Microchip with faraday cages and internal flexibility sipes

Description

BACKGROUND

1. Field of the Disclosure

The disclosure relates to a Faraday Cage surrounding semiconductor microchips, photovoltaic cells, and/or other micro and/or nano devices combined with the applicant's prior internal sipe inventions, including at least one compartment surrounded by at least one internal sipe, such as a slit. More specifically, a Faraday Cage coincides with an outer compartment, which forms one surface of a sipe surrounding an inner compartment including a personal computer microchip and/or a photovoltaic cell and/or a fuel cell and/or a battery.

The disclosure also relates to a semiconductor wafer, such as silicon, containing a multitude of microchips, such as with one or more core microprocessors. Instead of separating the microchips into separate dies in the conventional process, the entire semiconductor wafer is used essentially intact as a computer. More specifically, interconnects can be added to the printed circuit architecture of the wafer to connect the wafer microchips to other wafer microchips and/or other components on the wafer or external to it. Still more specifically, each microchip can be a complete system on a chip (SoC). Even more specifically, the semiconductor wafer can be used with other conventional interface devices for power and data, including wireless such as radio and/or optic, and/or wired such as fiber optic and/or electric, including for each SoC microchip on the wafer. In another specific embodiment, two or more semiconductor wafers can be stacked in vertical layers; for example, with a first wafer including microprocessors or cores; a second wafer including random access memory or RAM; and a third wafer including other components; each SoC microchip, in this example, can have one or more components on each of the three wafers.

The disclosure also relates to the semiconductor wafer including one or more of the applicant's prior internal sipe inventions, with an outer compartment having an internal sipe.

The disclosure also relates to the semiconductor wafer being surrounded by one or more Faraday Cages integrated into the internal sipe invention.

2. Brief Description of the Prior Art

Faraday Cage surrounding semiconductor microchips, photovoltaic cells, and/or other micro and/or nano devices, are described by the applicant in his U.S. application Ser. No. 10/802,049 filed Mar. 17, 2004, and published as Pub. No. US 2004/0215931 A1 on Oct. 28, 2004.

The applicant's prior internal footwear sipe inventions, including at least one compartment surrounded by at least one internal sipe, such as a slit, are described by the applicant in his U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/802,930, filed May 25, 2007 and published as Pub. No. US 2008/0086916 A1 on Apr. 17, 2008, as well as in several earlier U.S. applications filed by the applicant.

Existing semiconductor wafers, currently up to 300 mm in diameter, are always cut into a large number of separate dies, with one microchip formed into a package from each flaw-free die cut from the semiconductor wafer; some dies are inherently defective and are discarded. A typical semiconductor wafer is shown in the applicant's U.S. application Ser. No. 10/684,657 filed Oct. 15, 2003.

As described in Wikipedia, “wafer scale integration” (WSI) is a yet-unused system of building very-large integrated circuit networks that use an entire silicon wafer to produce a single “super-chip.” Through a combination of large size and reduced packaging, WSI could lead to dramatically reduced costs for some systems, notably massively parallel supercomputers.

Many companies including TI and ITT attempted to develop “wafer scale integration” (WSI) production systems in the 1970's and '80's, but all failed and no products were released. Further attempts at WSI appear to be largely abandoned for decades.

One critical problem that has not been overcome is that of inherent flaws in semiconductor wafers. It has been an ongoing goal to develop methods to handle faulty areas of the wafers through logic, as opposed to sawing them out of the wafer. Generally, this approach uses a grid pattern of sub-circuits and “rewires” around the damaged areas using appropriate logic.

The overwhelming difficulty of this approach is illustrated by the history of famous computer pioneer Gene Amdahl, who attempted to develop WSI as a method of making a supercomputer, starting Trilogy Systems in 1980 and garnering investments from Groupe Bull, Sperry Rand, and Digital Equipment Corporation, who (along with others) provided as estimated $230 million in financing. The design called for a 2.5″ square chip with 1200 pins on the bottom. After burning through about one third of the capital with nothing to show for it, Amdahl eventually declared the idea would only work with a 99.99% yield, which would not happen for 100 years. There were several subsequent efforts in the 1980's, but none successful.

Another well-known problem is the field of wafer-scale integration technology is the impact of thermal expansion on external connectivity. More specifically, when a WSI microelectronic complex is connected to a circuit board by thousands of, for example, connectors positioned between the microelectronic complex and the circuit board, these connectors can be damaged due to the different rates of thermal expansion experience by the surfaces of the microelectronic comples and circuit board.

Taking for example a finished silicon wafer, packaged in a material such as ceramic, the wafer typically expands at a rate of 3 ppm/C. In contrast, the material of the circuit board typically expands at a rate of 20-40 ppm/C. Thus, as the two materials heat up, the two surfaces will expand at different rates, potentially damaging many of the connectors distributed between the wafer and the circuit board. See Norman, et al., U.S. Pat. No. 7,279,787.

The present disclosure solves these longstanding problems with existing technology.

SUMMARY

In the applicant's disclosure regarding Faraday Cages and siped compartments, two entirely different technologies (siped cushioning compartments and Faraday Cages) from two entirely different and unrelated fields of technology (“macro” athletic footwear and microelectronics), each with their own completely different art, have been integrated into a surprising new combination wherein the integrated structural components have simultaneous dual functions that are completely separate and unrelated.

Moreover, the integrated use of a sipe media both as a lubricant between the siped compartments and as a cooling media for a microchip (or other electronic component) to deal with the critical microprocessor heat dissipation problem is an additional surprising combination of two entirely separate technical functions that are completely different into a single new structural and material component with dual functions, again from entirely different and unrelated fields of art.

The applicant's semiconductor wafer computer disclosure solves the two longstanding problems that have heretofore made all such wafer-scale integration efforts fail.

First, the applicant's disclosure solves the longstanding inherent flaw intolerance problem discussed above by using microchips on the wafer that are personal computer systems on the chip (SoC), so that each wafer microchip can operate independently, including communicating with other wafer microchips, such as wirelessly in free space and/or waveguides by radio or optical device. In the applicant's approach, the wafer microchips that inherently are flawed during manufacture or fail in operation require no elaborate special handling like that described above. Generally, if they fail fatally, the remaining wafer microchips inherently ignore them since they do not communicate with other microchips; also, partial failure can be detected remotely and the microchip can be turned off, if necessary.

Second, the applicant's disclosure solves the longstanding unequal thermal expansion problem discussed above by reducing, even almost eliminating the need for pins, since both on wafer and off wafer communication by the independently functioning microchips (personal computer SoC's) on the wafer can be accomplished by radio or optics connections that do not require pins or require far fewer structural connections. In addition, the applicant's use of stacked semiconductor wafers, which can have very similar or identical materials and expansion rates, can obviate the need for conventional motherboards or reduce their role.

Moreover, since the personal computer microchips on the semiconductor wafer can operate independently, such as in conventional clusters of several or many or all of the personal computers on the wafer (or including personal computers off the wafer as well), the operations occurring on the wafer can be asynchronous. The applicant's disclosure thereby also solves the longstanding problem of synchronizing such wafer scale operations by obviating the need for synchronizing them, as would be necessary without the applicant's disclosure.

These and other features of the disclosure will become apparent from the detailed description that follows.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

FIGS. 1-9 of this application are FIGS. 1-6, 52, 61, 67, 74, and 79 of both the applicant's U.S. application Ser. No. 11/802,033 filed May 18, 2007 and published on Apr. 10, 2008 as Pub. No. US 2008/0083140 A1 and PCT Application PCT/US2007/011976 filed 18 May 2007 and published on 31 Jan. 2008 as Int. Pub. No. WO 2008/013594 A2, as well as U.S. application Ser. No. 11/802,930 filed May 25, 2007 and published on Apr. 17, 2008 as Pub. No. US 2008/0086916 A1; all three applications are incorporated herein by reference. In addition, FIGS. 1-6 (except 6D-6F) of this application are FIGS. 83-88 of both the applicant's U.S. application Ser. No. 11/282,665 filed Nov. 21, 2005 and published on Nov. 9, 2006 as Pub. No. US 2006/0248749 A1 and PCT Application PCT/US2005/042341 filed 21 Nov. 2005 and published on 1 Jun. 2006 as Int. Pub. No. WO 2006/058013 A2, both of which are incorporated herein by reference.

FIG. 1A-4A show a frontal or sagittal plane cross section view of an example of a device 510 such as a flexible insert with a siped compartment or chamber or bladder.

FIGS. 1B-6B shows a horizontal plane view of a device 510 example.

FIG. 1C is an exploded perspective view showing the relationship of an insert device 510, which has a siped compartment or chamber or bladder, with a midsole, bottom sole, and upper of a shoe or other footwear.

FIGS. 1D-1F show an example of the 510 invention using typical commercial air bladder embodiments as compartment 501 modified with outer compartment 500.

FIGS. 5A-6A show a frontal or sagittal plane cross section view of an example of a device 510 such as a flexible insert with two siped compartments or chambers or bladders or combination.

FIG. 7A shows a computer laptop with the 510/511/513 inventions and FIG. 7B shows a semiconductor microchip with the 510/511/513 inventions.

FIGS. 7C-7D show additional examples of the 510/511/513 inventions applied to electronic game controllers and cell phone.

FIG. 8 is a chart showing approximate comparison of hardness scales.

FIGS. 9A-9C show a large urban telephone book lying flat, solid wooden block, and an upright very thick book to illustrate basic concepts of sipe flexibility and stability.

FIGS. 10-22 of this application are FIGS. 10A-10I, 16A-16Z, 16AA, and 16AB, 17A-17D, 21B, 22A, 23A-23E, 25A-25D, 26A-26C, 27A-27H, 28, 29A, 30A-30C, and 31 of both the applicant's U.S. application Ser. No. 10/802,049 filed May 17, 2004 and published on Oct. 28, 2004 as Pub. No. US 2004/0215931 A1.

FIGS. 10A-10I are simplified diagrams of a section of a computer network, such as the Internet, showing an embodiment of a system architecture utilizing an internal firewall to separate that part of a networked PC (including a system reduced in size to a microchip) that is accessible to the network for shared processing from a part that is kept accessible only to the PC user; also showing the alternating role that each PC in the network may play as either a master or slave in a shared processing operation involving one or more slave PC's in the network; and showing a home or business network system which can be configured as an Intranet; in addition, showing PC and PC microchips controlled by a controller (including remote) with limited or no processing capability; and showing PC and PC microchips in which an internal firewall 50 can be reconfigured by a PC user.

FIGS. 11A-11K show a new hierarchical network architecture for personal computers and/or microprocessors based on subdivision of parallel processing or multi-tasking operations through a number of levels down to a processing level.

FIGS. 12A-12D show an internal firewall 50 with a dual function, including that of protecting Internet users (and/or other network users sharing use) of one or more slave personal computers PC 1 or microprocessors 40 from unauthorized surveillance or intervention by an owner/operator of those slave processors.

FIG. 13 shows that all microprocessors of a personal computer or personal computer on a microchip can have a separate input/output communication link to a digital signal processor (DSP) or other transmission/reception connection component.

FIGS. 14A-C show a PC microprocessor on a microchip similar to that of FIG. 13, except that FIGS. 14A-C show microprocessors 93 and 94 each connecting to an optical wired connection 99′ such as thin mirrored hollow wire or optical omniguide or optical fiber.

FIGS. 15A-E show multiple firewalls 50 within a personal computer 1 or PC microchip 90.

FIGS. 16A-D show the use for security of power interruption or data overwrite of volatile memory like DRAM and non-volatile memory like Flash or MRAM (or ovonics), respectively, of the network portion of a personal computer PC1 or system on a microchip PC90.

FIGS. 17A-C show exemplary microchip and photovoltaic cell embodiments.

FIGS. 18A-H show exemplary microchip and Faraday Cage embodiments.

FIG. 19 shows a silicon wafer 500 used to make microchips.

FIG. 20A shows a top view of a microchip 501 surrounded by adjoining portions of adjoining microchips 501 in a section of the silicon wafer 500. FIG. 20B shows a top view of the microchip 501 embodiment of FIG. 20A after the die has been separated from the silicon wafer 500 and positioned in a microchip package 503.

FIGS. 21A-C show alternative embodiments that unite separate fabrication processes on the same microchip 501.

FIG. 22 shows a combination of the embodiments shown in FIGS. 20 and 21.

FIGS. 23A-23H are modifications of FIGS. 18A-27H of this application, which are FIGS. 27A-27H of U.S. application Ser. No. 10/802,049 filed Mar. 17, 2004 and published on Oct. 28, 2004, as Pub. No. US 2004/0215931 A1 and U.S. application Ser. No. 10/684,657 filed Oct. 15, 2003 and published on Aug. 18, 2005, as Pub. No. US 2005/0180095 A1, both of which applications are hereby incorporated by reference herein for completeness of disclosure.

FIGS. 23A-23H are more specific example embodiments of the FIG. 7B example; they show examples of the applicant's inventions involving one or more Faraday Cages surrounding various combinations of semiconductor microchips, photovoltaic cells, and/or other micro and/or nano devices with the applicant's internal sipe inventions 510/511/513.

FIGS. 24A and 25A-25B are modifications of FIGS. 28 and 29A-29B of U.S. application Ser. No. 10/684,657 filed Oct. 15, 2003 and published on Aug. 18, 2005, as Pub. No. US 2005/0180095 A1, which was above incorporated by reference herein for completeness of disclosure.

FIG. 24A is a top view of a semiconductor wafer 1500, the entire semiconductor wafer 1500 being used essentially intact as a computer, which can also include a Faraday Cage and a siped compartment. FIG. 24B is a side cross section of three stacked wafers 1500. FIG. 24C is another top view of a wafer 1500, but subdivided into smaller components, such as half sections and quarter sections.

FIGS. 25A-25B are modifications of FIGS. 29A-29B of the '657 application incorporated by reference herein above. FIG. 25B shows a microchip 1501 as a separated die in a package 1503 including the applicant's internal sipe inventions 510/511/513 and the Faraday Cage 300.

FIGS. 26A-26B is FIGS. 7A-7B with the addition of Faraday Cages, as well as stacked dies in FIG. 7B.

FIGS. 27A-27B are like FIGS. 28A-28B of the '033 and '930 Applications incorporated above shows in cross-section an example of a tire 535, such as for a wheel 533 of a transportation vehicle, with a device 510.

It is understood that the reference numbers identified in this application and in U.S. Patent Applications '665, '033, and '930 incorporated by reference herein, are used consistently throughout the application such that like reference numbers are used to describe the same or like elements.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION

FIGS. 1-9 show the applicant's prior inventions incorporating forms of insertable devices with one or more internal (or mostly internal) sipes, including slits (or channels or grooves and other shape, including geometrically regular or non-regular shapes, such as anthropomorphic shapes), into a large variety of products, including footwear and orthotics, athletic, occupational and medical equipment and apparel, padding for equipment and furniture, balls, tires and any other structural or support elements in a mechanical, architectural or any other device.

New reference numerals used in the FIGS. 1-79 are further defined as follows:

Ref. No 500: An outer compartment, such as an outer compartment 161 or chamber 188 or bladder, at least partially or mostly or entirely enclosing a space within the outer compartment/chamber/bladder 500, which can be located anywhere in a footwear sole or upper or both or other article described in this application. Construction and materials can be, as one embodiment example, simpler in shape but otherwise similar to those used in any commercial samples of Nike Air™.
Ref. No 501: An inner compartment, such as an inner compartment 161 or chamber 188 or bladder, is located inside the enclosed space of the outer compartment/chamber/bladder 500. Construction and materials of the inner compartment/chamber/bladder 501 can be, as one embodiment example, like those used in any commercial samples of gas bladders in Nike Air™.
Ref. No. 502: Structural element that is optional anywhere within either outer compartment/chamber/bladder 500 or inner compartment/chamber/bladder 501, of which a 501 embodiment is shown; any flexible, resilient material can be used, including structures molded into the shape of (and using the material of) the compartment/chamber/bladder 500 or 501, as is very common in the art, such as many commercial samples of gas bladders used in Nike Air™, as well as foamed plastic or plastic composite or other materials, like Nike Shox™ or Impax™ or Reebok DMX™ or New Balance N-ergy™. In addition, other materials can be used directly within a 501/500 compartment or can connected to or through a 501/500 compartment, as in the cushioning components of the shoe sole heel of commercial samples of Adidas 1™, including electromechanical, electronic, and other components. Some devices may benefit from the use of rigid or semi-rigid materials for part or all of a media within a compartment.
Ref. No. 503: Attachment of two compartment/chambers/bladders 500/501, including particularly attachment of outer 500 to inner 501; any practical number of attachments of any form using any materials can be used, including glue.
Ref. No. 504: Media contained within all or part of compartment/chamber/bladder 500 or 501, particularly 501, can be any useful material, such as gas (including, as an example, gas used in Nike Air™ or ambient air, liquid or fluid, gel, or foam (such as a plastic like PU or EVA or equivalent or rubber (natural or synthetic) or combination of two or more; encapsulation of foam is optional); material particles or coatings, such as dry coatings like Teflon™ can also be used. An optional element in an outer compartment/chamber 500 (or an inner compartment/chamber 501 that itself contains an inner compartment/chamber, as in FIG. 87).
Ref. No. 505: Internal sipe or slit or channel or groove for flexibility, such as between inner and outer compartment/chamber 500/501 (or bladder) surfaces, as one embodiment example; such surfaces can be substantially parallel and directly contact in one useful embodiment example, but are not attached so that at least parts of the two surfaces can move relative to each other, such as to facilitate a sliding motion between surfaces; the surfaces can be in other useful forms that allow portions of the surfaces to be proximate to each other but not contacting in an unloaded condition or in a partially loaded condition or in a maximally loaded condition.
Ref. No. 506: Media of internal sipe 505; media 506 can be any useful material like those used in media 504; media 506 can be located in part or all of 505 to decrease (or increase) sliding resistance between 500/501 or 505 surfaces, for example, to lubricate the surfaces with any suitable material; silicone or Teflon™ can be used, for example; an optional element.
Ref. No. 507: Metal particles.
Ref. No. 508: Shock absorbing fluid containing 507; a magnetorheological fluid.
Ref. No. 509: Electromagnetic field-creating circuit.
Ref. No. 510: A flexible insert or component including siped compartments 161 or chambers 188 or bladders used for example as outer and inner compartments/chambers/bladders 500/501 for footwear soles or orthotics or uppers or other uses; a useful embodiment being two or more compartment or chambers (or bladders) 161/188 (or mix) that are separated at least in part by an internal sipe 505, including the example of at least one 501 (either 161/188 or bladder) inside at least one 500 (either 161/188 or bladder) and being separated by an internal sipe 505.
Ref. No. 580: Computer or computer component.
Ref. No. 581: Micro-technology and nanotechnology devices, including a semiconductor microchip device (a part of a die or an entire die or multiple dies assembled together) microelectromechanical systems (MEMS), field-programmable gate arrays (FPGA's) and faraday cages, photovoltaic cells, fuel cells, batteries, and including devices assembled at the molecular or atomic scale.

FIGS. 1-7 show, as numeral 510, examples of a device or flexible insert including siped compartments 161 or chambers 188 or bladders (another term used in the art) for use in any footwear soles, including conventional soles 22 or the applicant's prior inventions, including footwear/shoe soles 28 and midsole inserts 145 as described in applicant's published '087 Application and Ser. No. 11/282,665 U.S. Application published Nov. 9, 2006, as Pub. No. US 2006/0248749 A1 incorporated by reference, or for orthotics 145 as described in the applicant's published '034 U.S. Application, '869 Patent, and WO 02/09547 WIPO publication, as well as to be published by WIPO PCT Application Number PCT/US2005/042341, all incorporated by reference herein, including for uppers for footwear or orthotics (or including uppers), or for other flexibility uses in athletic equipment like helmets and apparel including protective padding and guards, as well as medical protective equipment and apparel, and other uses, such as protective flooring, improved furniture cushioning, balls and tires for wheels, and other uses.

The device or flexible insert with siped compartments or chambers 510 include embodiments like two or more of either compartments 161 or chambers 188 or bladders (or a any mix including two or more of a compartment, a chamber, and a bladder) that are separated at least in part or in several parts or mostly or fully by an internal sipe 505. The flexible insert 510 can be inserted during assembly of an article by a maker or manufacturer or is insertable by a user or wearer (into an article like a shoe, for example, as part of a removable midsole insert 145 described above), or integrated into the construction of a device as one or more components.

Siped compartments or chambers 510 include example embodiments such as FIGS. 1-7, which generally show at least one inner compartment 161 or chamber 188 inside at least one other outer compartment 161 or chamber 161; and the two compartments/chambers 161/188 being separated by an internal sipe 505.

One practical example embodiment of the invention is any prior commercial embodiment of Nike Air™ gas bladder or compartment (like typical examples in FIGS. 12-16 of U.S. Pat. No. 6,846,534, which is hereby incorporated by reference) that is installed unattached, as is, located within the space enclosed partially or fully by a new, slightly larger outer compartment of one additional layer of the same or similar material, with the same or a simpler or the simplest geometric shape; that is, not necessarily following indentations or reverse curves, but rather incorporating straighter or the straightest lines, as seen in cross-section: for example, following the outermost side curvature seen in FIGS. 12-16, but with upper and lower surfaces that are substantially flat and parallel (or curved and parallel), to facilitate ease of movement between the two surfaces of the sipe 505 formed, increasing the resulting flexibility.

The new additional, outer compartment thus thereby has created by its presence an internal sipe 505 between the two unconnected compartments. The new internal sipe 505 provides much greater flexibility to any footwear sole 22 or 28, since it allows an inner, otherwise relatively rigid Nike Air™ compartment structure to become an inner compartment 501 (instead of typically being fixed into the other materials such as EVA of the footwear sole) to move freely inside the new outer compartment 500, which becomes a new compartment that is fixed to the footwear sole, rather that the conventional Nike Air™ bladder. The flexibility improvement allows the shoe sole to deform under a body weight load like a wearer's bare foot sole, so that stability is improved also, especially lateral stability.

The result is that the conventional, inner Nike Air™ compartment—now contained by a new outer compartment—can move easily within the overall footwear sole, allowing the sole to bend or flex more easily in parallel with the wearer's bare foot sole to deform to flatten under a body weight load, including during locomotion or standing, so that footwear sole stability is improved also, especially lateral stability. The extent to which the inner Nike Air™ compartment is “free-floating” within the new outer compartment can be controlled or tuned, for example, by one or more attachments (permanent or adjustable) to the outer compartment or by the media in the internal sipe.

The internal sipe 505 includes at least two surfaces that can move relative to each other to provide a flexibility increase for a footwear sole so that the shape of the footwear sole can deform under a body weight load to better parallel to the shape of the barefoot sole of a wearer under a same body weight load. The relative motion between the two internal sipe 505 surfaces increases the capability of the footwear sole to bend during locomotion under a wearer's body weight load to better parallel the shape of said wearer's bare foot sole.

Also, the sliding motion between internal support surfaces within the shoe sole 28 allowed by internal sipe 505 in response to torsional or shear forces between a wearer's foot and the ground assists in controlling and absorbing the impact of those forces, whether sudden and excessive or chronically repetitive, thereby helping to protect the wearer's joints from acute or chronic injury, especially to the ankles, knees, hips, lower back, and spine.

A benefit of the siped compartments/chambers 510 is that, as a single unitary component, it can be used in any conventional manner in constructing the footwear sole 28, generally like that used with a conventional single layer compartment such as used in Nike Air™; i.e. the outer surface of 510 can, as a useful embodiment, adhere to the adjacent materials like plastic such as PU (polyurethane) or EVA (ethyl vinyl acetate) or other plastic or rubber of the footwear sole that contact the 510 component, just as would be the case with the outer surface of existing single compartment 161 or chamber 188 of commercial examples of Nike Air™. However, the internal sipe 505 formed by the use of an inner compartment/chamber 501 in the siped compartment/chamber 510 provides flexibility in a footwear sole 28 that is absent in the relatively rigid footwear sole 28 formed with a conventional, single layer compartment 161 or chamber 188 of the many Nike Air™ commercial examples.

The sipe surfaces can in one useful example embodiment be formed by the inner surface (or part or parts of it) of the outer compartment 500 and the outer surface (or part or parts of it) of the inner compartment 501. Such sipe surfaces can be substantially parallel and directly contact each other in one useful embodiment example, but the two surfaces are generally not attached to each other, so that the sipe surfaces can move relative to each other to facilitate a sliding motion between the two surfaces.

The sipe surfaces can be in other useful forms that allow portions of the surfaces to be proximate to each other in an unloaded condition, rather than contacting; such surfaces can make partial or full direct contact under a wearer's body weight load (which can vary from a fraction of a “g” to multiple “g” forces during locomotion) or remain somewhat separated; the amount of sipe surface area making direct contact can also vary with a wearer's body weight load. The sipes surfaces also may not be parallel or only partially parallel, such as the areas of direct surface contact or proximal surface contact.

To preclude the surfaces of the internal sipe 505 from directly contacting each other (whether loaded or unloaded), the sipe surfaces can include an internal sipe media 506 located between the surfaces to reduce friction by lubrication and increase relative motion and therefore flexibility. Useful example embodiments of the internal sipe media 506 include any useful material known in the art (or equivalent), such as a liquid like silicone as one example, a dry material like Teflon™ as another example, or a gas like that used in Nike Air™ as a further example. The media 506 can be located in all of the sipe 505 or only part or parts, as shown in FIGS. 1-6.

The media 506 can be used to decrease (or increase) sliding resistance between the inner surfaces of the sipe; for example, to lubricate with any suitable material known in the art. The internal sipe media 506 is an optional feature.

The attachments 503 can be simply passive (i.e. static) or actively controlled by electronic, mechanical, electromagnetic, or other useful means. The attachments 503 can, for example, be designed to break away as a failsafe feature to compensate for a predetermined extreme torsional load, for example, to reduce extreme stress on critical joints (in lieu of a wearer's cartilage, tendons, muscle, bone, or other body parts being damaged); the attachments 503 can then be reset or replaced (or, alternatively, return automatically upon relief of extreme stress to a normal position).

Example embodiments of the compartments and chambers 500/501 can include a media 504 such as a gas (like that used in Nike Air™ or ambient atmospheric air), a liquid or fluid, a gel, a foam (made of a plastic like PU or EVA, both of which are common in the footwear art, or equivalent, or of a rubber (natural or synthetic) or blown rubber or a rubber compound or equivalent or of another useful material or of a combination of two or more of the preceding foam plastic/rubber/etc.) or a useful combination of one or more gas, liquid, gel, foam, or other useful material.

FIGS. 2A, 3A, and 4A show examples of embodiments of siped compartment/chamber/bladders 510 wherein either the inner compartment/chamber/bladder 501 or the outer compartment 500 can have one or more openings, for pressure equalization, assembly facilitation, or other purposes.

FIG. 5A shows an example embodiment with an inner compartment/chamber/bladder 501¹having a smaller inner compartment/chamber/bladder 501²; additional smaller inner compartments 501 are possible in a similar progression, either enclosed within the previous larger inner compartment 501 or within the same 501 or 500.

FIG. 6A shows an example embodiment with two inner compartment/chamber/bladders 501¹and 501²which are layered within outer compartment/chamber/bladder 500; additional compartment/chamber 501 layers can be useful also.

FIG. 1B shows an example embodiment of the device 510 in a horizontal plane view of FIGS. 1A, 2A, 3A, 4A, 5A, and 6A.

FIG. 1C is an exploded perspective view showing the relationship of an insert device 510, which has a siped compartment or chamber or bladder, with a midsole 148, bottom sole 149, and upper 21 of a shoe or any other footwear. The midsole 148 and bottom sole 149 (and any additional layers not shown) together form a shoe sole which can be any footwear sole, including any conventional sole 22 or any sole 28 according to one of the applicant's patents or applications. In the simple example shown, the device 510 can be inserted during a conventional manufacturing or assembly process or by a footwear wearer and can be located anywhere in the footwear sole and/or upper.

FIG. 1E shows a detailed frontal plane cross section of an example conventional commercial gas bladder/compartment/chamber shown as inner bladder or compartment or chamber 501 in schematic perspective in FIG. 1D. FIG. 2F shows the same detailed cross sectional view of the same inner bladder or compartment or chamber 501 enveloped by an outer bladder or compartment or chamber 500 forming an insertable siped compartment 510, including wherein all or part of the sipe 505 is a slit.

FIG. 7A shows a perspective view of a laptop personal computer 580 or any other electronic device with one of a potential multitude of potential example embodiments of the applicant's 510 or 511 or 513 inventions described above are used in two areas, but other useful embodiments with any of the previously described variations can be employed beneficially. For example, as shown, the 510/511/513 inventions can be used for cushioning selected corners of the laptop or can be integrated in the laptop frame in the same or other areas; and/or individual components of the laptop computer such as a harddrive can be protected by being mounted in a protected 510/511/513, such as the housing of the hard-drive forming an inner compartment 501 of the 510 siped compartment invention.

FIG. 7B shows a semiconductor microchip device 581 example including a part of a die or an entire die or multiple dies assembled together using the applicant's 510/511/513 invention; other devices 581 can include other micro-technology and nanotechnology devices, including microelectromechanical systems (MEMS), field-programmable gate arrays (FPGA's) and faraday cages, photovoltaic cells, fuel cells, batteries, and including devices assembled at the molecular or atomic scale. The FIG. 7B example embodiment can include a single layer of die or dies or can include a stacked arrangement of two or more layers of separate dies. FIG. 7C shows a cross section of the semiconductor microchip device 581 example of FIG. 7B, showing a stacked arrangement of three layers of separate dies 581 #1, 581 #2, and 581 #3.

FIGS. 7C and 7D show other examples such as electronic game controllers or any other remote controllers 580 and cell phones 580 that can beneficially incorporates any of the applicant's 510/511/513.

FIG. 8 shows a chart displaying “Approximate Comparison of Hardness Scales”. Products using the 510 or 511 or 513 inventions can be made of any material and any material hardness shown in chart, including Rockwell C and B Scales and Brinell Hardness Scale, including metallic and ceramic, generally for non-cushioning, relatively rigid structural elements into which a degree of flexibility is to be introduced using the applicant's 510/511/513 inventions, specific examples of which are shown in FIGS. 7A-7B.

FIG. 9A shows that, in an analogous way, especially to the thicker heel portion of a typical shoe sole, a thick urban area telephone book has in effect hundreds of mostly “internal sipes”, each page being in effect separated by a horizontal internal slit from each adjacent page, each of which thereby is able to move freely relative to each other, resulting in a flexible telephone book that bends quite easily as is well known by all, while at the same time relatively stable when a vertical force like body weight is applied. FIG. 9B shows, in contrast, if the same wood fiber material with the same dimensions as a thick telephone book were formed instead into a single piece of wood with no pages, like a solid particle board, it would be quite rigid with little flexibility, although it will support a body weight stably. FIG. 9C shows if, instead, the sipes were rotated 90 degrees into vertical slits and open to the bottom, so that the spine of a much wider telephone book with shorter pages is on top (in the form of a shoe sole with deep open external sipes, those external sipes would also provide a substantial amount of flexibility like that of the human foot sole, but at the cost of excessive instability when a vertical force like body weight is applied, as is obvious from common experience, since the pages will splay out uncontrollably.

As shown in FIGS. 10A-10F, to deal with operational and security issues, it may be beneficial for individual users to have one microprocessor or equivalent device that is designated, permanently or temporarily, to be a master 30 controlling device (comprising hardware and/or software and/of firmware and/or other component) that remains inaccessible (using, for example, a hardware and/or software and/or firmware and/or other component firewall 50) directly by the network but which controls the functions of the other slave microprocessors 40 when the network is not utilizing them.

For example, as shown in FIG. 10A, a typical PC 1 may have four or five microprocessors (even on a single microprocessor chip), with one master 30 and three or four slaves 40, depending on whether the master 30 is a controller exclusively (through different design of any component part), requiring four slave microprocessors 40; or the master microprocessor 30 has the same or equivalent microprocessing capability as a slave 40 and multiprocesses in parallel with the slave microprocessors 40, thereby requiring only three slave microprocessors 40. The number of PC slave microprocessors 40 can be increased to virtually any other number, such as at least about eight, about 16, about 32, about 64, about 128, about 256, about 512, about 1024, and so on. These multiples are not required, and the number of PC master microprocessors 30 may be increased. Also included is an internal firewall 50 between master 30 and slave 40 microprocessors. As shown in preceding FIGS. 1-9, the PC 1 in FIG. 10A may be connected to a network computer 2 and to the Internet or WWW or present or future equivalent or successor 3, like the Grid (or MetaInternet).

Other typical PC hardware components such as hard drive 61, floppy diskette drive 62, compact disk-read only memory (CD-ROM) 63, digital video disk (DVD) 64, Flash memory 65, random access memory (RAM) 66, video or other display 67, graphics card 68, and sound card 69, as well as digital signal processor or processors, together with the software and/or firmware stored on or for them, can be located on either side of internal firewall 50, but such devices as the display 67, graphics card 68 and sound card 69 and those devices that both read and write and have non-volatile memory (retain data without power and generally have to be written over to erase), such as hard drive 61, Flash memory 65, floppy diskette drive 62, read/write CD-ROM 63 or DVD 64 may be located on the PC user side of the internal firewall 50, where the master microprocessor is also located, as shown in FIG. 10A, for security reasons; their location can be flexible, with that capability controlled such as by password-authorized access.

Alternately, any of these devices that are duplicative (or for other exceptional needs) like a second hard drive 61′, can be located on the network side of the internal firewall 50. RAM 66 or equivalent or successor memory, which typically is volatile (data is lost when power is interrupted), should generally be located on the network side of the internal firewall 50, but some can be located with the master microprocessor to facilitate its independent use.

However, read-only memory (ROM) devices including most current CD drives (CD-ROM's) 63′ or DVD's (DVD-ROM) drives 64′ can be safely located on the network side of the internal firewall 50, since the data on those drives cannot be altered by network users; preemptive control of use may remain with the PC user.

However, at least a portion of RAM can be kept on the Master 30 microprocessor side of the internal firewall 50, so that the PC user can retain the ability to use a core of user PC 1 processing capability entirely separate from any network processing. If this capability is not desired, then the master 30 microprocessor can be moved to the network side of the internal firewall 50 and replaced with a simpler controller on the PC 1 user side, like the master remote controller 31 discussed below and shown in FIG. 10I.

The master microprocessor 30 may also control the use of several or all other processors 60 owned or leased by the PC user, such as home entertainment digital signal processors 70, especially if the design standards of such microprocessors in the future conform to the requirements of network parallel processing as described above. In this general approach, the PC master processor uses the slave microprocessors or, if idle (or working on low priority, deferrable processing), makes them available to the network provider or others to use. Wireless connections 100, including optical wireless, are expected to be extensively used in home or business network systems, including use of a master remote controller 31 without (or with) microprocessing capability, with broad bandwidth connections such as fiber optic cable connecting directly to at least one component such as a PC 1, shown in a slave configuration, of the home or business personal network system; that connection links the home system to the network 2 such as the Internet 3, as shown in FIG. 10I. A business system may include broadband such as fiber optic or optical wireless links to most or all personal computers PC 1 and other devices with microprocessors, such as printers, copiers, scanners, fax machines, telephone and video conferencing equipment; other wired or wireless links also can be used.

A PC 1 user can remotely access his networked PC 1 by using another networked master microprocessor 30 on another PC 1 and using a password or other access control means for entry to his own PC 1 master microprocessor 30 and files, as is common now in Internet and other access. Alternately, a remote user can simply carry his own digitally stored files and his own master microprocessor or use another networked master microprocessor temporarily has his own.

In the simplest configuration, as shown in FIG. 10B, the PC 1 may have a single master microprocessor 30 and a single slave microprocessor 40, separated by an internal firewall 50, with both processors used in parallel or multitasking processing or with only the slave 40 so used, and connected with broad bandwidth such as optical fiber wire 99 to a network computer 2 and Internet 3 and successors like the Grid (or MetaInternet). Virtually any number of slave microprocessors 40 is possible. The other non-microprocessor components shown in FIG. 10A above may also be included in this simple FIG. 10B configuration.

As shown in FIG. 10C, microchips 90 are expected to integrate most or all of the other necessary computer components (or their present or future equivalents or successors), like a PC's volatile memory like RAM 66 (such as DRAM), graphics 82, sound 83, power management 84, network communications 85, and video processing 86, possibly including modem 87, non-volatile memory like flash (or magnetic like MRAM or ovonic unified memory) 88, system BIOS 88′, digital signal processor (DSP) or processors 89, and other components or present or future equivalents or successors) and internal bus, on a single chip 90 (silicon, plastic, or other), known in the industry as “system on a chip”. Such a PC microchip 90 can have the same architecture as that of the PC 1 shown above in FIG. 10A: namely, a master control and/or processing unit 93 and one or more slave processing units 94 (for parallel or multitasking processing by either the PC 1 or the Network 2), separated by an internal firewall 50 and connected by broad bandwidth wire 99 such as optical fiber cable to a network computer 3 and the Internet 3 and successors like the Grid (or MetaInternet). Alternatively, microchip 90 can be an “appliance” system on a chip.

Existing PC components with mechanical components like hard drive 61, floppy or other removable diskette 62, CD-ROM 63, and DVD 64, which are mass storage devices with mechanical features that will likely not become an integral part of a PC “system of a chip” may still be capable of connection to a single PC microchip 90 and control by a single PC master unit 93.

In the simplest multi-processor case, as shown in FIG. 10D, the chip 90 has a single master unit 93 and at least one slave unit 94 (with the master having a controlling function only or a processing function also), separated by an internal firewall 50 and connected by broad bandwidth wire 99 such as fiber optic cable to a network computer 3 and the Internet 3 (and successors like the Grid or MetaInternet). The other non-microprocessor components shown in FIG. 10A above may also be included in this simple FIG. 10D configuration.

As noted above, any computer may be both a user and provider, alternatively—a dual mode operating capability. Consequently, any PC 1 within the network 2, connected to the Internet 3 and successors like the Grid (or MetaInternet), can be temporarily a master PC 30 at one time initiating a parallel or multitasking processing request to the network 2 for execution by at least one slave PC 40, as shown in FIG. 10E. At another time the same PC 1 can become a slave PC 40 that executes a parallel or multitasking processing request by another PC 1′ that has temporarily assumed the function of master 30, as shown in FIG. 10F. The simplest approach to achieving this alternation is for both master and slave versions of the parallel processing software to be loaded in each or every PC 1 that is to share in the parallel processing, so each PC 1 has the necessary software means, together with minor operational modifications, such as adding a switching means by which a signaled request for parallel processing initiated by one PC 1 user using master software is transmitted to at least a second PC 1, triggering its slave software to respond by initiating parallel processing.

As shown in FIGS. 10G and 10H, which are parallel to FIGS. 10E and 10F, the number of PC slave processors 40 can be increased to any virtually other number, such as at least about 4; as shown, the processing system is completely scalar, so that further increases can occur to, for example, about eight, about 16, about 32, about 64, about 128, about 256, about 512, about 1024, and so on; the PC master microprocessors 30 can also be increased.

In summary, as noted above relative to FIG. 10I, a PC 1 can function as a slave PC 40 and be controlled by a master controller 31, which can be remote and which can have limited or no microprocessing capability, but can as well have similar or greater capability. Such a master controller 31 can be located on the PC user side of the internal firewall 50, under the control of the PC user, while the microprocessors 40 reside on the network side of the internal firewall 50. The master controller 31 may receive input from the PC user by local means such as keyboard, microphone, videocam or future hardware and/or software and/or firmware or other equivalent or successor interface means (as does a master processor 40) that provides input to a PC 1 or microprocessor 30 originating from a user's hand, voice, eye, nerve or nerves, or other body part; in addition, remote access by telephone, cable, wireless or other connection may also be enabled by a hardware and/or software and/or firmware and/or other means with suitable security such as password controlled access. Similarly, relative to a PC “system on a chip”, a master controller unit (which could be capable of being accessed by the PC user through a remote controller 31) with only a controlling capability can be located on the PC user side of the internal firewall 50, under the control of the PC user, while the slave processor units 94 would reside on the network side of the internal firewall 50.

FIGS. 10A-10C show PC 1 with an internal firewall 50 that is configurable through either hardware and/or software and/or firmware and/or other means; software configuration is easiest and most typical, but active motherboard hardware configuration is possible and may present some security advantages, including a use of manual or electromechanical or other switches or locks. FIG. 10A shows a CD-ROM 63′ that has been placed by a PC user on the network side of an internal firewall 50 from a previous position on the PC user side of an internal firewall 50, which was shown in FIG. 10A. The settings of an internal firewall 50 may default to those that safely protect the PC 1 from uncontrolled access by network users, but with capability for the relatively sophisticated PC user to override such default settings and yet with proper safeguards to protect the unsophisticated user from inadvertently doing so; configuration of an internal firewall 50 may also be actively controlled by a network administrator in a local network like that of a business, where a PC user may not be the owner or leaser of the PC being used, either by remote access on the network or with a remote controller 31.

Similarly, FIGS. 10C and 10D show a PC “system on a chip” 90 with an internal firewall 50 that is configurable through either hardware and/or software and/or firmware and/or other means; software configuration is easiest and most typical. Active configuration of the integrated circuits of the PC microchip 90 is also possible and may present some speed and security advantages. Such direct configuration of the circuits of the microchip 90 to establish or change its internal firewall 50 could be provided by the use of field-programmable gate arrays (or FPGA's) or their future equivalents or successors; microcircuit electromechanical or other switches or locks can also be used potentially. For example, slave processing unit 94 can be moved to the PC user side of an internal firewall 50 from a network side position. The same active configuration of the chip circuit can use FPGA's for the simplest form of multiprocessing microchip 90 with a single slave unit 94, transferring its position to the PC user's side of an internal firewall 50 from a network side as shown by slave processing units 94 in FIGS. 10C and 10D.

FIGS. 11G-11I show the applicant's new hierarchical network structure and function applied to the design of a personal computer PC 1, as discussed previously in FIGS. 10A and 10B of the '049 Application. FIG. 11G shows the simplest general design, with a master M₁microprocessor 30 and two slave S₂₁and S₂₂microprocessors 40. FIG. 11H shows the same network structure with an additional level of slave microprocessors 40, S₃₁through S₃₄, while FIG. 11I shows the same network structure as FIG. 11H with an additional level of slave microprocessors 40, S₄₁through S₄₈. As shown in these examples, this network structure is completely scalar, including any practical number of slave microprocessors 40 on any practical number of processing levels.

FIG. 11J shows a useful embodiment in which each microprocessor 30 and 40 has, in addition to internal cache memory, its own random access memory (RAM) 66 or equivalent memory (volatile like DRAM or non-volatile like Flash memory, magnetic such as MRAM memory, or ovonic unified memory), integrated on-microchip 90 or separate off-microchip. A significant amount of such microchip RAM (volatile like DRAM or non-volatile like Flash memory, magnetic such as MRAM memory, or ovonic unified memory), significantly greater than cache memory (SRAM) and other on-chip memory used on microprocessor chips today, can be beneficial in improving the efficient operation of the microprocessor; if located off microprocessor chip, the size of such memory can substantially exceed the size of the associated microprocessor, but an on-microprocessor chip location for DRAM or Flash (or MRAM or ovonic memory), like cache (SRAM) memory, offers the best potential for improving microprocessor speed and efficiency. The design can also incorporate (or substitute) conventional shared memory or RAM 66′ (i.e. memory used by all, or some, of the microprocessors 30 or 40 (or 90) of the personal computer PC 1).

FIGS. 11A-11C are parallel to FIGS. 11G-11I above, but show PC microprocessor 90 architecture rather than macro PC 1 architecture; a PC microprocessor 90 is as earlier described in FIG. 10C, a personal computer on a microchip.

FIG. 11D is like FIG. 11J, also except for showing PC microprocessor 90 architecture instead of PC 1 architecture. FIG. 11D shows a useful embodiment in which each PC microprocessor 93 or 94 has its own integrated on-microchip (or separate off microchip) random access memory (RAM) 66 or equivalent memory (volatile like DRAM or non-volatile, like Flash memory, magnetic such as MRAM memory, or ovonic unified memory). A significant amount of such RAM or other memory, significantly greater than cache (SRAM) memory or other on-microchip memory used on microprocessor chips today, can be beneficial in improving the efficient operation of the microprocessor; if located off-microprocessor chip, the size of such memory can substantially exceed the size of the associated microprocessor, but an on-microprocessor chip 90 location for DRAM or Flash (or MRAM or ovonic memory), like cache (SRAM) memory, offers the best potential for improving microprocessor speed and efficiency. The microchip design can also incorporate (or substitute) conventional shared memory or RAM 66′ (i.e. memory used by all, or some, of the PC microprocessors 93 or 94 of the personal computer PC microprocessor 90).

FIGS. 11A-11D show a different and improved basic microchip architecture which can exclude or reduce the currently used superscalar approach in microprocessors to execute multiple instructions during each clock cycle. The FIGS. 11A-11D architecture is much simpler and, by integrating memory with microprocessor, reduces memory bottlenecks. The simplicity of the FIGS. 11A-11D microchip design, which may have little or no superscalar components, compared to conventional superscalar designs (the inherent extreme complexity of which creates a very substantial memory overhead), can result in the use of a much greater proportion of independent, non-superscalar processors per microchip, exclusive of integrating memory or RAM 66 onto the microprocessor chip 90, as discussed in FIG. 11D.

FIGS. 11G-11J, by using the same architecture for PC 1 networks as FIGS. 11A-11D, import the same advantage of microchip parallel processing performance to parallel processing in PC 1 networks.

FIG. 11K shows a direct connection of optical fiber 99 from Internet 3 (or another network) to random access memory (RAM) microchip 66′. The connection may be at a central portion 140 of RAM chip 66′ to provide equal access to stored data on RAM chip 66′. The direct connection can be anywhere on RAM chip 66′. Digital signal processor (DSP) 89 is on RAM chip 66′ for connection with optical fiber 99. RAM chip 66′ is for shared memory use among PC's 1 and for broadcast use. RAM chip 66′ can include volatile or non-volatile (flash-type) memory. RAM chip 66′ can have more than one DSP 89, such as shown in FIG. 20B.

All FIGS. 11A-11K, like the preceding figures of this application, show sections of a network of personal computers PC 1 (or PC microprocessors 90) or microprocessors 30 or 40 which can be parts of the WWW or Internet or Internet II or the Next Generation Internet (meaning connected to it) or Intranets or Extranets or other networks.

Also, except for FIGS. 11A-11C and 11G-11I, all of the FIG. 11 series show personal computers PC 1 and microprocessors 30 or 40 as occupying the same location. This dual representation was done for economy of presentation and to show the parallel functionality and interchangeability in conceptual terms of personal computer PC 1 and microprocessors 30 or 40 in the structure of the new network. So, taking FIG. 16A as an example, M₁, S₂₁and S₂₂show three personal computers PC 1 or, alternatively, one microprocessor 30 and two microprocessors 40.

As noted initially in FIG. 10C, a personal computer PC 1 can be reduced in size to a PC microprocessor chip 90, so preceding Figures showing personal computer PC 1 also generally represent PC microprocessor chip 90.

Finally, FIGS. 11A-11K show a mix of electrical and optical connections, including wired 99, especially connections such as optical glass fiber or omniguides, and wireless 100, especially wireless optical (and mixtures of both in a single figure), and dense wave division multiplexing (DWDM). Generally, either 99 or 100 or a mix can be used relatively interchangeably in the network inventions shown (as well as in prior figures), though in some embodiments either highest transmission speed (i.e. broadest bandwidth) or mobility (or some other factor) may dictate a use of wired or wireless. Generally, fiber optic wire 99 and dense wave division multiplexing (DWDM) may provide the most advantageous transmission means because it has the greatest bandwidth or data transmission speed, so it may be used for connections between personal computers and microchips, including direct connections, although optical wireless 100 also offers very high bandwidth, especially with dense wave division multiplexing (DWDM). Other wireless 100 (but also including optical wireless), including with DWDM, can be used where mobility is a paramount design criteria.

The FIG. 11 embodiments can be combined with, or modified by incorporating, any other network system architectures (including client/server or peer to peer) or any other topologies (including ring, bus, and star) either well known now in the art or their future equivalents or successors.

Any of the embodiments shown in FIGS. 11A-11K can be combined with any one or more of the preceding or subsequent figures of this application to provide a useful improvement over the art.

The parallel processing network architecture shown in the preceding FIGS. 11A-11K and in earlier figures has several features unique to its basic design that provide for the security of personal computers PC 1 (or PC microprocessor 90) or microprocessor 40 that share other computers for parallel and multi-tasking processing. First, the slave personal computers PC 1 (or microprocessors 40) each have only part of the operation (for large operations, only a very small part) and therefore unauthorized surveillance of a single PC 1 can provide only very limited knowledge of the entire operation, especially in only a relatively local area in which switching or routing was employed. Second, the addresses of the slave personal computers PC 1 (or microprocessors 40) are known or traceable, and therefore are not protected by anonymity (like hackers usually are) in case of unauthorized intervention. In addition, cryptography can be employed, with on microprocessor chip 30, 40, or 90 hardware 55 being used in some embodiments due to efficiency, although software and firmware can also be used, or a separate PC 1 hardware-based component 56 like an encryption microchip can be used; with either encryption component 55 or 56, micro electromechanical locks can be used to prevent access other than by the direct physical user; other MicroElectroMechanical System (MEMS) devices located on microchips like PC90 can be used for access prevention or other functions. Nonetheless, these inherent strengths can be substantially reinforced, as indicated in FIGS. 12B-12D.

FIG. 12A shows at least one internal firewall 50 performing its conventional function of keeping out intruders such as hackers from the Internet 3 from unauthorized access for either surveillance of, or intervention in, a user's personal computer PC 1 (or PC microprocessor 90) or master microprocessor 30.

FIG. 12B shows that, since Internet users can, as enabled by the applicant's network structure invention, use one or more of the slave microprocessors 40 of another's personal computer PC 1 (or PC microprocessor 90) for parallel (or multi-tasking) processing, the at least one internal firewall 50 has a dual function in also protecting Internet 3 use (or other shared use on a network) from unauthorized surveillance or intervention by a PC 1 owner/user who is providing the shared resources. To maintain the privacy necessary to operate such a cooperatively shared network arrangement, unauthorized surveillance or intervention must be carefully prevented by hardware/software/firmware or other means.

FIG. 12C therefore shows master M personal computer PC 1 (or PC microprocessor 90) using the slave S₂microprocessor 40 of a different personal computer, PC 1′, which is available for Internet 3 (or other net) shared use, while internal firewall 50′ blocks unauthorized access into PC 1′ by PC 1 (although PC 1′ owner/user can always interrupt a shared operation and take back control and use of slave S′ microprocessor 40, which then triggers off-loading action to compensate, as discussed above in FIGS. 16I-16J of the '049 Application).

FIG. 12D is similar to FIG. 12C, but shows a PC microprocessor 90 with a slave microprocessor 94 being used by Internet 3 users (or other net), so that at least one firewall 50 serves both to deny access such as surveillance by master M microprocessor 93 to an Internet 3 parallel processing (or multi-tasking) operation on slave S microprocessor 94 and to deny access to master M microprocessor 93 by Internet 3 (or other net) users of slave S microprocessor 94. At least one internal firewall 50 may be implemented by non-configurable hardware at the microchip level to provide protection against tampering with the internal firewall 50 by a PC 1 user, who has easier access to software or macro hardware such as PC motherboards to alter. PC 90 microchips may employ tamper-resistant construction or tamper-proof construction. As such, PC 90 microchips may be permanently locked by out-of-specification conditions or permanently destroyed by attempts at physical access.

Also, non-configurable hardware denying access from the network is the most immune to hacking from any outside source, including the Internet, and can therefore be used either for general protection or to protect an innermost kernel of the most confidential of personal files (such as passwords or financial data) and the most critical of operating system components, such as the system bios or access to file alternation.

At the same time, the FIG. 12 and earlier embodiments provide a solution to digital rights management by providing a highly safe environment for the owners of digital versions of audio, video, and software copyrighted material. Such copyrighted material as movies, television, music, and application or operating system software may be decrypted and controlled on the network user side of the PC 1 or PC 90, while the PC 1 user is denied access to the decrypted digital version of the copyrighted material. However, the network user can make the material viewable to the PC 1 user, but not copyable, via the PC 1 and PC 90 microchip architecture shown in FIGS. 10A and 10C.

Any of the embodiments shown in FIGS. 12A and 12B can be combined with one or more of any of the preceding figures of this application to provide a useful improvement over the art.

FIG. 13 is like FIG. 20B of the '049 Application (and therefore also can be combined with FIGS. 11J and 11D, respectively), but show additionally that all microprocessors 30, 40, 93, and 94 of PC 1 or PC 90₁can have a separate input/output communication link to a digital signal processor (DSP) or other transmission/reception connection component. The additional communications linkages are shown as 141, 142, 143, and 144, which connect to M₁, S₁, S₂₁, and S₂₂, respectively, and connect to the network, including the Internet 3, the WWW, the Grid, and equivalents or successors. Like all preceding and subsequent figures, FIG. 13 is a schematic architectural plan of the new and unique components of the parallel processing system invention disclosed in this application and can represent either physical connections or virtual relationships independent of hardware. FIG. 13 shows an embodiment in which the additional linkages lead through the Internet 3 to microprocessors PC 90₂₅-90₂₈.

The additional communications linkages 141, 142, 143, and 144, as well as the original linkages 111, 112, 113, and 114 of FIGS. 20A and 20B, may have a bandwidth sufficiently broad to at least avoid constraining the processing speed of microprocessors 30, 40, 93, and 94 connected to the linkages. The ultra high bandwidth of optical connections like optical fiber or omniguides or optical wireless may provide external connections between PC 1 and PC 90₁microprocessors that are far greater than the internal electrical connections or buses of those microprocessors, for example, by a factor of 10, or 100, or 1000, which are already possible with optical fiber, or 1,000,000, which is possible with optical omniguides, which are not limited to a relatively smaller band of wavelengths using DWDM like optical fiber; future increases will be substantial since the well established rate of increase for optical bandwidth is much greater than that for microprocessor speed and electrical connections. Wireless optical antennas that are positioned on the exterior of houses, buildings, or mobile reception sites, instead of inside of glass or other windows, should significantly increase the number of optical wavelengths that can be sent or received by each of the wireless optical antennas; the entire connection is freespace optical wireless, which allows for greater dense wave division multiplexing (DWDM) and thereby greater bandwidth.

A major benefit of the embodiment shown in FIG. 13 is that PC 1 and PC 90₁can function like the FIG. 9 embodiment to efficiently perform operations that are uncoupled, so that each microprocessor M₁, S₁-S₃₄can operate independently without microprocessors M₁, S₁, and S₂₁-S₂₂being idled, as they may be in FIG. 13. Another benefit is that for tightly coupled parallel operations, microprocessors M₁, S₁, and S₂₁-S₂₂can have broad bandwidth connections with microprocessors 30, 40, 93, or 94 that are not located on PC 1 or PC 90₁. Thus the embodiments shown in FIG. 13 provide an architecture that allows PC 1 or PC 90₁the flexibility to function in parallel operations either like FIG. 13 embodiments or like the FIG. 9 embodiment of the '049 Application, depending on the type of parallel operation being performed. Studies indicate that single chip multiprocessors like PC 90₁can also perform uniprocessor operations with a speed like that of uniprocessor architectures like wide-issue superscalar or simultaneous multithreading.

Like FIG. 20B of the '049 application, the embodiment of FIG. 13 includes broad bandwidth connection to the Internet 3 by wired means such as optical connection by fiber optic cable or omniguide or optical wireless, although other wired or non-wired means can be used with benefit, and the use of DWDM or wideband CDMA is clearly advantageous. It should be noted that the architecture of the FIGS. 20 and 21 embodiments may be particularly advantageous with ultrawideband communication connections.

Another advantage of the embodiments shown in FIGS. 14A and 14B when functioning in the FIG. 9 (of the '049 Application) form of loosely coupled or uncoupled parallel processing or multitasking is that if PC 1 or PC 90₁is functioning as a web server and typically uses only one microprocessor to do so, it can quickly add minor web sites using one or more additional microprocessors to meet increasing volume of visits or other use of the web site. This replication of web sites on additional microprocessors in response to increasing load can also be done using the FIG. 11 form of tightly coupled parallel processing. PC 1 and PC 90₁or any of their microprocessors 30, 40, 93, and 94 or other components can also serve as a switch or a router, including other associated hardware/software/firmware network components.

Any of the embodiments shown in FIG. 13 can be combined with one or more of any of the preceding figures of this application to provide a useful improvement over the art.

Binary tree configurations of microprocessors shown in FIGS. 11, and 13 can be laid out in 2D using an H-tree configuration, as shown in FIG. 21C of the '049 Application, and can be combined with one or more of any of the preceding figures of this application to provide a useful improvement over the art.

FIG. 14A shows a microprocessor PC 90₁like that of FIG. 13, except that FIG. 14A shows the microprocessors 93 and 94 each connecting to an optical wired interconnection 99′ such as thin mirrored hollow wire or omniguide or optical fiber (and other very broad bandwidth connections can be used); the interconnect can include a digital signal processor 89′ employed with a microlaser 150, which can be tunable, and other components to transmit and receive digital data for microprocessors 93 and 94 into the optical wired interconnects 99′ such as an omniguide using, for example, a specific wavelength of light for each separate channel of each separate microprocessor 93 and 94 utilizing dense wave division multiplexing (DWDM).

FIG. 14B shows an enlargement of the digital signal processor 89′ with microlaser 150 with other transmission and reception components.

FIG. 14A shows a simple bus network connection architecture between the interconnect 99′ and the microprocessors 93 and 94. However, since the interconnection 99′ is optical and the bandwidth available is very broad, the optical connection 99′ allows connections between microprocessors 93 and 94 in PC 90₁that are functionally equivalent to those shown in FIG. 13 of the '049 Application, which includes a representation of physical connections. The interconnects between microprocessors 93 and 94 like FIG. 13 are shown within the omniguide 99′ shown in FIG. 14A. In fact, the potential bandwidth of the optical interconnect 99′ is so great that complete interconnection between all microprocessors 93 and 94 with PC 90₁is possible, even for a much greater number of microprocessors either in a larger PC 90₁, like FIG. 11C for example, or in other PC 90s, such as PC 90₂₁-90₂₄and 90₃₁-90₃₁₆in FIG. 13 connected to PC 90₁through a network such as the Internet 3, the WWW, or the Grid; consequently, any conventional network structure can be implemented. Consequently, the embodiment shown in FIG. 14A has the flexibility of those of FIG. 13 to function in parallel operations like either the FIGS. 20A-20B embodiments or like the FIG. 9 embodiment (both of the 0.049 Application), depending on the type of parallel operation to be performed, or the FIG. 11 embodiments.

It should be noted that the optical interconnect 99′ shown in FIG. 14A can beneficially have a shape other than a thin wire or tube, such as an omniguide with any form or shape located above and connection to microlasers 150 at a suitable location such as on or near the upper surface of the microchip PC 90₁located at least at each microprocessor 93 and 94 or connected thereto, for example; the optical interconnect 99′ and microlasers 150 and associated transmission and reception components can be located elsewhere on the microchip PC 90₁with benefit. An omniguide can take a waveform shape or rely exclusively on a mirrored (or semi-mirrored) surface or surfaces (or combination of both shape and mirrored surface) to guide lightwave signals such as propagated by a microlaser 150 substantially directly and/or by reflection. A relatively large optical interconnect 99′ can enable freespace or wireless-like connections between microlasers 150; such an optical interconnect 99′ can cover substantially the entire PC90 microchip or can connect multiple PC90 microchips and can connect one or more PC90 microchips to other PC components.

As shown in FIG. 14A, random access memory (RAM) 66 can be located on microchip PC 90₁like in FIG. 11D and also can be connected directly or indirectly to the optical interconnect 99′ (or use non-optical connections not shown), so that the microprocessors 93 and 94 and RAM 66 can communicate with a very broad bandwidth connection, including with RAM 66 and microprocessors 93 and 94 located off microchip PC 90₁on the network including the Internet 3 and WWW. Any other components of the PC 90 microchip can be connected with the optical interconnect 99′ and more than one such interconnect 99′ can be used on the same PC 90 or other microchip. Microlasers 150 can include, for example, 5-to-20-micron-high (or other height) vertical cavity-surface-emitting lasers (VCSELs), which can beam down waveguides built into the PC90 microchip; alternatively, freespace optics can be employed; and lenses can be employed. Radio-frequency (RF) signals can also be used for similar interconnects 99′. Micro light emitting diodes (LEDs) can substitute for one or some or all of the microlasers 150 and either can be a transceiver (transmit and receive light signals).

FIG. 14C is a side cross section of the microchip PC 90₁shown in FIG. 14A taken at hatched line 22C (which is abbreviated). FIG. 14C shows the location of the omniguide above the surface of the microprocessors 93 and 94 and RAM 66 and connecting them while also containing two or more microlasers 150 (associated DSP and other components not shown) proximate to each to contain the optical signal generated by the microlasers 150 so that the signal can be transmitted between microprocessors 93 and 94 and RAM 66 either directly or by being reflected off the mirrored (or semi-mirrored) surface of the omniguide 99′, for example. Each of the microprocessors 93 and 94 (or 30 or 40) and RAM 66 (or any other memory component such as L1 cache or L2 cache, for example, or other microchip component) can have one or more microlasers 150 and each such microlaser 150 can distinguish itself from other microlasers 150 on the microchip (or off it) that also generate wavelength signals by using, for example, a distinct wavelength of light for data transmission and/or utilizing wave or dense wave division multiplexing. FIG. 14A is a top view of the microchip PC 90₁, which is a PC system on a microchip, any of which disclosed in this application can be also more generally any microchip with multiple processors. The microlasers 150 (and associated transmission and reception components such as DSP) that are associated with RAM (or parts of it) or other memory components can either provide data in response to direct inquiries or fetches made by a microprocessor 93 or 94 or can broadcast a continual stream of current data (continually updated and repeated in continuous cycle, for example) which is used by the microprocessor as needed.

Any of the embodiments shown in FIGS. 14A, 14B and 14C can be combined with one or more of any of the preceding figures of this application to provide a useful improvement over the art.

FIG. 15A shows multiple firewalls 50, a concept indicated earlier by the at least one firewall 50 discussed in FIG. 12D. FIG. 15A shows a PC1 or microchip 90 with a primary firewall 50 and additional interior firewalls 50¹, 50², and 50³, that are within primary firewall 50. As shown, interior firewall 50³is in the most protected position, since it is inside all the other firewalls, while the other interior firewalls 50², and 50¹are progressively less protected, since, for example, interior firewall 50¹is protected from the outside network only by the primary firewall 50. As shown, progressively more protected positions can be created within the PC1 or microchip 90. The interior firewalls can also be arranged in any other way within the primary firewall 50. The interior firewalls can be used to separate user files from system files, for example, or to separate various hardware components from each other. In this manner, a number of compartments can be created within the PC1 or microchip 90 to more safely protect the software, hardware, and firmware of the PC1 or microchip 90, just as ships have a number of separate watertight compartments to protect against flooding and avoid sinking. Any of the primary or interior (or other inner firewalls discussed below) can be hardware, software, or firmware, or a combination, and can coexist in layers, so that a firewall 50, for example, may have a hardware firewall, a software firewall, and a firmware firewall, either as independent units or as integrated components. W³in FIG. 15A and subsequent Figures denotes the World Wide Web.

FIG. 15B shows another embodiment of compartments created by inner firewalls within a PC1 or microchip 90. Primary firewall 50 and interior firewall 50¹are like FIG. 15A, but interior firewalls 50², 50³, and 50⁴are shown perpendicular to firewalls 50 and 50¹(just to illustrate in a simplified schematic way, which may be different in an actual embodiment). In this way, an upper row of compartments U¹and U²can be used, for example, to bring from the network files which are first authenticated and then enter into the U¹compartment, are decrypted, and undergo a security evaluation, such as by virus scan, before transfer to the most secure compartment U². Any operations could potentially occur in any compartment, depending on the level of security desired by the user (by over-ride) for example, but an advantageous default system would allow for files with the highest levels of authentication, encryption, and other security evaluations to be allowed into the most secure compartments.

Similarly, operating system files can also be authenticated and brought from the network side of the PC1 or microchip 90 into compartment O¹for decryption and security evaluation or other use, and then finally transferred into the most secure compartment O². Again, similarly, a row of compartments can be used for separating hardware, such as a master microprocessor 30 or 93 being located in compartment M¹and a remote controller 31, for example, located in compartment M².

Also, additional inner firewalls 50²², 50³³, and 50⁴⁴can be located outside the primary firewall 50, but within the network portion of the PC1 or microchip 90, to separate user files in compartment U from operating system files in compartment O from hardware such a slave microprocessor in compartment S on the network side. In the example shown, an additional row is shown for hardware, including a hard drive in a compartment HD on the network side, a hard drive in compartment HD¹on the PC1 or microchip 90 user's side, and flash memory (such as system bios 88) in compartment F². Each microprocessor 30, 40, 93, or 94 can have its own compartment in a manner like that shown in FIG. 15B, as can associated memory or any other hardware component.

FIG. 15C shows an inner firewall 50 embodiment similar to FIG. 15B, but FIG. 15C shows that any file or set of files, such as operating files O or user data files U or application files A, can have its own inner firewall 50^Oor 50^Uor 50^A. Similarly, any hardware component, such as hard drive HD, also can have its own inner firewall 50^HD. Additionally, more than one file or set of files or hardware components can be grouped together within an inner firewall, such as 50^Sshown in FIG. 15C.

FIGS. 15D and 15E show operating system files O or application files A like those shown in FIG. 15C, but organized differently in discrete layers, each separate grouping of the operating or application files having a separate firewall 50 (and optionally with as well as a PC1 or PC90 firewall shown in earlier Figures), so that the firewall structure is like that of an onion. The operating system files O or application files A can have a parallel structure, with an innermost kernel operating system or application file located in the center, with additional features in other files in subsequent layers, from the simplest to the most complex and from the most secure and trusted to the least secure and trusted.

Using this structure, as shown in FIG. 15D, an innermost operating system core O¹may be firmware stored in a read-only memory (ROM), located in a microchip for quick access, so that a simplest version operating system with all core features can be protected absolutely from alteration and can be available almost immediately, without lengthy boot up procedures required by loading the operating system from a hard drive, for example. The core operating system O¹can include a core of the system BIOS or of the operating system kernel, for example; it would be advantageous for this core to be capable of independent operation, not dependent on components in other levels to operate at the basic core level (similarly, other levels can advantageously be independent of higher levels).

A secondary operating system O²can be software located advantageously on flash or other microchip non-volatile memory such as magnetic (or less advantageously, a hard drive or other mechanical storage media) and can consist of additional features that are more optional, such as those not always used in every session, or features that require updating, changing, or improving, such features coming from trusted sources located on a network, such as the Internet or the Web; additional portions of or upgrades to the system BIOS and the operating system kernel can be located in O², for example.

A third level operating system O³located, for example, on a hard drive, can consist of additional software features that are used only occasionally and are more optional, and can be loaded as needed by a user into DRAM or magnetic memory microchip for execution, for example. Operating systems O²and O³can include, for example, the most recent upgrades from a known and trusted source, such as a commercial software vendor or open source software developer, that are downloaded from a network, including the Internet and the Web, or loaded from conventional memory media like CD or floppy diskette. All three levels of such operating systems O¹, O², and O³together can constitute, for example, roughly the equivalent of a conventional PC operating system typical in the year 2000.

A fourth level operating system O⁴, for example, can consist of special use or single use operating system add-ons, especially software coming from untrusted or unauthenticated sources on a network, such as the Internet or the Web.

For example, the graphical interface of the operating system can be in 2D only at the O¹level, in 3D at the O²level, rendering at the O³level, and animation in the O⁴level; additionally, a standard format can be maintained in the O¹and O²levels, with user or vender customization at the O³level.

As shown in FIG. 15E, application files such as A¹, A², A³, and A⁴can be structured the same way as operating system files O in FIG. 15D and with the same layered approach to firewalls 50 as in FIG. 15D. Typical application software of the year 2000 can be restructured in this manner.

The kernel operating system files O¹and O², as well as kernel application files A¹and A²can be located in any personal computer PC1 or PC90, including at the level of an appliance including the simplest device, advantageously in ROM and in non-volatile read/write memory such as Flash (or magnetic such as MRAM, or ovonic memory) microchips, for example, as described in FIGS. 15D and 15E above. Inclusion of wireless connection capability is advantageous, as is the use of DWDM.

An advantage of the file and firewall structures shown in FIGS. 15D and 15E is that a system crash or file corruption should never occur at the simple and unalterable level O¹or A¹and any level above O¹or A¹can be recovered at a lower level, specifically the highest level at which there is a stable system or uncorrupted data. For example, a word processing application program can have the most basic functions of a typewriter (i.e. storing alphanumeric, punctuation, spacing, and paragraph structure data) stored on a ROM microchip in A¹and related user files (i.e. such as a word document) on U². Insertion of a digital video file into a word document can be handled at the A³level and insertion of a downloaded special effect at the A⁴level. In this example, a crash caused by the insertion at the least secure and most complex A⁴level would not disturb the word document located at the U²or U³level. Rebooting and/or recovery can be automatic when detected by the operating system or at the option of the user.

Thus, FIGS. 15A-15E illustrate embodiments wherein a PC1 or microchip 90 includes a hierarchy of firewalls. In the context of the present invention, firewalls may be structured to allow varying degrees of access from the network side of PC1 or microchip 90. As discussed above, ROM may totally deny access from the network side, effectively creating an innermost firewall. Hardware, software, firmware, or combinations thereof may be structured to deny or allow a predetermined maximum level of access from the network side, effectively creating outer firewalls. Similarly, intermediate firewalls effectively may be created.

The embodiments of FIGS. 15A-15E, as well as earlier FIGS. 12A-12D and earlier embodiments, provide a solution to digital rights management by providing a highly safe environment for the owners of digital versions of audio, video, and software copyrighted material. Such copyrighted material as movies, television, music, and application or operating system software may be decrypted and controlled on the network user side of the PC 1 or PC 90, while the PC 1 user is denied access to the decrypted digital version of the copyrighted material. However, the network user can make the material viewable to the PC 1 user, but not copyable, via the PC 1 and PC 90 microchip architecture shown in FIGS. 10A and 10C. For example, a copyrighted movie or music album may be a file that is associated with control and other software; all files located on one or more specific hardware components may be grouped together within an inner firewall, such as 50^Sshown in FIG. 15C.

Additional security for copyright owners may be provided by using a digital signal processor (DSP), and/or analog and/or other components grouped within the inner firewall 50^Sto convert network user selected decrypted digital files into analog files before they are transmitted off the PC 90 microchip, so that only an analog signal exits the PC 90 microchip for viewing or listening by the PC 1 user. As such, direct digital copying by the PC 1 user of copyrighted digital files provided over the Internet is prevented.

Any of the embodiments shown in FIGS. 15A-15E can be combined with one or more of any of the preceding figures of this application to provide a useful improvement over the art.

Additionally, an inner firewall can divide any hardware component into a separate network side compartment and a separate firewall protected side compartment. For example, a hard drive 61 can have a controller 61′ that is divided into two compartments, HD and HD¹, as above. As shown in FIG. 24 of the '049 Application, the user side HD¹compartment of the controller 61′ can have a read capability controller r and a write capability controller w, while the network side HD compartment can be limited to a read capability controller r only. The user side HD¹compartment controller can be, for example, used to control only the upper surface of the hard drive 61 platters, while the network side HD compartment controller can be used to control only the lower surface of the hard drive 61 platters, so that a single hard drive can effectively serve a dual role as both a network-accessible hard drive and a user-accessible hard drive, while maintaining a firewall 50 between them. Additionally, the network side HD controller can optionally have a write capability also, which can be preemptively turned on or off by the PC 1 or microchip 90 user. Other relative allocations between network and user of the HD 61 platters can be made and can be configurable by the user or system administrator or not configurable.

Similarly, CD drives 63 or DVD drives 64 (read only or read/write) can have a controller 63′ or 64′ like that of the HD controller 61′ above that is divided by a firewall 50, so that some laser beams are under network control and other laser beams are under user control, like the above hard drives. Floppy disk drives, “Zip” drives, and other removable disk or diskette drives can similarly be divided by a firewall 50 so that there is a physical user portion of the disk or diskette and a physical network portion of the disk or diskette, both either fixed or configurable by a user or system administrator or other authorized source. Memory microchips such as RAM or Flash or other can also be divided into network and user sides in a similar manner.

The use of volatile memory on the network side of the PC1 or microchip 90 is particularly useful in eliminating viruses and other security problems originating from the network side, such as malicious hackers on the Internet. When the network side of the firewall 50 of the PC1 or microchip 90 is returned to its user (preemptively or otherwise), volatile memory like random access memory (RAM) such as DRAM on the network side can first be erased. For example, volatile memory can be purged by momentarily interrupting power to the network side of the PC1 or microchip 90, thereby erasing all network data so that no network data is retained when the user regains control of the network side of the PC1 or microchip 90 for the user's use, except at the user's option; other conventional means may be employed. Of course, when the user is specifically using the network side, for example, for Web browsing, the operating system or the user can selectively save network side files or transfer them to the user side.

On the network side, non-volatile memory like Flash, MRAM, and ovonic memory with network data must be overwritten to obtain the same erasure-type protection, which can be a disadvantage if it takes much more time. Moreover, for relatively large storage media, such as CD-RW or DVD-RW with write-once capability, network data writing must be tracked to be effectively erased. Any new network file on non-volatile memory with only a write-once capability can be erased by overwriting all “0's” to “1's”, so that, for example, the network data written on a CD-RW or DVD-RW would be converted to all “1's” or “pits” (no unpitted writing surface within the network data sector, permanently overwriting the file); optionally, the operating system or the user can selectively save network side files or transfer them to the user side, or vice versa. There is a disadvantage to using Flash memory, since repeated overwriting will eventually degrade it.

FIGS. 16A-16D show the use for security of power interruption or data overwrite of volatile memory like DRAM and non-volatile memory like Flash or MRAM (or ovonics), respectively, of the network portion (N) of a personal computer PC1 or system on a microchip PC90; the network (N) portion being created within a PC1 or PC90 by a firewall 50 (as described above in previous figures) and including resources that, when idled by a user, can be used by the network, including the Internet (I) or the World Wide Web. Such use is to prevent the unplanned or approved mixture of user and network files by either files being retained in the “swing space” (N) during the transition from use by a network user to use by the PC1/PC90 user or vice versa.

As shown in FIG. 16A and FIG. 16C, when the network portion (N) of the PC1 personal computer or PC90 microchip is idled by a user, for example, power is interrupted to volatile memory like DRAM and/or data is overwritten to files in non-volatile memory like Flash or MRAM (or ovonics), so that no files exist in the network portion (N) after such interruption or overwriting.

After the step shown in FIGS. 16A and 16C, the network portion (N) can be used safely from a security viewpoint by a user from the network, including the Internet and the World Wide Web (and potentially including other network resources), as shown in FIG. 16B, or by the PC1/PC90 user, as shown in FIG. 16D, potentially including other resources from the user portion (U) of the PC1 or PC90. As noted earlier, the FIG. 16 approach can advantageously be used as an additional feature to other conventional security measures.

Any of the embodiments shown in FIGS. 16A-16D can be combined with one or more of any of the preceding figures of this application to provide a useful improvement over the art.

The PC 90 microchip as previously described, or a personal computer PC 1 (or any microchip, including a special or general purpose microprocessor on a microchip, alone or including one or more other system components as previously described) may include one or more photovoltaic cells 201, as are well known in the art. The photovoltaic cells 201 may be located on the PC 90 microchip or located near the PC 90 microchip, such as adjoining it or adjacent to it, or located less near, such as in the PC 90 microchip user's home, office, or vehicle, either inside or outside, or may be located more remotely.

FIG. 17A shows one or more photovoltaic cells 201 located on a PC 90 microchip. The photovoltaic cells 201 may use electromagnetic radiation, such as visible light, as a power source that is directed to the cells 201 by an optical waveguide 202, which may include a size that is sufficient to allow the cells 201 to generate electrical power at maximum output level or at a most efficient level. In addition, visible light in freespace (without a waveguide 202) may also serve as a power source and can be directed by the use of one or more lenses 204.

FIG. 17B shows a single microchip 200 including both a PC 90 and one or more photovoltaic cells 201. FIG. 17B shows a top view of a multi-layer microchip having one or more photovoltaic cells 201 on one side of a microchip 200, with a PC 90 on the other side of the microchip 200, as shown in FIG. 17C in a bottom view of the same microchip as FIG. 17B. Besides being integrated on the same microchip 200, the photovoltaic cells 201 may be located separately from the PC 90 microchip, and the two separate elements may be joined or adjoining.

A light source for the photovoltaic cells 201 can be direct or indirect and can be sunlight or artificial light, including light from a laser, or a combination, and can be optionally focused by a lens 204. The light may be coherent with one or more discrete frequencies, such as from a laser, or incoherent with many frequencies. The artificial light may be generated by well known conventional means that are conventionally powered by electricity distributed by the existing electrical power grid, as is well known in the art.

A single photovoltaic cell or a number of cells 201 may power each component on the PC 90 microchip, such as the master microprocessor 93 or slave microprocessors 94, DRAM or MRAM, Flash memory, DSP, or laser 150, or any of the other components previously described. The photovoltaic cells 201 may be connected to one or more batteries. The photovoltaic cells 201 can be located remotely as a separate unit, such as on the PC 90 microchip user's roof at home, car, or office, so that the cells 201 provide general local power or power dedicated to the PC 90 microchip and/or associated components. The PC 90 microchip may be a network server, router, or switch, so that any network component can be powered by photovoltaic cells 201, including the Internet, an Intranet, or the World Wide Web.

The FIG. 17A-17C embodiments advantageously eliminate the need for a microchip, such as the PC 90 microchip, to have a wired connection 99 that typically provides power or data or both, but which also provides a connection means for the entry of electromagnetic flux, which can impair or destroy the functioning of the PC 90 microchip. The embodiments shown rely on light, which does not transmit electromagnetic flux, for power and data.

FIG. 18A shows a single microchip 200, combining a PC 90 microchip (or any microchip, including a special or general purpose microprocessor on a microchip, alone or including one or more other system components as previously described) and one or more photovoltaic cells 201, that is substantially surrounded by a Faraday Cage 300, such as is well known in the art, that is optimized to shield against magnetic flux, including high frequency flux (and may include shielding against electric flux). Faraday Cage 300 may be constructed of a mesh structure, or may also be a continuous structure without holes, which has an advantage of preventing entry by very high frequency electromagnetic flux, and may incorporate other microchip structures, such as a heat sink 301.

FIG. 18B shows separate PC 90 microchip and one or more photovoltaic cells 201; the two separate components are connected by a wire 99, and all three components are substantially surrounded by a Faraday Cage 300, also known as a Faraday Shield or Screen.

FIG. 18C shows the same components as FIG. 18B, but shows each component substantially surrounded by a separate Faraday Cage 300, all of which may be connected. For portable handheld wireless devices, the ground for the Faraday Cage 300 may be the user's body.

As shown in FIG. 18D, the PC 90 microchip may be located in a housing for any of the PC's described previously, such as a case of a laptop personal computer 401 or a PC cell phone 402, which may also have a separate Faraday Cage 300, so that the PC 90 microchip is substantially surrounded by more than one Faraday Cage 300. The inner Faraday Cage 300 surrounding the PC 90 microchip may be optimized to shield against specific frequencies of magnetic flux, such as high frequency flux in the microwave range, which may be assisted by the relatively smaller size of the PC 90 microchip (compared to its housing). FIG. 18D shows an inner Faraday Cage 300 surrounding only a portion, the PC 90, of a microchip such as the combined microchip 200.

As shown in FIGS. 18E and 18F, the PC 90 microchip can be separate from the photovoltaic cell or cells 201 and can be joined by a wired connection 99.

As shown in FIG. 18E, an inner Faraday Cage 300 may surround only a portion of a PC 90 microchip, such as a Magnetic Random Access Memory (MRAM) component.

FIG. 18F shows Faraday Cage 300 that surrounds only a portion of one or more photovoltaic cells 201, such as a part conducting an electrical current flow directly to the PC 90 microchip.

The PC 90 microchip may also be powered by one or more fuel cells 211 or one or more batteries (each with one or more cells) 221 or any combination of such batteries 221, fuel cells 211, or photovoltaic cells 201. As shown in FIGS. 18E and 18F, the PC 90 microchip is typically separate from a fuel cell or cells 211 or batteries 221 and can be joined by a wired connection 99, as shown, as is the case with a photovoltaic cell or cells 201. A wired connection 99 can be configured to protect the PC 90 microchip from electromagnetic flux through the use of RF traps or Ferrite grommets or beads 212 on the wire or cable connection 99.

By providing power without an external wired connection 99, both fuel cells 211 and batteries 221 isolate the PC 90 microchip from a power grid that can transmit electromagnetic flux, but to do so a battery or batteries 221 can be configured to provide connection to the power grid only intermittently when charging is required.

FIG. 18G shows a microchip, such as a PC 90 microchip, surrounded by a Faraday Cage 300 but without including a photovoltaic cell 201 shown in FIGS. 18A-18F.

FIG. 18H shows a PC housing such as a laptop PC 401 or PC cell phone 402 including a PC 90 microchip and separate Faraday Cages 300 surrounding both the microchip and housing. Also shown is an antenna 499 (or antennas) for wireless communication that can be separated from the Faraday Cage 300 to protect the electrical components of the PC by an RF trap or Ferrite grommets or beads 212. The antenna 499 can project externally from the PC housing or be located internally in the PC housing, such as in the screen housing of a laptop PC 401. In an exemplary implementation, the antenna 499 is located outside of at least one Faraday Cage 300.

Any of the embodiments shown in FIGS. 17A-17C and 18A-18H may be combined with one or more other embodiments shown in those figures or in preceding FIGS. 1-16 and described herein.

FIG. 19 shows a silicon wafer 500 used to make microchips. The largest wafers 500 in current use are 300 mm (12 inches) in diameter and can contain as many as 13 billion transistors. Current state of the art in microchip fabrication is 0.13 micron process technology and the next process will be measured in nanometers (90 nm). As shown in FIG. 19, microchips 501 are separated by an edge portion 502. A microchip 501 can be a PC 90 microchip.

FIG. 20A shows a top view of a microchip 501 surrounded by adjoining portions of adjoining microchips 501 in a section of the silicon wafer 500. The microchip 501 is bounded by edge portions 502. Although the current state of the art in microchip fabrication on a silicon wafer is to use only one process on a wafer, embodiments of the invention use two or more fabrication processes on a single wafer 500.

As shown in the example of FIG. 20A, one process can be located on one section 511 on the microchip 501, while a second process can be located on a second section 521 of the microchip 501. A third process can be located on a third section 531 of the microchip 501; additional processes can also be located on other sections of the microchip 501.

The processes can be completely separate while at least sharing the common silicon wafer 500 base, and the processes can occur at different fabrication facilities, including those owned by different manufacturers. Alternatively, two or more separate processes may have common sub-processes that can be integrated, i.e., performed at the same time. Sections of the microchip 501 that are not undergoing a process can be protected from that process by a protective coating that is unaffected by that process and removed after that process. There can be one or more temporary protective coatings, which can remain on for more than one process.

The separate sections of the separate fabrication processes of the microchip 501 can be in any shape or pattern of the microchip. As shown in the FIG. 20A example, one or more separate processes can be located on adjoining portions of adjoining microchips. For example, as shown in FIG. 20A, section 521 is located on the lower portion of one row of microchips 501 and on the upper portion of the adjoining row of microchips 501, which would be positioned upside down of the wafer 500, so that the contiguous area of the section 521 process is maximized. Similarly, section 531 is shown in the example located on the lower portion of the adjoining row of microchips 501 and on the upper portion of the middle row of microchips 501. Alternatively, all of the microchips 501 of the wafer 500 can be positioned upright on the wafer.

Embodiments of the invention include any fabrication process of a silicon wafer 500 and can include wafers made of other materials suitable for microelectronic devices, such as gallium arsenide. The fabrication processes in current widespread use are generally CMOS (complementary metal-oxide semiconductor), but can be bipolar or other. The separate processes (and separate sections 511, 521, and 531 shown in FIG. 29A) can be for general purpose microprocessor (including one or more cores), memory (DRAM or non-volatile such as Flash or MRAM or ovonic), analog (including radio and/or laser), digital signal processing (DSP), micro-electromechanical system (MEMS), field programmable gate arrays (FPGA), graphic processing unit (GPU), microprocessor chipset, and others.

Embodiments of the invention facilitate a “system on a chip” (SoC), such as the earlier described PC 90 microchip, by allowing most or all of the micro components of a PC to be located on a single microchip. Even the consolidation of only two microchips into a single microchip provides a significant increase in processing speed and reduced power consumption. The silicon die becomes the motherboard for all the micro components of the PC, leaving only the macro components like battery, power supply, and input/output (I/O) connections to be located on the printed circuit motherboard. The result is ultra-large-scale-integration.

FIG. 20B shows a top view of the microchip 501 embodiment of FIG. 20A after the die has been separated from the silicon wafer 500 and positioned in a microchip package 503.

The fabrication processes illustrated in FIGS. 20A-20B can include material such as silicon germanium, gallium arsenide, indium phosphide and others used, for example, as deposits on silicon. Besides using different materials in different sections of the microchip, different size processes can be used in different microchip sections, such as a 0.13 micron process on section 511 and a 0.18 micron process on section 521 in the FIG. 29A example. All or parts of the microchip 501 can be synchronous or asynchronous. Both different size and different material processes can be combined on different sections of the microchip 501.

Although the maximum increase in speed and decrease in power consumption can be achieved by putting all micro or nano components on a single “system on a chip,” such as for a PC, even a minimal combination of just two different micro or nano components of a single microchip 501 can yield a very significant increase in speed and decrease in power consumption. To take a very simple example, a silicon wafer 500 can have 256 MB of DRAM manufactured onto a section 531 of the microchips 502 located on the wafer by one factory; when that DRAM process is completed, a second factory can add a general purpose CPU like a Pentium 4 to a second section 511 of the microchips 501 on the silicon wafer 500. Such an approach allows direct communication between microprocessor and DRAM on the microchip 501 for much greater speed and reduced power. Since 256 MB DRAM is an inexpensive commodity product currently, especially if purchased as wafers 500, there would be little or no increase in the production time of the microprocessor.

FIG. 21A illustrates an embodiment of the invention, which is an alternative method of uniting separate fabrication processes on the same microchip 501. Sections 501¹, 501², and 501³of FIG. 21A correspond to sections 511, 521, and 531 of FIGS. 20A & 20B in that both sets of sections represent three separate processes, but in FIG. 21A each section is a separate die cut from a wafer 500 and all three sections are united in a single package 503. The section dies 501¹, 501², and 501³can be held together by the chip package 503 or can be glued together, or a combination of the two in parts or the whole. In addition, the section dies can be assembled into a chip package 503 or the package can be assembled around the dies or a combination of both partially or completely.

The separate process dies illustrated in the FIG. 21A example may be assembled with the surface that the process is on in each die being substantially level with each other, so that both process surfaces of the dies form a plane that is substantially flat. The edges of the dies are configured so adjoining dies fit together as closely as possible, as shown in FIG. 21A at 502²and 502³.

The circuits of dies 501¹, 501², and 501³are connected at their edges 502³and 502²by interconnect lines 580 that can be widened as shown in 581 of FIG. 21B, which shows a portion of die edge 502³and 502²in an enlarged view. A process can be added in the area 591 overlapping the edges of the dies at 502³and 502²bounded by lines 590; in that process interconnect lines 580 of the two separate dies can be connected by laying down connections at 582 that connect to the enlarged portions 581 of the interconnect lines 580, as illustrated in FIG. 21B.

FIG. 21C shows that the die edges 502³and 502²can have any shape or pattern, not just a straight line shown above in FIGS. 21A & 21B.

FIG. 22 shows a combination of the embodiments shown in FIGS. 20 and 21. Microchip 501 as shown in FIG. 20 is shown assembled with separate dies 501¹, 501², and 501³into a microchip package 503, with edges between dies at 502¹, 502², 502³, and 502²³, which could include a connection process such as the example shown in FIG. 21B.

The microchip 501 dies shown in FIGS. 20-22 can be packaged using FCPGA (flip-chip pin grid array), FCBGA (flip-chip ball grid array), BBUL (bumpless build-up layer) or other technology.

Any of the embodiments shown in FIGS. 19, 20A-20B, 21A-21C, and 22 can be combined with one or more other embodiments shown in those figures or in the preceding FIGS. 1-18 and described herein.

FIGS. 23A-23H are new inventions based on FIGS. 18A-27H of this application, which are FIGS. 27A-27H of U.S. application Ser. No. 10/802,049 filed Mar. 17, 2004 and published on Oct. 28, 2004, as Pub. No. US 2004/0215931 A1 and U.S. application Ser. No. 10/684,657 filed Oct. 15, 2003 and published on Aug. 18, 2005, as Pub. No. US 2005/0180095 A1, both of which applications are hereby incorporated by reference herein for completeness of disclosure.

FIGS. 23A-23H are example new embodiments based on the FIG. 7B example; they show examples of the applicant's inventions involving one or more Faraday Cages surrounding various combinations of semiconductor microchips, photovoltaic cells, and/or other micro and/or nano devices with the applicant's internal sipe inventions 510/511/513. In the exemplary embodiments shown, the Faraday Cages 300 coincide with the outer compartment 500, which forms a surface of the sipe 505 (as previously defined) which can partially or completely surround the PC 90 microchip and/or photovoltaic cell 201 and/or fuel cell 211 and/or battery 221; any one or more of which (90/201/211/221) can be connected by wire 99, which can also be protected by Faraday Cage 300 so that all components are protected; and one or more Faraday Cages 300 and or internal sipes 505 can be inside a Faraday Cage 300 and/or internal sipe 505 so as to provide additional protection, including of one or more individual components, as shown in several useful examples in the FIGS. 23A-23H.

Heat sink 301 or other microchip cooling device can be augmented or replaced by a cooling media 506, which can for example circulate by convection alone within the sipe 505 as shown in FIG. 23G for example or can be allowed to circulate away from the microchip or other micro or nano device to a heat sink in another location, for example, including by circulation powered by a pump, for example, or other powered means. One or more attachments 503 can provide external connection from the microchip/cell 200 or other component like fuel cell 211 or battery 221 to the outer compartment 500 and/or Faraday Cage 300 and then to other external connections, such as a wire 99 as shown in FIG. 23C or an antenna 499 as shown in FIG. 23H; as shown in the FIG. 23D example, one or more attachments 503, which can be one or more conventional pins, can connect a microchip PC 90 and/or other component with an internal Faraday Cage 300. Advantageous combinations of the FIGS. 23A-23H embodiments can be made with embodiments shown in FIGS. 24A-24C, 25A-25B and 26A-26B, as well as with previous FIGS. 1-22.

FIGS. 24A and 25A-25B are are based on FIGS. 28 and 29A-29B of U.S. application Ser. No. 10/684,657 filed Oct. 15, 2003 and published on Aug. 18, 2005, as Pub. No. US 2005/0180095 A1, which was above incorporated by reference herein for completeness of disclosure.

FIG. 24A is a top view of a semiconductor wafer 1500, of which 300 mm. is a current example using a 90 nanometer process, made of silicon, gallium arsenide, or any other suitable semiconductor materials in current use or future equivalents. The wafer 1500 contains a multitude of microchips 1501 with each microchip 1501 including, for example, 1 or more core microprocessors 93 or 94, including at least 2 or 4 or 8 or 16 or 32 or 64 or 128 or 256 or 512 or 1028 or more cores. But instead of separating the microchips 1501 into separate dies in the conventional process along lines 1502, the entire semiconductor wafer 1500 of any size (including smaller that 300 mm) is used essentially intact (that is, undiced into dies) as a computer (or in one example embodiment, the wafer 1500 can be virtually entire and intact, excluding deactivated or disconnected incomplete microchips 1501 located around the periphery of a circular wafer and microchips 1501 with manufacturing defects or other damage, such as failure during use, which can remain inactively on the wafer); instead of separating along lines 1502, interconnects 1505 of any length or configuration can be added to the printed circuit architecture to connect the microchips 1501 to other microchips 1501 and/or other components on the wafer 1500 or external to it, using any interconnection means or architecture known in the art.

The microchips 1501 on the wafer 1500 can for example each be a complete personal computer (PC 90) system on a chip (SoC), including for example microprocessors, random access memory, radio and/or optical communication components, and other operational components necessary for each microchip 1501 to be capable of functioning as a fully independent PC 90 unit on the semiconductor wafer 1500. Each PC 90 microchip 1501 on the wafer 1500 is in effect a stand-alone unit capable of operating independent of any other PC 90 microchip 1501 on the wafer; this means that operations of PC 90 microchips 1501 occurring on the wafer 1500 can occur asynchronously, such as some or all of the PC 90 microchips 1501 on a wafer can operate together as a cluster of personal computers, as is conventional in the art, and can also include other personal computers in the cluster that are not on the wafer 1500. The semiconductor wafer 1500 can be used with other conventional interface devices for power and data communication, including wireless such as radio and/or optic (See FIG. 14, for example), and/or wired such as fiber optic and/or electric; such connections can reduce or eliminate the need for interconnections between the PC 90 microchips 1501 or pins connecting a wafer 1500, for example, to a motherboard (not shown). One or more PC 90 microchips 1501 can also include these connections, and all can include wireless communication capability such a radio or optic device, so that even cluster operations between PC microchips 1501 on a wafer 1500 can occur completely on wafer 1500, obviating the need for pins and interconnects.

Alternatively, more than one semiconductor wafer 1500 can be stacked in vertical layers, for example, with wafer 1500 #1 including microprocessors or cores; wafer 1500 #2 including random access memory or RAM such as DRAM; and wafer 1500 #3 including other components, as shown in the FIG. 24B example, which is similar to FIG. 7B of this application. The wafers stacked can be entire wafers as shown, or portions of wafers (such as FIG. 24C below), or one or more entire wafers with one or more portions of wafers or dies or other components.

By reducing or eliminating the need to go “off microchip” or off wafer in this case to complete computation operations, the applicant's invention provides huge savings in terms of speed and energy efficiency.

FIG. 24A also shows an example of the semiconductor wafer 1500 including one or more of the applicant's 510 or 511 or 513 internal sipe invention, with an outer compartment 500 with a sipe 505. In addition, FIG. 24A shows an example of the semiconductor wafer 1500 including one (or potentially more) Faraday Cage 300 surrounding the semiconductor wafer 1500. Moreover, FIG. 24A shows an example embodiment wherein both one or more of the internal siped inventions 510/511/513 and one or more of the Faraday Cages 300 can be used with the same semiconductor wafer 1500. Finally, FIG. 24A shows an example wherein one or more of the outer compartment 500 of the internal siped invention coincide with one or more of the Faraday Cages 300. Each of the four example embodiments described above in this paragraph can be used independently from each other or in any combination, including all four together as shown in FIG. 24A.

FIG. 24B shows a side cross section of vertically stacked semiconductor wafers 1500, which have interconnects or vias 1504 between facing proximate surfaces of the wafers. FIG. 24B shows a three wafer example embodiment; two or more wafers can be stacked in any manner, including with each directly aligned on top of one another, as shown, or partially overlapping in any manner. Two or more of the wafers 1500 can contact directly as shown or a non-wafer layer can be between them.

As with the example embodiments shown in FIG. 24A, FIG. 24B shows those stacked wafers 1500 including one or more of the applicant's 510 or 511 or 513 internal sipe invention, with an outer compartment 500 with a sipe 505. In addition, FIG. 24A shows an example of the stacked semiconductor wafers 1500 including one or more Faraday Cage 300 surrounding the semiconductor wafer 1500. Moreover, FIG. 24A shows an example embodiment wherein both one or more of the internal siped inventions 510/511/513 and one or more of the Faraday Cages 300 can be used with the same stacked semiconductor wafers 1500. Finally, FIG. 24A shows an example wherein one or more of the outer compartment 500 of the internal siped invention coincide with one or more of the Faraday Cages 300 surrounding the stacked wafers 1500. Each of the four example embodiments described above in this paragraph can be used independently from each other or in any combination, including all four together as shown in FIG. 24B.

FIG. 24C is another top view of a circular wafer 1500, but subdivided into smaller components, such as half sections at the upper example and quarter sections in the lower sections. Other smaller component embodiments, including other non-rectangular embodiments can be used beneficially. Advantageous combinations of the FIGS. 24A-24C embodiments with embodiments shown in FIGS. 23A-23H can also be made, as well as with FIGS. 25A-25B and 26A-26B, as well as with previous FIGS. 1-22.

The invention examples shown in FIGS. 24A-24B can be used as stand-alone computers or as networked computers or as components of a computer. As noted above, sipe media 506 can also be a coolant, which can circulate to a location outside the outer compartment 500 (not shown) or be enclosed within the 300/500 structure (shown in FIG. 24B partially filling sipe 505 as one example and completely filling sipe 505 as another example (not shown).

FIGS. 25A-25B are modifications of FIGS. 20A and 20B of this application (which are FIGS. 29A-29B of the '657 application incorporated by reference herein above). FIG. 25A shows a top view of PC 90 microchips 1501 on a portion of the semiconductor wafer 1500, including interconnects 1505 between the microchips 1501, and the microchips 1501 being bounded by edge portions 1502. FIG. 25B shows a microchip 1501 as a separated die in a package 1503 including the applicant's internal sipe inventions 510/511/513 and the Faraday Cage 300. Advantageous combinations of the FIGS. 25A-25B embodiments can be made with embodiments shown in FIGS. 23A-23H, 24A-24C, and 26A-26B, as well as with previous FIGS. 1-22.

FIGS. 26A-26B are like FIG. 7A-7B with the addition of Faraday Cages, as well as the addition of stacked dies in a side view in FIG. 26B. Advantageous combinations of the FIGS. 26A-26B embodiments can be made with embodiments shown in FIGS. 23A-23H, 24A-24C, and 25A-25B, as well as with previous FIGS. 1-22.

By way of background, FIG. 28A of the '033 and '930 Applications incorporated by reference herein above shows in cross-section an example of a tire 535, such as for a wheel 533 of a transportation vehicle, with a device 510; the internal sipe 505 and/or inner compartment/chamber/bladder 501 can be pressured or not (valve not shown). As shown in the example, inner compartment/chamber/bladder 501 can have one or more direct attachments 503 to the wheel and the structural elements shown can be made of any useful material as is conventional in the art, including plastic and/or plastic composite and/or carbon fiber. The outer compartment/chamber/bladder 500 can be abbreviated to cover only part of inner compartment/chamber/bladder 501, as shown in FIG. 28A, (possibly pressure-sealed to the wheel like a conventional automobile tire and wheel); the outer compartment/chamber/bladder 500 can also be abbreviated further to cover only a lesser portion, including at least a tread portion, which can include rubber (natural or synthetic, as can other or all parts of the outer compartment 500. FIG. 28B of the '033 and '930 applications shows in a side view cross-section an example of shape of structural elements 502 of the inner compartment 501 (not shown for simplicity).

FIG. 27A is new in this application and shows another tire 535 example embodiment similar to that of FIG. 28A discussed in the previous paragraph, but maximizing lateral stability by locating the structural elements 502 at the sides of the tire 535, while maximizing soft ride by locating the media such as gas in the central portion of the tire 535. New FIG. 27B is a side view of FIG. 27A and is the same as FIG. 28B discussed above.

FIGS. 23A-27 can be combined in any manner with each other and with any or all of FIGS. 1-22 of this applications, as well as with the Figures of the applicant's patents and applications incorporated by reference herein this application.

Broadly, the flexible inserts or components 510, 511, and 513 can be usefully employed anywhere that cushioning already is being used, or could be with beneficial effect, such as protective padding or cases for equipment of any sort, including portable devices like PC laptops or video players and/or games, cell phones, personal digital assistants (PDA's), and personal digital music players like Apple Ipods™ and MP3 players, as examples, such as the mounting of delicate electronic (or other) components like hard-drives or for vibration dampening, such as in automobile structural and body components and connections.

The applicant's two earlier applications, U.S. application Ser. No. 11/190,087 published as Publication No. US 2005/0268487 A1 on Dec. 8, 2005 describing footwear and U.S. application Ser. No. 11/108,034 published as Publication No. US 2005/0217142 A1 on Oct. 6, 2005 describing orthotics, as well as U.S. Pat. No. 7,010,869, issued Mar. 14, 2006 (of which the '034 Application is a continuation), are hereby expressly incorporated by reference in its entirety for completeness of disclosure. The applicant's earlier application Ser. No. 11/179,887 published as Publication No. US 2005/0241183 A1 on Nov. 3, 2005 describing footwear is hereby expressly incorporated by reference in its entirety for completeness of disclosure.

The applicant's other footwear U.S. Pat. Nos. 4,989,349; 5,317,819; 5,544,429; 5,909,948; 6,115,941; 6,115,945; 6,163,982; 6,308,439; 6,314,662; 6,295,744; 6,360,453; 6,487,795; 6,584,706; 6,591,519; 6,609,312; 6,629,376; 6,662,470; 6,675,498; 6,675,499; 6,708,424; 6,729,046; 6,748,674; 6,763,616; 6,789,331; 6,810,606; 6,877,254; 6,918,197; 7,010,869; 7,082,697; 7,093,379; 7,127,834; 7,168,185; 7,174,658; 7,234,249; 7,287,341; 7,334,350; and 7,334,356 are all hereby incorporated by reference herein in their entirety into this application for completeness of disclosure of the applicant's novel and useful combination of one or more of any of the features or components of any of the figures of this application with one or more of any of the features of any one or more of the preceding applicant's patents listed above in this paragraph.

The applicant's other footwear U.S. Applications with Publication Numbers US 20020000051; 20020007571; 20020007572; 20020014020; 20020014021; 20020023373; 20020073578; 20020116841; 20030046830; 20030070320; 20030079375; 20030131497; 20030208926; 20030217482; 20040134096; 20040250447; 20050016020; 20050086837; 20050217143; 20060032086; 20060248749; 20070240332; 20070271817; 20080000108; 20080005931; 20080022556; 20080083140; and 20080086916 are hereby incorporated by reference herein in their entirety into this application for completeness of disclosure of the applicant's novel and useful combination of one or more of any of the features or components of any of the figures of this application with one or more of any of the features of any one or more of the preceding applicant's published U.S. Applications listed above in this paragraph.

The applicant's non-footwear patents on global network computers, U.S. Pat. Nos. 6,167,428; 6,732,141; 6,725,250; 7,024,449; 7,035,906, and 7,047,275 are all hereby incorporated by reference herein in their entirety into this application for completeness of disclosure of the applicant's novel and useful combination of one or more of any of the features or components of any of the figures of this application with one or more of any of the features of any one or more of the preceding applicant's patents listed above in this paragraph.

The applicant's non-footwear applications on global network computers are U.S. application Ser. Nos. 09/085,755; 09/884,041; 09/935,779; 10/663,911; 11/196,527; 11/329,423; and 11/338,887, as well as U.S. application Ser. No. 10/802,049 with U.S. Publication Number US 2004/0215931 published Oct. 28, 2004; U.S. application Ser. No. 10/684,657 with U.S. Publication Number US 2005/0180095 published Aug. 18, 2005; U.S. application Ser. No. 11/196,527 filed Aug. 4, 2005 with U.S. Publication Number US 2006/0095497 published May 4, 2006; U.S. application Ser. No. 11/329,423 filed Jan. 11, 2006 with U.S. Publication Number US 2006/0177226 published Aug. 10, 2006; U.S. application Ser. No. 11/338,887 filed Jan. 25, 2006 with U.S. Publication Number US 2006/0190565 published Aug. 24, 2006; all of these applications are hereby incorporated by reference herein in their entirety into this application for completeness of disclosure of the applicant's novel and useful combination of one or more of any of the features or components of any of the figures of this application with one or more of any of the features of any one or more of the preceding applicant's applications, including published applications, listed above in this paragraph.

To avoid confusion, any numeral in the above listed non-footwear patents or applications relating to computers that is the same as a numeral in the above listed footwear patents or applications should have (or be presumed to have) a prefix numeral of “1” added to the numeral (the equivalent of adding “1000” to the numeral, so that all the numerals of both sets of applications and patents remain unique).

In the following claims, the term “chamber” means a compartment 161 or a chamber 188 or a bladder and the term “sipe” means a sipe 505 or a slit or a channel or a groove as described in the textual specification above and associated figures of this application.

The foregoing shoe designs meet the objectives of this invention as stated above. However, it will clearly be understood by those skilled in the art that the foregoing description has been made in terms of the preferred embodiments and various changes and modifications may be made without departing from the scope of the present invention which is to be defined by the appended claims.

Claims

1. A microchip comprising: at least one outer chamber, compartment, or bladder;at least one inner chamber, compartment, or bladder inside said outer chamber, compartment, or bladder;at least one internal sipe separating at least a part of said outer chamber, compartment, or bladder and at least a part of said inner chamber, compartment, or bladder;at least one Faraday cage; andsaid microchip being configured to connect to at least one network of computers, said microchip comprising at least a first internal hardware firewall configured to deny access to at least a first protected portion of said microchip from said network; and wherein said at least one internal sipe is formed by at least a portion of an inner surface of said outer chamber, compartment, or bladder and at least a portion of an outer surface of said inner chamber, compartment, or bladder; andthe inner and outer surface portions forming said at least one internal sipe oppose each other and can move relative to each other in a sliding motion; andwherein at least a portion of an outer surface of said outer chamber, compartment, or bladder is proximate to an outer surface of said microchip.
2. The microchip according to claim 1, wherein said at least one outer chamber, compartment, or bladder includes at least one said Faraday Cage.
3. The microchip according to claim 1, wherein said microchip comprises at least one general purpose microprocessor including at least two general purpose core or general purpose processing units, and wherein at least a first said core or processing unit is located within said first protected portion of said microchip that is protected by at least said first internal hardware firewall;at least a second said core or processing unit is located within a second portion of said microchip that is not protected by at least said first internal hardware firewall; andat least said second core or processing unit is separated from said first core or processing unit by at least said first internal hardware firewall and is located between at least said first internal hardware firewall and said at least one network of computers.
4. The microchip according to claim 3, wherein said microchip further comprises a master controller of the microprocessor located within said first protected portion of said microchip that is protected by at least said first internal hardware firewall, and said master controller is configured to control said second said core or processing unit.
5. The microchip according to claim 1, wherein said microchip further comprises a wire cable configured for electronic devices, said wire cable comprising: at least one wire;at least one inner layer surrounding a portion of said at least one wire;at least one outer layer surrounding a portion of said at least one inner layer; andat least one internal sipe of said wire cable separating at least a part of one said outer layer and at least a part of one said inner layer; wherein said at least one internal sipe of said wire cable is formed by at least a portion of an inner surface of said outer layer and at least a portion of an outer surface of said inner layer; andthe inner layer and outer layer surface portions of said wire cable forming said at least one internal sipe of said wire cable oppose each other and can move relative to each other in a sliding motion.
6. A microchip comprising: at least one outer chamber, compartment, or bladder;at least one inner chamber, compartment, or bladder inside said outer chamber, compartment, or bladder;at least one internal sipe separating at least a part of said outer chamber, compartment, or bladder and at least a part of said inner chamber, compartment, or bladder;said microchip being configured to connect to at least one network of computers, said microchip comprising at least four internal hardware firewalls, said at least four internal hardware firewalls configured to deny access to at least four protected portions of said microchip from said network of computers;at least one Faraday cage; and wherein said at least one internal sipe is formed by at least a portion of an inner surface of said outer chamber, compartment, or bladder and at least a portion of an outer surface of said inner chamber, compartment, or bladder; andthe inner and outer surface portions forming said at least one internal sipe oppose each other and can move relative to each other in a sliding motion; and wherein at least a portion of an outer surface of said outer chamber, compartment, or bladder is proximate to an outer surface of said microchip.
7. The microchip according to claim 6, wherein said at least one outer chamber, compartment, or bladder includes at least one said Faraday Cage.
8. The microchip according to claim 6, wherein said microchip comprises at least one general purpose microprocessor including at least two general purpose core or general purpose processing units, and wherein at least a first said core or processing unit is located within said first protected portion of said microchip that is protected by at least said first internal hardware firewall;at least a second said core or processing unit is located within a second portion of said microchip that is not protected by at least said first internal hardware firewall; andat least said second core or processing unit is separated from said first core or processing unit by at least said first internal hardware firewall and is located between at least said first internal hardware firewall and said at least one network of computers.
9. The microchip according to claim 8, wherein said microchip further comprises a master controller of the microprocessor located within said first protected portion of said microchip that is protected by at least said first internal hardware firewall, and said master controller is configured to control said second said core or processing unit.
10. The microchip according to claim 6, wherein said microchip further comprises a wire cable configured for electronic devices, said wire cable comprising: at least one wire;at least one inner layer surrounding a portion of said at least one wire;at least one outer layer surrounding a portion of said at least one inner layer; andat least one internal sipe of said wire cable separating at least a part of one said outer layer and at least a part of one said inner layer; wherein said at least one internal sipe of said wire cable is formed by at least a portion of an inner surface of said outer layer and at least a portion of an outer surface of said inner layer; andthe inner layer and outer layer surface portions of said wire cable forming said at least one internal sipe of said wire cable oppose each other and can move relative to each other in a sliding motion.
11. The microchip according to claim 6, wherein said microchip comprises at least one general purpose microprocessor with at least four general purpose cores or general purpose processing units, each protected by at least one of said at least four internal hardware firewalls.
12. A microchip comprising: at least one outer chamber, compartment, or bladder;at least one inner chamber, compartment, or bladder inside said outer chamber, compartment, or bladder;at least one internal sipe separating at least a part of said outer chamber, compartment, or bladder and at least a part of said inner chamber, compartment, or bladder;at least one Faraday cage; andsaid microchip being configured to connect to at least one network of computers, said microchip comprising at least a first internal hardware firewalls configured to deny access to at least a first protected portion of said microchip from said network; and the microchip further including at least one general purpose microprocessor with at least a general purpose core or processing unit including a master controller of the microprocessor and at least one general purpose core or general purpose processing unit; andwherein said at least one internal sipe is formed by at least a portion of an inner surface of said outer chamber, compartment, or bladder and at least a portion of an outer surface of said inner chamber, compartment, or bladder; andthe inner and outer surface portions forming said at least one internal sipe oppose each other and can move relative to each other in a sliding motion; andwherein at least a portion of an outer surface of said outer chamber, compartment, or bladder is proximate to an outer surface of said microchip.
13. The microchip according to claim 12, wherein said at least one outer chamber, compartment, or bladder includes at least one said Faraday Cage.
14. The microchip according to claim 12, wherein said at least one general purpose microprocessor includes at least two general purpose cores or general purpose processing units, and wherein at least a first said core or processing unit is located within said first protected portion of said microchip that is protected by at least said first internal hardware firewall;at least a second said core or processing unit is located within a second portion of said microchip that is not protected by at least said first internal hardware firewall; andat least said second core or processing unit is separated from said first core or processing unit by at least said first internal hardware firewall and is located between at least said first internal hardware firewall and said at least one network of computers.
15. The microchip according to claim 14, wherein said master controller of the microprocessor is located within said first protected portion of said microchip that is protected by at least said first internal hardware firewall, and said master controller is configured to control said second said core or processing unit.
16. The microchip according to claim 12, wherein the master controller of the microprocessor is also protected by a second said internal hardware firewall.
17. The microchip according to claim 12, wherein said microchip further comprises a wire cable configured for electronic devices, said wire cable comprising: at least one wire;at least one inner layer surrounding a portion of said at least one wire;at least one outer layer surrounding a portion of said at least one inner layer; andat least one internal sipe of said wire cable separating at least a part of one said outer layer and at least a part of one said inner layer; wherein said at least one internal sipe of said wire cable is formed by at least a portion of an inner surface of said outer layer and at least a portion of an outer surface of said inner layer; andthe inner layer and outer layer surface portions of said wire cable forming said at least one internal sipe of said wire cable oppose each other and can move relative to each other in a sliding motion.

Parent Case Info

This application is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/931,080 filed Jun. 28, 2013; which is a continuation of Ser. No. 13/769,292, filed Feb. 16, 2013, now abandoned; which is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/292,769, filed Nov. 25, 2008, now U.S. Pat. No. 8,125,796, which is a continuation-in-part of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/292,553, filed Nov. 20, 2008, now U.S. Pat. No. 8,164,170, which is a non-provisional of U.S. Provisional Application No. 60/996,530, filed on Nov. 21, 2007, and U.S. Provisional Application No. 60/996,553, filed on Nov. 26, 2007. U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/292,769, filed Nov. 25, 2008, is also a non-provisional of U.S. Provisional Application No. 60/996,553, filed on Nov. 26, 2007. The contents of all of the above-mentioned applications are hereby incorporated herein by reference.

US Referenced Citations (635)

Number	Name	Date	Kind
D193914	Berry	Aug 1877	S
280791	Brooks	Jul 1883	A
288127	Shepard	Nov 1883	A
500385	Hall	Jun 1893	A
532429	Rogers	Jan 1895	A
584373	Kuhn	Jun 1897	A
1283335	Shillcock	Oct 1918	A
1289106	Bullock	Dec 1918	A
D5515	Barney	May 1920	S
D55115	Barney	May 1920	S
1458446	Schaeffer	Jun 1923	A
1622860	Cutler	Mar 1927	A
1639381	Manelas	Aug 1927	A
1701260	Fischer	Feb 1929	A
1735986	Wray	Nov 1929	A
1853034	Bradley	Apr 1932	A
2004906	Simister	Jun 1935	A
2120987	Murray	Jun 1938	A
2147197	Glidden	Feb 1939	A
2155166	Kraft	Apr 1939	A
2162912	Craver	Jun 1939	A
2170652	Brennan	Aug 1939	A
2179942	Lyne	Nov 1939	A
D119894	Sherman	Apr 1940	S
2201300	Prue	May 1940	A
2206860	Sperry	Jul 1940	A
D122131	Sannar	Aug 1940	S
D128817	Esterson	Aug 1941	S
2251468	Smith	Aug 1941	A
2328242	Witherill	Aug 1943	A
2345831	Pierson	Apr 1944	A
2433329	Adler et al.	Dec 1947	A
2434770	Lutey	Jan 1948	A
2470200	Wallach	May 1949	A
2546827	Lavinthal	Mar 1951	A
2627676	Hack	Feb 1953	A
2718715	Spilman	Sep 1955	A
2762134	Town	Sep 1956	A
2814133	Herbst	Nov 1957	A
3005272	Shelare et al.	Oct 1961	A
3087261	Russell	Apr 1963	A
3100354	Lombard et al.	Aug 1963	A
3110971	Chang	Nov 1963	A
3170250	Scholl	Feb 1965	A
3171133	Steffen	Mar 1965	A
3186004	Carlini	Jun 1965	A
3204678	Worcester	Sep 1965	A
3242500	Derr	Mar 1966	A
3248738	Morgan	May 1966	A
3253355	Menkin	May 1966	A
3305947	Kalsoy	Feb 1967	A
3308560	Jones	Mar 1967	A
3407406	Werner et al.	Oct 1968	A
3416174	Novitske	Dec 1968	A
3469576	Everts et al.	Sep 1969	A
3512274	McGrath	May 1970	A
3535799	Onituska	Oct 1970	A
3539876	Feinberg et al.	Nov 1970	A
3600714	Cade et al.	Aug 1971	A
3806950	Spencer-Foote	Apr 1974	A
3806974	DiPaolo	Apr 1974	A
3824716	DiPaolo	Jul 1974	A
3834046	Fowler	Sep 1974	A
3835530	Kilby	Sep 1974	A
3849801	Holt et al.	Nov 1974	A
3863366	Auberry et al.	Feb 1975	A
3872511	Nichols	Mar 1975	A
3958291	Spier	May 1976	A
3964181	Holcombe, Jr.	Jun 1976	A
3995320	Zafuto	Dec 1976	A
3997984	Hayward	Dec 1976	A
4003145	Liebscher et al.	Jan 1977	A
4023213	Rovani	May 1977	A
4030213	Daswick	Jun 1977	A
4035846	Jencks	Jul 1977	A
193914	Berry	Aug 1977	A
4043058	Hollister et al.	Aug 1977	A
4059910	Bryden	Nov 1977	A
4060855	Rappleyea	Dec 1977	A
4064565	Griffiths	Dec 1977	A
4067063	Ettinger	Jan 1978	A
4068395	Senter	Jan 1978	A
4083125	Benseler et al.	Apr 1978	A
4096649	Saurwein	Jun 1978	A
4098011	Bowerman et al.	Jul 1978	A
4128950	Bowerman et al.	Dec 1978	A
4128951	Tansill	Dec 1978	A
4141158	Benseler et al.	Feb 1979	A
4145785	Lacey	Mar 1979	A
4149324	Lesser et al.	Apr 1979	A
4161828	Benseler et al.	Jul 1979	A
4161829	Wayser	Jul 1979	A
4170078	Moss	Oct 1979	A
4172495	Zebuhr et al.	Oct 1979	A
4183156	Rudy	Jan 1980	A
4194310	Bowerman	Mar 1980	A
D256180	Turner	Aug 1980	S
D256400	Famolare, Jr.	Aug 1980	S
4217705	Donzis	Aug 1980	A
4219945	Rudy	Sep 1980	A
4223457	Borgeas	Sep 1980	A
4227320	Borgeas	Oct 1980	A
4235026	Plagenhoef	Nov 1980	A
4237627	Turner	Dec 1980	A
4240214	Sigle et al.	Dec 1980	A
4241523	Daswick	Dec 1980	A
4245306	Besemer et al.	Jan 1981	A
4245406	Landay	Jan 1981	A
4250638	Linnemann	Feb 1981	A
4258480	Famolare, Jr.	Mar 1981	A
4259792	Halberstadt	Apr 1981	A
4262433	Hagg et al.	Apr 1981	A
4263728	Frecentese	Apr 1981	A
4266349	Schmohl	May 1981	A
4268980	Gudas	May 1981	A
4271606	Rudy	Jun 1981	A
4272858	Hlustik	Jun 1981	A
4274211	Funck	Jun 1981	A
4276594	Morley	Jun 1981	A
4278837	Best	Jul 1981	A
4297797	Meyers	Nov 1981	A
4302892	Adamik	Dec 1981	A
4305212	Coomer	Dec 1981	A
4308671	Bretschneider	Jan 1982	A
4309832	Hunt	Jan 1982	A
4316332	Giese et al.	Feb 1982	A
4316335	Giese et al.	Feb 1982	A
4319412	Muller et al.	Mar 1982	A
D264017	Turner	Apr 1982	S
4322895	Hockerson	Apr 1982	A
D265019	Vermonet	Jun 1982	S
4335529	Badalamenti	Jun 1982	A
4340626	Rudy	Jul 1982	A
4342161	Schmohl	Aug 1982	A
4345338	Frieder, Jr. et al.	Aug 1982	A
4348821	Daswick	Sep 1982	A
4354284	Gooding	Oct 1982	A
4354319	Block et al.	Oct 1982	A
4361971	Bowerman	Dec 1982	A
4366634	Giese et al.	Jan 1983	A
4370817	Ratanangsu	Feb 1983	A
4372059	Ambrose	Feb 1983	A
4375108	Gooding	Mar 1983	A
4398357	Batra	Aug 1983	A
4399620	Funck	Aug 1983	A
D272294	Watanabe	Jan 1984	S
4432099	Grick et al.	Feb 1984	A
4449306	Cavanagh	May 1984	A
4451994	Fowler	Jun 1984	A
4454662	Stubblefield	Jun 1984	A
4455765	Sjöswärd	Jun 1984	A
4455767	Bergmans	Jun 1984	A
4467400	Stopper	Aug 1984	A
4468870	Sternberg	Sep 1984	A
4484364	Mitchell et al.	Nov 1984	A
4484397	Curley, Jr.	Nov 1984	A
4489397	Lee	Dec 1984	A
4494321	Lawlor	Jan 1985	A
4505055	Bergmans	Mar 1985	A
4506462	Cavanagh	Mar 1985	A
4521979	Blaser	Jun 1985	A
4527345	Lopez	Jul 1985	A
D280568	Stubblefield	Sep 1985	S
4538301	Sawatzki et al.	Sep 1985	A
4542598	Misevich et al.	Sep 1985	A
4546559	Dassler	Oct 1985	A
4547979	Harada et al.	Oct 1985	A
4557059	Misevich et al.	Dec 1985	A
4559723	Hamy et al.	Dec 1985	A
4559724	Norton	Dec 1985	A
4561195	Onoda et al.	Dec 1985	A
4570362	Vermonet	Feb 1986	A
4577417	Cole	Mar 1986	A
4578882	Talarico, II	Apr 1986	A
4580359	Kurrash et al.	Apr 1986	A
4624061	Wezel et al.	Nov 1986	A
4624062	Autry et al.	Nov 1986	A
4638577	Riggs	Jan 1987	A
4641438	Laird et al.	Feb 1987	A
4642917	Ungar	Feb 1987	A
4651445	Hannibal	Mar 1987	A
D289341	Turner	Apr 1987	S
4654983	Graham	Apr 1987	A
4658515	Oatman	Apr 1987	A
4667423	Autry	May 1987	A
4670995	Huang	Jun 1987	A
4676010	Cheskin	Jun 1987	A
4694591	Banich et al.	Sep 1987	A
4697361	Ganter et al.	Oct 1987	A
4703436	Varshney	Oct 1987	A
D293275	Bua	Dec 1987	S
4715133	Hartjes et al.	Dec 1987	A
4724622	Mills	Feb 1988	A
D294425	Le	Mar 1988	S
4727660	Bernhard	Mar 1988	A
4730402	Norton et al.	Mar 1988	A
4731939	Parracho et al.	Mar 1988	A
4736317	Hu et al.	Apr 1988	A
4747139	Taaffe	May 1988	A
4747220	Autry et al.	May 1988	A
D296149	Diaz	Jun 1988	S
D296152	Selbiger	Jun 1988	S
4748753	Ju	Jun 1988	A
4754561	DuFour	Jul 1988	A
4756098	Boggia	Jul 1988	A
4757620	Tiitola	Jul 1988	A
4759136	Stewart et al.	Jul 1988	A
4768295	Ito	Sep 1988	A
4769926	Meyers	Sep 1988	A
4777738	Giese	Oct 1988	A
D298684	Pitchford	Nov 1988	S
4783910	Boys	Nov 1988	A
4784462	Priaroggia	Nov 1988	A
4785557	Kelley et al.	Nov 1988	A
4802289	Guldager	Feb 1989	A
4817304	Parker et al.	Apr 1989	A
4827508	Shear	May 1989	A
4827631	Thornton	May 1989	A
4833795	Diaz	May 1989	A
4837949	Dufour	Jun 1989	A
D302900	Kolman et al.	Aug 1989	S
4853980	Zarotti	Aug 1989	A
4854057	Misevich et al.	Aug 1989	A
4855903	Carleton et al.	Aug 1989	A
4858340	Pasternak	Aug 1989	A
4864737	Marrello	Sep 1989	A
4864738	Horovitz	Sep 1989	A
4866861	Noone	Sep 1989	A
4876807	Tiitola et al.	Oct 1989	A
4890398	Thomasson	Jan 1990	A
4893174	Yamada et al.	Jan 1990	A
4894932	Harada	Jan 1990	A
4894933	Tonkel et al.	Jan 1990	A
4897936	Fuerst	Feb 1990	A
4906502	Rudy	Mar 1990	A
4907228	Bruckert et al.	Mar 1990	A
4918596	Nakano	Apr 1990	A
4922631	Anderie	May 1990	A
4934070	Mauger	Jun 1990	A
4934073	Robinson	Jun 1990	A
D310131	Hase	Aug 1990	S
D310132	Hase	Aug 1990	S
4947560	Fuerst et al.	Aug 1990	A
4949476	Anderie	Aug 1990	A
D310906	Hase	Oct 1990	S
4969092	Shorter	Nov 1990	A
4972527	Wallace	Nov 1990	A
4979794	Evans	Dec 1990	A
4982737	Guttmann	Jan 1991	A
4989349	Ellis, III	Feb 1991	A
D315634	Yung-Mao	Mar 1991	S
5010662	Dabuzhsky et al.	Apr 1991	A
5012597	Thomasson	May 1991	A
5014365	Schulz	May 1991	A
5014449	Richard et al.	May 1991	A
5024007	DuFour	Jun 1991	A
5025369	Schwartz	Jun 1991	A
5025573	Giese et al.	Jun 1991	A
5027864	Conti et al.	Jul 1991	A
5031089	Liu et al.	Jul 1991	A
5048203	Kling	Sep 1991	A
D320302	Kiyosawa	Oct 1991	S
2052130	Barry et al.	Oct 1991	A
5052130	Barry	Oct 1991	A
5068780	Bruckert et al.	Nov 1991	A
5077916	Beneteau	Jan 1992	A
5079856	Truelsen	Jan 1992	A
5083320	Halstead	Jan 1992	A
5092060	Frachey et al.	Mar 1992	A
5095545	Lane	Mar 1992	A
5103393	Harris et al.	Apr 1992	A
5109329	Strelioff	Apr 1992	A
5109512	Bahr et al.	Apr 1992	A
D327164	Hatfield	Jun 1992	S
D327165	Hatfield	Jun 1992	S
5131173	Anderie	Jul 1992	A
5136708	LaPourtre et al.	Aug 1992	A
D328968	Tinker	Sep 1992	S
D329528	Hatfield	Sep 1992	S
D329739	Hatfield	Sep 1992	S
5153945	Kobayashi et al.	Oct 1992	A
5155808	Shimizu	Oct 1992	A
D330972	Hatfield et al.	Nov 1992	S
D332344	Hatfield et al.	Jan 1993	S
D332692	Hatfield et al.	Jan 1993	S
5175889	Infusino	Jan 1993	A
5191727	Barry et al.	Mar 1993	A
5195031	Ordish	Mar 1993	A
5204998	Liu	Apr 1993	A
5212780	Padgaonkar et al.	May 1993	A
5214657	Farnworth et al.	May 1993	A
5224280	Preman et al.	Jul 1993	A
5224810	Pitkin	Jul 1993	A
5237507	Chasek	Aug 1993	A
5237758	Zachman	Aug 1993	A
5247742	Kilgore et al.	Sep 1993	A
5259070	De Roza	Nov 1993	A
5259071	Scott et al.	Nov 1993	A
5260943	Comroe et al.	Nov 1993	A
5263203	Kraemer et al.	Nov 1993	A
5282272	Guy et al.	Jan 1994	A
5283819	Glick et al.	Feb 1994	A
D345249	Sell, Jr.	Mar 1994	S
5291494	Bruckert et al.	Mar 1994	A
5291502	Pezeshki et al.	Mar 1994	A
5291505	Nielsen	Mar 1994	A
D347105	Johnson	May 1994	S
5317819	Ellis, III	Jun 1994	A
5341477	Pitkin et al.	Aug 1994	A
5343639	Kilgore	Sep 1994	A
5349682	Rosenberry	Sep 1994	A
5353459	Potter	Oct 1994	A
5353523	Kilgore	Oct 1994	A
5357404	Bright et al.	Oct 1994	A
5357632	Pian et al.	Oct 1994	A
5361362	Benkeser et al.	Nov 1994	A
5361410	Sigl	Nov 1994	A
5369896	Frachey et al.	Dec 1994	A
5381534	Shi	Jan 1995	A
5388211	Hornbuckle	Feb 1995	A
5392400	Berkowitz et al.	Feb 1995	A
5410651	Sekizawa et al.	Apr 1995	A
5426741	Butts, Jr. et al.	Jun 1995	A
5428783	Lake	Jun 1995	A
5434998	Akai et al.	Jul 1995	A
5446843	Fucito et al.	Aug 1995	A
5457797	Butterworth et al.	Oct 1995	A
5475606	Muyshondt et al.	Dec 1995	A
5497465	Chin et al.	Mar 1996	A
5515511	Nguyen et al.	May 1996	A
5522070	Sumimoto	May 1996	A
D372114	Turner et al.	Jul 1996	S
5535408	Hillis	Jul 1996	A
5539934	Ponder	Jul 1996	A
5543194	Rudy	Aug 1996	A
5544429	Ellis, III	Aug 1996	A
5546594	Wazumi	Aug 1996	A
5550984	Gelb	Aug 1996	A
5555584	Moore, III et al.	Sep 1996	A
5568375	Rausch	Oct 1996	A
5570270	Naedel et al.	Oct 1996	A
5572643	Judson	Nov 1996	A
5572805	Giese et al.	Nov 1996	A
5576554	Hsu	Nov 1996	A
5586121	Moura et al.	Dec 1996	A
5587928	Jones et al.	Dec 1996	A
5588003	Ohba et al.	Dec 1996	A
5590284	Crosetto	Dec 1996	A
5592376	Hodroff	Jan 1997	A
5592632	Leung et al.	Jan 1997	A
5594491	Hodge et al.	Jan 1997	A
5600597	Kean et al.	Feb 1997	A
5604882	Hoover et al.	Feb 1997	A
5606615	Lapointe et al.	Feb 1997	A
5608448	Smoral et al.	Mar 1997	A
5615127	Beatty et al.	Mar 1997	A
5627879	Russell et al.	May 1997	A
5666484	Orimo et al.	Sep 1997	A
5675844	Guyton et al.	Oct 1997	A
5678028	Bershteyn et al.	Oct 1997	A
5678327	Halberstadt	Oct 1997	A
5680461	McManis	Oct 1997	A
5680548	Trugman	Oct 1997	A
5696902	Leclercq et al.	Dec 1997	A
5699528	Hogan	Dec 1997	A
5701507	Bonneau, Jr. et al.	Dec 1997	A
D388594	Turner et al.	Jan 1998	S
5710884	Dedrick	Jan 1998	A
5734913	Iwamura et al.	Mar 1998	A
5748489	Beatty et al.	May 1998	A
5751881	Konda et al.	May 1998	A
5752067	Wilkinson et al.	May 1998	A
5754766	Shaw et al.	May 1998	A
5758077	Danahy et al.	May 1998	A
5758345	Wang	May 1998	A
5761507	Govett	Jun 1998	A
5764889	Ault et al.	Jun 1998	A
5774337	Lee et al.	Jun 1998	A
5774668	Choquier et al.	Jun 1998	A
5774721	Robinson	Jun 1998	A
5784551	De Leva et al.	Jul 1998	A
5784628	Reneris	Jul 1998	A
5790431	Ahrens, Jr. et al.	Aug 1998	A
5793968	Gregerson et al.	Aug 1998	A
5794059	Barker et al.	Aug 1998	A
5802320	Baehr et al.	Sep 1998	A
5809190	Chen	Sep 1998	A
5813141	Cho	Sep 1998	A
5813142	Demon	Sep 1998	A
5815665	Teper et al.	Sep 1998	A
5815793	Ferguson	Sep 1998	A
5823852	Chu	Oct 1998	A
5826014	Coley et al.	Oct 1998	A
5826029	Gore, Jr. et al.	Oct 1998	A
5828833	Belville et al.	Oct 1998	A
5835726	Shwed et al.	Nov 1998	A
5838436	Hotaling et al.	Nov 1998	A
5838542	Nelson et al.	Nov 1998	A
5843799	Hsu et al.	Dec 1998	A
5844594	Ferguson	Dec 1998	A
5845074	Kobata	Dec 1998	A
5846063	Lakic	Dec 1998	A
5850449	McManis	Dec 1998	A
5861817	Palmer et al.	Jan 1999	A
5862357	Hagersten et al.	Jan 1999	A
5864738	Kessler et al.	Jan 1999	A
5870721	Norris	Feb 1999	A
5872987	Wade et al.	Feb 1999	A
5881284	Kubo	Mar 1999	A
5889989	Robertazzi et al.	Mar 1999	A
5896499	McKelvey	Apr 1999	A
D409362	Turner et al.	May 1999	S
D409826	Turner et al.	May 1999	S
D410138	Turner et al.	May 1999	S
5905429	Hornstein et al.	May 1999	A
5909052	Ohta et al.	Jun 1999	A
5909681	Passera et al.	Jun 1999	A
5909948	Ellis, III	Jun 1999	A
5913412	Huber et al.	Jun 1999	A
5917629	Hortensius et al.	Jun 1999	A
5919247	Van Hoff et al.	Jul 1999	A
5930511	Hinsley	Jul 1999	A
5930918	Healy et al.	Aug 1999	A
5933984	Carlson et al.	Aug 1999	A
5943421	Grabon	Aug 1999	A
5956777	Popovich	Sep 1999	A
5964832	Kisor	Oct 1999	A
5976451	Skaja et al.	Nov 1999	A
5978829	Chung et al.	Nov 1999	A
5979078	McLaughlin	Nov 1999	A
5987781	Pavesi et al.	Nov 1999	A
6003133	Moughanni et al.	Dec 1999	A
6023857	Vizy et al.	Feb 2000	A
6052555	Ferguson	Apr 2000	A
6065118	Bull et al.	May 2000	A
6067082	Enmei	May 2000	A
6073209	Bergsten	Jun 2000	A
6073271	Alexander et al.	Jun 2000	A
6093933	Farnworth et al.	Jul 2000	A
6098091	Kisor	Aug 2000	A
6098209	Bainbridge et al.	Aug 2000	A
6112225	Kraft et al.	Aug 2000	A
6112243	Downs et al.	Aug 2000	A
6115698	Tuck et al.	Sep 2000	A
6115941	Ellis, III	Sep 2000	A
6115945	Ellis, III	Sep 2000	A
6163982	Ellis, III	Dec 2000	A
6178560	Halstead et al.	Jan 2001	B1
6202153	Diamant et al.	Mar 2001	B1
6208634	Boulos et al.	Mar 2001	B1
6219627	Bonneau et al.	Apr 2001	B1
6226801	Alexander et al.	May 2001	B1
D444293	Turner et al.	Jul 2001	S
6253466	Harmon-Weiss et al.	Jul 2001	B1
6268788	Gray	Jul 2001	B1
6287949	Mori et al.	Sep 2001	B1
6308439	Ellis	Oct 2001	B1
6308813	Carlson	Oct 2001	B1
D450916	Turner et al.	Nov 2001	S
6314662	Ellis	Nov 2001	B1
6326245	Farnworth et al.	Dec 2001	B1
6351853	Halstead et al.	Mar 2002	B1
6360453	Ellis	Mar 2002	B1
6360457	Qui et al.	Mar 2002	B1
6366472	Alina et al.	Apr 2002	B2
6391405	Bonk et al.	May 2002	B1
6440775	Khoury	Aug 2002	B2
6446271	Ho	Sep 2002	B1
6457261	Crary	Oct 2002	B1
6487795	Ellis	Dec 2002	B1
6493881	Picotte	Dec 2002	B1
6515870	Skinner	Feb 2003	B1
6519780	Goodwin	Feb 2003	B2
6530092	Pope	Mar 2003	B2
6537639	Huang	Mar 2003	B1
6571490	Scarfe et al.	Jun 2003	B2
6584706	Ellis	Jul 2003	B1
6591428	Halstead et al.	Jul 2003	B2
6591429	Jaszai	Jul 2003	B1
6591519	Ellis	Jul 2003	B1
6629376	Ellis	Oct 2003	B1
6645832	Kim et al.	Nov 2003	B2
6658671	Von Holst et al.	Dec 2003	B1
6662470	Ellis	Dec 2003	B2
6668470	Ellis	Dec 2003	B2
6675498	Ellis	Jan 2004	B1
6675499	Ellis	Jan 2004	B2
6681408	Ku	Jan 2004	B2
6708424	Ellis	Mar 2004	B1
6722058	Lucas et al.	Apr 2004	B2
6725250	Ellis	Apr 2004	B1
6729046	Ellis	May 2004	B2
6732141	Ellis	May 2004	B2
6748674	Ellis	Jun 2004	B2
6763616	Ellis	Jul 2004	B2
6772347	Xie et al.	Aug 2004	B1
6789331	Ellis	Sep 2004	B1
6795625	Ishii et al.	Sep 2004	B1
6797545	Farnworth et al.	Sep 2004	B2
6810606	Ellis	Nov 2004	B1
D500585	Wahoske et al.	Jan 2005	S
6837951	Rapaport	Jan 2005	B2
6845573	Litchfield et al.	Jan 2005	B2
6846534	Bonk et al.	Jan 2005	B2
6848200	Westin	Feb 2005	B1
6851204	Aveni	Feb 2005	B2
6877254	Ellis	Apr 2005	B2
6918197	Ellis	Jul 2005	B2
6946050	Dojan et al.	Sep 2005	B2
6950947	Purtell et al.	Sep 2005	B1
6957000	McAlpine et al.	Oct 2005	B2
6971193	Potter et al.	Dec 2005	B1
6976321	Lakic	Dec 2005	B1
6990755	Hatfield et al.	Jan 2006	B2
7010869	Ellis	Mar 2006	B1
7024449	Ellis	Apr 2006	B1
7035906	Ellis	Apr 2006	B1
7037571	Fish et al.	May 2006	B2
7047275	Ellis	May 2006	B1
7076890	Grove et al.	Jul 2006	B2
7082697	Ellis	Aug 2006	B2
7086179	Dojan et al.	Aug 2006	B2
7093379	Ellis	Aug 2006	B2
7123801	Fitz	Oct 2006	B2
7127834	Ellis	Oct 2006	B2
7132032	Tawney et al.	Nov 2006	B2
7140129	Newson et al.	Nov 2006	B2
7148565	Kim et al.	Dec 2006	B2
7161175	Shau	Jan 2007	B2
7168185	Ellis	Jan 2007	B2
7168188	Auger et al.	Jan 2007	B2
7174658	Ellis	Feb 2007	B2
7194826	Ungari	Mar 2007	B2
7234249	Ellis	Jun 2007	B2
7264908	Kaneko et al.	Sep 2007	B2
7287341	Ellis	Oct 2007	B2
7334349	Sokolowski et al.	Feb 2008	B2
7334350	Ellis	Feb 2008	B2
7334356	Ellis	Feb 2008	B2
7412588	Georgiou et al.	Aug 2008	B2
7467406	Cox et al.	Dec 2008	B2
7484318	Finkelstein	Feb 2009	B2
7506020	Ellis	Mar 2009	B2
7546699	Ellis	Jun 2009	B2
7562211	Paya et al.	Jul 2009	B2
7562468	Ellis	Jul 2009	B2
7591084	Santa Ana	Sep 2009	B2
7606854	Ellis	Oct 2009	B2
7634529	Ellis	Dec 2009	B2
7647710	Ellis	Jan 2010	B2
7707742	Ellis	May 2010	B2
7793429	Ellis	Sep 2010	B2
7793430	Ellis	Sep 2010	B2
7805756	Ellis	Sep 2010	B2
7814233	Ellis	Oct 2010	B2
7840997	Shevchenko	Nov 2010	B2
7908650	Ellis	Mar 2011	B2
7926097	Ellis	Apr 2011	B2
7984301	Kaabouch et al.	Jul 2011	B2
8010789	Witchey	Aug 2011	B2
8125796	Ellis	Feb 2012	B2
8141276	Ellis	Mar 2012	B2
8164170	Ellis	Apr 2012	B2
8255986	Ellis	Aug 2012	B2
8378474	Ellis	Feb 2013	B2
8561164	Ellis, III	Oct 2013	B2
8627444	Ellis	Jan 2014	B2
8670246	Ellis	Mar 2014	B2
8677026	Ellis, III	Mar 2014	B2
8726303	Ellis, III	May 2014	B2
8739195	Ellis, III	May 2014	B2
8848368	Ellis	Sep 2014	B2
8898768	Ellis	Nov 2014	B2
9003510	Ellis	Apr 2015	B2
9009809	Ellis	Apr 2015	B2
9183410	Ellis	Nov 2015	B2
20010032351	Nakayama et al.	Oct 2001	A1
20010046119	Hamano et al.	Nov 2001	A1
20010054159	Hoshino	Dec 2001	A1
20020002730	Dennis et al.	Jan 2002	A1
20020023291	Mendoza	Feb 2002	A1
20020152541	Halstead et al.	Oct 2002	A1
20020152542	Dennis et al.	Oct 2002	A1
20020166157	Pope	Nov 2002	A1
20030046830	Ellis, III	Mar 2003	A1
20030079276	Forsyth et al.	May 2003	A1
20030096899	Pearce	May 2003	A1
20030200598	Jessie	Oct 2003	A1
20040073603	Ellis	Apr 2004	A1
20040098621	Raymond	May 2004	A1
20040158744	Deng et al.	Aug 2004	A1
20040162992	Sami et al.	Aug 2004	A1
20040215931	Ellis	Oct 2004	A1
20040226077	Toth	Nov 2004	A1
20050039346	Thomas et al.	Feb 2005	A1
20050076536	Hatfield et al.	Apr 2005	A1
20050138169	Bahr	Jun 2005	A1
20050144808	Vito et al.	Jul 2005	A1
20050180095	Ellis	Aug 2005	A1
20050246824	Berger et al.	Nov 2005	A1
20050262739	McDonald et al.	Dec 2005	A1
20060010717	Finkelstein	Jan 2006	A1
20060075001	Canning et al.	Apr 2006	A1
20060095497	Ellis	May 2006	A1
20060137221	Dojan et al.	Jun 2006	A1
20060177226	Ellis	Aug 2006	A1
20060179683	Weiss et al.	Aug 2006	A1
20060190565	Ellis	Aug 2006	A1
20060230636	Kokstis et al.	Oct 2006	A1
20060248749	Ellis	Nov 2006	A1
20070084081	Fallon	Apr 2007	A1
20070094896	Hatfield et al.	May 2007	A1
20070162974	Speidel	Jul 2007	A1
20070196948	Trezza	Aug 2007	A1
20070300305	Gonsalves et al.	Dec 2007	A1
20080083140	Ellis	Apr 2008	A1
20080083976	Haba et al.	Apr 2008	A1
20080134290	Olsson	Jun 2008	A1
20080229614	Santa Ana	Sep 2008	A1
20090026524	Kreupl et al.	Jan 2009	A1
20090031412	Ellis	Jan 2009	A1
20090200661	Ellis	Aug 2009	A1
20090254986	Harris et al.	Oct 2009	A1
20090282092	Ellis	Nov 2009	A1
20100011083	Ellis	Jan 2010	A1
20110004930	Ellis	Jan 2011	A1
20110004931	Ellis	Jan 2011	A1
20120096537	Ellis	Apr 2012	A1
20120155002	Ellis	Jun 2012	A1
20120175752	Ellis	Jul 2012	A1
20120224819	Ellis	Sep 2012	A1
20130201623	Ellis	Aug 2013	A1
20140013411	Ellis	Jan 2014	A1
20140244085	Ellis	Aug 2014	A1
20150137307	Stuber	May 2015	A1

Foreign Referenced Citations (130)

Number	Date	Country
200963	May 1958	AU
1138194	Dec 1982	CA
1176458	Oct 1984	CA
23257	May 1956	DE
1888119	Dec 1963	DE
1918131	Jun 1965	DE
1918132	Jun 1965	DE
1287477	Jan 1969	DE
1290844	Mar 1969	DE
2036062	Jul 1970	DE
1948620	May 1971	DE
1685293	Jul 1971	DE
1685260	Oct 1971	DE
2045430	Mar 1972	DE
2522127	Nov 1976	DE
2525613	Dec 1976	DE
2602310	Jul 1977	DE
2613312	Oct 1977	DE
2706645	Aug 1978	DE
2654116	Jan 1979	DE
2737765	Mar 1979	DE
2805426	Aug 1979	DE
3021936	Apr 1981	DE
3024587	Jan 1982	DE
8219616.8	Sep 1982	DE
3113295	Oct 1982	DE
3245182	May 1983	DE
3317462	Oct 1983	DE
8431831.7	Dec 1984	DE
3347343	Jul 1985	DE
8530136.1	Feb 1988	DE
3629245	Mar 1988	DE
40 08 335	Sep 1991	DE
0048965	Apr 1982	EP
0083449	Dec 1982	EP
0130816	Jan 1985	EP
0185781	Jul 1986	EP
0207063	Oct 1986	EP
0206511	Dec 1986	EP
0213257	Mar 1987	EP
0215974	Apr 1987	EP
0238995	Sep 1987	EP
0260777	Mar 1988	EP
0301331	Feb 1989	EP
0329391	Aug 1989	EP
0410087	Jan 1991	EP
0 647 052	Apr 1995	EP
0697825	Feb 1996	EP
0 840216	May 1998	EP
0 853 279	Jul 1998	EP
0910964	Apr 1999	EP
1068460	Jan 2001	EP
1374808	Jan 2004	EP
1414322	May 2004	EP
1480534	Dec 2004	EP
1529457	May 2005	EP
1 164 766	Dec 2011	EP
602501	Mar 1926	FR
925961	Sep 1947	FR
1004472	Mar 1952	FR
1245672	Oct 1960	FR
1323455	Feb 1963	FR
2006270	Nov 1972	FR
2261721	Sep 1975	FR
2511850	Mar 1983	FR
2622411	May 1989	FR
9591	Jan 1913	GB
16143	Jan 1892	GB
764956	Jan 1957	GB
792034	Mar 1958	GB
807305	Jan 1959	GB
1504615	Mar 1978	GB
2023405	Jan 1980	GB
2039717	Aug 1980	GB
2076633	Dec 1981	GB
2133668	Aug 1984	GB
2136670	Sep 1984	GB
39-15597	Aug 1964	JP
45-5154	Mar 1970	JP
50-71132	Nov 1975	JP
57-139333	Aug 1982	JP
59-23525	Jul 1984	JP
61-55810	Apr 1986	JP
1129505	Jun 1986	JP
61-167810	Oct 1986	JP
1-195803	Aug 1989	JP
2136505	May 1990	JP
2279103	Nov 1990	JP
3-85102	Apr 1991	JP
3086101	Apr 1991	JP
4-279102	Oct 1992	JP
5-123204	May 1993	JP
189890	Sep 1981	NZ
WO 8707480	Dec 1987	WO
WO 8707481	Dec 1987	WO
WO 8808263	Nov 1988	WO
WO 8906500	Jul 1989	WO
WO 9000358	Jan 1990	WO
WO 9100698	Jan 1991	WO
WO 9103180	Mar 1991	WO
WO 9104683	Apr 1991	WO
WO 9105491	May 1991	WO
WO 9110377	Jul 1991	WO
WO 9111124	Aug 1991	WO
WO 9111924	Aug 1991	WO
WO 9119429	Dec 1991	WO
WO 9207483	May 1992	WO
WO 9218024	Oct 1992	WO
WO 9313928	Jul 1993	WO
WO 9401964	Jan 1994	WO
WO 9403080	Feb 1994	WO
WO 9501060	Jan 1995	WO
WO9614768	May 1996	WO
WO 9700029	Jan 1997	WO
WO 9826366	Jun 1998	WO
WO 9904561	Jan 1999	WO
WO 9932972	Jul 1999	WO
WO 00054616	Sep 2000	WO
WO 00064293	Nov 2000	WO
WO 00070981	Nov 2000	WO
WO 01080678	Nov 2001	WO
WO 0209547	Feb 2002	WO
WO 2005115190	Dec 2005	WO
WO 2005117628	Dec 2005	WO
WO 2005117629	Dec 2005	WO
WO 2006113212	Oct 2006	WO
WO 2006124116	Nov 2006	WO
WO 2007024523	Mar 2007	WO
WO 2011094616	Aug 2011	WO
WO 2011103299	Aug 2011	WO

Non-Patent Literature Citations (216)

Entry
Partial file history for U.S. Appl. No. 13/931,080.
Partial file history for U.S. Appl. No. 13/769,292.
European Search Report EP-05825112.5-2318 (Jul. 14, 2010).
Examiner's Comments, European Search Report EP-05825112.5-2318 (Jul. 14, 2010).
Partial file history for U.S. Appl. No. 12/292,769.
Partial file history for U.S. Appl. No. 12/292,553.
Partial file history for U.S. Appl. No. 13/404,888.
Partial file history for U.S. Appl. No. 13/426,133.
Fengjing Shao et al., “A new secure architecture of network computer based on single CPU and Dual Bus” Fifth IEEE International Symposium on Embedded Computing, pp. 309-314 (2008).
Tiedong Wang et al., “A Hardware implement of Bus Bridge Based on Single CPU and Dual Bus”, 2008 International Symposium on Computer Science and Computational Technology, pp. 17-20 (2008).
Famatech “Radmin V3.0, User Manuel”, Jun. 3, 2007 (203 pages).
Connect One, iChip CO2064/CO2128/CO2144, 2011 (64 pages).
O. M. Woodward et al., “The Omniguide Antenna: An Omnidirectional Waveguide Array for UHF-TV Broadcasts”, IRE international Convention Records, pp. 37-39, Mar. 1955.
Litzkow, et al., “Condor—A Hunter of Idle Workstations”, 1988 IEEE, pp. 104-111.
Theimer, et al., “Finding Idle Machines in a Workstation-Based Distributed System”, IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, Nov. 1989, vol. 15, No. 11, pp. 1444-1458.
Brown et al., Special Edition Using Netscape TM 2 Second Edition, Que Corporation, 1995, Ch. 1-2.
Gilder, “Angst and Awe on the Internet by George Gilder”, Forbes ASAP, Dec. 4, 1995.
Tandiary, et al., “Batrun: Utilizing Idle Workstations for Large-scale Computing”, Summer 1996, pp. 41-48.
Brisbin, “Shopping for Internet Access”, MacUser, Dec. 1994, v. 10, p. 133(2).
Gilder, “The Bandwidth Tidal Wave”, Forbes ASAP, Dec. 5, 1994.
N/A, “Special Report—Wonder Chips”, Business Week, Jul. 4, 1994.
N/A, “Supercomputers Divide and Conquer”, The Economist, Dec. 14, 1996.
N/A, “Cyber View World Widgets”, Scientific American, May 1997, p. 48.
Gibbs, “Bandwidth, Unlimited”, Scientific American, Jan. 1997, p. 41.
Markoff, “A New Standard to Govern PC's with Multiple Chips, Work Stations Mimicking Supercomputers”, The New York Times, Oct. 28, 1007.
N/A, “Aliens on your desktop”, The Economist, Apr. 18, 1998, p. 78.
Hare et al., “Master the Complexities of Network Security”, Internet Firewalls and Network Security, Second Edition, pp. 325-350 and 516, 1996.
Fox at al., Petcops and Exaops: Supercornputing on the Web, “IEEE Internet Computing”, vol. 1 No. 2 Mar.-Apr. 1997, pp. 38-46.
Dincer et al., Building a World-Wide Virtual Machine Based on Web and HPCC Technologies, “Student Technical Papers”, http://www.supercomp.org/sc96/proceedings/SC96PROC/DINCER/INDEX.HTM, pp. 1-18 (1996).
Hobbs et al., A Remote Process Creation and Execution Facility Supporting Parallel Execution on Distributed Systems, “IEEE 1996”, pp. 92-99.
Boku et al., The Architecture of Massively Parallel Processor CP-PACS, “IEEE 1997”, pp. 31-40.
Choi et al., A Diagnostic Network for Massively Parallel Processing Systems, “IEEE 1994”, pp. 348-353.
Bellovin et al., Network. Firewalis, “IEEE Communications Magazine 1994”, pp. 50-57.
Weiyi et al., “Java-to-Go—Itinerative Computing Using Java”, Sep. 10, 1996 http://ptolemy.eecs.berkeley.edu/dgm/javatools/java-to-go/.
Sullivan et al., “A New Major SETI Project Based on Project Serendip Data and 100,000 Personal Computers”. http://setiathome.ss/berkeley.edu/woody-paper.htm/; (1997).
“Ein-Chip-Firewall”, Elektroniknet Top News, XP-002164257; Mar. 31, 1999.
“Means for Implementing Optical Interconnections for Parallel Processors”, IBM Technical Disclosure Bulletin, Apr. 1991, vol. 33, No. 11, pp. 56-58, XP 000110310.
Alexandrov et al., “SuperWeb: Research Issues in Java-Based Global Computing”, Concurrency, vol. 9, No. 6, Jun. 1997, pp. 535-553.
Baratloo et al., “Charlotte: Metacomputing on the Web”, 9th International Conference on Parallel and Distributed Computing Systems (PDCS), 1996, pp. 1-8.
Bevinakoppa et al., “Digital Image Compression on a Network of Transputers”, Proc. of 5th Australian Transputer & OCCAM User Group Conference, IOS Press, Amsterdam, pp. 25-32; Nov. 4, 1992.
Blumofe; R. et al., “Scheduling Large-Scale Parallel Computations on Networks of Workstations”, Proc. Of the 3rd IEEE Int'l Sump on High Performance Distributed Computing, pp. 96-105; Aug. 1994.
Fields, Scott, “Hunting for Wasted Computing Power—New Softwarefor Computing Networks Plus Idle PC's to Work”, 1993 University of Wisconsin—Madison. Internet:.http://www.cs.wise.edu/condor/doc/Wiseidea.html.
Brecht et al., “ParaWebs Towards World-Wide Supercomputing”, Proceedings of the Seventh AcM SIGOPS European Workshop, Sep. 1996, 8 pgs.
Capello et al., “Market-Based Massively Parallel Internet Computing”, Proceedings Third Working Conference on Massively Parallel.Programming Models, 1998; pp. 118-129.
Celenk, M. at al., “Parallel Task Execution in LANs and Performance Analysis”; Proc. Of the 1995 IEEE 14th Annual Int'l Phoenix Conf. on Computers and Communications, pp. 423-429, Mar. 1995.
Chen, C. et al., “The DSC: Processing Scientific Data Over the Internet”, Proc. Of the 16th Int'l Conf. on Distributed Computing Systems, pp. 673-679, May 1996.
Clark, H. et al., “DAWGS—A Distributed Computer Server Utilizing Idle Workstations”, Proc. Of the 5th Distributed Memory Computing Conf., IEEE, pp. 732-741, Apr. 1990.
Fogg, C., “Survey of Software and Hardware VLC Architectures”, SPIE, vol. 2186, Image and Video Compression (1994), pp. 29-37.
Fox et al., “Towards Web/Java based High Performance Distributed Computing—an Evolving Virtual Machine”, as presented at 5th IEEE Int'l Symposium on High Performance Distributed Computing, Aug. 6-9, 1996; 86 pages.
Fox, E., “Advances in Interactive Digital Multimedia Systems”, Computer, Oct. 1991, pp. 9-21.
Gemmell, et al., “Multimedia Storage Servers: a Tutorial”, Computer, May 1995, pp. 40-49.
Hayes, “Computing Science: Collective, Wisdom”, American Scientist, Mar.-Apr. 1998, pp. 1-8.
Kim, B. “ATM Network: Goals and Challenges”, Communications of the ACM, Feb. 1995, Vol, 38, No. 2, pp. 39-44, 109.
Kremien, O., “Buying and Selling Computational Power Over the Network”, Proc. Of the 4th Int'l Conf. on Computer Communications and Networks, IEEE, pp. 616-619, Sep. 1995.
Lindley, C.; “JPEG-Like Image Compression, Part 2”, Dr. Dobbs Journal, Aug. 1995, pp. 62-66, 102-105.
Lindley, C., “JPEG-Like Image Compression, Part I”, Dr. Dobbs Journal, Jul. 1995, pp. 50-58, 101-102.
Morris, J. et al., “Fault Tolerant Networks of Workstations”, Proc. Of the 3rd Int'l. Conf. on High Performance Computing, IEEE, pp, 271- 276, Dec. 1996.
Nass, R., “Hardware-software combo could simplify MPEG real-time video compression”, Electronic Design, May 3, 1993, p. 36.
Nowatzyk et al., “Are Crossbars Really Dead? The Case for Optical Multiprocessor Interconnect Systems”, Proceedings of the Annual Symposium on Computer Architecture, ACM, vol. 22, Jun. 1995, pp. 106-115, XP 000687800.
Ozer, “Digital Video: Shot by Shot”, PC Magazine, Apr. 11, 1995, pp. 104-107, 110.
Ozer, J., “Why MPEG is Hot”, PC Magazine, Apr. 11, 1995, pp. 130-131.
Plotkin, “The Digital Compression Facility—A Solution to Today's Compression Needs”, 1994 IEEE, pp. 445-449.
Qiao et al., “Time-Division Optical Communications in Multiprocessor Arrays”, ACM, 1991, pp. 644-653, XP 000337522.
Rincon et al., “The Changing Landscape of System-on-a-chip Design”, MicroNews, Third Quarter 1999. www.chips.ibm.com/micronews/vol5—no3/rincon.html, pp. 1-10, vol. 5, No. 3.
Sachs, M. et al., “LAN and I/O Convergence: A Survey of the Issues”. Computer, Dec. 1994, pp. 24-32.
Sakano, et ai., “A Three-Dimensional Mesh Multiprocessor System Using Board-to-Board Free-Space Optical Interconnects: COSINE-III”, IEEE, 1993, pp. 278-283, XP 000463415.
Schroeder, E.., “New Offerings Buoy MPEG as Video Standard”, Desktop Computing, PC Week, May 8, 1995, pp. 1 and 29.
Shen et al., “A Parallel Implementation of an MPEG1 Encoder: Faster Than Real-Time!”, Proc. Of SPIE Conf. on Digital Video Compression, San Jose, CA, Feb. 1995.
McHenry et al., “An FPGA-Based Coprocessor for ATM Firewalls”, Field-Programmable Custom Computing Machines 1997, Apr. 16-18, 1997, pp. 30-39, XP-002157218.
Shivan, J. at ei. , “Ci:ent-Server Based Ray-Tracer Using ASTRA: An Asynchronous RPC Mechanism”; Computer Communications, vol. 19, No. 5, pp. 445-455, May 1996.
Szabo, B. et al., “Design Considerations for JPEG Video and Synchronized Audio in a Unix Workstation Environment”, USENIX—Summer '91, pp. 353-368.
Vetter. R. “ATM Concepts, Architectures, and Protocols”, Communications of the ACM; Feb. 1995; vol. 38, No. 2. pp. 30-38, 109.
Vetter, R. at al., “Issues and Challenges in ATM Networks”, Communications of the ACM, Feb. 1995; vol. 38, No. 2, pp. 28-29.
Waldspurger et al., “Spawn: A Distributed Computational Economy”, IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, vol. 18, No. 2, Feb. 1992, pp. 103-117 XP002124500.
Yoshida, J., “MPEG-2 Encoders Make Show of Force at NAB”, Electronic Engineering Times, Apr. 10, 1995.
Yu, Y. et al., “Software Implementation of MPEG-II Video Encoding Using Socket Programming in LAN”, SPIE vol. 2137, pp. 229-240, 1994.
Waltz et al. “Make 'em pay: Billing Net Usage”, MacWeek, vol. 6 (No. 27), p. 24 (2) (Dialog full text),(Jul. 27, 1992).
“The Economics of Network Billing: Network Billing and Monitoring Systems can Improve Efficiency and Cut Costs”, IBM System User, vol. 14 (No. 11), p. 53 (1) (Dialog Fulitext) (Nov. 1993).
“Let Your Computer Make Money While You Sleep”, Newsbytes, p. 1 (Dialog Fulltext), (Aug. 16, 1996).
Regenold et al., “A. Single-Chip Multiprocessor DSP Solution for Communication Applications”, ASIC Conference and Exhibit 1994, pp. 437-440.
Geppert, L. Solid State [Trend/Development], IEEE Spectrum. v. 33. iss. 1, 1996, pp. 51-55.
Li, Yao, “Free-space Optical Bus-based WDMA Interconnects for Parallel Computation”, LEOS '92 Conference Proceedings, Lasers and Bet-Aron-Optics Society Annual Meeting, p. 588-589, No. 16-19, 1992.
Dickinson et al., “An Integrated Free Space Optical Bus”, 1989 IEEE International Conference on Computer Design, VLSI in Computers and Processors, p. 62-65, Oct. 2-4. 1989.
Natarajan et al., “Bi-Directional Optical Backplane Bus for General Purpose Multi-Processor”, Journal of Lightwave Technology, vol. 14, No. 6, p. 1031-1040, Jun. 6, 1995.
Zhao et al., “General Purpose Bidirectional Optical Backplane: High Performance Bus for Multiprocessor Systems”, Massively Parallel Processing Using Optical Interconnections, 2nd International Conference, p. 188-195, Oct. 23-24, 1995.
Wu et al., “Microprocessor Control Signal Transmission Through Optical Fiber”, Conference Record of 1992, IEEE industry Applications Society Annual Meeting. p. 1747-1750, Oct. 4-9, 1992.
Fox et al., “Towards Web/Java based High Performance Distributed Computing-an Evolving Virtual Machine”, www.npac.syr.edu/projects/webspace/doc/hpdc5/paper, Jun. 10, 1996, 11 pages.
None, “PC Vision: Intel unveils plans to bring PCs to Vehicles”; EDGE: Work-Group Computing Report, EDGE Publishing, p. 1-2 (Oct. 28, 1996).
The American Heritage College Dictionary 4th Ed.—definition of “firewall” (2007).
White, “Covert Distributed Processing with Computer Viruses”, Advances in Cryptology, Crypto 89, Springer LNCS, v. 435, pp. 616-619.
Foster et al., “The Grid: Blueprint for a New Computing infrastructure”, Morgan Kaufman Publishers, Inc., 1998.
Hwang et al., “Scalable Parallel Computing”, WCB McGraw-Hill, 1998.
Wilkinson, et al., “Parallel Programming”, Prentice Hall, 1998.
Patterson et al., “Computer Architecture: A Quantitative Approach” (2nd Edition), Morgan Kaufmann Publishers, Inc., 1996.
Culler et ai., “Parallel Computer Architecture”, Morgan Kaufmann Publishers, Inc., 1998.
Hennessy et al., “Computer Orcianization and Design”, Morgan Kauffrnann Publishers, Inc., 1998.
Slater, “The Microprocessor Today”, IEEE Micro 1996, pp. 32-44.
Steinert-Threlkeid; “New Breed of Chip TI develops a Super circuit”; The Sun Baltimore; May 4, 1992.
Dallas Morning News; “LSI holds big plans for tiny chips Versatility of ‘system on a chip’ creates niche in microelectronics;” Mar. 4, 1996.
Mokhoff; “System-on-a-chip comes to wireless arena;” Electronic Engineering Times; Feb. 12, 1996.
Cindi: “System on a Chip stars at ISSCC;” Electronic News; Feb. 19, 1996.
Ang:, “System-on-a-chip to define next-generation set-top box”; Electronic Engineering Times; Dec. 15, 1995.
Marc; “New family of microprocessor cores from LSI Logic extends customers' system-on-a-chip design capability” Nov. 7, 1994.
Wall Street Journal; “Technology Brief—Advance Micro Devices Inc.: Company unveils Microchip for Hand-Held Computers”; Oct. 18, 1993.
Gelsinoer, Patrick of al. “Microprocessors circa 2000,” IEEE Spectrum, Oct. 1989 pp. 43-47.
Yu, Abet “The Future of Microprocessors,” IEEE Micro, Dec. 1996, pp. 46-53.
McWilliams. “Dell to Phase Out Computers Using Intel's Itanium,” The Wall Street Journal, Online, Sep. 15, 2005.
David Pescovitz, “Power of the PC”, Scientific American, pp. 27-28 (Apr. 2000).
Stephen H. Wildstrom, “The Problem with Firewalls”, Business Week, pp. 25 (Mar. 20, 2000).
J. McH., “Build Your Own Supercomputer”, Forbes, pp. 228 (Nov. 15, 1999).
Wilkinson, Barry et al., “Parallel Programming: Techniques and Applications Using Networked Workstations and Parallel Computers”, Chapter 4, Prentice-Hall, Inc., 1999.
Baker, Lou et. al., “Parallel Programming”, Chapter 4, McGraw Hill Companies, Inc., 1996.
Kayssi, A.; Harik, L.; Ferzli, R.; Fawaz, M. “FPGA-based internet Protocol Firewall Chip”: Electronics, Circuits and Systesm, 2000. ICECS 2000. The 7th International Conference on vol. 1, Dec. 17-20, 2000 pp. 316-319 vol. 1.[retrieved from IEEE database Jun. 9, 2008].
English language abstract of EP 0 647 052, published Apr. 5, 1995.
Newton's Telecom Dictionary, “Mobile IP”; p. 459. Mar. 1998.
Holographic Quantum Computer, http://www.unite/nw.com/holo1/index (May 1999).
Jonathan Fahey, “Screen Grab”, Forbes; pp. 52-53, Mar. 5, 2001.
Ronald Grover et al., “TV Guy”, Business Week, pp. 66-76, Mar. 12, 2001.
“Distributed Computing”, Red Herring, No. 87, pp. 166-202; Dec. 18, 2000.
Om Malik, “Distributed Computing Redefines Computer Networks, Underpinning Innovation, Company Formation; and Investments”, Red Herring, No. 88, pp. 95-96 and 105, Dec. 4, 2000.
Alan Zeichick, “PCP Network Expalined”, Red Herring, No. 86, pp. 204 and 206, Dec. 4, 2000.
“Napster is Clouding Groves Crystal Ball”; Fortune, pp. 271-272, May 29, 2000.
Gordon Force, Sr., “Portable Data Enoryctlon Approaches”, WESTCON/'95, Conference Record: Microelectronics Communications Technology Producing Quality Production Mobile and Portable Power emerging Technologies, Nov. 7-9, 1995, pp. 413-419.
A.D. Romig, Jr., “High Performance Microsystems Packaging: A Perspective”, Microelectron Reliab., vol. 37, No. 10/11, pp. 1771-1781 (1997).
Adidas Catalog 1986.
Adidas Catalog 1988.
Adidas Catalog 1989.
Adidas Catalog 1990.
Adidas Catalog 1991.
Adidas Catalog, Spring 1987.
Adidas' Second Supplemental Responses to Interrogatory No. 1.
Adidas shoe, Model “Buffalo” 1985.
Adidas shoe, Model “London”, 1986.
Adidas shoe, Model “Marathon 86” 1985.
Adidas shoe, Model “Skin Racer”, 1988.
Adidas shoe, Model “Tokio H” 1985.
Adidas shoe, Model “Torsion Grand Slam Indoor,” 1989.
Adidas shoe, Model <<Boston Super>> 1985.
Adidas shoe, Model <<Fire>> 1985.
Adidas shoe, Model <<Indoor Pro>> 1987.
Adidas shoe, Model <<Kingscup Indoor>>, 1986.
Adidas shoe, Model <<Marathon>> 1986.
Adidas shoe, Model <<Questar>>, 1986.
Adidas shoe, Model <<Tauern>> 1986.
Adidas shoe, Model <<Tennis Comfort>>, 1988.
Adidas shoe, Model <<Torsion Special HI>> 1989.
Adidas shoe, Model <<Torsion ZX9020S>> 1989.
Adidas shoe, Model <<Water Competition>> 1980.
Adidas shoe, Model, <<Indoor Pro>> 1987.
Adidas Spring Catalog 1989.
Areblad et al. <<Three-Dimensional Measurement of Rearfoot Motion During Running>> Journal of Biomechanics, vol., 23, vol. 9, pp. 933-940 (1990).
Avia Catalog 1986.
Avia Fall Catalog, 1988.
Brooks Catalog 1986.
Cavanagh et al., “Biomechanics of Distance Running,” Human Kinetics Books, pp. 155-164, 1990.
Clark Shoe Designed by Sven Coomer 1991.
Fineagan, “Comparison of the Effects of a Running Shoe and A Racing Flat on the Lower Extremity Biochemical Alignment of Runners,” Journal of the American Physical Therapy Association, vol. 68, No. 5, p. 806 (1988).
Fixx, The Complete Book of Running, pp. 134-137, 1977.
Footwear Journal, Nike Advertisement, Aug. 1987.
Footwear News, vol. 44, No. 37, Nike Advertisement (1988).
Footwear News, Special Supplement, Feb. 8,1988.
Footwear News, vol. 45, No. 5, Nike Advertisement 1989.
Frederick, Sports Shoes and Playing Surfaces. Biomechanical Properties, Entire Book, 1984.
Johnson et al., <<A Biomechanical Approach to the Design of Football Boots>>, Journal of Biomechanics, vol. 9, pp. 581-585 (1976).
Komi et al., “Interaction Between Man and Shoe in Running: Considerations for More Comprehensive Measurement Approach,” International Journal of Sports Medicine, vol.8, pp. 196-202 1987.
Kronos Catalog, 1988.
K-Swiss Catalog, Fall 1991.
Leuthi et al., <<Influence of Shoe Construction on Lower Extremity Kinematics and Load During Lateral Movements in Tennis>>, International Journal of Sport Biomechanics, vol. 2, pp. 166-174, 1986.
Nawoczenski et al., <<Effect of Rocker Sole Design on Plantar Forefoot Pressures>> Journal of the American Podiatric Medical Association, vol. 79, No. 9, pp. 455-460, 1988.
Nigg et al., “Biomechanical Aspects of Sport Shoes and Playing Surfaces,” Proceedings of the International Symposium on Biomechanical Aspects of Sport Shoes and Playing Surfaces, 1983.
Nigg et al., “Influence of Heel Flare and Midsole Constructions on Pronation” International Journal of Sport Biomechanics, vol. 4, No. 3, pp. 205-219 (1987).
Nigg et al., <<The Influence of Lateral Heel Flare of Running Shoes on Pronation and Impact Forces>>, Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise, vol. 19, No. 3, pp. 294-302, 1987.
Nigg et al., Biomechanics of Running Shoes, entire book, 1986.
Nigg, <<Biomechanical Analysis of Ankle and foot Movement Medicine and Sport Science>>, vol. 23, pp. 22-29 1987.
Nike Catalog, Footwear Fall, 1988.
Nike Fall Catalog 1987, pp. 50-51.
Nike Shoe, men's cross-training Model “Air Trainer SC” 1989.
Nike shoe, men's cross-training Model <<Air Trainer>> TW 1989.
Nike shoe, Model “Air Force” #1978, 1988.
Nike shoe, Model “Air” #1553, 1988.
Nike shoe, Model <<Air Flow>> #718, 1988.
Nike shoe, Model <<Air Revolution>> #15075, 1988.
Nike shoe, Model <<Air>>, #13213, 1988.
Nike shoe, Model <<Air>>, #4183, 1988.
Nike shoe, Model <<High Jump>> 88, 1988.
Nike shoe, Model <<Leather Cortex® >>, 1988.
Nike shoe, Model <<Zoom Street Leather>> 1988.
Nike Spring Catalog 1989 pp. 62-63.
Palamarchuk et al., “In shoe Casting Technique for Specialized Sport Shoes,” Journal of the American Podiatric Medical Association, vol. 79, No. 9, pp. 462-465, 1989.
Prince Cross-Sport 1989.
Puma basketball shoe, The Complete Handbook of Athletic Footwear, pp. 315, 1987.
Romika Catalog, Summer 1978.
Runner's World, “Shoe Review” Nov. 1988 pp. 46-74.
Runner's World, “Spring Shoe Survey,” pp. 45-74, 1989.
Runner's World, Apr. 1988.
Runner's World, Oct. 1986.
Saucony Spot-bilt Catalog 1988.
Saucony Spot-bilt Catalog Supplement, Spring 1985.
Saucony Spot-bilt shoe, The Complete Handbook of Athletic Footwear, pp. 332,1987.
Segesser et al., “Surfing Shoe,” The Shoe in Sport, 1989, (Translation of a book.published in Germany in 1987), pp. 106-110.
Sporting Goods Business, Aug. 1987.
Sports Illustrated, Nike Advertisement, Aug. 8, 1988.
Sports Illustrated, Special Preview Issue, The Summer Olympics <<Seoul '88 >> Reebok Advertisement.
The Complete Handbook of Athletic Footwear, Entire B000k, 1987.
Vagenas et al., “Evaluation of Rearfoot Asymmetries in Running with Worn and New Running Shoes,” International Journal of Sport Biomechanics, vol. 4, No. 3, pp. 220-230.
Valiant et al., <<A Study of Landing from a Jump:Implications for the Design of a Basketball Shoe>>, Scientific Program of IX International Congress of Biomechanics, 1983.
Williams et al., <<The Mechanics of Foot Action During the Golf Swing and Implications for Shoe Design>>, Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise, vol. 15, No. 3, pp. 247-255, 1983.
World Professional Squash Association Pro Tour Program, 1982-1983.
Williams, Walking on Air, Case Alumnus, vol. LXVII, No. 6, Fall 1989, pp. 4-8.
Brooks advertisement in Runner's World etc., Jun. 1989, pp. 56+.
Cavanaugh et al., Biological Aspects of Modeling Shoe/Foot Interaction During Running, Sports Shoes and Playing Surfaces, 1984, pp. 24-25, 32-35, 46.
Blechschmidt, The Structure of the Calcaneal Padding, Foot & Ankle vol. 2, No. 5, Mar. 1982, pp. 260-283.
Cavanaugh “The Running Shoe Book,” © 1980, pp. 176-180, Anderson World, Inc., Mountain View, CA.
Executive Summary with Seven Figures, 1993.
German Description of adidas badminton shoe, pre-1989(?), 1 page.
The Reebok Lineup, Fall 1987, 2 pages.

Related Publications (1)

	Number	Date	Country
	20150055280 A1	Feb 2015	US

Provisional Applications (2)

	Number	Date	Country
	60996530	Nov 2007	US
	60996553	Nov 2007	US

Continuations (4)

	Number	Date	Country
Parent	13931080	Jun 2013	US
Child	14454282		US
Parent	13769292	Feb 2013	US
Child	13931080		US
Parent	12292769	Nov 2008	US
Child	13769292		US
Parent	12292553	Nov 2008	US
Child	12292769		US

Microchip with faraday cages and internal flexibility sipes

Information

Patent Number

Date Filed

Date Issued

Inventors

Examiners

Agents

CPC

Field of Search

CPC

International Classifications

Disclaimer

Term Extension

Abstract