1. Field of the Invention
The invention relates to microlithographic projection exposure apparatus as are used in the manufacture of integrated circuits and other microstructured components. More particularly, the invention relates to illumination systems for such apparatus comprising an optical correction element having an aspherically shaped surface or a surface that has the effect of an aspherically shaped surface.
2. Description of Relevant Art
In the manufacture of highly-integrated electrical circuits and other microstructured components a plurality of structured layers is applied to a suitable substrate, which may be, for example, a silicon wafer. In order to structure the layers they are first covered with a photoresist which is sensitive to light of a given wavelength region, e.g. light in the deep ultraviolet (DUV) spectral region. The wafer coated in this way is then exposed in a projection illumination apparatus. A pattern of structures located on a mask is thereby imaged on the photoresist by means of a projection objective. Because the imaging scale is generally less than 1:1, such projection objectives are frequently referred to as reduction objectives.
After the photoresist has been developed the wafer is subjected to an etching or deposition process whereby the uppermost layer is structured according to the pattern on the mask. The remaining photoresist is then removed from the remaining parts of the layer. This process is repeated until all the layers have been applied to the wafer.
One of the primary objectives in developing the projection exposure apparatuses used in manufacture is the ability to define lithographically on the wafer structures of increasingly small dimensions. Small structures lead to high integration densities, which generally have a beneficial effect on the performance of the microstructured components manufactured by means of such apparatuses.
The size of the definable structures depends above all on the resolution of the projection objectives used. Because the resolution of the projection objective is inversely proportional to the wavelength of the projection light, one approach to increase the resolution is to use projection light having shorter and shorter wavelengths. The shortest wavelengths currently used are in the deep ultraviolet (DUV) spectral region and are of 193 nm and sometimes even 157 nm.
Another approach to increase the resolution is based on the idea of introducing an immersion liquid having a high refractive index into an immersion space located between a last lens of the projection objective on the image side and the photosensitive layer. Projection objectives which are designed for immersion operation, and are therefore also referred to as immersion objectives, can attain numerical apertures of more than 1, e.g. 1.3 or 1.4. In a broader sense one also refers to “immersion” if the photosensitive layer is covered by an immersion liquid without the last optical element of the projection objective on the image side necessarily being immersed in the immersion liquid.
Hitherto, projection objectives have usually been designed such that they are telecentric on both the object side and the image side. An imaging optical system is referred to as telecentric on the object side if the entrance pupil is located at infinity. The entrance pupil is the image of the aperture stop of the optical system formed on the object side. With regard to a principal ray distribution, this means that all the principal rays pass through the object plane parallel to the optical axis. The same applies correspondingly to telecentricity on the image side. Doubly-telecentric projection objectives are advantageous because imaging errors are reduced that arise if the mask and/or the wafer have small irregularities or are not positioned exactly in the object plane and the image plane, respectively.
However, with immersion objectives having very high numerical apertures of the kind possible with immersion operation it is difficult to achieve telecentricity on the object side. Such telecentricity requires very high-refraction lenses on the object side, which makes correction of Petzval imaging errors more difficult. For this reason such high-aperture projection objectives frequently have, at least on the object side, a principal ray distribution in which the principal rays are no longer disposed parallel to the optical axis in the object plane but are inclined thereto. If the tangent of the angle between the principal rays and the optical axis increases linearly with the distance from the optical axis, one speaks of a homocentric entrance pupil or of an optical system which is homocentric on the object side. Such high-aperture projection objectives are often, however, neither exact telecentrically nor exact homocentrically, but have more or less irregular principal ray distributions in the object plane.
A prerequisite for optimum imaging by the projection objective is that the principal ray distribution provided by the illumination system in the mask plane corresponds as exactly as possible to the object side principal ray distribution of the projection objective. Since the principle ray distribution of the projection objective cannot be significantly changed without altering the complete design of the objective, one usually attempts to adapt the principle ray distribution of the illumination system to the principle ray distribution of the projection objective, and not vice versa.
For describing principle ray distributions one often refers to the concept of pupil functions. This term denotes the distribution of the principle ray angles as a function of the field height in the image plane. The principle ray angle is formed in the image plane between the principle ray and a surface normal perpendicular to the image plane. Mathematically, the pupil function is described by a series expansion with odd powers; details can be found in U.S. Pat. No. 6,680,803 B2.
Often a masking objective is used to achieve a desired pupil function. The purpose of the masking objective of an illumination system is to image a diaphragm-like masking device onto an image plane of the masking objective in which the mask is arranged. The masking device has a plurality of blades, usually adjustable, that are imaged by the masking objective onto the mask. This ensures sharp edges of the region on the mask which is to be projected. Such a masking objective is sometimes referred to as a REMA objective, wherein REMA stands for “REticle MAsking”.
A combination of spherical lenses can be used to adjust pupil functions, as is widely known in the prior art. In order to reduce the number of spherical lenses required, U.S. Pat. No. 6,366,410 B1 proposes to replace a plurality of spherical lenses by at most five aspherical lenses, whose deviations from sphericity are comparatively small. In this way, the number of lenses required and the light path travelled in the lens material can be reduced by up to 60%.
Particularly simply constructed masking objectives with aspherical lenses are described in U.S. Pat. No. 6,680,803 B2 that has been mentioned above.
U.S. Pat. No. 4,906,080 A proposes to provide an aspherical lens in order to achieve the desired pupil function. Said lens is located directly before the mask plane. However, it has been found that such an arrangement of an aspherical surface degrades the imaging of the masking device seriously. To compensate for this degradation, further aspherical surfaces must be provided in the masking objective, which considerably increases the manufacturing cost of the illumination system.
EP 0 811 865 A2 discloses an illumination system for a microlithographic projection exposure apparatus in which an aspherical surface is arranged directly before a field plane in which a masking device for defining the shape of the field illuminated on the mask is arranged. In this case the aspherical surfaces are so defined that the numerical aperture of the illumination system is as constant as possible over the entire illuminated field.
EP 0 532 267 A1 discloses an objective for an infrared sensor, which comprises a first lens group for imaging an object plane onto an intermediate image plane and a second lens group, which images the intermediate image onto the detector plane or collimates it for observation through an eyepiece. The second lens group contains a diffractive optical element for the correction of imaging errors.
It is therefore a first object of the present invention to provide a microlithographic exposure apparatus comprising an illumination system in which a principal ray distribution required by the projection objective is attained with few surfaces having an aspherical shape or having the effect of an aspherically shaped surface.
According to invention, this object is achieved by an illumination system which includes a light source for generating a projection light beam, a masking device, a masking objective that projects the masking device into an image plane and an optical correction element. The optical correction element includes at least one aspherically acting surface which is aspherically shaped or carries diffractive structures that have at least substantially the effect of an aspherically shaped surface. The at least one aspherically acting surface is arranged at least approximately in a field plane preceding the image plane of the illumination system. In addition, the aspherically acting surface is so designed that a principal ray distribution generated by the illumination system in the image plane approximates to an object side principal ray distribution of the projection objective. This principal ray distribution may be telecentric; however, the invention is particularly suitable for adjusting complex non-telecentric principal ray distributions.
The principal ray distribution generated by the illumination system approximates to the principal ray distribution required by the projection objective if the directions of corresponding principal rays deviate from one another by not more than 5° in the mask plane. Often it is preferable if the deviations are smaller than 2° or even 0.5°.
An arrangement of the aspherically acting surface at least approximately in a field plane preceding the mask plane enables this surface to be positioned considerably closer to a field plane. This in turn allows undesired degradation of the imaging of the masking device to be largely avoided. There is then no necessity to provide numerous additional aspherically acting surfaces which serve to compensate for the degradation.
The field plane in which the correction element is arranged is preferably located in front of the masking objective in the optical path of the projection light beam.
In this case it is simplest to arrange the aspherically acting surface in immediate proximity to and, in particular, immediately in front of the masking arrangement. Since the masking arrangement must in any case be arranged in immediate proximity to a field plane, there is no need to provide an additional field plane just for receiving the aspherically acting surface.
If a rod homogenizer is provided for mixing the light in the illumination system, it may in itself form the corrective element if its light exit surface constitutes the aspherically acting surface. Advantage is thereby taken of the fact that the light exit surface of the rod homogenizer forms a field plane.
In terms of production technology it is particularly simple if the correction element is optically contacted to a light exit surface of a rod homogenizer. Both the rod homogenizer and the correction element can then be produced in a manner known as such.
In another advantageous embodiment of the invention the masking objective forms the masking device with at most a small magnification, preferably with an imaging scale of 1:1 or less than 1:1. In this way a reduction of the angular demands placed on the correction element is achieved. The slopes which are to be provided on the aspherically acting surface of the correction elements can also be correspondingly smaller. This simplifies the manufacture of the correction element.
In a further embodiment the correction element forms part of a field lens group in the entrance pupil of which an optical raster element is arranged and the focal plane of which is the field plane.
In an particularly advantageous embodiment a further correction element is provided, which also has at least one aspherically acting surface which is aspherically shaped or carries diffractive structures that have at least substantially the effect of an aspherically shaped surface, the further correction element being arranged inside the masking objective and being so designed that the principal ray distribution generated in the image plane by the illumination system further approximates to an object side principal ray distribution required by the projection objective.
In this way two correction elements arranged close to a field plane are provided having superposing optical effects with respect to the principal ray distribution. This distribution of the adjustment of the principal ray distribution on two aspherically acting surfaces which are arranged in or in the vicinity of different field planes allows even very complex principal ray distributions to be adjusted without the need for the two aspherically acting surfaces of the correction elements to have a particularly complicated shape. This simplifies the production of these surfaces and therefore has cost advantages. The aspherically acting surface which is closest to a field plane should then make the greatest contribution to the adjustment of the principal ray distribution. The precise allocation of these contributions to the two aspherically acting lenses may be determined, for example, by means of a numerical optimization method.
However, limits are also placed on the use of aspherical lenses in masking objectives. Aspherical lenses do admittedly offer more freedom for the design of the objective, compared with spherical lenses. Nevertheless, in particular for reasons of fabrication technology, aspherical lenses are also subject to limitations with respect to the surface contour and maximum possible arrow height. The large production costs are a substantial disadvantage of aspherical lenses.
It is therefore a further object of the present invention to provide an illumination system with a masking objective which is constructed more simply and is more cost-effective to produce.
This further object is achieved in that the masking objective contains at least one diffractive optical element.
The invention is based on the discovery that diffractive optical elements can achieve effects which otherwise can be produced only with aspherical lenses. Diffractive optical elements, moreover, generally require less space than aspherical lenses and are often more cost-effective to produce. Diffractive optical elements can be produced in a particularly space-saving way when they do not have their own support with a flat or curved support surface, but are fabricated on a surface of a lens that is required anyway.
The special properties of diffractive optical elements become advantageous particularly when the masking objective is also being used to adjust a particular pupil function. This is because diffractive optical elements offer significantly more design freedom compared with aspherical lenses, since they are not subject to limitations with respect to arrow height and testability. With diffractive element optical elements, therefore, a desired pupil function can be adjusted more accurately than has so far been possible with spherical lenses or even aspherical lenses. This in turn has a positive effect on the imaging properties and, in particular, the telecentricity properties of the projection objective.
The use of at least one diffractive optical element furthermore has the advantage that quantities other than the pupil function can be adjusted effectively by simple means. Examples for such other quantities are the angular distribution of the coma rays, the uniformity of the intensity distribution in the mask plane, the ellipticity of the illumination and quality with which a desired angular distribution is produced in the mask plane. With diffractive optical elements, furthermore, chromatic imaging errors can be corrected in a straightforward way since conventional lens materials and diffractive optical elements differ in terms of the sign of the dispersion.
With a view to adjusting the pupil function, it would be ideal to arrange a diffractive optical element in the image plane of the masking objective, since only the angular distribution, i.e. the pupil function, of the principle rays would then be influenced. However, since the mask is arranged in the image plane of the masking objective during the projection operation, a diffractive optical element cannot be placed there.
A conceivable position for arranging a diffractive optical element may then, for example, be a conjugate field plane preceding the image plane of the masking objective. The arrangement of aspherically acting surfaces in a field planes preceding the image plane has been described in detail further above.
If such a preceding field plane does not exist, then it is favorable to arrange a diffractive optical element as close as possible to the field plane. This may be achieved, for example, if the at least one diffractive optical element is the last optical element on the image side of the masking objective.
If the masking objective contains a plurality of lens groups, then, for the aforementioned reasons, it is advantageous if the at least one diffractive optical element is arranged in a field lens group which is arranged closest to the image plane.
The masking objective may be constructed particularly compact and cost-effective if the field lens group contains only refractive optical elements with spherical surfaces and a plurality of diffractive optical elements. In this way, the effect of previously used aspherical lenses is fully achieved by combining a plurality of diffractive optical elements. In order to obtain an additional degree of design freedom, the masking objective may contain at least one optical element with an aspherical refractive surface arranged in front of a diaphragm plane of the masking objective.
The diffraction efficiency of the at least one diffractive optical element has a special importance for the function of the masking objective. Low diffraction efficiencies lead not only to a light loss, but also perturb the illumination of the mask arranged in the image plane. In fact, on the basis of the preferred arrangement of the diffractive optical element in the vicinity of the field plane (mask plane), a larger part of the light scattered into undesired diffraction orders will reach the mask. This can lead to the creation of undesired additional images.
For these reasons, it is advantageous for the at least one diffractive optical element to be designed so that it deviates light only through small angles, and preferably by less than 2°, more preferably less than 1°. The at least one diffractive optical element may then have larger grating periods, so that blazed diffraction structures can be approximated more easily by a multiplicity of steps. Generally, the better this approximation is the greater the diffraction efficiency will be.
It is furthermore advantageous for the diffractive optical element to be designed so that light is predominantly diffracted into the first diffraction order. In general, the diffraction efficiency is then greater than when higher diffraction orders are used.
For at least one principle ray, in another advantageous embodiment of the invention, at least a first diffractive optical element leads to an increase in the principle ray angle and a second diffractive optical element leads to a decrease in the principle ray angle. The two diffractive optical elements therefore have opposite effects, although the overall effect of the two diffractive optical elements may lead to an increase or a decrease in the principle ray angle according to the way in which it is designed with a view to the desired pupil function. Here, the result of the partial compensation is that telecentricity deviations of the coma rays, which would occur in the case of only one large-aperture diffractive optical element, are substantially corrected.
In this case the first diffractive optical element and the second diffractive optical element may be arranged in a portion of the masking objective between a pupil plane and the image plane. This is advantageous because, if the diffractive optical element were to be arranged in front of a diaphragm plane, the diaphragm itself would have a field-dependent effect which is generally undesired.
Various features and advantages of the present invention may be more readily understood with reference to the following detailed description taken in conjunction with the accompanying drawing in which:
A beam of principal rays of the projection objective 16 is indicated in
The illumination system 12 further comprises a masking objective 38 having an object plane 40 and an image plane that coincides with the object plane 18 of the projection objective 16. In or close to the object plane 40 of the masking objective 38 the light exit surface 44 of the rod homogenizer 34 is located. Because the masking device 36 is located in or in immediate proximity to the object plane 40 of the masking objective 38, it is imaged by the masking objective 38 onto the mask 20 and thereby ensures a sharp delimitation of the region illuminated on the mask 20. To this extent the illumination system is known in the art, see, for example, U.S. Pat. No. 6,285,443 A.
A refractive correction element 46 having an aspherically shaped surface 48 is arranged in the object plane 40 of the masking objective 38 and optically contacted to the light exit surface 44 of the rod homogenizer 34. The aspherically shaped surface 48 is therefore located in immediate proximity to a field plane, namely the object plane 40 of the masking objective 38. The shape of the aspherical surface 48 is adapted to the object side principal ray distribution of the projection objective 16. The calculation of such aspherically shaped surfaces is known as such in the art, see, for example, U.S. Pat. No. 4,906,080 A that has been mentioned at the outset. Therefore further details relating to such calculations need not be described.
FIGS. 3 to 5 show further embodiments how an aspherically shaped surface may be arranged in the illumination system 12 in or close to a field plane preceding the object plane 18 of the projection objective 16.
In the embodiment shown in
In the embodiment shown in
In the embodiment shown in
Immediately before the field plane 140, the field lens group 52 contains a first correction element 146a with a surface 148a facing towards the field plane 140 that is aspherically curved. A second correction element 146b is located in the masking objective 138 and has an aspherically curved surface 148b, too. This aspherical surface 148b is the last curved surface of the illumination system 112 before the image plane 18.
In
In
The purpose of the diffractive optical element 242 is to modify the pupil function of the masking objective 238 so that an optimal pupil function is provided for the subsequent projection objective 16. Which pupil function is optimal for the projection objective 16 depends on the design details of the projection objective. Often a telecentric pupil function is preferred, but sometimes a more or less homocentric pupil function is required by the projection objective 16.
It should be understood that the pupil function is not determined exclusively by the diffractive optical element 242, but by the interaction of a plurality of optical elements. In particular, the aspherical surfaces 401a, 402a allow additional design freedom for adjusting the desired pupil function.
In order to be able to influence exclusively the principle rays, it would be optimal to arrange the diffractive optical element 242 in the object plane 18 of the projection objective 16. However, this position is required for the mask 20. Nevertheless the diffractive optical element 242 is the last curved optical element on the image side of the masking objective 238 and is thus arranged as close as possible to the object plane 18. As a result of this position, the light bundles 246, 252 converging towards the mask 20 have a small diameter such that the effect of the diffractive optical element 242 on the marginal rays 248, 250 and the upper and lower marginal rays 256 and 254 is small.
Instead of phase gratings with eight steps, for example, it is also possible to use gratings with another number of steps. Any increase in the number of steps generally increases the diffraction efficiency. For example, increasing the number of steps from 8 to 16 leads to a rise in the diffraction efficiency from about 96% to about 99%. Owing to their high diffraction efficiency, phase gratings with a continuous profile (so-called grey level gratings) are particularly suitable, as described for example in an article by Michael R. Wang et al. entitled “Laser direct-write gray-level mask and one-step etching for diffractive microlens fabrication”, Applied Optics, Vol. 37, No. 32, pages 7568 to 7576. In general, coatings also have a favourable effect on the diffraction efficiency.
Besides phase gratings, it is also conceivable to use diffractive optical elements which affect the intensity rather than the phase of electromagnetic waves passing through them.
Since the diffractive optical element 242 may have a diameter of about 15 cm or more, it sometimes cannot be readily produced by lithographic means. Production using a laser plotter which writes directly on a quartz plate may be envisaged as an alternative. Such a laser plotter can also be used to produce grey level gratings.
It is also conceivable to produce the diffractive optical element with the aid of an electron beam scriber, for example as available from the company LEICA. Structure sizes of less than 100 nanometres can be defined in this way. Diffractive optical elements with large areas can furthermore be produced holographically.
In the exemplary embodiment shown in
Besides saving on costs, the use of a plurality of diffractive optical elements 242a, 242b, 242c in the field lens group 263′ also has the advantage that a substantial independence from the illumination setting adjusted for the illumination system can be achieved in this way. The interaction of a plurality of diffractive optical elements and/or aspherical surfaces allows better correction of the entire pupil for each field point. With a single diffractive optical element, conversely, the principle ray angle can be adjusted only for a particular predetermined illumination setting. For other illumination settings, a deviation from the desired pupil function, leading for example to a telecentricity error at the exit of the projection objective, can be avoided only with difficulty.
The diffractive optical elements 242a, 242b, 242c are designed so that the diffractive optical element 242a leads to an increase in the principle ray angle, and the diffractive optical elements 242b, 242c lead to a decrease in the principle ray angle. As a result, the effects of the diffractive optical elements 242a, 242b, 242c partially compensate. Telecentricity deviations of the coma rays, which would occur in the case of only one large-aperture diffractive optical element, are therefore corrected at least partially.
In the exemplary embodiments presented above, the diffractive optical elements 242, 242a, 242b, 242c are applied on plane plates. However, it is also conceivable to apply the diffraction structures directly on curved surfaces, for example on the surface 404b of the last field lens 404 on the image side in the field lens group 263 shown in
This application claims priority of U.S. provisional applications Ser. No. 60/609,397 and Ser. No. 60/609,398 both filed Sep. 13, 2004, and U.S. provisional application Ser. No. 60/684,888 filed May 26, 2005.
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind | 371c Date |
---|---|---|---|---|
PCT/EP05/09804 | 9/13/2005 | WO | 8/8/2007 |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
60609398 | Sep 2004 | US | |
60609397 | Sep 2004 | US | |
60684888 | May 2005 | US |