This invention relates to methods for preparing tungsten films. Embodiments of the invention are useful for integrated circuit applications that require thin tungsten films having low electrical resistivity, low roughness and high reflectivity.
The deposition of tungsten films using chemical vapor deposition (CVD) techniques is an integral part of many semiconductor fabrication processes. Tungsten films may be used as low resistivity electrical connections in the form of horizontal interconnects, vias between adjacent metal layers, and contacts between a first metal layer and the devices on the silicon substrate. In a conventional tungsten deposition process, the wafer is heated to the process temperature in a vacuum chamber, and then a very thin portion of tungsten film, which serves as a seed or nucleation layer, is deposited. Thereafter, the remainder of the tungsten film (the bulk layer) is deposited on the nucleation layer. Conventionally, the tungsten bulk layer is formed by the reduction of tungsten hexafluoride (WF6) with hydrogen (H2) on the growing tungsten layer.
The present invention provides methods of producing low resistivity tungsten bulk layers having lower roughness and higher reflectivity. The smooth and highly reflective tungsten layers are easier to photopattern than conventional low resistivity tungsten films. The methods involve CVD deposition of tungsten in the presence of alternating nitrogen gas pulses, such that alternating portions of the film are deposited by CVD in the absence of nitrogen and in the presence of nitrogen. According to various embodiments, between 20-90% of the total film thickness is deposited by CVD in the presence of nitrogen.
The following detailed description can be more fully understood when considered in conjunction with the drawings in which:
Introduction
In the following description, numerous specific details are set forth in order to provide a thorough understanding of the present invention, which pertains to forming thin tungsten films. Modifications, adaptations or variations of specific methods and structures shown and discussed herein will be apparent to those skilled in the art and are within the scope of this invention.
The methods described herein relate to forming tungsten films. Conventional processes for forming a tungsten film on a surface involve forming a tungsten nucleation layer on the surface, and then performing a CVD operation.
Embodiments of the present invention involve depositing tungsten layers that have low resistivity, low roughness and high reflectivity. In previous processes, low resistivity tungsten film has been achieved by growing large tungsten grains. This, however, increases the roughness of the film. As a result, percentage root mean square (RMS) roughness to film thickness may exceed 10% for a low resistivity tungsten film of 500 A or greater film. Lowering the roughness of the film makes subsequent operations (patterning, etc.) easier.
The methods described also provide highly reflective films. Conventional processes for depositing bulk tungsten layers involve hydrogen reduction of tungsten-containing precursors in chemical vapor deposition (CVD) processes. The reflectivity of a 1000 A film that is grown by conventional hydrogen reduction CVD is 110% or less compared to that of a silicon surface. In certain applications, however, tungsten films having greater reflectivity are needed. For example, tungsten films having low reflectivity and high roughness can make photopatterning tungsten, e.g., to form bitlines or other structures, more difficult.
The methods described herein involve depositing tungsten by H2 CVD reduction in the presence of alternating nitrogen gas pulses. While it is known that tungsten deposition in the presence of nitrogen gas decreases tungsten roughness, the inventors have found that alternating CVD deposition in the presence of nitrogen with CVD deposition with no nitrogen present produces films improves reflectivity and roughness.
As features become smaller, the tungsten (W) contact or line resistance increases due to scattering effects in the thinner W film. While efficient tungsten deposition processes require tungsten nucleation layers, these layers typically have higher electrical resistivities than the bulk tungsten layers. Low resistivity tungsten films minimize power losses and overheating in integrated circuit designs. Because the ρnucleation>ρbulk, the thickness of the nucleation layer should be minimized to keep the total resistance as low as possible. On the other hand, the tungsten nucleation should be sufficiently thick to fully cover the underlying substrate to support high quality bulk deposition.
PNL techniques for depositing tungsten nucleation layers that have low resistivity and that support deposition of low resistivity tungsten bulk layers are described in U.S. patent applications Ser. Nos. 12/030,645, 11/951,236 and 61/061,078, incorporated by reference herein. Additional discussion regarding PNL type processes can be found in U.S. Pat. Nos. 6,635,965, 6,844,258, 7,005,372 and 7,141,494 as well as in U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/265,531, also incorporated herein by reference.
As indicated by a process block 203, a low temperature pulsed nucleation layer (PNL) process is performed to deposit a tungsten nucleation layer. Depositing tungsten nucleation layer using a PNL process involves exposing the substrate to alternating pulses of a reducing agent and a tungsten-containing precursor, such as WF6. Low temperature tungsten nucleation layer processes to deposit conformal nucleation layers are described in U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/265,531, filed Nov. 1, 2005, incorporated by reference herein in its entirety and for all purposes. In the embodiment depicted in
Referring back to
While
Returning to
Unlike with the PNL processes described above, in a CVD technique, the WF6 and H2 are simultaneously introduced into the reaction chamber. This produces a continuous chemical reaction of mix reactant gases that continuously forms tungsten film on the substrate surface.
The CVD deposition begins in an operation 103 in which the tungsten-containing precursor and hydrogen are introduced into the reaction chamber without any nitrogen being present. In certain embodiments, argon or another carrier gas is used as a carrier gas. The gases may be pre-mixed or not. The gases are allowed to react to deposit a portion of the desired total thickness of tungsten. As discussed below, the amount of tungsten deposited in this operation depends in part on the total desired thickness. For example, in certain embodiments, about 100 A is deposited in this operation. Next, in an operation 105, another portion of the tungsten layer is deposited by H2 reduction of WF6 or other tungsten-precursor, in the presence of nitrogen. Generally, transitioning from operation 103 (H2-WF6 reduction/no N2) to operation 105 (H2-WF6 reduction/N2) involves turning on a flow of N2 into the chamber, such that N2, H2 and WF6 are all flowing into the chamber. The argon or other gas flow may be reduced or stopped during this portion of the process to compensate for the additional (N2) gas introduced, thereby balancing the flows. Another portion of the tungsten layer is deposited in this operation. In certain embodiments, if the desired amount of tungsten has been deposited, the process ends here. For depositing thick films, e.g., 1000 A, more cycles are performed. This is indicated at an operation 107, in which H2-WF6 reduction CVD without nitrogen present is again performed. Transitioning from operation 105 to operation 107 typically involves turning off the flow of nitrogen, and if necessary, re-introducing any flow of argon or other gas that was reduced or stopped for operation 105. Another portion of the tungsten layer is deposited. Another pulse of nitrogen is then introduced in an operation 109, to deposit another portion of the tungsten layer again in the presence of nitrogen. One or more additional cycles of no-N2 and N2 H2 reductions of WF6 are then performed if necessary to reach the desired thickness. In certain embodiments, the process may also end after a H2-only reduction.
In another embodiment, pulses of N2 and tungsten containing precursor are simultaneously introduced into the chamber (e.g., with N2 as the carrier gas for the tungsten precursor) with delays such that pulsed N2-present reduction operations are performed without any intervening H2-only reduction operations. As shown in the schematic of
Tungsten precursor flow is indicated on the timing sequence. Argon or other carrier gas, hydrogen and nitrogen flow into the chamber is indicated below the sequence. As shown, argon flow remains constant, except for the H2 reduction in N2, in which it is reduced or stopped to account for the additional N2 gas. H2 remains constant throughout the process, while N2 is flowed only during the H2 reduction in the presence of N2.
Note that this process differs considerably from previous H2-WF6 CVD reduction processes to deposit bulk tungsten layers. Previous processes use one set of CVD conditions and gases to deposit the bulk layer. U.S. Pat. No. 7,141,494 describes H2 reduction of WF6 in the presence of nitrogen to deposit a tungsten bulk layer. As described in that patent, a process gas including, e.g., WF6-H2, WF6-B2H6 or W(CO)6 is introduced into the chamber. Nitrogen is also introduced into the deposition chamber, either before, during or after the process gas is introduced into the chamber. In certain situations, the nitrogen is introduced just after the deposition process begins in order to allow the tungsten to nucleate. Once the nitrogen is introduced, however, the deposition proceeds without additional pulsing of the nitrogen. As described below, however, while the process described in the '494 patent results in improved roughness over tungsten deposited in the absence of hydrogen, pulsing nitrogen throughout the process results in improving roughness and improving reflectivity.
Table 1 shows comparisons in reflectivity between tungsten film produced with H2 reduction with alternating N2 pulses, film produced by H2 reduction without any N2, and film produced by H2 reduction with N2 running during the entire deposition.
Tungsten nucleation layer deposition was performed by a PNL process as described above. Both processes 1 and 2 used alternating pulses of diborane and tungsten hexafluoride at low temperature, with process 2 also including a low resistivity treatment as described above with respect to
In addition to the improvement in reflectivity, roughness is improved for the alternating pulse process over both of the other processes. While it is generally known that H2 reduction of WF6 in the presence of N2 improves roughness, as compared to H2 reduction of WF6 with no N2, unexpectedly alternating H2-only CVD reduction with N2 H2 CVD reduction further improves roughness reduction. Without being bound by a particular theory, it is believed that the following mechanism may account for this phenomena: tungsten deposition with nitrogen gas present during the entire period may grow grains in certain preferred, such that alternating the nitrogen gas flow may break this continuity of grain growth; the presence of nitrogen gas may suppress certain nucleation sites on the tungsten growing surface, therefore some ensured tungsten grains may not follow the previous template.
In Table 1, while film resistivity increases slightly with the addition of N2, the process still produces films having resistivities below 13 micro-ohm-cm. Thus, the process is able to achieve the low resistivities obtainable with large grain size and still have the smoothness normally achieved with small grain size. This is because the grain size remains approximately the same as without the nitrogen exposure.
In another aspect of the invention, the film resistivity and roughness is optimized by the mixture of H2-CVD in the presence of N2 stacks and H2-only CVD stacks. (H2-CVD referring to H2 reduction of WF6 to deposit W by CVD). Specifically, by controlling the ratio of film deposited by H2 reduction in the presence of H2 to the total film, the resistivity and reflectivity can be optimized. This is shown in
In another aspect of the invention, the temperature at which the CVD operation is performed is increased to improve reflectivity. Specifically, temperatures above about 400 C using a N2-present H2 reduction provide better reflectivity than those below 400 C. This result is unexpected as the reflectivity for H2-only CVD shows the opposite effect.
In certain embodiments, the temperature during the N2-CVD cycles are higher than H2-only operations that are performed prior to the N2-CVD cycles. Also, in certain embodiments, the temperature is higher for the N2-present reduction of the N2-CVD cycle than during the H2-only portion of that cycle.
Apparatus
The methods of the invention may be carried out in various types of deposition apparatus available from various vendors. Examples of suitable apparatus include a Novellus Concept-1 Altus, a Concept 2 Altus, a Concept-2 ALTUS-S, a Concept 3 Altus deposition system, or any of a variety of other commercially available CVD tools. In some cases, the process can be performed on multiple deposition stations sequentially. See, e.g., U.S. Pat. No. 6,143,082, which is incorporated herein by reference for all purposes. In some embodiments, the pulsed nucleation process is performed at a first station that is one of two, five or even more deposition stations positioned within a single deposition chamber. Thus, the reducing gases and the tungsten-containing gases are alternately introduced to the surface of the semiconductor substrate, at the first station, using an individual gas supply system that creates a localized atmosphere at the substrate surface.
Another station is then used to perform CVD as described above. Two or more stations may be used to perform CVD in a parallel processing. Alternatively a wafer may be indexed to have the CVD operations performed over two or more stations sequentially.
Also mounted on the transfer module 703 may be one or more single or multi-station modules 707 capable of performing plasma or chemical (non-plasma) pre-cleans. The module may also be used for various other treatments, e.g., post liner tungsten nitride treatments. The system 700 also includes one or more (in this case two) wafer source modules 701 where wafers are stored before and after processing. An atmospheric robot (not shown) in the atmospheric transfer chamber 719 first removes wafers from the source modules 701 to loadlocks 721. A wafer transfer device (generally a robot arm unit) in the transfer module 703 moves the wafers from loadlocks 721 to and among the modules mounted on the transfer module 703.
In certain embodiments, a system controller is employed to control process conditions during deposition. The controller will typically include one or more memory devices and one or more processors. The processor may include a CPU or computer, analog and/or digital input/output connections, stepper motor controller boards, etc.
The controller may control all of the activities of the deposition apparatus. The system controller executes system control software including sets of instructions for controlling the timing, mixture of gases, chamber pressure, chamber temperature, wafer temperature, RF power levels, wafer chuck or pedestal position, and other parameters of a particular process. Other computer programs stored on memory devices associated with the controller may be employed in some embodiments.
Typically there will be a user interface associated with the controller. The user interface may include a display screen, graphical software displays of the apparatus and/or process conditions, and user input devices such as pointing devices, keyboards, touch screens, microphones, etc.
The computer program code for controlling the deposition and other processes in a process sequence can be written in any conventional computer readable programming language: for example, assembly language, C, C++, Pascal, Fortran or others. Compiled object code or script is executed by the processor to perform the tasks identified in the program.
The controller parameters relate to process conditions such as, for example, process gas composition and flow rates, temperature, pressure, plasma conditions such as RF power levels and the low frequency RF frequency, cooling gas pressure, and chamber wall temperature. These parameters are provided to the user in the form of a recipe, and may be entered utilizing the user interface.
Signals for monitoring the process may be provided by analog and/or digital input connections of the system controller. The signals for controlling the process are output on the analog and digital output connections of the deposition apparatus.
The system software may be designed or configured in many different ways. For example, various chamber component subroutines or control objects may be written to control operation of the chamber components necessary to carry out the inventive deposition processes. Examples of programs or sections of programs for this purpose include substrate positioning code, process gas control code, pressure control code, heater control code, and plasma control code.
A substrate positioning program may include program code for controlling chamber components that are used to load the substrate onto a pedestal or chuck and to control the spacing between the substrate and other parts of the chamber such as a gas inlet and/or target. A process gas control program may include code for controlling gas composition and flow rates and optionally for flowing gas into the chamber prior to deposition in order to stabilize the pressure in the chamber. A pressure control program may include code for controlling the pressure in the chamber by regulating, e.g., a throttle valve in the exhaust system of the chamber. A heater control program may include code for controlling the current to a heating unit that is used to heat the substrate. Alternatively, the heater control program may control delivery of a heat transfer gas such as helium to the wafer chuck.
Examples of chamber sensors that may be monitored during deposition include mass flow controllers, pressure sensors such as manometers, and thermocouples located in pedestal or chuck. Appropriately programmed feedback and control algorithms may be used with data from these sensors to maintain desired process conditions.
The foregoing describes implementation of embodiments of the invention in a single or multi-chamber semiconductor processing tool.
Applications
The present invention may be used to deposit thin, low resistivity tungsten layers for many different applications. One preferred application is for interconnects in integrated circuits such as memory chips and microprocessors. Interconnects are current lines found on a single metallization layer and are generally long thin flat structures. These may be formed by a blanket deposition of a tungsten layer (by a process as described above), followed by a patterning operation that defines the location of current carrying tungsten lines and removal of the tungsten from regions outside the tungsten lines.
A primary example of an interconnect application is a bit line in a memory chip. Of course, the invention is not limited to interconnect applications and extends to vias, contacts and other tungsten structures commonly found in electronic devices. In general, the invention finds application in any environment where thin, low-resistivity tungsten layers are required.
Another parameter of interest for many applications is a relatively low roughness of the ultimately deposited tungsten layer. Preferably, the roughness of the tungsten layer is not greater than about 10% of the total thickness of the deposited tungsten layer, and more preferably not greater than about 5% of the total thickness of the deposited tungsten layer. The roughness of a tungsten layer can be measured by various techniques such as atomic force microscopy.
Other Embodiments
While this invention has been described in terms of several embodiments, there are alterations, modifications, permutations, and substitute equivalents, which fall within the scope of this invention. It should also be noted that there are many alternative ways of implementing the methods and apparatuses of the present invention. It is therefore intended that the following appended claims be interpreted as including all such alterations, modifications, permutations, and substitute equivalents as fall within the true spirit and scope of the present invention.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4746375 | Lacovangelo | May 1988 | A |
4804560 | Shioya et al. | Feb 1989 | A |
4874719 | Kurosawa | Oct 1989 | A |
5028565 | Chang et al. | Jul 1991 | A |
5227329 | Kobayashi et al. | Jul 1993 | A |
5250329 | Miracky et al. | Oct 1993 | A |
5326723 | Petro et al. | Jul 1994 | A |
5391394 | Hansen | Feb 1995 | A |
5661080 | Hwang et al. | Aug 1997 | A |
5726096 | Jung | Mar 1998 | A |
5795824 | Hancock | Aug 1998 | A |
5804249 | Sukharev et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5817576 | Tseng et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
5926720 | Zhao et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
5956609 | Lee et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
6001729 | Shinriki et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6017818 | Lu | Jan 2000 | A |
6037263 | Chang | Mar 2000 | A |
6066366 | Berenbaum et al. | May 2000 | A |
6099904 | Mak et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6107200 | Takagi et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6143082 | McInerney et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
6174812 | Hsiung et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6206967 | Mak et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6245654 | Shih et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6265312 | Sidhwa et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6277744 | Yuan et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6294468 | Gould-Choquette et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6297152 | Itoh et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6309966 | Govindarajan et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6310300 | Cooney et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6355558 | Dixit et al. | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6404054 | Oh et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6429126 | Herner et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6465347 | Ishizuka et al. | Oct 2002 | B2 |
6551929 | Kori et al. | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6566250 | Tu et al. | May 2003 | B1 |
6566262 | Rissman et al. | May 2003 | B1 |
6607976 | Chen et al. | Aug 2003 | B2 |
6635965 | Lee et al. | Oct 2003 | B1 |
6706625 | Sudijono et al. | Mar 2004 | B1 |
6720261 | Anderson et al. | Apr 2004 | B1 |
6740585 | Yoon et al. | May 2004 | B2 |
6797340 | Fang et al. | Sep 2004 | B2 |
6844258 | Fair et al. | Jan 2005 | B1 |
6861356 | Matsuse et al. | Mar 2005 | B2 |
6902763 | Elers et al. | Jun 2005 | B1 |
6905543 | Fair et al. | Jun 2005 | B1 |
6908848 | Koo | Jun 2005 | B2 |
6936538 | Byun | Aug 2005 | B2 |
6939804 | Lai et al. | Sep 2005 | B2 |
6962873 | Park | Nov 2005 | B1 |
7005372 | Levy et al. | Feb 2006 | B2 |
7141494 | Lee et al. | Nov 2006 | B2 |
7157798 | Fair et al. | Jan 2007 | B1 |
7211144 | Lu et al. | May 2007 | B2 |
7220671 | Simka et al. | May 2007 | B2 |
7262125 | Wongsenakhum et al. | Aug 2007 | B2 |
7416979 | Yoon et al. | Aug 2008 | B2 |
7429402 | Gandikota et al. | Sep 2008 | B2 |
7589017 | Chan et al. | Sep 2009 | B2 |
7655567 | Gao et al. | Feb 2010 | B1 |
7691749 | Levy et al. | Apr 2010 | B2 |
7754604 | Wongsenakhum et al. | Jul 2010 | B2 |
7772114 | Chan et al. | Aug 2010 | B2 |
7955972 | Chan et al. | Jun 2011 | B2 |
7977243 | Sakamoto et al. | Jul 2011 | B2 |
8048805 | Chan et al. | Nov 2011 | B2 |
8053365 | Humayun et al. | Nov 2011 | B2 |
8058170 | Chandrashekar et al. | Nov 2011 | B2 |
8062977 | Ashtiani et al. | Nov 2011 | B1 |
8101521 | Gao et al. | Jan 2012 | B1 |
8207062 | Gao et al. | Jun 2012 | B2 |
8329576 | Chan et al. | Dec 2012 | B2 |
8367546 | Humayun et al. | Feb 2013 | B2 |
8409985 | Chan et al. | Apr 2013 | B2 |
8409987 | Chandrashekar et al. | Apr 2013 | B2 |
20010008808 | Gonzalez | Jul 2001 | A1 |
20010014533 | Sun | Aug 2001 | A1 |
20010015494 | Ahn | Aug 2001 | A1 |
20010044041 | Badding et al. | Nov 2001 | A1 |
20020090796 | Desai et al. | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20020177316 | Miller et al. | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20030059980 | Chen et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030104126 | Fang et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030127043 | Lu et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20040014315 | Lai et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040044127 | Okubo et al. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040142557 | Levy et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040202786 | Wongsenakhum et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040206267 | Sambasivan et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20050031786 | Lee et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050059236 | Nishida et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050136594 | Kim | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20060003581 | Johnston et al. | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060094238 | Levy et al. | May 2006 | A1 |
20070190780 | Chung et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20080045010 | Wongsenakhum et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080081127 | Thompson et al. | Apr 2008 | A1 |
20080124926 | Chan et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
20080254623 | Chan et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080280438 | Lai et al. | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20090149022 | Chan et al. | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090160030 | Tuttle | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090163025 | Humayun et al. | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20100035427 | Chan et al. | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20100055904 | Chen et al. | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100159694 | Chandrashekar et al. | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100267230 | Chandrashekar et al. | Oct 2010 | A1 |
20100267235 | Chen et al. | Oct 2010 | A1 |
20100273327 | Chan et al. | Oct 2010 | A1 |
20110059608 | Gao et al. | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110156154 | Hoentschel et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110221044 | Danek et al. | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20110223763 | Chan et al. | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20120015518 | Chandrashekar et al. | Jan 2012 | A1 |
20120040530 | Humayun et al. | Feb 2012 | A1 |
20120199887 | Chan et al. | Aug 2012 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2009-144242 | Jul 2009 | JP |
20050022261 | Mar 2005 | KR |
20050087428 | Aug 2005 | KR |
20080110897 | Dec 2008 | KR |
WO0127347 | Apr 2001 | WO |
WO2007121249 | Oct 2007 | WO |
WO2010025357 | Mar 2010 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Lee et al., PCT Search Report, Completed Oct. 15, 2004, PCT/US2004/006940, Int'l filing date May 3, 2004. |
Lee et al., Written Opinion, Completed Oct. 15, 2004, PCT/US2004/006940, Int'l filing date May 3, 2004. |
George et al., “Surface Chemistry for atomic Layer Growth”, J. Phys. Chem, 1996, vol. 100, No. 31, pp. 13121-13131. |
Bell et al., “Batch Reactor Kinetic Studies of Tungsten LPCVD from Silane and Tungsten Hexafluoride”, J. Electrochem. Soc., Jan. 1996, vol. 143, No. 1, pp. 296-302. |
Klaus et al., “Atomic layer deposition of tungsten using sequential surface chemistry with a sacrificial stripping reaction”, Thin Solid Films 360 (2000) 145-153. |
Klaus et al., “Atomically Controlled Growth of Tungsten and Tungsten Nitride Using Sequential Surface Reactions,” Applied Surface Science, 162-163, (2000) 479-491. |
Li et al., “Deposition of WNxCy Thin Films by ALCVD™ Method for Diffusion Barriers in Metallization,” IITC Conference Report, 2002, 3 Pages. |
Elam et al, “Nucleation and Growth During Tungsten Atomic Layer Deposition on SiO2 Surfaces,” Thin Solid Films, 2001, 13 Pages. |
Collins et al., “Pulsed Deposition of Ultra Thin Tungsten for Plugfill of High Aspect Ratio Contacts,” Presentation made at Semicon Korea 2003, Jan. 21, 2003, 9 pages. |
Collins, et al., “Pulsed Deposition of Ultra Thin Tungsten for Plugfill of High Aspect Ratio Contacts,” Semiconductor Equipment and Materials International, Semicon Korea, Jan. 21, 2003, 3 pages. |
Lee et al., Pulsed Deposition of Ultra Thin Tungsten and its Application for Plugfill of High Aspect Ratio Contacts, Abstract, Jan. 21, 2003, 1 page. |
U.S. Office Action mailed Jul. 12, 2005, from U.S. Appl. No. 10/815,560. |
U.S. Office Action mailed Jul. 17, 2002, from U.S. Appl. No. 09/975,074. |
U.S. Office Action mailed Feb. 8, 2005, from U.S. Appl. No. 10/649,351. |
U.S. Office Action mailed Jul. 14, 2005, from U.S. Appl. No. 10/649,351. |
Presentation by Inventor James Fair: “Chemical Vapor Deposition of Refractory Metal Silicides,” 27 Pages, 1983. |
Saito et al., “A Novel Copper Interconnection Technology Using Self Aligned Metal Capping Method,” IEEE, 3 Pages, 2001. |
U.S. Office Action mailed Jun. 22, 2004, from U.S. Appl. No. 10/435,010. |
U.S. Office Action mailed Mar. 23, 2005, from U.S. Appl. No. 10/690,492. |
U.S. Office Action mailed Nov. 23, 2005, from U.S. Appl. No. 10/984,126. |
Chan et al., “Methods for Growing Low-Resistivity Tungsten Film”, Novellus Systems, Inc., filed Nov. 1, 2005, U.S. Appl. No. 11/265,531, pp. 1-35. |
Levy et al., “Deposition of Tungsten Nitride”, Novellus Systems, Inc., filed Dec. 16, 2005, U.S. Appl. No. 11/305,368, pp. 1-39. |
U.S. Office Action mailed Dec. 28, 2005, from U.S. Appl. No. 10/815,560. |
U.S. Office Action mailed Dec. 30, 2005, from U.S. Appl. No. 10/649,351. |
Wongsenakhum et al., “Reducing Silicon Attack and Improving Resistivity of Tungsten Nitride Film”, Novellus Systems, Inc., filed Feb. 6, 2006, U.S. Appl. No. 11/349,035, pp. 1-26. |
U.S. Office Action mailed Apr. 17, 2006, from U.S. Appl. No. 10/815,560. |
U.S. Office Action mailed May 17, 2006, from U.S. Appl. No. 10/984,126. |
U.S. Office Action mailed Sep. 28, 2006, from U.S. Appl. No. 10/815,560. |
Gao et al., “Methods for Improving Uniformity and Resistivity of Thin Tungsten Films,” Novellus Systems, Inc, filed Jul. 24, 2007, U.S. Appl. No. 11/782,570, pp. 1-23. |
Chan et al., “Methods for Growing Low-Resistivity Tungsten for High Aspect Ratio and Small Features,” Novellus Systems, Inc., U.S. Appl. No. 12/030,645, filed Feb. 13, 2008. |
Humayun et al., “Methods for Forming All Tungsten Contacts and Lines,” Novellus Systems, Inc., U.S. Appl. No. 11/963,698, filed Dec. 21, 2007. |
Chan et al., “Method for Improving Uniformity and Adhesion of Low Resistivity Tungsten Film,” Novellus Systems, Inc., U.S. Appl. No. 11/951,236, filed Dec. 5, 2007. |
Notice of Allowance and Fee Due mailed Mar. 12, 2003, from U.S. Appl. No. 09/975,074. |
Allowed Claims from U.S. Appl. No. 09/975,074. |
Notice of Allowance and Fee Due mailed Jul. 21, 2006, from U.S. Appl. No. 10/649,351. |
Allowed Claims from U.S. Appl. No. 10/649,351. |
Notice of Allowance and Fee Due mailed Oct. 7, 2004, from U.S. Appl. No. 10/435,010. |
Allowed Claims from U.S. Appl. No. 10/435,010. |
Notice of Allowance and Fee Due mailed Aug. 25, 2006, from U.S. Appl. No. 10/984,126. |
Notice of Allowance and Fee Due mailed Sep. 14, 2005, from U.S. Appl. No. 10/690,492. |
Allowed Claims from U.S. Appl. No. 10/690,492. |
Notice of Allowance and Fee Due mailed Apr. 24, 2007, from U.S. Appl. No. 10/815,560. |
Allowed Claims from U.S. Appl. No. 10/815,560. |
U.S. Office Action mailed Jun. 27, 2008, from U.S. Appl. No. 11/305,368. |
U.S. Office Action mailed Aug. 21, 2008, from U.S. Appl. No. 11/265,531. |
Ashtiani et al., “Ternary Tungsten-Containing Thin Film Heater Elements,” Novellus Systems, Inc., U.S. Appl. No. 61/025,237, filed Jan. 31, 2008. |
U.S. Office Action mailed Oct. 16, 2008, from U.S. Appl. No. 11/349,035. |
U.S. Office Action mailed Sep. 29, 2008, from U.S. Appl. No. 11/782,570. |
Ashtiani et al., “Ternary Tungsten-Containing Thin Films,” Novellus Systems, Inc., U.S. Appl. No. 12/363,330, filed Jan. 30, 2009. |
Chandrashekar et al., “Method for depositing thin tungsten film with low resistivity and robust micro-adhesion characteristics,” Novellus Systems, Inc., U.S. Appl. No. 61/061,078, filed Jun. 12, 2008. |
U.S. Notice of Allowance mailed Nov. 17, 2009 from U.S. Appl. No. 11/305,368. |
Allowed Claims from U.S. Appl. No. 11/305,368. |
U.S. Final Office Action mailed Nov. 20, 2009 from U.S. Appl. No. 11/349,035. |
U.S. Final Office Action mailed Dec. 9, 2009 from U.S. Appl. No. 11/963,698. |
U.S. Notice of Allowance mailed Sep. 17, 2009 from U.S. Appl. No. 11/782,570. |
Allowed Claims from U.S. Appl. No. 11/782,570. |
Chan et al., “Methods for Growing Low-Resistivity Tungsten Film1”, Novellus Systems Inc., U.S. Appl. No. 12/538,770, filed Aug. 10, 2009. |
U.S. Final Office Action mailed Jan. 13, 2010 from U.S. Appl. No. 12/030,645. |
Gao et al., “Method for Improving Adhesion of Low Resistivity Tungsten/Tungsten Nitride Layers,” Novellus Systems, Inc., U.S. Appl. No. 12/556,490, filed Sep. 9, 2009. |
Gao et al., “Methods for Improving Uniformity and Resistivity of Thin Tungsten Films,” Novellus Systems, Inc, filed Dec. 11, 2009, U.S. Appl. No. 12/636,616. |
U.S. Office Action mailed Jan. 26, 2010 from U.S. Appl. No. 11/951,236. |
U.S. Notice of Allowance mailed Mar. 2, 2010 from U.S. Appl. No. 11/349,035. |
Allowed Claims from U.S. Appl. No. 11/349,035. |
Danek, et al, “Tungsten Barrier and Seed for Copper Filled TSV,” Novellus Systems, Inc., filed Mar. 12, 2010, U.S. Appl. No. 12/723,532. |
Chandrashekar, et al., “Method for Forming Tungsten Contacts and Interconnects with Small Critical Dimensions,” Novellus Systems, Inc, filed Apr. 6, 2010, U.S. Appl. No. 12/755,248. |
Chen, et al., “Methods for Depositing Ultra Thin Low Resistivity Tungsten Film for Small Critical Dimension Contacts and Interconnects,” Novellus Systems, Inc, filed Apr. 6, 2010, U.S. Appl. No. 12/755,259. |
U.S. Notice of Allowance and Allowed Claims mailed Apr. 6, 2010 from U.S. Appl. No. 11/951,236. |
U.S. Office Action mailed May 3, 2010 from U.S. Appl. No. 12/407,541. |
Chan et al., “Method for Improving Uniformity and Adhesion of Low Resistivity Tungsten Film,” Novellus Systems, Inc., U.S. Appl. No. 12/829,119, filed Jul. 1, 2010. |
U.S. Office Action mailed Jun. 11, 2010 from U.S. Appl. No. 11/963,698. |
U.S. Final Office Action mailed Jul. 23, 2010 from U.S. Appl. No. 12/030,645. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion mailed Apr. 12, 2010 from Application No. PCT/US2009/055349. |
Hoover, Cynthia, “Enabling Materials for Contact Metallization,” Praxair Electronic Materials R&D, Jul. 2007, pp. 1-16. |
Purchase of ethylcyclopentadienyl)dicarbonylnitrosyltungsten from Praxair in Oct. 2006. |
U.S. Final Office Action mailed Oct. 19, 2010 from U.S. Appl. No. 12/407,541. |
U.S. Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 12/538,770 mailed Nov. 23, 2010. |
U.S. Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/963,698 mailed Dec. 30, 2010. |
U.S. Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 12/636,616 mailed Jan. 25, 2011. |
Notice of Allowance and Fee Due mailed Jan. 24, 2011, from U.S. Appl. No. 12/030,645. |
Allowed Claims from U.S. Appl. No. 12/030,645 as of Jan. 24, 2011. |
Chan et al., “Methods for Growing Low-Resistivity Tungsten for High Aspect Ratio and Small Features,” Novellus Systems, Inc., U.S. Appl. No. 13/095,734, filed Apr. 27, 2011. |
U.S. Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 12/407,541 mailed May 2, 2011. |
U.S. Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 12/755,248 mailed May 13, 2011. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/560,688, filed Jul. 27, 2012, entitled “Methods of improving Tungsten Contact Resistance in Small Critical Dimension Features,”. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/633,798, filed Oct. 2, 2012, entitled “Method for Depositing Tungsten Film With Low Roughness and Low Resistivity,”. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/633,502, filed Oct. 2, 2012, entitled “Method for Producing Ultra-Thin Tungsten Layers With Improved Step Coverage,”. |
US Office Action, dated Apr. 3, 2009, issued in U.S. Appl. No. 11/305,368. |
US Final Office Action, dated Feb. 26, 2009, issued in U.S. Appl. No. 11/265,531. |
US Notice of Allowance, dated May 4, 2009, issued in U.S. Appl. No. 11/265,531. |
US Notice of Allowance, dated Jun. 30, 2011, issued in U.S. Appl. No. 12/538,770. |
US Final Office Action, dated Feb. 25, 2009, issued in U.S. Appl. No. 11/349,035. |
US Office Action, dated Jun. 4, 2009, issued in U.S. Appl. No. 11/349,035. |
US Final Office Action, dated Apr. 28, 2009, issued in U.S. Appl. No. 11/782,570. |
US Final Office Action, dated Jun. 15, 2011, issued in U.S. Appl. No. 12/636,616. |
US Notice of Allowance, dated Sep. 30, 2011, issued in U.S. Appl. No. 12/636,616. |
US Office Action, dated Jun. 24, 2009, issued in U.S. Appl. No. 12/030,645. |
US Office Action, dated Aug. 6, 2012, issued in U.S. Appl. No. 13/095,734. |
Notice of Allowance dated Dec. 3, 2012, issued in U.S. Appl. No. 13/095,734. |
US Office Action, dated Aug. 5, 2009, issued in U.S. Appl. No. 11/951,236. |
US Office Action, dated Jun. 30, 2011, issued in U.S. Appl. No. 12/829,119. |
US Final Office Action, dated Nov. 17, 2011, issued in U.S. Appl. No. 12/829,119. |
US Office Action, dated Apr. 19 2012, issued in U.S. Appl. No. 12/829,119. |
US Notice of Allowance, dated Aug. 7, 2012, issued in U.S. Appl. No. 12/829,119. |
US Office Action, dated Jun. 11, 2009, issued in U.S. Appl. No. 11/963,698. |
US Notice of Allowance, dated Sep. 2, 2011, issued in U.S. Appl. No. 11/963,698. |
US Office Action, dated Apr. 16 2012, issued in U.S. Appl. No. 13/276,170. |
US Notice of Allowance, dated Oct. 4, 2012, issued in U.S. Appl. No. 13/276,170. |
US Notice of Allowance, dated Jul. 25, 2011, issued in U.S. Appl. No. 12/363,330. |
US Notice of Allowance, dated Sep. 19, 2011, issued in U.S. Appl. No. 12/407,541. |
US Office Action, dated Mar. 6, 2012, issued in U.S. Appl. No. 13/244,016. |
Notice of Allowanace dated Nov. 29, 2012, issued in U.S. Appl. No. 13/244,016. |
US Office Action, dated Jun. 14, 2011, issued in U.S. Appl. No. 12/556,490. |
US Notice of Allowance, dated Mar. 2, 2012, issued in U.S. Appl. No. 12/556,490. |
US Office Action, dated Oct. 28, 2011, issued in U.S. Appl. No. 12/755,248. |
US Final Office Action, dated Apr. 30, 2012, issued in U.S. Appl. No. 12/755,248. |
US Office Action, dated Feb. 15, 2013, issued in U.S. Appl. No. 12/755,248. |
US Office Action dated Dec. 18, 2012, issued in U.S. Appl. No. 12/723,532. |
US Office Action, dated Feb. 16, 2012, issued in U.S. Appl. No. 12/755,259. |
US Final Office Action, dated Sep. 12, 2012, issued in U.S. Appl. No. 12/755,259. |
US Office Action, dated May 10, 2012, issued in U.S. Appl. No. 13/020,748. |
US Final Office Action, dated Nov. 16, 2012, issued in U.S. Appl. No. 13/020,748. |
Korean First Notification of Provisional Rejection, dated Dec. 8, 2010, issued in Application No. 2004-0036346. |
Korean Second Notification of Provisional Rejection, dated Aug. 25, 2011, issued in Application No. 2004-0036346. |
Korean Office Action, dated Jun. 13, 2011, issued in Application No. 2011-0032098. |
Chinese Office Action dated Sep. 18, 2012 issued in application No. 200980133560.1. |
Korean Office Action dated Sep. 6, 2012 issued in application No. 2011-7004322. |
Korean Office Action dated Mar. 21, 2013 issued in KR Application No. 2010-0024905. |
Korean Notification of Provisional Rejection dated Jul. 17, 2012, issued in Application No. 2010-0087997. |
Korean Office Action dated Mar. 4, 2013 in KR Application No. 2010-0035449. |
Korean Office Action dated Mar. 4, 2013 in KR Application No. 2010-0035453. |
Ken K. Lai and H. Henry Lamb. (1995) “Precursors for Organometallic Chemical Vapor Deposition of Tungsten Carbide Films”, Chemistry Material, pp. 2284-2292. |
Korean Office Action dated Jul. 19, 2013 issued in application No. 2011-7004322. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20100055904 A1 | Mar 2010 | US |