Patent Application
20090090382
1. Field of the Invention
The present invention relates to a method of self-cleaning of a carbon-based film deposited inside a reactor.
2. Description of the Related Art
In semiconductor processing techniques, optical films such as antireflective films and hard masks are used. In conventional techniques, these films are formed mainly by a technique called a coating method. The coating method forms highly functional polymer films by coating a liquid material and sintering it. It is, however, difficult to form a thin film on a substrate because a liquid having viscosity is coated. As semiconductor chip sizes continue to shrink, more thinned and higher-strength films are required.
As an advantageous method for achieving thinner films, use of a DLC (diamond-like carbon) film or an amorphous carbon film by plasma CVD has been reported (e.g., U.S. Pat. No. 5,470,661, U.S. Pat. No. 6,428,894). In these cases, using a molecule which is gaseous at room temperature as a material, a diamond-like carbon film or an amorphous carbon film is formed by decomposing the molecule by plasma. Using a plasma CVD method gives promise of facilitating to achieve thinner films.
U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/172,031, filed Jun. 30, 2005, owned by the same assignee as in the present application (the disclosure of which is herein incorporated by reference in its entirety) discloses a carbon polymer film capable of having a wide variety of structures, which is widely and industrially useable as high-strength materials such as a hard mask and various highly-functional materials. The carbon polymer can be produced by plasma CVD from organic monomers having high molecular weight such as benzene and can actualize a wide variety of structures and characteristics.
In a single-substrate- or small-batch substrate-processing apparatus, during CVD processing, a film is formed not only on a substrate but also on inner walls or other inner parts of a CVD chamber. The unwanted film on the inner parts of the chamber produces particles which deposit on a substrate during CVD processing and deteriorate the quality of a film on the substrate. Thus, the CVD chamber is cleaned periodically by using an in-situ cleaning process to remove unwanted adhesive products from an inner surface of the CVD chamber. Accumulation of unwanted adhesive products on surfaces of electrodes may affect plasma generation or distribution over a substrate and may cause damage to the electrodes. Further, unwanted adhesive products may cause generation of contaminant particles.
When pure or fluorine-doped SiO2 and SiN are deposited in a CVD reactor, sediment on inner surfaces of the CVD reactor can be removed by remote plasma cleaning. To reduce green house effect, NF3 gas is generally applied with remote plasma technology. In that case, Argon gas is added as a feedstock to stabilize plasma discharge in a remote plasma chamber isolated from the CVD reactor. This technology is disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 6,187,691, and U.S. Patent Publication No. 2002/0011210A. The following references also disclose chamber cleaning technologies. U.S. Pat. No. 6,374,831, U.S. Pat. No. 6,387,207, U.S. Pat. No. 6,329,297, U.S. Pat. No. 6,271,148, U.S. Pat. No. 6,347,636, U.S. Pat. No. 6,187,691, U.S. Patent Publication No. 2002/0011210A, U.S. Pat. No. 6,352,945, and U.S. Pat. No. 6,383,955. The disclosure of the foregoing references is herein incorporated by reference in their entirety, especially with respect to configurations of a reactor and a remote plasma reactor, and general cleaning conditions.
However, the above conventional methods are not effective in cleaning a carbon-based film such as the amorphous carbon film including diamond-like carbon film and the carbon polymer film described above, which have high carbon contents.
During the process of depositing a carbon-based film on a substrate a pre-selected number of times, a carbon-based film is also deposited on areas other than the substrate such as an inner wall and a showerhead (an upper electrode). Upon completion of deposition of a carbon-based film on a substrate, the cleaning of the reactor is initiated. If an oxygen-containing gas or oxygen-based gas is used as a cleaning gas, because oxygen ions are negatively charged, a plasma sheath is formed on a cleaning target by oxygen plasma generation, inhibiting oxygen ions from reaching the cleaning target. Further, because the life of oxygen ions is short, they cannot reach locations in the reactor far from the place where oxygen ions are generated, resulting in insufficient cleaning at the locations. On the other hand, if a fluorine-containing gas such as NF3, C2F6, or C3F8, is used as a cleaning gas, due to fluorine, the cleaning efficiency can be increased. However, at high temperatures, fluorine binds to aluminum which is the main material of an upper electrode, thereby generating aluminum fluoride (AlF) which is likely to be a cause of particle contamination on a showerhead surface. Further, fluorine binds to hydrogen present in the carbon-based film during a cleaning process, thereby generating HF which is likely to cause erosion to a showerhead or susceptor made of aluminum or its alloy. As a result, contaminant particles are generated and accumulate on an inner wall or the showerhead, and then fall on a substrate surface during a deposition process.
In an aspect, the present invention provides a method of continuously forming carbon-based films on substrate, comprising: (i) forming a carbon-based film on a substrate in a reactor a pre-selected number of times; (ii) exciting oxygen gas and/or nitrogen oxide gas and additive gas to generate a plasma for cleaning; (iii) cleaning an inside of the reactor with the plasma to remove particles accumulated during step (i) on the inside of the reactor; and (iv) repeating steps (i)-(iii) a pre-selected number of times. In the present disclosure, the “additive gas” means any secondary gas used in cleaning other than reactive gas in an embodiment (i.e., the “additive gas” includes rare gas). In another embodiment, the “additive gas” means any secondary gas used in cleaning other than reactive gas and rare gas.
The above aspect includes, but is not limited to, the following embodiments:
Step (ii) may be conducted in the reactor or may be conducted in the reactor and in a remote plasma unit. The method may further comprise determining a priority area of cleaning inside the reactor prior to step (ii). Step (iii) may comprise controlling pressure inside the reactor according to the priority area of cleaning.
Step (iii) may comprise controlling pressure inside the reactor at about 100 Pa to about 500 Pa when the priority area of cleaning is an inner wall of the reactor. Step (iii) may comprise controlling pressure inside the reactor at about 400 Pa to about 800 Pa when the priority area of cleaning is an upper electrode.
The method may further comprise selecting a cleaning gas including the oxygen gas and/or nitrogen oxide gas and additive gas prior to step (ii) according to the priority area of cleaning. Step (iii) may comprise a step for adjusting a ratio of a cleaning rate at an inner wall of the reactor to a cleaning rate at an upper electrode to 3/100 to 110/100 according to the priority area of cleaning.
Step (iii) may comprise controlling a gap between an upper electrode and a lower electrode according to the priority area of cleaning. Step (ii) may further comprise exciting a fluorine-containing gas, a flow rate of which is lower than that of the oxygen gas and/or nitrogen oxide gas, when the priority area of cleaning is an inner wall. Step (ii) may further comprise exciting a rare gas, N2 gas, and/or CO2 gas, a total flow rate of which is lower than that of the oxygen gas and/or nitrogen oxide gas, when the priority area of cleaning is an inner wall. Step (ii) may comprise exciting predominantly the nitrogen oxide gas when the priority area of cleaning is an inner wall. Step (ii) may comprise exciting predominantly the oxygen gas without a fluorine-containing gas when the priority area of cleaning is an upper electrode.
In the above, the oxygen gas and/or nitrogen oxide gas may be O2 gas and/or N2O gas.
The carbon-based polymer film in step (i) may be a carbon polymer film formed by: (a) vaporizing a hydrocarbon-containing liquid monomer (CαHβXγ, wherein α and β are natural numbers of 5 or more; γ is an integer including zero; X is O, N or F) having a boiling point of about 20° C. to about 350° C. which has no benzene structure; (b) introducing said vaporized gas into a CVD reaction chamber inside which a substrate is placed; and (c) forming a hydrocarbon-containing polymer film on said substrate by plasma polymerization of said gas.
In another aspect, the present invention provides a method of self-cleaning a plasma reactor using a cleaning gas containing oxygen gas and/or nitrogen oxide gas and additive gas at a pre-selected pressure upon depositing a carbon-based film on a substrate a pre-selected number of times, comprising: (i) changing the cleaning gas and/or the pressure; the step of changing the cleaning gas comprising (a) increasing a flow rate of oxygen gas for increasing a ratio of an etching rate of a carbon polymer accumulated on an upper electrode provided in the reactor to an etching rate of a carbon polymer accumulated on an inner wall of the reactor, or (b) increasing a flow rate of nitrogen oxide gas and/or adding to the cleaning gas at least one gas selected from the group consisting of fluorine-containing gas, rare gas, N2 gas, and CO2 gas for decreasing a ratio of an etching rate of the carbon polymer on the upper electrode to an etching rate of the carbon polymer on the inner wall; the step of changing the pressure comprising (c) increasing the pressure for increasing a ratio of an etching rate of the carbon-based film on the upper electrode to an etching rate of the carbon-based film on the inner wall, or (d) decreasing the pressure for decreasing a ratio of an etching rate of the carbon-based film on the upper electrode to an etching rate of the carbon-based film on the inner wall; and (ii) conducting self-cleaning of the reactor using the changed cleaning gas and/or the changed pressure.
In still another aspect, the present invention provides a method of self-cleaning a plasma reactor upon depositing a carbon-based film on a substrate a pre-selected number of times, comprising: (i) exciting oxygen gas and/or nitrogen oxide gas and additive gas to generate a plasma; and (ii) exposing to the plasma a carbon-based film accumulated on an upper electrode provided in the reactor and a carbon-based film accumulated on an inner wall of the reactor.
The above aspect includes, but is not limited to, the following embodiments:
In step (i), the plasma may be generated only from oxygen gas. In step (i), the plasma may be generated only from nitrogen oxide gas. The oxygen gas may be O2 gas, and the nitrogen oxide gas may be N2O gas.
In embodiments, the cleaning gas is preferably composed of oxygen gas such as O2 gas and rare gas such as Ar, and more preferably composed of oxygen gas such as O2 gas, rare gas such as Ar, and additive gas such as N2 gas. The cleaning gas is particularly effective on cleaning of a reactor for depositing carbon-based films. In embodiments, the flow rate ratio of (oxygen gas)/(rare gas)/(additive gas) may be (100)/(1-100)/(0-100), preferably (100)/(20-100)/(0.1-40). In embodiments, a flow rate of the oxygen gas may be set at a value which is 40% to 80% of total flow rates of the rare gas, the oxygen gas, and optionally the additive gas.
In all of the aforesaid aspects and embodiments, any element used in an aspect or embodiment can interchangeably or additionally be used in another aspect or embodiment unless such a replacement is not feasible or causes adverse effect.
For purposes of summarizing the invention and the advantages achieved over the related art, certain objects and advantages of the invention are described in the present disclosure. Of course, it is to be understood that not necessarily all such objects or advantages may be achieved in accordance with any particular embodiment of the invention. Thus, for example, those skilled in the art will recognize that the invention may be embodied or carried out in a manner that achieves or optimizes one advantage or group of advantages as taught herein without necessarily achieving other objects or advantages as may be taught or suggested herein.
Further aspects, features and advantages of this invention will become apparent from the detailed description of the preferred embodiments which follow.
These and other features of this invention will now be described with reference to the drawings of preferred embodiments which are intended to illustrate and not to limit the invention. The drawings are oversimplified for illustrative purposes and are not to scale.
The present invention will be explained in detail with reference to preferred embodiments. However, the preferred embodiments are not intended to limit the present invention.
In an embodiment, a method of continuously forming carbon-based films on substrate, comprises: (i) forming a carbon-based film on a substrate in a reactor a pre-selected number of times; (ii) exciting a rare gas, an oxygen gas, and optionally an additive gas to generate a plasma for cleaning; (iii) cleaning an inside of the reactor with the plasma to remove particles accumulated during step (i) on the inside of the reactor; and (iv) repeating steps (i)-(iii) a pre-selected number of times.
In the above, in an embodiment, step (ii) may comprise supplying the rare gas, the oxygen gas, and optionally the additive gas in a remote plasma unit. When using remote plasma cleaning, differences in cleaning rate depending on the location to be cleaned inside the reactor can be minimized. When step (ii) is conducted in the reactor, the method may further comprise determining a priority area of cleaning inside the reactor prior to step (ii). In the above, step (iii) may comprise controlling pressure inside the reactor according to the priority area of cleaning (e.g., about 100 Pa to about 400 Pa when the priority area of cleaning is an inner wall of the reactor; about 400 Pa to about 800 Pa when the priority area of cleaning is an upper electrode). Additionally or alternatively, step (iii) may comprise controlling a gap between an upper electrode and a lower electrode according to the priority area of cleaning. Further, the method may further comprise selecting a cleaning gas including the oxygen gas and/or nitrogen oxide gas prior to step (ii) according to the priority area of cleaning. Furthermore, step (iii) may comprise a step for adjusting a ratio of a cleaning rate at an inner wall of the reactor to a cleaning rate at an upper electrode to 3/100 to 110/100 according to the priority area of cleaning.
In any of the aforesaid embodiments, in step (ii), the additive gas may be used as a required gas. The additive gas may be N2 gas and/or CO2 gas, preferably N2 gas. In any of the aforesaid embodiments, the rare gas may be any one or more of Ar gas, He gas, Ne gas, Kr gas, and Xe gas. In any one of the aforesaid embodiments, the oxygen gas may be O2 gas and/or O3 gas.
In any of the aforesaid embodiments, in step (ii), a flow rate of the oxygen gas may be set at 1,000 to 30,000 sccm (including 5,000 sccm, 10,000 sccm, 20,000 sccm, and values between any two numbers of the foregoing), a flow rate of the rare gas may be set at 1,000 to 20,000 sccm (including 3,000 sccm, 8,000 sccm, 15,000 sccm, and values between any two numbers of the foregoing), rate of the additive gas may be set at 50 to 20,000 sccm (including 90 sccm, 200 sccm, 500 sccm, 1,000 sccm, 1,500 sccm, and values between any two numbers of the foregoing) in embodiments. In any of the aforesaid embodiments, a flow rate of the oxygen gas may be set at a value which is 40% to 80% (e.g., 50% to 70%) of total flow rates of the rare gas, the oxygen gas, and optionally the additive gas in embodiments.
In any of the aforesaid embodiments, applied plasma power in the remote plasma unit may be 1,000 W to 20,000 W, preferably 10,000 W to 15,000 W, especially in combination with high oxygen flow such as 10,000 sccm to 20,000 sccm in the presence of rare gas such as Ar with a flow rate of 1,000 sccm to 10,000 sccm. This embodiment is suitable for a reaction chamber for a substrate having a diameter of 300 mm.
In any of the aforesaid embodiments, in steps (i) to (iii), a susceptor on which the substrate is placed may be controlled at a temperature of 300° C. or higher (e.g., 400° C. or higher).
In any of the aforesaid embodiments, step (ii) may further comprise exciting a nitrogen oxide gas (which may be N2O gas, NO gas, N2O3 gas, or NO2 gas singly or in any combination, and preferably N2O gas). A flow rate of the nitrogen oxide gas will be described later. In any of the aforesaid embodiments, step (ii) may further comprise exciting a reduction gas (e.g., H2 gas, or NH3 gas singly or in combination). A flow rate of the reduction gas may be set at 50 to 2,000 sccm (e.g., 100 to 1,500 sccm). In order to keep the concentration of the reduction gas under an explosive level, a dilution gas such as N2 gas may be introduced to the secondary side of a pump.
In any of the aforesaid embodiments, the carbon-based polymer film in step (i) may be a carbon polymer film formed by: (I) vaporizing a hydrocarbon-containing liquid monomer (CαHβXγ, wherein α and β are natural numbers of 5 or more; γ is an integer including zero; X is O, N or F) having a boiling point of about 20° C. to about 350° C. which is not substituted by a vinyl group or an acetylene group; (II) introducing said vaporized gas into a CVD reaction chamber inside which a substrate is placed; and (III) forming a hydrocarbon-containing polymer film on said substrate by plasma polymerization of said gas.
In the present disclosure including the above, the ranges described may include or exclude the endpoints in embodiments.
An embodiment of the present invention provides a method of self-cleaning a plasma reactor using a cleaning gas containing oxygen gas and rare gas at a pre-selected pressure upon depositing a carbon-based film on a substrate a pre-selected number of times. In the case where a remote plasma unit is used, there may be four typical embodiments:
Embodiment 1 comprises: (i) introducing rare gas to a remote plasma unit, followed by igniting plasma; (ii) upon the ignition, introducing oxygen gas together with rare gas to the remote plasma unit; (iii) exciting the oxygen gas together with the rare gas via plasma in the remote plasma unit; (iv) introducing the excited rare gas and the oxygen gas to the reactor, thereby performing self-cleaning of the reactor. The type and the flow rate of the rare gas and the oxygen gas can be those described earlier or anywhere in the present disclosure.
Embodiment 2 comprises: (i) introducing rare gas to a remote plasma unit, followed by igniting plasma; (ii) upon the ignition, introducing oxygen gas and additive gas together with rare gas to the remote plasma unit; (iii) exciting the oxygen gas and the additive gas together with the rare gas via plasma in the remote plasma unit; (iv) introducing the excited rare gas, the oxygen gas, and the additive gas to the reactor, thereby performing self-cleaning of the reactor. The type and the flow rate of the rare gas, the oxygen gas, and the additive gas can be those described earlier or anywhere in the present disclosure.
Embodiment 3 comprises: (i) introducing rare gas to a remote plasma unit, followed by igniting plasma; (ii) upon the ignition, introducing oxygen gas, additive gas, and nitrogen oxide gas together with rare gas to the remote plasma unit; (iii) exciting the oxygen gas, the additive gas, and the nitrogen oxide gas together with the rare gas via plasma in the remote plasma unit; (iv) introducing the excited rare gas, the oxygen gas, the nitrogen oxide gas, and the additive gas to the reactor, thereby performing self-cleaning of the reactor. The type and the flow rate of the rare gas, the oxygen gas, the additive gas, and the nitrogen oxide gas can be those described earlier or anywhere in the present disclosure.
Embodiment 4 comprises: (i) introducing rare gas to a remote plasma unit, followed by igniting plasma; (ii) upon the ignition, introducing oxygen gas, additive gas, and reduction gas together with rare gas to the remote plasma unit; (iii) exciting the oxygen gas, the additive gas, and the reduction gas together with the rare gas via plasma in the remote plasma unit; (iv) introducing the excited rare gas, the oxygen gas, the reduction gas, and the additive gas to the reactor, thereby performing self-cleaning of the reactor. The type and the flow rate of the rare gas, the oxygen gas, the additive gas, and the reduction gas can be those described earlier or anywhere in the present disclosure.
In-situ cleaning can be conducted in a similar way. In addition, cleaning gas can be constituted by selecting one or more gases selected from the group consisting of oxygen gas, rare gas, additive gas, nitrogen oxide gas, and reduction gas, wherein oxygen gas and rare gas may be indispensable in a preferred embodiment. Each type of gas can be constituted by one or more gases.
The present invention will be described in detail with reference to other embodiments. The present invention, however, is not limited to these embodiments. Additionally, a requirement in an embodiment is freely applicable to other embodiments, and requirements are mutually replaceable unless special conditions are attached.
The self-cleaning method of the present invention can be applied to a reactor upon depositing a film on a substrate a pre-selected number of times in the reactor. In an embodiment, the cleaning of the reactor can be conducted every after one substrate is processed. In another embodiment, the cleaning of the reactor can be conducted every after a given number of substrates (e.g., 2-50 substrates, typically 5-25 substrates) are processed. The frequency of cleaning can be determined depending on the amount of unwanted film accumulated inside the reactor during a deposition process, the amount of particles generated by the cleaning itself, etc.
The reactor may be a capacitively-coupled plasma apparatus wherein a showerhead which can serve as an upper electrode and a susceptor which serves as a lower electrode are disposed in parallel to each other. The reactor may be a PECVD apparatus, HDP-CVD apparatus, ALD apparatus, etc. in which unwanted particles are accumulated on the showerhead and the inner wall during deposition of film of interest on a substrate.
The film deposited on a substrate in the reactor, upon deposition of which the cleaning inside the reactor of the present invention is conducted, is a carbon-based film which may be defined as a film containing 30% or more carbon (typically 30% to 80%, preferably 40% to 60%) per mass of the entire compositions in an embodiment. In another embodiment, the carbon-based film may be defined as a film formed with a carbon skeleton. In another embodiment, the carbon-based film may be defined as a film having a general formula CxHy (x, y are an integer of 2 or greater). The carbon-based film includes, but is not limited to, a nano-carbon polymer film disclosed in U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/172,031, filed Jun. 30, 2005, and Ser. No. 11/524,037, filed Sep. 20, 2006, both owned by the same assignee as in the present application (the disclosure of which is herein incorporated by reference in their entirety), and an amorphous carbon film (including diamond-like carbon film) disclosed in U.S. Patent Publications No. 2003/0091938 and No. 2005/0112509, U.S. Pat. No. 5,470,661, and U.S. Pat. No. 6,428,894 (the disclosure of which is herein incorporated by reference in their entirety).
For example, as disclosed in U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/172,031 mentioned above, a nano-carbon polymer film can be formed a method which comprises the steps of vaporizing a hydrocarbon-containing liquid monomer (CαHβXγ, wherein α and β are natural numbers of 5 or more; γ is an integer including zero; X is O or N) having a boiling point of 20° C.-350° C. which is not substituted by a vinyl group or an acetylene group, introducing the vaporized gas into a CVD reaction chamber inside which a substrate is placed, and forming a hydrocarbon-containing polymer film on the substrate by plasma polymerizing the gas. The substrate is, for example, a semiconductor device substrate. In the above method, the liquid monomer may be introduced into a heater disposed upstream of the reaction chamber and vaporized. Additionally, the liquid monomer may be flow-controlled by a valve upstream of the heater, and introduction of the liquid monomer into the heater may be blocked by a shutoff valve disposed between the flow control valve and the heater and kept at 80° C. or lower or at a temperature lower than that of heating/vaporization by approximately 50° C. or more except when a film is formed. Or, the liquid monomer may be flow-controlled by a valve disposed upstream of the heater and kept at 80° C. or lower or at a temperature lower than that of heating/vaporization by approximately 50° C. or more, and at the same time introduction of the liquid monomer into the heater may be blocked except when a film is formed.
Further, as disclosed in U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/172,031, usable liquid organic monomers for a nano-carbon polymer film are as follows:
As a liquid organic monomer, cyclic hydrocarbon can be used. The cyclic hydrocarbon may be substituted or non-substituted benzene. Further, the substituted or non-substituted benzene may be C6H6−nRn (wherein n, 0, 1, 2, 3); R may be independently —CH3 or —C2H5. The liquid monomer may be a combination of two types or more of substituted or non-substituted benzene. In the above, the substituted benzene may be any one or more of 1,3,5-trimethylbenzene, o-xylene, m-xylene or p-xylene; in addition to a benzene derivative, the cyclic hydrocarbon may be any one or more of cyclohexane, cyclohexene, cyclohexadiene, cyclooctatetraene, cyclopentane, and cyclopentene. The liquid monomer may be linear hydrocarbon, and the linear hydrocarbon may also be any one or more of pentane, iso-pentane, neo-pentane, hexane, 1-pentene, 1-hexene, 1-pentyne, and isoprene.
As a specific example, C6H3(CH3)3 (1,3,5-trimethylbenzene (TMB); boiling point of 165° C.) or C6H4(CH3)2 (dimethylbenzene (xylene); boiling point of 144° C.) can be mentioned. In addition to the above, as liner alkane (CnH2(n+1)), pentane (boiling point of 36.1° C.), iso-pentane (boiling point of 27.9° C.) or neo-pentane (boiling point of 9.5° C.), wherein n is 5, or hexane (boiling point: 68.7° C.) or isoprene (boiling point: 34° C.), wherein n is 6, can be used singly or in any combination as a source gas.
Additionally, a liquid organic monomer is a hydrocarbon-containing liquid monomer (CαHβXγ, wherein α and β are natural numbers of 5 or more; γ is an integer including zero; X is O, N or F) having a boiling point of room temperature or higher (e.g., approximately 20° C.-approximately 350° C.). Using this monomer, a hard mask is formed. Preferably, the carbon number is 6-30; the carbon number is 6-12. In this case as well, the liquid monomer is cyclic hydrocarbon, and the cyclic hydrocarbon may also be substituted or non-substituted benzene. Further, the substituted benzene or the non-substituted benzene may be C6H6−nRn (wherein n is 0, 1, 2, or 3); R may be independently —CH3, —C2H5, or —CH═CH2. Additionally, the liquid monomer is a combination of two types or more of the non-substituted benzene.
In the above, the substituted benzene may be any one of 1,3,5-trimethylbenzene, o-xylene, m-xylene, or p-xylene; In addition to benzene derivatives, the cyclic hydrocarbon may be any one of cyclohexene, cyclohexadiene, cyclooctatetraene. Additionally, it may be linear hydrocarbon; the linear hydrocarbon may be pentane, iso-pentane, neo-pentane, hexane, 1-pentene, 1-hexene, 1-pentyne, and/or isoprene.
Additionally, a reaction gas composed of only the liquid monomer may be used. Specifically, C6H5(CH═CH2) (vinylbenzene (styrene); boiling point of 145° C.) can be mentioned. In addition to this, as liner alkene (CnHn (n=5)), 1-pentene (boiling point of 30.0° C.); or as liner alkyne (CnH2(n−1) (n=5), 1-pentyne (boiling point of 40.2° C.), etc. can be used singly or in any combination as a source gas.
In the present invention, the cleaning of the reactor can be in-situ plasma cleaning in an embodiment, remote plasma cleaning in another embodiment, or a combination of in-situ plasma cleaning and remote plasma cleaning in still another embodiment. General methods of in-situ plasma cleaning and remote plasma cleaning are disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 6,187,691, U.S. Patent Publication No. 2002/0011210A, U.S. Pat. No. 6,374,831, U.S. Pat. No. 6,387,207, U.S. Pat. No. 6,329,297, U.S. Pat. No. 6,271,148, U.S. Pat. No. 6,347,636, U.S. Pat. No. 6,187,691, U.S. Patent Publication No. 2002/0011210A, U.S. Pat. No. 6,352,945, and U.S. Pat. No. 6,383,955, for example, the disclosure of which is herein incorporated by reference in their entirety.
During the process of depositing a carbon-based film on a substrate a pre-selected number of times, a carbon-based film is also deposited on areas other than the substrate such as an inner wall and a showerhead (an upper electrode). Upon completion of deposition of a carbon-based film on a substrate, the cleaning of the reactor is initiated. If a fluorine-containing gas such as NF3, C2F6, or C3F8, is used as a cleaning gas, fluorine binds to hydrogen present in the carbon-based film during a cleaning process, thereby generating HF which is likely to cause erosion to a showerhead or susceptor made of aluminum or its alloy. Consequently, contaminant particles are generated and accumulate on an inner wall or the showerhead, and then fall on a substrate surface during a deposition process. Alternatively or additionally, if a fluorine-containing gas such as NF3, C2F6, or C3F8, is used as a cleaning gas, fluorine binds to aluminum which is the main material of an upper electrode, thereby generating aluminum fluoride (AlF) which is likely to be a cause of particle contamination on a showerhead surface. The above theories are not intended to limit the present invention.
In an embodiment of the present invention, a carbon-based film can effectively be removed using oxygen gas and/or nitrogen oxide gas. When using oxygen gas and/or nitrogen oxide gas as a cleaning gas, C and H in the carbon-based film (e.g., C:H=50%:50%) react with 0 and generate CO2 and H2O which are discharged from the reactor to an exhaust system. These species are not likely to cause erosion to electrodes, thereby suppressing generation of contaminant particles.
When nitrogen oxide gas is added to oxygen gas, a plasma can be more stabilized and distributed widely inside the reactor, thereby more uniformly supplying an etchent (etching agent) to a wide area of the reactor. As a result, it is possible to increase a cleaning rate without causing damage to the electrodes. A ratio of oxygen gas to nitrogen oxide gas may be 100:0 to 0:100 including 90:10, 80:20, 70:30, 60:40, 50:50, 40:60, 30:70, 20:80, 10:90, and ranges between any two numerals of the foregoing. The ratio can be selected depending on a priority or target area of cleaning in the cleaning process. If priority is given to electrodes for cleaning, the ratio may be set high, and if priority is given to an inner wall of the reactor, the ratio may be set low. For example, if the deposition temperature is relatively low, accumulation of more particles on the electrodes and the inner wall of the reactor occurs, and if the deposition temperature is relatively high, accumulation of less particles occurs. It is possible to determine in advance through experiments which section of the reactor needs to be targeted more than other sections for cleaning.
In the above embodiments and embodiment described below, the oxygen gas may be O2 gas or O3 gas singly or in combination, and preferably O2 gas. The nitrogen oxide gas may be N2O gas, NO gas, N2O3 gas, or NO2 gas singly or in any combination, and preferably N2O gas.
In an embodiment, the cleaning steps includes changing a cleaning gas by (a) increasing a flow rate of oxygen gas for increasing a ratio of an etching rate of a carbon-based film accumulated on an upper electrode provided in the reactor to an etching rate of a carbon-based film polymer accumulated on an inner wall of the reactor, or (b) increasing a flow rate of nitrogen oxide gas for decreasing a ratio of an etching rate of the carbon-based film on the upper electrode to an etching rate of the carbon-based film on the inner wall. The flow rate of oxygen gas may be in the range of 100 sccm to 10,000 sccm, including 500 sccm, 1,000 sccm, 2,000 sccm, 3,000 sccm, 5,000 sccm, 7,000 sccm, and ranges between any two numbers of the foregoing, preferably more than 2,000 sccm and less than 7,000 sccm. The flow rate of nitrogen oxide gas may be in the range of 10 sccm to 6,000 sccm, including 50 sccm, 100 sccm, 500 sccm, 1,000 sccm, 2,000 sccm, 5,000 sccm, and ranges between any two numbers of the foregoing, preferably more than 1,000 sccm and less than 3,000 sccm. The total flow rate of a cleaning gas may be in the range of 100 sccm to 10,000 sccm, including 500 sccm, 1,000 sccm, 2,000 sccm, 3,000 sccm, 5,000 sccm, 7,000 sccm, and ranges between any two numbers of the foregoing, preferably more than 2,000 sccm and less than 7,000 sccm. The cleaning gas may contain oxygen gas and/or nitrogen oxide gas in an amount of more than 50% to 100% of the cleaning gas (including 60%, 70%, 80%, 90%, 95%, and ranges between any two numbers of the foregoing, preferably more than 90%).
In addition, in in-situ plasma cleaning, by controlling cleaning pressure, a cleaning rate (etching rate) can be adjusted differently between an electrode and an inner wall of the reaction. For example, at a high pressure such as about 800 Pa, a plasma tends to converge between the upper and lower electrodes, and thus, carbon-based film accumulated on the electrodes can effectively be removed. In the above, the etching rate at the electrodes can be increased, while the etching rate on the inner wall can be decrease (or is not as much increased as that at the electrodes) as compared with those at a low pressure such as about 100 Pa. On the other hand, at a low pressure such as about 100 Pa, a plasma tends to diverge and reach an inner wall of the reactor, and thus, carbon-based film accumulated on the inner wall can effectively be removed. In the above, the etching rate on the inner wall can be increased, while the etching rate at the electrode can be decreased (or is not as much increased as that on the inner wall) as compared with those at a high pressure such as about 800 Pa.
The pressure may be controlled at about 100 Pa to about 800 Pa in an embodiment. If the pressure is less than about 100 Pa, the etching rate tends to decrease and become insufficient. If the pressure is more than about 800 Pa, a plasma converges on the electrodes and tends to cause damage to the electrodes. For example, in order to increase the etching rate at the electrode, the pressure may be controlled at about 400 Pa to about 800 Pa. In order to increase the etching rate on the inner wall of the reactor, the pressure may be controlled at about 100 Pa to about 400 Pa.
In an embodiment, the steps of cleaning includes changing the pressure by (c) increasing the pressure for increasing a ratio of an etching rate of the carbon-based film on the upper electrode to an etching rate of the carbon-based film on the inner wall, or (d) decreasing the pressure for decreasing a ratio of an etching rate of the carbon-based film on the upper electrode to an etching rate of the carbon-based film on the inner wall.
Radio-frequency (RF) power for generating a plasma for cleaning can be of a conventional frequency such as 13.56 MHz or 27.12 MHz or can be of the conventional frequencies in combination with a low frequency such as 350 kHz or 430 kHz. A mixture of high-frequency RF power and low-frequency RF power can increase the overall etching rate in an embodiment. The ratio of high-frequency RF power to low-frequency RF power may be 100:5 to 100:60, preferably 100:10 to 100:30). In an embodiment, RF power is of 500 W to 3,000 W, preferably 1,000 W to 2,000 W. In another embodiment, RF power is of 1,000 W to 4,000 W, preferably 2,500 W to 3,000 W, especially in combination with a high oxygen flow such as 5,000 sccm to 10,000 sccm. This embodiment is suitable for a reaction chamber for a substrate having a diameter of 300 mm, for example.
In an embodiment, by adjusting a gap between the upper electrode and the lower electrode, a cleaning rate (etching rate) can be adjusted differently between an electrode and an inner wall of the reaction. For example, when the gap is small, the etching rate at the electrodes can be increased; and when the gap is large, the etching rate on the inner wall can be increased. In an embodiment, the gap between the upper and lower electrodes may be in the range of 10 mm to 100 mm including 20 mm, 30 mm, 50 mm, 70 mm, and ranges between any two numbers of the foregoing.
Temperature of the reactor (the temperature of a susceptor) may be 100-700° C., including 200, 300, 400, 500, 600° C., and any ranges between any two numbers of the foregoing.
In another embodiment, a cleaning gas may further comprise fluorine-containing gas such as one or more of F2, NF3, CF4, C2F6, C3F8, C4F8, CHF3, SF6, and COF2 in order to increase the etching rate and to expand an effective etching area. However, fluorine-containing gas may cause detaching of an anode oxide film formed on a surface of the upper electrode made of aluminum or its alloy and may cause erosion of the aluminum surface of the electrode, or such fluorine-containing gas may cause forming of aluminum-fluoride on a aluminum surface of upper electrode (in the case of a showerhead having no anodic oxide film), thereby generating contaminant particles. Fluorine-containing gas may be added in an amount of about 1% to about 10% (preferably less than 5% in an embodiment, 5-9% in another embodiment) of the total cleaning gas. The gas of high amount fluorine shows higher etching rate but it may intensively show the above contamination issue. Thus, the amount of fluorine-containing gas should be optimized considering the above.
The cleaning may be conducted every after processing a single substrate or more than one substrate. The frequency of cleaning may be reduced to every 5 to 50 substrates for getting higher through-put. In another embodiment, the frequency of cleaning may be reduced to every 2 to 50 substrates including 2 substrates, 4 substrates, one lot (25 substrates), and two lots (50 substrates), preferably every 4 substrates.
In another embodiment, a cleaning gas may further comprise a plasma stabilizing gas such as one or more of inert gas (e.g., He, Ne, Ar), N2, and CO2, so that an etchant (etching agent) can reach every corner of the reactor. The plasma stabilizing gas may be added in an amount of about 1% to less than 50% (preferably less than 30%) of the total cleaning gas.
By manipulating the above control parameters for cleaning, it becomes possible to differently control a cleaning rate at the electrodes and a cleaning rate on an inner wall of the reactor without generating contaminant particles. For example, a ratio of a cleaning rate at an inner wall of the reactor to a cleaning rate at an upper electrode can be adjusted in the range of 3/100 to 110/100 (including 5/100, 10/100, 30/100, 50/100, 70/100, 100/100, and ranges between any two numbers of the foregoing). In an embodiment, the etching rate on an inner wall of the reactor may be adjusted in the range of about 40 nm/min to about 2,000 nm/min (50 nm/min, 100 nm/min, 200 nm/min, 500 nm/min, 1,000 nm/min, 1,500 nm/min, and ranges between any two numbers of the foregoing), and the etching rate at an electrode of the reactor may be adjusted in the range of about 300 nm/min to about 2,500 nm/min (400 nm/min, 600 nm/min, 1,000 nm/min, 1,500 nm/min, 2,000 nm/min, and ranges between any two numbers of the foregoing).
In an embodiment, two-step cleaning may be performed. In the 1st step, by using a high oxygen gas flow rate such as 5,000 sccm to 10,000 sccm, a high RF power such as 2,500 W to 3,000 W, a high pressure such as 400 Pa to 800 Pa, and a small gap between the electrodes such as 15 mm to 35 mm, a high cleaning rate such as 2,000 nm/min to 4,000 nm/min (especially 3,000 nm/min or higher in a center area of the electrode) can be achieved. The 1st step may not be effective to clean an inner wall of the chamber. This 1st step may further be divided into two steps to increase cleaning efficiency. In order to clean the inner wall, the 2nd step may be performed by using a lower oxygen gas flow rate such as 2,000 sccm to 4,500 sccm (with 3-9% of F-containing gas), a lower pressure such as 100 Pa to 300 Pa, and a greater gap between the electrodes such as 35 mm to 65 mm, a high cleaning rate such as 600 nm/min to 1,000 nm/min for the inner wall can be achieved. This 2nd step may further be divided into two steps to increase cleaning efficiency.
In the present disclosure where conditions and/or structures are not specified, the skilled artisan in the art can readily provide such conditions and/or structures, in view of the present disclosure, as a matter of routine experimentation. Further, the disclosure of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/697,393, filed Apr. 6, 2007, which is commonly owned by the assignee of the present application and which claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Application No. 60/745,102, filed Apr. 19, 2006, can be used in embodiments of the present invention, the disclosure of which is herein incorporated by reference in their entirety.
The present invention will be explained with reference to preferred embodiment and drawings. The preferred embodiments and drawings are not intended to limit the present invention. Also, in the present disclosure, the numerical numbers applied in embodiments can be modified by a range of at least ±50% in other embodiments, and the ranges applied in embodiments may include or exclude the endpoints.
Nano-Carbon Polymer Formation
In this example, by providing a pair of electrically conductive flat-plate electrodes 4, 2 in parallel and facing each other inside a reaction chamber 11, applying RF power 5 to one side, and electrically grounding 12 the other side, plasma is excited between the electrodes. A temperature regulator is provided in a lower stage 2, and a temperature is kept constantly at a given temperature in the range of 0° C.-650° C. to regulate a temperature of a substrate 1 placed thereon. An upper electrode 4 serves as a shower plate as well, and reaction gas is introduced into the reaction chamber 11 through the shower plate. Additionally, in the reaction chamber 11, an exhaust pipe 6 is provided through which gas inside the reaction chamber 11 is exhausted.
A vaporizer 10 which vaporizes a liquid organic monomer has an inlet port for a liquid and an inlet port for an inert gas in an embodiment and comprises a mixing unit for mixing these gases and a unit for heating the mixture. In the embodiment shown in
The piping introducing the gas from the vaporizer to the reactor and a showerhead unit in an upper portion of the reactor are heated/temperature-controlled at a given temperature in the range of 30° C.-350° C. by a heater and their outer side is covered by an insulating material.
The apparatus shown in
Further, the remote plasma unit 13 can be disposed on a side of the reactor as shown in
Deposition conditions: Deposition conditions in the examples are as follows: Eagle®12 (ASM Japan) possessing a basic structure shown in
Reactor settings:
Temperature of upper electrode (shower plate): 140° C.
Size of shower plate: φ325 mm
(Size of substrate: φ300 mm)
Susceptor temperature: 550° C.
Vaporizer: Vaporizing unit temperature: 40° C.
Controlled temperature of gas inlet piping: 100° C.
Gap between shower plate and susceptor: 16 mm
Process conditions:
Precursor: Cyclopentene: 264 sccm
He supplied to vaporizer: 500 sccm
Ar supplied to the reactor: 700 sccm
Process gas He supplied to the reactor: 470 sccm
RF Power (13.56 MHz): 2000 W
Pressure: 600 Pa
Deposition time: 120 sec
Deposited film properties:
Thickness: 500 nm
RI(n)@633 nm: 1.927
RI(k)@633 nm: 0.431
Density: 1.43 g/cm3
Stress: −76 MPa
After depositing a nano-carbon polymer film on a semiconductor substrate, cleaning began using a remote plasma unit under respective conditions described blow.
As a cleaning gas, O2 gas was solely used. Ar gas was used only for igniting plasma at the remote plasma unit. It took about 5 sec to ignite plasma, and Ar flow was continued for about 15 sec. Cleaning conditions in this example and cleaning results are shown as follows. A cleaning rate was evaluated based on an etching rate on the carbon-based polymer film deposited on the substrate. In the examples, the etching rates were treated as cleaning rates.
Cleaning conditions:
Gap between shower plate and susceptor: 45 mm
Susceptor temperature: 250° C.
Ar gas supplied to the remote plasma unit: 5,000 sccm (only for igniting plasma)
O2 gas supplied to the remote plasma unit: 10,000, 13,000, 16,000 sccm
Cleaning time: 10 sec
Cleaning rates:
479 nm/min at 10,000 sccm of O2
687 nm/min at 13,000 sccm of O2
732 nm/min at 16,000 sccm of O2
Under the same conditions as in Example 1 except that Ar gas was continuously supplied to the remote plasma unit at a constant rate after the ignition. Further, the flow rate of O2 gas was slightly different. A cleaning rate (etching rate) was evaluated in the same way as in Example 1.
Cleaning conditions:
Gap between shower plate and susceptor: 45 mm
Susceptor temperature: 250° C.
Ar gas supplied to the remote plasma unit: 5,000 sccm
O2 gas supplied to the remote plasma unit: 10,000, 14,000, 18,000 sccm
Cleaning time: 10 sec
Cleaning rates:
396 nm/min at 10,000 sccm of O2
696 nm/min at 14,000 sccm of O2
1,186 nm/min at 18,000 sccm of O2
Under the same conditions as in Example 2 except that the flow rate of Ar gas was changed while the flow rate of O2 gas was constant. A cleaning rate (etching rate) was evaluated in the same way as in Example 1.
Cleaning conditions:
Gap between shower plate and susceptor: 45 mm
Susceptor temperature: 250° C.
Ar gas supplied to the remote plasma unit: 5,000, 8,500, 14,000 sccm
O2 gas supplied to the remote plasma unit: 14,000 sccm
Cleaning time: 10 sec
Cleaning rates:
696 nm/min at 5,000 sccm of Ar
1,122 nm/min at 8,500 sccm of Ar
1,490 nm/min at 14,000 sccm of Ar
As can be seen from Examples 1 and 2, when only O2 gas was used as a cleaning gas, an increase of cleaning rate was unspectacular when comparing 479 nm/min at an O2 flow rate of 16,000 sccm and 732 nm/min at an O2 flow rate of 10,000 sccm (Example 1). However, when Ar gas was added at a flow rate of 5,000 sccm to the cleaning gas, the cleaning rate was significantly increased to 1,186 nm/min at an O2 flow rate of 18,000 sccm (Example 2). Further, as shown in Example 3, when the flow rate of Ar gas was increased from 5,000 sccm to 14,000 sccm at a constant O2 flow rate of 14,000 sccm, the cleaning rate was increased by about 200% to 1,490 nm/min. Thus, it can be understood that high O2 flow rates and high Ar flow rates can significantly increase the cleaning rates. However, upper limits of O2 flow rates and Ar flow rates exist depending on the controllable input power ranges of the remote plasma unit, the controllable pressure ranges of the reactor, etc. The cleaning efficiency is as a function of quantity of supplied cleaning gas, applied input power for cleaning, and pressure during cleaning. In the case of remote plasma cleaning, the quantity of supplied gas is correlated to the applied input power. However, the remote plasma unit may have an upper limit of the applied input power such as 15 kW, and thus, naturally, an upper limit is imposed on the quantity of supplied gas. Further, when the pressure is low, excited species (radicals) have less chances to collide with unexcited species (gas), thereby increasing the cleaning efficiency. However, it is difficult to maintain low pressure when significant quantity of cleaning gas is supplied even though a high power vacuum pump is used. Thus, an upper limit is imposed on the quantity of supplied gas. In the case of in-situ cleaning, in order to avoid abnormal electric discharge, an upper limit is imposed on the quantity of supplied gas and the pressure. Accordingly, the ranges described in the present disclosure may be preferably in embodiments.
Under the same conditions as in Example 2 except that N2 gas was added to the cleaning gas while the flow rates of Ar gas and O2 gas were constant. A cleaning rate (etching rate) was evaluated in the same way as in Example 1.
Cleaning conditions:
Gap between shower plate and susceptor: 45 mm
Susceptor temperature: 250° C.
Ar gas supplied to the remote plasma unit: 5,000 sccm
O2 gas supplied to the remote plasma unit: 14,000 sccm
N2 gas supplied to the remote plasma unit: 100, 500, 1,000 sccm
Cleaning time: 10 sec
Cleaning rates:
1,463 nm/min at 100 sccm of N2
1,670 nm/min at 500 sccm of N2
1,836 nm/min at 10,000 sccm of N2
As can be seen in Examples 2 and 4, as compared with the case where the cleaning gas was composed only of O2 gas and Ar gas, when N2 gas was added even at as low a flow rate as 100 sccm to the cleaning gas, the cleaning rate was increased by about 200% from 696 nm/min to 1,463 nm/min. When N2 gas was added at 1,000 sccm, the cleaning rate was further increased to 1,836 nm/min. Thus, the addition of N2 gas can double the cleaning rate even at 100 sccm and can further increase the cleaning rate at a higher flow rate, although an upper limit may be imposed on the N2 flow rate as described earlier.
When in-situ cleaning was conducted using O2 gas as a cleaning gas, a cleaning rate was about 120 nm/min in an embodiment. Further, the O2 gas in-situ cleaning was applied to a reactor after depositing a carbon-containing film having a thickness of 200 nm, it took about 230 seconds. However, when remote plasma cleaning was conducted using 14 slm of O2 gas, 5 slm of Ar, and 1 slm of N2 gas at a pressure of 500 Pa, it took as short a time period as 155 seconds. As a result, productivity per one hour was increased by 20%. Further, ion bombardment between the electrodes was suppressed, thereby prolonging the replacement life of the electrodes. Additionally, the cost of ownership (i.e., including the cost of purchasing and maintaining an apparatus) can be lowered.
The present invention includes the above mentioned embodiments and other various embodiments including the following:
1) A method of continuously forming carbon-based films (carbon-containing films) on substrate, comprising:
2) The method according to item 1, wherein step (ii) is conducted in the reactor and/or a remote plasma unit.
3) The method according to item 1 or 2, wherein the additive gas is one or more types of gas.
4) The method according to item 3, wherein the additive gas is Ar and one or more types of other gas.
5) The method according to item 4, wherein the additive gas is Ar and N2.
6) The method according to any one of items 1 to 5, wherein the oxygen gas is O2 gas.
7) The method according to any one of items 1 to 6, wherein a flow rate of the oxygen gas is no less than 10 sccm and no more than 50,000 sccm.
8) The method according to item 7, wherein a flow rate of the oxygen gas is no less than 1,000 sccm and no more than 30,000 sccm.
9) The method according to any one of items 1 to 8, wherein a flow rate of the additive gas is no less than 10 sccm and no more than 30,000 sccm.
10) The method according to item 9, wherein a flow rate of the additive gas is no less than 1,000 sccm and no more than 20,000 sccm.
11) The method according to any one of items 1 to 10, wherein a susceptor on which the substrate is placed has a temperature of 400° C. or higher in steps (i) through (iii).
12) The method according to any one of items 1 through 11, further comprising determining a priority area of cleaning inside the reactor prior to step (ii).
13) The method according to item 12, wherein step (iii) comprises controlling pressure inside the reactor according to the priority area of cleaning.
14) The method according to item 12 or 13, wherein step (iii) comprises controlling pressure inside the reactor at about 100 Pa to about 400 Pa when the priority area of cleaning is an inner wall of the reactor.
15) The method according to item 12 or 13, wherein step (iii) comprises controlling pressure inside the reactor at about 400 Pa to about 800 Pa when the priority area of cleaning is an upper electrode.
16) The method according to any one of items 12 to 15, wherein step (iii) comprises controlling a gap between an upper electrode and a lower electrode according to the priority area of cleaning.
17) The method according to any one of items 12-16, further comprising selecting a cleaning gas including the oxygen gas and the additive gas prior to step (ii) according to the priority area of cleaning.
18) The method according to any one of items 12-17, wherein step (iii) comprises a step for adjusting a ratio of a cleaning rate at an inner wall of the reactor to a cleaning rate at an upper electrode to 3/100 to 110/100 according to the priority area of cleaning.
19) The method according to any one of items 12-18, wherein step (iii) comprises a 1st step of targeting the upper electrode as the priority area and a 2nd step of targeting the inner wall as the priority area, wherein the 1st step controls an oxygen gas flow rate in the range of 5,000 sccm to 20,000 sccm, a pressure in the range of 400 Pa to 800 Pa, and a gap between the electrodes in the range of 15 mm to 35 mm, and the 2nd step controls an oxygen gas flow rate in the ranged of 2,000 sccm to 20,000 sccm (e.g., lower than that in the 1st step), a pressure in the range of 100 Pa to 300 Pa (e.g., lower than that in the 1st step), and a gap between the electrodes in the range of 35 mm to 65 mm (e.g. greater than that in the 1st step).
20) The method according to item 2, wherein step (ii) is conducted in the reactor.
21) The method according to any one of items 1-20, wherein the carbon-based polymer film in step (i) is a carbon polymer film formed by:
22) A method of self-cleaning a plasma reactor using a cleaning gas containing oxygen gas and additive gas at a pre-selected pressure upon depositing a carbon-based film on a substrate a pre-selected number of times, comprising:
23) The method according to item 22, wherein step (ii) is conducted in the reactor and/or a remote plasma unit.
24) The method according to item 22 or 23, wherein the additive gas is one or more types of gas.
25) The method according to item 24, wherein the additive gas is Ar and one or more types of other gas.
26) The method according to item 25, wherein the additive gas is Ar and N2.
27) The method according to any one of items 22 to 26, wherein the oxygen gas is O2 gas.
28) The method according to any one of items 22 to 27, wherein a susceptor on which the substrate is placed has a temperature of 400° C. or higher in steps (i) through (iii).
29) The method according to any one of items 22 through 28, further comprising determining a priority area of cleaning inside the reactor prior to step (ii).
30) The method according to item 29, wherein step (iii) comprises controlling pressure inside the reactor according to the priority area of cleaning.
31) The method according to item 29 or 30, wherein step (iii) comprises controlling pressure inside the reactor at about 100 Pa to about 400 Pa when the priority area of cleaning is an inner wall of the reactor.
32) The method according to item 29 or 30, wherein step (iii) comprises controlling pressure inside the reactor at about 400 Pa to about 800 Pa when the priority area of cleaning is an upper electrode.
33) The method according to any one of items 29 to 32, wherein step (iii) comprises controlling a gap between an upper electrode and a lower electrode according to the priority area of cleaning.
34) The method according to any one of items 29-33, further comprising selecting a cleaning gas including the oxygen gas and the additive gas prior to step (ii) according to the priority area of cleaning.
35) The method according to any one of items 29-34, wherein step (iii) comprises a step for adjusting a ratio of a cleaning rate at an inner wall of the reactor to a cleaning rate at an upper electrode to 3/100 to 110/100 according to the priority area of cleaning.
36) The method according to any one of items 29-35, wherein step (iii) comprises a 1st step of targeting the upper electrode as the priority area and a 2nd step of targeting the inner wall as the priority area, wherein the 1st step controls an oxygen gas flow rate in the range of 5,000 sccm to 20,000 sccm, a pressure in the range of 400 Pa to 800 Pa, and a gap between the electrodes in the range of 15 mm to 35 mm, and the 2nd step controls an oxygen gas flow rate in the ranged of 2,000 sccm to 20,000 sccm (e.g., lower than that in the 1st step), a pressure in the range of 100 Pa to 300 Pa (e.g., lower than that in the 1st step), and a gap between the electrodes in the range of 35 mm to 65 mm (e.g., greater than that in the 1st step).
37) The method according to item 23, wherein step (ii) is conducted in the reactor.
It will be understood by those of skill in the art that numerous and various modifications can be made without departing from the spirit of the present invention. Therefore, it should be clearly understood that the forms of the present invention are illustrative only and are not intended to limit the scope of the present invention.
