Methods for making bipolar junction transistors including emitter-base and base-collector superlattices

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 11437486
  • Patent Number
    11,437,486
  • Date Filed
    Friday, June 26, 2020
    4 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, September 6, 2022
    2 years ago
Abstract
A method for making a bipolar junction transistor (BJT) may include forming a first superlattice on a substrate defining a collector region therein. The first superlattice may include a plurality of stacked groups of layers, with each group of layers comprising a plurality of stacked base semiconductor monolayers defining a base semiconductor portion, and at least one non-semiconductor monolayer constrained within a crystal lattice of adjacent base semiconductor portions. The method may further include forming a base on the first superlattice, and forming a second superlattice on the base comprising a plurality of stacked groups of layers, with each group of layers comprising a plurality of stacked base semiconductor monolayers defining a base semiconductor portion, and at least one non-semiconductor monolayer constrained within a crystal lattice of adjacent base semiconductor portions. The method may also include forming an emitter on the second superlattice.
Description
TECHNICAL FIELD

The present disclosure generally relates to semiconductor devices and, more particularly, to bipolar junction transistors (BJTs) and related methods.


BACKGROUND

Structures and techniques have been proposed to enhance the performance of semiconductor devices, such as by enhancing the mobility of the charge carriers. For example, U.S. Patent Application No. 2003/0057416 to Currie et al. discloses strained material layers of silicon, silicon-germanium, and relaxed silicon and also including impurity-free zones that would otherwise cause performance degradation. The resulting biaxial strain in the upper silicon layer alters the carrier mobilities enabling higher speed and/or lower power devices. Published U.S. Patent Application No. 2003/0034529 to Fitzgerald et al. discloses a CMOS inverter also based upon similar strained silicon technology.


U.S. Pat. No. 6,472,685 B2 to Takagi discloses a semiconductor device including a silicon and carbon layer sandwiched between silicon layers so that the conduction band and valence band of the second silicon layer receive a tensile strain. Electrons having a smaller effective mass, and which have been induced by an electric field applied to the gate electrode, are confined in the second silicon layer, thus, an n-channel MOSFET is asserted to have a higher mobility.


U.S. Pat. No. 4,937,204 to Ishibashi et al. discloses a superlattice in which a plurality of layers, less than eight monolayers, and containing a fractional or binary or a binary compound semiconductor layer, are alternately and epitaxially grown. The direction of main current flow is perpendicular to the layers of the superlattice.


U.S. Pat. No. 5,357,119 to Wang et al. discloses a Si—Ge short period superlattice with higher mobility achieved by reducing alloy scattering in the superlattice. Along these lines, U.S. Pat. No. 5,683,934 to Candelaria discloses an enhanced mobility MOSFET including a channel layer comprising an alloy of silicon and a second material substitutionally present in the silicon lattice at a percentage that places the channel layer under tensile stress.


U.S. Pat. No. 5,216,262 to Tsu discloses a quantum well structure comprising two barrier regions and a thin epitaxially grown semiconductor layer sandwiched between the barriers. Each barrier region consists of alternate layers of SiO2/Si with a thickness generally in a range of two to six monolayers. A much thicker section of silicon is sandwiched between the barriers.


An article entitled “Phenomena in silicon nanostructure devices” also to Tsu and published online Sep. 6, 2000 by Applied Physics and Materials Science & Processing, pp. 391-402 discloses a semiconductor-atomic superlattice (SAS) of silicon and oxygen. The Si/O superlattice is disclosed as useful in a silicon quantum and light-emitting devices. In particular, a green electroluminescence diode structure was constructed and tested. Current flow in the diode structure is vertical, that is, perpendicular to the layers of the SAS. The disclosed SAS may include semiconductor layers separated by adsorbed species such as oxygen atoms, and CO molecules. The silicon growth beyond the adsorbed monolayer of oxygen is described as epitaxial with a fairly low defect density. One SAS structure included a 1.1 nm thick silicon portion that is about eight atomic layers of silicon, and another structure had twice this thickness of silicon. An article to Luo et al. entitled “Chemical Design of Direct-Gap Light-Emitting Silicon” published in Physical Review Letters, Vol. 89, No. 7 (Aug. 12, 2002) further discusses the light emitting SAS structures of Tsu.


U.S. Pat. No. 7,105,895 to Wang et al. discloses a barrier building block of thin silicon and oxygen, carbon, nitrogen, phosphorous, antimony, arsenic or hydrogen to thereby reduce current flowing vertically through the lattice more than four orders of magnitude. The insulating layer/barrier layer allows for low defect epitaxial silicon to be deposited next to the insulating layer.


Published Great Britain Patent Application 2,347,520 to Mears et al. discloses that principles of Aperiodic Photonic Band-Gap (APBG) structures may be adapted for electronic bandgap engineering. In particular, the application discloses that material parameters, for example, the location of band minima, effective mass, etc., can be tailored to yield new aperiodic materials with desirable band-structure characteristics. Other parameters, such as electrical conductivity, thermal conductivity and dielectric permittivity or magnetic permeability are disclosed as also possible to be designed into the material.


Furthermore, U.S. Pat. No. 6,376,337 to Wang et al. discloses a method for producing an insulating or barrier layer for semiconductor devices which includes depositing a layer of silicon and at least one additional element on the silicon substrate whereby the deposited layer is substantially free of defects such that epitaxial silicon substantially free of defects can be deposited on the deposited layer. Alternatively, a monolayer of one or more elements, preferably comprising oxygen, is absorbed on a silicon substrate. A plurality of insulating layers sandwiched between epitaxial silicon forms a barrier composite.


Despite the existence of such approaches, further enhancements may be desirable for using advanced semiconductor materials and processing techniques to achieve improved performance in semiconductor devices.


SUMMARY

A method for making a bipolar junction transistor (BJT) may include forming a first superlattice on a substrate defining a collector region therein. The first superlattice may include a plurality of stacked groups of first layers, with each group of first layers including a first plurality of stacked base semiconductor monolayers defining a first base semiconductor portion, and at least one first non-semiconductor monolayer constrained within a crystal lattice of adjacent first base semiconductor portions. The method may further include forming a base on the first superlattice, and forming a second superlattice on the base comprising a second plurality of stacked groups of second layers, with each group of second layers comprising a plurality of stacked base semiconductor monolayers defining a second base semiconductor portion, and at least one second non-semiconductor monolayer constrained within a crystal lattice of adjacent second base semiconductor portions. The method may also include forming an emitter on the second superlattice.


In an example embodiment, the substrate may further define a sub-collector region below the collector region, and the method may further include forming a third superlattice in the substrate between the sub-collector region and the collector region. More particularly, the third superlattice may include a third plurality of stacked groups of third layers, each group of third layers comprising a third plurality of stacked base semiconductor monolayers defining a third base semiconductor portion, and at least one third non-semiconductor monolayer constrained within a crystal lattice of adjacent third base semiconductor portions.


The method may further include forming an emitter contact on an upper surface of the emitter, as well as forming a base contact on at least a portion of the base. The method may also include forming spaced apart isolation regions in the substrate. Furthermore, the emitter and the collector may have a first conductivity type, and the base may have a second conductivity type different than the first conductivity type.


In one example embodiment, the respective base semiconductor monolayers of the first and second superlattices may comprise silicon monolayers. In accordance with another example, the respective base semiconductor monolayers of the first and second superlattices may comprise germanium. Also by way of example, the respective at least one non-semiconductor monolayer of the first and second superlattices may comprise at least one of oxygen, nitrogen, fluorine, carbon and carbon-oxygen.





BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS


FIG. 1 is a greatly enlarged schematic cross-sectional view of a superlattice for use in a semiconductor device in accordance with an example embodiment.



FIG. 2 is a perspective schematic atomic diagram of a portion of the superlattice shown in FIG. 1.



FIG. 3 is a greatly enlarged schematic cross-sectional view of another embodiment of a superlattice in accordance with an example embodiment.



FIG. 4A is a graph of the calculated band structure from the gamma point (G) for both bulk silicon as in the prior art, and for the 4/1 Si/O superlattice as shown in FIGS. 1-2.



FIG. 4B is a graph of the calculated band structure from the Z point for both bulk silicon as in the prior art, and for the 4/1 Si/O superlattice as shown in FIGS. 1-2.



FIG. 4C is a graph of the calculated band structure from both the gamma and Z points for both bulk silicon as in the prior art, and for the 5/1/3/1 Si/O superlattice as shown in FIG. 3.



FIG. 5 is schematic cross-sectional diagram of a bipolar junction transistor (BJT) including superlattices as described with reference to FIGS. 1-4C separating the base/collector and emitter/base in accordance with an example embodiment.



FIG. 6 is a graph of a simulated doping profile for the BJT of FIG. 5 in accordance with an example configuration.



FIG. 7 is a graph of simulated dopant concentration vs. depth for the BJT of FIG. 5 in accordance with an example implementation.



FIG. 8 is a schematic block diagram of an alternative embodiment of the BJT of FIG. 5 in accordance with an example embodiment.



FIG. 9 is a schematic block diagram of another alternative embodiment of the BJT of FIG. 5 in accordance with an example embodiment.



FIG. 10 is a flow diagram illustrating a method for making semiconductor devices such as those shown in FIGS. 7-9.



FIGS. 11 and 12 are schematic block diagrams of other alternative embodiments of BJTs in accordance with example embodiments.





DETAILED DESCRIPTION

Example embodiments will now be described more fully hereinafter with reference to the accompanying drawings, in which the example embodiments are shown. The embodiments may, however, be implemented in many different forms and should not be construed as limited to the specific examples set forth herein. Rather, these embodiments are provided so that this disclosure will be thorough and complete. Like numbers refer to like elements throughout, and prime and multiple prime notation are used to indicate similar elements in different embodiments.


Generally speaking, the present disclosure relates to Bipolar Junction Transistors (BJTs) having an enhanced semiconductor superlattice therein to provide dopant blocking and performance enhancement characteristics. The enhanced semiconductor superlattice may also be referred to as an “MST” layer or “MST technology” in this disclosure.


More particularly, the MST technology relates to advanced semiconductor materials such as the superlattice 25 described further below. Applicant theorizes, without wishing to be bound thereto, that certain superlattices as described herein reduce the effective mass of charge carriers and that this thereby leads to higher charge carrier mobility. Effective mass is described with various definitions in the literature. As a measure of the improvement in effective mass Applicants use a “conductivity reciprocal effective mass tensor”, Me−1 and Mh−1 for electrons and holes respectively, defined as:








M

e
,

i

j



-
1




(


E
F

,
T

)


=





E
>

E
F








B
.
Z
.






(



k



E


(

k
,
n

)



)

i




(



k



E


(

k
,
n

)



)

j






f


(


E


(

k
,
n

)


,

E
F

,
T

)





E




d
3


k







E
>

E
F








B
.
Z
.





f


(


E


(

k
,
n

)


,

E
F

,
T

)




d
3


k









for electrons and:








M

h
,

i

j



-
1




(


E
F

,
T

)


=


-




E
<

E
F








B
.
Z
.






(



k



E


(

k
,
n

)



)

i




(



k



E


(

k
,
n

)



)

j






f


(


E


(

k
,
n

)


,

E
F

,
T

)





E




d
3


k








E
<

E
F








B
.
Z
.





(

1
-

f


(


E


(

k
,
n

)


,

E
F

,
T

)



)



d
3


k









for holes, where f is the Fermi-Dirac distribution, EF is the Fermi energy, T is the temperature, E(k,n) is the energy of an electron in the state corresponding to wave vector k and the nth energy band, the indices i and j refer to Cartesian coordinates x, y and z, the integrals are taken over the Brillouin zone (B.Z.), and the summations are taken over bands with energies above and below the Fermi energy for electrons and holes respectively.


Applicant's definition of the conductivity reciprocal effective mass tensor is such that a tensorial component of the conductivity of the material is greater for greater values of the corresponding component of the conductivity reciprocal effective mass tensor. Again Applicant theorizes without wishing to be bound thereto that the superlattices described herein set the values of the conductivity reciprocal effective mass tensor so as to enhance the conductive properties of the material, such as typically for a preferred direction of charge carrier transport. The inverse of the appropriate tensor element is referred to as the conductivity effective mass. In other words, to characterize semiconductor material structures, the conductivity effective mass for electrons/holes as described above and calculated in the direction of intended carrier transport is used to distinguish improved materials.


Applicant has identified improved materials or structures for use in semiconductor devices. More specifically, Applicant has identified materials or structures having energy band structures for which the appropriate conductivity effective masses for electrons and/or holes are substantially less than the corresponding values for silicon. In addition to the enhanced mobility characteristics of these structures, they may also be formed or used in such a manner that they provide piezoelectric, pyroelectric, and/or ferroelectric properties that are advantageous for use in a variety of different types of devices, as will be discussed further below.


Referring now to FIGS. 1 and 2, the materials or structures are in the form of a superlattice 25 whose structure is controlled at the atomic or molecular level and may be formed using known techniques of atomic or molecular layer deposition. The superlattice 25 includes a plurality of layer groups 45a-45n arranged in stacked relation, as perhaps best understood with specific reference to the schematic cross-sectional view of FIG. 1.


Each group of layers 45a-45n of the superlattice 25 illustratively includes a plurality of stacked base semiconductor monolayers 46 defining a respective base semiconductor portion 46a-46n and an energy band-modifying layer 50 thereon. The energy band-modifying layers 50 are indicated by stippling in FIG. 1 for clarity of illustration.


The energy band-modifying layer 50 illustratively includes one non-semiconductor monolayer constrained within a crystal lattice of adjacent base semiconductor portions. By “constrained within a crystal lattice of adjacent base semiconductor portions” it is meant that at least some semiconductor atoms from opposing base semiconductor portions 46a-46n are chemically bound together through the non-semiconductor monolayer 50 therebetween, as seen in FIG. 2. Generally speaking, this configuration is made possible by controlling the amount of non-semiconductor material that is deposited on semiconductor portions 46a-46n through atomic layer deposition techniques so that not all (i.e., less than full or 100% coverage) of the available semiconductor bonding sites are populated with bonds to non-semiconductor atoms, as will be discussed further below. Thus, as further monolayers 46 of semiconductor material are deposited on or over a non-semiconductor monolayer 50, the newly deposited semiconductor atoms will populate the remaining vacant bonding sites of the semiconductor atoms below the non-semiconductor monolayer.


In other embodiments, more than one such non-semiconductor monolayer may be possible. It should be noted that reference herein to a non-semiconductor or semiconductor monolayer means that the material used for the monolayer would be a non-semiconductor or semiconductor if formed in bulk. That is, a single monolayer of a material, such as silicon, may not necessarily exhibit the same properties that it would if formed in bulk or in a relatively thick layer, as will be appreciated by those skilled in the art.


Applicant theorizes without wishing to be bound thereto that energy band-modifying layers 50 and adjacent base semiconductor portions 46a-46n cause the superlattice 25 to have a lower appropriate conductivity effective mass for the charge carriers in the parallel layer direction than would otherwise be present. Considered another way, this parallel direction is orthogonal to the stacking direction. The band modifying layers 50 may also cause the superlattice 25 to have a common energy band structure, while also advantageously functioning as an insulator between layers or regions vertically above and below the superlattice.


Moreover, this superlattice structure may also advantageously act as a barrier to dopant and/or material diffusion between layers vertically above and below the superlattice 25. These properties may thus advantageously allow the superlattice 25 to provide an interface for high-K dielectrics which not only reduces diffusion of the high-K material into the channel region, but which may also advantageously reduce unwanted scattering effects and improve device mobility, as will be appreciated by those skilled in the art.


It is also theorized that semiconductor devices including the superlattice 25 may enjoy a higher charge carrier mobility based upon the lower conductivity effective mass than would otherwise be present. In some embodiments, and as a result of the band engineering achieved by the present invention, the superlattice 25 may further have a substantially direct energy bandgap that may be particularly advantageous for opto-electronic devices, for example.


The superlattice 25 also illustratively includes a cap layer 52 on an upper layer group 45n. The cap layer 52 may comprise a plurality of base semiconductor monolayers 46. The cap layer 52 may have between 2 to 100 monolayers of the base semiconductor, and, more preferably between 10 to 50 monolayers.


Each base semiconductor portion 46a-46n may comprise a base semiconductor selected from the group consisting of Group IV semiconductors, Group III-V semiconductors, and Group II-VI semiconductors. Of course, the term Group IV semiconductors also includes Group IV-IV semiconductors, as will be appreciated by those skilled in the art. More particularly, the base semiconductor may comprise at least one of silicon and germanium, for example.


Each energy band-modifying layer 50 may comprise a non-semiconductor selected from the group consisting of oxygen, nitrogen, fluorine, carbon and carbon-oxygen, for example. The non-semiconductor is also desirably thermally stable through deposition of a next layer to thereby facilitate manufacturing. In other embodiments, the non-semiconductor may be another inorganic or organic element or compound that is compatible with the given semiconductor processing as will be appreciated by those skilled in the art. More particularly, the base semiconductor may comprise at least one of silicon and germanium, for example


It should be noted that the term monolayer is meant to include a single atomic layer and also a single molecular layer. It is also noted that the energy band-modifying layer 50 provided by a single monolayer is also meant to include a monolayer wherein not all of the possible sites are occupied (i.e., there is less than full or 100% coverage). For example, with particular reference to the atomic diagram of FIG. 2, a 4/1 repeating structure is illustrated for silicon as the base semiconductor material, and oxygen as the energy band-modifying material. Only half of the possible sites for oxygen are occupied in the illustrated example.


In other embodiments and/or with different materials this one-half occupation would not necessarily be the case as will be appreciated by those skilled in the art. Indeed it can be seen even in this schematic diagram, that individual atoms of oxygen in a given monolayer are not precisely aligned along a flat plane as will also be appreciated by those of skill in the art of atomic deposition. By way of example, a preferred occupation range is from about one-eighth to one-half of the possible oxygen sites being full, although other numbers may be used in certain embodiments.


Silicon and oxygen are currently widely used in conventional semiconductor processing, and, hence, manufacturers will be readily able to use these materials as described herein. Atomic or monolayer deposition is also now widely used. Accordingly, semiconductor devices incorporating the superlattice 25 in accordance with the invention may be readily adopted and implemented, as will be appreciated by those skilled in the art.


It is theorized without Applicant wishing to be bound thereto that for a superlattice, such as the Si/O superlattice, for example, that the number of silicon monolayers should desirably be seven or less so that the energy band of the superlattice is common or relatively uniform throughout to achieve the desired advantages. The 4/1 repeating structure shown in FIGS. 1 and 2, for Si/O has been modeled to indicate an enhanced mobility for electrons and holes in the X direction. For example, the calculated conductivity effective mass for electrons (isotropic for bulk silicon) is 0.26 and for the 4/1 SiO superlattice in the X direction it is 0.12 resulting in a ratio of 0.46. Similarly, the calculation for holes yields values of 0.36 for bulk silicon and 0.16 for the 4/1 Si/O superlattice resulting in a ratio of 0.44.


While such a directionally preferential feature may be desired in certain semiconductor devices, other devices may benefit from a more uniform increase in mobility in any direction parallel to the groups of layers. It may also be beneficial to have an increased mobility for both electrons and holes, or just one of these types of charge carriers as will be appreciated by those skilled in the art.


The lower conductivity effective mass for the 4/1 Si/O embodiment of the superlattice 25 may be less than two-thirds the conductivity effective mass than would otherwise occur, and this applies for both electrons and holes. Of course, the superlattice 25 may further comprise at least one type of conductivity dopant therein, as will also be appreciated by those skilled in the art.


Indeed, referring now additionally to FIG. 3, another embodiment of a superlattice 25′ in accordance with the invention having different properties is now described. In this embodiment, a repeating pattern of 3/1/5/1 is illustrated. More particularly, the lowest base semiconductor portion 46a′ has three monolayers, and the second lowest base semiconductor portion 46b′ has five monolayers. This pattern repeats throughout the superlattice 25′. The energy band-modifying layers 50′ may each include a single monolayer. For such a superlattice 25′ including Si/O, the enhancement of charge carrier mobility is independent of orientation in the plane of the layers. Those other elements of FIG. 3 not specifically mentioned are similar to those discussed above with reference to FIG. 1 and need no further discussion herein.


In some device embodiments, all of the base semiconductor portions of a superlattice may be a same number of monolayers thick. In other embodiments, at least some of the base semiconductor portions may be a different number of monolayers thick. In still other embodiments, all of the base semiconductor portions may be a different number of monolayers thick.


In FIGS. 4A-4C, band structures calculated using Density Functional Theory (DFT) are presented. It is well known in the art that DFT underestimates the absolute value of the bandgap. Hence all bands above the gap may be shifted by an appropriate “scissors correction.” However the shape of the band is known to be much more reliable. The vertical energy axes should be interpreted in this light.



FIG. 4A shows the calculated band structure from the gamma point (G) for both bulk silicon (represented by continuous lines) and for the 4/1 Si/O superlattice 25 shown in FIG. 1 (represented by dotted lines). The directions refer to the unit cell of the 4/1 Si/O structure and not to the conventional unit cell of Si, although the (001) direction in the figure does correspond to the (001) direction of the conventional unit cell of Si, and, hence, shows the expected location of the Si conduction band minimum. The (100) and (010) directions in the figure correspond to the (110) and (−110) directions of the conventional Si unit cell. Those skilled in the art will appreciate that the bands of Si on the figure are folded to represent them on the appropriate reciprocal lattice directions for the 4/1 Si/O structure.


It can be seen that the conduction band minimum for the 4/1 Si/O structure is located at the gamma point in contrast to bulk silicon (Si), whereas the valence band minimum occurs at the edge of the Brillouin zone in the (001) direction which we refer to as the Z point. One may also note the greater curvature of the conduction band minimum for the 4/1 Si/O structure compared to the curvature of the conduction band minimum for Si owing to the band splitting due to the perturbation introduced by the additional oxygen layer.



FIG. 4B shows the calculated band structure from the Z point for both bulk silicon (continuous lines) and for the 4/1 Si/O superlattice 25 (dotted lines). This figure illustrates the enhanced curvature of the valence band in the (100) direction.



FIG. 4C shows the calculated band structure from both the gamma and Z point for both bulk silicon (continuous lines) and for the 5/1/3/1 Si/O structure of the superlattice 25′ of FIG. 3 (dotted lines). Due to the symmetry of the 5/1/3/1 Si/O structure, the calculated band structures in the (100) and (010) directions are equivalent. Thus the conductivity effective mass and mobility are expected to be isotropic in the plane parallel to the layers, i.e. perpendicular to the (001) stacking direction. Note that in the 5/1/3/1 Si/O example the conduction band minimum and the valence band maximum are both at or close to the Z point.


Although increased curvature is an indication of reduced effective mass, the appropriate comparison and discrimination may be made via the conductivity reciprocal effective mass tensor calculation. This leads Applicant to further theorize that the 5/1/3/1 superlattice 25′ should be substantially direct bandgap. As will be understood by those skilled in the art, the appropriate matrix element for optical transition is another indicator of the distinction between direct and indirect bandgap behavior.


Referring now to FIG. 5, the above-described superlattice structures may advantageously be used to provide dopant diffusion barriers in Bipolar Junction Transistors (BJTs), such as silicon BJTs with polysilicon/crystalline silicon emitters and silicon/SiGe bases for NPN and PNP bipolar devices, for example. By way of background, typical BJTs utilize high doping in the emitter, which generally results in diffusion of the dopant into the base, and thus a degradation in performance. However, the above-described superlattice/MST material may be used to advantageously block dopants from a highly doped emitter region from diffusing into the base and/or emitter, and thereby degrading performance. Moreover, the MST material may also advantageously block interstitial injection during oxide growth during device fabrication.


In the present example, a BJT 120 illustratively includes a substrate 121 (e.g., a silicon substrate) including spaced apart shallow trench isolation (STI) regions 122 (e.g., SiO2) therein. In the case of an NPN configuration, the substrate 121 may be doped with an N-type dopant (e.g., phosphorus, arsenic, etc.) to define a collector region 123 for the BJT 120. It should be noted that in some embodiments the collector dopant may be further distributed throughout the substrate 121 and not concentrated in a given location as shown in FIG. 5. A first superlattice 125a having a structure as described above is positioned between the substrate 121 and a base 130 overlying the first superlattice. The base 130 may comprise a semiconductor such as Si, Ge, or SiGe, and in an NPN configuration may be heavily P-doped with a dopant such as boron, for example. A second superlattice 125b, which again may have a structure as described further above, is positioned on the base 130.


An emitter 131 is positioned on the second superlattice 125b such that the second superlattice separates the emitter from the base 130. The emitter 130 may comprise a semiconductor (e.g., Si, Ge, or SiGe), and it is defined by adjacent spacers 132, 133 (e.g., nitride) and insulating regions 134 (e.g., oxide). The emitter 131 has an opposite conductivity type from the base 130, e.g., N+ in the example NPN configuration. An emitter contact 135 (e.g., silicide) overlies the emitter 130. Moreover, lower and upper extrinsic base regions 136, 137 are laterally outside of the emitter 130, and the lower extrinsic base region is positioned on the outer ends of the second superlattice 125b. The lower and upper extrinsic base regions 136, 137 may also comprise a semiconductor (e.g., Si, Ge, or SiGe) and have a similar doping profile to the base 130 (P+ in the present example). A base contact 138 (e.g., silicide) overlies the extrinsic base regions 136, 137, and contacts outer ends of the second superlattice 125b and base 130, as shown.


In typical BJT devices, the highly concentrated doping in the base results in diffusion of the base dopant into the collector, which degrades performance through widening of the base. However, in the BJT 120, the second superlattice 125b is advantageously positioned to block the dopants from the highly doped base 130 from diffusing into the collector 131, and thereby degrading performance from the widened base. Moreover, the first superlattice 125a is advantageously positioned to block interstitial injection during oxide growth that is performed during device fabrication, thereby also reducing dopant diffusion from the base 130 to the collector 123.


The foregoing dopant retention properties will be further understood with reference to the graphs 160 and 170 of FIGS. 6 and 7, respectively. The graph 160 illustrates a simulated doping profile for an example implementation of the BJT 120 in which the emitter 131 is N+ arsenic-doped polysilicon, the base 130 is P+ boron-doped SiGe, and the collector 123 is N phosphorous-doped silicon, although different semiconductor materials and dopant types/concentrations may be used in different embodiments. The graph 170 illustrates the corresponding simulated dopant concentrations (in cm−3) and Ge percentage across the emitter/base/collector layers for the same BJT device.


By way of contrast, the use of carbon doping in typical BJTs for dopant blocking results in a relatively high strain as compared to the MST material used for the first and second superlattices 125a, 125b, which advantageously provides improved dopant blocking through the incorporation of oxygen monolayers therein. Yet, the MST material still provides for epitaxial growth of the base notwithstanding the inclusion of the oxygen to provide dopant blocking, as discussed further above.


In accordance with other example embodiments of the BJT 120′, 120″ illustrated in FIGS. 8 and 9, respectively, the base 130′, 130″ is recessed below an upper surface of the STI regions 122′, 122″. Moreover, in the BJT 120″, the substrate 121″ further defines a sub-collector region 140″ below the collector region 123″, and a third superlattice 125c″′ is positioned between the sub-collector region and the collector region. More particularly, the third superlattice 125c″ may also be an MST superlattice as described further above. The other portions/regions of the BJTs 120′, 120″ are similar to those described above and require no further discussion herein.


Turning now to the flow diagram 200 of FIG. 10, a method for making the BJT 120 is described. Beginning at block 201, the method illustratively includes forming the first superlattice 125a as described above on the substrate 121 defining a collector region 123 therein, at Block 202. More particularly, for the example BJT 120 the STI regions 122 are formed and the dopant is added for the collector 123 prior to formation of the superlattice 125a, which may be done by a blanket formation across the substrate 121 or selectively where desired on the substrate. Moreover, in the example BJT 120″, the sub-collector region 140″ and superlattice 125c″ would be formed prior to the STI regions 122″, doping of the collector 123″, and the first superlattice 125a″.


The method further illustratively includes forming the base 130 on the first superlattice 125a, at Block 203, and forming a second superlattice 125b on the base (Block 204), as also described above. For the BJTs 120′ and 120″, the base 130′, 130″ is recessed below the upper surface of the STI regions 122′, 122″ and may be formed in a cap layer of the superlattice 125a′ or 125a″, for example, as described above. The method further illustratively includes forming an emitter 131 on the second superlattice, at Block 205. Additional processing steps may also be performed to form the other portions/regions described further above, as will be appreciated by those skilled in the art. The method of FIG. 10 illustratively concludes at Block 206.


Further details regarding example BJT structures may be found in U.S. Pat. No. 10,068,997 to Preisler, which is hereby incorporated herein in its entirety by reference.


It should also be noted that in certain implementations both of the superlattices 125a/125a′/125a″ and 125b/125b′/125b″ need not be present. That is, such embodiments may include one or the other of the two superlattices 125a/125a′/125a″ and 125b/125b′/125b″. A first example BJT 220 is illustrated in FIG. 11 which includes an MST superlattice 225 between the collector 223 and base 230, but not between the base and the emitter 231. Another example BJT 320 is illustrated in FIG. 12 which includes an MST superlattice 325 between the base 230 and emitter 231, but not between the collector 223 and the base. The remaining components 221, 222, 231-238 and 321, 322, 331-338 shown in FIGS. 11 and 12 are respectively similar to components 121, 122, 131-138 discussed above. A single MST implementation may similarly be used with the configurations shown in FIGS. 8 and 9, if desired.


Many modifications and other embodiments of the invention will come to the mind of one skilled in the art having the benefit of the teachings presented in the foregoing descriptions and the associated drawings. Therefore, it is understood that the invention is not to be limited to the specific embodiments disclosed, and that modifications and embodiments are intended to be included within the scope of the appended claims.

Claims
  • 1. A method for making a bipolar junction transistor (BJT) comprising: forming a first superlattice on a substrate, the substrate defining a collector region therein, the first superlattice comprising a plurality of stacked groups of first layers, each group of first layers comprising a first plurality of stacked base semiconductor monolayers defining a first base semiconductor portion, and at least one first non- semiconductor monolayer constrained within a crystal lattice of adjacent first base semiconductor portions;forming a base on the first superlattice;forming a second superlattice on the base comprising a second plurality of stacked groups of second layers, each group of second layers comprising a plurality of stacked base semiconductor monolayers defining a second base semiconductor portion, and at least one second non-semiconductor monolayer constrained within a crystal lattice of adjacent second base semiconductor portions; andforming an emitter on the second superlattice.
  • 2. The method of claim 1 wherein the substrate further defines a sub-collector region below the collector region; and further comprising forming a third superlattice in the substrate between the sub-collector region and the collector region.
  • 3. The method of claim 2 wherein the third superlattice comprises a third plurality of stacked groups of third layers, each group of third layers comprising a third plurality of stacked base semiconductor monolayers defining a third base semiconductor portion, and at least one third non-semiconductor monolayer constrained within a crystal lattice of adjacent third base semiconductor portions.
  • 4. The method of claim 1 further comprising forming an emitter contact on an upper surface of the emitter.
  • 5. The method of claim 1 further comprising forming a base contact on at least a portion of the base.
  • 6. The method of claim 1 further comprising forming spaced apart isolation regions in the substrate.
  • 7. The method of claim 1 wherein the emitter and the collector have a first conductivity type, and the base has a second conductivity type different than the first conductivity type.
  • 8. The method of claim 1 wherein the respective base semiconductor monolayers of the first and second superlattices comprise silicon monolayers.
  • 9. The method of claim 1 wherein the respective at least one non-semiconductor monolayer of the first and second superlattices comprises oxygen.
  • 10. The method of claim 1 wherein the respective base semiconductor monolayers of the first and second superlattices comprise germanium.
  • 11. The method of claim 1 wherein the respective at least one non-semiconductor monolayer of the first and second superlattices comprises at least one of oxygen, nitrogen, fluorine, carbon and carbon-oxygen.
RELATED APPLICATIONS

This application claims the benefit of U.S. provisional application Ser. No. 62/960,851 filed Jan. 14, 2020, which is hereby incorporated herein in its entirety by reference.

US Referenced Citations (135)
Number Name Date Kind
4937204 Ishibashi et al. Jun 1990 A
5101256 Harame et al. Mar 1992 A
5216262 Tsu Jun 1993 A
5357119 Wang et al. Oct 1994 A
5683934 Candelaria Nov 1997 A
5796119 Seabaugh Aug 1998 A
6141361 Mears et al. Oct 2000 A
6376337 Wang et al. Apr 2002 B1
6472685 Takagi Oct 2002 B2
6576535 Drobny et al. Jun 2003 B2
6741624 Mears et al. May 2004 B2
6830964 Mears et al. Dec 2004 B1
6833294 Mears et al. Dec 2004 B1
6878576 Mears et al. Apr 2005 B1
6891188 Mears et al. May 2005 B2
6897472 Mears et al. May 2005 B2
6927413 Mears et al. Aug 2005 B2
6952018 Mears et al. Oct 2005 B2
6958486 Mears et al. Oct 2005 B2
6993222 Mears et al. Jan 2006 B2
7018900 Kreps Mar 2006 B2
7033437 Mears et al. Apr 2006 B2
7034329 Mears et al. Apr 2006 B2
7045377 Mears et al. May 2006 B2
7045813 Mears et al. May 2006 B2
7071119 Mears et al. Jul 2006 B2
7105895 Wang et al. Sep 2006 B2
7109052 Mears et al. Sep 2006 B2
7123792 Mears et al. Oct 2006 B1
7148712 Prey, Jr. et al. Dec 2006 B1
7153763 Hytha et al. Dec 2006 B2
7202494 Blanchard et al. Apr 2007 B2
7227174 Mears et al. Jun 2007 B2
7229902 Mears et al. Jun 2007 B2
7265002 Mears et al. Sep 2007 B2
7279699 Mears et al. Oct 2007 B2
7279701 Kreps Oct 2007 B2
7288457 Kreps Oct 2007 B2
7303948 Mears et al. Dec 2007 B2
7420228 Bock et al. Sep 2008 B2
7432524 Mears et al. Oct 2008 B2
7435988 Mears et al. Oct 2008 B2
7436026 Kreps Oct 2008 B2
7446002 Mears et al. Nov 2008 B2
7446334 Mears et al. Nov 2008 B2
7491587 Rao Feb 2009 B2
7514328 Rao Apr 2009 B2
7517702 Halilov et al. Apr 2009 B2
7531828 Mears et al. May 2009 B2
7531829 Blanchard May 2009 B2
7531850 Blanchard May 2009 B2
7586116 Kreps et al. Sep 2009 B2
7586165 Blanchard Sep 2009 B2
7598515 Mears et al. Oct 2009 B2
7612366 Mears et al. Nov 2009 B2
7625767 Huang et al. Dec 2009 B2
7659539 Kreps et al. Feb 2010 B2
7700447 Dukovski et al. Apr 2010 B2
7718996 Dukovski et al. May 2010 B2
7781827 Rao Aug 2010 B2
7812339 Mears et al. Oct 2010 B2
7863066 Mears et al. Jan 2011 B2
7880161 Mears et al. Feb 2011 B2
7928425 Rao Apr 2011 B2
8389974 Mears et al. Mar 2013 B2
9275996 Mears et al. Mar 2016 B2
9406753 Mears et al. Aug 2016 B2
9558939 Stephenson et al. Jan 2017 B1
9899479 Mears et al. Feb 2018 B2
9941359 Mears et al. Apr 2018 B2
9972685 Mears et al. May 2018 B2
10056477 Choi Aug 2018 B1
10068997 Preisler Sep 2018 B1
10084045 Mears et al. Sep 2018 B2
10107854 Roy Oct 2018 B2
10109342 Roy Oct 2018 B2
10109479 Mears et al. Oct 2018 B1
10170560 Mears Jan 2019 B2
10170603 Mears et al. Jan 2019 B2
10170604 Mears et al. Jan 2019 B2
10191105 Roy Jan 2019 B2
10249745 Mears et al. Apr 2019 B2
10276625 Mears et al. Apr 2019 B1
10304881 Chen et al. May 2019 B1
10355151 Chen et al. Jul 2019 B2
10361243 Mears et al. Jul 2019 B2
10367028 Chen et al. Jul 2019 B2
10367064 Rao Jul 2019 B2
10381242 Takeuchi Aug 2019 B2
10396223 Chen et al. Aug 2019 B2
10410880 Takeuchi Sep 2019 B2
10453945 Mears et al. Oct 2019 B2
10461118 Chen et al. Oct 2019 B2
10468245 Weeks et al. Nov 2019 B2
10529757 Chen et al. Jan 2020 B2
10529768 Chen et al. Jan 2020 B2
10566191 Weeks et al. Feb 2020 B1
10580866 Takeuchi et al. Mar 2020 B1
10580867 Takeuchi et al. Mar 2020 B1
10593761 Takeuchi et al. Mar 2020 B1
10608027 Chen et al. Mar 2020 B2
10608043 Chen et al. Mar 2020 B2
10615209 Chen et al. Apr 2020 B2
20020070390 Chow Jun 2002 A1
20030034529 Fitzgerald et al. Feb 2003 A1
20030057416 Currie et al. Mar 2003 A1
20040188711 Coolbaugh et al. Sep 2004 A1
20050167653 Mears et al. Aug 2005 A1
20050282330 Mears et al. Dec 2005 A1
20060220118 Stephenson et al. Oct 2006 A1
20060267130 Rao Nov 2006 A1
20070012910 Mears et al. Jan 2007 A1
20070020833 Mears et al. Jan 2007 A1
20080012004 Huang et al. Jan 2008 A1
20080258134 Mears et al. Oct 2008 A1
20110215299 Rao Sep 2011 A1
20140264458 Preisler et al. Sep 2014 A1
20150041956 Cheng Feb 2015 A1
20150357414 Mears Dec 2015 A1
20160149023 Mears et al. May 2016 A1
20160358773 Mears et al. Dec 2016 A1
20180301584 Augusto Oct 2018 A1
20180337064 Takeuchi Nov 2018 A1
20180358361 Rao Dec 2018 A1
20190057896 Stephenson et al. Feb 2019 A1
20190058059 Stephenson et al. Feb 2019 A1
20190189652 Chen et al. Jun 2019 A1
20190279869 Weeks et al. Sep 2019 A1
20190279897 Stephenson et al. Sep 2019 A1
20190280090 Stephenson et al. Sep 2019 A1
20190317277 Stephenson Oct 2019 A1
20190319135 Stephenson Oct 2019 A1
20190319136 Stephenson Oct 2019 A1
20190319167 Stephenson Oct 2019 A1
20200075731 Weeks et al. Mar 2020 A1
Foreign Referenced Citations (3)
Number Date Country
2347520 Jun 2000 GB
200903800 Jan 2009 TW
2017059146 Apr 2017 WO
Non-Patent Literature Citations (31)
Entry
U.S. Appl. No. 16/176,005, filed Oct. 31, 2018 Weeks et al.
U.S. Appl. No. 16/192,897, filed Nov. 16, 2018 Connelly et al.
U.S. Appl. No. 16/192,911, filed Nov. 16, 2018 Takeuchi et al.
U.S. Appl. No. 16/192,923, filed Nov. 16, 2018 Takeuchi et al.
U.S. Appl. No. 16/192,987, filed Nov. 16, 2018 Takeuchi et al.
U.S. Appl. No. 16/193,000, filed Nov. 16, 2018 Takeuchi et al.
U.S. Appl. No. 16/193,011, filed Nov. 16, 2018 Takeuchi et al.
U.S. Appl. No. 16/513,528, filed 17/17/2019; Burton et al.
U.S. Appl. No. 16/513,832, filed 17/17/2019 Burton et al.
U.S. Appl. No. 16/513,845, filed 17/17/2019 Burton et al.
U.S. Appl. No. 16/513,875, filed 17/17/2019 Burton et al.
U.S. Appl. No. 16/513,895, filed 17/17/2019 Burton et al.
U.S. Appl. No. 16/513,906, filed 17/17/2019 Burton et al.
U.S. Appl. No. 16/513,932, filed 17/17/2019 Burton et al.
U.S. Appl. No. 16/513,943, filed 17/17/2019 Burton et al.
U.S. Appl. No. 16/801,287, filed Feb. 26, 2020 Weeks et al.
U.S. Appl. No. 16/801,305, filed Feb. 26, 2020 Weeks et al.
U.S. Appl. No. 16/810,957, filed Mar. 6, 2020 Cody et al.
U.S. Appl. No. 16/853,875, filed Apr. 21, 2020 Hideki Takeuchi.
U.S. Appl. No. 16/853,884, filed Apr. 21, 2020 Hideki Takeuchi.
U.S. Appl. No. 16/898,589, filed Jun. 11, 2020 Takeuchi et al.
U.S. Appl. No. 16/913,546, filed Jun. 26, 2020 Burton et al.
U.S. Appl. No. 16/898,564, filed Jun. 11, 2020 Takeuchi et al.
Luo et al., “Chemical Design of Direct-Gap Light-Emitting Silicon” published in Physical Review Letters, vol. 89, No. 7; Aug. 12, 2002; 4 pgs.
Mears et al. “Simultaneous Carrier Transport Enhancement and variability reduction in Si MOSFETs by insertion of partial Monolayers of oxygen” IEEE silicon Nanoelectronics Workshop (2012): (Date of conference Jun. 10-11, 2012) pp. 2.
Novikov et al. “Silicon-based Optoelectronics” 1999-2003, pp. 1-6.
R. Tsu “Phenomena in silicon nanostructure device” published online Sep. 6, 2000 by Applied Physics and Materials Science & Processing, pp. 391-402.
R. Tsu “Si Based Green ELD: Si-Oxygen Superlattice” wysiwyg://l/http://www3.interscience.wiley.com/cgi-bin/abstract/72512946/start: published online Jul. 21, 2000; 2 pgs. Abstract Only.
Xu et al. “Effectiveness of Quasi-confinement technology for improving P-chanel Si an Ge MOSSFET performance” Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, University of California, Berkeley, 2012, pp. 2. mearstech.net; retrieved from internet Jan. 18, 2016.
Xu et al. “Extension of planar bulk n-channel MOSFET scaling with oxygen insertion technology” IEEE Transactions on Electron devices, vol. 61, No. 9; Sep. 2014. pp. 3345-3349.
Xu et al., “MOSFET performance and scalability enhancement by insertion of oxygen layers”, Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, University of California, Berkeley, 2012, pp. 1-4.
Related Publications (1)
Number Date Country
20210217875 A1 Jul 2021 US
Provisional Applications (1)
Number Date Country
62960851 Jan 2020 US