1. Field of the Invention
The present invention relates to methods and apparatuses for determining organic component concentrations in an electrolytic solution, and more specifically to determination of organic component concentrations in a copper electroplating solution.
2. Description of the Related Art
In electrochemical deposition (ECD) process, the rigorous control of the relative proportions of respective inorganic and organic ingredients in the ECD bath is critical to the achievement of satisfactory results in the rate of metal film formation and the quality of the film so formed. During the use of the plating bath solution, the plating process may be affected by depletion of inorganic components and organic additives as well as by organic byproduct formation. The ECD bath chemistry therefore must be maintained by periodic replacement of a part or the entire ECD bath. It is therefore important to continuously or periodically monitor the concentrations of inorganic and/or organic components in the ECD bath, and responsively add respective components to the bath to maintain the composition of the bath in an effective state for the electrochemical deposition operation.
It is therefore one object of the present invention to provide an improved method for measuring concentrations of one or more organic components in an ECD bath.
Other objects and advantages will be more fully apparent from the ensuring disclosure and appended claims.
The present invention in one aspect relates to a method for determining concentration of an organic component in a sample electrolytic solution. Such method comprises the steps of:
Another aspect of the present invention relates to an apparatus for measuring concentration of an organic component in a sample electrolytic solution, comprising:
Other aspects, features and embodiments of the present invention will be more fully apparent from the ensuing disclosure and appended claims.
The boundary between a measuring electrode and an electrolytic solution is called an interface. The electrolytic solution is a first phase in which charge is carried by the movement of ions, and the measuring electrode is a second phase in which charge is carried by the movements of electrons.
Two types of processes occur at the electrode-solution interface: (1) the faradaic process involves actual electron transfers between the measuring electrode and the electrolytic solution; and (2) the non-faradaic process involves adsorption and desorption of organic species onto and from the electrode surface where no charge actually cross the interface.
During non-faradaic process, although no charge actually cross the interface, external transient currents are present when the electrical potential, electrode surface area, or the composition of the electrolytic solution changes. These transient currents flow to charge or discharge the electrode-solution interfacial region, which is generally referred to as an electrical double layer.
The capacitance of such electrical double layer (Cd) is a function of the applied electrical potential (E), the composition and concentration of the electrolytic solution, and the active electrode surface area. When the applied electrical potential and the active electrode surface area are constant, the double layer capacitance is directly correlative to the composition and concentration of the electrolytic solution.
Therefore, the present invention in one aspect provides a method for measuring the organic additive (i.e., suppressors, accelerators, and levelers) concentrations in a metal electroplating solution, more preferably a copper electroplating solution, based on the double layer capacitance of a working electrode that is immersed in such metal electroplating solution.
Under a given initial electrical potential or potential step (E), the metal electroplating solution demonstrates a current response that is characterized by an initial current peak or maximum current (Imax) at initial time t0 and an exponentially decaying current (I) at subsequent time t, which are determined by:
where Rs is the electrical resistance of the electrolytic solution, and e is the base for natural exponential.
When t=RsCd, the current I has decreased to about 37% of the initial current peak, as follows:
I=Imax×e(−1)=0.368×Imax (III)
The value of RsCd is usually referred to as the time constant tc, which is characteristic to the given electrode-solution interface.
From equations (I)-(III), one can express the double layer capacitance Cd as:
Therefore, by measuring the current peak Imax, the time constant tc required for the current to decrease to about 37% of the current peak Imax, and the initial potential step E, the double layer capacitance Cd of the measuring electrode in the sample electroplating solution can be determined quantitatively.
The current response of an electrolytic solution can be monitored by using one or more measuring devices. For example, an ammeter can be used to directly measuring the current flow through the sample electrolytic solution over time; alternatively, a combination of one or more potentiometers and one or more ohmmeters can be used to measuring the real-time potential and electrical resistance of the sample electrolytic solution, from which the current flow can be calculated.
Preferably, one or more calibration solutions are provided for constructing a correlative data set, which empirically correlates the double layer capacitance with the concentration of an organic component of interest. Specifically, each calibration solution so provided is compositionally identical to the sample electroplating solution but for the concentration of the organic component of interest, and each calibration solution preferably contains said organic component of interest at a unique, known concentration. The double layer capacitance of each calibration solution is measured according to the method described hereinabove and used in conjunction with the respective known concentration of the organic component of interest in each calibration solution to form the correlative data set.
Such correlative data set can then be used for direct mapping of the concentration of the organic component of interest in the sample electroplating solution, based on the double layer capacitance measured for such sample electroplating solution.
Preferably, the present invention employs a computer-based quantitative analyzer, which may comprise a computer, central processor unit (CPU), microprocessor, integrated circuitry, operated and arranged to collect the current response data for determining the double layer capacitance of the sample solution and according to the method described hereinabove and for mapping the organic component concentration. More preferably, such quantitative analyzer has a correlative data set stored in its memory for direct concentration mapping based on the double layer capacitance measured for the sample solution. Alternatively, such quantitative analyzer comprises a capacitance-concentration correlation protocol for in situ construction of such a correlative data set based on current response data collected for various calibration solutions and the respective known organic component concentrations in such calibration solutions. The capacitance-concentration correlation protocol can be embodied in any suitable form, such as software operable in a general-purpose programmable digital computer. Alternatively, the protocol may be hard-wired in circuitry of a microelectronic computational module, embodied as firmware, or available on-line as an operational applet at an Internet site for concentration analysis.
Usage of double layer capacitance for determining organic component concentrations in the present invention is particularly advantageous for analysis of copper electroplating solutions. First, measurement of the double layer capacitance involves little or no reduction of the copper ions (Cu2+), because such measurement is carried out in a potential range that is lower than that required for Cu2+ reduction reaction, which protects the measuring electrode from being alloyed with the reduced copper and increases the useful life of the electrode. Further, since measurement of the double layer capacitance does not involve copper deposition, the organic additives contained in the sample electrolytic solution are not consumed, and the concentration of such organic additives in the electrolyte solution throughout the measurement cycles remains constant, therefore significantly increasing the reproducibility of the measurement results.
An initial potential step (E) of about −0.208V is applied to each of the above-listed electrolytic solutions, and the current response curves of the electrolytic solutions under such initial potential step are obtained.
The current peak (Imax) and the time constant (tc) required for the current (I) to drop from the peak value to about 37% of the peak value can be directly read from such current response curves, and from which the double layer capacitance (Cd) can be calculated, according to equation (IV) provided hereinabove.
Following is a table listing the measurements obtained from the current response curves shown in
Among the three organic additives tested, the suppressor as added into solution (2) has the greatest impact on the double layer capacitance, and the leveler as added into solution (4) has the least impact at the given concentration. Therefore, different organic additives have relatively different impact on the double layer capacitance, which can be used for distinguishing said organic components from one another.
While the invention has been described herein with reference to specific aspects, features and embodiments, it will be recognized that the invention is not thus limited, but rather extends to and encompasses other variations, modifications and alternative embodiments. Accordingly, the invention is intended to be broadly interpreted and construed to encompass all such other variations, modifications, and alternative embodiments, as being within the scope and spirit of the invention as hereinafter claimed.
This application is a divisional application of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/833,194, entitled “Methods For Determining Organic Component Concentrations In An Electrolytic Solution”, filed on Apr. 27, 2004, and issued as U.S. Pat. No. 6,984,299 on Jan. 10, 2006.
| Number | Name | Date | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2707166 | Brown et al. | Apr 1955 | A |
| 2707167 | Hoover et al. | Apr 1955 | A |
| 2830014 | Gundel et al. | Apr 1958 | A |
| 2884366 | Anderson et al. | Apr 1959 | A |
| 2898282 | Flook, Jr. et al. | Aug 1959 | A |
| 3101305 | Roth et al. | Aug 1963 | A |
| 3276979 | Strauss et al. | Oct 1966 | A |
| 3288690 | Creutz et al. | Nov 1966 | A |
| 3655534 | Kampe | Apr 1972 | A |
| 3725220 | Kessler | Apr 1973 | A |
| 3798138 | Ostrow et al. | Mar 1974 | A |
| 3883414 | Fujinaga et al. | May 1975 | A |
| 3910830 | Mayse | Oct 1975 | A |
| 3950234 | Faulkner et al. | Apr 1976 | A |
| 3972789 | Eppensteiner et al. | Aug 1976 | A |
| 3996124 | Eaton et al. | Dec 1976 | A |
| 4038161 | Eckles et al. | Jul 1977 | A |
| 4071429 | Wagenknecht et al. | Jan 1978 | A |
| 4119532 | Park | Oct 1978 | A |
| 4132605 | Tench et al. | Jan 1979 | A |
| 4260950 | Hadden et al. | Apr 1981 | A |
| 4305039 | Steuernagel et al. | Dec 1981 | A |
| 4317002 | Spicer | Feb 1982 | A |
| 4388165 | Koshiishi et al. | Jun 1983 | A |
| 4496454 | Berger | Jan 1985 | A |
| 4498039 | Galwey et al. | Feb 1985 | A |
| 4529495 | Marsoner | Jul 1985 | A |
| 4568445 | Cates et al. | Feb 1986 | A |
| 4589958 | Alexander et al. | May 1986 | A |
| 4595462 | Vangaever et al. | Jun 1986 | A |
| 4707378 | McBride et al. | Nov 1987 | A |
| 4772375 | Wullschleger et al. | Sep 1988 | A |
| 4812210 | Bonivert et al. | Mar 1989 | A |
| 4849330 | Humphries et al. | Jul 1989 | A |
| 4917774 | Fisher | Apr 1990 | A |
| 4917777 | Fisher | Apr 1990 | A |
| 5017860 | Germer et al. | May 1991 | A |
| 5074157 | Marsoner et al. | Dec 1991 | A |
| 5131999 | Gunasingham | Jul 1992 | A |
| 5162077 | Bryan et al. | Nov 1992 | A |
| 5192403 | Chang et al. | Mar 1993 | A |
| 5223118 | Sonnenberg et al. | Jun 1993 | A |
| 5268087 | Lu | Dec 1993 | A |
| 5288387 | Ito et al. | Feb 1994 | A |
| 5296123 | Reddy et al. | Mar 1994 | A |
| 5316649 | Kronberg | May 1994 | A |
| 5320721 | Ludwig et al. | Jun 1994 | A |
| 5325038 | Banzai et al. | Jun 1994 | A |
| 5352350 | Andricacos et al. | Oct 1994 | A |
| 5404018 | Yasuda et al. | Apr 1995 | A |
| 5447802 | Tobiyama et al. | Sep 1995 | A |
| 5462645 | Albery et al. | Oct 1995 | A |
| 5612698 | Reay | Mar 1997 | A |
| 5635043 | Turyan et al. | Jun 1997 | A |
| 6022470 | Yarnitzky | Feb 2000 | A |
| 6210640 | Ruth et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
| 6231743 | Etherington | May 2001 | B1 |
| 6254760 | Shen et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
| 6270651 | Essalik et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
| 6280602 | Robertson | Aug 2001 | B1 |
| 6288783 | Auad | Sep 2001 | B1 |
| 6365033 | Graham et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
| 6366794 | Moussy et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
| 6395152 | Wang | May 2002 | B1 |
| 6409903 | Chung et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
| 6458262 | Reid | Oct 2002 | B1 |
| 6459011 | Tarr et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
| 6478950 | Peat et al. | Nov 2002 | B1 |
| 6495011 | Robertson | Dec 2002 | B2 |
| 6558519 | Dodgson et al. | May 2003 | B1 |
| 6569307 | Blachier et al. | May 2003 | B2 |
| 6572753 | Chalyt et al. | Jun 2003 | B2 |
| 6592737 | Robertson | Jul 2003 | B1 |
| 6645364 | Calvert et al. | Nov 2003 | B2 |
| 6673226 | Kogan et al. | Jan 2004 | B1 |
| 6709568 | Han et al. | Mar 2004 | B2 |
| 6758955 | Robertson | Jul 2004 | B2 |
| 6758960 | Robertson | Jul 2004 | B1 |
| 6808611 | Sun et al. | Oct 2004 | B2 |
| 6827839 | Sonnenberg et al. | Dec 2004 | B2 |
| 6974531 | Andricacos et al. | Dec 2005 | B2 |
| 6984299 | Han et al. | Jan 2006 | B2 |
| 7022215 | Schomburg | Apr 2006 | B2 |
| 7094323 | King et al. | Aug 2006 | B2 |
| 20020070708 | Wu | Jun 2002 | A1 |
| 20030080000 | Robertson | May 2003 | A1 |
| 20040040842 | King et al. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
| 20040055888 | Wikiel et al. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
| 20040065561 | Chalyt et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
| 20050016847 | Buehler | Jan 2005 | A1 |
| 20050067304 | King et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
| 20050109624 | King et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
| 20050224370 | Liu et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
| 20050241948 | Han et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
| 20050247576 | Tom et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
| 20060266648 | King et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
| Number | Date | Country |
|---|---|---|
| 19911447 | Dec 2000 | DE |
| 0 302 009 | Jul 1988 | EP |
| 2001-073183 | Mar 2001 | JP |
| WO - 0129548 | Apr 2001 | WO |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 20060102475 A1 | May 2006 | US |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Parent | 10833194 | Apr 2004 | US |
| Child | 11318129 | US |