Methods and systems for performing angle-resolved fourier-domain optical coherence tomography

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 7982879
  • Patent Number
    7,982,879
  • Date Filed
    Wednesday, February 21, 2007
    17 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, July 19, 2011
    13 years ago
Abstract
Arrangements, apparatus and methods are provided according to exemplary embodiments of the present invention. In particular, at least one first electro-magnetic radiation may be received and at least one second electro-magnetic radiation within a solid angle may be forwarded to a sample. The second electro-magnetic radiation may be associated with the first electro-magnetic radiation. A plurality of third electro-magnetic radiations can be received from the sample which is associated with the second electro-magnetic radiation, and at least one portion of the third electro-magnetic radiation is provided outside a periphery of the solid angle. Signals associated with each of the third electro-magnetic radiations can be simultaneously detected, with the signals being associated with information for the sample at a plurality of depths thereof. The depths can be determined using at least one of the third electro-magnetic radiations without a need to utilize another one of the third electro-magnetic radiations.
Description
FIELD OF THE INVENTION

The present invention relates to methods and systems for performing angle-resolved Fourier-domain optical coherence tomography, and more particularly to measuring spatially-resolved angular backscattering distributions from transparent and turbid samples using Fourier-domain optical coherence tomography techniques.


BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

Optical coherence tomography (“OCT”) enables cross-sectional images of biological samples to be obtained with resolution on a scale of several microns to tens of microns, thus allowing for detailed imaging of a tissue microstructure. It has been demonstrated that Fourier-domain OCT (“FD-OCT”) can provide a significantly improved sensitivity over the time-domain OCT, which enables high-speed imaging. For example, FD-OCT has been implemented in two configurations, e.g., spectral-domain OCT (“SD-OCT”) and optical frequency domain imaging (“OFDI”), as described in at least one of International Patent Application PCT/US2004/029148, filed Sep. 8, 2004, U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/266,779, filed Nov. 2, 2005, and U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/501,276, filed Jul. 9, 2004. FD-OCT has been shown to have significant potential as a tool for identifying morphological changes in many clinical contexts, including cardiovascular, gastrointestinal, and retinal imaging.


One limitation of conventional OCT systems and methods is that the backscattered light from only one angular range centered at 180 degrees is collected. The same is the case for optical coherence microscopy (“OCM”) systems, in which the array detection can be used to generate en-face two-dimensional images without beam scanning. An example of one such OCM system is shown in FIG. 1, as described in E. Beaurepaire et al., “Full-field optical coherence microscopy,” Optics Letters 23(4): 244-246, 1998. An acquisition of light backscattered from different angles can be implemented using a technique of angular compounding, which may reduce speckle. Speckle generally manifests itself as a checkered pattern within scattering regions of the image, and makes it more difficult to discern subtle reflectance differences in the tissue reflectance.


A method and system for acquiring backscattered light at different incident angles in the context of OCT enabling angular compounding employs path length encoding. The example of such system is shown in FIG. 2, as described in N. Iftimia et al., “Speckle reduction in optical coherence tomography by ‘path length encoded’ angular compounding,” Journal Of Biomedical Optics 8(2): 260-263, 2003. For example, an optical glass can be placed in the imaging beam path, splitting the incident field into two or more beamlets. This optical glass causes a portion of the incident beam (beamlet 2) to experience a greater path length delay than beamlet 1. In addition, beamlet 2 illuminates the sample at a different angle than beamlet 1. As a result, multiple OCT images of the sample (each acquired at a different angle) appear simultaneously on the OCT display. While being amenable to high-speed imaging, these method and system generally do not scale appropriately to a large number of angles, and can involve a tradeoff between the spatial resolution and the number of angles acquired thereby.


Another method and system translates a right angle prism, directing light from the sample arm to different positions on the focusing lens. An example of such system is shown in FIG. 3, as described in M. Bashkansky et al., “Statistics and reduction of speckle in optical coherence tomography,” Optics Letters 25(8): 545-547, 2000. In these method and system, a backscattered light at a narrow angular range centered at 180 degrees is generally collected, but the angle of incidence of the incident beam with respect to the sample normal varies with the position of the prism. Such method and system likely do not provide for (or even allow) a measurement of angular backscattering distributions. The speed at which the images can be acquired may be limited by the speed at which the prism can be translated in an oscillatory manner. In yet another method and system, detection of the OCT signals with four detectors can be performed simultaneously, which enables angular compounding for the speckle reduction. An example of such system is shown in FIG. 4, as described in J. M. Schmitt, “Array detection for speckle reduction in optical coherence microscopy,” Physics In Medicine And Biology 42(7): 1427-1439, 1997. In particular, the reference beam in this system is generally not larger than the incident beam. Thus, this system may not be conducive to measurements of the angular backscattering distributions. Furthermore, while each detector element receives the light backscattered at a different angle, the solid angle subtended by the light collected for a given detector element is contained entirely within that subtended by the incident beam. The detection in this system is performed in the time domain.


In the field of light-scattering spectroscopy, it is known that the angular distributions of backscattered light generally contain information regarding the size distributions of the scattering particles within the tissue. Given the optical resolution limitations of OCT, the ability to derive robust contrast between tissues with subtle differences in reflectance properties may (in certain circumstances) utilize the measurements of the angular distributions of the backscattered light. Depth-resolved angular backscattering measurements using the low-coherence interferometry have been designed for the light-scattering measurements with high angular resolution, as shown in the arrangements of FIGS. 5(a) and 5(b), as described in A. Wax et al., “Measurement of angular distributions by use of low-coherence interferometry for light-scattering spectroscopy,” Optics Letters 26(6): 322-324, 2001, and FIGS. 6(a) and 6(b), as described in J. W. Pyhtila et al., “Determining nuclear morphology using an improved angle-resolved low coherence interferometry system,” Optics Express 15(25): 3474-3484, 2003.


For example, light from a low-coherence source is divided into two arms of a modified Michelson interferometer, one beam being incident on the sample (or a sample arm) and another being incident on a mirror (or a reference arm). A lens placed in the reference arm can be translated in a direction parallel to the mirror face in order to provide the selectivity for different backscattering angles in the former arm. Measurements of interfered light are generally made in either the time domain (using the arrangement shown in FIGS. 5(a) and 5(b)) or the frequency domain (using the arrangement shown in FIGS. 6(a) and 6(b)). These techniques generally do not permit simultaneous measurements of the angular backscattering distributions, and the measurement speed is likely limited by the speed at which the lens can be precisely translated. While optimized for angular, point-sampling, in-situ measurements, angle-resolved LCI in its current implementations may likely be unsuitable for in-vivo clinical imaging.


Accordingly, there is a need to overcome the deficiencies described herein above. Indeed, simultaneously measuring the light that is backscattered from multiple angles in the imaging context of the optical coherence tomography may allow for high levels of speckle reduction and additional forms of image contrast.


Accordingly, there is a need to overcome the deficiencies described herein above.


OBJECTS AND SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

To address and/or overcome the above-described problems and/or deficiencies, exemplary embodiments of systems, apparatus and methods according to the present invention are provided for measuring spatially-resolved angular backscattering distributions from transparent and turbid samples using Fourier-domain optical coherence tomography principles. In addition, according to further exemplary embodiments of the present invention, systems and methods for utilizing the backscattering distributions are provided for performing speckle reduction and for generating image contrast.


Thus, in accordance with one exemplary embodiment of the present invention, apparatus and method are provided. In particular, at least one first electro-magnetic radiation can be received and at least one second electro-magnetic radiation within a solid angle may be forwarded to a sample. The second electro-magnetic radiation may be associated with the first electro-magnetic radiation. A plurality of third electro-magnetic radiations can be received from the sample which is associated with the second electro-magnetic radiation, and at least one portion of the third electro-magnetic radiation is provided outside a periphery of the solid angle. Signals associated with each of the third electro-magnetic radiations can be simultaneously detected, with the signals being associated with information for the sample at a plurality of depths thereof. The depths can be determined using at least one of the third electro-magnetic radiations without a need to utilize another one of the third electro-magnetic radiations.


In addition, an interference can be detected (e.g., using at least one third arrangement) between the two of the third radiations and at least one fourth radiation associated with the first radiation, and information associated with the sample can be obtained as a function of the depths within the sample based on the interference. Data associated with at least one of birefringence properties, spectroscopic properties, motion, angular back-scattering properties or elastic properties of at least one portion of the sample can be provided as a function of the signals (e.g., using at least one third arrangement). At least one image of at least one portion of the sample can be generated (e.g., using at least one third arrangement) as a function of the signals. The data associated with at least one of birefringence properties, spectroscopic properties, motion, angular back-scattering properties or elastic properties of at least one portion of the sample can also be provided as a function of the signals. The data can be contrast data associated with the image (e.g., using at least one third arrangement). Data associated with scattering characteristics of at least one portion of the sample can also be provided as a function of a combination of the signals. Further, the depths may be determined using a single one of the third electro-magnetic radiations.


According to another exemplary embodiment of the present invention, apparatus and method can provided which facilitate the production of data associated with at least one sample. For example, first information associated with signals for a plurality of electro-magnetic radiations provided from the at least one sample can be received. At least first one of the electro-magnetic radiations may be provided along a first axis, and at least second one of the electro-magnetic radiations can be provided along second axis which is different from the first axis. Data for each of the signals within at least one portion of the first information may include data for a plurality of depths within the sample. Second information associated with contrast data of at least one portion of an image for the at least one sample can be produced as a function of the first information.


In yet another exemplary embodiment of the present invention, further apparatus and method can provided. For example, at least one first electro-magnetic radiation can be received, and at least one second electro-magnetic radiation within a solid angle can be forwarded to a sample. The second electro-magnetic radiation may be associated with the first electro-magnetic radiation. At least two of a plurality of third electro-magnetic radiations may be simultaneously received from the sample which is associated with the second electro-magnetic radiation, and at least one portion of the third electro-magnetic radiations may be provided outside a periphery of the solid angle. An interference between the at least two of the third radiations and at least one fourth radiation associated with the first radiation may be detected. Information associated with the sample can be obtained as a function of at least one depth within the sample based on the interference.


These and other objects, features and advantages of the present invention will become apparent upon reading the following detailed description of embodiments of the invention, when taken in conjunction with the appended claims.





BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

Further objects, features and advantages of the present invention will become apparent from the following detailed description taken in conjunction with the accompanying figures showing illustrative embodiments of the present invention, in which:



FIG. 1 is a block diagram of a conventional apparatus for performing Optical Coherence Microscopy (“OCM”);



FIG. 2 is a block diagram of a conventional apparatus for performing path length encoded angular compounding for reducing speckle in Optical Coherence Tomography (“OCT”);



FIG. 3 is a block diagram of a conventional OCT apparatus for performing speckle reduction;



FIG. 4 is a block diagram of a conventional OCT apparatus for performing array detection for speckle reduction;



FIG. 5(
a) and 5(b) are block diagrams of conventional apparatus for performing angle-resolved low-coherence interferometry;



FIGS. 6(
a) and 6(b) are block diagrams of further conventional apparatus for performing the angle-resolved low-coherence interferometry;



FIG. 7 is a schematic diagram of an exemplary embodiment of an angle-resolved FD-OCT system according to the present invention that employs a single-dimensional detector array, with a rectangular, gray dashed region being oriented perpendicularly to the plane of the interferometer;



FIG. 8 is a schematic diagram of an exemplary embodiment of a wavelength-swept laser source utilized the system shown in FIG. 7;



FIG. 9 is a schematic and operational diagram of a detection of the interference another exemplary embodiment of an angle-resolved FD-OCT system according to the present invention that employs a two dimensional detector array for a simultaneous detection of wavelength and angle;



FIG. 10 is a schematic and operational diagram of imaging optics providing within a further exemplary embodiment of an angle-resolved FD-OCT system according to the present invention that can be compatible with endoscopic probes;



FIG. 11(
a) is a two-dimensional image of a tissue phantom obtained with the exemplary embodiments of the angle-resolved FD-OCT system according to the present invention for averages across one exemplary angular sample;



FIG. 11(
b) is another two-dimensional image of the tissue phantom obtained with the exemplary embodiments of the angle-resolved FD-OCT system according to the present invention for averages across 400 angular samples;



FIG. 12(
a) is a graph of an angular distribution obtained from one resolution element within a tissue phantom in accordance with an exemplary embodiment of the present invention;



FIG. 12(
b) is a graph of an angular distribution obtained from one resolution element using corresponding normalized cross-correlation function in accordance with an exemplary embodiment of the present invention;



FIG. 13A is an image of an exemplary esophageal tissue obtained from compounding one angular sample, with an arrow pointing to a thin scattering layer within the epithelium;



FIG. 13B is an image of an exemplary esophageal tissue obtained from compounding three angular sample, with the arrow pointing to a thin scattering layer within the epithelium;



FIG. 13C is an image of an exemplary esophageal tissue obtained from compounding thirty (30) angular samples, with the arrow pointing to a thin scattering layer within the epithelium; and



FIG. 13D is an image of an exemplary esophageal tissue obtained from compounding four hundred (400) angular samples, with the arrow pointing to a thin scattering layer within the epithelium.





Throughout the figures, the same reference numerals and characters, unless otherwise stated, are used to denote like features, elements, components or portions of the illustrated embodiments. Moreover, while the subject invention will now be described in detail with reference to the figures, it is done so in connection with the illustrative embodiments. It is intended that changes and modifications can be made to the described embodiments without departing from the true scope and spirit of the subject invention as defined by the appended claims.


DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF EXEMPLARY EMBODIMENTS

Exemplary Principle of Angle-Resolved FD-OCT


Angle-resolved FD-OCT is described herein below in a context of Fourier-Domain OCT. For example, in FD-OCT, the interference between reference light and the light backscattered from the imaging sample can be measured in the frequency domain in order to obtain the depth-resolved reflectance of a turbid, semi-turbid, or transparent medium. Electro-magnetic radiation (e.g., light, laser beam, etc.) of the input light source can be split into a reference beam and a sample beam. The sample beam light may be directed to the sample to be imaged, and backscattered light from the sample may be interfered with reference beam light. In the case of angle-resolved FD-OCT, the reference beam can be spatially expanded such that it can be made larger in a cross-sectional area than the cross-sectional area of the sample beam in order to allow for the interference with a range of backscattering angles beyond those subtended by the incident sample beam. The interference between the reference beam and the backscattered light can be measured using, e.g., a detector array, which may consist of (i) detectors integrated onto a single integrated circuit element, and/or (ii) individual detectors provided together in space. The angular dependence of the detected backscattered light with respect to the incident beam may be encoded in the spatial domain, as the distribution of light intensities along at least one dimension of the detector array. The wavelength dependence of the interfered light may be measured, and Fourier analysis axial reflectivity profiles corresponding to different ranges of backscattering angles can be obtained.


For example, the interference signal Si detected by an ith pixel of the detector array as a function of the frequency of laser light vn can be given by the following proportionality expression:

Si(vn)∝P(vn)√{square root over (γr,i(vns,i(vn))}{square root over (γr,i(vns,i(vn))}∫0√{square root over (R(z))}cos(4πvnz/c+φ(z))dz   (1)

where P(vn) is the total power of the source. R(z) and φ(z) are the amplitude and phase terms of the reflectance profile, respectively. An axial distance z may be expressed as a relative distance, with z=0 corresponding to zero optical path difference between the sample and reference arms. The amount of the sample arm and reference arm electro-magnetic radiation (e.g., light) that reaches pixel i, expressed as fractions of P(vn) can be denoted γs,i and γr,i, respectively. The reflectivity profile R(z) can be obtained as the Discrete Fourier Transform of the sampled interference signal along the dimension i:

√{square root over (R(z))}∝DFT(Si)   (2)


Exemplary Principle of Speckle Reduction Using Angle-Resolved FD-OCT


Speckle results from distortions of the backscattered wavefront, which are likely caused by low-angle multiple forward scattering and diffuse multiple backscattering from closely separated refractive index heterogeneities. Angular compounding techniques are generally obtained from an observation that as a result of this interference, fields originating from different backscattering angles are de-correlated. By averaging the signals from different scattering angles incoherently, e.g., averaging of the magnitude of the reconstructed reflectance profiles, a reflectance signal with reduced speckle can be obtained.


The speckle signal-to-noise ratio (“SNR”) can be a measure of the speckle reduction, as the ratio of the mean to the square-root of the variance of pixel intensities within a medium with homogenous scattering properties:










SNR
=




S
k








(


S
k

-



S
k




)

2






,




(
3
)








where the angular brackets denote an average over a collection of pixels indexed by k. The speckle SNR can be a normalized measure of the variance of the signal obtained from a homogenous sample. As such, the speckle SNR may differ from the system sensitivity, which can be defined without the presence of speckle as the minimum detectable reflectance. For the exemplary angular compounding method, the SNR may increase proportionally to the square-root of the number of uncorrelated, incoherent averages, N:

SNR(N)=SNR(1)√{square root over (N)}.   (4)


An extent to which the SNR can be increased by angular compounding may therefore be dependent on the level of angular decorrelation. In general, higher levels of decorrelation for OCT sample volumes containing large numbers of scatterers can be obtained, as well as those at large optical depths. In comparison, sharp interfaces and scatterers with dimensions that are similar to those of the sample volumes are likely to indicate a small amount of contrast enhancement from angular compounding.


Principle of Extraction of Parameters from Angular Backscattering Distributions for Image Contrast


The angular backscattering patterns of light, which may be measured by the angle-resolved FD-OCT methods and systems, can contain information about the scatterer size and the density of the imaging sample. This information may be relevant in, e.g., a clinical imaging context in order to distinguish between different regions of tissue that have very similar scattering properties that may be used in optical methods that measure the reflectance of light that is backscattered within a single angular range. Image contrast measures can be generated from angular backscattering distributions at each pixel, and such measures can be spatially smoothed, and/or image contrast measures can be generated from spatially smoothed angular backscattering distributions.


Angle-Resolved Fourier-Domain OCT


The FD-OCT techniques of SD-OCT and OFDI systems and method can measure a discrete spectral interference, and may differ in the implementation of this measurement. The OFDI systems and methods can use a wavelength-swept source to record the interference as a function of time, whereas the SD-OCT systems and methods may generally use a spectrometer to image interference spectra onto a detector array or a portion of an array.



FIG. 7 shows a schematic diagram of an exemplary embodiment of the angle-resolved FD-OCT imaging system in accordance with the present invention. This exemplary system can include the following modules: a wavelength-swept source 705, an interferometer 707, and an acquisition camera 765 with corresponding electronics 785. For example, the laser output can be directed to the optical coupler 710 which may split the light into two arms of the interferometer 707. A collimated light provided from a reference arm collimator 725 may be incident on a cylindrical lens telescope with elements 735, 740, 745, and this telescope can which expand the beam in the dimension of the line-scan camera 765. A free-space coupler of variable length 712 can be placed within the reference arm before the collimator 725 to facilitate reference arm length adjustments. The collimated light from the sample arm collimator 730 can be directed through a linear polarizer 755 and the beam splitter 750, where such light may be incident on imaging optics 770, 775 which focus the light on a sample 780.


Polarization controllers 715, 720 provided before the collimators 725, 730, respectively, can be positioned to maximize the fringe modulation across the frequency range of the wavelength-swept source 705. The imaging optics 770 and 775 consists of a galvanometer mirror 770 with its axis parallel to the plane of the interferometer 707 and perpendicular to the beam which is incident upon it from the beam splitter 750, and a focusing lens 775 that is placed one focal length from the sample 780. The incident beam contacts the horizontal and vertical centers of the galvanometer mirror 770. The light back-reflected from the sample 780 can pass back via the mirror 770 and the focusing lens 775, and may subsequently interfere with the reference beam at the beam splitter 750. The interfered light may be incident on a cylindrical lens 760 which focuses the light onto the line-scan camera 765. The light from a He—Ne laser 700 can be injected into the fiber coupler 710, and may act as a guide beam during the imaging procedure.


The signals from the line-scan camera 765 can be directed toward analog-to-digital (A-D) input ports of a data acquisition (“DAQ”) board 785. For example, in a time period corresponding to one a-line, the DAQ board 785 can obtain m data points from n exposures, where m may be the number of detectors in the line scan camera 765, and n can be the number of frequencies sampled per a-line. The a-line acquisition rate can be determined as the quotient of the line scan camera readout rate and n. The readout from the DAQ board 785 may be synchronized to the frequency-swept laser source 705 using, e.g., TTL trigger signals by the line-scan camera 765 at the beginning of each readout phase.


As shown in the diagram of FIG. 8, the exemplary embodiment of the wavelength-swept source can be constructed as a ring-cavity laser with a semiconductor optical amplifier (“SOA”) 845 as the gain element and a galvanometer mirror filter 800 that may include a galvanometer mirror 802, a telescope 805, 810, a diffraction grating 815, and a fiber collimator 820. Two polarization controllers 825, 840 can be provided to optimize a laser polarization and output coupler 835 which thus provides the laser output. The output coupler 835 can nominally split the light approximately equally between the output port 836 and the laser port 837. An optical circulator 830 may direct light from the laser port 837 to the galvanometer mirror filter 800 via the polarization controller 840, and can direct the light returning from the galvanometer mirror filter 800 back to the SOA 845 via the polarization controller 825. As the galvanometer mirror 802 rotates, the wavelength reflected from the galvanometer mirror filter 800 generally changes. An optical isolator 850 can be used to separate the laser from the rest of the exemplary system.


2D Detection for Resolution of Azimuthal and Polar Angles


According to a second exemplary embodiment of the present invention, the detection of the interfered light can be performed using a two dimensional array of detectors, with both dimensions corresponding to the angular distribution of backscattered light. The light incident on the sample may be provided by a wavelength-tunable, narrow line-width source. The light backscattered from the imaging sample is interfered with a reference beam that has been expanded along two spatial dimensions. Each detector array element can correspond to a unique range of polar and azimuthal angles of the backscattered light. By sweeping the laser across its tuning range, while acquiring readouts of the detector array, a vector for each discrete azimuth-polar angular pair can be obtained. Fourier-domain optical coherence tomographic reconstruction techniques may be applied the vectors, which can generate depth-resolved reflectance profiles. By scanning the beam across the sample or moving the sample relative to the beam while acquiring readouts of the array, angle-resolved reflectance profiles for different locations on the tissue may be obtained. These profiles can be combined to form two- or three-dimensional cross-sectional reflectance images.


2D Detection for Simultaneous Resolution of Angle and Wavelenth


According to a third exemplary embodiment of the present invention, a detection of the interfered light can be performed using, e.g., a two dimensional array of detectors, with one dimension corresponding to wavelength, and the other to the angle of the backscattered light, as shown in the operational and block diagram of FIG. 9. The light incident on the sample may be provided by a broadband source. The light backscattered from the sample can be interfered with a reference beam that has been expanded along one spatial dimension, and this dimension can correspond to the angle of the backscattered light. The interfered light 900 may be incident on a diffraction grating 905, which can separate light along another dimension corresponding to wavelength. Subsequently, this separated light 910 can be incident on the two-dimensional detector array 915. Along each one-dimensional portion of the detector array readout which corresponds to a particular backscattering angular range, Fourier-domain optical coherence tomographic reconstruction techniques can be applied to the interference spectrum, thereby providing a depth-resolved reflectance profile. By scanning the beam across the sample, or moving the sample with respect to the beam while acquiring readouts of the array, the angle-resolved reflectance profiles for different points on the tissue may be obtained. These profiles can be combined to form two- or three-dimensional cross-sectional reflectance images.


Fiber-Bundle Optical Probe


A fourth exemplary embodiment suitable for applications using small probe geometries in accordance with the present invention can be used with a fiber bundle, a shown in the operational and block diagram of FIG. 10. According to this exemplary embodiment, an array of optical fibers 1025 can be used to transmit and receive the light to and from an imaging sample 1000. One or more fibers in the array 1025 can be designated as “delivery fibers,” through which light 1010 may be transmitted to and received from the sample 1000. Each fiber in the array 1025 can correspond to a unique, narrow range of angular backscattering angles. Lenses placed before the fibers 1020 may serve to enhance the amount of light collected by each fiber. A lens 1015 placed in front of the lenses 1020 serves to focus light onto the sample 1000, and to collimate light backscattered from the sample 1000 prior to the collection by the lenses 1020.


Polarization Sensitive Angle-Resolved FD-OCT


Polarimetric measurements in the context of optical coherence tomography may be useful for spatially resolving birefringence in biological tissue. According to a fifth exemplary embodiment according to the present invention, polarimetric measurements can be performed by one or more of the following:

    • a) varying the polarization of the light prior to the receipt thereof at the interferometer, and by fixing the polarization state of the reference arm and/or the sample arm;
    • b) varying the polarization of only the sample beam as a function of time;
    • c) varying the polarization of only the reference beam as a function of time;
    • d) varying the polarization state of one or more parts of the reference beam as a function of space, such that there may be at least two distinct parts of the reference beam that differ in the polarization state;
    • e) varying the polarization state of one or more parts of the backscattered light as a function of space prior to interference with the reference beam, such that there may be at least two distinct parts of the sample beam that differ in the polarization state;
    • f) varying the polarization state of one or more parts of the interfered light as a function of space, such that there may be at least two distinct parts that differ in the polarization state.


Using the exemplary techniques (a), (b) and/or (c), the birefringence maps of the sample can be obtained by comparing a-lines received at different times, such that the polarization states from which they originated are likely different. Using the exemplary techniques (d), (e) and/or (f), the birefringence maps of the sample can be obtained by comparing a-lines obtained from different backscattering angular ranges such that the polarization states from which they originated are likely different.


Particle Sizing


The angular frequency content obtained from the angle-resolved FD-OCT system and/or method can be analyzed using a computational framework of Mie scattering, provided that the deviations of the beam from planar waves can be accounted for in the analysis. In particular, as the angular scattering distributions which can originate from spherical dielectric scatterers may be determined using the Mie theory, the inverse problem of determining the size distributions of the scatterers from the angular scattering distributions can be performed. The Mie scattering analyses of angular backscattering distributions can enable a measurement of scatterer distributions within epithelial tissues, which may be correlated with dysplastic transitions that precede cancerous lesions.


Angular Decorrelation


Another method of processing angular backscattering distributions acquired from angle-resolved FD-OCT involves analysis of their angular frequency content. Image contrast measures include the angular frequency bin with maximum power and the width of the peak with the highest power. Analysis of the power-spectral density of the angular backscattering distributions is equivalent to analysis of the auto-correlation function by the Wiener-Kinchine theorem. The normalized auto-correlation function C can be provided by:










C
i

=





j




(


S
j

-



S
j




)



(


S

j
-
i


-



S
j




)






j




(


S
j

-



S
j




)

2



.





(
5
)








where j and i can be angular indexes. For example, the width of the central lobe of the autocorrelation function, measured relative to the first minimum, can indicate the extent of the correlation between successive angular samples. This exemplary width can be determined for each pixel of a cross-sectional image obtained using the angle-resolved FD-OCT system and method, thus providing an image with the contrast for the de-correlation level of the angular backscattering distributions.


EXAMPLE

The exemplary embodiment of the system and method according to the present invention which can be used for reducing speckle was verified by the following experiment. Two-layer tissue phantoms were constructed from aqueous agar gel (0.5% agar by weight) and polymer microspheres of diameter 0.3 mm (Duke Scientific). The phantoms were contained in silicone isolators (Sigma). An initial scattering layer with an approximate depth of 2 mm was formed. A second scattering layer, designed to have a lower scattering coefficient than the first, was formed on top of the first and had an approximate depth of 450 mm. By analyzing the exponential signal attenuation with respect to depth, the total scattering coefficients were estimated to be 24 cm-1 and 12 cm-1 for the first and second layers, respectively.


The two-dimensional image generated from a single angular sample shows significant speckle, as shown in FIG. 11(a), in which the boundary between the two layers is not clearly visible. Speckle is greatly reduced in the angularly compounded image, with the boundary between the two layers clearly visible, as shown in FIG. 11(b). By a qualitative inspection, the resolution in the image in FIG. 11(b) is not likely to be significantly lower than that of the image of FIG. 11(a). Graphs of exemplary representative angular distributions obtained from a point that is 500 mm below the surface of the phantom and the corresponding autocorrelation function are shown in FIGS. 12(a) and 12(b).


The effects of angular compounding are striking when applied to esophagus tissue, as shown in the images of FIGS. 13A-13D. These images were obtained from a swine ex vivo, and the imaging sample was lightly compressed by a coverslip to enhance the visibility of the layers underlying the epithelium. In particular, as shown in FIG. 13A, the image generated from a single angular sample is qualitatively similar to that obtained by a state-of-the art conventional OFDI system, e.g., in terms of the features that are resolved and the graininess resulting from speckle. In this exemplary image, a scattering layer within the epithelium is only faintly apparent (see arrow). With three compounded angles as shown in the image of FIG. 13B, the level of speckle reduction is such that this layer can be resolved only in certain parts of the image. With 30 or more angular averages as shown in the images of FIGS. 13C and 13D, the scattering layer clearly resolved across the length of the image. Similar increases in detail afforded by angular compounding are seen within the regions of lamina propria and submucosa underlying the epithelium.


The foregoing merely illustrates the principles of the invention. Various modifications and alterations to the described embodiments will be apparent to those skilled in the art in view of the teachings herein. Indeed, the arrangements, systems and methods according to the exemplary embodiments of the present invention can be used with any OCT system, OFDI system, spectral domain OCT (SD-OCT) system or other imaging systems, and for example with those described in International Patent Application PCT/US2004/029148, filed Sep. 8, 2004, U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/266,779, filed Nov. 2, 2005, and U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/501,276, filed Jul. 9, 2004, the disclosures of which are incorporated by reference herein in their entireties. It will thus be appreciated that those skilled in the art will be able to devise numerous systems, arrangements and methods which, although not explicitly shown or described herein, embody the principles of the invention and are thus within the spirit and scope of the present invention. In addition, to the extent that the prior art knowledge has not been explicitly incorporated by reference herein above, it is explicitly being incorporated herein in its entirety. All publications referenced herein above are incorporated herein by reference in their entireties.

Claims
  • 1. An apparatus comprising: a first arrangement configured to receive at least one first electro-magnetic radiation, and forward at least one second electro-magnetic radiation within a solid angle to a sample, wherein the at least one second electro-magnetic radiation is associated with the at least one first electro-magnetic radiation, wherein the first arrangement is configured to receive a plurality of third electro-magnetic radiations from the sample which is associated with the at least one second electro-magnetic radiation, and wherein at least one portion of the third electro-magnetic radiations is provided outside a periphery of the solid angle; anda second arrangement configured to simultaneously detect signals which are (i) provided along optical axes associated therewith that are different from one another, and (ii) associated with each of the third electro-magnetic radiations, wherein the signals are associated with information for the at least one sample at a plurality of depths thereof, and wherein the second arrangement is configured to determine the depths using the at least one portion of the third electro-magnetic radiations.
  • 2. The apparatus according to claim 1, further comprising a third arrangement configured to detect an interference between the at least one portion of the third electro-magnetic radiation and at least one fourth electro-magnetic radiation associated with the at least one first electro-magnetic radiation, and to obtain information associated with the sample as a function of the depths within the sample based on the interference.
  • 3. The apparatus according to claim 1, further comprising a third arrangement configured to provide data associated with at least one of birefringence properties, spectroscopic properties, motion, angular back-scattering properties or elastic properties of at least one portion of the sample as a function of the signals.
  • 4. The apparatus according to claim 1, further comprising a third arrangement capable of generating at least one image of at least one portion of the sample as a function of the signals.
  • 5. The apparatus according to claim 4, wherein the third arrangement is further configured to provide data associated with at least one of birefringence properties, spectroscopic properties, motion, angular back-scattering properties or elastic properties of at least one portion of the sample as a function of the signals.
  • 6. The apparatus according to claim 5, wherein the data is contrast data associated with the at least one image.
  • 7. The apparatus according to claim 1, further comprising a third arrangement configured to provide data associated with scattering characteristics of at least one portion of the sample as a function of a combination of the signals.
  • 8. The apparatus according to claim 1, wherein the second arrangement is configured to determine the depths using a single one of the third electro-magnetic radiations.
  • 9. A method for detecting signals, comprising: receiving at least one first electro-magnetic radiation;forwarding at least one second electro-magnetic radiation within a solid angle to a sample, wherein the at least one second electro-magnetic radiation is associated with the at least one first electro-magnetic radiation;receiving a plurality of third electro-magnetic radiations from the sample which is associated with the at least one second electro-magnetic radiation, wherein at least one portion of the third electro-magnetic radiations is provided outside a periphery of the solid angle;simultaneously detecting the signals which are (i) provided along optical axes associated therewith that are different from one another, and (ii) associated with each of the third electro-magnetic radiations, wherein the signals are associated with information for the at least one sample at a plurality of depths thereof, andusing a computer arrangement, determining the depths using the at least one portion of the third electro-magnetic radiations.
  • 10. An apparatus for providing data associated with at least one sample, comprising: a first arrangement configured to receive first information associated with signals for a plurality of electro-magnetic radiations provided from the at least one sample, wherein at least one of the electro-magnetic radiations has a frequency that changes over time, wherein at least a first one of the electro-magnetic radiations being provided along a first axis, and at least a second one of the electro-magnetic radiations being provided along a second axis which is different from the first axis, wherein data for each of the signals within at least one portion of the first information includes data for a plurality of depths within the at least one sample; anda second arrangement configured to produce second information associated with contrast data of at least one portion of an image for the at least one sample as a function of the first information.
  • 11. The apparatus according to claim 10, wherein the at least one portion of the signals is provided outside a periphery of the solid angle.
  • 12. The apparatus according to claim 10, wherein the second arrangement is capable of determining parameters of the least one depth within the sample using the first information.
  • 13. The apparatus according to claim 10, wherein the second arrangement is capable of determining the at least one depth using data associated with a single one of the signals.
  • 14. The apparatus according to claim 10, further comprising a third arrangement capable of generating at least one image of at least one portion of the sample as a function of the second information.
  • 15. The apparatus according to claim 14, wherein the third arrangement is further configured to provide data associated with at least one of birefringence properties, spectroscopic properties, motion, angular back-scattering properties or elastic properties of at least one portion of the sample as a function of the second information.
  • 16. The apparatus according to claim 15, wherein the data is contrast data associated with the at least one image.
  • 17. The apparatus according to claim 10, further comprising a third arrangement configured to provide data associated with scattering characteristics of at least one portion of the sample as a function of a combination of the signals.
  • 18. A method providing data associated with at least one sample, comprising: receiving first information associated with signals for a plurality of electro-magnetic radiations provided from the at least one sample, wherein at least one of the electro-magnetic radiations has a frequency that changes over time, wherein at least first one of the electro-magnetic radiations being provided along a first axis, and at least second one of the electro-magnetic radiations being provided along second axis which is different from the first axis, wherein data for each of the signals within at least one portion of the first information includes data for a plurality of depths within the at least one sample; andusing a computer arrangement, producing second information associated with contrast data of at least one portion of an image for the at least one sample as a function of the first information.
  • 19. An apparatus comprising: a first arrangement configured to receive at least one first electro-magnetic radiation, and forward at least one second electro-magnetic radiation within a solid angle to a sample, wherein the at least one second electro-magnetic radiation is associated with the at least one first electro-magnetic radiation, wherein the first arrangement is configured to simultaneously receive at least two of a plurality of third electro-magnetic radiations from the sample which is associated with the at least one second electro-magnetic radiation, and wherein at least one portion of the third electro-magnetic radiations is provided outside a periphery of the solid angle; anda second arrangement configured to simultaneously detect an interference between the at least two of the third radiations which are provided along optical axes associated therewith that are different from one another and at least one fourth radiation associated with the at least one first radiation, and configured to obtain information associated with the sample as a function of at least one depth within the sample based on the interference.
  • 20. The apparatus according to claim 19, wherein the second arrangement is configured to determine the at least one depth based on the interference.
  • 21. The apparatus according to claim 19, wherein the one second arrangement is configured to simultaneously detect signals associated with each of the third electro-magnetic radiations.
  • 22. The apparatus according to claim 21, further comprising a third arrangement configured to provide data associated with a least one of birefringence properties, spectroscopic properties, motion, angular back-scattering properties or elastic properties of at least one portion of the sample as a function of the signals.
  • 23. The apparatus according to claim 21, further comprising a third arrangement capable of generating at least one image of at least one portion of the sample as a function of the signals.
  • 24. The apparatus according to claim 23, wherein the third arrangement is further configured to provide data associated with at least one of birefringence properties, spectroscopic properties, motion, angular back-scattering properties or elastic properties of at least one portion of the sample as a function of the signals.
  • 25. The apparatus according to claim 24, wherein the data is contrast data associated with the at least one image.
  • 26. The apparatus according to claim 21, further comprising a third arrangement configured to provide data associated with scattering characteristics of at least one portion of the sample as a function of a combination of the signals.
  • 27. The apparatus according to claim 20, wherein the second arrangement is configured to determine the depths using a single one of the third electro-magnetic radiations.
  • 28. A method for detecting signals, comprising: receiving at least one first electro-magnetic radiation;forwarding at least one second electro-magnetic radiation within a solid angle to a sample, wherein the at least one second electro-magnetic radiation is associated with the at least one first electro-magnetic radiation;simultaneously receiving at least two of a plurality of third electro-magnetic radiations from the sample which is associated with the at least one second electro-magnetic radiation, wherein at least one portion of the third electro-magnetic radiations is provided outside a periphery of the solid angle;simultaneously detecting an interference between the at least two of the third radiations and at least one fourth radiation associated with the at least one first radiation, wherein the third radiations are provided along optical axes associated therewith that are different from one another; andusing a computer arrangement, obtaining information associated with the sample as a function of at least one depth within the sample based on the interference.
  • 29. The apparatus according to claim 1, wherein the second arrangement is further configured to combine the signals.
  • 30. The method according to claim 9, further comprising, after the simultaneous detection, combining the signals.
  • 31. The apparatus according to claim 10, wherein the first and second axes are optical axes.
  • 32. The apparatus according to claim 10, wherein the first arrangement is at least one detector arrangement which is configured to receive the electro-magnetic radiations which are collimated.
  • 33. The apparatus according to claim 32, wherein the collimated electro-magnetic radiations are provided from the same location of the at least one sample.
  • 34. The method according to claim 18, wherein the first and second axes are optical axes.
  • 35. The method according to claim 28, further comprising simultaneously detecting signals associated with each of the third electro-magnetic radiations which are provided along optical axes associated therewith that are different from one another.
  • 36. An apparatus for providing data associated with at least one sample, comprising: a detector arrangement configured to receive a plurality of collimated electro-magnetic radiations provided from the at least one sample and generate first information based on the collimated electro-magnetic radiations, wherein at least one of the electro-magnetic radiations has a frequency that changes over time, wherein at least a first one of the electro-magnetic radiations being received along a first axis simultaneously with at least a second one of the electro-magnetic radiations which is received along a second axis that is different from the first axis, wherein data for each of the signals within at least one portion of the first information includes data for a plurality of depths within the at least one sample; andanother arrangement configured to produce second information associated with contrast data of at least one portion of an image for the at least one sample as a function of the first information.
  • 37. The apparatus according to claim 36, wherein the collimated electro-magnetic radiations are provided from the same location of the at least one sample.
  • 38. A method providing data associated with at least one sample, comprising: using a detector arrangement, receiving a plurality of collimated electro-magnetic radiations provided from the at least one sample; andgenerating first information based on the received collimated electro-magnetic radiations provided from the at least one sample, wherein at least one of the electro-magnetic radiations has a frequency that changes over time, wherein received along a first axis simultaneously with at least a second one of the electro-magnetic radiations which is received along a second axis that is different from the first axis, wherein data for each of the signals within at least one portion of the first information includes data for a plurality of depths within the at least one sample; andusing a computer arrangement, producing second information associated with contrast data of at least one portion of an image for the at least one sample as a function of the first information.
CROSS-REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATION(S)

This application is based upon and claims the benefit of priority from U.S. patent application Ser. No. 60/776,544, filed Feb. 24, 2006, the entire disclosure of which is incorporated herein by reference.

STATEMENT REGARDING FEDERALLY SPONSORED RESEARCH

The invention was made with the U.S. Government support under Contract No. R01 CA103769 awarded by the National Institutes of Health. Thus, the U.S. Government has certain rights in the invention.

US Referenced Citations (423)
Number Name Date Kind
2339754 Brace Jan 1944 A
3090753 Matuszak et al. May 1963 A
3601480 Randall Aug 1971 A
3856000 Chikama Dec 1974 A
3872407 Hughes Mar 1975 A
3941121 Olinger et al. Mar 1976 A
3973219 Tang et al. Aug 1976 A
3983507 Tang et al. Sep 1976 A
4030827 Delhaye et al. Jun 1977 A
4030831 Gowrinathan Jun 1977 A
4140364 Yamashita et al. Feb 1979 A
4141362 Wurster Feb 1979 A
4224929 Furihata Sep 1980 A
4295738 Meltz et al. Oct 1981 A
4300816 Snitzer et al. Nov 1981 A
4303300 Pressiat et al. Dec 1981 A
4428643 Kay Jan 1984 A
4479499 Alfano Oct 1984 A
4533247 Epworth Aug 1985 A
4585349 Gross et al. Apr 1986 A
4601036 Faxvog et al. Jul 1986 A
4607622 Fritch et al. Aug 1986 A
4631498 Cutler Dec 1986 A
4639999 Daniele Feb 1987 A
4650327 Ogi Mar 1987 A
4744656 Moran et al. May 1988 A
4751706 Rohde et al. Jun 1988 A
4763977 Kawasaki et al. Aug 1988 A
4770492 Levin et al. Sep 1988 A
4827907 Tashiro et al. May 1989 A
4834111 Khanna et al. May 1989 A
4868834 Fox et al. Sep 1989 A
4890901 Cross, Jr. Jan 1990 A
4892406 Waters Jan 1990 A
4905169 Buican et al. Feb 1990 A
4909631 Tan et al. Mar 1990 A
4925302 Cutler May 1990 A
4928005 Lefevre et al. May 1990 A
4940328 Hartman Jul 1990 A
4965441 Picard Oct 1990 A
4965599 Roddy et al. Oct 1990 A
4984888 Tobias et al. Jan 1991 A
4993834 Carlhoff et al. Feb 1991 A
4998972 Chin et al. Mar 1991 A
5039193 Snow et al. Aug 1991 A
5040889 Keane Aug 1991 A
5045936 Lobb et al. Sep 1991 A
5046501 Crilly Sep 1991 A
5065331 Vachon et al. Nov 1991 A
5085496 Yoshida et al. Feb 1992 A
5120953 Harris Jun 1992 A
5121983 Lee Jun 1992 A
5127730 Brelje et al. Jul 1992 A
5197470 Helfer et al. Mar 1993 A
5202745 Sorin et al. Apr 1993 A
5202931 Bacus Apr 1993 A
5208651 Buican May 1993 A
5212667 Tomlinson et al. May 1993 A
5214538 Lobb May 1993 A
5228001 Birge et al. Jul 1993 A
5241364 Kimura et al. Aug 1993 A
5248876 Kerstens et al. Sep 1993 A
5250186 Dollinger et al. Oct 1993 A
5251009 Bruno Oct 1993 A
5262644 Maguire Nov 1993 A
5275594 Baker et al. Jan 1994 A
5281811 Lewis Jan 1994 A
5291885 Taniji et al. Mar 1994 A
5293872 Alfano et al. Mar 1994 A
5293873 Fang Mar 1994 A
5304173 Kittrell et al. Apr 1994 A
5304810 Amos Apr 1994 A
5305759 Kaneko et al. Apr 1994 A
5317389 Hochberg et al. May 1994 A
5318024 Kittrell et al. Jun 1994 A
5321501 Swanson et al. Jun 1994 A
5348003 Caro Sep 1994 A
5353790 Jacques et al. Oct 1994 A
5383467 Auer et al. Jan 1995 A
5394235 Takeuchi et al. Feb 1995 A
5404415 Mori et al. Apr 1995 A
5411016 Kume et al. May 1995 A
5419323 Kittrell et al. May 1995 A
5424827 Horwitz et al. Jun 1995 A
5439000 Gunderson et al. Aug 1995 A
5441053 Lodder et al. Aug 1995 A
5450203 Penkethman Sep 1995 A
5454807 Lennox et al. Oct 1995 A
5459325 Hueton et al. Oct 1995 A
5459570 Swanson et al. Oct 1995 A
5465147 Swanson Nov 1995 A
5486701 Norton et al. Jan 1996 A
5491524 Hellmuth et al. Feb 1996 A
5491552 Knuttel Feb 1996 A
5522004 Djupsjobacka et al. May 1996 A
5526338 Hasman et al. Jun 1996 A
5555087 Miyagawa et al. Sep 1996 A
5562100 Kittrell et al. Oct 1996 A
5565983 Barnard et al. Oct 1996 A
5565986 Knuttel Oct 1996 A
5566267 Neuberger Oct 1996 A
5583342 Ichie Dec 1996 A
5590660 MacAulay et al. Jan 1997 A
5600486 Gal et al. Feb 1997 A
5601087 Gunderson et al. Feb 1997 A
5621830 Lucey et al. Apr 1997 A
5623336 Raab Apr 1997 A
5635830 Itoh Jun 1997 A
5649924 Everett et al. Jul 1997 A
5697373 Richards-Kortum et al. Dec 1997 A
5698397 Zarling et al. Dec 1997 A
5710630 Essenpreis et al. Jan 1998 A
5716324 Toida Feb 1998 A
5719399 Alfano et al. Feb 1998 A
5730731 Mollenauer et al. Mar 1998 A
5735276 Lemelson Apr 1998 A
5740808 Panescu et al. Apr 1998 A
5748318 Maris et al. May 1998 A
5748598 Swanson et al. May 1998 A
5784352 Swanson et al. Jul 1998 A
5785651 Kuhn et al. Jul 1998 A
5795295 Hellmuth et al. Aug 1998 A
5801826 Williams Sep 1998 A
5801831 Sargoytchev et al. Sep 1998 A
5803082 Stapleton et al. Sep 1998 A
5807261 Benaron et al. Sep 1998 A
5810719 Toida Sep 1998 A
5817144 Gregory Oct 1998 A
5836877 Zavislan Nov 1998 A
5840023 Oraevsky et al. Nov 1998 A
5840075 Mueller et al. Nov 1998 A
5842995 Mahadevan-Jansen et al. Dec 1998 A
5843000 Nishioka et al. Dec 1998 A
5843052 Benja-Athon Dec 1998 A
5847827 Fercher Dec 1998 A
5862273 Pelletier Jan 1999 A
5865754 Sevick-Muraca et al. Feb 1999 A
5867268 Gelikonov et al. Feb 1999 A
5871449 Brown Feb 1999 A
5872879 Hamm Feb 1999 A
5877856 Fercher Mar 1999 A
5887009 Mandella et al. Mar 1999 A
5892583 Li Apr 1999 A
5910839 Erskine et al. Jun 1999 A
5912764 Togino Jun 1999 A
5920373 Bille Jul 1999 A
5920390 Farahi et al. Jul 1999 A
5921926 Rolland et al. Jul 1999 A
5926592 Harris et al. Jul 1999 A
5949929 Hamm Sep 1999 A
5951482 Winston et al. Sep 1999 A
5955737 Hallidy et al. Sep 1999 A
5956355 Swanson et al. Sep 1999 A
5968064 Selmon et al. Oct 1999 A
5975697 Podoleanu et al. Nov 1999 A
5983125 Alfano et al. Nov 1999 A
5987346 Benaron et al. Nov 1999 A
5991697 Nelson et al. Nov 1999 A
5994690 Kulkarni et al. Nov 1999 A
5995223 Power Nov 1999 A
6002480 Izatt et al. Dec 1999 A
6004314 Wei et al. Dec 1999 A
6006128 Izatt et al. Dec 1999 A
6007996 McNamara et al. Dec 1999 A
6010449 Selmon et al. Jan 2000 A
6014214 Li Jan 2000 A
6016197 Krivoshlykov Jan 2000 A
6020963 DiMarzio et al. Feb 2000 A
6033721 Nassuphis Mar 2000 A
6044288 Wake et al. Mar 2000 A
6045511 Ott et al. Apr 2000 A
6048742 Weyburne et al. Apr 2000 A
6053613 Wei et al. Apr 2000 A
6069698 Ozawa et al. May 2000 A
6091496 Hill Jul 2000 A
6091984 Perelman et al. Jul 2000 A
6107048 Goldenring et al. Aug 2000 A
6111645 Tearney et al. Aug 2000 A
6117128 Gregory Sep 2000 A
6120516 Selmon et al. Sep 2000 A
6134003 Tearney et al. Oct 2000 A
6134010 Zavislan Oct 2000 A
6134033 Bergano et al. Oct 2000 A
6141577 Rolland et al. Oct 2000 A
6151522 Alfano et al. Nov 2000 A
6159445 Klaveness et al. Dec 2000 A
6160826 Swanson et al. Dec 2000 A
6161031 Hochman et al. Dec 2000 A
6166373 Mao Dec 2000 A
6174291 McMahon et al. Jan 2001 B1
6175669 Colston et al. Jan 2001 B1
6185271 Kinsinger Feb 2001 B1
6191862 Swanson et al. Feb 2001 B1
6193676 Winston et al. Feb 2001 B1
6198956 Dunne Mar 2001 B1
6201989 Whitehead et al. Mar 2001 B1
6208415 De Boer et al. Mar 2001 B1
6208887 Clarke Mar 2001 B1
6245026 Campbell et al. Jun 2001 B1
6249349 Lauer Jun 2001 B1
6249381 Suganuma Jun 2001 B1
6249630 Stock et al. Jun 2001 B1
6263234 Engelhardt et al. Jul 2001 B1
6264610 Zhu Jul 2001 B1
6272376 Marcu et al. Aug 2001 B1
6274871 Dukor et al. Aug 2001 B1
6282011 Tearney et al. Aug 2001 B1
6297018 French et al. Oct 2001 B1
6301048 Cao et al. Oct 2001 B1
6308092 Hoyns Oct 2001 B1
6324419 Guzelsu et al. Nov 2001 B1
6341036 Tearney et al. Jan 2002 B1
6353693 Kano et al. Mar 2002 B1
6359692 Groot Mar 2002 B1
6374128 Toida et al. Apr 2002 B1
6377349 Fercher Apr 2002 B1
6384915 Everett et al. May 2002 B1
6393312 Hoyns May 2002 B1
6394964 Sievert, Jr. et al. May 2002 B1
6396941 Bacus et al. May 2002 B1
6421164 Tearney et al. Jul 2002 B2
6437867 Zeylikovich et al. Aug 2002 B2
6441892 Xiao et al. Aug 2002 B2
6441959 Yang et al. Aug 2002 B1
6445485 Frigo et al. Sep 2002 B1
6445944 Ostrovsky Sep 2002 B1
6459487 Chen et al. Oct 2002 B1
6463313 Winston et al. Oct 2002 B1
6469846 Ebizuka et al. Oct 2002 B2
6475159 Casscells et al. Nov 2002 B1
6475210 Phelps et al. Nov 2002 B1
6477403 Eguchi et al. Nov 2002 B1
6485413 Boppart et al. Nov 2002 B1
6485482 Belef Nov 2002 B1
6501551 Tearney et al. Dec 2002 B1
6501878 Hughes et al. Dec 2002 B2
6517532 Altshuler et al. Feb 2003 B1
6538817 Farmer et al. Mar 2003 B1
6549801 Chen et al. Apr 2003 B1
6552796 Magnin et al. Apr 2003 B2
6556305 Aziz et al. Apr 2003 B1
6556853 Cabib et al. Apr 2003 B1
6558324 Von Behren et al. May 2003 B1
6564087 Pitris et al. May 2003 B1
6564089 Izatt et al. May 2003 B2
6567585 Harris May 2003 B2
6593101 Richards-Kortum et al. Jul 2003 B2
6611833 Johnson Aug 2003 B1
6615071 Casscells, III et al. Sep 2003 B1
6622732 Constantz Sep 2003 B2
6654127 Everett et al. Nov 2003 B2
6657730 Pfau et al. Dec 2003 B2
6680780 Fee Jan 2004 B1
6685885 Nolte et al. Feb 2004 B2
6687007 Meigs Feb 2004 B1
6687010 Horii et al. Feb 2004 B1
6687036 Riza Feb 2004 B2
6692430 Adler Feb 2004 B2
6701181 Tang et al. Mar 2004 B2
6721094 Sinclair et al. Apr 2004 B1
6738144 Dogariu et al. May 2004 B1
6741355 Drabarek May 2004 B2
6757467 Rogers Jun 2004 B1
6790175 Furusawa et al. Sep 2004 B1
6806963 Wälti et al. Oct 2004 B1
6816743 Moreno et al. Nov 2004 B2
6831781 Tearney et al. Dec 2004 B2
6839496 Mills et al. Jan 2005 B1
6882432 Deck Apr 2005 B2
6900899 Nevis May 2005 B2
6903820 Wang Jun 2005 B2
6909105 Heintzmann et al. Jun 2005 B1
6949072 Furnish et al. Sep 2005 B2
6961123 Wang et al. Nov 2005 B1
6980299 de Boer Dec 2005 B1
6996549 Zhang et al. Feb 2006 B2
7006231 Ostrovsky et al. Feb 2006 B2
7019838 Izatt et al. Mar 2006 B2
7027633 Foran et al. Apr 2006 B2
7061622 Rollins et al. Jun 2006 B2
7072047 Westphal et al. Jul 2006 B2
7075658 Izatt et al. Jul 2006 B2
7099358 Chong Aug 2006 B1
7113288 Fercher Sep 2006 B2
7113625 Watson et al. Sep 2006 B2
7130320 Tobiason et al. Oct 2006 B2
7139598 Hull et al. Nov 2006 B2
7142835 Paulus Nov 2006 B2
7177027 Hirasawa et al. Feb 2007 B2
7190464 Alphonse Mar 2007 B2
7231243 Tearney et al. Jun 2007 B2
7236637 Sirohey et al. Jun 2007 B2
7242480 Alphonse Jul 2007 B2
7267494 Deng et al. Sep 2007 B2
7272252 De La Torre-Bueno et al. Sep 2007 B2
7304798 Izumi et al. Dec 2007 B2
7336366 Choma et al. Feb 2008 B2
7342659 Horn et al. Mar 2008 B2
7355716 De Boer et al. Apr 2008 B2
7355721 Quadling et al. Apr 2008 B2
7359062 Chen et al. Apr 2008 B2
7366376 Shishkov et al. Apr 2008 B2
7391520 Zhou et al. Jun 2008 B2
7458683 Chernyak Dec 2008 B2
7530948 Seibel et al. May 2009 B2
7609391 Betzig Oct 2009 B2
7646905 Guittet et al. Jan 2010 B2
7664300 Lange et al. Feb 2010 B2
7782464 Mujat et al. Aug 2010 B2
7805034 Kato et al. Sep 2010 B2
20010047137 Moreno et al. Nov 2001 A1
20020016533 Marchitto et al. Feb 2002 A1
20020024015 Hoffmann et al. Feb 2002 A1
20020048025 Takaoka Apr 2002 A1
20020048026 Isshiki et al. Apr 2002 A1
20020052547 Toida May 2002 A1
20020057431 Fateley et al. May 2002 A1
20020064341 Fauver et al. May 2002 A1
20020076152 Hughes et al. Jun 2002 A1
20020085209 Mittleman et al. Jul 2002 A1
20020086347 Johnson et al. Jul 2002 A1
20020091322 Chaiken et al. Jul 2002 A1
20020093662 Chen et al. Jul 2002 A1
20020109851 Deck Aug 2002 A1
20020122182 Everett et al. Sep 2002 A1
20020122246 Tearney et al. Sep 2002 A1
20020140942 Fee et al. Oct 2002 A1
20020158211 Gillispie Oct 2002 A1
20020161357 Anderson et al. Oct 2002 A1
20020163622 Magnin et al. Nov 2002 A1
20020168158 Furusawa et al. Nov 2002 A1
20020172485 Keaton et al. Nov 2002 A1
20020183623 Tang et al. Dec 2002 A1
20020188204 McNamara et al. Dec 2002 A1
20020196446 Roth et al. Dec 2002 A1
20020198457 Tearney et al. Dec 2002 A1
20030013973 Georgakoudi et al. Jan 2003 A1
20030023153 Izatt et al. Jan 2003 A1
20030026735 Nolte et al. Feb 2003 A1
20030028114 Casscells, III et al. Feb 2003 A1
20030030816 Eom et al. Feb 2003 A1
20030053673 Dewaele et al. Mar 2003 A1
20030067607 Wolleschensky et al. Apr 2003 A1
20030082105 Fischman et al. May 2003 A1
20030097048 Ryan et al. May 2003 A1
20030108911 Klimant et al. Jun 2003 A1
20030120137 Pawluczyk et al. Jun 2003 A1
20030135101 Webler Jul 2003 A1
20030137669 Rollins et al. Jul 2003 A1
20030164952 Deichmann et al. Sep 2003 A1
20030165263 Hamer et al. Sep 2003 A1
20030171691 Casscells, III et al. Sep 2003 A1
20030174339 Feldchtein et al. Sep 2003 A1
20030199769 Podoleanu et al. Oct 2003 A1
20030216719 Debenedictis et al. Nov 2003 A1
20030220749 Chen et al. Nov 2003 A1
20030236443 Cespedes et al. Dec 2003 A1
20040002650 Mandrusov et al. Jan 2004 A1
20040054268 Esenaliev et al. Mar 2004 A1
20040072200 Rigler et al. Apr 2004 A1
20040075841 Van Neste et al. Apr 2004 A1
20040076940 Alexander et al. Apr 2004 A1
20040077949 Blofgett et al. Apr 2004 A1
20040086245 Farroni et al. May 2004 A1
20040100631 Bashkansky et al. May 2004 A1
20040100681 Bjarklev et al. May 2004 A1
20040126048 Dave et al. Jul 2004 A1
20040126120 Cohen et al. Jul 2004 A1
20040133191 Momiuchi et al. Jul 2004 A1
20040150829 Koch et al. Aug 2004 A1
20040150830 Chan Aug 2004 A1
20040152989 Puttappa et al. Aug 2004 A1
20040165184 Mizuno Aug 2004 A1
20040166593 Nolte et al. Aug 2004 A1
20040189999 De Groot et al. Sep 2004 A1
20040212808 Okawa et al. Oct 2004 A1
20040239938 Izatt Dec 2004 A1
20040246583 Mueller et al. Dec 2004 A1
20040254474 Seibel et al. Dec 2004 A1
20040263843 Knopp et al. Dec 2004 A1
20050018133 Huang et al. Jan 2005 A1
20050018201 De Boer et al. Jan 2005 A1
20050035295 Bouma et al. Feb 2005 A1
20050036150 Izatt et al. Feb 2005 A1
20050046837 Izumi et al. Mar 2005 A1
20050057680 Agan Mar 2005 A1
20050057756 Fang-Yen et al. Mar 2005 A1
20050059894 Zeng et al. Mar 2005 A1
20050065421 Burckhardt et al. Mar 2005 A1
20050075547 Wang Apr 2005 A1
20050083534 Riza et al. Apr 2005 A1
20050119567 Choi Jun 2005 A1
20050128488 Yelin et al. Jun 2005 A1
20050165303 Kleen et al. Jul 2005 A1
20050171438 Chen et al. Aug 2005 A1
20060033923 Hirasawa et al. Feb 2006 A1
20060103850 Alphonse et al. May 2006 A1
20060146339 Fujita et al. Jul 2006 A1
20060155193 Leonardi et al. Jul 2006 A1
20060164639 Horn et al. Jul 2006 A1
20060171503 O'Hara et al. Aug 2006 A1
20060184048 Saadat Aug 2006 A1
20060193352 Chong et al. Aug 2006 A1
20060244973 Yun et al. Nov 2006 A1
20070019208 Toida et al. Jan 2007 A1
20070038040 Cense et al. Feb 2007 A1
20070070496 Gweon et al. Mar 2007 A1
20070086013 De Lega et al. Apr 2007 A1
20070086017 Buckland et al. Apr 2007 A1
20070133002 Wax et al. Jun 2007 A1
20070188855 Shishkov et al. Aug 2007 A1
20070223006 Tearney et al. Sep 2007 A1
20070236700 Yun et al. Oct 2007 A1
20070258094 Izatt et al. Nov 2007 A1
20070291277 Everett et al. Dec 2007 A1
20080002197 Sun et al. Jan 2008 A1
20080007734 Park et al. Jan 2008 A1
20080049220 Izzia et al. Feb 2008 A1
20080097225 Tearney et al. Apr 2008 A1
20080204762 Izatt et al. Aug 2008 A1
20090273777 Yun et al. Nov 2009 A1
20100086251 Xu et al. Apr 2010 A1
20100150467 Zhao et al. Jun 2010 A1
Foreign Referenced Citations (84)
Number Date Country
1550203 Dec 2004 CN
10351319 Jun 2005 DE
0110201 Jun 1984 EP
0617286 Feb 1994 EP
0590268 Apr 1994 EP
0728440 Aug 1996 EP
0251062 Jan 1998 EP
0933096 Aug 1999 EP
1324051 Jun 2003 EP
1324051 Jul 2003 EP
1426799 Jun 2004 EP
2738343 Aug 1995 FR
1257778 Dec 1971 GB
2030313 Apr 1980 GB
2209221 May 1989 GB
2298054 Aug 1996 GB
6073405 Apr 1985 JP
20040056907 Feb 1992 JP
4135550 May 1992 JP
4135551 May 1992 JP
5509417 Nov 1993 JP
2002214127 Jul 2002 JP
20030035659 Feb 2003 JP
2007271761 Oct 2007 JP
7900841 Oct 1979 WO
9201966 Feb 1992 WO
9216865 Oct 1992 WO
9219930 Nov 1992 WO
9303672 Mar 1993 WO
9216865 Oct 1993 WO
9533971 Dec 1995 WO
9628212 Sep 1996 WO
9732182 Sep 1997 WO
9800057 Jan 1998 WO
9801074 Jan 1998 WO
9814132 Apr 1998 WO
9835203 Aug 1998 WO
9838907 Sep 1998 WO
9846123 Oct 1998 WO
9848838 Nov 1998 WO
9848846 Nov 1998 WO
9905487 Feb 1999 WO
9944089 Feb 1999 WO
9944089 Sep 1999 WO
9957507 Nov 1999 WO
0058766 Oct 2000 WO
0101111 Jan 2001 WO
0108579 Feb 2001 WO
0127679 Apr 2001 WO
0138820 May 2001 WO
0142735 Jun 2001 WO
0236015 May 2002 WO
0238040 May 2002 WO
0254027 Jul 2002 WO
02053050 Jul 2002 WO
02084263 Oct 2002 WO
2002084263 Oct 2002 WO
03020119 Mar 2003 WO
03046636 Jun 2003 WO
03052478 Jun 2003 WO
2003046495 Jun 2003 WO
03062802 Jul 2003 WO
03105678 Dec 2003 WO
2003105678 Dec 2003 WO
2004034869 Apr 2004 WO
2004057266 Jul 2004 WO
2004066824 Aug 2004 WO
2004088361 Oct 2004 WO
2004105598 Dec 2004 WO
2005000115 Jan 2005 WO
2005047813 May 2005 WO
2005054780 Jun 2005 WO
2005082225 Sep 2005 WO
20050082225 Sep 2005 WO
2006004743 Jan 2006 WO
2006014392 Feb 2006 WO
2006039091 Apr 2006 WO
2006059109 Jun 2006 WO
2006124860 Nov 2006 WO
2006130797 Dec 2006 WO
2007028531 Mar 2007 WO
2007038787 Apr 2007 WO
2007083138 Jul 2007 WO
2007084995 Jul 2007 WO
Related Publications (1)
Number Date Country
20070201033 A1 Aug 2007 US
Provisional Applications (1)
Number Date Country
60776544 Feb 2006 US