The invention relates to the general field of magneto-resistive memory elements with particular reference the free layer and, more particularly, to its shape.
Referring now to
For MRAM applications, the MTJ or GMR stack is usually formed so as to provide shape anisotropy. This shape anisotropy comes about when the stack's shape ceases to be circular, typically being replaced by an ellipse. In its quiescent state, the free layer magnetization lies along the long axis of the cell (in
Digital information is thus encoded as the direction of magnetization in the free layer.
In MRAM applications, the two external fields used to program a given MRAM cell (designated 31 in
It follows from the above discussion that the values of both bit and word currents have to be carefully set—too low and the selected cell cannot be programmed reliably, too high and errors may occur in half-selected cells. The MRAM programming window is determined by 3 boundaries: the field line need to reliably write the selected cells, the distance between the bit line field to the smallest Hs at Iword=0, and the distance between the bit line field to the smallest Hs at Iword.
This window can be increased by increasing the shape anisotropy value. However such an approach demands higher bit and word currents which is undesirable in high density applications. An alternative approach (such as disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 6,798,690 B1 and U.S. Pat. No. 6,798,691 B1) is to increase Hs at Iword=0 while maintaining Hs at Iword, by causing the free layer magnetization to be confined to a “C” shape (see
Once it enters the high hard axis field region, the switching behavior of the C-state returns to normal rotational mode. Thus for the C-state cells, the distance between the bit line field to the smallest Hs at Iword=0 is significantly increased. The conventional MRAM write operating point is set near the inflection point of the curves using combination fields generated by both word line and bit line, as indicated in the
Another approach to handling these two “half-select” issues has been to employ a segmented array architecture (U.S. Pat. No. 6,335,890 and U.S. Pat. No. 6,490,217). The segmented write field operating point 62 is also shown in
An unselected segmented group (e.g. 336) sharing a common write word line 386 with segmented group 334 does not receive a half-select field along its hard axis, even when the group select switch (e.g., 376) corresponding to the unselected segmented group 336 is enabled. This is primarily due to the fact that only one segmented bit slice among adjacent segmented bit slices, e.g., segmented bit slices N and N+1, can receive a destabilizing write current at any given time. Consequently, the magnitude of the hard axis field can be increased without disturbing the state of an unselected memory cell. Since all memory cells experiencing a hard axis field will, by definition, be written simultaneously, there are no half-selected memory cells along the word dimension using the segment write architecture.
With the segmented write architecture, the magnitude of the easy axis field (used to write the state of a memory cell) can be substantially decreased. The write margin between selected and half-selected cells is significantly increased. Moreover, because a large easy axis field is not required by the select line architecture of the invention, the bit line current required to write the memory cells can be significantly reduced, thus reducing the overall write current required by the memory array 300.
In addition to the reference cited above, a routine search of the prior art was performed with the following additional references of interest being found:
In U.S. Patent Application 2006/0013039, Braun et al. show a star-lobed structure for 2 bits storage. Their free layer magnetization has two easy axis directions 45 degree apart. U.S. Patent Application 2005/0242384 (Iwata et al) shows cruciform shapes, but this is along word/bit lines. U.S. Pat. No. 7,020,015 (Hong et al) shows a circle with a wedge removed and U-shaped structures both of which are variations of the basic “C” shape, while Hosotani, in U.S. Pat. No. 7,239,545, discloses first and second MTJ structures that together make an X-shape; i.e. two MTJs that store two bits and lie at an angle of 45 degrees to one another.
It has been an object of at least one embodiment of the present invention to eliminate the half-select problem from magneto-resistive based MRAMs.
Another object of at least one embodiment of the present invention has been to increase the value of the easy axis field when the hard axis field is close to zero.
Still another object of at least one embodiment of the present invention has been to eliminate said half-select problem without increasing programming currents.
A further object of at least one embodiment of the present invention has been to eliminate the half select problem without using a segmented-array architecture.
These objects have been achieved by giving the free layer a shape that approximates an X so that, when the free layer switches, the magnetization in the arms of the X guides the magnetization in the central section (the X's intersection area) so that it rotates towards the hard axis in two opposing directions. This raises the free layer's switching energy barrier, thereby reducing half-select errors.
The invention discloses the detailed design rules for forming such a free layer and presents data confirming that, relative to an elliptically shaped free layer, the X-shape results in about a 5× increase of the easy axis field at zero hard axis field. Even relative to the C-shape, there is about a 3× increase. This improvement effectively solves the half-select problem.
a and 1b provide schematic views of a free layer of the prior art,
a-4e illustrate how a C-shaped free layer switches.
a-7d illustrate how switching occurs in a free layer shaped according to the teachings of the present invention.
a-8g show variations on the schematic X-shape shown in
a and 9b show additional shape variations.
The invention discloses a new design for the shape of the free layer in a magneto-resistive device that is part of an MRAM. This design confines the quiescent free layer magnetization in a new state, the cross-tie (x-tie) state, as schematically illustrated by the example shown in
During switching, the magnetization in the branches serves to guide the central magnetization to rotate toward the hard axis, but in opposite directions (see
Note that if two C-shaped cells were placed back-to-back there would be no increase in the switching energy barrier since both domain walls would be operating in parallel. When the X-tie configuration of the present invention is used, however, a substantial increase in the barrier energy results. This can be seen in
A variety of shapes are possible that, as taught by the present invention, enable the shape anisotropy to guide the quiescent magnetization into an Xtie-state, thereby obtaining very high Hs at low hard axis field. This, in turn, largely eliminates the half-select problem discussed above.
The main characteristics that define the shape taught by the present invention are seen in
central section 71 that is approximately rectangular;
branches 72 (extensions of the central section) that originate at each of the four corners;
each branch 72 runs in a direction that is roughly parallel to a diagonal but may reduce its width and/or change its direction (always by tilting towards the hard axis direction) as it gets further from the central section;
branches 72 may have ends that come to a point (as in
as a design option, there may be additional branches (such as 82 in
there is no requirement that the shape be multiply symmetric (
termination of any given branch section can be as a point or as a rounded edge.
Dimensions for the free layer shape that are disclosed in the present invention include:
Each of the central region's short sides measured between 0.001 and 1.0 microns, with between 0.01 and 0.5 microns being preferred. Each of the long sides measured between 0.001 and 1.0 microns, with between 0.01 and 0.5 microns being preferred, while one of the long sides was, typically, between 1.1 and 5 times as long as one of the short sides.
Each of the branch sections had an average width between 0.0001 and 0.5, with between 0.001 and 0.1 microns being preferred, a length between 0.0001 and 0.5, with between 0.001 and 0.1 microns being preferred and an average length to width ratio of between 1.1 and 10 with between 1.1 and 3.0 microns being preferred.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
6335890 | Reohr et al. | Jan 2002 | B1 |
6490217 | DeBrosse et al. | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6798690 | Katti | Sep 2004 | B1 |
6798691 | Ounadjela et al. | Sep 2004 | B1 |
7020015 | Hong et al. | Mar 2006 | B1 |
7239545 | Hosotani | Jul 2007 | B2 |
20050242384 | Iwata et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20060013039 | Braun et al. | Jan 2006 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20090268512 A1 | Oct 2009 | US |