The present invention generally relates to the fabrication of semiconductor substrates from devices, and in particular relates to the use of strained silicon (Si) heterostructure substrates in forming devices such as transistors, for example, for high-performance CMOS integrated circuit products.
As microelectronic systems require faster operating speeds and increased computing power, the need exists for integrated circuits to provide a greater complexity of transistors in a smaller amount of circuit real estate. Such integrated circuits include, for example, microprocessors, ASICs, embedded controllers, and millions of transistors, such as metal oxide silicon semiconductor field-effect transistors (MOSFETs).
Certain microelectronics systems, such as radars, satellites, and cell phones, require low-power, high-speed, and high-density circuits with a high signal-to-noise ratio (i.e., low noise). These low power, high speed, and low noise requirements present a significant design challenge both at the circuit design and at the transistor design level. Microelectronic devices that include both analog and digital circuits are used together to achieve these requirements. Analog devices are used in applications requiring high speed and low noise, whereas digital circuits are used in applications requiring high density and low power.
Microelectronic devices that include both analog and digital circuits on the same substrate typically use traditional Si based MOSFET devices. Analog MOSFET devices, which run on analog signals, typically exhibit noise problems because noise is induced at high frequency when carriers scatter along the Si/SiO2 interface of a traditional MOSFET device. Thus, for high-speed analog devices, field-effect transistors (FETs) are not used; rather, bipolar transistors that do not have conduction along a Si/SiO2 interface are used. Unfortunately, it is difficult and expensive to integrate both bipolar and MOSFET devices on a single substrate.
One way to reduce noise and to achieve devices that are integrated on the same substrate is through changes at the transistor design level by using surface channel devices along with buried channel devices. A conventional Si based buried channel FET device has a channel conduction layer that is buried within a highly doped silicon region. This buried channel device has low noise because the charge carriers in the conduction channel are spatially separated from the Si/SiO2 interface.
While it is possible to build surface channel devices and buried channel devices on the same substrate, the manufacturing process requires complex and extensive process capabilities. For example, use of ion implantation to populate the buried channel requires counterdoping of the layers above the buried channel, and also requires extensive masking steps, adding to the cost and complexity of the overall manufacturing process. Furthermore, the excessive doping required to populate a buried conduction layer within a conventional silicon substrate places fundamental limitations on the performance of such a device.
Further, the use of strained semiconductor devices presents particular problems to the formation of surface channel devices and buried channel devices on the same substrate. For example, U.S. Pat. No. 5,963,817 discloses a method of using local selective oxidation of bulk or strained SiGe for forming buried channel oxide regions involving steps of masking, oxidation (e.g., thermal oxidation), and oxide removal; and U.S. Pat. No. 5,442,205 discloses the formation of surface channel semiconductor heterostructure devices with strained silicon device layers. It has been found, however, that the process of oxidation affects certain strained semiconductors differently. For example, the different layers of a strained semiconductor heterostructure may oxidize or become doped sufficiently differently that device formation procedures are compromised. Moreover, with high thermal budget oxidation, the thin strained semiconductor channels may be destroyed by significant interdiffusion during the high temperature oxidation steps.
There is a need, therefore, for a method of integrating surface channel and buried channel strained silicon devices on the same substrate
The invention provides a method of selectively removing SuGe alloy layers, thus exposing underlying semiconductor layers. The invention also provides a method of forming buried channel devices and surface channel devices on a heterostructure semiconductor substrate. In an embodiment, the method includes the steps of providing a structure comprising a first layer having a first oxidation rate disposed over a second layer having a second oxidation rate, wherein the first oxidation rate is greater than the second oxidation rate, reacting said first layer to form a sacrificial layer, and removing said sacrificial layer to expose said second layer.
The following description may be further understood with reference to the accompanying drawing in which
The drawings are shown for illustrative purposes and are not to scale.
The invention provides a simplified method of forming buried and surface channel heterostructure devices on the same substrate. As aforementioned, conventional Si based integrated buried and surface channel devices are typically manufactured using complex implantation procedures. In the present invention, the starting substrate material defines the buried and surface channel device structures. This starting material is a heterostructure where the the different materials in the heterostructure have different oxidation or removal properties. The difference in material properties allows for the selective removal of particular layers and this allows for the integration of varied device structures.
An exemplary embodiment of such a heterostructure substrate is a strained silicon substrate. A strained silicon (Si) substrate is generally formed by providing a relaxed SiGe layer on bulk Si through either epitaxial deposition or wafer bonding, and then providing a Si layer on the relaxed SiGe layer. Because SiGe has a different lattice constant than Si, the Si layer becomes strained and results in enhanced mobilities (and hence improved device performance) compared with bulk Si. The percentage of Ge in the SiGe can have a dramatic effect on the characteristics of the strained Si layer.
In an embodiment, the invention involves the selective removal of SiGe alloys to form buried channel strained Si FET devices and surface channel strained Si FET devices on the same substrate. Using this method, both device types (e.g., digital and analog) may be realized on a common substrate and both have distinct advantages over conventional silicon MOSFET technologies. For example, a strained silicon surface channel device offers an enhanced drive current over a conventional Si based MOSFET due to its enhanced carrier mobilities. Similarly, the band offset of the strained silicon buried channel device offers low noise characteristics due to the spatial separation of the active charge carriers from both the SiO2 interface and any remote impurity atoms introduced via ion implantation.
A variety of masking layers are then applied to the substrate of
As shown in
The exposed portion of the second SiGe layer 18 is then selectively oxidized to expose the strained Si layer 16 leaving regions 32 of oxidized SiGe, for example, at or below approximately 850° C., and in some applications at or below approximately 700° C. The selective removal requires consideration of oxidation rates for Si and SiGe at various Ge concentrations. For example,
A differential chemical oxidation rate may also be exploited during a wet chemical processing step. For example, a standard RCA SC-1 clean (NH4OH+H2O2+H2O) may be used to preferentially remove the second SiGe layer 18 over the strained silicon layer 16. Again, this preferential chemical removal is due to the enhanced chemical oxidation rate of SiGe alloys compared to that of silicon.
A second nitride layer 30 is then formed using LPCVD (approximately 500-1000 Å thick) over the entire surface of structure as shown in FIG. 5. Note that the oxidized SiGe regions 32 of the SiGe layer 18 may undercut and extend partially underneath strained Si cap layer 20. Isolation trenches 34, 36 and 38 may then be formed to isolate the various regions from one another as shown in FIG. 6. The devices may be isolated from one another as disclosed in U.S. Provisional Patent Application Ser. No. 60/296,976 filed Jun. 8, 2001, the disclosure of which is hereby incorporated by reference.
The second nitride layer 30 and the remaining region of the nitride masking layer 24 are then removed via plasma CF4/O2 or hot phosphoric wet etch as shown in FIG. 7. The oxide masking layer 22 and regions 32 of SiGe oxide are then wet etched using a buffered HF solution. This buffered HF solution etches oxide masking region 22 and SiGe oxide region 32, but stops on strained Si layer 16 and strained Si layer 20. In the same step, first isolation trenches 34, 36 and 38 are then planarized via etching to leave a relatively planar surface in both buried channel device region A and surface channel device region B as shown in
As shown in
Although the invention has been shown in connection with a strained Si/SiGe heterostructure, those skilled in the art will appreciate that any heterostructure that allows for the selective removal of the layers overlaying the channel layer will also work. Additionally, instead of a strained Si channel layer, layers of SiGe, Ge or GaAs may be used, alternatively, a plurality of such layers may be used to optimize the transport characteristics. Furthermore, the selective removal of blanket SiGe alloy layers may also be employed during the fabrication of silicon-on-insulator (SOI) and strained silicon-on-insulator (SSOI) substrates.
Those skilled in the art will appreciate that numerous modifications and variations may be made to the above disclosed embodiments without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention.
The present application claims priority to U.S. Provisional Patent Application Ser. No. 60/298,153 filed Jun. 14, 2001.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4710788 | Dambkes et al. | Dec 1987 | A |
4920076 | Holland et al. | Apr 1990 | A |
4990979 | Otto | Feb 1991 | A |
5241197 | Murakami et al. | Aug 1993 | A |
5291439 | Kauffmann et al. | Mar 1994 | A |
5312766 | Aronowitz et al. | May 1994 | A |
5327375 | Harari | Jul 1994 | A |
5442205 | Brasen et al. | Aug 1995 | A |
5461243 | Ek et al. | Oct 1995 | A |
5523592 | Nakagawa et al. | Jun 1996 | A |
5534713 | Ismail et al. | Jul 1996 | A |
5596527 | Tomioka et al. | Jan 1997 | A |
5617351 | Bertin et al. | Apr 1997 | A |
5683934 | Candelaria | Nov 1997 | A |
5739567 | Wong | Apr 1998 | A |
5777347 | Bartelink | Jul 1998 | A |
5780922 | Mishra et al. | Jul 1998 | A |
5786612 | Otani et al. | Jul 1998 | A |
5792679 | Nakato | Aug 1998 | A |
5808344 | Ismail et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5847419 | Imai et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
5891769 | Liaw et al. | Apr 1999 | A |
5906951 | Chu et al. | May 1999 | A |
5963817 | Chu et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
5986287 | Eberl et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
5998807 | Lustig et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6013134 | Chu et al. | Jan 2000 | A |
6058044 | Sugiura et al. | May 2000 | A |
6059895 | Chu et al. | May 2000 | A |
6096590 | Chan et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6107653 | Fitzgerald | Aug 2000 | A |
6111267 | Fischer et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6117750 | Bensahel et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
6130453 | Mei et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6143636 | Forbes et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
6204529 | Lung et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6207977 | Augusto | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6249022 | Lin et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6251755 | Furukawa et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6266278 | Harari et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6339232 | Takagi | Jan 2002 | B1 |
6350993 | Chu et al. | Feb 2002 | B1 |
6399970 | Kubo et al. | Jun 2002 | B2 |
6498359 | Schmidt et al. | Dec 2002 | B2 |
20010003364 | Sugawara et al. | Jun 2001 | A1 |
20020100942 | Fitzgerald et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020123197 | Fitzgerald et al. | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20020125471 | Fitzgerald et al. | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20020125497 | Fitzgerald | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20020140031 | Rim | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020197803 | Leitz et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20030013323 | Hammond et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030052334 | Lee et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030057439 | Fitzgerald | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030077867 | Fitzgerald | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030089901 | Fitzgerald | May 2003 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
41 01 167 | Jul 1992 | DE |
0 683 522 | Nov 1995 | EP |
0 829 908 | Mar 1998 | EP |
0 838 858 | Apr 1998 | EP |
0 844 651 | May 1998 | EP |
1 020 900 | Jul 2000 | EP |
1 174 928 | Jan 2002 | EP |
63122176 | May 1988 | JP |
4-307974 | Oct 1992 | JP |
7-106466 | Apr 1995 | JP |
11-233744 | Aug 1999 | JP |
2001319935 | Nov 2001 | JP |
02241195 | Aug 2002 | JP |
WO 9859365 | Dec 1998 | WO |
WO 9953539 | Oct 1999 | WO |
WO 0054338 | Sep 2000 | WO |
WO 0154202 | Jul 2001 | WO |
WO 0193338 | Dec 2001 | WO |
WO 0199169 | Dec 2001 | WO |
WO 0213262 | Feb 2002 | WO |
WO 0215244 | Feb 2002 | WO |
WO 0247168 | Jun 2002 | WO |
WO 02071488 | Sep 2002 | WO |
WO 02071491 | Sep 2002 | WO |
WO 02071495 | Sep 2002 | WO |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20030013323 A1 | Jan 2003 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
60298153 | Jun 2001 | US |