Multi-cable medical instrument

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 11950873
  • Patent Number
    11,950,873
  • Date Filed
    Thursday, November 18, 2021
    2 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, April 9, 2024
    23 days ago
Abstract
A medical instrument includes cable pairs respectively wound around input spindles and connected to actuate degrees of freedom of an instrument shaft structure. The cables may connect so that rotating the input spindles actuates corresponding degrees of freedom. First pulleys in the instrument may receive first cables from the input spindles and redirect the first cables toward the instrument shaft, and second pulleys may receive second cables from the input spindles and redirect the second cables toward the instrument shaft. In one configuration, the first and second pulleys are respectively mounted at first and second levels, and the second pulleys redirect the second cables through the first level. Additionally or alternatively, one level of cables may cross while the other level of cables does not.
Description
BACKGROUND

Robotically controlled instruments such as employed for minimally invasive medical procedures often employ a tool or end effector or other manipulation element at the distal end of an extended instrument shaft. (As used herein, the terms “robot” or “robotically” and the like include teleoperation or telerobotic aspects.) The instrument shaft and the distal tool generally have small diameters, often less than a centimeter, to minimize the size of incisions or natural lumens needed for insertion of the instrument. Accordingly, the distal tools are often remotely operated or actuated via thin drive members (e.g., tendons or rods) that extend between the distal tool and a transmission, sometimes referred to as the backend mechanism of the instrument. The backend mechanism of a replaceable instrument is generally configured to removably couple to actuators (e.g., a motor pack) in a docking port of a robot. The robot can then control the actuators and apply force through the backend mechanism to the drive members and through the drive members to the distal tool of the instrument.


Medical instruments that have many degrees of freedom of movement typically require many drive members, and backend mechanisms that accommodate the transition from the layout of a docking port of a robot to the layout of the drive members in the instrument shaft can be complex and difficult to assemble.


SUMMARY

In accordance with an aspect of the invention, a medical instrument may provide efficient routing of actuation cables and relatively simple assembly process for complex medical instruments.


One specific implementation provides a medical instrument including a chassis, input spindles mounted in the chassis, upper and lower cables wound around the input spindles, and an instrument shaft extending from the chassis and including a mechanical structure providing multiple degrees of freedom of motion. The upper and lower cables may connect to the mechanical structure so that rotations of the input spindles actuate respective degrees of freedom. Lower pulleys may be mounted at a first level to receive the lower cables from the input spindles and to redirect the lower cables toward the instrument shaft. Upper pulleys may be mounted at a second level to receive the upper cables from the input spindles and redirect the upper cables through the first level and toward the instrument shaft.


Another specific implementation is a method for assembling a medical instrument. The method may include: mounting lower pulleys on a first piece of a chassis of the medical instrument; feeding lower cables from an instrument shaft of the medical instrument over the lower pulleys; attaching a second piece of the chassis to the first piece so that at least portions of the lower cables are between the lower pulleys and the second piece; mounting upper pulleys in positions such that the second piece is between the upper pulleys and the lower pulleys; and feeding upper cables from the instrument shaft over the upper pulleys.


Yet another specific implementation is a medical instrument including input spindles, lower cables respectively wound around the input spindles, upper cables respectively wound around the input spindles, and an instrument shaft extending from a chassis in which the input spindles are mounted. A mechanical structure on the instrument shaft has multiple degrees of freedom of motion, and the upper and lower cables connect to the structure such that rotations the input spindles respectively actuate the degrees of freedom. The lower or upper cables may extend between the input spindles and the instrument shaft without crossing, and paths of the other upper or lower cables cross between the input spindles and the instrument shaft. The crossing in one set of cables may allow the upper cable and the lower cable that wrap around the same input spindle to be more efficiently directed toward locations on opposite sides of a central axis of the instrument shaft, which may improve mechanical efficiency of actuation of the mechanical structure.





BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS


FIG. 1 shows an implementation of a medical system employing removable instruments.



FIGS. 2A and 2B show side and top views of an example implementation of a medical instrument.



FIG. 3 shows cable routing in an example implementation of a backend mechanism of a medical instrument.



FIG. 4 is a cross-sectional view illustrating a routing of cables relative to a chassis and other structures in an example implementation of a backend mechanism of a medical instrument.



FIG. 5 is an expanded view of an implementation of a medical instrument including a backend mechanism with a multi-piece chassis.



FIGS. 6A, 6B, and 6C illustrate a pulley structure created during an assembly process for a backend mechanism that routes cables between an instrument shaft of a medical instrument and a set of input spindles around which the cables wrap.



FIG. 6D shows a cross-section of a portion of an example implementation of a backend mechanism and illustrates how pieces of a chassis may be fit close to a pulley to prevent cable derailment.





The drawings illustrate examples for the purpose of explanation and are not of the invention itself. Use of the same reference symbols in different figures indicates similar or identical items.


DETAILED DESCRIPTION

A backend mechanism of a robotically controlled medical instrument routes cables from multiple input spindles to an instrument shaft of the instrument and employs a routing that allows simple assembly using few components. Cables and associated pulleys in an instrument may be particularly grouped by level or height relative to the instrument shaft, and lower cables may be fit on pulleys mounted in a lower chassis piece before a next, higher chassis piece and pulleys for upper cables are attached to the lower chassis piece. A two-level system is particularly effective in a self-antagonistic system in which each input spindle has a pair of two associated cables that are wrapped around the input spindle in opposite directions and at different heights so that one cable pays in in one direction and the other cable pays out in an opposite direction as the spindle rotates. The cable routing leaves space for other components of the backend of a medical instrument, for example, to allow control or actuation of instrument shaft roll, grip drive, electrical connectors, and latching mechanisms that attach the backend mechanism to a robot. The cable routing can also position cables paired in opposition in the instrument shaft, so that the paired cables can efficiently actuate opposite directions of motion of a degree of freedom of the instrument.



FIG. 1 shows an example of a medical system 100 using replaceable medical instruments 110. System 100, which may, for example, be a da Vinci® Surgical System commercialized by Intuitive Surgical, Inc., may particularly employ multiple surgical instruments 110, each of which is removably mounted in a docking port 120 on a manipulator arm 130 of a robot 140. A sterile barrier (not shown) including a drape and adaptors for instruments 110 may be between instruments 110 and robot 140, so that robot 140, including manipulator arms 130 and docking ports 120, is outside a sterile environment for a patient. Accordingly, robot 140 may not need to be sterilized between medical procedures. In contrast, instruments 110, which may be used in the sterile environment and may contact the patient, are compact and removable so that instruments 110 may be sterilized or replaced between medical procedures performed using system 100.


Instruments 110 may vary in structure and purpose but may still be interchangeable, so that instruments 110 mounted in docking ports 120 of robot 140 can be selected for a particular medical procedure or changed during a medical procedure to provide the clinical functions needed. Each instrument 110 generally includes an end effector or distal tool 112, an instrument shaft 114, and a backend mechanism 116. Distal tools 112 may have different designs to implement many different functions. For example, distal tools 112 for different instruments 110 may have many different shapes or sizes and may include forceps, graspers, scalpels, scissors, cautery tools, or needle drivers to name a few possibilities, and instruments 110 having different distal tools 112 may be mounted on different arms 130 of robot 140 and may work cooperatively in the same work site. An endoscopic camera, for example, a stereoscopic camera, can also be mounted on an arm to provide visual information, particularly images, of the work site in which distal tools 112 of instruments 110 may be operating.


Docking ports 120 may include actuators, such as drive motors, that provide mechanical power for actuation of mechanical structures in instruments 110, drive couplings that connect the actuators to inputs of instruments 110, and systems for establishing and maintaining a sterile barrier between instruments 110 and the rest of medical system 100. Docking ports 120 may additionally include an electrical interface to provide power to instruments 110 or for communication with instruments 110, for example, to identify the type of instrument 110 in a docking port 120, to access parameters of instruments 110, or to receive information from sensors in instruments 110. For example, the electrical interface may convey to robot 140 measurements such as measurements of the position, orientation, or pose of distal tool 112 and instrument shaft 114 of an instrument 110. A computer system, which may be connected to or part of robot 140 and connected to a user interface device (not shown), may receive the measurements from instrument 110 and receive user commands from a surgeon or other medical personnel and may execute software that controls arms 130 and drive motors in docking ports 120 as needed to operate instruments 110 according to the user commands.



FIGS. 2A and 2B illustrate an example implementation of a medical instrument 110. FIG. 2A particularly shows a perspective view of an implementation having a tool 112 at the distal end of instrument shaft 114 and shows instrument shaft 114 extending from backend mechanism 116. In the illustrated implementation, distal tool 112 and instrument shaft 114 have six degrees of freedom of movement relative to backend mechanism 116. In particular, the six degrees of freedom correspond to: pitch and yaw rotations of a distal portion of tool 112 about two respective perpendicular axes 201 and 202 associated with a first joint mechanism 211 (also called “first joint 211”); pitch and yaw rotations or movement of jaws 213 relative to two respective perpendicular axes 203 and 204 associated with a second joint mechanism 212 (also called “second joint 212”; the joints 211,212 are sometimes referred to as “wrists”); opening or closing movement 205 of jaws 213 for “grip” actuation; and “roll” rotations of instrument shaft 114 about its central length axis 206. Other instruments may have more, fewer, or different degrees of freedom of movement.


Backend mechanism 116 as shown in FIG. 2B has six input spindles 221 to 226 with engagement features that are shaped and positioned to engage actuators, e.g., drive motors, in a docking port of a robot. In general, each input spindle 221 to 226 may be coupled for actuation of a different degree of freedom of movement of the instrument, so that the robot can identify and use the correct actuator or actuators to rotate the spindle or spindles that exercise desired degrees of freedom of motion. The assignment input spindles 221 to 226 to corresponding degrees of freedom must be known to the robot but can be otherwise defined by an arbitrary standard or convention. In an exemplary implementation, input spindle 226 may couple to a roll mechanism that connects to a proximal end of instrument shaft 114 for rotation of instrument shaft 114 about its length axis 206 when input spindle 226 rotates. Input spindles 221 to 225 may couple to drive members (not shown) such as cables or rods extending though instrument shaft 114 to distal tool 112, so that the actuators in the robot can rotate input spindles 221 to 225 to control a distal mechanism including joints 211 and 212 and jaws 213. More specifically, in an exemplary implementation, rotation of input spindle 221 may control rotation or actuation of a distal portion of tool 112 about an axis 201. Rotation of input spindle 222 may control rotation about an axis 202. Rotation of input spindle 223 may control rotation about an axis 203 for yaw actuation of jaws 213, and rotation of input spindle 224 may control rotation about an axis 204 for pitch actuation of jaws 213. In some implementations, rotations of input spindles 221 to 226 may correspond to motion that is different from or more complex than simple rotations of structures about axes. For example, input spindle 225 may be coupled to jaws 213 through a push-pull rod for actuation of gripping with jaws 213. Also, in a particular implementation, the mechanism in tool 112 may couple a proximal portion of joint 212 to a distal portion of joint 211 for parallelogram motion, while the distal portion of joint 212 may move independently.



FIG. 3 shows selected elements within an implementation of the backend mechanism 116 of FIGS. 2A and 2B and particularly illustrates a routing in backend mechanism 116 of cables that run through instrument shaft 114 and connect to joints 211 and 212. The term “cable” is used herein in a broad sense to include any tendon-like structure. In particular, a length of cable in a medical instrument may include sections of different materials or different characteristics. A cable may include, for example, a stranded section where flexibility in the cable is desired (e.g., where the cable winds around a spindle, capstan, or pulley) and may include a more rigid section (e.g., a tube or rod) to limit stretching where less bending of the cable is needed. FIG. 3 does not show elements of backend mechanisms 116 that may be used for actuation of degrees of freedom associated with rotation of instrument shaft 114 or for opening and closing of jaws 213. Co-filed U.S. Pat. App. No. 62/362,340 (filed Jul. 14, 2016), entitled “GEARED ROLL DRIVE FOR MEDICAL INSTRUMENT”, and U.S. Pat. App. No. 62/362,365 (filed Jul. 14, 2016), entitled “GEARED GRIP ACTUATION FOR MEDICAL INSTRUMENTS”, disclose aspects of particular implementations of such mechanisms and are hereby incorporated by reference in their entirety.


Input spindles 221, 222, 223, and 224, as described above, are for actuation of degrees of freedom associated with respective axes 201, 202, 203, and 204, and each input spindles 221, 222, 223, and 224 includes a pair of capstans around which a pair of actuation cables are wrapped. For example, as shown in FIG. 3, an upper capstan 231A and a lower capstan 231B may be fixed on an axle of input spindle 221 so that both capstans 231A and 231B rotate with rotation of input spindle 221. (The terms upper and lower are used here to distinguish levels and may only apply literally when instrument shaft 114 points in a generally downward direction, as illustrated in FIG. 3.) A cable 241A wraps in one direction (e.g., clockwise or counterclockwise) around capstan 231A, and a cable 241B wraps in the opposite direction (e.g., counterclockwise or clockwise) around capstan 231B. Cable 241A extends from upper capstan 231A to an upper pulley 251 that directs cable 241A toward instrument shaft 114. Similarly, cable 241B extends from lower capstan 231B to a lower pulley 261 that directs cable 241B toward instrument shaft 114. Cables 241A and 241B extend from respective pulleys 251 and 261 through a guide 280, into instrument shaft 114, and through instrument shaft 114 to connect to actuated joint mechanism 211, so that pulling cable 241A or 242B rotates a distal portion of mechanism 211 (and distal portions of tool 112) about axis 201. The positions of pulleys 251 and 261 and the shape of guide 280 may position cables 241A and 241B on opposite sides of the center or length axis 206 of instrument shaft 114, which may allow cable 241A to efficiently drive motion of mechanism 211 in one direction or sense about axis 201 and also allow cable 241B to efficiently drive motion of mechanism 211 in an opposite direction or sense about axis 201.


Each input spindle 222, 223, or 224 similarly includes an axle through a pair of capstans 232A and 232B, 233A and 233B, or 234A and 234B around which a pair of cables 242A and 242B, 243A and 243B, or 244A and 244B wrap in opposite directions, and cables 242A, 242B, 243A, 243B, 244A, and 244B pass over respective pulleys 252, 262, 253, 263, 254, and 264 and run through guide 280 and instrument shaft 114. In an exemplary implementation, cables 242A and 242B connect to joint mechanism 211, and cables 243A, 243B, 244A, and 244B connect to joint mechanism 212.


Each pair of cables 242A and 242B, 243A and 243B, and 244A and 244B as described above includes one cable wound in one direction (e.g., clockwise) about an input spindle 221, 222, 223, or 224 and another cable wound in the other direction (e.g., counterclockwise) around the input spindle 221, 222, 223, or 224, so that rotation of an input spindle 221, 222, 223, or 224 pulls in one cable while paying out another cable. Accordingly, instrument 110 may employ self-antagonistic actuation in which each pair of cables 241A and 241B, 242A and 242B, 243A and 243B, or 244A and 244B controls a corresponding degree of freedom of movement, e.g., rotations about axes 201, 202, 203, or 204, of the instrument. Non-antagonistic cable actuation may be used in some embodiments (e.g., one cable per spindle).


In the illustrated system, mechanisms 211 and 212 are wrists or joints that each provide two degrees of freedom of movement. Many other mechanisms can provide one or more degrees of freedom of movement and may be connected so that one or more pairs of cables can respectively actuate the one or more degrees of freedom. An actuated mechanism may, for example, include a mechanical linkage with a link that is rotatable about a pivot, and a pair of cables may be connected to rotate the link in opposite directions relative to the pivot. Alternatively, actuated mechanisms may be any structure, e.g., a linkage, a slide, or a flexure, capable of being moved/actuated in opposite directions. For each pair of cables, pulling one cable may drive actuation of the corresponding degree of freedom in one direction or sense, and pulling the other cable in the pair may drive actuation of the corresponding degree of freedom in an opposite direction or sense.


Routing of cables 241A, 242A, 243A, and 244A employs upper pulleys 251, 252, 253, and 254 to receive cables 241A, 242A, 243A, and 244A from upper capstans 231A, 232A, 233A, and 234A and employs lower pulleys 261, 262, 263, and 264 to receive cables 241B, 242B, 243B, and 244B from respective lower capstans 231B, 232B, 233B, and 234B. Upper pulleys 251, 252, 253, and 254 may all be positioned at about the same common height, while lower pulleys 261, 262, 263, and 264 may all be positioned at about another common height that differs from the common height of upper pulleys 251, 252, 253, and 254. This allows the pulleys to be captured in stacked blocks or chassis pieces as described further below.


The arrangement of upper pulleys 251, 252, 253, and 254 and lower pulleys 261, 262, 263, and 264 may also be simplified by pairing pulleys to independently spin on shared axles. Using pulleys that share an axle may allow faster assembly, because multiple pulleys can be added to a structure by attaching a single axle. In the implementation of FIG. 3, input spindles 221, 222, 223 and 224 are arranged in a rectangular array, e.g., in rows and columns, and paths of cables from input spindles in the same row to locations over instrument shaft 114 are roughly parallel. Accordingly, pulleys 251 and 253, which guide cables 241A and 243A running at the same height and substantially the same direction from input spindles 221 and 223, can be mounted on a common axle 271. Similarly, upper pulleys 252 and 254, which guide cables 242A and 244A that emerge from input spindles 222 and 224 with substantially the same height and direction, can be mounted on a shared axle 272. Lower pulleys 262 and 264, which guide cables 242B and 244B that emerge from input spindles 222 and 224 with substantially the same height and direction, can be mounted on another shared axle (not visible in FIG. 3), and lower pulleys 261 and 263, which guide cables 241B and 243B that emerge from input spindles 222 and 224 with substantially the same path and direction can be mounted on yet another shared axle 274.


Pulley axles 271 to 274 may also be angled according to exit directions of the cables from the input spindles 221 to 224 and relative to the central axis 206 of instrument shaft 114. For example, axle 271 may be turned about a first axis (e.g., an axis parallel to the axles of input spindles 221 to 224) to minimize the fleet angles at pulleys 251 and 253 of cables 241A and 243A from input spindles 221 and 223. Axle 271 may be turned about a second axis (e.g., an axis approximately parallel to the portion of cables 241A and 243A between pulleys 251 and 253 and capstans 231A and 233A) so that the portion of cables 241A and 243A between pulleys 251 and 253 and guide 280 converge toward guide 280 and instrument shaft 114. The angling of axles 271 to 274 may reduce the average fleet angle for entry and exit of the cables from the upper and lower pulleys and thereby reduce friction and wear.


Axles 271 to 274 may further be positioned relative to input spindles 221 to 224 and instrument shaft 114 to minimize wrap angles across sliding surfaces on the pulleys. The positions of the pulleys may be further refined according to the desired cable paths exiting guide 280. In particular, redirection of any cable passing through guide 280 should only cause rubbing on the resilient surface (e.g., a metal portion) of guide 280 and not a softer surface (e.g., a plastic portion) of guide 280. The wrap angle across guide 280 should also be small so that the friction and sawing action any cable against guide 280 is small. The cable path should further be relatively direct so that length of stranded cable does not negatively affect the overall stiffness of the drive train between the corresponding input spindle and the actuated mechanism. In general, the stranded sections of cables tend to stretch more than the rigid hypotube sections used in some embodiments.


The separations between input spindles 221 to 224 may be considerably larger than the diameter of instrument shaft 114 into which the cables need to be directed. Accordingly, the paths of the cables need to converge between input spindles 221 to 225 and instrument shaft 114. The cables also should not rub against each other or against any other structures in backend mechanism 116. To avoid cable interference, the winding directions of cables 241A, 241B, 242A, 242B, 243A, 243B, 244A, and 244B around the input spindles in the illustrated implementation are chosen so that cables at one level (e.g., lower cables 241B, 242B, 243B and 244B) emerge from inside the array of input spindles 221 to 224, and cables at other levels (e.g., upper cables 241A, 242A, 243A and 244A) emerge from an outer edge of the array of input spindles. Lower cables 241B, 242B, 243B and 244B, which emerge from inside an area of the input spindle array, can directly converge at a relatively small angles toward instrument shaft 114 without interfering with each other or rubbing against other structures, such as input spindles 223 or 224. Upper cables 241A, 242A, 243A and 244A, which emerge from the outer edge of input spindles 221 to 224, have crossing paths, which increases the angle of convergence. In particular, upper cables 241A and 243A, which emerge from input spindles 221 and 223, cross over upper cables 242A and 244A, which emerge from input spindles 222 and 224. For the crossing pattern, upper pulleys 251 and 253, which are within the same level group as upper pulleys 252 and 254, although having a generally common height may be staggered in height (e.g., so that cables 241A and 243A can cross over cables 242A and 244A without rubbing). The larger angle of convergence provided by the crossing pattern allows cables 241A and 242A to pass from outer edges of input spindles 221 and 222 through the gap between input spindles 223 and 224. The crossing pattern also allows pulleys 251 and 253, which receive cables 241A and 243A, to be farther from pulleys 252 and 254, which receive cables 242A and 244A, than pulleys 261 and 263 are from pulleys 262 and 264. The wider spacing of upper pulleys 251 to 254 allows routing cables 241A to 244A toward instrument shaft 114 without interference from lower pulleys 261 to 264 or cables 241B to 244B. Crossing one level of cables in this fashion also allows positioning of cables that wrap about the same input spindle and that are therefore paired for actuation of the same degree of freedom in opposition in instrument shaft 114, which may permit efficient connection of the pair of cables to an actuated mechanism.


The cable routing in the implementation of FIG. 3 may provide several advantages. In particular, the difference in the horizontal separation of upper pulleys 251 to 254 from the horizontal separation of lower pulleys 261 to 264, may allow upper pulleys 251 to 254 to be vertically positioned closer to lower pulleys 261 to 264, e.g., at a vertical separation that is less than the diameter of pulleys 251 to 254 and 261 to 264. Also, upper pulleys 251 to 254 and lower pulleys 261 to 264 may be at the same distance from the closest input spindles 223 and 224. Since one group of pulleys is not required to be closer to the input spindles, all of the pulleys can be at a relatively long distance from the input spindles, which may minimize the splay angles for the actuation cables. A crossing cable pattern may further reduce the space needed to accommodate the required splay. The cable routing can position pulleys so that the cables do not rub on each other or on neighboring input spindles and do not require additional intermediary idler pulleys.



FIG. 4 shows a cross-sectional view of internal structure in an example implementation of a backend mechanism 116. As illustrated, backend mechanism 116 may include a chassis 500 with a central support structure 410 that extends between rows of input spindles 221, 222, 223, and 224. The routing of cables 241A to 244A or 241B to 244B allows use of central support structure 410 to strengthen chassis 500 without interfering with cables 241A to 244A or 241B to 244B. The cable routing also causes cables 241A to 244A or 241B to 244B to converge sufficiently to pass between input spindles 225 and 226, through an opening in a linkage 420 for actuation of jaws 213, and through an opening in a linkage 430 used for actuation of rotation about instrument shaft axis 206. This configuration with support structure 410 in the center of backend mechanism 116 opens up access to input spindles 221, 222, 223, and 224 from around the perimeter of chassis 500, for example, to attach and wrap cables 241A to 244A or 241B to 244B on capstans 231A to 234A and 231B to 234B and to tighten capstan clamping screws during assembly of backend mechanism 116. Once input spindles 221, 222, 223, and 224 are mounted in chassis 500 and capstans 231A to 234A and 231B to 234B are wrapped and clamped, the space around input spindles 221, 222, 223, and 224 is available for other structures, such as a structure 440, for latching backend mechanism to a docking port on a robot.



FIG. 5 shows an expanded view of some of the components in an implementation of a medical instrument with a multi-piece chassis 500 for a backend mechanism 116. Chassis 500 includes pieces 510, 520, 530, 540, 550 and 560 that may be snapped together during an assembly process. During the assembly process, a proximal end of instrument shaft 114 may be inserted in a bearing system in chassis piece 510, at which point cables, e.g., cables 241A to 244A and 241B to 244B, which are attached to the distal tool of the instrument extend from instrument shaft 114. The cables may then be fed through desired locations in guide 280, and chassis piece 520 may be attached to chassis piece 510 so that guide 280 is captured between chassis pieces 510 and 520. All or portions of grip or roll gears or mechanisms that couple to input spindles 225 or 226 may also be assembled on chassis pieces 510 and 520 before chassis pieces 510 and 520 are snapped together and may be held in place by chassis pieces 510 and 520. An upper portion of chassis piece 520 further includes central support structure 410, which is described above and includes features 524 shaped to hold lower capstans 231B to 234B which will be mounted on input spindles 221 to 224.


The assembly process can then connect chassis piece 530 to chassis piece 520. Chassis pieces 530 and 520 are separate to allow for the assembly of linkage 420 that couples to input spindle 525 and is employed for grip actuation in the exemplary implementation.


Chassis piece 530 has an upper portion shaped to hold axles 273 and 274 for lower pulleys that guide the actuation cables and redirect the actuation cables toward the instrument shaft. As shown in FIG. 6A, lower pulleys 263 and 261 on axle 273 may be mounted in slots formed in chassis piece 530. Similarly, lower pulleys 262 and 264 on axle 274 are mounted in another set of slots in chassis piece 530. Lower cables 241B, 242B, 243B, and 244B, which extend from instrument shaft 114, may be seated in grooves on respective lower pulleys 261, 262, 263, and 264 and threaded through openings in chassis piece 530 so that proximal ends of lower cables 241B, 242B, 243B, and 244B are near features 524 where input spindles 221 to 224 will reside.


The assembly process can next connect a chassis piece 540 to chassis piece 530 as shown in FIG. 6B. Chassis piece 530 and 540 may be shaped to provide a close fit between chassis piece 540 and pulleys 261 to 264 so that cables 241B, 242B, 243B, and 244B are not easily derailed. Upper pulleys 251 and 253 on axle 272 and upper pulleys 252 and 254 on axle 271 may be mounted in slots created by the combination of chassis pieces 530 and 540. The slot into which axle 271 fits may be at slightly different level from the slot into which axle 272 fits so that the upper cables can cross as described above. Upper cables 241A, 242A, 243A, and 244A may be seated on respective upper pulleys 251, 252, 253, and 254 and threaded through openings in chassis 500 so that proximal ends of upper cables 241A, 242A, 243A, and 244A are also near features 524. A chassis piece 550 connects to chassis pieces 530 and 540 as shown in FIG. 6C and may be shaped to provide a close fit to upper pulleys 251 to 254 so that upper cables 241A, 242A, 243A, and 244A are not easily derailed. FIG. 6D particularly shows a cross-sectional view illustrating how chassis piece 550 when mounted on pieces 530 and 540 may be close fit to pulley 251 so that a gap 545 between chassis piece 550 and pulley 251 is narrower than the thickness of cable 241A on pulley 251. As a result, cable 241A fits into the grove in pulley 251 and cannot slip through gap 545.


Returning to FIG. 5, a chassis piece 560 snaps onto or otherwise connects to one or more of chassis pieces 520, 530, and 550. The top of chassis piece 560 is shaped to fit a docking port of a robot and includes features 564 that are shaped and located to hold the engagement features of input spindles 221 to 224 of the instrument. When chassis piece 560 attaches to the assembly including pieces 510, 520, 530, 540, and 550, chassis 500 may capture input spindles 221 to 224 between features 564 on chassis piece 560 and features 524 on chassis piece 520. Each input spindle may include an axle and a pair of capstans, e.g., upper capstans 231A to 234A and lower capstans 231B to 234B, which are initially free to rotate relative to each other. The loose proximal ends of the actuation cables near features 524 may be attached to the corresponding one of capstans 231A to 234A or 231B to 234B. Each capstan can then be independently rotated to wind the attached cable in the desired direction and to take up slack and provide a desired pre-tension in the attached cable. Once both cables wrapped around an input spindle have the desired cable tensioning, the capstans can be clamped or locked in place on the axle of the input spindle, e.g., by tightening a clamping screw. Other structures such as release levers comprising structure 440 of FIG. 4 may wrap around the outside of the actuation structure and cables and may be installed after assembly of the input spindles and routing of cables. Co-filed U.S. Pat. App. No. 62/362,454 (filed Jul. 14, 2016), entitled “INSTRUMENT RELEASE”, describes structures such as release levers comprising structure 440 in more detail and is hereby incorporated by reference in its entirety.


The instrument assembly and cable routing process illustrated by FIGS. 5 and 6A to 6D may be relatively simple when compared to the complexity of the instrument. In particular, achieving the desired cable routing does not require simultaneous threading of cables through and around a complex sequence of structures from which the cables may slip. Instead, assembly can proceed in a series of simple steps with the cables being in a secure configuration after each step. Further, the shape of the chassis provides good access to input spindles for cable connections.


Although particular implementations have been disclosed, these implementations are only examples and should not be taken as limitations. Various adaptations and combinations of features of the implementations disclosed are within the scope of the following claims. For example, although embodiments that employ rotating spindles have been described, other means of controlling cable motion may be used. These means include, for example, sliding tabs, levers, gimbals, and the like.

Claims
  • 1. A medical instrument comprising: a chassis;a plurality of input spindles mounted in the chassis;a first cable coupled to a first input spindle of the plurality of input spindles;a second cable coupled to a second input spindle of the plurality of input spindles;an instrument shaft having a first end and a second end, the first end of the instrument shaft coupled to the chassis;a tool coupled to the second end of the instrument shaft, the first cable and the second cable coupled to the tool such that rotations of one or more of the plurality of input spindles actuate the tool;a first pulley mounted at a first level on the chassis, the first pulley receiving the first cable from the first input spindle and redirecting the first cable into and through the instrument shaft; anda second pulley mounted at a second level on the chassis different from the first level, the second pulley receiving the second cable from the second input spindle and redirecting the second cable through the first level and into and through the instrument shaft;the first pulley being spaced from the second pulley such that a vertical separation between the first pulley and the second pulley is less than a diameter of the first pulley and less than a diameter of the second pulley.
  • 2. The medical instrument of claim 1, wherein: the chassis includes a first piece on which the first pulley is mounted, anda second piece mounted over the first piece so that the first pulley is located between the first piece and the second piece.
  • 3. The medical instrument of claim 1, further comprising: a plurality of first cables including the first cable;a plurality of second cables including the second cable;a plurality of first pulleys mounted at the first level on the chassis, the plurality of first pulleys including the first pulley; anda plurality of second pulleys mounted at the second level on the chassis, the plurality of second pulleys including the second pulley.
  • 4. The medical instrument of claim 3, wherein: the plurality of first cables extends between the plurality of input spindles and the plurality of first pulleys without crossing; anda first set of cables of the plurality of second cables crosses a second set of cables of the plurality of second cables between the plurality of input spindles and the plurality of second pulleys.
  • 5. The medical instrument of claim 1, wherein: the first cable is directed toward a location on a first side of a central axis of the instrument shaft and the second cable is directed toward a location opposite the first side of the central axis of the instrument shaft.
  • 6. The medical instrument of claim 1, wherein: the plurality of input spindles is arranged in an array,the first cable is wrapped about the first input spindle in a direction such that a path of the first cable from the first input spindle to the first pulley emerges within the array, andthe second cable is wrapped about the second input spindle in a direction such that a path of the second cable from the second input spindle to the second pulley emerges from a perimeter of the array.
  • 7. The medical instrument of claim 1, wherein: the first cable wraps around the first input spindle in a first direction, and the second cable wraps around the second input spindle in a second direction opposite the first direction.
  • 8. The medical instrument of claim 1, further comprising: a plurality of first pulleys mounted at the first level on the chassis, the plurality of first pulleys including the first pulley; anda plurality of second pulleys mounted at the second level on the chassis, the plurality of second pulleys including the second pulley,wherein a third pulley of the plurality of second pulleys is positioned to rotate about a first axis, the second pulley of the plurality of second pulleys is positioned to rotate about a second axis, and the first axis is nonparallel to the second axis.
  • 9. A medical instrument, comprising: a plurality of input spindles;a first cable coupled to a first input spindle of the plurality of input spindles;a second cable coupled to a second input spindle of the plurality of input spindles;a chassis to which the plurality of input spindles is mounted, the chassis including a first chassis piece, a second chassis piece and a third chassis piece, the second chassis piece mounted over the first chassis piece to define a first level and a second level, the second level different from the first level, the third chassis piece coupled to the second chassis piece;an instrument shaft having a first end and a second end, the first end of the instrument shaft coupled to the chassis;a tool coupled to the second end of the instrument shaft, the first cable and the second cable being connected to the tool such that rotations of one or more of the plurality of input spindles actuate the tool;a first pulley mounted to the first chassis piece at the first level of the chassis, the first pulley receiving the first cable from the first input spindle and redirecting the first cable toward the instrument shaft; and
  • 10. The medical instrument of claim 9, wherein: the first cable is directed toward a location on a first side of a central axis of the instrument shaft and the second cable is directed toward a location opposite the first side of the central axis of the instrument shaft.
  • 11. The medical instrument of claim 9, wherein: the plurality of input spindles is arranged in an array,the first cable is coupled to the first input spindle in a direction such that a path of the first cable from the first input spindle to the first pulley emerges within the array, andthe second cable is coupled to the second input spindle in a direction such that a path of the second cable from the second input spindle to the second pulley emerges from a perimeter of the array.
  • 12. The medical instrument of claim 9, wherein: the first cable wraps around the first input spindle in a first direction, and the second cable wraps around the second input spindle in a second direction opposite the first direction.
  • 13. The medical instrument of claim 9, wherein: the first pulley redirects the first cable into and through the instrument shaft, andthe second pulley redirects the second cable through the first level and into and through the instrument shaft.
  • 14. The medical instrument of claim 9, wherein: the first pulley is positioned to rotate about a first axis, the second pulley is positioned to rotate about a second axis, and the first axis is nonparallel to the second axis.
  • 15. A method for assembling a medical instrument comprising: mounting a first pulley on a first piece of a chassis of the medical instrument;feeding a first cable over the first pulley;attaching a second piece of the chassis to the first piece so that at least a portion of the first cable is between the first pulley and the second piece, a first portion of the second piece at least partially covering the first pulley;mounting a second pulley on the chassis in a position such that the second pulley is at an angle relative to the first pulley and such that the second piece is between the second pulley and the first pulley; andfeeding a second cable over the second pulley.
  • 16. The method of claim 15, further comprising: the second pulley being mounted to the chassis such that the second pulley rotates about an axle, the second piece including a second portion defining a groove within which the axle is mounted; andcoupling the axle to the second piece within the groove.
  • 17. The method of claim 15, wherein: a gap between the second piece and the first pulley is narrower than a width of the first cable.
  • 18. The method of claim 15, further comprising: attaching a third piece of the chassis to the first piece and the second piece so that at least a portion of the second cable is between the second pulley and the third piece.
  • 19. The method of claim 15, further comprising: wrapping the first cable around a lower portion of an input spindle; andwrapping the second cable around an upper portion of the input spindle, wherein the second cable and the first cable wrap around the input spindle in opposite directions.
  • 20. The method of claim 19, wherein: wrapping the first cable around the lower portion of the input spindle includes wrapping the first cable on a first capstan until the first cable has a desired tension, and affixing the first capstan on the input spindle.
  • 21. The method of claim 15, further comprising: arranging a plurality of input spindles in an array;wrapping the first cable about a first input spindle of the plurality of input spindles in a direction such that a first path of the first cable leading from the first input spindle to the first pulley emerges within the array; andwrapping the second cable about a second input spindle of the plurality of input spindles in a direction such that a second path of the second cable leading from the second input spindle to the second pulley emerges from a perimeter of the array.
  • 22. The method of claim 15, wherein: the feeding the first cable includes feeding the first cable from an instrument shaft of the medical instrument over the first pulley; andthe feeding the second cable includes feeding the second cable from the instrument shaft over the second pulley.
  • 23. A medical instrument comprising: a chassis;a plurality of input spindles mounted in the chassis;a first cable coupled to a first input spindle of the plurality of input spindles;a second cable coupled to a second input spindle of the plurality of input spindles;an instrument shaft having a first end and a second end, the first end of the instrument shaft coupled to the chassis;a tool coupled to the second end of the instrument shaft, the first cable and the second cable coupled to the tool such that rotations of one or more of the plurality of input spindles actuate the tool;a first pulley mounted at a first level on the chassis, the first pulley receiving the first cable from the first input spindle and redirecting the first cable into and through the instrument shaft; anda second pulley mounted at a second level on the chassis different from the first level, the second pulley receiving the second cable from the second input spindle and redirecting the second cable through the first level and into and through the instrument shaft;the second pulley mounted on the chassis such that the second pulley is positioned at an angle relative to the first pulley.
CROSS-REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS

This patent application is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 16/317,235 (filed Jan. 11, 2019), entitled “MULTI-CABLE MEDICAL INSTRUMENT,” which is a U.S. national stage filing under 35 U.S.C. § 371 of International Application No. PCT/US2017/038674 (filed Jun. 22, 2017), entitled “MULTI-CABLE MEDICAL INSTRUMENT,” which claims priority to and the filing date benefit of U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 62/362,431 (filed Jul. 14, 2016), entitled “MULTI-CABLE MEDICAL INSTRUMENT,” each of which is incorporated herein by reference in its entirety.

US Referenced Citations (141)
Number Name Date Kind
793510 Cramer et al. Jun 1905 A
2091317 Hill Aug 1937 A
2186181 Gustav et al. Jan 1940 A
3618420 Horwitt et al. Nov 1971 A
4341144 Milne Jul 1982 A
4899608 Knappe et al. Feb 1990 A
5207691 Nardella May 1993 A
5792135 Madhani et al. Aug 1998 A
5807377 Madhani et al. Sep 1998 A
5876325 Mizuno et al. Mar 1999 A
6007550 Wang et al. Dec 1999 A
6331181 Tierney et al. Dec 2001 B1
6371952 Madhani et al. Apr 2002 B1
6394998 Wallace et al. May 2002 B1
6676684 Morley et al. Jan 2004 B1
6817974 Cooper et al. Nov 2004 B2
6994708 Manzo Feb 2006 B2
7048745 Tierney et al. May 2006 B2
7090683 Brock et al. Aug 2006 B2
7169141 Brock et al. Jan 2007 B2
7214230 Brock et al. May 2007 B2
7331967 Lee et al. Feb 2008 B2
7371210 Brock et al. May 2008 B2
7524320 Tierney et al. Apr 2009 B2
7582055 Komiya et al. Sep 2009 B2
7608056 Kennedy, II et al. Oct 2009 B2
7608083 Lee et al. Oct 2009 B2
7666191 Orban, III et al. Feb 2010 B2
7935130 Williams May 2011 B2
8224484 Swarup et al. Jul 2012 B2
8444631 Yeung et al. May 2013 B2
8479969 Shelton, IV Jul 2013 B2
8506555 Ruiz Morales Aug 2013 B2
8551115 Steger et al. Oct 2013 B2
8597280 Cooper et al. Dec 2013 B2
8771270 Burbank Jul 2014 B2
8800838 Shelton, IV Aug 2014 B2
8808166 Hosaka Aug 2014 B2
8821480 Burbank Sep 2014 B2
8911471 Spivey et al. Dec 2014 B2
8992565 Brisson et al. Mar 2015 B2
9028494 Shelton, IV et al. May 2015 B2
9078684 Williams Jul 2015 B2
9204923 Manzo et al. Dec 2015 B2
9232979 Parihar et al. Jan 2016 B2
9259274 Prisco Feb 2016 B2
9572616 Vaughn Feb 2017 B2
9839439 Cooper et al. Dec 2017 B2
9869339 Zimmerman et al. Jan 2018 B2
9931106 Au et al. Apr 2018 B2
9962066 Rogers et al. May 2018 B2
10130366 Shelton, IV et al. Nov 2018 B2
10219874 Yu et al. Mar 2019 B2
10288837 Miyatani et al. May 2019 B2
10299873 Hares et al. May 2019 B2
10314583 Smith et al. Jun 2019 B2
10357321 Donlon et al. Jul 2019 B2
10550918 Cooper et al. Feb 2020 B2
10595948 Solomon et al. Mar 2020 B2
10595949 Donlon et al. Mar 2020 B2
10682141 Moore et al. Jun 2020 B2
10779898 Hill et al. Sep 2020 B2
10806530 Liao et al. Oct 2020 B2
10813706 Chaplin et al. Oct 2020 B2
10932868 Solomon et al. Mar 2021 B2
11013566 Diel et al. May 2021 B2
11129686 Chaplin et al. Sep 2021 B2
11207145 Lambrecht et al. Dec 2021 B2
11248686 Cooper et al. Feb 2022 B2
11304770 Crews et al. Apr 2022 B2
11517397 Lambrecht et al. Dec 2022 B2
20020111635 Jensen et al. Aug 2002 A1
20050119527 Banik et al. Jun 2005 A1
20060074415 Scott et al. Apr 2006 A1
20060276775 Rosenberg Dec 2006 A1
20070043338 Moll et al. Feb 2007 A1
20070119274 Devengenzo et al. May 2007 A1
20070137371 Devengenzo et al. Jun 2007 A1
20070232858 Macnamara et al. Oct 2007 A1
20080009838 Schena et al. Jan 2008 A1
20080046122 Manzo et al. Feb 2008 A1
20080065102 Cooper Mar 2008 A1
20080065105 Larkin et al. Mar 2008 A1
20080087871 Schena et al. Apr 2008 A1
20080103491 Omori et al. May 2008 A1
20080125794 Brock et al. May 2008 A1
20080196533 Bergamasco et al. Aug 2008 A1
20090088774 Swarup et al. Apr 2009 A1
20090198272 Kerver et al. Aug 2009 A1
20100011900 Burbank et al. Jan 2010 A1
20100170519 Romo et al. Jul 2010 A1
20100175701 Reis et al. Jul 2010 A1
20100198253 Jinno et al. Aug 2010 A1
20100318101 Choi et al. Dec 2010 A1
20110015650 Choi et al. Jan 2011 A1
20110118754 Dachs, II et al. May 2011 A1
20110184241 Zubiate et al. Jul 2011 A1
20110277580 Cooper et al. Nov 2011 A1
20110277775 Holop et al. Nov 2011 A1
20110295269 Swensgard et al. Dec 2011 A1
20110295270 Giordano et al. Dec 2011 A1
20120046522 Naito Feb 2012 A1
20120123441 Au et al. May 2012 A1
20120239060 Orban, III et al. Sep 2012 A1
20120289974 Rogers et al. Nov 2012 A1
20120298719 Shelton, IV et al. Nov 2012 A1
20130046318 Radgowski et al. Feb 2013 A1
20130144395 Stefanchik et al. Jun 2013 A1
20140005662 Shelton, IV Jan 2014 A1
20140005678 Shelton, IV et al. Jan 2014 A1
20140005708 Shelton, IV Jan 2014 A1
20140039527 Avelar et al. Feb 2014 A1
20140114327 Boudreaux et al. Apr 2014 A1
20140257333 Blumenkranz Sep 2014 A1
20140309625 Okamoto et al. Oct 2014 A1
20150150635 Kilroy et al. Jun 2015 A1
20150150636 Hagn et al. Jun 2015 A1
20150157355 Price et al. Jun 2015 A1
20160157926 Boudreaux Jun 2016 A1
20160184034 Holop et al. Jun 2016 A1
20160338762 Krastins et al. Nov 2016 A1
20160361049 Dachs, II et al. Dec 2016 A1
20170007345 Smith et al. Jan 2017 A1
20170165017 Chaplin et al. Jun 2017 A1
20180055583 Schuh et al. Mar 2018 A1
20180214223 Turner Aug 2018 A1
20190125468 Adams May 2019 A1
20190223960 Chaplin et al. Jul 2019 A1
20190231464 Wixey et al. Aug 2019 A1
20190307522 Lambrecht et al. Oct 2019 A1
20190328467 Waterbury et al. Oct 2019 A1
20190374240 Brodbeck et al. Dec 2019 A1
20200138473 Shelton, IV et al. May 2020 A1
20200197117 Donlon et al. Jun 2020 A1
20210322118 Donlon et al. Oct 2021 A1
20220000572 Ragosta et al. Jan 2022 A1
20220192764 Waterbury et al. Jun 2022 A1
20230079266 Wixey et al. Mar 2023 A1
20230119001 Abbott Apr 2023 A1
20230119775 Lambrecht et al. Apr 2023 A1
20230279931 Cooper et al. Sep 2023 A1
Foreign Referenced Citations (47)
Number Date Country
2014208189 Apr 2015 AU
101893060 Nov 2010 CN
102100569 Jun 2011 CN
102292046 Dec 2011 CN
103240732 Aug 2013 CN
104116547 Oct 2014 CN
104799891 Jul 2015 CN
105058406 Nov 2015 CN
109505951 Mar 2019 CN
2362285 Aug 2011 EP
2548529 Jan 2013 EP
2783643 Oct 2014 EP
2640301 Mar 2016 EP
3103374 Dec 2016 EP
3195993 Jul 2017 EP
3014678 Jun 2015 FR
H06114000 Apr 1994 JP
H10249777 Sep 1998 JP
2002200091 Jul 2002 JP
2005288590 Oct 2005 JP
2009500086 Jan 2009 JP
5815081 Nov 2015 JP
100778387 Nov 2007 KR
WO-8910242 Nov 1989 WO
WO-9729690 Aug 1997 WO
WO-0030557 Jun 2000 WO
WO-03001986 Jan 2003 WO
WO-2010009224 Jan 2010 WO
WO-2010081050 Jul 2010 WO
WO-2011060046 May 2011 WO
WO2012064528 May 2012 WO
WO-2012068156 May 2012 WO
WO-2013118774 Aug 2013 WO
WO-2015142290 Sep 2015 WO
WO-2016161449 Oct 2016 WO
WO-2016172299 Oct 2016 WO
WO-2017064303 Apr 2017 WO
WO-2018013313 Jan 2018 WO
WO-2018049217 Mar 2018 WO
WO-2018069679 Apr 2018 WO
WO-2018094191 May 2018 WO
WO-2020102776 May 2020 WO
WO-2020102780 May 2020 WO
WO-2020252184 Dec 2020 WO
WO2021155707 Aug 2021 WO
WO-2023055684 Apr 2023 WO
WO-2023177554 Sep 2023 WO
Non-Patent Literature Citations (13)
Entry
Office Action for KR Application No. 10-2022-7016510, dated Dec. 21, 2022, 9 pages.
Extended European Search Report for Application No. EP17828154.9 dated Jun. 24, 2020, 11 pages.
International Search Report and Written Opinion for Application No. PCT/US2017/038674, dated Oct. 31, 2017, 13 pages.
Non Final Office Action dated Aug. 14, 2020 for U.S. Appl. No. 16/810,429, filed Mar. 5, 2020, 20 pages.
Non-Final Office Action dated Apr. 26, 2021 for U.S. Appl. No. 16/317,235, filed Jan. 11, 2019, 18 pages.
Office Action for Chinese Application No. 201780054873.2, dated Sep. 16, 2021, 13 pages.
Office Action for Korean Application No. 1020197004347, dated Sep. 24, 2021, 9 pages.
Office Action dated Nov. 21, 2018 for U.S. Appl. No. 15/903,139, filed Feb. 23, 2018, 10 pages.
Office Action dated Feb. 3, 2021 for Chinese Application No. 201780054873.2 filed Jun. 22, 2017, 14 pages.
Partial Supplementary European Search Report for Application No. EP17828154.9 dated Feb. 4, 2020, 11 pages.
Vertut, J, and Coiffet, P., “Robot Technology: Teleoperation and Robotics Evolution and Development,” English translation, Prentice-Hall, Inc., Inglewood Cliffs, NJ, USA 1986, vol. 3A, 332 pages.
Notice of Allowance for KR Application No. 10-2022-7016510, dated Mar. 14, 2023, 7 pages.
Office Action for CN Application No. 2022102492594, mailed Dec. 1, 2023, 15 pages.
Related Publications (1)
Number Date Country
20220071727 A1 Mar 2022 US
Provisional Applications (1)
Number Date Country
62362431 Jul 2016 US
Continuations (1)
Number Date Country
Parent 16317235 US
Child 17529967 US