Methods of forming doped regions in semiconductor substrates.
Integrated circuit fabrication may involve implanting one or more dopants into a semiconductor substrate. One method for implanting dopant into the substrate is beamline ion implantation. Such method can utilize high energy to implant ions deeply into a substrate. However, as semiconductor devices become increasingly smaller (i.e., as a level of integration increases) multiple problems are encountered in attempting to utilize beamline ion implantation. Such problems include fundamental physical limits pertaining to the space charge limit, sputtering limit, and the implant angle limit for non-planar structures.
Another method for implanting dopant into a semiconductor substrate is plasma doping (PLAD), which may be also referred to as plasma immersion ion implantation (PIII). PLAD may offer advantages relative to beamline ion implantation such as system simplicity, lower-cost and higher throughput; and further may not be adversely affected by the fundamental physical limits that reduce the scalability of beamline ion implantation. However, PLAD can suffer from a disadvantage in that it is difficult to implant dopant deeply into a substrate. Further, PLAD often forms an undesired deposit across a substrate surface. The deposit can be removed with a subsequent clean, but such clean can exacerbate the problem of the shallow dopant implant occurring with PLAD. Specifically, the clean may remove some of the substrate from over the implant region and thereby render the implant to be even more shallow relative to an upper substrate surface.
In light of the above-discussed difficulties associated with conventional dopant implant methodologies, it would be desirable to develop new methods for implanting dopants into semiconductor substrates during integrated circuit fabrication.
In some embodiments doping methodologies comprise utilization of PLAD to provide a first dopant within a substrate to an initial depth, followed by utilization of a second dopant to knock the first dopant deeper into the substrate. The energy of the second dopant may be sufficient to knock first dopant out of a PLAD deposition layer and into an underlying substrate, but low enough that the second dopant remains primarily within the PLAD deposition layer, and/or near an interface of the deposition layer and an underlying substrate, so that the most, if not all, of the second dopant is removed with a subsequent clean step utilized to remove the PLAD deposition layer. In some embodiments the PLAD deposition layer is advantageously utilized as a screen to reduce or eliminate damage to the underlying substrate from the implant of the second dopant. In some embodiments the second dopant is implanted at an appropriate energy and dose so that the majority of the second dopant remains within the deposit. The second dopant may be elements, molecules or clusters.
The second dopant may be implanted by, for example, PLAD and/or ion bombardment (where ion bombardment refers to beamline ion implantation, or to other ion implantation conducted in the absence of plasma). The first dopant provided in the substrate with PLAD may be any of numerous dopants, including n-type dopants (for instance, phosphorus, arsenic, etc.) and p-type dopants (for instance, boron, etc.). In a specific example described herein, the first dopant is boron implanted utilizing PLAD with B2H6. The second dopant utilized to knock the first dopant deeper into the substrate may be any suitable particles, including, for example, n-type dopants, p-type dopants and/or neutral type dopants (for instance, carbon, silicon, germanium, etc.). Further, the second dopant may be heavier than the first dopant or lighter than the first dopant, provided that the overall energy of the second dopant is sufficient to knock the first dopant deeper into the substrate. In a specific example described herein, the second dopant is neutral-type dopant (specifically, germanium) and heavier than the first dopant.
An example embodiment is described with reference to
Referring to
The PLAD system may be an RF-excited continuous plasma with a DC pulsed bias substrate. Such doping system may utilize a doping gas of B2H6/H2 with an implant voltage that may be typically within a range of from 0 to −15 KV, and with a dose that may be typically within a range of from about 1×1016 atoms/cm2 to about 1×1017 atoms/cm2 (for instance, about 3.5×1016 atoms/cm2).
In the shown embodiment of
A significant amount of the deposited boron provided by PLAD processing may be within the layer 16, as well is within upper surface layers of substrate 12 that will ultimately be removed in the subsequent clean. Accordingly, less than or equal to about 50 percent of the total implanted boron dose may be deep enough within substrate 12 at the processing stage of
Referring to
The germanium implant can be utilized to move at least some of the boron within doped region 14 to a desired depth within substrate 12. Also, the germanium implant can increase the amount of boron that remains within substrate 12 after a subsequent clean (such clean is discussed below with service to
In some embodiments the germanium can be implanted deep enough to remain in a doped region after a subsequent clean of the PLAD deposit 16, and can have an additional advantage of enhancing boron activation during a subsequent anneal. In other embodiments, all of the germanium may be removed in a subsequent clean utilized to remove the PLAD deposit.
An example method for providing the germanium implant of
Referring to
The processing of
Sidewall spacers 66 are along sidewalls of the gate stack 58. The sidewall spacers may comprise any suitable composition or combination of compositions, and in some embodiments may comprise, consist essentially of, or consist of one or more of silicon dioxide, silicon nitride and silicon oxynitride.
Source/drain regions 54 and 56 are aligned relative to sidewall spacers 66. In some embodiments the source/drain regions may comprise halo regions (not shown) and/or lightly doped diffusion (LDD) regions (not shown) that extend to under spacers 66.
Although the example embodiment of
In the shown embodiment, the second dopant utilized at the process stage of
The utilization of a second dopant to knock the first plasma-deposited dopant deeper into a semiconductor substrate is found to improve sheet resistance, contact resistance and device performance relative to the utilization of plasma deposition alone.
The electronic devices discussed above may be incorporated into electronic systems. Such electronic systems may be used in, for example, memory modules, device drivers, power modules, communication modems, processor modules, and application-specific modules, and may include multilayer, multichip modules. The electronic systems may be any of a broad range of systems, such as, for example, clocks, televisions, cell phones, personal computers, automobiles, industrial control systems, aircraft, etc.
The particular orientation of the various embodiments in the drawings is for illustrative purposes only, and the embodiments may be rotated relative to the shown orientations in some applications. The description provided herein, and the claims that follow, pertain to any structures that have the described relationships between various features, regardless of whether the structures are in the particular orientation of the drawings, or are rotated relative to such orientation.
The cross-sectional views of the accompanying illustrations only show features within the planes of the cross-sections, and do not show materials behind the planes of the cross-sections in order to simplify the drawings.
When a structure is referred to above as being “on” or “against” another structure, it can be directly on the other structure or intervening structures may also be present. In contrast, when a structure is referred to as being “directly on” or “directly against” another structure, there are no intervening structures present. When a structure is referred to as being “connected” or “coupled” to another structure, it can be directly connected or coupled to the other structure, or intervening structures may be present. In contrast, when a structure is referred to as being “directly connected” or “directly coupled” to another structure, there are no intervening structures present.
In compliance with the statute, the subject matter disclosed herein has been described in language more or less specific as to structural and methodical features. It is to be understood, however, that the claims are not limited to the specific features shown and described, since the means herein disclosed comprise example embodiments. The claims are thus to be afforded full scope as literally worded, and to be appropriately interpreted in accordance with the doctrine of equivalents.
This patent resulted from a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/938,845, which was filed Nov. 3, 2010, and which is hereby incorporated herein by reference.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3562022 | Shifrin | Feb 1971 | A |
3865624 | Wilde | Feb 1975 | A |
4764394 | Conrad | Aug 1988 | A |
5374456 | Matossian et al. | Dec 1994 | A |
5672541 | Booske et al. | Sep 1997 | A |
5897363 | Gonzalez et al. | Apr 1999 | A |
6137713 | Kuroda et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6329686 | Lowrey et al. | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6417040 | Noble | Jul 2002 | B2 |
6492245 | Liu et al. | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6504201 | Noble et al. | Jan 2003 | B1 |
6563162 | Han et al. | May 2003 | B2 |
6593612 | Gruening et al. | Jul 2003 | B2 |
6600191 | Lowrey et al. | Jul 2003 | B2 |
6639846 | Nikutta | Oct 2003 | B2 |
6689660 | Noble et al. | Feb 2004 | B1 |
6716727 | Walther | Apr 2004 | B2 |
7052941 | Lee | May 2006 | B2 |
7074656 | Yeo et al. | Jul 2006 | B2 |
7099174 | Thompson et al. | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7166479 | Zhu et al. | Jan 2007 | B2 |
7179703 | Gonzalez et al. | Feb 2007 | B2 |
7365384 | Tran et al. | Apr 2008 | B2 |
7456068 | Kavalieros et al. | Nov 2008 | B2 |
7491641 | Southwick et al. | Feb 2009 | B2 |
7501676 | Doyle | Mar 2009 | B2 |
7592212 | Qin et al. | Sep 2009 | B2 |
7737010 | Qin et al. | Jun 2010 | B2 |
7768073 | Wells | Aug 2010 | B2 |
7939409 | Figura et al. | May 2011 | B2 |
7948064 | Barth et al. | May 2011 | B2 |
20020110039 | Forbes et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20030096490 | Borland et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
20030186519 | Downey et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20040132232 | Noble | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20050017281 | Lowrey | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050260838 | Downey et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20070087574 | Gupta et al. | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20080142931 | Sasaki et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20110220994 | Parekh et al. | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20120104491 | Heineck | May 2012 | A1 |
20120214285 | Guha | Aug 2012 | A1 |
Entry |
---|
Bernstein et al., “Effects of Dopant Deposition on p+/n and n+/p Shallow Junctions formed by Plasma Immersion Ion Implanation,” IEEE, 2000, pp. 464-467. |
Gras-Marti, “Recoil Implanatation Yields and Depth Profiles”, Phys. Stat. Sol. (1) 76, pp. 621-627, 1983. |
Oh et al., “Characterization of B2H6 Plasma Doping for Converted p+ Poly-Si Gate”, Ion Implantation Technology, 2006, pp. 25-28. |
Qin et al., “Comparative Study of Self-Sputtering Effects of Different Boron-Based Low-Energy Doping Techniques”, IEEE, 2009, pp. 1760-1766. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20130072006 A1 | Mar 2013 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 12938845 | Nov 2010 | US |
Child | 13674674 | US |