The present invention relates generally to automated test systems that utilize modular instrumentation that is intended to be housed within a standardized chassis.
The evolution of test instrumentation has transitioned over the years from a situation where a single stand-alone box that would typically provide a single dedicated function to one where a multitude of standardized chassis now have the ability to house a plurality of modules, with each module providing a dedicated function so that with a single chassis, multiple functions can be provided.
Bulky test stations for testing complex pieces of equipment using a rack-and-stack approach have largely morphed into significantly smaller footprints through the use of the modular instrumentation. Rack-and-stack implementations may still be used where instrumentation dictates a stand-alone unit (i.e., a display) but over time, even units requiring displays have also gone ‘faceless’ to reduce complexity. The benefits of a modular approach are readily apparent, including for example, redundant functions (control, cooling, power) are eliminated which in turn results in a reduction of size and an increase in overall station reliability.
Over the past 30 years or more, a number of standardized chassis have been implemented including, but not limited to: MMS, Eurocard, VERSAbus, VMEbus, VXI, VPX, PCI, PXI and AXle to name a few (the full terms of these abbreviations are known to those skilled in the art to which this invention pertains). While the modular approach has many benefits, one drawback is most systems typically have unused chassis space. Some systems intentionally allocate unused space for future expansion while in other systems it is simply the result of how the system was populated. Over time, as existing instrumentation is deemed obsolete by the original equipment manufacturers (OEMs), it is often replaced by a different (or even a newer) modular form factor which might not be currently implemented within a test station.
An object of at least one embodiment of the present invention is to provide a chassis that is capable of supporting a plurality of instrumentation form factors.
A chassis for an automated test system in accordance with the invention includes a housing, and at least a first and a second backplane in the housing. The first backplane provides electrical connections for at least one functional module of a first type when engaged therewith, and the second backplane provides electrical connections for at least one functional module of a second type different than the first type when engaged therewith. The first and second backplanes include electrical circuitry to enable signals to be provided for the functional modules when engaged therewith. Thus, two different backplanes are positioned in the same housing.
In other embodiments, each of the first and second backplanes includes a respective controller. The first and second backplanes may each be configured to source all voltages required by the functional modules engaging therewith. As an example of backplanes, the first backplane may be a VXI backplane while the second backplane is a PXI backplane.
A respective securing arrangement may be provided to secure each of the first and second types of functional modules to the housing. A common DC power source may be installed in the housing to provide power through the circuitry to both types of functional modules when engaged with the housing. The circuitry may be configured to allow for trigger signals to pass between the first and second types of functional modules when engaged with the housing. Additionally or alternatively, the circuitry may be configured to allow for clock signals to pass between the first and second types of functional modules when engaged with the housing in a user-controllable or user-selectable manner. Additionally or alternatively, the circuitry may be configured to provide signal conditioning or level translation of auxiliary signals passing between the first and second types of functional modules when engaged with the housing in a user-controllable or user-selectable manner.
A bottom of the housing may include ducts to enable cooling of both types of functional modules when engaged with the housing. Shielding is optionally installed between the first and second backplanes. Potentially, at least one of the first and second backplanes consists of a single printed circuit board. However, at least one of the first and second backplanes may include a plurality of printed circuit boards.
A method for designing a chassis that supports different functional modules in accordance with the invention includes determining parameters of a largest one of the modules to be supported by the chassis, configuring a housing of the chassis with respective backplane for each of a plurality of different types of module to enable the housing to support at least one of each type of module, each backplane including electrical circuitry to enable signals to be provided for the modules when engaged therewith, determining required supply voltages of the modules, and configuring the housing to provide at least one of the required supply voltages for each of the modules through the respective backplane. The method also includes arranging a controller for each type of module on the housing, and coupling the controller for each type of module to electrical connectors on the housing that engage with that type of module.
Variations to the method which may be implemented individually or in combinations with one another include providing power to the backplanes from a common source through the circuitry to both types of modules when supported by the housing, sourcing a clock signal for the modules when supported by the housing from a clock source on the backplane for a first type of modules, or a clock source on the backplane for a second type of modules, and interposing shielding between the backplanes to reduce signal interference.
Another embodiment of a chassis for an automated test system in accordance with the invention includes a housing, and a plurality of different backplanes in the housing all oriented in a common axis and situated alongside one another. Each backplane includes electrical connectors for a plurality of one distinct type of functional modules when engaged with the connectors. Also, each backplane includes electrical circuitry to enable signals to be provided simultaneously for all of the functional modules when engaged with the connectors. A cooling system may be configured to satisfy cooling requirements of the different types of functional modules when engaged with the connectors. The backplanes also include common signal lines additional to a minimum number of signal lines needed to support all of the functional modules, and each of the backplanes is configured to provide an address bus, a data bus, a trigger bus, an interrupt bus, a local bus, clock and power signals and slot identification signals and to source all voltages required by the functional modules.
The invention will be described in detail with reference to some preferred embodiments of the invention illustrated in the figures in the accompanying drawings. However, the invention is not confined to the illustrated and described embodiments alone.
Additional objects of the invention will be apparent from the following description of the preferred embodiment thereof taken in conjunction with the accompanying non-limiting drawings, in which:
In an effort to make the most of unused instrumentation space, a primary intent of this invention is to implement a chassis for test instrumentation which allows a plurality of different module types of dissimilar instrumentation standards to reside within the same chassis housing. To enumerate each and every chassis permutation ad nauseam serves no practical purpose, so for the sake of clarity and convenience, the descriptions herein will be limited to VXI (C-Size) and PXI modules due to their ubiquitous presence throughout the test instrumentation industry. The invention is in no way constrained to using only these instrumentation form factors/standards and those skilled in the art could readily adapt a chassis to other current and future instrumentation standards to house different module types/configurations, in view of the teachings disclosed herein. Moreover, the invention is in no way limited to a chassis for test instrumentation or instruments, although this is a preferred implementation.
Preferred embodiments of the invention will be described with reference to
The rendering shown in
The backplane 20 obtains this smaller depth by means of one or more supports or walls that extend beyond the larger depth backplane, i.e., backplane 16. The supports or walls might be considered to define a housing for supporting circuitry for the backplane 20 or at least a support structure to position and stably support the connectors of the backplane 20, or the backplane 20 itself, a distance in front of the backplane 16 in which they can receive the functional modules that engage therewith (see
Both of the backplanes 16, 20 are oriented in a common axis, i.e., they are adapted to receive functional modules when inserted from the right side in the orientation illustrated, and that would be urged toward the left into engagement with connectors 52, 54 on the backplanes 16, 20, respectively. Thus, the backplanes 16, 20 each include an engagement side (facing the right in
As for additional details about the supports or walls, as shown in
The support wall 62 is interposed between the backplanes 16, 20 such that all of the electrical connectors 52 of the backplane 16 are situated on one side of the support wall 62 (the left side in
Support wall 62 thus extends beyond backplane 16 and separates backplane 16 from backplane 20, as part of support structure 60 to allow for support of two (or more) backplanes at different depths. An important aspect is that the same support wall 62 serves two purposes, namely, it separates one backplane from another and also causes, as part of a support structure, one backplane to be at a different depth than the other backplane.
Each of the backplanes 16, 20 could be implemented as a single printed circuit board or as multiple printed circuit boards. A backplane or “backplane system” generally is considered a group of electrical connectors in parallel with each other, so that each pin of each connector is linked to the same relative pin of all the other connectors forming a computer bus. It is typically used as a backbone to connect several printed circuit boards together to make up a complete computer system.
Upper and lower extrusions 18 along with card guides 48 permit a plurality of VXI modules (not shown in
In a preferred embodiment, a removable divider 24 can be installed within the PXI segment, or portion thereof, to allow the use of 3U PXI cards and/or 6U PXI within the multi-standard instrumentation chassis 10. Since airflow cooling for both VXI and PXI modules originates from the bottom of the chassis 10, ducting the airflow for the difference in module depth between the VXI and PXI standards becomes a rather trivial matter readily achievable by one skilled in the art to which this invention pertains in view of the disclosure herein.
In terms of electrical compatibility, a primary intent of the invention is to generally isolate the signals present within one backplane 16, 20 from those within the other backplane(s) 16, 20 to prevent unnecessary noise, signal crosstalk and commingling of signals. Specifically, address and data buses between instrumentation standards/form factors must ideally remain isolated from one another in order to avoid contention between control functions of each instrumentation standard. A preferred embodiment implements shielding in the area where backplane edges are in close proximity to further reduce interaction or interference between the signals of one backplane 16, 20 on one or more of the other backplanes 16, 20. In instances where it might be possible to combine multiple instrumentation standards onto a single backplane, each instrumentation standard shall ideally remain isolated from the other standard(s) and implement shielding wherever necessary.
As shown in
There are instances where it might prove beneficial to allow limited interaction between the instrumentation standard backplanes 16, 20 within the multi-standard instrumentation chassis 10. In a preferred embodiment, the user would be able to configure/select one or more trigger bus signals (represented at 34, 36) to pass between the VXI and PXI backplanes 16, 20. These trigger signals may flow in a specific direction (i.e., VXI backplane 16 to PXI backplane 20 or PXI backplane 20 to VXI backplane 16) or be bi-directional (flows back and forth between VXI and PXI backplanes 16, 20) as required by customer application. Some signals or embodiments for other chassis standards/form factors may need to implement active circuitry 42, 44 to perform signal conditioning and/or level translation to insure compatibility between the signals of the instrumentation standards to be used. The signal conditioning and/or level translation is effected by circuitry 42, 44 on auxiliary signals passing between the VXI backplane 16 and the PXI backplane 20 during operation when they have VXI or PXI modules engaged therewith.
This circuitry 42, 44 may be user-controllable or user-selectable. As such, there may be limited interaction of auxiliary signals (i.e., trigger and/or clock signals) between the VXI backplane 16 and the PXI backplane 20 via user selectable means.
For certain applications, synchronized clock distribution between the different instrumentation standards may be desired. A clock might be sourced from the VXI backplane 16 (represented by VXI clock signals 38), PXI backplane 20 (represented by PXI clock signals 40) or from an external source 46. In a preferred embodiment, the user would be able to configure/select the clock source 38, 40, 46 for the various instrumentation backplane(s) implemented within the multi-standard instrumentation chassis 10. One preferred embodiment would utilize active clock distribution techniques to insure high isolation/buffering between backplanes 16, 20 and may optionally include clock multiplier/divider circuitry to allow clocks of different frequencies to be used while maintaining coherency. Alternative embodiments that do not require high isolation may use simpler passive or active circuits for sourcing these clock signals.
With the structure described above, the invention allows for specific advantages to be obtained, including configuring a common chassis that is capable of supporting a plurality of instrumentation form factors.
Use of the chassis would involve insertion of one or more of the mating modules into the chassis, and more specifically, into engagement with a respective one of the connectors of one or both of the backplanes. It is possible to use the chassis with only one type of functional modules, i.e., one or more functional modules of one type would be connected to the same backplane, or with two types of functional modules, i.e., at least one of a first type would be connected to a respective connector of the first backplane and at least one other, different type module would be connected to a respective connector of the other backplane. Once connected, the combined chassis and functional module(s) would be used in the usual manner in which a test station with one or more functional modules is used, and a variety of uses are known to those skilled in the art to which the invention pertains.
Manufacture of the chassis entails design and fabrication of the metalwork and other components, as well as assembly. Such design and assembly would be readily ascertainable by those skilled in the art to which this invention pertains in view of the disclosure herein.
Finally, it must be understood that although the illustrated embodiment shows two different backplanes, it is possible to use more than two backplanes in the same manner, i.e., placed the backplanes alongside one another in a common chassis and orient them in a common axis, i.e., in a position in which they are adapted to receive three or different types of functional modules when inserted from a common side of the chassis. It is possible to provide a chassis with two backplanes of the same type with one backplane of a different type interposed between them. Other configurations, combinations and permutations of different backplanes may be used in the invention without deviating from the scope and spirit thereof.
A general concept of one embodiment of the invention is therefore the provision of a common chassis with the capability of receiving two or more different types of functional modules arising from the presence of two or more backplanes. This concept may be embodied in a variety of different ways, as disclosed herein and as would be derivable from the teachings herein to those skilled in the art to which the invention pertains. All such disclosed and derivable embodiments are considered to be encompassed within the scope of the claims, to the extent possible.
Having thus described a few particular embodiments of the invention, various alterations, modifications, and improvements will readily occur to those skilled in the art. Such alterations, modifications and improvements as are made obvious by this disclosure are intended to be part of this description though not expressly stated herein, and are intended to be within the spirit and scope of the invention. Accordingly, the foregoing description is by way of example only, and is not limiting. The invention is limited only as defined in the claims and equivalents thereto.
This application is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 14/695,106 filed Apr. 24, 2015, which is a continuation-in-part of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 14/487,851 filed Sep. 16, 2014, now U.S. Pat. No. 9,295,169, which claims priority under 35 U.S.C. § 119(e) of U.S. provisional patent application Ser. Nos. 61/878,112 filed Sep. 16, 2013, and 61/902,475 filed Nov. 11, 2013, all of which are incorporated by reference herein.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4486816 | Hope | Dec 1984 | A |
5001422 | Dahlberg et al. | Mar 1991 | A |
5237484 | Ferchau et al. | Aug 1993 | A |
5268837 | Liken et al. | Dec 1993 | A |
5600788 | Lofgren et al. | Feb 1997 | A |
5794175 | Conner | Aug 1998 | A |
5896473 | Kaspari | Apr 1999 | A |
5986447 | Hanners et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
5986458 | Saito et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
5989037 | Ruque | Nov 1999 | A |
5991163 | Marconi et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
6163464 | Ishibashi et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
6249441 | Barbier et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6349037 | Draughn et al. | Feb 2002 | B1 |
6358095 | Rootz et al. | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6462532 | Smith | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6505281 | Sherry | Jan 2003 | B1 |
6597566 | Phan | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6640273 | Spisak et al. | Oct 2003 | B1 |
6643798 | Barton et al. | Nov 2003 | B2 |
6662255 | Klein | Dec 2003 | B1 |
6700396 | Smith et al. | Mar 2004 | B1 |
6757177 | Harris et al. | Jun 2004 | B2 |
6956379 | Mastoris et al. | Oct 2005 | B2 |
6975130 | Yevmeneko | Dec 2005 | B2 |
6981086 | Wetzel et al. | Dec 2005 | B2 |
6989902 | Maiaender et al. | Jan 2006 | B2 |
6995578 | Shibuya et al. | Feb 2006 | B2 |
7075796 | Pritchett | Jul 2006 | B1 |
7092253 | Lam | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7138733 | Sanders et al. | Nov 2006 | B2 |
7149093 | Conway | Dec 2006 | B2 |
7212412 | Carlson et al. | May 2007 | B2 |
7242590 | Yeap et al. | Jul 2007 | B1 |
7254025 | Baldwin, Jr. | Aug 2007 | B2 |
7272774 | Co et al. | Sep 2007 | B2 |
7331794 | Imbert et al. | Feb 2008 | B2 |
7348786 | Thacker et al. | Mar 2008 | B2 |
7355850 | Baldwin, Jr. | Apr 2008 | B2 |
7362089 | Kushnick et al. | Apr 2008 | B2 |
7576997 | Brolin et al. | Aug 2009 | B2 |
7780455 | Leigh et al. | Aug 2010 | B2 |
8040192 | Maeda et al. | Oct 2011 | B2 |
8138778 | Smith | Mar 2012 | B1 |
8446722 | Fowler | May 2013 | B2 |
8456857 | Groeschner et al. | Jun 2013 | B2 |
8656229 | Elserougi et al. | Feb 2014 | B2 |
9723727 | Lam | Aug 2017 | B2 |
20010030789 | Jiang | Oct 2001 | A1 |
20020090844 | Kocin | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20020131257 | Agard | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20040201956 | Conway | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20060090100 | Holzapfel et al. | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060109636 | Hood, III et al. | May 2006 | A1 |
20070291905 | Halliday et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20090106761 | Chandhoke | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090219702 | Mazura et al. | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20100079151 | Nordstrom et al. | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100199011 | Chen et al. | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20110255574 | Carter et al. | Oct 2011 | A1 |
20120113603 | Tokunaga | May 2012 | A1 |
20130050171 | Tsai | Feb 2013 | A1 |
20130201278 | Chang | Aug 2013 | A1 |
20130329392 | Czuba et al. | Dec 2013 | A1 |
20140365698 | Richard et al. | Dec 2014 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2354181 | Jan 2003 | CA |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61902475 | Nov 2013 | US | |
61878112 | Sep 2013 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 14695106 | Apr 2015 | US |
Child | 15259994 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 14487851 | Sep 2014 | US |
Child | 14695106 | US |