1. Field of the Invention
This invention relates to methods of modifying properties of polymer stents with radiation.
This invention relates to radially expandable endoprostheses, which are adapted to be implanted in a bodily lumen. An “endoprosthesis” corresponds to an artificial device that is placed inside the body. A “lumen” refers to a cavity of a tubular organ such as a blood vessel.
A stent is an example of such an endoprosthesis. Stents are generally cylindrically shaped devices, which function to hold open and sometimes expand a segment of a blood vessel or other anatomical lumen such as urinary tracts and bile ducts. Stents are often used in the treatment of atherosclerotic stenosis in blood vessels. “Stenosis” refers to a narrowing or constriction of the diameter of a bodily passage or orifice. In such treatments, stents reinforce body vessels and prevent restenosis following angioplasty in the vascular system. “Restenosis” refers to the reoccurrence of stenosis in a blood vessel or heart valve after it has been treated (as by balloon angioplasty, stenting, or valvuloplasty) with apparent success.
The treatment of a diseased site or lesion with a stent involves both delivery and deployment of the stent. “Delivery” refers to introducing and transporting the stent through a bodily lumen to a region, such as a lesion, in a vessel that requires treatment. “Deployment” corresponds to the expanding of the stent within the lumen at the treatment region. Delivery and deployment of a stent are accomplished by positioning the stent about one end of a catheter, inserting the end of the catheter through the skin into a bodily lumen, advancing the catheter in the bodily lumen to a desired treatment location, expanding the stent at the treatment location, and removing the catheter from the lumen.
In the case of a balloon expandable stent, the stent is mounted about a balloon disposed on the catheter. Mounting the stent typically involves compressing or crimping the stent onto the balloon. The stent is then expanded by inflating the balloon. The balloon may then be deflated and the catheter withdrawn. In the case of a self-expanding stent, the stent may be secured to the catheter via a retractable sheath or a sock. When the stent is in a desired bodily location, the sheath may be withdrawn which allows the stent to self-expand.
The stent must be able to satisfy a number of mechanical requirements. First, the stent must be capable of withstanding the structural loads, namely radial compressive forces, imposed on the stent as it supports the walls of a vessel. Therefore, a stent must possess adequate radial strength. Radial strength, which is the ability of a stent to resist radial compressive forces, is due to strength and rigidity around a circumferential direction of the stent. Once expanded, the stent must adequately maintain its size and shape throughout its service life despite the various forces that may come to bear on it, including the cyclic loading induced by the beating heart. For example, a radially directed force may tend to cause a stent to recoil inward. Due to loads applied during crimping, deployment, and after deployment a stent can experience substantial stress of localized portions of the stent's structure.
In addition, the stent must possess sufficient flexibility to allow for crimping, expansion, and cyclic loading. Longitudinal flexibility is important to allow the stent to be maneuvered through a tortuous vascular path and to enable it to conform to a deployment site that may not be linear or may be subject to flexure.
The structure of a stent is typically composed of scaffolding that includes a pattern or network of interconnecting structural elements often referred to in the art as struts or bar arms. The scaffolding can be formed from wires, tubes, or sheets of material rolled into a cylindrical shape. The scaffolding is designed so that the stent can be radially compressed (to allow crimping) and radially expanded (to allow deployment). A conventional stent is allowed to expand and contract through movement of individual structural elements of a pattern with respect to each other.
Additionally, a medicated stent may be fabricated by coating the surface of either a metallic or polymeric scaffolding with a polymeric carrier that includes an active or bioactive agent or drug. Polymeric scaffolding may also serve as a carrier of an active agent or drug.
Furthermore, it may be desirable for a stent to be biodegradable. In many treatment applications, the presence of a stent in a body may be necessary for a limited period of time until its intended function of, for example, maintaining vascular patency and/or drug delivery is accomplished. Therefore, stents fabricated from biodegradable, bioabsorbable, and/or bioerodable materials such as bioabsorbable polymers should be configured to completely erode only after the clinical need for them has ended.
In general, it would be desirable to tailor the properties of a stent and stent coating to a desired treatment. For example, may be desirable to modify the degradation rate and drug release rate of a stent substrate or coating.
Certain embodiments of the present invention include a method of modifying a stent comprising: selecting a desired drug release rate or a degradation rate for a polymer on a stent surface; and exposing the stent to a dose of radiation capable of modifying the molecular weight of a polymer on a stent, wherein the dose modifies the molecular weight of the polymer to obtain the selected drug release rate or degradation rate.
Further embodiments of the present invention include a method of modifying a stent comprising: selecting a drug release rate or a degradation rate for a polymer of a stent; determining a range of molecular weight of the polymer to obtain the selected drug release rate or degradation rate; determining a dose of radiation exposure on the polymer sufficient so that the polymer is within the determined range of molecular weight; and exposing the coating to the determined dose of radiation.
Other embodiments of the present invention include a method of modifying a stent, comprising: selectively exposing a selected region of a surface of a stent including a polymer to a dose of radiation capable of modifying the molecular weight of the polymer, the dose of radiation modifying a drug release rate and/or a degradation of the polymer in the selected region.
Additional embodiments of the present invention include a method of modifying a stent, comprising: selectively exposing a selected region of a surface of a stent including a polymer to a dose of radiation capable of modifying the molecular weight of the polymer, the dose of radiation modifying a property of the polymer.
Further embodiments of the present invention include a method of modifying a stent, comprising: selectively directing a dose of radiation from a radiation source onto a selected region of a polymer surface of a stent, the radiation capable of modifying molecular weight of the polymer, the dose of radiation modifying properties of the polymer.
Additional embodiments of the present invention include a method of modifying a stent, comprising: disposing a mask over a surface of a stent including a polymer, the mask covering selected regions of the surface of the stent; and exposing the stent to a dose of radiation capable of modifying the molecular weight of the polymer, wherein the mask reduces or prevents exposure of the selected regions to the radiation, the radiation modifying a property of the polymer on at least a portion of the stent surface not covered by the mask.
The various embodiments of the present invention relate to modifying properties of a polymer stent by modifying the molecular weight or molecular weight distribution of the polymer of a stent. Embodiments of methods disclosed include modifying the molecular weight of a polymer of a stent by exposing a surface of a stent to a dose of radiation that is capable of modifying the molecular weight of the polymer. The polymer may be in a polymer substrate, scaffolding, or body of a stent. Additionally, the polymer may be in a coating disposed over a substrate, scaffolding, or body composed of metal, polymer, ceramic, or other suitable material. The polymer coating can be medicated with a drug dispersed with the polymer.
The molecular weight can be measured or characterized by molecular weight distribution(s). “Molecular weight distribution” is defined as the relative amounts of polymer chains of different molecular weights that make up a specific polymer. The number average molecular weight (Mn) is the common, mean, average of the molecular weights of the individual polymers. It is determined by measuring the molecular weight of N polymer molecules, summing the weights, and dividing by N:
where Ni is the number of polymer molecules with molecular weight Mi. The weight average molecular weight is given by
where Ni is the number of molecules of molecular weight Mi.
The present invention can be applied to devices including, but is not limited to, self-expandable stents, balloon-expandable stents, stent-grafts, and grafts (e.g., aortic grafts). In particular, a stent can have a scaffolding or a substrate that includes a pattern of a plurality of interconnecting structural elements or struts.
A pattern may include portions of struts that are straight or relatively straight, an example being a portion 150. In addition, patterns may include curved portions 155, 160, and 165. Curved portions are a part of bending elements that bend inward when a stent is crimped to allow for radial compression and bend outward when a stent is expanded to allow for radial expansion. After deployment, a stent is under static and cyclic compressive loads from the vessel walls. Thus, curved portions of bending elements are subjected to stress and deformation during use. In particular, the curved portions of the bending elements are subjected to highly localized stress and deformation during use. “Use” includes, but is not limited to, manufacturing, assembling (e.g., crimping stent on a catheter), delivery of stent into and through a bodily lumen to a treatment site, and deployment of a stent at a treatment site, and treatment after deployment.
A stent such as stent 100 may be fabricated from a polymeric tube or a sheet by rolling and bonding the sheet to form a tube. A stent pattern may be formed on a polymeric tube by laser cutting a pattern on the tube. Representative examples of lasers that may be used include, but are not limited to, excimer, carbon dioxide, and YAG. In other embodiments, chemical etching may be used to form a pattern on a tube.
The underlying structure or substrate of a stent can be completely or at least in part made from a biodegradable polymer or combination of biodegradable polymers, a biostable polymer or combination of biostable polymers, or a combination of biodegradable and biostable polymers. Additionally, a polymer-based coating for a surface of a device can be a biodegradable polymer or combination of biodegradable polymers, a biostable polymer or combination of biostable polymers, or a combination of biodegradable and biostable polymers. The polymer-based coating can be a medicated layer with a drug mixed or dispersed within the polymer. Drug can be released from the coating by diffusion of the drug through and out of the coating into an implanted vessel. Alternatively or additionally, drug can be released from biodegradable coating polymer as the polymer degrades and erodes.
Several mechanisms may be relied upon for erosion and disintegration of implantable devices including, but are not limited to, mechanical, chemical breakdown and dissolution. In particular, degradation of polymers involves chemical breakdown involving enzymatic and/or hydrolytic cleavage of a device material due to exposure to bodily fluids such as blood. Hydrolysis is a chemical process in which a molecule is cleaved into two parts by the addition of a molecule of water. For example, in the degradation of polylactides, ester linkages can be broken through addition of water to form a degradation product having an acid group. Consequently, the degree of degradation in the bulk of a polymer is strongly dependent on the concentration of water in a polymer and the diffusion rate of water into the polymer.
The degradation rate may be characterized by the half-life of a polymer. The “half-life” of a degrading polymer refers to the length of time for the molecular weight of the polymer to fall to one half of its original value. See e.g., J. C. Middleton and A. J. Tipton, Biomaterials, Vol. 21 (23) (2000) pp. 2335-2346.
Degradation time refers to the time for a biodegradable coating on an implantable medical device or the time for an implantable medical device to substantially or completely erode away from an implant site. It is generally desirable for a biodegradable stent or stent coating to disintegrate and disappear once treatment is completed. For stents made from a biodegradable polymer, the stent or coating is intended to remain in the body for a duration of time until its intended function of, for example, maintaining vascular patency and/or drug delivery is accomplished. The duration of a treatment period depends on the bodily disorder that is being treated. For illustrative purposes only, the duration can be up to a month, three months, six months, twelve months, eighteen months, or two years.
It is understood that after the process of degradation, erosion, absorption, and/or resorption has been completed, no part of the stent will remain or in the case of coating applications on a biostable scaffolding, no polymer will remain on the device. In some embodiments, very negligible traces or residue may be left behind.
An exemplary polymer-drug coating on a polymer substrate includes a poly(DL-lactide) coating on a poly(L-lactide) substrate. An exemplary polymer-coating on a metallic substrate includes a polyester amide coating over a nitinol substrate.
As indicated above, it is desirable to tailor the properties of a substrate and stent coating. For example, the degradation rate of a polymer substrate or coating can be modified by including materials within a coating or substrate such as pore-forming agents or substances with degradation products that increase the degradation rate of the substrate or coating. Additionally, the mechanical properties of a substrate or coating can be modified by incorporating plasticizers in the coating or substrate. However, it would be desirable to modify the properties of a substrate or coating without the addition of additives.
In certain embodiments, the properties of a polymer coating or polymer substrate can be modified by exposing the polymer surface of the stent to radiation capable of modifying the molecular weight or molecular weight distribution of the polymer. In general, the properties of a polymer depend upon the molecular weight and molecular weight distribution. Properties that can be modified by modifying the molecular weight or molecular weight distribution of a polymer include, but are not limited to, degradation rate, permeability, diffusion rate of substances through the polymer, and mechanical properties such as modulus and strength. Since the degradation rate of a polymer, diffusion rate, and permeability are modified, the drug release rate from a polymer-drug coating is also modified.
Various kinds of radiation may be used to modify the molecular weight of a polymer of a stent, including, but not limited to, electron beam (e-beam), ion beam, x-ray, laser, and ultraviolet. Each of these types of radiation can cause chain scission in polymers which decreases the molecular weight. E-beam can cause chain scission with exposures at least between 5 kGy and 10 kGy. Ion beams can cause chain scission in the range of 4×10−14 to 1.2×10−14 ions/cm2. An IR-laser is expected to cause chain scission with a pulse power of 1 W/cm2 for 0.1 seconds.
For example, e-beam has been shown to cause chain scission in poly(DL-lactide) (PDLA). Specifically, e-beam radiation can cleave the labile ester bond in PDLA. A poly(L-lactide) (PLLA) tube with a PDLA coating was exposed to doses of e-beam radiation up 50 kGy. The Mn of the PDLA coating was determined at each level of exposure. A plot of e-beam radiation dose versus 1/Mn shows that the molecular weight of the PDLA coating is inversely proportional to radiation dose. Additionally, UV and x-ray radiation can also cleave the labile ester bond in PDLA. Furthermore, a laser may be used to modify the molecular weight of a polymer. The power of the laser should be high enough to cause chain scission without vaporizing the polymer. For example, an infra-read laser may be used.
The decrease in the molecular weight or Mn tends to cause an increase in the degradation rate for several reasons. Chain scission results in a larger number of smaller chain segments, many of which have acid end groups that can accelerate a hydrolysis degradation reaction. In addition, lower molecular weight polymers are closer to the final degradation products. Also, lower the molecular weight species tend to be more soluble. In addition, permeability of a polymer also increases as molecular weight decreases. As a result, there is an increase in uptake in water which increases the degradation rate through increased hydrolysis.
A decrease in molecular weight can cause an increase in drug release rate due to the increase in degradation rate and the increased permeability and diffusion of the drug through the polymer. Drug release from a stent structure can be controlled by degradation when degradation or absorption rate of the coating or substrate polymer is greater than the diffusion rate of the drug through the polymer. As a biodegradable polymer degrades or is absorbed into the body, a drug incorporated into the stent may be simultaneously released from the stent. Thus, drug release in tends to follow degradation kinetics of the polymer. It follows that drug release kinetics can be tuned or controlled by degradation rate of a coating or substrate.
Furthermore, it is well known to those of skill in the art that mechanical properties of a polymer depend on molecular weight. For example, as a polymer degrades by hydrolysis, the molecular weight decreases which is accompanied by a decrease in modulus and strength of the polymer.
Thus, radiation capable of modifying molecular weight of a polymer of a stent can be used to tailor the degradation, drug release, and mechanical properties of a polymer substrate or coating. In certain embodiments, a method of modifying a stent can include selecting a desired degradation rate, drug release rate, or value of a mechanical property for a polymer of a stent substrate or stent coating. The stent may then be exposed to a dose which can modify the molecular weight of the polymer to obtain the selected drug release rate, degradation rate, or value of mechanical property.
In some embodiments, determining the radiation dose to obtain the selected property can include determining a relationship between the molecular weight and the property. For example, the degradation rate or half-life of a polymer can be determined for various values of Mn. From the relationship of Mn and the property, an Mn range or Mn can be identified that results in the selected property, for example, a selected half-life. A radiation dose sufficient to obtain the selected property can be identified from the Mn identified and a relationship between the radiation dose and Mn.
It may be desirable to expose a polymer substrate to a different degree of radiation than a polymer coating over the substrate, since it may be desirable to modify properties of a polymer substrate to a different degree than a polymer coating. For example, it may be desirable to increase the degradation rate of the substrate to a greater degree than the coating. In some embodiments, a polymer substrate can be modified through exposure to radiation prior to applying a polymer coating. The polymer coating can then be applied and modified, if desired, through exposure to radiation, providing additional exposure and modification to the substrate.
The depth of penetration, and thus modification of the material, depends on the energy of the radiation and on the material. For example, the depth of penetration of a given material depends on the density or atomic structure. The more dense a material, the less the depth of radiation penetration will be. In general, the depth of penetration depends on the absorption of the material which can be determined from Beer's Law.
Additionally, since energy is absorbed as it passes through a material, the radiation intensity tends to decrease with penetration depth. Thus the degree of modification of the material varies with penetration depth. The radiation intensity at a given penetration depth can be increased by increasing the incident energy. Thus, one of skill in the art can modify the radiation energy to control the depth and degree of modification of a polymer material at a given depth.
Furthermore, it can be desirable to selectively modify the molecular weight, and thus, properties, of a stent with radiation. In particular, it can be useful to selectively modify the degradation rate of regions of a stent. Selective modification of degradation rate can enable control over the manner in which mechanical properties of stent degrade. Thus, the manner of failure of a stent can be controlled. In some embodiments, regions may be selectively modified to have a selected degradation rate or degradation time.
A biodegradable stent having different absorption rates on some regions may degrade and fail in a more desirable manner. As discussed above, a bioabsorbable stent is intended to remain in the body for a limited duration of time until its intended purpose has ended. Relatively small particles and/or molecules of stent material are eroded, absorbed, or resorbed due to degradation by bodily fluids and then are carried away by the bodily fluid. Degradation, erosion, absorption, and resorption of stent material result in degradation of the mechanical properties of the stent. The degradation of stent material may cause mechanical failure which may result in structural-sized portions of the stent separating from one another. The presence of such structural-sized portions may cause problems in a bodily lumen such as thrombosis and blockage. The smaller the size of such portions and the more uniform the mechanical failure of the stent, the lower the risk of such complications.
Thus, the selective modification of degradation rate can depend on the mechanical requirements of different portions. In one embodiment, regions of a stent having no or relatively no stress or strain can be selectively exposed to radiation to increase the degradation rate. As indicated above, mechanical requirements of a stent vary through the scaffolding. The curved regions of bending elements such as portions 155, 160, 165 are subjected to substantial stress ands strain during and after deployment. Straight portions, such as portion 150, experience no or relatively no stress or strain.
Additionally, curved regions 310 can be exposed to radiation to tune the degradation time corresponding to a selected treatment situation. In some situations, the curved regions can be modified to have a degradation rate that is faster or slower than the straight regions. In some embodiments, different regions of the stent, such as the curved regions and straight regions, can be exposed to different amounts of radiation to obtain a desired result for both the types of regions.
In some embodiments, to facilitate uniform disintegration during a selected time frame, intersections of struts can be targeted for selective exposure to radiation. For example, portions 155 and 160 include intersections of struts.
In additional embodiments, a stent can selectively exposed to radiation so that the degradation rate varies axially or longitudinally along a stent. For example, a stent can be exposed to radiation so that a proximal and distal end of the stent can have a different degradation rate than a middle section. In long lesions, the center portion of the lesion may be more pronounced than the ends of the lesion.
In other embodiments, multiple axial sections can be exposed to radiation to make the modulus and degradation rate different in the adjacent axial sections. In one embodiment, the properties of the axial section can alternate, increase or decrease along the length of the stent, or be random.
A stent having axial segments with different degradation rates and modulus can exhibit more flexibility. The increase in flexibility may be more significant when the degradation rates and moduli of the axial segments alternate. The increase in flexibility facilitates delivery of the stent through tortuous bodily lumen or implantation in an implant site that is nonlinear or that exhibits curvature. In some embodiments, as a stent degrades, the difference in mechanical properties can become more pronounced.
Various methods may be used to selectively expose regions of a stent to radiation capable of modifying molecular weight. In some embodiments, a dose of radiation can be selectively directed from a radiation source onto a selected region of a polymer surface of a stent. A system for selectively directing radiation from a radiation source onto a selected region of a stent can be adapted from a controlled deposition system that applies various substances only to certain targeted portions of an implantable medical device, such as a stent. A representative example of such a system, and a method of using the same, is described in U.S. Pat. No. 6,395,326 to Castro et al. A laser machining system for cutting stent patterns can also be adapted to selective radiation exposure of a stent. Systems for laser machining stents have been described in numerous patents including U.S. Pat. Nos. 6,521,865 and 6,131,266.
Various kinds of radiation can be selectively directed onto a stent surface including ultraviolet, ion-beam, and laser. A selective radiation system can be capable of directing radiation onto a stent surface having a complex geometry, and otherwise directing the radiation so that the treatment is limited to particular portions of the stent.
Additional embodiments of selectively exposing regions of a stent to radiation can include masking selected regions of a stent to radiation. In some embodiments, a mask may be disposed over a polymer surface of a stent such that the mask covers selected regions of the polymer surface. The stent may then be exposed to a dose of radiation capable of modifying the molecular weight of polymer of the stent. The mask can reduce or prevent exposure of the selected regions to the radiation. The radiation can modify properties of the polymer on and beneath at least a portion of the stent surface not covered by the mask.
In some embodiments, a mask can be disposed within a stent to cover a luminal polymer surface of a stent. The inner mask can reduce or prevent exposure of regions of the inner surface due to radiation passing through gaps between stent struts. In an embodiment, an outer and inner mask can be cylindrical and be configured to fit over an abluminal surface and over an luminal surface, respectively, of a stent.
In one embodiment, the inner or luminal mask can be the same or similar to the outer mask, but having a different diameter. In other embodiments, the inner mask can be configured to cover all or a majority of an inner surface of a stent. Additional embodiments can include directing a radiation source to expose an inner surface of the stent. For example, the radiation source can directed through one or both ends of the stent. In some embodiments, the abluminal surface can be exposed to radiation and the luminal surface not exposed. Alternatively, the inner surface can be exposed and the inner surface exposed. Additionally, the abluminal surface can be exposed to a different degree of radiation than the luminal surface. Thus, the abluminal surface can have a greater or lesser degradation rate (and greater or lesser drug release rate) than the luminal surface.
The mask can be composed of any material that can shield the covered portions of the stent surface from the radiation. The mask can be composed of a polymer, metal, ceramic, or a combination thereof. Metals are generally more effective at shielding radiation such as e-beam, UV, x-ray, and ion beam. A shield that is a combination of metal and polymer and/or ceramics should have sufficient metallic content to shield the radiation.
In general, the structure of a mask can take any form that allows exposure to selected regions of a stent surface where exposure is desired to radiation directed at the stent, while reducing or preventing exposure to regions where exposure is not desired. In one embodiment, the mask can be cylindrical with at least two ring elements connected by linking or connecting elements. The structure of the mask can be configured to allow selective exposure to regions described in
Polymers can be biostable, bioabsorbable, biodegradable or bioerodable. Biostable refers to polymers that are not biodegradable. The terms biodegradable, bioabsorbable, and bioerodable are used interchangeably and refer to polymers that are capable of being completely degraded and/or eroded when exposed to bodily fluids such as blood and can be gradually resorbed, absorbed, and/or eliminated by the body. The processes of breaking down and eventual absorption and elimination of the polymer can be caused by, for example, hydrolysis, metabolic processes, bulk or surface erosion, and the like.
It is understood that after the process of degradation, erosion, absorption, and/or resorption has been completed, no part of the stent will remain or in the case of coating applications on a biostable scaffolding, no polymer will remain on the device. In some embodiments, very negligible traces or residue may be left behind. For stents made from a biodegradable polymer, the stent is intended to remain in the body for a duration of time until its intended function of, for example, maintaining vascular patency and/or drug delivery is accomplished.
Representative examples of polymers that may be used to fabricate or coat an implantable medical device include, but are not limited to, poly(N-acetylglucosamine) (Chitin), Chitosan, poly(hydroxyvalerate), poly(lactide-co-glycolide), poly(hydroxybutyrate), poly(hydroxybutyrate-co-valerate), polyorthoester, polyanhydride, poly(glycolic acid), poly(glycolide), poly(L-lactic acid), poly(L-lactide), poly(D,L-lactic acid), poly(D,L-lactide), poly(caprolactone), poly(trimethylene carbonate), polyester amide, poly(glycolic acid-co-trimethylene carbonate), co-poly(ether-esters) (e.g. PEO/PLA), polyphosphazenes, biomolecules (such as fibrin, fibrinogen, cellulose, starch, collagen and hyaluronic acid), polyurethanes, silicones, polyesters, polyolefins, polyisobutylene and ethylene-alphaolefin copolymers, acrylic polymers and copolymers other than polyacrylates, vinyl halide polymers and copolymers (such as polyvinyl chloride), polyvinyl ethers (such as polyvinyl methyl ether), polyvinylidene halides (such as polyvinylidene chloride), polyacrylonitrile, polyvinyl ketones, polyvinyl aromatics (such as polystyrene), polyvinyl esters (such as polyvinyl acetate), acrylonitrile-styrene copolymers, ABS resins, polyamides (such as Nylon 66 and polycaprolactam), polycarbonates, polyoxymethylenes, polyimides, polyethers, polyurethanes, rayon, rayon-triacetate, cellulose, cellulose acetate, cellulose butyrate, cellulose acetate butyrate, cellophane, cellulose nitrate, cellulose propionate, cellulose ethers, and carboxymethyl cellulose. Another type of polymer based on poly(lactic acid) that can be used includes graft copolymers, and block copolymers, such as AB block-copolymers (“diblock-copolymers”) or ABA block-copolymers (“triblock-copolymers”), or mixtures thereof.
Additional representative examples of polymers that may be especially well suited for use in fabricating or coating an implantable medical device include ethylene vinyl alcohol copolymer (commonly known by the generic name EVOH or by the trade name EVAL), poly(butyl methacrylate), poly(vinylidene'fluoride-co-hexafluororpropene) (e.g., SOLEF 21508, available from Solvay Solexis PVDF, Thorofare, N.J.), polyvinylidene fluoride (otherwise known as KYNAR, available from ATOFINA Chemicals, Philadelphia, Pa.), ethylene-vinyl acetate copolymers, and polyethylene glycol.
A non-polymer substrate of the stent may be made of a metallic material or an alloy such as, but not limited to, cobalt chromium alloy (ELGILOY), stainless steel (316L), high nitrogen stainless steel, e.g., BIODUR 108, cobalt chrome alloy L-605, “MP35N,” “MP20N,” ELASTINITE (Nitinol), tantalum, nickel-titanium alloy, platinum-iridium alloy, gold, magnesium, or combinations thereof. “MP35N” and “MP20N” are trade names for alloys of cobalt, nickel, chromium and molybdenum available from Standard Press Steel Co., Jenkintown, Pa. “MP35N” consists of 35% cobalt, 35% nickel, 20% chromium, and 10% molybdenum. “MP20N” consists of 50% cobalt, 20% nickel, 20% chromium, and 10% molybdenum.
Examples of drugs or active agents include antiproliferative substances such as actinomycin D, or derivatives and analogs thereof (manufactured by Sigma-Aldrich 1001 West Saint Paul Avenue, Milwaukee, Wis. 53233; or COSMEGEN available from Merck). Synonyms of actinomycin D include dactinomycin, actinomycin IV, actinomycin I1, actinomycin X1, and actinomycin C1. The bioactive agent can also fall under the genus of antineoplastic, anti-inflammatory, antiplatelet, anticoagulant, antifibrin, antithrombin, antimitotic, antibiotic, antiallergic and antioxidant substances. Examples of such antineoplastics and/or antimitotics include paclitaxel, (e.g., TAXOL® by Bristol-Myers Squibb Co., Stamford, Conn.), docetaxel (e.g., Taxotere®, from Aventis S.A., Frankfurt, Germany), methotrexate, azathioprine, vincristine, vinblastine, fluorouracil, doxorubicin hydrochloride (e.g., Adriamycin® from Pharmacia & Upjohn, Peapack N.J.), and mitomycin (e.g., Mutamycin® from Bristol-Myers Squibb Co., Stamford, Conn.). Examples of such antiplatelets, anticoagulants, antifibrin, and antithrombins include aspirin, sodium heparin, low molecular weight heparins, heparinoids, hirudin, argatroban, forskolin, vapiprost, prostacyclin and prostacyclin analogues, dextran, D-phe-pro-arg-chloromethylketone (synthetic antithrombin), dipyridamole, glycoprotein IIb/IIIa platelet membrane receptor antagonist antibody, recombinant hirudin, and thrombin inhibitors such as Angiomax ä (Biogen, Inc., Cambridge, Mass.). Examples of such cytostatic or antiproliferative agents include angiopeptin, angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors such as captopril (e.g., Capoten® Capoten and Capozide® from Bristol-Myers Squibb Co., Stamford, Conn.), cilazapril or lisinopril (e.g., Prinivil® and Prinzide® from Merck & Co., Inc., Whitehouse Station, N.J.), calcium channel blockers (such as nifedipine), colchicine, proteins, peptides, fibroblast growth factor (FGF) antagonists, fish oil (omega 3-fatty acid), histamine antagonists, lovastatin (an inhibitor of HMG-CoA reductase, a cholesterol lowering drug, brand name Mevacor® from Merck & Co., Inc., Whitehouse Station, N.J.), monoclonal antibodies (such as those specific for Platelet-Derived Growth Factor (PDGF) receptors), nitroprusside, phosphodiesterase inhibitors, prostaglandin inhibitors, suramin, serotonin blockers, steroids, thioprotease inhibitors, triazolopyrimidine (a PDGF antagonist), and nitric oxide. An example of an antiallergic agent is permirolast potassium. Other therapeutic substances or agents which may be appropriate agents include cisplatin, insulin sensitizers, receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors, carboplatin, alpha-interferon, genetically engineered epithelial cells, steroidal anti-inflammatory agents, non-steroidal anti-inflammatory agents, antivirals, anticancer drugs, anticoagulant agents, free radical scavengers, estradiol, antibiotics, nitric oxide donors, super oxide dismutases, super oxide dismutases mimics, 4-amino-2,2,6,6-tetramethylpiperidine-1-oxyl (4-amino-TEMPO), tacrolimus, dexamethasone, ABT-578, clobetasol, cytostatic agents, prodrugs thereof, co-drugs thereof, and a combination thereof. Other therapeutic substances or agents may include rapamycin and structural derivatives or functional analogs thereof, such as 40-O-(2-hydroxy)ethyl-rapamycin (known by the trade name of EVEROLIMUS), 40-O-(3-hydroxy)propyl-rapamycin, 40-O-[2-(2-hydroxy)ethoxy]ethyl-rapamycin, methyl rapamycin, and 40-O-tetrazole-rapamycin.
While particular embodiments of the present invention have been shown and described, it will be obvious to those skilled in the art that changes and modifications can be made without departing from this invention in its broader aspects. Therefore, the appended claims are to encompass within their scope all such changes and modifications as fall within the true spirit and scope of this invention.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3687135 | Stroganov et al. | Aug 1972 | A |
3839743 | Schwarcz | Oct 1974 | A |
3900632 | Robinson | Aug 1975 | A |
4104410 | Malecki | Aug 1978 | A |
4110497 | Hoel | Aug 1978 | A |
4321711 | Mano | Mar 1982 | A |
4346028 | Griffith | Aug 1982 | A |
4596574 | Urist | Jun 1986 | A |
4599085 | Riess et al. | Jul 1986 | A |
4612009 | Drobnik et al. | Sep 1986 | A |
4633873 | Dumican et al. | Jan 1987 | A |
4656083 | Hoffman et al. | Apr 1987 | A |
4718907 | Karwoski et al. | Jan 1988 | A |
4722335 | Vilasi | Feb 1988 | A |
4723549 | Wholey et al. | Feb 1988 | A |
4732152 | Wallstén et al. | Mar 1988 | A |
4733665 | Palmaz | Mar 1988 | A |
4739762 | Palmaz | Apr 1988 | A |
4740207 | Kreamer | Apr 1988 | A |
4743252 | Martin, Jr. et al. | May 1988 | A |
4768507 | Fischell et al. | Sep 1988 | A |
4776337 | Palmaz | Oct 1988 | A |
4800882 | Gianturco | Jan 1989 | A |
4816339 | Tu et al. | Mar 1989 | A |
4818559 | Hama et al. | Apr 1989 | A |
4850999 | Planck | Jul 1989 | A |
4877030 | Beck et al. | Oct 1989 | A |
4878906 | Lindemann et al. | Nov 1989 | A |
4879135 | Greco et al. | Nov 1989 | A |
4886062 | Wiktor | Dec 1989 | A |
4902289 | Yannas | Feb 1990 | A |
4977901 | Ofstead | Dec 1990 | A |
4994298 | Yasuda | Feb 1991 | A |
5019090 | Pinchuk | May 1991 | A |
5028597 | Kodama et al. | Jul 1991 | A |
5059211 | Stack et al. | Oct 1991 | A |
5062829 | Pryor et al. | Nov 1991 | A |
5084065 | Weldon et al. | Jan 1992 | A |
5085629 | Goldberg et al. | Feb 1992 | A |
5100429 | Sinofsky et al. | Mar 1992 | A |
5104410 | Chowdhary | Apr 1992 | A |
5108417 | Sawyer | Apr 1992 | A |
5108755 | Daniels et al. | Apr 1992 | A |
5112457 | Marchant | May 1992 | A |
5123917 | Lee | Jun 1992 | A |
5156623 | Hakamatsuka et al. | Oct 1992 | A |
5163951 | Pinchuk et al. | Nov 1992 | A |
5163952 | Froix | Nov 1992 | A |
5163958 | Pinchuk | Nov 1992 | A |
5167614 | Tessmann et al. | Dec 1992 | A |
5192311 | King et al. | Mar 1993 | A |
5197977 | Hoffman, Jr. et al. | Mar 1993 | A |
5234456 | Silvestrini | Aug 1993 | A |
5234457 | Andersen | Aug 1993 | A |
5236447 | Kubo et al. | Aug 1993 | A |
5279594 | Jackson | Jan 1994 | A |
5282860 | Matsuno et al. | Feb 1994 | A |
5289831 | Bosley | Mar 1994 | A |
5290271 | Jernberg | Mar 1994 | A |
5306286 | Stack et al. | Apr 1994 | A |
5306294 | Winston et al. | Apr 1994 | A |
5328471 | Slepian | Jul 1994 | A |
5330500 | Song | Jul 1994 | A |
5342348 | Kaplan | Aug 1994 | A |
5342395 | Jarrett et al. | Aug 1994 | A |
5342621 | Eury | Aug 1994 | A |
5356433 | Rowland et al. | Oct 1994 | A |
5383925 | Schmitt | Jan 1995 | A |
5385580 | Schmitt | Jan 1995 | A |
5389106 | Tower | Feb 1995 | A |
5399666 | Ford | Mar 1995 | A |
5423885 | Williams | Jun 1995 | A |
5441515 | Khosravi et al. | Aug 1995 | A |
5443458 | Eury et al. | Aug 1995 | A |
5443500 | Sigwart | Aug 1995 | A |
5455040 | Marchant | Oct 1995 | A |
5464650 | Berg et al. | Nov 1995 | A |
5502158 | Sinclair et al. | Mar 1996 | A |
5514379 | Weissleder et al. | May 1996 | A |
5527337 | Stack et al. | Jun 1996 | A |
5545408 | Trigg et al. | Aug 1996 | A |
5554120 | Chen et al. | Sep 1996 | A |
5556413 | Lam | Sep 1996 | A |
5578046 | Liu et al. | Nov 1996 | A |
5578073 | Haimovich et al. | Nov 1996 | A |
5591199 | Porter et al. | Jan 1997 | A |
5591607 | Gryaznov et al. | Jan 1997 | A |
5593403 | Buscemi | Jan 1997 | A |
5593434 | Williams | Jan 1997 | A |
5599301 | Jacobs et al. | Feb 1997 | A |
5599922 | Gryaznov et al. | Feb 1997 | A |
5605696 | Eury et al. | Feb 1997 | A |
5607442 | Fischell et al. | Mar 1997 | A |
5607467 | Froix | Mar 1997 | A |
5618299 | Khosravi et al. | Apr 1997 | A |
5629077 | Turnlund et al. | May 1997 | A |
5631135 | Gryaznov et al. | May 1997 | A |
5632771 | Boatman et al. | May 1997 | A |
5632840 | Campbell | May 1997 | A |
5637113 | Tartaglia et al. | Jun 1997 | A |
5649977 | Campbell | Jul 1997 | A |
5667767 | Greff et al. | Sep 1997 | A |
5667796 | Otten | Sep 1997 | A |
5670558 | Onishi et al. | Sep 1997 | A |
5693085 | Buirge et al. | Dec 1997 | A |
5700286 | Tartaglia et al. | Dec 1997 | A |
5707385 | Williams | Jan 1998 | A |
5711763 | Nonami et al. | Jan 1998 | A |
5716981 | Hunter et al. | Feb 1998 | A |
5725549 | Lam | Mar 1998 | A |
5726297 | Gryaznov et al. | Mar 1998 | A |
5728751 | Patnaik | Mar 1998 | A |
5733326 | Tomonto et al. | Mar 1998 | A |
5733330 | Cox | Mar 1998 | A |
5733564 | Lehtinen | Mar 1998 | A |
5733925 | Kunz et al. | Mar 1998 | A |
5741881 | Patnaik | Apr 1998 | A |
5756457 | Wang et al. | May 1998 | A |
5756476 | Epstein et al. | May 1998 | A |
5765682 | Bley et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5766204 | Porter et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5766239 | Cox | Jun 1998 | A |
5766710 | Turnlund et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5769883 | Buscemi et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5780807 | Saunders | Jul 1998 | A |
5800516 | Fine et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5811447 | Kunz et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5824049 | Ragheb et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
5830178 | Jones et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
5830461 | Billiar | Nov 1998 | A |
5830879 | Isner | Nov 1998 | A |
5833651 | Donovan et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
5834582 | Sinclair et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
5836962 | Gianotti | Nov 1998 | A |
5837313 | Ding et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
5837835 | Gryaznov et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
5840083 | Braach-Maksvytis | Nov 1998 | A |
5851508 | Greff et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
5853408 | Muni | Dec 1998 | A |
5854207 | Lee et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
5855612 | Ohthuki et al. | Jan 1999 | A |
5855618 | Patnaik et al. | Jan 1999 | A |
5858746 | Hubbell et al. | Jan 1999 | A |
5865814 | Tuch | Feb 1999 | A |
5868781 | Killion | Feb 1999 | A |
5873904 | Ragheb et al. | Feb 1999 | A |
5874101 | Zhong et al. | Feb 1999 | A |
5874109 | Ducheyne et al. | Feb 1999 | A |
5874165 | Drumheller | Feb 1999 | A |
5876743 | Ibsen et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
5877263 | Patnaik et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
5879713 | Roth et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
5888533 | Dunn | Mar 1999 | A |
5891192 | Murayama et al. | Apr 1999 | A |
5897955 | Drumheller | Apr 1999 | A |
5906759 | Richter | May 1999 | A |
5914182 | Drumheller | Jun 1999 | A |
5916870 | Lee et al. | Jun 1999 | A |
5919893 | Roby et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
5922005 | Richter et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
5942209 | Leavitt et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
5948428 | Lee et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
5954744 | Phan et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
5957975 | Lafont et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
5965720 | Gryaznov et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
5971954 | Conway et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
5976182 | Cox | Nov 1999 | A |
5980564 | Stinson | Nov 1999 | A |
5980928 | Terry | Nov 1999 | A |
5980972 | Ding | Nov 1999 | A |
5981568 | Kunz et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
5986169 | Gjunter | Nov 1999 | A |
5997468 | Wolff et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6010445 | Armini et al. | Jan 2000 | A |
6015541 | Greff et al. | Jan 2000 | A |
6042875 | Ding et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
6048964 | Lee et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
6051648 | Rhee et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
6056993 | Leidner et al. | May 2000 | A |
6060451 | DiMaio et al. | May 2000 | A |
6066156 | Yan | May 2000 | A |
6071266 | Kelley | Jun 2000 | A |
6074659 | Kunz et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
6080177 | Igaki et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
6080488 | Hostettler et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
6083258 | Yadav | Jul 2000 | A |
6093463 | Thakrar | Jul 2000 | A |
6096070 | Ragheb et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6096525 | Patnaik | Aug 2000 | A |
6099562 | Ding et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6103230 | Billiar et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6107416 | Patnaik et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6110188 | Narciso, Jr. | Aug 2000 | A |
6113629 | Ken | Sep 2000 | A |
6117979 | Hendriks et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
6120536 | Ding et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
6120904 | Hostettler et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
6121027 | Clapper et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
6125523 | Brown et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6127173 | Eckstein et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6129761 | Hubbell | Oct 2000 | A |
6129928 | Sarangapani et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6131266 | Saunders | Oct 2000 | A |
6150630 | Perry et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
6153252 | Hossainy et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
4776337 | Palmaz | Dec 2000 | A |
6159951 | Karpeisky et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
6160084 | Langer et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
6165212 | Dereume et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
6166130 | Rhee et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
6169170 | Gryaznov et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6171609 | Kunz | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6174330 | Stinson | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6177523 | Reich et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6183505 | Mohn, Jr. et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6187045 | Fehring et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6210715 | Starling et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6224626 | Steinke | May 2001 | B1 |
6228845 | Donovan et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6240616 | Yan | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6245076 | Yan | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6245103 | Stinson | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6248344 | Ylanen et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6251135 | Stinson et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6251142 | Bernacca et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6273913 | Wright et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6281262 | Shikinami | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6284333 | Wang et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6287332 | Bolz et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6290721 | Heath | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6293966 | Frantzen | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6303901 | Perry et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6312459 | Huang et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6327772 | Zadno-Azizi et al. | Dec 2001 | B1 |
4733665 | Palmaz | Jan 2002 | C2 |
6375826 | Wang et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6379381 | Hossainy et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6387121 | Alt | May 2002 | B1 |
6388043 | Langer et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
6395326 | Castro et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
6409761 | Jang | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6423092 | Datta et al. | Jul 2002 | B2 |
6461632 | Gogolewski | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6464720 | Boatman et al. | Oct 2002 | B2 |
6479565 | Stanley | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6485512 | Cheng | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6492615 | Flanagan | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6494908 | Huxel et al. | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6495156 | Wenz et al. | Dec 2002 | B2 |
6511748 | Barrows | Jan 2003 | B1 |
6517888 | Weber | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6521865 | Jones et al. | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6527801 | Dutta | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6537589 | Chae et al. | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6539607 | Fehring et al. | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6540777 | Stenzel | Apr 2003 | B2 |
6554854 | Flanagan | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6565599 | Hong et al. | May 2003 | B1 |
6569191 | Hogan | May 2003 | B1 |
6569193 | Cox et al. | May 2003 | B1 |
6572672 | Yadav et al. | Jun 2003 | B2 |
6574851 | Mirizzi | Jun 2003 | B1 |
6585755 | Jackson et al. | Jul 2003 | B2 |
6592614 | Lenker et al. | Jul 2003 | B2 |
6592617 | Thompson | Jul 2003 | B2 |
6613072 | Lau et al. | Sep 2003 | B2 |
6626939 | Burnside et al. | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6635269 | Jennissen | Oct 2003 | B1 |
6645243 | Vallana et al. | Nov 2003 | B2 |
6656162 | Santini, Jr. et al. | Dec 2003 | B2 |
6664335 | Krishnan | Dec 2003 | B2 |
6666214 | Canham | Dec 2003 | B2 |
6667049 | Janas et al. | Dec 2003 | B2 |
6669723 | Killion et al. | Dec 2003 | B2 |
6676697 | Richter | Jan 2004 | B1 |
6679980 | Andreacchi | Jan 2004 | B1 |
6689375 | Wahlig et al. | Feb 2004 | B1 |
6695920 | Pacetti et al. | Feb 2004 | B1 |
6706273 | Roessler | Mar 2004 | B1 |
6709379 | Brandau et al. | Mar 2004 | B1 |
6719934 | Stinson | Apr 2004 | B2 |
6719989 | Matsushima et al. | Apr 2004 | B1 |
6720402 | Langer et al. | Apr 2004 | B2 |
6746773 | Llanos et al. | Jun 2004 | B2 |
6752826 | Holloway et al. | Jun 2004 | B2 |
6753007 | Haggard et al. | Jun 2004 | B2 |
6764505 | Hossainy et al. | Jul 2004 | B1 |
6818063 | Kerrigan | Nov 2004 | B1 |
6846323 | Yip et al. | Jan 2005 | B2 |
7169178 | Santos et al. | Jan 2007 | B1 |
7175873 | Roorda et al. | Feb 2007 | B1 |
20010044652 | Moore | Nov 2001 | A1 |
20020002399 | Huxel et al. | Jan 2002 | A1 |
20020004060 | Heublein et al. | Jan 2002 | A1 |
20020004101 | Ding et al. | Jan 2002 | A1 |
20020062148 | Hart | May 2002 | A1 |
20020065553 | Weber | May 2002 | A1 |
20020111590 | Davila et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020116050 | Kocur | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020138133 | Lenz et al. | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20020161114 | Gunatillake et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20030033001 | Igaki | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030093107 | Parsonage et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
20030100865 | Santini, Jr. et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
20030105518 | Dutta | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030105530 | Pirhonen | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030171053 | Sanders | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20030187495 | Cully et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030208259 | Penhasi | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20030209835 | Chun et al. | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20030226833 | Shapovalov et al. | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20030236565 | Fifer | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20040034409 | Heublein et al. | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040093077 | White et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
20040098095 | Burnside et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
20040111149 | Stinson | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040127970 | Webber | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040143317 | Stinson et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040167610 | Fleming, III | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20060034888 | Pacetti et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20070254012 | Ludwig et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20070299510 | Venkatraman et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
44 07 079 | Sep 1994 | DE |
197 31 021 | Jan 1999 | DE |
198 56 983 | Dec 1999 | DE |
0 108 171 | May 1984 | EP |
0 144 534 | Jun 1985 | EP |
0 364 787 | Apr 1990 | EP |
0 397 500 | Nov 1990 | EP |
0 464 755 | Jan 1992 | EP |
0 493 788 | Jul 1992 | EP |
0 554 082 | Aug 1993 | EP |
0 578 998 | Jan 1994 | EP |
0 604 022 | Jun 1994 | EP |
0 621 017 | Oct 1994 | EP |
0 623 354 | Nov 1994 | EP |
0 665 023 | Aug 1995 | EP |
0 709 068 | May 1996 | EP |
0 970 711 | Jan 2000 | EP |
2 247 696 | Mar 1992 | GB |
WO 8903232 | Apr 1989 | WO |
WO 9001969 | Mar 1990 | WO |
WO 9004982 | May 1990 | WO |
WO 9006094 | Jun 1990 | WO |
WO 9117744 | Nov 1991 | WO |
WO 9117789 | Nov 1991 | WO |
WO 9210218 | Jun 1992 | WO |
WO 9306792 | Apr 1993 | WO |
WO 9421196 | Sep 1994 | WO |
WO 9529647 | Nov 1995 | WO |
WO 9804415 | Feb 1998 | WO |
WO 9903515 | Jan 1999 | WO |
WO 9916386 | Apr 1999 | WO |
WO 9942147 | Aug 1999 | WO |
WO 0012147 | Mar 2000 | WO |
WO 0064506 | Nov 2000 | WO |
WO 0101890 | Jan 2001 | WO |
WO 2004023985 | Mar 2004 | WO |