The invention is directed generally to an electrical connector and more specifically to an electrical connector having improved inductive and capacitive coupling balancing characteristics.
It has long been desired to improve the electrical performance of particular components or whole systems by minimizing crosstalk therein. There is a reduction in both near end crosstalk (NEXT) and far end crosstalk (FEXT) when both the net inductive and capacitive crosstalk components are reduced in magnitude.
Past efforts to minimize the inductive component of crosstalk have in some cases included altering the length and orientation of the connector contacts to provide offsetting inductive coupling to preexisting inductive coupling present in the plug or elsewhere in the connector. However, the manufacturing processes required to produce contacts having special lengths and orientation are expensive. In addition, such contacts have been relatively long which causes excessive phase shift at high frequency. In addition, the inductance between such contacts are subject to excess variability. In addition or instead of such contact designs, past efforts to minimize crosstalk utilizing phase-offsetting coupling between pairs on a printed circuit board (PCB) have primarily utilized capacitive coupling. As such, better ways of balancing both inductive and capacitive coupling thereby minimizing crosstalk are sought.
The inventive connector and printed circuit board (PCB) provides an inductance-balancing function with traces on the PCB. It is synergistic in that it utilizes the inductive balancing traces to provide a capacitive-balancing function. This provides advantages over previous designs in terms of ability and cost to achieve a desired result with a compact connector. It also provides greater design flexibility and improved performance.
In some preferred embodiments of the invention, there is provided a jack for receiving a compatibly configured standard plug that terminates four twisted wire pairs. The jack includes a PCB having eight contacts projecting from a front side thereof for mating with the plug, eight insulation displacement contacts (IDC's) projecting from a rear side thereof, and eight traces embedded in the printed circuit board connecting corresponding terminals and IDC's (numbered 1-8 to facilitate reference). Four traces on the PCB are selectively routed in various zones thereof to create two distinct zones of coupling separated by a relatively coupling-free neutral zone. The introduced couplings improve the overall performance of pairs 3,6 and 4,5 of the combination of the jack and the plug.
a is a schematic cross-sectional view of the printed circuit board of
b is a schematic cross-sectional view of the printed circuit board of
c is a schematic cross-sectional view of the printed circuit board of
a and 12b shows the addition of capacitor plates to a section of current carrying traces of the PCB shown in
a, 14b, and 14c are schematic cross-sectional views of the PCB of
a and 15b are perspective views of a jack like that illustrated in
a and 16b are exploded perspective views of the jack of
a and 20b are schematic drawings of the contact of
a and 29b are perspective views of an alternate design of a grounding cap for the jack of
a and 30b are end and side views of the grounding cap of
a and 34b are side cross-sectional views of the “shielded patch panel” of
Using a PCB to provide inductance balancing is preferable to some conventional inductance balancing techniques (such as contact orientation) in that trace paths on a PCB are compact and inexpensive to attain without incurring significantly increased manufacturing costs. Additionally, using only a single compensation zone, where inductance of a certain magnitude (path length as the paths run in parallel) is purposefully introduced to offset a predetermined inductance from a plug or other portion of the connector is ineffective at high frequencies due to phase shift. The inventive connector utilizes the teachings of U.S. Pat. No. 5,997,358 to take phase shift into account. This application incorporates by reference in its entirety U.S. Pat. No. 5,997,358. By including two distinct inductance zones, however, separated by a neutral zone, one realizes significant gains in degrees of freedom for designing trace patterns on a PCB so that the pair of inductive coupling zones jointly offset the inductive coupling caused by a specification plug and the jack contacts both in magnitude and phase angle.
In a preferred embodiment of the invention, an electrical path may extend from the plug through the portion of a contact between the plug contact point and the contact through-hole on the PCB, along a precompensation portion of a trace, into a compensation zone of the trace, into a neutral zone of the trace, into a crosstalk zone of the trace, and into a corresponding IDC. Particular traces are run closely together in the compensation and crosstalk zones so as to introduce inductive coupling between particular trace pairs in these zones, while the precompensation zone and neutral zone are generally devoid of any intentionally introduced inductive coupling between trace pairs. The lengths of the various trace portions are subject to design considerations but are generally chosen to provide path lengths within the various zones so that the inductive coupling provided by the compensation and crosstalk zones and their locations combine to generally offset the inductive couplings in the plug and jack contacts.
Although there are several degrees of freedom in designing this system, the inclusion of the neutral zone, in particular, between the two inductance zones (the compensation zone and the crosstalk zone), yields considerable freedom in designing the through-hole locations and trace paths on the PCB, and thus offers more freedom pertaining to where the terminals and IDC's may be located on the PCB. It also provides more options for the introduction of capacitance on the PCB so that it also serves a capacitance balancing function.
In a preferred embodiment as shown in
The vectors in
The phase shift due to the distance and environment between b & c is equal to the phase shift due to distance and environment between a & b. As seen in
The objectives of the design of the jack as shown in
The current carrying traces on the PCB provide capacitive coupling in the compensation and crosstalk zones which is similar to the inductive coupling which they provide, however, additional capacitive coupling is required. This is provided by selectively adding capacitor plates above and below sections of current carrying leads as shown in
a and 12b shows the addition of capacitor plates to a section of current carrying traces of the PCB shown in
This design provides relatively compact PCB geometry. It utilizes current carrying traces to provide the required inductive and capacitive coupling in both the compensation and crosstalk zones.
The location of each capacitive coupling is controlled by the location of the connection between a current carrying trace and the associated capacitor plates. The magnitude of each capacitive coupling is determined by the length of the capacitor plates parallel to the current carrying traces.
The capacitive coupling vector origin locations are proximate the inductive coupling vector origins, however, the inductive and capacitive couplings are independently balanced.
The couplings of the specification plug have been calculated as follows:
Inductive Coupling: 1.428 nH
Capacitive Coupling: 0.936 pF
The design parameter objectives of the jack PCB design are:
This design was determined by simulation and calculation and is the basis for the design of a prototype. To tune the prototype, a plot of NEXT dB vs. frequency should be run. First, the length of the neutral zone should be varied until the Null (−dB) is maximized. Assuming that the magnitude of vector a equals the magnitude of vector b, this will make ∠ab equal to ∠bc. Second, the magnitude of the compensation zone should be varied until the Null frequency is 500 MHz. If the length of the compensation zone is varied to vary its magnitude, the length of the neutral zone must also be varied to make <ab equal to <bc. It should be noted that the crosstalk and compensation provided by the PCB will be a combination of inductive and capacitive coupling and the ideal combination will match the combination of a standard plug and the jack contacts.
The teachings taught herein can also be applied to additional pair combinations. State of the art methods would be used to obtain optimum pair impedance and balance to neutral of each pair.
The same PC board will also accommodate the IDC's for a punchdown termination design as illustrated in
a and 15b are perspective views of a jack which is similar to that shown in
The main housing 1 is substantially the same as the jack shown in
a and 16b are exploded perspective views of the jack shown in
The stems of the IDC's 14 are the same as those of the jack of
In addition, the contact holder 17 incorporates a radiused support 18 under each contact 16 which reduces stress concentration in each contact.
The contact shape is relatively horizontal in the section 19 that contacts the plug to minimize the change in contact force due to allowable dimensional variations in specification plugs.
The ratio of contact width to contact thickness is approximately 1.8:1. This ratio for typical state of the art rectangular contacts is 1.3:1. The free ends of the contacts 20 are supported.
If a six contact plug were installed in a jack with the above contacts, contacts number one and eight would be damaged. To prevent this, protrusion keys 21 in
In another embodiment as shown in
a and 20b are schematic drawings of the contact of
The contact 22 of
As shown in
As shown in
The metal pair divider 10 therefore decreases crosstalk magnitude and variation.
When the cap is installed, there is a space 29 between the end 30 of the metal pair divider 10 and an installed cable jacket which is sufficient to facilitate the necessary reorientation of pairs between the cable jacket and the IDCs.
The difference in the shielded version is the replacement of wiring cap 12 with shielded wiring cap 31 shown on
a and 29b are perspective views of an alternate design of the metal portion 33 of the shielded wiring cap 31.
a and 30b are end and side views of the metal portion 33 of cap 31.
The design of the shielded versions eliminates the need to install the shield in the field. When the cable is installed in the cap, the cable shield is connected to the metal portion of the cap.
When the cap is installed in the jack body, the metal portion 33 of the wiring cap 31 is connected to the jack shield.
This strain relief/grounding cap assembly provides a means to secure a shielded cable to a jack and to electrically connect the shield of an installed cable to the shield of the jack. This design accommodates a large range of cable diameters.
Installation of the strain relief/grounding cap assembly:
1. Cable is prepared per the following instructions:
2. Conductor pairs are fed through the grounding cap and oriented, foil shields are cut off where each wire will enter wire slot, wires are bent 90 degrees, inserted in wire slots, and cut off.
3. Cap assembly is located in the back of the jack housing and pressed in with an installation tool or pliers (not shown).
4. The spring clip is fully engaged with a pliers or the like to ensure good contact between the braid of the cable and the grounding cap.
5. The ground is connected from the cable/overbraid by clip/grounding cap to spring tabs on the housing shield.
The components include a metal frame 37, plastic inserts 38, spring metal grounding strip 39 with grounding fingers 40 a means to ground the strip 39 to the network ground 41 (not shown).
a is a side cross-sectional view of the patch panel 36.
b is a side cross-sectional view of the patch panel 36 with a typical shielded jack 26 installed with a grounding finger 40 pressing against the jack shield 35 at location 41.
This application is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/014,097, now U.S. Pat. No. 7,182,649, filed on Dec. 15, 2004 and entitled “Inductive and Capacitive Coupling Balancing Electrical Connector” which claimed priority to U.S. Provisional Application No. 60/531,756, filed on Dec. 22, 2003, entitled “Inductive and Capacitive Coupling Balancing Electrical Connector.” Both of these applications are hereby incorporated by reference in their entireties. Further, this application incorporates by reference in its entirety U.S. Pat. No. 5,997,358, entitled “Electrical Connector Having Time-Delayed Signal Compensation,” filed on Sep. 2,1997, as well as all materials incorporated therein by reference.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
5163836 | Young et al. | Nov 1992 | A |
5186647 | Denkmann et al. | Feb 1993 | A |
5228872 | Liu | Jul 1993 | A |
5299956 | Brownell et al. | Apr 1994 | A |
5503572 | White et al. | Apr 1996 | A |
5586914 | Foster, Jr. et al. | Dec 1996 | A |
5716237 | Conorich et al. | Feb 1998 | A |
5766034 | Block et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5779503 | Tremblay et al. | Jul 1998 | A |
5791943 | Lo et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
5797764 | Coulombe et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
5885111 | Yu | Mar 1999 | A |
5915989 | Adriaenssens et al. | Jun 1999 | A |
5997358 | Adriaenssens et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6017229 | Tulley et al. | Jan 2000 | A |
6017247 | Gwiazdowski | Jan 2000 | A |
6057743 | Aekins | May 2000 | A |
6079996 | Arnett | Jun 2000 | A |
6120330 | Gwiazdowski | Sep 2000 | A |
6155881 | Arnett et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
6168474 | German et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6176742 | Arnett et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6196880 | Goodrich et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6231397 | de la Borbolla et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6238235 | Shavit et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6255593 | Reede | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6267617 | Nozick | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6305950 | Doorhy | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6319069 | Gwiazdowski | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6332810 | Bareel | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6338655 | Masse et al. | Jan 2002 | B1 |
6356162 | DeFlandre et al. | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6371793 | Doorhy et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6379157 | Curry et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6379175 | Reede | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6402560 | Lin | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6409547 | Reede | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6410845 | Reede | Jun 2002 | B2 |
6464529 | Jensen et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6464541 | Hashim et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6524139 | Chang | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6533618 | Aekins | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6554638 | Hess et al. | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6736681 | Arnett | May 2004 | B2 |
6769937 | Roberts | Aug 2004 | B1 |
6780035 | Bohbot | Aug 2004 | B2 |
6802743 | Aekins et al. | Oct 2004 | B2 |
20010014563 | Morita et al. | Aug 2001 | A1 |
20020019172 | Forbes et al. | Feb 2002 | A1 |
20020197043 | Hwang | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20030171024 | Mossner et al. | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20030194908 | Brown et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20040184247 | Adriaenssens et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040248468 | Gurovich et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050014420 | Quenneville et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050181676 | Caveney et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050202697 | Caveney et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050207561 | Hammond, Jr. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050208838 | Horowitz et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050277339 | Caveney et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20060014410 | Caveney | Jan 2006 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
0901201 | Mar 2000 | EP |
1191646 | Nov 2002 | EP |
1275177 | Jan 2003 | EP |
1063734 | Sep 2005 | EP |
2823606 | Oct 2002 | FR |
2380334 | Apr 2003 | GB |
9930388 | Jun 1999 | WO |
9945611 | Sep 1999 | WO |
0180376 | Oct 2001 | WO |
2004001906 | Dec 2003 | WO |
2004086828 | Oct 2004 | WO |
2005101579 | Oct 2005 | WO |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20070123112 A1 | May 2007 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
60531756 | Dec 2003 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 11014097 | Dec 2004 | US |
Child | 11670668 | US |