Method of controlling gas flow to a semiconductor processing reactor

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 6773749
  • Patent Number
    6,773,749
  • Date Filed
    Thursday, January 18, 2001
    24 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, August 10, 2004
    20 years ago
Abstract
A method of controlling gas flow to a semiconductor processing reactor includes opening a first gas manifold inlet valve coupled between a first regulator and a gas manifold; regulating a flow rate of a flow of a first process gas through the first gas manifold inlet valve to the gas manifold with the first regulator; opening a second gas manifold inlet valve coupled between a second regulator and the gas manifold; and regulating a flow rate of a flow of a second process gas through the second gas manifold inlet valve to the gas manifold with the second regulator. The first process gas and the second process gas mix in the gas manifold.
Description




FIELD OF THE INVENTION




This invention relates generally to semiconductor process equipment, and more particularly, to a method and systems for controlling gas flow to a semiconductor processing reactor.




BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION




Semiconductor processing typically involves the formation of one or more layers on a semiconductor substrate. For example, silicon epitaxy, sometimes called epi, is a process in which one or more layers of single-crystal (monocrystalline) silicon are deposited on a monocrystalline silicon wafer.





FIG. 1

is a schematic representation of a semiconductor processing system


10


in accordance with the prior art. As shown in

FIG. 1

, system


10


included a susceptor


12


enclosed within a barrel reactor


14


. Susceptor


12


supported a plurality of substrates


16


, typically monocrystalline silicon wafers.




During processing, substrates


16


were heated with an external radiation source such as tungsten halogen lamps, resistive heating elements and/or RF heaters (not shown).




A process gas was introduced into reactor


14


through one or more injector ports


18


. The process gas typically included trichlorosilane although other process gases besides trichlorosilane sometimes were used depending upon the particular type of layer that was deposited. The process gas reacted with heated substrates


16


resulting in the deposition of layers on substrates


16


as those: skilled in the art understand. The spent process gas was exhausted through a vacuum pump


20


to exhaust


23


. Alternatively, the spent process gas was directly exhausted to exhaust


23


and vacuum pump


20


was not used.




Of importance, to insure the consistency and quality of the deposited layers on substrates


16


, the composition and mass flow rate of the process gas delivered to reactor


14


was carefully controlled. For this reason, system


10


included a gas flow control system


21


coupled to injector ports


18


by a process gas line


24


. Gas flow control system


21


was generally located in a gas cabinet


22


located at a distance from reactor


14


.




Located within a gas bottle cabinet


49


were three process gas sources


26


,


28


,


30


and a carrier gas source


50


. Illustratively, process gas sources


26


,


28


,


30


and carrier gas source


50


included compressed gas cylinders containing process gases A, B, C, and carrier gas CG, respectively.




Process gas sources


26


,


28


,


30


were coupled to a gas manifold


38


of system


21


through mass flow controllers (MFCS)


32


,


34


,


36


, respectively, of system


21


. Gas manifold


38


had a plurality of input ports


38


A,


38


B,


38


C, a first output port


38


Y and a second output port


38


Z. MFCs


32


,


34


,


36


controlled and regulated the mass flow rates of flows of process gases A, B, C from process gas sources


26


,


28


,


30


, respectively, to input ports


38


A,


38


B and


38


C, respectively, of gas manifold


38


. Output port


38


Y of gas manifold


38


was coupled to process gas line


24


by valve


40


of system


21


. Output port


38


Z of gas manifold


38


was coupled to an inlet of vacuum pump


20


(generally referred to as exhaust


23


) by valve


42


of system


21


. An outlet of vacuum pump


20


was coupled to exhaust


23


. Alternatively, vacuum pump


20


was not used and output port


38


Z of gas manifold


38


was directly coupled to exhaust


23


by valve


42


.




Carrier gas source


50


was coupled to process gas line


24


through a mass flower controller (MFC)


52


of system


21


. MFC


52


controlled and regulated the mass flow rate of a flow of carrier gas CG from carrier gas source


50


to process gas line


24


.




To illustrate the operation of gas flow control system


21


, assume that a heavily doped P type silicon layer was to be deposited after which a lightly doped P type silicon layer was to be deposited on substrates


16


. In this example, process gas C was a P type dopant gas. Further, process gas B was a source of silicon, e.g., was trichlorosilane.




Initially, to form the heavily doped P type silicon layer, valve


42


was open and valve


40


was closed. Process gases B, C from process gas sources


28


,


30


flowed through MFCs


34


,


36


, respectively, to gas manifold


38


. In gas manifold


38


, process gases B, C mixed (the mixture of process gases B, C is hereinafter referred to as high dopant concentration process gas). The high dopant concentration process gas flowed from gas manifold


38


through valve


42


to exhaust


23


.




As those skilled in the art understand, gas must flow through a mass flow controller (MFC) for a certain period of time after activation of the MFC to allow the mass flow rate of the flow of gas through the MFC to stabilize and to allow the MFC to accurately control the mass flow rate of the flow of gas. Thus, the flow of the high dopant concentration process gas to exhaust


23


continued until the mass flow rates of the flows through MFCs


34


,


36


stabilized. Valve


40


was opened and valve


42


was closed thereby providing the high dopant concentration process gas through process gas line


24


and injector ports


18


into reactor


14


. The high dopant concentration process gas reacted with heated substrates


16


and formed the heavily doped P type silicon layer on each of substrates


16


.




After a predefined time period, valve


40


was closed to stop the flow of the high dopant concentration process gas into reactor


14


and to stop the deposition of the heavily doped P type silicon layer on substrates


16


.

FIG. 2

is a graph of the concentration of the high dopant concentration process gas in reactor


14


verses time after shutting-off the flow of the high dopant concentration process gas to reactor


14


by closing valve


40


.




Referring to

FIGS. 1 and 2

together, time T=0 is at the end of the predefined period when valve


40


was closed. After valve


40


was closed, the concentration of the high dopant concentration process gas gradually decreased in reactor


14


as the high dopant concentration process gas was displaced by carrier gas CG supplied from carrier gas source


50


. In particular, a length of time T=T


1


, e.g., thirty seconds to two minutes or more, after valve


40


was closed passed before the high dopant concentration process gas was fully removed from reactor


14


. Undesirably, the high dopant concentration process gas continued to react and formed a transition layer on the newly formed heavily doped P type silicon layer until the high dopant concentration process gas was fully removed from reactor


14


.




After the high dopant concentration process gas was fully removed from reactor


14


, the lightly doped P type silicon layer was deposited. Valve


42


was opened and process gas A, hereinafter referred to as low dopant concentration process gas, flowed through MFC


32


through valve


42


to exhaust


23


until the mass flow rate of the, flow through MFC


32


stabilized. Valve


40


was opened and valve


42


was closed thereby providing the low dopant concentration process gas into reactor


14


. The low dopant concentration process gas reacted with heated substrates


16


and formed the lightly doped P type silicon layer on substrates


16


.





FIG. 3

is a graph of dopant concentration versus depth in a substrate


16


in accordance with the prior art process described above. Referring to

FIG. 3

, the top of the heavily doped P type silicon layer described above (hereinafter referred to as HD layer L


1


) was located at a distance D


1


from a surface of substrate


16


.




Referring to

FIGS. 1 and 3

together, after HD layer L


1


was formed with a desired thickness D


1


, valve


40


was closed to stop the flow of the high dopant concentration process gas to reactor


14


. However, after closing of valve


40


, transition layer TL was formed on HD layer L


1


.




Since the concentration of the high dopant concentration process gas diminished in reactor


14


after valve


40


was closed, the dopant concentration of transition layer TL gradually changed from heavily doped HD at the bottom of transition layer TL to lightly doped LD at the top of transition layer TL. The lightly doped P type silicon layer (hereinafter LD layer L


2


) was formed on transition layer TL.




AS the art moves towards smaller high speed devices, it is important that the transition between layers be abrupt. In particular, referring to

FIG. 3

, it is important to reduce or eliminate transition layer TL between the top of HD layer L


1


and the bottom of LD layer L


2


. Unfortunately, it is not possible to instantaneously purge the reaction chamber. Thus, the current generation of semiconductor processing reactors do not appear suitable for manufacturing the substrates used in making the smaller high speed devices.




In addition to having abrupt transitions between layers, it is also important to accurately control the dopant concentration within a layer in any particular batch and also from batch to batch. To illustrate, referring to

FIG. 3

, if the P type dopant concentration of the high dopant concentration process gas which formed HD layer L


1


was to high (low), the P type dopant concentration of HD layer L


1


exceeded (fell short of) the desired concentration HD of HD layer L


1


as indicated by the line


304


(


306


).





FIG. 4

is a schematic representation of process gas source


30


of

FIG. 1

illustrating the dilution of a dopant gas DG with a carrier gas CG in accordance with the prior art. As shown in

FIG. 4

, process gas source


30


included a mixer


50


. Coupled to mixer


50


was a check valve


52


through which carrier gas CG, e.g. hydrogen, flowed. Also coupled to mixer


50


was a mass flow controller (MFC)


54


through which dopant gas DG flowed. In mixer


50


, carrier gas CG and dopant gas DG mixed. The mixture of carrier gas CG and dopant gas DG was supplied as process gas C to a mass flow controller (MFC)


56


and to MFC


36


. MFC


36


controlled and regulated the mass flow rate of the flow of process gas C to reactor


14


as discussed above. MFC


56


controlled and regulated the mass flow rate of the flow of process gas C to exhaust


23


.




Observation of the dopant concentration in a layer formed using this apparatus reveals variations in the dopant concentration within the layer from batch to batch. While for conventional devices the variations are not significant, the variations are not acceptable for emerging process technologies that require a substantially constant doping concentration within a layer. Consequently, in addition to the problems with formation of transition layers, the present configurations do not produce the desired uniform doping level that is needed. Therefore, to achieve high volume quality production of thin layers, new apparatus and configurations will be required.




SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION




In accordance with the present invention, a gas flow controller system is located directly adjacent to a point of use that typically is a semiconductor processing reactor. This configuration eliminates the long prior art gas supply line that was between the gas manifold and the point of use. Consequently, this configuration eliminates the requirement to evacuate and/or purge the long prior art gas supply line through the point of use, which in turn results in a significantly faster reduction in the concentration of the process gas at the point of use, e.g., the semiconductor processing reactor. The significantly faster reduction in the process gas concentration significantly reduces or even eliminates the prior art transition layer. Thus, the gas flow controller system of this invention permits formation of abrupt transitions between layers.




In addition, the gas flow controller includes a novel configuration that permits stabilizing a second process gas flow simultaneously with supplying a first process gas flow to the semiconductor processing reactor. This reduces the process cycle time which in turn permits processing of more substrate batches in a given time period compared to the prior art processes.




The gas flow controller of this invention also provides for mixing predefined flows of a plurality of gases to create a substantially uniform concentration process gas flow. The substantially uniform concentration process gas flow is controlled so that a predefined portion is directed to the semiconductor processing reactor and a remainder is exhausted. Since the process gas flow from the mixing remains constant, a dopant concentration in the gas flow is precisely controlled. The precise control of the dopant concentration results in the formation of a doped layer on a substrate having a precise predefined concentration across the thickness of the layer in any particular batch and from batch to batch.




In one embodiment of the present invention, a gas flow control system for a semiconductor processing unit includes a first mass flow controller located at a first location and a support structure located at the semiconductor processing unit. The system further includes a gas manifold located at the support structure and a first gas manifold inlet valve located at the support structure and coupled between the gas manifold and the first mass flow controller. The gas manifold and the first gas manifold inlet valve are located at a second location separate and removed from the first location. The gas manifold is coupled through a process gas supply line to one or more injector ports of a reactor in which substrates, e.g., silicon wafers, are processed.




Of importance, the reactor is supported by the support structure, e.g., a table. Since the gas manifold and the gas manifold inlet valve are also located at the support structure as close as physically possible to the reactor, the length of the gas manifold and the process gas supply line is relatively short, e.g., is two feet or less, compared to the corresponding prior art, gas supply line between the gas manifold and the one or more injector ports which was relatively long, e.g., ten feet or more. Since the relatively short length of the gas manifold and the process gas supply line holds a small amount of process gas, the process gas within the gas manifold and the process gas supply line is removed in a relatively short time, e.g., thirty seconds or less, after the flow of the process gas to the gas manifold is shut off. Advantageously, the relatively short time in accordance with the present invention allows realization of an abrupt transition between layers formed on a substrate.




Also in accordance with the present invention, a method of controlling gas flow to a reactor includes opening a first gas manifold inlet valve coupled between a first mass flow controller, e.g., a first regulator, and a gas manifold and regulating a mass flow rate of a flow of a first process gas through the first gas manifold inlet valve to the gas manifold with the first mass flow controller. The method further includes opening a gas manifold exhaust valve coupled between a second mass flow controller, e.g., a second regulator, and an exhaust and regulating a mass flow rate of a flow of a second process gas through the gas manifold exhaust valve to the exhaust with the second mass flow controller.




Of importance, the second process gas flows through the second mass flow controller thus stabilizing the mass flow rate of the flow of the second process gas through the second mass flow controller while the first process gas is flowing to the gas manifold and thus to the reactor coupled to the gas manifold.




This is in contrast to the prior art where all the process gases were sent to exhaust through a single common gas manifold and valve thus precluding the possibility of stabilizing a mass flow rate of a flow of process gas through any of the mass flow controllers while another process gas was being supplied to the reactor. Advantageously, stabilizing the mass flow rate of the flow of the second process gas through the second mass flow controller while the first process gas is being supplied to the reactor in accordance with the present invention improves cycle time and thus reduces the cost of processing substrates compared to the prior art.




Also in accordance with the present invention, a system for diluting a dopant gas with a carrier gas includes a mixer, a dopant gas source, e.g., a first gas source, coupled to an inlet port of the mixer and a carrier gas source, e.g., a second gas source, coupled to the inlet port of the mixer. The system further includes a first mass flow controller, e.g., a first regulator, coupled between the inlet port of the mixer and the dopant gas source and a second mass flow controller, e.g., a second regulator, coupled between the inlet port of the mixer and the carrier gas source. Coupled to an outlet port of the mixer are a third mass flow controller, e.g., a third regulator, and a check valve.




During use, the dopant gas is diluted with the carrier gas to result in a process gas having a desired dopant concentration. Since the mass flow rates of the flows of the dopant gas and the carrier gas to the mixer are controlled and regulated by the first and second mass flow controllers, respectively, and are constant, the dopant concentration of the process gas is likewise constant. Thus, regardless of what percentage of the flow of process gas is directed to exhaust through the check valve versus directed to the reactor through the third mass flow controller, the dopant concentration of the process gas is precisely determined and remains constant. This, in turn, results in the formation of a doped layer on a substrate having a precise and constant dopant concentration across the entire thickness of the doped layer in any particular batch as well as from batch to batch. For this reason, a system in accordance with the present invention is well suited to meet and exceed the stringent requirements of existing and emerging process technologies.




Also in accordance with the present invention, a method of diluting a dopant gas with a carrier gas includes setting a mass flow rate of a flow of the dopant gas to a mixer and setting a mass flow rate of a flow of the carrier gas to the mixer, where the dopant gas and the carrier gas mix in the mixer to form a process gas which flows out of the mixer. The method further includes setting a mass flow rate of a flow of the process gas to a reactor, where a difference between the flow of the process gas out of the mixer and the flow of the process gas to the reactor is excess process gas which is directed to exhaust.











These and other features and advantages of the present invention will be more readily apparent from the detailed description set forth below taken in conjunction with the accompanying drawings.




BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS





FIG. 1

is a schematic representation of a semiconductor processing system in accordance with the prior art.





FIG. 2

is a graph of process gas concentration in a reactor verses time after shutting off the flow of the process gas to the reactor in accordance with the prior art.





FIG. 3

is a graph of dopant concentration versus depth in a substrate in accordance with the prior art.





FIG. 4

is a schematic representation of a process gas source of

FIG. 1

illustrating the dilution of a dopant gas with a carrier gas in accordance with the prior art.





FIG. 5A

is a schematic representation of a gas flow control system at a point of use in accordance with the present invention.





FIG. 5B

is a schematic representation of a semiconductor processing reactor at a point of use that includes a gas flow control system in accordance with the present invention.





FIG. 6

is a cross-sectional view of a substrate after processing in accordance with the present invention.





FIG. 7

is a graph of process gas concentration in a reactor verses time after shutting off the flow of the process gas to the reactor in accordance with the present invention.





FIG. 8

is a graph of dopant concentration versus depth in the substrate of

FIG. 6

in accordance with the present invention.





FIG. 9

is a schematic representation of a process gas source of

FIG. 5B

illustrating the dilution of a dopant gas with a carrier gas in accordance with one embodiment of the present invention.





FIG. 10

, which consists of

FIGS. 10A

,


10


B, is a schematic representation of a semiconductor processing system which includes a gas flow control system in accordance with one embodiment of the present invention.




In the following description, similar elements are labeled with similar reference numbers.











DETAILED DESCRIPTION




According to the principles of this invention, a novel gas flow controller system


500


(

FIG. 5A

) located directly adjacent to a point of use


501


eliminates the problems associated with the prior art gas flow controller located in a gas cabinet that was remote from the point of use. A plurality of gas lines


505


connect a plurality of process gas sources in gas cabinet


522


to gas flow controller system


500


. Gas flow controller system


500


selectively connects and disconnects each gas line in the plurality of gas lines


505


to a short process gas supply line


506


that is connected to point of use


501


. Point of use


501


is an apparatus that utilizes the process gas supplied by process gas supply line


506


.




For example, a process gas may be supplied to point of use


501


by gas flow controller system


500


to grow a layer on a semiconductor substrate. Short process gas supply line


506


significantly reduces or even eliminates the prior art problem of creating a transition layer after gas flow controller system


500


disconnects the process gas line or lines in the plurality of process gas lines


505


providing the process gas.




Specifically, since gas flow controller system


500


is located directly adjacent to point of use


501


, the long prior art process gas supply line (see process gas line


24


of

FIG. 1

) between the prior art gas manifold and the point of use is eliminated. Consequently, the configuration of

FIG. 5A

eliminates the requirement to evacuate and/or purge the long prior art gas supply line through the point of use, which in turn results in a significantly faster reduction in the concentration of the gas in the point of use. The significantly faster reduction of the gas concentration significantly reduces or even eliminates the prior art transition layer.




Thus, gas flow controller system


500


of this invention permits formation of abrupt transitions between layers on a substrate using prior art processing equipment without modification to the processing reactor itself or installation of new substrate processing equipment. However, in one embodiment, to enhance formation of abrupt transitions between layers on a substrate, gas flow controller system


500


of this invention is used in combination with a gas dispersion head of Moore et al., related and commonly assigned U.S. patent application Ser. No. 09/399,115, now U.S. Pat. No. 6,475,284, issued Nov. 5, 2002, entitled “GAS DISPERSION HEAD”, which is herein incorporated by reference in its entirety. Since this invention eliminates the need to obtain new processing reactors, the cost of production of substrates with state of the art feature sizes is reduced.




Gas flow controller system


500


also selectively connects and disconnects each gas line in at least a set of gas lines in the plurality of gas lines


505


to an exhaust line


521


. More specifically, gas flow controller system


500


simultaneously connects at least one gas line in the set to short process gas supply line


506


to supply a first process gas to point of use


501


, and connects another gas line in the set to exhaust line


521


to develop a stabilized mass flow rate of a flow of a second process gas.




In a processing cycle, it is necessary to change from the first process gas to the second process gas. In the prior art systems, the total processing cycle time was affected by the time required for stabilizing the mass flow rate of the flow of the second process gas after the switch in process gases was made. Since the mass flow rate of the flow of the second process gas is fully stabilized by venting the second process gas to the exhaust while the first process gas is being supplied to point of use


501


, when the switch is made to the second process gas, there is effectively no lost time waiting for the mass flow rate of the flow of the second process gas to stabilize. Consequently, gas flow controller system


500


and the method of use of gas flow controller system


500


improves the processing cycle time compared to the prior art systems and thus reduces the cost of processing.




Another feature of this invention, that is described more completely below, provides a doped process gas with a stable dopant concentration. In this embodiment, controlled flows of a dopant gas and a carrier gas are mixed to form the doped process gas. Since the flows of the two gases mixed together are controlled, the concentration of the dopant in the doped process gas is a constant. This eliminates the prior art problem of varying concentrations of the dopant in the doped process gas. Thus, not only does this invention reduce of eliminate transitions layers, but also this invention creates a more constant doping distribution within a layer in any particular batch and from batch to batch. Both of these features are essential to meet and/or exceed the stringent requirements of existing and emerging process technologies.




More particularly,

FIG. 5B

is a schematic representation of a semiconductor processing reactor


514


at point of use


501


that includes a gas flow controller system


500


in accordance with the present invention. As shown,in

FIG. 5B

, reactor


514


includes a susceptor


512


supporting a plurality of substrates


516


, e.g., silicon wafers. Process gas is supplied to reactor


514


through one or more injector ports


518


of reactor


514


. The spent process gas is exhausted from reactor


514


to exhaust


523


, through a vacuum pump


520


. Alternatively, vacuum pump


520


is not used and the spent process gas is exhausted from reactor


514


directly to exhaust


523


.




Located within a gas bottle cabinet


522


A are a plurality of process gas sources


524


,


526


,


528


and a carrier gas source


530


. Illustratively, each of the plurality of process gas sources


524


,


526


,


528


and carrier gas source


530


includes a cylinder of compressed gas and/or a container of liquid or other source of gas. It is important to keep the plurality of process gas sources


524


,


526


,


528


and carrier gas source


530


in gas bottle cabinet


522


A for several reasons as is well known to those of skill in the art. For example, one of these reasons is to protect process gas sources


524


,


526


,


528


and carrier gas source


530


from getting bumped and damaged. Another reason is to capture any process gases which escape from process gas sources


524


,


526


,


528


or carrier gas source


530


.




In this embodiment, process gas sources


524


,


526


and


528


supply process gases E, F and G, respectively. Examples of process gases include N type dopant gas, P type dopant gas, silane (SiH


4


), silicon tetrachloride (SiCl


4


), silicon trichloride (SiCl


3


), dichlorosilane (SiH


2


Cl


2


), hydrogen chloride (HCl), and/or mixtures of these gases. Carrier gas source


530


supplies a carrier gas CG, e.g., hydrogen.




In this embodiment, the mass flow rate of the flow of each of process gases E, F, G to a gas line within the plurality of gas lines


505


is controlled and regulated by a different mass flow controller (MFC) located within a gas cabinet


522


B. Gas bottle cabinet


522


A and gas cabinet


522


B collectively form gas cabinet


522


. Gas cabinet


522


, e.g., a first location, is separate and removed from reactor


514


and separate and removed from gas flow controller system


500


, e.g., a second location.




Specifically, each of MFCs


532


,


534


,


536


and


538


is coupled to a different process gas source, i.e., gas sources


524


,


526


,


528


and carrier gas source


530


, respectively. Each of MFCs


532


,


534


,


536


and


538


is also coupled to a different gas line in the plurality of gas lines


505


from gas cabinet


522


, i.e., gas lines


570


,


572


,


574


,


576


, respectively.




Gas flow control system


500


includes gas manifold


540


located as close as physically possible to injector ports


518


, a plurality of gas manifold inlet valves


542


,


544


,


546


and


548


and a plurality of gas manifold exhaust valves


550


,


552


and


554


. Each of gas manifold inlet valves


542


,


544


,


546


and


548


is coupled to a different input port of a plurality of gas manifold input ports, i.e., gas manifold input ports


560


,


562


,


564


,


566


, respectively, of gas manifold


540


. An output port


568


of gas manifold


540


is coupled to injector ports


518


and thus reactor


514


by process gas supply line


506


.




As indicated above, gas flow controller system


500


is located as close as physically possible to injector ports


518


of semiconductor processing reactor


514


so as to minimize the length of process gas supply line


506


. If possible, output port


568


of gas manifold


540


is connected directly to injector ports


518


. The important aspect is to minimize the volume of gas in the piping, i.e., gas manifold


540


and process gas supply line


506


, between gas manifold inlet valves


542


,


544


,


546


,


548


and injector ports


518


. Thus, when one or more of gas manifold inlet valves


542


,


544


,


546


,


548


are closed, the time required to purge or evacuate gas manifold


540


and process gas supply line


506


is minimized because the volume of gas has been minimized. Consequently, there is not enough of the process gas available to form a transition layer of any consequence.




In this embodiment, gas flow controller system


500


is mounted on a support structure


556


for reactor


514


as close as physically possible to reactor


514


. This configuration is suitable for reducing the thickness of any transition layer formed to the point that the transition layer is not significant in the operation of devices formed using the substrate. This is in sharp contrast to the prior art systems described above which produced unacceptable transition layers.




During use, one of process gases E, F, G or carrier gas CG or a combination of process gas E, F, G and/or carrier gas CG is supplied to gas manifold


540


and thus to injector ports


518


and reactor


514


.




Each gas line


570


,


572


,


574


in the plurality of gas lines


505


is coupled to exhaust


523


through one of gas manifold exhaust valves


550


,


552


and


554


, respectively, and, more,particularly, is coupled to an inlet port of vacuum pump


520


if vacuum pump


520


is used otherwise directly to exhaust


523


.




In accordance with the present invention, controlling a process gas flow to reactor


514


, e.g., process gas E, includes opening gas manifold inlet valve


542


and regulating a mass flow rate of a flow of process gas E through gas manifold inlet valve


542


to gas manifold


540


with MFC


532


, e.g., a first regulator. While process gas E is flowing to reactor


514


, gas manifold exhaust valve


554


that is coupled between mass flow controller (MFC)


536


, e.g., a second regulator, and exhaust


523


is opened and a mass flow rate of a flow of a process gas G through gas manifold exhaust valve


554


to exhaust


523


is regulated with MFC


536


.




Of importance, process gas G flows through MFC


536


and the mass flow rate of the flow of process gas G through MFC


536


is stabilized while process gas E is, flowing through gas manifold


540


to reactor


514


.




In another embodiment, to stabilize mass flow rates of flows of process gases E, F, G through MFCS


532


,


534


,


536


, respectively, gas manifold exhaust valves


550


,


552


and


554


are opened and MFCS


532


,


534


and


536


are activated to induce a flow of process gas E, F and G, respectively. After a period of time, e.g., a few seconds, the mass flow rates of the flows of process gases E, F, G through MFCS


532


,


534


and


536


stabilize and MFCS


532


,


534


and


536


accurately control and regulate the mass flow rates of flows of process gases E, F and G, respectively.




Once the flows through MFCs


532


,


534


and


536


are stabilized, gas manifold inlet valves


542


,


544


and


546


are opened and gas manifold exhaust valves


550


,


552


and


554


are closed. Thus, the flows of process gases E, F, and G are redirected into reactor


514


. To stop the flows of process gases E, F and G, gas manifold inlet valves


542


,


544


and


546


are closed and MFCs


532


,


534


and


536


are deactivated.




In one embodiment, reactor


514


is held and supported by support structure


556


, e.g., a table. Support structure


556


is separate from, and located at a distance from, gas cabinet


522


. Alternatively, gas cabinet


522


B of gas cabinet


522


is located at and attached to support structure


556


and gas bottle cabinet


522


A of gas cabinet


522


is separate from, and located at a distance from, support structure


556


.




Gas manifold


540


and process gas supply line


506


are located at, and in one embodiment attached to, support structure


556


.




Of importance, gas manifold inlet valves


542


,


544


,


546


,


548


and gas manifold exhaust valves


550


,


552


,


554


are also located at, and in one embodiment attached to, support structure


556


. Thus, the length of process gas supply line


506


and gas manifold


540


is relatively short, e.g., is two feet or less.




Due to the relatively short length of the piping from the plurality of gas manifold inlet valves


542


,


544


,


546


,


548


to injector ports


518


, upon closing of one or any combinations of gas manifold inlet valves


542


,


544


and


546


, process gas within gas manifold


540


and process gas supply line


506


is removed in a relatively short time, e.g., thirty seconds or less.




This is in contrast to the prior art where gas manifold


38


(

FIG. 1

) and valve


40


are located in gas cabinet


22


at a substantial distance from reactor


14


and thus require a substantial time, e.g., thirty seconds to two minutes or more, to remove process gas from the relatively long length of line


24


, e.g., ten feet or more, which extends from reactor


14


to gas cabinet


22


. Returning to

FIG. 5B

, the relatively short length of gas manifold


540


and process gas supply line


506


allows realization of an abrupt transition between layers formed on substrates


516


as discussed further below.




In embodiments in the above description, process gases E, F and G are simultaneously supplied to exhaust


523


or to reactor


514


. However, in light of this disclosure, it is understood that a single process gas E, F, or G, or any combination of process gases E, F, or G, can be supplied, regulated, and directed as described. Further, additional process gas sources, mass flow controllers and valves can be supplied if additional, process gases are needed depending upon the particular process performed in reactor


514


.




Further, although only a single process gas source


524


,


526


or


528


and a single MFC


532


,


534


or


536


is coupled to a set of gas manifold inlet valves


542


,


544


or


546


and gas manifold exhaust valves


550


,


552


or


554


, respectively, in light of this disclosure it is understood that additional process gas sources and mass flow controllers can be coupled. For example, an additional process gas source


526


X and mass flow controller


534


X are coupled in parallel with process gas source


526


and MFC


534


to the set of gas manifold inlet valve


544


and gas manifold exhaust valve


552


.





FIG. 6

is a cross-sectional view of a substrate


516


A after processing in accordance with the present invention. As shown in

FIG. 6

, substrate


516


A includes a body


601


, e.g., monocrystalline silicon. Substrate


516


A further includes a first layer


602


on body


601


, a second layer


606


and a transition layer


604


between layers


602


,


606


. For example, first layer


602


is a heavily doped P type silicon layer (hereinafter HD layer


602


) and second layer


606


is a lightly doped P type silicon layer (hereinafter LD layer


606


).




To form substrate


516


A, referring to

FIGS. 5B and 6

together, substrates


516


including substrate


516


A are placed inside of reactor


514


and on susceptor


512


. Reactor


514


is purged and in one embodiment a flow of carrier gas CG from carrier gas source


530


to reactor


514


is established. Substrates


516


are heated in a conventional manner. Gas manifold exhaust valves


550


,


552


are then opened and MFCS


532


,


534


are activated to initiate flows and regulate mass flow rates of flows of process gases E, F from process gas sources


524


,


526


, respectively to exhaust


523


.




For example, process gas E is a P type dopant gas in a carrier gas, and process gas F is a source of silicon e.g., is trichlorosilane. After the mass flow rates of the flows of process gases E, F through MFCS


532


,


534


have stabilized, gas manifold inlet valves


542


,


544


are opened and gas manifold exhaust valves


550


,


552


are closed. Thus, MFCs


532


,


534


regulate the mass flow rates of flows of process gases E, F from process gas sources


524


,


526


through MFCS


532


,


534


and gas manifold inlet valves


542


,


544


, respectively, to gas manifold


540


. Process gases E, F mix in gas manifold


540


, the resultant gas mixture is hereinafter referred to as process gas E, F. Process gas E, F then flows through gas manifold


540


, process gas supply line


506


, injector ports


518


and into reactor


514


. Process gas E, F contacts heated substrates


516


thus forming HD layer


602


on body


601


.




While HD layer


602


is being formed, gas manifold exhaust valve


554


is opened and MFC


536


is activated to initiate a flow and regulate a mass flow rate of the flow of process gas G from process gas source


528


through MFC


536


, gas manifold exhaust valve


554


and to exhaust


523


. Advantageously, the mass flow rate of the flow of process gas G through MFC


536


is stabilized while process gas E, F is being supplied to reactor


514


.




This is in contrast to the prior art where all process gases A, B, C (

FIG. 1

) were sent to exhaust


23


through a single common gas manifold


38


and valve


42


thus precluding the possibility of stabilizing a mass flow rate of the flow of a process gas through any of MFCs


32


,


34


,


36


while another process gas was being supplied to reactor


14


. Returning to

FIG. 5B

, stabilizing a mass flow rate of a flow of process gas G through MFC


536


while another process gas E, F is being supplied to reactor


514


in accordance with the present invention improves cycle time and thus reduces the cost of processing substrates


516


compared to the prior art.





FIG. 7

is a graph of the concentration of process gas E, F inside of reactor


514


versus time after closing of gas manifold inlet valves


542


,


544


in accordance with the present invention. Referring to

FIGS. 5B and 7

together, at time T=0, gas manifold inlet valves


542


,


544


are closed and MFCs


532


,


534


are deactivated to stop the flows of process gas E, F to gas manifold


540


and reactor


514


. Since gas manifold inlet valves


542


,


544


are located at support structure


556


as close as physically possible to reactor


514


, the volume of process gas E, F between injector ports


518


and gas manifold inlet valves


542


,


544


is relatively small. Thus, as indicated by curve


702


of

FIG. 7

, upon closing of gas manifold inlet valves


542


,


544


, the concentration of process gas E, F in reactor


514


rapidly decreases.




At a time T=TI, e.g., thirty seconds or less, essentially all of process gas E, F has been removed from reactor


514


. In this embodiment, carrier gas CG is supplied from carrier gas source


530


through MFC


53


B and gas manifold valve


548


to gas manifold


540


to flush process gas E, F from gas manifold


540


, process gas supply line


506


and reactor


514


. Of importance, the time (TI) to remove process gas E, F from reactor


514


in accordance with the present invention is substantially less than the time (TI) to remove process gas from a reactor in accordance with the prior art. Rapid removal of process gas E, F from reactor


514


is critical to obtaining an abrupt transition between layers as discussed below.




Since the mass flow rate of the flow of process gas G through MFC


536


is stabilized while process gas E, F is supplied to reactor


514


as described above, upon closing of gas manifold inlet valves


542


,


544


, gas manifold inlet valve


546


is immediately opened and gas manifold exhaust valve


554


is closed. Thus, the flow of process gas G is redirected from exhaust


523


to reactor


514


and, more particularly, is redirected through gas manifold inlet valve


546


, gas manifold


540


, process gas supply line


506


, injection ports


518


and into reactor


514


. Process gas G reacts with heated substrates


516


thus forming LD layer


606


above HD layer


602


(and on transition layer


604


to the extent it is formed). After LD layer


606


is formed, gas manifold inlet valve


546


is closed, MFC


536


is deactivated. After cooling, stopping the flow of carrier gas CG and purging reactor


514


, substrates


516


are removed from reactor


514


.





FIG. 8

is a graph of dopant concentration versus depth in substrate


516


A of

FIG. 6

in accordance with the present invention. As shown by a trace


802


in

FIG. 8

, HD layer


602


is a heavily doped P type silicon layer having a constant dopant concentration HD. The top of HD layer


602


is located at a distance Thd from the surface of body


601


which corresponds to the desired thickness of HD layer


602


.




Referring to

FIGS. 5B and 8

together, after the desired thickness of HD layer


602


is formed (i.e., at distance Thd), gas manifold inlet valves


542


,


544


are closed to stop the flow of process gas E, F to reactor


514


. Advantageously, as described above, upon closing of gas manifold inlet valves


542


,


544


, the flow of process gas E, F to reactor


514


is essentially instantaneously stopped. Thus, the dopant concentration abruptly falls off from the top of HD layer


602


to the bottom of LD layer


606


, i.e., across the width of transition layer


604


from distance Thd to distance Bld. In one embodiment, the transition between HD layer


602


and LD layer


606


is such that HD layer


602


and LD layer


606


are continuous with one another and transition layer


604


is not formed.




Accordingly, system,


500


is well suited to meet the requirements of existing and emerging process technologies which demand abrupt transition between layers. This is in contrast to the prior art (see

FIG. 3

) where the dopant concentration of transition layer TL between layers L


1


, L


2


gradually changes from heavily doped HD at the bottom of transition layer TL to lightly doped LD at the top of transition layer TL.




Referring again to

FIG. 6

, substrate


516


A includes both first layer


602


and second layer


606


. As described above, in one embodiment, first layer


602


is a heavily doped. P type silicon layer and second layer


606


is a lightly doped P type silicon layer. However, in an alternative embodiment, one or both of layers are N type or are undoped. In a further alternative, first layer


602


is lightly doped and second layer


606


is heavily doped. In another embodiment, only layer


602


is formed. In light of, this disclosure, those of skill in the art will recognize that a variety of process gases can be manipulated to form a variety of substrates such as those described above and numerous other variations.




Further, in one embodiment, gas flow controller system


500


is used during substrate cleaning, etching and/or other substrate: treatment. Advantageously, use of system


500


allows an abrupt termination of the substrate cleaning, etching and/or other substrate treatment for reasons similar to those discussed above.




System


500


in accordance with the present invention also improves the ability to control thickness of a deposited layer compared to the prior art. In particular, by essentially instantaneously stopping the flow of process gas to reactor


514


(FIG.


5


B), the growth of the layer being formed is also essentially instantaneously stopped resulting in a precise thickness of the layer. This is in contrast to the prior art (see

FIG. 3

) where transition layer TL had a substantial thickness equal to distance D


2


at the top of transition layer TL minus distance D


1


at the bottom of transition layer TL.




Referring again to

FIG. 5B

, in one embodiment, carrier gas CG is supplies to reactor


514


from carrier gas source


530


during the entire processing of substrates


516


. Since carrier gas CG continuously flows through gas manifold


540


and process gas supply line


506


, gas manifold


540


and process gas supply line


506


are continually flushed with carrier gas CG. This avoids cross-contamination from residual process gas remaining in gas manifold


540


and process gas supply line


506


.




In contrast, referring to

FIG. 1

, carrier gas source


50


was coupled to process gas supply line


24


and not to gas manifold


38


. Thus, carrier gas CG from carrier gas source


50


did not flush gas manifold


38


. Disadvantageously, residual process gas remaining in gas manifold


38


could cause significant cross-contamination of the process gas provided to reactor


14


depending upon the particular application.





FIG. 9

is a schematic representation of process gas source


524


of

FIG. 5B

illustrating the dilution of a dopant gas DG, e.g., a first gas, with a carrier gas CG, e.g., a second gas, in accordance with one embodiment of the present invention. As shown in

FIG. 9

, process gas source


524


includes a mixer


902


. Coupled to an inlet port


905


of mixer


902


through mass flow controllers (MFCs)


904


,


906


are dopant gas source


920


, e.g., a first gas source, and a carrier gas source


922


, e.g., a second gas source, respectively.




MFCs


904


,


906


regulate and control the mass flow rates of flows of a dopant gas DG from dopant gas source


920


and a carrier gas CG from carrier gas source


922


, respectively, to mixer


902


. For example, dopant gas source


920


is a compressed gas cylinder of arsine in hydrogen, diborane in hydrogen or phosphine in hydrogen and carrier gas source


922


is a compressed gas cylinder of hydrogen. As further examples, MFC


904


is a 30 standard cubic centimeters per minute (SCCM) mass flow controller and MFC


906


is a 30 standard liters per minute (SLM) mass flow controller.




In mixer


902


, carrier gas CG and dopant gas DG mix. The mixture of carrier gas CG and dopant gas DG flows out of an outlet port


907


of mixer


902


as process gas E. Coupled to outlet port


907


of mixer


902


are a check valve


908


and MFC


532


. MFC


532


controls and regulates the mass flow rate of the flow of process gas E to reactor


514


as discussed above. Check valve


908


is coupled to exhaust


523


and allows process gas E to flow in one direction only from mixer


902


past check valve


908


and to exhaust


523


when the pressure drop from an inlet port


910


to an outlet port


912


of check valve


908


exceeds a predetermined amount, e.g., 22 to 30 PSIG. Thus, in the event that the flow of process gas E out of mixer


902


exceeds the flow of process gas E through MFC


532


, the excess process gas E, i.e., the difference between the flows of process gas E out of mixer


902


and the flow through MFC


532


, is sent to exhaust


523


past check valve


908


. The mass flow rate of the flow of excess: process gas E through check valve


908


equals the difference between the mass flow rate of the flow of process gas E out of mixer


902


and the mass flow rate of the flow of process gas E through MFC


532


to reactor


514


.




During use, dopant gas DG is diluted with carrier gas CG to result in a process gas E having a desire dopant concentration, i.e., a desired percentage of dopant gas DG. More particularly, the mass flow rates of the flows of dopant gas DG and carrier gas CG are set using MFCs


904


,


906


, respectively, to result in a process gas E having a desired dopant concentration. For example, to obtain a process gas E containing 0.1% of dopant gas DG and 99.9% of carrier gas CG, MFC


904


is set to 10 SCCM and MFC


906


is set to 9.99 SLM. Although mixing of two,gases in mixer


902


is described, i.e., dopant gas DG and carrier gas CG, in light of this disclosure it is understood that more than two gases can be mixed in mixer


902


simply by coupling additional gas sources and mass flow controllers to inlet port


905


of mixer


902


.




Since the mass flow rates of the flows of dopant gas DG and carrier gas:CG to mixer


902


are controlled and regulated by MFCs


904


,


906


, respectively, and are constant, the dopant concentration of process gas E is likewise constant. Thus, regardless of what percentage of the flow of process gas E out of mixer


902


is directed to exhaust


523


through check valve


908


versus directed to reactor


514


through MFC


532


, the dopant concentration of process gas E is precisely determined and remains constant.




Referring to

FIGS. 6 and 8

together, this, in turn, results in HD layer


6102


having a precise and constant dopant concentration HD across the entire thickness of HD layer


602


in a batch and also from batch to batch. For this reason, system


500


in accordance with the invention is well suited to meet and exceed the stringent requirements of existing and emerging process technologies.




In contrast, the process gas source


30


of

FIG. 4

in accordance with the prior art provides a process gas C having an unpredictable dopant concentration. In particular, the inventor has discovered that use of MFCs


36


,


56


coupled in parallel to the outlet port of mixer


50


as illustrated in

FIG. 4

inherently resulted in variations in the mass flow rate of the flow of process gas C out of mixer


50


over time. Since the mass flow rate of the flow of dopant gas DG to mixer


50


was held constant by MFC


54


, the mass flow rate of the flow of carrier gas CG,into mixer


50


necessarily varied as the mass flow rate of the flow of process gas C out of mixer


50


varied. Since the mass flow rate of the flow of carrier gas CG relative to the mass flow rate of the flow of dopant gas DG into mixer


50


varied, the resulting dopant concentration of process gas C varied.




Thus, the dopant concentration of layer L


1


in

FIG. 3

varied as indicated by the traces


304


,


306


which is unacceptable for some applications.





FIG. 10

, which consists of

FIGS. 10A

,


10


B, is a schematic representation of a semiconductor processing system


1000


including a gas flow control system in accordance with one embodiment of the present invention. Illustrative specifications for the various characteristics shown in

FIG. 10

are set forth below in Table 1.















TABLE 1











CHARACTERISTIC




SPECIFICATION













512A




Susceptor







514A




Reactor







516B




Substrates







518A, 518B




Injector port







522A




Gas cabinet







524A, 524B,




Process gas source







526A, 526B,







526C, 526D,







528A







530A




Carrier gas source







532A, 532B,




Mass flow controller (300 SCCM H2)







904A, 904B







534A, 534D




Mass flow controller (3000 SCCM N2)







534B




Mass Flow Controller







534C




Mass flow controller (50 SLM H2)







536A




Mass flow controller (10 SLM N2)







538A




Mass flow controller (200 SLM H2)







540A




Gas (injection) manifold







542A, 544A,




Nupro or pneumatic valve







546A







548A, 550A,




Nupro valve







552A, 554A







1034







556A




Below table top







556B




above table top







902A, 902B




Mixer







906A, 906B




Mass flow controller (30 SLM H2)







908A, 908B,




Check valve







1040







1002




N type dopant







1004




P type dopant







1006




SiH4/Aux







1008




Single Source controller







1010




SiCl4/SiCl3







1012




SiH2Cl2







1014




HCl







1016




H2







1018




N2 Purge







1020




Manual on-off valve







1022




Regulator







1024




Filter







1026




Pressure Gauge 0-30 PSIG







1030




Nupro or pneumatic valve







1032




Pressure Switch







1036




Metering Valve







1038




Exhaust







1044




Hepa filter cabinet







1046




Exhaust cabinet















The drawings and the forgoing description gave examples of the present invention. The scope of the present invention, however, is by no means limited by these specific examples. Numerous variations, whether explicitly given in the specification or not, such as differences in structure, dimension, and use of material, are possible. For example, although mass flow controllers are set forth as the regulators for controlling and regulating the mass flow rates of the flows of various gases, it is understood that other regulators such as needle valves, fixed diameter orifices or source controllers can be used. Further, it is understood that the various items described are coupled to one another using conventional techniques and that the items are coupled to one another directly without any other items interposed between the coupled items or, alternatively, that other items, e.g., pressure gauges, valve s and other conventional gas system items, can be interposed between the coupled items. The scope of the invention is at least as broad as given by the following claims.



Claims
  • 1. A method comprising:opening a first gas manifold inlet valve coupled between a first regulator and a gas manifold; regulating a flow rate of a flow of a first process gas through said first gas manifold inlet valve to said gas manifold with said first regulator; opening a second gas manifold inlet valve coupled between a second regulator and said gas manifold; and regulating a flow rate of a flow of a second process gas through said second gas manifold inlet valve to said gas manifold with said second regulator, wherein said first process gas and said second process gas mix in said gas manifold.
  • 2. The method of claim 1 wherein said gas manifold is coupled to a reactor.
  • 3. The method of claim 2 wherein a mixture of said first process gas and maid second process gas is supplied from said gas manifold to said reactor.
  • 4. The method of claim 3 further comprising forming a layer on a substrate in said reactor by contacting said gas mixture with said substrate.
  • 5. The method of claim 1 further comprising:opening a gas manifold exhaust valve coupled between a third regulator and an exhaust; and regulating a flow rate of a flow of a third process gas through said gas manifold exhaust valve to said exhaust with said third regulator.
  • 6. The method of claim 5 wherein said regulating a flow rate of a flow of a third process gas occurs during said regulating a flow rate of a flow of a first process gas and said regulating a flow rate of a flow of a second process gas.
  • 7. The method of claim 6 further comprising:closing said first gas manifold inlet valve and said second gas manifold inlet valve to stop said flow of said first process gas and said flow of said second process gas to said gas manifold; and redirecting said flow of said third process gas from said exhaust to said gas manifold.
  • 8. The method of claim 7 wherein said redirecting comprises;closing said gas manifold exhaust valve; and opening a third gas manifold inlet valve coupled between said third regulator and said gas manifold.
  • 9. The method of claim 1 wherein said first process gas is supplied from a first process gas source and wherein said second process gas is supplied from a second process gas source, said first process gas source and said second process gas source being in a gas cabinet, said first gas manifold inlet valve and said second gas manifold inlet valve being located at a support structure separate from said gas cabinet.
  • 10. A method comprising:opening a first gas manifold inlet valve coupled between a first regulator and a gas manifold; regulating a flow rate of a flow of a first process gas through said first gas manifold inlet valve to said gas manifold with said first regulator; opening a gas manifold exhaust valve coupled between a second regulator and an exhaust; regulating a flow rate of a flow of a second process gas through said gas manifold exhaust valve to said exhaust with said second regulator, said regulating a flow rate of a flow of a second process gas occurring during said regulating a flow rate of a flow of a first process gas.
  • 11. A method comprising:setting a first flow rate of a flow of a first gas to a mixer; setting a second flow rate of a flow of a second gas to said mixer, wherein a first flow of a gas mixture comprising said first gas and said second gas exits said mixer, said first flow of said gas mixture having a third flow rate; setting a fourth flow rate of a second flow of said gas mixture to a reactor; and directing said second flow of said gas mixture to said reactor, said second flow being a first portion of said first flow of said gas mixture exiting said mixer.
  • 12. The method of claim 11 further comprising directing a third flow of said gas mixture to an exhaust, said third flow of said gas mixture having a fifth flow rate equal to a difference between said third flow rate and said second flow rate, said third flow being a second portion of said first flow of said gas mixture exiting said mixer.
  • 13. The method of claim 11 wherein said first gas is a dopant gas and wherein said second gas is a carrier gas.
  • 14. A method comprising:setting a flow rate of a flow of a dopant gas to a mixer; setting a flow rate of a flow of a carrier gas to said mixer, wherein said dopant gas and said carrier gas mix in said mixer to form a process gas which flows out of said mixer; and setting a flow rate of a first flow of said process gas to a reactor, wherein a difference between said flow of said process gas out of said mixer and said first flow of said process gas to said reactor is excess process gas, said first flow of said process gas and said excess process gas being portions of said flow of said process gas out of said mixer.
  • 15. The method of claim 14 further comprising sending said excess process gas to an exhaust past a check valve.
  • 16. The method of claim 15 wherein a flow of said excess process gas to said exhaust has a flow rate equal to a difference between a flow rate of said flow of said process gas out of said mixer and said flow rate of said first flow of said process gas to said reactor.
  • 17. A method comprising:opening a first gas manifold inlet valve coupled between a first regulator and a gas manifold; regulating a flow rate of a flow of a first process gas through said first gas manifold inlet valve to said gas manifold with said first regulator; opening a second gas manifold inlet valve coupled between a second regulator and said gas manifold; regulating a flow rate of a flow of a second process gas through said second gas manifold inlet valve to said gas manifold with said second regulator; opening a gas manifold exhaust valve coupled between a third regulator and an exhaust; and regulating a flow rate of a flow of a third process gas through said gas manifold exhaust valve to said exhaust with said third regulator during said regulating a flow rate of a flow of a first process gas and said regulating a flow rate of a flow of a second process gas.
  • 18. A method comprising:opening a first gas manifold inlet valve coupled between a first regulator and a gas manifold; regulating a flow rate of a flow of a first process gas through said first gas manifold inlet valve to said gas manifold with said first regulator; opening a second gas manifold inlet valve coupled between a second regulator and said gas manifold; regulating a flow rate of a flow of a second process gas through said second gas manifold inlet valve to said gas manifold with said second regulator; opening a gas manifold exhaust valve coupled between a third regulator and an exhaust; regulating a flow rate of a flow of a third process gas through said gas manifold exhaust valve to said exhaust with said third regulator during said regulating a flow rate of a flow of a first process gas and said regulating a flow rate of a flow of a second process gas; closing said first gas manifold inlet valve and said second gas manifold inlet valve to stop said flow of said first process gas and said flow of said second process gas to said gas manifold; and redirecting said flow of said third process gas from said exhaust to said gas manifold.
  • 19. The method of claim 18 wherein said redirecting comprises;closing said gas manifold exhaust valve; and opening a third gas manifold inlet valve coupled between said third regulator and said gas manifold.
  • 20. A method comprising:opening a first gas manifold inlet valve coupled between a first regulator and a gas manifold; regulating a flow rate of a flow of a first process gas through said first gas manifold inlet valve to said gas manifold with said first regulator; opening a gas manifold exhaust valve coupled between a second regulator and an exhaust; regulating a flow rate of a flow of a second process gas through said gas manifold exhaust valve to said exhaust with said second regulator, said regulating a flow rate of a flow of a second process gas occurring during said regulating a flow rate of a flow of a first process gas; closing said first gas manifold inlet valve to stop said flow of said first process gas to said gas manifold; and redirecting said flow of said second process gas from said exhaust to said gas manifold comprising: closing said gas manifold exhaust valve; and opening a second gals manifold inlet valve coupled between said second regulator and said gas manifold.
Parent Case Info

This application is a divisional of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 09/399,611, entitled “GAS FLOW CONTROLLER SYSTEM”, filed on Sep. 20, 1999.

US Referenced Citations (19)
Number Name Date Kind
4747367 Posa May 1988 A
5053247 Moore Oct 1991 A
5207835 Moore May 1993 A
5421288 Ohta et al. Jun 1995 A
5444217 Moore et al. Aug 1995 A
5580388 Moore Dec 1996 A
5601107 Moore et al. Feb 1997 A
5635242 Agnello et al. Jun 1997 A
5683518 Moore et al. Nov 1997 A
5710407 Moore et al. Jan 1998 A
5728222 Barbee et al. Mar 1998 A
5746834 Hanley May 1998 A
5802099 Curran et al. Sep 1998 A
5820686 Moore Oct 1998 A
5843234 Finn et al. Dec 1998 A
5872632 Moore Feb 1999 A
6051286 Zhao et al. Apr 2000 A
6126753 Shinriki et al. Oct 2000 A
6328221 Moore et al. Dec 2001 B1