This application relates to inks, particularly to printable molecular inks.
The mechanical properties of nanoparticle inks are typically poor. Further, the thickness of the traces can be decreased to improve the mechanical properties, but the traces derived from thinner layers of nanoparticle have lower volume resistivity values. It has been previously demonstrated that molecular inks produced with ethyl cellulose binders can have significantly enhanced mechanical properties (International Patent Publication WO 2015/192248 published Dec. 23, 2015). However, when the traces printed from this formulation are subjected to high temperatures (>230° C.) for extended periods of time (>20 minutes), mechanical failure can result (i.e. resistance change following flex or crease testing becomes greater than 10%). Such a failure could be problematic when the ink is used in multilayer processes, because the traces produced from the molecular ink printed as a first layer will have to be processed for up to 20-30 minutes at temperatures exceeding 220° C. as multiple layers are constructed in the device. Further, the narrowest traces (measured 3-5 mil linewidths) tend to sinter more quickly than the wider traces (measured 7-20 mil traces). As such, it can be difficult to fine tune processing conditions to allow for all of the traces, regardless of line width or thickness, to process under identical conditions.
With respect to such a molecular ink, decreasing sintering temperature and increasing sintering time can improve the mechanical properties of the resulting traces. However, resistivity of the traces sintered at temperatures below 200° C. can be up to 1.3 times higher than when sintered at higher temperatures (>230° C.).
Therefore, a need remains for an ink formulation that has improved thermal stability permitting sintering at high temperatures e.g. (>230° C.) and/or for longer periods of time (e.g. >20 minutes) of time while producing narrow conductive lines (e.g. <100 μm or about 4 mil) with good mechanical properties (e.g. less than 10% change in resistance following flexing and creasing according to ASTM F1683-02) and low resistivity (e.g. <5 mΩ/□/mil).
A molecular silver ink with the ability to increase the loading of silver salt to 80% by weight (32% by weight silver) or more has been formulated that enables the production of traces with extraordinary thermal stability.
In one aspect, there is provided a molecular ink comprising: a silver carboxylate; a solvent; and, a polymeric binder comprising a hydroxyl- and/or carboxyl-terminated polyester.
In another aspect, there is provided a molecular ink comprising: a silver carboxylate in an amount that provides a silver loading in the ink of about 24 wt % or more, based on total weight of the ink; a solvent; and, a polymeric binder comprising a polyester, polyimide, polyether imide or any mixture thereof having functional groups that render the polymeric binder compatible with solvent.
In another aspect, there is provided a process for producing a conductive silver trace on a substrate, the process comprising depositing the molecular ink onto a substrate to form a non-conductive trace of the ink on the substrate, and sintering the non-conductive trace of the ink on the substrate to form the conductive silver trace.
In another aspect, there is provided a substrate comprising a conductive silver trace produced by a process as described above.
In another aspect, there is provided an electronic device comprising a substrate having a conductive silver trace produced by a process as described above.
Further features will be described or will become apparent in the course of the following detailed description. It should be understood that each feature described herein may be utilized in any combination with any one or more of the other described features, and that each feature does not necessarily rely on the presence of another feature except where evident to one of skill in the art.
For clearer understanding, preferred embodiments will now be described in detail by way of example, with reference to the accompanying drawings, in which:
Silver carboxylates comprise a silver ion and an organic group containing a carboxylic acid moiety. The carboxylate preferably comprises from 1 to 20 carbon atoms, more preferably from 6 to 15 carbon atoms, even more preferably from 8 to 12 carbon atoms, for example 10 carbon atoms. The carboxylate is preferably an alkanoate. The silver carboxylate is preferably a silver salt of an alkanoic acid. Some non-limiting examples of preferred silver carboxylates are silver ethylhexanoate, silver neodecanoate, silver benzoate, silver phenylacetate, silver isobutyrylacetate, silver benzoylacetate, silver oxalate, silver pivalate and derivatives thereof and any mixtures thereof. Silver neodecanoate is particularly preferred. One or more than one silver carboxylate may be in the ink. The silver carboxylate is preferably dispersed in the ink. Preferably, the ink does not contain flakes or other particles of metallic silver material.
The silver carboxylate is preferably present in the ink in an amount to provide a silver loading of about 19 wt % or more in the ink, based on total weight of the ink. More preferably, the silver carboxylate provides a silver loading of about 23 wt % or more, or about 24 wt % or more, or about 25 wt % or more, or about 27 wt % or more, or about 31 wt % or more, or about 32 wt % or more. When the silver carboxylate is silver neodecanoate, the silver neodecanoate may be preferably present in the ink in an amount of about 50 wt % or more, based on total weight of the ink, or about 60 wt % or more, or about 65 wt % or more, or about 70 wt % of more, or about 80 wt % or more.
The solvent is preferably compatible with one or both of the silver salt or polymeric binder. The solvent is preferably compatible with both the silver salt and polymeric binder. The silver salt and/or polymeric binder are preferably dispersible, for example soluble, in the solvent. The solvent is preferably an organic solvent, more preferably a non-aromatic organic solvent. Non-aromatic organic solvents include, for example, terpenes (e.g. terpene alcohols), glycol ethers (e.g. dipropylene glycol methyl ether), alcohols (e.g. methylcyclohexanols, octanols, heptanols), carbitols (e.g. 2-(2-ethoxyethoxy)ethanol) or any mixture thereof. The solvent preferably comprises a terpene, more preferably a terpene alcohol. Terpene alcohols may comprise monoterpene alcohols, sesquiterpene alcohols and the like. Monoterpene alcohols, for example terpineols, geraniol, etc., are preferred. Terpineols, for example α-terpineol, β-terpineol, γ-terpineol, and terpinen-4-ol are particularly preferred. Especially preferred is α-terpineol. The solvent may be present in the ink in any suitable amount, preferably in a range of about 1 wt % to about 50 wt %, based on total weight of the ink. More preferably, the amount is in a range of about 5 wt % to about 50 wt %, or about 10 wt % to about 40 wt %.
The polymeric binder may comprise a polyester, polyimide, polyether imide or any mixture thereof having functional groups that render the polymeric binder compatible with the solvent. Preferably, the polymeric binder is dispersible, for example soluble, in the solvent. Thus, a mixture of the polymeric binder in the solvent does not lead to significant phase separation. Functional groups that render the polymeric binder compatible with the solvent are preferably polar groups capable of participating in hydrogen bonding, for example one or more of hydroxyl, carboxyl, amino and sulfonyl groups. Preferably, the polymeric binder comprises terminal hydroxyl and/or carboxyl groups. The polymeric binder preferably comprises a polyester having functional groups that render the polyester compatible with the solvent. More preferably, the polymeric binder comprises a hydroxyl- and/or carboxyl-terminated polyester.
The polymeric binder may be present in the ink in any suitable amount, preferably in a range of about 0.1 wt % to about 5 wt %, based on total weight of the ink. More preferably, the amount is in a range of about 0.5 wt % to about 3 wt %, or about 1 wt % to about 2 wt %.
The ink with the polymeric binder enables uniform processing of narrow traces even following heating at high temperature for a long time, for example at temperatures greater than about 230° C. for at least about one hour. Further, the polymeric binder advantageously is not required to be a rheology modifier in the ink. Viscosity of the ink may be controlled by adjusting the amount of silver salt in the ink. The polymeric binder may therefore be used in lower concentration, while permitting the use of more silver salt, and therefore higher silver loading, without unduly affecting the viscosity. These properties make the ink particularly well suited for screen printing, where the application of shear stress significantly decreases the viscosity of the paste, as shown in
The described molecular ink enables the production of traces with extraordinary thermal stability, specifically, with respect to the ability to survive flex and crease testing following exposure to high temperatures for long periods of time. Preferably, the ink traces can survive flex and crease testing following exposure to temperatures greater than about 230° C. for time periods of at least about one hour. Traces produced from the molecular ink may have mechanical stability when exposed to temperatures from about 180-300° C.
In one embodiment, the molecular ink consists of a silver carboxylate, a solvent, and a polymeric binder comprising a hydroxyl- and/or carboxyl-terminated polyester. In another embodiment, the molecular ink consists of a silver carboxylate in an amount that provides a silver loading in the ink of about 24 wt % or more, based on total weight of the ink, a solvent; and a polymeric binder comprising a polyester, polyimide, polyether imide or any mixture thereof having functional groups that render the polymeric binder compatible with solvent.
The ink may be deposited on a substrate by any suitable method to form a non-conductive trace of the ink on the substrate. The ink is particularly suited for printing, for example, screen printing, inkjet printing, flexography printing, gravure printing, off-set printing, stamp printing, airbrushing, aerosol printing, typesetting, or any other method. The ink is uniquely optimizable for a variety of different printing techniques.
After deposition on the substrate, drying and decomposing the silver carboxylate within the non-conductive trace forms a conductive trace. Drying and decomposition may be accomplished by any suitable technique, where the techniques and conditions are guided by the type of substrate on which the traces are deposited and the type of silver carboxylate in the ink. For example, drying the ink and decomposing the silver carboxylate may be accomplished by heating (thermal, IR, microwave, etc.) and/or intense-pulsed light-based photonic sintering.
In one technique, heating the substrate dries and sinters the trace to form the conductive trace. Sintering decomposes the silver carboxylate to form conductive particles (for example nanoparticles) of the silver. It is an advantage that heating may be performed at a relatively high temperature range for longer periods of time without compromising mechanical properties of the conductive traces formed from the ink, which is particularly advantageous in applications where multiple layers of the ink must be deposited and processed, and in applications involving thermoforming of substrates.
Heating may be performed at a temperature of about 150° C. or higher, or 165° C. or higher, or 175° C. or higher, or 180° C. or higher, or 185° C. or higher, or 200° C. or higher, or 220° C. or higher, or 230° C. or higher, or 240° C. or higher while producing relatively highly conductive silver traces that have good mechanical properties. In one embodiment, the temperature is in a range of about 200° C. to about 250° C.
Heating is preferably performed for a time in a range of about 1-180 minutes, for example 5-120 minutes, or 5-60 minutes. Heating is performed at a sufficient balance between temperature and time to sinter the trace on the substrate to form a conductive trace. Improved thermal stability of the ink permits heating for longer periods of time, for example up to 1 hour or more. The type of heating apparatus also factors into the temperature and time required for sintering. Sintering may be performed with the substrate under an oxidizing atmosphere (e.g. air) or an inert atmosphere (e.g. nitrogen and/or argon gas).
In another technique, a photonic sintering system may feature a high intensity lamp (e.g. a pulsed xenon lamp) that delivers a broadband spectrum of light. The lamp may deliver about 5-27 J/cm2 in energy to the traces. Pulse widths are preferably in a range of about 0.58-1.5 ms. Driving voltages are preferably in a range of about 1.6-3.0 kV. Photonic sintering may be performed under ambient conditions (e.g. in air). Photonic sintering is especially suited for polyethylene terephthalate and polyimide substrates.
A conductive trace formed by drying and sintering the ink on the substrate may be of any desired thickness and width. It is an advantage that the ink may be dried and sintered to form a conductive trace that is relatively thin and/or narrow, while maintaining relatively high conductivity (i.e. relatively low resistivity). The ink is well suited in applications where functional traces with linewidths ranging from about 50 μm to about 1000 μm are used in the same circuit. However, conductive traces may have width and/or thicknesses lower than 50 μm, enabling miniaturization of electronic circuits. In one embodiment, the ink enables uniform processing of traces with measured linewidths of about 3.5-23.0 mils with volume resistivity values ranging from 1.5-2.0 mΩ/□/mil capable of passing ASTM F1683-02 flex and crease testing, even following heating at 230° C. for up to one hour.
The substrate may be any suitable surface, especially printable surface. Suitable surfaces may include, for example polyethylene terephthalate (PET) (e.g. Melinex™), polyolefin (e.g. silica-filled polyolefin (Teslin™)), polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS), polystyrene, acrylonitrile/butadiene/styrene, polycarbonate, polyimide (e.g. Kapton™), thermoplastic polyurethane (TPU), silicone membranes, wool, silk, cotton, flax, jute, modal, bamboo, nylon, polyester, acrylic, aramid, spandex, polylactide, paper, glass, coated glass (e.g. ITO-coated glass), metal, dielectric coatings, among others.
The deposited conductive trace on the substrate may be incorporated into an electronic device, for example electrical circuits, conductive bus bars (e.g. for photovoltaic cells), sensors (e.g. touch sensors, wearable sensors), antennae (e.g. RFID antennae), thin film transistors, diodes, smart packaging (e.g. smart drug packaging), conformable inserts in equipment and/or vehicles, and multilayer circuits and MIM devices including low pass filters, frequency selective surfaces, transistors and antenna on conformable surfaces that can withstand high temperatures. The ink enables miniaturization of such electronic devices.
Silver neodecanoate (AgND)-based inks were formulated as described in Table 1. Ink I1 was formulated in accordance with the present invention and Ink C1 is a comparative example of another formulation of AgND-based ink. The inks were prepared by combining all components and mixing in a plenary mixer until the solutions were homogenous. One of two polymeric binders was added in the inks: Rokrapol™ 7005 (a polyester) or ethyl cellulose 46 cP.
The inks were screen printed onto 8.5×11″ sheets of Kapton™ HPP-ST using a screen with a mesh count of 400 (stainless steel screen with a 19 μm thread diameter and 45 μm mesh opening). As shown in
The electrical properties of the traces were characterized by measuring the resistance across the 10 cm long traces with an ohm meter. The widths and thickness of the sintered traces were measured using an optical profilometer (Cyber Technologies 3D Surface Profiler). The trace widths can be used to determine the number of squares in each 10-cm long trace, and subsequently used to calculate the sheet resistance. Using the thickness measurements, the sheet resistance values for the traces were calculated. The electrical properties of the sintered traces are provided in Table 3.
It is evident from
The sheet resistivity of the Ink I1 vs. sintering temperature was also determined for ink traces having linewidths in a range of 4.6-22.8 mil. The sintering temperatures ranged from 180° C. to 240° C. (substrate temperature) and the sintering times were 50 minutes.
Table 3 shows physical data (nominal and measured line widths and trace thicknesses) and electrical properties (sheet resistances and resistivity values) for 100 mm (100,000 μm) long screen printed traces having nominal linewidths from 2-20 mil produced from Ink I1 by sintering at 240° C. (substrate temperature) for 50 minutes in a batch reflow oven. It is evident from Table 3 that conductive traces produced by sintering Ink I1 at a relatively high temperature for a relatively long time have consistently very low resistivity over a wide range of linewidths, once again illustrating the excellent thermal stability of Ink I1.
Bend a crease testing in accordance with ASTM F1683-09 was performed on traces produced by sintering Ink I1 at 240-245° C. for 50 minutes. The results are shown in Table 4. It is evident from Table 4 that resistance does not increase by more than 5% following any of the tests.
Crease testing in accordance with ASTM F1683-09 was performed on traces produced by sintering Ink C1 and Ink I1 at 240° C. for 30 minutes.
Adhesion tests were performed using scotch tape on traces produced by sintering Ink C1 and Ink I1 at 240° C. for 30 minutes.
The novel features will become apparent to those of skill in the art upon examination of the description. It should be understood, however, that the scope of the claims should not be limited by the embodiments, but should be given the broadest interpretation consistent with the wording of the claims and the specification as a whole.
This application is a National Entry of International Application PCT/IB2018/050789 filed Feb. 8, 2019, and claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Application USSN 62/456,300 filed Feb. 8, 2017.
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
PCT/IB2018/050789 | 2/8/2018 | WO |
Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
WO2018/146617 | 8/16/2018 | WO | A |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3228897 | Nellessen et al. | Jan 1966 | A |
3702259 | Nielsen | Nov 1972 | A |
3729339 | Kiel | Apr 1973 | A |
3989644 | Bolon et al. | Nov 1976 | A |
4088801 | Bolon et al. | May 1978 | A |
4099376 | Japs | Jul 1978 | A |
4180407 | Gibson et al. | Dec 1979 | A |
4248921 | Steigerwald et al. | Feb 1981 | A |
4396666 | Ernsberger | Aug 1983 | A |
4487811 | Eichelberger et al. | Dec 1984 | A |
4552690 | Nobuyuki et al. | Nov 1985 | A |
4687597 | Siuta | Aug 1987 | A |
4775594 | Desjarlais | Oct 1988 | A |
4857111 | Haubennestel et al. | Aug 1989 | A |
5045236 | Tsunaga et al. | Sep 1991 | A |
5074978 | Debroy | Dec 1991 | A |
5248451 | Tsunaga et al. | Sep 1993 | A |
5306590 | Felder | Apr 1994 | A |
5900327 | Pei et al. | May 1999 | A |
5960251 | Brusic et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
5980622 | Byers | Nov 1999 | A |
5989700 | Krivopal | Nov 1999 | A |
6036889 | Kydd | Mar 2000 | A |
6048389 | Price et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
6090890 | Murakami et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
6521032 | Lehmann et al. | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6663799 | Kokubo et al. | Dec 2003 | B2 |
6770122 | Thompson | Aug 2004 | B2 |
7115218 | Kydd et al. | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7141104 | De Voeght et al. | Nov 2006 | B2 |
7211205 | Conaghan et al. | May 2007 | B2 |
7473307 | Song et al. | Jan 2009 | B2 |
7566357 | Zhao | Jul 2009 | B2 |
7629017 | Kodas et al. | Dec 2009 | B2 |
7683107 | Yang | Mar 2010 | B2 |
7691664 | Kodas et al. | Apr 2010 | B2 |
7731812 | Wang et al. | Jun 2010 | B2 |
7960037 | Liu et al. | Jun 2011 | B2 |
7976737 | Heo et al. | Jul 2011 | B2 |
8043535 | Kamikoriyama et al. | Oct 2011 | B2 |
8262894 | Xu et al. | Sep 2012 | B2 |
8282860 | Chung et al. | Oct 2012 | B2 |
8339040 | Bruton et al. | Dec 2012 | B2 |
8597397 | Kunze et al. | Dec 2013 | B2 |
8945328 | Longinotti-Buitoni et al. | Feb 2015 | B2 |
8948839 | Longinotti-Buitoni et al. | Feb 2015 | B1 |
9028599 | Abe | May 2015 | B2 |
9145503 | Yu et al. | Sep 2015 | B2 |
9187657 | Yano et al. | Nov 2015 | B2 |
9198288 | Wu et al. | Nov 2015 | B2 |
9283618 | Wu et al. | Mar 2016 | B2 |
9460824 | Liu et al. | Oct 2016 | B2 |
20030180451 | Kodas et al. | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20050070629 | Roberts | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20060118768 | Liu et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20070078215 | Yoon et al. | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070125989 | Kodas et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070154644 | Hwang et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20080093422 | Kodas et al. | Apr 2008 | A1 |
20080108218 | Kodas et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
20080178761 | Tomotake et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20090267060 | Forrest et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20110111138 | McCullough et al. | May 2011 | A1 |
20120104330 | Choi et al. | May 2012 | A1 |
20130121872 | Matsumoto | May 2013 | A1 |
20130156971 | McCullough et al. | Jun 2013 | A1 |
20130161573 | Torardi et al. | Jun 2013 | A1 |
20130277096 | Seong et al. | Oct 2013 | A1 |
20140124713 | Majumdar et al. | May 2014 | A1 |
20140178601 | Wei et al. | Jun 2014 | A1 |
20140034901 | Abe | Nov 2014 | A1 |
20140349017 | Abe | Nov 2014 | A1 |
20140349025 | Hui et al. | Nov 2014 | A1 |
20150004325 | Walker et al. | Jan 2015 | A1 |
20150056426 | Grouchko et al. | Feb 2015 | A1 |
20150132476 | Wu | May 2015 | A1 |
20150231740 | Grabey et al. | Aug 2015 | A1 |
20150257279 | Shahbazi et al. | Sep 2015 | A1 |
20150298248 | Walker et al. | Oct 2015 | A1 |
20150299489 | Walker | Oct 2015 | A1 |
20160081189 | Shimoda et al. | Mar 2016 | A1 |
20160095547 | Wang et al. | Apr 2016 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2017808 | Dec 1990 | CA |
1071182 | Apr 1993 | CN |
101271929 | Sep 2008 | CN |
101519356 | Sep 2009 | CN |
102270514 | Dec 2011 | CN |
102618033 | Aug 2012 | CN |
102863845 | Jan 2013 | CN |
103084581 | May 2013 | CN |
104263082 | Jan 2015 | CN |
104479463 | Apr 2015 | CN |
106147405 | Nov 2016 | CN |
0335237 | Oct 1989 | EP |
2871260 | May 2015 | EP |
1443099 | Jul 1976 | GB |
S61136978 | Jun 1986 | JP |
63278983 | Nov 1988 | JP |
H10279868 | Oct 1998 | JP |
2000136333 | May 2000 | JP |
2004162110 | Jun 2004 | JP |
2005537386 | Dec 2005 | JP |
2006519291 | Aug 2006 | JP |
2008013466 | Jan 2008 | JP |
2008031104 | Feb 2008 | JP |
2008531810 | Aug 2008 | JP |
2009212182 | Sep 2009 | JP |
2009256218 | Nov 2009 | JP |
20100018696 | Jan 2010 | JP |
2012234803 | Nov 2012 | JP |
2014148732 | Aug 2014 | JP |
2014182913 | Sep 2014 | JP |
2015187259 | Oct 2015 | JP |
2011-0002022 | Jan 2011 | KR |
20120132424 | Dec 2012 | KR |
101350507 | Jan 2014 | KR |
20150045605 | Apr 2015 | KR |
20150077676 | Jul 2015 | KR |
20150082133 | Jul 2015 | KR |
20150085332 | Jul 2015 | KR |
201406991 | Feb 2014 | TW |
201435925 | Sep 2014 | TW |
201437299 | Oct 2014 | TW |
03032084 | Apr 2003 | WO |
2003095701 | Nov 2003 | WO |
200416261 | Sep 2004 | WO |
2006093398 | Sep 2006 | WO |
2009036921 | Mar 2009 | WO |
2009126918 | Oct 2009 | WO |
2010036397 | Apr 2010 | WO |
2010128107 | Nov 2010 | WO |
2012014933 | Feb 2012 | WO |
2012135551 | Oct 2012 | WO |
2012144610 | Oct 2012 | WO |
2013036519 | Mar 2013 | WO |
2013073331 | May 2013 | WO |
2013073349 | May 2013 | WO |
2013096664 | Jun 2013 | WO |
2013128449 | Sep 2013 | WO |
2015024115 | Feb 2015 | WO |
2015160938 | Oct 2015 | WO |
2015183679 | Dec 2015 | WO |
2015192248 | Dec 2015 | WO |
2016012753 | Jan 2016 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Stay D, et al. Macromolecules. 2013, 46, 4361-4369. |
Suran S, et al. Thin Solid Films. 2016, 607, 36-42. |
Szeremeta J, et al. Optical Materials. 2011, 33, 1372-1376. |
Tsai C-Y, et al. Nanoscale Research Letters. 2015, 10, 357 (7 pages). |
Vaseem M, et al. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces. 2016, 8, 177-186. |
Walker SB, et al. J. Am. Chem.Soc. 2012, 134, 1419-1421. |
Wang H, et al. small. 2015, 11(1), 126-133. |
Yabuki A, et al. Thin Solid Films. 2011, 519, 6530-6533. |
Kabuki A, et al. Materials Research Bulletin. 2012, 47, 4107-4111. |
Yabuki A, et al. Synthesis of copper conductive film by low-temperature thermal decomposition of coppereaminediol complexes under an air atmosphere. Materials Chemistry and Physics. 2014, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.matchemphys.2014.07.047, 1e6. |
Yim C, et al. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces. 2016, 8, 22369-22373. |
Yong Y, et al. Scientific Reports. 7, 45150, DOI: 10.1038/srep45150, 9 pages. |
Zhai D, et al. Colloids and Surfaces A: Physicochem. Eng. Aspects. 2013, 424, 1-9. |
Zhu X, et al. Langmuir. 2012, 28, 14461-14469. |
Stranks SD, et al. Adv. Mater. 2013, 25, 4365-4371. |
Search Report dated Nov. 9, 2020 on European application 18750597.9. |
Araki T, et al. Langmuir. 2013, 29, 11192-11197. |
Bjornholm, T et al. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1998, 120, 7643-7644. |
Chen W, et al. Journal of Electronic Materials. 2015, 44(7), 2479-2487. |
Choi T-H, et al. Journal of Materials Chemistry. 2012, 22, 3624. |
Chung W-H, et al. Thin Solid Films. 2015, 580, 61-70. |
Curtis C, et al. NCPV Program Review Meeting Conference Paper (Lakewood Colorado). Metallizations by Direct-Write Inkjet Printing. NREL/CP-520-31020, 2001, 6 pages. |
Dang Z-M, et al. Journal of Applied Polymer Science. 2012, 126, 815-821. |
Dearden AL, et a. Macromol. Rapid Commun. 2005, 26, 315-318. |
De Boer B, et al. Macromolecules. 2002, 35, 6883-6892. |
Deore B, et al. Conference Poster. New Conductors for Advanced User Interfaces, Circuits and Devices. Canadian Society for Chemistry. 2015. |
Ding J, et al. Nanoscale. 2014, 6, 2328-2339. |
Dong Y, et al. Thin Solid Films. 2015, 589, 381-387. |
Farraj Y, et al. Chem. Commun., 2015, 51, 1587-1590. |
Gu L, et al. Applied Mechanics and Materials Online. 2013, 469, 51-54. |
Henkel's Printed Electronic Inks. Product Brochure F_LR615251. 2015. |
Hokita Y, et al. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces. 2015, 7, 19382-19389. |
Hu Y, et al. 15th International Conference on Electronic Packaging Technology. 2014, 1565-1567. |
Hwang J, et al. Bull. Korean Chem. Soc. 2014, 35(1), 147-150. |
International Preliminary Report on Patentability for PCT/IB2018/050788 dated Jul. 24, 2018. |
International Preliminary Report on Patentability for PCT/IB2018/050789 dated Jul. 23, 2018. |
International Preliminary Report on Patentability for PCT/IB2018/050790 dated Jul. 17, 2018. |
International Preliminary Report on Patentability for PCT/IB2018/050791 dated Jul. 25, 2018. |
International Search Report for PCT/IB2018/050788 dated Jul. 24, 2018. |
International Search Report for PCT/IB2018/050789 dated Jul. 23, 2018. |
International Search Report for PCT/IB2018/050790 dated Jul. 17, 2018. |
International Search Report for PCT/IB2018/050791 dated Jul. 25, 2018. |
Jahn SF, et al. Thin Solid Films. 2010, 518, 3218-3222. |
Kamyshny A, et al. The Open Applied Physics Journal. 2011, 4, 19-36. |
Kawaguchi Y, et al. Journal of Coating Science and Technology. 2016, 3(2), 56-61. |
Kim SJ, et al. Thin Solid Films. 2012, 520, 2731-2734. |
Kim I, et al. RSC Advances. 2013, 3, 15169-15177 (with ESI). |
Lee B, et al. Current Applied Physics. 2009, 9, e157-e160. |
Li Y, et al. J Mater Sci: Mater Electron. 2016, 27, 11432-11438. |
Li W, et al. J. Mater. Chem. C. 2016, 4, 8802-8808. |
Lin H-C, et al. Microelectronic Engineering. 2009, 86, 2316-2319. |
Lyons AM, et al. Abstract of J. Phys. Chem. 1991, 95(3), 1098-1105. |
Malenfant PRL, et al. NRC Printable Electronics. Presentation at IDTechEx (Santa Clara 2013). |
Nie X, et al. Applied Surface Science. 2012, 261, 554-560. |
Pacioni NL, et al. Silver Nanoparticle Applications, Engineering Materials. (Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2015, E.I. Alarcon et al. (eds.), DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-11262-6_2) pp. 13-46. |
Paquet C, et al. New Conductors for Advanced User Interfaces, Circuits and Devices. Poster Presentation at CPEIA 2015. |
Park K-H, et al. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2005, 127(26), 9330-9331. |
Pham LQ, et al. Journal of Colloid and Interface Science. 2012, 365, 103-109. |
Polzinger B, et al. 2011 11th IEEE International Conference on Nanotechnology. (Portland Marriott. Aug. 15-18, 2011, Portland, Oregon, USA) pp. 201-204. |
Rajan K, et al. Nanotechnology, Science and Applications. 2016, 9, 1-13. |
Rao RVK, et al. RSC Adv. 2015, 5, 77760-77790. |
Sakamoto M, et al. Journal of Photochemistry and Photobiology C: Photochemistry Reviews. 2009, 10, 33-56. |
Schulz DL, et al. Electrochemical and Solid-State Letters. 2001, 4(8), C58-C61. |
Shen L, et al. Journal of Electronic Materials. 2015, 44(2), 720-724. |
Shin D-Y, et al. J. Mater. Chem. 2012, 22, 11755-11764. |
Shin D-H, et al. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces. 2014, 6, 3312-3319. |
First Examination Report dated Mar. 30, 2021 on Indian application 201927032221. |
First Office Action dated Dec. 2, 2021 on Japanese Patent Application 2019-563709. |
First Examination Report dated Sep. 27, 2021 on Chinese Patent Application 2018800160488. |
First Examination Report dated Sep. 15, 2021 on Taiwan Patent Application 107104323. |
Office action dated Mar. 16, 2022 on European application 18750597.9. |
Office action dated Apr. 21, 2022 on Chinese application 2018800160488. |
Choi Y-H, et al. Langmuir 2015, 31, 8101-8110. |
Greer JR, et al. J. Appl. Phys. 101, 103529 (2007). |
Jahn SF, et al. Chem. Mater. 2010, 22, 3067-3071. |
Kim J-H, et al. Adv. Mater. Interfaces 2015, 2, 1500283. |
Kim K-S, et al. Journal of Nanoscience and Nanotechnology. (2011) vol. 11, 1493-1498. |
Kim K-S, et al. Journal of Nanoscience and Nanotechnology. (2012) vol. 12, 5769-5773. |
Moon YJ, et al. Journal of Electronic Materials. (2015) vol. 44, No. 4, 1192-1199. |
Office action dated Jul. 12, 2022 on Japanese patent application 2019-563709. |
Office action dated Aug. 19, 2022 on Korean application 10-2019-7026320. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20200010706 A1 | Jan 2020 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
62456300 | Feb 2017 | US |