The present disclosure generally relates to semiconductor devices, and, more particularly, to methods for making semiconductor devices with enhanced semiconductor materials and associated methods.
Structures and techniques have been proposed to enhance the performance of semiconductor devices, such as by enhancing the mobility of the charge carriers. For example, U.S. Patent Application No. 2003/0057416 to Currie et al. discloses strained material layers of silicon, silicon-germanium, and relaxed silicon and also including impurity-free zones that would otherwise cause performance degradation. The resulting biaxial strain in the upper silicon layer alters the carrier mobilities enabling higher speed and/or lower power devices. Published U.S. Patent Application No. 2003/0034529 to Fitzgerald et al. discloses a CMOS inverter also based upon similar strained silicon technology.
U.S. Pat. No. 6,472,685 B2 to Takagi discloses a semiconductor device including a silicon and carbon layer sandwiched between silicon layers so that the conduction band and valence band of the second silicon layer receive a tensile strain. Electrons having a smaller effective mass, and which have been induced by an electric field applied to the gate electrode, are confined in the second silicon layer, thus, an re-channel MOSFET is asserted to have a higher mobility.
U.S. Pat. No. 4,937,204 to Ishibashi et al. discloses a superlattice in which a plurality of layers, less than eight monolayers, and containing a fractional or binary or a binary compound semiconductor layer, are alternately and epitaxially grown. The direction of main current flow is perpendicular to the layers of the superlattice.
U.S. Pat. No. 5,357,119 to Wang et al. discloses a Si—Ge short period superlattice with higher mobility achieved by reducing alloy scattering in the superlattice. Along these lines, U.S. Pat. No. 5,683,934 to Candelaria discloses an enhanced mobility MOSFET including a channel layer comprising an alloy of silicon and a second material substitutionally present in the silicon lattice at a percentage that places the channel layer under tensile stress.
U.S. Pat. No. 5,216,262 to Tsu discloses a quantum well structure comprising two barrier regions and a thin epitaxially grown semiconductor layer sandwiched between the barriers. Each barrier region consists of alternate layers of SiO2/Si with a thickness generally in a range of two to six monolayers. A much thicker section of silicon is sandwiched between the barriers.
An article entitled “Phenomena in silicon nanostructure devices” also to Tsu and published online Sep. 6, 2000 by Applied Physics and Materials Science & Processing, pp. 391-402 discloses a semiconductor-atomic superlattice (SAS) of silicon and oxygen. The Si/O superlattice is disclosed as useful in a silicon quantum and light-emitting devices. In particular, a green electroluminescence diode structure was constructed and tested. Current flow in the diode structure is vertical, that is, perpendicular to the layers of the SAS. The disclosed SAS may include semiconductor layers separated by adsorbed species such as oxygen atoms, and CO molecules. The silicon growth beyond the adsorbed monolayer of oxygen is described as epitaxial with a fairly low defect density. One SAS structure included a 1.1 nm thick silicon portion that is about eight atomic layers of silicon, and another structure had twice this thickness of silicon. An article to Luo et al. entitled “Chemical Design of Direct-Gap Light-Emitting Silicon” published in Physical Review Letters, Vol. 89, No. 7 (Aug. 12, 2002) further discusses the light emitting SAS structures of Tsu.
U.S. Pat. No. 7,105,895 to Wang et al. discloses a barrier building block of thin silicon and oxygen, carbon, nitrogen, phosphorous, antimony, arsenic or hydrogen to thereby reduce current flowing vertically through the lattice more than four orders of magnitude. The insulating layer/barrier layer allows for low defect epitaxial silicon to be deposited next to the insulating layer.
Published Great Britain Patent Application 2,347,520 to Mears et al. discloses that principles of Aperiodic Photonic Band-Gap (APBG) structures may be adapted for electronic bandgap engineering. In particular, the application discloses that material parameters, for example, the location of band minima, effective mass, etc., can be tailored to yield new aperiodic materials with desirable band-structure characteristics. Other parameters, such as electrical conductivity, thermal conductivity and dielectric permittivity or magnetic permeability are disclosed as also possible to be designed into the material.
Furthermore, U.S. Pat. No. 6,376,337 to Wang et al. discloses a method for producing an insulating or barrier layer for semiconductor devices which includes depositing a layer of silicon and at least one additional element on the silicon substrate whereby the deposited layer is substantially free of defects such that epitaxial silicon substantially free of defects can be deposited on the deposited layer. Alternatively, a monolayer of one or more elements, preferably comprising oxygen, is absorbed on a silicon substrate. A plurality of insulating layers sandwiched between epitaxial silicon forms a barrier composite.
Despite the existence of such approaches, further enhancements may be desirable for using advanced semiconductor materials and processing techniques to achieve improved performance in semiconductor devices.
A method for making a semiconductor device may include forming a superlattice above a semiconductor layer. The superlattice may include a plurality of stacked groups of layers, with each group of layers including a plurality of stacked base semiconductor monolayers defining a base semiconductor portion and at least one non-semiconductor monolayer constrained within a crystal lattice of adjacent base semiconductor portions. The method may further include selectively etching the superlattice to remove semiconductor atoms and cause non-semiconductor atoms to accumulate and define an etch stop layer.
In an example embodiment, the method may further include epitaxially growing an active semiconductor layer above the etch stop layer. In another example implementation, the method may include removing the etch stop layer. Furthermore, the method may also include forming at least one other superlattice between the semiconductor layer and the superlattice layer, with the at least one other superlattice including a plurality of stacked groups of layers, and each group of layers including a plurality of stacked base semiconductor monolayers defining a base semiconductor portion and at least one non-semiconductor monolayer constrained within a crystal lattice of adjacent base semiconductor portions.
By way of example, selectively etching may comprise chemical etching or plasma etching. The at least one non-semiconductor monolayer may comprise a non-semiconductor selected from the group consisting of oxygen, nitrogen, fluorine, carbon and carbon-oxygen, for example. Furthermore, the base semiconductor layers may comprise silicon, for example. Also by way of example, the etch stop layer may comprise at least one full monolayer of non-semiconductor atoms.
Example embodiments will now be described more fully hereinafter with reference to the accompanying drawings, in which the example embodiments are shown. The embodiments may, however, be implemented in many different forms and should not be construed as limited to the specific examples set forth herein. Rather, these embodiments are provided so that this disclosure will be thorough and complete. Like numbers refer to like elements throughout, and prime notation is used to indicate similar elements in different embodiments.
Generally speaking, the present disclosure relates to the formation of semiconductor devices utilizing an enhanced semiconductor superlattice. The enhanced semiconductor superlattice may also be referred to as an “MST” layer/film or “MST technology” in this disclosure.
More particularly, the MST technology relates to advanced semiconductor materials such as the superlattice 25 described further below. Applicant theorizes, without wishing to be bound thereto, that certain superlattices as described herein reduce the effective mass of charge carriers and that this thereby leads to higher charge carrier mobility. Effective mass is described with various definitions in the literature. As a measure of the improvement in effective mass Applicant's use a “conductivity reciprocal effective mass tensor”, Me−1 and Mh−1 for electrons and holes respectively, defined as:
for electrons and:
for holes, where f is the Fermi-Dirac distribution, EF is the Fermi energy, T is the temperature, E(k,n) is the energy of an electron in the state corresponding to wave vector k and the nth energy band, the indices i and j refer to Cartesian coordinates x, y and z, the integrals are taken over the Brillouin zone (B.Z.), and the summations are taken over bands with energies above and below the Fermi energy for electrons and holes respectively.
Applicant's definition of the conductivity reciprocal effective mass tensor is such that a tensorial component of the conductivity of the material is greater for greater values of the corresponding component of the conductivity reciprocal effective mass tensor. Again, Applicant theorizes without wishing to be bound thereto that the superlattices described herein set the values of the conductivity reciprocal effective mass tensor so as to enhance the conductive properties of the material, such as typically for a preferred direction of charge carrier transport. The inverse of the appropriate tensor element is referred to as the conductivity effective mass. In other words, to characterize semiconductor material structures, the conductivity effective mass for electrons/holes as described above and calculated in the direction of intended carrier transport is used to distinguish improved materials.
Applicant has identified improved materials or structures for use in semiconductor devices. More specifically, Applicant has identified materials or structures having energy band structures for which the appropriate conductivity effective masses for electrons and/or holes are substantially less than the corresponding values for silicon. In addition to the enhanced mobility characteristics of these structures, they may also be formed or used in such a manner that they provide piezoelectric, pyroelectric, and/or ferroelectric properties that are advantageous for use in a variety of different types of devices, as will be discussed further below.
Referring now to
Each group of layers 45a-45n of the superlattice 25 illustratively includes a plurality of stacked base semiconductor monolayers 46 defining a respective base semiconductor portion 46a-46n and an energy band-modifying layer 50 thereon. The energy band-modifying layers 50 are indicated by stippling in
The energy band-modifying layer 50 illustratively includes one non-semiconductor monolayer constrained within a crystal lattice of adjacent base semiconductor portions. By “constrained within a crystal lattice of adjacent base semiconductor portions” it is meant that at least some semiconductor atoms from opposing base semiconductor portions 46a-46n are chemically bound together through the non-semiconductor monolayer 50 therebetween, as seen in
In other embodiments, more than one such non-semiconductor monolayer may be possible. It should be noted that reference herein to a non-semiconductor or semiconductor monolayer means that the material used for the monolayer would be a non-semiconductor or semiconductor if formed in bulk. That is, a single monolayer of a material, such as silicon, may not necessarily exhibit the same properties that it would if formed in bulk or in a relatively thick layer, as will be appreciated by those skilled in the art.
Applicant theorizes without wishing to be bound thereto that energy band-modifying layers 50 and adjacent base semiconductor portions 46a-46n cause the superlattice 25 to have a lower appropriate conductivity effective mass for the charge carriers in the parallel layer direction than would otherwise be present. Considered another way, this parallel direction is orthogonal to the stacking direction. The band modifying layers 50 may also cause the superlattice 25 to have a common energy band structure, while also advantageously functioning as an insulator between layers or regions vertically above and below the superlattice.
Moreover, this superlattice structure may also advantageously act as a barrier to dopant and/or material diffusion between layers vertically above and below the superlattice 25. These properties may thus advantageously allow the superlattice 25 to provide an interface for high-K dielectrics which not only reduces diffusion of the high-K material into the channel region, but which may also advantageously reduce unwanted scattering effects and improve device mobility, as will be appreciated by those skilled in the art.
It is also theorized that semiconductor devices including the superlattice 25 may enjoy a higher charge carrier mobility based upon the lower conductivity effective mass than would otherwise be present. In some embodiments, and as a result of the band engineering achieved by the present invention, the superlattice 25 may further have a substantially direct energy bandgap that may be particularly advantageous for opto-electronic devices, for example.
The superlattice 25 also illustratively includes a cap layer 52 on an upper layer group 45n. The cap layer 52 may comprise a plurality of base semiconductor monolayers 46. By way of example, the cap layer 52 may have between 1 to 100 monolayers 46 of the base semiconductor, and, more preferably between 10 to 50 monolayers. However, in some applications the cap layer 52 may be omitted, or thicknesses greater than 100 monolayers may be used.
Each base semiconductor portion 46a-46n may comprise a base semiconductor selected from the group consisting of Group IV semiconductors, Group III-V semiconductors, and Group II-VI semiconductors. Of course, the term Group IV semiconductors also includes Group IV-IV semiconductors, as will be appreciated by those skilled in the art. More particularly, the base semiconductor may comprise at least one of silicon and germanium, for example.
Each energy band-modifying layer 50 may comprise a non-semiconductor selected from the group consisting of oxygen, nitrogen, fluorine, carbon and carbon-oxygen, for example. The non-semiconductor is also desirably thermally stable through deposition of a next layer to thereby facilitate manufacturing. In other embodiments, the non-semiconductor may be another inorganic or organic element or compound that is compatible with the given semiconductor processing as will be appreciated by those skilled in the art. More particularly, the base semiconductor may comprise at least one of silicon and germanium, for example.
It should be noted that the term monolayer is meant to include a single atomic layer and also a single molecular layer. It is also noted that the energy band-modifying layer 50 provided by a single monolayer is also meant to include a monolayer wherein not all of the possible sites are occupied (i.e., there is less than full or 100% coverage). For example, with particular reference to the atomic diagram of
In other embodiments and/or with different materials this one-half occupation would not necessarily be the case as will be appreciated by those skilled in the art. Indeed, it can be seen even in this schematic diagram, that individual atoms of oxygen in a given monolayer are not precisely aligned along a flat plane as will also be appreciated by those of skill in the art of atomic deposition. By way of example, a preferred occupation range is from about one-eighth to one-half of the possible oxygen sites being full, although other numbers may be used in certain embodiments.
Silicon and oxygen are currently widely used in conventional semiconductor processing, and, hence, manufacturers will be readily able to use these materials as described herein. Atomic or monolayer deposition is also now widely used. Accordingly, semiconductor devices incorporating the superlattice 25 in accordance with the invention may be readily adopted and implemented, as will be appreciated by those skilled in the art.
It is theorized without Applicant wishing to be bound thereto that for a superlattice, such as the Si/O superlattice, for example, that the number of silicon monolayers should desirably be seven or less so that the energy band of the superlattice is common or relatively uniform throughout to achieve the desired advantages. The 4/1 repeating structure shown in
While such a directionally preferential feature may be desired in certain semiconductor devices, other devices may benefit from a more uniform increase in mobility in any direction parallel to the groups of layers. It may also be beneficial to have an increased mobility for both electrons and holes, or just one of these types of charge carriers as will be appreciated by those skilled in the art.
The lower conductivity effective mass for the 4/1 Si/O embodiment of the superlattice 25 may be less than two-thirds the conductivity effective mass than would otherwise occur, and this applies for both electrons and holes. Of course, the superlattice 25 may further comprise at least one type of conductivity dopant therein, as will also be appreciated by those skilled in the art.
Indeed, referring now additionally to
In some device embodiments, all of the base semiconductor portions of a superlattice may be a same number of monolayers thick. In other embodiments, at least some of the base semiconductor portions may be a different number of monolayers thick. In still other embodiments, all of the base semiconductor portions may be a different number of monolayers thick.
In
It can be seen that the conduction band minimum for the 4/1 Si/O structure is located at the gamma point in contrast to bulk silicon (Si), whereas the valence band minimum occurs at the edge of the Brillouin zone in the (001) direction which we refer to as the Z point. One may also note the greater curvature of the conduction band minimum for the 4/1 Si/O structure compared to the curvature of the conduction band minimum for Si owing to the band splitting due to the perturbation introduced by the additional oxygen layer.
Although increased curvature is an indication of reduced effective mass, the appropriate comparison and discrimination may be made via the conductivity reciprocal effective mass tensor calculation. This leads Applicant to further theorize that the 5/1/3/1 superlattice 25′ should be substantially direct bandgap. As will be understood by those skilled in the art, the appropriate matrix element for optical transition is another indicator of the distinction between direct and indirect bandgap behavior.
Using the above-described techniques, advanced semiconductor devices may be fabricated in which one or more MST layers may be selectively etched to accumulate non-semiconductor atoms in the MST layer(s) (e.g., oxygen, carbon, nitrogen, etc.) in a desired location, such as to provide an etch stop layer. This approach may conceptually be considered as “bulldozing” non-semiconductor atoms to a desired location, in that these atoms are pushed/piled up as semiconductor (e.g., silicon) atoms are etched away at a higher rate than then dopants/alloyed atoms.
Referring initially to the flow diagram 100 of
Referring additionally to
Furthermore, another less stable Si/O superlattice 125d′ was then formed on the cap layer 152a′, followed by another cap layer 152b′. A second H2 anneal was then performed on the entire structure 130′, also at a temperature of 1000° C. for 300 seconds. Heating from the anneals causes non-semiconductor atoms from the superlattices 125a′, 125c′ to migrate toward the non-semiconductor monolayer(s) of the superlattice 125b′. The result of having the different types of thermally stable superlattices 125a′-125d′ and the anneals results in an oxygen accumulation 181 located at approximately 45 nm from the upper surface of the cap layer 152b′, as seen in
Also in the present example, different film recipes or configurations were used for different MST layers. For example, these may correspond to different numbers of repeating groups of layers, different numbers of semiconductor monolayers in the groups (e.g., 2/1, 5/1, 10/1, etc.), and in some cases different types of semiconductor and/or non-semiconductor materials may be used in the different MST layers. Moreover, in the present example etch-back processing was used to fabricate the MST films with reduced defects. Further details on this etch-back process are set forth in U.S. Pat. Nos. 10,566,191 and 10,811,498, which are assigned to the present Applicant and are hereby incorporated herein in their entireties by reference. In
After the second thermal anneal was performed to concentrate oxygen atoms as noted above, a 120 second bulldozing etch was performed using a thermal etch (chemical vapor HCl etch) which resulted in 170A of silicon removal, the results of which are shown in the graph 190. In particular, a total oxygen dose of 2.88×10 at/cm2 was used, and the oxygen accumulation 181 which was at 4.71×1021 atoms/cm3 after ASED processing increased to 5.43×1021 atoms/cm3 as a result of the bulldozing etch, as shown in the graph 190. Yet, despite no further oxygen dosage being applied, the oxygen interfacial accumulation 181 increased by approximately fifteen percent solely by adding the thermal bulldozing etch following ASED processing. It was also observed that the top oxygen donor layers were completely bulldozed into the lower MST layer 125b′.
Accordingly, if the etch time is extended for a long enough duration, then the oxygen peak 181 would increase to the point where the accumulated oxygen defines an etch stop layer that will stop the etch (or subsequent etches performed during later processing) completely. As will be appreciated by those skilled in the art, HCl exhibits selectivity to dielectrics such as SiO2 and Si3N4, and it has an affinity to remove/react with silicon atoms from the surface faster than oxygen. This allows most of the oxygen atoms to condensate/remain in the underlying epitaxial growth. Moreover, the bulldozing approach may be used to ensure that the final structure is just the ASED MST layer 125b′. In this application, the layers above the ASED MST layer 125b′ serve as sacrificial oxygen donor layers.
The above-described example utilized a thermal HCl etch to perform bulldozing, i.e., the pushing and piling up of non-semiconductor atoms (e.g., oxygen, carbon, nitrogen, boron, sulfur, phosphorus, selenium, etc.), as semiconductor atoms (e.g., silicon, germanium, etc.) are etched away at a higher rate than then dopants/alloyed atoms. In other example embodiments, bulldozing may be performed using plasma, thermal, or wet etching. In some cases, the end goal is that that silicon (or an alloy thereof such as SiGe, SiGeSn, etc.) grown or deposited on top of an MST layer is removed with an etch, and when the etch comes in contact with the MST layers the oxygen or other alloy atom will be pushed and piled up until a critical accumulation is reached that stops the etch all together. In the alternative, it may have significant etch selectivity such that the etch stop layer etches much slower as compared to the silicon capping layer.
Plasma etch may be performed using a process chamber that produces a local or remote plasma. These etches are often referred to as reactive ion etching (RIE), or chemical etching. Sirconi™ and Previum™ are examples of chemical plasma etches where the precursors are ionized and then either reacted directly with the surface that is to be etched, or mixed with another ionized precursor to form an etchant. One example of the latter would be the ionization of NF3 and then mixing the gas stream with NH3 to form ammonium bifluoride (NH4HF2) or ammonium fluoride (NH4F) to selectively etch silicon dioxide using a remote plasma. Etch selectivity of SiO2/epitaxial silicon approaches infinity.
There are many plasma etch precursors, of which SF6, CF4 are common. Plasma etch power may be used to adjust the etch selectivity of the plasma. To achieve improved etch selectivity with such chemistries the plasma power and frequency may be optimized, such as by reducing the silicon etch rate by reducing plasma power.
Mixtures of hydrogen, bromine, chlorine, and in some cases oxygen in plasma etching have also been shown to have great etch selectivity to silicon dioxide, silicon nitride, and silicon carbide while having high silicon etch rates. Etch selectivity of these plasma etches may be adjusted using plasma power and ion precursor ratios. For example, at high plasma power (KW) the etch is more driven like a plasma ion etch and may be used to remove a native oxide from the surface of the silicon substrate. At lower bias, these hydrogen, bromine, and chlorine etch chemistries become more chemical. Cl2/HBr etches are an established standard used in the semiconductor industry to etch silicon and stop on gate oxide, as they have nearly infinite selectivity to silicon oxide.
In addition to Cl2/HBr not etching silicon oxide, it also has nearly infinite selectivity to carbon. If one were to deposit an MST film including carbon monolayers and then start etching it with a Cl2/HBr plasma etch, the carbon and/or oxygen in the MST film would be bulldozed until a full monolayer of carbon and oxygen was formed to define an etch stop with nearly infinite selectivity. The chemical nature of the Cl2/HBr plasma drives the selectivity. Si—C and Si—O bonds are stronger than Si—Si bonds. In some cases, O2 may be added to the gas stream. The following table provides a summary of example etches that may be used for common materials in certain bulldozing applications.
With respect to wet etching, tetramethylammonium hydroxide, or N(CH3)4OH, also known as TMAH, is a good example of a chemical used in wet etching of silicon in the semiconductor industry. This type of etch, or any other etchant that will etch silicon but not oxide and nitrides, may be used for bulldozing MST oxygen until the oxygen content stops the etching, if desired. As with the thermal and plasma etches, the etch rate is important. The TMAH-to-H2O ratio may be optimized to adjust the etch rate and selectivity. Etch temperature also plays a role in selectivity, as will be appreciated by those skilled in the art.
KOH may be used in some embodiments, such as for etch stop layers for micro-electromechanical (MEMS) devices, but care should be taken for advanced semiconductor applications as the potassium may be a contaminant. EDP, HNA (HF, Nitric, and acetic acid), and BOE are other examples. All of these wet etchants show selectivity to etching silicon over dielectrics. Using these at the appropriate etch rate, they would bulldoze the oxygen until an etch barrier is formed.
Referring additionally to
More particularly, the illustrated MOSFET 200 includes source/drain regions 222, 223 defining a channel region therebetween. In some embodiments, an MST layer may be formed in the channel region, if desired. Moreover, in configurations such as the structure 130′, there may be one or more MST layers underneath the etch stop layer 126. Source/drain contacts 232, 233 overlie the source/drain regions 222, 223. A gate 235 illustratively includes a gate insulating layer 237 over the channel region, and a gate electrode layer 236 on the gate insulating layer. Sidewall spacers 240 are also provided in the illustrated MOSFET 200, along with a gate contact layer 241. Other semiconductor circuits and devices (e.g., FINFETs, MEMS devices, etc.) may also or instead be formed in the active semiconductor layer 201 in different embodiments. Other applications for the above-described bulldozing approach may include the formation of SOI wafers with circuits using a flip-chip process, where the etch stop layer is used to prevent etching down into the circuitry after wafer bonding. Moreover, in some embodiments, the accumulated non-semiconductor atoms of the layer 261 may be removed (e.g., with an HF etch) before further device processing, such as in the embodiment of the MOSFET 200′ shown in
Further details regarding the above-described configurations are provided in co-pending application bearing Ser. No. 17/452,604 and filed Oct. 28, 2021, which is hereby incorporated herein in its entirety by reference.
Many modifications and other embodiments of the invention will come to the mind of one skilled in the art having the benefit of the teachings presented in the foregoing descriptions and the associated drawings. Therefore, it is understood that the invention is not to be limited to the specific embodiments disclosed, and that modifications and embodiments are intended to be included within the scope of the appended claims.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4937204 | Ishibashi et al. | Jun 1990 | A |
5216262 | Tsu | Jun 1993 | A |
5357119 | Wang et al. | Oct 1994 | A |
5683934 | Candelaria | Nov 1997 | A |
5796119 | Seabaugh | Aug 1998 | A |
6141361 | Mears et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6376337 | Wang et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6472685 | Takagi | Oct 2002 | B2 |
6741624 | Mears et al. | May 2004 | B2 |
6830964 | Mears et al. | Dec 2004 | B1 |
6833294 | Mears et al. | Dec 2004 | B1 |
6878576 | Mears et al. | Apr 2005 | B1 |
6891188 | Mears et al. | May 2005 | B2 |
6897472 | Mears et al. | May 2005 | B2 |
6927413 | Mears et al. | Aug 2005 | B2 |
6952018 | Mears et al. | Oct 2005 | B2 |
6958486 | Mears et al. | Oct 2005 | B2 |
6993222 | Mears et al. | Jan 2006 | B2 |
7018900 | Kreps | Mar 2006 | B2 |
7033437 | Mears et al. | Apr 2006 | B2 |
7034329 | Mears et al. | Apr 2006 | B2 |
7045377 | Mears et al. | May 2006 | B2 |
7045813 | Mears et al. | May 2006 | B2 |
7071119 | Mears et al. | Jul 2006 | B2 |
7105895 | Wang et al. | Sep 2006 | B2 |
7109052 | Mears et al. | Sep 2006 | B2 |
7123792 | Mears et al. | Oct 2006 | B1 |
7148712 | Prey, Jr. et al. | Dec 2006 | B1 |
7153763 | Hytha et al. | Dec 2006 | B2 |
7202494 | Blanchard et al. | Apr 2007 | B2 |
7227174 | Mears et al. | Jun 2007 | B2 |
7229902 | Mears et al. | Jun 2007 | B2 |
7265002 | Mears et al. | Sep 2007 | B2 |
7279699 | Mears et al. | Oct 2007 | B2 |
7279701 | Kreps | Oct 2007 | B2 |
7288457 | Kreps | Oct 2007 | B2 |
7303948 | Mears et al. | Dec 2007 | B2 |
7432524 | Mears et al. | Oct 2008 | B2 |
7435988 | Mears et al. | Oct 2008 | B2 |
7436026 | Kreps | Oct 2008 | B2 |
7446002 | Mears et al. | Nov 2008 | B2 |
7446334 | Mears et al. | Nov 2008 | B2 |
7491587 | Rao | Feb 2009 | B2 |
7514328 | Rao | Apr 2009 | B2 |
7517702 | Halilov et al. | Apr 2009 | B2 |
7531828 | Mears et al. | May 2009 | B2 |
7531829 | Blanchard | May 2009 | B2 |
7531850 | Blanchard | May 2009 | B2 |
7586116 | Kreps et al. | Sep 2009 | B2 |
7586165 | Blanchard | Sep 2009 | B2 |
7598515 | Mears et al. | Oct 2009 | B2 |
7612366 | Mears et al. | Nov 2009 | B2 |
7625767 | Huang et al. | Dec 2009 | B2 |
7659539 | Kreps et al. | Feb 2010 | B2 |
7700447 | Dukovski et al. | Apr 2010 | B2 |
7718996 | Dukovski et al. | May 2010 | B2 |
7781827 | Rao | Aug 2010 | B2 |
7812339 | Mears et al. | Oct 2010 | B2 |
7863066 | Mears et al. | Jan 2011 | B2 |
7880161 | Mears et al. | Feb 2011 | B2 |
7928425 | Rao | Apr 2011 | B2 |
8389974 | Mears et al. | Mar 2013 | B2 |
8537870 | Jikutani et al. | Sep 2013 | B2 |
9099423 | Weeks et al. | Aug 2015 | B2 |
9275996 | Mears et al. | Mar 2016 | B2 |
9406753 | Mears et al. | Aug 2016 | B2 |
9558939 | Stephenson et al. | Jan 2017 | B1 |
9711598 | Kavalieros et al. | Jul 2017 | B2 |
9899479 | Mears et al. | Feb 2018 | B2 |
9941359 | Mears et al. | Apr 2018 | B2 |
9972685 | Mears et al. | May 2018 | B2 |
10084045 | Mears et al. | Sep 2018 | B2 |
10107854 | Roy | Oct 2018 | B2 |
10109342 | Roy | Oct 2018 | B2 |
10109479 | Mears et al. | Oct 2018 | B1 |
10170560 | Mears | Jan 2019 | B2 |
10170603 | Mears et al. | Jan 2019 | B2 |
10170604 | Mears et al. | Jan 2019 | B2 |
10191105 | Roy | Jan 2019 | B2 |
10249745 | Mears et al. | Apr 2019 | B2 |
10276625 | Mears et al. | Apr 2019 | B1 |
10304881 | Chen et al. | May 2019 | B1 |
10355151 | Chen et al. | Jul 2019 | B2 |
10361243 | Mears et al. | Jul 2019 | B2 |
10367028 | Chen et al. | Jul 2019 | B2 |
10367064 | Rao | Jul 2019 | B2 |
10381242 | Takeuchi | Aug 2019 | B2 |
10396223 | Chen et al. | Aug 2019 | B2 |
10410880 | Takeuchi | Sep 2019 | B2 |
10453945 | Mears et al. | Oct 2019 | B2 |
10461118 | Chen et al. | Oct 2019 | B2 |
10468245 | Weeks et al. | Nov 2019 | B2 |
10529757 | Chen et al. | Jan 2020 | B2 |
10529768 | Chen et al. | Jan 2020 | B2 |
10566191 | Weeks et al. | Feb 2020 | B1 |
10580866 | Takeuchi et al. | Mar 2020 | B1 |
10580867 | Takeuchi et al. | Mar 2020 | B1 |
10593761 | Takeuchi et al. | Mar 2020 | B1 |
10608027 | Chen et al. | Mar 2020 | B2 |
10608043 | Chen et al. | Mar 2020 | B2 |
10615209 | Chen et al. | Apr 2020 | B2 |
10636879 | Rao | Apr 2020 | B2 |
10727049 | Weeks et al. | Jul 2020 | B2 |
10741436 | Stephenson et al. | Aug 2020 | B2 |
10763370 | Stephenson | Sep 2020 | B2 |
10777451 | Stephenson et al. | Sep 2020 | B2 |
10811498 | Weeks et al. | Oct 2020 | B2 |
10818755 | Takeuchi et al. | Oct 2020 | B2 |
10825901 | Burton et al. | Nov 2020 | B1 |
10825902 | Burton et al. | Nov 2020 | B1 |
10840335 | Takeuchi et al. | Nov 2020 | B2 |
10840336 | Connelly et al. | Nov 2020 | B2 |
10840337 | Takeuchi et al. | Nov 2020 | B2 |
10840388 | Burton et al. | Nov 2020 | B1 |
10847618 | Takeuchi et al. | Nov 2020 | B2 |
10854717 | Takeuchi et al. | Dec 2020 | B2 |
10868120 | Burton et al. | Dec 2020 | B1 |
10879356 | Stephenson et al. | Dec 2020 | B2 |
10879357 | Burton et al. | Dec 2020 | B1 |
10884185 | Stephenson | Jan 2021 | B2 |
10937868 | Burton et al. | Mar 2021 | B2 |
10937888 | Burton et al. | Mar 2021 | B2 |
11075078 | Cody et al. | Jul 2021 | B1 |
20030034529 | Fitzgerald et al. | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030057416 | Currie et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20050279991 | Mears et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20050282330 | Mears et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20060220118 | Stephenson et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060267130 | Rao | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20070012910 | Mears et al. | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070020833 | Mears et al. | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20080012004 | Huang et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080258134 | Mears et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20100059737 | Bhuwalka et al. | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20110215299 | Rao | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20150357414 | Mears | Dec 2015 | A1 |
20160149023 | Mears et al. | May 2016 | A1 |
20160351747 | Forrest et al. | Dec 2016 | A1 |
20160358773 | Mears | Dec 2016 | A1 |
20170236924 | Balakrishnan | Aug 2017 | A1 |
20190058059 | Stephenson et al. | Feb 2019 | A1 |
20190189652 | Chen et al. | Jun 2019 | A1 |
20190319135 | Stephenson | Oct 2019 | A1 |
20190319167 | Stephenson | Oct 2019 | A1 |
20200135489 | Weeks | Apr 2020 | A1 |
20200343367 | Takeuchi et al. | Oct 2020 | A1 |
20200343380 | Takeuchi et al. | Oct 2020 | A1 |
20200411645 | Weeks et al. | Dec 2020 | A1 |
20210020749 | Burton et al. | Jan 2021 | A1 |
20210074814 | Stephenson et al. | Mar 2021 | A1 |
20210217875 | Burton | Jul 2021 | A1 |
20210217880 | Burton | Jul 2021 | A1 |
20210265220 | Lee et al. | Aug 2021 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2347520 | Jun 2000 | GB |
2021002593 | Jan 2021 | JP |
2013039807 | Apr 2013 | KR |
2020102283 | May 2020 | WO |
Entry |
---|
U.S. Appl. No. 16/801,287, filed Feb. 26, 2020 Weeks et al. |
U.S. Appl. No. 16/801,305, filed Feb. 26, 2020 Weeks et al. |
U.S. Appl. No. 16/898,564, filed Jun. 11, 2020 Takeuchi et al. |
U.S. Appl. No. 16/898,589, filed Jun. 11, 2020 Takeuchi et al. |
U.S. Appl. No. 17/236,289, filed Apr. 21, 2021 Hytha et al. |
U.S. Appl. No. 17/236,329, filed Apr. 21, 2021 Hytha et al. |
U.S. Appl. No. 17/305,098, filed Jun. 30, 2021 Weeks et al. |
U.S. Appl. No. 17/305,101, filed Jun. 30, 2021 Weeks et al. |
U.S. Appl. No. 17/305,192, filed Jul. 1, 2021 Weeks et al. |
U.S. Appl. No. 17/330,831, filed May 26, 2021 Hytha et al. |
U.S. Appl. No. 17/330,860, filed May 26, 2021 Hytha et al. |
Luo et al., “Chemical Design of Direct-Gap Light-Emitting Silicon” published in Physical Review Letters, vol. 89, No. 7; Aug. 12, 2002; 4 pgs. |
Mears et al. “Simultaneous Carrier Transport Enhancement and variability reduction in Si MOSFETs by insertion of partial Monolayers of oxygen” IEEE silicon Nanoelectronics Workshop (2012): (Date of conference Jun. 10-11, 2012) pp. 2. |
Novikov et al. “Silicon-based Optoelectronics” 1999-2003, pp. 1-6. |
R. Tsu “Phenomena in silicon nanostructure device” published online Sep. 6, 2000 by Applied Physics and Materials Science & Processing, pp. 391-402. |
R. Tsu “Si Based Green ELD: Si-Oxygen Superlattice” ysiwyg://l/http://www3.interscience.wiley.com/cgi-bin/abstract/72512946/start: published online Jul. 21, 2000; 2 pgs. Abstract Only. |
Xu et al. “Effectiveness of Quasi-confinement technology for improving P-chanel Si an Ge MOSSFET performance” Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, University of California, Berkeley, 2012, pp. 2. mearstech.net; retrieved from internet Jan. 18, 2016. |
Xu et al. “Extension of planar bulk n-channel MOSFET scaling with oxygen insertion technology” IEEE Transactions on Electron devices, vol. 61, No. 9; Sep. 2014. pgs. 3345-3349. |
Xu et al., “MOSFET performance and scalability enhancement by insertion of oxygen layers”, Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, University of California, Berkeley, 2012, pp. 1-4. |
https://www.pall.com/content/dam/pall/microelectronics/literature-library/non-gated/HBr_Polysilicon.pdf. |
U.S. Appl. No. 17/452,604, filed Oct. 28, 2021 Hytha et al. |
Balachova et al., “CF4 plasma etching of materials used in microelectronics manufacturing”, Microelectronic Journal, Oct. 1999, pp. 213-215. |
Isheden et al., “Mosfe I s with recessed SiGe source/drain junctions formed by selective etching and growth”, Electrochemical and Solid-State letters, Jul. 2003, pgs g53-g55. |
Saggio et al., “Reactive ion etching characterization of a-SiC:H in CF4/O2 plasma”, Materials Science and Engineer B29, 1995, pp. 176-180. |
“Wet-Chemical Etching of Silicon”, MicroChemicals, www.microchemicals.eu/technical_information, Feb. 2012, pp. 1-3. |