Large-area electronics based on polymeric semiconductors, for applications such as display systems, often require the deposition and patterning of solution processable polymeric materials over large areas. Various printing techniques have been used to achieve the deposition and patterning. However, each of these printing techniques suffers from a number of problems.
One polymeric material deposition method uses ink jet printing to deposit droplets of polymeric material. However, ink jet printing is a slow sequential process. Using multiple ink jet nozzles to print in parallel speeds up the process but also dramatically increases complexity and expense.
A second patterning method uses liquid embossing. A publication by Bulthaup et al., Applied Physics Letters 79 (10) 1525, (2001), describes depositing an “ink” on a substrate and patterning the ink in a liquid embossing process. In order to pattern the ink, a stamp displaces the “ink” and creates a reverse or negative image on the substrate relative to the pattern in the stamp. In addition, after removal of the stamp, the “ink” is still liquid and is cured before handling. The curing process reduces the robustness and throughput of the process. Furthermore, heating the substrate to cure the “ink” can also degrade the electrical properties of the embossed polymer.
S. Y. Chou in U.S. Pat. No. 5,772,905 describes using conventional embossing and nanoprint lithography to flow a thin film under a stamp to create a pattern. An anisotropic etching step, such as reactive ion etching (RIE), finishes the pattern definition. Conventional nanoprint lithography often involves exposing the patterned polymer to high temperatures, UV exposure and etching processes. These processes result in a harsh environment that potentially degrades the electrical properties of the polymeric semiconductor.
Still other techniques use a surface-energy pattern on a substrate to pattern a polymer. C. R. Kagan et al. in Appl. Phys. Lett. 79 (21) 3536 (2001) describes patterning self-assembled monolayers using such a surface-energy pattern. Such patterns are typically generated using surface energy modulation. However, use of such a system in electronic device fabrication is restricted to surfaces on which a self-assembled monolayer can be deposited (typically the noble metals such as gold or palladium). An additional coating step, typically accomplished through dip-coating the surface-energy pattern of the substrate over the entire substrate area is complex and slow, lowering throughput and yield.
Thus an improved method of patterning a polymer is needed.
A method of forming an using a stamping procedure to pattern a surface is described. In the method, a liquid carrier solution including a liquid carrier and a precipitate is deposited on a substrate. A relief pattern on a stamp is brought into contact with the liquid carrier solution such that raised portions of the relief pattern absorbs the liquid carrier leaving a thin precipitate layer between the raised portions of the relief pattern and the substrate. Both liquid carrier and precipitate are removed from substrate regions between the substrate and non-raised portions of the relief pattern. When, the stamp is removed, a precipitate pattern or residue pattern that matches the raised portions of the relief pattern on the stamp remains on the substrate.
A novel stamping procedure to pattern a polymer is described. In the procedure a relief pattern that includes raised portions and non-raised portions is formed on a stamp. The relief pattern is brought into contact with a polymer. When the relief pattern is removed, the remaining polymer pattern matches the raised portions of the relief pattern.
A surface 112 of relief master 108 includes a negative of the relief pattern to be formed on stamp 104. A number of well known techniques, including but not limited to, photolithography and wax printing patterning, may be used to form surface 112 of relief master 108. In one example, height 116 of raised portions 120 on surface 112 of relief master 108 exceeds the width 124 of the raised portion resulting in a height to width ratio in excess of approximately 0.1. In one embodiment, non-raised or “recessed” portions 128 of stamps formed from such relief masters will have a width to depth ratio of less than approximately 10. Actual dimensions of the stamp and the ratios of width to depth may vary considerably as will be later discussed in connection with
After oxidation, stamp 104 is exposed to a reacting solution 404. In one embodiment, a compound in reacting solution 104 forms covalent bonds to the stamp. An example of a compound that forms such covalent bonds are chlorosilane compounds. A hexadecane solution of benzyltrichlorosilane (BTS) is one example of a suitable chlorosilane compound. The reaction with reacting solution 104 reduces stamp hydrophobicity.
For simplicity, the discussion that follows, the material that precipitates will be described as a polymer and the liquid carrier will be a solvent, although other materials may be used and the claims should not be limited to solvents and liquid polymers.
When forming an electronic device, the precipitate carried by the liquid carrier is a semiconductor material that often has electrical properties suitable for forming an electronic device. The solvent solution keeps the semiconductor in a liquid state. One example of a typical polymer is poly -9.9′, dioctyl-fluorene-cobithiophene (F8T2).
After polymer deposition,
The remaining precipitate, or dry semiconductor and/or polymer material 804 may have distinctive characteristics. One example characteristic is a very uniform deposition of polymer material 804 across substrate 608. In other deposition techniques that rely on evaporation, a “coffee ring” effect may occur in that uneven evaporation of solute causes uneven distribution of precipitate, more particularly, a very slight increase in precipitate height occurs toward the center of the deposited layer. By using a stamp that uniformly absorbs solvent across the surface of polymer material 804, the described stamping technique can be adjusted to avoid such uneven effects.
Stamp 904 is pressed into polymer solution 908 forming an airtight or conformal contact. A force, typically from a pressure differential, forces liquid in polymer solution 908 into recesses 912, 916. The pressure differential may be caused by inducing a gas flow along channels coupling the recessed areas of the stamp to lower the pressure in the recessed areas of the stamp. Alternately, the reduced hydrophobic nature of the stamp surface causes capillary action that draws the liquid polymer solution into the recess such that a concave meniscus 918 forms in the recess. The edge of concave meniscus 918 wets the walls of the stamp recess.
Arrows 934 in
Arrows 938 of
After removal of stamp 904, the stamp recess walls, such as recesses 912, 916 are coated with a thin polymer film while the stamp raised portions 929, 930, 931 remain largely uncoated. In order to minimize distortion in the pattern from stamp swelling, stamp 904 is preferably significantly larger than the volume of solvent absorbed.
In
After flat surface 1104 is removed, the relief surface 1008 is exposed to a second chlorosilane compound 1204, such as tridecafluoro-1,1,2,2,-tetrahydrooctyl trichlorosilane (FTS) as shown in
In the preceding description, a number of details have been provided. For example, polymer compounds and particular treatments of adjusting the stamp surface have been described. However, such details are included to assist the reader in understanding various ways in which the invention may be used and should not be interpreted to limit the scope of the invention. The invention itself should only be limited by the following claims.
This invention was made with Government support by NIST, under NIST contract number NIST 70NANB0H3033, and the Government has certain rights in this invention.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
5079600 | Schnur et al. | Jan 1992 | A |
5122215 | Shibata et al. | Jun 1992 | A |
5512131 | Kumar et al. | Apr 1996 | A |
5611279 | Ando et al. | Mar 1997 | A |
5772905 | Chou | Jun 1998 | A |
5776748 | Singhvi et al. | Jul 1998 | A |
5830529 | Ross | Nov 1998 | A |
5948621 | Turner et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
6000335 | Imamaki et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6015603 | Ou-Yang | Jan 2000 | A |
6027595 | Suleski | Feb 2000 | A |
6165911 | Calveley | Dec 2000 | A |
6231948 | Ouellette et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6276272 | Takami et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6311618 | Okumura et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6354827 | Kerfeld | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6444254 | Chilkoti et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6458426 | Bulovic et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6468819 | Kim et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6673287 | Breen et al. | Jan 2004 | B1 |
6780492 | Hawker et al. | Aug 2004 | B1 |
6887332 | Kagan et al. | May 2005 | B1 |
6957608 | Hubert et al. | Oct 2005 | B1 |
6966997 | Inganas et al. | Nov 2005 | B1 |
6972261 | Wong et al. | Dec 2005 | B1 |
20020021657 | Lee et al. | Feb 2002 | A1 |
20020050220 | Schueller et al. | May 2002 | A1 |
20020094594 | Kim et al. | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20030047535 | Schueller et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030178316 | Jacobs et al. | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20040121066 | Anderson et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040170117 | Edwards et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040231781 | Bao et al. | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20040235406 | Duescher | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20050120902 | Adams et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050121415 | Paek et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050139103 | Cracauer et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050221271 | Murphy et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20050098537 A1 | May 2005 | US |