The present disclosure relates to sensors within a defined space, and more particularly to sensors that can associate personal devices with comfort preferences.
Different people and different objects may all have different requirements or preferences for what may be broadly termed “comfort.” For example, an old, expensive violin may require humidity between 40-60% to keep it from degrading. A person may prefer a temperature of 74°. However, the temperature inside, the temperature outside, wind, and the humidity (among other factors) all interact to create a comfort level, which is not just the temperature as read by a thermometer. Further, someone dressed in a wool suit will prefer a different temperature than someone dressed in shorts and a t-shirt. Add to this, people are warm; when they enter a building, the building warms up due to their heat.
This summary is provided to introduce a selection of concepts in a simplified form that are further described below in the Detailed Description section. This summary does not identify required or essential features of the claimed subject matter. The innovation is defined with claims, and to the extent this Summary conflicts with the claims, the claims should prevail.
In general, one innovative embodiment comprises a defined space with a building control system that modifies upon user preference. It comprises computing hardware and programmable memory, a sensor that is operationally able to notice at least one signal from at least one personal electronic device, an associator which associates the personal electronic device with a user, a preference associated with the user stored in memory; and a modifier that modifies defined space state based on the preference.
Some embodiments provide a determiner determines the number of people in the defined space based on number of noticed signals from the sensor. The modifier will modify at least a portion of the defined space state based on the number of people in the defined space.
Some embodiments provide a comfort level calculator, which calculate number of people in the defined space, calculate a comfort value based on number of people in the defined space; and adjusts defined space state to match the comfort value. Matching the comfort value does not indicate that the defined space is able to exactly match the comfort value, but rather that the defined space is able to get within a certain percent of the comfort value, can get within a certain value of the comfort value, and so on.
Some embodiments provide an occupant profile which holds user preferences. These preferences may be location value, temperature value, humidity value, lighting value, security value, entertainment value, personal services value, comfort value, or grounds control value, height, weight, sex, activity level, or insulation value of clothing.
Some embodiments use personal electronic devices to determine the number of people within a space and then adaptively modify the state of the space to accommodate the number of people.
Disclosed below are representative embodiments of methods, computer-readable media, and systems having particular applicability to systems and methods for building neural networks that describe physical structures. Described embodiments implement one or more of the described technologies.
Various alternatives to the implementations described herein are possible. For example, embodiments described with reference to flowchart diagrams can be altered, such as, for example, by changing the ordering of stages shown in the flowcharts, or by repeating or omitting certain stages.
Sensors are devices which are created to detect changes in the environment. These changes can then be used in a variety of ways, such as being displayed (as in a thermostat) or being sent to a computer system such as a controller, where the information will be used. Sensors can be used to infer occupancy using network systems activity. Network systems can associate information from particular electronic device's interaction with the network with a user. This user may have information about desired space comfort levels stored in a database that can be accessed by a controller that can change the state of the defined space. When the controller receives information that a specific user has entered the defined space, the controller may be able to use the database information to change state of the space or a portion of the space (e.g., an office) to meet the comfort goals of the user. When multiple users are in a space, the controller may be able to use a formula to combine the comfort goals of the users present in the building to achieve a combined comfort goal. This combined comfort goal may be determined in a variety of ways. One such way may be to take the median or mean value of the comfort goals of the people that have been determined to be in the defined space. This comfort goal can be used by the controller to automatically adjust the defined space state to meet the needs of those in the space. A “state” as used herein may be Air Temperature, Radiant Temperature, Atmospheric Pressure, Sound Pressure, Occupancy Amount, Occupancy distance, Indoor Air Quality, CO2 concentration, Humidity, Light Intensity, or another state that can be measured and controlled.
The technical character of embodiments described herein will be apparent to one of ordinary skill in the art, and will also be apparent in several ways to a wide range of attentive readers. Some embodiments address technical activities that are rooted in computing technology, such as more efficiently running HVAC systems by the ability to preheat and precool buildings when people enter and exit, rather than waiting for sensors to register a greater amount of heat in a building. This is useful when a large number of people enter a building in short time, and can lead to energy savings and savings on equipment wear and tear as a heating system can slowly ramp up to its HVAC systems rather than suddenly trying to run at maximum capacity. Buildings can also run more efficiently as they can monitor people in the building including their locations, and only provide services for those portions of the building that are occupied. Buildings can also provide greater comfort to the inhabitants, as the building itself can cater its parameters to those in the building at a given time without lag, rather than waiting for state monitors, such as thermostats, to record the change. Other advantages based on the technical characteristics of the teachings will also be apparent to one of skill from the description provided.
The sensor 125 may also be able to notice a signal from a personal electronic device. The personal electronic device may be a cell phone, a personal computer, a tablet, or any other sort of device that has a wireless signal. It may also be a tag with network capability attached to an object. The wireless signal may comprise strength and directionality. The wireless signal may also comprise an identifier that identifies the user to the system.
The defined space may also comprise an associator 130, which associates a personal device with a user. This may be done using e.g., IMEI & GPS call trackers, or other methods known to those of skill in the art. In some embodiments, there are multiple users with multiple preferences, and an aggregator 160 which calculates an aggregate state value (which also might be an aggregated comfort value). This aggregate state value comprises a calculation of the multiple user preferences, and may be some combination of temperature, humidity, noise level, such as air flow noise level, entertainment noise level, crowd noise level, CO2 levels, lighting level, allergen level, etc. In some embodiments, the modifier 140 uses the aggregate state value to modify output of a device operationally controlled by the controller to achieve the aggregate state value in the defined space. This associator 130 may be stored in memory 120 in the controller 110, may be a portion of a computer program associated with the controller, and so on.
With reference to
When beacons are used to determine occupancy, the beacons may use trilateration to determine occupancy. Bluetooth beacons may have a Received Signal Strength Indicator (RSSI) value. This RSSI value is the signal strength of the beacon at a known distance. The personal electronic device (PED) carried by a person (or object) picks up the beacon and can determine its signal strength at the personal electronic device. The personal electronic device can then broadcast this information to the controller 110 using, e.g., a network. An approximation of the PED location can be determined using the known output signal strength of the beacon and the signal strength at the PED.
The sensor 125, 220 or the controller 110 may determine the location of one or more people in the building based on their personal electronic device wireless signal 210, 215. The controller then may use a modifier 140 to change state location in the defined space 105 based on the number of noticed people. The controller may use its ability to control an HVAC system to raise or lower the temperature, turn off a piece of equipment to lower noise in the space, change the humidity, etc.
In some embodiments, the sensor 125, the controller 110, or the two working in combination, may be able to determine that a specific signal is from a specific user that is known to the system. In such a case, the system (a database associated with the location, the sensors, the controller, or something else) may have access to preferences 135 for the user. This user may be an organization, a person, or an inanimate object with appropriate hardware. Using these preferences, the building may change state, i.e., the controller may stop, start, or modify resources to change state in the defined space. In an embodiment, there is an associator 130 which associates the personal electronic device with a known user; a preference storer 630 which stores at least one preference 135 associated with a known user; and a modifier 140 which modifies state (e.g., temperature, humidity, air flow noise level, lighting level, etc.) of at least one portion of the defined space, based on at least one preference of the user.
In some embodiments, the preference 135 comprises at least one of location, temperature, humidity, lighting, security, entertainment, personal services, or grounds control preferences of the user. For example, the user may be known to park in a certain parking space and walk into the building following a certain path. When the user's signal is picked up, lights along the user's preferred path may be signaled to turn on; any sprinklers along the user's preferred path may be signaled to turn off, and lights in the user's preferred office should turn on. In other instances, the signal itself is used to provide a location, and lights, sprinklers, etc., are modified depending on the location of the signal.
In some embodiments, preferences 135 are specific information about a user such as height, weight, sex, activity level, or insulation value of clothing. The system then may use an estimator 150 which uses at least one of the preferences associated with the known user to estimate at least one of user metabolic rate, user heat level, user convection level, or user sweat level, etc.
In some embodiments, there is also a radiant value calculator 165 that is used to calculate radiant temperature for a given person or people. This may be associated with the comfort level calculator 155. The comfort level calculator calculates (in some embodiments) a comfort level, which will be used by the modifier 140 to modify state of the defined space 105. This may be associated with the person or object identified by personal electronic device or may be calculated for a generalized person. Humans do not directly determine from a specific temperature how comfortable they are. Rather, perceived human comfort is a combination of air flow, humidity, and radiant temperature, which, roughly, is the mean temperature of a set of surfaces around a person. According to Wikipedia1, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mean_radiant_temperature, last viewed May 12, 2020
In some embodiments, a building control system, which may be a controller 110 with computer hardware 115 and memory 120 (which may be programmable memory), and which has the ability to store, run, and modify computer programs, resides in the defined space 105. This building control system may calculate the radiant temperature for an individual or several individuals, and use this calculation to change building state. With reference to
In some embodiments, the building control system can notice when a signal associated with a user personal electronic device leaves the building, or an area around the building. When a signal goes missing, the building control system uses this information to modify the defined place state, by for example, no longer using the user's preferences to determine the defined place state.
With reference to
The determiner 410 may update a value that indicates number of people in the space, or may use a different method to indicate number of people in the space. In some embodiments, the controller comprises the ability to modify devices that can be controlled by the controller. These devices may be wired to the controller, such as, e.g., an air conditioner 420, may be connected to the controller through wireless means, such as some sensors, or may be connected to the controller using a different method. In an embodiment, when the determiner determines that the number of people 425 within a defined space 405 has changed, the determiner signals a modifier 415, which uses the controller 110 to modify a device that controls state within the defined space 405, such as an air conditioner 420. Without limitation, any number of devices that can be controlled may be modified; e.g., heaters, water heaters, humidifiers, air filters, and a host of other devices.
With reference to
With continuing reference to
In some embodiments, at least two, and possibly three bluetooth beacons 515, 520 are used by the location determiner 510 to determine the location of the personal electronic device 535. The beacons may be transmitting their namespace and an instance ID, a universally unique identifier (UUID), major and minor values, or, a different method of determining the beacon address and location. No matter the specific protocol, the beacons should be transmitting values that can be turned into location coordinates. Using the Received Signal Strength Indicator (RSSI) from the beacons, the device may be able to determine their position within a certain error. When three beacons are used, the personal electronic device should be able to be pinpointed with a fair amount of accuracy. That location can then be transmitted to the controller, or the controller may determine the location.
The location determiner 510 is, e.g., a program that runs on the controller. Once the location of the device is known, then a modifier 140, 530 can be used to change the state of the defined space within some distance of the personal electronic device 535. This location determiner may be, e.g., programs or portions of programs that uses sensor data and runs on the controller 110 or multiple controllers. In some embodiments, the sensor may process some of the sensor data prior to passing it onto the controller 110. In some embodiments, at least one signal associated with a personal electronic device is saved; e.g., in the memory 120, and the location determiner can determine that the stored signal has disappeared. In such cases, the modifier 530 may signal to the controller 110 to change state reflecting the updated number of people 425 in the defined space 105 or portion of the space.
A comfort level calculator 155, 625 may be used to calculate a comfort value 620. With reference to
With further reference to
This comfort value 620 may be used to modify output of a device associated with the defined space that can be instructed to change state to meet the comfort value 620. With continuing reference to
The occupant profile 635 contains potentially dynamic information about the current state of the occupant, such as information about current activity levels. The occupant profile 635 may also be related to a non-human item, such as a piece of furniture, munitions, or a musical instrument that requires specific humidity and temperature requirements to prevent degradation. In some embodiments, there may be non-human occupant profiles and human occupant profiles.
Additionally, in an embodiment, an occupant profile 635/preference state information may include active or passive occupant feedback on current comfort. In one embodiment, this state information is gathered through a user interface using a mobile, wearable, handheld, and/or other electronic device. The preference/occupant profile creation may involve aggregation of profile and state information relating to the comfort states of occupants (human and non-human) into a suitable data structure—the occupant user interface. In some embodiments, a user may be able to modify occupant profile information, which may be used in an occupant user interface, a comport level calculator, an occupant controller, or in multiple of them, such that when a user, e.g., enter a defined space, they may be able to specify what they are wearing, what their activity level is, or, e.g., other information they may find useful to specify their comfort level. The user may be able to enter this information prior to entering the defined space, but it may be read once the defined space is entered. This information may be entered using an app stored on a personal information device such as a phone. This occupant profile, in certain embodiments, is used in the comfort level calculator 625 to determine a comfort level.
A location preference 640 is disclosed, which comprises, in some embodiments, information about a specific location, such as the defined space 105. This information may include temperature value, humidity value, lighting value, security value, entertainment value, personal services value, comfort value, or a grounds control value. The location preference may be stored in memory 120, and may be set up by a user 305, along with other preferences 310.
In some embodiments an aggregator 645 is operationally able to use the location preference and the occupant profile to modify the state of the defined space. The aggregator is able, in some embodiments, to aggregate preferences of two or more users to a single state value that can be used to set the state for the defined space. The aggregator may use a mean, a medium, a mode to determine the aggregate state, may use a weighted average that weights certain users over others, may use parameters that require the state to fall between certain values, or not fall below or above certain values, may use a combination of these, or may use another method to determine the estimate.
With reference to
In one embodiment, environmental variables (e.g. ambient temperature, humidity, CO2, VOC, allergen levels) are provided by sensing devices as described above. The comfort model accepts both the environmental variables and occupant state inputs (e.g., from the occupant profile 700) and determines the comfort level of the occupant(s), where the model comprises a mathematical equation of human comfort which outputs the comfort state of the occupant(s), such as, e.g., the mean radiant temperature, as discussed above.
The mathematical equation may comprise one or more of the variables like air temperature, radiant temperature, air velocity, humidity, metabolic rate, skin temperature, skin wetness, total evaporative heat loss from skin, skin surface area, sweat rate, body weight, body mass-index, gender, age, occupancy, ethnicity, locality, and/or clothing insulation value.
The mathematical equation of human comfort may be a derivative of, e.g., any of the following, and not to exclude any other models: Fanger Model, KSU Two-Node Model, Pierce Two-Node Model, Standard Effective Temperature Model, Adaptive Comfort Model, and/or any human comfort model.
In some instances, an occupant comfort mean function may be used. In such a case, an occupant comfort mean function aggregates the comfort states of all occupants. An occupant comfort mean function, is attained by any of the following techniques: averaging methods, such as arithmetic mean, geometric mean, harmonic mean, tri-mean, median, mode, mid-range, quadratic mean (RMS), cubic mean, generalized mean, weighted mean; machine learning and statistical techniques, such as linear regression, logistic regression, polynomial regression, k-means clustering, k-nearest neighbors, decision trees, perceptron, multi-layer perceptron, kernel methods, support vector machines, ensemble methods, boosting, bagging, naïve Bayes, expectation maximization, Gaussian mixture models, Gaussian processes, principal component analysis, singular value decomposition, reinforcement learning, Voronoi decomposition; and social theory voting techniques and concepts, such as social welfare functions, social choice functions, single transferrable vote, Bucklin's rule, social decision schemes, collective utility functions, and/or Condorcet method and extensions such as Copeland's rule, maximum, Dodgson's rule, Young's rule, and/or ranked pairs.
In some embodiments, the comfort model may also comprise comfort levels for non-human assets that allows for comfort models of equipment, building envelope components, animals, plants, collections, systems, and/or other items in/around/near a defined space. These may be used to provide more optimal management comprising the quality, comfort, value, or longevity of these assets. The comfort model for the non-human asset comprises, e.g., a mathematical equation of a defined space asset comfort, which might comprise a mathematical equation of building asset comfort which itself may comprise one or more of an equipment environmental operation model, a metallic rust model, a building material moisture capacity model, a building material mold potential model, an animal comfort model, a plant health model, and a water freeze model. These models and the math underlying them are known to those of skill in the art.
Once the signal has been associate with a user, a state preference of the user may be determined 815. This state preference may be looked up a database associated with the signal, the user, or using some other method. The user may be able to change their state preference on the fly once reaching the defined space. The state preference may be fed into a comfort model which uses other information associated with the space (such as with a comfort level calculator 625) to determine optimal (or near-optimal) state of the building or section of the building (such as a room the user may be in). State preference of the user may also need to be modified to more accurately match the user's desired state. For example, if a user prefers the temperature to be 72°, but the humidity level is 65%, the actual temperature may be lower for the user to feel like the temperature is 72°.
In some embodiments, locations have preferences for state. For example, a room with an antique piano may require humidity to be within a certain range at all times. At 825, location preference(s) for a specific location or locations are determined.
In some embodiments, the user's information may be combined with other users in the building or near the user or in the same space, etc., to achieve a comfort level. For example, different users may have differing comfort level preferences; some people like it hot, and some don't. At 820, multiple user's preferences may be aggregated to generate a single state that the defined space can be set to. For example, user preferences may be averaged, the mode may be taken, a weighted average may be used, with certain values, users, etc., being given higher weights, certain values may have predefined minimums and/or maximums, and so forth. Once a comfort level is determined, this comfort level may then be used by a controller 110 that controls state change devices in the space to signal to a state change device or devices to change state of the defined space 830.
With reference to
A computing environment may have additional features. For example, the computing environment may include storage 920 which may also include memory 925, one or more input devices 930, one or more output devices 935, and one or more other communication devices 940. These may include touch screens, keyboards, game controllers, touchpads, LED screens, voice-operated input systems, printers, phone connections, FAX machines, etc. An interconnection mechanism such as a bus, controller, or network interconnects the components of the computing environment. Typically, operating system software stored in memory 915, 925 provides an operating environment for other software executing in the computing environment, and coordinates activities of the components of the computing environment. The computer system 900 can connect to other computer systems through network(s) 950, which may be wired, wireless, or both. Peripherals 955, such as external hard drives, modems, mice, keyboards, zip drives, scanners, 3-d printers, etc. Certain things may belong to more than one category.
The computing system 900, like other suitable systems, also includes one or more computer-readable storage media 960. Media 960 may be of different physical types. The media 960 may be volatile memory, non-volatile memory, fixed in place media, removable media, magnetic media, optical media, solid-state media, and/or of other types of physical durable storage media (as opposed to merely a propagated signal). In particular, a configured medium 960 such as a portable (i.e., external) hard drive, CD, DVD, memory stick, or other removable non-volatile, non-transient memory medium may become functionally a technological part of the computer system when inserted or otherwise installed, making its content accessible for interaction with and use by central processing unit 905. The removable configured medium 960 is an example of a computer-readable storage medium 960. Some other examples of computer-readable storage media 960 include built-in RAM, ROM, hard disks, and other memory storage devices which are not readily removable by users 945. A computer-readable medium should not be considered a signal; neither should a computer-readable memory be considered a signal.
The medium 960 is configured with instructions 970 that are executable by a central processing unit 905; “executable” is used broadly to include, human readable source code, such as Java or C++, compiled code, and/or machine code. Executable code also includes code that a runs using a distributed system, such as a series of controllers and controllers that distribute and run complex problems. The medium 960 is also configured with data 965 which is created, modified, referenced, and/or otherwise used for technical effect by execution of the instructions 970. The instructions 970 and the data 965 configure the memory or other storage medium 960 in which they reside; when that memory or other computer readable storage medium is a functional part of a given computer system, the computer system may be configured by the instructions 970 and data 965.
Although an embodiment may be described as being implemented as software instructions executed by one or more processors in a computing device (e.g., general purpose computer, cell phone, or controller), such description is not meant to exhaust all possible embodiments. One of skill will understand that the same or similar functionality can also often be implemented, in whole or in part, directly in hardware logic, to provide the same or similar technical effects. Alternatively, or in addition to software implementation, the technical functionality described herein can be performed, at least in part, by one or more hardware logic components. For example, and without excluding other implementations, an embodiment may include hardware logic components such as Field-Programmable Gate Arrays (FPGAs), Application-Specific Integrated Circuits (ASICs), Application-Specific Standard Products (ASSPs), System-on-a-Chip components (SOCs), Complex Programmable Logic Devices (CPLDs), and similar components. Components of an embodiment may be grouped into interacting functional modules based on their inputs, outputs, and/or their technical effects, for example.
The present application hereby incorporates by reference the entirety of, and claims priority to, U.S. Provisional Patent Application Ser. No. 63/070,460 filed 26 Aug. 2020.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
5530643 | Hodorowski | Jun 1996 | A |
6275962 | Fuller et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6301341 | Gizara et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6645066 | Gutta et al. | Nov 2003 | B2 |
7304855 | Milligan et al. | Dec 2007 | B1 |
7578135 | Mattheis | Aug 2009 | B2 |
7587250 | Coogan et al. | Sep 2009 | B2 |
7729882 | Seem | Jun 2010 | B2 |
7734572 | Wiemeyer et al. | Jun 2010 | B2 |
7917232 | McCoy et al. | Mar 2011 | B2 |
8024054 | Mairs et al. | Sep 2011 | B2 |
8099178 | Mairs et al. | Jan 2012 | B2 |
8503943 | Spanhake | Aug 2013 | B2 |
8628239 | Merrow et al. | Jan 2014 | B2 |
8643476 | Pinn et al. | Feb 2014 | B2 |
8749959 | Riley et al. | Jun 2014 | B2 |
8782619 | Wu et al. | Jul 2014 | B2 |
8925358 | Kasper | Jan 2015 | B2 |
9441847 | Grohman | Sep 2016 | B2 |
9521724 | Berry et al. | Dec 2016 | B1 |
9602301 | Averitt | Mar 2017 | B2 |
9664400 | Wroblewski et al. | May 2017 | B2 |
9678494 | Hyde | Jun 2017 | B2 |
9740385 | Fadell et al. | Aug 2017 | B2 |
9791872 | Wang et al. | Oct 2017 | B2 |
9857238 | Malhotra et al. | Jan 2018 | B2 |
9860961 | Chemel et al. | Jan 2018 | B2 |
9952573 | Sloo et al. | Apr 2018 | B2 |
10042730 | Zebian | Aug 2018 | B2 |
10094586 | Pavlovski et al. | Oct 2018 | B2 |
10223721 | Bhatia | Mar 2019 | B1 |
10528016 | Noboa | Jan 2020 | B2 |
10557889 | Montoya et al. | Feb 2020 | B2 |
10558183 | Piaskowski et al. | Feb 2020 | B2 |
10558248 | Adrian | Feb 2020 | B2 |
10627124 | Walser et al. | Apr 2020 | B2 |
10640211 | Whitten et al. | May 2020 | B2 |
10672293 | Labutov et al. | Jun 2020 | B2 |
10687435 | Adrian et al. | Jun 2020 | B2 |
10736228 | Kho et al. | Aug 2020 | B2 |
10892946 | Costa et al. | Jan 2021 | B2 |
10900489 | Rendusara et al. | Jan 2021 | B2 |
10942871 | Cawse et al. | Mar 2021 | B2 |
10943444 | Boyd et al. | Mar 2021 | B2 |
10966068 | Tramiel et al. | Mar 2021 | B2 |
10966342 | Lairsey et al. | Mar 2021 | B2 |
10969133 | Harvey | Apr 2021 | B2 |
11088989 | Gao et al. | Aug 2021 | B2 |
20040236547 | Rappaport et al. | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20070096902 | Seeley et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20070162288 | Springhart et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20090065596 | Seem | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20100131933 | Kim et al. | May 2010 | A1 |
20110087988 | Ray et al. | Apr 2011 | A1 |
20110125930 | Tantos et al. | May 2011 | A1 |
20120102472 | Wu et al. | Apr 2012 | A1 |
20120221986 | Whitford et al. | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20140088772 | Lelkens | Mar 2014 | A1 |
20140101082 | Matsuoka et al. | Apr 2014 | A1 |
20140215446 | Araya et al. | Jul 2014 | A1 |
20140358291 | Wells | Dec 2014 | A1 |
20140364985 | Tiwari et al. | Dec 2014 | A1 |
20150081928 | Wintzell et al. | Mar 2015 | A1 |
20150198938 | Steele et al. | Jul 2015 | A1 |
20150234381 | Ratilla et al. | Aug 2015 | A1 |
20160016454 | Yang et al. | Jan 2016 | A1 |
20160062753 | Champagne | Mar 2016 | A1 |
20160073521 | Marcade et al. | Mar 2016 | A1 |
20160086242 | Schafer et al. | Mar 2016 | A1 |
20160088438 | O'Keeffe | Mar 2016 | A1 |
20160092427 | Bittmann | Mar 2016 | A1 |
20160132308 | Muldoon | May 2016 | A1 |
20160195856 | Spero | Jul 2016 | A1 |
20160205784 | Kyle et al. | Jul 2016 | A1 |
20160209868 | Hartman et al. | Jul 2016 | A1 |
20160295663 | Hyde | Oct 2016 | A1 |
20170097259 | Brown | Apr 2017 | A1 |
20170131611 | Brown | May 2017 | A1 |
20170176034 | Hussain et al. | Jun 2017 | A1 |
20170365908 | Hughes | Dec 2017 | A1 |
20180005195 | Jacobson | Jan 2018 | A1 |
20180075168 | Tiwari et al. | Mar 2018 | A1 |
20180089172 | Needham | Mar 2018 | A1 |
20180123272 | Mundt et al. | May 2018 | A1 |
20180307781 | Byers et al. | Oct 2018 | A1 |
20190087076 | Dey et al. | Mar 2019 | A1 |
20190138704 | Shrivastava | May 2019 | A1 |
20190156443 | Hall | May 2019 | A1 |
20190173109 | Wang | Jun 2019 | A1 |
20190294018 | Shrivastava et al. | Sep 2019 | A1 |
20200003444 | Yuan et al. | Jan 2020 | A1 |
20200018506 | Ruiz | Jan 2020 | A1 |
20200050161 | Noboa | Feb 2020 | A1 |
20200187147 | Meerbeek et al. | Jun 2020 | A1 |
20200221269 | Tramiel et al. | Jul 2020 | A1 |
20200226223 | Reichl | Jul 2020 | A1 |
20200228759 | Ryan | Jul 2020 | A1 |
20200255142 | Whitten et al. | Aug 2020 | A1 |
20200279482 | Berry et al. | Sep 2020 | A1 |
20200342526 | Ablanczy | Oct 2020 | A1 |
20200379730 | Graham | Dec 2020 | A1 |
20200387041 | Shrivastava et al. | Dec 2020 | A1 |
20200387129 | Chandaria | Dec 2020 | A1 |
20210073441 | Austern et al. | Mar 2021 | A1 |
20210081504 | Mccormick et al. | Mar 2021 | A1 |
20210081880 | Bivins et al. | Mar 2021 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
103926912 | Jul 2014 | CN |
206002869 | Mar 2017 | CN |
206489622 | Sep 2017 | CN |
206489622 | Sep 2017 | CN |
6301341 | Mar 2018 | JP |
2008016500 | Mar 2008 | WO |
2012019328 | Feb 2012 | WO |
Entry |
---|
De Meester et al., SERIF:A Semantic ExeRcise Interchange FormatConference: Proceedings of the 1st International Workshop on LINKed EDucation, Oct. 2015. |
Kalagnanam et al., “A System for Automated Mapping of Bill-of_Materials Part Numbers”, KDD '04: Proceedings of the tenth ACM SIGKDD international conference on Knowledge discovery and data mining, Aug. 2004, pp. 805-810. |
Mouser Electronics News Release, Aug. 16, 2018. |
Ouf et al., Effectiveness of using WiFi technologies to detect and predict building occupancy, Sust. Buildi. 2, 7 (2017). |
RadioMaze, Inc., “WiFi signals enable motion recognition throughout the entire home,” Dec. 4, 2017. |
Sensorswarm, 2018. |
Serale G., et al., Model Predictive Control (MPC) for Enhancing Building and HVAC System Energy Efficiency: Problem Formulation, Applications and Opportunities, Energies 2018, 11, 631; doi:10.3390, Mar. 12, 2018. |
Siano, P, “Demand response and smart grids—A survey”, Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 30 (2014) 461-478. |
Wang et al., “A Practical Multi-Sensor Cooling Demand Estimation Approach Based on Visual Indoor and Outdoor Information Sensing,” Sensors 2018, 18, 3591; doi:10.3390. |
Yegulap, Serdar, “What is LLVM? The power behind Swift, Rust, Clang, and more,” Infoworld, Mar. 11, 2020. |
Amin, Massoud, “Toward self-healing energy infrastructure systems,” IEEE Computer Applications in Power 14.1 (2002): pp. 20-28. |
Gou, Wenqi, and Mengchu Zhou, “An emerging technology for improved building automation control, 2009, IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man and Cybernetics”, IEEE, 2009, pp. 337-342. |
Gungor et al., “Industrial Wireless Sensor Networks: Challenges, Design Principles, and Technical Approaches,” IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics, vol. 56, No. 10, Oct. 2009. |
BigLadder Software Full Ref, Occupant Thermal Comfort: Engineering Reference, 2014, The Board of Trustees of the University of Illinois and the Regents of the University of California through the Ernest Orlando Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory (Year: 2014). |
Hagentoft et al. Full Reference, Assessment Method of Numerical Prediction Models for Combined Heat, Air and Moisture Transfer in Building Components: Benchmarks for One-dimensional Cases, Journal of Thermal Env. & Bldg. Sci., vol. 27, No. 4, Apr. 2004. |
BigLadder Software, Occupant Thermal Comfort: Engineering Reference, 2014, The Board of Trustees of the University of Illinois and the Regents of the University of California through the Ernest Orlando Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory (Year: 2014). |
Hagentoft, C., et al., Assessment Method of Numerical Prediction Models for Combined Heat, Air and Moisture Transfer In Building Components: Benchmarks for One-Dimensional Cases, Journal of Thermal. Env. and Bldg. Sci., vol. 27, No. 4, Apr. 2004. |
U.S. Appl. No. 15/995,019 Office Action dated Jul. 26, 2019. |
U.S. Appl. No. 15/995,019 Office Action dated Oct. 8, 2020. |
U.S. Appl. No. 15/995,019 Office Action dated Apr. 15, 2020. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20220066405 A1 | Mar 2022 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
63070460 | Aug 2020 | US |