1. Field of the Invention
Devices, systems and methods are described for treating lungs. The devices, systems and methods improve the quality of life and restore lung function for patients suffering from emphysema. The systems consist of an implant and a delivery catheter that can be advanced through tortuous anatomy and actuated to retain a pre-determined shape and rigidity. The actuated implant modifies the shape of the airways and locally compresses lung parenchyma to cause volume reduction and thereby tensions the lung parenchyma to restore elastic recoil. Systems and devices are also included that deploy and actuate the implantable devices, as well as systems and devices designed for recapture of the implanted device.
2. Background of the Invention
Current medical literature describes emphysema as a chronic (long-term) lung disease that can get worse over time. It's usually caused by smoking. Having emphysema means some of the air sacs in your lungs are damaged, making it hard to breathe. Some reports indicate that emphysema is the fourth largest cause of mortality in the U.S., affecting an estimated 16-30 million U.S. citizens. Each year approximately 100,000 sufferers die of the disease. Smoking has been identified as a major cause, but with ever increasing air pollution and other environmental factors that negatively affect pulmonary patients; the number of people affected by emphysema is on the rise.
A currently available solution for patients suffering from emphysema is a surgical procedure called Lung Volume Reduction (LVR) surgery whereby diseased lung is resected and the volume of the lung is reduced. This allows healthier lung tissue to expand into the volume previously occupied by the diseased tissue and allows the diaphragm to recover. High mortality and morbidity may be associated with this invasive procedure. Several minimally invasive investigational therapies exist that aim at improving the quality of life and restoring lung function for patients suffering from emphysema. These potential therapies include mechanical devices and biological treatments. The Zephyr™ device by Emphasys (Redwood City Calif.) and the IBV™ device by Spiration (Redmond Wash.) are mechanical one way valve devices. The underlying theory behind these devices is to achieve absorptive atelectasis by preventing air from entering diseased portion of the lung, while allowing air and mucous to pass through the device out of the diseased regions.
The Watanabe spigot is another mechanical device that completely occludes the airway, thereby preventing air from entering and exiting the lung. Collateral ventilation (interlobar and intralobar—porous flow paths that prevent complete occlusion) prevents atelectasis and this is shown in the published Emphasys VENT clinical trial data, where approximately ⅓ or fewer of the patients actually achieve measurable atelectasis. The lack of atelectasis or lung volume reduction drastically reduces the effectiveness of such devices. Other mechanical devices include means of deploying anchors into airways and physically deforming airways by drawing the anchors together via cables.
Biological treatments utilize tissue engineering aimed at causing scarring at specific locations. Unfortunately, it can be difficult to control the scarring and to prevent uncontrolled proliferation of scarring.
An aspect of the invention includes a lung volume reduction system comprising an implantable device adapted to be delivered to a lung airway of a patient in a delivery configuration and to change to a deployed configuration to bend the lung airway. The system has a delivery configuration that is resiliently bendable into a plurality of shapes. The system can have a deployed configuration that has a rigid shape. Additionally, the system may be elastically strained into a deliverable shape whereby elastic recoil allows it to recover back to its manufactured shape that provides a load on lung tissue. Further shapes include: c-shape; S-shape; and Spiral, baseball seam shape to name a few.
The system can further be adapted to comprise an actuator adapted to be operated from outside the patient to change the implantable device from the delivery configuration to the deployed configuration. The actuator comprises an actuation element connected to a distal end of the implantable device and adapted to be moved proximally to bend the device. As will be appreciated by those skilled in the art, the distal end includes the front end of the device and can include, for example, from the mid-point along the length to the end furthest away from the user.
In some embodiments, the system can further be adapted to comprise a lock adapted to lock the device in the deployed configuration. In some embodiments, the lock comprises a ratchet. In other embodiments, the lock can be unlocked for retrieval. The system can further comprise a connector adapted to connect the implantable device to the actuator and to disconnect the device from the actuator after actuation. The connector may be used to connect two or more devices together. The device can be configured to comprise a member having a plurality of notches adapted to permit the device to bend more easily in one direction than in another. In some embodiments, the device can further be adapted to self-actuate from the delivery configuration to the deployed configuration. The devices of the invention can be comprised of shape memory material. Suitable shape memory material are known in the art and include the nickel-titanium alloy Nitinol. In some embodiments a plurality of shape memory elements can be configured to form a flexible overtube. In other embodiments, the device comprises a plurality of asymmetric segments and a connecting element adapted to connect the segments. In still other embodiments, the device is adapted to be delivered through a working channel of a bronchoscope. In still other embodiments, the device is adapted to be delivered from a loading cartridge through a catheter that is adapted to fit through a working channel of a bronchoscope. The system may include a guide wire for steering to specific bronchi, a wire steering handle to assist with grasping the wire to rotate it, a dilator to provide a smooth transition from the wire to a delivery catheter and a loading cartridge to contain the implant system in a deliverable condition. The device can further be adapted to provide an anchor to anchor the device within the airway. In still other embodiments, the system further comprises a delivery tool adapted to deliver the device to a treatment site in the airway. In yet other embodiments, the system further comprises a retrieval tool adapted to retrieve the device from the airway after delivery. The retrieval device can further be adapted to unlock the device from the deployed configuration. As will be appreciated by those skilled in the art, the device can be configured to have a fixed length or a variable length.
A method of bending a lung airway of a patient is also provided. The method comprising inserting a device into the airway in a delivery configuration and bending the device into a deployed configuration, thereby bending the airway. In some embodiments of the method, the bending step comprises operating an actuator outside the patient, the actuator being operatively connected to the device. The method further comprises locking the device into the deployed configuration. The method can also comprise unlocking the device to permit it to return to the delivery configuration. In yet other embodiments, the method can include disconnecting the actuator from the device. In some instances, the device comprises a plurality of asymmetric segments, inserting comprises delivering the plurality of asymmetric segment to the airway. In still other embodiments, the bending comprises rotating at least one asymmetric segment with respect to at least another asymmetric segment. In some instances, the device comprises shape memory material, bending comprises permitting the device to bend itself The method can also further comprise the step of delivering an overtube and subsequently delivering a shape memory element to the overtube. Depending upon the desired result, the bending can comprise bending the device into a substantially C shape; bending the device into a substantially S shape; or bending the device into a substantially spiral shape. Additionally, the inserting step can further comprise delivering the device through a working channel of a bronchoscope. In yet other embodiments, the device can be elastically strained into a deliverable shape, advanced through and out the end of a bronchoscope whereby elastic recoil drives the system, to recover back to it's original manufactured shape. Finally, the method can further comprise the step of retrieving the device from the airway.
The design of the device facilitates strain relief on both ends of the device. Further the ends of the device in either the delivery or deployed state are more resilient.
The implant length can range from, for example, 2 cm to 10 cm. Typically, the length is 5 cm. The diameter of the device can range from 1.00 mm to 3.0 mm, preferably 2.4 mm. The device is used with a catheter which has a working length of 60 cm to 200 cm, preferably 90 cm.
Suitable materials for use in constructing the implant, delivery or retrieval systems include materials selected from: metals (stainless steel, nickel-titanium alloy (Nitinol), titanium); polymers (durable and bioabsorbable); ultra high molecular weight polyethylene (UHMWPE), polycarbonate, silicone, urethane, Teflon® (available from DuPont), fluoropolymers, Poly(d, 1-lactic-co-glycolic acid), poly(glycolic acid caprolactone), [rho]oly(lactide co-glycolides), as well as any other material that would be considered suitable by a person of skill in the art. Other materials include polymers (nylon, Pebax®, polyetheretherketone (PEEK), polycarbonate, Acrylonitrile Butadiene Styrene (ABS), high density polyethyelene, low density polyethylene, polypropylene, polyimide, urethane, polyethylene, and terephthalate), as well as any other material that would be considered suitable by a person of skill in the art. One or more materials can be employed in any of the embodiments described.
In one embodiment, the device is constructed from a metallic or polymeric tube with slots separated by specific distances that allow preferential bending of the tube where the slots are oriented. In another embodiment, the implant is composed of short segments of metallic or polymeric tubes or cylinders.
Aspects of the invention also include devices adapted to deliver and/or retrieve the implant. The device can be configured to pull or push the actuation device; lock the device in a particular configuration; unlock the device; maintain the device at a temperature that facilitates implantation; manipulates the proximal end of the device to facilitate retrieval; and/or controls the torque on the device.
The delivery catheter construction includes a stainless steel hypotube, stainless steel tight-pitch coil, polymeric tube (polyimide, Nylon, Pebax® (available from Ato Chimie), Teflon®, fluoropolymers) with stainless steel reinforcement (braided, axial).
In operation the devices of the invention are minimally invasive and can be used with a bronchoscope procedure. There is no incision, and no violation of the pleural space. Collateral ventilation does not affect the effectiveness. The devices can be used for homogeneous and heterogeneous emphysema.
In yet another embodiment of the invention, the lung volume reduction system comprises an implantable device that imparts bending force on lung tissue. The lung volume reduction system can further be adapted and configured to comprise an implantable spring element that imparts bending force on lung tissue. In yet another embodiment of the invention, a lung volume reduction system is adapted and configured to comprise an implantable spring element that can be constrained into a shape that can be delivered to a lung airway and unconstrained to allow the element to impart bending force on the airway to cause the airway to be bent.
Embodiments of the lung volume reduction system can be adapted to provide an implant that is constrained in a first configuration to a relatively straighter delivery configuration and allowed to recover in situ to a second configuration that is less straight configuration. Devices and implants can be made, at least partially, of spring material that will fully recover after having been strained at least 1%, suitable material includes a metal, such as metals comprising Nickel and Titanium. In some embodiments, the implant of the lung volume reduction system is cooled below body temperature in the delivered configuration. In such an embodiment, the cooling system can be controlled by a temperature sensing feedback loop and a feedback signal can be provided by a temperature transducer in the system. The device can be configured to have an Af temperature adjusted to 37 degrees Celsius or colder. Additionally, at least a portion of the metal of the device can be transformed to the martensite phase in the delivery configuration and/or can be in an austenite phase condition in the deployed configuration.
In another embodiment of the invention, a lung volume reduction system comprising an implantable device that is configured to be deliverable into a patient's lung and configured to be reshaped to make the lung tissue that is in contact with the device more curved. In some embodiments, The device is configured to be reshaped to a permanent second configuration. Additionally, or alternatively, the device can be adapted and configured to have a first shape and is configured to be strained elastically to a deliverable shape. Additionally, in some embodiments, the implantable device has a first shape and is adapted to be elastically constrained by a delivery device to a deliverable configuration whereby removal of the delivery device allows the implant to recoil and be reshaped closer to its first shape. In still other embodiments, the tissue that is in contact with the device is that of blood vessel, airway, lung dissection fissure or a combination of these. The delivered device can be reshaped into a shape that is shorter in length than the deliverable implant configuration. Additionally, the implant can be adapted and configured to provide a distal end and a proximal end and the distance between the two ends is reduced when the implant is reshaped. Further, the implant can be configured to occupy less than the entire lumen cross section area of a lung airway; less than the entire lumen cross section area of a blood vessel; and/or have a deliverable shape that fits within a cylindrical space that is 18 mm in diameter or smaller. In some embodiments, the surface area of the implant that comes into contact with tissue is larger than 1.0−6 square inches per linear inch of length of the implant. In other embodiments, the implant is coated with material that reduces the rate of wound healing, tissue remodeling, inflammation, generation of granular tissue or a combination of these. In still other embodiments, the reshaped implant is adapted and configured to lie within a single plane. Additionally, the reshaped implant can take on a variety of shapes, including, for example, the shape of a C, the shape of an S, or any other suitable shape. In still other embodiments, the reshaped implant is adapted and configured to lie within more than a single plane. In multiplanar embodiments, the reshaped implant is adapted and configured to take on a variety of shapes, including, for example, the shape of a baseball seam, or the shape of a coil. In some embodiments, the reshaped implant has more than one radius of curvature. Additionally, systems are provided wherein more than one implant is delivered and reshaped. In such systems, the devices can be delivered to separate locations. Alternatively, the devices can be coupled, either before or after delivery. Additionally, the implants can be deployed to partially occupy a common region in the lung. In still further embodiments, the lung volume reduction system can provide implantable devices made of a resiliently bendable material. The system can further be adapted to comprise an actuator adapted to be operated from outside the patient to reshape the implant. Suitable mechanisms for actuating the device include, catheters. Additionally, the catheter can be further adapted and configured to constrain the implant in a deliverable configuration. In some embodiments, the system further comprises a pusher adapted to deliver the implant into a patient's lung. Additionally, the implant can be adapted and configured to have blunt distal and proximal ends, such as with the use of balls positioned thereon. Additionally, a central wire can be provided that spans the length of the device. A pusher can be provided that is releasably coupled to the device.
In another embodiment, the system provides a recapture device adapted and configured to remove the implant from a patient's lungs. The recapture device can be adapted to couple at an end of the device. Additionally, the recapture device can be configured to operate within a catheter or bronchoscope working channel lumen. A resilient wire can also be provided to guide a delivery catheter. In still other embodiments, the system further comprises a resilient dilator device that fits in the catheter lumen. The dilator device can be further adapted and configured to provide a lumen that accommodates a resilient wire. In at least some embodiments, the lung volume reduction system implant has an arc length that remains constant.
In yet another embodiment of the invention, a lung volume reduction device is provided that comprises an elongate body adapted to be inserted into a lumen adjacent lung tissue, the device having a delivery configuration and a deployed configuration more curved than the delivery configuration. In some embodiments, the elongate body is more rigid in the deployment configuration than in the delivery configuration. In still other embodiments, at least a portion of the elongate body comprises a rigid arc when in the deployment configuration having rigidity greater than that of lung tissue. In some embodiments, the rigid arc extends from a point in a proximal half of the device to a point in the distal half of the device. In still other embodiments, the elongate body comprises a plurality of rigid arcs when in the deployment configuration. The plurality of rigid arcs can also be positioned such that the arcs are not at the proximal or distal ends of the elongate body.
In another embodiment of the invention, a lung volume reduction system is provided comprising an implantable device that is configured to be deliverable into a patient's lung and configured to reshape lung tissue while allowing fluid to flow both directions past the implant.
In still another embodiment of the invention, a lung volume reduction system is provided comprising an implantable device that is configured to be deliverable into a patient's lung configured to be reshaped to a shape that is not axi-symmetric to bend lung tissue.
According to a method of the invention, a method of reducing a patient's lung volume is provided comprising: inserting a lung volume reduction device into a patient lumen, such as a lung airway, adjacent lung tissue in a delivery configuration, the device comprising an elongate body; and moving the elongate body from the delivery configuration to a deployment configuration more curved than the delivery configuration. The step of moving can further comprise making at least a portion of the elongate body more rigid. In another embodiment, the step of moving can comprise forming a rigid arc in the elongate body, the rigid arc having a rigidity greater than that of the lung tissue. In yet another embodiment, the step of moving can further comprise forming a plurality of rigid arcs in the elongate body. In still another embodiment, the step of moving can further comprise forming the plurality of rigid arcs away from a proximal end or a distal end of the elongate body.
Pursuant to another method of the invention, a method of bending a lung airway of a patient is provided comprising inserting a device into the airway in a delivery configuration and bending the device into a deployed configuration to reduce the radius of curvature of at least a portion the airway.
Still another method of the invention provides a method of bending a lung airway of a patient comprising inserting an implantable device into the airway in a delivery configuration and bending the device into a deployed configuration to reduce the radius of curvature of at least a portion the airway. In an embodiment, the step of bending can further comprise operating an actuator outside the patient, the actuator being operatively connected to the device. In yet another embodiment, the step of bending further comprising locking the device into the deployed configuration. In still another embodiment, the step of bending further comprises unlocking the device to permit it to return to the delivery configuration. Additionally, in some embodiments, the step of bending can further comprise disconnecting the actuator from the device. Suitable devices for the methods of the invention include devices that comprise a plurality of asymmetric segments, inserting comprises delivering the plurality of asymmetric segments to the airway as well as devices comprising shape memory material. Additionally, the step of bending can further comprise rotating at least one asymmetric segment with respect to at least another asymmetric segment. An additional step of some embodiments of the method can further comprise delivering a catheter and delivering a shape memory element through the catheter. After delivery of the device, according to the methods provided, the device can then bend into a substantially C shape, S shape, spiral shape, coil shape of one or more radiuses, as well as any shape that is within one or more planes. In an additional embodiment of the method, the step of inserting further comprises delivering the device through a working channel of a bronchoscope. In yet another step of the method, the method further comprises retrieving the device from the airway. Embodiments of the method can further provide the step of providing strain relief to an end of the device during deployment. The delivery configuration of the device can be achieved by transforming metal to a martensite phase or by cooling the implant, such as by delivering liquids or gas. Cooled liquids or gases can be at delivered at temperatures that are at or below body temperature, are 37 degrees Celsius or lower in temperature, or at or below zero degrees Celsius. In some methods of the invention, the implant and surrounding tissues are cooled below zero degrees Celsius, or at or below minus fifteen degrees Celsius.
In yet another method of the invention, a method of reducing lung volume by bending a lung airway of a patient is provided comprising inserting an implantable device into the airway in a delivery configuration and bending the device into a deployed configuration to change the radius of curvature of at least a portion of the airway.
In another method of the invention, a method is provided for reducing lung volume in a patient comprising inserting a device into an airway and causing bending of the airway. The method can further include the step of inserting a second device into a second airway; connecting the first and second devices to each other; bending the first device to a the first device to a deployed condition to bend or deform the airway at a first location; and bending the second device to a deployed condition to bend the airway at a second location. Additionally, the method can include connecting two or more devices, such as connecting the devices to a common airway. An additional step of the method can include applying pressure on the junction where the airways join. Still another step of the method can include connecting bending elements that are individually placed into one or more airways. Yet another step can include bending one or more bending elements that are placed in one or more airways. An additional step includes configuring the device to make the airway conform to the shape of the implant in a deployed condition.
All publications and patent applications mentioned in this specification are herein incorporated by reference to the same extent as if each individual publication or patent application was specifically and individually indicated to be incorporated by reference.
A better understanding of the features and advantages of the present invention will be obtained by reference to the attached documents that set forth illustrative embodiments, in which the principles of the invention are utilized, and the accompanying drawings of which:
FIGS. IA-C illustrates the anatomy of the respiratory system;
By way of background and to provide context for the invention,
As shown in more detail in
The lungs 19 are described in current literature an elastic structure that float within the thoracic cavity 11. The thin layer of pleural fluid that surrounds the lungs 19 lubricates the movement of the lungs within the thoracic cavity 11. Suction of excess fluid from the pleural space 46 into the lymphatic channels maintains a slight suction between the visceral pleural surface of the lung pleura 42 and the parietal pleural surface of the thoracic cavity 44. This slight suction creates a negative pressure that keeps the lungs 19 inflated and floating within the thoracic cavity 11. Without the negative pressure, the lungs 19 collapse like a balloon and expel air through the trachea 12. Thus, the natural process of breathing out is almost entirely passive because of the elastic recoil of the lungs 19 and chest cage structures. As a result of this physiological arrangement, when the pleura 42, 44 is breached, the negative pressure that keeps the lungs 19 in a suspended condition disappears and the lungs 19 collapse from the elastic recoil effect.
When fully expanded, the lungs 19 completely fill the pleural cavity 38 and the parietal pleurae 44 and visceral pleurae 42 come into contact. During the process of expansion and contraction with the inhaling and exhaling of air, the lungs 19 slide back and forth within the pleural cavity 38. The movement within the pleural cavity 38 is facilitated by the thin layer of mucoid fluid that lies in the pleural space 46 between the parietal pleurae 44 and visceral pleurae 42. As discussed above, when the air sacs in the lungs are damaged 32, such as is the case with emphysema, it is hard to breathe. Thus, isolating the damaged air sacs to improve the elastic structure of the lung improves breathing.
A conventional flexible bronchoscope is described in U.S. Pat. No. 4,880,015 to Nierman for Biopsy Forceps. As shown in
Positioned within a lumen 113 of the tubular member 112 is an actuation element 116 or pull-wire. The actuation element can have a circular circumference in cross-section, as depicted, or can have any other suitable cross-section. The actuation element 116 is anchored at one end of the device 110, e.g. the distal end, by a cap 119. The cap 119 can be bonded to the catheter and a distal crimp can be provided to crimp the cap into the pull wire. The rounded cap can also be provided to make the tip of the device atraumatic. The opposing end, e.g. proximal end, is adapted and configured to engage a mechanism 120. The mechanism enables the device to be deployed. The mechanism can further be adapted and configured to enable the device to lock into a deployed configuration once the device 110 is deployed or unlocked to retrieve the device. The device 110 is configured to be detachable from a delivery catheter adapted to deliver the lung volume reduction device (discussed below).
Mechanism 120, at the proximal end of the device, can be adapted to include a retainer ring 122 that engages a ratchet 124 that can be used to lock the device in place. The coupler 126 retains the ratchet 124 such that the ratchet locks the device in place once deployed. At the proximal end a retrieval adapter 130 is provided, such as a pull-wire eyelid. The retrieval adapter 130 is adapted and configured to enable the device to be retrieved at a later point during the procedure or during a subsequent procedure. The ratchet device has flanges that extend away from a central axis when deployed to lock the device in place.
Turning to
In another embodiment of the invention, as illustrated in
Turning now to
The component depicted in
The device illustrated in
Turning now to
A variety of mechanisms can be used to couple the clip of the device to the catheter. As shown in
In some instances, where the device has been implanted for a length of time sufficient for tissue in-growth to occur, a torquable catheter 2750 having a sharp blade (not shown) within its lumen can be advanced along the length of the device 2710 to enable tissue to be cut away from the implant prior to withdrawal such as shown in
A variety of steps for performing a method according to the invention would be appreciated by those skilled in the art upon review of this disclosure. However, for purposes of illustration,
In one embodiment, the device operation includes the step of inserting a bronchoscope into a patient's lungs and then inserting an intra-bronchial device or lung volume reduction device into the bronchoscope. The intra-bronchial device is then allowed to exit the distal end of the bronchoscope where it is pushed into the airway. A variety of methods can then be used to verify the positioning of the device to determine if the device is in the desired location. Suitable methods of verification include, for example, visualization via visualization equipment, such as fluoroscopy, CT scanning, etc. Thereafter the device is activated by pulling the pull wire proximally (i.e., toward the user and toward the exterior of the patient's body). At this point, another visual check can be made to determine whether the device has been positioned and deployed desirably. Thereafter, the device can be fully actuated and the ratchet can be allowed to lock and hold the device in place. Thereafter, the implant is decoupled from the delivery catheter and the delivery catheter is removed.
Another method of tensioning the lung is shown in
A Nitinol metallic implant, such as the one illustrated in
As with previous embodiments, the embodiments depicted in
The devices can have any suitable length for treating target tissue. However, the length typically range from, for example, 2 cm to 10 cm, usually 5 cm. The diameter of the device can range from 1.00 mm to 3.0 mm, preferably 2.4 mm. The device is used with a catheter which has a working length of 60 cm to 200 cm, preferably 90 cm.
In operation the devices shown in
Each of the devices depicted in
Embodiments of the lung volume reduction system can be adapted to provide an implant that is constrained in a first configuration to a relatively straighter delivery configuration and allowed to recover in situ to a second configuration that is less straight configuration. Devices and implants can be made, at least partially, of spring material that will fully recover after having been strained at least 1%, suitable material includes a metal, such as metals comprising Nickel and Titanium. In some embodiments, the implant of the lung volume reduction system is cooled below body temperature in the delivered configuration. In such an embodiment, the cooling system can be controlled by a temperature sensing feedback loop and a feedback signal can be provided by a temperature transducer in the system. The device can be configured to have an Af temperature adjusted to 37° Celsius or colder. Additionally, at least a portion of the metal of the device can be transformed to the martensite phase in the delivery configuration and/or can be in an austenite phase condition in the deployed configuration.
Lung volume reduction systems, such as those depicted in
As will be appreciated by those skilled in the art, the devices illustrated in
As will be appreciated by those skilled in the art, the device can be manufactured and deployed such that it is deliverable through a bronchoscope. When actuated, the device can be adapted and configured to bend or curl which then distorts lung tissue with which the device comes in contact. Lung tissues that may be beneficially distorted by the device are airways, blood vessels, faces of tissue that have been dissected for introduction of the device or a combination of any of these. By compressing the lung tissue, the device can result in an increase in elastic recoil and tension in the lung in at least some cases. Additionally, in some instances, lung function can be at least partially restored regardless of the amount of collateral ventilation. Further, the diaphragm may, in some instances, move up once greater tension is created which enables the lung cavity to operate more effectively.
Devices according to the invention have a small cross-section, typically less than 10 F. The flexibility of the device prior to deployment facilitates advancement of the device through the tortuous lung anatomy. Once deployed, the device can remain rigid to hold and maintain a tissue deforming effect. Further, the device design facilitates recapture, de-activation and removal as well as adjustment in place.
Candidate materials for the devices and components described herein would be known by persons skilled in the art and include, for example, suitable biocompatible materials such as metals (e.g. stainless steel, shape memory alloys, such a nickel titanium alloy (nitinol), titanium, and cobalt) and engineering plastics (e.g. polycarbonate). See, for example U.S. Pat. No. 5,190,546 to Jervis for Medical Devices Incorporating SIM Memory Alloy Elements, and U.S. Pat. No. 5,964,770 to Flomenblit for High Strength Medical Devices of Shape Memory Alloy. In some embodiments, other materials may be appropriate for some or all of the components, such as biocompatible polymers, including polyetheretherketone (PEEK), polyarylamide, polyethylene, and polysulphone.
Polymers and metals used to make the implant and delivery system should be coated with materials to prevent the formation and growth of granular tissue, scar tissue and mucus. Many of the drugs used with stent products to arrest hyperplasia of smooth muscle cells in blood vessels after deploying metallic stents will work very well for these devices. Slow release drug eluting polymers or solvents may be used to regulate the release of drugs that include any substance capable of exerting a therapeutic or prophylactic effect for a patient. For example, the drug could be designed to inhibit the activity of smooth muscle cells. It can be directed at inhibiting abnormal or inappropriate migration and/or proliferation of smooth muscle cells to inhibit tissue mass buildup. The drug may include small molecule drugs, peptides or proteins. Examples of drugs include antiproliferative substances such as actinomycin D, or derivatives and analogs thereof (manufactured by Sigma-Aldrich of Milwaukee, Wis., or COSMEGEN available from Merck). Synonyms of actinomycin D include dactinomycin, actinomycin IV, actinomycin1, actinomycin X1, and actinomycin C1. The active agent can also fall under the genus of antineoplastic, anti-inflammatory, antiplatelet, anticoagulant, antifibrin, antithrombin, antimitotic, antibiotic, antiallergic and antioxidant substances. Examples of such antineoplastics and/or antimitotics include paclitaxel (e.g. TAXOL® by Bristol-Myers Squibb Co. of Stamford, Conn.), docetaxel (e.g. Taxotere®, from Aventis S. A. of Frankfurt, Germany) methotrexate, azathioprine, vincristine, vinblastine, fluorouracil, doxorubicin hydrochloride (e.g. Adriamycin® from Pharmacia & Upjohn of Peapack N.J.), and mitomycin (e.g. Mutamycin® from Bristol-Myers Squibb). Examples of such antiplatelets, anticoagulants, antifibrin, and antithrombins include sodium heparin, low molecular weight heparins, heparinoids, hirudin, argatroban, forskolin, vapiprost, prostacyclin and prostacyclin analogues, dextran, D-phe-pro-arg-chloromethylketone (synthetic antithrombin), dipyridamole, glycoprotein Hh/IIIa platelet membrane receptor antagonist antibody, recombinant hirudin, and thrombin inhibitors such as Angiomax™ (Biogen, Inc. of Cambridge, Mass.). Examples of such cytostatic or antiproliferative agents include angiopeptin, angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors such as captopril (e.g. Capoten® and Capozide® from Bristol-Myers Squibb), cilazapril or Hsinopril (e.g. Prinivil® and Prinzide® from Merck & Co., Inc. of Whitehouse Station, N.J.); calcium channel blockers (such as nifedipine), colchicine, fibroblast growth factor (FGF) antagonists, fish oil (omega 3-fatty acid), histamine antagonists, lovastatin (an inhibitor of HMG-CoA reductase, a cholesterol lowering drug, brand name Mevacor® from Merck & Co.), monoclonal antibodies (such as those specific for Platelet-Derived Growth Factor (PDGF) receptors), nitroprusside, phosphodiesterase inhibitors, prostaglandin inhibitors, suramin, serotonin blockers, steroids, thioprotease inhibitors, triazolopyrimidine (a PDGF antagonist), and nitric oxide. An example of an antiallergic agent is permirolast potassium. Other therapeutic substances or agents which jtnay be appropriate include alpha-interferon, genetically engineered epithelial cells, tacrolimus, dexamethasone, and rapamycin and structural derivatives or functional analogs thereof, such as 40-O-(2-hydroxy)ethyl-rapamycin (known by the trade name of EVEROLIMUS available from Novartis of New York, N.Y.), 40-O-(3-hydroxy)propyl-rapamycin, 40-O-[2-(2-hydroxy)ethoxy]ethyl-rapamycin, and 40-O-tetrazole-rapamycin.
Other polymers that may be suitable for use in some embodiments, for example other grades of PEEK, such as 30% glass-filled or 30% carbon filled, provided such materials are cleared for use in implantable devices by the FDA, or other regulatory body. The use of glass filled PEEK would be desirable where there was a need to reduce the expansion rate and increase the flexural modulus of PEEK for the instrument. Glass-filled PEEK is known to be ideal for improved strength, stiffness, or stability while carbon filled PEEK is known to enhance the compressive strength and stiffness of PEEK and lower its expansion rate. Still other suitable biocompatible thermoplastic or thermoplastic polycondensate materials may be suitable, including materials that have good memory, are flexible, and/or deflectable have very low moisture absorption, and good wear and/or abrasion resistance, can be used without departing from the scope of the invention. These include polyetherketoneketone (PEKK), polyetherketone (PEK), polyetherketoneetherketoneketone (PEKEKK), and polyetheretherketoneketone (PEEKK), and generally a polyaryletheretherketone. Further other polyketones can be used as well as other thermoplastics. Reference to appropriate polymers that can be used in the tools or tool components can be made to the following documents, all of which are incorporated herein by reference. These documents include: PCT Publication WO 02/02158 A1, to Victrex Manufacturing Ltd. entitled Bio-Compatible Polymeric Materials; PCT Publication WO 02/00275 A1, to Victrex Manufacturing Ltd. entitled Bio-Compatible Polymeric Materials; and PCT Publication WO 02/00270 A1, to Victrex Manufacturing Ltd. entitled Bio-Compatible Polymeric Materials. Still other materials such as Bionate®, polycarbonate urethane, available from the Polymer Technology Group, Berkeley, Calif., may also be appropriate because of the good oxidative stability, biocompatibility, mechanical strength and abrasion resistance. Other thermoplastic materials and other high molecular weight polymers can be used as well for portions of the instrument that are desired to be radiolucent.
The implant described herein can be made of a metallic material or an alloy such as, but not limited to, cobalt-chromium alloys (e.g., ELGILOY), stainless steel (316L), “MP35N,” “MP20N,” ELASTINITE (Nitinol), tantalum, tantalum-based alloys, nickel-titanium alloy, platinum, platinum-based alloys such as, e.g., platinum-iridium alloy, iridium, gold, magnesium, titanium, titanium-based alloys, zirconium-based alloys, or combinations thereof. Devices made from bioabsorbable or biostable polymers can also be used with the embodiments of the present invention. “MP35N” and “MP20N” are trade names for alloys of cobalt, nickel, chromium and molybdenum available from Standard Press Steel Co. of Jenkintown, Pa. “MP35N” consists of 35% cobalt, 35% nickel, 20% chromium, and 10% molybdenum. “MP20N” consists of 50% cobalt, 20% nickel, 20% chromium, and 10% molybdenum.
While preferred embodiments of the present invention have been shown and described herein, it will be obvious to those skilled in the art that such embodiments are provided by way of example only. Numerous variations, changes, and substitutions will now occur to those skilled in the art without departing from the invention. It should be understood that various alternatives to the embodiments of the invention described herein may be employed in practicing the invention. It is intended that the following claims presented will define the scope of the invention and that methods and structures within the scope of these claims and their equivalents be covered thereby.
This application is a Continuation of Ser. No. 12/167,167 filed Jul. 2, 2008 (Allowed), which is a Continuation of PCT Patent Appln. No. PCT/US2007/006339 filed on Mar. 13, 2007, which is a Continuation-in-Part of Ser. No. 11/422,047 filed Jun. 2, 2006 (now U.S. Pat. No. 8,157,837), which claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Patent Appln. Nos. 60/743,471 filed on Mar. 13, 2006, 60/884,804 filed Jan. 12, 2007, and 60/885,305 filed Jan. 17, 2007. The disclosures, each of which are incorporated herein by reference in their entirety for all purposes.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3559652 | Banitt et al. | Feb 1971 | A |
4013080 | Froning | Mar 1977 | A |
4153058 | Nehme | May 1979 | A |
4233984 | Walling | Nov 1980 | A |
4245624 | Komiya | Jan 1981 | A |
4479792 | Lazarus et al. | Oct 1984 | A |
4494531 | Gianturco | Jan 1985 | A |
4532935 | Wang | Aug 1985 | A |
4702260 | Wang | Oct 1987 | A |
4739760 | Chin et al. | Apr 1988 | A |
4766906 | Wang | Aug 1988 | A |
4769017 | Fath et al. | Sep 1988 | A |
4821722 | Miller et al. | Apr 1989 | A |
4880015 | Nierman | Nov 1989 | A |
5056529 | de Groot | Oct 1991 | A |
5084012 | Kelman | Jan 1992 | A |
5108368 | Hammerslag et al. | Apr 1992 | A |
5165420 | Strickland | Nov 1992 | A |
5186167 | Kolobow | Feb 1993 | A |
5190546 | Jervis | Mar 1993 | A |
5219895 | Kelman | Jun 1993 | A |
5240011 | Assa | Aug 1993 | A |
5261889 | Laine et al. | Nov 1993 | A |
5303714 | Abele et al. | Apr 1994 | A |
5312329 | Beaty et al. | May 1994 | A |
5312331 | Knoepfler | May 1994 | A |
5315992 | Dalton | May 1994 | A |
5334183 | Wuchinich | Aug 1994 | A |
5354287 | Wacks | Oct 1994 | A |
5385606 | Kowanko | Jan 1995 | A |
5423830 | Schneebaum et al. | Jun 1995 | A |
5472017 | Kovalcheck | Dec 1995 | A |
5479938 | Weier | Jan 1996 | A |
5484401 | Rodriguez et al. | Jan 1996 | A |
5514536 | Taylor | May 1996 | A |
5522819 | Graves et al. | Jun 1996 | A |
5526821 | Jamshidi | Jun 1996 | A |
5549551 | Peacock et al. | Aug 1996 | A |
5549904 | Juergensen et al. | Aug 1996 | A |
5599294 | Edwards et al. | Feb 1997 | A |
5660175 | Dayal | Aug 1997 | A |
5660185 | Shmulewitz et al. | Aug 1997 | A |
5697365 | Pel | Dec 1997 | A |
5735264 | Siczek et al. | Apr 1998 | A |
5736132 | Juergensen et al. | Apr 1998 | A |
5750657 | Edwardson et al. | May 1998 | A |
5762070 | Nagamatsu | Jun 1998 | A |
5846235 | Pasricha et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
5875692 | Lin | Mar 1999 | A |
5895417 | Pomeranz et al. | Apr 1999 | A |
5916210 | Winston | Jun 1999 | A |
5916212 | Baust et al. | Jun 1999 | A |
5938635 | Kuhle | Aug 1999 | A |
5954636 | Schwartz et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
5957919 | Laufer | Sep 1999 | A |
5964770 | Flomenblit et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
5972026 | Laufer et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
5978697 | Maytal et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
6066090 | Yoon | May 2000 | A |
6080113 | Heneveld et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
6083255 | Laufer et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
6123665 | Kawano | Sep 2000 | A |
6174323 | Biggs et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6183498 | DeVore et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6196966 | Kerin et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6200333 | Laufer | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6245090 | Gilson et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6258100 | Alferness et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6267732 | Heneveld et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6273907 | Laufer | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6283988 | Laufer et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6283989 | Laufer et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6287290 | Perkins et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6287304 | Eggers et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6293951 | Alferness et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6299633 | Laufer | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6306141 | Jervis | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6310166 | Hickey et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6312428 | Eggers et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6315737 | Skinner | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6328689 | Gonzalez et al. | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6328701 | Terwilliger | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6352503 | Matsui et al. | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6379373 | Sawhney et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6387044 | Tachibana et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
6390967 | Forman et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
6398775 | Perkins et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6402701 | Kaplan et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6402754 | Gonzalez | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6402781 | Langberg et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6411852 | Danek et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6416554 | Alferness et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6443944 | Doshi et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6447534 | Cragg et al. | Sep 2002 | B2 |
6464648 | Nakamura | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6474340 | Vaska et al. | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6478730 | Bala et al. | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6485407 | Alferness et al. | Nov 2002 | B2 |
6485436 | Truckai et al. | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6488673 | Laufer et al. | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6491706 | Alferness et al. | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6494844 | Van Bladel et al. | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6494897 | Sterman et al. | Dec 2002 | B2 |
6509031 | Miller et al. | Jan 2003 | B1 |
6514290 | Loomas | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6514522 | Domb | Feb 2003 | B2 |
6527761 | Soltesz et al. | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6537195 | Forman | Mar 2003 | B2 |
6537314 | Langberg et al. | Mar 2003 | B2 |
6540694 | Van Bladel et al. | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6540716 | Holm | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6549800 | Atalar et al. | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6551255 | Van Bladel et al. | Apr 2003 | B2 |
6551302 | Rosinko et al. | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6552172 | Marx et al. | Apr 2003 | B2 |
6558337 | Dvorak et al. | May 2003 | B2 |
6568387 | Davenport et al. | May 2003 | B2 |
6569166 | Gonzalez | May 2003 | B2 |
6577893 | Besson et al. | Jun 2003 | B1 |
6585639 | Kotmel et al. | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6589161 | Corcoran | Jul 2003 | B2 |
6592559 | Pakter et al. | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6592594 | Rimbaugh et al. | Jul 2003 | B2 |
6599311 | Biggs et al. | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6610043 | Ingenito | Aug 2003 | B1 |
6622731 | Daniel et al. | Sep 2003 | B2 |
6629951 | Laufer et al. | Oct 2003 | B2 |
6632222 | Edwards et al. | Oct 2003 | B1 |
6632239 | Snyder et al. | Oct 2003 | B2 |
6632243 | Zadno-Azizi et al. | Oct 2003 | B1 |
6634363 | Danek et al. | Oct 2003 | B1 |
6638275 | McGaffigan et al. | Oct 2003 | B1 |
6652516 | Gough | Nov 2003 | B1 |
6652520 | Moorman et al. | Nov 2003 | B2 |
6653525 | Ingenito et al. | Nov 2003 | B2 |
6663624 | Edwards et al. | Dec 2003 | B2 |
6679264 | Deem et al. | Jan 2004 | B1 |
6682520 | Ingenito | Jan 2004 | B2 |
6685626 | Wironen | Feb 2004 | B2 |
6689072 | Kaplan et al. | Feb 2004 | B2 |
6690976 | Fenn et al. | Feb 2004 | B2 |
6692494 | Cooper et al. | Feb 2004 | B1 |
6694977 | Federowicz et al. | Feb 2004 | B1 |
6694979 | Deem et al. | Feb 2004 | B2 |
6695791 | Gonzalez | Feb 2004 | B2 |
6709401 | Perkins et al. | Mar 2004 | B2 |
6709408 | Fisher | Mar 2004 | B2 |
6709456 | Langberg et al. | Mar 2004 | B2 |
6712812 | Roschak et al. | Mar 2004 | B2 |
6716180 | Fontenot | Apr 2004 | B2 |
6723095 | Hammerslag | Apr 2004 | B2 |
6730044 | Stephens et al. | May 2004 | B2 |
6736822 | McClellan et al. | May 2004 | B2 |
6749606 | Keast et al. | Jun 2004 | B2 |
6752767 | Turovskiy et al. | Jun 2004 | B2 |
6752812 | Truwit | Jun 2004 | B1 |
6758824 | Miller et al. | Jul 2004 | B1 |
6768425 | Flaherty et al. | Jul 2004 | B2 |
6770066 | Weaver et al. | Aug 2004 | B1 |
6770070 | Balbierz | Aug 2004 | B1 |
6789545 | Littrup et al. | Sep 2004 | B2 |
6790172 | Alferness et al. | Sep 2004 | B2 |
6790185 | Fisher et al. | Sep 2004 | B1 |
6797001 | Mathis et al. | Sep 2004 | B2 |
6807446 | Fenn et al. | Oct 2004 | B2 |
6808525 | Latterell et al. | Oct 2004 | B2 |
6814778 | Farnworth | Nov 2004 | B1 |
6817973 | Merril et al. | Nov 2004 | B2 |
6825091 | Bae et al. | Nov 2004 | B2 |
6827086 | Shuman | Dec 2004 | B2 |
6827683 | Otawara | Dec 2004 | B2 |
6830756 | Hnojewyj | Dec 2004 | B2 |
6840243 | Deem et al. | Jan 2005 | B2 |
6840948 | Albrecht et al. | Jan 2005 | B2 |
6840952 | Saker et al. | Jan 2005 | B2 |
6843767 | Corcoran et al. | Jan 2005 | B2 |
6849262 | Ollerenshaw et al. | Feb 2005 | B2 |
6852108 | Barry et al. | Feb 2005 | B2 |
6860847 | Alferness et al. | Mar 2005 | B2 |
6863676 | Lee et al. | Mar 2005 | B2 |
6875209 | Zvuloni et al. | Apr 2005 | B2 |
6878106 | Herrmann | Apr 2005 | B1 |
6878141 | Perkins et al. | Apr 2005 | B1 |
6886558 | Tanaka | May 2005 | B2 |
6901927 | Deem et al. | Jun 2005 | B2 |
6902526 | Katzman | Jun 2005 | B2 |
6902536 | Manna et al. | Jun 2005 | B2 |
6904909 | Andreas et al. | Jun 2005 | B2 |
6907881 | Suki et al. | Jun 2005 | B2 |
6908440 | Fisher | Jun 2005 | B2 |
6918881 | Miller et al. | Jul 2005 | B2 |
6929637 | Gonzalez et al. | Aug 2005 | B2 |
6936014 | Vetter et al. | Aug 2005 | B2 |
6941950 | Wilson et al. | Sep 2005 | B2 |
6942627 | Huitema | Sep 2005 | B2 |
6945942 | Van Bladel et al. | Sep 2005 | B2 |
6962587 | Johnson et al. | Nov 2005 | B2 |
6964662 | Kidooka | Nov 2005 | B2 |
6967673 | Ozawa et al. | Nov 2005 | B2 |
6979344 | Jones et al. | Dec 2005 | B2 |
6986737 | Suzuki et al. | Jan 2006 | B2 |
6997189 | Biggs et al. | Feb 2006 | B2 |
6997918 | Soltesz et al. | Feb 2006 | B2 |
7011094 | Rapacki et al. | Mar 2006 | B2 |
7022088 | Keast et al. | Apr 2006 | B2 |
7033387 | Zadno-Azizi et al. | Apr 2006 | B2 |
7036509 | Rapacki et al. | May 2006 | B2 |
7063682 | Whayne et al. | Jun 2006 | B1 |
7100616 | Springmeyer | Sep 2006 | B2 |
7112225 | Ginn | Sep 2006 | B2 |
7128747 | Ginn | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7141046 | Perkins et al. | Nov 2006 | B2 |
7165548 | Deem et al. | Jan 2007 | B2 |
7175619 | Koblish et al. | Feb 2007 | B2 |
7195017 | Tanaka | Mar 2007 | B2 |
7198635 | Danek et al. | Apr 2007 | B2 |
7300428 | Ingenito | Nov 2007 | B2 |
7351202 | Long | Apr 2008 | B2 |
7393330 | Keast et al. | Jul 2008 | B2 |
7393363 | Ginn | Jul 2008 | B2 |
7445010 | Kugler et al. | Nov 2008 | B2 |
7451765 | Adler | Nov 2008 | B2 |
7503931 | Kowalsky et al. | Mar 2009 | B2 |
7517320 | Wibowo et al. | Apr 2009 | B2 |
7549984 | Mathis | Jun 2009 | B2 |
7608579 | Gong et al. | Oct 2009 | B2 |
7662181 | Deem et al. | Feb 2010 | B2 |
7670282 | Mathis | Mar 2010 | B2 |
7731651 | Pearce et al. | Jun 2010 | B2 |
7757691 | Reynolds et al. | Jul 2010 | B2 |
7766891 | McGurk et al. | Aug 2010 | B2 |
7766895 | Soltesz et al. | Aug 2010 | B2 |
7766938 | McGurk et al. | Aug 2010 | B2 |
7775968 | Mathis | Aug 2010 | B2 |
8142455 | Thompson et al. | Mar 2012 | B2 |
8157823 | Aronson et al. | Apr 2012 | B2 |
8157837 | Thompson et al. | Apr 2012 | B2 |
8282660 | Thompson et al. | Oct 2012 | B2 |
20010051799 | Ingenito | Dec 2001 | A1 |
20020026188 | Balbierz et al. | Feb 2002 | A1 |
20020042564 | Cooper et al. | Apr 2002 | A1 |
20020042565 | Cooper et al. | Apr 2002 | A1 |
20020062120 | Perkins et al. | May 2002 | A1 |
20020077593 | Perkins et al. | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020091379 | Danek et al. | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20020111620 | Cooper et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020112729 | DeVore et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020128647 | Roschak et al. | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20020138074 | Keast et al. | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20020161392 | Dubrul | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020161399 | Cruise et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020176893 | Wironen et al. | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20020183244 | Ollerenshaw et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20020183838 | Liddicoat et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20020188171 | Alferness et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20030018318 | Melsky | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030029452 | Suki et al. | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030050648 | Alferness et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030051733 | Kotmel et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030055331 | Kotmel et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030069488 | Alferness et al. | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030070676 | Cooper et al. | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030070682 | Wilson et al. | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030070683 | Deem et al. | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030075170 | Deem et al. | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030083671 | Rimbaugh et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
20030100921 | Addis et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
20030109866 | Edwards et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030127090 | Gifford et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030130657 | Tom et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030154988 | DeVore et al. | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20030158515 | Gonzalez et al. | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20030159700 | Laufer et al. | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20030181356 | Ingenito | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20030181922 | Alferness | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20030183235 | Rimbaugh et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030191496 | Edwards et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030192551 | Deem et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030195385 | DeVore | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030195511 | Barry | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030212337 | Sirokman | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20030212412 | Dillard et al. | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20030233099 | Danaek et al. | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20040010209 | Sirokman | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040010289 | Biggs et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040024356 | Tanaka | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040030262 | Fisher et al. | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040031494 | Danek et al. | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040038868 | Ingenito | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040040555 | Tanaka | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040049187 | Burnett et al. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040052850 | Schankereli | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040055606 | Hendricksen et al. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040059263 | De Vore et al. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040063613 | Rolke et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040072756 | Wilkie et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040073155 | Laufer et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040073191 | Soltesz et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040073201 | Cooper et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040073207 | Ginn | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040073241 | Barry et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040078054 | Biggs et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040081676 | Schankereli et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040120849 | Stewart et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040133168 | Salcudean et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040134487 | Deem et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040154621 | Deem et al. | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20040158228 | Perkins | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20040172058 | Edwards et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040176801 | Edwards et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040176833 | Pavenik et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040210248 | Gordon et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040211434 | Loomas et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040220556 | Cooper et al. | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20040225254 | Tanaka et al. | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20040231674 | Tanaka | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20040234575 | Horres et al. | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20040237966 | Tanaka | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20040244802 | Tanaka | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20040244803 | Tanaka | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20040267277 | Zannis et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050004599 | McNally-Heintzelman et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050015106 | Perkins et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050033310 | Alferness et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050033344 | Dillard et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050043751 | Phan et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050043752 | Phan et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050049615 | Cooper et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050051163 | Deem et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050056292 | Cooper | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050060041 | Phan et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050060042 | Phan et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050060044 | Roschak et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050061322 | Freitag | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050085801 | Cooper et al. | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050096529 | Cooper et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20050101836 | Onuki et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20050103340 | Wondka | May 2005 | A1 |
20050107783 | Tom et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20050119614 | Mesky | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050131339 | Makin et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050137518 | Biggs et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050137611 | Escudero et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050137712 | Biggs et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050137715 | Phan et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050145253 | Wilson et al. | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050148902 | Minar et al. | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050166925 | Wilson et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050171396 | Pankratov et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050177144 | Phan et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050178389 | Shaw et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050192526 | Biggs et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050196344 | McCutcheon et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050244401 | Ingenito | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20050281739 | Gong et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20050281740 | Gong et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20050281796 | Gong et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20050281797 | Gong et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20050281798 | Gong et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20050281799 | Gong et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20050281800 | Gong et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20050281801 | Gong et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20050281802 | Gong et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20050282748 | Gong et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20050288684 | Aronson et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20050288702 | McGurk et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20060004388 | Whayne et al. | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060004400 | McGurk et al. | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060009748 | Mathis | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060020243 | Speck et al. | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060025815 | McGurk et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060029548 | Pelleg et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060030863 | Fields et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060032497 | Doshi | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060076023 | Rapacki et al. | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060095002 | Soltesz et al. | May 2006 | A1 |
20060100666 | Wilkinson et al. | May 2006 | A1 |
20060116749 | Willink et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060118126 | Tanaka | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060124126 | Tanaka | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060135947 | Soltesz et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060135984 | Kramer et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060162731 | Wondka et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060167416 | Mathis et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060200076 | Gonzalez et al. | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060206147 | DeVore et al. | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060235432 | DeVore et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060235467 | DeVore et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060249164 | Springmeyer | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060264772 | Aljuri et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060276807 | Keast et al. | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20060280772 | Roschak et al. | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20060280773 | Roschak et al. | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20060283462 | Fields et al. | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20070005083 | Sabanathan et al. | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070096048 | Clerc | May 2007 | A1 |
20070221230 | Thompson et al. | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20080036763 | Chen et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080063693 | Cook et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080161865 | Hagen | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080183204 | Greenhalgh et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080200797 | Kotmel et al. | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20090012626 | Thompson et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090076622 | Thompson et al. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090076623 | Mathis et al. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090104183 | Gong et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090221967 | Thommen et al. | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20090306644 | Mayse et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20100070050 | Mathis et al. | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100100196 | Thompson et al. | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100305715 | Mathis et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2840796 | Dec 2003 | FR |
2324729 | Nov 1998 | GB |
H04-22908 | Feb 1992 | JP |
9401508 | Jan 1994 | WO |
9801084 | Jan 1998 | WO |
0013592 | Mar 2000 | WO |
0113839 | Mar 2001 | WO |
0154618 | Aug 2001 | WO |
0200270 | Jan 2002 | WO |
0200275 | Jan 2002 | WO |
0202158 | Jan 2002 | WO |
03077768 | Sep 2003 | WO |
2004062505 | Jul 2004 | WO |
2004086977 | Oct 2004 | WO |
2005122870 | Dec 2005 | WO |
2007106495 | Sep 2007 | WO |
2008036763 | Mar 2008 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Hermanson, Greg T. Bioconjugate Techniques. San Diego: Academic Press, Inc. 1996. (Table of contents only). |
Lam, et al. X-Ray Diagnosis: A Physician's Approach. Singapore: Springer. 1998. (Table of contents only). |
Rowe, et al. Handbook of Pharmaceutical Excipients. 4th Edition. London: Pharmaceutical Press. 2003. (Table of contents only). |
Slone, et al. Body CT: A Practical Approach. New York: McGraw-Hill. 2000. (Table of contents only). |
Stout, et al. X-Ray Structure Determination: A Practical Guide. 2nd Edition. New York: John Wiley & Sons. 1989. (Table of contents only). |
The United States Pharmacopeia. 29th Revision. 2006. The United States Pharmacopeia Convention. Rockville, MD. (Table of contents only). |
Supplementary European Search Report of EP Application No. 07752999.8, mailed Sep. 22, 2009, 12 pages total. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion of PCT Application No. PCT/US2009/056839, mailed on Jan. 4, 2010, 15 pages total. |
International Search Report of PCT Application No. PCT/US07/06339, dated May 14, 2008, 5 pages total. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion of PCT Application No. PCT/US2010/035297, mailed Jul. 20, 2010, 14 pages total. |
O'Brien et al. “Improvements in Lung Function, Exercise, and Quality of Life in Hypercapnic COPD Patients After Lung Volume Reduction Surgery”. Chest 115 (1999): 75-84. |
Quint et al. “Diaphragmetic Shape Change After Lung Volume Reduction Surgery”. Journal of Thoracic Imaging 16 (2001):149-155. |
Yusen et al. “A Prospective Evaluation of Lung Volume Reduction Surgery in 200 Consecutive Patients.” Chest 123 (2003):1026-1037. |
Office Action for Japanese Patent Application No. 2009-500440, May 11, 2012, 3 pages. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20130102887 A1 | Apr 2013 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
60743471 | Mar 2006 | US | |
60884804 | Jan 2007 | US | |
60885305 | Jan 2007 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 12167167 | Jul 2008 | US |
Child | 13618986 | US | |
Parent | PCT/US2007/006339 | Mar 2007 | US |
Child | 12167167 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 11422047 | Jun 2006 | US |
Child | PCT/US2007/006339 | US |