This application relates to the general field of magnetic tunneling junctions (MTJ) and, more particularly, to etching methods for forming sub 60 nm MTJ structures.
Fabrication of magnetoresistive random-access memory (MRAM) devices normally involves a sequence of processing steps during which many layers of metals and dielectrics are deposited and then patterned to form a magnetoresistive stack as well as electrodes for electrical connections. To define the magnetic tunnel junctions (MTJ) in each MRAM device, precise patterning steps including photolithography and reactive ion etching (RIE), ion beam etching (IBE), or their combination are usually involved. MTJ critical dimension (CD) variation is a critical parameter because large CD variation can cause significant variations in MTJ resistance and switching current. Besides pattern density, the CD variation is mainly dependent on photo CD variation, which is limited mainly by wavelength of the exposure light, dose, focus, lens aberration, and mask error. The MTJ area may vary as much as 10% due to photoresist sidewall roughness. However, larger photo CD will always have less variation than smaller photo CD due to less wavelength effect and/or less edge effect. Sidewall roughness leads to large CD variation for small CD. For example, if the sidewall roughness is 1.5 nm, it will be 3 nm on both sides. This will cause a 2% CD variation for a 150 nm device, but a 4% CD variation for a 75 nm device.
Using short wavelength light for exposure is the most effective way to make small CD with better CD uniformity. The dominant lithography technology uses 248 nm or 193 nm wavelength; however, the current state-of-the-art photolithography is 13.5 nm EUV. It desired to find a way to minimize photoresist roughness and CD variation.
Several patents teach methods of hard mask trimming, including U.S. Pat. No. 9,779,952 (Ranjan et al), U.S. Pat. No. 7,910,483 (Abatchev et al), and U.S. Pat. No. 7,550,044 (Gaidis et al) and U.S. Patent Application 2016/0268338 (Kashiwada et al). These references are different from the present disclosure.
It is an object of the present disclosure to provide an improved method of forming MTJ structures having a critical dimension of 10-60 nm.
Another object of the present disclosure is to provide an improved method of forming MTJ structures having a critical dimension of 10-60 nm by adding a hard mask trimming step prior to MTJ etching to improve the quality of the hard mask.
Yet another object is to provide an improved method of forming MTJ structures having a critical dimension of 10-60 nm by using a photoresist mask having a critical dimension of 40-115 nm and by adding a hard mask trimming step prior to MTJ etching to improve the quality of the hard mask.
In accordance with the objectives of the present disclosure, a method for etching a magnetic tunneling junction (MTJ) structure is achieved. A MTJ stack is deposited on a bottom electrode. A conductive hard mask is deposited on the MTJ stack and a dielectric mask is deposited on the conductive hard mask. A photoresist pattern is formed on the dielectric mask, having a critical dimension of about 65-115 nm. The dielectric and conductive hard masks are etched wherein the photoresist pattern is removed. The dielectric and conductive hard masks are trimmed to reduce their critical dimension to 10-60 nm and to reduce sidewall surface roughness. The dielectric and conductive hard masks and the MTJ stack are etched wherein the dielectric mask is removed and a MTJ device is formed having a small critical dimension of 10-60 nm, and having further reduced sidewall surface roughness.
In the accompanying drawings forming a material part of this description, there is shown:
Now, the DARC and hard mask layers 16 and 14 are etched where they are not covered by the photoresist mask 20, as shown in
Now, the MTJ stack 14 is etched using the hard mask as a pattern. All of the DARC layer 18 and some of the hard mask layer 16 are consumed by this etching step. The sidewall surface roughness is transferred to the MTJ sidewalls, as shown in
The present disclosure provides a process for lowering CD variation. The existing process needs a small photo CD (about 50 nm) with a photo mask size of about 186 nm to achieve a small etch CD (approximately 10-60 nm). The CD variation is large. The process of the present disclosure is able to use a larger photo CD (75 nm vs 50 nm) with the same photo mask size (186 nm) to reduce CD variation. Furthermore, a hard mask (HM) trimming step is added after the hard mask etch. This process can achieve the same or smaller (10-60 nm) etch CD with less CD variation. Even smaller CD can be achieved by increasing the HM trimming amount.
The preferred embodiment of the present disclosure will be described in more detail with reference to
MTJ film layers are deposited, typically including a seed layer, a pinned layer, a barrier layer, a free layer, and a cap layer, for example. These layers form the MTJ film stack 14. Now, a conductive hard mask layer 16 is deposited on the MTJ stack. The hard mask 16 may be Ta, TaN, Ti, TiN, W, Ru, Mo, Al, or their alloys having a thickness of between about 30 and 100 nm.
Next, a BARC or DARC layer 18, such as SiO2, SiN, SiON, SiC, SiCN, carbon, or Advanced Pattering Film (APF®) is deposited over the hard mask layer 16 to a thickness of between about 10 and 150 nm. Finally, photoresist 20 is patterned to a CD width of 40-115 nm, and preferably greater than about 65 nm. This larger CD will lower CD variation. The photoresist mask 20 still has sidewall roughness, however.
Now, referring to
Next, referring to
Referring now to
After patterning, the whole device can be encapsulated by dielectric or metal oxide such as SiO2, SiN, SiON, SiC, SiCN, Al2O3 and MgO 26, as shown in
The process of the present disclosure was implemented and tested. Six samples were prepared. The first two samples started with the larger photo CD (80-90 nm) and the hard mask trimming step of the present disclosure. The last four samples started with the smaller photo CD (40-50 nm) of the conventional process and without hard mask trimming. For every sample, one Transmission Electron Microscopy (TEM) cut was done on approximately 10 adjacent devices and all CD's were measured on the TEM images, as shown in Table 1. The first two samples with larger photo CD and with hard mask trimming showed smaller variation than the other four samples with smaller photo CD and without hard mask trimming. The table shows a standard deviation of the first two samples fabricated according to the process of the present disclosure of at most 1.7 nm, or 4.5% while the samples fabricated according to a conventional process had a standard deviation of 2.8-8.7 nm, or 9.3-34%.
The larger photo CD and hard mask trimming of the present disclosure can achieve the same size MTJ CD and lower resistance coefficient of variation (RpCov) for small devices (10-60 nm). RpCov was improved for small MTJ devices (10-60 nm) by making a larger photo CD with the same photo equipment and same photo mask size as is conventional in the art and an additional hard mask trimming step. The process of the present disclosure can reduce CD and sidewall roughness.
Although the preferred embodiment of the present disclosure has been illustrated, and that form has been described in detail, it will be readily understood by those skilled in the art that various modifications may be made therein without departing from the spirit of the disclosure or from the scope of the appended claims.
The present application is a continuation application of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 16/728,053, filed Dec. 27, 2019, which is a continuation application of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 15/986,183, filed May 22, 2018, each of which is herein incorporated by reference in its entirety.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
7550044 | Gaidis et al. | Jun 2009 | B2 |
7910483 | Abatchev et al. | Mar 2011 | B2 |
8975089 | Jung et al. | Mar 2015 | B1 |
9779952 | Ranjan et al. | Oct 2017 | B2 |
10043851 | Shen | Aug 2018 | B1 |
10069064 | Haq | Sep 2018 | B1 |
10134981 | Yang | Nov 2018 | B1 |
10522751 | Shen et al. | Dec 2019 | B2 |
10790442 | Sonoda | Sep 2020 | B2 |
20030209769 | Nickel | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20060221515 | Carey et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20130029431 | Takahashi | Jan 2013 | A1 |
20140198564 | Guo | Jul 2014 | A1 |
20150104882 | Jung | Apr 2015 | A1 |
20160268338 | Kashiwada et al. | Sep 2016 | A1 |
20160351798 | Shen | Dec 2016 | A1 |
20170148976 | Annunziata | May 2017 | A1 |
20180069174 | Annunziata | Mar 2018 | A1 |
20180331279 | Shen | Nov 2018 | A1 |
20190123267 | Yang | Apr 2019 | A1 |
20190363248 | Shen et al. | Nov 2019 | A1 |
20200044147 | Yang | Feb 2020 | A1 |
20200052196 | Shen | Feb 2020 | A1 |
20200144493 | Shen et al. | May 2020 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20210359202 A1 | Nov 2021 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 16728053 | Dec 2019 | US |
Child | 17391716 | US | |
Parent | 15986183 | May 2018 | US |
Child | 16728053 | US |