wide off-target sites at which Cas9 nucleases induce DSBs. None of these methods, at least in their present forms, are suitable for assessing the genome-wide specificities of programmable deaminases, simply because deaminases do not yield DSBs. We reasoned that DSBs could be produced at deaminated, uracil-containing sites in vitro using appropriate enzymes and that these DNA cleavage sites could be identified via Digenome-seq (digested-genome sequencing; Kim, D., Kim, S., Kim, S., Park, J. & Kim, J. S. Genome-wide target-specificities of CRISPR-Cas9 nucleases revealed by multiplex Digenome-seq. Genome research 26, 406-415 (2016); Kim, D. et al. Genome-wide analysis reveals specificities of Cpf1 endonucleases in human cells. Nature biotechnology 34, 863-868 (2016); Kim, D. et al. Digenome-seq: genome-wide profiling of CRISPR-Cas9 off-target effects in human cells. Nature methods 12, 237-243, 231 p following 243 (2015)), an in vitro method used for assessing genome-wide specificities of Cas9 and Cpf1 nucleases.
To test this idea, a PCR amplicon containing a target sequence was incubated (1) with the recombinant rAPOBEC1-nCas9 protein (Reference Example 2), a derivative of BE3 with no UGI domain, and its sgRNA in vitro to induce C-to-U conversions and a nick in the Watson and Crick strands, respectively, and then (2) with USER (Uracil-Specific Excision Reagent), a mixture of E. coli Uracil DNA glycosylase (UDG) and DNA glycosylase-lyase Endonuclease VIII, to generate a gap at the location of the uracils, giving rise to a composite DSB (
C-to-U conversions induced by BE3 and uracil removal by USER were confirmed by Sanger sequencing (
After sequence alignment to the human reference genome (hg19), we used Integrative Genomics Viewer (IGV) to monitor alignment patterns at each on-target site, and the results are shown in
To identify BE3 off-target sites in the human genome, a DNA cleavage score was assigned, based on the number of sequence reads whose 5′ ends aligned at a given position, to each nt position across the genome and listed all the sites with scores over 2.5, a cutoff value that was used for finding off-target sites of Cas9 nucleases with the same set of 7 sgRNAs in the inventor's previous study (Kim, D., Kim, S., Kim, S., Park, J. & Kim, J. S. Genome-wide target-specificities of CRISPR-Cas9 nucleases revealed by multiplex Digenome-seq. Genome research 26, 406-415 (2016)) (
The DNA cleavage score at site i of each nucleotide (i.e., the nucleotide position on genomic DNA) was calculated by the following formula:
In the above formula, the number of nucleotide sequence data means the number of nucleotide leads, the sequencing depth means the number of sequencing leads at a specific site, and the C value is 1.
Digenome-captured sites (cleavage site+PAM) and DNA cleavage score are shown in Tables 2 to 8 below:
(In Tables 2 to 8, the bases in lower case letters represent mismatched bases)
The primers used in the deep sequencing are summarized in Tables 9 to 15 below:
As can be seen from the above results, seven BE3 deaminases plus USER cleaved human genomic DNA in vitro at just 1-24 (8±3) sites, far fewer than did Cas9 nucleases with the same set of sgRNAs (70±30 sites) in a multiplex Digenome-seq analysis (Kim, D., Kim, S., Kim, S., Park, J. & Kim, J. S. Genome-wide target-specificities of CRISPR-Cas9 nucleases revealed by multiplex Digenome-seq. Genome research 26, 406-415 (2016)) (
The inventors further improved the computer program (termed Digenome 2.0) to identify potential off-target sites more comprehensively. The inventors counted the number of positions whose DNA cleavage scores were over a cutoff value that ranged from 0.0001 to 10 and the number of PAM (5′-NGN-3′ or 5′-NNG-3′)-containing sites with 10 or fewer mismatches, compared to the on-target site, among the positions with scores over the cutoff value (
With Digenome 2.0, it was able to identify many additional BE3- and Cas9-associated DNA cleavage sites, including two sites that had been missed in the previous study ((Kim, D., Kim, S., Kim, S., Park, J. & Kim, J. S. Genome-wide target-specificities of CRISPR-Cas9 nucleases revealed by multiplex Digenome-seq. Genome Res (2016)) but had been captured by both HTGTS and GUIDE-seq using EMX1-specific Cas9.
The inventors examined the BE3- and Cas9-associated sites as shown in
To validate off-target effects at BE3-associated sites identified by Digenome-seq, the inventors performed targeted deep sequencing and measured BE3-induced substitution frequencies and Cas9-induced indel frequencies in HEK293T cells. The results are shown in 6e to 6h as above and Table 16 as below.
The inventors analyzed a total of 75 sites identified using 7 sgRNAs and observed BE3-induced point mutations at 50 sites, including all 7 on-target sites, with frequencies above noise levels caused by sequencing errors (typically in the range of 0.1-2%), resulting in a validation rate of 67%. It is possible that BE3 can still induce mutagenesis at the other BE3-associated, Digenome-positive sites with frequencies below background noise levels. Importantly, we were able to identify BE3 off-target sites at which base editing was detected with a frequency of 0.1%, demonstrating that Digenome-seq is a highly sensitive method. Cas9 nucleases detectably induced indels at 70% (=44/63) of the sites associated with both Cas9 and BE3 but failed to do so at each of the 12 sites associated with BE3 alone (Tables 2-8).
To reduce BE3 off-target effects, the inventors replaced conventional sgRNAs (termed gX19 or GX19; “g” and “G” represent, respectively, a mismatched and matched guanine) with truncated sgRNAs (termed gX18 or gX17) or extended sgRNAs containing one or two extra guanines at the 5′ terminus (termed gX20 or ggX20) and measured on-target and off-target base-editing frequencies in HEK293T cells. The results are shown in
As shown in
In summary, the results obtained using mismatched sgRNAs, Digenome-seq, and targeted deep sequencing showed that BE3 deaminases were highly specific, catalyzing C-to-U conversions in vitro and base editing in human cells at a limited number of sites in the human genome. It was also found that BE3 and Cas9 off-target sites were not always coincidental, justifying independent assessments of each tool. It is expect that the above results and methods will accelerate broad use of RNA-guided programmable deaminases in research and medicine.
A PCR amplicon containing a target sequence (ENX1 on-target sequence; SEQ ID NO: 31) was incubated with BE1 (rAPOBEC1-dCas9; Example 2) and its sgRNA (sgRNA targeting SEQ ID NO: 31) in vitro to induce Cytidine to Uracil conversions. Uracil, which is induced by rAPOBEC1, was removed by USER (Uracil-Specific Excision Reagent) Enzyme (New England Biolabs). Then, S1 nuclease (Catalog #M5761; Promega) was treated to cleave phosphodiester bonds in a single-strand DNA, producing a DSB at the cytosine-deaminated site (
The above-obtained PCR amplicon was subjected to electrophoresis, to confirm that they are cleaved by the treatment of BE1/sgRNA, USER, and S1 Nuclease (
From the above description, it will be understood by those skilled in the art that the present invention may be embodied in other specific forms without departing from the spirit or essential characteristics thereof. In this regard, it should be understood that the above-described embodiments are to be considered in all respects as illustrative and not restrictive. The scope of the present invention should be construed as being included in the scope of the present invention without departing from the scope of the present invention as defined by the appended claims.
| Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| PCT/KR2017/010056 | 9/13/2017 | WO |
| Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| WO2018/052247 | 3/22/2018 | WO | A |
| Number | Name | Date | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| 20150166980 | Liu et al. | Jun 2015 | A1 |
| 20150226671 | Huang | Aug 2015 | A1 |
| 20160304846 | Liu | Oct 2016 | A1 |
| 20170121693 | Liu | May 2017 | A1 |
| Number | Date | Country |
|---|---|---|
| 2015-105928 | Jul 2015 | WO |
| 2015-138620 | Sep 2015 | WO |
| 2016-022363 | Feb 2016 | WO |
| Entry |
|---|
| Kim et al., Digenome-seq: genome-wide profiling of CRISPR-Cas9 off-target effects in human cells. Nature Methods (2015) 12(3): 237-243 and Supplemental material (Year: 2015). |
| Mung Bean Nuclease, NEB, www.neb.com/products/m0250-mung-bean-nuclease (archived from Sep. 18, 2015) [retrieved Sep. 16, 2022] (Year: 2015). |
| Chaudhry and Weinfeld, Induction of double-strand breaks by S1 nuclease, mung bean nuclease and nuclease P1 in DNA containing abasic sites and nicks. Nucleic Acids Research (1995), 23(19): 3805-3809 (Year: 1995). |
| Krokan et al., Base Excision Repair. Cold Spring Harbor Perspectives in Biology (2013), 5: a012583 (Year: 2013). |
| Albert's Molecular Biology of the Cell, 5th Ed. (2008), Chapter 4: DNA, Chromosomes and Genomes (Year: 2008). |
| Briggs et al., Removal of deaminated cytosines and detection of in vivo methylation in ancient DNA. Nucleic Acids Research (2010), 38: e87, 1-12 (Year: 2010). |
| Daesik Kim et al, “Genome-wide target specificities of CRISPR RNA-guided programmable deaminases”, Nature Biotechnology, vol. 35, No. 5, Apr. 10, 2017, pp. 475-480, XP055383071, ISSN 1087-0156. doi:10.1038/nbt.3852. |
| EPO, Supplementary European Search Report of EP 17851121.8 dated Mar. 30, 2020. |
| “User Enzyme”, New England BioLabs, Inc., https://www.neb.com/products/m5505-user-enzyme. |
| “The new editor-targeted genome engineering in the absence of homology-directed repair”, Cell Death Discovery, vol. 2, pp. 1-2, Jun. 13, 2016. |
| Alexis C. Komor et al., “Programmable editing of a target base in genomic DNA without double-stranded DNA cleavage”, Nature, vol. 533, pp. 420-424 and Methods, May 19, 2016. |
| Keiji Nishida et al., “Targeted nucleotide editing using hybrid prokaryotic and vertebrate adaptive immune systems”, Science, vol. 353, Issue 6305, Sep. 16, 2016. |
| Yunqing Ma et al., “Targeted AIDID-mediated mutagenesis (TAM) enables efficient genomic diversification in mammalian cells”, Nature Methods, vol. 13, No. 12, Dec. 2016. |
| Gaelen T Hess et al., “Directed evolution using dCas9-targeted somatic hypermutation in mammalian cells”, Nature Methods, vol. 13, No. 12, pp. 1036-10742, Dec. 2016. |
| Luhan Yang et al., “Engineering and optimising deaminase fusions for genome editing”, Nature communications, vol. 7, 2016. |
| Hyongbum Kim et al., “A guide to genome engineering with programmable nucleases”, Nature Reviews, vol. 15, pp. 321-334, May 2014. |
| Shengdar Q Tsai et al., “GUIDE-seq enables genome-wide profiling of off-target cleavage by CRISPR-Cas nucleases”, Nature biotechnology, vol. 33, No. 2, pp. 189-197, Feb. 2015. |
| Richard L Frock et al., “Genome-wide detection of DNA double-stranded breaks induced by engineered nucleases”, Nature biotechnology, vol. 33, No. 2, Feb. 2015. |
| F. Ann Ran et al., “In vivo genome editing using Staphylococcus aureus Cas9”, Nature, vol. 520, pp. 186-191, Apr. 2015. |
| Xiaoling Wang et al., “Unbiased detection of off-target cleavage by CRISPR-Cas9 and TALENs using integrase-defective lentiviral vectors”, Nature biotechnology, vol. 33, No. 2, Feb. 2015. |
| Daesik Kim et al., “Genome-wide target specificities of CRISPR-Cas9 nucleases revealed by multiplex Digenome-seq”, Genome research, vol. 26, pp. 406-415, 2016. |
| Daesik Kim et al., “Genome-wide analysis reveals specificities of Cpf1 endonucleases in human cells”, Nature biotechnology, vol. 34, pp. 863-868, 2016. |
| Daesik Kim et al., “Digenome-seq: genome-wide profiling of CRISPR-Cas9 off-target effects in human cells”, Nature methods, vol. 12, No. 3, pp. 237-243, 231 p following 243, Mar. 2015. |
| Sangsu Bae et al., “Cas-OFFinder: A fast and versatile algorithm that searches for potential off-target sites of Cas9 RNA-guided endonucleases”, Bioinformatics, vol. 30, No. 10, 2014. |
| Luhan Yang et al., “Genome Editing With Targeted Deaminases”, bioRxiv, 2016. |
| Stefanie V Lensing et al., “DSBCapture: in situ capture and sequencing of DNA breaks”, Nature methods, vol. 13, No. 10, Oct. 2016. |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 20200131536 A1 | Apr 2020 | US |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 62445310 | Jan 2017 | US | |
| 62393682 | Sep 2016 | US |
