The present disclosure generally relates to semiconductor devices and, more particularly, to bipolar junction transistors (BJTs) and related methods.
Structures and techniques have been proposed to enhance the performance of semiconductor devices, such as by enhancing the mobility of the charge carriers. For example, U.S. Patent Application No. 2003/0057416 to Currie et al. discloses strained material layers of silicon, silicon-germanium, and relaxed silicon and also including impurity-free zones that would otherwise cause performance degradation. The resulting biaxial strain in the upper silicon layer alters the carrier mobilities enabling higher speed and/or lower power devices. Published U.S. Patent Application No. 2003/0034529 to Fitzgerald et al. discloses a CMOS inverter also based upon similar strained silicon technology.
U.S. Pat. No. 6,472,685 B2 to Takagi discloses a semiconductor device including a silicon and carbon layer sandwiched between silicon layers so that the conduction band and valence band of the second silicon layer receive a tensile strain. Electrons having a smaller effective mass, and which have been induced by an electric field applied to the gate electrode, are confined in the second silicon layer, thus, an n-channel MOSFET is asserted to have a higher mobility.
U.S. Pat. No. 4,937,204 to Ishibashi et al. discloses a superlattice in which a plurality of layers, less than eight monolayers, and containing a fractional or binary or a binary compound semiconductor layer, are alternately and epitaxially grown. The direction of main current flow is perpendicular to the layers of the superlattice.
U.S. Pat. No. 5,357,119 to Wang et al. discloses a Si—Ge short period superlattice with higher mobility achieved by reducing alloy scattering in the superlattice. Along these lines, U.S. Pat. No. 5,683,934 to Candelaria discloses an enhanced mobility MOSFET including a channel layer comprising an alloy of silicon and a second material substitutionally present in the silicon lattice at a percentage that places the channel layer under tensile stress.
U.S. Pat. No. 5,216,262 to Tsu discloses a quantum well structure comprising two barrier regions and a thin epitaxially grown semiconductor layer sandwiched between the barriers. Each barrier region consists of alternate layers of SiO2/Si with a thickness generally in a range of two to six monolayers. A much thicker section of silicon is sandwiched between the barriers.
An article entitled “Phenomena in silicon nanostructure devices” also to Tsu and published online Sep. 6, 2000 by Applied Physics and Materials Science & Processing, pp. 391-402 discloses a semiconductor-atomic superlattice (SAS) of silicon and oxygen. The Si/O superlattice is disclosed as useful in a silicon quantum and light-emitting devices. In particular, a green electroluminescence diode structure was constructed and tested. Current flow in the diode structure is vertical, that is, perpendicular to the layers of the SAS. The disclosed SAS may include semiconductor layers separated by adsorbed species such as oxygen atoms, and CO molecules. The silicon growth beyond the adsorbed monolayer of oxygen is described as epitaxial with a fairly low defect density. One SAS structure included a 1.1 nm thick silicon portion that is about eight atomic layers of silicon, and another structure had twice this thickness of silicon. An article to Luo et al. entitled “Chemical Design of Direct-Gap Light-Emitting Silicon” published in Physical Review Letters, Vol. 89, No. 7 (Aug. 12, 2002) further discusses the light emitting SAS structures of Tsu.
U.S. Pat. No. 7,105,895 to Wang et al. discloses a barrier building block of thin silicon and oxygen, carbon, nitrogen, phosphorous, antimony, arsenic or hydrogen to thereby reduce current flowing vertically through the lattice more than four orders of magnitude. The insulating layer/barrier layer allows for low defect epitaxial silicon to be deposited next to the insulating layer.
Published Great Britain Patent Application 2,347,520 to Mears et al. discloses that principles of Aperiodic Photonic Band-Gap (APBG) structures may be adapted for electronic bandgap engineering. In particular, the application discloses that material parameters, for example, the location of band minima, effective mass, etc., can be tailored to yield new aperiodic materials with desirable band-structure characteristics. Other parameters, such as electrical conductivity, thermal conductivity and dielectric permittivity or magnetic permeability are disclosed as also possible to be designed into the material.
Furthermore, U.S. Pat. No. 6,376,337 to Wang et al. discloses a method for producing an insulating or barrier layer for semiconductor devices which includes depositing a layer of silicon and at least one additional element on the silicon substrate whereby the deposited layer is substantially free of defects such that epitaxial silicon substantially free of defects can be deposited on the deposited layer. Alternatively, a monolayer of one or more elements, preferably comprising oxygen, is absorbed on a silicon substrate. A plurality of insulating layers sandwiched between epitaxial silicon forms a barrier composite.
Despite the existence of such approaches, further enhancements may be desirable for using advanced semiconductor materials and processing techniques to achieve improved performance in semiconductor devices.
A method for making a bipolar junction transistor (BJT) may include forming a first superlattice on a substrate defining a collector region therein. The first superlattice may include a plurality of stacked groups of first layers, with each group of first layers including a first plurality of stacked base semiconductor monolayers defining a first base semiconductor portion, and at least one first non-semiconductor monolayer constrained within a crystal lattice of adjacent first base semiconductor portions. The method may further include forming a base on the first superlattice, and forming a second superlattice on the base comprising a second plurality of stacked groups of second layers, with each group of second layers comprising a plurality of stacked base semiconductor monolayers defining a second base semiconductor portion, and at least one second non-semiconductor monolayer constrained within a crystal lattice of adjacent second base semiconductor portions. The method may also include forming an emitter on the second superlattice.
In an example embodiment, the substrate may further define a sub-collector region below the collector region, and the method may further include forming a third superlattice in the substrate between the sub-collector region and the collector region. More particularly, the third superlattice may include a third plurality of stacked groups of third layers, each group of third layers comprising a third plurality of stacked base semiconductor monolayers defining a third base semiconductor portion, and at least one third non-semiconductor monolayer constrained within a crystal lattice of adjacent third base semiconductor portions.
The method may further include forming an emitter contact on an upper surface of the emitter, as well as forming a base contact on at least a portion of the base. The method may also include forming spaced apart isolation regions in the substrate. Furthermore, the emitter and the collector may have a first conductivity type, and the base may have a second conductivity type different than the first conductivity type.
In one example embodiment, the respective base semiconductor monolayers of the first and second superlattices may comprise silicon monolayers. In accordance with another example, the respective base semiconductor monolayers of the first and second superlattices may comprise germanium. Also by way of example, the respective at least one non-semiconductor monolayer of the first and second superlattices may comprise at least one of oxygen, nitrogen, fluorine, carbon and carbon-oxygen.
Example embodiments will now be described more fully hereinafter with reference to the accompanying drawings, in which the example embodiments are shown. The embodiments may, however, be implemented in many different forms and should not be construed as limited to the specific examples set forth herein. Rather, these embodiments are provided so that this disclosure will be thorough and complete. Like numbers refer to like elements throughout, and prime and multiple prime notation are used to indicate similar elements in different embodiments.
Generally speaking, the present disclosure relates to Bipolar Junction Transistors (BJTs) having an enhanced semiconductor superlattice therein to provide dopant blocking and performance enhancement characteristics. The enhanced semiconductor superlattice may also be referred to as an “MST” layer or “MST technology” in this disclosure.
More particularly, the MST technology relates to advanced semiconductor materials such as the superlattice 25 described further below. Applicant theorizes, without wishing to be bound thereto, that certain superlattices as described herein reduce the effective mass of charge carriers and that this thereby leads to higher charge carrier mobility. Effective mass is described with various definitions in the literature. As a measure of the improvement in effective mass Applicants use a “conductivity reciprocal effective mass tensor”, Me−1 and Mh−1 for electrons and holes respectively, defined as:
for electrons and:
for holes, where f is the Fermi-Dirac distribution, EF is the Fermi energy, T is the temperature, E(k,n) is the energy of an electron in the state corresponding to wave vector k and the nth energy band, the indices i and j refer to Cartesian coordinates x, y and z, the integrals are taken over the Brillouin zone (B.Z.), and the summations are taken over bands with energies above and below the Fermi energy for electrons and holes respectively.
Applicant's definition of the conductivity reciprocal effective mass tensor is such that a tensorial component of the conductivity of the material is greater for greater values of the corresponding component of the conductivity reciprocal effective mass tensor. Again Applicant theorizes without wishing to be bound thereto that the superlattices described herein set the values of the conductivity reciprocal effective mass tensor so as to enhance the conductive properties of the material, such as typically for a preferred direction of charge carrier transport. The inverse of the appropriate tensor element is referred to as the conductivity effective mass. In other words, to characterize semiconductor material structures, the conductivity effective mass for electrons/holes as described above and calculated in the direction of intended carrier transport is used to distinguish improved materials.
Applicant has identified improved materials or structures for use in semiconductor devices. More specifically, Applicant has identified materials or structures having energy band structures for which the appropriate conductivity effective masses for electrons and/or holes are substantially less than the corresponding values for silicon. In addition to the enhanced mobility characteristics of these structures, they may also be formed or used in such a manner that they provide piezoelectric, pyroelectric, and/or ferroelectric properties that are advantageous for use in a variety of different types of devices, as will be discussed further below.
Referring now to
Each group of layers 45a-45n of the superlattice 25 illustratively includes a plurality of stacked base semiconductor monolayers 46 defining a respective base semiconductor portion 46a-46n and an energy band-modifying layer 50 thereon. The energy band-modifying layers 50 are indicated by stippling in
The energy band-modifying layer 50 illustratively includes one non-semiconductor monolayer constrained within a crystal lattice of adjacent base semiconductor portions. By “constrained within a crystal lattice of adjacent base semiconductor portions” it is meant that at least some semiconductor atoms from opposing base semiconductor portions 46a-46n are chemically bound together through the non-semiconductor monolayer 50 therebetween, as seen in
In other embodiments, more than one such non-semiconductor monolayer may be possible. It should be noted that reference herein to a non-semiconductor or semiconductor monolayer means that the material used for the monolayer would be a non-semiconductor or semiconductor if formed in bulk. That is, a single monolayer of a material, such as silicon, may not necessarily exhibit the same properties that it would if formed in bulk or in a relatively thick layer, as will be appreciated by those skilled in the art.
Applicant theorizes without wishing to be bound thereto that energy band-modifying layers 50 and adjacent base semiconductor portions 46a-46n cause the superlattice 25 to have a lower appropriate conductivity effective mass for the charge carriers in the parallel layer direction than would otherwise be present. Considered another way, this parallel direction is orthogonal to the stacking direction. The band modifying layers 50 may also cause the superlattice 25 to have a common energy band structure, while also advantageously functioning as an insulator between layers or regions vertically above and below the superlattice.
Moreover, this superlattice structure may also advantageously act as a barrier to dopant and/or material diffusion between layers vertically above and below the superlattice 25. These properties may thus advantageously allow the superlattice 25 to provide an interface for high-K dielectrics which not only reduces diffusion of the high-K material into the channel region, but which may also advantageously reduce unwanted scattering effects and improve device mobility, as will be appreciated by those skilled in the art.
It is also theorized that semiconductor devices including the superlattice 25 may enjoy a higher charge carrier mobility based upon the lower conductivity effective mass than would otherwise be present. In some embodiments, and as a result of the band engineering achieved by the present invention, the superlattice 25 may further have a substantially direct energy bandgap that may be particularly advantageous for opto-electronic devices, for example.
The superlattice 25 also illustratively includes a cap layer 52 on an upper layer group 45n. The cap layer 52 may comprise a plurality of base semiconductor monolayers 46. The cap layer 52 may have between 2 to 100 monolayers of the base semiconductor, and, more preferably between 10 to 50 monolayers.
Each base semiconductor portion 46a-46n may comprise a base semiconductor selected from the group consisting of Group IV semiconductors, Group III-V semiconductors, and Group II-VI semiconductors. Of course, the term Group IV semiconductors also includes Group IV-IV semiconductors, as will be appreciated by those skilled in the art. More particularly, the base semiconductor may comprise at least one of silicon and germanium, for example.
Each energy band-modifying layer 50 may comprise a non-semiconductor selected from the group consisting of oxygen, nitrogen, fluorine, carbon and carbon-oxygen, for example. The non-semiconductor is also desirably thermally stable through deposition of a next layer to thereby facilitate manufacturing. In other embodiments, the non-semiconductor may be another inorganic or organic element or compound that is compatible with the given semiconductor processing as will be appreciated by those skilled in the art. More particularly, the base semiconductor may comprise at least one of silicon and germanium, for example
It should be noted that the term monolayer is meant to include a single atomic layer and also a single molecular layer. It is also noted that the energy band-modifying layer 50 provided by a single monolayer is also meant to include a monolayer wherein not all of the possible sites are occupied (i.e., there is less than full or 100% coverage). For example, with particular reference to the atomic diagram of
In other embodiments and/or with different materials this one-half occupation would not necessarily be the case as will be appreciated by those skilled in the art. Indeed it can be seen even in this schematic diagram, that individual atoms of oxygen in a given monolayer are not precisely aligned along a flat plane as will also be appreciated by those of skill in the art of atomic deposition. By way of example, a preferred occupation range is from about one-eighth to one-half of the possible oxygen sites being full, although other numbers may be used in certain embodiments.
Silicon and oxygen are currently widely used in conventional semiconductor processing, and, hence, manufacturers will be readily able to use these materials as described herein. Atomic or monolayer deposition is also now widely used. Accordingly, semiconductor devices incorporating the superlattice 25 in accordance with the invention may be readily adopted and implemented, as will be appreciated by those skilled in the art.
It is theorized without Applicant wishing to be bound thereto that for a superlattice, such as the Si/O superlattice, for example, that the number of silicon monolayers should desirably be seven or less so that the energy band of the superlattice is common or relatively uniform throughout to achieve the desired advantages. The 4/1 repeating structure shown in
While such a directionally preferential feature may be desired in certain semiconductor devices, other devices may benefit from a more uniform increase in mobility in any direction parallel to the groups of layers. It may also be beneficial to have an increased mobility for both electrons and holes, or just one of these types of charge carriers as will be appreciated by those skilled in the art.
The lower conductivity effective mass for the 4/1 Si/O embodiment of the superlattice 25 may be less than two-thirds the conductivity effective mass than would otherwise occur, and this applies for both electrons and holes. Of course, the superlattice 25 may further comprise at least one type of conductivity dopant therein, as will also be appreciated by those skilled in the art.
Indeed, referring now additionally to
In some device embodiments, all of the base semiconductor portions of a superlattice may be a same number of monolayers thick. In other embodiments, at least some of the base semiconductor portions may be a different number of monolayers thick. In still other embodiments, all of the base semiconductor portions may be a different number of monolayers thick.
In
It can be seen that the conduction band minimum for the 4/1 Si/O structure is located at the gamma point in contrast to bulk silicon (Si), whereas the valence band minimum occurs at the edge of the Brillouin zone in the (001) direction which we refer to as the Z point. One may also note the greater curvature of the conduction band minimum for the 4/1 Si/O structure compared to the curvature of the conduction band minimum for Si owing to the band splitting due to the perturbation introduced by the additional oxygen layer.
Although increased curvature is an indication of reduced effective mass, the appropriate comparison and discrimination may be made via the conductivity reciprocal effective mass tensor calculation. This leads Applicant to further theorize that the 5/1/3/1 superlattice 25′ should be substantially direct bandgap. As will be understood by those skilled in the art, the appropriate matrix element for optical transition is another indicator of the distinction between direct and indirect bandgap behavior.
Referring now to
In the present example, a BJT 120 illustratively includes a substrate 121 (e.g., a silicon substrate) including spaced apart shallow trench isolation (STI) regions 122 (e.g., SiO2) therein. In the case of an NPN configuration, the substrate 121 may be doped with an N-type dopant (e.g., phosphorus, arsenic, etc.) to define a collector region 123 for the BJT 120. It should be noted that in some embodiments the collector dopant may be further distributed throughout the substrate 121 and not concentrated in a given location as shown in
An emitter 131 is positioned on the second superlattice 125b such that the second superlattice separates the emitter from the base 130. The emitter 130 may comprise a semiconductor (e.g., Si, Ge, or SiGe), and it is defined by adjacent spacers 132, 133 (e.g., nitride) and insulating regions 134 (e.g., oxide). The emitter 131 has an opposite conductivity type from the base 130, e.g., N+ in the example NPN configuration. An emitter contact 135 (e.g., silicide) overlies the emitter 130. Moreover, lower and upper extrinsic base regions 136, 137 are laterally outside of the emitter 130, and the lower extrinsic base region is positioned on the outer ends of the second superlattice 125b. The lower and upper extrinsic base regions 136, 137 may also comprise a semiconductor (e.g., Si, Ge, or SiGe) and have a similar doping profile to the base 130 (P+ in the present example). A base contact 138 (e.g., silicide) overlies the extrinsic base regions 136, 137, and contacts outer ends of the second superlattice 125b and base 130, as shown.
In typical BJT devices, the highly concentrated doping in the base results in diffusion of the base dopant into the collector, which degrades performance through widening of the base. However, in the BJT 120, the second superlattice 125b is advantageously positioned to block the dopants from the highly doped base 130 from diffusing into the collector 131, and thereby degrading performance from the widened base. Moreover, the first superlattice 125a is advantageously positioned to block interstitial injection during oxide growth that is performed during device fabrication, thereby also reducing dopant diffusion from the base 130 to the collector 123.
The foregoing dopant retention properties will be further understood with reference to the graphs 160 and 170 of
By way of contrast, the use of carbon doping in typical BJTs for dopant blocking results in a relatively high strain as compared to the MST material used for the first and second superlattices 125a, 125b, which advantageously provides improved dopant blocking through the incorporation of oxygen monolayers therein. Yet, the MST material still provides for epitaxial growth of the base notwithstanding the inclusion of the oxygen to provide dopant blocking, as discussed further above.
In accordance with other example embodiments of the BJT 120′, 120″ illustrated in
Turning now to the flow diagram 200 of
The method further illustratively includes forming the base 130 on the first superlattice 125a, at Block 203, and forming a second superlattice 125b on the base (Block 204), as also described above. For the BJTs 120′ and 120″, the base 130′, 130″ is recessed below the upper surface of the STI regions 122′, 122″ and may be formed in a cap layer of the superlattice 125a′ or 125a″, for example, as described above. The method further illustratively includes forming an emitter 131 on the second superlattice, at Block 205. Additional processing steps may also be performed to form the other portions/regions described further above, as will be appreciated by those skilled in the art. The method of
Further details regarding example BJT structures may be found in U.S. Pat. No. 10,068,997 to Preisler, which is hereby incorporated herein in its entirety by reference.
It should also be noted that in certain implementations both of the superlattices 125a/125a′/125a″ and 125b/125b′/125b″ need not be present. That is, such embodiments may include one or the other of the two superlattices 125a/125a′/125a″ and 125b/125b′/125b″. A first example BJT 220 is illustrated in
Many modifications and other embodiments of the invention will come to the mind of one skilled in the art having the benefit of the teachings presented in the foregoing descriptions and the associated drawings. Therefore, it is understood that the invention is not to be limited to the specific embodiments disclosed, and that modifications and embodiments are intended to be included within the scope of the appended claims.
This application claims the benefit of U.S. provisional application Ser. No. 62/960,851 filed Jan. 14, 2020, which is hereby incorporated herein in its entirety by reference.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4937204 | Ishibashi et al. | Jun 1990 | A |
5101256 | Harame et al. | Mar 1992 | A |
5216262 | Tsu | Jun 1993 | A |
5357119 | Wang et al. | Oct 1994 | A |
5683934 | Candelaria | Nov 1997 | A |
5796119 | Seabaugh | Aug 1998 | A |
6141361 | Mears et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6376337 | Wang et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6472685 | Takagi | Oct 2002 | B2 |
6576535 | Drobny et al. | Jun 2003 | B2 |
6741624 | Mears et al. | May 2004 | B2 |
6830964 | Mears et al. | Dec 2004 | B1 |
6833294 | Mears et al. | Dec 2004 | B1 |
6878576 | Mears et al. | Apr 2005 | B1 |
6891188 | Mears et al. | May 2005 | B2 |
6897472 | Mears et al. | May 2005 | B2 |
6927413 | Mears et al. | Aug 2005 | B2 |
6952018 | Mears et al. | Oct 2005 | B2 |
6958486 | Mears et al. | Oct 2005 | B2 |
6993222 | Mears et al. | Jan 2006 | B2 |
7018900 | Kreps | Mar 2006 | B2 |
7033437 | Mears et al. | Apr 2006 | B2 |
7034329 | Mears et al. | Apr 2006 | B2 |
7045377 | Mears et al. | May 2006 | B2 |
7045813 | Mears et al. | May 2006 | B2 |
7071119 | Mears et al. | Jul 2006 | B2 |
7105895 | Wang et al. | Sep 2006 | B2 |
7109052 | Mears et al. | Sep 2006 | B2 |
7123792 | Mears et al. | Oct 2006 | B1 |
7148712 | Prey, Jr. et al. | Dec 2006 | B1 |
7153763 | Hytha et al. | Dec 2006 | B2 |
7202494 | Blanchard et al. | Apr 2007 | B2 |
7227174 | Mears et al. | Jun 2007 | B2 |
7229902 | Mears et al. | Jun 2007 | B2 |
7265002 | Mears et al. | Sep 2007 | B2 |
7279699 | Mears et al. | Oct 2007 | B2 |
7279701 | Kreps | Oct 2007 | B2 |
7288457 | Kreps | Oct 2007 | B2 |
7303948 | Mears et al. | Dec 2007 | B2 |
7420228 | Bock et al. | Sep 2008 | B2 |
7432524 | Mears et al. | Oct 2008 | B2 |
7435988 | Mears et al. | Oct 2008 | B2 |
7436026 | Kreps | Oct 2008 | B2 |
7446002 | Mears et al. | Nov 2008 | B2 |
7446334 | Mears et al. | Nov 2008 | B2 |
7491587 | Rao | Feb 2009 | B2 |
7514328 | Rao | Apr 2009 | B2 |
7517702 | Halilov et al. | Apr 2009 | B2 |
7531828 | Mears et al. | May 2009 | B2 |
7531829 | Blanchard | May 2009 | B2 |
7531850 | Blanchard | May 2009 | B2 |
7586116 | Kreps et al. | Sep 2009 | B2 |
7586165 | Blanchard | Sep 2009 | B2 |
7598515 | Mears et al. | Oct 2009 | B2 |
7612366 | Mears et al. | Nov 2009 | B2 |
7625767 | Huang et al. | Dec 2009 | B2 |
7659539 | Kreps et al. | Feb 2010 | B2 |
7700447 | Dukovski et al. | Apr 2010 | B2 |
7718996 | Dukovski et al. | May 2010 | B2 |
7781827 | Rao | Aug 2010 | B2 |
7812339 | Mears et al. | Oct 2010 | B2 |
7863066 | Mears et al. | Jan 2011 | B2 |
7880161 | Mears et al. | Feb 2011 | B2 |
7928425 | Rao | Apr 2011 | B2 |
8389974 | Mears et al. | Mar 2013 | B2 |
9275996 | Mears et al. | Mar 2016 | B2 |
9406753 | Mears et al. | Aug 2016 | B2 |
9558939 | Stephenson et al. | Jan 2017 | B1 |
9899479 | Mears et al. | Feb 2018 | B2 |
9941359 | Mears et al. | Apr 2018 | B2 |
9972685 | Mears et al. | May 2018 | B2 |
10056477 | Choi | Aug 2018 | B1 |
10068997 | Preisler | Sep 2018 | B1 |
10084045 | Mears et al. | Sep 2018 | B2 |
10107854 | Roy | Oct 2018 | B2 |
10109342 | Roy | Oct 2018 | B2 |
10109479 | Mears et al. | Oct 2018 | B1 |
10170560 | Mears | Jan 2019 | B2 |
10170603 | Mears et al. | Jan 2019 | B2 |
10170604 | Mears et al. | Jan 2019 | B2 |
10191105 | Roy | Jan 2019 | B2 |
10249745 | Mears et al. | Apr 2019 | B2 |
10276625 | Mears et al. | Apr 2019 | B1 |
10304881 | Chen et al. | May 2019 | B1 |
10355151 | Chen et al. | Jul 2019 | B2 |
10361243 | Mears et al. | Jul 2019 | B2 |
10367028 | Chen et al. | Jul 2019 | B2 |
10367064 | Rao | Jul 2019 | B2 |
10381242 | Takeuchi | Aug 2019 | B2 |
10396223 | Chen et al. | Aug 2019 | B2 |
10410880 | Takeuchi | Sep 2019 | B2 |
10453945 | Mears et al. | Oct 2019 | B2 |
10461118 | Chen et al. | Oct 2019 | B2 |
10468245 | Weeks et al. | Nov 2019 | B2 |
10529757 | Chen et al. | Jan 2020 | B2 |
10529768 | Chen et al. | Jan 2020 | B2 |
10566191 | Weeks et al. | Feb 2020 | B1 |
10580866 | Takeuchi et al. | Mar 2020 | B1 |
10580867 | Takeuchi et al. | Mar 2020 | B1 |
10593761 | Takeuchi et al. | Mar 2020 | B1 |
10608027 | Chen et al. | Mar 2020 | B2 |
10608043 | Chen et al. | Mar 2020 | B2 |
10615209 | Chen et al. | Apr 2020 | B2 |
20020070390 | Chow | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20030034529 | Fitzgerald et al. | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030057416 | Currie et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20040188711 | Coolbaugh et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20050167653 | Mears et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050282330 | Mears et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20060220118 | Stephenson et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060267130 | Rao | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20070012910 | Mears et al. | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070020833 | Mears et al. | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20080012004 | Huang et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080258134 | Mears et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20110215299 | Rao | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20140264458 | Preisler et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20150041956 | Cheng | Feb 2015 | A1 |
20150357414 | Mears | Dec 2015 | A1 |
20160149023 | Mears et al. | May 2016 | A1 |
20160358773 | Mears et al. | Dec 2016 | A1 |
20180301584 | Augusto | Oct 2018 | A1 |
20180337064 | Takeuchi | Nov 2018 | A1 |
20180358361 | Rao | Dec 2018 | A1 |
20190057896 | Stephenson et al. | Feb 2019 | A1 |
20190058059 | Stephenson et al. | Feb 2019 | A1 |
20190189652 | Chen et al. | Jun 2019 | A1 |
20190279869 | Weeks et al. | Sep 2019 | A1 |
20190279897 | Stephenson et al. | Sep 2019 | A1 |
20190280090 | Stephenson et al. | Sep 2019 | A1 |
20190317277 | Stephenson | Oct 2019 | A1 |
20190319135 | Stephenson | Oct 2019 | A1 |
20190319136 | Stephenson | Oct 2019 | A1 |
20190319167 | Stephenson | Oct 2019 | A1 |
20200075731 | Weeks et al. | Mar 2020 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2347520 | Jun 2000 | GB |
200903800 | Jan 2009 | TW |
2017059146 | Apr 2017 | WO |
Entry |
---|
U.S. Appl. No. 16/176,005, filed Oct. 31, 2018 Weeks et al. |
U.S. Appl. No. 16/192,897, filed Nov. 16, 2018 Connelly et al. |
U.S. Appl. No. 16/192,911, filed Nov. 16, 2018 Takeuchi et al. |
U.S. Appl. No. 16/192,923, filed Nov. 16, 2018 Takeuchi et al. |
U.S. Appl. No. 16/192,987, filed Nov. 16, 2018 Takeuchi et al. |
U.S. Appl. No. 16/193,000, filed Nov. 16, 2018 Takeuchi et al. |
U.S. Appl. No. 16/193,011, filed Nov. 16, 2018 Takeuchi et al. |
U.S. Appl. No. 16/513,528, filed 17/17/2019; Burton et al. |
U.S. Appl. No. 16/513,832, filed 17/17/2019 Burton et al. |
U.S. Appl. No. 16/513,845, filed 17/17/2019 Burton et al. |
U.S. Appl. No. 16/513,875, filed 17/17/2019 Burton et al. |
U.S. Appl. No. 16/513,895, filed 17/17/2019 Burton et al. |
U.S. Appl. No. 16/513,906, filed 17/17/2019 Burton et al. |
U.S. Appl. No. 16/513,932, filed 17/17/2019 Burton et al. |
U.S. Appl. No. 16/513,943, filed 17/17/2019 Burton et al. |
U.S. Appl. No. 16/801,287, filed Feb. 26, 2020 Weeks et al. |
U.S. Appl. No. 16/801,305, filed Feb. 26, 2020 Weeks et al. |
U.S. Appl. No. 16/810,957, filed Mar. 6, 2020 Cody et al. |
U.S. Appl. No. 16/853,875, filed Apr. 21, 2020 Hideki Takeuchi. |
U.S. Appl. No. 16/853,884, filed Apr. 21, 2020 Hideki Takeuchi. |
U.S. Appl. No. 16/898,589, filed Jun. 11, 2020 Takeuchi et al. |
U.S. Appl. No. 16/913,546, filed Jun. 26, 2020 Burton et al. |
U.S. Appl. No. 16/898,564, filed Jun. 11, 2020 Takeuchi et al. |
Luo et al., “Chemical Design of Direct-Gap Light-Emitting Silicon” published in Physical Review Letters, vol. 89, No. 7; Aug. 12, 2002; 4 pgs. |
Mears et al. “Simultaneous Carrier Transport Enhancement and variability reduction in Si MOSFETs by insertion of partial Monolayers of oxygen” IEEE silicon Nanoelectronics Workshop (2012): (Date of conference Jun. 10-11, 2012) pp. 2. |
Novikov et al. “Silicon-based Optoelectronics” 1999-2003, pp. 1-6. |
R. Tsu “Phenomena in silicon nanostructure device” published online Sep. 6, 2000 by Applied Physics and Materials Science & Processing, pp. 391-402. |
R. Tsu “Si Based Green ELD: Si-Oxygen Superlattice” wysiwyg://l/http://www3.interscience.wiley.com/cgi-bin/abstract/72512946/start: published online Jul. 21, 2000; 2 pgs. Abstract Only. |
Xu et al. “Effectiveness of Quasi-confinement technology for improving P-chanel Si an Ge MOSSFET performance” Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, University of California, Berkeley, 2012, pp. 2. mearstech.net; retrieved from internet Jan. 18, 2016. |
Xu et al. “Extension of planar bulk n-channel MOSFET scaling with oxygen insertion technology” IEEE Transactions on Electron devices, vol. 61, No. 9; Sep. 2014. pp. 3345-3349. |
Xu et al., “MOSFET performance and scalability enhancement by insertion of oxygen layers”, Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, University of California, Berkeley, 2012, pp. 1-4. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20210217875 A1 | Jul 2021 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
62960851 | Jan 2020 | US |