1. Technical Field
This invention relates to the use of multivariate image analysis to detect defects on a production line producing a food product.
2. Description of Related Art
The chemical acrylamide has long been used in its polymer form in industrial applications for water treatment, enhanced oil recovery, papermaking, flocculants, thickeners, ore processing and permanent-press fabrics. Acrylamide precipitates as a white crystalline solid, is odorless, and is highly soluble in water (2155 g/L at 30° C.). Synonyms for acrylamide include 2-propenamide, ethylene carboxamide, acrylic acid amide, vinyl amide, and propenoic acid amide. Acrylamide has a molecular mass of 71.08, a melting point of 84.5° C., and a boiling point of 125° C. at 25 mmHg.
In recent times, a wide variety of foods have tested positive for the presence of acrylamide monomer. Acrylamide has especially been found primarily in carbohydrate food products that have been heated or processed at high temperatures. Examples of foods that have tested positive for acrylamide include coffee, cereals, cookies, potato chips, crackers, french-fried potatoes, breads and rolls, and fried breaded meats. Acrylamide has not been determined to be detrimental to humans, but its presence in food products, especially at elevated levels, is undesirable.
One way to reduce the formation of acrylamide is to thermally process food products to a higher moisture content. However, food products that contain too much moisture have poor organoleptical properties and are undesirable to consumers. It is the objective of the present invention to detect defects, particularly food products having a moisture content above a certain threshold, in a process producing a food product with a higher moisture content.
One aspect of the present invention is directed towards a method for the real time detection of defects in a food product comprising the steps of capturing an image of a food product in the visible spectrum, performing multivariate image analysis on the image to reveal a data set, and determining whether a defect exists in the food product based on the data set. In one aspect, the invention further comprises removal of food products containing a defect prior to a packaging step. One aspect of the invention comprises adjusting a process variable to reduce the number of manufactured food products that are defective. One aspect of the present invention comprises analyzing and removing the food products for acrylamide defects.
One aspect of the present invention is directed towards a field programmable gate array having an algorithm that transforms a color image of a food product into a data set such as a t1-t2 score space via multivariate image analysis, determines if a defect exists based on the data set, and sends a signal to downstream sorting equipment to reject said defect within about 0.002 seconds.
In one aspect, the present invention is directed towards an apparatus for monitoring a process producing a food product for defects. In one aspect, the apparatus comprises an image capturing device, a computing device capable of storing an algorithm, wherein said algorithm transforms a color image of a food product into a suitable expression of an image matrix via multivariate image analysis, and determines if a defect exists based on a resulting data set.
Other aspects, embodiments and features of the invention will become apparent from the following detailed description of the invention when considered in conjunction with the accompanying drawings. The accompanying figures are schematic and are not intended to be drawn to scale. In the figures, each identical, or substantially similar component that is illustrated in various figures is represented by a single numeral or notation. For purposes of clarity, not every component is labeled in every figure. Nor is every component of each embodiment of the invention shown where illustration is not necessary to allow those of ordinary skill in the art to understand the invention.
The novel features believed characteristic of the invention are set forth in the appended claims. The invention itself, however, as well as a preferred mode of use, further objectives and advantages thereof, will be best understood by reference to the following detailed description of illustrative embodiments when read in conjunction with the accompanying drawings, wherein:
a depicts a plurality of fried potato chips, each chip having a desirable crispy region and a defective soft center region;
b is a depiction of the corrected image of the defective soft center region superimposed upon the fried potato chips depicted in
The present invention, in one embodiment, comprises a method for real-time detection of defects in a process producing a food product. The present invention can be used to monitor a process producing a food product and detect food products that contain defects by utilizing multivariate image analysis to differentiate between characteristics of the food product, some of which are defective and some of which are not, that appear similar when viewed in the visible spectrum.
Referring now to
Next, it is determined if a defect exists 120 based on the resulting data set. In one embodiment, if a defect is found, a signal 130 can be sent to sorting equipment, such as a bank of independently selected air nozzles, located downstream from the vision equipment, to reject the food product containing the defect. The sorting equipment then rejects those food products that contain defects by deflecting the defective food products from the conveyor carrying the product with a stream of air from an air nozzle prior to a packaging step.
In one embodiment, the invention comprises using the real time measurement of defects to adjust a process variable in the food manufacturing line to lower the percentage of defects in the food products.
One embodiment of the present invention can be explained with reference to a potato chip production line and “soft center” defects that occur in fried potato chips having a moisture content of greater than about 2.5% by weight. A soft center defect occurs when a thermally processed food such as a fried potato chip is not cooked to a moisture content that ensures a crispy texture throughout the food product. Thus, the central region of the food product is relatively soft. Soft centers are problematic because they adversely affect the shelf life of the product by increasing the amount of moisture in the product container and lead to the product becoming stale more rapidly. Further, soft centers affect the texture of the potato chip, which results in decreased consumer satisfaction, and can cause multiple chips to stick together, which results in problems during further processing.
As foods are thermally processed to higher moisture contents to lower the level of acrylamide in the food, soft center defects become more prevalent. For example, potato chips are typically cooked by frying to a moisture content distribution prophetically depicted by curve 200 in
Existing sorting equipment in the production of potato chips based on the visible spectrum sorts out defective chips based on the degree of darkness (e.g. black, brown, green), and size of the observed defect on the chip. However, detecting soft center defects with the existing equipment is difficult because soft centers reflect light differently than other defects because soft center defects emit a white or glossy/shiny wavelength signature. For example, color is sometimes described in an HSI (hue, saturation, intensity) color space. It is difficult to use the HSI colorspace to accurately detect soft centers because the glare or glossy component, which is mostly unrelated to the object's actual saturation and intensity properties, is necessarily measured by the HSI technology. Further complicating matters is the fact that oil-soaked chips, which are not considered defective, also emit a white or glossy wavelength signature and can be erroneously rejected along with the soft centers.
Oil soaked chips are fried food products where the oil is not attached to the starch. Various regions of the fried chip can be oil-soaked. In some embodiments, because chips are analyzed for defects within a relatively short period of time after exiting the fryer, oil can still be on the surface of the fried food if the oil is not yet been imbibed into the food product. Oil soaked chips are not considered defective. Consequently, a need exists for an apparatus and method to monitor a thermally processed food product production line for soft centers, and selectively reject the soft centers without rejecting oil-soaked chips.
While thermally processed fried food products are typically processed to moisture contents of less than 2.5% by weight of the food product, and more preferably less than about 2.0% by weight of the food product, baked goods such as crackers can be thermally processed to higher moisture contents and still be shelf-stable. Consequently, as used herein, a thermally processed food product is defined as a food product having a moisture content of less than about 5% by weight, and more preferably less than about 3.5% by weight. As used herein, the term chip and thermally processed food product are used interchangeably.
One embodiment of the present invention allows soft center defects and oil-soaked chips to be differentiated by performing multivariate image analysis on an image taken in the visible spectrum of the thermally processed food product to construct an algorithm that can be used to identify features, such as soft center defects and oil-soaked areas on the food product.
A color image captured in the visible spectrum is a multivariate image composed of three variables—red, green and blue channels. The color of each pixel in the image has varying intensities of the colors red, green and blue and is characterized by the numerical values (normally integers from 0 to 255) of its red, green and blue channels. A color image can be expressed as a 3-way matrix. Two dimensions represent the x-y spatial coordinates and the third dimension is the color channel. Without considering the spatial coordinates of pixels, the image matrix can be unfolded and expressed as a 2-way matrix.
I is a 3-way image matrix with image size Nrow×Ncol. I is the unfolded 2-way image matrix. N is the number of pixels in the image, N=Nrow×Ncol, ci,r, ci,g, ci,b (i=1, . . . , N) are the intensity values of the red, green and blue channels for pixel i. ci (i=1, . . . , N) is the i-th row vector of I, which represents the color values of pixel i. Different regression methods known in the art, such as Principle Component Analysis (PCA) or Partial Least Squares (PLS), may be used on the 2-way matrix I to obtain a t1-t2 score space.
For example, multi-way Principle Component Analysis can be performed on the multivariate color image to obtain a t1-t2 score space. Multi-way PCA is equivalent to performing PCA on the unfolded 2-way image matrix I.
where A is the number of principal components, the ta's are score vectors and the corresponding pa's are loading vectors.
Because the row dimension of the 2-way image matrix I is very large (equal to 307,200 for a 480×640 image space) and the column dimension is much smaller (equal to 3 for an RGB color image), a kernel algorithm can be used to compute the loading and score vectors. In this algorithm, the kernel matrix (ITI) is first formed (for a set of images, kernel matrix is calculated as
and then singular value decomposition (SVD) is performed on this very low dimension matrix (3×3 for color image) to obtain loading vectors pa (a=1, . . . , A).
After obtaining loading vectors, the corresponding score vectors to are then computed ta=I pa. Since the first two components normally explain most of the variance, instead of working in original 3-dimensional RGB space, working in the 2-dimensional orthogonal t1-t2 score space allows the images to be more easily interpreted.
a depicts a plurality of fried potato chips, each chip having a desirable, non-defective crispy region 302 and a soft center region 304. The lightly hatched region depicted by numeral 304 necessarily represents a darker color in this drawing than would be indicative of a soft center on an actual color image, and is depicted to show a prophetic soft center region 304.
To develop the algorithm used to accomplish the multivariate image analysis that correlates the color image of a fried potato chip to determine whether the chip is defective, a multiway PCA is performed on two of the images in
Modifications may be made to existing equipment to enable the user to look for white/glossy areas, such as changing the belt material from white to a darker color like blue to allow differentiation between the background/transport belt color and the defect thereby permitting more accurate detection of soft centers. Consequently, in one embodiment, the background color, for example the color of the conveyor belt, is removed from the image in
Next, a mask is created by highlighting an identified defect in the RGB space and observing where the defect falls in the t1-t2 space. A mask 402 is created that highlights the area in the t1-t2 space that is characteristic of the defect, which corresponds to the soft center region identified by numeral 304 in
The area comprising the mask 402 in the t1-t2 space is selected and a corrected image is projected back into the RGB space on the potato chip shown in
The above process can be repeated to define masks that are correlated with other food product properties including, but not limited to, other defects. For example, potato slices with defects have also been found to be linked with higher levels of acrylamide when fried in hot oil (e.g., fried in oil having an oil temperature of greater than about 280° F.) than potato slices having no potato defects. A potato slice having no defects is a slice having an evenly golden color on its entire surface area after frying. Potato defects are well known to those skilled in the art and such defects include, but are not limited to zebra, dry rot, scab, hollow heart, greening, blackleg, sprouting, bruises, leaf roll and sugar defects. Additional detail on defects found in potatoes, including a listing of such defects, can be found in Information Bulletin 205 titled ‘Detection of Potato Tuber, Diseases and Defects’ published by the Cornell University Department of Plant Pathology on their website at http://vegetablemdonline.ppath.cornell.edu/factsheets/Potato_Detection.htm. This information bulletin is incorporated herein by reference.
Several fried potato slices having various defects were fried to a moisture content below 2% by weight in hot oil and analyzed for levels of acrylamide. The results are provided in the table below.
Sugar defects are not typically removed from product streams prior to packaging. Interestingly, chips having the highest acrylamide levels because of sugar defects have not historically been flagged as consumer defects, because these defects have predominantly light to mid-brownish colors and therefore are not considered unacceptable. Rather, defects such as rot, blackleg, and sprouting which have predominantly black or very dark colors are the types of potato defects most likely to be removed prior to packaging.
As exemplified by the data above, removal of defective fried potato chips from the packaging process can help to substantially reduce the average level of acrylamide in a food product serving. Consequently, in one embodiment of the invention, a food product having an acrylamide defect known to be characteristic of high levels of acrylamide is removed prior to packaging the food products. As used herein, a food product has an acrylamide defect known to be characteristic of a high level of acrylamide if the acrylamide concentration due to the defect is more than twice the level of a non-defective potato slice thermally processed under the same conditions. Thus, a slice having a sugar defect is one that because of higher than normal sugar content will produce a finished potato slice having more than twice the level of acrylamide as a potato slice having a normal sugar content (e.g., chipping potatoes typically have less than 0.05% reducing sugar by weight of a fresh potato) that is thermally processed under the same conditions.
In one embodiment, a mask is created by highlighting a non-defective portion of a chip, such as an oil-soaked region and observing where the defect falls in the RGB space. Mask areas can again be selected by trial and error or by an automated algorithm until the oil-soaked area produces a corrected image that adequately covers the non-defective area of the chip. In this way, a differentiation can be made between the light colored area on the potato chip that is caused by a defective soft center as opposed to a light colored area on the potato chip that corresponds to non-defective oil-soaked chip. Software, such as Proportion, from Prosensus, Inc. can be used to develop the algorithm in the manner discussed above to accomplish the multivariate image analysis that can be used to create the corrected image.
This algorithm can then be programmed into a FPGA to determine, based on the captured image and corresponding dataset calculated from that image, the number, type, and degree of defect pixels within the chip, and establish which chips are defective. FPGA's are known in the art and can, for example, be purchased from Hunt Engineering of Brent Knoll Village, Somerset, England.
Advantageously, the present invention, unlike the prior art, permits one or more defective areas within the chip to be aggregated. In one embodiment, defects most associated with acrylamide can be weighted so that acrylamide defects require less defective area for removal than other defects, such as soft centers, which have relatively low levels of acrylamide. Whether a chip is classed as defective can be determined by one or more pre-determined variables. In one embodiment, a defect exists when the dataset or corrected image reveals that at least about 10% of the imaged food comprises a soft center.
In one embodiment, defective chips are targeted for removal. If a chip has been targeted for removal, the FPGA can calculate the target area, translate the target area to the specific rejection nozzles in the bank of air nozzles downstream, calculate the necessary timing, and communicate the firing sequence to the ejector controller. Sorting equipment such as a Manta high capacity sorter available from Key Technologies of Walla Walla, Wash. can be used.
To accomplish this, the algorithm can be programmed into the processor 506 that is connected with the vision equipment 504 and sorting equipment 508. A color image of a potato chip 502 can be taken by the vision equipment 504 and sent to the processing unit 506. The processing unit 506 can comprise an FPGA.
The processor 506 applies the algorithm that was developed by methods discussed above to the image, which transforms the color image into a t1-t2 score space or other suitable expression of the image matrix via multivariate image analysis and determines if a defect exists based on the resulting data set. In one embodiment, the resulting dataset is used to superimpose a corrected image in the RGB space onto the food substrate.
In one embodiment, if a defect exists, a signal is sent to the downstream sorting equipment 508 to reject the defective chip. Using FPGA and/or high speed processor array technology 506 allows the process to occur in less than about 0.002 seconds and more preferably in less than about 0.001 seconds to allow actuation of high speed air solenoid valves connected to air nozzles 508 that are selected to remove identified defects from the product stream. Defective chips are routed to a defect stream 510 while the non-defective chip stream 512 is routed to seasoning and/or packaging.
In one embodiment, if a defect exists, a signal can then be used to adjust process variables to adjust the defect levels in a finished food product. For example, the time and temperature of exposure of a food product in the fryer can be optimized so as to reduce, lower and/or minimize the level of defects in the finished food product. For example, the paddle wheel speed can be decreased to permit a longer residence time in the fryer and/or the hot oil temperature can be increased to fry out the soft centers. Other process levels that can be adjusted include, but are not limited to, oil flow rate into the fryer, the oil level in the fryer, the submerger speed, the take out conveyor speed, the inlet oil temperature, and the product feed rate.
In one embodiment, an evaluation of the defect stream 510 and/or non-defect stream 512 occurs to provide additional fine tuning to the process. For example, in one embodiment, the defect stream 510 is measured to ascertain the level of non-defective chips in the defect stream 510. In one embodiment, the non-defect stream 512 is measured to ascertain the level of defective chips in the non-defective stream 512. This information is collected, along with statistics of the incoming defects by type and degree calculated from the processor 506 and used to adjust the algorithm. Such fine tuning can be achieved in one embodiment by observing the shape of the mask in the t1-t2 image and increasing (causing more of the pixels to fit within the definition of a specified defect class) or decreasing (causing less of the pixels to fit within the definition of a specified defect class) the radial distance from the centroid of the mask, 402 shown in
In one embodiment, the number, type, and degree of defect pixels within each chip in the defective stream 510 and/or the non-defective stream 512 are counted for purposes of statistical analysis 514. In one embodiment, these statistics can be combined with the level of defective chips in the non-defect stream 512 to evaluate the performance 516 of the system. Using the information from the system performance 516, and the level of non-defective food products in the defect stream 510, calculations can be made to adjust the aggressiveness 518 of the tuning as it applies to each individual defect class. For example, as it applies to each individual defect class if a high number of defects are being passed through the system, the tuning action would be to steadily increase the sensitivity of each defect, by class, until an acceptable degree of defect rejection is achieved. On the other hand, if the number of defects in the non-defective stream 512 is within acceptable performance limits, and the number of “good” chips in the reject stream 510 is unacceptably high (meaning that yield is being given up), then the system could be tuned by decreasing the sensitivity or aggressiveness 518 to certain defect classes (the ones that are less egregious in terms of acrylamide) to reduce the number of “good” chips occurring in the reject stream 510.
This information can be used alone or in conjunction with a manual input by an operator to adjust the overall sensitivity 520 of the system. In such embodiment, an operator would have access to an operator input device such as a slide bar or up/down arrow keys, or a “bias” adjustment/numeric input based on any desired scale (e.g. 0-100, +1-10, etc) that would be used to bias the overall system sensitivity to defects. For, example, if the operator wants to increase the allowable defects in the “good” or non-defective stream 512 to increase or decrease by a given percentage, say from 5% to 4%, the operator would be able to make this adjustment manually. In one embodiment, the manual adjustment by an operator would be unavailable to adjust the sensitivity of certain classes of defects, specifically those resulting in increased acrylamide levels, to ensure that rejection of such defects could not be overridden manually by an operator.
Potato slices are cooked in a continuous fryer at, for example, a temperature of about 340° F. to about 370° F. for approximately 3 minutes. The cooking step generally reduces the moisture level of the chip to less than 2% by weight. For example, a typical fried potato chip exits the fryer with approximately 1.5% moisture by weight.
The cooked potato chips exit the fryer and proceed along a conveyor at approximately 8 feet per second. A digital camera, positioned above the conveyor, captures a color image of the chip as it proceeds down the conveyor. The image is sent to the processing unit containing the FPGA or processor array with the programmed algorithm. The FPGA or processor array applies the algorithm to transform the color image into a t1-t2 score space. The algorithm then determines if the potato chip is defective based where the chip's characteristics are located in the t1-t2 score space. A mask is created that highlights the area in the t1-t2 score space that is characteristic of the defect. This is done first by highlighting an identified defect in the RGB space and observing where the defect falls in the t1-t2 space. An area around the point in the t1-t2 score space is selected and projected back into the RGB space. Mask areas around the defect region would have been previously identified by trial and error until the area mapped back into the RGB space adequately covers the defective area of the chip. The FPGA signals the sorting equipment, that in one embodiment comprises one or more air nozzles, that a defective chip is approaching in 3 feet or 0.006 seconds. The sorting equipment then rejects the defective chip by contacting the defective chip with a blast of air as the chip is launched across an opening of about 12 inches in width between the transport conveyor to a receiving/slow down chute. The air blast deflects the defective chip from the conveyor and into a waste stream.
One advantage for having a short distance between the detection zone and the rejection nozzles is that chips moving at high velocities, meaning speeds of greater than about 500 feet per minute exhibit aerodynamics and can move relative to the targeting information that is transmitted to the air rejection nozzles. Any movement in relative position of the chip can result in either a missed shot or possibly rejecting an adjacent non-defective chip. An advantage of placing the vision units as close as possible to the rejection nozzles is that the theoretical probability of missed chips or false rejections is reduced. In one embodiment, image is captured during the “flight” of the chip between the transport conveyor and the slow down chute. In those cases, the distance is probably on the order of less than a foot between the image acquisition system and the ejection nozzles.
Though the present invention has been described with reference to a potato chip production line and soft center defects in potato chips, it is to be understood that the invention is applicable to other defects a familiar to the potato processing industry, and other thermally processed food products, such as baked or fried corn chips, tortilla chips, crackers, etc. The examples and explanations given are not meant to limit the present invention.
Having thus described several aspects of at least one embodiment of this invention, it is to be appreciated that various alterations, modifications, and improvements will readily occur to those skilled in the art. Such alterations, modifications, and improvements are intended to be part of this disclosure, and are intended to be within the spirit and scope of the invention. Accordingly, the foregoing description and drawings are by way of example only.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
1053 | Hatfield | Dec 1838 | A |
1782960 | Erysin | Nov 1930 | A |
2448152 | Patton | Aug 1948 | A |
2490431 | Greene | Dec 1949 | A |
2498024 | Baxter | Feb 1950 | A |
2584893 | Lloyd | Feb 1952 | A |
2611705 | Hendel | Sep 1952 | A |
2704257 | deSellano | Mar 1955 | A |
2744017 | Baldwin | May 1956 | A |
2759832 | Cording, Jr. | Aug 1956 | A |
2762709 | Janis | Sep 1956 | A |
2780552 | Willard | Feb 1957 | A |
2893878 | Simon | Jul 1959 | A |
2905559 | Anderson | Sep 1959 | A |
2910367 | Melnick | Oct 1959 | A |
2987401 | Johnston | Jun 1961 | A |
3026885 | Eytinge | Mar 1962 | A |
3027258 | Markakis | Mar 1962 | A |
3038810 | Akerboom | Jun 1962 | A |
3044880 | Bogyo | Jul 1962 | A |
3085020 | Backinger | Apr 1963 | A |
3219458 | Higby | Nov 1965 | A |
3278311 | Brown | Oct 1966 | A |
3305366 | Sutton | Feb 1967 | A |
3359123 | Katucki | Dec 1967 | A |
3365301 | Lipoma | Jan 1968 | A |
3369908 | Gonzalez | Feb 1968 | A |
3370627 | Willard | Feb 1968 | A |
3404986 | Wimmer | Oct 1968 | A |
3436229 | Simpson | Apr 1969 | A |
3460162 | Sijbring | Aug 1969 | A |
3545979 | Ghafoori | Dec 1970 | A |
3578463 | Smith | May 1971 | A |
3608728 | Trimble | Sep 1971 | A |
3620925 | Mochizuki | Nov 1971 | A |
3627535 | Davidson | Dec 1971 | A |
3634095 | Willard | Jan 1972 | A |
3652402 | Chibata | Mar 1972 | A |
3687679 | Sijbring | Aug 1972 | A |
3690895 | Amadon | Sep 1972 | A |
3725087 | Miller | Apr 1973 | A |
3773624 | Wagner | Nov 1973 | A |
3782973 | Pittet | Jan 1974 | A |
3812775 | Sijbring | May 1974 | A |
3849582 | Blagdon | Nov 1974 | A |
3851572 | Lazzarini | Dec 1974 | A |
3870809 | Green | Mar 1975 | A |
3914436 | Nakadai | Oct 1975 | A |
3917866 | Purves | Nov 1975 | A |
3925568 | Rao | Dec 1975 | A |
3987210 | Cremer | Oct 1976 | A |
3997684 | Willard | Dec 1976 | A |
3998975 | Liepa | Dec 1976 | A |
4005225 | Craig | Jan 1977 | A |
4073952 | Standing | Feb 1978 | A |
4084008 | Yueh | Apr 1978 | A |
4122198 | Wisdom | Oct 1978 | A |
4124727 | Rockland | Nov 1978 | A |
4136208 | Light | Jan 1979 | A |
4140801 | Hilton | Feb 1979 | A |
4167137 | van Remmen | Sep 1979 | A |
4192773 | Yoshikawa | Mar 1980 | A |
4199612 | Fragas | Apr 1980 | A |
4210594 | Logan | Jul 1980 | A |
4251895 | Caridis | Feb 1981 | A |
4272554 | Schroeder | Jun 1981 | A |
4277510 | Wicklund | Jul 1981 | A |
4312892 | Rubio | Jan 1982 | A |
4317742 | Yamaji | Mar 1982 | A |
4366749 | Caridis | Jan 1983 | A |
4394398 | Wilson | Jul 1983 | A |
4418088 | Cantenot | Nov 1983 | A |
4461832 | Tschang | Jul 1984 | A |
4537786 | Bernard | Aug 1985 | A |
4555409 | Hart | Nov 1985 | A |
4582927 | Fulcher | Apr 1986 | A |
4594260 | Vaquerio | Jun 1986 | A |
4595597 | Lenchin | Jun 1986 | A |
4645679 | Lee | Feb 1987 | A |
4673581 | Fulcher | Jun 1987 | A |
4706556 | Wallace | Nov 1987 | A |
4721625 | Lee | Jan 1988 | A |
4749579 | Haydock | Jun 1988 | A |
4751093 | Hong | Jun 1988 | A |
4756916 | Dreher | Jul 1988 | A |
4806377 | Ellis | Feb 1989 | A |
4844930 | Mottur | Jul 1989 | A |
4844931 | Webb | Jul 1989 | A |
4863750 | Pawlak | Sep 1989 | A |
4884780 | Ohashi | Dec 1989 | A |
4889733 | Willard | Dec 1989 | A |
4900576 | Bonnett | Feb 1990 | A |
4917909 | Prosise | Apr 1990 | A |
4931296 | Shanbhag | Jun 1990 | A |
4933199 | Neel | Jun 1990 | A |
4937085 | Cherry | Jun 1990 | A |
4963373 | Fan | Oct 1990 | A |
4966782 | Heidolph | Oct 1990 | A |
4971813 | Strobel | Nov 1990 | A |
4978684 | Cerami | Dec 1990 | A |
4985269 | Irvin | Jan 1991 | A |
5002784 | Pare | Mar 1991 | A |
5009903 | deFigueiredo | Apr 1991 | A |
5035904 | Huang | Jul 1991 | A |
5045335 | DeRooij | Sep 1991 | A |
5071661 | Stubbs | Dec 1991 | A |
5087467 | Schwank | Feb 1992 | A |
5126153 | Beck | Jun 1992 | A |
5134263 | Smith | Jul 1992 | A |
5137740 | Benson | Aug 1992 | A |
5167975 | Tsurumaki | Dec 1992 | A |
5171600 | Young | Dec 1992 | A |
5176933 | Fulcher | Jan 1993 | A |
5196225 | Lush | Mar 1993 | A |
5232721 | Polansky | Aug 1993 | A |
5279840 | Baisier | Jan 1994 | A |
5292542 | Beck | Mar 1994 | A |
5298274 | Khalsa | Mar 1994 | A |
5356646 | Simic-Glavaski | Oct 1994 | A |
5362511 | Villagran | Nov 1994 | A |
5368879 | White | Nov 1994 | A |
5370898 | Zussman | Dec 1994 | A |
5389389 | Beck | Feb 1995 | A |
5391384 | Mazza | Feb 1995 | A |
5391385 | Seybold | Feb 1995 | A |
5393543 | Laufer | Feb 1995 | A |
5394790 | Smith | Mar 1995 | A |
5441758 | Lewis | Aug 1995 | A |
5447742 | Malvido | Sep 1995 | A |
5458903 | Colson | Oct 1995 | A |
5464642 | Villagran | Nov 1995 | A |
5464643 | Lodge | Nov 1995 | A |
5505978 | Roy | Apr 1996 | A |
5514387 | Zimmerman | May 1996 | A |
5534280 | Welch | Jul 1996 | A |
5554405 | Fazzolare | Sep 1996 | A |
5558886 | Martinez-Bustos | Sep 1996 | A |
5580598 | Benson | Dec 1996 | A |
5589213 | Desai | Dec 1996 | A |
5603972 | McFarland | Feb 1997 | A |
5603973 | Benson | Feb 1997 | A |
5620727 | Gerrish | Apr 1997 | A |
5676042 | Sakuma | Oct 1997 | A |
5690982 | Fazzolare | Nov 1997 | A |
5695804 | Hnat | Dec 1997 | A |
5707671 | Beck | Jan 1998 | A |
5747084 | Cochran | May 1998 | A |
5776531 | Aasman | Jul 1998 | A |
5792499 | Atwell | Aug 1998 | A |
5846589 | Baker | Dec 1998 | A |
5858429 | Wallace | Jan 1999 | A |
5858431 | Wiedersatz | Jan 1999 | A |
5887073 | Fazzari | Mar 1999 | A |
5919691 | Schulein | Jul 1999 | A |
5945146 | Twinam | Aug 1999 | A |
5947010 | Barry | Sep 1999 | A |
5972367 | Inoue | Oct 1999 | A |
5972397 | Durance | Oct 1999 | A |
6001409 | Gimmler | Dec 1999 | A |
6016096 | Barnes | Jan 2000 | A |
6025011 | Wilkinson | Feb 2000 | A |
6033707 | Lanner | Mar 2000 | A |
6039978 | Bangs | Mar 2000 | A |
6066353 | Martines-Serna Villagran et al. | May 2000 | A |
6068872 | Hashiguchi | May 2000 | A |
6068873 | Delrue | May 2000 | A |
RE36785 | Colson | Jul 2000 | E |
6139884 | Shifferaw | Oct 2000 | A |
6159530 | Christiansen | Dec 2000 | A |
6207204 | Christiansen | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6210720 | Leusner | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6227421 | Richard | May 2001 | B1 |
6287672 | Fields | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6290999 | Gerrish | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6299914 | Christiansen | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6335048 | Swarvar | Jan 2002 | B1 |
6358544 | Henry, Jr. | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6383533 | Soeda | May 2002 | B1 |
6419965 | Douaire | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6436458 | Kuechle | Aug 2002 | B2 |
6521871 | Shelton | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6528768 | Simic-Glavaski | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6531174 | Barrett et al. | Mar 2003 | B2 |
6558730 | Gisaw | May 2003 | B1 |
6599547 | Villagran | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6602533 | Smith | Aug 2003 | B1 |
6607777 | Walsh | Aug 2003 | B1 |
6638554 | Rubio | Oct 2003 | B1 |
6638558 | Brubacher | Oct 2003 | B2 |
6716462 | Prosise | Apr 2004 | B2 |
6770469 | Yamaguchi | Aug 2004 | B2 |
6778887 | Britton | Aug 2004 | B2 |
6828527 | Simic-Glavaski | Dec 2004 | B2 |
6872417 | Freudenrich | Mar 2005 | B1 |
6896528 | Kubota | May 2005 | B2 |
6929812 | Van Der Doe | Aug 2005 | B2 |
6989167 | Howie | Jan 2006 | B2 |
7037540 | Elder | May 2006 | B2 |
7122719 | Hakimi | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7169417 | Lang et al. | Jan 2007 | B2 |
7189422 | Howie | Mar 2007 | B2 |
7190813 | Daley et al. | Mar 2007 | B2 |
7220440 | Dria | May 2007 | B2 |
7267834 | Elder | Sep 2007 | B2 |
7291380 | Nyholm | Nov 2007 | B2 |
7393550 | Barry | Jul 2008 | B2 |
7514113 | Zyzak | Apr 2009 | B2 |
7524519 | Zyzak | Apr 2009 | B2 |
7527815 | Teras | May 2009 | B2 |
7534934 | Rommens | May 2009 | B2 |
20020018838 | Zimmerman | Feb 2002 | A1 |
20020025367 | Koehler | Feb 2002 | A1 |
20020129713 | Caridis | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20030049359 | Kulkarni | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030183092 | Barber | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030198725 | Cardenas | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030219518 | Li | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20040047973 | Bourhis | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040086597 | Awad | May 2004 | A1 |
20040101607 | Zyzak | May 2004 | A1 |
20040105929 | Tomoda | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040109926 | Tomoda | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040115321 | Tricoit | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040126469 | Tomoda | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040131737 | Tomoda | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040180125 | Plank | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040180129 | Plank | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040197012 | Bourg et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040224066 | Lindsay | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20050064084 | Elder | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050068535 | Bond | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050074538 | Elder | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050079254 | Corrigan | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050118322 | Elder | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050152811 | Taylor | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050196504 | Finley | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050214411 | Lindsay | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20060019007 | Baas | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060088633 | Barber | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060110503 | Bates | May 2006 | A1 |
20060127534 | Elder | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060193964 | Eckhoff | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060210693 | Oftring | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060216376 | Milici | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060216388 | Christensen | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20070042080 | Plomp | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070087101 | Gusek | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070141225 | Elder | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070141226 | Elder | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070141227 | Boudreaux | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070148318 | Rubio | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070166439 | Soe | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070178219 | Boudreaux | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070184175 | Rubio | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070196556 | Van Der Meer | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070281062 | Bourg | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20070292589 | Elder | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20080003340 | Karwowski | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080008780 | Streekstra | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080101657 | Durkin | May 2008 | A1 |
20080138480 | Bows | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080144880 | DeLuca | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080166450 | Corrigan | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080166452 | Corrigan | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080253648 | Mulder | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080279994 | Cantley et al. | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20080299273 | Bhaskar | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20090047725 | Elder | Feb 2009 | A1 |
20090074915 | Hendriksen | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090098265 | Kock | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090191310 | Zyzak | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20100040729 | Sahagian | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20100040750 | Assaad | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20100051419 | Desai | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100055259 | Bourg | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100062123 | Anderson | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100112177 | Bourg, Jr. | May 2010 | A1 |
20100143540 | Bhaskar | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100255167 | Bourg | Oct 2010 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
4032002 | Jun 2003 | CL |
2743230 | Apr 1979 | DE |
113940 | Jul 1984 | EP |
1419702 | May 2004 | EP |
1419703 | May 2004 | EP |
2019044 | Feb 1990 | ES |
874453 | Aug 1942 | FR |
156905 | Jan 1921 | GB |
1132296 | Oct 1968 | GB |
1519049 | Jul 1978 | GB |
335214 | Sep 1980 | GB |
68006927 | Sep 1965 | JP |
70009815 | Oct 1966 | JP |
57100179 | Dec 1980 | JP |
62048351 | Mar 1987 | JP |
4104753 | Apr 1992 | JP |
6030782 | Feb 1994 | JP |
06169713 | Jun 1994 | JP |
05123126 | May 1998 | JP |
10136883 | May 1998 | JP |
11056280 | Mar 1999 | JP |
11178536 | Jul 1999 | JP |
2004180563 | Jul 2004 | JP |
2004-313183 | Nov 2004 | JP |
2004313183 | Nov 2004 | JP |
2005278448 | Oct 2005 | JP |
910006619 | Aug 1991 | KR |
1822863 | Jun 1993 | RU |
2048512 | Nov 1995 | RU |
2078797 | May 1997 | RU |
2140927 | Nov 1999 | RU |
2216574 | Nov 2003 | RU |
9601572 | Jan 1996 | WO |
0004784 | Feb 2000 | WO |
0191581 | Dec 2001 | WO |
2004004484 | Jan 2004 | WO |
2004026043 | Apr 2004 | WO |
2004028276 | Apr 2004 | WO |
2004028277 | Apr 2004 | WO |
2004028278 | Apr 2004 | WO |
2004032647 | Apr 2004 | WO |
2004032648 | Apr 2004 | WO |
2004039174 | May 2004 | WO |
2004040999 | May 2004 | WO |
2004047559 | Jun 2004 | WO |
2004060078 | Jul 2004 | WO |
2004080205 | Sep 2004 | WO |
2006128843 | Dec 2006 | WO |
2007106996 | Sep 2007 | WO |
2008061982 | May 2008 | WO |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20110050880 A1 | Mar 2011 | US |