Patent Grant
9530795
In modern semiconductor chip (“chip”) design, standard cells are placed on the chip to define a particular logic function. To ensure that each standard cell will be manufacturable when arbitrarily placed on the chip, each standard cell is defined to have an edge exclusion zone sized equal to one-half of a design rule spacing requirement between adjacent conductive features. In this manner, when any two standard cells are placed next to each other, their combined exclusion zone sizes at their interfacing boundaries will equal at least the design rule spacing requirement between adjacent conductive features. Thus, the exclusion zone enables features to be placed arbitrarily within a standard cell without concern for cell-to-cell interface problems. However, when many standard cells are placed together on the chip, the edge exclusion zones associated with the standard cells can combine to occupy an expensive amount of chip area.
In view of the foregoing, it is of interest to optimize cell layout and placement such that chip area and routing resources can be most efficiently utilized, particularly when cells are defined according to a constrained layout architecture.
In one embodiment, a semiconductor device is disclosed to include a plurality of cells. Each of the plurality of cells has a respective outer cell boundary defined to circumscribe the cell in an orthogonal manner. Also, each of the plurality of cells includes circuitry for performing one or more logic functions. This circuitry includes a plurality of conductive features defined in one or more levels of the cell. Within the semiconductor device, one or more of the conductive features in at least one level of a given cell is an encroaching feature positioned to encroach by an encroachment distance into an exclusion zone. The exclusion zone occupies an area within the cell defined by an exclusion distance extending perpendicularly inward into the given cell from a first segment of the outer cell boundary. The exclusion distance is based on a design rule distance. The design rule distance is a minimum separation distance required between conductive features in adjacently placed cells on the semiconductor device.
In one embodiment, a semiconductor device is disclosed to include a plurality of cells. Each of the plurality of cells has a respective outer cell boundary defined to circumscribe the cell in an orthogonal manner. Also, each of the plurality of cells includes circuitry for performing one or more logic functions. This circuitry includes a plurality of conductive features defined in one or more levels of the cell. At least one instance of a given cell is defined on the semiconductor device in accordance with any one of multiple versions of the given cell or combination thereof. The multiple versions of the given cell include a first version of the given cell having an encroachment region defined within a particular cell level adjacent to a first segment of the outer cell boundary. The first version of the given cell also includes a spacing allowance region defined within the particular cell level adjacent to a second segment of the outer cell boundary located opposite the given cell from the first segment. The multiple versions of the given cell also include a second version of the given cell having the encroachment region defined within the particular cell level adjacent to both the first and second segments of the outer cell boundary. The multiple versions of the given cell also include a third version of the given cell having the spacing allowance region defined within the particular cell level adjacent to both the first and second segments of the outer cell boundary. The encroachment region is defined as a peripheral region of the particular cell level of the given cell within which at least one encroaching feature is positioned to encroach by an encroachment distance into an exclusion zone. The exclusion zone occupies an area within the given cell defined by an exclusion distance extending perpendicularly inward into the given cell from the outer cell boundary adjacent to the encroachment region. The exclusion distance is based on a design rule distance. The spacing allowance region is defined to extend perpendicularly inward into the given cell from the outer cell boundary by a spacing allowance distance equal to at least the encroachment distance plus the exclusion distance. The spacing allowance region within the particular cell level does not include any conductive features.
In one embodiment, a cell library stored in a digital format on a computer readable storage medium is disclosed to include one or more layouts of a cell. The cell has an outer cell boundary defined to circumscribe the cell in an orthogonal manner. The cell is defined to include circuitry for performing one or more logic functions. Each of the layouts for the cell include layout shapes for conductive features in one or more levels of the cell. The layouts of the cell include a first layout of the cell having an encroachment region defined within a given level of the cell adjacent to a first segment of the outer cell boundary. The encroachment region includes at least one encroaching layout shape positioned to encroach by an encroachment distance into an exclusion zone. The exclusion zone occupies an area within the given cell defined by an exclusion distance extending perpendicularly inward into the cell from the first segment of the outer cell boundary. The exclusion distance is based on a design rule distance. The first layout of the cell also includes a spacing allowance region defined within the given level of the cell adjacent to a second segment of the outer cell boundary, located opposite the cell from the first segment of the outer cell boundary. The spacing allowance region extends perpendicularly inward into the cell from the second segment of the outer cell boundary by a spacing allowance distance equal to at least the encroachment distance of the encroachment region plus the exclusion distance. The spacing allowance region in the cell level does not include any layout shapes.
Other aspects and advantages of the invention will become more apparent from the following detailed description, taken in conjunction with the accompanying drawings, illustrating by way of example the present invention.
In the following description, numerous specific details are set forth in order to provide a thorough understanding of the present invention. It will be apparent, however, to one skilled in the art that the present invention may be practiced without some or all of these specific details. In other instances, well known process operations have not been described in detail in order not to unnecessarily obscure the present invention.
Cell Description
A cell, as referenced herein, represents an abstraction of a logic function, and encapsulates lower-level integrated circuit layouts for implementing the logic function. It should be understood that a given logic function can be represented by multiple cell variations, wherein the cell variations may be differentiated by feature size, performance, and process compensation technique (PCT) processing. For example, multiple cell variations for a given logic function may be differentiated by power consumption, signal timing, current leakage, chip area, OPC (optical proximity correction), RET (reticle enhancement technology), etc. It should also be understood that each cell description includes the layouts for the cell in each level of a chip within the associated vertical column of the chip, as required to implement the logic function of the cell. More specifically, a cell description may include layouts for the cell in each level of the chip extending from the substrate level up through a particular interconnect level.
Dynamic Array Architecture
Generally speaking, a dynamic array architecture is provided to address semiconductor manufacturing process variability associated with a continually increasing lithographic gap. In the area of semiconductor manufacturing, lithographic gap is defined as the difference between the minimum size of a feature to be defined and the wavelength of light used to render the feature in the lithographic process, wherein the feature size is less than the wavelength of the light. Current lithographic processes utilize a light wavelength of 193 nm. However, current feature sizes are as small as 45 nm and are expected to get even smaller. With a size of 45 nm, the shapes are three times smaller than the wavelength of the light used to define the shapes. Also, considering that the interaction radius of light is about five light wavelengths, it should be appreciated that shapes exposed with a 193 nm light source will influence the exposure of shapes approximately 5*193 nm (965 nm) away.
In the dynamic array architecture, layout features in a given layer are shaped and spaced such that constructive and destructive interference of the light from neighboring features will be optimized to produce the best rendering of all features in the neighborhood. The feature-to-feature spacing in a given layer is proportional to the wavelength of the light used to expose the features. The light used to expose each feature within about a five light wavelength distance from a given feature will serve to enhance the exposure of the given feature to some extent. The exploitation of constructive interference of the standing light waves used to expose neighboring features enables the manufacturing equipment capability to be maximized and not be limited by concerns regarding light interactions during the lithography process.
In the dynamic array architecture, layout features are defined along a regular-spaced virtual grate (or regular-spaced virtual grid) in a number of levels of a cell, i.e., in a number of levels of a semiconductor chip, such as chip 101. The virtual grate is defined by a set of equally spaced, parallel virtual lines extending across a given level in a given chip area. The equal spacing, as measured perpendicularly between adjacent virtual lines of the virtual grate, is defined as the virtual grate pitch. In one embodiment, the layout features are sized substantially smaller than the wavelength of the light used in the lithographic process to form the physical shapes corresponding to the layout features.
In one embodiment, the virtual grate of a given level is oriented to be substantially perpendicular to the virtual grate of an adjacent level. For example, in this embodiment, a virtual grate for the first interconnect level (M1 level) (not shown) extends in a direction perpendicular to both the gate level and M2 level virtual grates. However, it should be appreciated, that in some embodiments, the virtual grate of a given level may be oriented either perpendicular or parallel to the virtual grate of an adjacent level.
Within the dynamic array architecture, a feature layout channel is defined about a given virtual line so as to extend between virtual lines adjacent to the given virtual line. For example, feature layout channels 801A-1 through 801E-1 are defined about virtual lines 801A through 801E, respectively. It should be understood that each virtual line has a corresponding feature layout channel. Also, for virtual lines positioned adjacent to an edge of a prescribed layout space, e.g., adjacent to a cell boundary, the corresponding feature layout channel extends as if there were a virtual line outside the prescribed layout space, as illustrated by feature layout channels 801A-1 and 801E-1. It should be further understood that each feature layout channel is defined to extend along an entire length of its corresponding virtual line.
A contiguous layout feature can include both a portion which defines an active part of a circuit, and a portion that does not define a part of the circuit. For example, in the gate level, a contiguous layout feature can extend over both a diffusion region and a dielectric region of an underlying chip level. In one embodiment, each portion of a gate level layout feature that forms a gate electrode of a transistor is positioned to be substantially centered upon a given virtual line. Furthermore, in this embodiment, portions of the gate level layout feature that do not form a gate electrode of a transistor can be positioned within the feature layout channel associated with the given virtual line. Therefore, a given gate level layout feature can be defined essentially anywhere within a feature layout channel, so long as gate electrode portions of the given gate level layout feature are centered upon the virtual line corresponding to the given feature layout channel, and so long as the given gate level layout feature complies with design rule spacing requirements relative to other gate level layout features in adjacent feature layout channels.
As shown in
As illustrated by the example feature layout channels 801A-1 through 801E-1 of
Some layout features may have one or more contact head portions defined at any number of locations along their length. A contact head portion of a given layout feature is defined as a segment of the layout feature having a height and a width of sufficient size to receive a contact structure, wherein “width” is defined across the substrate in a direction perpendicular to the virtual line of the given layout feature, and wherein “height” is defined across the substrate in a direction parallel to the virtual line of the given layout feature. It should be appreciated that a contact head of a layout feature, when viewed from above, can be defined by essentially any layout shape, including a square or a rectangle. Also, depending on layout requirements and circuit design, a given contact head portion of a layout feature may or may not have a contact defined thereabove.
In one embodiment, the layout features are defined to provide a finite number of controlled layout shape-to-shape lithographic interactions which can be accurately predicted and optimized for in manufacturing and design processes. In this embodiment, the layout features are defined to avoid layout shape-to-shape spatial relationships which would introduce adverse lithographic interaction within the layout that cannot be accurately predicted and mitigated with high probability. However, it should be understood that changes in direction of layout features within their feature layout channels are acceptable when corresponding lithographic interactions are predictable and manageable.
In one embodiment, each layout feature of a given level is substantially centered upon one of the virtual lines of the virtual grate associated with the given level. A layout feature is considered to be substantially centered upon a particular line of a virtual grate when a deviation in alignment between the centerline of the layout feature and the particular line of the virtual grate is sufficiently small so as to not reduce a manufacturing process window from what would be achievable with a true alignment between of the centerline of the layout feature and the line of the virtual grate. Therefore, in this embodiment, if there are layout features placed in different chip levels according to virtual grates of rational spatial relationship, the layout features will be aligned at a spatial frequency defined by the rational spatial relationship. In one embodiment, the above-mentioned manufacturing process window is defined by a lithographic domain of focus and exposure that yields an acceptable fidelity of the layout feature. In one embodiment, the fidelity of a layout feature is defined by a characteristic dimension of the layout feature.
In the dynamic array architecture, variations in a vertical cross-section shape of an as-fabricated layout feature can be tolerated to an extent, so long as the variation in the vertical cross-section shape is predictable from a manufacturing perspective and does not adversely impact the manufacture of the given layout feature or its neighboring layout features. In this regard, the vertical cross-section shape corresponds to a cut of the as-fabricated layout feature in a plane perpendicular to both the centerline of the layout feature and the substrate of the chip. It should be appreciated that variation in the vertical cross-section of an as-fabricated layout feature along its length can correspond to a variation in width of the layout feature along its length. Therefore, the dynamic array architecture also accommodates variation in the width of an as-fabricated layout feature along its length, so long as the width variation is predictable from a manufacturing perspective and does not adversely impact the manufacture of the layout feature or its neighboring layout features. Additionally, different layout features within a given level can be designed to have the same width or different widths.
In one embodiment, within a given level defined according to the dynamic array architecture, proximate ends of adjacent, co-aligned linear-shaped layout features may be separated from each other by a substantially uniform gap. More specifically, in this embodiment, adjacent ends of linear-shaped layout features defined along a common line of a virtual grate are separated by an end gap, and such end gaps within the level associated with the virtual grate may be defined to span a substantially uniform distance. Additionally, in one embodiment, a size of the end gaps is minimized within a manufacturing process capability so as to optimize filling of a given level with linear-shaped layout features.
Also, in the dynamic array architecture, a level can be defined to have any number of virtual grate lines occupied by any number of layout features. In one example, a given level can be defined such that all lines of its virtual grate are occupied by at least one layout feature. In another example, a given level can be defined such that some lines of its virtual grate are occupied by at least one layout feature, and other lines of its virtual grate are vacant, i.e., not occupied by any layout features. Furthermore, in a given level, any number of successively adjacent virtual grate lines can be left vacant. Also, the occupancy versus vacancy of virtual grate lines by layout features in a given level may be defined according to a pattern or repeating pattern of layout features across the given level.
Additionally, within the dynamic array architecture, vias and contacts are defined to interconnect a number of the layout features in various levels so as to form a number of functional electronic devices, e.g., transistors, and electronic circuits. Layout features for the vias and contacts can be aligned to a virtual grid, wherein a specification of this virtual grid is a function of the specifications of the virtual grates associated with the various levels to which the vias and contacts will connect. Thus, a number of the layout features in various levels form functional components of an electronic circuit. Additionally, some of the layout features within various levels may be non-functional with respect to an electronic circuit, but are manufactured nonetheless so as to reinforce manufacturing of neighboring layout features.
It should be understood that the dynamic array architecture is defined to enable accurate prediction of semiconductor device manufacturability with a high probability, even when layout features of the semiconductor device are sized smaller than a wavelength of light used to render the layout features in a lithographic manufacturing process. Additionally, it should be understood that the dynamic array architecture is defined by placement of layout features on a regular-spaced grate (or regular-spaced grid) in at least one level of a cell, such that layout features in a given level of the cell are confined within their feature layout channel, and such that layout features in adjacent feature layout channels do not physically contact each other. Furthermore, it should be understood that the dynamic array architecture can be applied to one or more chip levels. For example, in one embodiment, only the gate level of the chip is defined according to the dynamic array architectures. In another embodiment, the gate level and one or more interconnect levels are defined according to the dynamic array architecture.
It should be understood that in some embodiments the dynamic array architecture may only be applied to a portion of one chip level, with overlying portions of other chip levels unconstrained with respect to dynamic array architecture restrictions. For example, in one embodiment, the gate electrode level is defined to comply with the dynamic array architecture, and the higher interconnect levels are defined in an unconstrained manner, i.e., in a non-dynamic array manner. In this embodiment, the gate electrode level is defined by a virtual grate and its corresponding feature layout channels within which gate electrode level conductive features are defined, as discussed above. Also, in this embodiment, the layout features of the non-dynamic array higher interconnect levels can be unconstrained with regard to a virtual grate and associated feature layout channels. For instance, in this particular embodiment, layout features in any interconnect level above the gate electrode level can include bends so as to form arbitrary two-dimensionally shaped layout features. As an alternative to the above-mentioned embodiment, other embodiments can exist in which multiple chip levels are defined according to the dynamic array architecture.
It should be understood that the cell boundary encroachment techniques disclosed herein are equally applicable to any embodiment that uses the dynamic array architecture, regardless of the number of chip levels that are defined according to the dynamic array architecture. Additionally, although the cell boundary encroachment techniques are described below within the exemplary context of the dynamic array architecture, it should be understood that the principles of the cell boundary encroachment techniques are equally applicable to essentially any cell layout, including non-dynamic array architecture layouts, in which it is beneficial to allow certain non-continuous layout shapes to encroach within a design rule spacing buffer at a cell boundary, while ensuring that neighboring layout shapes in an adjacently placed cell are spaced sufficiently far away to ensure compliance with global shape-to-shape design rule spacing requirements.
Cell Boundary Encroachment Technique
In one embodiment, the design rule distance is within a range extending from about 30 nm (nanometers) to about 90 nm. In another embodiment, the design rule distance is less than 70 nm. The design rule distance buffer extends inside of the cell boundaries by a set fraction or multiple of one or more design rule values. In one embodiment, the design rule distance buffer is set at one-half of an established design rule spacing value. In another embodiment, the design rule distance buffer is set at one-third of the established design rule spacing value. It should be understood that in other embodiments, the design rule distance buffer can be set at other fractions or multiples of an established design rule value or combination of established design rule values.
In the example of
Cell boundary encroachment techniques are disclosed herein to optimize cell area utilization by providing a systematic method for allowing encroachment of non-continuous layout shapes into the design rule distance buffer at the cell boundary, while preserving global shape-to-shape design rule spacing integrity.
A boundary encroachment specification of a given track in a given cell level is defined by which end of the given track, if any, allows for layout shape encroachment within the design rule distance buffer at the cell boundary, and which end of the given track, if any, requires a spacing allowance region at the cell boundary. With regard to Cell A of
Track T1: No encroachment allowance.
Track T2: Left side encroachment region. Right side spacing allowance region.
Track T3: Right side encroachment region. Left side spacing allowance region.
Track T4: No encroachment allowance.
Track T5: No encroachment allowance.
Track T6: Right side encroachment allowance. Left side spacing allowance region.
Track T7: Left side encroachment region. Right side spacing allowance region.
Track T8: No encroachment allowance.
If each cell in a cell library is defined according to a common boundary encroachment specification, or includes layout shape-to-cell boundary spacings of at least the same size as the common boundary encroachment specification for each track, then the cells within the cell library can be placed next to each other in a compatible manner so as to comply with global shape-to-shape design rule separation requirements. For example, in one exemplary embodiment, each cell in a cell library is defined based on a left boundary encroachment specification and a complimentary right boundary encroachment specification. The left boundary encroachment specification will identify which tracks allow for layout shape encroachment within the design rule distance buffer at the left boundary of the cell, and which tracks require a spacing allowance region between a nearest layout shape and the left boundary of the cell.
Similarly, the right boundary encroachment specification will identify which tracks allow for layout shape encroachment within the design rule distance buffer at the right boundary of the cell, and which tracks require a spacing allowance region between a nearest layout shape and the right boundary of the cell. In this embodiment, if the boundary encroachment specification allows for encroachment of a given layout shape within the design rule distance buffer at the cell boundary of a given track, then actual layout shape encroachment at the cell boundary of the given track is allowed but not required. However, in this embodiment, if the boundary encroachment specification identifies a spacing allowance region at the cell boundary of a given track, then the spacing allowance region at the cell boundary of the given track is required.
In an extension of the above-described embodiment, the cell library can also include one or more cells which implement a mirrored encroachment specification in which both the left and right boundaries of the cell have the same boundary encroachment specification. Cells that implement the mirrored encroachment specification are referred to herein as “mirror cells.” In this embodiment, to ensure full cell placement compatibility, two variations of each mirror cell are defined within the cell library. The first variation of a mirror cell applies the left common boundary encroachment specification to both the left and right boundaries of the mirror cell. The second variation of the mirror cell applies the right common boundary encroachment specification to both the left and right boundaries of the mirror cell.
By having both variations of the mirror cell in the cell library, the mirror cell can be placed next to any other cell that complies with the common boundary encroachment specification. For example, to implement left-to-right placement of Cells C, A, C, the cell placement can be done as C-v1, Cell A-flipped, C-v2.
Although the exemplary embodiments of
It should be understood that the cell layouts presented in
Also, any given cell may utilize the cell boundary encroachment techniques disclosed herein on multiple cell levels. Cell boundary encroachment technique utilization within multiple cell levels of a given cell will be permutative in determining how many variations the given cell exists in the cell library. Additionally, different cells may utilize the cell boundary encroachment techniques on different cell levels. Moreover, some cells may not utilize the cell boundary encroachment techniques on a given level, but will comply with spacing allowance region requirements associated with the given level so as to be compatible for placement next to cells that do utilize the cell boundary encroachment techniques on the given level.
Utilizing the above-described cell boundary encroachment techniques, a semiconductor device is defined in accordance with one embodiment of the present invention. The semiconductor device includes a plurality of cells in which each cell has a respective outer cell boundary defined to circumscribe the cell in an orthogonal manner, i.e., with cell boundary segments extending at right angles to each other. For example, each of the example cell layouts of
In the semiconductor device, one or more of the conductive features in at least one level of a given cell is an encroaching feature positioned to encroach by an encroachment distance into an exclusion zone defined within the cell about the outer boundary of the cell. The exclusion zone occupies an area within the cell defined by an exclusion distance extending perpendicularly inward into the cell from the cell outer boundaries. In one embodiment, the exclusion distance is defined by one-half of a design rule distance as measured perpendicularly inward into the given cell from a segment of the outer cell boundary. However, in other embodiments, the exclusion distance is defined by a fraction or multiple of the design rule distance other than one-half, as measured perpendicularly inward into the given cell from a segment of the outer cell boundary. In one embodiment, the encroachment distance of the encroaching feature extends from a position corresponding to the inward extent of the exclusion distance from the segment of the outer cell boundary adjacent to the encroaching region, to an outermost edge of the encroaching feature relative to an interior of the given cell.
In one embodiment, the level of the given cell having the encroaching feature is also defined to correspondingly include a spacing allowance region adjacent to a segment of the outer cell boundary located opposite the given cell from the segment of the outer cell boundary where the encroaching region exists. The spacing allowance region extends perpendicularly inward into the given cell from its corresponding segment of the outer cell boundary by a spacing allowance distance equal to at least the encroachment distance plus the exclusion distance. This spacing allowance region size ensures that when two cells are placed side-by-side such that the encroachment region is placed next to the spacing allowance region, the conductive features within the encroachment region will be spaced apart from other conductive features by at least a full design rule separation distance. It should be understood that the spacing allowance region within the level of the given cell does not include any conductive features.
In one embodiment, the encroaching feature within the encroachment region is a conductive feature within a gate electrode level of the given cell. In one version of this embodiment, the gate electrode level of the given cell is defined to include only linear-shaped conductive features positioned parallel to each other, such as in the dynamic array architecture. An example of this is shown by encroaching feature A6 in the example cell layout of
In one embodiment, the encroaching feature is a conductive interconnect feature within an interconnect level of the given cell defined above a gate electrode level of the given cell. In one version of this embodiment, the interconnect level of the given cell is defined to include only linear-shaped conductive features positioned parallel to each other, such as in the dynamic array architecture. However, in another version of this embodiment, the interconnect level of the given cell is defined to include arbitrary shaped conductive features. In this case, the encroaching feature includes both a portion that is parallel to and a portion that is perpendicular to the segment of the outer cell boundary from which the encroachment region extends.
Also, in one embodiment, an outermost edge of the encroaching feature (relative to an interior of the given cell) is located inside of the outer cell boundary so as to be located inside of the given cell. However, in another embodiment, the outermost edge of the encroaching feature is located outside of the outer cell boundary, such that the encroaching feature overlaps the segment of the outer cell boundary from which the encroachment region extends, i.e., the reference segment of the outer cell boundary. For discussion purposes, this embodiment is referred to as an overlapping encroachment embodiment.
In one version of the overlapping encroachment embodiment, the encroaching feature is a linear-shaped conductive feature positioned parallel to the reference segment of the outer cell boundary, such that a width direction of the encroaching feature is perpendicular to the reference segment of the outer cell boundary. In one instance, a first extent of the encroaching feature in the width direction inside of the reference segment of the outer cell boundary is equal to a second extent of the encroaching feature in the width direction outside of the reference segment of the outer cell boundary. In another case, a first extent of the encroaching feature in the width direction inside of the reference segment of the outer cell boundary is different from a second extent of the encroaching feature in the width direction outside of the reference segment of the outer cell boundary.
In another version of the overlapping encroachment embodiment, the encroaching feature is a two-dimensionally shaped feature having one or more portions that extend parallel to the reference segment of the outer cell boundary and one or more portions that extend perpendicular to the reference segment of the outer cell boundary. In one instance, the encroaching portion of the two-dimensionally shaped encroaching feature includes both portions that extend parallel to and perpendicular to the reference segment of the outer cell boundary. In another instance, the encroaching portion of the two-dimensionally shaped encroaching feature may includes a portion that extends in a single direction either parallel to or perpendicular to the reference segment of the outer cell boundary. It should be understood that in various embodiments, the encroaching portion(s) of the encroaching feature may have essentially any shape depending on the particular layout of the cell.
In one example instance of the overlapping encroachment embodiment, the semiconductor device includes a first cell and a second cell, wherein the labels first and second are provided for identification purposes only and do not infer sequence or position. In this embodiment, the first cell includes an encroaching feature positioned to overlap a reference segment of an outer cell boundary of the first cell. Also, in this embodiment, the second cell includes an encroaching feature positioned to overlap a reference segment of an outer cell boundary of the second cell. The encroaching feature of the second cell is shaped to align with and overlap the encroaching feature of the first cell when the reference segments of the outer boundaries of the first and second cells are aligned. In this embodiment, the encroaching feature of the first cell and the encroaching feature of the second cell have a shared functionality such that a single instance of the overlapping encroaching features within the semiconductor device provides the shared functionality for both the first and second cells, when the first and second cells are placed such that their respective outer boundary reference segments are aligned.
Also, in one embodiment, the semiconductor chip includes mirrored versions of one or more cells. In this embodiment, a given cell and its mirrored version each have a common centerline defined parallel to and equidistant between two opposing segments of the outer cell boundary, e.g., between left and right segments of the outer cell boundary. In this embodiment, conductive features within the mirrored version of the given cell respectively correspond to conductive features within the given cell having been flipped about the common centerline.
In one embodiment, at least one instance of a given cell is defined on the semiconductor chip in accordance with any one of multiple versions of the given cell or combination thereof. The multiple versions of the given cell include:
Use of the labels first and second with regard to segments of the outer cell boundary are provided for reference purposes only and do not infer sequence or position. In this embodiment, the encroachment region is defined as a peripheral region of the particular cell level of the given cell within which at least one encroaching feature is positioned to encroach by an encroachment distance into an exclusion zone. As previously mentioned, the exclusion zone occupies the area within the cell defined by the exclusion distance extending perpendicularly inward into the cell from the cell outer boundaries.
The encroachment distance extends from a position corresponding to the inward extent of the exclusion distance from the segment of the outer cell boundary adjacent to the encroaching region, to an outermost edge of the encroaching feature relative to an interior of the given cell. Also, in this embodiment, the spacing allowance region is defined to extend perpendicularly inward into the given cell from the outer cell boundary by a spacing allowance distance equal to at least the encroachment distance plus the exclusion distance. The spacing allowance region within the particular cell level does not include any conductive features.
Also, in this embodiment, the multiple versions of the given cell include mirrored versions of each of the first, second, and third versions, i.e., non-mirrored versions, of the given cell, as described above. Each non-mirrored version of the given cell and its corresponding mirrored version both have a common centerline defined parallel to and equidistant between the first and second segments of the outer cell boundary. Conductive features within each mirrored version of the given cell respectively correspond to conductive features within the corresponding non-mirrored version of the given cell having been flipped about the common centerline.
In another embodiment, the cell boundary encroachment techniques described herein can be represented in a cell library stored in a digital format on a computer readable storage medium. The cell library includes one or more layouts of a cell. The cell has an outer cell boundary defined to circumscribe the cell in an orthogonal manner. The cell is also defined to include circuitry for performing one or more logic functions. Each layout for the cell includes layout shapes for conductive features in one or more levels of the cell. A first layout of the cell has an encroachment region defined within a given level of the cell adjacent to a first segment of the outer cell boundary. The encroachment region includes at least one encroaching layout shape positioned to encroach by an encroachment distance into an exclusion zone. The exclusion zone occupies an area within the cell defined by an exclusion distance extending perpendicularly inward into the cell from the cell outer boundaries. The encroachment distance extends from a position corresponding to the inward extent of the exclusion distance from the segment of the outer cell boundary adjacent to the encroaching region, to an outermost edge of the encroaching layout shape relative to an interior of the given cell.
The first layout of the cell also includes a spacing allowance region defined within the given level of the cell adjacent to a second segment of the outer cell boundary located opposite the cell from the first segment of the outer cell boundary. The spacing allowance region extends perpendicularly inward into the cell from the second segment of the outer cell boundary by a spacing allowance distance equal to at least the encroachment distance of the encroachment region plus the exclusion distance. The spacing allowance region in the cell level does not include any layout shapes.
In one embodiment, the cell library also includes a mirrored version of the first layout of the cell. The first layout of the cell and its mirrored version both have a common centerline defined parallel to and equidistant between the first and second segments of the outer cell boundary. Conductive features within the mirrored version of the first layout of the cell correspond to conductive features within the first layout of the cell having been flipped about the common centerline.
In one embodiment, the cell library also includes a second layout of the cell in which the cell level has a first encroachment region defined adjacent to the first segment of the outer cell boundary, and a second encroachment region defined adjacent to the second segment of the outer cell boundary located opposite the cell from the first segment of the outer cell boundary. In this embodiment, each of the first and second encroachment regions includes at least one encroaching layout shape positioned to encroach by a respective encroachment distance into a corresponding exclusion zone.
In one embodiment, the cell library also includes a mirrored version of the second layout of the cell. The second layout of the cell and its mirrored version both have a common centerline defined parallel to and equidistant between the first and second segments of the outer cell boundary. Conductive features within the mirrored version of the second layout of the cell correspond to conductive features within the second layout of the cell having been flipped about the common centerline.
In one embodiment, the cell library also includes a third layout of the cell in which the cell level has a first spacing allowance region defined adjacent to the first segment of the outer cell boundary, and a second spacing allowance region defined adjacent to the second segment of the outer cell boundary located opposite the cell from the first segment of the outer cell boundary. In this embodiment, the first spacing allowance region extends perpendicularly inward into the cell from the first segment of the outer cell boundary by a first spacing allowance distance equal to at least the encroachment distance of the second encroachment region of the second cell layout plus the exclusion distance. Also, the second spacing allowance region extends perpendicularly inward into the cell from the second segment of the outer cell boundary by a second spacing allowance distance equal to at least the encroachment distance of the first encroachment region of the first and second layouts plus the exclusion distance. Each of the first and second spacing allowance regions in the cell level does not include any layout shapes.
In one embodiment, the cell library also includes a mirrored version of the third layout of the cell. The third layout of the cell and its mirrored version both have a common centerline defined parallel to and equidistant between the first and second segments of the outer cell boundary. Conductive features within the mirrored version of the third layout of the cell correspond to conductive features within the third layout of the cell having been flipped about the common centerline.
The foregoing description of the cell boundary encroachment techniques have been provided primarily within the context of a given cell or a given pair of interfacing cells, i.e., adjacently placed cells. In addition to the principles of the cell boundary encroachment techniques, as described above, it should be understood that additional considerations may be made when implementing the cell boundary encroachment techniques across a cell library.
Specifically, within the cell library, there should be at least one version of each cell that has a boundary specification defined to accommodate the most aggressive boundary encroachments among the cells in the cell library. The most aggressive boundary encroachments are those that have the largest encroachment distance. For discussion purposes, consider an example cell library that includes multiple cells, including a Cell J and a Cell K, among others.
For discussion purposes, consider that within level L-x within all the cells in the cell library, the encroachment distance 952 of encroachment region 951 of Cell J is the maximum encroachment distance at the cell boundary location B-1. Also, consider that the encroachment distance 956 of encroachment region 955 of Cell J is the maximum encroachment distance at the cell boundary location B-2. Also, consider that the encroachment distance 960 of encroachment region 959 of Cell K is the maximum encroachment distance at the cell boundary location B-3.
To ensure that the cells within the library can be placed next to each other without violating the design rule spacing requirement between adjacent conductive features, there should be a version of each cell within the cell library that has a level L-x layout with spacing allowance regions defined to accommodate the most aggressive boundary encroachments among the cells in the cell library. In the present example, the most aggressive boundary encroachments among the cells in the cell library within level L-x are those corresponding to encroachment regions 951 and 955 of Cell J, and the encroachment region 959 of Cell K. Therefore, in the present example, there should be a version of each cell within the cell library that has a level L-x layout with spacing allowance regions defined to accommodate the encroachment regions 951 and 955 of Cell J, and the encroachment region 959 of Cell K.
The spacing allowance region 963 extends inward into the Cell M by a distance 964 equal to at least a sum of the encroachment distance 952 (of encroachment region 951 of Cell J) plus the exclusion distance of the exclusion zone. The spacing allowance region 965 extends inward into the Cell M by a distance 966 equal to at least a sum of the encroachment distance 960 (of encroachment region 959 of Cell K) plus the exclusion distance of the exclusion zone. In this manner, the spacing allowance regions 963 and 965 at boundary locations B-1 and B-3, respectively, accommodate the most aggressive encroachment regions within the cell library at boundary locations B-1 and B-3, respectively.
In one embodiment, cells are placed next to each other in a sequential manner. In this case, it may be acceptable for a cell to have a version that accommodates the most aggressive boundary encroachment specification on one side of the cell at a time. For instance, a second version of Cell M may be defined to have the spacing allowance region 961 on the right cell boundary, and not have the spacing allowance regions 963 and 965 on the left cell boundary. However, in this case, the second version of Cell M could not be the only version of Cell M in the cell library. In this case, their should be at least one other version of Cell M that includes the spacing allowance regions 963 and 965 on the left cell boundary. This at least one other version of Cell M could be satisfied by the first version of Cell M as shown in
It should be understood that mirrored version of the cells within the cell library can be placed on the semiconductor chip. Therefore, a version of a cell having spacing allowance region(s) located on a right side of a cell can be mirrored, i.e., flipped, to have the same spacing allowance region(s) located on a left side of the cell, vice-versa. Also, it should be understood that multiple levels of a cell can have encroachment boundary specifications. The example described above with regard to
In various embodiments, the cell boundary encroachment techniques disclosed herein can be used to facilitate implementation of either standard or non-standard cell designs. In one embodiment, cells can be defined to include a level in which layout features are defined to have a width size of odd number, such as 35 nm (nanometers) by way of example. With the odd numbered feature width size, it may not be possible to have a centered alignment of layout features on the cell boundaries. In other words, the encroachment distance of a layout feature on one side of the cell boundary may be different than the encroachment distance of another layout feature on the other side of the cell boundary.
For example,
It can be seen that a simple flipping, i.e., mirroring, of Cell P-v1 does not enable placement of Cell P in a side-by-side manner. Therefore, another version of Cell P is generated to enable side-by-side placement.
In one embodiment, the cell boundary encroachment techniques utilized to implement cells with feature width sizes of odd number, such as described in
In summary, it should be understood that the cell boundary encroachment techniques disclosed herein provide a systematic approach for allowing certain layout shapes to encroach within the design rule spacing buffer at a cell boundary, while ensuring that global shape-to-shape design rule separation requirements are satisfied when cells are placed next to each other. For any given cell level, the cell boundary encroachment techniques disclosed herein can be applied to left/right cell boundaries, top/bottom cell boundaries, or both left/right and top/bottom cell boundaries.
It should be understood that the cell boundary encroachment techniques disclosed herein can be implemented in a layout that is stored in a tangible form, such as in a digital format on a computer readable medium. For example, the layouts incorporating the cell boundary encroachment techniques disclosed herein can be stored in a layout data file of one or more cells, selectable from one or more libraries of cells. The layout data file can be formatted as a GDS II (Graphic Data System) database file, an OASIS (Open Artwork System Interchange Standard) database file, or any other type of data file format suitable for storing and communicating semiconductor device layouts. Also, multi-level layouts utilizing the cell boundary encroachment techniques can be included within a multi-level layout of a larger semiconductor device. The multi-level layout of the larger semiconductor device can also be stored in the form of a layout data file, such as those identified above.
Also, the invention described herein can be embodied as computer readable code on a computer readable medium. For example, the computer readable code can include the layout data file within which one or more layouts implementing the cell boundary encroachment techniques are stored. The computer readable code can also include program instructions for selecting one or more layout libraries and/or cells that include a layout utilizing the cell boundary encroachment techniques as defined therein. The layout libraries and/or cells can also be stored in a digital format on a computer readable medium.
The computer readable medium mentioned herein is any data storage device that can store data which can thereafter be read by a computer system. Examples of the computer readable medium include hard drives, network attached storage (NAS), read-only memory, random-access memory, CD-ROMs, CD-Rs, CD-RWs, magnetic tapes, and other optical and non-optical data storage devices. The computer readable medium can also be distributed over a network of coupled computer systems so that the computer readable code is stored and executed in a distributed fashion.
Any of the operations described herein that form part of the invention are useful machine operations. The invention also relates to a device or an apparatus for performing these operations. The apparatus may be specially constructed for the required purpose, such as a special purpose computer. When defined as a special purpose computer, the computer can also perform other processing, program execution or routines that are not part of the special purpose, while still being capable of operating for the special purpose. Alternatively, the operations may be processed by a general purpose computer selectively activated or configured by one or more computer programs stored in the computer memory, cache, or obtained over a network. When data is obtained over a network the data maybe processed by other computers on the network, e.g., a cloud of computing resources.
The embodiments of the present invention can also be defined as a machine that transforms data from one state to another state. The data may represent an article, that can be represented as an electronic signal and electronically manipulate data. The transformed data can, in some cases, be visually depicted on a display, representing the physical object that results from the transformation of data. The transformed data can be saved to storage generally, or in particular formats that enable the construction or depiction of a physical and tangible object. In some embodiments, the manipulation can be performed by a processor. In such an example, the processor thus transforms the data from one thing to another. Still further, the methods can be processed by one or more machines or processors that can be connected over a network. Each machine can transform data from one state or thing to another, and can also process data, save data to storage, transmit data over a network, display the result, or communicate the result to another machine.
It should be further understood that the cell boundary encroachment embodiments as disclosed herein can be manufactured as part of a semiconductor device or chip. In the fabrication of semiconductor devices such as integrated circuits, memory cells, and the like, a series of manufacturing operations are performed to define features on a semiconductor wafer. The wafer includes integrated circuit devices in the form of multi-level structures defined on a silicon substrate. At a substrate level, transistor devices with diffusion regions are formed. In subsequent levels, interconnect metallization lines are patterned and electrically connected to the transistor devices to define a desired integrated circuit device. Also, patterned conductive layers are insulated from other conductive layers by dielectric materials.
While this invention has been described in terms of several embodiments, it will be appreciated that those skilled in the art upon reading the preceding specifications and studying the drawings will realize various alterations, additions, permutations and equivalents thereof. Therefore, it is intended that the present invention includes all such alterations, additions, permutations, and equivalents as fall within the true spirit and scope of the invention.
This application is a continuation under 35 U.S.C. 120 of prior U.S. application Ser. No. 14/187,171, filed on Feb. 21, 2014, issued as U.S. Pat. No. 9,269,702, on Feb. 23, 2016, which is a divisional application under 35 U.S.C. 121 of prior U.S. application Ser. No. 12/904,134, filed Oct. 13, 2010, issued as U.S. Pat. No. 8,661,392, on Feb. 25, 2014, which claims priority under 35 U.S.C. 119(e) to U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 61/251,279, filed Oct. 13, 2009. The disclosure of each above-identified patent application is incorporated herein by reference in its entirety.
| Number | Name | Date | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| 4069493 | Bobenrieth | Jan 1978 | A |
| 4197555 | Uehara et al. | Apr 1980 | A |
| 4417161 | Uya | Nov 1983 | A |
| 4424460 | Best | Jan 1984 | A |
| 4575648 | Lee | Mar 1986 | A |
| 4602270 | Finegold | Jul 1986 | A |
| 4613940 | Shenton et al. | Sep 1986 | A |
| 4657628 | Holloway et al. | Apr 1987 | A |
| 4682202 | Tanizawa | Jul 1987 | A |
| 4745084 | Rowson et al. | May 1988 | A |
| 4780753 | Shinichi et al. | Oct 1988 | A |
| 4801986 | Chang et al. | Jan 1989 | A |
| 4804636 | Groover, III | Feb 1989 | A |
| 4812688 | Chu et al. | Mar 1989 | A |
| 4884115 | Michel et al. | Nov 1989 | A |
| 4928160 | Crafts | May 1990 | A |
| 4975756 | Haken et al. | Dec 1990 | A |
| 5047979 | Leung | Sep 1991 | A |
| 5068603 | Mahoney | Nov 1991 | A |
| 5079614 | Khatakhotan | Jan 1992 | A |
| 5097422 | Corbin et al. | Mar 1992 | A |
| 5117277 | Yuyama | May 1992 | A |
| 5121186 | Wong et al. | Jun 1992 | A |
| 5208765 | Turnbull | May 1993 | A |
| 5224057 | Igarashi | Jun 1993 | A |
| 5242770 | Chen et al. | Sep 1993 | A |
| 5268319 | Harari | Dec 1993 | A |
| 5298774 | Ueda et al. | Mar 1994 | A |
| 5313426 | Sakuma et al. | May 1994 | A |
| 5338963 | Klaasen | Aug 1994 | A |
| 5351197 | Upton et al. | Sep 1994 | A |
| 5359226 | DeJong | Oct 1994 | A |
| 5365454 | Nakagawa et al. | Nov 1994 | A |
| 5367187 | Yuen | Nov 1994 | A |
| 5378649 | Huang | Jan 1995 | A |
| 5396128 | Dunning et al. | Mar 1995 | A |
| 5420447 | Waggoner | May 1995 | A |
| 5461577 | Shaw et al. | Oct 1995 | A |
| 5471403 | Fujimaga | Nov 1995 | A |
| 5497334 | Russell et al. | Mar 1996 | A |
| 5497337 | Ponnapalli et al. | Mar 1996 | A |
| 5526307 | Lin et al. | Jun 1996 | A |
| 5536955 | Ali | Jul 1996 | A |
| 5545904 | Orbach | Aug 1996 | A |
| 5581098 | Chang | Dec 1996 | A |
| 5581202 | Yano et al. | Dec 1996 | A |
| 5612893 | Hao et al. | Mar 1997 | A |
| 5636002 | Garofalo | Jun 1997 | A |
| 5656861 | Godinho et al. | Aug 1997 | A |
| 5682323 | Pasch et al. | Oct 1997 | A |
| 5684311 | Shaw | Nov 1997 | A |
| 5684733 | Wu et al. | Nov 1997 | A |
| 5698873 | Colwell et al. | Dec 1997 | A |
| 5705301 | Garza et al. | Jan 1998 | A |
| 5723883 | Gheewalla | Mar 1998 | A |
| 5723908 | Fuchida et al. | Mar 1998 | A |
| 5740068 | Liebmann et al. | Apr 1998 | A |
| 5745374 | Matsumoto | Apr 1998 | A |
| 5764533 | deDood | Jun 1998 | A |
| 5774367 | Reyes et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
| 5780909 | Hayashi | Jul 1998 | A |
| 5789776 | Lancaster et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
| 5790417 | Chao et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
| 5796128 | Tran et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
| 5796624 | Sridhar et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
| 5798298 | Yang et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
| 5814844 | Nagata et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
| 5825203 | Kusunoki et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
| 5834851 | Ikeda et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
| 5838594 | Kojima | Nov 1998 | A |
| 5841663 | Sharma et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
| 5847421 | Yamaguchi | Dec 1998 | A |
| 5850362 | Sakuma et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
| 5852562 | Shinomiya et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
| 5858580 | Wang et al. | Jan 1999 | A |
| 5898194 | Gheewala | Apr 1999 | A |
| 5900340 | Reich et al. | May 1999 | A |
| 5905287 | Hirata | May 1999 | A |
| 5908827 | Sirna | Jun 1999 | A |
| 5915199 | Hsu | Jun 1999 | A |
| 5917207 | Colwell et al. | Jun 1999 | A |
| 5920486 | Beahm et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
| 5923059 | Gheewala | Jul 1999 | A |
| 5923060 | Gheewala | Jul 1999 | A |
| 5929469 | Mimoto et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
| 5930163 | Hara et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
| 5935763 | Caterer et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
| 5949101 | Aritome | Sep 1999 | A |
| 5973507 | Yamazaki | Oct 1999 | A |
| 5977305 | Wigler et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
| 5977574 | Schmitt et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
| 5998879 | Iwaki et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
| 6009251 | Ho et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
| 6026223 | Scepanovic et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
| 6026225 | Iwasaki | Feb 2000 | A |
| 6037613 | Mariyama | Mar 2000 | A |
| 6037617 | Kumagai | Mar 2000 | A |
| 6044007 | Capodieci | Mar 2000 | A |
| 6054872 | Fudanuki et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
| 6063132 | DeCamp et al. | May 2000 | A |
| 6077310 | Yamamoto et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
| 6080206 | Tadokoro et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
| 6084255 | Ueda et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
| 6084437 | Sako | Jul 2000 | A |
| 6091845 | Pierrat et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
| 6099584 | Arnold et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
| 6100025 | Wigler et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
| 6114071 | Chen et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
| 6144227 | Sato | Nov 2000 | A |
| 6159839 | Jeng et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
| 6166415 | Sakemi et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
| 6166560 | Ogura et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
| 6174742 | Sudhindranath et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
| 6182272 | Andreev et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
| 6194104 | Hsu | Feb 2001 | B1 |
| 6194252 | Yamaguchi | Feb 2001 | B1 |
| 6194912 | Or-Bach | Feb 2001 | B1 |
| 6209123 | Maziasz et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
| 6230299 | McSherry et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
| 6232173 | Hsu et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
| 6240542 | Kapur | May 2001 | B1 |
| 6249902 | Igusa et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
| 6255600 | Schaper | Jul 2001 | B1 |
| 6255845 | Wong et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
| 6262487 | Igarashi et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
| 6269472 | Garza et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
| 6275973 | Wein | Aug 2001 | B1 |
| 6282696 | Garza et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
| 6291276 | Gonzalez | Sep 2001 | B1 |
| 6297668 | Schober | Oct 2001 | B1 |
| 6297674 | Kono et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
| 6303252 | Lin | Oct 2001 | B1 |
| 6331733 | Or-Bach et al. | Dec 2001 | B1 |
| 6331791 | Huang | Dec 2001 | B1 |
| 6335250 | Egi | Jan 2002 | B1 |
| 6338972 | Sudhindranath et al. | Jan 2002 | B1 |
| 6347062 | Nii et al. | Feb 2002 | B2 |
| 6356112 | Tran et al. | Mar 2002 | B1 |
| 6359804 | Kuriyama et al. | Mar 2002 | B2 |
| 6370679 | Chang et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
| 6378110 | Ho | Apr 2002 | B1 |
| 6380592 | Tooher et al. | Apr 2002 | B2 |
| 6388296 | Hsu | May 2002 | B1 |
| 6393601 | Tanaka et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
| 6399972 | Masuda et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
| 6400183 | Yamashita et al. | Jun 2002 | B2 |
| 6408427 | Cong et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
| 6415421 | Anderson et al. | Jul 2002 | B2 |
| 6416907 | Winder et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
| 6417549 | Oh | Jul 2002 | B1 |
| 6421820 | Mansfield et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
| 6425112 | Bula et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
| 6425117 | Pasch et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
| 6426269 | Haffner et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
| 6436805 | Trivedi | Aug 2002 | B1 |
| 6445049 | Iranmanesh | Sep 2002 | B1 |
| 6445065 | Gheewala et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
| 6467072 | Yang et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
| 6469328 | Yanai et al. | Oct 2002 | B2 |
| 6470489 | Chang et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
| 6476493 | Or-Bach et al. | Nov 2002 | B2 |
| 6477695 | Gandhi | Nov 2002 | B1 |
| 6480032 | Aksamit | Nov 2002 | B1 |
| 6480989 | Chan et al. | Nov 2002 | B2 |
| 6492066 | Capodieci et al. | Dec 2002 | B1 |
| 6496965 | van Ginneken et al. | Dec 2002 | B1 |
| 6504186 | Kanamoto et al. | Jan 2003 | B2 |
| 6505327 | Lin | Jan 2003 | B2 |
| 6505328 | Van Ginneken et al. | Jan 2003 | B1 |
| 6507941 | Leung et al. | Jan 2003 | B1 |
| 6509952 | Govil et al. | Jan 2003 | B1 |
| 6514849 | Hui et al. | Feb 2003 | B1 |
| 6516459 | Sahouria | Feb 2003 | B1 |
| 6523156 | Cirit | Feb 2003 | B2 |
| 6525350 | Kinoshita et al. | Feb 2003 | B1 |
| 6536028 | Katsioulas et al. | Mar 2003 | B1 |
| 6543039 | Watanabe | Apr 2003 | B1 |
| 6553544 | Tanaka et al. | Apr 2003 | B2 |
| 6553559 | Liebmann et al. | Apr 2003 | B2 |
| 6553562 | Capodieci et al. | Apr 2003 | B2 |
| 6566720 | Aldrich | May 2003 | B2 |
| 6570234 | Gardner | May 2003 | B1 |
| 6571140 | Wewalaarachchi | May 2003 | B1 |
| 6571379 | Takayama | May 2003 | B2 |
| 6574786 | Pohlenz et al. | Jun 2003 | B1 |
| 6578190 | Ferguson et al. | Jun 2003 | B2 |
| 6583041 | Capodieci | Jun 2003 | B1 |
| 6588005 | Kobayashi et al. | Jul 2003 | B1 |
| 6590289 | Shively | Jul 2003 | B2 |
| 6591207 | Naya et al. | Jul 2003 | B2 |
| 6609235 | Ramaswamy et al. | Aug 2003 | B2 |
| 6610607 | Armbrust et al. | Aug 2003 | B1 |
| 6617621 | Gheewala et al. | Sep 2003 | B1 |
| 6620561 | Winder et al. | Sep 2003 | B2 |
| 6621132 | Onishi et al. | Sep 2003 | B2 |
| 6632741 | Clevenger et al. | Oct 2003 | B1 |
| 6633182 | Pileggi et al. | Oct 2003 | B2 |
| 6635935 | Makino | Oct 2003 | B2 |
| 6642744 | Or-Bach et al. | Nov 2003 | B2 |
| 6643831 | Chang et al. | Nov 2003 | B2 |
| 6650014 | Kariyazaki | Nov 2003 | B2 |
| 6661041 | Keeth | Dec 2003 | B2 |
| 6662350 | Fried et al. | Dec 2003 | B2 |
| 6664587 | Guterman et al. | Dec 2003 | B2 |
| 6673638 | Bendik et al. | Jan 2004 | B1 |
| 6677649 | Minami et al. | Jan 2004 | B2 |
| 6687895 | Zhang | Feb 2004 | B2 |
| 6690206 | Rikino et al. | Feb 2004 | B2 |
| 6691297 | Misaka et al. | Feb 2004 | B1 |
| 6700405 | Hirairi | Mar 2004 | B1 |
| 6703170 | Pindo | Mar 2004 | B1 |
| 6709880 | Yamamoto | Mar 2004 | B2 |
| 6714903 | Chu et al. | Mar 2004 | B1 |
| 6732334 | Nakatsuka | May 2004 | B2 |
| 6732338 | Crouse et al. | May 2004 | B2 |
| 6732344 | Sakamoto et al. | May 2004 | B2 |
| 6734506 | Oyamatsu | May 2004 | B2 |
| 6737199 | Hsieh | May 2004 | B1 |
| 6737318 | Murata et al. | May 2004 | B2 |
| 6737347 | Houston et al. | May 2004 | B1 |
| 6745372 | Cote et al. | Jun 2004 | B2 |
| 6745380 | Bodendorf et al. | Jun 2004 | B2 |
| 6749972 | Yu | Jun 2004 | B2 |
| 6750555 | Satomi et al. | Jun 2004 | B2 |
| 6760269 | Nakase et al. | Jul 2004 | B2 |
| 6765245 | Bansal | Jul 2004 | B2 |
| 6777138 | Pierrat et al. | Aug 2004 | B2 |
| 6777146 | Samuels | Aug 2004 | B1 |
| 6787823 | Shibutani | Sep 2004 | B2 |
| 6789244 | Dasasathyan et al. | Sep 2004 | B1 |
| 6789246 | Mohan et al. | Sep 2004 | B1 |
| 6792591 | Shi et al. | Sep 2004 | B2 |
| 6792593 | Takashima et al. | Sep 2004 | B2 |
| 6794677 | Tamaki et al. | Sep 2004 | B2 |
| 6794914 | Sani et al. | Sep 2004 | B2 |
| 6795332 | Yamaoka et al. | Sep 2004 | B2 |
| 6795358 | Tanaka et al. | Sep 2004 | B2 |
| 6795952 | Stine et al. | Sep 2004 | B1 |
| 6795953 | Bakarian et al. | Sep 2004 | B2 |
| 6800883 | Furuya et al. | Oct 2004 | B2 |
| 6806180 | Cho | Oct 2004 | B2 |
| 6807663 | Cote et al. | Oct 2004 | B2 |
| 6809399 | Ikeda et al. | Oct 2004 | B2 |
| 6812574 | Tomita et al. | Nov 2004 | B2 |
| 6818389 | Fritze et al. | Nov 2004 | B2 |
| 6818929 | Tsutsumi et al. | Nov 2004 | B2 |
| 6819136 | Or-Bach | Nov 2004 | B2 |
| 6820248 | Gan | Nov 2004 | B1 |
| 6826738 | Cadouri | Nov 2004 | B2 |
| 6834375 | Stine et al. | Dec 2004 | B1 |
| 6835991 | Pell, III | Dec 2004 | B2 |
| 6841880 | Matsumoto et al. | Jan 2005 | B2 |
| 6850854 | Naya et al. | Feb 2005 | B2 |
| 6854096 | Eaton et al. | Feb 2005 | B2 |
| 6854100 | Chuang et al. | Feb 2005 | B1 |
| 6867073 | Enquist | Mar 2005 | B1 |
| 6871338 | Yamauchi | Mar 2005 | B2 |
| 6872990 | Kang | Mar 2005 | B1 |
| 6877144 | Rittman et al. | Apr 2005 | B1 |
| 6881523 | Smith | Apr 2005 | B2 |
| 6884712 | Yelehanka et al. | Apr 2005 | B2 |
| 6885045 | Hidaka | Apr 2005 | B2 |
| 6889370 | Kerzman et al. | May 2005 | B1 |
| 6897517 | Houdt et al. | May 2005 | B2 |
| 6897536 | Nomura et al. | May 2005 | B2 |
| 6898770 | Boluki et al. | May 2005 | B2 |
| 6904582 | Rittman et al. | Jun 2005 | B1 |
| 6918104 | Pierrat et al. | Jul 2005 | B2 |
| 6920079 | Shibayama | Jul 2005 | B2 |
| 6921982 | Joshi et al. | Jul 2005 | B2 |
| 6922354 | Ishikura et al. | Jul 2005 | B2 |
| 6924560 | Wang et al. | Aug 2005 | B2 |
| 6928635 | Pramanik et al. | Aug 2005 | B2 |
| 6931617 | Sanie et al. | Aug 2005 | B2 |
| 6953956 | Or-Bach et al. | Oct 2005 | B2 |
| 6954918 | Houston | Oct 2005 | B2 |
| 6957402 | Templeton et al. | Oct 2005 | B2 |
| 6968527 | Pierrat | Nov 2005 | B2 |
| 6974978 | Possley | Dec 2005 | B1 |
| 6977856 | Tanaka et al. | Dec 2005 | B2 |
| 6978436 | Cote et al. | Dec 2005 | B2 |
| 6978437 | Rittman et al. | Dec 2005 | B1 |
| 6980211 | Lin et al. | Dec 2005 | B2 |
| 6992394 | Park | Jan 2006 | B2 |
| 6992925 | Peng | Jan 2006 | B2 |
| 6993741 | Liebmann et al. | Jan 2006 | B2 |
| 6994939 | Ghandehari et al. | Feb 2006 | B1 |
| 6998722 | Madurawe | Feb 2006 | B2 |
| 7003068 | Kushner et al. | Feb 2006 | B2 |
| 7009862 | Higeta et al. | Mar 2006 | B2 |
| 7016214 | Kawamata et al. | Mar 2006 | B2 |
| 7022559 | Barnak et al. | Apr 2006 | B2 |
| 7028285 | Cote et al. | Apr 2006 | B2 |
| 7041568 | Goldbach et al. | May 2006 | B2 |
| 7052972 | Sandhu et al. | May 2006 | B2 |
| 7053424 | Ono | May 2006 | B2 |
| 7063920 | Baba-Ali | Jun 2006 | B2 |
| 7064068 | Chou et al. | Jun 2006 | B2 |
| 7065731 | Jacques et al. | Jun 2006 | B2 |
| 7079413 | Tsukamoto et al. | Jul 2006 | B2 |
| 7079989 | Wimer | Jul 2006 | B2 |
| 7093208 | Williams et al. | Aug 2006 | B2 |
| 7093228 | Andreev et al. | Aug 2006 | B2 |
| 7103870 | Misaka et al. | Sep 2006 | B2 |
| 7105871 | Or-Bach et al. | Sep 2006 | B2 |
| 7107551 | de Dood et al. | Sep 2006 | B1 |
| 7115343 | Gordon et al. | Oct 2006 | B2 |
| 7115920 | Bernstein et al. | Oct 2006 | B2 |
| 7120882 | Kotani et al. | Oct 2006 | B2 |
| 7124386 | Smith et al. | Oct 2006 | B2 |
| 7126837 | Banachowicz et al. | Oct 2006 | B1 |
| 7132203 | Pierrat | Nov 2006 | B2 |
| 7137092 | Maeda | Nov 2006 | B2 |
| 7141853 | Campbell et al. | Nov 2006 | B2 |
| 7143380 | Anderson et al. | Nov 2006 | B1 |
| 7149999 | Kahng et al. | Dec 2006 | B2 |
| 7152215 | Smith et al. | Dec 2006 | B2 |
| 7155685 | Mori et al. | Dec 2006 | B2 |
| 7155689 | Pierrat et al. | Dec 2006 | B2 |
| 7159197 | Falbo et al. | Jan 2007 | B2 |
| 7174520 | White et al. | Feb 2007 | B2 |
| 7175940 | Laidig et al. | Feb 2007 | B2 |
| 7176508 | Joshi et al. | Feb 2007 | B2 |
| 7177215 | Tanaka et al. | Feb 2007 | B2 |
| 7183611 | Bhattacharyya | Feb 2007 | B2 |
| 7185294 | Zhang | Feb 2007 | B2 |
| 7188322 | Cohn et al. | Mar 2007 | B2 |
| 7194712 | Wu | Mar 2007 | B2 |
| 7200835 | Zhang et al. | Apr 2007 | B2 |
| 7202517 | Dixit et al. | Apr 2007 | B2 |
| 7205191 | Kobayashi | Apr 2007 | B2 |
| 7208794 | Hofmann et al. | Apr 2007 | B2 |
| 7214579 | Widdershoven et al. | May 2007 | B2 |
| 7219326 | Reed et al. | May 2007 | B2 |
| 7221031 | Ryoo et al. | May 2007 | B2 |
| 7225423 | Bhattacharya et al. | May 2007 | B2 |
| 7227183 | Donze et al. | Jun 2007 | B2 |
| 7228510 | Ono | Jun 2007 | B2 |
| 7231628 | Pack et al. | Jun 2007 | B2 |
| 7235424 | Chen et al. | Jun 2007 | B2 |
| 7243316 | White et al. | Jul 2007 | B2 |
| 7252909 | Shin et al. | Aug 2007 | B2 |
| 7257017 | Liaw | Aug 2007 | B2 |
| 7264990 | Rueckes et al. | Sep 2007 | B2 |
| 7266787 | Hughes et al. | Sep 2007 | B2 |
| 7269803 | Khakzadi | Sep 2007 | B2 |
| 7278118 | Pileggi et al. | Oct 2007 | B2 |
| 7279727 | Ikoma et al. | Oct 2007 | B2 |
| 7287320 | Wang et al. | Oct 2007 | B2 |
| 7294534 | Iwaki | Nov 2007 | B2 |
| 7302651 | Allen et al. | Nov 2007 | B2 |
| 7308669 | Buehler et al. | Dec 2007 | B2 |
| 7312003 | Cote et al. | Dec 2007 | B2 |
| 7315994 | Aller et al. | Jan 2008 | B2 |
| 7327591 | Sadra et al. | Feb 2008 | B2 |
| 7329938 | Kinoshita | Feb 2008 | B2 |
| 7335966 | Ihme et al. | Feb 2008 | B2 |
| 7337421 | Kamat | Feb 2008 | B2 |
| 7338896 | Vanhaelemeersch et al. | Mar 2008 | B2 |
| 7345909 | Chang et al. | Mar 2008 | B2 |
| 7346885 | Semmler | Mar 2008 | B2 |
| 7350183 | Cui et al. | Mar 2008 | B2 |
| 7353492 | Gupta et al. | Apr 2008 | B2 |
| 7358131 | Bhattacharyya | Apr 2008 | B2 |
| 7360179 | Smith et al. | Apr 2008 | B2 |
| 7360198 | Rana et al. | Apr 2008 | B2 |
| 7366997 | Rahmat et al. | Apr 2008 | B1 |
| 7367008 | White et al. | Apr 2008 | B2 |
| 7376931 | Kokubun | May 2008 | B2 |
| 7383521 | Smith et al. | Jun 2008 | B2 |
| 7397260 | Chanda et al. | Jul 2008 | B2 |
| 7400627 | Wu et al. | Jul 2008 | B2 |
| 7402848 | Chang et al. | Jul 2008 | B2 |
| 7404154 | Venkatraman et al. | Jul 2008 | B1 |
| 7404173 | Wu et al. | Jul 2008 | B2 |
| 7411252 | Anderson et al. | Aug 2008 | B2 |
| 7421678 | Barnes et al. | Sep 2008 | B2 |
| 7423298 | Mariyama et al. | Sep 2008 | B2 |
| 7424694 | Ikeda | Sep 2008 | B2 |
| 7424695 | Tamura et al. | Sep 2008 | B2 |
| 7424696 | Vogel et al. | Sep 2008 | B2 |
| 7426710 | Zhang et al. | Sep 2008 | B2 |
| 7432562 | Bhattacharyya | Oct 2008 | B2 |
| 7434185 | Dooling et al. | Oct 2008 | B2 |
| 7441211 | Gupta et al. | Oct 2008 | B1 |
| 7442630 | Kelberlau et al. | Oct 2008 | B2 |
| 7444609 | Charlebois et al. | Oct 2008 | B2 |
| 7446352 | Becker | Nov 2008 | B2 |
| 7449371 | Kemerling et al. | Nov 2008 | B2 |
| 7458045 | Cote et al. | Nov 2008 | B2 |
| 7459792 | Chen | Dec 2008 | B2 |
| 7465973 | Chang et al. | Dec 2008 | B2 |
| 7466607 | Hollis et al. | Dec 2008 | B2 |
| 7469396 | Hayashi et al. | Dec 2008 | B2 |
| 7480880 | Visweswariah et al. | Jan 2009 | B2 |
| 7480891 | Sezginer | Jan 2009 | B2 |
| 7484197 | Allen et al. | Jan 2009 | B2 |
| 7485934 | Liaw | Feb 2009 | B2 |
| 7487475 | Kriplani et al. | Feb 2009 | B1 |
| 7492013 | Correale, Jr. | Feb 2009 | B2 |
| 7500211 | Komaki | Mar 2009 | B2 |
| 7502275 | Nii et al. | Mar 2009 | B2 |
| 7503026 | Ichiryu | Mar 2009 | B2 |
| 7504184 | Hung et al. | Mar 2009 | B2 |
| 7506300 | Sezginer et al. | Mar 2009 | B2 |
| 7508238 | Yamagami | Mar 2009 | B2 |
| 7509621 | Melvin, III | Mar 2009 | B2 |
| 7509622 | Sinha et al. | Mar 2009 | B2 |
| 7512017 | Chang | Mar 2009 | B2 |
| 7512921 | Shibuya | Mar 2009 | B2 |
| 7514355 | Katase | Apr 2009 | B2 |
| 7514959 | Or-Bach et al. | Apr 2009 | B2 |
| 7523429 | Kroyan et al. | Apr 2009 | B2 |
| 7527900 | Zhou et al. | May 2009 | B2 |
| 7538368 | Yano | May 2009 | B2 |
| 7543262 | Wang et al. | Jun 2009 | B2 |
| 7563701 | Chang et al. | Jul 2009 | B2 |
| 7564134 | Lee et al. | Jul 2009 | B2 |
| 7568174 | Sezginer et al. | Jul 2009 | B2 |
| 7569309 | Walter et al. | Aug 2009 | B2 |
| 7569310 | Wallace et al. | Aug 2009 | B2 |
| 7569894 | Suzuki | Aug 2009 | B2 |
| 7575973 | Mokhlesi et al. | Aug 2009 | B2 |
| 7598541 | Okamoto et al. | Oct 2009 | B2 |
| 7598558 | Hashimoto et al. | Oct 2009 | B2 |
| 7614030 | Hsu | Nov 2009 | B2 |
| 7625790 | Yang | Dec 2009 | B2 |
| 7632610 | Wallace et al. | Dec 2009 | B2 |
| 7640522 | Gupta et al. | Dec 2009 | B2 |
| 7646651 | Lee et al. | Jan 2010 | B2 |
| 7653884 | Furnish et al. | Jan 2010 | B2 |
| 7665051 | Ludwig et al. | Feb 2010 | B2 |
| 7700466 | Booth et al. | Apr 2010 | B2 |
| 7712056 | White et al. | May 2010 | B2 |
| 7739627 | Chew | Jun 2010 | B2 |
| 7749662 | Matthew et al. | Jul 2010 | B2 |
| 7755110 | Gliese et al. | Jul 2010 | B2 |
| 7770144 | Dellinger | Aug 2010 | B2 |
| 7781847 | Yang | Aug 2010 | B2 |
| 7791109 | Wann et al. | Sep 2010 | B2 |
| 7802219 | Tomar et al. | Sep 2010 | B2 |
| 7816740 | Houston | Oct 2010 | B2 |
| 7825437 | Pillarisetty et al. | Nov 2010 | B2 |
| 7842975 | Becker et al. | Nov 2010 | B2 |
| 7873929 | Kahng | Jan 2011 | B2 |
| 7882456 | Zach | Feb 2011 | B2 |
| 7888705 | Becker | Feb 2011 | B2 |
| 7898040 | Nawaz | Mar 2011 | B2 |
| 7906801 | Becker et al. | Mar 2011 | B2 |
| 7908578 | Becker | Mar 2011 | B2 |
| 7910958 | Becker et al. | Mar 2011 | B2 |
| 7910959 | Becker et al. | Mar 2011 | B2 |
| 7917877 | Singh et al. | Mar 2011 | B2 |
| 7917879 | Becker et al. | Mar 2011 | B2 |
| 7923266 | Thijs et al. | Apr 2011 | B2 |
| 7923337 | Chang et al. | Apr 2011 | B2 |
| 7923757 | Becker et al. | Apr 2011 | B2 |
| 7926001 | Pierrat | Apr 2011 | B2 |
| 7932544 | Becker et al. | Apr 2011 | B2 |
| 7932545 | Becker et al. | Apr 2011 | B2 |
| 7934184 | Zhang | Apr 2011 | B2 |
| 7939443 | Fox et al. | May 2011 | B2 |
| 7943966 | Becker et al. | May 2011 | B2 |
| 7943967 | Becker et al. | May 2011 | B2 |
| 7948012 | Becker et al. | May 2011 | B2 |
| 7948013 | Becker et al. | May 2011 | B2 |
| 7952119 | Becker et al. | May 2011 | B2 |
| 7956421 | Becker | Jun 2011 | B2 |
| 7958465 | Lu et al. | Jun 2011 | B2 |
| 7962867 | White et al. | Jun 2011 | B2 |
| 7962879 | Tang et al. | Jun 2011 | B2 |
| 7964267 | Lyons et al. | Jun 2011 | B1 |
| 7971160 | Osawa et al. | Jun 2011 | B2 |
| 7989847 | Becker et al. | Aug 2011 | B2 |
| 7989848 | Becker et al. | Aug 2011 | B2 |
| 7992122 | Burstein et al. | Aug 2011 | B1 |
| 7994583 | Inaba | Aug 2011 | B2 |
| 8004042 | Yang et al. | Aug 2011 | B2 |
| 8022441 | Becker et al. | Sep 2011 | B2 |
| 8030689 | Becker et al. | Oct 2011 | B2 |
| 8035133 | Becker et al. | Oct 2011 | B2 |
| 8044437 | Venkatraman et al. | Oct 2011 | B1 |
| 8058671 | Becker et al. | Nov 2011 | B2 |
| 8058690 | Chang | Nov 2011 | B2 |
| 8072003 | Becker et al. | Dec 2011 | B2 |
| 8072053 | Li | Dec 2011 | B2 |
| 8088679 | Becker et al. | Jan 2012 | B2 |
| 8088680 | Becker et al. | Jan 2012 | B2 |
| 8088681 | Becker et al. | Jan 2012 | B2 |
| 8088682 | Becker et al. | Jan 2012 | B2 |
| 8089098 | Becker et al. | Jan 2012 | B2 |
| 8089099 | Becker et al. | Jan 2012 | B2 |
| 8089100 | Becker et al. | Jan 2012 | B2 |
| 8089101 | Becker et al. | Jan 2012 | B2 |
| 8089102 | Becker et al. | Jan 2012 | B2 |
| 8089103 | Becker et al. | Jan 2012 | B2 |
| 8089104 | Becker et al. | Jan 2012 | B2 |
| 8101975 | Becker et al. | Jan 2012 | B2 |
| 8110854 | Becker et al. | Feb 2012 | B2 |
| 8129750 | Becker et al. | Mar 2012 | B2 |
| 8129751 | Becker et al. | Mar 2012 | B2 |
| 8129752 | Becker et al. | Mar 2012 | B2 |
| 8129754 | Becker et al. | Mar 2012 | B2 |
| 8129755 | Becker et al. | Mar 2012 | B2 |
| 8129756 | Becker et al. | Mar 2012 | B2 |
| 8129757 | Becker et al. | Mar 2012 | B2 |
| 8129819 | Becker et al. | Mar 2012 | B2 |
| 8130529 | Tanaka | Mar 2012 | B2 |
| 8134183 | Becker et al. | Mar 2012 | B2 |
| 8134184 | Becker et al. | Mar 2012 | B2 |
| 8134185 | Becker et al. | Mar 2012 | B2 |
| 8134186 | Becker et al. | Mar 2012 | B2 |
| 8138525 | Becker et al. | Mar 2012 | B2 |
| 8161427 | Morgenshtein et al. | Apr 2012 | B2 |
| 8178905 | Toubou | May 2012 | B2 |
| 8178909 | Venkatraman et al. | May 2012 | B2 |
| 8198656 | Becker et al. | Jun 2012 | B2 |
| 8207053 | Becker et al. | Jun 2012 | B2 |
| 8214778 | Quandt | Jul 2012 | B2 |
| 8217428 | Becker et al. | Jul 2012 | B2 |
| 8225239 | Reed | Jul 2012 | B2 |
| 8225261 | Hong et al. | Jul 2012 | B2 |
| 8245180 | Smayling et al. | Aug 2012 | B2 |
| 8247846 | Becker | Aug 2012 | B2 |
| 8253172 | Becker et al. | Aug 2012 | B2 |
| 8253173 | Becker et al. | Aug 2012 | B2 |
| 8258547 | Becker et al. | Sep 2012 | B2 |
| 8258548 | Becker et al. | Sep 2012 | B2 |
| 8258549 | Becker et al. | Sep 2012 | B2 |
| 8258550 | Becker et al. | Sep 2012 | B2 |
| 8258551 | Becker et al. | Sep 2012 | B2 |
| 8258552 | Becker et al. | Sep 2012 | B2 |
| 8258581 | Becker et al. | Sep 2012 | B2 |
| 8264007 | Becker et al. | Sep 2012 | B2 |
| 8264008 | Becker et al. | Sep 2012 | B2 |
| 8264009 | Becker et al. | Sep 2012 | B2 |
| 8283701 | Becker et al. | Oct 2012 | B2 |
| 8294212 | Wang et al. | Oct 2012 | B2 |
| 8316327 | Herold | Nov 2012 | B2 |
| 8356268 | Becker et al. | Jan 2013 | B2 |
| 8363455 | Rennie | Jan 2013 | B2 |
| 8378407 | Audzeyeu et al. | Feb 2013 | B2 |
| 8395224 | Becker et al. | Mar 2013 | B2 |
| 8402397 | Robles et al. | Mar 2013 | B2 |
| 8405163 | Becker et al. | Mar 2013 | B2 |
| 8422274 | Tomita et al. | Apr 2013 | B2 |
| 8436400 | Becker et al. | May 2013 | B2 |
| 8453094 | Kornachuk et al. | May 2013 | B2 |
| 8575706 | Becker et al. | Nov 2013 | B2 |
| 8667443 | Smayling et al. | Mar 2014 | B2 |
| 8701071 | Kornachuk et al. | Apr 2014 | B2 |
| 8735995 | Becker et al. | May 2014 | B2 |
| 8756551 | Becker et al. | Jun 2014 | B2 |
| 8836045 | Becker et al. | Sep 2014 | B2 |
| 8839162 | Amundson et al. | Sep 2014 | B2 |
| 8839175 | Smayling et al. | Sep 2014 | B2 |
| 8847329 | Becker et al. | Sep 2014 | B2 |
| 8863063 | Becker et al. | Oct 2014 | B2 |
| 9006841 | Kumar | Apr 2015 | B2 |
| 9202779 | Kornachuk et al. | Dec 2015 | B2 |
| 9269423 | Sever | Feb 2016 | B2 |
| 9336344 | Smayling | May 2016 | B2 |
| 20010049813 | Chan et al. | Dec 2001 | A1 |
| 20020003270 | Makino | Jan 2002 | A1 |
| 20020015899 | Chen et al. | Feb 2002 | A1 |
| 20020030510 | Kono et al. | Mar 2002 | A1 |
| 20020063582 | Rikino | May 2002 | A1 |
| 20020068423 | Park et al. | Jun 2002 | A1 |
| 20020079927 | Katoh et al. | Jun 2002 | A1 |
| 20020149392 | Cho | Oct 2002 | A1 |
| 20020166107 | Capodieci et al. | Nov 2002 | A1 |
| 20020194575 | Allen et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
| 20030042930 | Pileggi et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
| 20030046653 | Liu | Mar 2003 | A1 |
| 20030061592 | Agrawal et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
| 20030088839 | Watanabe | May 2003 | A1 |
| 20030088842 | Cirit | May 2003 | A1 |
| 20030103176 | Abe et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
| 20030106037 | Moniwa et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
| 20030117168 | Uneme et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
| 20030124847 | Houston et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
| 20030125917 | Rich et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
| 20030126569 | Rich et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
| 20030145288 | Wang et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
| 20030145299 | Fried et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
| 20030177465 | MacLean et al. | Sep 2003 | A1 |
| 20030185076 | Worley | Oct 2003 | A1 |
| 20030203287 | Miyagawa | Oct 2003 | A1 |
| 20030229868 | White et al. | Dec 2003 | A1 |
| 20030229875 | Smith et al. | Dec 2003 | A1 |
| 20040029372 | Jang et al. | Feb 2004 | A1 |
| 20040049754 | Liao et al. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
| 20040063038 | Shin et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
| 20040115539 | Broeke et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
| 20040139412 | Ito et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
| 20040145028 | Matsumoto et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
| 20040153979 | Chang | Aug 2004 | A1 |
| 20040161878 | Or-Bach et al. | Aug 2004 | A1 |
| 20040164360 | Nishida et al. | Aug 2004 | A1 |
| 20040169201 | Hidaka | Sep 2004 | A1 |
| 20040194050 | Hwang et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
| 20040196705 | Ishikura et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
| 20040229135 | Wang et al. | Nov 2004 | A1 |
| 20040232444 | Shimizu | Nov 2004 | A1 |
| 20040243966 | Dellinger | Dec 2004 | A1 |
| 20040262640 | Suga | Dec 2004 | A1 |
| 20050009312 | Butt et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
| 20050009344 | Hwang et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
| 20050012157 | Cho et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
| 20050044522 | Maeda | Feb 2005 | A1 |
| 20050055828 | Wang et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
| 20050076320 | Maeda | Apr 2005 | A1 |
| 20050087806 | Hokazono | Apr 2005 | A1 |
| 20050093147 | Tu | May 2005 | A1 |
| 20050101112 | Rueckes et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
| 20050110130 | Kitabayashi et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
| 20050135134 | Yen | Jun 2005 | A1 |
| 20050136340 | Baselmans et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
| 20050138598 | Kokubun | Jun 2005 | A1 |
| 20050156200 | Kinoshita | Jul 2005 | A1 |
| 20050185325 | Hur | Aug 2005 | A1 |
| 20050189604 | Gupta et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
| 20050189614 | Ihme et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
| 20050196685 | Wang et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
| 20050205894 | Sumikawa et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
| 20050212018 | Schoellkopf et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
| 20050224982 | Kemerling et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
| 20050229130 | Wu et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
| 20050251771 | Robles | Nov 2005 | A1 |
| 20050264320 | Chan et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
| 20050264324 | Nakazato | Dec 2005 | A1 |
| 20050266621 | Kim | Dec 2005 | A1 |
| 20050268256 | Tsai et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
| 20050278673 | Kawachi | Dec 2005 | A1 |
| 20050280031 | Yano | Dec 2005 | A1 |
| 20060036976 | Cohn | Feb 2006 | A1 |
| 20060038234 | Liaw | Feb 2006 | A1 |
| 20060063334 | Donze et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
| 20060070018 | Semmler | Mar 2006 | A1 |
| 20060084261 | Iwaki | Apr 2006 | A1 |
| 20060091550 | Shimazaki et al. | May 2006 | A1 |
| 20060095872 | McElvain | May 2006 | A1 |
| 20060101370 | Cui et al. | May 2006 | A1 |
| 20060112355 | Pileggi et al. | May 2006 | A1 |
| 20060113533 | Tamaki et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
| 20060113567 | Ohmori et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
| 20060120143 | Liaw | Jun 2006 | A1 |
| 20060121715 | Chang et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
| 20060123376 | Vogel et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
| 20060125024 | Ishigaki | Jun 2006 | A1 |
| 20060131609 | Kinoshita et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
| 20060136848 | Ichiryu | Jun 2006 | A1 |
| 20060146638 | Chang et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
| 20060151810 | Ohshige | Jul 2006 | A1 |
| 20060158270 | Gibet et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
| 20060170108 | Hiroi | Aug 2006 | A1 |
| 20060177744 | Bodendorf et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
| 20060181310 | Rhee | Aug 2006 | A1 |
| 20060195809 | Cohn et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
| 20060195810 | Morton | Aug 2006 | A1 |
| 20060197557 | Chung | Sep 2006 | A1 |
| 20060206854 | Barnes et al. | Sep 2006 | A1 |
| 20060223302 | Chang et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
| 20060248495 | Sezginer | Nov 2006 | A1 |
| 20060261417 | Suzuki | Nov 2006 | A1 |
| 20060277521 | Chen | Dec 2006 | A1 |
| 20070001304 | Liaw | Jan 2007 | A1 |
| 20070002617 | Houston | Jan 2007 | A1 |
| 20070004147 | Toubou | Jan 2007 | A1 |
| 20070007574 | Ohsawa | Jan 2007 | A1 |
| 20070038973 | Li et al. | Feb 2007 | A1 |
| 20070074145 | Tanaka | Mar 2007 | A1 |
| 20070094634 | Seizginer et al. | Apr 2007 | A1 |
| 20070101305 | Smith et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
| 20070105023 | Zhou et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
| 20070106971 | Lien et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
| 20070113216 | Zhang | May 2007 | A1 |
| 20070172770 | Witters et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
| 20070186196 | Tanaka | Aug 2007 | A1 |
| 20070196958 | Bhattacharya et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
| 20070209029 | Ivonin et al. | Sep 2007 | A1 |
| 20070210391 | Becker | Sep 2007 | A1 |
| 20070234252 | Visweswariah et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
| 20070234262 | Uedi et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
| 20070241810 | Onda | Oct 2007 | A1 |
| 20070251771 | Huang | Nov 2007 | A1 |
| 20070256039 | White | Nov 2007 | A1 |
| 20070257277 | Takeda et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
| 20070264758 | Correale | Nov 2007 | A1 |
| 20070274140 | Joshi et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
| 20070277129 | Allen et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
| 20070288882 | Kniffin et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
| 20070290361 | Chen | Dec 2007 | A1 |
| 20070294652 | Bowen | Dec 2007 | A1 |
| 20070297249 | Chang et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
| 20080001176 | Gopalakrishnan | Jan 2008 | A1 |
| 20080005712 | Charlebois et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
| 20080021689 | Yamashita et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
| 20080022247 | Kojima et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
| 20080046846 | Chew et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
| 20080081472 | Tanaka | Apr 2008 | A1 |
| 20080082952 | O'Brien | Apr 2008 | A1 |
| 20080086712 | Fujimoto | Apr 2008 | A1 |
| 20080097641 | Miyashita et al. | Apr 2008 | A1 |
| 20080098334 | Pileggi et al. | Apr 2008 | A1 |
| 20080098341 | Kobayashi et al. | Apr 2008 | A1 |
| 20080099795 | Bernstein et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
| 20080127000 | Majumder et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
| 20080127029 | Graur et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
| 20080134128 | Blatchford et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
| 20080144361 | Wong | Jun 2008 | A1 |
| 20080148216 | Chan et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
| 20080163141 | Scheffer et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
| 20080168406 | Rahmat et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
| 20080211028 | Suzuki | Sep 2008 | A1 |
| 20080216207 | Tsai | Sep 2008 | A1 |
| 20080244494 | McCullen | Oct 2008 | A1 |
| 20080251779 | Kakoschke et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
| 20080265290 | Nielsen et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
| 20080276105 | Hoberman et al. | Nov 2008 | A1 |
| 20080283910 | Dreeskornfeld et al. | Nov 2008 | A1 |
| 20080285331 | Torok | Nov 2008 | A1 |
| 20080308848 | Inaba | Dec 2008 | A1 |
| 20080308880 | Inaba | Dec 2008 | A1 |
| 20080315258 | Masuda et al. | Dec 2008 | A1 |
| 20090014811 | Becker et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
| 20090024974 | Yamada | Jan 2009 | A1 |
| 20090031261 | Smith et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
| 20090032898 | Becker | Feb 2009 | A1 |
| 20090032967 | Becker et al. | Feb 2009 | A1 |
| 20090037864 | Becker et al. | Feb 2009 | A1 |
| 20090057780 | Wong et al. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
| 20090075485 | Ban et al. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
| 20090077524 | Nagamura | Mar 2009 | A1 |
| 20090085067 | Hayashi et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
| 20090087991 | Yatsuda et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
| 20090101940 | Barrows et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
| 20090106714 | Culp et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
| 20090155990 | Yanagidaira et al. | Jun 2009 | A1 |
| 20090181314 | Shyu et al. | Jul 2009 | A1 |
| 20090187871 | Cork | Jul 2009 | A1 |
| 20090206443 | Juengling | Aug 2009 | A1 |
| 20090224408 | Fox | Sep 2009 | A1 |
| 20090228853 | Hong et al. | Sep 2009 | A1 |
| 20090228857 | Kornachuk et al. | Sep 2009 | A1 |
| 20090235215 | Lavin et al. | Sep 2009 | A1 |
| 20090273100 | Aton | Nov 2009 | A1 |
| 20090280582 | Thijs et al. | Nov 2009 | A1 |
| 20090283921 | Wang | Nov 2009 | A1 |
| 20090302372 | Chang et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
| 20090319977 | Saxena et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
| 20100001321 | Becker et al. | Jan 2010 | A1 |
| 20100006897 | Becker et al. | Jan 2010 | A1 |
| 20100006898 | Becker et al. | Jan 2010 | A1 |
| 20100006899 | Becker et al. | Jan 2010 | A1 |
| 20100006900 | Becker et al. | Jan 2010 | A1 |
| 20100006901 | Becker et al. | Jan 2010 | A1 |
| 20100006902 | Becker et al. | Jan 2010 | A1 |
| 20100006903 | Becker et al. | Jan 2010 | A1 |
| 20100006947 | Becker et al. | Jan 2010 | A1 |
| 20100006948 | Becker et al. | Jan 2010 | A1 |
| 20100006950 | Becker et al. | Jan 2010 | A1 |
| 20100006951 | Becker et al. | Jan 2010 | A1 |
| 20100006986 | Becker et al. | Jan 2010 | A1 |
| 20100011327 | Becker et al. | Jan 2010 | A1 |
| 20100011328 | Becker et al. | Jan 2010 | A1 |
| 20100011329 | Becker et al. | Jan 2010 | A1 |
| 20100011330 | Becker et al. | Jan 2010 | A1 |
| 20100011331 | Becker et al. | Jan 2010 | A1 |
| 20100011332 | Becker et al. | Jan 2010 | A1 |
| 20100011333 | Becker et al. | Jan 2010 | A1 |
| 20100012981 | Becker et al. | Jan 2010 | A1 |
| 20100012982 | Becker et al. | Jan 2010 | A1 |
| 20100012983 | Becker et al. | Jan 2010 | A1 |
| 20100012984 | Becker et al. | Jan 2010 | A1 |
| 20100012985 | Becker et al. | Jan 2010 | A1 |
| 20100012986 | Becker et al. | Jan 2010 | A1 |
| 20100017766 | Becker et al. | Jan 2010 | A1 |
| 20100017767 | Becker et al. | Jan 2010 | A1 |
| 20100017768 | Becker et al. | Jan 2010 | A1 |
| 20100017769 | Becker et al. | Jan 2010 | A1 |
| 20100017770 | Becker et al. | Jan 2010 | A1 |
| 20100017771 | Becker et al. | Jan 2010 | A1 |
| 20100017772 | Becker et al. | Jan 2010 | A1 |
| 20100019280 | Becker et al. | Jan 2010 | A1 |
| 20100019281 | Becker et al. | Jan 2010 | A1 |
| 20100019282 | Becker et al. | Jan 2010 | A1 |
| 20100019283 | Becker et al. | Jan 2010 | A1 |
| 20100019284 | Becker et al. | Jan 2010 | A1 |
| 20100019285 | Becker et al. | Jan 2010 | A1 |
| 20100019286 | Becker et al. | Jan 2010 | A1 |
| 20100019287 | Becker et al. | Jan 2010 | A1 |
| 20100019288 | Becker et al. | Jan 2010 | A1 |
| 20100019308 | Chan et al. | Jan 2010 | A1 |
| 20100023906 | Becker et al. | Jan 2010 | A1 |
| 20100023907 | Becker et al. | Jan 2010 | A1 |
| 20100023908 | Becker et al. | Jan 2010 | A1 |
| 20100023911 | Becker et al. | Jan 2010 | A1 |
| 20100025731 | Becker et al. | Feb 2010 | A1 |
| 20100025732 | Becker et al. | Feb 2010 | A1 |
| 20100025733 | Becker et al. | Feb 2010 | A1 |
| 20100025734 | Becker et al. | Feb 2010 | A1 |
| 20100025735 | Becker et al. | Feb 2010 | A1 |
| 20100025736 | Becker et al. | Feb 2010 | A1 |
| 20100032722 | Becker et al. | Feb 2010 | A1 |
| 20100032723 | Becker et al. | Feb 2010 | A1 |
| 20100032724 | Becker et al. | Feb 2010 | A1 |
| 20100032726 | Becker et al. | Feb 2010 | A1 |
| 20100037194 | Becker et al. | Feb 2010 | A1 |
| 20100037195 | Becker et al. | Feb 2010 | A1 |
| 20100096671 | Becker et al. | Apr 2010 | A1 |
| 20100115484 | Frederick | May 2010 | A1 |
| 20100203689 | Bernstein et al. | Aug 2010 | A1 |
| 20100224943 | Kawasaki | Sep 2010 | A1 |
| 20100229140 | Strolenberg et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
| 20100232212 | Anderson et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
| 20100252865 | Van Der Zanden | Oct 2010 | A1 |
| 20100252896 | Smayling | Oct 2010 | A1 |
| 20100264468 | Xu | Oct 2010 | A1 |
| 20100270681 | Bird et al. | Oct 2010 | A1 |
| 20100287518 | Becker | Nov 2010 | A1 |
| 20100301482 | Schultz et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
| 20110014786 | Sezginer | Jan 2011 | A1 |
| 20110016909 | Mirza et al. | Jan 2011 | A1 |
| 20110108890 | Becker et al. | May 2011 | A1 |
| 20110108891 | Becker et al. | May 2011 | A1 |
| 20110154281 | Zach | Jun 2011 | A1 |
| 20110207298 | Anderson et al. | Aug 2011 | A1 |
| 20110260253 | Inaba | Oct 2011 | A1 |
| 20110298025 | Haensch et al. | Dec 2011 | A1 |
| 20110317477 | Liaw | Dec 2011 | A1 |
| 20120012932 | Perng et al. | Jan 2012 | A1 |
| 20120118854 | Smayling | May 2012 | A1 |
| 20120131528 | Chen | May 2012 | A1 |
| 20120273841 | Quandt | Nov 2012 | A1 |
| 20130097574 | Balabanov et al. | Apr 2013 | A1 |
| 20130200465 | Becker et al. | Aug 2013 | A1 |
| 20130200469 | Becker et al. | Aug 2013 | A1 |
| 20130207198 | Becker et al. | Aug 2013 | A1 |
| 20130207199 | Becker et al. | Aug 2013 | A1 |
| 20130254732 | Kornachuk et al. | Sep 2013 | A1 |
| 20140197543 | Kornachuk et al. | Jul 2014 | A1 |
| 20150249041 | Becker et al. | Sep 2015 | A1 |
| 20150270218 | Becker et al. | Sep 2015 | A1 |
| Number | Date | Country |
|---|---|---|
| 0102644 | Jul 1989 | EP |
| 0788166 | Aug 1997 | EP |
| 1394858 | Mar 2004 | EP |
| 1670062 | Jun 2006 | EP |
| 1833091 | Aug 2007 | EP |
| 1730777 | Sep 2007 | EP |
| 2251901 | Nov 2010 | EP |
| 2860920 | Apr 2005 | FR |
| 58-182242 | Oct 1983 | JP |
| 58-215827 | Dec 1983 | JP |
| 61-182244 | Aug 1986 | JP |
| S63-310136 | Dec 1988 | JP |
| H01284115 | Nov 1989 | JP |
| 03-165061 | Jul 1991 | JP |
| H05152937 | Jun 1993 | JP |
| H05211437 | Aug 1993 | JP |
| H05218362 | Aug 1993 | JP |
| H07-153927 | Jun 1995 | JP |
| 2684980 | Jul 1995 | JP |
| 1995-302706 | Nov 1995 | JP |
| 1997-09289251 | Nov 1997 | JP |
| 10-116911 | May 1998 | JP |
| 1999-045948 | Feb 1999 | JP |
| 2001-068558 | Mar 2001 | JP |
| 2001-168707 | Jun 2001 | JP |
| 2002-026125 | Jan 2002 | JP |
| 2002-026296 | Jan 2002 | JP |
| 2002-184870 | Jun 2002 | JP |
| 2001-056463 | Sep 2002 | JP |
| 2002-258463 | Sep 2002 | JP |
| 2002-289703 | Oct 2002 | JP |
| 2001-272228 | Mar 2003 | JP |
| 2003-100872 | Apr 2003 | JP |
| 2003-264231 | Sep 2003 | JP |
| 2004-013920 | Jan 2004 | JP |
| 2004-200300 | Jul 2004 | JP |
| 2004-241529 | Aug 2004 | JP |
| 2004-342757 | Dec 2004 | JP |
| 2005-020008 | Jan 2005 | JP |
| 2003-359375 | May 2005 | JP |
| 2005-135971 | May 2005 | JP |
| 2005-149265 | Jun 2005 | JP |
| 2005-183793 | Jul 2005 | JP |
| 2005-203447 | Jul 2005 | JP |
| 2005-268610 | Sep 2005 | JP |
| 2006-073696 | Mar 2006 | JP |
| 2005-114752 | Oct 2006 | JP |
| 2006-303022 | Nov 2006 | JP |
| 2007-012855 | Jan 2007 | JP |
| 2007-013060 | Jan 2007 | JP |
| 2007-043049 | Feb 2007 | JP |
| 2007-141971 | Jun 2007 | JP |
| 2011-515841 | May 2011 | JP |
| 10-0417093 | Jun 1997 | KR |
| 10-1998-087485 | Dec 1998 | KR |
| 1998-0084215 | Dec 1998 | KR |
| 10-1999-0057943 | Jul 1999 | KR |
| 2000-0005660 | Jan 2000 | KR |
| 10-2000-0028830 | May 2000 | KR |
| 10-2002-0034313 | May 2002 | KR |
| 10-2002-0070777 | Sep 2002 | KR |
| 2003-0022006 | Mar 2003 | KR |
| 2004-0005609 | Jan 2004 | KR |
| 10-2005-0030347 | Mar 2005 | KR |
| 2005-0037965 | Apr 2005 | KR |
| 2006-0108233 | Oct 2006 | KR |
| 386288 | Apr 2000 | TW |
| 200709309 | Mar 2007 | TW |
| 200709565 | Mar 2007 | TW |
| 200811704 | Mar 2008 | TW |
| 200947567 | Nov 2009 | TW |
| WO 2005104356 | Nov 2005 | WO |
| WO 2006014849 | Feb 2006 | WO |
| WO 2006052738 | May 2006 | WO |
| WO 2006090445 | Aug 2006 | WO |
| WO 2007014053 | Feb 2007 | WO |
| WO 2007103587 | Sep 2007 | WO |
| Entry |
|---|
| U.S. Appl. No. 60/625,342, filed May 25, 2006, Pileggi et al. |
| Acar, et al., “A Linear-Centric Simulation Framework for Parametric Fluctuations”, 2002, IEEE, Carnegie Mellon University USA, pp. 1-8, Jan. 28, 2002. |
| Amazawa, et al., “Fully Planarized Four-Level Interconnection with Stacked VLAS Using CMP of Selective CVD-A1 and Insulator and its Application to Quarter Micron Gate Array LSIs”, 1995, IEEE, Japan, pp. 473-476, Dec. 10, 1995. |
| Axelrad et al. “Efficient Full-Chip Yield Analysis Methodology for OPC-Corrected VLSI Design”, 2000, International Symposium on Quality Electronic Design (ISQED), Mar. 20, 2000. |
| Balasinski et al. “Impact of Subwavelength CD Tolerance on Device Performance”, 2002, SPIE vol. 4692, Jul. 11, 2002. |
| Burkhardt, et al., “Dark Field Double Dipole Lithography (DDL) for Back-End-Of-Line Processes”, 2007, SPIE Proceeding Series, vol. 6520; Mar. 26, 2007. |
| Capetti, et al., “Sub k1 = 0.25 Lithography with Double Patterning Technique for 45nm Technology Node Flash Memory Devices at λ=193nm”, 2007, SPIE Proceeding Series, vol. 6520; Mar. 27, 2007. |
| Capodieci, L., et al., “Toward a Methodology for Manufacturability-Driven Design Rule Exploration,” DAC 2004, Jun. 7, 2004, San Diego, CA. |
| Chandra, et al., “An Interconnect Channel Design Methodology for High Performance Integrated Circuits”, 2004, IEEE, Carnegie Mellon University, pp. 16, Feb. 16, 2004. |
| Cheng, et al., “Feasibility Study of Splitting Pitch Technology on 45nm Contact Patterning with 0.93 NA”, 2007, SPIE Proceeding Series, vol. 6520; Feb. 25, 2007. |
| Chow, et al., “The Design of a SRAM-Based Field-Programmable Gate Array—Part II: Circuit Design and Layout”, 1999, IEEE, vol. 7 # 3 pp. 321-330, Sep. 1, 1999. |
| Clark et al. “Managing Standby and Active Mode Leakage Power in Deep Sub-Micron Design”, Aug. 9, 2004, ACM. |
| Cobb et al. “Using OPC to Optimize for Image Slope and Improve Process Window”, 2003, SPIE vol. 5130, Apr. 16, 2003. |
| Devgan “Leakage Issues in IC Design: Part 3”, 2003, ICCAD, Nov. 9, 2003. |
| DeVor, et al., “Statistical Quality Design and Control”, 1992, Macmillan Publishing Company, pp. 264-267, Jan. 3, 1992. |
| Dictionary.com, “channel,” in Collins English Dictionary—Complete & Unabridged 10th Edition. Source location: HarperCollins Publishers. Sep. 3, 2009. |
| Dusa, et al. “Pitch Doubling Through Dual Patterning Lithography Challenges in Integration and Litho Budgets”, 2007, SPIE Proceeding Series, vol. 6520; Feb. 25, 2007. |
| El-Gamal, “Fast, Cheap and Under Control: The Next Implementation Fabric”, Jun. 2, 2003, ACM Press, pp. 354-355. |
| Firedberg, et al., “Modeling Within-Field Gate Length Spatial Variation for Process-Design Co-Optimization,” 2005 Proc. of SPIE vol. 5756, pp. 178-188, Feb. 27, 2005. |
| Frankel, “Quantum State Control Interference Lithography and Trim Double Patterning for 32-16nm Lithography”, 2007, SPIE Proceeding Series, vol. 6520; Feb. 27, 2007. |
| Garg, et al. “ Lithography Driven Layout Design”, 2005, IEEE VLSI Design 2005, Jan. 3, 2005. |
| Grobman et al. “Reticle Enhancement Technology Trends: Resource and Manufacturability Implications for the Implementation of Physical Designs” Apr. 1, 2001, ACM. |
| Grobman et al. “Reticle Enhancement Technology: Implications and Challenges for Physical Design” Jun. 18, 2001, ACM. |
| Gupta et al. “ Enhanced Resist and Etch CD Control by Design Perturbation”, Oct. 4, 2006, Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers. |
| Gupta et al. “A Practical Transistor-Level Dual Threshold Voltage Assignment Methodology”, 2005, Sixth International Symposium on Quality Electronic Design (ISQED), Mar. 21, 2005. |
| Gupta et al. “Detailed Placement for Improved Depth of Focus and CD Control”, 2005, ACM, Jan. 18, 2005. |
| Gupta et al. “Joining the Design and Mask Flows for Better and Cheaper Masks”, Oct. 14, 2004, Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers. |
| Gupta et al. “Manufacturing-Aware Physical Design”, ICCAD 2003, Nov. 9, 2003. |
| Gupta et al. “Selective Gate-Length Biasing for Cost-Effective Runtime Leakage Control”, Jun. 7, 2004, ACM. |
| Gupta et al. “Wafer Topography-Aware Optical Proximity Correction for Better DOF Margin and CD Control”, Apr. 13, 2005, SPIE. |
| Gupta, Puneet, et al., “Manufacturing-aware Design Methodology for Assist Feature Correctness,” SPIE vol. 5756, May 13, 2005. |
| Ha et al., “Reduction in the Mask Error Factor by Optimizing the Diffraction Order of a Scattering Bar in Lithography,” Journal of the Korean Physical Society, vol. 46, No. 5, May 5, 2005, pp. 1213-1217. |
| Hakko, et al., “Extension of the 2D-TCC Technique to Optimize Mask Pattern Layouts,” 2008 Proc. of SPIE vol. 7028, 11 pages, Apr. 16, 2008. |
| Halpin et al., “Detailed Placement with Net Length Constraints,” Publication Year 2003, Proceedings of the 3rd IEEE International Workshop on System-on-Chip for Real-Time Applications, pp. 22-27, Jun. 30, 2003. |
| Hayashida, et al., “Manufacturable Local Interconnect technology Fully Compatible with Titanium Salicide Process”, Jun. 11, 1991, VMIC Conference. |
| Heng, et al., “A VLSI Artwork Legalization Technique Base on a New Criterion of Minimum Layout Perturbation”, Proceedings of 1997 International Symposium on Physical Design, pp. 116-121, Apr. 14, 1997. |
| Heng, et al., “Toward Through-Process Layout Quality Metrics”, Mar. 3, 2005, Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers. |
| Hu, et al., “Synthesis and Placement Flow for Gain-Based Programmable Regular Fabrics”, Apr. 6, 2003, ACM Press, pp. 197-203. |
| Hur et al., “Mongrel: Hybrid Techniques for Standard Cell Placement,” Publication Year 2000, IEEE/ACM International Conference on Computer Aided Design, ICCAD-2000, pp. 165-170, Nov. 5, 2000. |
| Hutton, et al., “A Methodology for FPGA to Structured-ASIC Synthesis and Verification”, 2006, EDAA, pp. 64-69, Mar. 6, 2006. |
| Intel Core Microarchitecture White Paper “Introducing the 45 nm Next-Generation Intel Core Microarchitecture,” Intel Corporation, 2007 (best available publication date). |
| Jayakumar, et al., “A Metal and VIA Maskset Programmable VLSI Design Methodology using PLAs”, 2004, IEEE, pp. 590-594, Nov. 7, 2004. |
| Jhaveri, T. et al., Maximization of Layout Printability/Manufacturability by Extreme Layout Regularity, Proc. of the SPIE vol. 6156, Feb. 19, 2006. |
| Kang, S.M., Metal-Metal Matrix (M3) for High-Speed MOS VLSI Layout, IEEE Trans. on CAD, vol. CAD-6, No. 5, Sep. 1, 1987. |
| Kawashima, et al., “Mask Optimization for Arbitrary Patterns with 2D-TCC Resolution Enhancement Technique,” 2008 Proc. of SPIE vol. 6924, 12 pages, Feb. 24, 2008. |
| Kheterpal, et al., “Design Methodology for IC Manufacturability Based on Regular Logic-Bricks”, DAC, Jun. 13, 2005, IEEE/AMC, vol. 6520. |
| Kheterpal, et al., “Routing Architecture Exploration for Regular Fabrics”, DAC, Jun. 7, 2004, ACM Press, pp. 204-207. |
| Kim, et al., “Double Exposure Using 193nm Negative Tone Photoresist”, 2007, SPIE Proceeding Series, vol. 6520; Feb. 25, 2007. |
| Kim, et al., “Issues and Challenges of Double Patterning Lithography in DRAM”, 2007, SPIE Proceeding Series, vol. 6520; Feb. 25, 2007. |
| Koorapaty, et al., “Exploring Logic Block Granularity for Regular Fabrics”, 2004, IEEE, pp. 1-6, Feb. 16, 2004. |
| Koorapaty, et al., “Heterogeneous Logic Block Architectures for Via-Patterned Programmable Fabric”, 13th International Conference on Field Programmable Logic and Applications (FPL) 2003, Lecture Notes in Computer Science (LNCS), Sep. 1, 2003, Springer-Verlag, vol. 2778, pp. 426-436. |
| Koorapaty, et al., “Modular, Fabric-Specific Synthesis for Programmable Architectures”, 12th International Conference on Field Programmable Logic and Applications (FPL—2002, Lecture Notes in Computer Science (LNCS)), Sep. 2, 2002, Springer-Verlag, vol. 2438 pp. 132-141. |
| Kuh et al., “Recent Advances in VLSI Layout,” Proceedings of the IEEE, vol. 78, Issue 2, pp. 237-263, Feb. 1, 1990. |
| Lavin et al. “Backend DAC Flows for ”Restrictive Design Rules“”, 2004, IEEE, Nov. 7, 2004. |
| Li, et al., “A Linear-Centric Modeling Approach to Harmonic Balance Analysis”, 2002, IEEE, pp. 1-6, Mar. 4, 2002. |
| Li, et al., “Nonlinear Distortion Analysis Via Linear-Centric Models”, 2003, IEEE, pp. 897-903, Jan. 21, 2003. |
| Liebmann et al., “Integrating DfM Components into a Cohesive Design-to-Silicon Solution,” Proc. SPIE 5756, Design and Process Integration for Microelectronic Manufacturing III, Feb. 27, 2005. |
| Liebmann et al., “Optimizing Style Options for Sub-Resolution Assist Features,” Proc. of SPIE vol. 4346, Feb. 25, 2001, pp. 141-152. |
| Liebmann, et al., “High-Performance Circuit Design for the RET-Enabled 65nm Technology Node”, Feb. 26, 2004, SPIE Proceeding Series, vol. 5379 pp. 20-29. |
| Liebmann, L. W., Layout Impact of Resolution Enhancement Techniques: Impediment or Opportunity?, International Symposium on Physical Design, Apr. 6, 2003. |
| Liu et al., “Double Patterning with Multilayer Hard Mask Shrinkage for Sub 0.25 k1 Lithography,” Proc. SPIE 6520, Optical Microlithography XX, Feb. 25, 2007. |
| Mansfield et al., “Lithographic Comparison of Assist Feature Design Strategies,” Proc. of SPIE vol. 4000, Feb. 27, 2000, pp. 63-76. |
| Miller, “Manufacturing-Aware Design Helps Boost IC Yield”, Sep. 9, 2004, http://www.eetimes.com/showArticle.jhtml?articlelD=47102054. |
| Mishra, P., et al., “FinFET Circuit Design,” Nanoelectronic Circuit Design, pp. 23-54, Dec. 21, 2010. |
| Mo, et al., “Checkerboard: A Regular Structure and its Synthesis, International Workshop on Logic and Synthesis”, Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Sciences, UC Berkeley, California, pp. 1-7, Jun. 1, 2003. |
| Mo, et al., “PLA-Based Regular Structures and Their Synthesis”, Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Sciences, IEEE, pp. 723-729, Jun. 1, 2003. |
| Mo, et al., “Regular Fabrics in Deep Sub-Micron Integrated-Circuit Design”, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Entire Book, Jun. 1, 2002. |
| Moore, Samuel K., “Intel 45-nanometer Penryn Processors Arrive,” Nov. 13, 2007, IEEE Spectrum, http://spectrum.ieee.org/semiconductors/design/intel45nanometer-penryn-processors-arrive. |
| Mutoh et al. “1-V Power Supply High-Speed Digital Circuit Technology with Multithreshold-Voltage CMOS”, 1995, IEEE, Aug. 1, 1995. |
| Op de Beek, et al., “Manufacturability issues with Double Patterning for 50nm half pitch damascene applications, using RELACS® shrink and corresponding OPC”, 2007, SPIE Proceeding Series, vol. 6520; Feb. 25, 2007. |
| Or-Bach, “Programmable Circuit Fabrics”, Sep. 18, 2001, c-ASIC, pp. 1-36. |
| Otten, et al., “Planning for Performance”, DAC 1998, ACM Inc., pp. 122-127, Jun. 15, 1998. |
| Pack et al. “Physical & Timing Verification of Subwavelength-Scale Designs-Part I: Lithography Impact on MOSFETs”, 2003, SPIE vol. 5042, Feb. 23, 2003. |
| Pandini, et al., “Congestion-Aware Logic Synthesis”, 2002, IEEE, pp. 1-8, Mar. 4, 2002. |
| Pandini, et al., “Understanding and Addressing the Impact of Wiring Congestion During Technology Mapping”, ISPD Apr. 7, 2002, ACM Press, pp. 131-136. |
| Patel, et al., “An Architectural Exploration of Via Patterned Gate Arrays, ISPD 2003”, Apr. 6, 2003, pp. 184-189. |
| Pham, D., et al., “FINFET Device Junction Forniation Challenges,” 2006 International Workshop on Junction Technology, pp. 73-77, Aug. 1, 2006. |
| Pileggi, et al., “Exploring Regular Fabrics to Optimize the Performance-Cost Trade-Offs, Proceedings of the 40th ACM/IEEE Design Automation Conference (DAC) 2003”, Jun. 2, 2003, ACM Press, pp. 782-787. |
| Poonawala, et al., “ILT for Double Exposure Lithography with Conventional and Novel Materials”, 2007, SPIE Proceeding Series, vol. 6520; Feb. 25, 2007. |
| Qian et al. “Advanced Physical Models for Mask Data Verification and Impacts on Physical Layout Synthesis” 2003 IEEE, Mar. 24, 2003. |
| Ran, et al., “An Integrated Design Flow for a Via-Configurable Gate Array”, 2004, IEEE, pp. 582-589, Nov. 7, 2004. |
| Ran, et al., “Designing a Via-Configurable Regular Fabric”, Custom Integrated Circuits Conference (CICC). Proceedings of the IEEE, Oct. 1, 2004, pp. 423-426. |
| Ran, et al., “On Designing Via-Configurable Cell Blocks for Regular Fabrics” Proceedings of the Design Automation Conference (DAC) 2004, Jun. 7, 2004, ACM Press, s 198-203. |
| Ran, et al., “The Magic of a Via-Configurable Regular Fabric”, Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Computer Design (ICCD) Oct. 11, 2004. |
| Ran, et al., “Via-Configurable Routing Architectures and Fast Design Mappability Estimation for Regular Fabrics”, 2005, IEEE, pp. 25-32, Sep. 1, 2006. |
| Reis, et al., “Physical Design Methodologies for Performance Predictability and Manufacturability”, Apr. 14, 2004, ACM Press, pp. 390-397. |
| Robertson, et al., “The Modeling of Double Patterning Lithographic Processes”, 2007, SPIE Proceeding Series, vol. 6520; Feb. 25, 2007. |
| Rosenbluth, et al., “Optimum Mask and Source Patterns to Print a Given Shape,” 2001 Proc. of SPIE vol. 4346, pp. 486-502, Feb. 25, 2001. |
| Rovner, “Design for Manufacturability in Via Programmable Gate Arrays”, May 1, 2003, Graduate School of Carnegie Mellon University. |
| Sengupta, “An Integrated CAD Framework Linking VLSI Layout Editors and Process Simulators”, 1998, Thesis for Rice University, pp. 1-101, Nov. 1, 1998. |
| Sengupta, et al., “An Integrated CAD Framework Linking VLSI Layout Editors and Process Simulators”, 1996, SPIE Proceeding Series, vol. 2726; pp. 244-252, Mar. 10, 1996. |
| Sherlekar, “Design Considerations for Regular Fabrics”, Apr. 18, 2004, ACM Press, pp. 97-102. |
| Shi et al., “Understanding the Forbidden Pitch and Assist Feature Placement,” Proc. of SPIE vol. 4562, pp. 968-979, Mar. 11, 2002. |
| Smayling et al., “APF Pitch Halving for 22 nm Logic Cells Using Gridded Design Rules,” Proceedings of SPIE, USA, vol. 6925, Jan. 1, 2008, pp. 69251E-1-69251E-7. |
| Socha, et al., “Simultaneous Source Mask Optimization (SMO),” 2005 Proc. of SPIE vol. 5853, pp. 180-193, Apr. 13, 2005. |
| Sreedhar et al. “ Statistical Yield Modeling for Sub-Wavelength Lithography”, 2008 IEEE, Oct. 28, 2008. |
| Stapper, “Modeling of Defects in Integrated Circuit Photolithographic Patterns”, Jul. 1, 1984, IBM, vol. 28 # 4, pp. 461-475. |
| Taylor, et al., “Enabling Energy Efficiency in Via-Patterned Gate Array Devices”, Jun. 7, 2004, ACM Press, pp. 874-877. |
| Tian et al. “Model-Based Dummy Feature Placement for Oxide Chemical—Mechanical Polishing Manufacturability” IEEE, vol. 20, Issue 7, Jul. 1, 2001. |
| Tong, et al., “Regular Logic Fabrics for a Via Patterned Gate Array (VPGA), Custom Integrated Circuits Conference”, Sep. 21, 2003, Proceedings of the IEEE, pp. 53-56. |
| Vanleenhove, et al., “A Litho-Only Approach to Double Patterning”, 2007, SPIE Proceeding Series, vol. 6520; Feb. 25, 2007. |
| Wang, et al., “Performance Optimization for Gridded-Layout Standard Cells”, vol. 5567 SPIE, Sep. 13, 2004. |
| Wang, J. et al., Standard Cell Layout with Regular Contact Placement, IEEE Trans. on Semicon. Mfg., vol. 17, No. 3, Aug. 9, 2004. |
| Webb, Clair, “45nm Design for Manufacturing,” Intel Technology Journal, vol. 12, Issue 02, Jun. 17, 2008, ISSN 1535-864X, pp. 121-130. |
| Webb, Clair, “Layout Rule Trends and Affect upon CPU Design”, vol. 6156 SPIE, Feb. 19, 2006. |
| Wenren, et al., “The Improvement of Photolithographic Fidelity of Two-dimensional Structures Though Double Exposure Method”, 2007, SPIE Proceeding Series, vol. 6520; Feb. 25, 2007. |
| Wilcox, et al., “Design for Manufacturability: A Key to Semiconductor Manufacturing Excellence”, 1998 IEEE, pp. 308-313, Sep. 23, 1998. |
| Wong, et al., “Resolution Enhancement Techniques and Design for Manufacturability: Containing and Accounting for Variabilities in Integrated Circuit Creation,” J. Micro/Nanolith. MEMS MOEMS, Sep. 27, 2007, vol. 6(3), 2 pages. |
| Wu, et al., “A Study of Process Window Capabilities for Two-dimensional Structures under Double Exposure Condition”, 2007, SPIE Proceeding Series, vol. 6520; Feb. 25, 2007. |
| Xiong, et al., “The Constrained Via Minimization Problem for PCB and VLSI Design”, 1988 ACM Press/IEEE, pp. 573-578, Jun. 12, 1998. |
| Yamamaoto, et al., “New Double Exposure Technique without Alternating Phase Shift Mask”, SPIE Proceeding Series, vol. 6520; Feb. 25, 2007. |
| Yamazoe, et al., “Resolution Enhancement by Aerial Image Approximation with 2D-TCC,” 2007 Proc. of SPIE vol. 6730, 12 pages, Sep. 17, 2007. |
| Yang, et al., “Interconnection Driven VLSI Module Placement Based on Quadratic Programming and Considering Congestion Using LFF Principles”, 2004 IEEE, pp. 1243-1247, Jun. 27, 2004. |
| Yao, et al., “Multilevel Routing With Redundant Via Insertion”, Oct. 23, 2006, IEEE, pp. 1148-1152. |
| Yu, et al., “True Process Variation Aware Optical Proximity Correction with Variational Lithography Modeling and Model Calibration,” J. Micro/Nanolith. MEMS MOEMS, Sep. 11, 2007, vol. 6(3), 16 pages. |
| Zheng, et al.“Modeling and Analysis of Regular Symmetrically Structured Power/Ground Distribution Networks”, DAC, Jun. 10, 2002, ACM Press, pp. 395-398. |
| Zhu, et al., “A Stochastic Integral Equation Method for Modeling the Rough Surface Effect on Interconnect Capacitance”, 2004 IEEE, Nov. 7, 2004. |
| Zhu, et al., “A Study of Double Exposure Process Design with Balanced Performance Parameters for Line/Space Applications”, 2007, SPIE Proceeding Series, vol. 6520; Feb. 25, 2007. |
| Zuchowski, et al., “A Hybrid ASIC and FPGA Architecture”, 2003 IEEE, pp. 187-194, Nov. 10, 2002. |
| Alam, Syed M. et al., “A Comprehensive Layout Methodology and Layout-Specific Circuit Analyses for Three-Dimensional Integrated Circuits,” Mar. 21, 2002. |
| Alam, Syed M. et al., “Layout-Specific Circuit Evaluation in 3-D Integrated Circuits,” May 1, 2003. |
| Aubusson, Russel, “Wafer-Scale Integration of Semiconductor Memory,” Apr. 1, 1979. |
| Bachtold, “Logic Circuits with Carbon,” Nov. 9, 2001. |
| Baker, R. Jacob, “CMOS: Circuit Design, Layout, and Simulation (2nd Edition),” Nov. 1, 2004. |
| Baldi et al., “A Scalable Single Poly EEPROM Cell for Embedded Memory Applications,” pp. 1-4, Fig. 1, Sep. 1, 1997. |
| Cao, Ke, “Design for Manufacturing (DFM) in Submicron VLSI Design,” Aug. 1, 2007. |
| Capodieci, Luigi, “From Optical Proximity Correction to Lithography-Driven Physical Design (1996-2006): 10 years of Resolution Enhancement Technology and the roadmap enablers for the next decade,” Proc. SPIE 6154, Optical Microlithography XIX, 615401, Mar. 20, 2006. |
| Chang, Leland et al., “Stable SRAM Cell Design for the 32 nm Node and Beyond,” Jun. 16, 2005. |
| Cheung, Peter, “Layout Design,” Apr. 4, 2004. |
| Chinnery, David, “Closing the Gap Between ASIC & Custom: Tools and Techniques for High-Performance ASIC Design,” Jun. 30, 2002. |
| Chou, Dyiann et al., “Line End Optimization through Optical Proximity Correction (OPC): A Case Study,” Feb. 19, 2006. |
| Clein, Dan, “CMOS IC Layout: Concepts, Methodologies, and Tools,” Dec. 22, 1999. |
| Cowell, “Exploiting Non-Uniform Access Time,” Jul. 1, 2003. |
| Das, Shamik, “Design Automation and Analysis of Three-Dimensional Integrated Circuits,” May 1, 2004. |
| Dehaene, W. et al., “Technology-Aware Design of SRAM Memory Circuits,” Mar. 1, 2007. |
| Deng, Liang et al., “Coupling-aware Dummy Metal Insertion for Lithography,” p. 1, col. 2, Jan. 23, 2007. |
| Devoivre et al., “Validated 90nm CMOS Technology Platform with Low-k Copper Interconnects for Advanced System-on-Chip (SoC),” Jul. 12, 2002. |
| Enbody, R. J., “Near-Optimal n-Layer Channel Routing,” Jun. 29, 1986. |
| Ferretti, Marcos et al., “High Performance Asynchronous ASIC Back-End Design Flow Using Single-Track Full-Buffer Standard Cells,” Apr. 23, 2004. |
| Garg, Manish et al., “Litho-driven Layouts for Reducing Performance Variability,” p. 2, Figs. 2b-2c, May 23, 2005. |
| Greenway, Robert et al., “32nm 1-D Regular Pitch SRAM Bitcell Design for Interference-Assisted Lithography,” Oct. 6, 2008. |
| Gupta et al., “Modeling Edge Placement Error Distribution in Standard Cell Library,” Feb. 23, 2006. |
| Grad, Johannes et al., “A standard cell library for student projects,” Proceedings of the 2003 IEEE International Conference on Microelectronic Systems Education, Jun. 2, 2003. |
| Hartono, Roy et al., “Active Device Generation for Automatic Analog Layout Retargeting Tool,” May 13, 2004. |
| Hartono, Roy et al., “IPRAIL—Intellectual Property Reuse-based Analog IC Layout Automation,” Mar. 17, 2003. |
| Hastings, Alan, “The Art of Analog Layout (2nd Edition),” Jul. 4, 2005. |
| Hurat et al., “A Genuine Design Manufacturability Check for Designers,” Feb. 19, 2006. |
| Institute of Microelectronic Systems, “Digital Subsystem Design,” Oct. 13, 2006. |
| Ishida, M. et al., “A Novel 6T-SRAM Cell Technology Designed with Rectangular Patterns Scalable beyond 0.18 pm Generation and Desirable for Ultra High Speed Operation,” IEDM 1998, Dec. 6, 1998. |
| Jakusovszky, “Linear IC Parasitic Element Simulation Methodology,” Oct. 1, 1993. |
| Jangkrajarng, Nuttorn et al., “Template-Based Parasitic-Aware Optimization and Retargeting of Analog and RF Integrated Circuit Layouts,” Nov. 5, 2006. |
| Kahng, Andrew B., “Design Optimizations DAC-2006 DFM Tutorial, part V),” Jul. 24, 2006. |
| Kang, Sung-Mo et al., “CMOS Digital Integrated Circuits Analysis & Design,” Oct. 29, 2002. |
| Kottoor, Mathew Francis, “Development of a Standard Cell Library based on Deep Sub-Micron SCMOS Design Rules using Open Source Software (MS Thesis),” Aug. 1, 2005. |
| Kubicki, “Intel 65nm and Beyond (or Below): TDF Day 2 Coverage (available at http://www.anandtech.com/show/1468/4),” Sep. 9, 2004. |
| Kuhn, Kelin J., “Reducing Variation in Advanced Logic Technologies: Approaches to Process and Design for Manufacturability of Nanoscale CMOS,” p. 27, Dec. 12, 2007. |
| Kurokawa, Atsushi et al., “Dummy Filling Methods for Reducing Interconnect Capacitance and No. of Fills, Proc. of ISQED,” pp. 586-591, Mar. 21, 2005. |
| Lavin, Mark, “Open Access Requirements from RDR Design Flows,” Nov. 11, 2004. |
| Liebmann, Lars et al., “Layout Methodology Impact of Resolution Enhancement Techniques,” pp. 5-6, Apr. 6, 2003. |
| Liebmann, Lars et al., “TCAD development for lithography resolution enhancement,” Sep. 1, 2001. |
| Lin, Chung-Wei et al., “Recent Research and Emerging Challenges in Physical Design for Manufacturability/Reliability,” Jan. 26, 2007. |
| McCullen, Kevin W., “Layout Techniques for Phase Correct and Gridded Wiring,” pp. 13, 17, Fig. 5, Dec. 1, 2006. |
| MOSIS, “Design Rules MOSIS Scalable Cmos (SCMOS) (Revision 8.00),” Oct. 4, 2004. |
| MOSIS, “MOSIS Scalable CMOS (SCMOS) Design Rules (Revision 7.2),” Jan. 1, 1995. |
| Muta et al., “Manufacturability-Aware Design of Standard Cells,” pp. 2686-2690, Figs. 3, 12, Dec. 1, 2007. |
| Na, Kee-Yeol et al., “A Novel Single Polysilicon EEPROM Cell With a Polyfinger Capacitor,” Nov. 30, 2007. |
| Pan et al., “Redundant Via Enhanced Maze Routing for Yield Improvement,” DAC 2005, Jan. 18, 2005. |
| Park, Tae Hong, “Characterization and Modeling of Pattern Dependencies in Copper Interconnects for Integrated Circuits,” Ph.D. Thesis, MIT, May 24, 2002. |
| Patel, Chetan, “An Architectural Exploration of Via Patterned Gate Arrays (CMU Master's Project),” May 1, 2003. |
| Pease, R. Fabian et al., “Lithography and Other Patterning Techniques for Future Electronics,” IEEE 2008, vol. 96, Issue 2, Jan. 16, 2008. |
| Serrano, Diego Emilio, Pontificia Universidad Javeriana Facultad De Ingenieria, Departamento De Electronica, “Diseño De Multiplicador 4×8 en VLSI, Introduccion al VLSI,” 2006 (best available publication date). |
| Pramanik, “Impact of layout on variability of devices for sub 90nm technologies,” 2004 (best available publication date). |
| Pramanik, Dipankar et al., “Lithography-driven layout of logic cells for 65-nm node (SPIE Proceedings vol. 5042),” Jul. 10, 2003. |
| Roy et al., “Extending Aggressive Low-K1 Design Rule Requirements for 90 and 65 Nm Nodes Via Simultaneous Optimization of Numerical Aperture, Illumination and Optical Proximity Correction,” J.Micro/Nanolith, MEMS MOEMS, 4(2), 023003, Apr. 26, 2005. |
| Saint, Christopher et al., “IC Layout Basics: A Practical Guide,” Chapter 3, Nov. 5, 2001. |
| Saint, Christopher et al., “IC Mask Design: Essential Layout Techniques,” May 24, 2002. |
| Scheffer, “Physical CAD Changes to Incorporate Design for Lithography and Manufacturability,” Feb. 4, 2004. |
| Smayling, Michael C., “Part 3: Test Structures, Test Chips, In-Line Metrology & Inspection,” Jul. 24, 2006. |
| Spence, Chris, “Full-Chip Lithography Simulation and Design Analysis: How OPC is changing IC Design, Emerging Lithographic Technologies IX,” May 6, 2005. |
| Subramaniam, Anupama R., “Design Rule Optimization of Regular layout for Leakage Reduction in Nanoscale Design,” pp. 474-478, Mar. 24, 2008. |
| Tang, C. W. et al., “A compact large signal model of Ldmos,” Solid-State Electronics 46(2002) 2111-2115, May 17, 2002. |
| Taylor, Brian et al., “Exact Combinatorial Optimization Methods for Physical Design of Regular Logic Bricks,” Jun. 8, 2007. |
| Tian, Ruiqi et al., “Dummy Feature Placement for Chemical-Mechanical Uniformity in a Shallow Trench Isolation Process,” IEEE Trans. on Computer-Aided Design of Integrated Circuits and Systems, vol. 21, No. 1, pp. 63-71, Jan. 1, 2002. |
| Tian, Ruiqi et al., “Proximity Dummy Feature Placement and Selective Via Sizing for Process Uniformity in a Trench-First-Via-Last Dual-Inlaid Metal Process,” Proc. of IITC, pp. 48-50, Jun. 6, 2001. |
| Torres, J. A. et al., “RET Compliant Cell Generation for sub-130nm Processes,” SPIE vol. 4692, Mar. 6, 2002. |
| Uyemura, John P., “Introduction to VLSI Circuits and Systems,” Chapters 2, 3, 5, and Part 3, Jul. 30, 2001. |
| Uyemura, John, “Chip Design for Submicron VLSI: CMOS Layout and Simulation,” Chapters 2-5, 7-9, Feb. 8, 2005. |
| Verhaegen et al., “Litho Enhancements for 45nm-nod MuGFETs,” Aug. 1, 2005. |
| Wong, Ban P., “Bridging the Gap between Dreams and Nano-Scale Reality (DAC-2006 DFM Tutorial),” Jul. 28, 2006. |
| Wang, Dunwei et al., “Complementary Symmetry Silicon Nanowire Logic: Power-Efficient Inverters with Gain,” Aug. 17, 2006. |
| Wang, Jun et al., “Effects of grid-placed contacts on circuit performance,” pp. 135-139, Figs. 2, 4-8, Feb. 28, 2003. |
| Wang, Jun et al., “Standard cell design with regularly placed contacts and gates (SPIE vol. 5379),” Feb. 22, 2004. |
| Wang, Jun et al., “Standard cell design with resolution-enhancement-techniquedriven regularly placed contacts and gates,” J. Micro/Nanolith, MEMS MOEMS, 4(1), 013001, Mar. 16, 2005. |
| Watson, Bruce, “Challenges and Automata Applications in Chip-Design Software,” pp. 38-40, Jul. 16, 2007. |
| Weste, Neil et al., “CMOS VLSI Design: A Circuits and Systems Perspective, 3rd Edition,” May 21, 2004. |
| Wingerden, Johannes van, “Experimental verification of improved printability for litho-driven designs,” Mar. 14, 2005. |
| Wong, Alfred K., “Microlithography: Trends, Challenges, Solutions, and Their Impact on Design,” Micro IEEE vol. 23, Issue 2, Apr. 29, 2003. |
| Xu, Gang, “Redundant-Via Enhanced Maze Routing for Yield Improvement,” Proceedings of ASP-DAC 2005, Jan. 18, 2005. |
| Yang, Jie, “Manufacturability Aware Design,” pp. 93, 102, Fig. 5.2, Jan. 16, 2008. |
| Yongshun, Wang et al., “Static Induction Devices with Planar Type Buried Gate,” Chinese Journal of Semiconductors, vol. 25, No. 2, Feb. 1, 2004. |
| Zobrist, George (editor), “Progress in Computer Aided VLSI Design: Implementations (Ch. 5),” Ablex Publishing Corporation, Feb. 1, 1990. |
| Petley, Graham, “VLSI and ASIC Technology Standard Cell Library Design,” from website www.vlsitechnology.org, Jan. 11, 2005. |
| Liebmann, Lars, et al., “Layout Optimization at the Pinnacle of Optical Lithography,” Design and Process Integration for Microelectronic Manufacturing II, Proceedings of SPIE vol. 5042, Jul. 8, 2003. |
| Kawasaki, H., et al., “Challenges Sram Cell and a Logic Circuit and Solutions of FinFET Integration in an for 22 nm node and beyond,” Electron Devices Meeting (IEDM), 2009 IEEE International, IEEE, Piscataway, NJ, USA, Dec. 7, 2009, pp. 1-4. |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 20160172375 A1 | Jun 2016 | US |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 61251279 | Oct 2009 | US |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Parent | 12904134 | Oct 2010 | US |
| Child | 14187171 | US |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Parent | 14187171 | Feb 2014 | US |
| Child | 15051532 | US |
