Method to control artifacts of microstructural fabrication

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 7105098
  • Patent Number
    7,105,098
  • Date Filed
    Thursday, June 6, 2002
    22 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, September 12, 2006
    18 years ago
Abstract
New methods for fabrication of silicon microstructures have been developed. In these methods, an etching delay layer is deposited and patterned so as to provide differential control on the depth of features being etched into a substrate material. Compensation for etching-related structural artifacts can be accomplished by proper use of such an etching delay layer.
Description
FIELD OF THE INVENTION

The present invention relates generally to silicon-based microstructure fabrication, and in particular to the use of etching delay layers to control artifacts arising in fabrication of silicon-based microstructures.


BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

Development of new fabrication technologies for silicon-based microstructures is currently under aggressive pursuit. Silicon-based microstructures commonly comprise silicon and silicon oxides, but can also comprise silicon nitride, metal thin films, and a range of other structural materials known in the art. Such microstructures are commonly fabricated using a range of techniques originally developed for fabrication of silicon integrated circuits, and find application in the area of microelectromechanical systems (MEMS), and in microfluidic systems, such as micro-scale chemical sensors, gas chromatographs, and the like.


It is held desirable in the art to fabricate a desired microstructure so that the number of gross assembly steps is limited. Gross assembly steps are those which provide external functional interconnection between individually fabricated subassemblies. Gross assembly steps require precision handling, positioning, and bonding of delicate millimeter-scale structures, which are fraught with opportunities for failure. In particular, when the goal is a micromechanical device, the bonding materials can easily interfere with the desired motion of the components of the device. Similarly, when the goal is a microfluidic device, the bonding materials can block the flow channels, or prevent microvalves from functioning properly.


Working against the above motivations for direct fabrication of complex microstructures is the difficulty of fabricating such microstructures in their entirety. As the complexity of a process required for fabrication of a desired silicon microstructure increases, the useful yield of that process falls rapidly toward zero. Complex fabrication processes are not only susceptible to error, but in many cases can lead to accumulation of residual stress, nonplanarity, and other structural flaws which can render the desired product unusable.


The etching of features into a silicon-based microstructure plays a central role in the fabrication of micro-scale silicon-based devices. Both wet etching and dry etching are commonly used in such fabrication. Wet etching of silicon is commonly carried out using liquid etchants including, but not limited to, KOH, tetramethyl ammonium hydroxide, or ethylene diamine pyrochatechol. In contrast, dry etching generally comprises the application of reactive neutrals and ionic etchants generated in a plasma to the surface to be etched. Of particular utility in silicon-based microstructural fabrication is deep reactive ion etching.


Both wet and dry etching procedures exhibit an effect called aspect-ratio-dependent etching, in which a narrow feature being defined by etching deepens less rapidly than does a wide feature being defined under the same etching conditions. In other words, the etching rate varies with the size of the feature being defined. Aspect-ratio-dependent etching effects can result in the need to define and etch narrow features separately from wider features, resulting in an undesirable increase in the complexity of the overall fabrication process.


There is an ongoing need in the art for microstructural fabrication techniques which allow the development of less complex fabrication processes.


The present invention addresses this need by enabling increased control over the definition by etching of structural features having widely different pattern widths.


These and other advantages of the method of the present invention will become evident to those skilled in the art.


SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

New methods for fabrication of silicon-based microstructures have been developed. These methods comprise the deposition and patterning of an etching delay layer, whose presence modifies an etching step so as to more precisely control the end product thereof.





BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS


FIG. 1 shows a schematic illustration of various structures produced during the use of the present invention to compensate for aspect-ratio-dependent etching. FIG. 1a shows a cross-sectional view of the desired microcomponent. FIG. 1b shows a mask layer and an etching delay layer on a substrate from which the desired microcomponent is to be fabricated. FIG. 1c shows a structure during the early stages of etching, at the moment when the etching delay layer has been removed. FIG. 1d shows a structure later during the etching process, when the depth of the wide groove is catching up with the depth of the narrow groove. FIG. 1e shows attainment of the desired structure after subsequent etching.



FIG. 2 illustrates an artifact resulting from reactive ion etching of a deep well into a substrate. FIG. 2a shows the initial mask pattern on the surface of the substrate. FIG. 2b shows the well which forms from an etching process, and the gradual transition from the walls of the well to the bottom of the well.



FIG. 3 illustrates stages in the formation of a square-bottomed well in a substrate according to the present invention. FIG. 3a shows the initial substrate masked for etching with a mask layer and an etching delay layer. FIG. 3b shows the structure early in the etching process. FIG. 3c shows the structure after the etching delay layer has been removed. FIG. 3d shows the structure when the depth of the center of the well is nearly as deep as the depth at the edge of the well. FIG. 3e shows the final structure of a square-bottomed well in the substrate.





DETAILED DESCRIPTION


FIG. 1 illustrates the use of an etching delay layer in the fabrication of microstructures having features with a range of pattern shapes. Specifically, FIG. 1a shows the target microstructure. A narrow groove 101 and a wide groove 102 are to be fabricated in a substrate 100. Grooves 101 and 102 are to have the same nominal depth below the original surface of the substrate.



FIG. 1
b shows the structure immediately prior to the start of the etching process. Mask layer 103 is deposited atop substrate 100. Mask layer 103 can be either a conventional photoresist layer or a thin film hard mask (metal or dielectric) layer, and is patterned so as to define etching windows for narrow groove 101 and wide groove 102.


Etching delay layer 104 is deposited on substrate 100 within the etching window for wide groove 102. Delay of the etching process in this region is required to obtain the desired structure of FIG. 1a, because wide features etch more rapidly to a given depth than do narrow features. The thickness dd of the etching delay layer required to obtain the desired structure is given by the relation

dd=rd[(dn/rn)−(dw/rw)],

where dn is the desired depth of narrow groove 101, dw is the desired depth of wide groove 102, and rn, rw, and rd are the etching rates of the narrow groove, the wide groove, and the etching delay layer respectively. The example of FIG. 1 is chosen so that dn and dw are equal, but this is not necessary to use the present method, which can thus simultaneously enable fabrication of a multi-level surface and compensate for aspect-ratio-dependent etching effects.



FIG. 1
c shows an intermediate structure reached in the early stages of etching. Narrow groove 101 is well begun, while etching delay layer 104 has just been etched away or intentionally removed, so that the formation of wide groove 102 is just beginning. The depth of the narrow groove at this point is just sufficient to compensate for the smaller etching rate of narrow features.



FIG. 1
d shows an intermediate structure reached near the end of the etching process. Although narrow groove 101 is still deeper than is wide groove 102, the difference in depth is less than that of FIG. 1c. The larger etch rate of the wide groove relative to that of the narrow groove is narrowing the difference in depth of the two grooves.



FIG. 1
e shows the fabrication of the desired component at the end of the etching process. As desired, the depths of the two grooves is equal. Use of the etching delay layer enabled features with different etching rates to be fabricated to equal depths in a substrate using a single etching process.


Another type of etching artifact can be ameliorated by use of an etching delay layer. FIG. 2 shows the formation of a large well 202 in a substrate 200 by a reactive ion etching process. The outline of well 202 is defined by resist layer 201, as shown in FIG. 2a. FIG. 2b shows the result of etching well 202 in substrate 200. Although the desired cross-sectional shape of well 202 is rectangular, the actual shape exhibits gradual transitions 203 between the vertical walls of well 202 and the flat bottom of well 202. This is an artifact of the etching process, resulting from ions scattering away from the vertical walls of well 202 as the etching process is carried out. As a result, less etching takes place immediately adjacent to said wall, and gradual transitions 203 form.


The abovedescribed etching artifact can be largely prevented, and the desired cross-sectional shape formed, with the use of an etching delay layer, as shown in FIG. 3. FIG. 3a shows the initial configuration of the substrate to be etched immediately prior to the etching process. Here the desired shape of the well to be formed in substrate 300 is defined by mask layer 301. Mask layer 301 can comprise a metallic, dielectric, or organic layer which is sufficiently resistant to the effects of the etching process that it defines the desired shape of the well throughout the etching process step.


Etching delay layer 302 is formed and patterned within the shape defined by mask layer 301, as shown in FIG. 3a. A gap is left between etching delay layer 302 and mask layer 301, such that the size of the gap along the substrate surface is similar to, and typically a bit less than, the expected width of the gradual transition which would result from etching the desired well in the absence of etching delay layer 302. The purpose of this gap is to etch more deeply the region where the gradual transition would otherwise form, thereby attaining a substantially flat bottom for the well.



FIG. 3
b shows the structure attained early in the etching process. Here transition wells 303 have been formed around the edge of etching delay layer 302, which itself has been partially removed by the etching process.



FIG. 3
c shows the structure attained a bit later in the etching process. Here the transition wells 303 have been etched to a sufficient depth, and etching delay layer 302 has been removed, so that the well center surface 304 will deepen with continued etching.


Note that this process can be carried out with removal of etching delay layer 302 resulting solely from the substrate etching procedure, or alternately etching delay layer 302 can be removed by a separate etching or solvent step when the depth of transition wells 303 reaches their design value. In a particularly useful implementation, mask layer 301 will consist substantially of a hard-baked photoresist, and etching delay layer 302 will consist substantially of a non-hard-baked photoresist. When etching delay layer 302 is to be removed, application of a suitable solvent will remove layer 302, while substantially not removing mask layer 301.


The etching process continues, resulting in the penultimate structure shown in FIG. 3d. Here the more rapid etching rate of well center surface 304 has put that surface nearly at the same depth as that of the transition wells 303. In FIG. 3e, the well center surface and the bottoms of the transition wells have the same nominal depth, resulting in formation of the desired flat-bottomed well 305.


The specific implementations of the present invention described above are intended only to illustrate various features of the present invention. The scope of the present invention is intended to be set by the claims in view of the specification.

Claims
  • 1. A method for fabrication of silicon-based microstructures, comprising the deposition and patterning of an etching delay layer, and further comprising an etching process, the thickness and location of said etching delay layer being chosen to compensate for aspect-ratio-dependent etching effects.
  • 2. The method of claim 1, wherein said etching delay layer comprises an inorganic thin film.
  • 3. The method of claim 1, wherein said etching delay layer comprises an organic thin film.
  • 4. The method of claim 3, wherein said organic thin film comprises a polymer.
  • 5. A method for fabrication of silicon-based microstructures, comprising the deposition and patterning of an etching delay layer and the deposition and patterning of a mask layer, the size, shape, and position of the etching delay layer relative to the mask layer being in such a way as to substantially avoid etching artifacts.
  • 6. The method of claim 5, wherein the mask layer comprises a hard-baked photoresist, the etching delay layer comprises a photoresist, and the etching delay layer is removed by application of a solvent to which the mask layer is substantially insoluble.
GOVERNMENT RIGHTS

This invention was made with Government support under Contract DE-AC04-94AL85000 awarded by the U.S. Department of Energy. The Government has certain rights in the invention.

US Referenced Citations (113)
Number Name Date Kind
749633 Steeley Jan 1904 A
2178931 Crites et al. Nov 1939 A
2197392 Hawthorn Apr 1940 A
2249769 Leonardon Jul 1941 A
2301783 Lee Nov 1942 A
2354887 Silverman et al. Aug 1944 A
2379800 Hare Jul 1945 A
2414719 Cloud Jan 1947 A
2531120 Feaster Nov 1950 A
2633414 Boivinet Mar 1953 A
2659773 Barney Nov 1953 A
2662123 Koenig, Jr. Dec 1953 A
2748358 Johnston May 1956 A
2974303 Dixon Mar 1961 A
2982360 Morton et al. May 1961 A
3079549 Martin Feb 1963 A
3090031 Lord May 1963 A
3170137 Brandt Feb 1965 A
3186222 Martin Jun 1965 A
3194886 Mason Jul 1965 A
3209323 Grossman, Jr. Sep 1965 A
3227973 Gray Jan 1966 A
3253245 Brandt May 1966 A
3518608 Papadopoulos Jun 1970 A
3696332 Dickson, Jr. et al. Oct 1972 A
3793632 Still Feb 1974 A
3807502 Heilhecker et al. Apr 1974 A
3879097 Oertle Apr 1975 A
3930220 Shawhan Dec 1975 A
3957118 Barry et al. May 1976 A
3989330 Cullen et al. Nov 1976 A
4012092 Godbey Mar 1977 A
4087781 Grossi et al. May 1978 A
4095865 Denison et al. Jun 1978 A
4121193 Denison Oct 1978 A
4126848 Denison Nov 1978 A
4215426 Klatt Jul 1980 A
4220381 van der Graaf Sep 1980 A
4348672 Givler Sep 1982 A
4445734 Cunningham May 1984 A
4496203 Meadows Jan 1985 A
4537457 Davis, Jr. et al. Aug 1985 A
4578675 Macleod Mar 1986 A
4605268 Meador Aug 1986 A
4660910 Sharp et al. Apr 1987 A
4683944 Curlett Aug 1987 A
4698631 Kelly, Jr. et al. Oct 1987 A
4722402 Weldon Feb 1988 A
4785247 Meador et al. Nov 1988 A
4788544 Howard Nov 1988 A
4806928 Veneruso Feb 1989 A
4884071 Howard Nov 1989 A
4901069 Veneruso Feb 1990 A
4914433 Galle Apr 1990 A
4924949 Curlett May 1990 A
5008664 More et al. Apr 1991 A
5052941 Hernandez-Marti et al. Oct 1991 A
5148408 Matthews Sep 1992 A
5248857 Ollivier Sep 1993 A
5278550 Rhein-Knudsen et al. Jan 1994 A
5302138 Shields Apr 1994 A
5311661 Zifferer May 1994 A
5332049 Tew Jul 1994 A
5334801 Mohn Aug 1994 A
5371496 Tanamachi Dec 1994 A
5454605 Mott Oct 1995 A
5455573 Delatorre Oct 1995 A
5505502 Smith et al. Apr 1996 A
5517843 Winship May 1996 A
5521592 Veneruso May 1996 A
5568448 Tanigushi et al. Oct 1996 A
5650983 Kondo et al. Jul 1997 A
5691712 Meek et al. Nov 1997 A
5743301 Winship Apr 1998 A
RE35790 Pustanyk et al. May 1998 E
5810401 Mosing et al. Sep 1998 A
5833490 Bouldin Nov 1998 A
5853199 Wilson Dec 1998 A
5856710 Baughman et al. Jan 1999 A
5898408 Du Apr 1999 A
5908212 Smith et al. Jun 1999 A
5924499 Birchak et al. Jul 1999 A
5942990 Smith et al. Aug 1999 A
5955966 Jeffryes et al. Sep 1999 A
5959547 Tubel et al. Sep 1999 A
5971072 Huber et al. Oct 1999 A
6030004 Schock et al. Feb 2000 A
6041872 Holcomb Mar 2000 A
6045165 Sugino et al. Apr 2000 A
6046685 Tubel Apr 2000 A
6057784 Schaaf et al. May 2000 A
6104707 Abraham Aug 2000 A
6108268 Moss Aug 2000 A
6123561 Turner et al. Sep 2000 A
6141763 Smith et al. Oct 2000 A
6173334 Matsuzaki et al. Jan 2001 B1
6177882 Ringgenberg et al. Jan 2001 B1
6188223 Van Steenwyk et al. Feb 2001 B1
6196335 Rodney Mar 2001 B1
6209632 Holbert et al. Apr 2001 B1
6223826 Chau et al. May 2001 B1
6291357 Zhang et al. Sep 2001 B1
6367565 Hall Apr 2002 B1
6392317 Hall et al. May 2002 B1
6405795 Holbert et al. Jun 2002 B1
6641434 Boyle et al. Nov 2003 B1
6655464 Chau et al. Dec 2003 B1
6670880 Hall et al. Dec 2003 B1
6703132 Yasuda et al. Mar 2004 B1
20020135179 Boyle et al. Sep 2002 A1
20020193004 Boyle et al. Dec 2002 A1
20030070842 Bailey et al. Apr 2003 A1
20030213598 Hughes Nov 2003 A1