Methodology for equalizing systemic latencies in television reception in connection with games of skill played in connection with live television programming

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 11007434
  • Patent Number
    11,007,434
  • Date Filed
    Saturday, May 4, 2019
    5 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, May 18, 2021
    3 years ago
Abstract
A method of and system for handling latency issues encountered in producing real-time entertainment such as games of skill synchronized with live or taped televised events is described herein. There are multiple situations that are dealt with regarding latencies in receiving a television signal with respect to real-time entertainment based on the unfolding games played along with the telecasts. Systemic delays, arbitrarily imposed delays of a broadcast signal and variances in the precise broadcast times of taped television programs have to be equalized so as to provide fair entertainment.
Description
FIELD OF THE INVENTION

The present invention relates to the field of distributed gaming. More specifically, the present invention relates to the field of distributed gaming utilizing a mobile device.


BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

In the United States alone there are over 170 million registered cellular phones. With the expiration of the U.S. Pat. No. 4,592,546 to Fascenda and Lockton, companies are able to now use the cellular phone and other mobile communication devices utilizing a multicast network to control television viewers in games of skill based upon predicting, for example, what the quarterback may call on the next play within a football game. Both prime time and programs syndicated on a market-by-market basis lend themselves to games of skill. In addition, games of skill with a common start time can be conducted simultaneously among cellular phone owners, based on classic card, dice, trivia, and other games. In order to avoid the anti-gaming laws in the various states, the winners must be determined by the relative skill, experience and practice of the player in each discrete game.


U.S. Pat. No. 5,813,913 ('913) to Berner and Lockton provides for a central computing system which includes a means of grouping participants having similar skill levels together in simultaneous, but separate, levels of competition playing an identical game. The relative performances are communicated to only those participants competing at the same skill level. The '913 patent also provides for a wireless receiving device to permanently store the specific skill level for each participant for each type of common event such as those based on televised sports or game shows. The '913 patent provides for a telephonic link at the completion of the game to collect information and update the skill level of the participants of a particular game. When a person achieves sufficient points or meets other objective criteria to graduate into another skill level, a method is provided for accomplishing this in the central computer and then transmitting an alert to the participant notifying them of their promotion. The '913 patent describes awarding prizes and providing recognition for the members of each discreet skill level in a common game. All users, no matter what level they are on, receive the same number of questions and thus the possibility of earning the same number of points. Thus direct comparisons between users at different levels, although not encouraged are possible. Such comparisons between players of disparate skills can lead to user discouragement.


Games of skill and chance have an intrinsic excitement and entertainment value. Any game is greatly enhanced by a participant's ability to know how their performance compares in relation to other participants and/or to historical performance for the game throughout the contest. As with any game of skill, competition among friends, or with strangers of similar experience, or the ability at ones option, sometimes for an extra consideration, to compete in a separate team or individual contest, offers the opportunity of increased enjoyment and prizes.


Games of skill that rely on participation by watching an event on a television have potential latency issues since television signal reception is not synchronized nationwide. For example, a participant in Texas using a satellite dish network may experience a 3 second delay compared to an individual in California using a cable network. Also, there are delays between individuals attending a game live and those watching the game live on television. Furthermore, for taped programs, both those shown to viewers in time zones or those syndicated on a market-by-market basis, there are potential delay issues as experienced with the live broadcasts in addition to other possible differences in timing of the broadcasts. Therefore, to maintain user enjoyment and fairness for all participants, these delays must be neutralized.


SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

A method of and system for handling latency issues encountered in producing real-time entertainment such as games of skill synchronized with live or taped televised events is described herein. There are multiple situations that are dealt with regarding latencies in receiving a television signal with respect to real-time entertainment based on the unfolding games played along with the telecasts. Systemic delays, arbitrarily imposed delays of a broadcast signal and variances in the precise broadcast times of taped television programs have to be equalized so as to provide fair entertainment.


In one aspect, a method of equalizing effects of latency differences in a game of skill comprises grouping participants into a set of cohorts viewing a telecast delivered by identical transmission and reception systems, determining an amount of delay for each cohort in the set of cohorts and substantially equalizing the set of cohorts through adjustment of the amount of delay. The method further comprises determining how each participant receives a television signal. How each participant receives a television signal is selected from the group consisting of an over the air broadcast, a cable system and a satellite system. The participants are grouped based on how the participants receive a television signal. The method further comprises determining if there is additional processing of a television signal in a reception location. The additional processing occurs within a participant's location selected from the group consisting of a public place, a home, an office and a bar. Since each cable system may impose different delay at their head-ends, the specific cable provider is identified. Determining the amount of delay comprises one or more of requiring the participants to answer questions related to their television system service, requiring the participants to mark on a game playing client device, a precise time that a predetermined audio or visual event is viewed on a television program, utilizing a GPS function in a cellular phone to determine a physical location of each of the participants, utilizing an employee of a game producer who is a member of each cohort in the set of cohorts to determine the amount of delay, inserting an artifact in the telecast in which the participants respond to, and establishing the amount of delay through an automated system which samples an audio or video track of a satellite, cable or over the air broadcast television signal, linked to a game server, to provide information related to a precise arrival of an underlying television picture. An average is taken when requiring participants to mark the precise time the predetermined audio or visual event is viewed on the television program. Equalizing the set of cohorts comprises at least one of time stamping the amount of delay on a game lock out signal, imposing the amount of delay on an entire game data stream and sending game control data to the participant cohorts at the same time where client software delays presentation of game data based on a precise time of reception of the telecast by the group.


In another aspect, a method of preventing a first set of participants at a live event from having an advantage over a second set of participants watching the live event on television comprises determining a cellular site that serves a set of cellular phones at a venue site, determining the set of cellular phones that are utilizing the cellular site of the venue site, determining a subset of cellular phones within the set of cellular phones that are located within the venue site and generating separate groups of competitions based on the subset of cellular phones within the set of cellular phones that are located within the venue site. A first group within the separate groups of competitions includes only the first set of participants and a second group within the separate groups of competitions includes only the second set of participants. An application on a server determines the cellular site, the set of cellular phones utilizing the cellular site and the subset of cellular phones located within the venue site. An application on each cellular phone within the subset of cellular phones determines if the cellular phone is located within the venue site.


In another aspect, a method of equalizing effects of latency issues with a taped television broadcast comprises storing a set of data files on a server, determining one or more start times and transmitting the set of files from the server to each mobile device at a transmission time corresponding to an appropriate start time for the mobile device. An application starts using the set of files at the one or more start times. The set of data files are game data files. Determining the one or more start times includes at least one of utilizing an employee of a game provider based on visual observation of a telecast, utilizing at least one of an audio and video recognition system with online access to the broadcast for each separate market which provides real-time tracking of the broadcast to the server, adding at least one of an audio and video event in the television broadcast which is recognizable at a starting point, designating at least one of the audio and video event in the television broadcast which is recognizable as the starting point, utilizing an audio signal, inserted within the broadcast recognizable by an audio receiver of the mobile device, and using a vertical blanking interval.


In yet another aspect, a system for equalizing effects of latency issues for a game of skill comprises a mobile device and a server coupled to the mobile device wherein the server sends a lockout signal at an appropriate time based on a measured amount of delay to prevent a user from submitting a response after they see the outcome. The mobile device is within a group of mobile devices. The server determines which group the mobile device is in. The server stores game control data and transmits the game control data to the mobile device. The game control data includes delay information for implementing the lockout signal. The server contains a location determination application for determining the location of the mobile device. The mobile device contains a location determination application for determining the location of the mobile device. Variances in delays in receiving the television signal determine delays in transmitting applicable data files within a television signal reception path


In another aspect, a device for equalizing effects of latency issues for a game of skill comprises a storage device and a set of applications contained within the storage device for sending a lockout signal at an appropriate time based on a measured amount of delay to prevent a user from submitting a response after they see the outcome. The set of applications determines which group mobile devices coupled to the device are in. The device stores game control data and transfers the game control data to mobile devices. The game control data includes delay information for implementing the lockout signal. The set of applications includes a location application for determining the location of mobile devices. The amount of delay accounts for delays within a television signal reception path.


A network of devices comprises a plurality of mobile devices and a server coupled to the mobile devices wherein the server groups the plurality of mobile devices into a set of cohorts and wherein the server sends a lockout signal at an appropriate time based on an amount of delay to prevent users from submitting a response after they see the outcome. Each cohort within the set of cohorts is based on a signal reception path. The signal reception path is selected from the group consisting of an over the air network, a cable network and a satellite network. The server stores game control data and transfers the game control data to each mobile device within the plurality of mobile devices. The game control data is specific for each cohort within the set of cohorts. The game control data includes delay information for equalizing the lockout signal.


The amount of delay accounts for delays within a television signal reception path.





BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS


FIG. 1 illustrates a flowchart of a process of preventing latency issues from giving an advantage to some participants.



FIG. 2 illustrates a flowchart of a process of preventing participants at a live event from having an unfair advantage over participants watching on television.



FIG. 3 illustrates a flowchart of a process of handling latency issues for taped programs.



FIG. 4 illustrates a graphical representation of an embodiment of the present invention.



FIG. 5 illustrates a graphical representation of a network of devices of the present invention.





DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENT

U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 60/692,356, filed Jun. 20, 2005, and entitled “SYSTEMS AND METHODOLOGIES ENABLING A CELL PHONE BASED SUBSCRIPTION SERVICE OFFERING A VARIETY OF SCHEDULED GAMES IN CONNECTION WITH LIVE TELEVISION PROGRAMMING,” is incorporated by reference herein.


The present invention addresses three separate classes of latency issues for the length of time it takes a television signal to reach a viewer in producing real-time entertainment such as games of skill synchronized with television programming. The latency issues are: 1) systemic propagation delays in the delivery of a television signal to a receiver, 2) arbitrarily imposed delays of a broadcast television signal and 3) variances in precise broadcast times of segments of taped television programs between local and national commercials, sold through syndication to individual television stations.


Systemic Propagation Delays


There are specific challenges facing a service comprised of games or other entertainment played by remote participants utilizing cellular phones or the Internet, in connection with a live or taped telecast. Examples are live baseball, basketball and football games, taped game shows such as Wheel of Fortune™ and Jeopardy™ or other television programming such as predicting the winners of the Oscars. In a game of skill, for example, fair competition necessitates that a fast paced game, based on the unfolding television action has a level playing field for all participants regardless of how they receive their television signal. Propagation delays result from, among other things, the number of satellite hops required to deliver the signal, the method of processing and rebroadcasting the signal after it is received by cable systems head ends or an over the air broadcast television station, and whether or not the signal is further processed for high definition television. Furthermore, digital television recording systems (DVRs) such as TiVo™ are also able to generate delays in the viewing of the picture after receipt via satellite or cable. These delays are able to result in a difference between the first signal received and the last received of more than several seconds.


People have an unsatisfactory experience and/or others are able to gain a potential competitive advantage from the variances in the exact time one viewer sees an event on their television versus another competitor who receives their television signal through a different delivery path. In the U.S., the 120 million television homes receive their signal either through an over the air broadcast, cable system or via satellite delivery. Each delivery system can impose propagation delays of various time lengths. If the delay between the time a viewer with the least amount of delay and the person receiving the signal with the greatest amount of delay exceeds several seconds, some inequalities in game experience and play are able to result.


One example is a game is based upon a football telecast, wherein competitors predict the play that the coaches and/or quarterback call prior to the snap of the ball. The competitor's prediction is based among other things on their observation of the down, distance and the offensive and defensive formations on the field and tendencies of the teams in these situations. Such a game utilizes a “lock out” signal, as described in the U.S. Pat. No. 4,592,546 to Fascenda, entitled “Game of Skill Playable by Remote Participants in Conjunction with a Live Event,” which is incorporated by reference herein, to prohibit the entry of predictions after the competitor sees the play begin to unfold, at the snap of the ball. The time stamped “lock out” signal is generated by a game producer also viewing the same telecast from a different location. If the game producer is viewing a television signal several seconds before some competitors and generating a time stamp based on that event, an advantage is able to result if the difference in the time stamp and the receipt of the “lock out” signal is more than several seconds earlier in relation to another competitor's television signal which is delayed. During this period of time, for example, on a first or second down situation, a competitor receives the “lock out” just as the quarterback receives the snap and the corresponding television signal at the same time as the game producer while another competitor with a delayed television signal, receives a “lock out” signal while the quarterback is approaching the line of scrimmage. In another example, if the game producer is viewing a signal after a viewer, a competitor might see the quarterback start to drop back into a “shot gun” formation, making the likelihood of a pass considerably higher. This latter player might have time to change his prediction from, “run” to “pass” before receiving a “lock out” generated at the snap of the ball. A person consistently receiving a “lock out” later than another competitor might, through the course of the game, gain some competitive advantage.


While it is not clear that sufficient enough competitive advantage is gained between a competitor receiving his “lock out” signal precisely at the snap of the ball and one who is locked out a few seconds prior to the snap of the ball, this discrepancy could present the appearance of a playing field that is not level, and one of the primary benefits of the system addressed in the present invention is to ensure the competitors feel they are on equal footing.


The present invention solves the above described issue through a system and method to effectively equalize systemic propagation delay variances to a required level dictated by the demands and rules of a particular game, so that a material competitive advantage is not obtained and the user experience is optimized for all players.


The solution first relies on the determination of how each viewer is receiving their television signal (e.g. via an over the air broadcast in a metropolitan area, via a particular cable system or a particular satellite system). All subscribers to a particular service provider or who are receiving an over the air broadcast in a specific metropolitan area will receive the signal at their location at the same time. It is also able to be determined if there is further processing of the signal within the homes, office, bar and others, which could further increase the total length of the propagation delay. Examples would be the use of a DVR, such as TiVo™. The present invention relies on a variety of methodologies which are able to be utilized to determine the time difference between the reception of the television picture being utilized by the central game production facility where “lock out” signals are generated and each separate group of viewers around the country or around the world.


For this system, the total viewing population for a telecast is divided into segments or blocks of viewers referred to as “cohorts.” For example, the 2 million inhabitants of the San Francisco Bay Area would be divided into approximately 1 over the air broadcast, 3 satellite independent providers and several cable “head ends” or central broadcast points serving a “cohort.” This information would be gathered at a central game server, and all players registered to play in a particular contest would be assigned to a specific cohort of viewers.


The following are some methodologies for determining the delays experienced by various cohorts which are able to be used in combination or separately.


In one methodology, upon joining the service and prior to initial game play, subscribers and competitors are required to identify the method by which they receive their television signal and identify the cable or satellite service provider and answer questions relative to whether or not they subscribe to an analog or digital high definition service or utilize a DVR. This information is able to be verified by sending questions to their cellular phones concerning commercials, station breaks and the precise time they are viewed or utilizing other information only seen by members of that cohort.


In another methodology, a routine is established upon entry into the game where the individual viewer is asked to mark the precise time a predetermined audio or visual event in the television program occurs, such as the initial kickoff, which would establish the deviation of their receipt of their television picture from the television signal utilized by the game producers. While some viewers might attempt to cheat by delaying their input, the earliest entries from the cohorts in this group would be averaged to establish the accurate delta between the receipt of the telecast by the production crew and those in each discrete sub group of viewers.


In another methodology, the GPS function in the cellular phone is used to determine the physical location of a viewer which is matched to a database of cable lead ends or over the air broadcast stations available to a consumer in that precise location.


In another methodology, employees of the game producer who are members of the subgroups which constitute the competitors/viewers, e.g. a subscriber to Comcast Cable in San Francisco, are utilized by the game service provider. These individuals would provide the current propagation delay information sent to the game server utilizing their identification of a recognizable event they observe on their television set, such as the initial snap of the ball.


In another methodology, audio or video artifacts or information done in cooperation with the television signal provider are inserted which must be immediately responded to by the competitor to verify the source of their television signal or monitored at cooperative viewers' television sets.


In another methodology, the various delays through an automated system linked to the game server, which continuously samples the audio or video track of the underlying satellite, cable or over the air broadcast television signals are established around the country to provide the information of the precise arrival of the underlying television picture.


Utilizing software resident in the game control server, game control data for each set of viewers/competitors of the game in progress who are receiving their television picture through the same source are batched together by the game control server, and the appropriate delay is either time stamped on the game “lock out” signals, or is imposed on the entire data stream so that competitors receiving their television information slightly behind or ahead of others gain no material competitive advantage. Another method is for the game control server to send all the game control data to all of the viewers/competitors of the game at the same time, and the client software is able to delay the presentation of the game data based on the viewers' cohort.


Utilizing these methodologies to measure the delays in each cohort, each cohort of viewers would have artificial time delays on the game control information imposed by the game control server, which would substantially equalize the receipt of “lock out” data relative to the event triggering the “lock out,” based on the underlying television programming, for example, the snap of the football. Players receiving the television signals in advance of the one with the slowest receipt of the television signal would receive “lock out” signals slightly delayed or time stamped with a slightly later time as described in U.S. Pat. No. 4,592,546. By providing a correspondingly delayed lock out to a viewer receiving their signal later, a potential advantage is mitigated.


Alternatively, this time equalization from cohort to cohort could, for example, involve artificially delaying the transmission of the game control data stream sent to all competitors cell phones or other mobile devices by the appropriate amount of seconds, to sufficiently minimize the advantage a player with a few more seconds of television based information would have. For example, by time stamping the “lock out” signal at an earlier event, such as when the team breaks from the huddle, the chance of some cohorts seeing the actual beginning of the play is eliminated and the discrepancy in propagation delay provides little or no advantage.



FIG. 1 illustrates a flowchart of a process of preventing latency issues from giving an advantage to some participants. In the step 100, it is determined how each viewer receives a television signal, where possibilities include an over the air broadcast, a particular cable system or a particular satellite system. In the step 102, it is determined if there is additional processing of the television signal when after the signal enters a viewer/participant's house, office, bar or other location from an item such as a DVR. In the step 104, the viewers/participants are grouped into groups also referred to as cohorts. In the step 106, a delay amount is determined for each group. The delay amount is able to be determined by the one or more methods as described above. In the step 108, the viewers/participants are equalized. The methods of equalization vary, but some examples include time stamping on the game “lock out” signals, imposing a time stamp on the entire data stream so that competitors receiving their television information is slightly behind or ahead of others gain no material competitive advantage. Another method is for the game control server to send all the game control data to all of the viewers/participants of the game at the same time, and the client software is able to delay the presentation of the game data based on the viewers' group.


Arbitrarily Imposed Delays on the Broadcast of the Signal and the Physically Present Competitor


As a result of the Janet Jackson half time show episode at the 2004 Super Bowl, some networks have announced their intentions to impose up to a 7 second delay on telecasts of live sporting events. More recently an obscenity uttered by a competitor at the conclusion of a live NASCAR race has resulted in another network announcing it may impose a 5-7 second delay on future broadcasts of NASCAR races. These arbitrarily imposed delays are a significantly longer duration than those resulting from the above described propagation delays of the broadcast television or cellular network control information.


A distinct advantage is able to arise for a game player who is physically present at an event being televised which is the basis of a contest of skill in the home, or other location, separate from the live game venue. This is because in certain instances they will receive “lock out” signals generated for competitors among the television viewing audience, particularly if the game producer is not physically present at the venue, but producing by viewing a telecast. This discrepancy would permit prediction entry as much as 7 seconds later than those watching an artificially delayed television picture. This magnitude of delay can result in a significant competitive advantage for the game player who is physically present. For example, a soccer or hockey contest of skill might contain an element where a competitor is given a limited number of opportunities to predict if there will be a “shot on goal” within the next 5 seconds. The 5 second advantage to the competitor physically present would be significant, because the receipt of a lockout signal generated for the huge television audience could occur after a shot had occurred.


In a contest based on a football game, a competitor present at the stadium would receive their “lock out” signals after the play was underway and could often determine whether the play was a pass or a run prior to receipt of the lockout signal. It is also likely that other live televised events such as The Oscars, Grammy's, beauty contests and other television programming that can support games of skill would impose delays on the telecast for the same or different reasons, also providing the opportunity for a competitive advantage for those who are attending the event in person.


The cellular telephone system currently has methodologies to determine a user's physical location. The 911 emergency laws mandate the cellular systems to have the capability of determining the location of a 911 emergency caller within 150 feet. More sophisticated approaches combine cellular site location technology with geosynchronous positioning satellite capabilities. Companies like Qualcomm™ have implemented various location technologies such as Snaptrack, Snap Smart and Snapcore, which provide a cellular phone's physical location within a matter of yards.


For each televised live event, the physical venue for this event would be known by the organizer of a game of skill in advance. Therefore, it is possible to determine for each contest of skill the specific cellular sites which will serve cellular phone owners physically present at that venue. A methodology is employed to identify all of the cellular phones logging into the game server registering to play the game of skill which are co-located within cellular sites servicing the stadium or auditorium where the televised live event is taking place. The present invention is also able to involve a communication methodology between the cellular carrier and the game control computer software contained in the game application resident on a game competitor's phone, which would identify the cellular phone physically in the stadium.


Before the start of the contest of skill, the system informs the central computer of the game selected to be played by each competitor, for example, the San Francisco 49ers versus the New York Giants. The central game control server's software would hold current information on the physical location of the stadium of each game, for example, Candlestick Park in South San Francisco, and the cellular sites covering this location. The software resident on the cellular phone or on the server then identifies the phone as one located physically at the telecast game's venue.


To ensure that potential competitors at the live venue are able to also compete in a contest of skill, the central game server will separate the scoring data and game control data for competitors using these cellular phones in this specific location from the general pool of competitors who are not so located, but watching the game via television. A separate contest is then generated and scored for those competitors who have the advantage of viewing the event live, and a separate prize pool is awarded. This separate game would be produced though the observation of the actual game physically at the venue or through the operation of a non-delayed satellite feed.


If it is ultimately determined that certain groups of television viewers, as opposed to live event attendees, who are competitors in these games of skill are gaining sufficient enough competitive advantage, segregating those players at the extreme ends of the propagation delays, into two or more separate contests with separate sets of prizes, may also be employed as described above. For example, separate contests for satellite viewers versus cable and over the air viewers are able to be generated.



FIG. 2 illustrates a flowchart of a process of preventing participants at a live event from having an unfair advantage over participants watching on television. In the step 200, a cellular site that serves cellular phones at a venue site is determined for each contest of skill. For example, if a game of skill is played for a game between the San Francisco 49ers and the Oakland Raiders at Candlestick Park in South San Francisco, a specific cellular site serves the cellular phones in that location. In the step 202, the cellular phones that are utilizing the cellular site of the venue site and are participating in the game of skill for that event are determined. For example, if there are 1,000 cellular phone users in Candlestick Park who register to play in a game of skill involving the 49ers and the Raiders, they are detected by the system. In the step 204, it is determined if the cellular phone is located within the venue site. The determination is made by comparing the current cellular information with information stored on a server indicating the location of each venue such as Candlestick Park. Based on the determination in the step 204, separate groups are generated in the step 206. A group is generated for users that are located at the live venue, and a group is generated for those players that are watching live on television. Therefore, the live players who do not experience any delay compete against each other, and television viewers compete with others television viewers who have a delay.


In addition to implementing the above-mentioned solutions to latency issues, additional groups are able to be generated if the delays between signal providers are not resolved. For example, all viewers with satellite television signals compete against each other, and all cable television viewers compete against each other, with no cross competition.


Taped and Syndicated Television Programs


A separate but related latency problem arises in the case of syndicated television shows, which are by necessity pre-taped. Examples are game shows like Wheel of Fortune™ and Jeopardy™. These pre-recorded television game shows are generally syndicated, meaning they are sold to a specific television station on an exclusive lease for the local television market served by the station's signal. The television stations generally air these half hour episodes at various times in “prime time access,” which is generally considered between 6-8 pm. Therefore, with 3 different time zones in the United States, the start times will differ from market to market. In addition, the precise time each commercial bracketed television show segment that is broadcast is able to vary by a few seconds based on the time each station's engineering personnel starts the show's segments after the insertion of local and national commercials. Thus, for a show like Jeopardy™, there might be over 100 separate slightly different broadcasts from a time standpoint for a single episode of Jeopardy™ on a given day. In addition, these syndicated telecasts can also experience the same propagation delays as described above.


Contests of skill on cellular phones around these syndicated telecasts are produced with the cooperation of the game show producers, and game data files are produced which are precisely time-synchronized to the final video tape of the television game show. These files must be precisely synchronized and a delay of just a few seconds could give an unfair competitive advantage to a viewer who is receiving their “lock out” signal later than another competitor in a fast paced game like Jeopardy™. The game data files must be synchronized with the television show at the beginning of the program and again as the show returns to the game competition from each commercial break.


This solution addresses the separate, but related problems of synchronizing game data files with the broadcast of prerecorded and syndicated games, entertainment, reality or other television programming that is aired in different time zones at the choice of the purchasing television station. As opposed to live sporting events, the game production for this genre of programming is not done live through real-time observation of the unfolding telecast but is produced in advance with the cooperation of the show producer as a time synchronized file utilizing the final edited for broadcast, television program.


In general, the game data files are divided into separate “segments” which comprise the entire television program and aired between the insertion of national, regional and local advertising. As the television program returns from the opening commercials, the initial game or entertainment segment is launched by the game producer, synchronized to the playing of the television tape, and the data files for this segment would end with the first commercial break. The other game “chapters” are resynchronized as each segment of the telecast resumes from commercial break. The local telecasts might have variations of anywhere from 1 to 5 seconds, or more, resulting from the use of different commercials by different stations, and the variances in the local production by the engineering management of the syndicated telecasts.


This invention protects a system which first determines all of the separate and unique television markets where the cellular phone service will be offered in connection with a syndicated, taped version of an underlying television program, for example, Jeopardy™. Network broadcasts usually air in three separate time zones. This information is available from the shows syndicator, for example, Jeopardy™, the syndicator King World™ or Sony™, the show's licensor. This information is also publicly available through the various television guides. The game production servers hold the pre-produced game data files to be broadcast to the cellular phones of the participating subscribers, containing, for example, the correct answers and possibly some intentionally wrong multiple choice answers in the case of Jeopardy™ or other multiple choice based game shows. The server begins the broadcast of its time synchronized files for each discrete telecast of a single television program at a precise start point for each “segment” or chapter. With knowledge of the precise timing of the discrete segments of the broadcast, for each separate syndicated market, the server transmits the pre-recorded files in most cases, at a slightly separate and different time to each viewer who is viewing the telecast in a particular market via a particular broadcast, satellite or cable signal.


The precise start times of the beginning episode of a game show and the start times of the other segments, beginning as the show resumes after a national and local commercial are delivered to the server through various methodologies.


One methodology requires the cooperation of an employee of the game provider based on visual observation of the telecast for that market, utilizing a personal computer and the Internet, or by utilizing their local cellular phone, all coupled to the game server.


Another methodology includes utilizing an audio or video recognition system with online access to the broadcast of the underlying television program for each separate market which provides real-time tracking of the television broadcast to the game control server, ensuring the game data file is able to be precisely synchronized to the television picture. Information is also able to be inserted in a Vertical Banking Interval (VBI) of the taped syndicated show and tracked online in real time by the game control server. For remote telecasts and online connection from a remote device, reading data embedded in the VBI via a high speed connection to the central game server is utilized. Utilizing some of the procedures outlined above, the propagation delays in the receipt of the cellular transmissions are also monitored and the game server adjusts the data files containing the “lock outs” to accommodate the systemic delay in the delivery of the game data on the cellular networks.


Another methodology, with the cooperation of the producers of game shows, precise audio or video events in the telecast could either be added to the video, such as a visible count down, or existing events in the telecast identified by the producers as synchronization points which the competitors could utilize as start points for the previously downloaded data files at the press of an appropriate button on their cellular phone. This would trigger the launch of a program previously downloaded to the phone's RAM. Then, time synchronization would be launched.


One more methodology uses an audio signal, possibly sub-audible to humans, which is inserted into the taped audio track recognizable by the audio receiver in a cellular phone which would be utilized to start and/or continually keep the pre-produced data files resident on the cellular phone in synchronization with the telecast.



FIG. 3 illustrates a flowchart of a process of handling latency issues for taped programs. In the step 300, pre-produced game data files are stored in servers; preferably, game production servers. The game data files include information required to participate in a game such as questions and answers for a trivia game like Jeopardy™. In the step 302, start times are determined for each discrete telecast of a show. The start times are determined as described above, such as with the cooperation of a game provider employee, utilizing an audio/video recognition system, using a visible count down or a recognizable signal which is able to be recognized by a cellular phone. Other ways of determining start times are possible as well. In the step 304, the game data files are transmitted at appropriate times based on the start times for each separate market. Furthermore, if additional delays are recognized, such as those delays described above, that is able to be accounted for.



FIG. 4 illustrates a graphical representation of an embodiment of the present invention. A server 400 contains applications 402 and a storage mechanism 404. The applications 402 include an application to generate and modify game control data. The game control data is eventually transferred to users' cellular phones. If necessary the game control data is synchronized and time-stamped for each group, so that, as described previously, there are no unfair advantages for the competitors. A location application stored on the server 400 is able to determine which cellular phones are logged into the server 400 and what their location is. A grouping application is able to separate information such as scoring data and game control data into different groups. The grouping application also separates the cellular phones into groups or cohorts as described above. The storage mechanism 404 is utilized for storing the applications 402 in addition to selections and results. The storage mechanism 404 preferably includes a database for organizing the data including the selections, results, standings and groups amongst other data needed for executing the competitions. The server 400 is part of a network 406. A device 408 couples to the server 400 through the network 406. In some embodiments the network 406 includes the Internet. In some embodiments, the network 406 includes a cellular network. Also, in some embodiments, the network 406 includes both the Internet and a cellular network. The device 408 is preferably a cellular phone. In other embodiments a PDA, a computer, a laptop or any other device capable of communicating with the server 400 is possible. The device 408 stores a variety of applications 410. A game application is stored on the device 408. In some embodiments, software to identify the physical location of the device 408 is stored on the device 408. The device 408 also receives the game control data which ensures no competitors have an unfair advantage using the methodologies described above. Furthermore, the device 408 receives game data which is used to play the games. An example of game data includes Jeopardy™ multiple choice answers. Additional applications are able to be included on the server 400 and on the device 408, as necessary, for smooth operation of the games. Although some of the applications are described separately above, in some embodiments, the applications are included in one large application.



FIG. 5 illustrates a graphical representation of a network of devices of the present invention. A server 400 is coupled to many devices through a network 406. The devices are grouped into groups or cohorts as described above. For example, Group 1 of devices 500 includes a set of devices that receive a television signal through cable with a delay time of x. Group 2 of devices 502 includes a set of devices that receive a television signal through satellite with a delay time of y. Group 3 of devices 504 includes a set of devices that receive a television signal over the air with a delay time of z. Then, based on the delay times of each group, steps need to be taken to ensure these delays do not affect the ability of users to play a game of skill which corresponds to a live event shown on television. As described above, a lockout signal is sent at the appropriate time depending on the delay, or a lockout signal is sent, but included with the lockout signal is information for the lockout not to be implemented until the delay is accounted for. This ensures that users with different delays based on their television signal reception path do not receive advantages or disadvantages. Furthermore, in addition to the delays being related to the type of signal reception path such as cable versus satellite, the delays could also be related to other aspects of the signal reception path such as the location of the receiving television or the type of equipment that one television company uses versus another.


To utilize the present invention, for the most part, a participant in a game of skill playing on his/her mobile device does not have to perform any different actions when playing a standard game of skill without the present invention. The user simply plays as usual except that with the present invention, users with faster or slower connections do not receive any advantages or disadvantages. In embodiments which require user input, the user performs an action, such as recognizing an event to synchronize the game with a live or taped event. For game producers, implementing the present invention is able to be automated or performed manually. Automation includes technology to automatically determine the start of an event such as automatically detecting the start of a football game. Manual implementation requires a person to watch an event and respond to that event such as watching a football game and noting when the first play occurs in order to synchronize the “lock out” signal appropriately.


In operation, the present invention is able to synchronize separate games of skill which have different latencies based on television signal reception differences, random delays and/or other delays. For live events where all of the participants are watching the event on television and participating in a game of skill corresponding to that live event, delays related to the television signal reception differences have to be handled. Television signal reception differences occur because some televisions receive the live event signal via satellite, while others have cable and still others have something else. The signals do not arrive at the participants at the same time. Therefore, to ensure fair competition, participants are separated into groups or cohorts based on delivery system type, location and other parameters that affect the timing of the signal. Then, using a mechanism described above, the delay for each group is determined. Based on that determined delay, the game of skill is able to be configured with the appropriate timing for a lock out signal, so that each participant has the same amount of time to select an answer and also sees the same amount of the live event as others before the lock out occurs.


For games of skill where there are both participants attending the event live and watching it on television which typically has a few seconds delay, the participants are separated into different competitive groups wherein the attending participants are in one group and the television viewing participants are in another group.


For games of skill using tape recorded events like game shows, the important aspect is ensuring the game of skill corresponds with the televised recorded event. For example, if the game of skill were off by a few seconds, participants could receive multiple choice answers to the wrong questions. Therefore, the present invention ensures that the game of skill is synchronized with the taped televised event even when there are different latencies depending on how and where the television signal is being displayed.


Furthermore, although the methods of handling latency have been described above as handling a specific scenario such as delays in television signal reception, the methods are able to be used in conjunction with each other as well. For example, when participants are separated into attending and televised groups because some participants are actually attending an event while others watch it on television, for those watching it on television there will still be issues from location to location and based on the television signal reception, so the latency balancer which handles that aspect of latency is also able to be implemented.


The present invention has been described in terms of specific embodiments incorporating details to facilitate the understanding of principles of construction and operation of the invention. Such reference herein to specific embodiments and details thereof is not intended to limit the scope of the claims appended hereto. It will be readily apparent to one skilled in the art that other various modifications may be made in the embodiment chosen for illustration without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention as defined by the claims.

Claims
  • 1. A device for equalizing effects of latency issues for a game of skill or chance or other entertainment played in conjunction with content comprising: a storage device; andan application contained within the storage device for applying a lockout signal based on a delay in receipt of content to prevent a user from submitting a selection to the game of skill or chance or other entertainment, after an outcome of an event in the content is known, wherein the application comprises a location application for determining the location of one or more devices and further wherein the lockout signal is generated by a person physically present at an event location utilizing a device coupled to the game server.
  • 2. The device of claim 1 wherein the event location comprises a physical venue for an event included in the broadcast.
  • 3. The device of claim 2 wherein the person observes the event at the physical venue.
  • 4. The device of claim 1 wherein the lockout signal is applied immediately before competitors are able to see a play unfold.
  • 5. The device of claim 1 wherein the lockout signal is sent during an in-progress play, not during a stoppage, and prevents submitting a response before a critical element of the in-progress play unfolds.
  • 6. The device of claim 1 wherein the lockout signal suspends ability to submit the response while betting odds information is updated to reflect changing event status.
  • 7. The device of claim 1 wherein the lockout signal is initiated before a scoring chance in the game of skill or chance or other entertainment and additional user input is allowed after the scoring chance is resolved.
  • 8. The device of claim 7 wherein the lockout signal prevents a response while betting odds information is updated to reflect changing event status.
  • 9. The device of claim 1 wherein the lockout signal suspends interaction for a limited amount of time.
  • 10. The device of claim 9 wherein the lockout signal prevents a response while betting odds information is updated to reflect changing event status.
  • 11. The device of claim 1 wherein an earliest receipt of the lockout signal by participants is utilized for equalizing locking out all participants receiving the content.
  • 12. The device of claim 1 wherein the application is further for determining a shortest delay of a signal received by participants and applying lockouts to the participants based on the shortest delay.
  • 13. The device of claim 1 wherein a server sends the game of skill or chance or other entertainment to the device.
  • 14. The device of claim 1 wherein the content and the application are presented on a same screen.
  • 15. The device of claim 1 wherein the content and the application are presented on different screens.
  • 16. The device of claim 1 wherein the device comprises a mobile device.
  • 17. The device of claim 1 wherein the device comprises an Internet connected device.
  • 18. The device of claim 1 wherein the device comprises a server.
  • 19. The device of claim 1 wherein the lockout signal is generated via an Internet connection.
RELATED APPLICATION(S)

This Patent Application is a continuation of co-pending U.S. patent application Ser. No. 15/985,918, filed May 22, 2018, titled “A METHODOLOGY FOR EQUALIZING SYSTEMIC LATENCIES IN TELEVISION RECEPTION IN CONNECTION WITH GAMES OF SKILL PLAYED IN CONNECTION WITH LIVE TELEVISION PROGRAMMING,” which is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 15/639,457, filed Jun. 30, 2017, titled “A METHODOLOGY FOR EQUALIZING SYSTEMIC LATENCIES IN TELEVISION RECEPTION IN CONNECTION WITH GAMES OF SKILL PLAYED IN CONNECTION WITH LIVE TELEVISION PROGRAMMING,” which is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 15/249,162, filed Aug. 26, 2016, titled “A METHODOLOGY FOR EQUALIZING SYSTEMIC LATENCIES IN TELEVISION RECEPTION IN CONNECTION WITH GAMES OF SKILL PLAYED IN CONNECTION WITH LIVE TELEVISION PROGRAMMING,” which is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 14/338,314, filed Jul. 22, 2014, titled “A METHODOLOGY FOR EQUALIZING SYSTEMIC LATENCIES IN TELEVISION RECEPTION IN CONNECTION WITH GAMES OF SKILL PLAYED IN CONNECTION WITH LIVE TELEVISION PROGRAMMING,” which is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/681,211, filed Nov. 19, 2012, titled “A METHODOLOGY FOR EQUALIZING SYSTEMIC LATENCIES IN TELEVISION RECEPTION IN CONNECTION WITH GAMES OF SKILL PLAYED IN CONNECTION WITH LIVE TELEVISION PROGRAMMING,” which is a divisional of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/403,845, filed Feb. 23, 2012, (now U.S. Pat. No. 8,717,701), titled, “A METHODOLOGY FOR EQUALIZING SYSTEMIC LATENCIES IN TELEVISION RECEPTION IN CONNECTION WITH GAMES OF SKILL PLAYED IN CONNECTION WITH LIVE TELEVISION PROGRAMMING,” which is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/786,992, filed Apr. 12, 2007, (now U.S. Pat. No. 8,149,530), titled, “A METHODOLOGY FOR EQUALIZING SYSTEMIC LATENCIES IN TELEVISION RECEPTION IN CONNECTION WITH GAMES OF SKILL PLAYED IN CONNECTION WITH LIVE TELEVISION PROGRAMMING,” which claims priority under 35 U.S.C. § 119(e) of the co-owned U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 60/791,793, filed Apr. 12, 2006, and titled “A METHODOLOGY FOR EQUALIZING SYSTEMIC LATENCIES IN TELEVISION RECEPTION IN CONNECTION WITH GAMES OF SKILL PLAYED IN CONNECTION WITH LIVE TELEVISION PROGRAMMING” which are also all hereby incorporated by reference in their entireties.

US Referenced Citations (650)
Number Name Date Kind
2831105 Parker Apr 1958 A
3562650 Gossard et al. Feb 1971 A
4141548 Everton Feb 1979 A
4270755 Willhide et al. Jun 1981 A
4386377 Hunter, Jr. May 1983 A
4496148 Morstain et al. Jan 1985 A
4521803 Gittinger Jun 1985 A
4592546 Fascenda et al. Jun 1986 A
4816904 McKenna et al. Mar 1989 A
4918603 Hughes et al. Apr 1990 A
4930010 MacDonald May 1990 A
5013038 Luvenberg May 1991 A
5018736 Pearson et al. May 1991 A
5035422 Berman Jul 1991 A
5073931 Audebert et al. Dec 1991 A
5083271 Thatcher et al. Jan 1992 A
5083800 Lockton Jan 1992 A
5119295 Kapur Jun 1992 A
5120076 Luxenberg et al. Jun 1992 A
5213337 Sherman May 1993 A
5227874 Von Kohom Jul 1993 A
5256863 Ferguson Oct 1993 A
5263723 Pearson et al. Nov 1993 A
5283734 Von Kohom Feb 1994 A
5327485 Leaden Jul 1994 A
5343236 Koppe et al. Aug 1994 A
5343239 Lappington et al. Aug 1994 A
5417424 Snowden May 1995 A
5462275 Lowe et al. Oct 1995 A
5479492 Hofstee et al. Dec 1995 A
5488659 Miliani Jan 1996 A
5519433 Lappington May 1996 A
5530483 Cooper Jun 1996 A
5553120 Katz Sep 1996 A
5566291 Boulton et al. Oct 1996 A
5585975 Bliss Dec 1996 A
5586257 Perlman Dec 1996 A
5589765 Ohmart et al. Dec 1996 A
5594938 Engel Jan 1997 A
5618232 Martin Apr 1997 A
5628684 Jean-Etienne May 1997 A
5636920 Shur et al. Jun 1997 A
5638113 Lappington Jun 1997 A
5643088 Vaughn et al. Jul 1997 A
5663757 Morales Sep 1997 A
5759101 Won Kohom Jun 1998 A
5761606 Wolzien Jun 1998 A
5762552 Voung et al. Jun 1998 A
5764275 Lappington et al. Jun 1998 A
5794210 Goldhaber et al. Aug 1998 A
5805230 Staron Sep 1998 A
5813913 Berner et al. Sep 1998 A
5818438 Howe et al. Oct 1998 A
5828843 Grimm Oct 1998 A
5838774 Weiser, Jr. Nov 1998 A
5846132 Junkin Dec 1998 A
5848397 Marsh et al. Dec 1998 A
5860862 Junkin Jan 1999 A
5894556 Grimm Apr 1999 A
5916024 Von Kohom Jun 1999 A
5870683 Wells et al. Sep 1999 A
5970143 Schneier et al. Oct 1999 A
5971854 Pearson et al. Oct 1999 A
5987440 O'Neil et al. Nov 1999 A
6009458 Hawkins et al. Dec 1999 A
6015344 Kelly et al. Jan 2000 A
6016337 Pykalisto Jan 2000 A
6042477 Addink Mar 2000 A
6064449 White May 2000 A
6104815 Alcorn et al. Aug 2000 A
6110041 Walker et al. Aug 2000 A
6117013 Elba Sep 2000 A
6126543 Friedman Oct 2000 A
6128660 Grimm Oct 2000 A
6135881 Abbott et al. Oct 2000 A
6174237 Stephenson Jan 2001 B1
6182084 Cockrell et al. Jan 2001 B1
6193610 Junkin Feb 2001 B1
6222642 Farrell et al. Apr 2001 B1
6233736 Wolzien May 2001 B1
6251017 Leason et al. Jun 2001 B1
6263447 French Jul 2001 B1
6267670 Walker Jul 2001 B1
6287199 McKeown et al. Sep 2001 B1
6293868 Bernard Sep 2001 B1
6312336 Handelman et al. Nov 2001 B1
6345297 Grimm Feb 2002 B1
6371855 Gavriloff Apr 2002 B1
6373462 Pan Apr 2002 B1
6411969 Tam Jun 2002 B1
6416414 Stadelmann Jul 2002 B1
6425828 Walker et al. Jul 2002 B2
6434398 Inselberg Aug 2002 B1
6470180 Kotzin et al. Oct 2002 B1
6475090 Gregory Nov 2002 B2
6524189 Rautila Feb 2003 B1
6527641 Sinclair et al. Mar 2003 B1
6530082 Del Sesto et al. Mar 2003 B1
6536037 Guheen et al. Mar 2003 B1
6578068 Bowma-Amuah Jun 2003 B1
6594098 Sutardja Jul 2003 B1
6604997 Saidakovsky et al. Jul 2003 B2
6610953 Tao et al. Aug 2003 B1
6611755 Coffee Aug 2003 B1
6648760 Nicastro Nov 2003 B1
6659860 Yamamoto et al. Dec 2003 B1
6659861 Faris Dec 2003 B1
6659872 Kaufman et al. Dec 2003 B1
6690661 Agarwal et al. Feb 2004 B1
6718350 Karbowski Apr 2004 B1
6752396 Smith Jun 2004 B2
6758754 Lavanchy et al. Jul 2004 B1
6758755 Kelly et al. Jul 2004 B2
6760595 Insellberg Jul 2004 B2
6763377 Balknap et al. Jul 2004 B1
6766524 Matheny et al. Jul 2004 B1
6774926 Ellis et al. Aug 2004 B1
6785561 Kim Aug 2004 B1
6801380 Sutardja Oct 2004 B1
6806889 Malaure et al. Oct 2004 B1
6807675 Millard et al. Oct 2004 B1
6811482 Letovsky Nov 2004 B2
6811487 Sengoku Nov 2004 B2
6816628 Sarachik et al. Nov 2004 B1
6817947 Tanskanen Nov 2004 B2
6824469 Allibhoy et al. Nov 2004 B2
6837789 Garahi et al. Jan 2005 B2
6837791 McNutt et al. Jan 2005 B1
6840861 Jordan et al. Jan 2005 B2
6845389 Sen Jan 2005 B1
6846239 Washio Jan 2005 B2
6857122 Takeda et al. Feb 2005 B1
6863610 Vancraeynest Mar 2005 B2
6870720 Iwata et al. Mar 2005 B2
6871226 Ensley et al. Mar 2005 B1
6873610 Noever Mar 2005 B1
6884166 Leen et al. Apr 2005 B2
6884172 Lloyd et al. Apr 2005 B1
6887159 Leen et al. May 2005 B2
6888929 Saylor May 2005 B1
6893347 Zilliacus et al. May 2005 B1
6898762 Ellis et al. May 2005 B2
6899628 Leen et al. May 2005 B2
6903681 Faris Jun 2005 B2
6908389 Puskala Jun 2005 B1
6942574 LeMay et al. Sep 2005 B1
6944228 Dakss et al. Sep 2005 B1
6960088 Long Nov 2005 B1
6978053 Sarachik et al. Dec 2005 B1
7001279 Barber et al. Feb 2006 B1
7029394 Leen et al. Apr 2006 B2
7035626 Luciano, Jr. Apr 2006 B1
7035653 Simon et al. Apr 2006 B2
7058592 Beckerman et al. Jun 2006 B1
7076434 Newman et al. Jul 2006 B1
7085552 Buckley Aug 2006 B2
7116310 Evans et al. Oct 2006 B1
7117517 Milazzo et al. Oct 2006 B1
7120924 Katcher et al. Oct 2006 B1
7125336 Anttila et al. Oct 2006 B2
7136871 Ozer et al. Nov 2006 B2
7144011 Asher et al. Dec 2006 B2
7169050 Tyler Jan 2007 B1
7191447 Ellis et al. Mar 2007 B1
7192352 Walker et al. Mar 2007 B2
7194758 Waki et al. Mar 2007 B1
7228349 Barone, Jr. et al. Jun 2007 B2
7231630 Acott et al. Jun 2007 B2
7233922 Asher et al. Jun 2007 B2
7240093 Danieli et al. Jul 2007 B1
7244181 Wang et al. Jul 2007 B2
7249367 Bove, Jr. et al. Jul 2007 B2
7254605 Strum Aug 2007 B1
7260782 Wallace et al. Aug 2007 B2
RE39818 Slifer Sep 2007 E
7283830 Buckley Oct 2007 B2
7288027 Overton Oct 2007 B2
7341517 Asher et al. Mar 2008 B2
7343617 Kartcher et al. Mar 2008 B1
7347781 Schultz Mar 2008 B2
7351149 Simon et al. Apr 2008 B1
7367042 Dakss et al. Apr 2008 B1
7379705 Rados et al. May 2008 B1
7389144 Osorio Jun 2008 B1
7430718 Gariepy-Viles Sep 2008 B2
7452273 Amaitis et al. Nov 2008 B2
7460037 Cattone et al. Dec 2008 B2
7461067 Dewing et al. Dec 2008 B2
7502610 Maher Mar 2009 B2
7517282 Pryor Apr 2009 B1
7534169 Amaitis et al. May 2009 B2
7562134 Fingerhut et al. Jul 2009 B1
7614944 Hughes et al. Nov 2009 B1
7630986 Herz et al. Dec 2009 B1
7693781 Asher et al. Apr 2010 B2
7699707 Bahou Apr 2010 B2
7711628 Davie et al. May 2010 B2
7753772 Walker Jul 2010 B1
7753789 Walker et al. Jul 2010 B2
7780528 Hirayama Aug 2010 B2
7828661 Fish Nov 2010 B1
7835961 Davie et al. Nov 2010 B2
7886003 Newnam Feb 2011 B2
7907211 Oostveen et al. Mar 2011 B2
7926810 Fisher et al. Apr 2011 B2
7937318 Davie et al. May 2011 B2
7976389 Cannon et al. Jul 2011 B2
8002618 Lockton et al. Aug 2011 B1
8006314 Wold Aug 2011 B2
8025565 Leen et al. Sep 2011 B2
8028315 Barber Sep 2011 B1
8082150 Wold Dec 2011 B2
8086445 Wold et al. Dec 2011 B2
8086510 Amaitis et al. Dec 2011 B2
8092303 Amaitis et al. Jan 2012 B2
8105141 Leen et al. Jan 2012 B2
8107674 Davis et al. Jan 2012 B2
8109827 Cahill et al. Feb 2012 B2
8128474 Amaitis et al. Mar 2012 B2
8147313 Amaitis et al. Apr 2012 B2
8147373 Amaitis et al. Apr 2012 B2
8149530 Lockton et al. Apr 2012 B1
8176518 Junkin et al. May 2012 B1
8186682 Amaitis et al. May 2012 B2
8204808 Amaitis et al. Jun 2012 B2
8240669 Asher et al. Aug 2012 B2
8246048 Amaitis et al. Aug 2012 B2
8267403 Fisher et al. Sep 2012 B2
8342924 Leen et al. Jan 2013 B2
8342942 Amaitis et al. Jan 2013 B2
8353763 Amaitis et al. Jan 2013 B2
8376855 Lockton et al. Feb 2013 B2
8397257 Barber Mar 2013 B1
8465021 Asher et al. Jun 2013 B2
8473393 Davie et al. Jun 2013 B2
8474819 Asher et al. Jul 2013 B2
8535138 Amaitis et al. Sep 2013 B2
8538563 Barber Sep 2013 B1
8543487 Asher et al. Sep 2013 B2
8555313 Newnam Oct 2013 B2
8556691 Leen et al. Oct 2013 B2
8585490 Amaitis et al. Nov 2013 B2
8622798 Lockton et al. Jan 2014 B2
8638517 Lockton et al. Jan 2014 B2
8641511 Ginsberg et al. Feb 2014 B2
8659848 Lockton et al. Feb 2014 B2
8672751 Leen et al. Mar 2014 B2
8699168 Lockton et al. Apr 2014 B2
8705195 Lockton Apr 2014 B2
8708789 Asher et al. Apr 2014 B2
8717701 Lockton et al. May 2014 B2
8727352 Amaitis et al. May 2014 B2
8734227 Leen et al. May 2014 B2
8737004 Lockton et al. May 2014 B2
8738694 Huske et al. May 2014 B2
8771058 Alderucci et al. Jul 2014 B2
8780482 Lockton et al. Jul 2014 B2
8805732 Davie et al. Aug 2014 B2
8813112 Cibula et al. Aug 2014 B1
8814664 Amaitis et al. Aug 2014 B2
8817408 Lockton et al. Aug 2014 B2
8837072 Lockton et al. Sep 2014 B2
8849225 Choti Sep 2014 B1
8849255 Choti Sep 2014 B2
8858313 Selfors Oct 2014 B1
8870639 Lockton et al. Oct 2014 B2
8935715 Cibula et al. Jan 2015 B2
9056251 Lockton Jun 2015 B2
9067143 Lockton et al. Jun 2015 B2
9069651 Barber Jun 2015 B2
9076303 Park Jul 2015 B1
9098883 Asher et al. Aug 2015 B2
9111417 Leen et al. Aug 2015 B2
9205339 Cibula et al. Dec 2015 B2
9233293 Lockton Jan 2016 B2
9258601 Lockton et al. Feb 2016 B2
9270789 Huske Feb 2016 B2
9289692 Barber Mar 2016 B2
9306952 Burman et al. Apr 2016 B2
9314686 Lockton Apr 2016 B2
9314701 Lockton et al. Apr 2016 B2
9355518 Amaitis et al. May 2016 B2
9406189 Scott et al. Aug 2016 B2
9457272 Lockton et al. Oct 2016 B2
9498724 Lockton et al. Nov 2016 B2
9501904 Lockton Nov 2016 B2
9504922 Lockton et al. Nov 2016 B2
9511287 Lockton et al. Dec 2016 B2
9526991 Lockton et al. Dec 2016 B2
9536396 Amaitis et al. Jan 2017 B2
9556991 Furuya Jan 2017 B2
9604140 Lockton et al. Mar 2017 B2
9652937 Lockton May 2017 B2
9662576 Lockton et al. May 2017 B2
9662577 Lockton et al. May 2017 B2
9672692 Lockton Jun 2017 B2
9687738 Lockton et al. Jun 2017 B2
9687739 Lockton et al. Jun 2017 B2
9707482 Lockton et al. Jul 2017 B2
9716918 Lockton et al. Jul 2017 B1
9724603 Lockton et al. Aug 2017 B2
9744453 Lockton et al. Aug 2017 B2
9805549 Asher et al. Oct 2017 B2
9821233 Lockton et al. Nov 2017 B2
9878243 Lockton et al. Jan 2018 B2
9881337 Jaycob et al. Jan 2018 B2
9901820 Lockton et al. Feb 2018 B2
9908053 Lockton et al. Mar 2018 B2
9919210 Lockton Mar 2018 B2
9919211 Lockton et al. Mar 2018 B2
9919221 Lockton et al. Mar 2018 B2
9978217 Lockton May 2018 B2
9993730 Lockton et al. Jun 2018 B2
9999834 Lockton et al. Jun 2018 B2
10052557 Lockton et al. Aug 2018 B2
10089815 Asher et al. Oct 2018 B2
10096210 Amaitis et al. Oct 2018 B2
10137369 Lockton et al. Nov 2018 B2
10150031 Lockton et al. Dec 2018 B2
10165339 Huske et al. Dec 2018 B2
10186116 Lockton Jan 2019 B2
10195526 Lockton et al. Feb 2019 B2
10226698 Lockton et al. Mar 2019 B1
10226705 Lockton et al. Mar 2019 B2
10232270 Lockton et al. Mar 2019 B2
10248290 Galfond Apr 2019 B2
20010004609 Walker et al. Jun 2001 A1
20010005670 Lahtinen Jun 2001 A1
20010013125 Kitsukawa et al. Aug 2001 A1
20010020298 Rector, Jr. et al. Sep 2001 A1
20010032333 Flickinger Oct 2001 A1
20010036272 Hirayama Nov 2001 A1
20010036853 Thomas Nov 2001 A1
20020010789 Lord Jan 2002 A1
20020026321 Faris Feb 2002 A1
20020029381 Inselberg Mar 2002 A1
20020035609 Lessard Mar 2002 A1
20020037766 Muniz Mar 2002 A1
20020069265 Bountour Mar 2002 A1
20020042293 Ubale et al. Apr 2002 A1
20020046099 Frengut et al. Apr 2002 A1
20020054088 Tanskanen et al. May 2002 A1
20020055385 Otsu May 2002 A1
20020056089 Houston May 2002 A1
20020059094 Hosea et al. May 2002 A1
20020059623 Rodriguez et al. May 2002 A1
20020069076 Faris Jun 2002 A1
20020076084 Tian Jun 2002 A1
20020078176 Nomura et al. Jun 2002 A1
20020083461 Hutcheson Jun 2002 A1
20020091833 Grimm Jul 2002 A1
20020095333 Jokinen et al. Jul 2002 A1
20020097983 Wallace et al. Jul 2002 A1
20020099709 Wallace Jul 2002 A1
20020100063 Herigstad et al. Jul 2002 A1
20020103696 Huang et al. Aug 2002 A1
20020105535 Wallace et al. Aug 2002 A1
20020107073 Binney Aug 2002 A1
20020108112 Wallace et al. Aug 2002 A1
20020108125 Joao Aug 2002 A1
20020108127 Lew et al. Aug 2002 A1
20020112249 Hendricks et al. Aug 2002 A1
20020115488 Berry et al. Aug 2002 A1
20020119821 Sen Aug 2002 A1
20020120930 Yona Aug 2002 A1
20020124247 Houghton Sep 2002 A1
20020132614 Vanlujit et al. Sep 2002 A1
20020133817 Markel Sep 2002 A1
20020133827 Newman et al. Sep 2002 A1
20020142843 Roelofs Oct 2002 A1
20020144273 Reto Oct 2002 A1
20020147049 Carter, Sr. Oct 2002 A1
20020157002 Messerges et al. Oct 2002 A1
20020157005 Brunk Oct 2002 A1
20020159576 Adams Oct 2002 A1
20020162031 Levin et al. Oct 2002 A1
20020162117 Pearson Oct 2002 A1
20020165020 Koyama Nov 2002 A1
20020165025 Kawahara Nov 2002 A1
20020177483 Cannon Nov 2002 A1
20020187825 Tracy Dec 2002 A1
20020198050 Patchen Dec 2002 A1
20030002638 Kaars Jan 2003 A1
20030013528 Allibhoy et al. Jan 2003 A1
20030023547 France Jan 2003 A1
20030040363 Sandberg Feb 2003 A1
20030054885 Pinto et al. Mar 2003 A1
20030060247 Goldberg et al. Mar 2003 A1
20030066089 Anderson Apr 2003 A1
20030069828 Blazey et al. Apr 2003 A1
20030070174 Solomon Apr 2003 A1
20030078924 Liechty et al. Apr 2003 A1
20030086691 Yu May 2003 A1
20030087652 Simon May 2003 A1
20030088648 Bellaton May 2003 A1
20030114224 Anttila et al. Jun 2003 A1
20030115152 Flaherty Jun 2003 A1
20030134678 Tanaka Jul 2003 A1
20030144017 Inselberg Jul 2003 A1
20030154242 Hayes et al. Aug 2003 A1
20030165241 Fransdonk Sep 2003 A1
20030177167 Lafage et al. Sep 2003 A1
20030177504 Paulo et al. Sep 2003 A1
20030189668 Newman et al. Oct 2003 A1
20030195023 Di Cesare Oct 2003 A1
20030195807 Maggio Oct 2003 A1
20030208579 Brady et al. Nov 2003 A1
20030211856 Zilliacus Nov 2003 A1
20030212691 Kuntala et al. Nov 2003 A1
20030216185 Varley Nov 2003 A1
20030216857 Feldman et al. Nov 2003 A1
20030233425 Lyons et al. Dec 2003 A1
20040005919 Walker et al. Jan 2004 A1
20040014524 Pearlman Jan 2004 A1
20040022366 Ferguson et al. Feb 2004 A1
20040025190 McCalla Feb 2004 A1
20040056897 Ueda Mar 2004 A1
20040060063 Russ et al. Mar 2004 A1
20040073915 Dureau Apr 2004 A1
20040088729 Petrovic et al. May 2004 A1
20040093302 Baker et al. May 2004 A1
20040152454 Kauppinen May 2004 A1
20040107138 Maggio Jun 2004 A1
20040117831 Ellis et al. Jun 2004 A1
20040117839 Watson et al. Jun 2004 A1
20040125877 Chang Jul 2004 A1
20040128319 Davis et al. Jul 2004 A1
20040139482 Hale Jul 2004 A1
20040148638 Weisman et al. Jul 2004 A1
20040152517 Hardisty Aug 2004 A1
20040152519 Wang Aug 2004 A1
20040158855 Gu et al. Aug 2004 A1
20040162124 Barton et al. Aug 2004 A1
20040166873 Simic Aug 2004 A1
20040176162 Rothschild Sep 2004 A1
20040178923 Kuang Sep 2004 A1
20040183824 Benson Sep 2004 A1
20040185881 Lee Sep 2004 A1
20040190779 Sarachik et al. Sep 2004 A1
20040198495 Cisneros et al. Oct 2004 A1
20040201626 Lavoie Oct 2004 A1
20040203667 Shroder Oct 2004 A1
20040203898 Bodin et al. Oct 2004 A1
20040210507 Asher et al. Oct 2004 A1
20040215756 VanAntwerp Oct 2004 A1
20040216161 Barone, Jr. et al. Oct 2004 A1
20040216171 Barone, Jr. et al. Oct 2004 A1
20040224750 Ai-Ziyoud Nov 2004 A1
20040242321 Overton Dec 2004 A1
20040266513 Odom Dec 2004 A1
20050005303 Barone, Jr. et al. Jan 2005 A1
20050021942 Diehl et al. Jan 2005 A1
20050026699 Kinzer et al. Feb 2005 A1
20050028208 Ellis Feb 2005 A1
20050043094 Nguyen et al. Feb 2005 A1
20050076371 Nakamura Apr 2005 A1
20050060219 Ditering et al. May 2005 A1
20050097599 Potnick et al. May 2005 A1
20050101309 Croome May 2005 A1
20050113164 Buecheler et al. May 2005 A1
20050003878 Updike Jun 2005 A1
20050131984 Hofmann et al. Jun 2005 A1
20050138668 Gray et al. Jun 2005 A1
20050144102 Johnson Jun 2005 A1
20050155083 Oh Jul 2005 A1
20050177861 Ma et al. Aug 2005 A1
20050210526 Levy et al. Sep 2005 A1
20050216838 Graham Sep 2005 A1
20050235043 Teodosiu et al. Oct 2005 A1
20050239551 Griswold Oct 2005 A1
20050255901 Kreutzer Nov 2005 A1
20050256895 Dussault Nov 2005 A1
20050266869 Jung Dec 2005 A1
20050273804 Preisman Dec 2005 A1
20050283800 Ellis et al. Dec 2005 A1
20050288080 Lockton Dec 2005 A1
20050288101 Lockton et al. Dec 2005 A1
20050288812 Cheng Dec 2005 A1
20060025070 Kim et al. Feb 2006 A1
20060046810 Tabata Mar 2006 A1
20060047772 Crutcher Mar 2006 A1
20060053390 Gariepy-Viles Mar 2006 A1
20060058103 Danieli Mar 2006 A1
20060059161 Millett et al. Mar 2006 A1
20060063590 Abassi et al. Mar 2006 A1
20060082068 Patchen Apr 2006 A1
20060087585 Seo Apr 2006 A1
20060089199 Jordan et al. Apr 2006 A1
20060111168 Nguyen May 2006 A1
20060135253 George et al. Jun 2006 A1
20060148569 Beck Jul 2006 A1
20060156371 Maetz et al. Jul 2006 A1
20060174307 Hwang et al. Aug 2006 A1
20060183547 Mc Monigle Aug 2006 A1
20060183548 Morris et al. Aug 2006 A1
20060205483 Meyer et al. Sep 2006 A1
20060205510 Lauper Sep 2006 A1
20060217198 Johnson Sep 2006 A1
20060236352 Scott, III Oct 2006 A1
20060248553 Mikkelson et al. Nov 2006 A1
20060256865 Westerman Nov 2006 A1
20060256868 Westerman Nov 2006 A1
20060269120 Mehmadi et al. Nov 2006 A1
20060285586 Westerman Dec 2006 A1
20070004516 Jordan et al. Jan 2007 A1
20070013547 Boaz Jan 2007 A1
20070019826 Horbach Jan 2007 A1
20070028272 Lockton Feb 2007 A1
20070037623 Romik Feb 2007 A1
20070054695 Huske et al. Mar 2007 A1
20070078009 Lockton et al. Apr 2007 A1
20070083920 Mizoguchi et al. Apr 2007 A1
20070086465 Paila et al. Apr 2007 A1
20070093296 Asher Apr 2007 A1
20070101358 Ambady May 2007 A1
20070106721 Schloter May 2007 A1
20070107010 Jolna et al. May 2007 A1
20070129144 Katz Jun 2007 A1
20070147870 Nagashima et al. Jul 2007 A1
20070162328 Reich Jul 2007 A1
20070183744 Koizumi Aug 2007 A1
20070210908 Putterman et al. Sep 2007 A1
20070219856 Ahmad-Taylor Sep 2007 A1
20070222652 Cattone et al. Sep 2007 A1
20070226062 Hughes et al. Sep 2007 A1
20070238525 Suomela Oct 2007 A1
20070243936 Binenstock et al. Oct 2007 A1
20070244570 Speiser et al. Oct 2007 A1
20070244585 Speiser et al. Oct 2007 A1
20070244749 Speiser et al. Oct 2007 A1
20070265089 Robarts Nov 2007 A1
20080013927 Kelly et al. Jan 2008 A1
20080051201 Lore Feb 2008 A1
20080066129 Katcher et al. Mar 2008 A1
20080076497 Kiskis et al. Mar 2008 A1
20080104630 Bruce May 2008 A1
20080146337 Halonen Jun 2008 A1
20080169605 Shuster et al. Jul 2008 A1
20080240681 Fukushima Oct 2008 A1
20080248865 Tedesco Oct 2008 A1
20080270288 Butterly et al. Oct 2008 A1
20080288600 Clark Nov 2008 A1
20090011781 Merrill et al. Jan 2009 A1
20090094632 Newman et al. Apr 2009 A1
20090103892 Hirayama Apr 2009 A1
20090186676 Amaitis et al. Jul 2009 A1
20090163271 George et al. Sep 2009 A1
20090228351 Rijsenbrij Sep 2009 A1
20090234674 Wurster Sep 2009 A1
20090264188 Soukup Oct 2009 A1
20100099421 Patel et al. Apr 2010 A1
20100099471 Feeney et al. Apr 2010 A1
20100107194 McKissick et al. Apr 2010 A1
20100120503 Hoffman et al. May 2010 A1
20100137057 Fleming Jun 2010 A1
20100203936 Levy Aug 2010 A1
20100279764 Allen et al. Nov 2010 A1
20110053681 Goldman Mar 2011 A1
20110065490 Lutnick Mar 2011 A1
20110081958 Herman Apr 2011 A1
20110130197 Bythar et al. Jun 2011 A1
20110227287 Reabe Sep 2011 A1
20110269548 Barclay et al. Nov 2011 A1
20110306428 Lockton et al. Dec 2011 A1
20120058808 Lockton Mar 2012 A1
20120115585 Goldman May 2012 A1
20120157178 Lockton Jun 2012 A1
20120264496 Behrman et al. Oct 2012 A1
20120282995 Allen et al. Nov 2012 A1
20120295686 Lockton Nov 2012 A1
20130005453 Nguyen et al. Jan 2013 A1
20130072271 Lockton et al. Mar 2013 A1
20130079081 Lockton et al. Mar 2013 A1
20130079092 Lockton et al. Mar 2013 A1
20130079093 Lockton et al. Mar 2013 A1
20130079135 Lockton et al. Mar 2013 A1
20130079150 Lockton et al. Mar 2013 A1
20130079151 Lockton et al. Mar 2013 A1
20130196774 Lockton et al. Aug 2013 A1
20130225285 Lockton Aug 2013 A1
20130225299 Lockton Aug 2013 A1
20140031134 Lockton et al. Jan 2014 A1
20140100011 Gingher Apr 2014 A1
20140106832 Lockton et al. Apr 2014 A1
20140128139 Shuster et al. May 2014 A1
20140155130 Lockton et al. Jun 2014 A1
20140155134 Lockton Jun 2014 A1
20140206446 Lockton et al. Jul 2014 A1
20140237025 Huske et al. Aug 2014 A1
20140248952 Cibula et al. Sep 2014 A1
20140256432 Lockton et al. Sep 2014 A1
20140279439 Brown Sep 2014 A1
20140287832 Lockton et al. Sep 2014 A1
20140335961 Lockton et al. Nov 2014 A1
20140335962 Lockton et al. Nov 2014 A1
20140378212 Sims Dec 2014 A1
20150011310 Lockton et al. Jan 2015 A1
20150067732 Howe et al. Mar 2015 A1
20150148130 Cibula et al. May 2015 A1
20150238839 Lockton Aug 2015 A1
20150238873 Arnone et al. Aug 2015 A1
20150258452 Lockton et al. Sep 2015 A1
20160023116 Wire Jan 2016 A1
20160045824 Lockton et al. Feb 2016 A1
20160049049 Lockton Feb 2016 A1
20160054872 Cibula et al. Feb 2016 A1
20160082357 Lockton Mar 2016 A1
20160121208 Lockton et al. May 2016 A1
20160134947 Huske et al. May 2016 A1
20160217653 Meyer Jul 2016 A1
20160271501 Balsbaugh Sep 2016 A1
20160361647 Lockton et al. Dec 2016 A1
20160375362 Lockton et al. Dec 2016 A1
20170036110 Lockton et al. Feb 2017 A1
20170036117 Lockton et al. Feb 2017 A1
20170043259 Lockton et al. Feb 2017 A1
20170053498 Lockton Feb 2017 A1
20170065891 Lockton et al. Mar 2017 A1
20170098348 Odom Apr 2017 A1
20170103615 Theodospoulos Apr 2017 A1
20170128840 Croci May 2017 A1
20170221314 Lockton Aug 2017 A1
20170225071 Lockton et al. Aug 2017 A1
20170225072 Lockton et al. Aug 2017 A1
20170232340 Lockton Aug 2017 A1
20170243438 Merati Aug 2017 A1
20170249801 Malek Aug 2017 A1
20170252649 Lockton et al. Sep 2017 A1
20170259173 Lockton et al. Sep 2017 A1
20170264961 Lockton Sep 2017 A1
20170282067 Lockton et al. Oct 2017 A1
20170296916 Lockton et al. Oct 2017 A1
20170304726 Lockton et al. Oct 2017 A1
20170345260 Strause Nov 2017 A1
20180025586 Lockton Jan 2018 A1
20180071637 Baazov Mar 2018 A1
20180104582 Lockton et al. Apr 2018 A1
20180104596 Lockton et al. Apr 2018 A1
20180117464 Lockton et al. May 2018 A1
20180140955 Lockton et al. May 2018 A1
20180154255 Lockton Jun 2018 A1
20180169523 Lockton et al. Jun 2018 A1
20180190077 Hall Jul 2018 A1
20180236359 Lockton et al. Aug 2018 A1
20180243652 Lockton et al. Aug 2018 A1
20180264360 Lockton et al. Sep 2018 A1
20180300988 Lockton Oct 2018 A1
20180318710 Lockton et al. Nov 2018 A1
20190054375 Lockton et al. Feb 2019 A1
20190060750 Lockton et al. Feb 2019 A1
Foreign Referenced Citations (25)
Number Date Country
2252074 Nov 1997 CA
2252021 Nov 1998 CA
2279069 Jul 1999 CA
2287617 Oct 1999 CA
0649102 Jun 1996 EP
2364485 Jan 2002 GB
11-46356 Feb 1999 JP
11-239183 Aug 1999 JP
2000-165840 Jun 2000 JP
2000-217094 Aug 2000 JP
2000-358255 Dec 2000 JP
2001-28743 Jan 2001 JP
2000-209563 Jul 2008 JP
330242 Oct 1989 NZ
01039506 May 2001 WO
0165743 Sep 2001 WO
0203698 Oct 2002 WO
2005064506 Jul 2005 WO
2006004855 Jan 2006 WO
2006004856 Jan 2006 WO
2007002284 Jan 2007 WO
2007016575 Feb 2007 WO
2007041667 Apr 2007 WO
2008027811 Mar 2008 WO
2008115858 Sep 2008 WO
Non-Patent Literature Citations (11)
Entry
“Understanding the Interactivity Between Television and Mobile commerce”, Robert Davis and David Yung, Communications of the ACM, Jul. 2005, vol. 48, No. 7, pp. 103-105.
“Re: Multicast Based Voting System” www.ripe.net/ripe/maillists/archives/mbone-eu-op/1997/msg00100html.
“IST and Sportal.com: Live on the Internet Sep. 14, 2004 by Clare Spoonheim”, www.isk.co.usk/NEWS/dotcom/ist_sportal.html.
“PurpleAce Launches 3GSM Ringtone Competition”, www.wirelessdevnet.com/news/2005/jan/31/news6html.
“On the Perfomance of Protocols for collecting Responses over a Multiple-Access Channel”, Mostafa H. Ammar and George N. Rouskas, IEEE INCOMFORM '91, pp. 1490-1499, vol. 3, IEEE, New York, NY.
Ducheneaut et al., “The Social Side of Gaming: A Study of Interaction Patterns in a Massively Multiplayer Online Game”, Palo Alto Research Center, Nov. 2004, vol. 6, Issue 4, pp. 360-369.
Pinnacle, “The basics of reverse line movement,” Jan. 19, 2018, Retrieved on Jan. 22, 2020 , http://www.pinnacle.com/en/betting-articles educational/basics-of-reverse-line-movement/QAH26XGGQQS7M3GD.
Gambling Commission,“Virtual currencies, eSports and social casino gaming-position paper,” Mar. 2017, Retrieved on Jan. 22, 2020, http://gamblingcomission.gov.uk/PDF/Virtual-currencies-eSports-and -social-casino-gaming.pdf.
Sipko et al.,“Machine learning for the prediction of professional tennis matches,” In: MEng computing-final year project, Imperial College London, Jun. 15, 2015, http://www.doc.ic.ac.uk/teaching/distinguished-projects/2015/m.sipko.pdf.
Winview Game Producer, “Live TV Sports Play Along App WinView Games Announces Sponsorship With PepsiCo to Start This Holiday Season,” In Winview Games. Dec. 21, 2016, Retrieved on Jan. 21, 2020 from , http://www. winviewgames./press-release/live-tv-sports-play-along-app-winview-games-announces-sponsorship-pepsico-start-holiday-season/.
The International Search Report and the Written Opinion for the PCT/US2019/054859 dated Feb. 4, 2020.
Related Publications (1)
Number Date Country
20190255436 A1 Aug 2019 US
Provisional Applications (1)
Number Date Country
60791793 Apr 2006 US
Divisions (1)
Number Date Country
Parent 13403845 Feb 2012 US
Child 13681211 US
Continuations (6)
Number Date Country
Parent 15985918 May 2018 US
Child 16403506 US
Parent 15639457 Jun 2017 US
Child 15985918 US
Parent 15249162 Aug 2016 US
Child 15639457 US
Parent 14338314 Jul 2014 US
Child 15249162 US
Parent 13681211 Nov 2012 US
Child 14338314 US
Parent 11786992 Apr 2007 US
Child 13403845 US