The present disclosure relates generally to devices, systems and methods for monitoring fluid volume in patients with renal disease.
Current methods used to manage stage 3 to stage 4 chronic kidney disease patients typically involve monitoring the patient's symptoms and glomerular filtration rate (GFR). Prior to the patient reaching a point where additional therapy in the form of supplemental hemodialysis is needed, an access point (fistula) will typically be created by surgically diverting an artery to a vein. The fistula usually takes four to six weeks to mature, but can take up to six months to mature and be ready for hemodialysis. In some situations, the patient's kidneys decline to rapidly such that the fistula has not matured before they require dialysis treatment. In such situations, a central venous catheter may be used until the fistula matures. However, central venous catheters are more infection prone and suffer from clotting and fatigue issues. Accordingly, it is desired to ensure that the fistula matures prior to the patient requiring hemodialysis. Unfortunately, it can be difficult to predict when a stage 3 or stage 4 chronic kidney disease patient will need supplemental hemodialysis treatment and current methods for sufficiently monitoring such patients are lacking.
Once a patient begins undergoing dialysis treatment or another fluid removal processes, such as ultrafiltration, it can be difficult to determine how much fluid to remove during a given treatment session. The amount of fluid to be removed is determined before the treatment session and is related to the patient's pre-treatment weight, fluid addition during treatment and their theoretical dry weight. However, it can be difficult to accurately determine a patient's dry weight, which is considered to be the weight that the person would be if their kidneys were properly functioning. What a given patient might weigh if their kidneys were properly functioning is often an unknown variable and can change over time. Yet an accurate determination of the patient's dry weight is important to the successful outcome of a fluid removal session.
Unfortunately, the patient's dry weight is not typically calculated or re-evaluated frequently. Unlike the patient's actual weight, which is measured before and after a fluid removal session, dry weight is often determined much less frequently; e.g. monthly, and much can change in the time between a dry weight determination and a given fluid removal session, which typically occurs three times a week. While being an important variable in fluid removal considerations, dry weight is often difficult to calculate and may vary between sessions.
Errors in fluid volume removal can result in severe hypotension and patient crashing following or during hemodialysis treatment, and insufficient frequency of fluid removal sessions can have serious consequences. For example, sudden and cardiac death (including death from congestive heart failure, myocardial infarction, and sudden death) are common in hemodialysis patients. See Bleyer et al, “Sudden and cardiac death rated in hemodialysis patients,” Kidney International, (1999), 55:1552-1559.
For various reasons, additional monitoring of patients for which a blood fluid removal session is indicated may be desired.
This disclosure, among other things, describes devices, systems and methods for chronically monitoring fluid volume of patients undergoing or suspected of needing to undergo fluid removal procedures, such as hemodialysis, ultrafiltration, or the like. By chronically monitoring indicators of fluid volume, it may be possible to more accurately predict when stage 3 or stage 4 chronic kidney disease patients may first require supplemental fluid removal treatment, potentially allowing for better predictions as to when a fistula should be initiated so that it is mature by the time of the first fluid removal session. Chronic monitoring of indicators of fluid volume may also be valuable in more accurately identifying appropriate fluid removal parameters (fluid removal “prescription”) for use during fluid removal sessions.
In various embodiments described herein, a method includes monitoring an indicator of fluid volume of a patient via a sensor device, and setting an initial fluid volume removal prescription for a blood fluid removal session based on the monitored indicator of fluid volume. The method may further include transmitting data regarding the indicator of fluid volume from the implantable sensor device to fluid removal device. In some embodiments, the fluid removal device sets or calculates the initial fluid volume removal prescription based on the data received from the implantable sensor. The indicator of fluid volume may be an indicator of tissue fluid volume or an indicator of blood fluid volume.
In some embodiments described herein, a system includes a sensor configured to monitor an indicator of fluid volume and a blood fluid removal device. The blood fluid removal device includes (i) an inlet for receiving blood from a patient, (ii) an first outlet for returning blood from the patient, (iii) a medium for removing fluid from the blood, the medium being positioned between the inlet and the first outlet, (iv) a fluid rate removal controller, (v) a second outlet for flow of the removed fluid, and (vi) electronics coupled to the fluid rate removal controller and the sensor, wherein the electronics are configured to set an initial fluid rate removal prescription based on data received from the sensor and to control the fluid rate removal controller based on the set initial fluid rate removal prescription.
In any embodiment, a system can comprise a sensor configured to monitor an indicator of fluid volume; and a blood fluid removal device comprising (i) an inlet for receiving blood from a patient, (ii) an first outlet for returning blood from the patient, (iii) a medium for removing fluid from the blood, the medium being positioned between the inlet and the first outlet, (iv) a fluid rate removal controller, and (v) a second outlet for flow of the removed fluid. In any embodiment of the system, an initial fluid rate removal prescription can be based on data received from the sensor, and the fluid removal rate can be adjusted via the fluid rate removal controller to meet initial goals of the fluid rate removal prescription.
In any embodiment, the system can comprise control electronics coupled to the fluid rate removal controller and the sensor, wherein the control electronics are configured to set the initial fluid rate removal prescription based on data received from the sensor, sent to the fluid rate removal controller.
In any embodiment of the system, the sensor can be implantable.
In any embodiment of the system, the sensor can be wearable.
In any embodiment of the system, the electronics can comprise a computer readable medium that, when implemented, cause the electronics to calculate the initial fluid rate removal prescription based on data received from the sensor and instruct the fluid rate removal controller to operate according to the initial fluid rate removal prescription.
In any embodiment, any one of the sensor and the fluid removal device can be implantable.
In any embodiment, any one of the sensor and the fluid removal device can be wearable.
In any embodiment of the system, the control electronics can be disposed in a housing of the blood fluid removal device.
In any embodiment of the system, the sensor can be configured to measure one or more of tissue impedance, blood hematocrit, and hemoglobin levels.
In any embodiment of the system, the sensor can be configured to measure interstitial fluid of a patient.
In any embodiment of the system, the sensor can be configured to measure impedance, and the sensor can comprise a first electrode and a second electrode.
In any embodiment, the system can comprise a second sensor configured to measure impedance, wherein the second sensor measures impedance in a location different from the first sensor.
In any embodiment, the first sensor and the second sensor can be in electronic communication, and the system can be configured to determine if the impedance measured by the first sensor and the impedance measured by the second sensor differ by a pre-determined amount.
In any embodiment, the system can further comprise a medium for introducing replacement fluid into the blood.
In any embodiment, the system can comprise a replacement fluid rate controller configured to control the rate of fluid introduction into the blood, wherein an initial replacement fluid rate prescription is based on data received from the sensor, and wherein the replacement fluid rate is adjusted via the replacement fluid rate controller to meet initial goals of the replacement fluid rate prescription.
In any embodiment of the system, the replacement fluid can be added to the blood before the blood enters the blood fluid removal device.
In any embodiment of the system, the replacement fluid can be added to the blood after the blood exits the blood fluid removal device.
In any embodiment of the system, the electronics can be configured to set an initial fluid volume removal prescription.
In any embodiment of the system, the sensor can be configured to transmit the monitored indicator to an external device.
In any embodiment of the system, the external device can be one or more of the group consisting of a programmer, a computer, a personal data assistant, and a tablet.
In any embodiment, the system can comprise an alert mechanism; the alert mechanism configured to provide an alert if the monitored indicator exceeds a predetermined threshold.
In numerous embodiments described herein, a sensor device includes (i) a detector circuit and components configured to acquire sensed data regarding an indicator of fluid volume; and (ii) control electronic configured to receive the acquired sensed data from the detector circuit and to calculate a fluid volume removal prescription based on the acquired sensed data.
The devices and methods used herein with regard to chronic monitoring of an indicator of fluid volume may also be used to assist in determining an appropriate time for creating a fistula in a patient suffering from or at risk of chronic kidney disease.
One or more embodiments of the systems, devices and methods described herein may provide one or more advantages over prior systems, devices and methods for blood fluid removal in patients or monitoring fluid in patients. For example, chronic kidney disease patients are often are not aware of their disease until it is too late (Stage 5). When patients reach stage 5, treatment options are limited and hemodialysis is often the only option. If monitoring can help patients to track their kidney functions (especially for those with hypertension and diabetes), the patients may be treated with therapies other then dialysis and their progress toward stage 5 may be slowed. In cases where patients are treated with diuretic therapy, monitoring can be used to track whether patients respond to the treatment. Monitoring may also help to avoid misdiagnosis. For example, patients with kidney disease may be diagnosed as merely hypertensive without regard to impaired renal function, thereby missing an opportunity to slow the progression of chronic kidney disease. For patients with hypertension and diabetes, monitoring as described herein may be valuable, as hypertension and diabetes are thought to contribute to ⅔ of the stage 5 kidney failure patients. These advantages and others will be apparent to those of skilled in the art upon reading the following detailed description.
The accompanying drawings, which are incorporated into and form a part of the specification, illustrate several embodiments of the present disclosure and, together with the description, serve to explain the principles of the disclosure. The drawings are only for the purpose of illustrating embodiments of the disclosure and are not to be construed as limiting the disclosure.
The schematic drawings presented herein are not necessarily to scale. Like numbers used in the figures refer to like components, steps and the like. However, it will be understood that the use of a number to refer to a component in a given figure is not intended to limit the component in another figure labeled with the same number. In addition, the use of different numbers to refer to components is not intended to indicate that the different numbered components cannot be the same or similar.
In the following detailed description, reference is made to the accompanying drawings that form a part hereof, and in which are shown by way of illustration several embodiments of devices, systems and methods. It is to be understood that other embodiments are contemplated and may be made without departing from the scope or spirit of the present disclosure. The following detailed description, therefore, is not to be taken in a limiting sense.
All scientific and technical terms used herein have meanings commonly used in the art unless otherwise specified. The definitions provided herein are to facilitate understanding of certain terms used frequently herein and are not meant to limit the scope of the present disclosure.
As used in this specification and the appended claims, the singular forms “a”, “an”, and “the” encompass embodiments having plural referents, unless the content clearly dictates otherwise.
As used in this specification and the appended claims, the term “or” is generally employed in its sense including “and/or” unless the content clearly dictates otherwise.
As used herein, “have”, “having”, “include”, “including”, “comprise”, “comprising” or the like are used in their open ended sense, and generally mean “including, but not limited to.”
As used herein, “chronic” with regard to monitoring, means that monitoring occurs over the course of days, weeks, months or years. The chronic monitoring may include continuous, periodic, intermittent, or the like sensing over the time frame that monitoring occurs.
As used herein, “fluid volume” may refer to tissue fluid volume or blood fluid volume.
As used herein, “tissue fluid volume” means the volume of fluid (as opposed to cells or solids) in a tissue or region of a patient, which can be the entire patient. Tissue “fluid” is often referred to as interstitial fluid. In various embodiments, one or more of tissue fluid volume, rate of change of tissue fluid volume, or the like, or indicators thereof, are monitored in accordance with the teaching presented herein.
As used herein, “blood fluid volume” means the volume or percentage of blood volume that is occupied by fluid, as opposed to cells or solids in the blood. In various embodiments, one or more of blood fluid volume, rate of change of blood fluid volume, or the like, or indicators thereof, are monitored in accordance with the teaching presented herein.
As used herein, a “blood fluid removal process,” or the like, refers to a process from which fluid is removed from blood of a patient and the blood is returned to the patient. In most cases, the blood is also cleaned; i.e., waste products are removed from the blood and cleaned blood is returned to the patient. Examples of blood fluid removal processes include ultrafiltration, hemofiltration, hemodialysis, hemodiafiltration, peritoneal dialysis and the like. Any patient for which blood fluid removal is indicated may benefit from the devices, systems and methods described herein.
As used herein, a “patient for which a blood fluid removal session is indicated” is a patient that has undergone, is undergoing, or is likely to undergo at least one blood fluid removal session. In general, such patients are fluid overloaded patients, such as patients suffering from heart failure, chronic kidney disease, or acute kidney failure. Often such patients are stage 3 to stage 5 chronic kidney disease patients, are unresponsive or under-responsive to diuretics, or the like.
This disclosure, among other things, describes devices, systems and methods for chronic monitoring fluid volume of patients undergoing or suspected of needing to undergo fluid removal procedures, such as hemodialysis, ultrafiltration, or the like. The chronic monitoring may improve the treatment or outcomes of such patients by providing indications of when therapeutic intervention may be indicated or by facilitating an appropriate determination of the amount and rate of fluid removal to be removed during a particular treatment session. Any suitable monitoring or sensor device may be used.
In some embodiments and with reference to
Whether the sensor 200 is wearable or implantable, it is preferred that the sensor 200 include a power source that enables a patient to carry about their daily activities without having to plug the sensor 200 into an electrical outlet. Examples of suitable power sources include a battery, which may be rechargeable, a coupled capacitor, or the like.
For purposes of illustration, a block diagram of selected components of an implantable sensing device 200 is shown in
It will also be understood that a wearable sensing device may have similar components or may be configured differently. For example, a communication circuit for wired communication may replace, or be present in addition to, a telemetry circuit.
In various embodiments, a sensor for chronic fluid monitoring may be used to monitor blood fluid volume, or an indicator thereof. Typically, the sensors measure fluid volume indirectly, and thus directly monitor an indicator of fluid volume. For example, in some embodiments, sensor indirectly monitors hematocrit (the portion of blood volume that is occupied by red blood cells). Any suitable hematocrit sensor, such as a CRIT-LINE monitor from HEMA METRICS (see, HEMA METRICS, CRIT-LINE hematocrit accuracy, Vol. 1, Techn Note No. 11 (Rev. D) Feb. 24, 2003), may be used or modified for use in devices and methods described and contemplated herein. A typical hematocrit level for a healthy adult male is between about 40% and 54% or about 47%, and a typical level for a healthy adult female is between about 37% and 47%, or about 42%. As the state of renal disease progresses in a patient, or prior to a blood fluid removal session, the fluid volume of the patient may be elevated, thus hematocrit levels may be lower than desired.
Hematocrit levels, or an approximation or indicator of hematocrit levels, can thus be used to monitor blood fluid volume. In some embodiments, hemoglobin levels are monitored as an indicator of hematocrit levels and blood fluid volume, as hemoglobin concentration is typically proportional to red blood cell concentration. Any suitable sensor may be used to measure hemoglobin concentration, such as sensors used in pulse oximeters which measure adsorption of red and infrared light to determine concentration of oxygenated hemoglobin and deoxyhemoglobin, respectfully. In some embodiments, the sensor may be clipped to a patient's finger and may employ pulse oximeter technology for detecting hemoglobin levels as an indicator of blood fluid volume. Of course, the sensors (which may include the associated light source(s)) may be placed in any suitable location, such as around tubing that carries blood from the patient to the blood fluid removal device or from the blood fluid removal device to the patient, within the blood fluid removal device, or the like. In some embodiments, the sensor is implanted in a patient and disposed about a blood vessel to measure hemoglobin levels, and thus hematocrit and blood fluid levels.
By way of example and with reference to
Regardless of the placement of the sensor 200, the sensor may be calibrated by monitoring flow of blood having known hematocrit levels through tubing 300 (whether a blood vessel or tubing for use with a blood fluid removal device). The values obtained may be stored in a lookup table for reference during a blood fluid removal session or as otherwise needed while the sensor is in use. In some embodiments, the reference signal may be reset or obtained after a blood fluid cleaning session when the patient's blood should be at its desired fluid level. In some embodiments, the rate of change of blood fluid volume may be determined by comparing the rate of change in light absorbance; e.g., as the blood fluid volume increases following a blood fluid cleaning session or as the patient's condition worsens.
The discussion above with regard to hemoglobin sensing is provided as an example of how known sensing technologies and components may be employed in accordance with the teachings presented herein with regard to blood fluid volume monitoring. It will be understood that other technologies and components may be used to monitor blood fluid volume. For example, total blood protein or albumin concentrations and blood pressure, alone or in combination, can be used to evaluate blood volume. By way of example, high blood pressure combined with low hematocrit or low blood protein indicates a higher possibility of blood fluid overloading. Alternatively or additionally, blood viscosity may be used as an indicator of blood fluid volume and may be measured by pressure or flow.
In various embodiments, a sensor for chronic fluid monitoring may be used to monitor tissue fluid volume, or an indicator thereof. Any suitable sensor may be employed. By way of example, impedance of flow of current through a tissue of a patient may be monitored as an indicator of fluid volume in the tissue. With reference to
As depicted in
In the example depicted in
Tissue impedance sensing for purposes of monitoring tissue fluid volume has been well documented. One example of a well studied system that may be used or modified for use herein is Medtronic, Inc.'s OptiVol® fluid status monitoring system. Such a system, or other similar systems, have well-documented procedures for determining acceptable ranges of tissue impedance and thus fluid volume. See, e.g., (i) Siegenthalar, et al. Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing (2010): 24:449-451, and (ii) Wang, Am. J. Cardiology, 99(Suppl):3G-1-G, May 21, 2007. Alternatively or in addition, tissue impedance may be monitored for a suitable period of time to establish as suitable baseline, and patient markers or clinician input may be used to instruct whether the patient is fluid overloaded or under-loaded. The data acquired by impedance sensor and input data regarding fluid status of the patient at the time the sensor data is acquired may be used to establish suitable ranges for impedance values.
In some embodiments, more than one implanted impedance sensor, such as more than one OptiVol® fluid status monitoring system, may be employed. The sensors may be configured or placed to monitor impedance of different tissues, different areas of the same tissue, or the like. Duplication of sensors may provide redundancy in case of sensor failure or as a check on the readings obtained from another sensor. In some cases, tissue fluid changes detected by a sensor may be due to conditions other than chronic heart failure or renal disease. For example, increased lung fluid may result from pneumonia. Such fluid may not be indicative of a need for a blood fluid removal session. By having a second impedance sensor placed to monitor, e.g., abdominal fluid, a check may be placed on the sensor placed and configured to monitor lung fluid volume. The sensors may be configured to communicate with each other or another device to determine whether the sensor readings are significantly different or whether the difference exceeds a threshold value, in which case the patient may be prompted to seek medical attention. The use of more than one impedance sensor should be valuable in reducing the likelihood of false positive or false negative fluid overload conditions.
The discussion above with regard to impedance monitoring is provided as an example of how known sensing technologies and components may be employed in accordance with the teachings presented herein with regard to tissue fluid volume monitoring. It will be understood that other technologies and components may be used to monitor tissue fluid volume. For example, the concentration of an electrolyte, such as sodium, potassium, or calcium may be measured in a tissue using an ion selective electrode, with concentrations being higher with lower tissue fluid volume. By way of further example, a pressure sensor may be placed in the tissue to measure extension or contraction of tissue as fluid volume changes, stress and strain sensors may be used to measure modulus or stress-strain curves for tissue and may be used to correlate to different tissue fluid volumes, stress relaxation or creep profiled of tissue may be measured and correlated with different fluid volumes, etc. Another example of indirect tissue fluid monitoring is a measure of lung noise, which tends to be greater during fluid overload due to impedance of air flow.
Regardless of the sensor or sensor configuration employed and regardless of whether the sensor is configured to monitor blood fluid or tissue fluid, the sensor data may be used to improve treatment or outcomes of fluid overloaded patients such as patients suffering from chronic kidney disease. In various embodiments, the sensor data may be used to assist in determining the timing of the creation of a fistula. In some embodiments, the sensor data may be used to aid in determining an appropriate fluid volume removal prescription (e.g., amount and rate or profile of fluid removal) of a blood fluid removal session. In some embodiments, the sensor data may be used during a blood fluid removal treatment session, e.g. as described in U.S. provisional patent application No. 61/480,528, filed on the same date as the present disclosure, entitled FLUID VOLUME MONITORING FOR PATIENTS WITH RENAL DISEASE, which provisional patent application is hereby incorporated herein by reference in its entirety to the extent that it does not conflict with the disclosure presented herein.
Referring now to
In some embodiments, the methods depicted in
As shown in
For example and as shown in
It will be understood that the methods depicted in, and described with regard to
Any suitable device or system for removing fluid, or fluid and contaminants, from blood may be used in accordance with the teachings presented herein. The devices, or components thereof, may be traditional large counsel-type, wearable, implantable, or the like.
Block diagrams of some examples devices and systems for blood fluid removal are shown in
With some of such devices, fluid may be removed at too great of a rate. Accordingly and with reference to
As shown in the embodiment depicted in
As shown in
Regardless of the device or blood fluid removal process employed, it is important to control the amount and rate of fluid removal to avoid severe hypotension, heart failure or sudden cardiac death in patients from whom blood fluid is removed. It is also important to control the amount and rate of fluid removal for purposes of efficiency. That is, even though it may be generally safer to remove fluid very slowly, such slow removal may result in blood fluid removal sessions that last for considerable periods of time. While such slow removal may be acceptable for blood fluid removal systems that are wearable or implantable, it may not be acceptable for larger stand alone systems that require a patient visit to a clinic. The patient's quality of life, which is typically already low, may suffer from extended stays in the clinic that would be necessary for systems that slowly remove fluid from the blood. Ideally a blood fluid removal device or system balances the health concerns with the efficiency concerns in controlling the rate of fluid removal.
Of course, the amount of fluid removed is also an important variable in maintenance of patient health. If too little fluid is removed, the patient is burdened with excess fluid, which can lead to heart failure, hypertension, or other disorders, until their next blood fluid removal session or until their fluid removal prescription is changed. If too much fluid is removed, the patient may suffer from hypotension, crashing, sudden cardiac death, or the like. Accordingly, it would be desirable to remove fluid from the blood not only at an acceptable rate, but also in an acceptable amount.
The data acquired from sensors, e.g. as described above, used in chronic monitoring of indicators of fluid volume may, in some embodiments, be used to allow initial fluid volume removal prescriptions to be more accurate and reliable than those currently used based on dry weight (which often may be determined days or weeks from a given fluid removal session). In some embodiments, the sensor data may be used during a blood fluid removal treatment session, e.g. as described in U.S. provisional patent application No. 61/480,528, filed on the same date as the present disclosure, entitled FLUID VOLUME MONITORING FOR PATIENTS WITH RENAL DISEASE, and having.
Referring now to
Based on information received from sensors that monitor blood fluid volume or tissue fluid volume, the control electronics 150 can control one or more of the blood flow control element 120 (e.g., based on calculated fluid volume removal prescription), the dialysis flow control element 170, and the negative pressure control element 190 to adjust the rate at which fluid is removed from the blood of the patient. For example, altering the flow rate of the blood (via the blood flow control element 120) through the medium component 130 may alter fluid clearance across the membrane. Altering flow of dialysate (via dialysis flow control element 170) through the medium component 130 may similarly alter fluid clearance across the membrane. Negative pressure (via negative pressure control element 190) may be applied on the dialysate compartment side of the membrane 135 and may result in greater fluid clearance across the membrane due to convective forces. It will be understood that a device 100 need not have all of the controllable elements (120, 170, 190) depicted in
Any suitable blood flow control elements 120 may be used to control flow of blood through the membrane component 130. For example, a variable or adjustable rate pump may be employed. Alternatively or in addition, a series of electronically controllable valves in communication flow paths having differing resistance to flow may be employed (in such cases the flow restrictors would preferably be downstream of the medium component 130). Dialysis flow control element 170 may contain similar components or be similarly configured to blood flow control element 120. The negative pressure control element 120 may include a pump or the like.
Referring now to
Any suitable replacement fluid flow control element 195 may be used to control flow of replacement fluid into the blood before being returned to the patient. Replacement fluid flow control element 195 may contain similar components or be similarly configured to blood flow control element 120 as described above with regard to
As discussed above and as shown in
In some embodiments, a computer readable medium contains instructions that cause the processor of control electronics (of sensing device or fluid volume removal device) to carry out the methods described above, e.g. the methods depicted and described above with regard to
Of course, a sensing device may communicate with one or more intermediary device before data is sent to the blood fluid removal device or system to use the data to control the rate of fluid removal from blood in accordance with the teachings presented herein.
Various aspects of devices, systems, methods, computer-readable media, etc. are described herein. Some of the aspects are summarized below.
In a first aspect, a method comprises (i) monitoring an indicator of fluid volume of a patient via an implantable sensor device; and setting an initial fluid volume removal prescription for a blood fluid removal session based on the monitored indicator of fluid volume.
A second aspect is a method of the first aspect, further comprising transmitting data regarding the indicator of fluid volume from the implantable sensor device to fluid removal device.
A third aspect is a method of the second aspect, wherein setting the initial fluid volume removal prescription comprises calculating the fluid volume prescription by the fluid removal device based on the data received from the implantable sensor.
A fourth aspect is a method of any of aspects 1-3, wherein the indicator of fluid volume is an indicator of tissue fluid volume or an indicator of blood fluid volume.
A fifth aspect is a method of any of aspects 1-4, wherein the indicator of fluid volume is tissue impedance or blood hematocrit.
A sixth aspect is a method of any of aspects 1-5, wherein the indicator of fluid volume is tissue impedance.
A seventh aspect is a method of any of aspects 1-6, further comprising determining whether the indicator of fluid volume crosses a predetermined threshold value, and providing an alert to the patient if the indicator of fluid volume is determined to cross the threshold value.
An eighth aspect is a method of the seventh aspect, further comprising automatically scheduling a blood fluid removal session if the indicator crosses the threshold value by transmitting a signal from the sensor to a healthcare provider via an intermediary device.
A ninth aspect is a method of the first aspect, wherein monitoring the indicator of fluid volume comprises monitoring an indicator of tissue fluid volume, wherein the method further comprises monitoring an indicator of blood fluid volume, and wherein setting the initial fluid volume removal prescription for the blood fluid removal session based on the monitored indicator of fluid volume comprises setting the initial fluid volume removal prescription based on the ratio of the monitored indicators of tissue fluid volume and blood fluid volume.
A tenth aspect is a method of the first aspect, wherein monitoring the indicator of fluid volume comprises monitoring an indicator of blood fluid volume, wherein the method further comprises monitoring an indicator of tissue fluid volume, and wherein setting the initial fluid volume removal prescription for the blood fluid removal session comprises setting the initial fluid volume removal prescription based on the ratio of the monitored indicators of tissue fluid volume and blood fluid volume.
An eleventh aspect is a system comprising (a) a sensor configured to monitor an indicator of fluid volume; and (b) a blood fluid removal device comprising (i) an inlet for receiving blood from a patient, (ii) an first outlet for returning blood from the patient, (iii) a medium for removing fluid from the blood, the medium being positioned between the inlet and the first outlet, (iv) a fluid rate removal controller, (v) a second outlet for flow of the removed fluid, and (vi) electronics coupled to the fluid rate removal controller and the sensor, wherein the electronics are configured to set an initial fluid rate removal prescription based on data received from the sensor and to control the fluid rate removal controller based on the set initial fluid rate removal prescription.
A twelfth aspect is a system of the eleventh aspect, wherein the sensor is implantable.
A thirteenth aspect is a system of the eleventh aspect, wherein the sensor is wearable.
A fourteenth aspect is a system of any of aspects 11-13, wherein the electronics comprise a computer readable medium that, when implemented, cause the electronics to calculate the initial fluid rate removal prescription based on data received from the sensor and instruct the fluid rate removal controller to operate according to the initial fluid rate removal prescription.
A fifteenth aspect is a method of aspect 11 or 14, wherein the sensor and the fluid removal device are implantable.
A sixteenth aspect is a method of aspect 11 or 14, wherein the sensor and the fluid removal device are wearable.
A seventeenth aspect is a system of any of aspects 11-16, wherein the control electronics are disposed in a housing of the blood fluid removal device
An eighteenth aspect is a method carried out by an implantable device comprising: (i) monitoring indicator of fluid volume in a patient suffering from chronic kidney disease, wherein the monitoring is performed, at least in part, by an implantable sensor device; (ii) determining whether the monitored indicator of fluid volume crosses a predetermined threshold; and (iii) providing a sensory cue to the patient if the monitored indicator is determined to cross the threshold.
A nineteenth aspect is a method of the eighteenth aspect, further comprising automatically scheduling a blood fluid removal session if the monitored indicator is determined to cross the threshold.
A twentieth aspect is a system comprising: (a) an implantable sensor device configured to monitor impedance of tissue of a patient, the device comprising (i) a first electrode, (ii) a second electrode, (iii) electronics operably coupled to the first and second electrodes for monitoring impedance of current flow between the two electrodes, and (iv) a first communication circuit configured to transmit data regarding the monitored impedance; (b) a fluid removal device for removing fluid from a patient, the device comprising (i) an inlet for receiving blood from a patient, (ii) a medium in for removing fluid from the blood, the medium being in communication with the inlet, (iii) an outlet in communication with the medium for returning blood to the patient; (iv) a flow controller in communication with the inlet, outlet or medium configured to control the rate at which the fluid is removed from the medium; (c) a second communication circuit configured to wirelessly receive the data regarding the impedance from the implantable device; and (d) electronics in communication with the second communication circuit and the flow controller wherein the electronics are configured to set an initial fluid removal prescription for a fluid removal session based on the impedance data received prior to the start of the session and to control the flow controller regarding the rate of fluid removal based on the received impedance data.
A twenty-first aspect is a system of the twentieth aspect, wherein the electronics of the fluid removal device are configured to alter the initial fluid removal rate or profile during a fluid removal session based on the on the impedance data received during the session.
A twenty-second aspect is a method of aspect 20 or 21, wherein the fluid removal device is implantable, and wherein the first communication circuit of the sensor device and the second communication circuit of the fluid removal device are the same circuit.
A twenty-third aspect is a system of any of aspects 20-22, wherein the control electronics are disposed in a housing of the blood fluid removal device.
A twenty-fourth aspect is a sensor device comprising: (i) a detector circuit and components configured to acquire sensed data regarding an indicator of fluid volume; (ii) control electronic configured to receive the acquired sensed data from the detector circuit and to calculate a fluid volume removal prescription based on the acquired sensed data.
The following prophetic example is presented to provide guidance as to how to acquire and interpret data from an implantable sensor configured to tissue fluid volume of a patient for use in methods or devices as described in the DETAILED DESCRIPTION above. It will be understood that the prophetic example provided herein in only one suitable way for monitored data to be acquired and interpreted in accordance with the general principles disclosed herein.
For this prophetic example, an implantable tissue impedance sensor, such as Medtronic, Inc.'s OptiVol® fluid status monitoring system, is implanted in a patient such that tissue impedance is measured between the housing of the device and an electrode extended from the housing via a lead. Well-documented procedures for determining acceptable ranges of tissue impedance and thus fluid volume have been established. See, e.g., (i) Siegenthalar, et al. Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing (2010): 24:449-451, and (ii) Wang, Am. J. Cardiology, 99(Suppl):3G-1-G, May 21, 2007. Such methods may be employed/Alternatively or in addition, tissue impedance may be monitored for a suitable period of time to establish as suitable baseline, and patient markers or clinician input may be used to instruct whether the patient is fluid overloaded or under-loaded. The data acquired by impedance sensor and input data regarding fluid status of the patient at the time the sensor data is acquired may be used to establish suitable ranges for impedance values. The sensor may be recalibrated from time to time by transmitting information regarding the fluid status of the patient determined, for example, as a result of a physical examination.
Once the sensor is properly calibrated, its readings with regard to tissue impedance as it relates to fluid volume may be trusted. These readings can then be reliably used in accordance with the teachings provided herein.
Thus, systems, devices and methods for MONITORING FLUID VOLUME FOR PATIENTS WITH RENAL DISEASE are described. Those skilled in the art will recognize that the preferred embodiments described herein may be altered or amended without departing from the true spirit and scope of the disclosure, as defined in the accompanying claims.
This application claims priority to U.S. Provisional Application No. 61/480,539, U.S. Provisional Application No. 61/480,544, filed Apr. 29, 2011, U.S. Provisional Application No. 61/480,541, U.S. Provisional Application No. 61/480,535, U.S. Provisional Application No. 61/480,532, U.S. Provisional Application No. 61/480,530, U.S. Provisional Application No. 61/480,528, and U.S. application Ser. No. 13/424,467, all of which application are hereby incorporated by reference in its entirety to the extent that it does not conflict with the disclosure presented herein.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3608729 | Haselden | Sep 1971 | A |
3669878 | Marantz | Jun 1972 | A |
3669880 | Marantz | Jun 1972 | A |
3850835 | Marantz | Nov 1974 | A |
3884808 | Scott | May 1975 | A |
3989622 | Marantz | Nov 1976 | A |
4060485 | Eaton | Nov 1977 | A |
4371385 | Johnson | Feb 1983 | A |
4374382 | Markowitz | Feb 1983 | A |
4381999 | Boucher | May 1983 | A |
4460555 | Thompson | Jul 1984 | A |
4556063 | Thompson | Dec 1985 | A |
4562751 | Nason | Jan 1986 | A |
4581141 | Ash | Apr 1986 | A |
4650587 | Polak | Mar 1987 | A |
4678408 | Mason | Jul 1987 | A |
4685903 | Cable | Aug 1987 | A |
4750494 | King | Jun 1988 | A |
4826663 | Alberti | May 1989 | A |
4828693 | Lindsay | May 1989 | A |
5080653 | Voss | Jan 1992 | A |
5092886 | Dobos-Hardy | Mar 1992 | A |
5097122 | Coiman | Mar 1992 | A |
5127404 | Wyborny | Jul 1992 | A |
5284470 | Beltz | Feb 1994 | A |
5302288 | Meidl | Apr 1994 | A |
5305745 | Zacouto | Apr 1994 | A |
5318750 | Lascombes | Jun 1994 | A |
5468388 | Goddard | Nov 1995 | A |
5683432 | Goedeke | Nov 1997 | A |
5762782 | Kenley | Jun 1998 | A |
5902336 | Mishkin | May 1999 | A |
5944684 | Roberts | Aug 1999 | A |
6048732 | Anslyn | Apr 2000 | A |
6052622 | Holmstrom | Apr 2000 | A |
6058331 | King | May 2000 | A |
6156002 | Polaschegg et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
6230059 | Duffin | May 2001 | B1 |
6248093 | Moberg | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6254567 | Treu | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6321101 | Holmstrom | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6362591 | Moberg | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6363279 | Ben-Haim | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6505075 | Weiner | Jan 2003 | B1 |
6554798 | Mann | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6555986 | Moberg | Apr 2003 | B2 |
6589229 | Connelly | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6602399 | Fromherz | Aug 2003 | B1 |
6627164 | Wong | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6676608 | Keren | Jan 2004 | B1 |
6689083 | Gelfand | Feb 2004 | B1 |
6706007 | Gelfand | Mar 2004 | B2 |
6711439 | Bradley | Mar 2004 | B1 |
6726647 | Sternby | Apr 2004 | B1 |
6780322 | Bissler | Aug 2004 | B1 |
6818196 | Wong | Nov 2004 | B2 |
6878283 | Thompson | Apr 2005 | B2 |
6887214 | Levin | May 2005 | B1 |
6890315 | Levin | May 2005 | B1 |
6960179 | Gura | Nov 2005 | B2 |
7074332 | Summerton | Jul 2006 | B2 |
7077819 | Goldau | Jul 2006 | B1 |
7175809 | Gelfand | Feb 2007 | B2 |
7208092 | Micheli | Apr 2007 | B2 |
7276042 | Polaschegg | Oct 2007 | B2 |
7399289 | Gelfand | Jul 2008 | B2 |
7500958 | Asbrink | Mar 2009 | B2 |
7566432 | Wong | Jul 2009 | B2 |
7575564 | Childers | Aug 2009 | B2 |
7674231 | McCombie | Mar 2010 | B2 |
7704361 | Garde | Apr 2010 | B2 |
7736507 | Wong | Jun 2010 | B2 |
7744553 | Kelly | Jun 2010 | B2 |
7754852 | Burnett | Jul 2010 | B2 |
7756572 | Fard | Jul 2010 | B1 |
7775983 | Zhang | Aug 2010 | B2 |
7776210 | Rosenbaum | Aug 2010 | B2 |
7785463 | Bissler | Aug 2010 | B2 |
7794141 | Perry | Sep 2010 | B2 |
7850635 | Polaschegg | Dec 2010 | B2 |
7857976 | Bissler | Dec 2010 | B2 |
7867214 | Childers | Jan 2011 | B2 |
7896831 | Sternby | Mar 2011 | B2 |
7922686 | Childers | Apr 2011 | B2 |
7922911 | Micheli | Apr 2011 | B2 |
7947179 | Rosenbaum | May 2011 | B2 |
7955291 | Sternby | Jun 2011 | B2 |
7967022 | Grant | Jun 2011 | B2 |
7981082 | Wang | Jul 2011 | B2 |
8000000 | Greenberg | Aug 2011 | B2 |
8034161 | Gura | Oct 2011 | B2 |
8070709 | Childers | Dec 2011 | B2 |
8096969 | Roberts | Jan 2012 | B2 |
8183046 | Lu | May 2012 | B2 |
8187250 | Roberts | May 2012 | B2 |
8197439 | Wang | Jun 2012 | B2 |
8202241 | Karakama | Jun 2012 | B2 |
8246826 | Wilt | Aug 2012 | B2 |
8273049 | Demers | Sep 2012 | B2 |
8282828 | Wallenas | Oct 2012 | B2 |
8292594 | Tracey | Oct 2012 | B2 |
8313642 | Yu et al. | Nov 2012 | B2 |
8317492 | Demers | Nov 2012 | B2 |
8357113 | Childers | Jan 2013 | B2 |
8366316 | Kamen | Feb 2013 | B2 |
8366655 | Kamen | Feb 2013 | B2 |
8404091 | Ding | Mar 2013 | B2 |
8409441 | Wilt | Apr 2013 | B2 |
8496809 | Roger | Jul 2013 | B2 |
8499780 | Wilt | Aug 2013 | B2 |
8500676 | Jansson | Aug 2013 | B2 |
8512271 | Moissl | Aug 2013 | B2 |
8518260 | Raimann | Aug 2013 | B2 |
8521482 | Akonur | Aug 2013 | B2 |
8535525 | Heyes | Sep 2013 | B2 |
8560510 | Brueggerhoff | Oct 2013 | B2 |
8580112 | Updyke | Nov 2013 | B2 |
8597227 | Childers | Dec 2013 | B2 |
8696626 | Kirsch | Apr 2014 | B2 |
8903492 | Soykan | Dec 2014 | B2 |
20020042561 | Schulman et al. | Apr 2002 | A1 |
20020112609 | Wong | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20030080059 | Peterson | May 2003 | A1 |
20030097086 | Gura | May 2003 | A1 |
20030105435 | Taylor | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030114787 | Gura | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20040019312 | Childers | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040068219 | Summerton | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040099593 | DePaolis | May 2004 | A1 |
20040147900 | Polaschegg | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040168969 | Sternby | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040215090 | Erkkila | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20050065760 | Murtfeldt | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050113796 | Taylor | May 2005 | A1 |
20050126961 | Bissler | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050126998 | Childers | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050131331 | Kelly | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050150832 | Tsukamoto | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050234381 | Niemetz | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050236330 | Nier | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050274658 | Rosenbaum | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20060025661 | Sweeney | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060058731 | Burnett | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060195064 | Plahey | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060217771 | Soykan | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060226079 | Mori | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060241709 | Soykan | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060264894 | Moberg | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20070007208 | Brugger | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070066928 | Lannoy | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070138011 | Hofmann | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070175827 | Wariar | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070179431 | Roberts | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070213653 | Childers | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20070215545 | Bissler | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20070255250 | Moberg | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20080006570 | Gura | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080021337 | Li | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080053905 | Brugger | Mar 2008 | A9 |
20080067132 | Ross | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080093276 | Roger | Apr 2008 | A1 |
20080215247 | Tonelli | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080253427 | Kamen | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20090020471 | Tsukamoto | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090101577 | Fulkerson | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090124963 | Hogard | May 2009 | A1 |
20090127193 | Updyke | May 2009 | A1 |
20090171261 | Sternby | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090264776 | Vardy | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090275849 | Stewart | Nov 2009 | A1 |
20090275883 | Chapman | Nov 2009 | A1 |
20090281484 | Childers | Nov 2009 | A1 |
20090282980 | Gura | Nov 2009 | A1 |
20090314063 | Sternby | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20100004588 | Yeh | Jan 2010 | A1 |
20100010429 | Childers | Jan 2010 | A1 |
20100042035 | Moissl | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20100078381 | Merchant | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100078387 | Wong | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100084330 | Wong | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100087771 | Karakama | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100094158 | Solem | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100113891 | Barrett | May 2010 | A1 |
20100114012 | Sandford | May 2010 | A1 |
20100137693 | Porras | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100137782 | Jansson | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100168546 | Kamath | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100217180 | Akonur | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20100217181 | Roberts | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20100224492 | Ding | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100234795 | Wallenas | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100241045 | Kelly | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20110017665 | Updyke | Jan 2011 | A1 |
20110048949 | Ding et al. | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110066043 | Banet | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110071465 | Wang | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110077574 | Sigg | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110079558 | Raimann | Apr 2011 | A1 |
20110087187 | Beck | Apr 2011 | A1 |
20110100909 | Stange | May 2011 | A1 |
20110106003 | Childers | May 2011 | A1 |
20110130666 | Dong | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110144570 | Childers | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110184340 | Tan | Jul 2011 | A1 |
20110272337 | Palmer | Nov 2011 | A1 |
20110301447 | Park | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20120016228 | Kroh | Jan 2012 | A1 |
20120083729 | Childers | Apr 2012 | A1 |
20120085707 | Beiriger | Apr 2012 | A1 |
20120115248 | Ansyln | May 2012 | A1 |
20120220528 | VanAntwerp | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20120258546 | Marran | Oct 2012 | A1 |
20120259276 | Childers | Oct 2012 | A1 |
20120273415 | Gerber | Nov 2012 | A1 |
20120273420 | Gerber | Nov 2012 | A1 |
20120277546 | Soykan | Nov 2012 | A1 |
20120277551 | Gerber | Nov 2012 | A1 |
20120277552 | Gerber | Nov 2012 | A1 |
20120277604 | Gerber | Nov 2012 | A1 |
20120277650 | Gerber | Nov 2012 | A1 |
20120277655 | Gerber | Nov 2012 | A1 |
20120277722 | Gerber | Nov 2012 | A1 |
20130037465 | Heyes | Feb 2013 | A1 |
20130062265 | Balschat | Mar 2013 | A1 |
20130193073 | Hogard | Aug 2013 | A1 |
20130199998 | Kelly | Aug 2013 | A1 |
20130211730 | Wolff | Aug 2013 | A1 |
20130213890 | Kelly | Aug 2013 | A1 |
20130228517 | Roger | Sep 2013 | A1 |
20130231607 | Roger | Sep 2013 | A1 |
20130248426 | Pouchoulin | Sep 2013 | A1 |
20130274642 | Soykan | Oct 2013 | A1 |
20130324915 | Britton | Dec 2013 | A1 |
20130330208 | Ly | Dec 2013 | A1 |
20130331774 | Farrell | Dec 2013 | A1 |
20140018728 | Plahey | Jan 2014 | A1 |
20140042092 | Akonur | Feb 2014 | A1 |
20140065950 | Mendelsohn | Mar 2014 | A1 |
20140088442 | Soykan | Mar 2014 | A1 |
20140110340 | White | Apr 2014 | A1 |
20140110341 | White | Apr 2014 | A1 |
20140158538 | Collier | Jun 2014 | A1 |
20140158588 | Pudil | Jun 2014 | A1 |
20140158623 | Pudil | Jun 2014 | A1 |
20140190876 | Meyer | Jul 2014 | A1 |
20140217028 | Pudil | Aug 2014 | A1 |
20140217029 | Meyer | Aug 2014 | A1 |
20140217030 | Meyer | Aug 2014 | A1 |
20140220699 | Pudil | Aug 2014 | A1 |
20150032023 | Soykan | Jan 2015 | A1 |
20150080682 | Gerber | Mar 2015 | A1 |
20150088047 | Gerber | Mar 2015 | A1 |
20150144539 | Pudil | May 2015 | A1 |
20150250427 | Soykan | Sep 2015 | A1 |
20150352269 | Gerber | Dec 2015 | A1 |
20150367054 | Gerber | Dec 2015 | A1 |
20160206801 | Gerber | Jul 2016 | A1 |
20160331884 | Sigg | Nov 2016 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
103037917 | Apr 2013 | CN |
266795 | Nov 1987 | EP |
1124599 | May 2000 | EP |
1175238 | Nov 2000 | EP |
2308526 | Oct 2003 | EP |
1364666 | Nov 2003 | EP |
1523347 | Jan 2004 | EP |
1523350 | Jan 2004 | EP |
0906768 | Feb 2004 | EP |
1691863 | Apr 2005 | EP |
2116269 | Feb 2008 | EP |
1450879 | Oct 2008 | EP |
1514562 | Apr 2009 | EP |
2219703 | May 2009 | EP |
1592494 | Jun 2009 | EP |
2100553 | Sep 2009 | EP |
2398529 | Nov 2010 | EP |
2575827 | Dec 2010 | EP |
2100553 | Aug 2011 | EP |
2576453 | Dec 2011 | EP |
2701580 | Nov 2012 | EP |
2701595 | Nov 2012 | EP |
1345856 | Mar 2013 | EP |
2344220 | Apr 2013 | EP |
1351756 | Jul 2013 | EP |
2190498 | Jul 2013 | EP |
2701596 | Mar 2014 | EP |
1582226 | Jan 2016 | EP |
2002542900 | Dec 2002 | JP |
2003235965 | Aug 2003 | JP |
5099464 | Oct 2012 | JP |
9503839 | Feb 1995 | WO |
9937342 | Jul 1999 | WO |
0057935 | Oct 2000 | WO |
0066197 | Nov 2000 | WO |
0066197 | Nov 2000 | WO |
0170307 | Sep 2001 | WO |
0185295 | Sep 2001 | WO |
0185295 | Nov 2001 | WO |
1085295 | Nov 2001 | WO |
03043677 | May 2003 | WO |
03043680 | May 2003 | WO |
03051422 | Jun 2003 | WO |
2004008826 | Jan 2004 | WO |
2004009156 | Jan 2004 | WO |
2004009158 | Jan 2004 | WO |
2004030716 | Apr 2004 | WO |
2004030717 | Apr 2004 | WO |
2004064616 | Aug 2004 | WO |
2005061026 | Jul 2005 | WO |
2005123230 | Dec 2005 | WO |
2006011009 | Feb 2006 | WO |
2006017446 | Feb 2006 | WO |
2007038347 | Apr 2007 | WO |
2007089855 | Aug 2007 | WO |
2008037410 | Apr 2008 | WO |
2009026603 | Dec 2008 | WO |
2009024566 | Feb 2009 | WO |
2009026603 | Mar 2009 | WO |
2009061608 | May 2009 | WO |
2009094184 | Jul 2009 | WO |
2009157877 | Dec 2009 | WO |
2009157878 | Dec 2009 | WO |
2010028860 | Feb 2010 | WO |
2010028860 | Mar 2010 | WO |
2010033699 | Mar 2010 | WO |
2010077851 | Jul 2010 | WO |
2010096659 | Oct 2010 | WO |
2010121820 | Oct 2010 | WO |
2011025705 | Mar 2011 | WO |
2011026645 | Mar 2011 | WO |
2011137693 | Nov 2011 | WO |
2012042323 | Apr 2012 | WO |
2012050781 | Apr 2012 | WO |
2012051996 | Apr 2012 | WO |
2012073420 | Jul 2012 | WO |
2012148781 | Nov 2012 | WO |
2012148786 | Nov 2012 | WO |
2012148787 | Nov 2012 | WO |
2012148789 | Nov 2012 | WO |
2012162515 | Nov 2012 | WO |
2012172398 | Dec 2012 | WO |
2013019179 | Feb 2013 | WO |
2013019994 | Feb 2013 | WO |
2013025844 | Feb 2013 | WO |
2013028809 | Feb 2013 | WO |
2013101292 | Jul 2013 | WO |
2013103607 | Jul 2013 | WO |
2013103906 | Jul 2013 | WO |
2013110906 | Aug 2013 | WO |
2013110919 | Aug 2013 | WO |
2013114063 | Aug 2013 | WO |
2013121162 | Aug 2013 | WO |
2013140346 | Sep 2013 | WO |
2013141896 | Sep 2013 | WO |
2013101292 | Oct 2013 | WO |
2014066254 | May 2014 | WO |
2014066255 | May 2014 | WO |
2014077082 | May 2014 | WO |
2014121162 | Aug 2014 | WO |
2014121163 | Aug 2014 | WO |
2014121167 | Aug 2014 | WO |
2014121169 | Aug 2014 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Wang, Fundamentals of intrathoracic impedance monitoring in heart failure, Am. J. Cardiology, 2007, 3G-310: Suppl. |
Bleyer, et. al., Sudden and cardiac death rates in hemodialysis patients, Kidney International, 1999, 1553-1559 : 55. |
Brynda, et. al., The detection of toman 2-microglcbuiin by grating coupler immunosensor with three dimensional antibody networks. Biosensors & Bioelectronics, 1999, 363-368, 14(4). |
Hemametrics, Crit-Line Hematocrit Accuracy, 2003, 1-5, vol. 1, Tech Note No. 11 (Rev. D). |
Nedelkov, et. al., Design of buffer exchange surfaces and sensor chips for biosensor chip mass spectrometry, Proteomics, 2002, 441-446, 2(4). |
PCT/US/2012/034327, International Search Report, Aug. 13, 2013. |
PCT/US/2012/034329, International Search Report, Dec. 3, 2012. |
PCT/US2012/034331, International Search Report, Jul. 9, 2012. |
PCT/US2012/034334, International Search Report, Jul. 6, 2012. |
PCT/US2012/034335, International Search Report, Sep. 5, 2012. |
Roberts M, The regenerative dialysis (REDY) sorbent system. Nephrology, 1998, 275-278:4. |
Siegenthalar, et. al., Pulmonary fluid status monitoring with intrathoracic impedance, Journal of Cli. |
Zhong, et. al., Miniature urea sensor based on H(+)-ion sensitive field effect transistor and its application in clinical analysis, Chin. J. Biotechnol., 1992, 57-65. 8(1). |
Overgaard, et. al., Activity-induced recovery of excitability in K+-depressed rat soieus muscle, Am. J. P. |
Overgaard. et. al., Relations between excitability and contractility in rate soleus'muscle: role of the Na+-K+ pump and Na+-K-S gradients. Journal of Physiology, 1999, 215-225, 518(1). |
PCT/US2012/034330, International Search Report, Aug. 28, 2012. |
PCT/US2012/034332, International Search Report, Jul. 5, 2012. |
Secemsky, et. al, High prevalence of cardiac autonomic dysfunction and T-wave alternans in dialysis patients. Heart Rhythm, Apr. 2011, 592-598 : vol. 8, No. 4. |
Wang, Fundamentals of intrathoracic impedance monitoring in heart failure, Am. J. Cardiology, 2007, 3G-10G : Suppl. |
Wei, et. al., Fullerene-cryptand coated piezoelectric crystal urea sensor based on urease, Analytica Chimica Acta, 2001,77-85:437. |
Redfield, et. al, Restoration of renal response to atria! natriuretic factor in experimental low-output heat failure, Am. J. Physiol., 1989, R917-923:257. |
Rogoza, et. al., Validation of A&D UA-767 device for the self-measurement of blood pressure, Blood Pressure Monitoring, 2000, 227-231, 5(4). |
Ronco, et. al., Cardiorenal Syndrome, J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., 2008, 1527-1539:52. |
PCT/US2012/034329, International Preliminary Report on Patentability, Oct. 29, 2013. |
MacLean, et, al., Effects of hindlimb contraction on pressor and muscle interstitial metabolite responses in the cat, J. App. Physiol., 1998, 1583-1592, 85 (4). |
Lima, et. al., An electrochemical sensor based on nanostructure hollsndite-type manganese oxide for detection of potassium ion, Sensors, 2009, 6613-8625, 9. |
PCT/US2012/034335, International Preliminary Report on Patentability, Nov. 7, 2013. |
Gambro AK 96 Dialysis Machine Operator's Manual, Dec. 2012. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/757,794, filed Feb. 2, 2013. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/757,722, filed Feb. 1, 2013. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/837,287, filed Mar. 15, 2013. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/757,792, filed Feb. 2, 2013. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/791,755, filed Mar. 8, 2013. |
The FHN Trial Group. In-Center. Hemodialysis Six Times per Week versus Three Times per Week, New England Journal of Medicine, 2010 Abstract. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/757,693, filed Feb. 1, 2013. |
Coast, et al. 1990, An approach to Cardiac Arrhythmia analysis Using Hidden Markov Models, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering. 1990, 37 (9):826-835. |
PCT/US2012/034330, International Preliminary Report on Patentability, Oct. 29, 2013. |
PCT Application, PCT/US20013/020404, filed Jan. 4, 2013. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/836,973, filed Mar. 15, 2013. |
U.S. Appl. No. 14/259,655, filed Apr. 23, 2014. |
U.S. Appl. No. 14/259,589, filed Apr. 23, 2014. |
PCT/US2012/034333, International Preliminary Report on Patentability, Oct. 29, 2013. |
PCT/US2012/034333, International Search Report, Aug. 29, 2013. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/757,794, filed Feb. 2, 2012. |
Bleyer, et. al., Sudden and cardiac death rated in hemodialysis patients, Kidney International. 1999, 1553-1559: 55. |
Weiner, et. al., Article: Cardiac Function and Cardiovascular Disease in Chronic Kidney Disease, Book: Primer on Kidney Diseases (Author: Greenberg, et al), 2009,499-505, 5th Ed., Saunders Elsevier, Philadelphia, PA. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/424,517 IDS, filed Aug. 2, 2012. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/424,517, IDS filed Dec. 2, 2013. |
PCT/US2012/034332, Internatonal Preliminary Report on Patentability, Oct. 29, 2013. |
PCT/US2012/034303, Internationa Search Report, Jul. 6, 2013. |
PCT/US2012/034327, International Preliminary Report on Patentability, Oct. 29, 2013. |
Zoccali, Pulmonary Congestion Predicts Cardiac Events and Mortality in ESRD, Clinical Epidemiology, J. Am Soc Nephrol 24:639-646, 2013. |
Velasco, Optimal Fluid Control can Normalize Cardiovascular Risk Markers and Limit Left Ventricular Hypertrophy in Thrice Weekly Dialysis Patients, Hemodialysis Intenational, 16:465-472, 2012. |
Whitman, CKD and Sudden Cardiac Death: Epidemiology, Mechanisms, and Therapeutic Approaches, J Am Soc Nephrol, 23:1929-1939, 2012. |
Hall, Hospitalization for Congestive Heart Failure: United States, 2000-2010, NCHS Data Brief, No. 108, Oct. 2012. |
Albert, Fluid Management Strategies in Heart Failure, Critical Care Nurse, 32:20-32, 2012. |
PCT/US2014/065201 International Search Report mailed May 26, 2015. |
John Wm Agar: “Review: Understnading sorbent dialysis systems,” Nephrology, vol. 15, No. 4, Jun. 1, 2010, pp. 406-411. |
Office Action in U.S. Appl. No. 14/554,338 Dated Jun. 7, 2016. |
Office Action in U.S. Appl. No. 14/554,338 Dated Sep. 28, 2016. |
Office Action in U.S. Appl. No. 13/424,467 Dated Oct. 16, 2013. |
Office Action in U.S. Appl. No. 13/424,467 Dated Mar. 3, 2014. |
Office Action in U.S. Appl. No. 13/424,490 Dated Oct. 22, 2013. |
Office Action in U.S. Appl. No. 13/424,490 Dated Mar. 10, 2014. |
Office Action in U.S. Appl. No. 13/424,490 Dated Jul. 14, 2014. |
Office Action in U.S. Appl. No. 13/424,490 Dated Dec. 5, 2014. |
Office Action in U.S. Appl. No. 13/424,525 dated Sep. 29, 2014. |
Office Action in U.S. Appl. No. 13/424,525 dated May 6, 2015. |
Office Action in U.S. Appl. No. 13/424,525 dated Aug. 11, 2015. |
Office Action in U.S. Appl. No. 13/424,525 dated Oct. 26, 2016. |
Office Action in U.S. Appl. No. 13/424,454 Dated Oct. 17, 2013. |
Office Action in U.S. Appl. No. 13/424,454 Dated Mar. 10, 2014. |
Office Action in U.S. Appl. No. 13/424,429 Dated Oct. 15, 2015. |
Office Action in U.S. Appl. No. 12/571,127 dated Feb. 27, 2014. |
Office Action in U.S. Appl. No. 12/571,127 dated Jul. 6, 2015. |
Office Action in U.S. Appl. No. 12/571,127 dated Dec. 17, 2015. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20150088047 A1 | Mar 2015 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61480539 | Apr 2011 | US | |
61480544 | Apr 2011 | US | |
61480541 | Apr 2011 | US | |
61480535 | Apr 2011 | US | |
61480532 | Apr 2011 | US | |
61480530 | Apr 2011 | US | |
61480528 | Apr 2011 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 13424467 | Mar 2012 | US |
Child | 14554272 | US |