This invention relates to a coating for foodstuffs, which is cookable or reheatable using a microwave oven, combination microwave oven or by radiant heat by any means. The invention relates particularly but not exclusively to microwaveable cookable or reheatable batters or breaded coatings.
Microwave ovens are commonly used for heating food products, which have been pre-prepared by a foodstuff manufacturer. Pre-prepared products include batter coated foodstuffs in which the basic foodstuff, for example meat, fish, poultry, vegetables, fruit or dairy products, has been coated in a batter optionally coated with crumbs, deep fried and then frozen for supply to a consumer.
Heating in a microwaveable oven may complete the cooking process or simply reheat a previously cooked product. Microwave cookable coatings have particular requirements. Microwave energy penetrates throughout a food product. Steam released from the core of a food product can cause the batter coating to become soggy. This impairs the texture and taste of the product.
WO 88/06007 disclosed a batter composition and method of preparation wherein the foodstuff is pre-dusted with high amylose starch and methylcellulose. The batter included high enzyme soya flour. WO93/003634 disclosed an improved pre-dust composition including a mixture of particulate starch and particulate cellulose gum, which gelled on heating in the presence of moisture. Such a pre-dust can form a dense, high viscosity barrier to absorption of oil and migration of moisture. The barrier also provides a stable environment for any seasoning and can enhance bonding with the batter. Although high enzyme soya flours generally afford acceptable products, variations in their enzyme content have given rise to inconsistent and occasionally undesirable flavours. WO96/032026 disclosed a microwaveable batter comprising starch, flour, a gelling agent, an enzyme, additive and further ingredients. An exemplified formulation comprised genetically modified high amylose maize flour.
The present invention provides a batter coating having improved properties during manufacture, storage and upon consumption, and related compositions and methods.
Batter or breaded coatings in accordance with this invention are preferably cookable or reheatable using conventional ovens or fryers in addition to microwave ovens and combination microwave ovens.
According to a first aspect of the present invention, a microwave cookable or reheatable foodstuff coating composition comprises an aqueous mixture including the following ingredients:
The amount of the starch component, excluding any starch which may be present in the flour, may comprise about 20-35% more preferably about 28.8% by weight of the dry ingredients.
The starch may comprise high amylose starch, preferably maize starch, for example as manufactured under trademark HYLON 7 of National Starch. An amylose content of 60% to 80%, preferably 70%, is preferred. Use of a hot swell starch is preferred.
The flour component may comprise about 40% to about 55% preferably about 48.2% by weight of the dry ingredients.
The weight ratio of flour to starch components, that is non-flour starch, may be in the range of about 36% to about 87%, preferably about 50% to about 63%.
The flour component comprises a mixture of at least one first gluten free flour, preferably soya flour for example HiSoy supplied by Bake Mark UK manufactured from soya beans of Canadian origin and maize flour for example French maize flour YF36 manufactured by Smiths Flour Mills. Maize flour is gluten free. Gluten free flour referred to in this specification may contain less than 1% gluten, preferably less than 0.1% gluten. In particularly preferred flours, gluten is completely absent.
The flour component may contain from about 25% to about 70% of maize flour and from about 30% to about 75% of one or more other gluten free flours.
The flour mixture preferably has a fat content of about 15-33%, more preferably about 20-28%, especially about 24%. Full fat soya flour may be employed.
A reducing sugar or mixture of reducing sugars may be used to give colour to the cooked coating. D-xylose is preferred although fructose, maltose or mixtures of these reducing sugars may be used. An amount of about 1-3% preferably about 2% is preferred.
The gelling agent or thickener (referred to for convenience as a gelling agent) is employed in an amount sufficient to stabilise the coating as an emulsion. One or more of the following may be employed: collagen, alginate, xanthan gum, gelatine, guar gum, agar gum, gum arabic, locust bean gum, or carrageenan gum. Use of guar gum or mixtures containing guar gum is preferred. An amount of about 0.5—to about 3% preferably about 1% may be employed. The gelling agent is preferably present in an amount sufficient to give long-term stability, for example to allow the batter to be stored before use.
The further ingredients may include whole egg. An amount of about 10-18%, preferably about 14% may be employed. The egg may comprise dried egg. This may comprise dried whole egg or a blend of egg white and egg yolk.
Glyceryl monostearate may be used as an emulsifier. Alternative emulsifiers may be used. An amount of 1% to 5%, preferably about 2% may be employed.
A phosphate may be employed in an amount of about 0.7 to 3% to adjust the pH for optimum enzyme activity. Monosodium phosphate in an amount of about 1.87% is preferred.
The further ingredients preferably include ammonium bicarbonate used as an aid to formulation. An amount of about 0.7% is preferred.
Glucono-D-lactone may be used as a slow release pH adjuster. An amount of about 0.67% may be employed.
Sodium acid pyrophosphate may be used to regulate pH. An amount of about 0.37% may be employed.
A thickener, for example methylcellulose, Methocel A4M may be used in an amount of about 0.1-1%, preferably about 0.25%.
Use of a coating composition in accordance with the first aspect of this invention confers several advantages. The coating adheres well to a substrate and to subsequently applied crumb. The coating allows escape of moisture during frying but does not give a high a degree of fat pickup from the frying oil. A shell-like coating is formed to give a desirably crisp bite.
The gel, batter and crumb form an integral, consolidated layer after cooking.
The enzyme additive is preferably a concentrated enzyme preparation. Enzyme containing conventional ingredients used in batter, for example high enzyme flours are inconsistent and are not preferred. However, the concentrated enzyme preparation may be blended with a further ingredient such as starch or flour to facilitate mixing into the composition. The enzyme preparation may contain buffers or stabilizers.
Preferred enzyme additives include bacterial amylases, for example, Novamyl BG10000.
The additive preferably contains only the enzymes required for the coating composition. Lipoxygenases or other enzymes, which may be present in commercial high enzyme flours are avoided since these may give rise to adverse flavours.
The viscosity of the coating composition before use is preferably in the range of about 400 to 700 cp, preferably about 550 cp measured using a Brookfield viscometer with a No 3 spindle at 60 rpm.
The freshly mixed composition in the ratio of about 2 parts water and about 1 part batter may have a viscosity about 1500 to 1700 cp preferably about 1600 cp. After mixing in a high shear mixer, the temperature may be raised to 42° C. Following mixing the batter is stored and allowed to ferment. After storage, the mixture is diluted with water to give a final ratio of 2.4 parts of water to 1 part of batter mix to give a viscosity of about 550 cP.
The batter ingredients may be mixed in starter batches in the ratio of 2 parts of water to 1 of batter, and stored overnight, for example, in a chill room. The batter continues to ferment for about 24 hours at a decreasing rate until the temperature of the batch reaches approximately 5° C. The viscosity increases overnight to a value between about 1000 cP and about 1600 cP depending on the batch. The mixer used may be a Silverson batch mixer with a high shear slotted disintegrating head.
A pre-dust or pre-coating may be applied to the substrate before application of the batter composition. A conventional pre-dust may be used but use of an aqueous gel is preferred.
The aqueous gel may comprise, by dry weight:
starch range 28 to 40%
thickener range 18 to 30%
xanthan gum range 20 to 35%
egg albumen range 10 to 25%.
A preferred formulation is:
starch 35%
thickener 25%
xanthan gum 25%
egg albumen 15%
by dry weight.
Amounts and quantities referred to in this specification are by weight unless indicated otherwise. Percentages and other proportions are selected from ranges given to total 100%.
The invention is further described by means of example but not in any limitative sense
A coating composition was prepared by mixing the following ingredients:
The batter can be mixed in batches using a Silverson DX high shear mixer on a gantry with a slotted disintegrating head. Batches were mixed in the ratio of 25 kilos water to 12.5 kilos dry batter powder in a vat with a diameter of 68 cm. Thereafter, the mix was diluted as required.
In full production the batter ingredients were mixed using two 200 liter stainless steel vessels linked by a pump and an inline Silverson mixer with a high shear slotted disintegrating head. One tank was fitted with a paddle and was filled with water at 15-20° C. The dry ingredients were added to the water and wetted by rotation of the paddle. The second tank was fitted with a cooling jacket and a return pipe to the first vessel. The batter mixture was circulated through the high shear head until a temperature of 42° C. was reached by mechanical heat transfer. External heating may be employed to avoid a tendency to over shear the starch. When 42° C. was reached, the mixing and enzymolyis were complete. The batter was transferred to the second vessel and cooled. A heat exchanger may be used to cool the mixture. After cooling, the batter was pumped into a tempura type batter applicator.
The viscosity in the batter mixture was in the range 550-650 cP as measured by a number 3 spindle at 60 rpm. The batter was found to give a good rate of pickup and a crisp coating after frying.
A composition of the following ingredients is used to form a semi-reversible gel
The composition was dissolved in water to produce a solution with a concentration suitable to stabilising the particular substrate in use. This general purpose formula may be modified to increase its efficiency in specific substrates. The above formula may be modified by addition of citric acid (up to 1%) and ascorbic acid (up to 2%) with the polydextrose (Litesse II) being reduced accordingly. Water bonding is improved. Subject to further testing 0.5% of each could be added with corresponding reduction of the weight of polydextrose by 1%.
The dry powder mix was partially hydrated in a tub and then poured into a bowl chopper. The bowl chopper was then run for two to three minutes until fully hydrated. The mix can be hydrated directly in the bowl chopper if required. Alternatively, the stabiliser may be hydrated using a high shear mixer using a general purpose head.
A chicken mixture for chicken dippers or nuggets was prepared with the following composition. The stabiliser of Example 2 was used.
The chicken breast was chilled to −3° C. and minced using a 10 mm plate. After mincing, the temperature was 0-3° C. Water was added with mixing. A chicken emulsion comprising the following ingredients was added with mixing:
The stabiliser in accordance to Example 2 was added and mixed thoroughly. Rusk was added with mixing following by seasoning. A colourless, solid flavouring was preferred.
A vacuum was applied to the mixture to consolidate the structure following which the chicken mixture was chilled to −3° C. and formed into shaped particles.
A similar procedure was used for other comminuted meat products. Large particulate cores may be manufactured using a similar method.
A conventional pre-dust may be employed, for example as disclosed in WO9632026 the disclosure of which is incorporated herein by reference for all purposes. Use of a pre-dust has a disadvantage of formation of dust clouds. Transfer of a pre-dust to the batter affects the viscosity of the batter during prolonged use. Accordingly, use of a gel pre-coating is preferred. The following mixture was prepared:
The mixture was dissolved in water to form a 1% solution using a CFS Scanbrine mixer with paddle agitation. The solution was left to stand for 24 hours to form a fully hydrated gel.
The gel was applied to the substrate particles using a tempura type batter applicator in which the particles were dipped.
A pump is necessary to run the machine but after a short while bubbles form in the pre-gel in the applicator. To prevent this problem food grade anti foaming agents can be used. Polydimethylsiloxane is preferred but calcium alginate, methyl ethyl cellulose, methylphenylpolysiloxane or polyethylene glycol can be used.
A crumb was prepared as disclosed in PCT/GB09/001617, published as WO 2010/001101 the disclosure of which is incorporated herein by reference for all purposes.
Following application of the pre-gel a fine crumb was applied with a mesh size less than 1% or described as a dust, using a CFS Crumbmaster breadcrumb applicator.
The coated particles were passed through the batter of Example 1 in a tempura batter applicator.
A 2 mm crumb was applied in a second CFS Crumbmaster breadcrumb applicator with slight pressure from a roller. Particles were passed through a third CFS Crumbmaster breadcrumb applicator to infill with a 1 mm crumb using light pressure from a roller.
The coated substrate was fried in pure, fresh rapeseed oil for 2 minutes 20 seconds approximately at 180-188° C. The frying time can be varied depending upon the weight and size of the particles. After frying, the core temperature was 74-85° C. A small loss of weight was observed due to loss of water from the substrate but this is mostly compensated for by the uptake of oil.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
1000747.6 | Jan 2010 | GB | national |
This application is a continuation of prior application Ser. No. 12/764,428 filed on Apr. 21, 2010, now abandoned, the disclosure of which is incorporated by reference herein in its entirety.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2446175 | Gerber | Aug 1948 | A |
3067921 | Reifers | Dec 1962 | A |
3052545 | Ducharme et al. | Sep 1963 | A |
3208851 | Antinori et al. | Sep 1965 | A |
3251531 | Hook et al. | May 1966 | A |
3399062 | Willard, Jr. et al. | Aug 1968 | A |
3486904 | Ziegler | Dec 1969 | A |
3586512 | Mancuso et al. | Jun 1971 | A |
3597227 | Murray et al. | Aug 1971 | A |
3619208 | Bahoshy et al. | Nov 1971 | A |
3656969 | Horn | Apr 1972 | A |
RE27531 | Murray et al. | Dec 1972 | E |
3751268 | van Patten et al. | Aug 1973 | A |
3857976 | Szymanski et al. | Dec 1974 | A |
3899602 | Rutenberg et al. | Aug 1975 | A |
3904429 | Eastman et al. | Sep 1975 | A |
3904601 | Tessler et al. | Sep 1975 | A |
3915532 | Ashton | Oct 1975 | A |
3956515 | Moore et al. | May 1976 | A |
3969340 | Tessler et al. | Jul 1976 | A |
3970767 | Tessler et al. | Jul 1976 | A |
4068009 | Rispoli et al. | Jan 1978 | A |
4192900 | Cheng | Mar 1980 | A |
4208442 | Evans et al. | Jun 1980 | A |
4218485 | Lee et al. | Aug 1980 | A |
4308286 | Anstett et al. | Dec 1981 | A |
4342788 | Clatfelter | Aug 1982 | A |
4364961 | Darley et al. | Dec 1982 | A |
4393088 | Matsusaka | Jul 1983 | A |
4415599 | Bos | Nov 1983 | A |
4423078 | Darley et al. | Dec 1983 | A |
4427706 | El-Hag | Jan 1984 | A |
4440793 | Seki | Apr 1984 | A |
4568550 | Fulger et al. | Feb 1986 | A |
4568555 | Spanier | Feb 1986 | A |
4588600 | Suderman | May 1986 | A |
4597974 | Fonteneau et al. | Jul 1986 | A |
4609557 | Mao et al. | Sep 1986 | A |
4609558 | Giacone et al. | Sep 1986 | A |
4623552 | Rapp | Nov 1986 | A |
4767637 | Ek | Aug 1988 | A |
4778684 | D'Amico et al. | Oct 1988 | A |
4864089 | Tighe et al. | Sep 1989 | A |
4877628 | Stypula | Oct 1989 | A |
4908487 | Sarnoff et al. | Mar 1990 | A |
4913918 | Stypula | Apr 1990 | A |
4915970 | Coffey | Apr 1990 | A |
4943438 | Rosenthal | Jul 1990 | A |
4948608 | Stypula et al. | Aug 1990 | A |
4978541 | Stypula et al. | Dec 1990 | A |
5049711 | August | Sep 1991 | A |
5057329 | Stypula et al. | Oct 1991 | A |
5088179 | Gibbon | Feb 1992 | A |
5093176 | Pribonic et al. | Mar 1992 | A |
5175010 | Roig et al. | Dec 1992 | A |
5202138 | Stypula et al. | Apr 1993 | A |
H1229 | McGinley et al. | Sep 1993 | H |
5266340 | Samson et al. | Nov 1993 | A |
5281432 | Zallie et al. | Jan 1994 | A |
5308636 | Tye et al. | May 1994 | A |
5310977 | Stenkamp et al. | May 1994 | A |
5310980 | Beckett et al. | May 1994 | A |
5321900 | Meyer | Jun 1994 | A |
5350585 | Sunderland | Sep 1994 | A |
5423477 | Valdman et al. | Jun 1995 | A |
5431944 | Melvej | Jul 1995 | A |
5433966 | Wolt et al. | Jul 1995 | A |
5492707 | Chalupa et al. | Feb 1996 | A |
5523102 | Morasch | Jun 1996 | A |
5565132 | Salyer | Oct 1996 | A |
5601861 | Gerrish et al. | Feb 1997 | A |
5736178 | Cook et al. | Apr 1998 | A |
6097017 | Pickford | Aug 2000 | A |
6214403 | Broberg et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6261625 | Pickford | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6287621 | Lacourse et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6288179 | Baur et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6326599 | Pickford | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6399130 | Parker | Jun 2002 | B2 |
6413562 | Conforti et al. | Jul 2002 | B2 |
6458404 | Adachi | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6503546 | Ferrari-Philippe et al. | Jan 2003 | B1 |
6613370 | Pickford | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6620447 | Paukkunen et al. | Sep 2003 | B1 |
7147885 | Asano et al. | Dec 2006 | B2 |
20010014363 | Parker | Aug 2001 | A1 |
20010024672 | Kondou et al. | Sep 2001 | A1 |
20010055641 | Conforti et al. | Dec 2001 | A1 |
20020039615 | Adachi | Apr 2002 | A1 |
20020119226 | Conforti et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020192332 | Pickford | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20030147998 | Geng et al. | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20030198711 | Pickford | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20040213883 | Sadek et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20050169099 | Sprinkle | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20060053650 | Manak et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060286240 | Roosjen | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20110091612 | Pickford | Apr 2011 | A1 |
20110177200 | Pickford | Jul 2011 | A1 |
20110177210 | Pickford | Jul 2011 | A1 |
20110177211 | Pickford | Jul 2011 | A1 |
20120196004 | Pickford | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20120196005 | Pickford | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20120288592 | Pickford | Nov 2012 | A1 |
20130156925 | Pickford | Jun 2013 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
980164 | Dec 1975 | CA |
2220528 | Dec 1972 | DE |
2338180 | Feb 1975 | DE |
17338 | Oct 1980 | EP |
109226 | May 1984 | EP |
155760 | Sep 1985 | EP |
327332 | Aug 1989 | EP |
344726 | Dec 1989 | EP |
392119 | Oct 1990 | EP |
510320 | Feb 1992 | EP |
273475 | Mar 1992 | EP |
648433 | Oct 1994 | EP |
1929887 | Jun 2008 | EP |
2207434 | Aug 2011 | EP |
2359697 | Aug 2011 | EP |
2374361 | Oct 2011 | EP |
2481294 | Aug 2012 | EP |
2481295 | Aug 2012 | EP |
2337534 | Aug 1977 | FR |
2343668 | Oct 1997 | FR |
1419455 | Dec 1975 | GB |
2226220 | Nov 1988 | GB |
57-159451 | Oct 1982 | JP |
01-168242 | Jul 1989 | JP |
8501188 | Mar 1985 | WO |
8806007 | Aug 1988 | WO |
8806847 | Sep 1988 | WO |
8908549 | Sep 1989 | WO |
9201384 | Feb 1992 | WO |
9303634 | Mar 1993 | WO |
9306752 | Apr 1993 | WO |
9314995 | Aug 1993 | WO |
9413160 | Jun 1994 | WO |
9419917 | Sep 1994 | WO |
9427887 | Dec 1994 | WO |
9507629 | Mar 1995 | WO |
9523523 | Sep 1995 | WO |
9524110 | Sep 1995 | WO |
9530344 | Nov 1995 | WO |
WO 9530344 | Nov 1995 | WO |
9602149 | Feb 1996 | WO |
9622228 | Jul 1996 | WO |
9632026 | Oct 1996 | WO |
9638054 | Dec 1996 | WO |
9703572 | Feb 1997 | WO |
9729653 | Aug 1997 | WO |
9808399 | Mar 1998 | WO |
9944439 | Sep 1999 | WO |
2005112664 | Dec 2005 | WO |
2006030333 | Mar 2006 | WO |
2006082804 | Aug 2006 | WO |
2008078997 | Jul 2008 | WO |
2010001101 | Jan 2010 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Altschul, A.M., “Low-calorie foods handbook”, Georgetown University School of Medicine, Marcel Dekker, Inc., Jul. 29, 1993, pp. 1-10. |
Albert, A. et al., “Adhesion in fried battered nuggets: Performance of different hydrocolloids as predusts using three cooking procedures”, Food Hydrocolloids 23 (2009) 1443-1448. |
Henderson, A., “Cellulose ethers—the role of thermal gelation”, Dow Chemical Europe, CH-8810 Horgen, Switzerland, 1988, pp. 265-275. |
WO application No. PCT/GB96/01685, International Search Report mailed Oct. 29, 1996. |
WO application No. PCT/GB97/00924, International Search Report mailed Jul. 30, 1997. |
WO application No. PCT/GB99,00564, International Search Report mailed Jun. 29, 1999. |
WO application No. PCT/GB92/01559, International Search Report mailed Dec. 30, 1992. |
WO application No. PCT/GB95/00958, International Search Report mailed Aug. 22, 1995. |
WO patent application No. PCT/GB2011/050060, International Search Report and Written Opinion mailed May 23, 2011. |
WO patent application No. PCT/GB2011/050057, International Search Report mailed May 23, 2011. |
WO patent application No. PCT/GB2011/050055, International Search Report and Written Opinion mailed May 20, 2011. |
U.S. Appl. No. 09/000,319, Office Action mailed Feb. 3, 1999. |
U.S. Appl. No. 09/000,319, Office Action mailed Mar. 27, 2000. |
U.S. Appl. No. 09/381,848, Office Action mailed Sep. 26, 2000. |
U.S. Appl. No. 09/381,848, Office Action mailed May 8, 2001. |
U.S. Appl. No. 09/646,068, Office Action mailed May 8, 2002. |
U.S. Appl. No. 09/646,068, Office Action mailed Feb. 4, 2003. |
EP patent application No. 11152421.1, Extended Search Report mailed Jul. 5, 2011. |
EP patent application No. 11152415.3, Extended Search Report mailed Jul. 5, 2011. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/015,486, “Production of microwaveable coated food products”, Keith Graham Pickford, filed Jan. 27, 2011. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/015,491, “Microwaveable coated food product, and method and apparatus for the manufacture thereof”, Keith Graham Pickford, filed Jan. 27, 2011. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/107,814, “Microwaveable batter”, Keith Graham Pickford, filed May 13, 2011. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/331,900, “Crumb Manufacture”, Pickford et al., filed Dec. 20, 2011. |
U.S. Appl. No. 12/764,428, Office Action mailed Jan. 5, 2012. |
U.S. Appl. No. 12/764,428, Office Action mailed Jun. 21, 2012. |
U.S. Appl. No. 12/764,407, Office Action mailed Oct. 5, 2012. |
U.S. Appl. No. 12/764,421, Office Action mailed Oct. 9, 2012. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/015,486, Office Action mailed Oct. 12, 2012. |
FoodSafety.gov, “Minimum Cooking Temperatures,” downloaded from http://www.foodsafety.gov/keep/charts/mintemp.html on Sep. 30, 2012. |
Kuntz, Lynn A., “The Great Cover-Up: Batters, Breadings & Coatings,” downloaded from http://www.foodproductdesign.com on Sep. 28, 2012. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/015,491, Office Action mailed Oct. 15, 2012. |
WO patent application No. PCT/GB2009/001617, Search Report and Written Opinion mailed Jul. 1, 2008. |
EP patent application No. 09772781.2, Communication under Rule 71(3) EPC, intent to grant, mailed Mar. 14, 2011. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/331,900, Office Action mailed Dec. 7, 2012. |
Clextral Press Release: New drying technology provides optimal drying for complex products and reduces energy expense, Clextral—a division of Groupe Legris Industries, Jun. 2009. |
Clextral Rotante Evolum dryer—new generation for sustainable development, Clextral—a division of Groupe Legris Industries, Jun. 2009. |
EP patent application No. 1119483.6, Extended European Search Report mailed Aug. 10, 2012. |
Perten, Harald, “Application of the falling number method for evaluating alpha-amylase activity,” Cereal Chemistry, vol. 41, May 1964, pp. 127-140. |
English translation of Paris GDS Moulins FR 2,458,227, Jan. 1981. |
Edwards, W.P., “The Science of Bakery Products,” Chapter 7—Raw Materials, The Royal Society of Chemistry, 2007. |
English translation of Wiedmann et al., EP 0510320A1, Oct. 1992, downloaded from http://translationportal.epo.org on Jan. 25, 2013. |
“Criteria for Judging Quality,” published Jun. 20, 2008, downloaded from http://web.archive,org/web/20080620034754http://www.theartisan.net/flour—criteria—judging.htm on Jan. 25, 2013. |
English translation of RU 2277438, Rye-wheat bread and its proI3vodstva, Berestnev et al., Jun. 10, 2006. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/015,486, Office Action mailed Feb. 19, 2013. |
U.S. Appl. No. 12/764,428, Office Action mailed Mar. 22, 2013. |
U.S. Appl. No. 12/764,421, Office Action mailed Apr. 1, 2013. |
U.S. Appl. No. 12/764,407, Office Action mailed Apr. 5, 2013. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/331,900, Office Action mailed Apr. 10, 2013 |
EP patent application No. 12178463, European Search Report mailed Jan. 22, 2013. |
WO patent application No. PCT/EP2012/076015, International Search Report and Written Opinion mailed May 7, 2013. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/015,491, Office Action mailed Jun. 5, 2013. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/107,814, Office Action mailed Jun. 21, 2013. |
U.S. Appl. No. 12/669,953, Notice of Allowance mailed Jul. 25, 2013. |
EP patent application No. 11163536.3, Communication under Rule 71(3) EPC, Intent to Grant, mailed May 30, 2013. |
U.S. Appl. No. 12/764,407, Office Action mailed Oct. 25, 2013. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/015,491, Office Action mailed Nov. 8, 2013. |
U.S. Appl. No. 14/105,847, “Stabilized Cheese Products,” van der Kolk et al., filed Dec. 13, 2013. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/015,486, Office Action mailed Jan. 6, 2014. |
U.S. Appl. No. 12/764,407, Notice of Allowance mailed Feb. 12, 2014. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/107,814, Office Action mailed Feb. 13, 2014. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20140093615 A1 | Apr 2014 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 12764428 | Apr 2010 | US |
Child | 14032881 | US |