Patent Application
20070291922
The present invention provides methods and apparatus for variable wait treatments based on characteristics of the queue, such as the expected wait time of the call. According to a further aspect of the invention, wait treatments are provided to a caller using an IVR system or an announcement server, without losing control of the call.
While the invention is generally illustrated in conjunction with the processing of calls in an exemplary call center, the invention is not limited to use with any particular type of call center or communication processing application. For example, the invention is applicable to the processing of both incoming and outgoing communications. The disclosed techniques can be used with automatic call distribution (ACD) systems, telemarketing systems, private-branch exchange (PBX) systems, computer-telephony integration (CTI)-based systems, as well as in combinations of these and other types of call centers. A call center in accordance with the invention may be configured using any type of network infrastructure, such as, e.g., asynchronous transfer mode (ATM), local area networks, wide area networks or Internet Protocol (IP) networks. The term “call center” as used herein is thus intended to include any type of ACD system, telemarketing system or other communication system that processes calls or other service requests, including voice calls, video calls, multimedia calls, e-mail, faxes, text chat or voice messages as well as various portions or combinations of these and other types of communications. The term “call” as used herein is intended to include any of the above-noted types of communications as well as portions or combinations of these and other communications.
The ACD system 101 may be implemented in a manner similar to, for example, the Avaya Communication Manager™ from Avaya Inc. of Basking Ridge, N.J. or the Definity™ PBX-based ACD system from Lucent Technologies.
Referring again to
Similarly, each agent's skills are prioritized according to his or her level of expertise in that skill, and agents may be, for example, enqueued in individual ones of the agent queues 130 in their order of expertise level, or enqueued in different ones of a plurality of agent queues that correspond to a skill and each one of which corresponds to a different expertise level in that skill. It should be noted that the invention can also be implemented in systems using a wide variety of other types of queue arrangements and queuing techniques.
The ACD system 101 further includes a call vector 140. The call vector 140 may be one of a number of different types of stored control programs implemented in system 101. Calls incoming to the call center on lines or trunks 100 are assigned by call vector 140 to different call queues 121-129 based upon the agent skill that they require for proper handling. Agents 106-108 who are available for handling calls are assigned to agent queues 131-139 based upon the skills which they possess. An agent may have multiple skills, and hence may be assigned to multiple agent queues 131-139 simultaneously. Such an agent is referred to herein as a “multi-skill agent.” Furthermore, an agent may have different levels of skill expertise (e.g., different skill levels in a multi-level scale or primary (P) and secondary (S) skills), and hence may be assigned to different agent queues 131-139 at different expertise levels.
Call vectoring is described in greater detail in Definity™ Communications System Generic 3 Call Vectoring/Expert Agent Selection (EAS) Guide, AT&T Publication No. 555-230-520, Issue 3, November 1993, which is incorporated by reference herein. Skills-based ACD techniques are described in greater detail in, for example, U.S. Pat. No. 5,206,903 issued Apr. 27, 1993 in the name of inventors J. E. Kohler et al. and entitled “Automatic Call Distribution Based on Matching Required Skills with Agents Skills,” which is incorporated by reference herein.
Another program executing in ACD system 101 is an agent selector 150. Selector 150 may be implemented in software stored either in the memory 115 of system 101, in a peripheral memory (e.g., a disk or CD-ROM) of system 101, or in any other type of computer readable medium associated with system 101, and executed by processor 116 or other suitable processing hardware associated with the ACD system 101. Selector 150 in this exemplary embodiment implements conventional techniques for providing an assignment between available calls and available agents. The conventional techniques implemented by selector 150 are well known in the art and will not be further described herein. It should be noted that these functions could be implemented in other elements of the ACD system 101, or using a combination of a number of different elements in such a system.
Further details regarding call processing in a system such as ACD system 101 can be found in, for example, U.S. Pat. No. 5,905,793 in the name of inventors A. D. Flockhart et al. and entitled “Waiting-Call Selection Based on Anticipated Wait Times,” and U.S. Pat. No. 6,192,122, in the name of inventors A. D. Flockhart et al. and entitled “Call Center Agent Selection that Optimizes Call Wait Times,” both of which are incorporated by reference herein.
The call center of
Once it is determined during step 310 that a managed resource has become available, the available managed resource is matched with a request during steps 320 through 340. After a resource becomes available, the exemplary resource allocation process 300 obtains the state of the service classes for which the managed resource is qualified (i.e., capable) during step 320. The state of service classes may be obtained, for example, using a publish/subscribe mechanism and may be cached by each resource manager.
In one exemplary embodiment, each service class can progress through multiple states. Each state indicates that the service class is in greater need than the previous state. For example, each state indicates how close the service class is to exceeding its target or how much the service class has progressed beyond its target. It is noted that the “greatest need” generally does not mean that the customer is in the greatest need to speak to an agent. The “greatest need” is based on one or more predefined criteria for selecting which queue 120 should be chosen to meet or preserve goals for customer service and to give customers the desired level of service.
In one exemplary embodiment, one of the following five service class states can be assigned to a queue 120 to indicate the current performance level: over served, within range, future jeopardy, current jeopardy, over threshold. For example, the following table shows the service class states for each of the exemplary call queues 120 shown in
The service class with the greatest need is identified during step 330 based on one or more predefined criteria. In one exemplary implementation, when multiple service classes are in a state that indicates the greatest need, the resource allocation process 300 prioritizes the assignment of requests to local resources. If the service classes in greatest need include at least one local service class, a local service class is selected. If no local service classes are in greatest need, a remote service class with the greatest need is selected. If two or more remote service classes are in the same state, services classes are selected, for example, based on a round-robin technique, selecting the remote service class with the oldest time stamp. The logical resource manager optionally applies a time stamp to a remote service class when an agent offered for that service class has been accepted.
Once the service class with the greatest need is selected during step 330, the managed resource is assigned during step 340 to process the next request associated with the selected service class. For example, if the service class with the greatest need is a local service class, the request can be obtained from the associated queue 120. If, however, the service class with the greatest need is a remote service class, then the resource can be offered to a remote resource manager, to be matched to work queued at the remote service class.
It is noted that the matching of requests to managed resources can be restricted to resources in a specific location or region, for example, by adding a location qualifier to the service classes. The location qualifier can apply to only one site, or to a region (group of sites). The location qualifier restricts contacts in the service class to be delivered only to that location. For example, a location qualifier can ensure that email contacts received in given country are only handled by agents in the same country.
As indicated above, a call center agent can have one or more capability sets. Each capability set should include the same qualifiers as a service class that the agent can handle. The capability sets are used to match a contact with the agent. If the qualifiers in a capability set match the qualifiers in the service class for a contact, the resource allocation process 300 matches the contact to the agent.
Once a new request is added to a queue, the predicted wait time is determined for the request during step 420. An announcement is selected for request during step 430, based on the predicted wait time or other characteristics of the queue. For example, if the wait time is only five minutes, a brief announcement can be selected that provides summary account and transaction information. If the wait time is 30 minutes, however, a longer announcement can be selected that provides more detailed information. The request is then transferred to an announcement server during step 440 with an indication of the selected announcement. In this manner, the ACD system has the flexibility to hand off the announcement to another server yet only loses control of the call for the duration of the selected announcement.
A test is performed during step 450 to determine if the call is returned from the announcement server. Generally, the call is automatically returned from the announcement server upon completion of the announcement that was selected during step 430.
When the call is returned, the predicted wait time for the request is reassessed during step 470. A test is then performed during step 480 to determine if an agent is available to service the request. If an agent is available, then program control proceeds to the resource allocation process 300 and continues in the manner described above. If, however, an agent is not available, then program control returns to step 430 for selection of a new announcement (or another wait treatment) based on the recalculated wait time.
While
While exemplary embodiments of the present invention have been described with respect to processing steps in a software program, as would be apparent to one skilled in the art, various functions may be implemented in the digital domain using digital logic blocks or in hardware by circuit elements or state machines, or in combination of both software and hardware. Such software may be employed in, for example, a digital signal processor, micro-controller, or general-purpose computer. Such hardware and software may be embodied within circuits implemented within an integrated circuit.
Thus, the functions of the present invention can be embodied in the form of methods and apparatuses for practicing those methods. One or more aspects of the present invention can be embodied in the form of program code, for example, whether stored in a storage medium, loaded into and/or executed by a machine, or transmitted over some transmission medium, wherein, when the program code is loaded into and executed by a machine, such as a computer, the machine becomes an apparatus for practicing the invention. When implemented on a general-purpose processor, the program code segments combine with the processor to provide a device that operates analogously to specific logic circuits.
System and Article of Manufacture Details
As is known in the art, the methods and apparatus discussed herein may be distributed as an article of manufacture that itself comprises a computer readable medium having computer readable code means embodied thereon. The computer readable program code means is operable, in conjunction with a computer system, to carry out all or some of the steps to perform the methods or create the apparatuses discussed herein. The computer readable medium may be a recordable medium (e.g., floppy disks, hard drives, compact disks, or memory cards) or may be a transmission medium (e.g., a network comprising fiber-optics, the world-wide web, cables, or a wireless channel using time-division multiple access, code-division multiple access, or other radio-frequency channel). Any medium known or developed that can store information suitable for use with a computer system may be used. The computer-readable code means is any mechanism for allowing a computer to read instructions and data, such as magnetic variations on a magnetic media or height variations on the surface of a compact disk.
The computer systems and servers described herein each contain a memory that will configure associated processors to implement the methods, steps, and functions disclosed herein. The memories could be distributed or local and the processors could be distributed or singular. The memories could be implemented as an electrical, magnetic or optical memory, or any combination of these or other types of storage devices. Moreover, the term “memory” should be construed broadly enough to encompass any information able to be read from or written to an address in the addressable space accessed by an associated processor. With this definition, information on a network is still within a memory because the associated processor can retrieve the information from the network.
It is to be understood that the embodiments and variations shown and described herein are merely illustrative of the principles of this invention and that various modifications may be implemented by those skilled in the art without departing from the scope and spirit of the invention.
