Method of fabricating integrated LC/ESI device using smile, latent masking, and delayed locos techniques.

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 6673253
  • Patent Number
    6,673,253
  • Date Filed
    Friday, November 2, 2001
    23 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, January 6, 2004
    21 years ago
Abstract
Three fundamental and three derived aspects of the present invention are disclosed. The three fundamental aspects each disclose a process sequence that may be integrated in a full process. The first aspect, designated as “latent masking”, defines a mask in a persistent material like silicon oxide that is held abeyant after definition while intervening processing operations are performed. The latent oxide pattern is then used to mask an etch. The second aspect, designated as “simultaneous multi-level etching (SMILE)”, provides a process sequence wherein a first pattern may be given an advanced start relative to a second pattern in etching into an underlying material, such that the first pattern may be etched deeper, shallower, or to the same depth as the second pattern. The third aspect, designated as “delayed LOCOS”, provides a means of defining a contact hole pattern at one stage of a process, then using the defined pattern at a later stage to open the contact holes. The fourth aspect provides a process sequence that incorporates all three fundamental aspects to fabricate an integrated liquid chromatography (LC)/electrospray ionization (ESI) device. The fifth aspect provides a process sequence that incorporates two of the fundamental aspects to fabricate an ESI device. The sixth aspect provides a process sequence that incorporates two of the fundamental aspects to fabricate an LC device. The process improvements described provide increased manufacturing yield and design latitude in comparison to previously disclosed methods of fabrication.
Description




FIELD OF THE INVENTION




The invention relates to the field of design, development, and manufacturing of miniaturized chemical analysis devices and systems using microelectromechanical systems (MEMS) technology. In particular, the invention relates to improvements in process sequences for fabricating MEMS and microfluidic devices, including electrospray ionization, liquid chromatography, and integrated liquid chromatography/electrospray devices.




BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION




Explosive growth in the demand for analysis of samples in combinatorial chemistry, genomics, and proteomics is driving widespread efforts to increase throughput, increase accuracy, and to reduce volumes of reagents and samples required, as well as waste generated. Rapid developments in drug discovery and development are creating new demands on traditional analytical techniques. For example, combinatorial chemistry is often employed to discover new lead compounds, or to create variations of a lead compound. Combinatorial chemistry techniques can generate thousands or millions of compounds in combinatorial libraries within days or weeks. The generation of enormous amounts of genetic sequence data through new DNA sequencing methods in the field of genomics has allowed rapid identification of new targets for drug development efforts. There is therefore a critical need for rapid sequential analysis and identification of compounds that interact with a gene or gene product in order to identify potential drug candidates. Efficient proteomic screening methods are needed in order to obtain the pharmacokinetic profile of a drug early in the evaluation process, testing for cytotoxicity, specificity, and other pharmaceutical characteristics in high-throughput assays instead of in expensive animal testing and clinical trials. Testing such a large number of compounds for biological activity in a timely and efficient manner requires high-throughput screening methods that allow rapid evaluation of the characteristics of each candidate compound. Development of viable screening methods for these new targets will often depend on the availability of rapid separation and analysis techniques for analyzing the results of assays.




Microchip-based separation devices have been developed for rapid analysis of large numbers of samples. Compared to other conventional separation devices, these microchip-based separation devices have higher sample throughput, reduced sample and reagent consumption and reduced chemical waste. Liquid flow rate for microchip-based separation devices range from approximately 1-300 nanoliters (nL) per minute for most applications.




Examples of microchip-based separation devices include those for capillary electrophoresis (CE), capillary electrochromatography (CEC) and high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC). See Harrison et al., Science 1993, 261, 895-897; Jacobsen et al., Anal. Chem. 1994, 66, 1114-1118; and Jacobsen et al., Anal. Chem. 1994, 66, 2369-2373. Such separation devices are capable of fast analyses and provide improved precision and reliability compared to other conventional analytical instruments.




He et al., Anal. Chem. 1998, 70, 3790-3797 describes the fabrication of chromatography columns on quartz wafers and reports an evaluation of column efficiency in the capillary electrochromatography (CEC) mode. The fabrication sequence described relies partly on standard, parallel microfabrication operations to create multiple separation channels and structures therein on which stationary phase materials may be coated. However, methods described for enclosing the separation channels as well as for providing fluidic access to and egress from the channels are decidedly non-standard and unsuitable for integration in a conventional, high-productivity microfabrication sequence.




Liquid chromatography (LC) is a well-established analytical method for separating components of a fluid for subsequent analysis and/or identification. Traditionally, liquid chromatography utilizes a separation column, such as a cylindrical tube, filled with tightly packed beads, gel or other appropriate particulate material to provide a large surface area. The large surface area facilitates fluid interactions with the particulate material, resulting in separation of components of the fluid as it passes through the separation column, or channel. The separated components may be analyzed spectroscopically or may be passed from the liquid chromatography column into other types of analytical instruments for analysis.




The separated product of such separation devices may be introduced as a liquid sample to a device that is used to produce electrospray ionization. The electrospray device may be interfaced to an atmospheric pressure ionization mass spectrometer (API-MS) for analysis of the electrosprayed fluid.




A schematic of an electrospray system


10


is shown in FIG.


1


. An electrospray is produced when a sufficient electrical potential difference V


spray


is applied between a conductive or partly conductive fluid exiting a capillary orifice and an electrode so as to generate a concentration of electric field lines emanating from the tip or end of a capillary


2


of an electrospray device. When a positive voltage V


spray


is applied to the tip of the capillary relative to an extracting electrode


4


, such as one provided at the ion-sampling orifice to the mass spectrometer, the electric field causes positively-charged ions in the fluid to migrate to the surface of the fluid at the tip of the capillary


2


. When a negative voltage V


spray


is applied to the tip of the capillary relative to the extracting electrode


4


, such as one provided at the ion-sampling orifice to the mass spectrometer, the electric field causes negatively-charged ions in the fluid to migrate to the surface of the fluid at the tip of the capillary


2


.




When the repulsion force of the solvated ions exceeds the surface tension of the fluid sample being electrosprayed, a volume of the fluid sample is pulled into the shape of a cone, known as a Taylor cone


6


, which extends from the tip of the capillary


2


. Small charged droplets


8


are formed from the tip of the Taylor cone


6


, which are drawn toward the extracting electrode


4


. This phenomenon has been described, for example, by Dole et al., J. Chem. Phys. 1968, 49, 2240 and Yamashita and Fenn, J. Phys. Chem. 1984, 88, 4451. The potential voltage required to initiate an electrospray is dependent on the surface tension of the solution as described by, for example, Smith, IEEE Trans. Ind. Appl. 1986, IA-22, 527-535. Typically, the electric field is on the order of approximately 10


6


V/m. The physical size of the capillary determines the density of electric field lines necessary to induce electrospray.




The process of electrospray ionization at flow rates on the order of nanoliters per minute has been referred to as “nanoelectrospray.” Electrospray into the ion-sampling orifice of an API mass spectrometer produces a quantitative response from the mass spectrometer detector due to the analyte molecules present in the liquid flowing from the capillary. It is desirable to provide an electrospray ionization device for integration upstream with microchip-based separation devices and for integration downstream with API-MS instruments.




The development of miniaturized devices for chemical analysis—and, further, for synthesis and fluid manipulation—is motivated by the prospects of improved efficiency, reduced cost, and enhanced accuracy. Efficient, reliable manufacturing processes are a critical requirement for the cost-effective, high-volume production of devices that are targeted at high-volume, high-throughput test markets.




Attempts have been made to fabricate an electrospray device that produces nanoelectrospray. For example, Wilm and Mann, Anal. Chem. 1996, 68, 1-8 describes the process of electrospray from fused silica capillaries drawn to an inner diameter of 2-4 μm at flow rates of 20 nL/min. Specifically, a nanoelectrospray at 20 nL/min was achieved from a 2 μm inner diameter and 5 μm outer diameter pulled fused-silica capillary with 600-700 V at a distance of 1-2 mm from the ion-sampling orifice of an API mass spectrometer.




Ramsey et al., Anal. Chem. 1997, 69, 1174-1178 describes nanoelectrospray at 90 nL/min from the edge of a planar glass microchip with a closed separation channel 10 μm deep, 60 μm wide and 33 mm in length using electroosmotic flow. A voltage of 4.8 kV was applied to the fluid exiting the closed separation channel on the edge of the microchip to initiate electrospraying, with the edge of the chip at a distance of 3-5 mm from the ion-sampling orifice of an API mass spectrometer. Approximately 12 nL of the sample fluid collected at the edge of the chip before a Taylor cone formed and initiated a stable nanoelectrospray from the edge of the microchip. However, collection of approximately 12 nL of the sample fluid results in re-mixing of the fluid, thereby undoing the separation done in the separation channel. Re-mixing at the edge of the microchip causes band broadening, fundamentally limiting its applicability for nanoelectrospray-mass spectrometry for analyte detection. Thus, electrospraying from the edge of this microchip device after capillary electrophoresis or capillary electrochromatography separation is rendered impractical. Furthermore, because this device provides a flat surface, and thus a relatively small amount of physical asperity for the formation of the electrospray, the device requires an impracticably high voltage to initiate electrospray, due to poor field line concentration.




Xue et al., Anal. Chem. 1997, 69, 426-430 describes a stable nanoelectrospray from the edge of a planar glass microchip with a closed channel 25 μm deep, 60 μm wide and 35-50 mm in length. A potential of 4.2 kV was applied to the fluid exiting the closed separation channel on the edge of the microchip to initiate electrospraying, with the edge of the chip at a distance of 3-8 mm from the ion-sampling orifice of an API mass spectrometer. A syringe pump was utilized to deliver the sample fluid to the glass electrospray microchip at a flow rate between 100-200 nL/min. The edge of the glass microchip was treated with a hydrophobic coating to alleviate some of the difficulties associated with electrospraying from a flat surface and to thereby improve the stability of the nanoelectrospray. Electrospraying in this manner from a flat surface, however, again results in poor field line concentration and yields an inefficient electrospray.




In all of the devices described above, edge-spraying from a chip is a poorly controlled process due to the inability to rigorously and repeatably determine the physical form of the chip's edge. In another embodiment of edge-spraying, ejection nozzles, such as small segments of drawn capillaries, are separately and individually attached to the chip's edge. This process imposes space constraints in chip design and is inherently cost-inefficient and unreliable, making it unsuitable for manufacturing.




Desai et al., 1997 International Conference on Solid-State Sensors and Actuators, Chicago, Jun. 16-19, 1997, 927-930 describes a multi-step process to generate a nozzle on the edge of a silicon microchip 1-3 μm in diameter or width and 40 μm in length. A voltage of 4 kV was applied to the entire microchip at a distance of 0.25-0.4 mm from the ion-sampling orifice of an API mass spectrometer. This nanoelectrospray nozzle reduces the dead volume of the sample fluid. However, the extension of the nozzle from the edge of the microchip makes the nozzle susceptible to accidental breakage. Because a relatively high spray voltage was utilized and the nozzle was positioned in very close proximity to the mass spectrometer sampling orifice, a poor field line concentration and a low efficient electrospray were achieved.




Wang et al., 1999 IEEE International Conference on Micro Electro Mechanical Systems, Orlando, Jan. 17-21, 1999, 523-528 describes a polymer-based electrospray structure designed to spray from the edge of the chip, essentially replacing the mechanically fragile silicon nitride nozzle of Desai et al. with a polymeric nozzle. While the polymer substitution provides a significant improvement in mechanical reliability, additional non-standard processing materials and operations are required, making the fabrication of the structures incompatible with standard high-volume manufacturing facilities. Further, the presence of the polymeric material seriously limits the nature of subsequent processing operations and precludes high-temperature processing altogether. Concerns regarding sample contamination by monomeric residues in the polymer remain unresolved.




Thus, it is also desirable to provide an electrospray ionization device with controllable spraying and a method for producing such a device that is easily reproducible and manufacturable in high volumes.




U.S. Pat. Appl. Ser. No. 09/156,037 (Moon et al.) describes electrospray ionization (ESI), liquid chromatography (LC), and integrated LC/ESI devices and systems and fabrication sequences to make them in silicon by reactive-ion etching. That application discloses methods of designing and fabricating those devices and similar ones in a manner that is consistent with well-established, cost-efficient, high-volume manufacturing operations. However, there are several aspects of the fabrication sequences and designs that potentially limit manufacturing yield. First, separation posts formed for purposes of liquid chromatography are subject to damaging mechanical stresses due to coating of additional films, wet immersions, and abrasion and clamping in the course of processing operations after formation of the separation posts. Second, etch lag in electrospray nozzle channels makes it difficult to complete the channel while controlling the height of the nozzle. Third, the formation of electrical contacts to the substrate in the presence of significant topographical steps of more than 1-2 μm is problematic due to an inability to uniformly and continuously coat photoresist for purposes of lithographic patterning and subsequent etching. Thus, improved processing operations and sequences are desired in order to ensure the high-yield manufacturability of such devices and systems. Further, such processing improvements that can be widely applied to a variety of MEMS and microfluidic devices and systems are highly desired.




SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION




The aspects of the present invention described herein have been shown to significantly improve prior approaches to fabricating MEMS and microfluidic devices. They have been successfully used to overcome the specific yield-limiting problems discussed hereinabove. They may be used individually or severally to greatly improve the component of manufacturing yield attributed to wafer-level processing for many microfabricated devices. In particular, some or all of them may be used to improve the yield of electrospray ionization (ESI), liquid chromatography (LC), and integrated LC/ESI devices.




The present invention provides three sequences of process steps that may be individually or severally integrated with other standard silicon processing operations to fabricate MEMS and microfluidic devices and systems with enhanced manufacturability. Each of the three aspects of the present invention provides relief to design and process integration constraints and overcomes limitations deriving from interacting process operations. In general, these constraints and limitations are surmounted by rendering the device or system insensitive to problematic operations and/or by decoupling design and process interactions. Each of the aspects is independent from the others. Any two or all of the aspects may be used in concert to relieve a multiplicity of constraints. The yield-enhancing effects of the several aspects are found to have a cumulative, positive impact on manufacturing yield.




The three fundamental aspects of this invention are referred to herein as latent masking, simultaneous multi-level etching (SMILE), and delayed LOCOS. Each of these three fundamental aspects generally comprises a sequence of silicon processing steps that may be incorporated in a complete sequence for the fabrication of MEMS and microfluidic devices and systems. Three additional aspects of the present invention are derived aspects that incorporate one or more of the three fundamental aspects in integrated processes to fabricate specific MEMS or microfluidic devices or systems. Each of the derived aspects of the present invention provides a novel fabrication process that significantly improves fabrication reliability and manufacturing yield.




The first fundamental aspect of the present invention, designated herein as latent masking, provides a means by which a mask may be created at one stage of the overall process but then held abeyant pending its ultimate use to mask an etch of an underlying film or substrate after a sequence of intervening process steps. During the intervening steps, the mask remains latent and unperturbed, neither affecting the operations conducted nor being affected by them. The latent mask is preferably formed in a film of silicon oxide or, alternatively, is formed in a material such as a polyimide. The salient characteristic of the masking material is its resistance to wet and/or dry processing steps after its formation and prior to its ultimate use.




In the preferred embodiment, a silicon oxide film is patterned to create the latent mask by a sequence of standard lithographic processing steps, including coating, exposure, and development of a photoresist film, followed by a reactive-ion etch of the underlying oxide film, thereby transferring the photoresist pattern to the oxide layer. In an alternative embodiment, a more durable masking material such as polyimide may be coated and patterned lithographically, then cured at elevated temperature.




Once the latent mask has been created, a sequence of processing operations may be performed before using the mask. After those intervening process steps, the mask is used to protect certain areas of an underlying film or substrate during the etching of that film/substrate, thereby transferring the mask pattern into the underlying film/substrate. Preferably, the latent mask is composed of silicon oxide and is used to mask the etch of an underlying silicon substrate by reactive-ion etching. In alternative embodiments of the invention, the etching may be done using wet chemical etching techniques and/or the underlying film/substrate may be a material other than silicon, the principal requirement being the compatibility of the etch mask material with the chosen method of etching.




One advantage of latent masking as described herein is that the latent mask does not interfere with subsequent lithographic patterning steps. A second advantage is that the low-profile latent mask is not susceptible to damage from abrasion stresses. Yet another, and decisive, advantage of latent masking is that the use of the mask may be placed at a late enough stage in the overall process to ensure that the resulting fragile structures are not subjected to damaging stresses by subsequent operations.




The second fundamental aspect of the present invention, designated herein as


s


imultaneous


m


ult


i


-


l


evel


e


tching (SMILE), provides a means of etching two different patterns into, preferably, a silicon substrate such that the final etched depths of the two patterns may be independently controlled. The essence of this aspect is that the etching of one pattern may be advanced relative to a second pattern by beginning to etch the former first pattern without simultaneously etching the second pattern. After an initial etch of the first pattern alone, both patterns are etched simultaneously.




Lithographic patterning creates a first pattern in a photoresist mask. The first pattern is transferred to an underlying silicon oxide layer by reactive-ion etching or wet etching, after which the photoresist mask is removed. A second lithographic patterning step is then done to create a second photoresist mask that comprises both the first and second patterns. After the patterning of the second photoresist mask, an opening exists in the photoresist mask and silicon oxide film corresponding to the first pattern, whereas the second pattern in the photoresist mask is open only to the underlying silicon oxide layer. A silicon etch is done by reactive-ion etching in the openings to the silicon substrate corresponding to the first pattern, thereby providing the desired advanced etch for the first pattern. Next, an oxide etch is done to open the second pattern through the silicon oxide to the silicon substrate. Finally, a second silicon etch is done, proceeding simultaneously in both the first and second patterns, after which any remaining photoresist mask may be removed.




This aspect of the present invention may be used to compensate for etch-rate lag and to thereby attain equal etch depths in all features. Alternatively, two patterns may be etched to two different depths. Further, the manufacturing yield of a second pattern may be significantly improved compared to standard sequential lithographic patterning and etch sequences. The limited topography created by the first patterning sequence does not adversely affect the deposition of a second photoresist film. An additional advantage over standard sequential lithographic patterning and etch sequences is a savings of up to half the total sequential etching time as a result of the two patterns being partially etched simultaneously.




SMILE may be used to compensate for etch rate lag, a phenomenon observed in reactive-ion etching in which the etch rate in a small opening is retarded relative to that in a larger opening. By appropriately advancing the etching of a small first pattern, for example, the subsequent simultaneous etch of the first pattern and a larger second pattern may be used to attain an equal final depth in both patterns. Alternatively, an etch of a first pattern may be advanced relative to a second pattern of equivalent geometry to result in a deeper final depth for the first pattern.




The third fundamental aspect of the present invention, designated herein as delayed LOCOS, generally comprises a sequence of processing steps to provide electrical access to an otherwise isolated substrate. This aspect of the invention may be used, preferably, to create contact holes through a silicon oxide insulating layer to an underlying silicon substrate. The essence of this aspect of the invention is that patterns that will ultimately correspond to the required contact holes to the substrate are created at an early stage in an overall fabrication sequence. Rather than completing the opening of the contact holes and forming the contacts immediately after patterning, the contact pattern remains abeyant while other standard silicon processing operations are executed. At a later stage in the process, the latent contact pattern is used to create the desired contact holes.




This aspect of the present invention is a modification to and improvement upon a standard silicon processing sequence known as


LOC


al


O


xidation of


S


ilicon, or LOCOS. A relatively thin oxide film is grown, followed by the deposition of a thicker silicon nitride film. Standard lithographic procedures and reactive-ion etching are used to pattern the silicon nitride film. The pattern is such that nitride remains where contact holes are ultimately to be formed. The nitride pattern thus formed remains in place during subsequent processing.




When a stage is reached in the overall process—generally, after all high temperature (>400° C.) processing has been completed—where electrical contacts to the silicon substrate must be formed, the silicon nitride and the underlying thin oxide layer are removed to expose the silicon substrate. Metal, preferably aluminum, is then deposited and may be patterned by standard lithographic and etching techniques.




This aspect of the present invention has the advantage that the nitride patterning is done at an early stage in the process when there is little or no surface topography to interfere with the uniform and continuous coating of photoresist for lithographic patterning. This is favored over the standard alternative approach in which contact hole patterning is done immediately prior to metallization, generally in the presence of significant and limiting surface topography.




A fourth aspect of the present invention provides an improved process for fabricating an integrated liquid chromatography/electrospray ionization (LC/ESI) device. All three of the fundamental aspects of this invention are incorporated in the fabrication sequence to significantly improve fabrication reliability and manufacturing yield. In the preferred embodiment, the integrated process produces an LC/ESI device generally comprising a silicon substrate defining an introduction orifice and a nozzle on an ejection surface such that electrospray generated by the ESI component is generally approximately perpendicular to the ejection surface; a fluid reservoir and a separation channel on a separation surface; at least one controlling electrode electrically contacting the substrate through the oxide layer on the ejection surface; and a second substrate attached to the separation surface of the first substrate so as to enclose the fluid reservoir and separation channel. The second substrate may also define an electrode or electrodes with which to control fluid motion in the LC/ESI device. The LC/ESI device is integrated such that the exit of the separation channel forms a homogeneous interface with the entrance to the nozzle. All surfaces of the device preferably have a layer of silicon oxide to electrically isolate the liquid sample from the substrate and to provide for biocompatibility.




A fifth aspect of the present invention provides an improved process for fabricating an electrospray ionization (ESI) device. Two of the fundamental aspects of the present invention, simultaneous multi-level etching and delayed LOCOS, are incorporated in the fabrication sequence to significantly improve fabrication reliability and manufacturing yield. In the preferred embodiment, the integrated process produces an ESI device generally comprising a silicon substrate defining a nozzle and surrounding recessed region on an ejection surface, an entrance orifice on the opposite surface (the injection surface), and a nozzle channel extending between the entrance orifice and nozzle such that the electrospray generated by the electrospray device is directed generally perpendicularly to the ejection surface. All surfaces of the ESI device preferably have a layer of silicon oxide to electrically isolate the liquid sample from the substrate and to provide for biocompatibility.




A sixth aspect of the present invention provides an improved process for fabricating a liquid chromatography (LC) device. Two of the fundamental aspects of the present invention—latent masking and delayed LOCOS—are incorporated in the fabrication sequence to significantly improve fabrication reliability and manufacturing yield. In the preferred embodiment, the integrated process produces an LC device generally comprising a silicon substrate defining an introduction channel between an entrance orifice and a reservoir, a separation channel between the reservoir and a separation channel terminus, and an exit channel between the separation channel terminus and an exit orifice; the LC device further comprising a second substrate attached to the separation surface of the first substrate so as to enclose the reservoir and separation channel. All surfaces of the LC device preferably have a layer of silicon oxide to electrically isolate the liquid sample from the substrate and to provide for biocompatibility.











BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS





FIG. 1

shows a schematic of an electrospray system;





FIG. 2A

shows a schematic cross-sectional view of the application of stress to a silicon structure;





FIG. 2B

shows a schematic cross-sectional view of the damage to a silicon structure resulting from application of stress;





FIG. 3A

shows a cross-sectional view of the latent masking process sequence;





FIG. 3B

shows a plan view of the latent masking process sequence;





FIG. 3C

shows a cross-sectional view of the latent masking process sequence;





FIG. 3D

shows a cross-sectional view of the latent masking process sequence;





FIG. 4A

shows a cross-sectional view of an alternative embodiment of the latent masking aspect of the present invention;





FIG. 4B

shows a cross-sectional view of an alternative embodiment of the latent masking aspect of the present invention;





FIG. 5A

shows a conventional process sequence for fabricating separation posts;





FIG. 5B

shows a latent masking block process sequence for fabricating separation posts;





FIG. 6A

shows a scanning electron micrograph of separation posts fabricated using conventional processes;





FIG. 6B

shows a scanning electron micrograph of separation posts fabricated using latent masking processes;





FIG. 7A

shows a plan view of the simultaneous multi-level etching (SMILE) process sequence;





FIG. 7B

a cross-sectional view of the simultaneous multi-level etching (SMILE) process sequence;





FIG. 7C

shows a plan view of the simultaneous multi-level etching (SMILE) process sequence;





FIG. 7D

shows a cross-sectional view of the simultaneous multi-level etching (SMILE) process sequence;





FIG. 8

shows a cross-sectional view of the simultaneous multi-level etching (SMILE) process sequence;





FIG. 9

shows a cross-sectional view of the simultaneous multi-level etching (SMILE) process sequence;





FIG. 10

shows a cross-sectional view of the simultaneous multi-level etching (SMILE) process sequence;





FIG. 11A

shows a cross-sectional view of one of three alternative outcomes from the SMILE process;





FIG. 11B

shows a cross-sectional view of one of three alternative outcomes from the SMILE process;





FIG. 11C

shows a cross-sectional view of one of three alternative outcomes from the SMILE process;





FIG. 12A

shows a plan view of a nozzle structure;





FIG. 12B

shows a cross-sectional view of a nozzle structure;





FIG. 13A

shows a cross-sectional view of an etched nozzle structure without compensation for etch lag;





FIG. 13B

shows a cross-sectional view of an etched nozzle structure with compensation for etch lag;





FIG. 14

shows a scanning electron micrograph of a nozzle structure fabricated using the SMILE process;





FIG. 15

shows a cross-sectional view of a nozzle and through-substrate channel fabricated using the SMILE process to overcome certain limitations on design geometries;





FIG. 16A

shows a plan view of an alternative embodiment of the SMILE process sequence to independently control etch depths of three patterns;





FIG. 16B

shows a cross-section a l view of an alternative embodiment of the SMILE process sequence to independently control etch depths of three patterns;





FIG. 16C

shows a plan view of an alternative embodiment of the SMILE process sequence to independently control etch depths of three patterns;





FIG. 16D

shows a cross-sectional view of an alternative embodiment of the SMILE process sequence to independently control etch depths of three patterns;





FIG. 16E

shows a cross-sectional view of an alternative embodiment of the SMILE process sequence to independently control etch depths of three patterns;





FIG. 16F

shows a cross-sectional view of an alternative embodiment of the SMILE process sequence to independently control etch depths of three patterns;





FIG. 16G

shows a cross-sectional view of an alternative embodiment of the SMILE process sequence to independently control etch depths of three patterns;





FIG. 16H

shows a plan view of an alternative embodiment of the SMILE process sequence to independently control etch depths of three patterns;





FIG. 16I

shows a cross-sectional view of an alternative embodiment of the SMILE process sequence to independently control etch depths of three patterns;





FIG. 17

shows the delayed LOCOS block process sequence;





FIG. 18

shows a cross-sectional view of the initial steps of the delayed LOCOS process;





FIG. 19

shows a cross-sectional view of the initial steps of the delayed LOCOS process;





FIG. 20

shows a cross-sectional view of the initial steps of the delayed LOCOS process;





FIG. 21

shows data relating to the oxidation of silicon nitride;





FIG. 22A

shows a cross-sectional view of an alternative method for silicon nitride removal to open contact holes;





FIG. 22B

shows a cross-sectional view of an alternative method for silicon nitride removal to open contact holes;





FIG. 22C

shows a cross-sectional view of an alternative method for silicon nitride removal to open contact holes;





FIG. 23

shows a cross-sectional view of the bird's beak region at the edge of a contact hole;





FIG. 24

shows a block process sequence for fabricating an integrated LC/ESI device;





FIG. 25A

shows a plan view of a completed LC/ESI device;





FIG. 25B

shows a cross-sectional view of a completed LC/ESI device;





FIG. 25C

shows a cross-sectional view of a completed LC/ESI device;





FIG. 26A

shows a plan view of the initial process steps relating to the delayed LOCOS aspect of the invention, as part of a fabrication sequence for an integrated LC/ESI device;





FIG. 26B

shows a cross-sectional view of the initial process steps relating to the delayed LOCOS aspect of the invention, as part of a fabrication sequence for an integrated LC/ESI device;





FIG. 26C

shows a cross-sectional view of the initial process steps relating to the delayed LOCOS aspect of the invention, as part of a fabrication sequence for an integrated LC/ESI device;





FIG. 27A

shows a plan view of the initial process steps relating to the delayed LOCOS aspect of the invention, as part of a fabrication sequence for an integrated LC/ESI device;





FIG. 27B

shows a cross-sectional view of the initial process steps relating to the delayed LOCOS aspect of the invention, as part of a fabrication sequence for an integrated LC/ESI device;





FIG. 28

shows a cross-sectional view of further process steps in the fabrication of an integrated LC/ESI device;





FIG. 29

shows a cross-sectional view of further process steps in the fabrication of an integrated LC/ESI device;





FIG. 30A

shows a plan view of further process steps in the fabrication of an integrated LC/ESI device;





FIG. 30B

shows a cross-sectional view of further process steps in the fabrication of an integrated LC/ESI device;





FIG. 31

shows a cross-sectional view of process steps relating to the definition of an oxide mask for latent masking in the fabrication of an integrated LC/ESI device;





FIG. 32A

shows a plan view of process steps relating to the definition of an oxide mask for latent masking in the fabrication of an integrated LC/ESI device;





FIG. 32B

shows a cross-sectional view of process steps relating to the definition of an oxide mask for latent masking in the fabrication of an integrated LC/ESI device;





FIG. 33

shows a cross-sectional view of process steps relating to the formation of fluid reservoirs and through-wafer channels in the fabrication of an integrated LC/ESI device;





FIG. 34A

shows a plan view of process steps relating to the formation of fluid reservoirs and through-wafer channels in the fabrication of an integrated LC/ESI device;





FIG. 34B

shows a cross-sectional view of process steps relating to the formation of fluid reservoirs and through-wafer channels in the fabrication of an integrated LC/ESI device;





FIG. 35

shows a cross-sectional view of process steps relating to the formation of fluid reservoirs and through-wafer channels in the fabrication of an integrated LC/ESI device;





FIG. 36

shows a cross-sectional view of process steps relating to nozzle and through-substrate channel formation using the SMILE aspect of the invention, as part of a continuing fabrication sequence for an integrated LC/ESI device;





FIG. 37A

shows a plan view of process steps relating to nozzle and through-substrate channel formation using the SMILE aspect of the invention, as part of a continuing fabrication sequence for an integrated LC/ESI device;





FIG. 37B

shows a cross-sectional view of process steps relating to nozzle and through-substrate channel formation using the SMILE aspect of the invention, as part of a continuing fabrication sequence for an integrated LC/ESI device;





FIG. 38

shows a cross-sectional view of process steps relating to nozzle and through-substrate channel formation using the SMILE aspect of the invention, as part of a continuing fabrication sequence for an integrated LC/ESI device;





FIG. 39A

shows a plan view of process steps relating to nozzle and through-substrate channel formation using the SMILE aspect of the invention, as part of a continuing fabrication sequence for an integrated LC/ESI device;





FIG. 39B

shows a cross-sectional view of process steps relating to nozzle and through-substrate channel formation using the SMILE aspect of the invention, as part of a continuing fabrication sequence for an integrated LC/ESI device;





FIG. 40

shows a cross-sectional view of process steps relating to nozzle and through-substrate channel formation using the SMILE aspect of the invention, as part of a continuing fabrication sequence for an integrated LC/ESI device;





FIG. 41

shows a cross-sectional view of process steps relating to nozzle and through-substrate channel formation using the SMILE aspect of the invention, as part of a continuing fabrication sequence for an integrated LC/ESI device;





FIG. 42A

shows a plan view of process steps relating to completion of the latent masking aspect of the invention in the fabrication of an integrated LC/ESI device;





FIG. 42B

shows a cross-sectional view of process steps relating to completion of the latent masking aspect of the invention in the fabrication of an integrated LC/ESI device;





FIG. 43

shows a cross-sectional view of an integrated LC/ESI device after passivation oxidation;





FIG. 44A

shows an exploded perspective view of the first silicon substrate and a cover substrate in the fabrication of an integrated LC/ESI device;





FIG. 44B

shows an exploded cross-sectional view of the first silicon substrate and a cover substrate in the fabrication of an integrated LC/ESI device;





FIG. 45

shows a cross-sectional view of the formation of electrical contact to the substrate in the fabrication of an integrated LC/ESI device;





FIG. 46

shows a cross-sectional view of the formation of electrical contact to the substrate in the fabrication of an integrated LC/ESI device;





FIG. 47A

shows a plan view of the formation of electrical contact to the substrate in the fabrication of an integrated LC/ESI device;





FIG. 47B

shows a cross-sectional view of the formation of electrical contact to the substrate in the fabrication of an integrated LC/ESI device;





FIG. 47C

shows a cross-sectional view of the formation of electrical contact to the substrate in the fabrication of an integrated LC/ESI device;





FIG. 48A

shows an exploded perspective view of an alternative method of metallization involving the use of a shadow mask in the fabrication of an integrated LC/ESI device;





FIG. 48B

shows an exploded cross-sectional view of an alternative method of metallization involving the use of a shadow mask in the fabrication of an integrated LC/ESI device;





FIG. 49

shows a block process sequence for fabricating an ESI device;





FIG. 50A

shows a plan view of a completed ESI device;





FIG. 50B

shows a cross-sectional view of a completed ESI device;





FIG. 51A

shows a plan view of the initial process steps relating to the delayed LOCOS aspect of the invention, as part of a fabrication sequence for an ESI device;





FIG. 51B

shows a cross-sectional view of the initial process steps relating to the delayed LOCOS aspect of the invention, as part of a fabrication sequence for an ESI device;





FIG. 51C

shows a cross-sectional view of the initial process steps relating to the delayed LOCOS aspect of the invention, as part of a fabrication sequence for an ESI device;





FIG. 52A

shows a plan view of the initial process steps relating to the delayed LOCOS aspect of the invention, as part of a fabrication sequence for an ESI device;





FIG. 52B

shows a cross-sectional view of the initial process steps relating to the delayed LOCOS aspect of the invention, as part of a fabrication sequence for an ESI device;





FIG. 53

shows a cross-sectional view of further process steps in the fabrication of an ESI device;





FIG. 54

shows a cross-sectional view of further process steps in the fabrication of an ESI device;





FIG. 55A

shows a plan view of further process steps in the fabrication of an ESI device;





FIG. 55B

shows a cross-sectional view of further process steps in the fabrication of an ESI device;





FIG. 56

shows a cross-sectional view of process steps relating to nozzle and through-substrate channel formation using the SMILE aspect of the invention, as part of a continuing fabrication sequence for an ESI device;





FIG. 57A

shows a plan view of process steps relating to nozzle and through-substrate channel formation using the SMILE aspect of the invention, as part of a continuing fabrication sequence for an ESI device;





FIG. 57B

shows a cross-sectional view of process steps relating to nozzle and through-substrate channel formation using the SMILE aspect of the invention, as part of a continuing fabrication sequence for an ESI device;





FIG. 58

shows a cross-sectional view of process steps relating to nozzle and through-substrate channel formation using the SMILE aspect of the invention, as part of a continuing fabrication sequence for an ESI device;





FIG. 59A

shows a plan view of process steps relating to nozzle and through-substrate channel formation using the SMILE aspect of the invention, as part of a continuing fabrication sequence for an ESI device;





FIG. 59B

shows a cross-sectional view of process steps relating to nozzle and through-substrate channel formation using the SMILE aspect of the invention, as part of a continuing fabrication sequence for an ESI device;





FIG. 60

shows a cross-sectional view of process steps relating to nozzle and through-substrate channel formation using the SMILE aspect of the invention, as part of a continuing fabrication sequence for an ESI device;





FIG. 61

shows a cross-sectional view of process steps relating to nozzle and through-substrate channel formation using the SMILE aspect of the invention, as part of a continuing fabrication sequence for an ESI device;





FIG. 62

shows a cross-sectional view of an ESI device after passivation oxidation;





FIG. 63

shows a cross-sectional view of the formation of electrical contact to the substrate in the fabrication of an ESI device;





FIG. 64

shows a cross-sectional view of the formation of electrical contact to the substrate in the fabrication of an ESI device;





FIG. 65A

shows a plan view of the formation of electrical contact to the substrate in the fabrication of an ESI device;





FIG. 65B

shows a cross-sectional view of the formation of electrical contact to the substrate in the fabrication of an ESI device;





FIG. 66

shows a cross-sectional view of the formation of electrical contact to the substrate in the fabrication of an ESI device;





FIG. 67A

shows a plan view of the formation of electrical contact to the substrate in the fabrication of an ESI device;





FIG. 67B

shows a cross-sectional view of the formation of electrical contact to the substrate in the fabrication of an ESI device;





FIG. 68

shows a perspective view of a fluid delivery system and an ESI device;





FIG. 69A

shows an exploded perspective of an alternative method of metallization involving the use of a shadow mask in the fabrication of an ESI device;





FIG. 69B

shows an exploded cross-sectional view of an alternative method of metallization involving the use of a shadow mask in the fabrication of an ESI device;





FIG. 70

shows a block process sequence for fabricating an LC device;





FIG. 71A

shows a plan view of a completed LC device;





FIG. 71B

shows a cross-sectional view of a completed LC device;





FIG. 71C

shows a cross-sectional view of a completed LC device;





FIG. 72A

shows a plan view of the initial process steps relating to the delayed LOCOS aspect of the invention, as part of a fabrication sequence for an LC device;





FIG. 72B

shows a cross-sectional view of the initial process steps relating to the delayed LOCOS aspect of the invention, as part of a fabrication sequence for an LC device;





FIG. 72C

shows a cross-sectional view of the initial process steps relating to the delayed LOCOS aspect of the invention, as part of a fabrication sequence for an LC device;





FIG. 73A

shows a plan view of the initial process steps relating to the delayed LOCOS aspect of the invention, as part of a fabrication sequence for an LC device;





FIG. 73B

shows a cross-sectional view of the initial process steps relating to the delayed LOCOS aspect of the invention, as part of a fabrication sequence for an LC device;





FIG. 74

shows a cross-sectional view of further process steps in the fabrication of an LC device;





FIG. 75

shows a cross-sectional view of further process steps in the fabrication of an LC device;





FIG. 76A

shows a plan view of further process steps in the fabrication of an LC device;





FIG. 76B

shows a cross-sectional view of further process steps in the fabrication of an LC device;





FIG. 77

shows a cross-sectional view of process steps relating to the definition of an oxide mask for latent masking in the fabrication of an LC device;





FIG. 78A

shows a plan view of process steps relating to the definition of an oxide mask for latent masking in the fabrication of an LC device;





FIG. 78B

shows a cross-sectional view of process steps relating to the definition of an oxide mask for latent masking in the fabrication of an LC device;





FIG. 79

shows a cross-sectional view of process steps relating to the formation of fluid reservoirs and through-wafer channels in the fabrication of an LC device;





FIG. 80A

shows a plan view of process steps relating to the formation of fluid reservoirs and through-wafer channels in the fabrication of an LC device;





FIG. 80B

shows a cross-sectional view of process steps relating to the formation of fluid reservoirs and through-wafer channels in the fabrication of an LC device;





FIG. 81

shows a cross-sectional view of process steps relating to the formation of fluid reservoirs and through-wafer channels in the fabrication of an LC device;





FIG. 82A

shows a plan view of process steps relating to completion of the latent masking aspect of the invention in the fabrication of an LC device;





FIG. 82B

shows a cross-sectional view of process steps relating to completion of the latent masking aspect of the invention in the fabrication of an LC device;





FIG. 83

shows a cross-sectional view of an LC device after passivation oxidation;





FIG. 84A

shows an exploded perspective view of the first silicon substrate and a cover substrate in the fabrication of an LC device;





FIG. 84B

shows an exploded cross-sectional view of the first silicon substrate and a cover substrate in the fabrication of an LC device;





FIG. 85

shows a cross-sectional view of the formation of electrical contact to the substrate in the fabrication of an LC device;





FIG. 86

shows a cross-sectional view of the formation of electrical contact to the substrate in the fabrication of an LC device;





FIG. 87A

shows a plan view of the formation of electrical contact to the substrate in the fabrication of an LC device;





FIG. 87B

shows a cross-sectional view of the formation of electrical contact to the substrate in the fabrication of an LC device;





FIG. 88A

shows a plan view of the formation of electrical contact to the substrate in the fabrication of an LC device;





FIG. 88B

shows a cross-sectional view of the formation of electrical contact to the substrate in the fabrication of an LC device;





FIG. 89A

shows an exploded perspective view of an alternative method of metallization involving the use of a shadow mask in the fabrication of an LC device; and





FIG. 89B

shows an exploded cross-sectional view of an alternative method of metallization involving the use of a shadow mask in the fabrication of an LC device.











DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENT




The present invention generally describes methods by which constraints in the design and fabrication of MEMS and microfluidic devices may be overcome. Six aspects of the invention are described. Three aspects are fundamental, independent, and mutually compatible solutions to frequently encountered design and/or process constraints. Each of the other three aspects is derived by incorporating one or more of the fundamental aspects in an integrated process to fabricate a specific microfluidic device. The problems and limitations discussed are framed in the specific context of fabricating electrospray ionization (ESI), liquid chromatography (LC), and integrated LC/ESI devices. Descriptions of specific applications are provided only as examples. Various modifications to the preferred embodiments will be readily apparent to those skilled in the art, and the general principles defined herein may be applied to other embodiments and applications without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention. Thus, the present invention is not intended to be limited to the embodiments shown, but is to be accorded the widest scope consistent with the principles and features disclosed herein.




LATENT MASKING




A first aspect of the present invention provides a method of preventing damage to small, high-aspect-ratio structures by forming them after all other potentially damaging processing has been completed. Damage may be done to silicon structures


16


in a MEMS or microfluidic device when sufficient stress is applied, as shown schematically in FIG.


2


A. Silicon, like all materials, has an ability to accommodate limited stress through strain. However, beyond a critical point irreparable damage can be done to a structure


16


′, as shown in FIG.


2


B. In deep silicon micromachining, high-aspect-ratio structures may be formed by first patterning a silicon oxide film, then using the oxide as a hard mask during an etch of the underlying silicon substrate. After the formation of these structures, further processing may be done on the same wafer surface to form other features. In the course of those lithographic and etch steps, the previously formed structures—which may be typically on the order of several micrometers in diameter and tens of micrometers in height—are subjected to mechanical stress from polymeric (photoresist) over-coating and wet immersion (e.g., wet etching, removal of photoresist, and wafer cleaning). Further, processing on the opposite side of the wafer, if any, requires that the already-structured side be handled as the supporting surface, leading to mechanical stress on the fragile structures from abrasion and clamping. Any or all of the foregoing mechanical stresses can lead to breakage of fragile structures, dramatically reducing manufacturing yield and, concomitantly, increasing the unit cost of such a device. It is therefore highly desirable that fragile structures be protected from the aforementioned stresses or, preferably, that they be formed at a stage in the overall process after which they will not be subjected to any damaging stresses. Inasmuch as stress is inadvertently applied during the course of routine processing, any successful approach to eliminating damage will require a minimum of handling and processing once the structures are formed.




The essential element of this aspect of the present invention is that the silicon etch to form the fragile structures is postponed, rather than being performed immediately following the patterning of the latent mask. After the masking layer, preferably of silicon oxide, is patterned, the photoresist is removed and normal processing operations are performed to process either the same side or the opposite side of the substrate. The patterned latent mask must be robust to the processing that occurs prior to its ultimate use as a mask for silicon etching.




The latent mask must have three qualities that are crucial to its persistence during these intervening steps. First, it must be chemically resistant to lithographic deposition, development, and removal steps. Second, it must be a mechanically hard, durable material. Third, the masking layer must be at most 1-2 μm in thickness, and therefore the patterned features in the mask are at most several micrometers high. This implies a very low probability of a mask feature having enough lateral force applied to it to do any damage when abrasions occurs and stress is applied. Further, the low profile represented by a mask feature of at most several micrometers in height makes it significantly easier to overcoat and expose photoresist in any desired lithographic step. Coating photoresist over features with high aspect ratio is extremely difficult to do with the required uniformity. Further, as noted before, the use of photoresist itself and the stress produced upon normal baking to remove solvents is sufficient to extensively damage small, fragile features.




A detailed description of the latent masking process sequence is now given using the preferred embodiment of silicon oxide as the masking material.

FIGS. 3A-3D

show plan and cross-sectional views of the latent masking process sequence. First, a layer of silicon oxide


22


is provided on a silicon substrate


20


, as shown in FIG.


3


A. The silicon oxide film may be grown thermally by known silicon oxidation techniques such as, for example, processing at elevated temperatures in a steam ambient. Alternatively, the silicon oxide layer


22


may be deposited by a variety of silicon processing techniques, including low-pressure chemical vapor deposition (LPCVD) and plasma-enhanced chemical vapor deposition (PECVD). A photoresist layer


24


is then coated on the silicon oxide layer


22


.




Referring to the plan and cross-sectional views, respectively, of

FIGS. 3B and 3C

, photolithographic processing is used to define a pattern on the silicon oxide layer


22


: a pattern is exposed in a photoresist


24


in a known lithographic tool such as a stepper, a scanner, or an aligner; and the exposed pattern is developed, leaving a pattern of openings


26


in the photoresist layer


24


. The photoresist layer


24


then serves as a mask during an etch of certain areas


28


of the underlying oxide layer


22


, transferring the photoresist pattern to the oxide. The oxide etch may be done wet or dry, although a dry (plasma) etch affords much better dimensional control and allows formation of smaller features. The result of the foregoing is the formation of patterns


30


of oxide that ultimately serve to mask an etch of the underlying silicon substrate


20


. The remaining photoresist


24


may be removed in an oxygen plasma or in an actively oxidizing chemical bath such as sulfuric acid (H


2


SO


4


) activated with hydrogen peroxide (H


2


O


2


). Alternatively, the photoresist mask


24


may be retained if compatible with intermediate processing steps to provide additional masking protection during lengthy silicon etches.




Rather than proceeding immediately to etch the underlying silicon using the patterned oxide as a mask, a variety of processing operations may be performed on either a same surface


21


or an opposite surface


23


of the substrate


20


. The principal requirement is that none of the operations perturb the latent mask


30


. At an appropriate stage of the overall process after the intervening process steps, the latent mask


30


is finally used to protect certain areas


32


corresponding to desired structures during an etch into the underlying silicon substrate


20


, as shown in FIG.


3


D.




In an alternative embodiment of a latent masking process, an alternative organic photosensitive material such as polyimide may be used alone (i.e., without an underlying oxide layer) in place of photoresist as the masking material. In this case, a polyimide


34


would be coated directly on a silicon substrate


35


(FIG.


4


A). The polyimide layer


34


would then be patterned and cured, an operation that requires treatment at an elevated temperature. The cured polyimide material is much more robust than photoresist, and will therefore survive many silicon processing steps that standard photoresist will not, including immersion in some solvents, abrasive handling (e.g., during the course of processing on the opposite side of the wafer), and elevated temperature operations up to 400° C., typically. After intervening processing, a polyimide pattern


34


may be used at a later stage in the process to mask the silicon etch to define silicon structures


36


(FIG.


4


B). Additional alternative masking materials include metal, silicon nitride, and amorphous diamond-like carbon.




Structures for performing liquid chromatography have been fabricated as a demonstration of the efficacy of the latent masking process. The structures are posts roughly 1-2 μm in diameter and 10 μm in height, populating a 10 μm deep fluid channel.

FIGS. 5A and 5B

schematically show conventional and latent masking process sequences, respectively, for fabricating the separation posts. In

FIG. 5A

, formation of the latent oxide mask is followed immediately by a deep silicon etch to form the channel and posts. Additional lithographic patterning and etching is subsequently done both on the same substrate surface as the separation posts as well as on the opposite surface. The additional processing after formation of the posts subjected them, first, to film stress from photoresist in the same-side processing and, second, to handling abrasion during the opposite-side processing. The damage that is done to the posts as a result of those stresses can be seen in the scanning electron micrograph of FIG.


6


A. In comparison, the latent masking process is incorporated as shown schematically in FIG.


5


B. In this case, the posts are etched after all other features have been created.

FIG. 6B

shows a corresponding channel portion from a device fabricated according to the latent masking process of FIG.


5


B. The absence of stress-induced damage is representative of all parts of all channels on the device.




It is therefore seen that the latent masking process is highly effective in eliminating stress-related damage to small, fragile features. One advantage of latent masking is that it does not require additional or different photolithographic masks as compared to a conventional process. A further advantage is that the latent mask, once formed, presents a low profile that does not interfere with the ability to uniformly and continuously coat photoresist films. This allows lithographic patterning to be done after the latent mask's formation. When latent masking is not used, as in the process of

FIG. 5A

, topographical variations are created by the silicon etch that are too extreme to permit the uniform and continuous coating of new photoresist films. Patterning steps on the etched surface are therefore precluded. Yet another benefit of the latent-masking process is that the low profile of the latent mask makes it significantly less susceptible to being damaged by handling and abrasive stresses than completed high-aspect-ratio structures, and may therefore be expected to survive additional processing without being damaged. A final advantage is that the use of the latent mask may be placed at a late enough stage in the overall process to ensure that the resulting fragile structures are not subjected to damaging stresses by subsequent operations.






S


IMULTANEOUS


M


ULT


I


-


L


EVEL


E


TCHING (SMILE)




A second aspect of the present invention provides a method of independently controlling etch depths of two patterns while simultaneously etching both patterns. The challenge inherent in etching two patterns to independently controllable depths has two facets. First, the phenomenon known as etch lag causes a small pattern to etch at a generally slower rate than a larger pattern. The effect becomes increasingly pronounced as the smaller pattern diminishes in at least one lateral dimension below 10 μm, resulting in as much as 30-40% slower etch rate in the smaller pattern. Second, two patterns of approximately equal area attain an equivalent depth when etched simultaneously. Under standard processing conditions, it is not possible to etch a small pattern and a large pattern simultaneously to the same depth; nor is it possible to etch equal-area patterns simultaneously to different depths.




A method by which two patterns of arbitrary dimensions may be etched into a substrate must satisfy two requirements: first, that existence of the first pattern does not interfere with the lithographic processing associated with the second pattern; and second, that the final depths of the two etched patterns can be independently controlled.




The essence of this aspect of the present invention is the use of two masking layers, preferably a photoresist layer and a silicon oxide layer, to allow appropriate staging of mask and substrate etches so that both requirements are met. The patternability of the second pattern is ensured by etching the first pattern only through the oxide layer before performing a second lithographic patterning sequence. The second photoresist mask is exposed and developed to comprise both the first and second patterns, i.e., the first pattern is not occluded by the second photoresist mask. The first pattern may then be etched into the silicon to a desired extent in order to advance the etching of the first pattern relative to the second. The exposed oxide layer corresponding to the second pattern prevents the second pattern from being etched into the silicon substrate until the desired amount of advance is given the first pattern, after which the oxide is etched and silicon etching is done in both patterns simultaneously until reaching the desired depths.




A detailed description of the SMILE process sequence is now given using the preferred embodiment of silicon oxide as a masking material to complement photoresist-masked etching. Referring to the plan and cross-sectional views of

FIGS. 7A and 7B

, respectively, a required oxide layer


42


on a substrate


40


is created at an earlier stage in the device fabrication sequence. A photoresist layer


44


is deposited uniformly on the oxide layer


42


, then photolithographic processing is used to expose and remove certain areas


46


corresponding to a first pattern. The resulting pattern in the photoresist layer


44


is then transferred to the underlying oxide layer


42


by either dry or wet etching the oxide until reaching the silicon substrate


40


. Dry (plasma) etching of the oxide will provide tighter dimensional control and an ability to create smaller features than wet etching. A silicon etch is not done at this stage. Rather, as shown in

FIGS. 7C and 7D

, the photoresist


44


is removed, then a new photoresist layer


48


is coated. The photoresist layer


48


is exposed and developed to open certain areas


46


,


50


that correspond to both first and second patterns, respectively. After this photolithographic processing step, the area


46


is open to the silicon substrate


40


and the area


50


is open to the silicon oxide layer


42


.




Referring to

FIG. 8

, a silicon etch is then performed into the substrate


40


using the photoresist


48


and oxide


42


masks, thus beginning the etch of the area


46


, corresponding to the first pattern, into the silicon substrate


40


. Due to its being masked by the oxide, the area


50


, corresponding to the second pattern, is not etched into the silicon substrate


40


at the same time. This gives the first pattern an advance over the second pattern. The silicon etch is stopped when the desired depth has been attained in the area


46


, as determined by measurement and/or calculation relying on etch rate (allowing for etch rate lag). As shown in

FIG. 9

, the remaining photoresist mask


48


is then used to mask an oxide etch, transferring the second pattern to the oxide layer


42


and creating openings


52


in the oxide layer


42


to the underlying silicon substrate


40


corresponding to the second pattern. The area


46


is unaffected during the oxide etch. The combined remaining photoresist


48


and oxide masks


42


are then used to mask a second silicon etch to the desired depth of the first pattern and the second pattern, with etching proceeding simultaneously in both areas


46


,


50


(FIG.


10


).




The amount of first-pattern-only silicon etch, i.e., the first silicon etch, may be designed to be such that one of three general alternative outcomes is attained (FIGS.


11


A-


11


C). A relatively limited amount of first-pattern etch will result in the final depth of a first pattern


46


′ being less than that of a second pattern


50


′ (FIG.


11


A). (In the limit, where no first-pattern etch is done, the first pattern depth would be that dictated by etch rate lag, if any.) Alternatively, the amount of first-pattern etch may be chosen so as to roughly balance the respective final depths of first and second patterns


46


′,


50


′ (FIG.


11


B). Lastly, the amount of first-pattern etch may be chosen so as to realize a greater final depth in a first pattern


46


′″ than in a second pattern


50


′″ (FIG.


11


C).




Nozzle structures have been fabricated as a demonstration of the efficacy of the SMILE process. The nozzle structure, shown in the plan and cross-sectional views of

FIGS. 12A and 12B

, respectively, comprises a cylindrical form generally perpendicular to a surface


61


of a substrate


60


, having a nozzle channel


64


centered in and extending along the axis of a nozzle


62


, as well as an annular region


66


recessed from the surface


61


and extending radially from the outer diameter of the nozzle


62


. A masking oxide


68


covers the surface


61


where it has not been etched. The nozzle is an essential element of an electrospray ionization device, that device further comprising an extension of the nozzle channel continuously to the opposite substrate surface.




If the nozzle channel were etched simultaneously with the recessed region surrounding the nozzle, the etch lag phenomenon would prevent the small nozzle channel from etching as quickly as the recessed region. As shown schematically in the cross-sectional view of

FIG. 13A

, when the desired depth of a recessed region


66


′ (or, equivalently, the desired height of the nozzle) is attained, a nozzle channel


64


′ is etched to only a fraction of the recessed region depth.




By advancing the etch of a nozzle channel


64


′ over a recessed region


66


′ according to the SMILE process, the effects of etch lag may be compensated for, thereby producing the preferred structure shown schematically in FIG.


13


B. In the context of the SMILE aspect of the present invention, the nozzle channels


64


,


64


′,


64


′ correspond to the first pattern and the recessed regions


66


,


66


′,


66


′ to the second pattern. The scanning electron micrograph of

FIG. 14

shows a nozzle structure fabricated according to the method taught herein. The desired height of the nozzle shown was attained while ensuring that the nozzle channel was etched to a sufficient depth to reach an etched region on the opposite surface of the substrate, thereby completing the required through-substrate channel.




The SMILE process is thus shown to be a highly effective means of satisfying the two requirements for two-pattern etching—namely, that the establishment of the first pattern does not impede photolithographic patterning for the second pattern, and that the final depths of the two patterns may be independently controlled.




SMILE has a significant advantage over the standard approach to etching two different patterns into a substrate. In the standard approach, one pattern would first be created by standard lithographic processing and etched to the desired depth into the silicon substrate, then a second pattern would be created and etched in the same manner. A serious shortcoming of the standard method is that the severe topography created by the first lithographic patterning and etch greatly inhibits the ability to uniformly and continuously coat photoresist for the second patterning sequence. By limiting the amount of etching prior to second-mask lithography, topographical variation is limited to the thickness of the oxide layer, preferably 1-2 μm, which presents no obstacle to uniform and continuous photoresist coating. A second shortcoming of the standard method, also overcome by the present invention, is the potentially substantial incremental amount of etching time required to create the two patterns sequentially rather than partly to mostly in parallel. By etching both patterns simultaneously, up to half the standard amount of etch time may be eliminated, thereby increasing throughput and manufacturing efficiency and consequently lowering manufacturing cost.




A further significant advantage of the SMILE process may be seen in the important context of nozzle structures and through-substrate channel formation for electrospray ionization devices. The invention provides a method by which the relative amount of etching from injection and ejection sides of the substrate may be designed independently of the desired depth of the recessed region surrounding the nozzle.




If the nozzle-side portion of the through-substrate channel is no deeper than the recessed region, the remaining part of the through-substrate channel must be, at most, equal in diameter to the nozzle-side portion and preferably smaller to allow for alignment tolerances. In the case of relatively shallow recessed regions, etch lag would prevent completion of the through-substrate channel. As an example, if the nozzle-side portion of the through-substrate channel and recessed region are 100 μm deep, the remaining 300 μm of a 400 μm-thick substrate must be etched from the injection side. At a maximum, the injection-side channel leading to a 10 μm nozzle channel would be 10 μm (and, practically, less than 10 μm to allow for misalignment). With a practical aspect ratio limit of 20:1 (vertical:horizontal etch dimensions), the deepest 10 μm hole that could be etched from the injection side would be 200 μm, leaving the intended through-substrate channel unconnected.




This limitation on design geometries may be overcome through the application of the SMILE aspect of the present invention. The critical outcome would be to extend a portion


74


of a channel through a substrate


70


on a nozzle side


71


below a bottom of a recessed region


76


, as shown in

FIG. 15. A

patterned silicon oxide layer


72


and photoresist masking are used according to the SMILE process. Preferably, this extension of portion


74


would be at least 50 μm to allow for adequate mechanical strength of the resulting structure, but in principle could be any positive amount, limited only by aspect ratio. The significance of extending the nozzle-side channel portion


74


is that a portion


78


etched from an injection side


73


is no longer constrained to be the same or smaller diameter. The reason for this, as can be seen in the figure, is that the injection-side portion


78


no longer undercuts nozzle sidewalls


77


when it is larger in diameter than the nozzle-side channel portion


74


. The injection-side channel


78


may thus be designed to be large enough to eliminate etch rate lag and aspect ratio constraints. By extending the nozzle-side 10 μm hole to a depth of 150 μm, i.e., 50 μm below the bottom of the recessed region, the through-substrate channel may be completed by etching a portion from the injection side to the depth of 250 μm, which can be achieved in a hole as small as 12.5 μm in diameter. If the injection-side etch depth is required to be limited to a lesser depth, e.g., 200 μm, in order to determine the depth of simultaneously-etched features, the nozzle-side portion may be extended to make up the difference, up to a limit dictated by aspect ratio (200 μm for a 10 μm nozzle hole). Thus, we see that the application of the invention decouples design geometries of injection and nozzle-side features while still ensuring the completion of the through-substrate channel.




Several collateral advantages may be seen to proceed from the foregoing. First, required photolithographic alignment tolerances in fabrication may be loosened, thereby directly increasing manufacturing yield. This is due to elimination of the need to align a small injection-side channel within a small inner diameter of the nozzle, in favor of aligning the nozzle channel within a much larger injection-side channel. A further consequence of the foregoing is that the nozzle channel diameter may be reduced as desired for more effective electrospray to a limit dictated by aspect ratio with no adverse impact on required alignment tolerances.




An alternative embodiment of the SMILE method may be used to independently control the etch depths of three patterns. The process sequence for three patterns is depicted in

FIGS. 16A-16I

. Referring to the plan and cross-sectional views of

FIGS. 16A and 16B

, respectively, a required oxide layer


43


on a substrate


40


is created at an earlier stage in the device fabrication sequence. A photoresist layer


45


is deposited uniformly on the oxide layer


43


, then photolithographic processing is used to expose and remove photoresist from certain areas


47


,


49


corresponding to a first and a second pattern, respectively. The resulting patterns in the photoresist layer


45


are then transferred to the underlying oxide layer


43


by either dry or wet etching the oxide until reaching the silicon substrate


40


. Dry (plasma) etching of the oxide will provide tighter dimensional control and an ability to create smaller features than wet etching. A silicon etch is not done at this stage. Rather, as shown in

FIGS. 16C and 16D

, the photoresist


45


is removed, after which a new photoresist layer


51


is coated. The photoresist layer


51


is exposed and developed to open certain areas


47


,


53


that correspond to first and third patterns, respectively. After the photolithographic processing step, the area


47


is open to the silicon substrate


40


, and the area


53


is open to the silicon oxide layer


43


. Note that area


49


(the second pattern) remains protected by the photoresist layer


51


.




Referring to

FIG. 16E

, a silicon etch is then performed into the substrate


40


using the photoresist


51


and oxide


43


masks, thus beginning the etch of area


47


, corresponding to the first pattern, into the silicon substrate


40


. Due to its being masked by the oxide


43


, the area


53


, corresponding to the third pattern, is not etched into the silicon substrate


40


at the same time. This gives the first pattern an advance over the third pattern. The silicon etch is stopped when the desired depth has been attained in the area


47


, as determined by measurement and/or calculation relying on etch rate (allowing for etch rate lag). As shown in

FIG. 16F

, the remaining photoresist mask


51


is then used to mask an oxide etch, transferring the third pattern to the oxide layer


43


and creating openings


53


in the oxide layer


43


to the underlying silicon substrate


40


corresponding to the third pattern. The area


47


is unaffected during the oxide etch. The combined remaining photoresist


51


and oxide


43


masks are then used to mask a second silicon etch to the desired depth of the first pattern and third pattern, with etching proceeding simultaneously in both areas


47


,


53


(FIG.


16


G).




The remaining photoresist


51


is then removed to expose area


49


, corresponding to the second pattern, that was etched earlier through the oxide layer


43


to the underlying silicon substrate


40


. The oxide mask


43


is then used to mask a third silicon etch simultaneously in areas


47


,


49


,


53


to the desired depth of the first, second, and third patterns, respectively (FIGS.


16


H and


16


I).




The foregoing alternative embodiment of the SMILE process is a highly effective method of satisfying the principal requirements for three-pattern etching—namely, that the establishment of the first pattern does not impede photolithographic patterning for the second or third patterns, that the establishment of the second pattern does not impede photolithographic patterning for the third pattern, and that the final depths of the three patterns may be independently controlled. All advantages attributable to the SMILE process in the preferred embodiment also pertain to the foregoing alternative embodiment.




LOCOS




A third aspect of the present invention provides an improved method for the formation of an electrical contact to a substrate. The purpose of the contact is to provide a method of fixing or modulating the electrical potential of the substrate. The difficulty inherent in forming an electrical contact to the substrate at a later stage of the overall process arises primarily from the presence of severe topography. The topography, in the form of previously defined features, makes it very difficult to successfully coat photoresist uniformly and continuously. It is particularly difficult to ensure photoresist coverage and protection of isolated structures surrounded by etched, recessed regions. In order to ensure high manufacturing yield, an alternative means of providing electrical contact to the substrate is required.




The essential element of this aspect of the present invention is the modification of a


LOC


al


O


xidation of


S


ilicon (LOCOS) process to allow the definition and delayed opening of contact(s) to the substrate. LOCOS has been routinely used in integrated circuit design and manufacturing to create electrically isolated regions on a silicon chip.




The delayed LOCOS process sequence is shown schematically in

FIG. 17

, and

FIGS. 18-22C

show cross-sectional views of the progression of process steps. In the preferred embodiment of the invention, an entire surface


82


of a substrate


80


is heavily implanted with the same type of dopant species as the substrate itself (i.e., n-type or p-type) to form an implanted region


85


and to thereby ensure a non-rectifying contact between the substrate


80


and metal deposited at the time of contact formation. A pad oxide


84


of 10-20 nm is then grown, as in standard LOCOS. A film of silicon nitride


86


is then deposited, e.g., by low-pressure chemical vapor deposition (LPCVD) or plasma-enhanced chemical vapor deposition (PECVD). Referring to

FIG. 19

, after deposition, the nitride layer


86


is patterned by lithography and etching to leave patterns of silicon nitride


88


where contacts will ultimately be formed. In a standard LOCOS process, the nitride etch would be followed immediately by a thick field oxidation, then by removal of the nitride to expose active areas that are electrically isolated from their lateral neighbors.




At this stage of the delayed LOCOS process, however, the focus of processing shifts to other structures and objectives. While the intervening process steps are executed, the patterns of silicon nitride


88


continue to define and protect the intended contact areas. During oxidation steps, for example, oxidation is suppressed under the silicon nitride, as shown in

FIG. 20

, while growing in adjacent regions


90


. The silicon nitride itself oxidizes to form a thin oxide layer


92


under such conditions as are used to oxidize silicon, and care must be taken to ensure that enough silicon nitride


86


is deposited to last through all subsequent oxidations. The data of

FIG. 21

show the amount of nitride oxidized for various times of oxidation. In order to complete contact formation, the silicon nitride, as well as any small amount of silicon oxide


92


formed from silicon nitride during oxidations and the original pad oxide


84


, is etched until the underlying silicon substrate


80


is reached.




Removal of silicon nitride to open contact holes


96


to the substrate


80


may be done in several ways, as shown in

FIGS. 22A-22C

. In one method (FIG.


22


A), the silicon nitride


88


may be removed by wet etching in hot phosphoric acid, an etch that will remove nitride strongly preferentially to oxide. If this method is used, however, it is essential that any oxide


92


on nitride be first removed by dry or wet etching. The pad oxide


84


must also be removed by dry or wet etching after removal of nitride


88


. In a second method (FIG.


22


B), a blanket, i.e., unmasked, etch may be done by reactive-ion etching to remove the nitride


88


in the contact areas, as well as the grown oxide


92


and the underlying pad oxide


84


. This method removes more of the adjacent oxide


90


than the first method. In a third method (FIG.


22


C), a shadow mask


98


, i.e., a substrate


97


with holes


99


provided in the same pattern as the pattern of contacts, may be used to mask a reactive-ion etch of the grown oxide


92


, the nitride


88


and underlying oxide


84


. After opening the contact hole(s) by one of the methods of

FIGS. 22A-22C

, a metal, preferably aluminum, is deposited and subsequently patterned in another lithographic sequence to define interconnecting wires on the chip.




In an alternative embodiment, the heavy ion implantation may be done directly into the contact hole after removal of the nitride contact pattern, prior to metallization, rather than at the beginning of the process.




The delayed LOCOS process has several advantages over the standard contact formation sequence. First, the definition of the contact area is done early in the overall process, thereby avoiding the need for conducting lithography on a surface with severe topography. Second, the use of this approach significantly reduces the amount of etching required to open the contact to the substrate, since a substantially thinner film must be etched to open the contact. This is a consequence of the silicon nitride not oxidizing to the same extent as non-contact areas during process steps between nitride patterning and nitride removal to open contacts. Thus, a blanket etch may be performed to open the contact areas while still having the required oxide film everywhere else. A third advantage is that the nitride is removed immediately before metallization, thus guaranteeing a clean, undamaged metal/silicon interface.




A fourth advantage of the delayed LOCOS process has to do with the shape of the transition region from the bottom of an opened contact hole to the surrounding oxide region. A well-known collateral outcome of a LOCOS sequence is the formation of the so-called “bird's beak”. Shown in

FIG. 23

in close-up view at one edge of the nitride island


88


, is a lateral extension


95


(bird's beak) of the field oxide region


90


under a small edge portion of the silicon nitride


88


which occurs as a result of diffusing oxidizing species during the high-temperature field oxidation. The consequence of this lateral extension


95


is that, after removal of the nitride


88


, the oxide film transitions smoothly and gradually from the contact area


96


to the surrounding thick isolation region


90


. This is an advantage because of the necessity of subsequently depositing a film of metal, typically aluminum, uniformly and without discontinuities, because, whereas an abrupt vertical step is extremely difficult to cover without discontinuities, a gradual transition such as that produced by the LOCOS process is easily covered by either evaporative or sputtering methods of metal deposition.




The delayed LOCOS aspect of the present invention may be viewed as an extension or another embodiment of the latent masking aspect. The essential element of the latent masking aspect is to create a mask, or pattern, that is held abeyant rather than being immediately used to mask an etch as would customarily be done. The mask, preferably a silicon oxide mask in the present invention, persists during intervening process steps until it is finally used to mask an etch into the silicon substrate. Similarly, the delayed LOCOS process creates a pattern, preferably in silicon nitride in the present invention, that is held abeyant during subsequent processing until it is removed to provide access to the underlying substrate. Thus it is seen that both aspects provide a pattern that is ultimately used after an interval of process steps during which it remains inert—its ultimate use being, in one aspect, to act as a mask for an etch; in the other aspect, to act as a mask during several oxidations.




Improved Integrated Liquid Chromatography(LC)/Electrospray Ionization (ESI) Device Fabrication Procedure




The fourth aspect of the present invention, the fabrication of an integrated LC/ESI device, is explained with reference to

FIGS. 24-48B

. A process to fabricate an integrated LC/ESI device is shown in block form in FIG.


24


. The process flow shown omits standard but important steps such as cleaning, and is intended only to show the inter-relationships of the three fundamental aspects of the present invention and the integrated process sequence. It will be apparent to a skilled practitioner of the art that subtle changes may be made in the detailed process without materially affecting the function and form of the resulting device. As one example, the insertion or deletion of a wafer cleaning step may have a measurable impact on manufacturing yield, but will have no influence on the form, appearance, or function of a successfully yielding device.




The block process shown in

FIG. 24

incorporates the three fundamental aspects of the present invention. The outcome of this particular process sequence is an integrated LC/ESI device


100


(

FIGS. 25A-25C

) in which a fluid reservoir


438


is filled through an introduction orifice


457


on an ejection side


403


of the device


100


(the same surface as that on which a substrate contact


409


, nozzle


472


, and recessed region


474


are formed), and through an introduction channel


468


extending between the introduction orifice


457


and the fluid reservoir


438


; in which a liquid chromatographic separation is performed in a separation channel


478


populated with a plurality of separation posts


482


and extending between the fluid reservoir


438


and a separation channel terminus


480


; and in which fluid exiting the separation channel


478


via the separation channel terminus


480


flows through a nozzle channel


442


where the fluid is electrosprayed in a direction generally perpendicular to the ejection surface


403


from a nozzle


472


on the ejection surface


403


. All surfaces of the LC/ESI device preferably have a layer of silicon oxide


484


to electrically isolate the liquid sample from the substrate


400


and to provide for biocompatibility.




The three fundamental aspects of the present invention are incorporated in the integrated fabrication sequence in the manner shown in FIG.


24


. After any preparatory processing, the nitride deposition and patterning steps for the delayed LOCOS process are performed at


110


. Next, the channel and separation posts are patterned according to the latent masking process at


120


. After patterning and etching of fluid reservoirs and part of the introduction and nozzle channels on the separation surface of the substrate, processing continues on the ejection surface according to the SMILE process at


130


. The fluid reservoirs are optionally patterned at the same time as the channel and separation posts instead of with the introduction and nozzle channels. The delayed channel/post etch using the latent mask is then performed on the separation surface at


140


, after which the substrate is attached or bonded to the second substrate at


150


. Finally, the delayed LOCOS process is completed by opening the required contact hole at


160


, followed by metallization at


170


.




The fabrication of the LC/ESI device


100


(

FIGS. 25A-25C

) using the fundamental aspects of the present invention will now be explained with reference to

FIGS. 26A-48B

. The integrated process utilizes established, well-controlled thin-film silicon processing techniques such as thermal oxidation, photolithography, reaction-ion etching (RIE), ion implantation, and metal deposition. Fabrication using such silicon processing techniques facilitates massively parallel processing of similar devices, is time-efficient and cost-efficient, allows for tighter control of critical dimensions, is easily reproducible, and results in a wholly integral device, thereby eliminating any assembly requirements. Further, the fabrication sequence is easily extended to create physical aspects or features on the ejection surface of the LC/ESI device to facilitate interfacing and connection to a fluid delivery system or to facilitate integration with a fluid delivery sub-system to create a single integrated system.




Ejection Surface Processing: Contact Pattern Definition (Delayed LOCOS)





FIGS. 26A and 26B

illustrate the initial processing steps for the ejection side of the first substrate in fabricating the LC/ESI device


100


(FIGS.


25


A-


25


C). A double-side-polished silicon wafer substrate


400


is subjected to an elevated temperature in an oxidizing ambient to grow a layer or film of silicon oxide


402


on an ejection side


403


and a layer or film of silicon oxide


404


on a separation side


405


of the substrate


400


. Each of the resulting silicon oxide layers


402


,


404


has a thickness of approximately 10-20 nm. The silicon oxide layer


402


provides some protection to the surface of the silicon substrate


400


at a silicon/silicon oxide interface


401


.




A high-dose implantation is made through the silicon oxide layer


402


to form an implanted region


406


to ensure a low-resistance electrical connection between an electrode that will be formed at a later stage of the process and the substrate


400


. If the starting substrate


400


is acceptor-doped (i.e., p-type), the high-dose implantation is done with a p-type species such as boron, resulting in a p+ implanted region


406


. If the starting substrate


400


is donor-doped (i.e., n-type), the high-dose implantation is done with an n-type species such as arsenic or phosphorus, resulting in an n+ implanted region


406


.




A layer or film of silicon nitride


408


is deposited on the silicon oxide layer


402


on the ejection side


403


of the substrate


400


. Deposition of the silicon nitride layer


408


is done in the preferred embodiment by low-pressure chemical vapor deposition (LPCVD), which also deposits a layer of silicon nitride


410


on the separation side


405


of the substrate


400


. Each of the resulting silicon nitride layers


408


,


410


has a thickness of approximately 150-200 nm. Deposition of the silicon nitride layer


408


may be done by plasma-enhanced chemical vapor deposition (PECVD) in an alternative embodiment.




In an alternative embodiment shown in the cross-sectional view of

FIG. 26C

, the silicon oxide layer


402


may be removed after the high-dose implantation, the silicon oxide layer


402


having presumptively been damaged by the implantation. Removal would preferably be accomplished by immersion in hydrofluoric acid (HF) or a buffered solution of HF. Silicon oxide layer


404


would be simultaneously removed. After removal, new silicon oxide layers


402


′,


404


′ would then be re-grown to a thickness of 10-20 nm by subjecting the substrate


400


to an elevated temperature in an oxidizing ambient.




Referring again to

FIGS. 26A and 26B

, a film of positive-working photoresist


412


is deposited on the silicon nitride layer


408


on the ejection side


403


of the substrate


400


. All areas of the photoresist


412


exclusive of a contact area that will be protected by silicon nitride until ultimately being opened to form a contact to the substrate


400


are selectively exposed through a mask by an optical lithographic exposure tool.




Referring to the plan and cross-sectional views, respectively, of

FIGS. 27A and 27B

, after development of the photoresist


412


, the exposed area


414


of the photoresist is removed and open to the underlying silicon nitride layer


408


, while the unexposed areas remain protected by photoresist


412


. The exposed area


416


of the silicon nitride layer


408


is then etched by a fluorine-based plasma with a high degree of anisotropy and selectivity to the protective photoresist


412


until the silicon oxide layer


402


is reached. Next, the entire layer of silicon nitride


410


on the separation side


405


of the substrate


400


is etched by a fluorine-based plasma until the silicon oxide layer


404


is reached. Any remaining photoresist


412


on the ejection side


403


of the substrate


400


is then removed in an oxygen plasma or in an actively oxidizing chemical bath such as sulfuric acid (H


2


SO


4


) activated with hydrogen peroxide (H


2


O


2


).




This completes the first set of process steps for the delayed LOCOS aspect of the present invention. The area of the silicon substrate


400


directly below the patterned silicon nitride layer


408


will ultimately become a contact area


409


to the substrate


400


when the nitride layer


408


is removed prior to metallization.




Oxidation for Masked Silicon Etching




Referring to

FIG. 28

, the silicon oxide layer


402


is made thicker on the ejection side


403


of the substrate


400


by subjecting the silicon substrate


400


to elevated temperature in an oxidizing ambient. The silicon oxide layer


404


is also made thicker on the separation side


405


of the substrate


400


at the same time by the same method. For example, the oxidizing ambient may be an ultra-pure steam produced by oxidation of hydrogen for a silicon oxide thickness greater than approximately several hundred to several thousand nanometers, or pure oxygen for a silicon oxide thickness of approximately several hundred nanometers or less. In the preferred embodiment, the silicon oxide layers


402


,


404


are increased in thickness to 150-200 nm. The layers of silicon oxide


402


,


404


provide electrical isolation and also serve as masks for subsequent selective etching of certain areas of the silicon substrate


400


. As a result of the oxidation of a small amount of the silicon nitride layer


408


on the ejection side


403


of the substrate


400


, a thin silicon oxide layer


418


is formed on the silicon nitride layer


408


.




Separation Surface Processing: Alignment to Ejection Surface




As shown in the cross-sectional view in

FIG. 29

(shown inverted from FIG.


28


), a film of positive-working photoresist


420


is deposited on the silicon oxide layer


404


on the separation side


405


of the substrate


400


. Patterns on the separation side


405


are aligned to those previously formed on the ejection side


403


of the substrate


400


. Because silicon and its oxide are inherently relatively transparent to light in the infrared wavelength range of the electromagnetic spectrum, i.e., approximately 700-1000 nm, the extant pattern on the ejection side


403


can be distinguished with sufficient clarity by illuminating the substrate


400


from the patterned ejection side


403


with infrared light. Thus, the photolithographic mask for the separation side


405


can be aligned within required tolerances.




After alignment, certain areas of the photoresist


420


corresponding to alignment keys are selectively exposed through the separation-side lithographic mask by an optical lithographic exposure tool. As shown in the plan and cross-sectional views, respectively, of

FIGS. 30A and 30B

, the photoresist


420


is then developed to remove the exposed areas of the photoresist


422


such that an alignment key pattern is open to the underlying silicon oxide layer


404


while the unexposed areas remain protected by photoresist


420


. The exposed area


424


of the silicon oxide layer


404


is then etched by a fluorine-based plasma with a high degree of anisotropy and selectivity to the protective photoresist


420


until the silicon substrate


400


is reached. The remaining photoresist


420


is then removed in an oxygen plasma or in an actively oxidizing chemical bath such as sulfuric acid (H


2


SO


4


) activated with hydrogen peroxide (H


2


O


2


).




Separation Surface Processing: Latent Mask Definition




A latent mask for eventual use in fabricating separation posts and channels is now defined. As shown in the cross-sectional view of

FIG. 31

, a film of positive-working photoresist


426


is deposited on the silicon oxide layer


404


on the separation surface


405


of the substrate


400


. After alignment, certain areas of the photoresist film


426


corresponding to a reservoir, separation channel separation posts, and separation channel terminus that will be subsequently etched are selectively exposed through a lithographic mask by an optical lithographic exposure tool.




Referring to the plan and cross-sectional views, respectively, of

FIGS. 32A and 32B

, after development of the photoresist


426


the exposed areas


425


,


427


,


428


of the photoresist corresponding to the reservoir, separation channel, and separation channel terminus, respectively, are removed and open to the underlying silicon oxide layer


404


, while the unexposed areas remain protected by photoresist


426


. The protected areas


429


of the silicon oxide layer


404


correspond to the pattern of separation posts. The exposed areas


430


,


431


,


433


of the silicon oxide layer


404


corresponding to the reservoir, separation channel and separation channel terminus, respectively, are then etched by a fluorine-based plasma with a high degree of anisotropy and selectivity to the protective photoresist


426


until the silicon substrate


400


is reached. The remaining photoresist


426


is then removed in an oxygen plasma or in an actively oxidizing chemical bath such as sulfuric acid (H


2


SO


4


) activated with hydrogen peroxide (H


2


O


2


). This concludes the definition of the latent channel/post mask.




Separation Surface Processing: Reservoir/Nozzle Channel




As shown in the cross-sectional view of

FIG. 33

, a film of positive-working photoresist


432


is deposited on the separation side


405


of the substrate


400


. The photoresist film


432


uniformly and continuously covers both areas


430


that are open through the silicon oxide layer


404


to the silicon substrate


400


as well as remaining areas of the silicon oxide layer


404


. Areas of the photoresist film


432


corresponding to a fluid reservoir and nozzle channel that will subsequently be etched are selectively exposed through a photolithographic mask by an optical lithographic exposure tool. Referring to

FIGS. 34A and 34B

, we see a plan and cross-sectional view, respectively, of the LC/ESI device


100


(

FIGS. 25A-25C

) after processing to form fluid reservoirs and partial through-substrate nozzle channels. The photoresist


432


is developed to remove the exposed areas of the photoresist such that the reservoir area


434


and the nozzle channel area


436


are open to the underlying silicon substrate


400


while the unexposed areas remain protected by photoresist


432


. The open areas


434


,


436


are open to the silicon substrate


400


rather than the silicon oxide layer


404


in this preferred embodiment because equal or larger areas


430


were opened through the silicon oxide layer


404


when the channel/post latent mask was defined.




As shown in the cross-sectional view of

FIG. 35

, the remaining photoresist


432


provides masking during a subsequent fluorine-based silicon etch to vertically etch certain patterns into the separation side


405


of the silicon substrate


400


. The fluorine-based silicon etch creates a reservoir


438


and a separation-side portion


440


of a nozzle channel


442


in the silicon substrate


400


. The remaining photoresist


432


is then removed in an oxygen plasma or in an actively oxidizing chemical bath such as sulfuric acid (H


2


SO


4


) activated with hydrogen peroxide (H


2


O


2


).




Ejection Surface Processing: Nozzle, Nozzle Channel, Introduction Channel





FIG. 36

(shown inverted from

FIG. 35

) shows a cross-sectional view of the LC/ESI device


100


(

FIGS. 25A-25C

) prior to nozzle formation using the simultaneous multi-level etching (SMILE) aspect of the present invention. A film of positive-working photoresist


444


is deposited on the ejection side


403


of the substrate


400


. After alignment, areas of the photoresist film


444


corresponding to a nozzle orifice and an introduction orifice that will be subsequently etched are selectively exposed through a photolithographic mask by an optical lithographic exposure tool.




As shown in the plan and cross-sectional views, respectively, of

FIGS. 37A and 37B

, the photoresist


444


is developed to remove the exposed areas of the photoresist such that an introduction orifice area


446


and a nozzle orifice area


448


are open to the underlying silicon oxide layer


402


while the unexposed areas remain protected by photoresist


444


. An exposed introduction orifice area


450


and an exposed nozzle orifice area


452


of the silicon oxide layer


402


are then etched by a fluorine-based plasma with a high degree of anisotropy and selectivity to the protective photoresist


444


until the silicon substrate


400


is reached. The remaining photoresist


444


is then removed in an oxygen plasma or in an actively oxidizing chemical bath such as sulfuric acid (H


2


SO


4


) activated with hydrogen peroxide (H


2


O


2


).




Referring now to

FIG. 38

, a new film of positive-working photoresist


454


is deposited over the ejection side


403


of the substrate


400


. After alignment, certain areas of the photoresist film


454


corresponding to an introduction orifice, an introduction channel, a nozzle orifice, a nozzle channel, a nozzle, and a recessed region surrounding and defining the nozzle that will be subsequently etched are selectively exposed through a photolithographic mask by an optical lithographic exposure tool.




As shown in the plan and cross-sectional views, respectively, of

FIGS. 39A and 39B

, the photoresist


454


is developed to remove the exposed areas of the photoresist such that an exposed area


456


of the photoresist


454


corresponding to an introduction orifice


457


and an exposed area


458


of the photoresist


454


corresponding to a nozzle orifice


459


are open to the silicon substrate


400


. The exposed area


460


of the photoresist


454


corresponding to a recessed region


474


(

FIG. 41

) is open to the underlying silicon oxide layer


402


, while the unexposed areas remain protected by photoresist


454


.




Referring to the cross-sectional view of

FIG. 40

, exposed areas


462


,


464


of the silicon substrate


400


corresponding to the introduction orifice


457


and the nozzle orifice


459


, respectively, are vertically etched into the silicon by a fluorine-based plasma with a high degree of anisotropy and selectivity to the protective photoresist


454


until a desired depth is reached. The remaining photoresist mask


454


is then used to protect unexposed areas while a fluorine-based oxide etch of an exposed silicon oxide area


466


is performed with a high degree of anisotropy and selectivity to the protective photoresist


454


until the silicon substrate


400


is reached.




As shown in the cross-sectional view of

FIG. 41

, the remaining photoresist


454


and oxide layer


402


provide masking during a subsequent fluorine-based silicon etch to vertically etch certain patterns into the ejection side


403


of the silicon substrate


400


. The fluorine-based silicon etch completes an introduction channel


468


and a nozzle channel


442


through the silicon substrate


400


by forming an ejection-side portion


470


of the nozzle channel


442


aligned with and reaching to a separation-side portion


440


of the nozzle channel


442


previously formed. The silicon etch also creates an ejection nozzle


472


, a recessed region


474


exterior to the nozzle


472


, and a grid-plane region


476


exterior to both the nozzle


472


and the recessed region


474


on the ejection side


403


of the substrate


400


. The grid-plane region


476


is preferably co-planar with the tip of the nozzle


472


so as to physically protect the nozzle


472


from casual abrasion, stress fracture in handling and/or accidental breakage. The remaining photoresist


454


is then removed in an oxygen plasma or in an actively oxidizing chemical bath such as sulfuric acid (H


2


SO


4


) activated with hydrogen peroxide (H


2


O


2


).




This completes the part of the fabrication sequence corresponding to the SMILE aspect of the present invention. The use of the SMILE process ensures that the nozzle


472


is etched to the desired height while still ensuring that the introduction channel


468


and the nozzle channel


442


are completed.




Separation surface processing: separation channel and post formation Referring to the plan and cross-sectional views, respectively, of

FIGS. 42A and 42B

(shown inverted from FIG.


41


), certain patterns on the separation side


405


of the substrate


400


that are open to the silicon substrate


400


are now etched by a fluorine-based plasma with a high degree of anisotropy and selectivity to the latent mask previously formed in the silicon oxide layer


404


. The silicon etch creates a separation channel


478


and a separation channel terminus


480


on the separation side


405


of the silicon substrate


400


. Further, where masked by the separation post pattern


429


in the silicon oxide layer


404


, separation posts


482


are formed by the silicon etch. The etch continues until the desired separation channel depth is reached, preferably between approximately 5-20 μm and more preferably approximately 10 μm. The reservoir


438


and separation-side portion


440


of the nozzle channel


442


are simultaneously etched into the silicon substrate


400


by an additional amount equivalent to the channel/post silicon etch.




This completes the fabrication steps corresponding to the latent masking aspect of the present invention. The potentially damaging effects of intervening process steps on fragile, high-aspect-ratio silicon structures


482


are avoided by postponing the use of the latent mask


404


until the present stage. Subsequent steps will not subject the silicon structures


482


to mechanical stress.




Oxidation for Electrical Isolation and Biocompatibility




As shown in the cross-sectional view of

FIG. 43

, a layer of silicon oxide


484


is grown on all silicon surfaces of the substrate


400


by subjecting the substrate


400


to elevated temperature in an oxidizing ambient. For example, the oxidizing ambient may be an ultra-pure steam produced by oxidation of hydrogen for a silicon oxide thickness greater than approximately several hundred nanometers, or pure oxygen for a silicon oxide thickness of approximately several hundred nanometers or less. The layer of silicon oxide


484


over all silicon surfaces of the substrate electrically isolates a fluid in the introduction channel


468


, reservoir


438


, separation channel


478


, separation channel terminus


480


and nozzle channel


442


from the silicon substrate


400


and permits the application and sustenance of different electrical potentials to the fluid in those channels. In addition to electrical isolation, oxidation renders a surface relatively inactive compared to a bare silicon surface, resulting in surface passivation and enhanced biocompatibility.




Cover Substrate Processing and Bonding




The exploded perspective and cross-sectional views of

FIGS. 44A and 44B

, respectively, show the LC/ESI device


100


that generally includes the first silicon substrate


400


and a cover substrate


500


, preferably silicon. The substrate


400


defines the introduction channel


468


through the substrate


400


extending between the introduction orifice


457


on the ejection side


403


and the fluid reservoir


438


on the separation side


405


of the substrate


400


; the separation channel


478


extending between the reservoir


438


and the channel terminus


480


, and separation posts


482


along the separation channel


478


on the separation side


405


; the nozzle orifice


459


, the nozzle


472


, the recessed region


474


, and the grid-plane region


476


on the ejection side


403


; and the nozzle channel


442


extending between the nozzle orifice


459


on the ejection side


403


and the separation channel terminus


480


on the separation side


405


of substrate


400


. All aforementioned features defined on substrate


400


are formed according to the process sequence described above. The purpose of the cover substrate


500


is to provide an enclosure surface


505


for the reservoir


438


, the separation channel


478


, and the separation channel terminus


480


on the separation side


405


of the substrate.




All surfaces of the cover substrate


500


are subjected to thermal oxidation in a manner that is the same as or similar to the process described above in the processing of substrate


400


. A film or layer of silicon oxide


502


is created on a support side


503


of the substrate


500


. A film or layer of silicon oxide


504


is created on an enclosure side


505


of the substrate


500


. The cover substrate


500


is then preferably hermetically attached or bonded by any suitable method to the separation side


405


of substrate


400


for containment and isolation of fluids in the LC/ESI device


100


. Any of several methods of bonding known in the art, including anodic bonding, sodium silicate bonding, eutectic bonding, and fusion bonding can be used.




Ejection Surface Processing: Contacts and Metallization





FIGS. 45-48B

illustrate the formation of electrical contact to the substrate


400


by completion of the delayed LOCOS aspect of the present invention and metallization. As shown in the cross-sectional view of

FIG. 45

, and referring again to

FIG. 28

, an unmasked fluorine-based etch is first done to remove surface oxide


418


that has grown on the nitride contact pattern


408


as a result of the several oxidations which formed masking oxides


402


,


404


and the isolation oxide


484


(FIG.


43


). Next, a blanket (unmasked) fluorine-based etch is done until the silicon substrate


400


is reached in the contact area


409


, etching through the silicon nitride layer


408


and the underlying silicon oxide layer


402


. Since oxide is also uniformly removed from the ejection side


403


, care must be taken to halt the etch once the silicon substrate


400


is reached. The contact area


409


preferentially clears while leaving regions


476


exterior to the contact area


409


still protected by silicon oxide


402


because the nitride


408


strongly inhibited oxide growth in the contact area


409


during the aforementioned oxidations.




In alternative embodiments, as discussed above in the context of the third aspect of the present invention (delayed LOCOS), the contact areas may also be cleared by hot phosphoric acid etching of the nitride or by shadow-masked etching.





FIG. 46

shows a detailed cross-sectional view of the contact area


409


and adjacent areas in order to illustrate another advantage of the use of the delayed LOCOS aspect of the present invention. As a result of the lateral diffusion of oxidizing species under the edge of the nitride layer


408


adjacent the grid-plane region


476


during oxidation, a transitional region of silicon oxide


486


is grown, so that there is not an abrupt step from the silicon substrate


400


at the bottom of the contact area


409


to the height of the surrounding oxide layer


402


. This transitional region is referred to in the art as a “bird's beak”. The non-abrupt topography of the bird's beak provides a significant advantage in the remaining process block (metallization).




Referring to the plan and cross-sectional views of

FIGS. 47A

,


47


B, and


47


C, a conductive film


488


such as aluminum may be uniformly deposited on the ejection side


403


of the substrate


400


, including on contact sidewalls


490


and onto the contact area


409


. The bird's beak topography, as characterized by the silicon oxide transitional region


486


, ensures continuous contact sidewall


490


coverage into the contact area


409


. The slope is exaggerated in

FIG. 47B

to effectively show the required contact sidewall


490


coverage.




The conductive film


488


may be deposited by any method that does not produce a continuous film of the conductive material on sidewalls


492


of the ejection nozzle


472


or on sidewalls


494


of the recessed region


480


. Such a continuous film would electrically connect the fluid in the nozzle channel


442


to the substrate


400


so as to prevent the independent control of their respective electrical potentials. For example, the conductive film may be deposited by thermal or electron-beam evaporation of the conductive material, resulting in line-of-sight deposition on presented surfaces. Orienting the substrate


400


such that the sidewalls


492


of the ejection nozzle


472


are out of the line-of-sight of the evaporation source ensures that no conductive material is deposited as a continuous film on the sidewalls of the ejection nozzle


472


. Sputtering of conductive material in a plasma is an example of a deposition technique that would result in deposition of conductive material on all surfaces and thus is undesirable.




In an alternative embodiment, shown in exploded perspective and cross-sectional views in

FIGS. 48A and 48B

, respectively, a shadow mask


496


may be used to ensure that the conductive film


488


is not deposited on the nozzle


472


. The shadow mask


496


includes a solid, rigid substrate


497


in which a through-hole


498


has been created by any of a number of suitable means, including etching and stamping. In this alternative embodiment, the shadow mask


496


is held in alignment during the deposition of the conductive film


488


and then removed. Since no conductive film


488


deposition occurs on or near the nozzle


472


, any standard deposition technique may be used, including evaporation and sputtering.




The foregoing process is provided for two purposes: first, to provide a significantly improved process for the fabrication of integrated LC/ESI devices; and second, to illustrate the application of the three fundamental aspects disclosed hereinabove. A practitioner skilled in the art will recognize that (a) any or all of the aspects may be incorporated without altering the essential functionality of the device, and that (b) any or all of the inventions may be applied to other devices having similar or dissimilar functionality. The three fundamental aspects are mutually compatible and act individually and in concert to significantly enhance the manufacturability of the LC/ESI device. In alternative embodiments of this aspect of the present invention, any two or only one of the three aspects may be incorporated in the integrated process for fabricating an LC/ESI device. The essential outcome from incorporation of the fundamental aspects is a significant improvement in manufacturing yield, and in the case of the SMILE aspect, significant extension of permissible design geometries.




Improved Electrospray Ionization (ESI) Device Fabrication Procedure




The fifth aspect of the present invention, the fabrication of an ESI device, is explained with reference to

FIGS. 49-69B

. A process to fabricate an ESI device is shown in block form in FIG.


49


. It will be apparent to a skilled practitioner of the art that subtle changes may be made in the detailed process without materially affecting the function and form of the resulting device. As one example, the insertion or deletion of a wafer cleaning step may have a measurable impact on manufacturing yield, but will have no influence on the form, appearance, or function of a successfully yielding device.




The block process shown in

FIG. 49

incorporates two of the fundamental aspects of the present invention, simultaneous multi-level etching (SMILE) and delayed LOCOS, to significantly improve fabrication reliability and manufacturing yield. The outcome of this particular process sequence is an ESI device


200


(

FIGS. 50A-50B

) in which a silicon substrate


600


defines a nozzle channel


630


between a nozzle


656


on an ejection surface


603


and an injection orifice


626


on an injection surface


605


such that the electrospray generated by the electrospray device


200


is generally approximately perpendicular to the ejection surface


603


. In the preferred embodiment of the process in the present invention, the device produced defines a nozzle


656


with an inner and an outer diameter delineated by an annular region


658


recessed from the ejection surface


603


and extending radially from the outer diameter. The tip of the nozzle


656


is co-planar with the ejection surface


603


. All surfaces of the ESI device


200


preferably have a layer of silicon oxide


662


to electrically isolate a fluid sample from the substrate


600


and to provide for biocompatibility.




Two fundamental aspects of the present invention, SMILE and delayed LOCOS, are incorporated in the integrated fabrication sequence in the manner shown in FIG.


49


. After any preparatory processing, the nitride deposition and patterning steps for the delayed LOCOS process are performed as shown at


210


, preferably on the injection surface. Next the injection orifice is patterned on the injection surface, followed by a deep etch through the oxide film and into the silicon substrate as shown at


220


. Processing then continues on the ejection surface according to the SMILE process to form the nozzle, complete the nozzle channel, and form the recessed region as shown at


230


. Finally, the delayed LOCOS process is completed by opening the required contact hole on the injection surface, shown at


240


, followed by metallization, shown at


250


.




Injection Surface Processing: Contact Pattern Definition (Delayed LOCOS)





FIGS. 51A and 51B

illustrate the initial processing steps for the ejection side of the first substrate in fabricating an ESI device


200


(FIGS.


50


A-


50


B). A double-side-polished silicon wafer substrate


600


is subjected to an elevated temperature in an oxidizing ambient to grow a layer or film of silicon oxide


602


on an ejection side


603


and a layer or film of silicon oxide


604


on an injection side


605


of the substrate


600


. Each of the resulting silicon oxide layers


602


,


604


has a thickness of approximately 10-20 nm. The silicon oxide layer


604


provides some protection to the surface of the silicon substrate


600


at a silicon/silicon oxide interface


601


.




A high-dose implantation is made through the silicon oxide layer


604


to form an implanted region


606


to ensure a low-resistance electrical connection between an electrode that will be formed at a later stage of the process and the substrate


600


. If the starting substrate


600


is acceptor-doped (i.e., p-type) the high-dose implantation is done with a p-type species such as boron, resulting in a p+ implanted region


606


. If the starting substrate


600


is donor-doped (i.e., n-type) the high-dose implantation is done with an n-type species such as arsenic or phosphorus, resulting in an n+ implanted region


606


.




A layer or film of silicon nitride


608


is deposited on the silicon oxide layer


604


on the injection side


605


of the substrate


600


. Deposition of the silicon nitride layer


608


is done in the preferred embodiment by low-pressure chemical vapor deposition (LPCVD), which also deposits a layer of silicon nitride


610


on the ejection side


603


of the substrate


600


. Each of the resulting silicon nitride layers


608


,


610


has a thickness of approximately 150-200 nm. Deposition of the silicon nitride layer


608


may alternatively be done by plasma-enhanced chemical vapor deposition (PECVD).




In an alternative embodiment shown in the cross-sectional view of

FIG. 51C

, the silicon oxide layer


604


is removed after the high-dose implantation, the silicon oxide layer


604


having presumptively been damaged by the implantation. Removal is preferably accomplished by immersion in hydrofluoric acid (HF) or a buffered solution of HF. Silicon oxide layer


602


is simultaneously removed. After removal, new silicon oxide layers


602


′,


604


′ are then re-grown to a thickness of 10-20 nm by subjecting the substrate


600


to an elevated temperature in an oxidizing ambient.




Referring back to

FIGS. 51A and 51B

, a film of positive-working photoresist


612


is deposited on the silicon nitride layer


608


on the injection side


605


of the substrate


600


. All areas of the photoresist


612


, exclusive of a contact area that will be protected by silicon nitride until ultimately being opened to form a contact to the substrate


600


, are selectively exposed through a mask by an optical lithographic exposure tool. As shown in the plan and cross-sectional views, respectively, of

FIGS. 52A and 52B

, after development of the photoresist


612


an exposed area


614


of the photoresist is removed and open to the underlying silicon nitride layer


608


while the unexposed areas remain protected by photoresist


612


. An exposed area


616


of the silicon nitride layer


608


is then etched by a fluorine-based plasma with a high degree of anisotropy and selectivity to the protective photoresist


612


until the silicon oxide layer


604


is reached. Next, the entire layer of silicon nitride


610


on the ejection side


603


of the substrate


600


is etched by a fluorine-based plasma until the silicon oxide layer


602


is reached. Any remaining photoresist


612


on the injection side


605


of the substrate


600


is then removed in an oxygen plasma or in an actively oxidizing chemical bath such as sulfuric acid (H


2


SO


4


) activated with hydrogen peroxide (H


2


O


2


).




This completes the first set of process steps for the delayed LOCOS aspect of the present invention. The area of the silicon substrate


600


directly below the patterned silicon nitride layer


608


will ultimately become the contact area


609


to the substrate


600


when the nitride layer


608


is removed prior to metallization.




Oxidation for Masked Silicon Etching




Referring to

FIG. 53

, the silicon oxide layer


604


is made thicker on the injection side


605


of the substrate


600


by subjecting the silicon substrate


600


to elevated temperature in an oxidizing ambient. The silicon oxide layer


602


is also made thicker on the ejection side


603


of the substrate


600


at the same time by the same means. For example, the oxidizing ambient may be an ultra-pure steam produced by oxidation of hydrogen for a silicon oxide thickness greater than approximately several hundred to several thousand nanometers, or pure oxygen for a silicon oxide thickness of approximately several hundred nanometers or less. In the preferred embodiment, the silicon oxide layers


602


,


604


are increased in thickness to 150-200 nm. The layers of silicon oxide


602


,


604


provide electrical isolation and also serve as masks for subsequent selective etching of certain areas of the silicon substrate


600


. As a result of the oxidation of a small amount of the silicon nitride layer


608


on the injection side


605


of the substrate


600


, a thin silicon oxide layer


618


is formed on the silicon nitride layer


608


.




Injection Surface Processing: Injection Orifice Definition




As shown in the cross-sectional view of

FIG. 54

, a film of positive-working photoresist


620


is deposited on the silicon oxide layer


604


on the injection side


605


of the substrate


600


. After alignment, a certain area of the photoresist film


620


corresponding to an injection orifice that will be subsequently etched is selectively exposed through a lithographic mask by an optical lithographic exposure tool.




Referring to the plan and cross-sectional views, respectively, of

FIGS. 55A and 55B

, after development of the photoresist


620


the exposed area


622


of the photoresist corresponding to the injection orifice is removed and open to the underlying silicon oxide layer


604


while the unexposed areas remain protected by photoresist


620


. The exposed area


624


of the silicon oxide layer


604


corresponding to the injection orifice is then etched by a fluorine-based plasma with a high degree of anisotropy and selectivity to the protective photoresist


620


until the silicon substrate


600


is reached.




The remaining photoresist


620


and unexposed areas of the silicon oxide layer


604


provide masking during a subsequent fluorine-based silicon etch to vertically etch certain patterns into the injection side


605


of the silicon substrate


600


. The fluorine-based silicon etch creates an injection orifice


626


and an injection-side portion


628


of a nozzle channel


630


in the silicon substrate


600


. The remaining photoresist


620


is then removed in an oxygen plasma or in an actively oxidizing chemical bath such as sulfuric acid (H


2


SO


4


) activated with hydrogen peroxide (H


2


O


2


).




Ejection Surface Processing: Nozzle, Nozzle Channel, Recessed Region





FIG. 56

(shown inverted from

FIGS. 55A-55B

) shows a cross-sectional view of the ESI device


200


prior to nozzle formation using the SMILE aspect of the present invention. A film of positive-working photoresist


632


is deposited on the silicon oxide layer


602


on the ejection side


603


of the substrate


600


. Patterns on the ejection side


603


are aligned to those previously formed on the injection side


605


of the substrate


600


. Because silicon and its oxide are inherently relatively transparent to light in the infrared wavelength range of the electromagnetic spectrum, i.e., approximately 700-1000 nm, the extant pattern on the injection side


605


can be distinguished with sufficient clarity by illuminating the substrate


600


from the patterned injection side


605


with infrared light. Thus, the photolithographic mask for the ejection side


603


can be aligned within required tolerances. After alignment, a certain area of the photoresist film


632


corresponding to a nozzle orifice that will be subsequently etched is selectively exposed through a photolithographic mask by an optical lithographic exposure tool.




As shown in the plan and cross-sectional view, respectively, of

FIGS. 57A and 57B

, the photoresist


632


is developed to remove the exposed areas of the photoresist such that the nozzle orifice area


634


is open to the underlying silicon oxide layer


602


while the unexposed areas remain protected by photoresist


632


. The exposed nozzle orifice area


636


of the silicon oxide layer


602


are then etched by a fluorine-based plasma with a high degree of anisotropy and selectivity to the protective photoresist


632


until the silicon substrate


600


is reached. The remaining photoresist


632


is then removed in an oxygen plasma or in an actively oxidizing chemical bath such as sulfuric acid (H


2


SO


4


) activated with hydrogen peroxide (H


2


O


2


).




Referring now to

FIG. 58

, a new film of positive-working photoresist


638


is deposited over the ejection side


603


of the substrate


600


. After alignment, certain areas of the photoresist film


638


corresponding to a nozzle orifice, a nozzle channel, a nozzle, and a recessed region surrounding and defining the nozzle that will be subsequently etched are selectively exposed through a photolithographic mask by an optical lithographic exposure tool.




As shown in the plan and cross-sectional views, respectively, of

FIGS. 59A and 59B

, the photoresist


638


is developed to remove the exposed areas of the photoresist such that the exposed area


640


of the photoresist


638


corresponding to a nozzle orifice


642


are open to the silicon substrate


600


. An exposed area


644


of the photoresist


638


corresponding to a recessed region is open to the underlying silicon oxide layer


602


, while the unexposed areas remain protected by photoresist


638


. Referring to the cross-sectional view of

FIG. 60

, an exposed area


646


of the silicon substrate


600


corresponding to the nozzle orifice


642


is vertically etched into the silicon by a fluorine-based plasma with a high degree of anisotropy and selectivity to the protective photoresist


638


until a desired depth is reached. The remaining photoresist mask


638


is then used to protect unexposed areas while a fluorine-based oxide etch of the exposed silicon oxide area


650


is performed with a high degree of anisotropy and selectivity to the protective photoresist


638


until the silicon substrate


600


is reached.




As shown in the cross-sectional view of

FIG. 61

, the remaining photoresist


638


and oxide layer


602


provide masking during a subsequent fluorine-based silicon etch to vertically etch certain patterns into the ejection side


603


of the silicon substrate


600


. The fluorine-based silicon etch completes a nozzle channel


630


through the silicon substrate


600


by forming an ejection-side portion


654


of the nozzle channel


630


aligned with and reaching to an injection-side portion


628


of the nozzle channel


630


previously formed. The silicon etch also creates an ejection nozzle


656


, a recessed region


658


exterior to the nozzle


656


, and a grid-plane region


660


exterior to the nozzle


656


and the recessed region


658


on the ejection side


603


of the substrate


600


. The grid-plane region


660


is preferably co-planar with the tip of the nozzle


656


so as to physically protect the nozzle


656


from casual abrasion, stress fracture in handling and/or accidental breakage. The remaining photoresist


638


is then removed in an oxygen plasma or in an actively oxidizing chemical bath such as sulfuric acid (H


2


SO


4


) activated with hydrogen peroxide (H


2


O


2


).




This completes the part of the fabrication sequence corresponding to the SMILE aspect of the present invention. The use of the SMILE process ensures that the nozzle


656


is etched to the desired height while still ensuring that the nozzle channel


630


is completed.




Oxidation for Electrical Isolation and Biocompatibility




As shown in the cross-sectional view of

FIG. 62

, a layer of silicon oxide


662


is grown on all silicon surfaces of the substrate


600


by subjecting the substrate


600


to elevated temperature in an oxidizing ambient. For example, the oxidizing ambient may be an ultra-pure steam produced by oxidation of hydrogen for a silicon oxide thickness greater than approximately several hundred nanometers or pure oxygen for a silicon oxide thickness of approximately several hundred nanometers or less. The layer of silicon oxide


662


over all silicon surfaces of the substrate electrically isolates a fluid in the nozzle channel


630


from the silicon substrate


600


and permits the application and sustenance of different electrical potentials to the fluid in the channel. In addition to electrical isolation, oxidation renders a surface relatively inactive compared to a bare silicon surface, resulting in surface passivation and enhanced biocompatibility.




Injection Surface Processing: Contacts and Metallization





FIGS. 63-67B

(shown inverted from

FIG. 62

) illustrate the formation of electrical contact to the substrate


600


by completion of the delayed LOCOS aspect of the present invention and metallization. As shown in the cross-sectional view of

FIG. 63

, and referring back to

FIG. 53

, an unmasked fluorine-based etch is first done to remove surface oxide


618


that has grown on the nitride contact pattern


608


as a result of the several oxidations that formed masking oxides


602


,


604


and the isolation oxide


662


. Next, a blanket (unmasked) fluorine-based etch is done until the silicon substrate


600


is reached in the contact area


609


, etching through the silicon nitride layer


608


and the underlying silicon oxide layer


604


. Since oxide is uniformly removed from the injection side


605


, care must be taken to halt the etch once the silicon substrate


600


is reached. The contact area


609


preferentially clears while leaving grid-plane regions


661


exterior to the contact area


609


still protected by silicon oxide


604


because the nitride


608


strongly inhibited oxide growth in the contact area


609


during the aforementioned oxidations.




In alternative embodiments, as discussed above in the context of the third aspect of the present invention (delayed LOCOS), the contact areas may also be cleared by hot phosphoric acid etching of the nitride or by shadow-masked etching.





FIG. 64

shows a detailed cross-sectional view of the contact area


609


and adjacent areas in order to illustrate another advantage of the use of the delayed LOCOS aspect of the present invention. As a result of the lateral diffusion of oxidizing species under the edge of the nitride layer


608


adjacent the grid-plane region


661


during oxidation, a transitional region of silicon oxide


664


is grown, so that there is not an abrupt step from the silicon substrate


600


at the bottom of the contact area


609


to the height of the surrounding oxide layer


604


. This transitional region is referred to in the art as a “bird's beak”. The non-abrupt topography of the bird's beak provides a significant advantage in the remaining process block (metallization).




Referring to the plan and cross-sectional views of

FIGS. 65A and 65B

, a conductive film


666


such as aluminum may be uniformly deposited on the injection side


605


of the substrate


600


, including on contact sidewalls


668


and onto the contact area


609


. The bird's beak topography, as characterized by the silicon oxide transitional region


664


, ensures continuous contact sidewall


668


coverage into the contact area


609


. The slope is exaggerated in

FIG. 65B

to effectively show the required contact sidewall


668


coverage. The conductive film


666


may be deposited by any standard deposition technique, including evaporation and sputtering, that produces a continuous film of the conductive material on the contact sidewalls


668


.




As shown in the cross-sectional view of

FIG. 66

, a film of positive-working photoresist


670


is deposited over the injection side


605


of the substrate


600


. After alignment, certain areas of the photoresist film


670


corresponding to an injection interface area that will be subsequently etched are selectively exposed through a photolithographic mask by an optical lithographic exposure tool.




Referring to the plan and cross-sectional views, respectively, of

FIGS. 67A and 67B

, the photoresist


670


is developed to remove the exposed areas of the photoresist


670


such that an exposed area


672


corresponding to an injection interface is open to the underlying conductive layer


666


while the unexposed areas remain protected by photoresist


670


. An exposed area


674


of the conductive layer


666


corresponding to an injection interface is then etched by any standard thin-film etching technique, including wet-chemical-based as well as plasma-based reactive-ion etching. In the preferred embodiment, the conductive layer is aluminum. In this embodiment, wet etching of the aluminum film may be done in a solution of phosphoric, nitric, and acetic acids. Reactive-ion etching of the aluminum film may be done with chlorine-based plasma chemistry. The etch, whether wet or dry, must be selective to the underlying silicon oxide layer


604


, or is terminated upon reaching the silicon oxide layer


604


as determined by the etch rate and time. The etch creates an injection interface area


676


on the injection side


605


of the substrate


600


. The purpose of the injection interface area


676


is to provide a portion of the injection side


605


for establishing an interface between a fluid delivery system and the ESI device


200


.





FIG. 68

shows a perspective view of a fluid delivery system


678


and an ESI device


200


. The fluid delivery system


678


shown in

FIG. 68

may be, for example, a capillary or a micropipette tip. The conductive layer


666


must be removed from the injection interface area


676


according to the foregoing procedure so as to prevent electrical contact between a fluid delivered by the fluid delivery system


678


to the injection orifice


626


and the conductive layer


666


, which is electrically connected to the substrate


600


in the contact area


609


. The remaining photoresist


670


is removed in a plasma or in a solvent bath such as acetone.




In an alternative method, shown in exploded perspective and cross-sectional views in

FIGS. 69A and 69B

, respectively, a shadow mask


680


is used to ensure that the conductive film


666


is not deposited adjacent the injection orifice


626


. The shadow mask


680


is a solid, rigid substrate


682


in which a through-hole


684


has been created by any of a number of suitable means, including etching and stamping. In this alternative method, the shadow mask


680


is held in alignment during the deposition of the conductive film


666


, then removed. Any standard deposition technique may be used, including evaporation and sputtering. Inasmuch as the conductive layer


666


is deposited as a pattern in this alternative embodiment, the lithographic patterning and etching steps as shown in

FIGS. 66-67B

are not required.




The foregoing process is provided for two purposes: first, to provide a significantly improved process for the fabrication of ESI devices; and second, to illustrate the application of the two fundamental aspects disclosed hereinabove. A practitioner skilled in the art will recognize that (a) any or all of the aspects may be incorporated without altering the essential functionality of the device, and that (b) any or all of the aspects may be applied to other devices having similar or dissimilar functionality. The two fundamental aspects are mutually compatible and act individually and in concert to significantly enhance the manufacturability of the ESI device. In an alternative embodiment of this aspect of the present invention, the contacts are formed on the ejection surface rather than the injection surface. In further alternative embodiments, only one of the two aspects is incorporated in the integrated process for fabricating an ESI device. The essential outcome from incorporation of the fundamental aspects is a significant improvement in manufacturing yield, and in the case of the SMILE aspect, significant extension of permissible design geometries.




Improved Liquid Chromatography (LC) Device Fabrication Procedure




The sixth aspect of the present invention, the fabrication of an LC device, is explained with reference to

FIGS. 70-89B

. A process to fabricate an LC device is shown in block form in FIG.


70


. It will be apparent to a skilled practitioner of the art that subtle changes may be made in the detailed process without materially affecting the function and form of the resulting device. As one example, the insertion or deletion of a wafer cleaning step may have a measurable impact on manufacturing yield, but will have no influence on the form, appearance, or function of a successfully yielding device. The block process shown incorporates two of the fundamental aspects of the present invention, latent masking and delayed LOCOS, to significantly improve fabrication reliability and manufacturing yield. The outcome of this particular process sequence is an LC device


300


(

FIGS. 71A-71C

) in which a silicon substrate


800


defines an introduction channel


834


between an entrance orifice


830


and a reservoir


864


, a separation channel


868


between the reservoir


864


and a separation channel terminus


870


, and an exit channel


840


between the separation channel terminus


870


and an exit orifice


836


; the LC device


300


further including a second substrate


900


attached to the separation surface


805


of the first substrate


800


so as to enclose the reservoir


864


and separation channel


868


. The separation channel


868


is populated with separation posts


872


extending from a side wall of the separation channel


868


perpendicular to the fluid flow through the separation channel


868


. Preferably, the separation posts


872


do not extend beyond and are preferably co-planar with the separation surface


805


of the substrate


800


. All surfaces of the LC device


300


preferably have a layer of silicon oxide


874


to electrically isolate a fluid sample from the substrate


800


and to provide for biocompatibility.




Two fundamental aspects of the present invention, latent masking and delayed LOCOS, are incorporated in the integrated fabrication sequence in the manner shown in FIG.


70


. After any preparatory processing, the nitride deposition and patterning steps for the delayed LOCOS process are performed on the introduction surface as shown at


310


. Next, the introduction and exit channels are defined and etched on the introduction side of the substrate as shown at


320


. The separation channel and separation posts are then patterned on the separation surface according to the latent masking process as shown at


330


. After patterning and etching of a fluid reservoir and portions of the introduction and exit channels on the separation side of the substrate, as shown at


340


, the delayed channel/post etch is performed using the latent mask as shown at


350


. The substrate is then attached or bonded to the second substrate as shown at


360


. Finally, the delayed LOCOS process is completed by opening the required contact hole, as shown at


370


, followed by metallization as shown at


380


.




Introduction Surface Processing: Contact Pattern Definition (Delayed LOCOS)





FIGS. 72A and 72B

illustrate the initial processing steps for the introduction side of the first substrate in fabricating an LC device


300


(FIGS.


71


A-


71


C). A double-side-polished silicon wafer substrate


800


is subjected to an elevated temperature in an oxidizing ambient to grow a layer or film of silicon oxide


802


on an introduction side


803


and a layer or film of silicon oxide


804


on a separation side


805


of the substrate


800


. Each of the resulting silicon oxide layers


802


,


804


has a thickness of approximately


10


-


20


nm. The silicon oxide layer


802


provides some protection to the surface of the silicon substrate


800


at a silicon/silicon oxide interface


801


.




A high-dose implantation is made through the silicon oxide layer


802


to form an implanted region


806


to ensure a low-resistance electrical connection between an electrode that will be formed at a later stage of the process and the substrate


800


. If the starting substrate


800


is acceptor-doped (i.e., p-type) the high-dose implantation is done with a p-type species such as boron, resulting in a p+ implanted region


806


. If the starting substrate


800


is donor-doped (i.e., n-type) the high-dose implantation is done with an n-type species such as arsenic or phosphorus, resulting in an n+ implanted region


806


.




A layer or film of silicon nitride


808


is deposited on the silicon oxide layer


802


on the introduction side


803


of the substrate


800


. Deposition of the silicon nitride layer


808


is done in the preferred embodiment by low-pressure chemical vapor deposition (LPCVD), which also deposits a layer of silicon nitride


810


on the separation side


805


of the substrate


800


. Each of the resulting silicon nitride layers


808


,


810


has a thickness of approximately 150-200 nm. Deposition of the silicon nitride layer


808


may alternatively be done by plasma-enhanced chemical vapor deposition (PECVD).




In an alternative method shown in the cross-sectional view of

FIG. 72C

, the silicon oxide layer


802


is removed after the high-dose implantation, the silicon oxide layer


802


having presumptively been damaged by the implantation. Removal is preferably accomplished by immersion in hydrofluoric acid (HF) or a buffered solution of HF. Silicon oxide layer


804


would be simultaneously removed. After removal, silicon oxide layers


802


′,


804


′ are then re-grown to a thickness of 10-20 nm by subjecting the substrate


800


to an elevated temperature in an oxidizing ambient.




Referring back to

FIGS. 72A and 72B

, a film of positive-working photoresist


812


is deposited on the silicon nitride layer


808


on the introduction side


803


of the substrate


800


. All areas of the photoresist


812


, exclusive of a contact area that will be protected by silicon nitride until ultimately being opened to form a contact to the substrate


800


, are selectively exposed through a mask by an optical lithographic exposure tool. As shown in the plan and cross-sectional views, respectively, of

FIGS. 73A and 73B

, after development of the photoresist


812


the exposed area


814


of the photoresist is removed and open to the underlying silicon nitride layer


808


, while the unexposed areas remain protected by photoresist


812


. An exposed area


816


of the silicon nitride layer


808


is then etched by a fluorine-based plasma with a high degree of anisotropy and selectivity to the protective photoresist


812


until the silicon oxide layer


802


is reached. Next, the entire layer of silicon nitride


810


on the separation side


805


of the substrate


800


is etched by a fluorine-based plasma until the silicon oxide layer


804


is reached. Any remaining photoresist


812


on the introduction side


803


of the substrate


800


is then removed in an oxygen plasma or in an actively oxidizing chemical bath such as sulfuric acid (H


2


SO


4


) activated with hydrogen peroxide (H


2


O


2


).




This completes the first set of process steps for the delayed LOCOS aspect of the present invention. The area of the silicon substrate


800


directly below the patterned silicon nitride layer


808


will ultimately become the contact area


809


to the substrate


800


when the nitride layer


808


is removed prior to metallization.




Oxidation for Masked Silicon Etching




Referring to

FIG. 74

, the silicon oxide layer


802


is made thicker on the introduction side


803


of the substrate


800


by subjecting the silicon substrate


800


to elevated temperature in an oxidizing ambient. The silicon oxide layer


804


is also made thicker on the separation side


805


of the substrate


800


at the same time by the same means. For example, the oxidizing ambient may be an ultra-pure steam produced by oxidation of hydrogen for a silicon oxide thickness greater than approximately several hundred to several thousand nanometers, or pure oxygen for a silicon oxide thickness of approximately several hundred nanometers or less. In the preferred embodiment, the silicon oxide layers


802


,


804


are increased in thickness to 150-200 nm. The layers of silicon oxide


802


,


804


provide electrical isolation and also serve as masks for subsequent selective etching of certain areas of the silicon substrate


800


. As a result of the oxidation of a small amount of the silicon nitride layer


808


on the introduction side


803


of the substrate


800


, a thin silicon oxide layer


818


is formed on the silicon nitride layer


808


.




As shown in the cross-sectional view of

FIG. 75

, a film of positive-working photoresist


820


is deposited on the silicon oxide layer


802


on the introduction side


803


of the substrate


800


. After alignment, certain areas of the photoresist film


820


corresponding to an introduction orifice and an exit orifice that will be subsequently etched are selectively exposed through a lithographic mask by an optical lithographic exposure tool.




Referring to the plan and cross-sectional views, respectively, of

FIGS. 76A and 76B

, after development of the photoresist


820


, an exposed area


822


of the photoresist corresponding to the introduction orifice and an exposed area


824


of the photoresist corresponding to the exit orifice are removed and open to the underlying silicon oxide layer


802


, while the unexposed areas remain protected by photoresist


820


. The exposed areas


826


,


828


of the silicon oxide layer


802


corresponding to the introduction orifice and the exit orifice, respectively, are then etched by a fluorine-based plasma with a high degree of anisotropy and selectivity to the protective photoresist


820


until the silicon substrate


800


is reached.




The remaining photoresist


820


and unexposed areas of the silicon oxide layer


802


provide masking during a subsequent fluorine-based silicon etch to vertically etch certain patterns into the introduction side


803


of the silicon substrate


800


. The fluorine-based silicon etch creates an introduction orifice


830


, an introduction channel


834


, an exit orifice


836


, and an introduction-side portion


838


of an exit channel


840


in the silicon substrate


800


. The remaining photoresist


820


is then removed in an oxygen plasma or in an actively oxidizing chemical bath such as sulfuric acid (H


2


SO


4


) activated with hydrogen peroxide (H


2


O


2


).




Separation Surface Processing: Latent Mask Definition




A latent mask for eventual use in fabricating separation posts and channels is now defined. As shown in the cross-sectional view in

FIG. 77

, a film of positive-working photoresist


842


is deposited on the silicon oxide layer


804


on the separation side


805


of the substrate


800


. Patterns on the separation side


805


are aligned to those previously formed on the introduction side


803


of the substrate


800


. Because silicon and its oxide are inherently relatively transparent to light in the infrared wavelength range of the electromagnetic spectrum, i.e., approximately 700-1000 nm, the extant pattern on the introduction side


803


can be distinguished with sufficient clarity by illuminating the substrate


800


from the patterned introduction side


803


with infrared light. Thus, the photolithographic mask for the separation side


805


can be aligned within required tolerances. After alignment, certain areas of the photoresist film


842


corresponding to a reservoir, separation channel separation posts, and separation channel terminus that will be subsequently etched are selectively exposed through a lithographic mask by an optical lithographic exposure tool.




Referring to the plan and cross-sectional views, respectively, of

FIGS. 78A and 78B

, after development of the photoresist


842


the exposed areas


844


,


846


,


848


of the photoresist corresponding to the reservoir, separation channel, and separation channel terminus, respectively, are removed and open to the underlying silicon oxide layer


804


while the unexposed areas remain protected by photoresist


842


. The protected areas


850


of the silicon oxide layer


804


correspond to the pattern of separation posts. The exposed areas


852


,


854


,


856


of the silicon oxide layer


804


corresponding to the reservoir, separation channel and separation channel terminus, respectively, are then etched by a fluorine-based plasma with a high degree of anisotropy and selectivity to the protective photoresist


842


until the silicon substrate


800


is reached. The remaining photoresist


842


is then removed in an oxygen plasma or in an actively oxidizing chemical bath such as sulfuric acid (H


2


SO


4


) activated with hydrogen peroxide (H


2


O


2


). This concludes the definition of the latent channel/post mask.




Separation Surface Processing: Reservoir and Exit Channel




As shown in the cross-sectional view of

FIG. 79

, a film of positive-working photoresist


858


is deposited on the separation side


805


of the substrate


800


. The photoresist film


858


uniformly and continuously covers areas that are open through the silicon oxide layer


804


to the silicon substrate


800


as well as remaining areas of the silicon oxide layer


804


. Areas of the photoresist film


858


corresponding to a fluid reservoir and an exit channel that will subsequently be etched are selectively exposed through a photolithographic mask by an optical lithographic exposure tool.




Referring to the plan and cross-sectional views, respectively, of

FIGS. 80A and 80B

, the photoresist


858


is developed to remove the exposed areas of the photoresist


858


such that a reservoir area


860


and an exit channel area


862


are open to the underlying silicon substrate


800


while the unexposed areas remain protected by photoresist


858


. The areas


860


,


862


are open to the silicon substrate


800


rather than to the silicon oxide layer


804


in this preferred embodiment because equal or larger areas were opened through the silicon oxide layer


804


when the patterning for the reservoir and separation channel terminus was defined in photoresist


842


.




As shown in the cross-sectional view of

FIG. 81

, the remaining photoresist


858


provides masking during a subsequent fluorine-based silicon etch to vertically etch certain patterns into the separation side


805


of the silicon substrate


800


. The fluorine-based silicon etch creates a reservoir


864


and a separation-side portion


866


of an exit channel


840


in the silicon substrate


800


. The remaining photoresist


858


is then removed in an oxygen plasma or in an actively oxidizing chemical bath such as sulfuric acid (H


2


SO


4


) activated with hydrogen peroxide (H


2


O


2


).




Separation Surface Processing: Separation Channel and Post Formation




Referring to the plan and cross-sectional views, respectively, of

FIGS. 82A and 82B

, certain patterns on the separation side


805


of the substrate


800


that are open to the silicon substrate


800


are now etched by a fluorine-based plasma with a high degree of anisotropy and selectivity to the latent mask previously formed in the silicon oxide layer


804


. The silicon etch creates a separation channel


868


and a separation channel terminus


870


on the separation side


805


of the silicon substrate


800


. Further, where masked by the separation post pattern


850


in the silicon oxide layer


804


, separation posts


872


are formed by the silicon etch. The etch continues until the desired separation channel depth is reached, preferably between approximately 5-20 μm and more preferably approximately 10 μm. The reservoir


864


and separation-side portion


866


of the exit channel


840


are simultaneously etched into the silicon substrate


800


by an additional amount equivalent to the channel/post silicon etch.




This completes the fabrication steps corresponding to the first aspect of the present invention, latent masking. The potentially damaging effects of intervening process steps on fragile, high-aspect-ratio silicon structures such as separation posts


872


are avoided by postponing the use of the latent mask


804


until the present stage. Subsequent steps will not subject the separation posts


872


to mechanical stress.




Oxidation for Electrical Isolation and Biocompatibility




As shown in the cross-sectional view of

FIG. 83

, a layer of silicon oxide


874


is grown on all silicon surfaces of the substrate


800


by subjecting the substrate


800


to elevated temperature in an oxidizing ambient. For example, the oxidizing ambient may be an ultra-pure steam produced by oxidation of hydrogen for a silicon oxide thickness greater than approximately several hundred nanometers or pure oxygen for a silicon oxide thickness of approximately several hundred nanometers or less. The layer of silicon oxide


874


over all silicon surfaces of the substrate electrically isolates a fluid in the introduction channel


834


, reservoir


864


, separation channel


868


, and separation channel terminus


870


from the silicon substrate


800


and permits applying and maintaining different electrical potentials to the fluid in those channels. In addition to electrical isolation, oxidation renders a surface relatively inactive compared to a bare silicon surface, resulting in surface passivation and enhanced biocompatibility.




Cover Substrate Processing and Bonding




The exploded perspective and cross-sectional views of

FIGS. 84A and 84B

, respectively, show an LC device


300


that generally includes a first silicon substrate


800


and a cover substrate


900


, preferably silicon. The substrate


800


defines an introduction channel


834


through the substrate


800


extending between an introduction orifice


830


on the introduction side


803


and a fluid reservoir


864


on the separation side


805


of the substrate


800


; a separation channel


868


extending between the reservoir


864


and a channel terminus


870


, and a plurality of posts


872


along the separation channel


868


on the separation side


805


; an exit orifice


836


on the introduction side


803


; and an exit channel


840


extending between the exit orifice


836


on the introduction side


803


and the separation channel terminus


870


on the separation side


805


of substrate


800


. All aforementioned features defined on substrate


800


are formed according to the process sequence described above. The purpose of the cover substrate


900


is to provide an enclosure side


905


for the reservoir


864


, the separation channel


868


, and the separation channel terminus


870


on the separation side


805


of the substrate.




All surfaces of the cover substrate


900


are subjected to thermal oxidation in a manner that is the same as or similar to the process described above in processing of substrate


800


. A film or layer of silicon oxide


902


is created on a support side


903


of the substrate


900


. A film or layer of silicon oxide


904


is created on the enclosure side


905


of the substrate


900


. The cover substrate


900


is then preferably hermetically attached or bonded by any suitable method to the separation side


805


of substrate


800


for containment and isolation of fluids in the LC device


300


. Any of several methods of bonding known in the art are suitable, including anodic bonding, sodium silicate bonding, eutectic bonding, and fusion bonding.




Introduction Surface Processing: Contacts and Metallization





FIGS. 85-89B

illustrate the formation of electrical contact to the substrate


800


by completion of the delayed LOCOS aspect of the present invention. As shown in the cross-sectional view of

FIG. 85

, and referring back to

FIG. 74

, an unmasked fluorine-based etch is first done to remove surface oxide


818


that has grown on the nitride contact pattern


808


as a result of the several oxidations that formed masking oxides


802


,


804


and the isolation oxide


874


(FIG.


83


). Next, a blanket (unmasked) fluorine-based etch is done until the silicon substrate


800


is reached in the contact area


809


, etching through the silicon nitride layer


808


and the underlying silicon oxide layer


802


. Since oxide is also uniformly removed from the introduction side


803


, care must be taken to halt the etch once the silicon substrate


800


is reached. The contact area


809


preferentially clears while leaving field regions


876


exterior to the contact area


809


still protected by silicon oxide


802


because the nitride


808


strongly inhibited oxide growth in the contact area


809


during the aforementioned oxidations.




In alternative embodiments, as discussed above in the context of the third aspect (delayed LOCOS) of the present invention, the contact areas may also be cleared by hot phosphoric acid etching of the nitride or by shadow-masked etching.





FIG. 86

shows a detailed cross-sectional view of the contact area


809


and adjacent field regions


876


in order to illustrate another advantage of the use of the delayed LOCOS aspect of the present invention. As a result of the lateral diffusion of oxidizing species under the edge of the nitride layer


808


adjacent the field region


876


during oxidation, a transitional region of silicon oxide


878


is grown, so that there is not an abrupt step from the silicon substrate


800


at the bottom of the contact area


809


to the height of the surrounding oxide layer


802


. This transitional region is referred to in the art as a “bird's beak”. The non-abrupt topography of the bird's beak provides a significant advantage in the remaining process block (metallization).




Referring to the plan and cross-sectional views of

FIGS. 87A and 87B

, respectively, a conductive film


880


such as aluminum is uniformly deposited on the introduction side


803


of the substrate


800


, including on contact sidewalls


882


and onto the


30


contact area


809


. The bird's beak topography, as characterized by the silicon oxide transitional region


878


, ensures continuous contact sidewall


882


coverage into the contact area


809


. The slope is exaggerated in

FIG. 87B

to effectively show the required contact sidewall


882


coverage. The conductive film


880


may be deposited by any standard deposition technique, including evaporation and sputtering, that produces a continuous film of the conductive material on the contact sidewalls


882


.




Referring to the plan and cross-sectional views, respectively, of

FIGS. 88A and 88B

, a film of positive-working photoresist


884


is deposited on the conductive layer


880


on the introduction side


803


of the substrate


800


. After alignment, certain areas of the photoresist film


884


that will be subsequently etched are selectively exposed through a photolithographic mask by an optical lithographic exposure tool. The photoresist


884


is then developed to remove the exposed areas


886


of the photoresist


884


such that the unexposed area of the developed photoresist


884


corresponding to a contact pad area protects the underlying conductive layer


880


while the exposed areas are removed. The exposed areas


888


of the conductive layer


880


are then etched by any standard thin-film etching technique, including wet-chemical-based as well as plasma-based reactive-ion etching. In the preferred embodiment, the conductive layer


880


is aluminum.




Wet etching of the aluminum film may be done in a solution of phosphoric, nitric, and acetic acids. Reactive-ion etching of the aluminum film may be done with chlorine-based plasma chemistry. The etch, whether wet or dry, must be selective to the underlying silicon oxide layer


802


, or be terminated upon reaching the silicon oxide layer


802


as determined by the etch rate and time. The area of the conductive layer


880


that is protected by photoresist


884


during the wet or dry etch becomes a contact pad


890


on the introduction side


803


of the substrate


800


. The purpose of the contact pad


890


is to provide a means of applying an electrical potential to the substrate


800


of the LC device


300


through the contact area


809


. The remaining photoresist


884


is removed in a plasma or in a solvent bath such as acetone.




In an alternative embodiment, shown in exploded perspective and cross-sectional views in

FIGS. 89A and 89B

, respectively, a shadow mask


892


may be used to ensure that a conductive film is deposited directly in the form of the desired contact pad


890


. The shadow mask


892


includes a solid, rigid substrate


894


in which a through-hole


896


has been created by any of a number of suitable means, including etching and stamping. In this alternative embodiment, the shadow mask


892


is held in alignment during the deposition of the conductive film, and then removed. Any standard deposition technique may be used, including evaporation and sputtering. Inasmuch as the conductive layer is deposited as a pattern in this alternative embodiment, the lithographic patterning and etching steps as shown in

FIGS. 88A and 88B

are not required.




The foregoing process is provided for two purposes: first, to provide a significantly improved process for the fabrication of LC devices; and second, to illustrate the application of the two fundamental aspects disclosed hereinabove. A practitioner skilled in the art will recognize that (a) any or all of the aspects may be incorporated without altering the essential functionality of the device, and that (b) any or all of the aspects may be applied to other devices having similar or dissimilar functionality. The two fundamental aspects are mutually compatible and act individually and in concert to significantly enhance the manufacturability of the LC device. In an alternative embodiment of this aspect of the present invention, the exit channel is defined by the second substrate, the exit channel extending between the surface of the second substrate that is attached to the first substrate and the opposite, or introduction, surface of the second substrate. In further alternative embodiments, only one of the two aspects is incorporated in the integrated process for fabricating an LC device. The essential outcome from incorporation of the fundamental aspects is a significant improvement in manufacturing yield.




Accordingly, it is to be understood that the embodiments of the invention herein described are merely illustrative of the application of the principles of the invention. Reference herein to details of the illustrated embodiments are not intended to limit the scope of the claims, which themselves recite those features regarded as essential to the invention.



Claims
  • 1. A method for fabricating an integrated liquid chromatography/electrospray ionization microelectromechanical device, comprising the steps of:a) providing a silicon substrate having an ejection surface and an opposing separation surface; b) forming first and second silicon oxide layers on said ejection and separation surfaces of said substrate, respectively; c) doping said ejection surface with a dopant of a same conductivity type as a conductivity type of said substrate; d) forming a silicon nitride film on said first silicon oxide layer; e) patterning and etching said silicon nitride film to form at least one silicon nitride contact area on said first silicon oxide layer; f) oxidizing said substrate, after step (e), to increase said first and second silicon oxide layers; g) coating a first photoresist layer on said second silicon oxide layer; h) defining a first pattern on said first photoresist layer, said first pattern including a separation channel, a separation channel terminus, and a plurality of separation posts; i) transferring said first pattern onto said second silicon oxide layer; j) removing said first photoresist layer; k) coating, defining, and transferring a second pattern consisting of a fluid reservoir and a first portion of a nozzle channel onto said second silicon oxide layer when said first pattern does not include said fluid reservoir; otherwise, coating and defining said second pattern onto said separation surface when said fluid reservoir is also included in said first pattern; l) etching said second pattern into said silicon substrate; m) coating, defining, and transferring a third pattern onto said first silicon oxide layer, said third pattern consisting of an introduction channel and a second portion of said nozzle channel, said third pattern being aligned on said first silicon oxide layer such that said second portion and said first portion of said nozzle channel are substantially axially aligned, and such that said fluid reservoir and said introduction channel are substantially aligned; n) removing all photoresist provided in coating, defining, and transferring said third pattern; o) coating and defining a fourth pattern onto said first silicon oxide layer, said fourth pattern consisting of an introduction channel, a second portion of said nozzle channel, and a recessed area surrounding an unrecessed area, wherein a nozzle is defined by said nozzle channel within said unrecessed area; p) etching, after the step of defining said fourth pattern, said third pattern into said silicon substrate for a first period of time; q) transferring said fourth pattern onto said first silicon oxide layer; r) etching simultaneously, after the step of transferring said fourth pattern, said third and fourth patterns for a second period of time; s) removing at least all photoresist layers which occlude said first pattern; t) etching said first pattern into said silicon substrate; u) forming, after step (t), an isolation layer on all silicon surfaces of said silicon substrate; v) attaching, after step (u), a cover substrate to said separation surface of said silicon substrate; w) removing, after step (v), said silicon nitride from said at least one silicon nitride contact area and removing any of said pad oxide beneath said at least one silicon nitride contact area, thereby forming at least one contact area on said ejection surface; and x) depositing a metal on said at least one contact area.
  • 2. A method according to claim 1, wherein said isolation layer is an electrical isolation layer.
  • 3. A method according to claim 1, wherein said isolation layer is a biocompatibility isolation layer.
  • 4. A method according to claim 1, wherein said etching in at least one of steps (e), (l), (p), (r), and (t) is performed by dry etching.
  • 5. A method according to claim 1, wherein said step of removing said silicon nitride is performed by wet etching in hot phosphoric acid.
  • 6. A method according to claim 1, wherein said step of removing said silicon nitride and said pad oxide is performed as an unmasked etch by reactive ion etching.
  • 7. A method according to claim 1, further comprising shadow masking, before step (w), said at least one silicon nitride contact area and wherein said step of removing said silicon oxide and said oxide is performed by reactive ion etching.
  • 8. A method according to claim 1, wherein step (c) is performed before step (d).
  • 9. A method according to claim 1, wherein step (c) is performed after step (w) and before step (x).
CROSS REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATION

This is a divisonal application of U.S. Ser. No. 09/334,408, filed Jun. 16, 1999, now U.S. Pat. No. 6,444,138 the entirely of which is incorporated herein by reference.

US Referenced Citations (16)
Number Name Date Kind
4764244 Chitty et al. Aug 1988 A
4911783 Voboril Mar 1990 A
5006202 Hawkins et al. Apr 1991 A
5043043 Howe et al. Aug 1991 A
5131978 O'Neill Jul 1992 A
5628917 MacDonald et al. May 1997 A
5658471 Murthy et al. Aug 1997 A
5683591 Offenberg Nov 1997 A
5690841 Elderstig Nov 1997 A
5717251 Hayashi et al. Feb 1998 A
5770465 MacDonald et al. Jun 1998 A
5804084 Nasby et al. Sep 1998 A
6020272 Fleming Feb 2000 A
6071819 Tai et al. Jun 2000 A
6136243 Mehregany et al. Oct 2000 A
6174820 Habermehl et al. Jan 2001 B1
Foreign Referenced Citations (1)
Number Date Country
44 42 023 May 1996 DE
Non-Patent Literature Citations (12)
Entry
Desai, Amish, et al., A MEMS Electrospray Nozzle for Mass Spectroscopy, 1997, pp. 927-930.
Dole, Malcom, et al., Molecular Beams of Macroions, 1968, pp. 2240-2249.
Harrison, D. Jed, et al., Micromachining a Miniaturized Capillary Electrophoresis-Based Chemical Analysis System on a Chip, 1993, pp. 895-897.
He, Bing, et al., Fabrication of Nanocolumns for Liquid Chromatography, 1998, pp. 3790-3797.
Jacobson, Stephen C., et al., High-Speed Separations on a Microchip, 1994, pp. 1114-1118.
Jacobson, Stephen C., et al., Open channel Electrochromatography on a Microchip, 1994, pp. 2369-2373.
Ramsey, R.S., et al., Generating Electrospray from Microchip Devices Using Electroosmotic Pumping, 1997, pp. 1174-1178.
Smith, David P., The Electrohydrodynamic Atomization of Liquids, 1986, pp. 527-535.
Wang, Xuan-Oi, et al., Polymer-Based Electrospray Chips for Mass Spectrometry, 1999, pp. 523-528.
Wilm, Matthiasm et al., Analytical Properties of the Nanoelctrospray Ion Source, 1996, pp. 1-8.
Xue, Gifeng, et al., Multichannel Microchip Electrospray Mass Spectrometry, 1997, pp. 426-430.
Yamashita, Masamichi, et al., Electrospray Ion Source. Another Variation of the Free-Jet Theme, 1984, pp. 4451-4459.