Patent Application
20070173048
The present invention relates to a method of manufacturing an electrical component, and to electrical components manufactured by that method. The method is suited to manufacturing foil sensors. Such foil sensors are of particular but by no means exclusive suitability as corrosion sensors for monitoring corrosion in inaccessible locations or under protective surfaces, and for monitoring the structural health of high value structures.
Foil sensors are composed of a thin metal foil bonded to an insulating substrate, and are used in monitoring the structural health of high value structures.
However, existing sensors are manufactured by techniques that in each case are suitable for only a small range of foil materials. Consequently, such foils are not generally made of the parent structural material to be monitored; the corrosion detected by the sensor must therefore be related by some means to the corrosion on the parent structure. This may be described as an indirect monitoring approach; it can produce errors and it restricts the use of existing sensors to structures where the sensor/structure relationship is known.
Further, existing small structure manufacturing techniques used in the manufacture of sensors means that only a limited number of materials can be used in sensor manufacture, so the breadth of existing sensor types is small. These existing techniques also have difficulty producing thin foils and adhering thin foils to rigid insulating backings.
According to the present invention, there is provided a method of manufacturing an electrical component, involving:
The method preferably includes filling said trench with an insulating material.
Preferably the insulating material is a polymer.
Preferably said polymer comprises an epoxy resin, such as EPOTHIN™ brand epoxy resin.
The method preferably includes forming said metal foil from a parent foil that is substantially identical with the material of the structure to be monitored.
The method may also include laser machining said component blank to produce one or more back slots, said slots being equal in depth to the full thickness of said sensor. The back slots can then be used for the purpose of filling the trenches with a trench filling material, e.g. an insulating material.
The method preferably includes preparing the metal foil by machining a sample of parent material to a desired final thickness. More preferably the method includes alternately machining both faces of the parent material until said final thickness is achieved.
Machining in this manner removes any surface finish due to processes such as rolling, plating or heat treating, produces a relatively stress free material, and thins the parent material without effecting the material properties (unlike thinning by chemical milling or rolling). Milling may be performed from one surface only if it is desired to maintain a completely pristine surface as the sensing surface. A light chemical etch with the sensing surface protected can be performed on the milled surface to remove any stresses introduced by the milling process.
Preferably the method includes preparing the foil for said bonding by applying a chemically resistant film (such as a polyester tape) to a first face of said foil, and dipping the other face of said foil in a bond enhancer (such as a 1% silane solution), wherein said first face is ultimately the exposed face and said chemically resistant film protects said first face from said bond enhancer.
Preferably the method includes drying said foil and then removing said film.
Preferably the substrate has an ablation rate that is sufficiently low to prevent unwanted penetration of the substrate during machining to remove said foil.
Preferably said substrate comprises a plurality of layers of fibreglass prepreg.
Preferably where the electrical component is a metal foil sensor the method includes preparing said component blank by coating said component blank on the surface comprising the ultimate sensor side of said sensor with a chemically resistant coating solution, to protect said surface from contamination during sensor processing. More preferably the method includes then drying said sensor blank.
Preferably said laser machining said foil comprises producing slots, in one embodiment of approximately 150 μm length at 1.5 mm intervals. Preferably a polymer is introduced into the trenches preferably using the slots.
The invention also provides an electrical component produced according to the above method.
The invention still further provides an electrical component, comprising:
Electrical components that can be made using this method include, for example, linear polarisation resistance gauges, electrochemical impedance spectrometry gauges, corrosion resistance gauges, spiral inductors and delay circuits.
In order that the invention may be more clearly ascertained, an embodiment will now be described, by way of example, with reference to the accompanying drawings, in which:
According to one embodiment of the present invention, foil sensors were manufactured by the following method, described by reference to the exemplary manufacture of an aluminium foil sensor.
Firstly, a thick parent foil material (in this embodiment, aluminium) was machined by alternately machining both faces of the parent material until a final thickness of 80 μm was achieved. During the machining, a fine pitch vacuum chuck was used to hold the material down, and thermal and stability effects were minimized by using a large milling machine. The vacuum chuck was machined ‘true’ before commencing the process.
Machining in this manner removes any surface finish due to processes such as rolling, plating or heat treating, produces a relatively stress free material, and thins the parent material without effecting the material properties.
The foil was then prepared for bonding. The foil was degreased and cleaned: in order not to change the surface properties of the foil, it was subjected to the following:
An acetone wash;
A distilled water wash;
A 30% nitric acid wash;
A distilled water wash;
Light wet abrasion of the non-sensor face with 800 grit paper;
A distilled water wash;
Nitrogen drying; and
Baking for 1 h at 110°C.
A chemically resistant adhesive polyester tape was then applied to one face of the foil (i.e. the face ultimately to become the exposed face of the sensor) to protect it from the bond enhancer. A suitable tape, ECONOBREAKER™ brand tape supplied by Airtech International, Inc., was used for this purpose.
The other face was then dip coated for 15 min with a bond enhancer comprising a 1% silane solution (which had been mixed for 30 min before use).
The sample was oven dried at 45° C. for 1 h, after which the tape was removed.
The foil was then bonded to the substrate. The prepreg used for the substrate, comprising 0.003 inch (76 μm) FR4 Fibreglass prepreg, was prepared by drying the prepreg in a vacuum oven at 40° C. and 2 kPa for 24 h. This material was chosen as its ablation route is sufficiently low to prevent unwanted penetration during machining, for example when an additional pass of the laser is required to remove remnants of foil.
The prepared foil was bonded to three layers of prepreg in a bonding press under 3 kN over 150 mm2, at 175° C. for 1 h. The resulting sensor material was cut into 25×75 mm sensor blanks ready for laser machining. However, it will be appreciated that sensors can be manufactured in large strips.
A thin chemically resistant coating solution was prepared, so that the sensor blanks could be coated on the sensor side to protect that surface from contamination during sensor processing. This was done by attaching the sensor blank with double sided tape to a flat glass carrier and positioning the blank/slide centrally on a stationary spin coater. A thick layer of the coating solution was applied and, using a gloved finger, the solution was gently and evenly spread over the surface until an even coat of ˜1 mm thickness was produced. The spinner was spun up to 3900 rpm for 10 s to produce a thin even coat of protective film.
Those skilled in the art will appreciate that there are a number of manual and automatic techniques for applying protective coatings. For instance a spray could be used to apply the protective coating and this would be particularly useful for processing long strips of material.
In this example the coating solution comprised a mixture of 50% LACOMIT™ brand vinyl based coating solution and 50% LACOMIT™ brand thinner, both by Agar Scientific Limited. Other comparable coating materials that might prove suitable include Crystalbond 509™ brand mounting adhesive and Microshield™ brand protectant, both by Structure Probe, Inc.
The blanks were dried in a 35° C. oven for 4 hours.
The sensor blanks were laser machined to form trenches in the blanks as follows.
The sensor blank/slide were positioned, using a locating jig, under the laser cutter. Three laser path files were used in the machining:
1) Setup file;
2) Sensor Cutting file; and
3) Sensor Backfile Slotting file.
The blank was translated in the x direction and another pair of sensors was then machined. This continued along the length of the sensor material.
The Setup File: this file produces multiple scans over a non-sensor area of the blank material. From post inspection it was possible to gauge the number of laser scans necessary to cut through the aluminium foil and the fibreglass (as required when cutting slots in the sensor), and the number of scans necessary to cut through the aluminium foil completely but leave the fibreglass essentially intact (as required when cutting the sensor pattern out).
The Sensor Cutting file: this file is used to cut the trenches that define the sensor pattern. The number of laser scans is set according to the results of the setup process, that is, the correct number of scans to penetrate the foil but not the fibreglass substrate.
The Slotting file: this file puts 150 μm back slots at 1.5 mm intervals along the sensor pattern. The number of scans is set to fully penetrate the foil and the fibreglass substrate.
It will be appreciated by the skilled person that, during laser machining, ablation products form on the sensor face close to the trench edge. These were removed by subjecting the sensors to the following:
The protective film of LACOMIT™ brand coating solution protects the bulk of the surface from chemical attack during this removal of ablation products.
The protective film covering the sensor was then removed with a suitable solvent, LACOMIT™ brand Remover by Agar Scientific Limited, a xylene based product selected so as not to effect the sensor surface.
Trench filling was conducted as follows. A high temperature polyester adhesive tape was applied to the sensor face. FLASHBREAKER 2R™ brand tape by Airtech International, Inc. was selected for this purpose, as high temperature tape has fewer volatile substances so does not outgas to as great extent as some alternatives.
The sensor was taped along its edge, fibreglass side up, to the base of a shallow container and dried in a vacuum oven for 12 h at 60° C. at 2 kPa.
The oven was vented and a low viscosity epoxy resin (in this example, EPOTHIN™ brand epoxy resin by Buehler Ltd) was introduced from a container above the sensor. (This container had a drain plug that can be operated from outside the chamber.) The vacuum was re-established and the epoxy allowed to outgas for a few minutes.
Care was exercised in the outgassing of the epoxy resin; the vacuum was hard enough to remove air introduced during the epoxy mixing, but not so hard as to ‘boil’ the low density components out of the epoxy. Also, outgassing was kept brief (between 10 to 15 min) so that the epoxy did not start to cure.
While still under vacuum and using remote control, the resin was allowed to flow into the sensor, that is, the sensor was essentially immersed in the resin.
The oven was vented, to force the resin to flow through the back slots and into the trenches. Filling the trenches through the back slots allows it to be introduced without contaminating the sensing surface.
In the final assembly stage, the sensors were removed from the resin and excess resin was removed. The sensors were then cured in an oven at 50° C. for 24 h.
The protective tape was removed, and the surface cleaned with turpentine to remove any residual adhesive, washed with ethanol, rinsed in distilled water and dried with nitrogen.
Finally, the completed foil sensors were separated into individual elements either by guillotining or by snapping the sensor off along the lines of the outer machined rectangle. If the slots are machined to enable the snapping off, the machining should weaken the underlying substrate sufficiently for this to be a reliable separation technique.
Foil sensors manufactured according to the above embodiment of the present invention can advantageously be formed of the same material as that which they are intended to monitor; the ability to use material that is the same as the monitored structure simplifies the correlation of sensor results with what is occurring on the structure. For example, corrosion activity on an aluminium alloy structure can be correlated with a corrosion sensor made of precisely the same material.
Such foils sensors can be made with fine feature size. The ability to machine stable structures in the tens of microns range enables electrical parameters to be scaled to a point where they can be reliably measured.
Methods such as described above are suitable for manufacturing electronic components where the thin metal foil is in the range of 15 to 200 μm in thickness, although. It will be appreciated that thicker metal foils could be used but as a result the cutting process becomes more difficult and higher power lasers may be required. The typical minimum spacing between the electrodes (i.e. metal tracks) is the cutting width of the laser beam which in this example is 25 to 30 μm. This closer separation of electrodes (i.e. the trench width) allows sensors of higher sensitivity to be produced. Although, it will be appreciated that depending on the application wider trenches may be suitable, for example to adjust the sensitivity of a device.
Metal foil sensors produced according to the method have a closer spacing of elements in the sensors because they are produced using laser machining rather than a chemical etching process. Further, this allows sensor fabrication to be largely independent of the metal that the sensor is being fabricated in unlike a chemical process. Resistance sensors of superior sensitivity due to the higher resistance obtained using long, thin, compact serpentine patterns can be produced. Further, flat inductive devices and sensors will have a lower resistance and higher inductance than similar sized devices produced using etching process.
The ratio of depth of the trench to width of the trench can be in the range of 1:1 to 7:1 while maintaining substantially straight trench walls. This compares with typical etching processes which are only capable of producing ratios of about 1:1 and also have a much larger amount of undercut—i.e. the walls will be angled. The relative lack of undercut allows:
Further, such thin metal sensors are more robust than their counterpart sensors formed from vapour deposition where the layer of metal may only be a micron thick. This allows them to be used in environments requiring a more robust sensor—e.g. corrosion sensors.
Multiple types of corrosion sensor can be manufactured using the process, including corrosion sensors (whether electrochemical or resistance (labyrinth) sensors), fatigue gauges and continuity gauges. Further, two or more different types of sensors can be incorporated as part of the same foil sensor—e.g. a resistance sensor and a corrosion sensor. These sensors can also be situated under paint and sealant beads
The thin sensors manufactured in accordance with embodiments of the invention make them ideal for applications under paints or sealants or other narrow locations to monitor the integrity of the paint or sealant or whether corrosion is occurring in the narrow location.
Persons skilled in the art will appreciate that other electrical components that can be made of foil tracks can be manufactured using methods as exemplified above. For example, spiral inductors are useful in flat radio frequency circuits and also in flat eddy current non-destructive testing sensors and can be produced using the above method. The advantage of the above technique for spiral inductors is that spirals are produced with straight edges to give higher density, and lower resistance for achieved inductance than chemical etching processes. Capacitors can also be produced.
Furthermore, the material is preferably milled to size, rather than rolled or chemically etched to size. Milling allows the material to retain important properties, whereas these other two methods alter such properties.
In embodiments where the method involves filling of the trenches with an insulator, this plays the important role of protecting the edges of the metal so that corrosion only occurs at the face of the sensor. This is important to maintain the same corrosion characteristics as the structure being monitored and is especially important for aluminium alloys in which edge corrosion known as exfoliation occurs very rapidly compared to face corrosion. For example, by preventing water from getting between the foil tracks. However, when components have other applications such as spiral inductors for a radio circuit, an insulating material will not be needed as the metal tracks are electrically isolated by the air gap between tracks and the insulating substrate. Persons skilled in the art will also appreciate that while a polymer insulating material will typically be used, other insulating materials can be used.
The trench filling material can also be an active part of the sensor such as a dielectric that changes its properties on exposure to certain agents. The change in the dielectric properties is then detected by a change in the electrical response of the sensor electrodes.
The trench filling material can also enhance the properties of the sensor. For example a material bearing particles with magnetic properties could be used to modify the properties of spiral inductors.
Modifications within the scope of the invention may be readily effected by those skilled in the art, for example to convert the above method into a method more suited for mass production. It is to be understood, therefore, that this invention is not limited to the particular embodiments described by way of example hereinabove.
Any reference herein to prior art is not intended to imply that such prior art forms or formed a part of the common general knowledge.
| Number | Date | Country | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2003906776 | Dec 2003 | AU | national |
| Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind | 371c Date |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PCT/AU04/01686 | 12/1/2004 | WO | 3/20/2007 |
