The present invention relates generally to silicon-based microstructure fabrication, and in particular to the use of etching delay layers to control artifacts arising in fabrication of silicon-based microstructures.
Development of new fabrication technologies for silicon-based microstructures is currently under aggressive pursuit. Silicon-based microstructures commonly comprise silicon and silicon oxides, but can also comprise silicon nitride, metal thin films, and a range of other structural materials known in the art. Such microstructures are commonly fabricated using a range of techniques originally developed for fabrication of silicon integrated circuits, and find application in the area of microelectromechanical systems (MEMS), and in microfluidic systems, such as micro-scale chemical sensors, gas chromatographs, and the like.
It is held desirable in the art to fabricate a desired microstructure so that the number of gross assembly steps is limited. Gross assembly steps are those which provide external functional interconnection between individually fabricated subassemblies. Gross assembly steps require precision handling, positioning, and bonding of delicate millimeter-scale structures, which are fraught with opportunities for failure. In particular, when the goal is a micromechanical device, the bonding materials can easily interfere with the desired motion of the components of the device. Similarly, when the goal is a microfluidic device, the bonding materials can block the flow channels, or prevent microvalves from functioning properly.
Working against the above motivations for direct fabrication of complex microstructures is the difficulty of fabricating such microstructures in their entirety. As the complexity of a process required for fabrication of a desired silicon microstructure increases, the useful yield of that process falls rapidly toward zero. Complex fabrication processes are not only susceptible to error, but in many cases can lead to accumulation of residual stress, nonplanarity, and other structural flaws which can render the desired product unusable.
The etching of features into a silicon-based microstructure plays a central role in the fabrication of micro-scale silicon-based devices. Both wet etching and dry etching are commonly used in such fabrication. Wet etching of silicon is commonly carried out using liquid etchants including, but not limited to, KOH, tetramethyl ammonium hydroxide, or ethylene diamine pyrochatechol. In contrast, dry etching generally comprises the application of reactive neutrals and ionic etchants generated in a plasma to the surface to be etched. Of particular utility in silicon-based microstructural fabrication is deep reactive ion etching.
Both wet and dry etching procedures exhibit an effect called aspect-ratio-dependent etching, in which a narrow feature being defined by etching deepens less rapidly than does a wide feature being defined under the same etching conditions. In other words, the etching rate varies with the size of the feature being defined. Aspect-ratio-dependent etching effects can result in the need to define and etch narrow features separately from wider features, resulting in an undesirable increase in the complexity of the overall fabrication process.
There is an ongoing need in the art for microstructural fabrication techniques which allow the development of less complex fabrication processes.
The present invention addresses this need by enabling increased control over the definition by etching of structural features having widely different pattern widths.
These and other advantages of the method of the present invention will become evident to those skilled in the art.
New methods for fabrication of silicon-based microstructures have been developed. These methods comprise the deposition and patterning of an etching delay layer, whose presence modifies an etching step so as to more precisely control the end product thereof.
b shows the structure immediately prior to the start of the etching process. Mask layer 103 is deposited atop substrate 100. Mask layer 103 can be either a conventional photoresist layer or a thin film hard mask (metal or dielectric) layer, and is patterned so as to define etching windows for narrow groove 101 and wide groove 102.
Etching delay layer 104 is deposited on substrate 100 within the etching window for wide groove 102. Delay of the etching process in this region is required to obtain the desired structure of
dd=rd[(dn/rn)−(dw/rw)],
where dn is the desired depth of narrow groove 101, dw is the desired depth of wide groove 102, and rn, rw, and rd are the etching rates of the narrow groove, the wide groove, and the etching delay layer respectively. The example of
c shows an intermediate structure reached in the early stages of etching. Narrow groove 101 is well begun, while etching delay layer 104 has just been etched away or intentionally removed, so that the formation of wide groove 102 is just beginning. The depth of the narrow groove at this point is just sufficient to compensate for the smaller etching rate of narrow features.
d shows an intermediate structure reached near the end of the etching process. Although narrow groove 101 is still deeper than is wide groove 102, the difference in depth is less than that of
e shows the fabrication of the desired component at the end of the etching process. As desired, the depths of the two grooves is equal. Use of the etching delay layer enabled features with different etching rates to be fabricated to equal depths in a substrate using a single etching process.
Another type of etching artifact can be ameliorated by use of an etching delay layer.
The abovedescribed etching artifact can be largely prevented, and the desired cross-sectional shape formed, with the use of an etching delay layer, as shown in
Etching delay layer 302 is formed and patterned within the shape defined by mask layer 301, as shown in
b shows the structure attained early in the etching process. Here transition wells 303 have been formed around the edge of etching delay layer 302, which itself has been partially removed by the etching process.
c shows the structure attained a bit later in the etching process. Here the transition wells 303 have been etched to a sufficient depth, and etching delay layer 302 has been removed, so that the well center surface 304 will deepen with continued etching.
Note that this process can be carried out with removal of etching delay layer 302 resulting solely from the substrate etching procedure, or alternately etching delay layer 302 can be removed by a separate etching or solvent step when the depth of transition wells 303 reaches their design value. In a particularly useful implementation, mask layer 301 will consist substantially of a hard-baked photoresist, and etching delay layer 302 will consist substantially of a non-hard-baked photoresist. When etching delay layer 302 is to be removed, application of a suitable solvent will remove layer 302, while substantially not removing mask layer 301.
The etching process continues, resulting in the penultimate structure shown in
The specific implementations of the present invention described above are intended only to illustrate various features of the present invention. The scope of the present invention is intended to be set by the claims in view of the specification.
This invention was made with Government support under Contract DE-AC04-94AL85000 awarded by the U.S. Department of Energy. The Government has certain rights in the invention.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
749633 | Steeley | Jan 1904 | A |
2178931 | Crites et al. | Nov 1939 | A |
2197392 | Hawthorn | Apr 1940 | A |
2249769 | Leonardon | Jul 1941 | A |
2301783 | Lee | Nov 1942 | A |
2354887 | Silverman et al. | Aug 1944 | A |
2379800 | Hare | Jul 1945 | A |
2414719 | Cloud | Jan 1947 | A |
2531120 | Feaster | Nov 1950 | A |
2633414 | Boivinet | Mar 1953 | A |
2659773 | Barney | Nov 1953 | A |
2662123 | Koenig, Jr. | Dec 1953 | A |
2748358 | Johnston | May 1956 | A |
2974303 | Dixon | Mar 1961 | A |
2982360 | Morton et al. | May 1961 | A |
3079549 | Martin | Feb 1963 | A |
3090031 | Lord | May 1963 | A |
3170137 | Brandt | Feb 1965 | A |
3186222 | Martin | Jun 1965 | A |
3194886 | Mason | Jul 1965 | A |
3209323 | Grossman, Jr. | Sep 1965 | A |
3227973 | Gray | Jan 1966 | A |
3253245 | Brandt | May 1966 | A |
3518608 | Papadopoulos | Jun 1970 | A |
3696332 | Dickson, Jr. et al. | Oct 1972 | A |
3793632 | Still | Feb 1974 | A |
3807502 | Heilhecker et al. | Apr 1974 | A |
3879097 | Oertle | Apr 1975 | A |
3930220 | Shawhan | Dec 1975 | A |
3957118 | Barry et al. | May 1976 | A |
3989330 | Cullen et al. | Nov 1976 | A |
4012092 | Godbey | Mar 1977 | A |
4087781 | Grossi et al. | May 1978 | A |
4095865 | Denison et al. | Jun 1978 | A |
4121193 | Denison | Oct 1978 | A |
4126848 | Denison | Nov 1978 | A |
4215426 | Klatt | Jul 1980 | A |
4220381 | van der Graaf | Sep 1980 | A |
4348672 | Givler | Sep 1982 | A |
4445734 | Cunningham | May 1984 | A |
4496203 | Meadows | Jan 1985 | A |
4537457 | Davis, Jr. et al. | Aug 1985 | A |
4578675 | Macleod | Mar 1986 | A |
4605268 | Meador | Aug 1986 | A |
4660910 | Sharp et al. | Apr 1987 | A |
4683944 | Curlett | Aug 1987 | A |
4698631 | Kelly, Jr. et al. | Oct 1987 | A |
4722402 | Weldon | Feb 1988 | A |
4785247 | Meador et al. | Nov 1988 | A |
4788544 | Howard | Nov 1988 | A |
4806928 | Veneruso | Feb 1989 | A |
4884071 | Howard | Nov 1989 | A |
4901069 | Veneruso | Feb 1990 | A |
4914433 | Galle | Apr 1990 | A |
4924949 | Curlett | May 1990 | A |
5008664 | More et al. | Apr 1991 | A |
5052941 | Hernandez-Marti et al. | Oct 1991 | A |
5148408 | Matthews | Sep 1992 | A |
5248857 | Ollivier | Sep 1993 | A |
5278550 | Rhein-Knudsen et al. | Jan 1994 | A |
5302138 | Shields | Apr 1994 | A |
5311661 | Zifferer | May 1994 | A |
5332049 | Tew | Jul 1994 | A |
5334801 | Mohn | Aug 1994 | A |
5371496 | Tanamachi | Dec 1994 | A |
5454605 | Mott | Oct 1995 | A |
5455573 | Delatorre | Oct 1995 | A |
5505502 | Smith et al. | Apr 1996 | A |
5517843 | Winship | May 1996 | A |
5521592 | Veneruso | May 1996 | A |
5568448 | Tanigushi et al. | Oct 1996 | A |
5650983 | Kondo et al. | Jul 1997 | A |
5691712 | Meek et al. | Nov 1997 | A |
5743301 | Winship | Apr 1998 | A |
RE35790 | Pustanyk et al. | May 1998 | E |
5810401 | Mosing et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5833490 | Bouldin | Nov 1998 | A |
5853199 | Wilson | Dec 1998 | A |
5856710 | Baughman et al. | Jan 1999 | A |
5898408 | Du | Apr 1999 | A |
5908212 | Smith et al. | Jun 1999 | A |
5924499 | Birchak et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
5942990 | Smith et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
5955966 | Jeffryes et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
5959547 | Tubel et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
5971072 | Huber et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
6030004 | Schock et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6041872 | Holcomb | Mar 2000 | A |
6045165 | Sugino et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
6046685 | Tubel | Apr 2000 | A |
6057784 | Schaaf et al. | May 2000 | A |
6104707 | Abraham | Aug 2000 | A |
6108268 | Moss | Aug 2000 | A |
6123561 | Turner et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
6141763 | Smith et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6173334 | Matsuzaki et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6177882 | Ringgenberg et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6188223 | Van Steenwyk et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6196335 | Rodney | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6209632 | Holbert et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6223826 | Chau et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6291357 | Zhang et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6367565 | Hall | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6392317 | Hall et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
6405795 | Holbert et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6641434 | Boyle et al. | Nov 2003 | B1 |
6655464 | Chau et al. | Dec 2003 | B1 |
6670880 | Hall et al. | Dec 2003 | B1 |
6703132 | Yasuda et al. | Mar 2004 | B1 |
20020135179 | Boyle et al. | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20020193004 | Boyle et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20030070842 | Bailey et al. | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030213598 | Hughes | Nov 2003 | A1 |