The present description pertains to pumps and particularly to gas pumps. More particularly, it pertains to micro pumps.
Related-art gas pumps for microanalytics are bulky, comprise mechanical actuators that are prone to wear and limit their service life, and create undesirable flow pulsations that need to be dampened via bulky buffer volumes. The cost to fabricate and assemble such mechanical actuation pumps (regardless of whether they are based on electromagnetic, piezo-electric or electro-static forces) is high and contributes to their high price.
The present pump avoids related-art shortcomings by generating a steady gas flow, which is driven by viscous drag created by a small volumetric fraction of large (relative to the electrons), in-situ-generated ions, which then drift in a steady applied electric field. The uniformity of the applied DC electric fields and operation of such pumps is favored by the scale and length/diameter ratio of MEMS or micro channels.
a is a graphical illustration emission current versus applied voltage for cold-cathode emissions from diamond films; and
b is restricted Fowler-Nordheim plot of the electron emission of a micro-wave CVD sample.
Stokes' Law relates particle radius, r, particle velocity, v, and fluid viscosity, η, to viscous shear force, Fv, where
Fv=6π·η·v·r.
If this particle 17 is charged it also experiences an electrostatic force, Fe=E·q. The associated drift velocity of a particle of charge, q, mass, m, experiencing an average time between collisions, τ, and subjected to the force of an electric field, E, is v=vd, where for m(N2)=0.028 kg/mole/NA and
or 462 cm/s if one applies 100 V to the (+) electrode 11 and (−) electrode 12 spaced at about 1 cm.
To arrive at the above vd, τ=6.7·10−6/50,000=1.34·10−10 sec may be used, based on the average velocity of N2 molecules in air of v=50,000 cm/s, and where τ=time between collisions=λ/vT=λ/(3kT/m)0.5, m=28/NA=kg-mass of a N2+ charge carrier, vT=thermal velocity and λ=mean free path=6.7×10−6 cm at 1 atm, or generally, λ=0.005/p, with p in Torr and λ in cm at ambient conditions, NA=6.022·1023=Avogadro Number of molecules per mole, the Boltzmann constant, k=1.3807·10−16 erg/K, and the elemental charge value of q=1.6022·10−19 coulombs.
The viscous shear force on the capillary wall 13 caused by fluid flow is derived from Poiseuille's Law, which relates volume flow to pressure drop: V=πrc2v=π·Δp·rc4/(8·Lc·η), so that Fc=Δp·πrc2=8π·η·v·Lc.
To equate the two forces, one may need to make an assumption on the concentration of ions. For v=100 cm/s, rc=0.0050 cm and for a xion=10 ppb concentration of ions leads to a current of
q·πrc2·v·x·NA*=1.6022·10−19·π·0.00502·100·10−8·NA=0.0232 μA.
The associated power for an applied potential of 100 V is Q=2.32 μW. The number of traveling ions within the L=1 cm e-field section is
N=NA/VM(To/T)·xio·πrc2·Lc=6.022·1023/22415(To/T)10−8·π·0.00502·1/=19,660,000 ions,
while the total number of molecules in Lc is NA*=NA/VM(To/T)=2.883·1019/cm3.
One may determine the achievable macroscopic flow velocity, vc, by equating the ion drag force by N ions, Fion, with that of capillary flow in the same length of capillary 13, Lc, with the force Fc=Δp·πrc2 and set Fion≡Fc, and remembering that ionic friction is related to vd, but that ionic current relates to vc+vd, where
Fion=6π·η·vd·rion·xion NA*·πrc2Lc≡Fc=8π·η·vc·Lc; and
one may get, with rion=1.5·10−8 cm, vd(100 V/cm)=461.6 cm/s:
vc=(6π/8)·vd·xion·rion·NA*·rc2=(2.3562)·461.7·10−8·1.5·10−8·2.883·1019·0.00502=117.6 cm/s,
for 10 ppb ions and 100 V/cm in the 100 μm capillary.
Table 20 of
The table 20 data show that, barring minor variations in the values used above, this method of generating flow may work well, and with a very small concentration of ions, provided that one does not run into electron-attachment or space charge effects and can maintain electric neutrality as one pulls the heavy ions through the gas. However, this ion drift spectrometry may be leveraging, which can be used as a gas detector.
As one increases the intensity of the fields applied to the MDDs (microdischarge devices) 14 and 16 for ion generation, which are drawn into
As the DC field is increased, changed or switched off, the macroscopic flow changes within fractions of a millisecond and may thus be used to control and/or pulse the flow in the second stage of a μGC-μGC analyzer. μGC may be micro gas chromatography.
Although conceived for use with gases, the easy availability of ions in liquids may lend itself to the use of pump 10 for liquid fluids also but less well, due to the much smaller difference between positive and negative ions (no free electrons) than between the mostly positive ions and the electrons in gases.
To determine the actual flow velocity that results from balancing the ion-drag action force and the viscous force offered by the flow in a capillary 13 of length, Lcs, one may set Fion≡Fc, and therefore obtain
6π·η·vd·rion·Nion=8π·η·vc·Lcs,
and numerically with
This flow may increase with vd=q·E·τ/m, xion, rion and Lce, while it decreases as Lcs is lengthened. Additional parameters are shown in table 20, especially those that relate to energy consumption.
The usefulness of this ion-drag pump may depend on the density and life of the generated ions, the differentiation in size or asymmetry between positive and negative charge carriers, and the asymmetric positioning and shape of the ion drift e-field electrodes.
By providing such essentials, the charge carriers may be able to drive flow of the neutral molecules, not just through its own e-field section but through and against a useful “load”, i.e., against the flow restriction of a practical flow system as, e.g., in a GC or μGC of column length, Lcs. For practical and variable inputs such as 100 V/cm DC field, ion size (assumed enhanced by the attachment of polar molecules like water and a range of ion mole fractions, xion, (inputs are highlighted with stars), Table 20 lists the achievable flow velocities without load (Lcs=Lce); and for a useful load the flow velocities, vc, the Reynolds Numbers, Re, viscous pressure drops, Δpe, and the dissipated powers and total power and efficiencies, using as a reference the ideal or theoretical power to move the gas against the listed pressure head.
An additional important consideration is the amount of power needed to not only draw and collect the ions, but to also generate and regenerate them as they drift and recombine along the e-field. It may be assumed in Table 20 that one would need to regenerate ions 99 times within the moving gas volume in the e-field. This may be partly redundant with the fact that the practical energy for generation of ions exceeds the theoretical ionization energy by a factor of 4 to 6, so that the textbook ˜10 to 12 eV (see table 21 of
Table 20 of
Changing input parameters may reveal further features of the pump and its present model: 1) Increasing the effective ion radius by a factor of 2 increases efficiency at xion=1 ppm from 42.5 to 68.8%; 2) The needed generation power is only 1.65 mW for Eion=70 eV and 99% regeneration rate; 3) Reducing the e-field by 2 times decreases flow by 2 times and efficiency from 42 to 27%; and 4) Reducing the capillary length by 2 times doubles the flow velocity, maintains the pressure drop constant and increases efficiency to 52.5%.
As mentioned above, an application a practical ion-drag pump may depend on the ability to configure and operate MDDs to generate the needed ion concentrations and asymmetries. By configuring MDDs 14 and 16 in series and parallel, the desired flow and pump pressure head may be achieved.
Achieving advantageous energy efficiencies obtained by the present model may depend of the actual number and amount of power the MDDs needed to move the sample gas. Descriptions of macroscopic ion-drag pump systems may show reduced efficiency as dimensions are reduced, but may be strongly dependent on the involved type of ion generation.
One type of MDDs that may be well suited for operation of micro-scale pumps may be those stabilized in arrays of orifices, as used for UV light generation, and sketched out in
Several versions with a small exemplary number of parallel and series orifice-MDDs in an array on a thin-film dielectric are presented in
At the thin or sharp edged or pointed orifice 46, a corona discharge may be an electrical discharge brought on by the ionization of a fluid surrounding a conductor, which occurs when the potential gradient or concentrated field exceeds a certain value, in situations where sparking is not favored. In the negative corona (generated from high-voltage applied to a sharp point or ridge), energetic electrons are present beyond the ionization boundary and the number of electrons is about an order of magnitude greater than in the positive corona. Both positive and negative coronas can generate “electric wind” and drag neutral molecules towards a measurable flow. The voltage that may be applied to plates 31 and 32 may be a value from about 9 volts to about 900 volts DC. The plus polarity of the power supply may be applied to plate 31 and the negative polarity or ground of that supply may be applied to plate 32. Insulator layer 36 may be of a dielectric material and have a thickness sufficient to prevent arching of voltage between electrode plates or films 31 and 32.
On a first side of the elements 43 may be a chamber side 51 for containing the fluid that may be pumped through pump 30. On the other side of the elements 43 may be a chamber side 52. An input port 53 for the entry of fluid into pump 30 may be towards one end of the chamber side 51 and pump 30. Sides or walls 51 and 52 may be made from silicon, a polymer or other appropriate material. An output 54 for the exit of fluid out of pump 30 may be towards other end. A flow of a fluid 55 may enter input port 53 into a chamber of the first stage of pump 30. The fluid 55 may flow from input 53 through elements 43 of a first stage or sub-chamber 61, second stage or sub-chamber 62, third stage or sub-chamber 63, fourth stage or sub-chamber 64 and out of pump 30 through exit port 54.
An ion pump may have an insulating layer 36, a first conductive layer 32 situated on a first side of the insulating layer 36, and a second conductive layer 31 situated on a second side of the insulating layer 36. There may be openings 46 situated in the first conductive layer 32, the insulating layer 36 and the second conductive layer 31 thereby forming elements or channels 43 having first and second discharge device electrodes, respectively. An enclosure, such as enclosure 51 and 52 of
The openings 46 on the first conductive layer 32 may have a sharp-like configuration, and the openings 47 on the second conductive layer 31 may have a non-sharp-like configuration. This arrangement provides for predominant generation of in-situ ions proximate to the sharp-edged conductor openings 46. The ions then bear predominantly the polarity of those sharp edges, which then may induce a fluid 55 flow of neutral molecules as a result of the force and viscous drag of those predominant ions.
The sharp conductor of opening or orifice 46 may provide an electrical discharge with conductive nanotube whiskers. The nanotube whiskers may be operated in a cold cathode field emission mode. The nanotube whiskers may also operate in a corona discharge mode. The electrical discharge may be energized by one of DC and AC applied voltages. The sharp conductive opening or electrode for providing an electrical discharge may consist of thin-film material. The conductive electrode material such as thin film material for providing an electrical discharge may be operated in a cold cathode field emission mode. Or the conductive electrode material such as the thin film material for providing an electrical discharge may be operated in a corona discharge mode.
The sharp edges of the predominant discharge polarity electrodes of openings or orifices 46 may consist of 10- to 100-nm-thick films of conductive material, and the film thickness of the non-predominant electrodes of openings or orifices 47 may be at least 10-100 times thicker and rounded at its inner diameter edge.
The openings or orifices 45 and 46, and holes 48 may be fabricated via one of etch, laser-drill, mechanical stamping and combination of these. The openings may be sized for a ratio of axial length (=non conductive film thickness) to inner diameter, R, of maximize the performance of the pump, so that approximately 1≦R≦10, and the film thickness for the non-conductive spacer is about 6 μm≦S≦100 μm.
The pump may consist of as many consecutive, i.e., serial, stages, L, (e.g., stages 61, 62, 63 and 64) and applied voltage, U, as needed to achieve the desired total pressure head, Δpt=n·Δp, where the achieved pressure head at each stage is about Δp, with due allowance for the changes in absolute pressure, gas volume (due to its compressibility) and temperature at each stage, which entails changes in pump effectiveness and capacity at each stage. The number of openings, stages, n, and applied voltage, U, may be chosen so that the desired total pumping volumetric rate and total pump head pressure can be achieved, with due allowance for the pressure drop through the pump itself (requiring a number of openings, no) and through the (analyzer) load itself. The number of openings may be increased by a factor α=n/no=Δpo/(Δpo−ΔpL), where Δpo=ion pump pressure head without a load and ΔpL=pressure drop through the load, with preferably Δpo˜2·ΔpL.
Rapid control of sample gas flow in the pump may be enabled upon resetting the applied fields, to, e.g., achieve small gas pulses/injections of sample/analyte into micro-GC columns, as in the second stage of a GC-GC system or the second part of a separation column of a second material. The ion pump may be operated like a valve by adjusting the applied voltage to the conductive electrodes to just oppose and balance external flow or pressure drivers. The sharp-edged electrode or sharp-like openings may be recessed to a larger ID (inner diameter) than the ID of the insulating layer, by a radial distance equal to about 10 to 20% of the insulating layer radius, to enable removal of the non-predominant polarity ions before the remaining predominant ions enter the ID of the openings in the insulating layer.
The present pump may be a gas pump without moving parts, driven by the force and drift caused by an electric field on ions that are generated inside the pump. Although “normally open” when not energized, the pump may maintain zero or positive flow when energized. The simple design of the pump consists of a central insulating layer that supports a top and a bottom electrode with many parallel openings for operation of asymmetric corona discharges.
The pump 40 chamber may be formed with chamber sides or walls 76 and 77 which may be fabricated from silicon, a polymer or other appropriate material. Between stages 71 and 72 and between stages 72 and 73 of pump 40, the corona polarity may be switched to avoid the extra flow switch 45 of pump 30 in
The design of pump 40 may do away with the extra routing of the sample gas being pumped. Other tradeoffs may be made relative to pump 30 of
Listed as follows is the nomenclature of some common physical parameters relative to the present description. E is electric field; E=U/s, in volts/cm; Eion is energy of formation of ions; F is force of electrostatic field, Fe, of ionic viscous drag, Fion, or of viscous capillary flow, Fc; Lc is length of the capillary, in the applied e-field, Lce, and of the whole system, Lcs, in cm; λ is mean free path between collisions, in cm; N is number of ions in the length of capillary between electrodes, N=xion·NA*·π·rc2·Lce; NA is Avogadro number in mol−1; NA* is Avogadro number in cm−3; r is radius of capillary, rc, or ion, rion; T is temperature in K; τ is time between collisions τ=λ/vT=λ/(3 kT/m)0.5, in s; x is molar or volumetric fraction of ions, xion, or molecules, x; v is velocity—1) Ion drift relative to fluid, vion; and 2) Macroscopic capillary flow, vc, in cm/s; vion is velocity of ion drift relative to fluid, total ion velocity=vion+vc, but friction loss ˜vion; V is volume in cm3; VF is volumetric flow in cm3/s; VM is volume of one mol of gas, VMo under 1 atm and 0° C. conditions.
Some of the features of the pumps 10, 30 and 40 may include: 1) Use of in-situ-generated ions to induce macroscopic gas flow in a small channel, as observed in the deflection of flames when a high electric field is applied (electric wind effect), which leverage the large size difference between bulky positive ions and ˜1000 times smaller (mass of) electrons; 2) Generation of such ions via suitably distributed MDDs, typically energized by electroless discharges operating in the 2 kHz to 20 MHz frequency range; 3) Taking advantage of the high frequency MDD to eliminate pump pulsations plaguing traditional mechanical pumps; 4) Applying non-symmetrical AC voltage and power to the ion-accelerating ions, in order to also use electroless operation, so that the negative electrode attracting the mostly positive and heavy ions gets most of the fractional “on”-time; 5) Merging the MDD for ion generation with the set of electrodes used to generate ion drift, whereby the above non-symmetrical approach is used for both generation and ion drift/acceleration; 6) Rapid control of gas flow upon resetting the applied fields, to, e.g., achieve small gas pulses/injections of sample/analyte into micro-GC columns, as in the second stage of a GC-GC system; and 7) Operation of the ion pump as a valve by adjusting the applied voltage to just oppose and balance external flow or pressure drivers.
The advantages of the pumps 10, 30 and 40 over related-art pumps may include: 1) Elimination of or much reduced flow pulsations; therefore elimination of buffer volumes; 2) Reduced mechanical noise; 3) Smaller size, lower power (see table 22 of
Comparison of performance parameters between an ideal, theoretical pump and an actually operating one may be made. The present pumping approach has compactness and low power consumption. A comparison to other pumping schemes to achieve 235 cm/s in a 100×100 μm duct, i.e., 1.41 cm3/s against Δp of 9.7 psi, is shown in table 22 of
Energies are needed to generate ions. Listed are two sets of examples which may show that the generation of positive gas ions is roughly 10 times higher than that for negative electrons. The table 21 in
Cold cathode emission from carbon nanotubes may be used for the electron emitter electrode in the ion pump. The nanotube whiskers may provide for an electrical discharge and operate in a cold cathode field emission mode or a corona discharge mode.
Although the invention has been described with respect to at least one illustrative embodiment, many variations and modifications will become apparent to those skilled in the art upon reading the present specification. It is therefore the intention that the appended claims be interpreted as broadly as possible in view of the prior art to include all such variations and modifications.
The present patent application claims priority as a continuation-in-part of co-pending U.S. Nonprovisional Patent Application Ser. No. 10/750,483, filed Dec. 31, 2003, and entitled “GAS IONIZATION SENSOR”, which is hereby incorporated by reference in its entirety in the present application. The present patent application claims priority as a continuation-in-part of co-pending U.S. Nonprovisional Patent Application Ser. No. 10/749,863, filed Dec. 31, 2003, and entitled “MICRO-PLASMA SENSOR SYSTEM”, which is hereby incorporated by reference in its entirety in the present application.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
906468 | Steynis | Dec 1908 | A |
1157859 | Freet | Oct 1915 | A |
1454219 | Goedicke | May 1923 | A |
1505669 | Quain | Aug 1924 | A |
3146616 | Loyd | Sep 1964 | A |
3554669 | Reader | Jan 1971 | A |
3557532 | Broerman | Jan 1971 | A |
3730874 | Trub | May 1973 | A |
3783356 | Lide, III et al. | Jan 1974 | A |
3833492 | Bollyky | Sep 1974 | A |
3921002 | Williams | Nov 1975 | A |
3967131 | Slipiec et al. | Jun 1976 | A |
3979193 | Sikich | Sep 1976 | A |
4025441 | Tabata et al. | May 1977 | A |
4043196 | Trageser | Aug 1977 | A |
4048668 | von Bargen | Sep 1977 | A |
4049552 | Arff | Sep 1977 | A |
4051045 | Yamamoto et al. | Sep 1977 | A |
4079260 | Dmietriev et al. | Mar 1978 | A |
4101783 | Hutter | Jul 1978 | A |
4123664 | Yamamura et al. | Oct 1978 | A |
4128768 | Yamamoto et al. | Dec 1978 | A |
4159971 | Gneupel | Jul 1979 | A |
4216096 | Pare et al. | Aug 1980 | A |
4228815 | Juffa et al. | Oct 1980 | A |
4234800 | Kenly | Nov 1980 | A |
4383976 | Notaro | May 1983 | A |
4411756 | Bennett et al. | Oct 1983 | A |
4417966 | Krauss et al. | Nov 1983 | A |
4461744 | Erni et al. | Jul 1984 | A |
4478076 | Bohrer | Oct 1984 | A |
4483200 | Togawa et al. | Nov 1984 | A |
4504446 | Kunicki et al. | Mar 1985 | A |
4507974 | Yelderman | Apr 1985 | A |
4576050 | Lambert | Mar 1986 | A |
4614573 | Masuda | Sep 1986 | A |
4640782 | Burleson | Feb 1987 | A |
4650573 | Nathanson | Mar 1987 | A |
4656010 | Leitzke | Apr 1987 | A |
4690803 | Hirth | Sep 1987 | A |
4696800 | Sasaki et al. | Sep 1987 | A |
4725412 | Ito | Feb 1988 | A |
4735082 | Kolloff | Apr 1988 | A |
4759210 | Wohltjen | Jul 1988 | A |
4764349 | Arff et al. | Aug 1988 | A |
4877588 | Ditzler et al. | Oct 1989 | A |
4886645 | Fischer et al. | Dec 1989 | A |
4909078 | Sittler et al. | Mar 1990 | A |
4944035 | Aagardl et al. | Jul 1990 | A |
4960569 | Fovell et al. | Oct 1990 | A |
4969850 | Wales | Nov 1990 | A |
4981656 | Leitzke | Jan 1991 | A |
5004587 | Tacchi | Apr 1991 | A |
5008087 | Batchelor | Apr 1991 | A |
5031126 | McCulloch et al. | Jul 1991 | A |
5034198 | Kaiga et al. | Jul 1991 | A |
5044766 | Stuart | Sep 1991 | A |
5056047 | Sondergeld | Oct 1991 | A |
5093087 | Freeman | Mar 1992 | A |
5106589 | Conrad | Apr 1992 | A |
5124132 | Francis, Jr. et al. | Jun 1992 | A |
5145653 | Fischer et al. | Sep 1992 | A |
5146414 | McKown et al. | Sep 1992 | A |
5243858 | Erskine et al. | Sep 1993 | A |
5263380 | Sultan et al. | Nov 1993 | A |
5268151 | Reed et al. | Dec 1993 | A |
5268302 | Rounbehler et al. | Dec 1993 | A |
5379630 | Lacey | Jan 1995 | A |
5411713 | Iwanaga | May 1995 | A |
5463899 | Zemel et al. | Nov 1995 | A |
5469013 | Kang | Nov 1995 | A |
5533412 | Jerman et al. | Jul 1996 | A |
5570179 | Weckstrom | Oct 1996 | A |
5587520 | Rhodes | Dec 1996 | A |
5591896 | Lin | Jan 1997 | A |
5665604 | Monagle et al. | Sep 1997 | A |
5836750 | Cabuz | Nov 1998 | A |
5922974 | Davison et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
5968377 | Yuasa et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
6016027 | DeTemple et al. | Jan 2000 | A |
6031711 | Tennent et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6106236 | Henoch et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6106245 | Cabuz | Aug 2000 | A |
6139384 | DeTemple et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6178811 | Bonne et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6179586 | Herb et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6184607 | Cabuz et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6194833 | DeTemple et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6308553 | Bonne et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6313638 | Sun et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6393894 | Bonne et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
6457347 | Koo et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6494617 | Stokes et al. | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6583407 | Fischer et al. | Jun 2003 | B1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2 934 566 | Mar 1981 | DE |
32 34 146 | Mar 1984 | DE |
42 22 458 | Jan 1994 | DE |
42 43 573 | Jun 1994 | DE |
296 07 315 | Sep 1996 | DE |
196 19 133 | Nov 1997 | DE |
0 232 719 | Jan 1987 | EP |
0 348 245 | Dec 1989 | EP |
0 364 982 | Apr 1990 | EP |
0 419 873 | Aug 1990 | EP |
0 468 793 | Jan 1992 | EP |
0 702 212 | Mar 1996 | EP |
0 773 432 | May 1997 | EP |
2 287 792 | Sep 1995 | GB |
56-153256 | Nov 1981 | JP |
57-131029 | Aug 1982 | JP |
57-206830 | Dec 1982 | JP |
WO 9206369 | Apr 1992 | WO |
WO 9420825 | Sep 1994 | WO |
WO 9822793 | May 1998 | WO |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20050141999 A1 | Jun 2005 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 10749863 | Dec 2003 | US |
Child | 10765517 | US | |
Parent | 10750483 | Dec 2003 | US |
Child | 10749863 | US |